MKTX 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Marketaxess Holdings Inc. · Nasdaq · Security Brokers, Dealers & Flotation Companies · CIK 1278021 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “If we acquire or invest in other businesses, products or technologies, and are unable to integrate them with our business, our financial performance may be impaired. We may not realize the anticipated financial and strategic goals for any such transactions or any strategic alliances, partnerships or joint ventures, which we may enter into.”
New heading “Failure to retain our senior management team or the inability to attract and retain qualified personnel could materially adversely impact our ability to operate or grow our business.”
Removed heading “Credit and Operational Risks”
Removed heading “Intellectual Property Risks”
Removed heading “Risks Related to Possible Transactions or Investments”
Removed heading “Risks Related to Key Personnel and Employees”
Removed heading “Climate and Sustainability Risks”
Removed heading “Credit and Operational Risks”
Removed heading “Intellectual Property Risks”
Removed heading “Risks Related to Possible Transactions or Investments”
Removed heading “Risks Related to Key Personnel and Employees”
Removed heading “We are dependent on our management team, and the loss of any key member of this team may prevent us from implementing our business plan in a timely manner.”
Removed heading “Because competition for our employees is intense, we may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled employees we need to support our business.”
Removed heading “The growing divergence of the U.K. and E.U. legal and regulatory requirements following Brexit could materially adversely impact our business, clients, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.”
Removed heading “Climate and Sustainability Risks”
Largest changes
The global financial services business is, by its nature, risky and volatile and is directly affected by many national and international factors that are beyond our control. Recently, for example,see in full comparisonthecentral2023bankregionalinterestbankingratecrisis,changes, risinginterest ratesinflation andinflation,governmentaltheactionCOVID-19relatedpandemictoand the Russia-Ukraine war,tariffs each created significant volatility in the markets we serve and increased uncertainty and economic disruption. Certain of the factors below have caused, and may in the future cause, a substantial decline in the U.S. and/or global financial services markets, resulting in reduced trading volume, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. These factors include:
“In particular, we depend on third-party vendors for our bond reference databases, the clearing and settlement of certain of our Open Trading transactions and to provide the technology underpinning key portions of our MarketAxess Rates platform. We obtain essential reference data and information services from external sources, including data received from certain competitors, clients, self-regulatory organizations, rating agencies and other third-party data providers. …”see in full comparison
“Because competition for our employees is intense, we may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled employees we need to support our business.”see in full comparison
Sanctions imposed by the United States or other countries in response to conflicts or other geopolitical events could adversely impact the financial markets and the global economy, and any economic countermeasures by the affected countries or others could exacerbate market and economic instability.see in full comparisonFor example, in February 2022, following the onset of the Russia-Ukraine war, the U.S., the U.K., and the E.U., among others, adopted sanctions that, in various ways, prohibited transactions with numerous Russian entities, including major Russian banks, and individuals; limited transactions in Russian sovereign debt; and constrained investment, trade and financing to, from or in certain regions of Ukraine.Our financial position and results of operations may be adversely affected if these sanctions are further expanded or the ongoing war or geopolitical tensions have further adverse effects on the global economy or the participants on our platforms. In addition, any such sanctions may limit our ability to effect transactions in certain instruments on our platforms.
“In particular, we depend on third-party vendors for our bond reference databases, the clearing and settlement of certain of our Open Trading transactions, to host our cloud infrastructure and to provide the technology underpinning key portions of our MarketAxess Rates platform. We obtain essential reference data and information services from external sources, including data received from certain competitors, clients, self-regulatory organizations, rating agencies and other third-party data providers. …”see in full comparison
“We rely on several third parties to supply elements of our trading, information and other systems, as well as computers and other equipment, and related support and maintenance. These providers may not be willing and/or able to continue to provide these services in an efficient, cost-effective manner, if at all; adequately expand their services to meet our needs; or meet the increasing regulatory requirements applicable to certain technology and data services providers to financial institutions. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (79)
We face substantial competition that could reduce trading on our platforms or our market share and harm our financial performance.
Risks Related to our CustomerOperation Concentrationand Performance of our Business
Credit and Operational Risks
Failure to retain our senior management team or the inability to attract and retain qualified personnel could materially adversely impact our ability to operate or grow our business.
Technology, IT SystemsCybersecurity and CybersecurityIntellectual Property Risks
Intellectual Property Risks
Risks Related to Possible Transactions or Investments
If we acquire or invest in other businesses, products or technologies, and are unable to integrate them with our business, our financial performance may be impaired or we may not realize the anticipated financial and strategic goals for any such transactions or any strategic alliances, partnerships or joint ventures, which we may enter into.
Risks Related to Key Personnel and Employees
We are dependent on our management team, and the loss of any key member of this team may prevent us from implementing our business plan in a timely manner.
Because competition for our employees is intense, we may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled employees we need to support our business.
The growing divergence of the U.K. and E.U. legal and regulatory requirements following Brexit could materially adversely impact our business, clients, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Climate and Sustainability Risks
The global financial services business is, by its nature, risky and volatile and is directly affected by many national and international factors that are beyond our control. Recently, for example, thecentral 2023bank regionalinterest bankingrate crisis,changes, rising interest ratesinflation and inflation,governmental theaction COVID-19related pandemicto and the Russia-Ukraine war,tariffs each created significant volatility in the markets we serve and increased uncertainty and economic disruption. Certain of the factors below have caused, and may in the future cause, a substantial decline in the U.S. and/or global financial services markets, resulting in reduced trading volume, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. These factors include:
There have been significant declines in trading volumes in the financial markets generally in the past and there may be similar declines in trading volumes generally or across our platforms in particular in the future. Any one or more of the above factors may contribute to reduced trading volumes. Our revenues and profitability are likely to decline significantly during periods of stagnant economic conditions, low volatility or low trading volumevolumes in the U.S. and global financial markets.
There has been increased demand for portfolio trading workflows over the last few years, which has resulted in heightened competition among trading platforms to enhance their portfolio trading offerings and expand them across different geographies and products. During periods of relatively lower credit spread volatility, clients have been using portfolio trading workflows in lieu of more established trading protocols designed to generate price competition on individual bonds. Our dealer clients have also increased their usage of matching sessions offered by competing platforms in recent periods. To the extent that our clients increase their use of portfolio trading and matching session protocols offered by other platforms, our market share in those products could decrease. Due to the large size of the trades and the concentration of activity at the end of the month, portfolio trading can drive significant swings in trading volumes and estimated market share. Furthermore, portfolio trading is generally provided under a lower-fee structure than other protocols and the growth of portfolio trading on our platform will likely have a negative impact on our average credit variable transaction fee per million.
A decline in overall market volumes, trading volumes on our platforms,platforms or our platforms’ market share for any reason or the increased usage of portfolio trading in lieu of other trading protocols on our platforms would negatively affect our commission revenue and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We face substantial competition that could reduce trading on our platforms or our market share and harm our financial performance.
Competition in the markets in which we operate has intensified due to consolidation, which has resulted in increasingly large and sophisticated competitors. In recent years, our competitors have made acquisitions and/or entered joint ventures and consortia to improve the competitiveness of their electronic trading offerings. If, because of industry consolidation, our competitors are able to offer lower cost and/or a wider range of trading venues and solutions, obtain more favorable terms from third-party providers or otherwise take actions that could attract trading volume away from our platforms or increase their market share, our competitive position and therefore our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
Our operations also include the sale of pre- and post-trade services, analytics, and market data services. There is a high degree of competition among market data and information vendors in solutions for pre- and post-trade data, analytics and reporting, and such businesses may become more competitive in the future as new competitors emerge. Some of these companies are already in or may enter the electronic trading business. Accordingly, some of our competitors may be able to combine use of their electronic trading platforms with complementary access to market data and analytical tools and/or leverage relationships with existing clients to obtain additional business from such clients, which could preempt use of our platforms or solutions. For example, Bloomberg, Refinitivthe London Stock Exchange and Intercontinental Exchange own trading platforms that compete with ours and also have a data and analytics relationships with the vast majority of institutional, wholesale and retail market participants. If we are not able to compete successfully in this area in the future, our revenues could be adversely impacted and, as a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.
In addition, under certain of our U.S. high grade fee plans, our fees are designated in basis points in yield (and, as a result, are subject to fluctuation depending on the duration of the bond traded) or our fees vary based on trade size or maturity. For example, during recent periods, a significant rise in corporate bond yields contributed to a decrease in the duration of the U.S. high grade bonds traded on our platforms, which had a negative effect on our average credit variable transaction fee per million. We anticipate that our average feescredit variable transaction fee per million may continue to vary in the future due to changes in yield, years-to-maturity and nominal size of bonds traded on our platforms. Consequently, past trends in commissions are not necessarily indicative of future commissions.
Our strategy includes leveraging our electronic trading platforms to enter new markets, including new asset classes, products and geographies, including markets where we have little or no operating experience. For example, with the acquisition of Pragma in 2023, we began providing algorithmic trading and quantitative execution solutions in the equities and foreign exchange markets, and in 2024,2025, we agreedcompleted toour acquireacquisition of a majority stake in RFQ-hub, a platform specializing in ETFs and derivatives. We may have difficulties identifying and entering into new markets due to established competitors, lack of recognition of our brand and lack of acceptance of our platforms and solutions, as has occurred with certain of our initiatives in the past.
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations, including, as a result of Brexit,including our access to,to and our ability to compete for and hire, skilled employees in both the U.K. and the E.U.;
Risks Related to our CustomerOperation Concentrationand Performance of our Business
We rely on our broker-dealer clients to provide liquidity on our electronic trading platforms by posting prices for bonds in their inventory and responding to institutional investor client inquiries. The contractual obligations of our broker-dealer clients to us are minimal, non-exclusive and terminable by such clients. Our broker-dealer clients buy and sell fixed-income securities through traditional methods, including by telephone, e-mailtelephone and instant messaging, and through other electronic trading platforms. Some of our broker-dealer clients have developed electronic trading networks that compete with us or have announced their intention to explore the development of such electronic trading networks, and many of our broker-dealer and institutional investor clients are involved in other ventures, including other electronic trading platforms or other distribution channels, as trading participants and/or as investors. These competing trading platforms may offer some features that we do not currently offer. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that such broker-dealers’ primary commitments will not be to one of our competitors.
We rely on our institutional investor clients to launch inquiries over our trading platforms and, increasingly, to provide liquidity through our Open Trading protocols. A limited number of such clients can account for a significant portion of our trading volume. The obligations of our institutional investor clients to us under our standard contractual agreements are minimal, non-exclusive and terminable by such clients. Our institutional investor clients also buy and sell fixed-income securities through traditional methods, including by telephone, e-mailtelephone and instant messaging, and through other electronic trading platforms.
Credit and Operational Risks
We rely on several third parties to supply elements of our trading, information and other systems, as well as computers and other equipment, and related support and maintenance. These providers may not be willing and/or able to continue to provide these services in an efficient, cost-effective manner, if at all; adequately expand their services to meet our needs; or meet the increasing regulatory requirements applicable to certain technology and data services providers to financial institutions. See “Regulatory and Legal Risks – Our business and the trading businesses of many of our clients are subject to increasingly extensive government and other regulation, which may affect our trading volumes and increase our cost of doing business.” If we are unable to make alternative arrangements for the supply of critical products or services in the event of a malfunction of a product or an interruption in or the cessation of service by an existing service provider, including as a result of a cybersecurity incident or other outage at a service provider, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
In particular, we depend on third-party vendors for our bond reference databases, the clearing and settlement of certain of our Open Trading transactions, to host our cloud infrastructure and to provide the technology underpinning key portions of our MarketAxess Rates platform. We obtain essential reference data and information services from external sources, including data received from certain competitors, clients, self-regulatory organizations, rating agencies and other third-party data providers. Our reference data sources and information providers could increase the price for or withdraw their data or information services for a variety of reasons. Further, as has occurred in the past, our competitors could revise the current terms on which they provide us with data or information services or could cease providing us with data or information services altogether for a variety of reasons, including competition. Certain third-party services may have limited alternative providers readily available, and disruptions in the services provided by those third-parties to us, including as a result of their inability (due to cybersecurity incidents or otherwise) or unwillingness to continue to license products or provide technology services that are critical to the success of our business, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we acquire or invest in other businesses, products or technologies, and are unable to integrate them with our business, our financial performance may be impaired. We may not realize the anticipated financial and strategic goals for any such transactions or any strategic alliances, partnerships or joint ventures, which we may enter into.
From time to time, we may pursue acquisitions, which may not be completed or, if completed, may not be as beneficial to us as expected. We have made acquisitions in the past, including the purchases of the regulatory reporting business of Deutsche Börse in 2020, MuniBrokers in 2021, Pragma in 2023 and a controlling stake in RFQ-hub in 2025. We also may consider potential divestitures of businesses from time to time. We routinely evaluate potential acquisition and divestiture candidates and engage in discussions and negotiations regarding potential acquisitions and divestitures on an ongoing basis; however, even if we execute a definitive agreement, there can be no assurance that we will consummate the transaction within the anticipated closing timeframe, or at all. Moreover, there is significant competition for acquisition and expansion opportunities in the electronic financial services industry.
We may also enter into strategic alliances, partnerships or joint ventures as a means to accelerate our entry into new markets, provide new solutions or enhance our existing capabilities. Entering into strategic alliances, partnerships and joint ventures entails risks, including:
difficulties in developing or expanding the business of newly formed alliances, partnerships and joint ventures;
exercising influence over the activities of joint ventures in which we do not have a controlling interest;
potential conflicts with or among our partners;
the possibility that our partners could take action without our approval or prevent us from taking action; and the possibility that our partners become bankrupt or otherwise lack the financial resources to meet their obligations.
Failure to retain our senior management team or the inability to attract and retain qualified personnel could materially adversely impact our ability to operate or grow our business.
The success of our business depends upon the skills, experience and efforts of our executive officers and other key personnel. We do not maintain “key person” life insurance on any of our executive officers and other key personnel. Although we have invested in succession planning, any loss or interruption of one or more of our executive officers or key personnel could nevertheless have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Should we lose the services of any such person, we may have to conduct a search for a qualified replacement. This search may be prolonged, and we may not be able to locate and hire a qualified replacement.
Our business also depends on our ability to continue to attract, motivate and retain a large number of highly qualified personnel in order to support our clients and achieve our business results. There is a limited pool of employees who have the requisite skills, training and education. Identifying, recruiting, training, integrating and retaining qualified personnel requires significant time, expense and attention, and the market for qualified personnel, particularly those with experience in technology, clearing and settlement, product management and regulatory compliance, has become more competitive as an increasing number of companies seek to enhance their positions in the markets we serve. In particular, we compete for technology personnel with highly innovative technology companies and large companies focused on technology development both in and outside our industry and our traditional geographic markets. Many of these companies have significant financial resources and more recognizable brands than ours and may be able to offer more attractive employment opportunities and more lucrative compensation packages. Our inability to attract, retain and motivate personnel with the requisite skills could impact our ability to develop new platforms, platform features or solutions, enhance our existing platforms and solutions, grow our client base, enter into new markets, operate under various regulatory frameworks or manage our business effectively.
Sanctions imposed by the United States or other countries in response to conflicts or other geopolitical events could adversely impact the financial markets and the global economy, and any economic countermeasures by the affected countries or others could exacerbate market and economic instability. For example, in February 2022, following the onset of the Russia-Ukraine war, the U.S., the U.K., and the E.U., among others, adopted sanctions that, in various ways, prohibited transactions with numerous Russian entities, including major Russian banks, and individuals; limited transactions in Russian sovereign debt; and constrained investment, trade and financing to, from or in certain regions of Ukraine. Our financial position and results of operations may be adversely affected if these sanctions are further expanded or the ongoing war or geopolitical tensions have further adverse effects on the global economy or the participants on our platforms. In addition, any such sanctions may limit our ability to effect transactions in certain instruments on our platforms.
In addition, certain governments, investors, employees, customers, and the public are focused on sustainability practices and disclosures. Increasing scrutiny from stakeholders and regulators with respect to sustainability matters may impose additional costs and expose us to additional risks. For example, certain investors are incorporating the business risks of climate change and the adequacy of companies’ responses to climate change and other sustainability matters as part of their investment theses and policies. Conversely, there are some stockholders and regulators who have expressed opposing views against sustainability practices, including support for anti-sustainability legislation and policies. For example, certain U.S. states have restricted state-controlled funds from investing based on sustainability factors. Our reputation could be adversely impacted by our sustainability practices and sustainability disclosures or investor perceptions thereof, including if we fail to establish measurable environmental goals or subsequently fail to meet any such goals or if we are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for sustainability or climate issues. Any negative publicity we receive regarding sustainability, low sustainability scores or ratings, or shifts in investing priorities may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock or our business, operations and earnings. Finally, we could experience increased operating costs or capital expenditures associated with complying with new disclosure-based or emissions-reduction requirements.
Technology, IT SystemsCybersecurity and CybersecurityIntellectual Property Risks
We must continue to enhance and improve our electronic trading platforms. The electronic financial services industry is characterized by significant structural changes, increasingly complex systems and infrastructures, changes in clients’ needs and preferences, constant competition and new business models. If new industry standards and practices emerge and our competitors release new technology before us, our existing technology, systems and electronic trading platforms may become obsolete orand our existing business may be harmed. Our future success will depend on our ability to:
develop and/or license new products and technologies that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our broker-dealer and institutional investor clients and prospective clients;
We use AI technologies in our business, including in certain of our product offerings, and we are making investments in expanding AI capabilities in our products and tools. AI technologies are complex, and generative and agentic AI technologies, in particular, are rapidly evolving. The introduction of AI technologies, including generative and agentic AI, into new or existing products or our internal business processes may result in new or enhanced governmental or regulatory scrutiny, additional compliance costs, confidentiality or security risks, privacy concerns, ethical challenges, or other complications that could adversely affect our business, reputation, or financial results.
In addition, the intellectual property ownership and license rights surrounding AI technologies are currently not fully addressed by courts or regulators. The use or adoption of AI technologies in our products or internal business services may result in exposure to claims by third parties of copyright infringement or other intellectual property misappropriation. Such use or adoption could also lead to the loss of our intellectual property rights. The evolving legal, regulatory, and compliance framework for AI technologies may also impact our ability to protect our own data and intellectual property against infringing use.use, and we may need to develop or deploy additional protections and safeguards for handling the use of customer and proprietary data with such technologies.
We also rely on third-party AI suppliers for certain tools and services, which may introduce risks related to transparency, supply chain security or our ability to monitor and control external AI models. Failures, errors, or disruptions in AI systems, whether developed internally or provided by third parties, could result in operational disruption or impact our critical business processes.
If our AI development, deployment, content labelingdeployment or governance is ineffective or inadequate, it may result in competitive disadvantage, reputational harm, liability, or other adverse consequences to our business operations.
We rely on several third parties to supply elements of our trading, information and other systems, as well as computers and other equipment, and related support and maintenance. These providers may not be willing and/or able to continue to provide these services in an efficient, cost-effective manner, if at all; adequately expand their services to meet our needs; or meet the increasing regulatory requirements applicable to certain technology and data services providers to financial institutions. See “Regulatory and Legal Risks – Our business and the trading businesses of many of our clients are subject to increasingly extensive government and other regulation, which may affect our trading volumes and increase our cost of doing business.” If we are unable to make alternative arrangements for the supply of critical products or services in the event of a malfunction of a product or an interruption in or the cessation of service by an existing service provider, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
In particular, we depend on third-party vendors for our bond reference databases, the clearing and settlement of certain of our Open Trading transactions and to provide the technology underpinning key portions of our MarketAxess Rates platform. We obtain essential reference data and information services from external sources, including data received from certain competitors, clients, self-regulatory organizations, rating agencies and other third-party data providers. Our reference data sources and information providers could increase the price for or withdraw their data or information services for a variety of reasons. Further, as has occurred in the past, our competitors could revise the current terms on which they provide us with data or information services or could cease providing us with data or information services altogether for a variety of reasons, including competition. Disruptions in the services provided by those third-parties to us, including as a result of their inability (due to cybersecurity incidents or otherwise) or unwillingness to continue to license products or provide technology services that are critical to the success of our business, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, we used ICBC Financial Services (“ICBC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited, to clear certain U.S. government bond trades on the MarketAxess Rates platform. Following the November 2023 ransomware attack on ICBC, we switched to a different pre-existing clearing arrangement with another clearing provider. While this event did not have a material adverse effect on the Company, similar events in the future events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
While we generally have disaster recovery and business continuity plans in place for much of our business, including redundant systems, networks, computer software and hardware and data centers to address interruption to our normal course of business, our systems, networks and infrastructure may not always be fully redundant and our disaster recovery and business continuity plans may not always be sufficient or effective. Similarly, although some contracts with our third-party providers as well as relevant law require adequate disaster recovery or business continuity capabilities, we cannot be certain that these will be adequate or implemented properly. Our disaster recovery and business continuity plans are heavily reliant on the availability of cloud service providers, internet and mobile phone technology, so any disruption of those systems may affect our ability to recover promptly from a crisis situation. If we are unable to execute our disaster recovery and business continuity plans, or if our plans prove insufficient for a particular situation or take longer than expected to implement in a crisis situation, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our business interruption insurance may not adequately compensate us for losses that may occur.
The operation of our electronic trading platforms relies on the secure processing, storage and transmission of a large amount of transactional data and other confidential sensitive data (including confidential client and personal information). Our computer systems, software and networks (or those of our third-party vendors, including cloud service providers) may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, loss or destruction of data (including confidential and personal customer information), ransomware, unavailability or disruption of service, computer viruses, acts of vandalism, or other malicious code, cyber-attack and other harmful events that could have an adverse security impact. Further, as AI technologies, including generative and agentic AI models develop rapidly, bad actors may use these technologies to create new sophisticated attack methods that are increasingly automated, targeted and coordinated and more difficult to defend against.
Our business also depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our platforms, systems, networks and infrastructure. Any failure of, or significant interruption, delay or disruption to, our systems, networks or infrastructure due to a ransomware attack or other cyber-attack could result in: disruption to our operations, including disruptions in service to our clients; slower response times; distribution of untimely or inaccurate market data to clients who rely on this data for their trades; delays in trade execution; incomplete or inaccurate accounting, recording or processing of trades; significant expense to repair, replace or remediate systems, networks or infrastructure; financial losses and liabilities to clients; loss of clients; and legal or regulatory claims, proceedings, penalties or fines. We also face thethese riskrisks of operational disruption, failure or capacity constraints of any of the third-party service providers that facilitate our business activities, including clients, clearing and settlement agents and trading system software, network or data providers. Such parties could also be the source of a cyber-attack on or breach of our operational systems, data or infrastructure. Increased flexibility for our employees to work remotely has amplified certain risks related to, among other things, the increased demand on our information technology resources and systems, the increased risk of phishing and other cybersecurity attacks, and the increased number of points of possible attack, such as laptops and mobile devices (both of which are now being used in increased numbers), to be secured. Any system failure or significant interruption, delay or disruption in our operations, or decreases in the responsiveness of our platforms, could materially harm our reputation and business and lead our clients to decrease or cease their use of our trading platform.
As the privacy and data protection landscapes continue to trend in favor of increasing regulation and compliance our efforts to comply have and could in the future entail substantial expense and may divert resources from other initiatives. Additionally, our own compliance with applicable law and regulation depends, in certain circumstances, on the continued compliance of our third-party providers. As a result, we are required to monitor the performance of our third-party providers as violations by such providers may also put our operations at risk. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with any of our obligations relating to privacy and data protection may result in governmental investigations or enforcement actions, litigation, claims or reputational damage.
Intellectual Property Risks
Risks Related to Possible Transactions or Investments
From time to time, we may pursue acquisitions, which may not be completed or, if completed, may not be as beneficial to us as expected. We have made acquisitions in the past, including the purchases of the regulatory reporting business of Deutsche Börse in 2020, MuniBrokers in 2021 and Pragma in 2023. We also agreed to take a controlling stake in RFQ-hub in 2024. We also may consider potential divestitures of businesses from time to time. We routinely evaluate potential acquisition and divestiture candidates and engage in discussions and negotiations regarding potential acquisitions and divestitures on an ongoing basis; however, even if we execute a definitive agreement, there can be no assurance that we will consummate the transaction within the anticipated closing timeframe, or at all. Moreover, there is significant competition for acquisition and expansion opportunities in the electronic financial services industry.
We may also enter into strategic alliances, partnerships or joint ventures as a means to accelerate our entry into new markets, provide new solutions or enhance our existing capabilities. Entering into strategic alliances, partnerships and joint ventures entails risks, including: (i) difficulties in developing or expanding the business of newly formed alliances, partnerships and joint ventures; (ii) exercising influence over the activities of joint ventures in which we do not have a controlling interest; (iii) potential conflicts with or among our partners; (iv) the possibility that our partners could take action without our approval or prevent us from taking action; and (v) the possibility that our partners become bankrupt or otherwise lack the financial resources to meet their obligations.
Risks Related to Key Personnel and Employees
We are dependent on our management team, and the loss of any key member of this team may prevent us from implementing our business plan in a timely manner.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”
New heading “Uncertain tax positions”
Largest changes
“We believe our scale, network effects, and product innovation uniquely position us to capture increased trading volumes as the markets continue their transition from voice to electronic trading. At the center of our offerings is Open Trading, our award winning all-to-all marketplace, which creates a unique, anonymous liquidity pool that connects market participants across a broad range of fixed-income products. …”see in full comparison
In addition to reporting financial results in accordance with GAAP, we use certain non-GAAP financial measures: earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), EBITDA margin and free cash flow. From time to time, we present selected GAAP-basis financial results, excluding notable items. Notable items are revenues, expenses, other income (expense) and tax related items that are non-recurring and outside of the Company’s normal course of business or other notables, such as acquisition and restructuring charges or gains/losses on sales (collectively, “notable items”). We define EBITDA margin as EBITDA divided by revenues. We define free cash flow as net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities excluding the net change in trading investments and net change in securities failed-to-deliver and securities failed-to-receive from broker-dealers, clearing organizations and customers, less expenditures for furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements and capitalized software development costs.see in full comparisonWe believe these non-GAAPNon-GAAP financialmeasures, when taken into consideration with the corresponding GAAP financial measures, are important in understanding our operating results. EBITDA, EBITDA margin and free cash flow are notmeasuresof financial performance or liquidity under GAAP and thereforeshouldnotbe consideredaninalternativeadditiontoto,netnotincomeas a substitute for orcashsuperiorflowto,fromfinancialoperatingmeasuresactivitiesdeterminedasinanconformityindicatorwithof operating performance or liquidity.GAAP. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures, when taken into consideration with the corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide additional information regarding our operating results because they assist both investors and management in analyzing and evaluating the performance of our business.
“Goodwill is assessed for impairment annually in the fourth quarter or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change that indicate an impairment may exist. When assessing goodwill for impairment, first, a qualitative assessment can be made to determine whether it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If the results of the qualitative assessment are not conclusive, a quantitative goodwill test is performed. …”see in full comparison
Our business is subject to extensive regulations in the United States and internationally, which may expose us to significant regulatory risk and causesee in full comparisonadditional legal costsus toensureincurcompliance.additional expense. The existing legal framework that governs the financial markets is periodically reviewed and amended, resulting in the enactment and enforcement of new laws and regulations that apply to our business.In January 2022, the SEC proposed rules that will expand Regulation ATS and Regulation SCI to alternative trading systems (ATS) that trade government securities and amend the SEC rule regarding the definition of an “exchange” to include Communication Protocol Systems, such as our request-for-quote protocols. Based on these proposed rules, we expect that we will have to operate additional trading protocols in compliance with Regulation ATS and we could become subject to Regulation SCI for certain parts of our business in the future.The SECalso recentlyadopted final rules regarding the central clearing of certain secondary market transactions involving U.S. Treasury securities, which are currently set to become effective for certain cash market transactions on December 31,2025 and repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions on June 30,2026. Once effective, this central clearing mandate will impact certain of our participants who do not centrally clear such tradestoday,today. These reforms may also change how our clients trade andsomewhereoftheyourclearinvestor clients have expressed concerns aboutwhen usingplatforms that will require the clearing of any resultant trades executed on suchour platforms. While we expect this change will increase our own platform efficiency, it could also negatively affect trading activity and liquidity in the markets in which we operate, and it is still unknown at this time the full impact of this change, and what effect it will have, whether positive or negative, on our industry, our clients or us. In addition,followingthe SEC withdrew multiple rule proposals in 2025, including those relating to thechangeexpansioninofU.S.RegulationpresidentialATSadministrations,anditRegulationisSCI. It remains unknown to what extent new legislation will be passed into law or whether other pending or new regulatory proposals will be adopted, abandoned or modified, or what effect such passage, adoption, abandonment or modification will have, whether positive or negative, on our industry, our clients or us.
“With regard to the international products traded on our platforms, Eurobonds and emerging markets estimated market volumes increased significantly compared to the prior year. The increase in emerging markets estimated market volumes was driven by a more favorable macroeconomic outlook in developed markets, reflecting easing concerns over inflation and the lower probability of an economic recession.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (70)
MarketAxess operates leading electronic trading platforms delivering greater trading efficiency, a diversified pool of liquidity and significant cost savings to ourapproximately 2,100 institutional investor and broker-dealer clients across the global fixed-income markets. Approximately 2,100 institutional investor and broker-dealer firms use our patented trading technology to efficiently trade U.S. high-grade bonds, U.S. high-yield bonds, emerging market debt, Eurobonds, municipal bonds, U.S. government bonds and other fixed-income securities.markets. We leveragehave built a differentiated market position through our integrated approach to electronic trading, combining diverse set of trading protocols, automated and algorithmic tradingexecution solutions, intelligent data and index products and aanalytics rangeand ofcomprehensive post-trade servicesand totechnology provideservices. anThe end-to-endfixed-income tradingmarkets solutionwe tofocus ouron robustremain networksignificantly ofless platformelectronified participants.than Ourother award-winningasset Open Trading marketplace is widely regarded as the preferred all-to-all trading solution in the global credit markets,classes, creating asignificant unique liquidity poolopportunities for acontinued broad range of credit market participants.growth.
We believe our scale, network effects, and product innovation uniquely position us to capture increased trading volumes as the markets continue their transition from voice to electronic trading. At the center of our offerings is Open Trading, our award winning all-to-all marketplace, which creates a unique, anonymous liquidity pool that connects market participants across a broad range of fixed-income products. By expanding the number of potential trading counterparties, we believe that Open Trading facilitates price discovery, improves execution quality, and reduces transaction costs for market participants. Institutional investors can also send trading inquiries directly to broker-dealer counterparties on a disclosed basis, while simultaneously accessing the rest of the market on an anonymous basis through Open Trading. We continue to invest in technology innovation. X-Pro, our next-generation trading platform, provides access to multiple trading protocols and workflow tools and integrates our suite of proprietary pre- and post-trade data and analytics tools, powered by our AI-driven pricing engine, CP+, to deliver a seamless user experience. Our automated execution protocols enable clients to pre-define trading parameters and leverage automation to execute transactions seamlessly and efficiently, reducing manual intervention and allowing traders to focus on higher-value opportunities.
We provide automated and algorithmic trading solutions that we believe, when combined with our integrated and actionable data offerings, help our clients make faster, better-informed decisions on when and how to trade on our platforms. In 2024, we continued our roll-out of X-Pro, our newest trading platform, to more seamlessly combine our trading protocols with our proprietary data and pre-trade analytics. Our AI-driven technology, such as CP+, our real-time pricing engine, is a critical data input and pricing source for multiple MarketAxess trading protocols and solutions, including Auto-X™ and portfolio trading. In 2024, we leveraged our recent acquisition of Pragma, a quantitative trading technology provider specializing in algorithmic and analytical trading services, to accelerate our development of AI driven execution algorithms across all of our key product areas. We believe that we will be able to enhance our capabilities and increase our efficiency by leveraging Pragma technology across our technology stack.
We also provide a number of integrated and actionable data offerings, including CP+ and Axess All, to assist clients with real-time pricing and trading decisions and transaction cost analysis. We offer a range of post-trade services, including straight-through processing, post-trade matching, trade publication, regulatory transaction reporting and market and reference data across fixed-income and other products.
We operate in a large and growing market that provides us with a significant opportunity for future growth, due, in part, to the relatively low levels of electronic trading in many of our largest current product areas. We offer Open Trading for most of our products in order to capitalize on this addressable market by increasing the number of potential trading counterparties and providing our clients with a menu of solutions at each step in the trading process. We believe that Open Trading drives meaningful price improvement for our clients and reduces risk in fixed-income markets by creating a global, diversified pool of liquidity whereby our institutional investor, dealer and alternative liquidity provider clients can all interact on an anonymous basis. Institutional investors can also send trading inquiries directly to their traditional broker-dealer counterparties on a disclosed basis, while simultaneously accessing additional counterparties through our anonymous Open Trading solutions.
Our objective is to providecreate the leading global network for the trading of fixed-income securities for our broker-dealer and institutional investor clients to help them connect, be more efficient and achieve better trading outcomes. We seek to achieve this goal by offering our clients full end-to-end electronic trading solutions and workflow tools, powered by a broad array of proprietary data and analytical tools. The key elements of our strategy are discussed in Part I, Item 1. “Business – Our Strategy.”
The global fixed-income securities industry is risky and volatile and is directly affected by a number of economic, political and market factors that may impact trading volume. These factors could have a material adverse or positive effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. These factors include, among others, fixed-income market conditions, the current interest rate environment, including the volatility of interest rates and investors’ forecasts of future interest rates, the duration of U.S. high grade bonds traded, economic and political conditions in the United States, Europe and elsewhere, including recent and potential future changes in tariffs, international trade agreements or trade policies, and the consolidation or contraction of our broker-dealer and institutional investor clients.
In 2025, the market backdrop for the Company showed increases in estimated U.S. credit market volumes, with U.S. high-grade and U.S. high-yield market average daily volume up 8.4% and 19.5%, respectively, compared to the prior year. However, despite an increase in volatility during March and April, credit spreads and credit spread volatility remained at relatively low levels throughout much of 2025. With regard to the international products traded on our platforms, estimated market volumes of emerging markets and eurobonds increased significantly compared to the prior year.
In 2024, the market backdrop for the Company showed strong increases in estimated U.S. credit market volumes, with U.S. high-grade and U.S. high-yield market average daily trading volume up 25.3% and 8.9%, respectively, compared to the prior year. However, credit spreads and credit spread volatility remained at historically low levels. A strong new issue calendar, which we have seen in recent periods, and low levels of credit spread volatility can contribute to a decrease in exchange-trade fund (“ETF”) market maker activity on our platforms, as the increased availability of new issues may lead to reduction in secondary market trading, especially in U.S. high-yield. A strong new issue calendar can also negatively impact our market share in the short-term, but is expected to positively impact secondary trading volumes over the long-term. The decrease in U.S. high-yield activity during the year negatively impacted our total credit average variable fee per million, but the increase in higher duration bonds traded in U.S. high-grade positively impacted our total credit average variable fee per million.
With regard to the international products traded on our platforms, Eurobonds and emerging markets estimated market volumes increased significantly compared to the prior year. The increase in emerging markets estimated market volumes was driven by a more favorable macroeconomic outlook in developed markets, reflecting easing concerns over inflation and the lower probability of an economic recession.
Because the majority of our assets are short-term in nature, they are not significantly affected by inflation. However, the rate of inflation impacts our expenses, such as employee compensation, technology and communications expenses, which may not be readily recoverable in the prices of our services. Interest rates are currently higher than recent periods due to a period of increased inflation. To the extent interest rates remain high or inflation has other adverse effects on the securities markets or the economy, our financial position and results of operations may be adversely affected.
On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the “OBBBA”) was enacted into law in the United States. The OBBBA made significant changes to existing U.S. federal and international tax provisions. The most impactful provisions to our business include the immediate expensing of domestic U.S. research. The OBBBA may have various impacts which are complicated by their different effective dates and many elections available in the OBBBA, as well as uncertainties around U.S. states’ reactions to these federal tax law changes. The OBBBA did not have a material impact on our effective tax rate.
We expect that current cash and investment balances, in combination with cash flows that are generated from operations and the ability to borrow under our 2026 Amended Credit Agreement (as defined below), will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs and planned capital expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve months. We ended the year with $749.9$529.9 million in available borrowing capacity under theour 2023 Credit Agreement (as defined below) and capital significantly in excess of our regulatory requirements.
There has been increased demand for portfolio trading workflows over the last few years, which has resulted in heightened competition among trading platforms to enhance their portfolio trading offerings and expand them across different geographies and products. During periods of relatively lower credit spread volatility, clientsClients have been using portfolio trading workflows in lieu of more established trading protocols designed to generate price competition on individual bonds. Our dealer clients have also increased their usage of matching sessions offered by competing platforms in recent periods. To the extent that our clients increase their use of portfolio trading and matching session protocols offered by other platforms, our market share in those products could decrease. Due to the large size of the trades and the concentration of activity at the end of the month, portfolio trading can drive significant swings in trading volumes and estimated market share. Furthermore, portfolio trading is generally provided under a lower-fee structure than other protocols and the growth of portfolio trading on our platform will likely have a negative impact on our average credit variable transaction fee per million.
Our business is subject to extensive regulations in the United States and internationally, which may expose us to significant regulatory risk and cause additional legal costsus to ensureincur compliance.additional expense. The existing legal framework that governs the financial markets is periodically reviewed and amended, resulting in the enactment and enforcement of new laws and regulations that apply to our business. In January 2022, the SEC proposed rules that will expand Regulation ATS and Regulation SCI to alternative trading systems (ATS) that trade government securities and amend the SEC rule regarding the definition of an “exchange” to include Communication Protocol Systems, such as our request-for-quote protocols. Based on these proposed rules, we expect that we will have to operate additional trading protocols in compliance with Regulation ATS and we could become subject to Regulation SCI for certain parts of our business in the future. The SEC also recently adopted final rules regarding the central clearing of certain secondary market transactions involving U.S. Treasury securities, which are currently set to become effective for certain cash market transactions on December 31, 2025 and repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions on June 30, 2026. Once effective, this central clearing mandate will impact certain of our participants who do not centrally clear such trades today,today. These reforms may also change how our clients trade and somewhere ofthey ourclear investor clients have expressed concerns aboutwhen using platforms that will require the clearing of any resultant trades executed on suchour platforms. While we expect this change will increase our own platform efficiency, it could also negatively affect trading activity and liquidity in the markets in which we operate, and it is still unknown at this time the full impact of this change, and what effect it will have, whether positive or negative, on our industry, our clients or us. In addition, followingthe SEC withdrew multiple rule proposals in 2025, including those relating to the changeexpansion inof U.S.Regulation presidentialATS administrations,and itRegulation isSCI. It remains unknown to what extent new legislation will be passed into law or whether other pending or new regulatory proposals will be adopted, abandoned or modified, or what effect such passage, adoption, abandonment or modification will have, whether positive or negative, on our industry, our clients or us.
We provide regulated services to our clients within the E.U. in reliance upon the authorizations our subsidiaries have received from the AFM in the Netherlands. Brexit has led to an ongoing divergence between the U.K. and E.U. financial regulations, which has made it more difficult and costly to comply with the extensive government regulation to which we are subject. The cost and complexity of operating across increasingly divergent regulatory regimes hashave increased and isare likely to continue to increase in the future.
Compliance with new regulations may require us to dedicate additional financial and operational resources, which may adversely affect our profitability. For example, DORA,the E.U.’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (“DORA”), which focuses on the security of network and information systems of financial services entities, as well as third parties which provide certain information communication technology services (“ICTs”) to them, became applicable to portions of our business in January 2025. DORA has, among other things, introduced significant additional ICT-related governance, risk management, resilience testing and sub-contracting and notification requirements. However, we also believe new regulations may increase demand for our platforms and we believe we are well positioned to benefit from those regulatory changes that cause market participants to seek electronic trading platforms that meet the various regulatory requirements.
We must continue to enhance and improve our electronic trading platforms. The markets in which we compete are characterized by increasingly complex protocols, systems, technology and infrastructure requirements that require us to devote substantial resources to modify and adapt our services. Our future success will depend on our ability to enhance our existing products and services, develop and/or license new products and technologies that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our existing and prospective broker-dealer and institutional investor clients and respond to technological advances and emerging industry and regulatory standards and practices, including cloud and AI technologies, on a cost-effective and timely basis. For example, in 2023,2025, we introduced MarketAxess X-Pro,continued our newroll-out tradingof platform,Targeted RFQ, which provideshighlights tradersour withAI-driven dealer selection tool, a flexiblemachine userlearning experience,model intuitivethat workflowspredicts andwhich accesscounterparties are most likely to provide competitive pricing for high-touch workflows. We have also recently expanded our proprietaryglobal dataMid-X andoffering, pre-tradea analytics.sessions-based mid-point matching tool for broker-dealers, to emerging market bonds. In addition, as the overall share of electronic trading grows in global credit products, we are experiencing continued demand for, and growth in, our automated and algorithmic trading solutions. We also support a large and growing base of dealer market making algorithms. We plan to continue to focus on technology infrastructure and automation initiatives to support more efficient trade execution by our clients.
The majority of our revenue is derived from commissions for transactions executed on our platforms between and among our institutional investor and broker-dealer clients. We believe that the following are the key variables that impact the notional value of such transactions on our platforms, the amount of commissions earned by usplatforms and our variable transaction fees per millionrevenues:
the particular trading protocol that our participants use to trade bondssecurities on our platforms;
the duration of the U.S. high grade bonds trading on our platforms, which may be affected by inflation, among other macroeconomic factors; and the particular fee plan under which we earn commissions.
Commissions for high-yield bonds, emerging markets bonds, Eurobonds,eurobonds, municipal bonds and leveraged loans generally vary based on the type of the instrument traded using standard fee schedules. Our high-yield fee plan structure is similar to our U.S. high-grade fee plans. Certain dealers participate in a high-yield fee plan that incorporates a variable transaction fee and a fixed distribution fee, while other dealers participate in a plan that does not contain monthly distribution fees and instead incorporates additional per transaction execution fees and minimum monthly fee commitments.
Other Commissions. Other commissions include equities and foreign exchange commissions for Pragma’s algorithmic trading services.services and derivative and ETF commissions earned by RFQ-hub. Commissions for equitiesequities, foreign exchange, derivatives and foreign exchangeETFs are volume-tiered and consist of variable transaction fees that are billed monthly.
We generate proprietary data from the trading activity and order flow on our platforms. We have prioritized the use of this data to power our AI-driven trading solutions and analytical products. We believe this approach has positioned us to capture higher long-term value by leveraging our proprietary data to enhance our trading solutions and strengthen the integrated value proposition of our platform. We generate revenue from data licensed to our broker-dealer clients, institutional investor clients and data-only subscribers; professional and consulting services; technology software licenses; and maintenance and support services. These revenues are either for subscription-based services transferred over time, and may be net of volume-based discounts, or one-time services. Revenues for services transferred over time are recognized ratably over the contract period while revenues for services transferred at a point in time are recognized in the period the services are provided. Customers are generally billed monthly, quarterly, or annually; revenues billed in advance are deferred and recognized ratably over the contract period.
Technology services include technologytechnology-related serviceslicense revenueand generatedconnectivity by Pragmafees and revenue generated from telecommunications line charges to broker-dealer clients.
Depreciation and Amortization. We depreciate our computer hardware and related software, office hardware and furniture and fixtures and amortize our capitalized software development costs on a straight-line basis over three to five years. We amortize leasehold improvements on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the life of the improvement or the remaining term of the lease. Intangible assets with definite lives, including purchased technologies, customer relationships and other intangible assets, are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from one to 15 years, using either a straight-line or accelerated amortization method based on the pattern of economic benefit that we expect to realize from such assets. Intangible assets are assessed for impairment annually, or sooner when events or circumstances indicate a possible impairment.
Interest Expense. Interest expense consists of financing charges incurred on short-term borrowings.
In 2022,2023, 20232024 and 2024,2025, the PSUs were granted to the executive officers and certain senior managers. Each PSU is earned or forfeited based on our level of achievement of certain predetermined metrics, including pre-tax adjusted operating margin, U.S. credit market share and revenue growth excluding U.S. credit. The vested share payout ranges from zero to 200%200.0% of the PSU target. The number of PSUs that vest, if any, is determined by the level of achievement of the performance metrics during the three-year performance periods, as certified by the Compensation and Talent Committee following the conclusion of the performance period. In addition, participants must provide continued service through the vesting date, subject to death, disability and qualified retirement exceptions, as applicable. Compensation expense for the PSUs is measured using the fair value of our stock at the grant date and estimates of future performance and actual share payouts. Each period, we make estimates of the current expected share payouts and adjust the life-to-date compensation expense recognized since the grant date. As of December 31, 2024,2025, a 10.0% change in the expected final share payouts would increase or decrease the life-to-datetotal compensationvalue expenseof the awards by $1.5$1.3 million. The estimated final share payouts for the 20222023 and 20232024 awards as of December 31, 20242025 decreased 26.6%27.6% compared to December 31, 2023.2024.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill is assessed for impairment annually in the fourth quarter or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change that indicate an impairment may exist. When assessing goodwill for impairment, first, a qualitative assessment can be made to determine whether it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If the results of the qualitative assessment are not conclusive, a quantitative goodwill test is performed. As a result of the annual assessment, we determined that it was more likely than not that the estimated fair value of goodwill exceeded its carrying value. Therefore, we determined that goodwill was not impaired and that a quantitative goodwill test was not required.
Identifiable intangible assets are tested for impairment annually, or sooner when events or changes in circumstances suggest that an asset’s or asset group’s carrying value may not be fully recoverable. Judgment is required to evaluate whether indications of potential impairment have occurred, and to test identifiable intangible assets for impairment, if required. An impairment is recognized if the estimated undiscounted cash flows relating to the asset or asset group is less than the corresponding carrying value. During the year ended December 31, 2025, there were no events or changes in circumstances that suggested our intangible assets' carrying values exceeded their fair values, and as such, no impairment charges were recorded.
Uncertain tax positions
Our interpretations of tax laws around the world are subject to review and examination by the various taxing authorities in the jurisdictions where we operate, and disputes may occur regarding our view on a tax position. These disputes over interpretations with the various taxing authorities may be settled by audit, administrative appeals or adjudication in the court systems of the tax jurisdictions in which we operate.
In accounting for income taxes, we recognize tax positions in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on examination by the relevant taxing authority or the court of last resort based on the technical merits of the position. We reassess our unrecognized tax benefits as necessary when new information becomes available, including changes in tax law and regulations, relevant tax court rulings and interactions with taxing authorities. Uncertain tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize. An uncertain tax position is measured based on the largest amount of benefit that we believe is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon settlement. It is possible that the reassessment of our unrecognized tax benefits may have a material impact on our effective income tax rate in the period in which the reassessment occurs. See Note 9 for a discussion of our provisions for unrecognized tax benefits related to current and prior periods.
Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2024 include a full year of Pragma revenues of $31.7 million, while total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2023 include three months of Pragma revenues of $7.6 million.
Credit variable transaction fees increased by $37.3$8.6 million, driven by a 13.5%10.0% increase in trading volume, partially offset by a 5.3%7.6% decrease in total credit average variable transaction fee per million. Open Trading credit volume totaled $1.0 trillion during the year ended December 31, 2024, up 8.7% from the year ended December 31, 2023, and Open Trading credit variable transaction fees represented 33.0% and 35.6% of total credit variable transaction fees for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Rates variable transaction fees increased by $4.4$3.0 million, driven principally by a 23.3%14.9% increase in trading volumes, partially offset by a 1.6%2.5% decrease in average variable transaction fee per million. Other variable transaction fees include equities and foreign exchange commissions and, beginning in May 2025, derivative and ETF commissions earned by Pragma.RFQ-hub.
Credit fixed distribution fees decreased $7.8 million mainly due to migrations to variable fee plans, partially offset by the addition of new dealer fixed fee plans.
The 17.4%4.4% increase in our U.S. high-grade volume was principally due to an increase in estimated market volumes, partially offset by a decrease in our estimated market share. Estimated U.S. high-grade market volume as reported by TRACE increased by 25.9%8.0% to $9.0$9.7 trillion for the year ended December 31, 20242025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. Our estimated market share of total U.S. high-grade corporate bond volume decreased to 18.4% for the year ended December 31, 2025 from 19.0% for the year ended December 31, 2024 from 20.4% for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. U.S. high-yield volume decreasedincreased by 15.9%12.5% primarily due to an increase in estimated market volumes, partially offset by a decrease in our estimated market share. Our estimated market share of total U.S. high-yield corporate bond volume decreased to 12.5% for the year ended December 31, 2025 from 13.2% for the year ended December 31, 2024 from 17.1% for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024.
Emerging markets and Eurobondeurobond volumes increased by 19.7%14.0% and 15.2%,19.2%, respectively, driven by an increase in block trading. Other credit volumes increased 13.2%, mainly due to an increase in estimated market volumes. Other credit volumes increased 20.9%, mainly due to an increase in our estimated municipal bond market share.volumes. Rates trading volume increased 23.3%,14.9%, primarily due to an increase in estimated market volumes.
Credit average variable transaction fee per million decreased by 5.3%7.6% to $150.26$138.87 per million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, mainly due to product and protocol mix-shift reflecting lower levels of U.S. high-yield activity and increased portfolio trading, which was partially offset by an increase in the duration of U.S. high-grade bonds traded on our platforms.trading.
Post-Trade Services. Post-trade services revenue increased by $2.3$2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, principally due to net new contract revenue of $1.6 million and the positive impact of foreign currency fluctuations of $0.7$1.4 million and net new contract revenue of $0.6 million.
Technology Services. Technology services revenue increased by $9.3$1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20242025 due to thehigher inclusionlicense ofand aconnectivity full-year of technology services revenue generated by Pragma.fees.
Employee compensation and benefits increased by $12.7 million primarily due to higher salary costs on higher average headcount and higher severance costs, including repositioning charges related to changes in the Company’s management structure.
Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 include a full year of Pragma expenses of $32.0 million, while total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023 include three months of Pragma expenses of $8.7 million.
Employee compensation and benefits increased by $29.0 million, primarily due to an increase in salaries, taxes and benefits of $20.2 million on higher employee headcount, largely driven by the Pragma Acquisition (as defined below), higher employee incentive compensation of $7.6 million and higher stock compensation expense of $1.2 million.
Depreciation and amortization increased by $3.3$2.9 million primarily due to higher amortization of software development costs of $2.6 million and higher amortization of intangibles of $1.2 million,costs, offset by lower depreciation of officeproduction hardware of $0.8 million.software.
Technology and communications expenses increased by $9.4$6.1 million, primarily due to higher software subscriptionas a service costs of $3.1 million, higher integration and connectivity costs of $3.2 million, higher market data costs of $1.0 million, higher data center and cloud hosting costs of $1.2 million and higher U.S. Treasury platform licensing fees of $0.8 million.fees.
Professional and consulting fees decreasedincreased by $4.6$4.1 million primarily due to lowerhigher IT consulting costscosts, of $2.6 million, lower acquisition-related legal expenses of $1.4 million and lowerhigher other consulting expenses ofand $1.3higher million,non-IT consulting costs, partially offset by higherlower auditacquisition-related consulting and taxlegal costs of $0.9 million.costs.
Clearing costs decreased by $1.3 million primarily due to lower U.S. Treasury clearing costs.
General and administrative expenses increased by $3.9 million, primarily due to higher subscription costs and higher charitable contributions.
Interest income increased by $3.6 million primarily due to higher corporate bond and U.S. Treasury investment balances during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Interest expenseincome decreased by $0.3$1.6 million primarily due to lower financinginterest charges incurred on our short-term borrowing arrangements.rates.
Interest expense decreased by $0.1 million primarily due to lower financing charges incurred on our short-term borrowing arrangements.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate represents the proportionate share of net income of our equity method investee.investee through May 9, 2025, the date of the 2025 RFQ-hub Acquisition (as defined below).
Other, net decreasedincreased by $2.7$8.0 million principally driven by unrealizedforeign exchange gains in the current year compared to losses ofin $1.0the millionprior year and unrealized gains on our U.S. Treasury investments in the current period compared to unrealized gains of $0.5 millionlosses in the prior period and higher credit facility fees of $0.9 million.period.
Our consolidated effective tax rate can vary from period to period depending on the geographic mix of our earnings, provisions for unrecognized tax benefits, changes in tax legislation and tax rates and the amount and timing of excess tax benefits or detriments related to share-based payments, among other factors. The increase in the effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2025 is due to the reserve for unrecognized tax benefits established in 2025.
The provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2024 included benefits of $1.9 million for return-to-provision adjustments, $0.6 million for the settlement of tax liability, interest and penalties in connection with unrecognized tax benefits and $2.0 million for the purchase of renewable energy-related transferable tax credits. In comparison, the provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2023 included benefits of $5.4 million for return-to-provision adjustments, $2.0 million for the settlement of tax liability, interest and penalties in connection with unrecognized tax benefits and $1.5 million for the purchase of renewable energy-related transferable tax credits. Our consolidated effective tax rate can vary from period to period depending on the geographic mix of our earnings, changes in tax legislation and tax rates and the amount and timing of excess tax benefits related to share-based payments, among other factors.
In August 2023, we entered into a three-year revolving credit facility (the “2023 Credit Agreement,Agreement”), which provides aggregate commitments totaling $750.0 million, includingconsisting of a revolving credit facility, a $5.0 million letter of credit sub-limit for standby letters of credit and a $380.0 million sub-limit for swingline loans. The 2023 Credit Agreement was amended and restated on February 4, 2026 (the “2026 Amended Credit Agreement”). The 2026 Amended Credit Agreement will mature on AugustFebruary 9,2, 2026,2029, with our option to request up to two additional 364-day extensions at the discretion of each lender and subject to customary conditions. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had $220.0 million of borrowings and $0.1 million in letters of credit outstandingoutstanding, and $749.9$529.9 million in available borrowing capacity under the 2023 Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the 2026 Amended Credit Agreement will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to an alternate base rate or the adjusted term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) rate, plus an applicable margin that varies with our consolidated total leverage ratio. The 2026 Amended Credit Agreement requires that we satisfy certain covenants, including a requirement to not exceed a maximum consolidated total leverage ratio. We were in compliance with all applicable covenants at December 31, 2024.2025. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the 2023 Credit Agreement. See Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the 2026 Amended Credit Agreement.
In connection with their self-clearing operations, certain of our operating subsidiaries maintain agreements with a settlement bank to allow the subsidiaries to borrow an aggregate of up to $500.0 million on an uncommitted basis, collateralized by eligible securities pledged by the subsidiaries to the settlement bank, subject to certain haircuts. Borrowings under these agreements will bear interest at a base rate per annum equal to 1.00% plus the higher of (i) the upper range of the Federal Funds Rate, 0.25%(ii) one-month SOFR plus an applicable margin or one-month(iii) SOFR, plus 1.00%.0.25%. As of December 31, 2024,2025, the subsidiaries had no borrowings outstanding and up to $500.0 million in available uncommitted borrowing capacity under such agreements. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of these agreements.
Cash flows from operating activities consist primarily of net income adjusted for non-cash items that primarily include depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expense, deferred tax expense and changes in receivables and payables on the consolidated statement of financial condition. The $51.5$3.1 million increasedecrease in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to higherlower net income and favorableunfavorable changes in accounts receivable, prepaid and other assets, trading investments, accrued employee compensation and accounts payable accrued expenses and other liabilities, offset by higher net receivables from broker-dealers, clearing organizations and customerscustomers, associatedand withaccrued ouremployee clearingcompensation, activities.partially offset by favorable changes in income and other tax liabilities, accounts receivable, trading investments and accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
New heading “Risks Related to the Pending Merger”
Largest changes
“Litigation relating to the Merger could result in significant costs and delay completion. We may be subject to lawsuits related to the Merger Agreement and the proposed transaction. Such litigation could result in significant costs, divert management attention and delay or prevent the completion of the Merger.”see in full comparison
“The Merger Agreement contains provisions that limit our ability to pursue alternatives. Under the Merger Agreement, the Company is bound by a “no-shop” provision that restricts our ability to solicit, initiate or knowingly take any action to facilitate or encourage any competing acquisition proposals. …”see in full comparison
“The Merger may not be completed on the anticipated terms or timeline, or at all. The completion of the proposed Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions, many of which are beyond our control, including receipt of required regulatory approvals (or any conditions, limitations or restrictions placed on such approvals); approval of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holder of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon (“Company Stockholder Approval”); and the absence of any law or order prohibiting the transaction. …”see in full comparison
“The pendency of the Merger could adversely affect our business and operations. Uncertainty about the effect of the Merger on employees, customers, suppliers and other stakeholders may have an adverse effect on our business. For example, current and prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their roles following the Merger, which could lead to attrition or difficulty in attracting and retaining key executives and other employees. …”see in full comparison
“We may be required to pay a termination fee under certain circumstances. Upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including if we terminate the Merger Agreement to enter into an alternative acquisition agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal, the Company will be required to pay to Parent a termination fee of $148.8 million. This obligation could discourage alternative transactions that might otherwise be favorable to our stockholders.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (9)
ThereExcept as discussed below, there have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our most recent Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. For a discussion of the risk factors affecting the Company, see “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our 2025 Form 10-K.
Risks Related to the Pending Merger
We are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties as a result of the Merger, including the following:
The Merger may not be completed on the anticipated terms or timeline, or at all. The completion of the proposed Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions, many of which are beyond our control, including receipt of required regulatory approvals (or any conditions, limitations or restrictions placed on such approvals); approval of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holder of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon (“Company Stockholder Approval”); and the absence of any law or order prohibiting the transaction. There can be no assurance that these conditions will be satisfied in a timely manner or at all, or that any required regulatory approvals will not contain terms or conditions that are adverse to our business. If the Merger is not completed, we may experience negative impacts, including the diversion of management attention, potential employee attrition, substantial costs incurred in connection with the transaction (including financial advisory, legal, accounting and other professional services fees that have already been incurred or will continue to be incurred), reputational harm and negative perceptions among investors, customers and business partners, without realizing the anticipated benefits of the Merger. In addition, our stock price may decline to the extent that the current market price reflects a market assumption about the likelihood and timing of the Merger.
The pendency of the Merger could adversely affect our business and operations. Uncertainty about the effect of the Merger on employees, customers, suppliers and other stakeholders may have an adverse effect on our business. For example, current and prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their roles following the Merger, which could lead to attrition or difficulty in attracting and retaining key executives and other employees. Contractual restrictions under the Merger Agreement that require us to operate our business in the ordinary course and limit us from taking certain actions without Parent’s consent may also limit our ability to respond to changing market conditions, pursue new opportunities or take other actions that might be beneficial to our business, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The Merger Agreement contains provisions that limit our ability to pursue alternatives. Under the Merger Agreement, the Company is bound by a “no-shop” provision that restricts our ability to solicit, initiate or knowingly take any action to facilitate or encourage any competing acquisition proposals. While these restrictions are subject to the Board’s right, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, to engage in discussions or negotiations regarding an unsolicited acquisition proposal that is or would reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement), these restrictions could limit our ability to pursue potentially more favorable transactions and may discourage other parties from making competing offers.
We may be required to pay a termination fee under certain circumstances. Upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including if we terminate the Merger Agreement to enter into an alternative acquisition agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal, the Company will be required to pay to Parent a termination fee of $148.8 million. This obligation could discourage alternative transactions that might otherwise be favorable to our stockholders.
Litigation relating to the Merger could result in significant costs and delay completion. We may be subject to lawsuits related to the Merger Agreement and the proposed transaction. Such litigation could result in significant costs, divert management attention and delay or prevent the completion of the Merger.
If the Merger is completed, our stockholders will forgo the opportunity to realize potential future appreciation in our stock. Upon completion of the Merger, our stockholders will receive the consideration specified in the Merger Agreement and will no longer participate in any future growth or appreciation of our business.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Other Income (Expense)”
New heading “Provision for Income Taxes”
Removed heading “Stock-based compensation”
Largest changes
“Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
Cash Flows for thesee in full comparisonThreeSix Months EndedMarchJune31,30, 2026 Compared to theThreeSix Months EndedMarchJune31,30, 2025
“The 3.2% increase in our U.S. high-grade volume was principally due to an increase in estimated market volumes, partially offset by a decrease in our estimated market share. Estimated U.S. high-grade market volume as reported by TRACE increased by 15.2% to $5.8 trillion for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. Our estimated market share of total U.S. high-grade corporate bond volume, including SD PT, decreased to 17.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from 19.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. U.S. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (82)
The global fixed-income securities industry is risky and volatile and is directly affected by a number of economic, political and market factors that may impact trading volume. These factors could have a material adverse or positive effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. These factors include, among others, fixed-income market conditions, the current interest rate environment, including the volatility of interest rates and investors’ forecasts of future interest rates, the duration of U.S high grade bonds traded, economic and political conditions in the United States, Europe and elsewhere, including recent and potential future changes in tariffs, international trade agreements or trade policies, and the consolidation or contraction of our broker-dealer and institutional investor clients. In the first threesix months of 2026, the market backdrop for the Company reflected increases in estimated market volumes in most of the Company’s key markets compared to the prior year, due, in part, to increased levelsperiods of event-driven volatility.volatility and elevated primary issuance.
There has been increased demand for portfolio trading workflows over the last few years, which has resulted in heightened competition among trading platforms to enhance their portfolio trading offerings and expand them across different geographies and products. Certain clients have been increasingly using portfolio trading workflows in lieu of more established trading protocols designed to generate price competition on individual bonds. Our dealer clients have also increased their usage of matching sessions offered by competing platforms in recent periods. To the extent that our clients increase their use of portfolio trading and matching session protocols offered by other platforms, our market share could decrease. Due to the large size of the trades and the concentration of activity at the end of the month, portfolio trading can drive significant swings in trading volumes and estimated market share. Furthermore, portfolio trading is generally provided under a lower-fee structure than other protocolsprotocols, and the growth of portfolio trading on our platform will likely have a negative impact on our average credit variable transaction fee per million. In addition, block trading may generate lower fees per million than other activity, and could have a negative impact on our average credit variable transaction fee per million.
Our business is subject to extensive regulations in the United States and internationally, which may expose us to significant regulatory risk and cause us to incur additional expense. The existing legal framework that governs the financial markets is periodically reviewed and amended, resulting in the enactment and enforcement of new laws and regulations that apply to our business. The SEC adopted final rules regarding the central clearing of certain secondary market transactions involving U.S. Treasury securities, which are currently set to become effective for certain cash market transactions on December 31, 2026. Once effective, this central clearing mandate will impact certain of our participants who do not centrally clear such trades today. These reforms may also change how our clients trade and where they clear when using our platforms to trade U.S. Treasury securities. While we expect this change will increase our own platform efficiency, it could also negatively affect trading activity and liquidity in the markets in which we operate and the full impact of this change is still unknown at this time. In AprilJuly 2026, FINRAthe filedSEC approved a proposed rule changesubmitted by FINRA that wouldwill require member firms to identify and flag certain affiliate back-to-back trade reports in TRACE (as defined below). IfFINRA adopted,has stated that it will not implement these requirements without providing firms with at least 12 months prior notice of the implementation date, but that it will permit firms to comply with these requirements on a voluntary basis prior to the mandatory implementation date. When fully implemented, the rule wouldwill suppress qualifying affiliate principal transactions from reported monthly TRACE volumes and could affect the Company’s estimated market share for U.S. high-grade, U.S. high-yield and U.S. Treasury products. The proposed rule change is subject to SEC review and public comment, and FINRA will announce the effective date if the rule is approved. It remains unknown to what extent new legislation will be passed into law or whether other pending or new regulatory proposals will be adopted, abandoned or modified, or what effect such passage, adoption, abandonment or modification will have, whether positive or negative, on our industry, our clients or us.
As further described under “— Critical Factors Affecting our Industry and our Company — Economic, Political and Market Factors,” and “— Results of Operations — Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 Compared to Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025,” and “— Results of Operations — Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025,” our credit trading volumes increased and our average credit variable transaction fee per million decreased.decreased compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025.
Stock-based compensation
In 2024, 2025 and 2026, the PSUs were granted to the executive officers and certain senior managers. Each PSU is earned or forfeited based on our level of achievement of certain predetermined metrics, including pre-tax adjusted operating margin, U.S. credit market share and revenue growth excluding U.S. credit. The vested share payout ranges from zero to 200% of the PSU target. The number of PSUs that vest, if any, is determined by the level of achievement of the performance metrics during the three-year performance periods, as certified by the Compensation and Talent Committee following the conclusion of the performance period. In addition, participants must provide continued service through the vesting date, subject to death, disability and qualified retirement exceptions, as applicable. Compensation expense for the PSUs is measured using the fair value of our stock at the grant date and estimates of future performance and actual share payouts. Each period, we make estimates of the current expected share payouts and adjust the life-to-date compensation expense recognized since the grant date. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, a 10.0% change in the expected final share payouts would increase or decrease the total value of the awards by $1.7 million. The estimated final share payouts for the 2024 and 2025 awards as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 decreased 12.3%15.2% compared to December 31, 2025. See Note 9 for a discussion of the Company’s stock-based compensation expense.
Identifiable intangible assets are tested for impairment annually, or sooner when events or changes in circumstances suggest that an asset’s or asset group’s carrying value may not be fully recoverable. Judgment is required to evaluate whether indications of potential impairment have occurred, and to test identifiable intangible assets for impairment, if required. An impairment is recognized if the estimated undiscounted cash flows relating to the asset or asset group is less than the corresponding carrying value. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, there were no events or changes in circumstances that suggested our intangible assets’ carrying values exceeded their fair values, and as such, no impairment charges were recorded.
Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 Compared to Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
The following table summarizes our financial results for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
Changes in average foreign currency exchange rates compared to the U.S. dollar had theno effectsignificant ofimpact increasingon revenues and expenses by $3.4 million and $2.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
Our revenues for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, and the resulting dollar and percentage changes, were as follows:
Commissions. Our commission revenues for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, and the resulting dollar and percentage changes, were as follows:
Credit variable transaction fees increaseddecreased by $14.5$8.6 million, primarily driven by a 17.0% increase in trading volume, partially offset by a 5.0%6.5% decrease in total credit average variable transaction fee per million.million, partially offset by a 0.6% increase in trading volume. Rates variable transaction fees increasedremained byflat, $2.0 million,mainly driven by a 15.6% increase in trading volume and an 11.4%23.1% increase in total rates average variable transaction fee per million.million, offset by an 18.6% decrease in trading volume. Other variable transaction fees include equities and foreign exchange commissions and, beginning in May 2025, derivative and ETF commissions earned by RFQ-hub.
Our trading volumes for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
The 10.9%4.2% increasedecrease in our U.S. high-grade volume was principally due to an increase in estimated market volumes partially offset by a decrease in our estimated market share. Estimated U.S. high-grade market volume as reported by the FINRA Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (“TRACE”) increased by 17.1%13.2% to $3.0$2.8 trillion for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Our estimated market share of total U.S. high-grade corporate bond volume decreased to 17.1%17.5% including single-dealer portfolio trades (“SD PT”) for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from 18.0%19.8% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Our U.S. high-yield volume increaseddecreased by 11.6%7.8% primarily due to ana increasedecrease in estimated market volumes andpartially offset by an increase in our estimated market share. Our estimated market share of total U.S. high-yield corporate bond volume increased to 12.2%14.1%, including SD PT, for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from 11.9%13.2% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Market share estimates are presented including single-dealer portfolio trading activity to align with our monthly volume press releases. Excluding SD PT, our estimated market share of total U.S. high-grade corporate bond volume decreased to 16.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2026 from 19.4% three months ended June 30, 2025. Excluding SD PT, our estimated market share of total U.S. high-yield corporate bond volume decreased to 12.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2026 from 12.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2025.
Emerging markets and eurobond volumes increased by 29.8%12.0% and 20.4%,2.3%, respectively. Other credit volumes increased 10.2%,1.9%, mainly due to an increase in estimated municipal bond market volumes.share. Rates trading volume increaseddecreased 15.6%,18.6%, primarily due to ana increasedecrease in estimated market volumes.share.
Our average variable transaction fee per million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 was as follows:
Credit average variable transaction fee per million decreased by 5.0%6.5% to $132$129 per million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, mainly due to protocol and product mix, partiallyas offsetwell byas higherlower duration of bonds traded in U.S. high grade.
Information Services. Information services revenue increased by $1.5$3.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 primarily due to net new contract revenue and the positive impact of foreign currency fluctuations.revenue.
Post-Trade Services. Post-trade services revenue increased by $0.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 mainly due to thenet positivenew impactcontract of foreign currency fluctuations.revenue.
Technology Services. Technology services revenue increased by $0.6$0.3 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 duelargely todriven by higher license and connectivity fees.fees reflecting the inclusion of RFQ-hub.
The following table summarizes our expenses for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
Employee compensation and benefits increaseddecreased by $8.3$3.1 millionmillion, primarily due to higherlower salaryseverance costs and benefitbonus cost and higher severance costs, including repositioning charges related to changes in the Company’s management structure.accruals.
Depreciation and amortization increased by $1.0$0.1 million, primarily due to higher amortization of internally-developed software development costs and higher amortization of intangibles.
Technology and communications expenses increased by $2.3$2.1 millionmillion, primarily due to higherinvestments in software and cloud hosting and software service costs.
Marketing and advertising expenses increased by $0.3 million primarily due to higher sales-related travel and entertainment costs.
ClearingProfessional costsand consulting fees increased by $0.2$0.8 millionmillion, primarily due to higher tradinglegal volumes.expenses, partially offset by cost-savings initiatives.
Occupancy increased by $0.2 million, primarily due to higher office management and facilities expense.
Marketing and advertising expenses increased by $0.5 million, primarily due to an increase in advertising expense and timing of sales-related events.
General and administrative expenses increased by $0.4 million, primarily due to higher allowance for doubtful accounts and relocation costs.
Our other income (expense) for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, and the resulting dollar and percentage changes, were as follows:
Interest income decreased by $2.9$1.2 million, mainly driven by lower interest rates on ouraverage cash balances.balances and lower yields due to central bank rate cuts.
Interest expense increased by $2.7$1.7 millionmillion, primarily due to borrowings on the Company’s credit facility that were used,facility, along with cash on hand, to fund the ASR.
Other, net increaseddecreased by $1.0$2.5 millionmillion, primarily driven by receiptforeign ofcurrency tax credits in the current period partially offset by unrealizedtransaction losses on investments in the current period compared to unrealizedforeign currency transaction gains in the prior period.
The provision for income taxes and effective tax rate for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
Our consolidated effective tax rate can vary from period to period depending on the geographic mix of our earnings, provisions for unrecognized tax benefits, changes in tax legislation and tax rates and the amount and timing of excess tax benefits or detriments related to share-based payments, among other factors. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 is mainlyprimarily due to a benefit recognized from the reserveremeasurement of reserves for uncertain tax positions related to prior periods, compared with accruals for unrecognized tax benefits establishedrecognized induring the firstthree quartermonths ofended June 30, 2025.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
The following table summarizes our financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:
Changes in average foreign currency exchange rates compared to the U.S. dollar had the effect of increasing revenues and expenses by $4.1 million and $3.0 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025.
Our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, and the resulting dollar and percentage changes, were as follows:
Commissions. Our commission revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, and the resulting dollar and percentage changes, were as follows:
Credit variable transaction fees increased by $5.9 million, primarily driven by a 8.6% increase in trading volume partially offset by a decrease of 6.5% in total credit average variable transaction fee per million. Rates variable transaction fees increased by $2.0 million, driven principally by a 17.0% increase in average variable transaction fee per million, partially offset by a 3.1% decrease in trading volume. Other variable transaction fees include equities and foreign exchange commissions and, beginning in May 2025, derivative and ETF commissions earned by RFQ-hub.
Our trading volumes for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
For volume reporting purposes, transactions in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars at average monthly rates.
The 3.2% increase in our U.S. high-grade volume was principally due to an increase in estimated market volumes, partially offset by a decrease in our estimated market share. Estimated U.S. high-grade market volume as reported by TRACE increased by 15.2% to $5.8 trillion for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. Our estimated market share of total U.S. high-grade corporate bond volume, including SD PT, decreased to 17.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from 19.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. U.S. high-yield volume increased by 1.1% primarily due to an increase in estimated market volumes and increase in our estimated market share. Our estimated market share of total U.S. high-yield corporate bond volume, including SD PT, increased to 14.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from 12.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Excluding SD PT, our estimated market share of total U.S. high-grade corporate bond volume decreased to 16.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from 18.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Excluding SD PT, our estimated market share of total U.S. high-yield corporate bond volume decreased to 12.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from 12.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2025.
Emerging markets and Eurobond volumes increased by 20.7% and 11.0%, respectively. Other credit volumes increased 5.8%, mainly due to an increase in estimated municipal bond market share. Rates trading volume decreased 3.1%, primarily due to a decrease in estimated market share.
Our average variable transaction fee per million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 was as follows:
Credit average variable transaction fee per million decreased by 6.5% to $130 per million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, mainly due to protocol and product mix, partially offset by higher duration of bonds traded in U.S. high grade.
Information Services. Information services revenue increased by $4.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, primarily due to net new contract revenue of $4.0 million and the positive impact of foreign currency fluctuations of $0.5 million.
Post-Trade Services. Post-trade services revenue increased by $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, mainly due to the positive impact of foreign currency fluctuations of $1.1 million.
Technology Services. Technology services revenue increased by $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, largely driven by to higher license and connectivity fees reflecting the inclusion of RFQ-hub.
The following table summarizes our expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:
Employee compensation and benefits increased by $5.2 million, primarily due to higher stock-based compensation expense from employee stock and option awards, as well as higher benefits and employment taxes from increased pension contributions, partially offset by lower repositioning charges.
Technology and communications expenses increased by $4.4 million, primarily due to investments in software and cloud hosting costs, as well as higher market data expenses.
Professional and consulting expenses increased by $0.8 million, primarily due to higher legal expense, partially offset by cost-savings initiatives.
Other Income (Expense)
Our other income (expense) for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, and the resulting dollar and percentage changes, were as follows:
Interest income decreased by $4.1 million, mainly driven by lower yields due to central bank rate cuts and lower average cash balances.
Interest expense increased $4.4 million, primarily due to borrowings on the Company’s credit facility that were used, along with cash on hand, to fund the ASR.
Other, net decreased by $1.5 million, primarily driven by foreign currency transaction losses in the current period compared to foreign currency transaction gains in the prior period.
MKTX insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 6 filings (2 insiders, 5 trade dates, 6,664 shares, about $1.1M; 5 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -6,664 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$1.1M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-10 | Pintoff Scott |
Open-market sale |
100 | $163.32 | $16.3K |
| 2026-09-10 | Cruger William Frank Jr. |
Open-market sale | 6,164 | $163.20 | $1.0M |
| 2026-08-12 | Portney Emily Hope |
Gift | 2,085 | — | — |
| 2026-08-12 | Portney Emily Hope |
Gift | 2,085 | — | — |
| 2026-08-10 | Pintoff Scott |
Open-market sale |
100 | $162.60 | $16.3K |
| 2026-08-07 | Chwick Jane |
Gift | 606 | — | — |
| 2026-07-10 | Pintoff Scott |
Open-market sale |
100 | $115.12 | $11.5K |
| 2026-06-18 | Hernandez Carlos Mauricio |
Gift | 10,708 | — | — |
| 2026-06-18 | Hernandez Carlos Mauricio |
Gift | 10,708 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Altobello Nancy A. |
Grant/award | 1,390 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Pintoff Scott |
Open-market sale |
100 | $116.03 | $11.6K |
| 2026-06-10 | Cifu Douglas A |
Grant/award | 1,390 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Portney Emily Hope |
Grant/award | 1,390 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Chwick Jane |
Grant/award | 1,390 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Gibson Kourtney |
Grant/award | 1,390 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Hoornweg Roberto |
Grant/award | 1,390 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Ketchum Richard G |
Grant/award | 1,390 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Schiciano Kenneth T |
Grant/award | 1,390 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Begleiter Steven L |
Grant/award | 1,390 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Hernandez Carlos Mauricio |
Grant/award | 2,616 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Cruger William Frank Jr. |
Grant/award | 1,390 | — | — |
| 2026-06-03 | Fiszel Bieler Ilene |
Shares withheld for tax | 332 | $123.18 | $40.9K |
| 2026-05-11 | Pintoff Scott |
Open-market sale |
100 | $146.99 | $14.7K |
| 2026-05-01 | Quan William |
Grant/award | 218 | — | — |
Well-known investors holding MKTX (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMECAP Management | 2026-06-30 | 3,504,905 | $397.8M | 0.24% | Added 5% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 1,987,288 | $222.8M | 0.08% | Reduced 26% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 543,890 | $61.7M | 0.05% | Added 4% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 481,689 | $54.7M | 0.03% | Added 486% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 200,000 | $22.7M | 0.03% | Added 20% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 109,590 | $12.4M | 0.01% | Reduced 90% |
| First Eagle Investment Management | 2026-06-30 | 49,577 | $5.6M | 0.01% | Added 225250% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 47,977 | $5.4M | 0.0% | Added 1348% |
| Baillie Gifford | 2026-06-30 | 29,032 | $4.8M | — | Sold out |
| Gotham Asset Management (Joel Greenblatt) | 2026-06-30 | 11,762 | $1.3M | 0.0% | Reduced 80% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 8,100 | $919.3K | 0.0% | Reduced 97% |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2026-06-30 | 7,024 | $797.2K | 0.0% | Added 25% |