MDBH 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
MDB Capital Holdings, LLC · Nasdaq · Finance Services · CIK 1934642 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Impact of the Iran Conflict”
Removed heading “MDB and our partner companies have recognized the need for and have committed to developing a robust infrastructure to ensure the accurate and timely reporting of financial results. Previously, we identified areas within our internal systems of control that were not sufficiently robust, which could potentially lead to delays, errors, and the need for restatement of financial reports. In response, we have taken decisive actions to address and rectify these material weaknesses.”
Removed heading “The market, including clients and potential investors, may be skeptical of the viability and benefits of M1’s pipeline products because they are relatively novel and will likely be subject to regulatory approvals.”
Removed heading “The market for longevity and inhibiting age-related diseases is a rapidly growing and changing market, and if M1 is unable to keep up to date with developments, its business may be adversely affected.”
Removed heading “Because its compounds are novel, M1 will have to perform tests for safety, use, and claim validation.”
Removed heading “M1 will be highly dependent on its ability to hire and retain scientific and other staff with specialized backgrounds as needed.”
Removed heading “Laboratory conditions differ from commercial and therapeutic conditions, which could affect the effectiveness of M1’s potential products. Failures to effectively move from laboratory to commercial scale would harm its business.”
Removed heading “The success of M1 depends, in part, on the successful development of its science technologies and its products.”
Removed heading “M1 is subject to risks relating to portfolio concentration.”
Removed heading “M1 does not have any sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution capabilities or arrangements, and will need to create these as it moves towards commercialization of our products.”
Removed heading “M1 expects to experience competition from other companies and research institutions.”
Largest changes
“MDB and our partner companies have recognized the need for and have committed to developing a robust infrastructure to ensure the accurate and timely reporting of financial results. Previously, we identified areas within our internal systems of control that were not sufficiently robust, which could potentially lead to delays, errors, and the need for restatement of financial reports. In response, we have taken decisive actions to address and rectify these material weaknesses.”see in full comparison
“Currently, we believe that the ongoing military conflict involving Iran (the “Iran Conflict”), including actions by the United States and Israel, does not have any direct impact on our operations, financial condition or financial reporting. …”see in full comparison
“Laboratory conditions differ from commercial and therapeutic conditions, which could affect the effectiveness of M1’s potential products. Failures to effectively move from laboratory to commercial scale would harm its business.”see in full comparison
“M1 expects to experience competition from other companies and research institutions.”see in full comparison
“The market, including clients and potential investors, may be skeptical of the viability and benefits of M1’s pipeline products because they are relatively novel and will likely be subject to regulatory approvals.”see in full comparison
“The market for longevity and inhibiting age-related diseases is a rapidly growing and changing market, and if M1 is unable to keep up to date with developments, its business may be adversely affected.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (58)
Under
current law, so long as certain conditions are satisfied (see “Certain Material U.S. Federal Tax Considerations — Classification
as a Partnership”),satisfied, we should be treated, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as a partnership and not as a corporation. As such,
MDB will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. Instead, each shareholder of MDB will be required to take into account
its allocable share of each item of MDB’s income, gain, loss, deduction or credit, whether or not MDB distributes any cash to it,
including distributions or dividends MDB receives from its corporate entities (i.e., in partner companies). Consequently, it is possible
that in any year, a shareholder’s tax liability arising from MDB could exceed the distributions made to him, her or it by MDB.
Thus, there may be years in which a shareholder’s tax liability exceeds its share of distributed cash from MDB. If this were to
occur, a shareholder would have to use funds from other sources to satisfy his, her or its tax liability.
The
value of the Class A Common Shares of MDB that you hold will depend in part on MDB being treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. We intend to manage our affairs so that, upon becoming a “publicly traded partnership” within the meaning of
Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), we will not be taxable as a corporation because
90% or more of our gross income in each taxable year will be “qualifying income” (see “Certain Material U.S. Federal
Tax Considerations—Classification as a Partnership” for a discussion of the rules relating to qualifying income and publicly-traded
partnerships). However, there is no assurance or guarantee that we will meet on an ongoing basis the applicable requirements to be taxable
as a partnership and, as discussed below, current law may change so as to cause, in either event, MDB to be treated as a corporation
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If we were treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, then, among other things,
(i) we would become subject to corporate income tax and (ii) distributions to our shareholders would be taxable as dividends for U.S.
federal income tax purposes to the extent of our earnings and profits. In addition, because a tax would be imposed upon MDB as a corporation,
its cash available for distribution would be substantially reduced. We have not requested, and do not plan to request, a ruling from
the IRS on this or any other tax matter affecting us.
The
ability of the shareholders to utilize any tax losses generated by an investment in MDB may be subject to a number of limitations under
the Code, including the basis limitations, the passive activity loss limitations, the “at-risk” limitations, and the excess
business loss limitations. See “Certain Material U.S. Federal Tax Considerations” for more information regarding such limitations.
There
is no assurance that MDB will continue to be as successful as when our broker-dealer business was operating as a single, stand-alone
business. As a reorganized holding company, we have a limited operating history. We believe that because of the reorganization of our
Company, we are subject to some or all of the risks inherent in the establishment of a new enterprise. Some of the risks may arise from
the absence of a significant consolidated operating history, the addition of management responsibilities as a public company, including
the production of K-1 tax documents for owners of the Company’s shares, and lack of experience in complying with reporting and
other obligations associated with being a publicly-tradedpublicly traded company listed on Nasdaq. If our business plan, operating as a holding company,
turns out to be unsuccessful, investors may lose some or all of their investment in MDB.
We might require additional capital to support operations and business growth and to fund our partner companies; this capital might not be available on terms favorable to us, or all, when needed.
●
intensifying competition affecting the products and services that our partner companies offer could adversely affect their businesses,
financial condition, results of operationsoperations, cash flows and prospects for growth;
Our
partner companies willare expected to be early-stage development companies, which will make it difficult to judge and evaluate their
businesses and
their future success.
MDB
and our partner companies have recognized the need for and have committed to developing a robust infrastructure to ensure the accurate
and timely reporting of financial results. Previously, we identified areas within our internal systems of control that were not sufficiently
robust, which could potentially lead to delays, errors, and the need for restatement of financial reports. In response, we have taken
decisive actions to address and rectify these material weaknesses.
MDB
transitioned from a private company to a public entity in September 2023, MDB operated with a lean accounting team and limited resources
while navigating challenges associated with limited accounting personnel and resources critical for robust internal control over financial
reporting. Upon a thorough evaluation of our internal controls over financial reporting across partner companies, subsidiaries, and the
holding company itself, we identified and addressed three material weaknesses.
Initially,
we encountered gaps in maintaining adequately designed entity-level controls across the five components of internal control, as outlined
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) 2013 Framework, essential for preventing or detecting material misstatements in our
consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, our general information technology controls concerning logical access, user terminations,
authentication, and user access management required significant enhancement to support the integrity of the Company’s business
processes effectively. These areas of concern also contributed to segregation of duties conflicts within certain business processes.
To
address these challenges, MDB embarked on a comprehensive overhaul of its internal controls framework. We have since established and
implemented appropriately designed entity-level controls, aligning with each component of the COSO 2013 Framework, thus fortifying our
capacity to prevent or detect material misstatements accurately. Moreover, we have redefined our general information technology controls,
ensuring they are now adequately designed, implemented, and operational, thereby safeguarding logical access, managing user terminations,
and streamlining authentication and user access processes across all business functions.
Additionally,
MDB has developed and instituted formal accounting policies, procedures, and controls across virtually all business and financial reporting
processes. This advancement ensures timely, complete, and accurate financial accounting, reporting, and disclosures. These corrective
measures have effectively remedied the previously identified material weaknesses, significantly reducing the possibility of material
misstatements in our annual or interim consolidated financial statements not being identified or rectified promptly.
We
willare monitormonitoring our compliance with the 40% Test and conduct our business activities to comply with this test and other exemptions such
that we are exempt from the Investment Company Act. It is not feasible for us to be regulated as an investment company because the Investment
Company Act rules are inconsistent with our strategy of actively helping our partner companies in their efforts to build value. We may
need to take various actions, however, that we would otherwise not pursue in order to remain in compliance with the 40% Test. For example,
we may need to retain a majority interest in a partner company that we no longer consider strategic, we may not be able to acquire an
interest in a company unless we are able to obtain a majority ownership interest in the company, or we may be limited in the manner or
timing in which we sell or distribute our interests in a partner company. Our ownership levels also may be affected if our partner companies
are acquired by third parties or if our partner companies issue stock which dilutes our majority ownership. The actions may require us
to take actions to avoid application of the Investment Company Act of 1940 so as to maintain compliance with the 40% Test that could
adversely affect our ability to create and realize value at our partner companies. The Company’s Broker-Dealer subsidiary is excluded from the Investment Company Act of 1940, and therefore all securities held by
the Broker-Dealer are excluded from the asset calculation.
Our
ability to retain our senior professionals and recruit additional professionals is critical to the success of our business, and our failure
to do so may adversely affect our reputation, business, results of operationsoperations, cash flows and financial condition.
Our
people are one of our most valuable resources. Our ability to source attractive technologies and companies to deploy our capital
depends depends
upon the reputation, judgment, and execution skills of our senior professionals, particularly our directors and senior
management. Despite
our efforts to retain valuable employees, members of our management team may terminate their employment with us
on short notice. The
loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees could potentially harm our
business, operating results,
cash flows or financial condition. Currently, we do not maintain key man insurance policies with
respect to any of our executive officers or employees.
Since
November 2024, eXoZymes has been a publicly traded company and its operational and strategic decisions have been directed by its board
and management. As a public company its stock price will beis determined by the market and investor reaction to its product developmental
decisions and performance. The actual performance of eXoZymes will depend on many factors, such as its product discovery and development,
its ability to enter into strategic alliances or licensing arrangements, its ability to generate revenues, the maintenance of its financial
resources, regulatory compliance and developments that impact its products, and broader economic conditions.
Although
we are not engaged
in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities, we will own a controlling positionor other positions in our partner companies
companies pursuant to our business model. We generally will be active in the management and development of our partner companies, as
well as actively
monitoring their operations to keep abreast of their business development. In time, we anticipate that we will monetize
the value we hold
in our partner companies. Our monetization process will contemplate the typical forms of merger and acquisition transactions,
such as
licensing, private and public offerings, asset or company sales and registered common stock distributions. To the extent that
any of our
partner companies become publicly traded, their value will become subject to market fluctuations. Any fluctuation in the value
of our
partner companies’ securities, for whatever reason, may affect the value of MDB as a holding company resulting in a partial
or total
loss of your investment.
We
could experience competition from other potential acquirers when we seek to establish partner companies, which may result in not being
able to acquire them or having to payinvest at a higher valuation, thus increasing our risk of loss and reducing potential future gains.
We
believe that we will face competition from other capital providers and acquisition orientedacquisition-oriented entities as we seek to acquire and develop
our partner companies. Some of our competitors have more experience identifying and acquiring companies in various industries and have
greater financial and management resources, brand name recognition or industry contacts than we possess. We compete with those firms
on a number of factors, including our history and reputation, our ability to partner, encourage and support development of each company,
the abilities and experience of our professionals in working with development-stage companies, and our ability to source and perform
due diligence on new technologies and companies. In addition, even though we seek to acquire technologies at their very early stages
of development, we may still pay higher prices in our acquisitions and partner company creation because of competition from other potential
acquirers and higher valuations. This could increase the risk of loss and result in lower gains to the holding company.
We
strive to maintain a work environment that reinforces our culture of collaboration, motivation and alignment of interests with investors.
The effects of becoming public, including potential changes in our compensation structure, could adversely affect this culture. If we
do not continue to develop and implement the right processes and tools to manage our changing enterprise and maintain our culture, our
ability to compete successfully and achieve our business objectives could be impaired, which could negatively impact our business, financial
condition andcondition, results of operations.operations and cash flows.
Impact of the Iran Conflict
Currently, we believe that the ongoing military conflict involving Iran (the “Iran Conflict”), including actions by the United States and Israel, does not have any direct impact on our operations, financial condition or financial reporting. We believe the conflict will have only a general impact on our operations in the same manner as it is having a general impact on all businesses that have their operations in North America as a result of international sanctions and embargo regulations, possible disruptions to global energy supplies and oil prices due to tensions in the Strait of Hormuz and the Middle East region, shortages of goods and supply chain challenges, and the international and US domestic inflationary results of the conflict and government spending for and funding of our country’s response. We do not believe we will be specifically targeted for cyber-attacks in connection with the conflict, but as a financial institution, we are aware that we may be a general target for cyber-attacks, including potentially from state-sponsored actors associated with the conflict. We have no operations in Iran or the countries directly involved in the conflict and are not specifically impacted by any of the sanctions and embargoes, as we principally operate in the United States. Other than general securities market trends, we do not have reason to believe that investors will evaluate the company as having special risks or exposures related to the conflict.
In
the course of our operations and the processing of transactions, we collect, process, store, disclose, use, share and/or transmit personal
information and other sensitive data from current, past and prospective clients as well as our employees in and across multiple jurisdictions.
The regulatory framework for privacy issues worldwide is rapidly evolving and is likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future.
There are federal, state and foreign laws and regulations regarding privacy, data security and the collection, processing, use, storage,
protection, sharing and/or transmission of personal information and sensitive data. For example, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”)
(along with its implementing regulations) restricts certain collection, processing, storage, use and disclosure of personal information,
requires notice to individuals of privacy practices and provides individuals with certain rights to prevent the use and disclosure of
certain nonpublicnon-public or otherwise legally protected information. Additionally, many states continue to enact legislation on matters of privacy,
information security, cybersecurity, data breach and data breach notification requirements. For example, as of January 1, 2020, the California
Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) grants additional consumer rights with respect to data privacy in California. The CCPA, among
other things, entitles California residents to know how their personal information is being collected and shared, to access or request
the deletion of their personal information and to opt out of certain sharing of their personal information. The CCPA is subject to further
amendments pending certain proposed regulations that are being reviewed and revised by the California Attorney General. The CCPA provides
for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for certain data breaches that result in the loss of personal
information. This private right of action may increase the likelihood of, and risks associated with, data breach litigation. We cannot
predict the impact of the CCPA on our business, operations or financial condition, but it could result in liabilities and/or require
us to modify certain processes or procedures, which could result in additional costs.
Because
the interpretation and application of many privacy and data protection laws are uncertain, it is possible that these laws may be interpreted
and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our existing data management practices or the features of our services and platform
capabilities. If so, in addition to the possibility of being subjected to fines, lawsuits and other claims, we could be required to fundamentally
change our business activities and practices or modify our platform, which could have an adverse effect on our business. Any violations
or perceived violations of these laws, rules and regulations by us, or any third parties with which we do business, may require us to
change our business practices or operational structure, including limiting our activities in certain states and/or jurisdictions, addressing
investigations or being subjected to legal claims by governmental entities or private actors, sustaining monetary penalties, sustaining
reputational damage, expending substantial costs, time and other resources and/or sustaining other harms to our business. Furthermore,
our online, external-facing privacy policy and website make certain statements regarding our privacy, information security and data security
practices with regard to information collected from our clients or visitors to our website. Failure or perceived failure to adhere to
such practices may result in regulatory scrutiny and investigation, complaints by affected clients or visitors to our website, reputational
damage and/or other harm to our business. If either we, or the third-party service providers with which we share client data, are unable
to address privacy concerns, even if unfounded, or to comply with applicable privacy or data protection laws, regulations and policies,
it could result in additional costs and liability to us, damage our reputation, inhibit sales and harm our business, financial conditioncondition,
and results of operations.operations, and cash flows.
Most
jurisdictions (includingin allthe
United 50 states)States have enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals, regulatory authorities and/or others
of security breaches involving
certain types of data. In addition, our agreements with certain partners and service providers may require
us to notify them in the event
of a security breach. Such mandatory disclosures are costly, could lead to negative publicity, may cause
our clients, partners and service
providers to lose confidence in the effectiveness of our security measures and require us to expend
significant capital and other resources
to respond to and/or alleviate problems caused by the actual or perceived security breach. A
security breach of any of our vendors that
processes personal information of our clients may pose similar risks.
Our partner companies, during their development, will typically assert various forms of intellectual property protection. Intellectual property is likely to constitute an important part of our partner companies’ assets and competitive strengths. Federal law, most typically, copyright, patent, trademark and trade secret laws, generally protects intellectual property rights. State law also addresses property rights. Although we expect that our partner companies will take reasonable efforts to protect the rights to their intellectual property, the complexity of United States, individual state and international trade secret, copyright, trademark and patent law, coupled with the limited resources of these partner companies and the demands of quick delivery of products and services to market, create a risk that their efforts will prove inadequate to prevent misappropriation of our partner companies’ technology, third parties may develop similar technology independently, or they will otherwise be unable to adequately protected their trade secrets.
Patents
have a limited lifespan. In the United States, if all maintenance fees are timely paid, the natural expiration of a patent is generally
20 years from its earliest U.S. non-provisional filing date. Various extensionsextensions, such as patent term adjustments and/or extensions, may
be available, but the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Even if patents covering a product are obtained, once
the patent life has expired, our partner companies may be open to competition from competitive products. Given the amount of time required
for the development, testing and regulatory review of new products, patents protecting new products might expire before or shortly after
such products are commercialized. As a result, a patent portfolio may not provide sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing
products similar or identical to those of the partner companies.
The
market, including clients and potential investors, may be skeptical of the viability and benefits of M1’s pipeline products because
they are relatively novel and will likely be subject to regulatory approvals.
The
viability and benefits of our products, which include pharmaceutical drugs, may be difficult to assess because they are based on a relatively
novel therapy. M1’s pipeline of potential products are currently in pre-clinical assessment as a therapeutic or product for other
uses. It is often an issue that what is possible in the small quantities used at the research level cannot be replicated as production
quantities are increased for testing and commercialization. Each product will be required to be progressively scaled up from early research
production quantities to show the feasibility of production in larger quantities, whether for clinical evaluation, testing, and ultimately
commercial manufacturing amounts before being made available to clients. As M1 continues to develop and optimize the M1 Platform to make
its products in the quantities needed for research, clinical or testing evaluation and manufacturing, there can be no assurance that
such products will be understood, approved, or accepted by clients, regulators and potential investors, that the relevant target products
can be commercially manufactured, or that it will be able to sell products at competitive prices and with features sufficient to establish
demand and generate revenues or any level of profit. Another consideration is if a product is a candidate as an active pharmaceutical
ingredient, then it will require FDA or any other applicable regulatory approvals, including manufacturing approvals, which may not be
obtainable. If it is unable to convince potential clients of the utility and value of its products, it will not be successful in entering
the markets that it has identified, and its business and results of operations will be adversely affected.
The
market for longevity and inhibiting age-related diseases is a rapidly growing and changing market, and if M1 is unable to keep up to
date with developments, its business may be adversely affected.
M1
is operating in a rapidly growing and changing business space within the anti-senescence market. Therefore, the market is becoming more
developed and highly competitive. M1 will have to continually assess the market and what kinds of products will be in demand. If it fails
to anticipate market demands or is not able to meet a market demand in a timely fashion, its research and development efforts will not
pay off as expected or at all. The intellectual property aspects of this market are evolving, and patents filed several years ago by
potential competitors are currently being granted, which may force M1 to license technologies it needs for its processes or to develop
a workaround to the valid claims of others. M1 may not be able to obtain any necessary licenses or develop processes that do not infringe
on others; in which case its business will be impaired, and it will be prevented from executing its business plan. The anti-senescence
market, in which M1 seeks to compete, is rapidly evolving, and therefore the extent to which it may encounter intellectual property of
others that limits or restricts its processes is unpredictable.
Because
its compounds are novel, M1 will have to perform tests for safety, use, and claim validation.
We
anticipate, because its compounds are unique, that M1 will face all the hurdles of a new technology in a marketplace. Depending on the
use of the compounds, M1 may have to comply with the extensive array of medical and other areas of regulation depending on the use of
the particular compound. In addition, it anticipates having to conduct many forms of tests to convince regulators, commercialization
partners and potential users of the safety, uses, and claim validation to be able to commercialize and gain market acceptance for its
compounds. If it is unable to successfully justify the efficacy, safety and potential of its compounds, or do so in a timely manner,
it will not be able to successfully develop its business and may have to curtail or cease its business. Holders of our shares of Common
Stock may lose value in their holdings.
M1
will be highly dependent on its ability to hire and retain scientific and other staff with specialized backgrounds as needed.
In
this early stage of its development, M1 is highly dependent on its current scientific professionals and its other staff and management.
We believe that our future success depends on retaining these persons, particularly those with key knowledge about the M1 technology.
Success also depends on being able to expand its employee base as required. We believe there are relatively few persons with specific
knowledge of the anti-senescence space. Persons with the talents that M1 seeks to hire tend to be in high demand and it may not be able
to hire such persons as and when needed. The inability to hire and retain necessary employees may have an adverse impact on its business
implementation.
Laboratory
conditions differ from commercial and therapeutic conditions, which could affect the effectiveness of M1’s potential products.
Failures to effectively move from laboratory to commercial scale would harm its business.
Observations
and developments that may be achievable under laboratory circumstances may not be able to be replicated in commercial settings, in human
drug trials or clinical settings. M1 has observed multiple results that encourage the development of the M1 platform. M1, however, is
not certain that these laboratory results will be able to be replicated at a commercial or therapeutic scale. As it advances its technology,
M1 plans to make products at higher scales until it reaches commercially viable scales. If these results obtained at the current levels
are not replicated at commercial scales or in therapeutic settings the attractiveness of the technology will be adversely affected and
its business may fail to be successful.
The
success of M1 depends, in part, on the successful development of its science technologies and its products.
To
be successful, M1 will need to continue to develop its science technologies and the products that it can offer to commercialization entities.
If M1 does not anticipate correctly and respond with products that are commercially acceptable, it will not be successful. In that event,
the value of our business and overall company value would be diminished.
M1
is subject to risks relating to portfolio concentration.
Currently,
the M1 business is highly dependent on a small number of products, which are based on its principal technology. If these products cannot
be fully commercialized or are not accepted in the market, M1 will have expended significant financial, development and corporate assets
that will not necessarily be recovered.
M1
does not have any sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution capabilities or arrangements, and will need to create these as it
moves towards commercialization of our products.
M1
does not yet have a full sales, marketing, manufacturing or distribution capacity. To date there have been limited to no sales and marketing
activities, with the primary efforts being those of research and development. To be able to commercialize our potential products, M1
will need to develop all the foregoing elements of commercialization. M1 does not have any corporate experience in establishing these
capabilities, and therefore, it may be unsuccessful in achieving commercialization and earning revenues. Setting up the commercialization
aspects of a company will take a substantial amount of capital and commitment of time and effort. M1 plans on seeking development and
marketing partners and license the technology to others or develop contract manufacturing partners in order to avoid it having to provide
the full range of marketing, manufacturing and distribution capabilities within the M1 organization. There can be no assurance that M1
will find any development and marketing partners or companies that are interested in licensing our technology. If management is unable
to establish and maintain adequate sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, independently or with others, M1 will not be able
to generate product revenue, and may not become profitable.
M1
expects to experience competition from other companies and research institutions.
M1
believes that it will face competition from many large pharmaceutical and nutraceutical companies and research institutions that are
currently working in, and will enter, the industry to work on all the many aspects of anti-senescence technology.
M1
believes that a majority of the companies that present some aspects of competition are well established companies that have more experience
identifying and carrying out the scientific development required in the research and development of products that will be competitive
to those of M1. Many of these companies have, and others that it anticipates entering the market in the future will have, greater financial
and management resources, brand or science name recognition or industry contacts than possessed by M1. Several of the companies are multinational
companies, and many are also publicly listed companies, with large market capitalizations.
PatentVest
has operated, to date, on a small scale, and it has not yet proven its ability to commercialize services on a large scale. PatentVest
has plans to serve approximately 30 clients at any one time. In order to do this successfully, it may have to make additional technology
and relationship investments that could delay or limit its ability to develop its client base and commercialize its reports and consultative
services. The reports may be found to be ineffective, unreliable or otherwise unsatisfactory to potential clients as there may be unforeseen
complications in the processes of scaling. These complications could delay or limit the ability of PatentVest to provide client services
or reports, could increase the cost of its consultative and report products, prevent it from implementing processes of the appropriate
quality and completeness, and thereby cause the business to suffer. Moreover, PatentVest needs to grow sales, marketing and support staff
or make appropriate arrangements with strategic partners to market, sell and support its clients and service and report products. If
PatentVest is not able to compete effectively with others while scaling commercially on a timely basis, in sufficient quantities or on
commercially reasonable terms, it will suffer a loss of business reputation and clients.
Public
Ventures self-clearing capabilities are necessary to operate
facilitate its business as planned.operations.
Self-clearing requires us to finance transactions and maintain margin deposits at clearing organizations. Self-clearing exposes our business to operational risks, including business and technology disruption; operational inefficiencies; liquidity, financing and regulatory risks; and potentially increased expenses. We have in the past and may in the future also encounter difficulties with self-clearing that lead to operating inefficiencies, technology issues, dissatisfaction amongst our client base, disruption in the infrastructure that supports the business, inadequate liquidity, increased margin requirements with clearing organizations and third-party settlement agents who provide financing with respect to transactions, reductions in available borrowing capacity and financial loss. Any such delay, disruption, expense or failure could adversely affect our ability to effect transactions and manage our exposure to risk. Moreover, any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
Both
the broker-dealer operations and the self-clearing operations are subject to extensive regulation. In addition, regulators perceive that
engaging in business with “small and micro-cap” companies (those with market capitalizations of $300 million and under) and
“penny” stocks (stocks with market prices of less than $1.00) is an especially high-risk activity, and therefore extensively
review and supervise such business activities. Public Ventures focuses on this niche as we believe it offers a significant opportunity
for clients of Public Ventures and other persons to gain value on their securities holdings, and we believe that such companies need
access to capital. By focusing on this business, however, Public Ventures we will likely increase the potential for regulatory oversight
oversight and the potential for regulatory action against the firm. Certain aspects of the regulatory regime, including the Know Your
Client (KYC)
and Anti Money Laundering (AML) requirements. The ability to oversee KYC and AML
requirements is critical to its ability to expand our
client networks and increase the volume of transactions the firm performs as required
by its business model. If Public Ventures is not
able to fulfill its regulatory obligations, it may be fined, have to change its business
at greater cost, or be required to cease its
business.
To
operate the broker-dealer and self-clearing operations, Public Ventures must meet different capitalization requirements in the Company.
Company. To do this, it will have to maintain within the capital structure of the various cash and cash equivalent assets and retain
access to
necessary lines of credit that can assure its ability to comply with changing deposit requirements of the SEC and of the
Depositary Trust
Clearing Company (“DTCC”), and the National Securities Clearing Corporation (“NSCC”). It is expected that these regulations
regulations will undergo substantial changes, from time to time, which could require additional capital as settlement operations
move to T+1 (one
day after the settlement date) and T+0 settlement in the future. Without the required capital at any time, Public
Ventures will not be
able to operate its business.
To
be able to operate its self-clearing activities, Public Ventures must hire and retain the human talent capable
of handling the operational
activities and fulfilling the compliance requirements of the business. Trading and settlement and compliance
personnel are necessary
to manage the operations. Further expertise in financial matters and obligations for self-clearing are also required.
Although it has following
a conservative approach to launching the business and onboarding clients to cause less stress on the organization,
the firm’s
ability to perform going forward nonetheless depends on successfully recruiting, training and retaining new personnel.
As part of these
recruitment and retention efforts, the firm must ensure that it can maintain an adequate supervising and leadership structure capable
capable of supporting the successful development of its business model.
Two
persons, Anthony DiGiandomenico and Christopher Marlett, own all the Class B Common Shares. The Class A Common Shares have one vote
per per
share, and the Class B Common Shares have five votes per share. The Class A Common Shares and Class B Common Shares vote
together as
a single class on all matters, including the election of directors. There are 5,000,000 Class B Common Shares issued and
outstanding, outstanding,
currently representing 90.8% of the aggregate voting authority of our common shares immediately prior to the
date of this filing. Therefore,
even if the maximum Class A offered sharesshares, as currently approved by the Board of the Directors, are sold, the Class B Common Shares will continue to be
able to dictate the outcome of all matters
put before the shareholders. There is no automatic or voluntary conversion of the Class B
Common Shares into Class A Common Shares, thus
the Class B Common Shares will have control of MDB for an indefinite period of
time.
Based
on the foregoing, the Class B Common Shares will have significant influence over corporate actions requiring shareholder approval, including
the following actions:
We
may make distributions of the securities of our partner companies, including cash and rights to purchase equity of a partner companiescompanies.
An
aspect of our business plan willis beto distributingdistribute to our shareholders assets of the parent company, which may include the securities of
our partner companies after they go public, rights to purchase the equity of these companies, and/or cash and other property, from time
to time. The distribution of a right to purchase the equity of a partner company may come at a time when a recipient does not have the
ability to exercise the right, and thereby lose the opportunity that the right affords. Any distribution of securities of a partner company,
cash and other property may have an adverse impact on the value of your Class A Common Shares. On the other hand, we do not plan to regularly
make any periodic distributions, therefore investors should not look to any distribution that we might make to be a regular income item
in an investor’s portfolio.
As
a smaller reporting
company, we are not be required and may notto include a Compensation Discussion and Analysis section in our proxy statements;
we needprovided only provide onlythe
required two years of financial statements; and we need not provideprovided the table of selected financial data.data as required for a smaller reporting company. We also have other
other “scaled” disclosure requirements that are less comprehensive than issuers that are not smaller reporting companies which
which could make our securities less attractive to potential investors, which could make it more difficult for our security holders to
sell their securities.investors.
The
United States stock markets recently have
experienced price and volume fluctuations due to many factors, including federal
government policies, inflationary pressures, changing
interest rates, and the conflictconflicts in Ukraine.Ukraine and Iran.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
“Financial Condition: Overall, the majority of each of the decreases in assets are all directly tied to the deconsolidation of eXoZymes, formerly known as Invizyne, on November 14, 2024, when eXoZymes completed its IPO of common stock diluting the MDB ownership to approximately 47%. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was due to the transfer of U.S Treasury bills to cash and was offset by cash utilization for operational activities during the period. The rise in cash segregated in compliance with regulations stemmed from customer deposits. …”see in full comparison
“Financial Condition: Overall, the reduction in assets was primarily attributed to their utilization for operational activities during the period. The increase in cash segregated in compliance with regulations stemmed from customer deposits. The increase in investment securities at fair value was due to an increase in the value of common stock and warrants over the period and the receipt of warrants for investment banking activities. The decrease in prepaid expenses stemmed from the amortization of prepaid insurance over the period. …”see in full comparison
“At December 31, 2025, the Company had working capital of $13.2 million, as compared to working capital of $19.8 million at December 31, 2024, reflecting a decrease in working capital of $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. The decrease in working capital during the year ended December 31, 2025, was primarily the result of the expenditures to fund the Company’s operating expenses. At December 31, 2025, the Company had cash of $15.5 million, of which $2.3 million was cash segregated in compliance with regulations that is not to fund its operations.”see in full comparison
“At December 31, 2024, the Company had working capital of $19,822,938, as compared to working capital of $28,925,236 at December 31, 2023, reflecting a decrease in working capital of $9,102,398 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in working capital during the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily the result of the expenditures to fund the Company’s operating expenses. At December 31, 2024, the Company had cash of $21,281,233, of which $843,741 was cash segregated in compliance with regulations that are not to fund its operations.”see in full comparison
“Operating Activities. For the year ended December 31, 2024, operating activities used cash of $9,037,746. The main driver for the increase in net income compared to the prior year was primarily driven by the gain of the deconsolidation of eXoZymes (formerly Invizyne), which was offset by stock-based compensation expense. Additional cash outflows resulted from the accretion of U.S. Treasury Bills held at amortized cost and the acquisition of investment securities. The deconsolidation also led to a decrease in accounts payable and grants receivable related to eXoZymes. …”see in full comparison
“Operating Activities. For the year ended December 31, 2025, operating activities used cash of $5.7 million. Operating activities use of cash represented a combination of increased activity in the broker dealer, increased professional and consulting fees related to year end audits and issuance of the tax preparation fees related to the publicly traded partnership For the year ended December 31, 2024, operating activities used cash of $9.0 million. The main driver for the increase in net income compared to the year ended December 31. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (72)
MDB
Capital Holdings,
LLC (the “Company” or “MDB”), a Delaware limited liability company, is a holding company
that has three
wholly-owned subsidiaries: MDB CG Management Company (“MDB Management”); Public Ventures, LLC, d/b/a MDB Capital
Capital (“Public Ventures”); and PatentVest, Inc. (“PatentVest”), and has one majority-owned partner company MDB
MDB Minnesota One, Inc. (“MDB Minnesota One”) and one minority owned company eXoZymes Technologies, Inc., formerly known as
as Invizyne Technologies, Inc., (“eXoZymes”), that was majority owned and is consolidated up to until November 14, 2024, when
eXoZymes eXoZymes
issued securities in its IPOIPO. andBecause MDB no longer holds a majority ownedownership byinterest MDB.in eXoZymeseXoZymes, the company is no
longer consolidated intoin the financial
statements of MDB.statements.
MDB
Management is principally
an “administrative” entity whose purpose is to conduct,conduct andand, wherever possible, to consolidate shared
services/resources,resources for
our US-based operations.
eXoZymes, formerly known as Invizyne,eXoZymes was
formed with the objective of taking nature’s building blocks to make molecules of interest, effectively simplifying
nature. eXoZymes
is a biology technology development company that is a minority-owned subsidiary as of the date of the financial statements
included in
this annual report. Invizyne’seXoZymes’s technology is a differentiated and unique synthetic biology platform which is designed
to enable
the scalable exploration of a large number of molecules and properties found in nature. eXoZymes was majority owned by MDB Capital
Holdings, Holdings,
up until November 14, 2024.
On
November 14, 2024, eXoZymes
completed its initial public offering (IPO),offering, in which it sold common stock, reducing MDB Capital
Holdings’ ownership interest from
approximately 60% to 47%. As a result, effective November 14, 2024, eXoZymes became a
minority owned company and is now accounted for
under the equity method of accounting. As noted below, we recognized a gain of $39,307,217$39.3 million on the date of deconsolidation.
Consolidated
Results of Operations for the
Years Ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024 (in thousands):
Operating Income.
Income. For the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023, respectively,2024, operating income werewas derived primarily from the Company’s broker
broker dealer and intellectual property service segment.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, operating income was generated from the Company’s fees from investment banking transactions in the broker-dealer and intellectual property services. The increase compared to the year ended December 31. 2024 is attributable to investment banking activity, as the Company executed significantly larger transactions during the year ended December 31. 2025. For the year ended December 31, 2024, operating income was generated from the Company’s fees from investment banking transactions in the broker-dealer and patent related intellectual property services.
For
the year ended December 31, 2024, operating income was generated from the Company’s fee from two investment banking
transactions in the broker-dealer and patent related intellectual property services. The decrease compared to the prior year is
attributable to reduced investment banking activity, as the Company executed significantly larger transactions in the previous year.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, operating income was generated from the Company’s fee income and unrealized gains
related to warrants received as compensation for investment banking services in the second quarter of 2023 in the broker-dealer and
intellectual property service segment.
General
and Administrative
Costs. During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, and 2023, respectively,2024, several factors contributed to changes
in various expense
categories:
Research
and Development
Costs. For the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023, respectively, the2024, research and development costs derived from the Company’s
technology segment.
The
increase in research and development costs for the period was partially offset by increased grant funding. For the year ended
December 31, 2024, there was an increase in research and development costs due to a decrease of grant funding. It is important
to note that the upswing in grant funding was not linked to any specific event and is expected to fluctuate throughout the year.
Other
Income. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the increase is primarily from the unrealized gain on deconsolidation of a
subsidiary, eXoZymes, completed in the fourth quarter of 2024.
Income
Taxes. For the year ended December
31, 2024,2025 theresearch decreaseand indevelopment incomeexpenses taxes was a direct result of the reduction in fee income
asdecreased compared to the same period in the year ended,ended December 31,31. 2023.2024, due to the deconsolidation of
eXoZymes.
Other Income. For the year ended December 31, 2025, the decrease in other income compared to the year ended December 31, 2024 was the result of less interest generated on U.S. Treasury Bill interest from cash used in operating activities during the year. The decrease in gain on deconsolidation of subsidiary was an event that happened in November 2024.
Broker
Dealer and Intellectual Property Service Segment (Public Ventures and PatentVest) Results of Operations for the Years Ended December
31, 2024 and 2023
Operating
Income. For the year ended December 31, 2024, operating income was generated from the Company’s fee income and
unrealized gains related to operating income that was generated from fees earned from the broker-dealer’s investment banking
activities and patent related intellectual property services. The decrease compared to the prior year is attributable to reduced investment banking activity, as the Company executed
significantly larger transactions in the previous year. For the year ended December 31, 2023, operating income was generated
from the Company’s fee income and unrealized gains related to warrants received as fees for investment banking activity in the
second quarter of 2023 in the broker-dealer, and fees earned at the intellectual property service segment.
General
and Administrative Costs. During the years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023, respectively, several factors contributed
to changes in various expense categories:
Other
Income. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the increase in interest expense compared to the prior year is primarily due to
inter-company subordinated loans for the broker-dealer, which are eliminated for consolidation purposes. Additionally, interest income
increased as a result of the broker-dealer maintaining higher balances in high-yield money market accounts.
IncomeEquity
Taxes.Method Investee. For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, the decreaseincrease in incomeequity taxesin loss of equity method investee was a direct result of the reduction in taxable grant income
as compareddue to recording
the yearnet ended,loss Decemberfor 31,eXoZymes 2023.as equity investee.
Technology Segment
(MDB Minnesota One and eXoZymes, formerly known as Invizyne) Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. The
results for eXoZymes are presented through November 14, 2024, which represents the date of deconsolidation from our financial statements.
Operating
Income.Income Taxes. For the year ended December 31, 2023,2025, operatingthe increase in income taxes was
a generatedresult fromincreased onerevenues feasibilityat studythe conducted.broker-dealer.
Broker Dealer and Intellectual Property Service Segment (Public Ventures and PatentVest) Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):
Operating Income. For the year ended December 31, 2025, operating income was generated from the Company’s fees from investment banking transactions in the broker-dealer and patent related intellectual property services. The increase compared to the year ended December 31, 2024 is attributable to investment banking activity, as the Company executed significantly larger transactions in the year ended December 31, 2025. For the year ended December 31, 2024, operating income was generated from the Company’s fees from investment banking transactions in the broker-dealer and patent related intellectual property services.
Other Income. For the year ended December 31, 2025, the increase in interest expense compared to the year ended December 31, 2024 is primarily due to inter-company subordinated loans for the broker-dealer, which are eliminated for consolidation purposes.
Research
and Development Costs. The increase in research and development costs for the current period was partially offset by increased
grant funding. For the year ended December 31, 2024, there was an increase in research and development costs due to a decrease
of grant funding. It is important to note that the upswing in grant funding was not linked to any specific event and is expected to fluctuate
throughout the year.
Change
in fair value of the SAFE. The technology division received a SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity) from the parent company
as operating capital prior to the initial public offering. Because the SAFE originates from the parent company, it is removed during
the consolidation process. The SAFE was converted on November 14, 2024, into shares of common stock of eXoZymes.
Income
Taxes. The technology segment is a corporation for federal and state income tax purposes, The technology segment recognized an
income tax expense related to taxable grant income of approximately $105,827 for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets December 31, 2024 and 2023
Financial
Condition: Overall, the majority of each of the decreases in assets are all directly tied to the deconsolidation of eXoZymes,
formerly known as Invizyne, on November 14, 2024, when eXoZymes completed its IPO of common stock diluting the MDB ownership to approximately
47%. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was due to the transfer of U.S Treasury bills to cash and was offset by cash utilization
for operational activities during the period. The rise in cash segregated in compliance with regulations stemmed from customer deposits.
The decline in investment securities at amortized cost occurred because U.S. Treasury bills were sold and moved to high-yield money-market
accounts, with the underlining investment in U.S Treasury bills, which allows the Company to provide liquidity for operating expenses.
The decrease in investment securities at fair value was due to a decrease in the value of common stock and warrants over the period,
held by the broker dealer. Clearing deposits increased due to the launch of the self-clearing operations. Prepaid expenses remained stable
compared to the previous period. The decrease in grants receivable, property plant and equipment, and operating lease of right to use
asset are all directly tied to the deconsolidation of eXoZymes. Finally, the deferred offering costs were associated with expenses related
to eXoZymes IPO that was completed on November 14, 2024.
The
decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and operating lease liabilities are all directly tied to the deconsolidation of eXoZymes,
formerly known as Invizyne, on November 14, 2024. Additionally, the rise in payables to customers stemmed from increased activity in
the self-clearing operations of the broker-dealer. Furthermore, the payables non-customers is movement by those non-customers from cash
to securities as part of self-clearing operations.
The
equity increase was primarily driven by the deconsolidation in the equity investment of eXoZymes.
The
decrease in non-controlling interest was a result of the deconsolidation of eXoZymes, formerly known as Invizyne.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources – December 31, 2024
The
Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows as discussed herein are presented below.
At
December 31, 2024, the Company had working capital of $19,822,938, as compared to working capital of $28,925,236 at December 31,
2023, reflecting a decrease in working capital of $9,102,398 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in working capital
during the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily the result of the expenditures to fund the Company’s operating expenses.
At December 31, 2024, the Company had cash of $21,281,233, of which $843,741 was cash segregated in compliance with regulations
that are not to fund its operations.
Operating
Activities. For the year ended December 31, 2024, operating activities used cash of $9,037,746. The main
driver for the increase in net income compared to the prior year was primarily driven by the gain of the deconsolidation of
eXoZymes (formerly Invizyne), which was offset by stock-based compensation expense. Additional cash outflows resulted from the accretion of U.S.
Treasury Bills held at amortized cost and the acquisition of investment securities. The deconsolidation also led to a decrease in
accounts payable and grants receivable related to eXoZymes. These impacts were offset by increases in clearing deposits and customer
payables, attributable to the launch of self-clearing operations. There was also a decrease in accrued expenses due to bonus
payments made in Q1 2024, along with a reduction in payables to non-customers For
the year ended December 31, 2023, operating activities utilized cash of $7,125,622, the overall decline in cash remained consistent across
the period. Despite a reduction in net loss compared to the previous period, there was a rise in fee income received in the form of warrants
instead of cash. Additionally, there was accretion of investments at amortized costs (U.S. Treasury Bills) and the acquisition of investment
securities, funded by cash received as part of an investment banking deal.
However,
this decrease in cash was partly offset by an increase in accrued expenses, deferred revenue, and proceeds from the sale of investment
securities by the broker dealer. The rise in accrued expenses to self-clearing operations and bonuses paid in the first quarter of 2024.
Investing
Activities. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the increase in cash flows from investing activities was
primarily attributable to the proceeds
from the sale and maturity of U.S. Treasury Bills and purchases of investment securities. These inflows were partially offset by the
reinvestment of proceeds into new U.S. Treasury Bills, transfers of cash to support operating activities, and investments in money
market funds.
For the year ended December 31,
2023, the decrease in investing activities consisted of the proceeds from the sale and the maturing of U.S. Treasury Bills and purchases
of investment securities, which was offset by the reinvestment of the proceeds into new U.S. Treasury Bills and the transfer of cash for
operating activities.
FinancingIncome Taxes.
Activities. For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, financingthe activitiesincrease consistedin income taxes was a result of deferredincreased IPOrevenues costsat beingthe recognized.broker-dealer.
Technology Segment (MDB Minnesota One and eXoZymes) Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. The results for eXoZymes are presented through November 14, 2024, which represents the date of deconsolidation from the Company’s financial statements (in thousands):
Operating Income. There was no activity during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
General and Administrative Costs. During the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, several factors contributed to changes in various expense categories:
Research and Development Costs. The research and development costs were incurred by the Company’s technology development segment. For the year ended December 31, 2025, R&D expenses decreased compared to the same period in the year ended December 31, 2024, due to the deconsolidation of eXoZymes.
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):
Financial Condition: Overall, the reduction in assets was primarily attributed to their utilization for operational activities during the period. The increase in cash segregated in compliance with regulations stemmed from customer deposits. The increase in investment securities at fair value was due to an increase in the value of common stock and warrants over the period and the receipt of warrants for investment banking activities. The decrease in prepaid expenses stemmed from the amortization of prepaid insurance over the period. The increase in accounts receivable is due to an increase in activity from legal and strategy fees earned. The decrease in related party receivable is due to the payoff of a loan to an equity method investment. The decrease in equity method investment is directly tied to the Company’s portion of the net loss. Finally, the reduction in property and equipment and right-of-use asset was due to its regular utilization.
The decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses stemmed from normal course of business activity. The increase in payables to customers stemmed from customer deposits. The decrease in related party payables was due to taxes paid on behalf of employees being settled during the year ended December 31, 2025. Finally, the reduction in lease liability was due to its routine utilization.
The decrease in equity was primarily due from the current period net loss.
The increase in non-controlling interest resulted from the net loss experienced by M1.
Liquidity and Capital Resources – December 31, 2025
The Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows as discussed herein are presented below (in thousands):
At December 31, 2025, the Company had working capital of $13.2 million, as compared to working capital of $19.8 million at December 31, 2024, reflecting a decrease in working capital of $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. The decrease in working capital during the year ended December 31, 2025, was primarily the result of the expenditures to fund the Company’s operating expenses. At December 31, 2025, the Company had cash of $15.5 million, of which $2.3 million was cash segregated in compliance with regulations that is not to fund its operations.
Operating Activities. For the year ended December 31, 2025, operating activities used cash of $5.7 million. Operating activities use of cash represented a combination of increased activity in the broker dealer, increased professional and consulting fees related to year end audits and issuance of the tax preparation fees related to the publicly traded partnership For the year ended December 31, 2024, operating activities used cash of $9.0 million. The main driver for the increase in net income compared to the year ended December 31. 2024 was the gain of the deconsolidation of eXoZymes, which was offset by stock-based compensation expense. Additional cash outflows resulted from the accretion of U.S. Treasury Bills held at amortized cost and the acquisition of investment securities. The deconsolidation also led to a decrease in accounts payable and grants receivable related to eXoZymes. These impacts were offset by increases in clearing deposits and customer payables, attributable to the launch of self-clearing operations. There was also a decrease in accrued expenses due to bonus payments made during the three months ended March 31, 2024, along with a reduction in payables to non-customers.
Investing Activities. There was an investment in the development of self-clearing software for the year ended December 31, 2025.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, the increase in cash flows from investing activities was primarily attributable to the proceeds from the sale and maturity of U.S. Treasury Bills and purchases of investment securities. These inflows were partially offset by the reinvestment of proceeds into new U.S. Treasury Bills, transfers of cash to support operating activities, and investments in money market funds.
Financing Activities.
For
the year ended December 31, 20232024, financing activities consisted primarily of the receiptnon-cash recognition of netpreviously proceedsdeferred initial
public offering costs, which were reclassified to additional paid-in capital upon completion of $17,763,991the from MDB’s
initial public offering.IPO.
See
Note 2 into the consolidated financial statements for the discussion
of on recentlyrecent accounting pronouncements.
The
preparation of
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles general accepted accounting principles in the United States requires
management management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period.
We have identified certain accounting policies as being critical because they require us to make difficult,
subjective, or complex judgments
about matters that are uncertain. We believe that the judgment, estimates, and assumptions used in
the preparation of our unaudited consolidated
financial statements and audited consolidated financial statements are appropriate
given the factual circumstances at the time. However,
actual results could differ, and the use of other assumptions or estimates
could result in material differences in our results of operations
or financial condition. Our critical accounting estimates are:
A
valuation allowance is provided
for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not these items will either expire before the
Company is able to realize their benefits,
or that future deductibility is uncertain. At December 31, 20242025 and 2023, eXoZymes,
formerly known as Invizyne,2024, Public Ventures, PatentVest,
MDB Minnesota One, and MDB CG Management have established a full valuation
allowance against all net deferred tax assets.
The Company havehas and will
develop partner companies that receivesreceives, grant reimbursements, which are netted against research and development expenses in the consolidated
statement of operations. Grant reimbursements for capitalized assets are recognized over the useful life of the assets, with the unrecognized
portion considered a deferred liability and are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheet.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Broker Dealer and Intellectual Property Service Segment (Public Ventures and PatentVest) Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):”
New heading “Broker Dealer and Intellectual Property Service Segment (Public Ventures and PatentVest) Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):”
New heading “Technology Segment (MDB Minnesota One). Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):”
New heading “Technology Segment (MDB Minnesota One). Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):”
Removed heading “Broker Dealer and Intellectual Property Service Segment (Public Ventures and PatentVest) Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):”
Largest changes
“Broker Dealer and Intellectual Property Service Segment (Public Ventures and PatentVest) Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):”see in full comparison
“Broker Dealer and Intellectual Property Service Segment (Public Ventures and PatentVest) Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):”see in full comparison
“Broker Dealer and Intellectual Property Service Segment (Public Ventures and PatentVest) Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):”see in full comparison
“Technology Segment (MDB Minnesota One). Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):”see in full comparison
“Technology Segment (MDB Minnesota One). Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):”see in full comparison
“Equity Method Investment. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, the decrease in other income was due to the Company’s recognition of its proportionate share of eXoZymes’ net loss under the equity method of accounting and an impairment loss realized due the stock price dropping below the equity value.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (46)
Public
Ventures is a U.S. registered broker-dealer under the Exchange Act and is a member of FINRA and the Texas State Securities Board. Public
Ventures is managed by Christopher A. Marlett, who is also a founder of MDB. Public Ventures operates on a fully disclosed basis with
a nonrelated FINRA member firm, Interactive Brokers, LLC (“Interactive Brokers”), and is not required to maintain a clearing
deposit. Interactive Brokers is the clearing firm and custodian of investments maintained by Public Ventures. Public Ventures also operates
as a self-clearing broker dealer,dealer and began carrying accounts for customers in January 2024.
On
November 14, 2024, eXoZymes completed its initial public offering (IPO), in which it sold common stock, reducing the Company’s
ownership interest from approximately 60% to 47%. As a result, effective November 14, 2024, eXoZymes became a minority owned company
and is now accounted for under the equity method of accounting.accounting, which 40.75% is owned by the company.
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Operating
Income. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, operating income was generated from the Company’s fees from investment
banking transactions in the broker-dealer and patent related intellectual property services. The increase compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2025, is attributable to investment banking activity, as the Company executed a larger transaction in the three months
ended March 31, 2026. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, operating income was generated from the Company’s fees from investment
banking transactions in the broker-dealer and patent related intellectual property services. The decrease in unrealized loss on investment
securities, net (from our licensed broker dealer) was due to a decrease in the market value and fair value of securities held for investment.
General
and Administrative Costs. During the three months ended March 31, 2026, and 2025, respectively, several factors contributed
to changes in various expense categories:
Other
Income. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, the decrease in other income compared to the three months ended March
31, 2025, was primarily due to mark-to-market losses on securities held outside of the broker-dealer and losses related to dilution from
additional equity issuances by eXoZymes. The subordinated loans for the broker-dealer are eliminated for consolidation purposes.
Income
Taxes. For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, there was no income tax expense.
Equity
Method Investment. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025, the decrease
in other income was due to the Company’s recognition of its proportionate share of eXoZymes’ net loss under the equity method
of accounting.
Broker
Dealer and Intellectual Property Service Segment (Public Ventures and PatentVest) Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March
31, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Operating
Income. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, operating income was generated from the Company’s fees from investment
banking transactions in the broker-dealer and patent related intellectual property services. The increase compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2025, is attributable to investment banking activity, as the Company executed a larger transaction in the three months
ended March 31, 2026. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, operating income was generated from the Company’s fees from investment
banking transactions in the broker-dealer and patent related intellectual property services. The decrease in unrealized loss on investment
securities, net (from our licensed broker dealer) was due to mark to market activity in the held securities.
General
and Administrative Costs. During the three months ended March 31, 2026, and 2025, respectively, several factors contributed
to changes in various expense categories:
Other
Income. The decrease in other income for the three-month period ending March 31, 2026, can be attributed to interest income,
stemming from a decrease in the cash balance from the three-month period ending March 31, 2025.
TechnologyUnaudited
SegmentCondensed (MDB Minnesota One).Consolidated Results of Operations for the ThreeSix Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Operating Loss. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, operating income was generated from the Company’s fees from investment banking transactions in the broker-dealer and patent related intellectual property services. The increase compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, is attributable to investment banking activity, as the Company executed larger transactions in the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, operating income was generated from the Company’s fees from investment banking transactions in the broker-dealer and patent related intellectual property services, as well as one investment banking transaction for a related party entity. The decrease in unrealized loss on investment securities, net (from our licensed broker dealer), as well as related party securities held by our licensed broker dealer and investment securities, net (not from our licensed broker dealer) was due to mark to market activity in the held securities.
Operating
Income. There was no activity during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025.
General
and Administrative Costs. During the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, and 2025, thererespectively, wasseveral littlefactors activitycontributed
to changes in thisvarious segment
andexpense the decrease in professional fees was attributable to less activity and legal fees with M1.categories:
Other Income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, the decrease in other income compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, was primarily due to mark-to-market losses on securities held outside of the broker-dealer and losses related to dilution from additional equity issuances by eXoZymes. The subordinated loans for the broker-dealer are eliminated for consolidation purposes.
Income Taxes. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, there was no income tax expense.
Equity Method Investment. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, the decrease in other income was due to the Company’s recognition of its proportionate share of eXoZymes’ net loss under the equity method of accounting and an impairment loss realized due the stock price dropping below the equity value.
Broker Dealer and Intellectual Property Service Segment (Public Ventures and PatentVest) Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Broker Dealer and Intellectual Property Service Segment (Public Ventures and PatentVest) Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Operating Loss. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, operating income was generated from the Company’s fees from investment banking transactions in the broker-dealer and patent related intellectual property services. The increase compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, is attributable to investment banking activity, as the Company executed larger transactions in the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, operating income was generated from the Company’s fees from investment banking transactions in the broker-dealer and patent related intellectual property services, as well as one investment banking transaction for a related party entity. The decrease in unrealized loss on investment securities, net (from our licensed broker dealer), as well as related party securities held by our licensed broker dealer and investment securities, net (not from our licensed broker dealer) was due to mark to market activity in the held securities.
General and Administrative Costs. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, and 2025, respectively, several factors contributed to changes in various expense categories:
Other Income. The decrease in other income for the three and six months period ending June 30, 2026, can be attributed to interest income, stemming from a decrease in the cash balance from the three-month period ending June 30, 2025.
Technology Segment (MDB Minnesota One). Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Technology Segment (MDB Minnesota One). Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Operating Income. There was no activity during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.
General and Administrative Costs. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, there was little activity in this segment and the decrease in professional fees was attributable to less activity and legal fees with M1.
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 (in thousands):
Financial
Condition: Overall, the reduction in assets was primarily attributed to their utilization for operational activities
during during
the period. The decrease in cash segregated in compliance with regulations stemmed from customer deposits held at December
31, 2025,
for an investment banking deal that was closingclosed in early January.January 2026. The decrease in investment securities at fair value was due
to a decrease
in the value of common stock and warrants over the period offset by the receipt of warrants for investment banking
activities. The decrease
increase in prepaid expenses and other assets stemmed from cash due to the amortizationcompany as part of prepaidan insuranceinvestment over the period.banking
deal. The increase in accounts receivable is due to
an increase in activity from legal and strategy fees earned. The increase in
related party receivable is due to increased activity by
PatentVest for eXoZymes. The decrease in equity method investment is
directly tied to the Company’s portion of the net loss.loss, the dilution due to the issuance of shares, and the impairment of the
investment due to the declining stock price. Finally,
the reduction in property and equipment and right-of-use assets was due to its
regular utilization.
The increase in accounts payable and decrease in accrued expenses stemmed from normal course of business activity. The decrease in payables to customers stemmed from customer deposits. Finally, the reduction in lease liability was due to its routine utilization.
Stockholders’
equity decreased from December 31, 2025, to MarchJune 31,30, 2026, primarily due to the net loss for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, partially
partially offset by the recognition of stock-based compensation expense during the period.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources – MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025
At
MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company had $14.2$12.2 million of working capital. This is a decrease of $5.9$5.4 million, from the working capital of $20.1$17.7
that the Company had at MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease in working capital is primarily attributed to the use of cash to fund operations.
Operating
Activities. For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, in addition to cash used in normal operating activities, there was an
an approximately $2.0 million decrease in cash resulting from the release of customer deposits that had been held in segregated accounts
in compliance with regulatory requirements at December 31, 2025. These deposits related to an investment banking transaction that closed
in early January 2026.
For
the threesix months ending on MarchJune 31,30, 2025, operating activities use of cash represented a combination of increased activity in the broker
dealer, increased professional and consulting fees related to year end audits and issuance of the tax preparation fees related to the
publicly traded partnership.
Investing
Activities. There was an investment into the deferred IT costs for development of the self-clearing system, for the threesix months
months ended March,June 31,30, 2026. There was no activity for the threesix months ended March,June 31,30, 2025.
Financing
Activities. There was no activity for the three or six months ended March,June 31,30, 2026 and 2025.
Public
Ventures, LLC, d/b/a MDB Capital, is subject to the uniform net capital rule (SEC Rule 15c3-1) of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “SEC”), which requires both the maintenance of minimum net capital and the maintenance of maximum ratio of aggregate
indebtedness to net capital. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, Public Ventures had net capital of $10.01$8.96 million and $10.18$8.61 million, respectively,
which was $9.76$8.71 million and $9.93$8.36 million in excess of the minimum $0.25 million, as required by the Securities and Exchange Commission
Rule Rule
15c3-1.
In 2024 the Company entered into a subordinated loan agreement with its broker-dealer subsidiary for $7.3 million. This amount, together with existing subordinated loans totaling $5.9 million and $2.3 million of accrued interest payable, is subordinated to other liabilities of the Company, and is considered members’ equity for calculating net capital, and is not included in aggregate indebtedness At June 30, 2026, the broker-dealer subsidiary’s ratio of aggregate indebtedness of $3.9 million to net capital was 0.43 to 1, as compared to the maximum of a 15 to 1 allowable ratio of a broker dealer. Minimum net capital is based upon the greater of the statutory minimum net capital of $250,000 or 2% of customer debts, which was calculated as $13 thousand at June 30, 2026 To comply with DTC membership requirements, the broker-dealer subsidiary has committed to maintain at least $5 million of net capital in excess of the $0.25 million minimum.
The requirement to comply with the Uniform Net Capital Rule 15c3-1 may limit Public Ventures’ ability to issue dividends to its parent company.
The
Company has subordinated loans with its Parent company totaling $13.2 million and $2.0 million of accrued interest payable, which is
subordinated to other liabilities of the Company, and is considered members’ equity for calculating net capital, and is not included
in aggregate indebtedness.
Minimum
net capital is based upon the greater of the statutory minimum net capital of $0.25 million or 2% of aggregate customer debits, which
was $0 at March 31, 2026.
To
comply with to DTCC membership requirements, the Company has committed to maintain at least $5.0 million of net capital in excess of
the $0.25 million minimum.
Public
Ventures has agreed to indemnify its clearing broker for losses that the clearing broker may sustain from the accounts of customers.
Should a customer not fulfill its obligation on a transaction, Public Ventures may be required to buy or sell securities at prevailing
market prices in the future on behalf of its customer. The indemnification obligations of Public Ventures to its clearing brokers have
no maximum amount. All unsettled trades at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, have subsequently settled with no resulting material liability to
Public Ventures. For the years ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, Public Ventures had no material loss due to counterparty failure and had
no obligations outstanding under the indemnification arrangement as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025.
As
part of initial consideration for the License Agreement, M1 issued 1.98 million shares of common stock equity to Mayo; which at that
time represented thirty-three percent of its shares. M1 also paid an initial license fee of $0.15 million as part of the initial consideration.
M1 will pay earned royalties on future net sales (including modest minimum annual royalties, which commence in the second year of the
term of the License Agreement and gradually increase and plateau over time, and which will be credited against earned royalties due on
net sales), and a percentage of any sublicensing income. The earned royalty commences after the first commercial sale of a licensed product.
At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, there were no accrued royalties recorded.
MDBH insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-20 | Torpey Daniel Thomas |
Grant/award | 10,000 | $3.90 | $39.0K |
| 2026-02-09 | James Jeremy William |
Grant/award | 10,000 | $3.90 | $39.0K |
| 2026-02-09 | Magennis Sean James |
Grant/award | 10,000 | $3.90 | $39.0K |
| 2025-08-14 | Torpey Daniel Thomas |
Option exercise | 20,000 | — | — |
Well-known investors holding MDBH (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.