Companies › MLTX

MLTX 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

MoonLake Immunotherapeutics · Nasdaq · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1821586 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from MoonLake Immunotherapeutics's public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

9 / 2risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
2new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
12Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-02-25 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-02-26 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

9new paragraphs
2removed paragraphs
42reworded paragraphs
24,099 → 25,640words in section

New heading “The Loan and Security Agreement contains certain covenants that could adversely affect our operations and, if an event of default were to occur, we could be forced to repay any outstanding indebtedness sooner than planned and possibly at a time when we do not have sufficient capital to meet this obligation.”

New heading “We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could negatively impact our financial condition.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: bankruptcy, default, covenant
“Pursuant to the loan and security agreement (the “Loan and Security Agreement”) we entered in March 2025 with Hercules Capital Inc. and certain of its affiliates, we have pledged substantially all of our assets, subject to customary exceptions. Additionally, the Loan and Security Agreement contains certain affirmative and negative covenants that could prevent us from taking certain actions without the consent of our lenders. These covenants may limit our flexibility in operating our business and our ability to take actions that might be advantageous to us and our shareholders. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: default, covenant
“The Loan and Security Agreement contains certain covenants that could adversely affect our operations and, if an event of default were to occur, we could be forced to repay any outstanding indebtedness sooner than planned and possibly at a time when we do not have sufficient capital to meet this obligation.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: litigation, tariff

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

As a result of global economic conditions, including new or increased tariffs imposed by the U.S. government and potential retaliatory measures by foreign governments and other barriers to trade, especially in light of recent executive orders made by the presidential administration, trade and other international disputes, inflation and fluctuating interest rates, slower growth or recession, tighter credit, volatility in financial markets, high unemployment, labor availability constraints, public health crises, significant natural disasters, including as a result of climate change, changes to fiscal and monetary policy or government budget dynamics, particularly in the pharmaceutical and biotech areas, political and military conflict, including the conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East, we may in the future experience disruptions that could seriously harm our business. PotentialIn addition, in September 2025, the United States announced the imposition of up to 100% tariffs on imported branded or patented pharmaceuticals, subject to certain exceptions. There remains substantial uncertainty as to when such tariffs may go into effect and whether such tariffs would apply to the importation of active pharmaceutical ingredients or bulk drug products that are intended for use in clinical trials and, more generally, about the duration of existing tariffs, tariff levels, implementation of announced tariffs, litigation challenging tariffs and whether additional tariffs or retaliatory actions may be imposed, modified or suspended. Other potential disruptions include but are not limited to: delays or difficulties in enrolling patients in, initiating or expanding our clinical trials, including delays or difficulties with clinical site initiation and recruiting clinical site investigators and clinical site staff; increased rates of patients withdrawing from our clinical trials following enrollment as a result of certain health conditions or being forced to quarantine; interruption of key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site data monitoring and efficacy, safety and translational data collection, processing and analyses, due to limitations on travel imposed; recommendations by federal, state or local governments, employers and others or interruptions of clinical trial subject visits, which may impact the collection and integrity of subject data and clinical trial endpoints; diversion of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials, including the diversion of hospitals serving as our clinical trial sites and hospital staff supporting the conduct of our clinical trials; delays or disruptions in preclinical experiments and IND-enabling studies due to restrictions of on-site staff and unforeseen circumstances at CROs and vendors; interruption or delays in the operations of the FDA, EMA, and comparable foreign regulatory authorities including delays in receiving approval from local regulatory authorities to initiate our planned clinical trials; interruption of, or delays in receiving, supplies of SLK from our CMOs due to staffing shortages, raw materials shortages, production slowdowns or stoppages and disruptions in delivery systems; and limitations on employee or other resources that would otherwise be focused on the conduct of our clinical trials and preclinical work, including because of sickness of employees or their families, the desire of employees to avoid travel or contact with large groups of people, an increased reliance on working from home, school closures or mass transit disruptions.
see in full comparison
New text topics: default
“We are unable to predict the extent to which the presidential administration may impose or seek to impose leadership or policy changes at the FDA or changes to rules and policies impacting our business and operations. For example, there can be no assurance that the FDA will implement or continue the plan it announced in December 2025 to change its default evidentiary requirement from two clinical trials to one clinical trial for new drug approvals. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: lawsuit, class action

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

In the past, securitiesSecurities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities. Such class action lawsuits have been initiated against us, and we may become subject to additional securities class action lawsuits in the future. Additional information on such class action lawsuits is discussed in Item 3 “Legal Proceedings”. This type of litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operation.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: litigation, class action

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for biotechnology companies in particular, have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. Class action securities litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management attention and resources, which could significantly harm our profitability and reputation. In addition, broad market and industry factors may negatively affect the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares, regardless of our actual operating performance. The market price for our Class A Ordinary Shares may be influenced by many factors, including:
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (53)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 1 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

We are a clinical-stage company with limited operating history. To become and remain profitable, we must develop and eventually commercialize a product or products with significant market potential. This will require us to be successful in a range of challenging activities, including establishing our business model and key third-party relationships with payers,payors, completing preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates, obtaining marketing approval for these product candidates, manufacturing, marketing, selling those products for which we may obtain marketing approval and satisfying any post-marketing requirements.

Added

Additional capital may not be available in sufficient amounts or on reasonable terms, if at all. The current market environment for small and midcap biotechnology companies like MoonLake, and broader macroeconomic factors may preclude us from successfully raising additional capital. For example, escalating trade tensions, elevated interest rates and regulatory uncertainty have caused significant market volatility in recent months, and particularly in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries, which such volatility can have an adverse effect on the ability to raise capital.

Reworded

We have no products approved for commercial sale and, since our inception, we have been incurring significant operating losses, and expect to incur significant losses in the foreseeable future. As with any clinical development, we cannot be certain that our planned clinical trials will begin or be completed on time or at all. In addition, we have not yet demonstrated an ability to obtain marketing approvals, manufacture a commercial-scale product or arrange for a third partythird-party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales, marketing and distribution activities necessary for successful product commercialization. Our ability to generate revenue depends on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, our ability to:

Reworded

•successfully complete our ongoing and planned preclinicalnon-clinical and clinical studies for SLK;

Reworded

•obtain and maintain acceptance of the products, if and when approved, by patients, the medical community and third-party payerspayors;

Reworded

We have incurred net losses in each period since we commenced operations on March 10,in 2021. Our net losses were $121.2$230.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.2025. We expect to continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future. Our failure to become profitable would decrease the value of our Company and could impair our ability to raise capital, maintain our research and development efforts, expand our business and/or continue our operations. A decline in the value of our Company could also cause you to lose all or part of your investment.

Reworded

Developing biopharmaceutical products is a very long, time-consuming, expensive and uncertain process that takes years to complete. We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we conduct clinical trials of, and seek marketing approval from the FDA, EMA, and similar foreign regulatory authorities for, SLK. Even if SLK is approved for commercial sale, we anticipate incurring costs associated with sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution activities to launch SLK. Our expenses could increase beyond expectations if we are required by the FDA, EMA, or other regulatory agencies to perform preclinical studies or clinical trials in addition to those that we currently anticipate. Because the design and outcome of our planned and anticipated clinical trials are highly uncertain, we cannot reasonably estimate the actual amount of funding that will be necessary to successfully complete the development and commercialization of SLK. Our future capital requirements depend on many factors, including factors that are not within our control. Based on our current operating plan, we believe our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities, will be sufficient to fund our operations tointo the endsecond half of 2026.2027. This estimate is based on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect.

Reworded

WeOther than the Loan and Security Agreement (as defined below), we do not have any committed external sources of funds and adequate additional financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. We may be required to seek additional funds sooner than planned through public or private equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations and licensing arrangements or other sources. Such financing may dilute our shareholders or the failure to obtain such financing may restrict our operating activities. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms may include liquidation or other preferences and anti-dilution protections that adversely affect your rights as a shareholder. Debt financing may result in the imposition of debt covenants, increased fixed payment obligations or other restrictions that may affect our business. If we raise additional funds through upfront payments or milestone payments pursuant to future collaborations with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to SLK, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. Our ability to raise additional capital may be adversely impacted by potential worsening global economic conditions and the recent disruptions to and volatility in the credit and financial markets in the United States and worldwide, including resulting from public health crises, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine or the conflicts in the Middle East. If our costs, in particular costs related to clinical development, manufacture and supply, were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures, it may adversely impact our business, operating results and financial condition. Our failure to raise capital as and when needed or on acceptable terms has in the past had, and in the future may have, a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategy, and we have in the past had to, and in the future may have to, delay, reduce the scope of, suspend or eliminate one or more of our research-stage programs, clinical trials or future commercialization efforts.

Reworded

We also have diligence obligations under the License Agreement, including: (a) developing one licensed product in at least two indications; (b) launching and commercializing one product in seven major markets, including with pricing approval if required for commercialization, within 12 months of receiving regulatory approval in the respective market; (c) securing within six months of the effective date of the exclusive license a contract research facility; and (d) initiating two Phase 2 clinical trials for a product within 12 months of the effective date of the exclusive license, taking into account any regulatory requirements from the FDA, EMA or other regulatory authorities, of which we satisfied upon the initiation of our MIRA and ARGO trials. We have not yet demonstrated our ability to obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a commercial scale product, or arrange for a third partythird-party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful commercialization. Due to the uncertainties and risks associated with these activities, we may not be successful in meeting these diligence obligations within the required timeframes, and may lose the ability to develop and commercialize SLK.

Reworded

We are developing therapies for patients with inflammatory skin and joint diseases with unmet needs. In particular, we are developing a portfolio of therapeutic indications for SLK, and are initially focused on the development of SLK in inflammatory diseases including HS, PsA, axSpA and PPP. In May 2022, we initiated our MIRA trial, and in OctoberJune 2023, we announced fullpositive 24-weektop-line dataresults from the global Phase 2 MIRA clinicalthis trial. In FebruaryMay 2024, wefollowing announced the successful outcome of ourpositive end-of-Phase 2 interactions with the FDA,FDA as well asand positive feedback from our interactions with the EMA, withwe bothstarted regulatoryenrollment bodiesin supporting our proposed approach for advancing tothe Phase 3 with the VELA program. In May 2024, we announced the screening of the first patients in the VELA-1 and VELA-2 trials. In September 2025, we announced primary endpoint data from these trials. In November 2025, we were granted a Type B meeting with the FDA to discuss adequacy of the current clinical evidence package of SLK to support a BLA. In January 2026, we announced positive feedback from this interaction, confirming that we may establish substantial evidence of effectiveness without additional clinical trials in HS. In February 2026, we presented an interim analysis of the long-term data from the VELA trials, which will continue to week 52 followed by an open-label extension for up to two years. In December 2022, we initiated our ARGO trial, and in March 2024, we announced full 24-week data from the ARGO trial. In June 2024, we announced the successful outcome of our end-of-Phase 2 interactions with the FDA, as well as positive feedback from our interactions with the EMA, with both regulatory bodies supporting our proposed approach for advancing to Phase 3 with the IZAR program. In November 2024, we announced the screening of the first patients in the IZAR-1 and IZAR-2 trials. In JanuaryFebruary 2025,2026, we announced the screeningcompletion of theenrollment first patients infor the VELA-TEENIZAR-1 trial in adolescent HS, in the LEDA trial in PPP and in the S-OLARIS trial in axSpA.trial.

Reworded

Our decisions concerning the allocation of research, development, collaboration, management and financial resources toward particular indications may not lead to the development of any viable commercial product and may divert resources away from opportunities for other indications that later prove to have greater commercial potential or a greater likelihood of success. The primary endpoints for the Phase 2 trials for the therapeutic indications of HS and PsA were the therapeutic scores of the HiSCR and ACR, respectively. The primary endpoints of such trials were met and SLK demonstrated meaningful increases in such therapeutic scores. However, there is no guarantee that the results will be replicated in Phase 3 studies,studies. norFor example, in the VELA-2 trial, a higher-than-expected placebo arm precluded the study from achieving statistical significance in the week 16 primary endpoint using composite strategy. In addition, although SLK achieved statistical significance for all primary and secondary endpoints in the VELA-1 trial, there is no guarantee that theysuch results or results from other Phase 3 studies, like the IZAR-1 and IZAR-2 trials, will lead to market acceptance or commercial success of SLK, if approved. Even if SLK receives marketing approval, it may not achieve commercial success. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for SLK, we may relinquish valuable rights to SLK through future collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights. We may make incorrect determinations regarding the viability or market potential of SLK or misread trends in our industry.

Reworded

We are a holding company and have no material assets other than cash and our ownership of Class V shares in MoonLake AG and common shares in MoonLake AG (“MoonLake AG Common Shares”).AG. As such, we have no independent means of generating revenue or cash flow, besides interest income on cash held depository institutions, if any, and our ability to pay taxes and operating expenses or declare and pay dividends in the future, if any, will be dependent upon the financial results and cash flows of MoonLake AG and its subsidiaries, and distributions we receive from MoonLake AG. There can be no assurance that MoonLake AG and its subsidiaries will generate sufficient profits and/or cash flow to distribute funds to us, or that applicable laws and contractual restrictions, including negative covenants in any debt agreements of MoonLake AG or its subsidiaries, will permit such distributions.

Added

The Loan and Security Agreement contains certain covenants that could adversely affect our operations and, if an event of default were to occur, we could be forced to repay any outstanding indebtedness sooner than planned and possibly at a time when we do not have sufficient capital to meet this obligation.

Added

Pursuant to the loan and security agreement (the “Loan and Security Agreement”) we entered in March 2025 with Hercules Capital Inc. and certain of its affiliates, we have pledged substantially all of our assets, subject to customary exceptions. Additionally, the Loan and Security Agreement contains certain affirmative and negative covenants that could prevent us from taking certain actions without the consent of our lenders. These covenants may limit our flexibility in operating our business and our ability to take actions that might be advantageous to us and our shareholders. The Loan and Security Agreement also contains customary affirmative and negative covenants that, among other things, limit our ability, subject to certain exceptions, to incur indebtedness, grant liens, enter into a merger or consolidation, enter into transactions with affiliates, or sell all or a portion of our property, business or assets. The Loan and Security Agreement contains customary events of default. Upon the occurrence and continuation of an event of default, all amounts due under the Loan and Security Agreement become (in the case of an insolvency or bankruptcy event), or may become (in the case of all other events of default and at the option of Hercules Capital, Inc.), immediately due and payable. If an event of default under the Loan and Security Agreement should occur, we could be required to immediately repay any outstanding indebtedness. If we are unable to repay such debt, the lenders would be able to foreclose on the secured collateral, including our cash accounts, and take other remedies permitted under the Loan and Security Agreement. Even if we are able to repay any indebtedness on an event of default, the repayment of these sums may significantly reduce our working capital and impair our ability to operate as planned.

Reworded

We have not yet demonstrated our ability to successfully obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a commercial scale product, or arrange for a third partythird-party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful commercialization. If we are required to conduct additional preclinical studies or clinical trials of SLK beyond those that we currently contemplate, if we are unable to successfully complete clinical trials of SLK or other testing, or if the results of these trials or tests are not positive or are only modestly positive or if there are safety concerns, we may:

Added

Our future success is substantially dependent on our ability to successfully develop SLK for future marketing approval, and then successful commercialization. We are investing a majority of our efforts and financial resources into the research and development of SLK. In HS, we expect to complete the one-year VELA-1 and VELA-2 trials in the second quarter of 2026, and the six-month VELA-TEEN trial in mid-2026. We expect to submit a BLA for treatment of adult and adolescent patients in the second half of 2026, based on our MIRA, VELA-1, VELA-2 and VELA-TEEN clinical trials, with a potential commercial launch in the United States in the second half of 2027. In PsA, we expect primary endpoint readouts from our IZAR-1, IZAR-2 and P-OLARIS clinical trials in mid-2026, second half of 2026 and end of 2026, respectively, and expect to seek regulatory approval after completion of these studies through submission of a supplemental BLA. In PPP, we presented positive results from our LEDA clinical trial in November 2025, and announced receipt of Fast Track designation by the FDA in February 2026. We expect to initiate a Phase 3 clinical trial in the third quarter of 2026. In axSpA, we announced positive results from our S-OLARIS clinical trial in February 2026 and are currently evaluating the next steps to complete the clinical development of SLK in this indication.

Removed

Our future success is substantially dependent on our ability to successfully develop SLK for future marketing approval, and then successful commercialization. We are investing a majority of our efforts and financial resources into the research and development of SLK. In October 2023, we announced full 24-week data from the global Phase 2 MIRA clinical trial in HS. In May 2024, we announced the screening of the first patients in the Phase 3 VELA-1 and VELA-2 trials in HS. We expect primary endpoint data from the VELA trials as of mid-2025. In March 2024, we announced full 24-week data from the Phase 2 ARGO trial in PsA. We commenced the Phase 3 IZAR program in PsA in November 2024 and expect primary endpoint data in the first half of 2026. In January 2025, we announced that first patients have been screened in the Phase 3 VELA-TEEN trial in adolescent HS, in the Phase 2 LEDA trial in PPP, and in the Phase 2 S-OLARIS trial in axSpA. We expect primary endpoint data from the LEDA trial in 2025, the VELA-TEEN trial in 2026 and the S-OLARIS trial in 2026.

Reworded

Before obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for commercialization of SLK, we must complete clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of SLK in humans and in selected diseases. Our clinical trials may not be conducted as planned or completed on schedule, if at all, and a failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage. The outcome of preclinical studies and prior clinical trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials, and the outcome of preclinical studies and prior clinical trials for a product candidate for a particular indication may not be predictive of the success of preclinical studies and clinical trials for the same product candidate for a different indication. In particular,HS, we expect to complete the one-year VELA-1 and VELA-2 trials in Octoberthe 2023,second wequarter announcedof full2026, 24-week data fromand the globalsix-month Phase 2 MIRA clinicalVELA-TEEN trial in HSmid-2026, and, in March 2024, we announced full 24-week data from the global Phase 2 ARGO trial in PsA. In May 2024, we announced the screening of the first patients in the Phase 3 VELA program in HS and we expect primary endpoint data as of mid-2025. We commenced the Phase 3 IZAR program in PsA in November 2024 and expect primary endpoint data in the first half of 2026. Although data from the Phase 2 MIRA and ARGO clinical trials for SLK in patients established SLK as a highly promising and differentiated therapeutic solution in HS and PsA, respectively, the Phase 3 VELA trials and the Phase 3 IZAR trials of the efficacy of SLK in patients with HS and PsA, respectively, may not yield similar results. If a Phase 3 study is conducted for SLK in patients with PSO, the outcome may be different than those observed in the Phase 2 trial. In addition,but we may not observe positive results from such trials. We expect to submit a BLA for treatment of adult and adolescent patients in the second half of 2026, based on our MIRA, VELA-1, VELA-2 and VELA-TEEN clinical trials, with a potential commercial launch in the United States in the second half of 2027. In PsA, we expect primary endpoint readouts from our IZAR-1, IZAR-2 and P-OLARIS clinical trials forin othermid-2026, indications,second includinghalf adolescentof HS, axSpA2026 and PPP.end of 2026, respectively, and to seek regulatory approval after completion of these studies through submission of a supplemental BLA. In PPP, we presented positive results from our LEDA clinical trial in November 2025 and announced receipt of Fast Track designation by the FDA in February 2026. We expect to initiate a Phase 3 clinical trial in the third quarter of 2026, which may not yield a favorable outcome. In axSpA, we announced positive results from our S-OLARIS clinical trial in February 2026 and are currently evaluating the next steps to complete the clinical development of SLK in this indication. Unexpectedly favorable results of comparator arms in any trial could lead to unfavorable comparisons to SLK. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval of their product candidates.

Reworded

In particular, pharmaceutical companies that develop and/or market products for the indications we are pursuing, including HS and PsA, are likely to represent substantial competition. These include companies developing and/or marketing IL-17A inhibitors (such as Novartis AG, Eli Lilly and Co, Zura Bio Ltd and LEO Pharma), IL-23 inhibitors (such as AbbVie, Janssen, Sun Pharmaceutical and Almirall), IL-12/23 inhibitors (including Janssen), TNF alpha inhibitors (such as AbbVie, Pfizer, Janssen and UCB), TYK2 inhibitors (such as Bristol Myers Squibb), JAK inhibitors (such as AbbVie, Incyte and Pfizer), IL1a/IL1b inhibitors (such as Abbvie and Avalo Therapeutics), OX40L inhibitors (such as Sanofi), and IRAK4 degraders (such as Kymera Therapeutics Inc). It also includes UCB as the development and commercializing company for bimekizumab, the only other IL-17A and IL-17F inhibitor beyond SLK that has received approval or is in late-stage clinical development of which we are aware. Other IL-17A and IL-17F inhibitors are in preclinicalearlier development stages, including molecules being developed by Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Oruka Therapeutics, Inc. and Scinai Immunotherapeutics Ltd. While SLK represents a novel mechanism of action, all of the above mechanisms are also of potential therapeutic use in one or more other indications that we are or may be pursuing. If SLK does not offer sustainable advantages over competing products, we may otherwise not be able to successfully compete against current and future competitors.

Reworded

As a result of global economic conditions, including new or increased tariffs imposed by the U.S. government and potential retaliatory measures by foreign governments and other barriers to trade, especially in light of recent executive orders made by the presidential administration, trade and other international disputes, inflation and fluctuating interest rates, slower growth or recession, tighter credit, volatility in financial markets, high unemployment, labor availability constraints, public health crises, significant natural disasters, including as a result of climate change, changes to fiscal and monetary policy or government budget dynamics, particularly in the pharmaceutical and biotech areas, political and military conflict, including the conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East, we may in the future experience disruptions that could seriously harm our business. PotentialIn addition, in September 2025, the United States announced the imposition of up to 100% tariffs on imported branded or patented pharmaceuticals, subject to certain exceptions. There remains substantial uncertainty as to when such tariffs may go into effect and whether such tariffs would apply to the importation of active pharmaceutical ingredients or bulk drug products that are intended for use in clinical trials and, more generally, about the duration of existing tariffs, tariff levels, implementation of announced tariffs, litigation challenging tariffs and whether additional tariffs or retaliatory actions may be imposed, modified or suspended. Other potential disruptions include but are not limited to: delays or difficulties in enrolling patients in, initiating or expanding our clinical trials, including delays or difficulties with clinical site initiation and recruiting clinical site investigators and clinical site staff; increased rates of patients withdrawing from our clinical trials following enrollment as a result of certain health conditions or being forced to quarantine; interruption of key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site data monitoring and efficacy, safety and translational data collection, processing and analyses, due to limitations on travel imposed; recommendations by federal, state or local governments, employers and others or interruptions of clinical trial subject visits, which may impact the collection and integrity of subject data and clinical trial endpoints; diversion of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials, including the diversion of hospitals serving as our clinical trial sites and hospital staff supporting the conduct of our clinical trials; delays or disruptions in preclinical experiments and IND-enabling studies due to restrictions of on-site staff and unforeseen circumstances at CROs and vendors; interruption or delays in the operations of the FDA, EMA, and comparable foreign regulatory authorities including delays in receiving approval from local regulatory authorities to initiate our planned clinical trials; interruption of, or delays in receiving, supplies of SLK from our CMOs due to staffing shortages, raw materials shortages, production slowdowns or stoppages and disruptions in delivery systems; and limitations on employee or other resources that would otherwise be focused on the conduct of our clinical trials and preclinical work, including because of sickness of employees or their families, the desire of employees to avoid travel or contact with large groups of people, an increased reliance on working from home, school closures or mass transit disruptions.

Reworded

The process of obtaining regulatory approvals in the United States, the EU, and other jurisdictions is complex, expensive and typically takes many years following commencement of clinical trials, if approval is obtained at all, and can vary substantially based upon a variety of factors, including the type, complexity and novelty of the product candidates involved. We cannot commercialize SLK in the United States without first obtaining regulatory approval from the FDA. Similarly, we cannot commercialize SLK outside of the United States without obtaining regulatory approval from comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of SLK, we must demonstrate through complex and expensive preclinical studies and clinical trials that SLK is both safe and effective for each targeted indication. Securing regulatory approval also requires the submission of information about the drug manufacturing process to, and inspection of manufacturing facilities by, the relevant regulatory authorities. Further, SLK may not be effective, may be only moderately effective or may prove to have undesirable or unintended side effects, toxicities or other characteristics that may preclude our obtaining marketing approval. The FDA, EMA, and comparable foreign regulatory authorities have discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application or may decide that our data are insufficient for approval and require additional preclinical, clinical or other data. SLK could be delayed in receiving, or fail to receive, regulatory approval for many reasons, including: the FDA, EMA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with the design or implementation of our clinical trials; we may be unable to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA, EMA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities that SLK is safe and effective for its proposed indication; the results of clinical trials may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA, EMA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities for approval; serious and unexpected drug-related side effects may be experienced by participants in our clinical trials or by individuals using drugs similar to SLK; we may be unable to demonstrate that SLK’s clinical and other benefits outweigh its safety risks; the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our interpretation of data from preclinical studies or clinical trials; the data collected from clinical trials of SLK may not be acceptable or sufficient to support the submission of a BLA or other submission or to obtain regulatory approval in the United States or elsewhere, and we may be required to conduct additional clinical trials; the FDA, EMA, or the applicable foreign regulatory authority may disagree regarding the formulation, labeling and/or the specifications of SLK; the FDA, EMA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may fail to approve the manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with which we contract for clinical and commercial supplies; and the approval policies or regulations of the FDA, EMA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may significantly change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval. Thus, the approval requirements for SLK are likely to vary by jurisdiction such that success in one jurisdiction is not necessarily predicativepredictive of success elsewhere. Further, the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities may undergo leadership changes, change their policies, issue additional regulations or revise existing regulations, or take other actions, which may impact our clinical development plans or prevent or delay approval of our product candidates under development on a timely basis. Such policy or regulatory changes could impose additional requirements upon us that could delay our ability to obtain approvals and increase the costs of compliance.

Reworded

The ability of the FDA to review regulatory filings and our ability to commence human clinical trials can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory and policy changes.changes, disruptions caused by government shutdowns and public health crises. There have been mass layoffs of federal government employees since the start of the presidential administration in January 2025, the full impact of which is unclear at this time. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of the SEC, and other government agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. Furthermore, the presidential administration has made and is expected to continue to make changes in the leadership of various U.S. federal regulatory agencies and changes to U.S. federal government policy that have led to, in some cases, legal challenges and uncertainty around the funding, functioning and policy priorities of the U.S. federal regulatory agencies, including the FDA.

Added

We are unable to predict the extent to which the presidential administration may impose or seek to impose leadership or policy changes at the FDA or changes to rules and policies impacting our business and operations. For example, there can be no assurance that the FDA will implement or continue the plan it announced in December 2025 to change its default evidentiary requirement from two clinical trials to one clinical trial for new drug approvals. It is unclear how these executive actions or other potential actions by the federal government will impact the FDA or other regulatory authorities that oversee our business. Government proposals to reduce or eliminate budgetary deficits may include reduced allocations to the FDA and other related government agencies. These budgetary pressures may reduce the FDA’s ability to perform its responsibilities, which could result in delays in our clinical trial timelines. If a significant reduction in the FDA’s workforce occurs, the FDA’s budget is significantly reduced or a prolonged government shutdown occurs, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions or take other actions critical to the development or manufacturing of our product candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Reworded

Ensuring that our internal operations and future business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payerspayors play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any product candidates for which we obtain regulatory approval. Our future arrangements with third-party payerspayors may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we market, sell and distribute our product candidates for which we obtain regulatory approval. See the section titled “Business — Government Regulation” for a more detailed description of the laws that may affect our ability to operate.

Reworded

Pharmaceutical and biological product marketing is subject to substantial regulation in the U.S.United States and EU, and any failure by us or our future commercial and collaborative partners to comply with applicable statutes or regulations can adversely affect our business.

Reworded

We are subject to laws and regulations related to, among other things, privacy, data protection, information security and consumer protection across different markets where we conduct our business. Such laws and regulations are constantly evolving and changing and are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial operations. Complying with these numerous, complex, and often changing regulations is expensive and difficult, and failure to comply with any data protection, privacy laws or data security laws or any security incident or breach involving the potential or actual misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized processing, use or disclosure of sensitive or confidential patient, consumer or other personal information, whether by us, one of our collaborators or another third party,third-party, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations, including but not limited to investigation costs, material fines and penalties, compensatory, special, punitive, and statutory damages, litigation, consent orders regarding our privacy and security practices, requirements that we provide notices, credit monitoring services, and/or credit restoration services or other relevant services to impacted individuals, adverse actions against our licenses to do business, reputational damage and injunctive relief.

Reworded

The GDPR also imposes specific restrictions on the transfer of personal data to countries outside of the EEA that are not considered by the EU Commission to provide an adequate level of data protection. Appropriate safeguards are required to enable such transfers. Among the appropriate safeguards that can be used, the data exporter may use the standard contractual clauses (“SCCs”),SCCs, as updated in 2021. In this respect, when relying on SCCs, the data exporters are required to conduct a transfer risk assessment to verify if anything in the law and/or practices of the third country may impinge on the effectiveness of the SCCs in the context of the transfer at stake and, if so, to identify and adopt supplementary measures that are necessary to bring the level of protection of the data transferred to the EU standard of essential equivalence. Where no supplementary measure is suitable, the data exporter should avoid, suspend or terminate the transfer. With regard to the transfer of personal data from the EEA to the United States, on July 10, 2023, the European Commission adopted its adequacy decision for the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. On the basis of the new adequacy decision, personal data can flow from the EEA to United States companies participating in the framework. With regard to the transfer of data from the EU to the United Kingdom, on June 28, 2021, the EC adopted two adequacy decisions for the UK – one under the GDPR and the other for the Law Enforcement Directive. Personal data may now freely flow between the EEA and the UK since the UK is deemed to have an adequate data protection level for purposes of the EU regime. However, the adequacy decisions include a ‘sunset clause’ which entails that the decisions will automatically expire four years after their entry into force, unless renewed.

Reworded

The collection and use of personal health data and other personal data in the US is governed by various federal and state laws, including comprehensive state privacy laws (including CCPA), data breach notification laws, health privacy laws (such as HIPAA and state health privacy laws), federal and state consumer protection laws, and Section 5 of the FTC Act. Failure to comply with these laws can result in fines (including statutory damages for certain privacy laws), third partythird-party liabilities, regulatory inquiries and enforcement, legal fees, and legal claims.

Added

We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could negatively impact our financial condition.

Added

The rules governing U.S. federal, state and local income taxation are constantly under review and modification by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and the U.S. Treasury Department. Changes to tax laws, including those with potential retroactive application, could adversely affect us or our shareholders. We regularly assess the potential impact of various tax reform proposals and modifications to existing tax treaties in jurisdictions where we have operations to understand their potential effect on our business and any assumptions we have made about our future taxable income. However, we cannot predict whether any specific proposals will be enacted, the terms of any such proposals or what effect, if any, such proposals would have on our financial conditions or our shareholders, if they were to be enacted.

Added

For example, beginning in 2022, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the previously available option to immediately deduct research and development expenditures and instead requires taxpayers to amortize them generally over five years for research activities conducted in the United States and over 15 years for research activities conducted outside the United States. On July 4, 2025, the U.S. Congress enacted the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which includes a provision restoring the immediate deductibility of domestic research and development expenditures. The impact of this newly enacted law on our tax position will depend on how the provision is implemented and interpreted by the IRS and other regulatory authorities. In addition, we have no assurance as to whether, when and how this provision may be subject to further amendment or repeal. Such changes, among others, may adversely affect our effective tax rate, results of operation and financial condition.

Reworded

Our ability to compete in the highly competitive biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries depends upon our ability to attract and retain qualified managerial, scientific and medical personnel. We are dependent on our managerial, scientific and medical personnel, including our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Scientific Officer, and our Chief Financial Officer. If we do not succeed in attracting and retaining qualified personnel, it could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We could in the future have difficulty attracting and retaining experienced personnel and may be required to expend significant financial resources in our employee recruitment and retention efforts. Furthermore, we are dependent on our ability to attract, hire, relocate and retain qualified managerial, scientific and medical personnel from jurisdictions other than Switzerland, the United Kingdom, PortugalKingdom and Belgium.Portugal. Therefore, Swiss, British, PortugueseBritish and BelgianPortuguese immigration requirements have a significant influence on our human resources planning. Immigration applications can take several months or more to be finalized. If we are unable to complete the requisite visa applications, either as a result of changing requirements or otherwise, our ability to successfully implement our business strategy could suffer, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. We intend to establish a presence in the United States in order to build the sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure to commercialize SLK. Certain of the locations that we are considering for such presence are headquarters to many other biopharmaceutical companies and many academic and research institutions. Competition for skilled personnel in such locations is intense and may limit our ability to hire and retain highly qualified personnel on acceptable terms or at all.

Reworded

Our ability to execute our business plan and maintain operations depends on the continued and uninterrupted performance of our information technology (“IT”) systems or those of third parties upon whom we rely. IT systems are vulnerable to risks and damages from a variety of sources, including telecommunications or network failures, malicious human acts, and natural disasters (such as a tornado, an earthquake, or a fire). Moreover, despite network security and back-up measures, some of our and our vendors’ servers are potentially vulnerable to physical or electronic break-ins, including cyber-attacks, computer viruses, and similar disruptive problems. The techniques used by criminal elements to attack computer systems are increasingly sophisticated, change frequently, and may originate from less regulated and remote areas of the world. In addition, the use of artificial intelligence by cybercriminals may increase the frequency and severity of cybersecurity attacks, including against us or the third parties on which we rely. As a result, we may not be able to address these techniques proactively or implement adequate preventative measures. If the IT systems are compromised, we could be subject to fines, damages, litigation, and enforcement actions, and we could lose trade secrets, the occurrence of which could harm our business. Despite precautionary measures designed to prevent unanticipated problems that could affect the IT systems, sustained or repeated system failures that interrupt our ability to generate and maintain data could adversely affect our ability to operate our business. In addition, the failure of our systems, maintenance problems, upgrading or transitioning to new platforms, or a cybersecurity incident could result in delays and reduce efficiency in our operations. Remediation of such problems could result in significant, unplanned capital investments.

Reworded

We have utilized and plan to continue to utilize and depend upon independent investigators and collaborators, such as medical institutions, CROs, CMOs and strategic partners, to conduct and support our preclinical studies and clinical trials under agreements with us. We will rely heavily on these third parties over the course of our preclinical studies and clinical trials, and we control only certain aspects of their activities. As a result, we will have less direct control over the conduct, timing and completion of these preclinical studies and clinical trials and the management of data developed through preclinical studies and clinical trials than would be the case if we were relying entirely upon our own staff. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our studies and trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal, regulatory and scientific standards, and our reliance on these third parties does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. We and our third-party contractors and CROs are required to comply with GCP regulations, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for product candidates in clinical development. If we or any of these third parties fail to comply with applicable GCP regulations, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA, EMA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. We cannot assure you that upon inspection by a given regulatory authority, such regulatory authority will determine that any of our clinical trials comply with GCP regulations, even if responsibilities have been outlined in agreements with external partners, such as CROs. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with product produced under cGMP regulations. Our failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process. Moreover, our business may be implicated if any of these third parties violatesviolate federal or state fraud and abuse or false claims laws and regulations or healthcare privacy and security laws.

Reworded

Moreover, we or our licensors may be subject to a third-party pre-issuance submission of prior art to the USPTO or become involved in opposition, derivation, revocation, reexamination, inter partes review, post-grant review or interference proceedings challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of others. An adverse determination in any such submission, proceeding or litigation could reduce the scope of, or invalidate, our patent rights, allow third parties to commercialize our technology or SLK and compete directly with us, without payment to us, or result in our inability to manufacture or commercialize drugs without infringing third-party patent rights. If the breadth or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened, regardless of the outcome, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize SLK. In addition to seeking patents for some of our technology and SLK, we may also rely on trade secrets, including unpatented know-how, technology and other proprietary information, to maintain our competitive position. Any disclosure, either intentional or unintentional, by our employees, the employees of third parties with whom we share our facilities or third-party consultants and vendors that we engage to perform research, clinical trials or manufacturing activities, or misappropriation by third parties (such as through a cybersecurity breach) of our trade secrets or proprietary information could enable competitors to duplicate or surpass our technological achievements, thus eroding our competitive position in our market. In order to protect our proprietary technology and processes, we rely in part on confidentiality agreements with our collaborators, employees, consultants, outside scientific collaborators and sponsored researchers and other advisors. These agreements may not effectively prevent disclosure of confidential information and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. As our organization grows, so does the risk of unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. We may need to share our proprietary information, including trade secrets, with future business partners, collaborators, contractors and others located in countries at heightened risk of theft of trade secrets, including through direct intrusion by private parties or foreign actors and those affiliated with or controlled by state actors. In addition, while we undertake efforts to protect our trade secrets and other confidential information from disclosure, others may independently discover trade secrets and proprietary information, and in such cases, we may not be able to assert any trade secret rights against such party. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets is challenging and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, courts outside of the U.S. may be less willing to protect trade secrets. Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights and failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection could adversely affect our competitive business position.

Removed

may be less willing to protect trade secrets. Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights and failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection could adversely affect our competitive business position.

Reworded

Also, we may be unable to obtain patents covering SLK that contain one or more claims that satisfy the requirements for listing in the Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the “Orange Book”). Even if we submit a patent for listing in the Orange Book, the FDA may decline to list the patent, or a manufacturer of generic drugs may challenge the listing. If SLK is approved and a patent covering SLK is not listed in the Orange Book, a manufacturer of generic drugs would not have to provide advance notice to us of any abbreviated new drug application filed with the FDA to obtain permission to sell a generic version of SLK.

Reworded

Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of patent laws in the United States, including patent reform legislation such as the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (the “Leahy-Smith Act”) could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our owned and in-licensed patent applications and the maintenance, enforcement or defense of our owned and in-licensed issued patents. The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant changes to United States patent law. These changes include provisions that affect the way patent applications are prosecuted, redefine prior art, provide more efficient and cost-effective avenues for competitors to challenge the validity of patents, and enable third-party submission of prior art to the USPTO during patent prosecution and additional procedures to challenge the validity of a patent at USPTO-administered post-grant proceedings, including post-grant review, inter partes review, and derivation proceedings. Also, under the Leahy-Smith Act, the United States transitioned from a first-to-invent to a first-to-file system in which, assuming that the other statutory requirements for patentability are met, the first inventor to file a patent application will be entitled to the patent on an invention regardless of whether a third partythird-party was the first to invent the claimed invention. Foreign counterparts to this law are also not uniform, and there is no worldwide policy governing the subject matter and scope of claims granted in a pharmaceutical or biotechnology patent. As such, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Reworded

Because the intellectual property landscape in the biotechnology industry is rapidly evolving and is interdisciplinary, it is difficult to conclusively assess our freedom to operate without infringing on or violating third partythird-party rights. If a third partythird-party successfully brings a claim against us, we may be required to pay substantial damages, be forced to abandon SLK and/or seek a license from the patent holder. In addition, any intellectual property claims (e.g. patent infringement or trade secret theft) brought against us, whether or not successful, may cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert the attention of our management and key personnel from other business concerns. We cannot be certain that patents owned or licensed by us will not be challenged by others in the course of litigation. Some of our competitors may be able to absorb the costs of complex intellectual property litigation more effectively than we can. In addition, any uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of any litigation could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise funds and on the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares.

Reworded

Further, we may be required to protect our patents through procedures created to challenge the validity of a patent at the USPTO. An adverse determination in any such submission or proceeding could reduce the scope or enforceability of, or invalidate, our patent rights, which could adversely affect our competitive position. Because of a lower evidentiary standard in USPTO proceedings compared to the evidentiary standard in United States federal courts necessary to invalidate a patent claim, a third partythird-party could potentially provide evidence in a USPTO proceeding sufficient for the USPTO to hold a claim invalid even though the same evidence would be insufficient to invalidate the claim if first presented in a district court action.

Reworded

The degree of future protection afforded by our intellectual property rights, whether owned or in-licensed, is uncertain because intellectual property rights have limitations, and may not adequately protect our business, provide a barrier to entry against our competitors or potential competitors, or permit us to maintain our competitive advantage. Moreover, if a third partythird-party has intellectual property rights that cover the practice of our technology, we may not be able to fully exercise or extract value from our intellectual property rights. The factors that may limit any potential competitive advantage provided by our intellectual property rights include:

Reworded

The trading price of our Class A Ordinary Shares has been and may continue to be highly volatile and is subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including the factors discussed in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The realization of any of these factors has had and may continue to have an adverse impact on the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. For example, escalating trade tensions, elevated interest rates and regulatory uncertainty have caused significant market volatility in recent months, and particularly in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries.

Reworded

In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for biotechnology companies in particular, have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. Class action securities litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management attention and resources, which could significantly harm our profitability and reputation. In addition, broad market and industry factors may negatively affect the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares, regardless of our actual operating performance. The market price for our Class A Ordinary Shares may be influenced by many factors, including:

Added

•significant market volatility in recent months, particularly in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries, caused by escalating trade tensions, elevated interest rates and regulatory uncertainty;

Reworded

In the past, securitiesSecurities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities. Such class action lawsuits have been initiated against us, and we may become subject to additional securities class action lawsuits in the future. Additional information on such class action lawsuits is discussed in Item 3 “Legal Proceedings”. This type of litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operation.

Reworded

Certain provisions of our Memorandum and Articles of Association (the "MAA"“Memorandum”) and Cayman Islands Law may have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, defer or prevent a merger, acquisition, tender offer, takeover attempt or other change of control transaction that a shareholder might consider in its best interest, including those attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares held by our members.

Reworded

•requiring a special resolution to amend the MAAMemorandum; and

Reworded

These anti-takeover provisions could make it more difficult for a third partythird-party to acquire our Company, even if the third party’sthird-party’s offer may be considered beneficial by many of our shareholders. As a result, our shareholders may be limited in their ability to obtain a premium for their shares. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other shareholders to elect directors of your choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions you desire.

Reworded

Cayman Islands law does not limit the extent to which a company’s memorandum and articles of association may provide for indemnification of officers and directors, except to the extent any such provision may be held by the Cayman Islands courts to be contrary to public policy, such as to provide indemnification against willful default, willful neglect, actual fraud or the consequences of committing a crime. The MAAMemorandum provides for indemnification of our officers and directors to the maximum extent permitted by law, including for any liability incurred in their capacities as such, except through their own actual fraud, willful default or willful neglect. We purchased a policy of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance that insures our officers and directors against the cost of defense, settlement or payment of a judgment in some circumstances and insures us against our obligations to indemnify our officers and directors. We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers that obligate us to indemnify, hold harmless, exonerate, and to advance expenses as incurred, to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law, from damage arising from the fact that such person is or was an officer or director of our Company or its subsidiaries.

Reworded

There is no assurance that we will not incur debt or issue equity ranking senior to the Class A Ordinary Shares. Those securities will generally have priority upon liquidation. Such securities also may be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting its operating flexibility. Additionally, any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of Class A Ordinary Shares. Separately, additional financing may not be available on favorable terms, or at all. Because our decision to issue debt or equity in the future will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, itwe cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing, nature or success of our future capital raising efforts. As a result, future capital raising efforts may reduce the market price of Class A Ordinary Shares and be dilutive to existing shareholders.

Reworded

We may become a “foreign private issuer” as defined in Rule 36-43b-4 promulgated under the Exchange Act. If we do become a foreign private issuer, we would be exempt from certain rules and regulations in the United States that are applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, including:

Reworded

•the section of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act;

Reworded

In addition, if we become a foreign private issuer whose securities are listed on Nasdaq, we would be permitted to, and may elect to, follow certain home country corporate governance practices in lieu of the requirements of the Nasdaq Rules pursuant to Nasdaq Rule 5615(a)(3). Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, may differ significantly from the Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards applicable to U.S. domestic issuers and may afford our shareholders less protection than they otherwise would enjoy under the Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards applicable to U.S. domestic issuers. We would be required to disclose any significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those followed by U.S. domestic issuers under Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards in an annual report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC or on our website.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

32new paragraphs
16removed paragraphs
39reworded paragraphs
7,384 → 9,104words in section

New heading “HS Trials and Plans for Commercial Launch”

New heading “Additional Trials for Other Indications”

New heading “Financial summary”

New heading “Interest Expense”

New heading “Term Loan Facility”

Removed heading “Options Exercised under the Equity Incentive Plan”

Removed heading “Business Combination”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: default, covenant
“The Loan and Security Agreement contains customary covenants, such as financial covenants and certain events of default after which loans under the Credit Facility may be due and payable immediately. We were in compliance with all covenants as of December 31, 2025.”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Options Exercised under the Equity Incentive Plan”
see in full comparison
New text
“HS Trials and Plans for Commercial Launch”
see in full comparison
New text
“Additional Trials for Other Indications”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: goodwill
“The Business Combination was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization. Under this method of accounting, Helix was treated as the “acquired” company for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, the Business Combination was treated as the equivalent of MoonLake AG issuing shares for the net assets of Helix, accompanied by a recapitalization, whereby no goodwill or other intangible assets was recorded. Operations prior to the Business Combination are those of MoonLake AG.”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Business Combination”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (87)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 2 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

A discussion regarding our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 20232024 compared to December 31, 20222023 can be found under Part II - Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 29,26, 2024, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2023, which was filed with the SEC on May 7, 2024.2025.

Reworded

We are a clinical stage biotechnology company advancing therapies to address significant unmet needs in inflammatory skin and joint diseases. We are currently a single asset company focused on the development of Sonelokimab (“SLK”), a novel tri-specific IL-17A and IL-17F inhibiting Nanobody, that we exclusively licensed from Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (“MHKDG”) and that has the potential, based on response levels seen in clinical trials, to drive disease modification in dermatology and rheumatology patients.

Reworded

SLK is a proprietary Nanobody that was discovered by Ablynx N.V., Belgium, a Sanofi company (“Ablynx”), and previously studied by MHKDG and Avillion LLP (“Avillion”) under a 2017 co-development agreement. The terms “Nanobody” and “Nanobodies” used herewith are registered trademarks of Ablynx. Nanobodies are able to bind selectively to a specific antigen with high affinity. Nanobodies have a fraction of the molecular weight compared to traditional antibodies. They offer a number of potential advantages over traditional monoclonal antibodies, including the potential to create multivalent molecules with enhanced ability to penetrate inflamed tissue, especially when containing an additional albumin binding domain such as SLK, an easier manufacturing process and a higher thermostability.

Added

HS Trials and Plans for Commercial Launch

Added

In May 2022, we initiated a Phase 2b trial of SLK in patients with moderate-to-severe HS (the MIRA trial (M1095-HS-201)), and in June 2023, we announced positive top-line results from this trial, which met its primary endpoint of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (“HiSCR”) 75 with 43% of patients treated with SLK 120mg achieving such response at week 12. In October 2023, we announced positive 24-week top-line results showing that the maintenance treatment with SLK led to further improvements in HiSCR75 response rates and other clinically relevant outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. In February 2024, we announced the successful outcome of our end-of-Phase 2 interactions with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), as well as positive feedback from our interactions with the E.U. European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), with both regulatory bodies supporting our proposed approach for advancing our Phase 3 program of SLK in HS. In May 2024, we announced the screening of the first patients in the Phase 3 VELA-1 (M1095-HS-301) and VELA-2 trials (M1095-HS-302). In April 2025, we announced completion of enrollment of the VELA program and presented baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. In September 2025, we announced primary endpoint data from the VELA-1 and VELA-2 clinical trials. In the combined VELA program, patients treated with SLK experienced a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement across all primary and key secondary endpoints using both pre-specified strategies (p<0.001). In VELA-1, SLK achieved statistical significance for all primary and key secondary endpoints using both pre-specified strategies (HiSCR75, delta to placebo of 17%, p<0.001). 34% of patients treated with SLK 120mg achieved a HiSCR75 response at the week 16 primary endpoint. In VELA-2, response rates associated with SLK were similar to those observed in VELA-1 (HiSCR75 response of 34%), but a higher-than-expected placebo arm precluded the study from achieving statistical significance in the week 16 primary endpoint using the composite strategy (HiSCR75, delta to placebo of 9%, p=0.053). Impact on HS lesions, including draining tunnels, was matched by improvements in all key Patient Reported Outcomes (“PROs”), such as quality-of-life and pain scores, that are meaningful for HS patients and their treating physicians. The safety profile of SLK was consistent with previously reported studies with no new safety signals observed. This included the absence of new signals in key events of interest with IL-17A and F therapies such as Suicidal Ideation and Behavior, hepatic events, Inflammatory Bowel Disease (“IBD”) and non-infectious diarrhea, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (“MACE”), and Eczema and Dermatitis. In February 2026, we presented an interim analysis of the long-term data from the VELA trials, which indicated that monthly maintenance treatment with SLK can lead to further improvements in clinically relevant outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe HS, including an as-observed HiSCR75 response rate of 69% in VELA-1 (n=104) and 67% in VELA 2 (n=123) after 52 weeks of treatment with SLK 120mg. The VELA trials are expected to continue to week 52, followed by an open-label extension for up to two years (the VELA-OLE trial (M1095-HS-303)). We expect the full one-year data of VELA-1 and VELA-2 to become available in the second quarter of 2026. In parallel, we are conducting a Phase 3 trial of SLK in adolescent patients with HS (the VELA-TEEN trial (M1095-HS-304)), which we initiated in January 2025. In February 2026, we presented an interim analysis of the VELA-TEEN clinical trial which showed that 67% of patients achieved a HiSCR75 response at week 16 (n=21). We expect to complete the VELA-TEEN clinical trial in mid-2026.

Added

In November 2025, we were granted a Type B meeting with the FDA to discuss adequacy of the current clinical evidence package of SLK in HS to support a Biologics License Application (“BLA”) and in January 2026, we announced positive feedback from this interaction, confirming that we may establish substantial evidence of effectiveness (“SEE”) without additional clinical trials in HS. The FDA specifically advised to include the results of the MIRA trial together with the results of the VELA trials in the submission to establish SEE. Based on the positive feedback, we expect to submit a BLA for SLK in adult and adolescent HS in the second half of 2026. Subject to FDA approval, we expect a first commercial launch in the United States in the second half of 2027.

Added

PsA Trials

Removed

In May 2022, we initiated a Phase 2b trial of SLK in patients with moderate-to-severe HS (the MIRA trial (M1095-HS-201)), and in June 2023, we announced positive top-line results from this trial, which met its primary endpoint of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (“HiSCR”) 75. In October 2023, we announced positive 24-week top-line results showing that the maintenance treatment with SLK led to further improvements in HiSCR75 response rates and other clinically relevant outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. In February 2024, we announced the successful outcome of our end-of-Phase 2 interactions with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), as well as positive feedback from our interactions with the E.U. European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), with both regulatory bodies supporting our proposed approach for advancing our Phase 3 program of SLK in HS. In May 2024, we announced the screening of the first patients in the VELA-1 trial (M1095-HS-301) and VELA-2 trial (M1095-HS-302). We expect primary endpoint data from the VELA-1 and VELA-2 clinical trials as of mid-2025.

Reworded

In December 2022, we initiated a Phase 2b trial in patients with active PsA (the ARGO trial (M1095-PSA-201)), and in November 2023, we announced positive top-line results from this trial, which met its primary endpoint of American College of Rheumatology (“ACR”) 50.50 with 46% of patients on 60mg SLK achieving such response at week 12. In March 2024, we announced positive 24-week data from the ARGO trial in PsA showing that continued treatment with SLK led to significant improvements across all key outcomes. In June 2024, we announced the successful outcome of our end-of-Phase 2 interactions with the FDA, as well as positive feedback from our interactions with the EMA, with both regulatory bodies supporting our proposed approach for advancing our Phase 3 program of SLK in PsA. In November 2024, we announced the screening of the first patients in the IZAR-1 trial (M1095-PSA-301) and IZAR-2 trial (M1095-PSA-302). In February 2026, we announced completion of enrollment for the IZAR-1 trial. We expect a readout of the primary and key secondary endpoints of the IZAR-1 clinical trial in mid-2026 and of the IZAR-2 clinical trial in the second half of 2026. In addition, in January 2025, we initiated another Phase 2 clinical trial of SLK in patients with PsA where we are applying novel imaging techniques (the P-OLARIS trial (M1095-snSpA-202)). We expect results of the P-OLARIS trial to become available at the end of 2026.

Added

PPP Trials

Added

In November 2024, we initiated a Phase 2 trial in patients with PPP (the LEDA trial (M1095-PPP-201)) and in November 2025, we presented positive results of this trial, suggesting that SLK could provide clinically meaningful improvements in patients with PPP. Patients treated with SLK achieved a mean percent change from baseline in the Palmoplantar Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (“PPPASI”) of 64% at week 16, and 39% of patients achieved a ≥75% reduction in the PPPASI (“PPPASI75”). In February 2026, we announced that we received Fast Track designation from the FDA for SLK in moderate-to-severe PPP. We expect to commence a Phase 3 clinical trial in PPP in the third quarter of 2026.

Added

axSpA Trials

Added

In February 2025, we initiated a Phase 2 trial in patients with axSpA (the S-OLARIS trial (M1095-axSpA-202)) and in February 2026, we presented positive results of this trial, suggesting that SLK could provide clinically meaningful improvements in patients with axSpA. Of the patients (n=26) treated with SLK, 81% achieved an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (“ASAS40”) response at week 12, showing at least 40% improvement and an absolute improvement of ≥2 units on a numerical rating scale (0 to 10) from baseline in at least three of the four key domains (Patient Global Assessment (“PGA”) of disease activity, total back pain, physical function, inflammation). More than 80% of patients have achieved a “clinically important improvement” as per ASDAS-CRP score by week 12, confirming the strong result in this clinically relevant endpoint.

Added

PET and MRI imaging data collected as part of the clinical trial confirm a significant reduction in inflammation in the deep tissue of the spine and sacroiliac joint affected by axSpA in a pooled analysis comparing baseline to week 12. Additional objective biomarker and tissue analyses conducted as part of the clinical trial reinforce rapid and sustained effect of the treatment with SLK in axSpA patients. The safety profile of SLK in the S-OLARIS trial was consistent with previous trials with no new safety signals detected.

Added

Additional Trials for Other Indications

Removed

In March 2024, we announced plans to initiate clinical studies of SLK in additional indications, including a Phase 3 trial in adolescent patients with HS (the VELA-TEEN trial (M1095-HS-304)), a Phase 2 trial in patients with PPP (the LEDA trial (M1095-PPP-201)), a Phase 2 trial in patients with axSpA (the S-OLARIS trial (M1095-axSpA-202)) and another Phase 2 trial applying novel imaging techniques in patients with PsA (the P-OLARIS trial (M1095-snSpA-202)). In January 2025, we announced that first patients have been screened in the VELA-TEEN, the LEDA, and the S-OLARIS clinical trials. We expect patient enrollment for the P-OLARIS trial to commence in the first half of 2025.

Reworded

SLK was also studied in a Phase 2b trial in PsO patients where it showed a significant improvement in the primary end point as compared with placebo and for which results were presented in peer-reviewed scientific publications and conferences. In addition to the three Phase 2b trials,addition, Phase 1 single ascending and multiple ascending dosing trials were previously completed, bringing the total number of patients in completed SLK-related trials to more than 700.completed.

Added

Financial summary

Removed

We expect to submit a first Biologics License Application (“BLA”) for SLK in 2026 and, subject to FDA approval, a first commercial launch in the U.S. in 2027.

Reworded

We do not have any product candidates approved for commercial sale, and we have not generated any revenue from product sales. Our ability to generate revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend on the successful development and eventual commercialization of SLK in one or more indications, which we expect to take a number of years. We expect to continue to incur significantsubstantial expenses and operating losses for at least the next threetwo years as we continue the development of SLK and prepare for commercial launches. ItWe is expectedexpect that operating losses will fluctuate significantlynotably from year to year depending on the timing of our planned clinical development programs andprograms, efforts to achieve regulatory approval.approval, and planned marketing and sales expenditures leading up to a commercial launch.

Reworded

As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had $180.4$334.5 million ofin cash and cash equivalents. Based on our current operating plans,plans and the Loan and Security Agreement (as defined below), we believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities, together amounting to $448.0$394.0 million, will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements untilinto the endsecond half of 2026.2027.

Removed

On April 5, 2022, we completed the Business Combination (as defined below) which raised $134.7 million net of transaction related expenses. In May 2023, June 2023, December 2023, January 2024 and February 2024, we completed equity offerings which raised additional gross proceeds of $15.2 million, $460.0 million, $31.7 million, $39.6 million, and $13.7 million, respectively.

Removed

On August 31, 2023, we entered into a Sales Agreement with Leerink Partners (the “August 2023 Sales Agreement” and together with the May 2023 Sales Agreement, the “Sales Agreements”), through which we could issue and sell up to $350.0 million of our Class A Ordinary Shares (the “August 2023 ATM Shares”), through Leerink Partners as sales agent. The August 2023 ATM Shares to be sold under the August 2023 Sales Agreement, if any, would be issued and sold pursuant to our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-274286), which was declared effective by the SEC on September 11, 2023, and a prospectus supplement thereto filed with the SEC on August 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2024, there was $265.0 million remaining for future sales under the August 2023 ATM Sales Agreement.

Removed

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we sold 914,828 and 1,070,818 Class A Ordinary Shares, respectively, through the Sales Agreements for net proceeds of $52.5 million and $45.8 million, respectively, after deducting sales agent's commissions and transaction costs. For the three months ended December 31, 2024, there were no sales under the August 2023 Sales Agreement.

Removed

On June 27, 2023, we entered into an underwriting agreement with Leerink Partners and Guggenheim Securities LLC as the representatives of the underwriters named therein to issue and sell 8,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares at a public offering price of $50.00 per share (the “Offering”). In addition, we granted the underwriters an option for a period of 30 days to purchase up to an additional 1,200,000 Class A Ordinary Shares at the public offering price less the underwriting discounts and commissions (the “Option”), and such Option was exercised in full by the underwriters.

Removed

The Offering closed on June 30, 2023, and net proceeds from the Offering, including proceeds from the exercise in full by the underwriters of the Option, were $436.7 million, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and the offering expenses in the amount of $23.3 million.

Removed

Following the completion of the Offering, we opted to direct a substantial portion of the net proceeds to MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG, a Swiss stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft) registered with the commercial register of the Canton of Zug, Switzerland under the number CHE-433.093.536 (“MoonLake AG”). This was executed as a two-step process: (i) we acquired the remaining 22,756 common shares in MoonLake AG (“MoonLake AG Common Shares”) held in treasury through a share purchase and assignment agreement formally executed on July 09, 2023 ($38.9 million) and (ii) additional funds were contributed to MoonLake AG’s capital reserves through a cash contribution agreement formally executed on July 10, 2023 ($275 million). A stamp duty tax of $2.8 million was levied on the aforementioned capital contribution which we have classified as cash flows from financing activities in order to correctly mirror the underlying nature of the transaction.

Removed

Options Exercised under the Equity Incentive Plan

Removed

In the year ended December 31, 2024, certain participants exercised their stock options under the Equity Incentive Plan (as defined below) for an aggregate of 48,796 Class A Ordinary Shares and total cash consideration of $242,004.

Removed

Business Combination

Removed

On April 5, 2022, we consummated the previously announced business combination pursuant to that certain Business Combination Agreement, dated October 4, 2021 (the “Business Combination Agreement”), by and among Helix Acquisition Corp. (“Helix”), MoonLake AG, the existing equityholders of MoonLake AG set forth on the signature pages to the Business Combination Agreement and the equityholders of MoonLake AG that executed joinders to the Business Combination Agreement (collectively, the “ML Parties”), Helix Holdings LLC, a Cayman Islands limited liability company and the sponsor of Helix, and the representative of the ML Parties (such transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement, collectively, the “Business Combination”). Pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, MoonLake AG merged with and into Helix, with MoonLake AG as the surviving company in the Business Combination and, after giving effect to such Business Combination, MoonLake AG became our subsidiary. The ML Parties received the right to transfer their MoonLake AG Common Shares to the Company in exchange for 33.638698 MoonLake Immunotherapeutics Class A Ordinary Shares (the “Exchange Ratio”). In connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, we changed our name from Helix Acquisition Corp. to MoonLake Immunotherapeutics.

Removed

The Business Combination was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization. Under this method of accounting, Helix was treated as the “acquired” company for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, the Business Combination was treated as the equivalent of MoonLake AG issuing shares for the net assets of Helix, accompanied by a recapitalization, whereby no goodwill or other intangible assets was recorded. Operations prior to the Business Combination are those of MoonLake AG.

Reworded

•costs related to manufacturing material for our research programprogram, clinical studies, and clinicalpre-launch studiesinventory;

Reworded

The successful development of SLK is highly uncertain. We expect to incur significantconsiderable research and development expenses for the foreseeable future as we continue the development and manufacturing partnerships for SLK, conduct research activities and potentially expand our pipeline by pursuing additional indications for SLK or including new product candidates in our portfolio. We cannot determine with certainty the timing of initiation, the duration, or the completion costs of current or future research studies and clinical trials of SLK due to the inherently unpredictable nature of research activities and clinical development. Clinical development timelines, the probability of success and the development costs can differ materially from expectations. We anticipate that we will make determinations as to which indications to pursue and how much funding to direct to each indication on an ongoing basis in response to the results of ongoing and future research studies and clinical trials, regulatory developments, and our ongoing assessments as to each indication’s commercial potential.

Reworded

Any changes in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of SLK could mean a significantnotable change in the costs and timing associated with its development. We may never succeed in achieving regulatory approval for SLK. We may obtain unexpected results from our clinical trials. We may elect to discontinue, delay or modify clinical trials or focus on other product candidates. For example, if the FDA, the EMA, or another regulatory authority were to delay our planned start of clinical trials or require us to conduct clinical trials or other testing beyond those that we currently expect or if we experience significant delays in enrollment in any of our planned clinical trials, we could be required to expend significant additional financial resources and time on the completion of SLK’s clinical development.

Reworded

•Completing the development of SLK in our current focus indications, HS, PsA, axSpA and PPP — We expect to incur significantconsiderable research and development expenses, and G&A expenses as we: (i) conduct clinical trials for SLK including the ongoing Phase 3 clinical trials in HS, PsA and adolescent HS andHS, the ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial in PsA, and potential future Phase 3 clinical trials in PPP and axSpA; (ii) attract, hire and retain additional clinical, scientific, quality control, and administrative personnel; and (iii) add clinical, operational, financial and management information systems and personnel.

Reworded

•Preparing for commercialization of SLK — We have started preparing the BLA to seek approval of SLK in the U.S.United States in HS and adolescent HS. We expect to incur significant research and development expense, and G&A expenses in this process, as we make milestone and commercial payments under the In-License Agreement, dated April 29, 2021, by and between MoonLake AG and MHKDG (the "In-License Agreement") (based on regulatory filing acceptances, first commercial sales, and aggregate annual net sales) and as we establish a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure to commercialize SLK including establishing a presence in the U.S.United States. We expect to submit the BLA in the second half of 2026 after completion of the VELA program, and, subject to FDA approval, we expect a commercial launch in the U.S.United States in the second half of 2027.

Reworded

•Building our manufacturing capabilities — We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities, and currently have no plans to establish any. We partner with third-party CMOs for both drug substance and finished drug product. We obtain our supplies from these manufacturers based on purchase orders. Therefore, we expect to incur research and development costs for the purchase of our supplies on an as needed basis to conduct our clinical trials. TechnologyWe have executed technology transfers for drug substance and drug product to commercial scale CMOsCMOs, and we have alreadysuccessfully beenmanufactured executedProcess inPerformance 2022,Qualification batches, but we may pursue additional technology transfers and process improvements. This is designed to allow us to scale up while SLK is in clinical development and advance potential commercial requirements. The improvement of our manufacturing capabilities will be important in driving efficiency, maintaining high standards of quality control, and ensuring that investigators, physicians, and patients have adequate access to our product candidates, if approved. We also plan to start thebegan stock-piling of drug substance as pre-launch inventory during the third quarter of 2025 and expect to continue doing so in 2025.2026.

Reworded

•Granting share-based compensation awards and vesting of existing plans — We expect to continue to grant awards to selected employees, directors and non-employees pursuant to the MoonLake Immunotherapeutics 2022 Equity Incentive Plan (“Equity Incentive Plan”).Plan. Further, we expect to continue to incur share-based compensation charges in connection with the above-mentioned plan and the vesting of awards made under MoonLake AG’s Employee Share Participation Plan (“ESPP”).Plan.

Reworded

We also expect to incur additional IT, legal, accounting, investor relationsleasing, and other expenses associated with operating as a public company and as we continue to grow our business. Our net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year, depending on the timing of our clinical trials and our expenditures on other research and development activities.

Reworded

We expect our existing cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to advance the development of SLK in multiple indications, including the above-mentioned clinical trials in HS, PsA, adolescent HS, PPP and axSpA, and to submit a Biologics License ApplicationBLA for SLK. Clinical development involves a lengthy and expensive process with uncertain outcomes and is subject to risks described in Item 1A,1A. Risk Factors, including that our preclinicalnon-clinical studies or clinical trials may not be conducted as planned or completed on schedule and may not satisfy the requirements of the FDA, EMA, or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities. If we are required to conduct additional preclinical studies or clinical trials of SLK beyond those that we currently contemplate, if we are delayed or unable to successfully complete clinical trials of SLK or other testing, or if the results of these trials or tests are not positive or are only modestly positive or if there are safety concerns, we may require additional funding. Moreover, we will require additional capital to commercialize SLK and to discover, develop, obtain regulatory approval and commercialize any future product candidates, as applicable. We do not have any committed external source of funds. We expect to finance future cash needs through public or private equityequity, oradditional debt offeringsdebt, or product collaborations. Additional capital may not be available in sufficient amounts or on reasonable terms, if at all. The current market environment for small biotechnology companies, like us, and broader macroeconomic factors, including recent and potential future disruptions in access to bank deposits or lending commitments due to bank failures,factors may preclude us from successfully raising additional capital.

Reworded

Gains or losses from foreign currency translationtransactions are included in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss in “otherOther income, net”. We recognized a net foreign currency transaction gain of $599 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2025, a net foreign currency transaction loss of $42,186$42 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2024, and a net foreign currency transaction gain of $151,493$151 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2023, and a foreign currency transaction gain of $325,317 for the year ended December 31, 2022.2023.

Reworded

Research and development expenses were $202.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $112.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $31.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increase of $81.0$90.1 millionmillion, or 79.9%, is primarily related to an increase of $47.7$54.5 million in expenses pertaining to clinical development trials with CROs, including the Phase 3 VELA program in HS and the Phase 3 IZAR program in PsA, as well as the additional trials in adolescent HS (the VELA-TEEN trial), PPP (the LEDA trial), axSpA (the S-OLARIS trial) and PsA (the P-OLARIS trial). An additional increase of $23.7 million related to supply and logistic services for such clinical development trials, including the purchase of a comparator drug for the IZAR-2 trial in PsA, and, an increase of $5.4$21.6 million in manufacturing, supply and logistics expenses through CMOs, which is primarily related to the production of stockpiled pre-launch inventory, and increases of $5.5 million and $4.7 million in personnel-related costs and consulting expenses, respectively, to support our research and development efforts. In the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, research and development expenses were predominantly made up of external costs.

Reworded

General and administrative expenses were $42.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $30.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $22.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increase of $8.0$11.7 millionmillion, or 38.4%, is primarily related to an increase of $3.3$7.0 million in personnel-related costscosts, an increase of $3.2 million in expenses for advisory and professional services, both to support organizational growth, an increase of $2.4$1.4 million in legal expenses for advisory and professional services to support organizational growth, an increase of $1.6 million in office expenses driven by the newLoan leasesand forSecurity additional office space,Agreement, and an increase of $1.2$0.7 million in market research expenses. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $0.7 million for insurance expenses.

Added

Interest Expense

Added

Interest expense was $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $nil for the year ended December 31, 2024. The interest expense during the current period is related to recognized interest on the Loan and Security Agreement.

Reworded

Other income, net was $22.1$22.4 million for year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to $10.1$22.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increase of $12.0$0.2 millionmillion, or 1.1%, is primarily related to an increase of $12.3$0.6 million in net currency gains, partially offset by a decrease of $0.5 million in realized interest on cash held in bankbanks and cash investments in short-term marketable debt securities.

Reworded

Income tax expense was $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The expense for each period is related to corporate income tax of our subsidiaries in the U.K.United Kingdom and Portugal.

Reworded

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Reworded

Other comprehensive loss was $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to other comprehensive income wasof $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2024. comparedThe decrease in other comprehensive income of $7.1 million, or (272.5)%, is primarily related to $2.0the millionreclassification forof unrealized gains from investments in short-term marketable debt securities recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income to other income, net during the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase of $0.6 million primarily related to an increase in net unrealized gain in short-term marketable debt securities.2025.

Reworded

•contract with third parties, including CROs and CMOs, to support the clinical trials of SLK, including trials in HS, PsA, adolescent HS, PPP and axSpAaxSpA, and to produce pre-launch inventory;

Reworded

•continue operatingoperate as a public company.

Reworded

For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, we incurred a loss of $121.2$230.3 million, which includes non-cash items such as share-based compensation expense of $7.3$12.9 million, and cash outflow from operations of $116.6$196.0 million. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had a total of $448.0$394.0 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities. Based on our current operating plans,plans and the Loan and Security Agreement, we believe our available cash, cash equivalentsequivalents, and short-term marketable securities will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements untilinto the endsecond half of 2026.2027.

Reworded

We expect to incur significantnotable expenses and operating losses for at least the next threetwo years, assuming we continue the clinical development of, and seek regulatory approval for, our product candidate under an in-licensing agreement. It is expected that operating losses will fluctuate significantly from year to year due to the timing of clinical development programs, efforts to achieve regulatory approval, and sales and marketing efforts. We willmay require substantial additional funding to bring our product candidate to market and support our continuing operations. In addition, with a change in the presidential administration in 2025, there has been an economic policy shift towards increasing tariffs, which in turn has led and could lead to further retaliatory tariffs. These may have the potential to impact expenses as well as our ability to, if ever, generate revenue or maintain profitability. Until such time that we can generate significant revenue from product sales or other sources, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through the sale of equity, debt financings, or other capital sources, which may include income from collaborations, strategic partnerships, or marketing, distribution, licensing or other strategic arrangements with third parties, or from grants. If we are unable to acquire additional capital or resources, we will be required to modify our operational plans to fund our operating expense requirements. Refer to “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Limited Operating History, Business, Financial Condition, and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details related to the risk of raising additional capital to fund our operations.

Added

Term Loan Facility

Added

In March 2025, we entered into a loan and security agreement (the “Loan and Security Agreement”) with Hercules Capital, Inc. (“Hercules”) and certain of its affiliates (collectively with Hercules, the “Lenders”) for an aggregate principal amount of $500.0 million, of which $300.0 million was fully committed subject to achievement of milestones (the “Credit Facility”). An initial tranche of $75.0 million (the “Tranche 1 Loan”) was funded under the Loan and Security Agreement on March 31, 2025. In addition to the Tranche 1 Loan, the Credit Facility provides for additional tranches as follows:

Added

a.Subject to our announcement that the VELA-1 and VELA-2 Phase 3 studies of SLK in adult patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa each achieved their protocol-specified primary endpoint with SLK having demonstrated an acceptable safety profile (the “Tranche 2 Milestone”), a second tranche with additional term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $125.0 million, available on the Tranche 2 Milestone achievement date through the earlier of (i) 30 days following such date and (ii) December 31, 2025, b.Subject to our announcement that the IZAR-1 and IZAR-2 Phase 3 studies of SLK in patients with active psoriatic arthritis each achieved their protocol-specified primary endpoint with SLK having demonstrated an acceptable safety profile (the “Tranche 3 Milestone”), a third tranche with additional term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $50.0 million, available on the Tranche 3 Milestone achievement date through the earlier of (i) 60 days following such date and (ii) September 15, 2026, c.Subject to our achievement of the Tranche 2 Milestone and Tranche 3 Milestone and the FDA’s acceptance of the Company’s submission of a BLA for SLK (collectively, the “Tranche 4 Milestone”), a fourth tranche with additional term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $50.0 million, available on the Tranche 4 Milestone achievement date through the earlier of (i) 60 days following such date and (ii) March 15, 2027, and d.Subject to approval by the Lenders in their discretion, a fifth tranche of additional term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $200.0 million.

Added

On September 28, 2025, we announced the primary endpoint results of the VELA-1 and VELA-2 Phase 3 studies. While VELA-1 met the primary endpoint, a higher-than-expected placebo response at week 16 precluded VELA-2 from meeting the pre-specified primary endpoint and, as a result, we did not achieve the Tranche 2 and Tranche 4 Milestones, reducing the committed amount under the Loan and Security agreement by $175.0 million. As of December 31, 2025, we had $250.0 million of remaining undrawn tranches, representing the aggregate principle amount available to be drawn under the Credit Facility.

Added

The Credit Facility matures on April 1, 2030 (the “Maturity Date”) and bears interest at an annual rate equal to the greater of (i) prime rate as reported in The Wall Street Journal plus 1.45% and (ii) 8.45% with the initial interest rate equal to 8.95%. As of December 31, 2025, the Credit Facility bears interest at 8.45%. This rate is subject to a 0.25% reduction upon achievement of the FDA’s approval of a BLA for SLK. Certain additional commitment and undrawn amount fees are also payable in connection with the Credit Facility.

Added

The Credit Facility does not provide for scheduled amortization payments during the term. All principal will be due on the Maturity Date. We may, at our option at any time, prepay all loans under the Credit Facility by paying the principal balance, plus accrued and unpaid interest, subject to (i) a prepayment premium equal to a range of 2.0% to 0.0% and (ii) an end of term charge equal to a range of 6.95% to 4.25%, each based on when the prepayment occurs. If the Credit Facility is repaid in full as a result of a change of control of the Company, the prepayment premium shall be waived.

Showing the first 60 of 87 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-10 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-11 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

1new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
1reworded paragraphs
747 → 869words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: tariff, russia, ukraine, middle east
“As a result of global economic conditions, including new or increased tariffs imposed by the United States government and potential retaliatory measures by foreign governments and other barriers to trade, especially in light of recent executive orders made by the presidential administration, trade and other international disputes, inflation and fluctuating interest rates, slower growth or recession, tighter credit, volatility in financial markets, high unemployment, labor availability constraints, public health crises, significant natural disasters, including as a result of climate change …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: tariff, russia, ukraine, middle east

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

As a result of global economic conditions, including new or increased tariffs imposed by the U.S. government and potential retaliatory measures by foreign governments and other barriers to trade, especially in light of recent executive orders made by the presidential administration, trade and other international disputes, inflation and fluctuating interest rates, slower growth or recession, tighter credit, volatility in financial markets, high unemployment, labor availability constraints, public health crises, significant natural disasters, including as a result of climate change, changes to fiscal and monetary policy or government budget dynamics, particularly in the pharmaceutical and biotech areas, political and military conflict, including the conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East, and related volatility in oil and other commodity prices, we may in the future experience disruptions that could seriously harm our business. In addition, in September 2025, the United States announced the potential imposition of up to 100% tariffs on imported branded or patented pharmaceuticals, subject to certain exceptions, and in April 2026, the Trump Administration issued a proclamation regarding the imposition of such tariffs. There remains substantial uncertainty as to the implementation and potential impacts of such tariffs and, more generally, about the duration of existing tariffs, tariff levels, and whether additional tariffs or retaliatory actions may be imposed, modified or suspended. Other potential disruptions include but are not limited to: delays or difficulties in enrolling patients in, initiating or expanding our clinical trials, including delays or difficulties with clinical site initiation and recruiting clinical site investigators and clinical site staff; increased rates of patients withdrawing from our clinical trials following enrollment as a result of certain health conditions or being forced to quarantine; interruption of key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site data monitoring and efficacy, safety and translational data collection, processing and analyses, due to limitations on travel imposed; recommendationsor recommended by federal, state or local governments, employers and others or interruptions of clinical trial subject visits, which may impact the collection and integrity of subject data and clinical trial endpoints; diversion of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials, including the diversion of hospitals serving as our clinical trial sites and hospital staff supporting the conduct of our clinical trials; delays or disruptions in preclinical experiments and IND-enabling studies due to restrictions of on-site staff and unforeseen circumstances at CROs and vendors; interruption or delays in the operations of the FDA, EMA, and comparable foreign regulatory authorities including delays in receiving approval from local regulatory authorities to initiate our planned clinical trials; interruption of, or delays in receiving, supplies of SLK from our CMOs due to staffing shortages, raw materials shortages, production slowdowns or stoppages and disruptions in delivery systems; and limitations on employee or other resources that would otherwise be focused on the conduct of our clinical trials and preclinical work, including because of sickness of employees or their families, the desire of employees to avoid travel or contact with large groups of people, an increased reliance on working from home, school closures or mass transit disruptions.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (2)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Added

As a result of global economic conditions, including new or increased tariffs imposed by the United States government and potential retaliatory measures by foreign governments and other barriers to trade, especially in light of recent executive orders made by the presidential administration, trade and other international disputes, inflation and fluctuating interest rates, slower growth or recession, tighter credit, volatility in financial markets, high unemployment, labor availability constraints, public health crises, significant natural disasters, including as a result of climate change, changes to fiscal and monetary policy or government budget dynamics, particularly in the pharmaceutical and biotech areas, political and military conflict, including the conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East, we may in the future experience disruptions that could seriously harm our business. For example, in early April 2026, the U.S. Administration issued a proclamation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 determining that imports of certain pharmaceutical products, including patented pharmaceuticals, associated active pharmaceutical ingredients and related materials could threaten U.S. national security and authorized the imposition of tariffs of up to 100% on covered imports, beginning July 31, 2026 (the “Pharmaceutical Tariffs”). Imports of certain listed products from specific partner countries, including South Korea and the European Union, may be subject to reduced tariff rates. Certain tariff exemptions or zero-rate treatment may be available for products where all approved indications are designated as orphan, subject to applicable determinations, conditions and implementation guidance. There remains substantial uncertainty as to the implementation and potential impacts of such tariffs, the duration of existing tariffs, tariff levels, and whether additional tariffs or other retaliatory actions may be imposed, modified or suspended. For example, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in February 2026 that certain tariffs imposed by the U.S. federal government under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act exceeded presidential authority and therefore are invalid. However, tariffs imposed under different statutes (including the Pharmaceutical Tariffs, if implemented) were not directly impacted by the decision and therefore remain in place.

Reworded

As a result of global economic conditions, including new or increased tariffs imposed by the U.S. government and potential retaliatory measures by foreign governments and other barriers to trade, especially in light of recent executive orders made by the presidential administration, trade and other international disputes, inflation and fluctuating interest rates, slower growth or recession, tighter credit, volatility in financial markets, high unemployment, labor availability constraints, public health crises, significant natural disasters, including as a result of climate change, changes to fiscal and monetary policy or government budget dynamics, particularly in the pharmaceutical and biotech areas, political and military conflict, including the conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East, and related volatility in oil and other commodity prices, we may in the future experience disruptions that could seriously harm our business. In addition, in September 2025, the United States announced the potential imposition of up to 100% tariffs on imported branded or patented pharmaceuticals, subject to certain exceptions, and in April 2026, the Trump Administration issued a proclamation regarding the imposition of such tariffs. There remains substantial uncertainty as to the implementation and potential impacts of such tariffs and, more generally, about the duration of existing tariffs, tariff levels, and whether additional tariffs or retaliatory actions may be imposed, modified or suspended. Other potential disruptions include but are not limited to: delays or difficulties in enrolling patients in, initiating or expanding our clinical trials, including delays or difficulties with clinical site initiation and recruiting clinical site investigators and clinical site staff; increased rates of patients withdrawing from our clinical trials following enrollment as a result of certain health conditions or being forced to quarantine; interruption of key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site data monitoring and efficacy, safety and translational data collection, processing and analyses, due to limitations on travel imposed; recommendationsor recommended by federal, state or local governments, employers and others or interruptions of clinical trial subject visits, which may impact the collection and integrity of subject data and clinical trial endpoints; diversion of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials, including the diversion of hospitals serving as our clinical trial sites and hospital staff supporting the conduct of our clinical trials; delays or disruptions in preclinical experiments and IND-enabling studies due to restrictions of on-site staff and unforeseen circumstances at CROs and vendors; interruption or delays in the operations of the FDA, EMA, and comparable foreign regulatory authorities including delays in receiving approval from local regulatory authorities to initiate our planned clinical trials; interruption of, or delays in receiving, supplies of SLK from our CMOs due to staffing shortages, raw materials shortages, production slowdowns or stoppages and disruptions in delivery systems; and limitations on employee or other resources that would otherwise be focused on the conduct of our clinical trials and preclinical work, including because of sickness of employees or their families, the desire of employees to avoid travel or contact with large groups of people, an increased reliance on working from home, school closures or mass transit disruptions.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

26new paragraphs
11removed paragraphs
42reworded paragraphs
8,216 → 8,414words in section

New heading “Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”

New heading “Research and Development”

New heading “General and Administrative”

New heading “Interest Expense”

New heading “Other Income, Net”

New heading “Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)”

New heading “June 2026 Public Offering of Class A Ordinary Shares, Pre-Funded Warrants and Over-Allotment Option”

Removed heading “Additional Trials for Other Indications”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: fine
“In June 2026, we announced the week 52 results of the VELA-1 trial (M1095-HS-301) and VELA-2 trial (M1095-HS-302), marking the end of the parental trial time period. Week 52 data for SLK showed consistent and further improvement in all clinical scores, compared to week 16 data. Across VELA-1 and VELA-2, 67.2% of patients treated with SLK achieved HiSCR75 and 33.1% of patients achieved HiSCR100 at week 52 (n=396). The results were consistent across both trials (VELA-1: 68.3% HiSCR75, 31.2% HiSCR100; VELA-2: 66.0% HiSCR75, 35.1% HiSCR100). …”
see in full comparison
New text
“June 2026 Public Offering of Class A Ordinary Shares, Pre-Funded Warrants and Over-Allotment Option”
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine
“In August 2026, we announced positive results from an analysis of the week 16 primary endpoint in the IZAR-1 trial (M1095-PSA-301) which met all clinical endpoints at week 16 for 60 mg SLK. 42.1% of biologic-naïve patients treated with SLK 60 mg with induction achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) response at week 16, the primary endpoint of the trial. In addition, SLK demonstrated strong efficacy across multiple disease domains characteristic of PsA. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Additional Trials for Other Indications”
see in full comparison
New text
“Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (79)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (“Quarterly Report”) on Form 10-Q,, and with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 25, 2026 (our “Annual Report”). Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and presented in United States dollars ($).

Reworded

This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this Quarterly Report, including, without limitation, statements regarding the following, are forward-looking statements: our future results of operations and financial position, our expectations regarding industry trends, the sufficiency of our cash and cash equivalents, the anticipated sources and uses of cash, the anticipated investments in our business, our business strategystrategy, expectations regarding our clinical programs and related financings, the plans and objectives of management for future operations and capital expenditures, our expectations regarding the timing and outcome of our clinical trial activities and results, regulatory submissions and approval and commercialization of our product candidates, including SLK (as defined below), and other information referred to in the sections titled “Business” and “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and "Risk Factors" in this Quarterly Report. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “could”, “intend”, “target”, “project”, “contemplate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential”, “might”, “possible”, or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report are only predictions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans and strategy for our business and related financing, as well as expectations regarding the timing of regulatory submissions and potential commercialization for SLK (as defined below). Our actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.

Reworded

•the impact of adverse business and economic conditions including inflationary pressures, general economic slowdown or a recession, fluctuating interest rates, new or increased tariffs and other barriers to trade, changes in fiscal and monetary policy or government budget dynamics, the prospect of a shutdown of the U.S.United States federal government, conflicts in the Middle East, and significant volatility in commodity prices, including the price of oil and the responses thereto;

Reworded

•securities litigation following periods of volatility in the marketplace or our share price; and

Reworded

•the other factors described under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report, as may be updated in this Quarterly Report, and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).SEC.

Reworded

SLK is a proprietary Nanobody that was discovered by Ablynx N.V., Belgium, a Sanofi company (“Ablynx”), and previously studied by MHKDG and Avillion LLP under a 2017 co-development agreement. The terms “Nanobody” and “Nanobodies” used herewithherein are registered trademarks of Ablynx. Nanobodies are able to bind selectively to a specific antigen with high affinity. Nanobodies have a fraction of the molecular weight compared to traditional antibodies. They offer a number of potential advantages over traditional monoclonal antibodies, including the potential to create multivalent molecules with enhanced ability to penetrate inflamed tissue, especially when containing an additional albumin binding domain such as SLK, an easier manufacturing process and a higher thermostability.

Added

In June 2026, we announced the week 52 results of the VELA-1 trial (M1095-HS-301) and VELA-2 trial (M1095-HS-302), marking the end of the parental trial time period. Week 52 data for SLK showed consistent and further improvement in all clinical scores, compared to week 16 data. Across VELA-1 and VELA-2, 67.2% of patients treated with SLK achieved HiSCR75 and 33.1% of patients achieved HiSCR100 at week 52 (n=396). The results were consistent across both trials (VELA-1: 68.3% HiSCR75, 31.2% HiSCR100; VELA-2: 66.0% HiSCR75, 35.1% HiSCR100). At week 52, 26.0% of patients (n=396) achieved an IHS4-100 response (VELA-1: 24.4%, VELA-2: 27.7%), reflecting inflammatory remission, defined as a 100% reduction in abscesses (A100), nodules (N100) and draining tunnels (DT100). The long-term results of the VELA program are higher than in previous Phase 3 HS programs with competing agents (using the same pooled, as observed, end of parental trial data analysis). The strong long-term clinical responses observed with SLK were accompanied by sustained improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes, which we believe matter most to patients living with HS and their treating physicians. Patients treated with SLK consistently showed the largest reductions in the HS-specific Quality of Life score (HiSQOL) at week 52, with a -15.3 mean score difference between end of trial and baseline in VELA-1, and -14.8 in VELA-2 (as observed, n=395). The broader skin Dermatology Life Quality Index score confirmed the HiSQOL results and showed clinically meaningful response (≥4-point improvement from baseline) in 75.0% (VELA-1) and 69.4% (VELA-2) of patients (as observed, in patients with baseline DLQI ≥4, n=363). Responses for both these quality-of-life metrics were higher than previously demonstrated in competitor pivotal HS studies. In line with these data, 46.5% of patients experienced a marked reduction in pain, measured as at least a 3-point reduction from baseline in the worst skin pain numerical rating scale (VELA-1: 48.4%, VELA-2: 44.3%; as observed, in patients with baseline worst skin pain score of ≥3, n=241).

Added

In June 2026, we presented an interim analysis of the VELA-TEEN clinical trial (M1095-HS-304) based on the latest available data. The data showed rapid onset and high response rates in adolescent patients with HS. At week 24, ~68% of patients treated with SLK achieved HiSCR75, alongside ~86% achieving HiSCR50 and ~45% achieving HiSCR100 (as observed, n=22). HiSCR75 rates in VELA‑TEEN were higher than those observed in the adult VELA program at comparable time points, indicating a pronounced clinical response in adolescent patients with earlier stage disease. SLK was generally well tolerated in this vulnerable patient population, and no new safety signals were observed. We expect to announce final topline results from the VELA-TEEN clinical trial in the second half of 2026.

Added

The VELA trials are followed by an open-label extension for up to two years (the VELA-OLE trial (M1095-HS-303)).

Added

The comparisons above to results reported in other sponsors' clinical programs, and between our own trials, are not based on head-to-head studies. Differences in trial design, patient populations, endpoints, analysis methods, timing and trial conduct may materially affect the comparability of these results, and regulators, physicians, payors and investors may weigh or interpret them differently than we do.

Removed

In May 2022, we initiated a Phase 2b trial of SLK in patients with moderate-to-severe HS (the MIRA trial (M1095-HS-201)), and in June 2023, we announced positive top-line results from this trial, which met its primary endpoint of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (“HiSCR”) 75 with 43% of patients treated with SLK 120mg achieving such response at week 12. In October 2023, we announced positive 24-week top-line results showing that the maintenance treatment with SLK led to further improvements in HiSCR75 response rates and other clinically relevant outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. In February 2024, we announced the successful outcome of our end-of-Phase 2 interactions with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), as well as positive feedback from our interactions with the E.U. European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), with both regulatory bodies supporting our proposed approach for advancing our Phase 3 program of SLK in HS. In May 2024, we announced the screening of the first patients in the VELA-1 trial (M1095-HS-301) and VELA-2 trial (M1095-HS-302). In April 2025, we announced completion of enrollment of the VELA program and presented baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. In September 2025, we announced primary endpoint data from the VELA-1 and VELA-2 clinical trials. In the combined VELA program, patients treated with SLK experienced a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement across all primary and key secondary endpoints using both pre-specified strategies (p<0.001). In VELA-1, SLK achieved statistical significance for all primary and key secondary endpoints using both pre-specified strategies (HiSCR75, delta to placebo of 17%, p<0.001). 34% of patients treated with SLK 120mg achieved a HiSCR75 response at the week 16 primary endpoint. In VELA-2, response rates associated with SLK were similar to those observed in VELA-1 (HiSCR75 response of 34%), but a higher-than-expected placebo arm precluded the study from achieving statistical significance in the week 16 primary endpoint using the composite strategy (HiSCR75, delta to placebo of 9%, p=0.053). Impact on HS lesions, including draining tunnels, was matched by improvements in all key Patient Reported Outcomes (“PROs”), such as quality-of-life and pain scores, that are meaningful for HS patients and their treating physicians. The safety profile of SLK was consistent with previously reported studies with no new safety signals observed. This included the absence of new signals in key events of interest with IL-17A and F therapies such as Suicidal Ideation and Behavior, hepatic events, Inflammatory Bowel Disease (“IBD”) and non-infectious diarrhea, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (“MACE”), and Eczema and Dermatitis. In February 2026, we presented an interim analysis of the long-term data from the VELA trials, which indicated that monthly maintenance treatment with SLK can lead to further improvements in clinically relevant outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe HS, including an as-observed HiSCR75 response rate of 69% in VELA-1 (n=104) and 67% in VELA 2 (n=123) after 52 weeks of treatment with SLK 120mg. In March 2026, we announced the week 40 results of the VELA-1 and VELA-2 clinical trials, which demonstrated continued improvement of clinical scores and PROs associated with continued SLK treatment. Across both VELA-1 and VELA-2, 62% of patients treated with SLK achieved a HiSCR75 response at week 40, and up to 32% of patients achieved HiSCR100 response at week 40. The VELA trials are expected to continue to week 52, followed by an open-label extension for up to two years (the VELA-OLE trial (M1095-HS-303)). We expect the full one-year data of VELA-1 and VELA-2 to become available in the second quarter of 2026. In parallel, we are conducting a Phase 3 trial of SLK in adolescent patients with HS (the VELA-TEEN trial (M1095-HS-304)), which we initiated in January 2025 and which completed enrollment in April 2026. In February 2026, we presented an interim analysis of the VELA-TEEN clinical trial which showed that 67% of patients achieved a HiSCR75 response at week 16 (n=21). We expect to announce topline results from the VELA-TEEN clinical trial in the second half of 2026.

Removed

In November 2025, we were granted a Type B meeting with the FDA to discuss adequacy of the current clinical evidence package of SLK in HS to support a Biologics License Application (“BLA”) and in January 2026, we announced positive feedback from this interaction, confirming that we may establish substantial evidence of effectiveness (“SEE”) without additional clinical trials in HS. The FDA specifically advised to include the results of the MIRA trial together with the results of the VELA trials in the submission to establish SEE.

Removed

In April 2026, we conducted a positive pre-BLA meeting with the FDA which constituted the last expected meeting with the FDA before the anticipated filing of the BLA for SLK in HS. In the meeting, we confirmed key elements of the proposed BLA submission package. No gaps were identified and we expect to submit the BLA for SLK in HS at the end of the third quarter of 2026. In the meeting, we further re-confirmed the inclusion of the MIRA trial to establish SEE and will thus continue to build the relevant sections of the proposed label as planned. We also aligned with the FDA on the inclusion of our VELA-TEEN clinical trial data to seek approval for patients with HS from age 12 onwards and notified the FDA of our intent to apply for priority review. Subject to FDA approval, we expect a first commercial launch in the United States in the second half of 2027.

Added

In August 2026, we announced positive results from an analysis of the week 16 primary endpoint in the IZAR-1 trial (M1095-PSA-301) which met all clinical endpoints at week 16 for 60 mg SLK. 42.1% of biologic-naïve patients treated with SLK 60 mg with induction achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) response at week 16, the primary endpoint of the trial. In addition, SLK demonstrated strong efficacy across multiple disease domains characteristic of PsA. Across key secondary clinical endpoints, 66.5% of patients achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) response, and 41.2% achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA). In patients with concomitant skin involvement, 61% achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) response. Patients treated with SLK also demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported and physical outcomes. Mean change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) was -0.427, while improvements were observed in SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) with a score of 6.54. Consistent with the unblinding protocol defined with the FDA, topline disclosure at week 16 included absolute response levels and endpoint outcomes for the SLK 60 mg with induction arm. Comparative analyses versus placebo and detailed treatment arm data remain blinded until completion of the trial.

Added

We expect to complete enrollment for the IZAR-2 trial (M1095-PSA-302) in the third quarter of 2026. In addition, we expect results of the P-OLARIS trial (M1095-snSpA-202) to become available at the end of 2026 or early 2027.

Removed

In December 2022, we initiated a Phase 2b trial in patients with active PsA (the ARGO trial (M1095-PSA-201)) and in November 2023, we announced positive top-line results from this trial, which met its primary endpoint of American College of Rheumatology (“ACR”) 50 with 46% of patients on 60mg SLK achieving such response at week 12. In March 2024, we announced positive 24-week data from the ARGO trial in PsA showing that continued treatment with SLK led to significant improvements across all key outcomes. In June 2024, we announced the successful outcome of our end-of-Phase 2 interactions with the FDA, as well as positive feedback from our interactions with the EMA, with both regulatory bodies supporting our proposed approach for advancing our Phase 3 program of SLK in PsA. In November 2024, we announced the screening of the first patients in the IZAR-1 trial (M1095-PSA-301) and IZAR-2 trial (M1095-PSA-302). In February 2026, we announced completion of enrollment for the IZAR-1 trial. We expect a readout of the primary and key secondary endpoints of the IZAR-1 clinical trial in mid-2026 and of the IZAR-2 clinical trial in the second half of 2026. In addition, in January 2025, we initiated another Phase 2 clinical trial of SLK in patients with PsA where we are applying novel imaging techniques (the P-OLARIS trial (M1095-snSpA-202)). We expect results of the P-OLARIS trial to become available at the end of 2026.

Added

We expect to commence enrollment for the Phase 3 NOVA trial (M1095-PPP-301) in the second half of 2026.

Removed

In November 2024, we initiated a Phase 2 trial in patients with PPP (the LEDA trial (M1095-PPP-201)) and in November 2025, we presented positive results of this trial, suggesting that SLK could provide clinically meaningful improvements in patients with PPP. Patients treated with SLK achieved a mean percent change from baseline in the Palmoplantar Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (“PPPASI”) of 64% at week 16, and 39% of patients achieved a ≥75% reduction in the PPPASI (“PPPASI75”). In February 2026, we announced that we received Fast Track designation from the FDA for SLK in moderate-to-severe PPP. In April 2026, we received feedback from the FDA on the design of the proposed Phase 3 clinical trial in PPP, and we expect to commence enrollment in the third quarter of 2026.

Removed

axSpA Trials

Removed

In February 2025, we initiated a Phase 2 trial in patients with axSpA (the S-OLARIS trial (M1095-axSpA-202)) and in February 2026, we presented positive results of this trial, suggesting that SLK could provide clinically meaningful improvements in patients with axSpA. Of the patients (n=26) treated with SLK, 81% achieved an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (“ASAS40”) response at week 12, showing at least 40% improvement and an absolute improvement of ≥2 units on a numerical rating scale (0 to 10) from baseline in at least three of the four key domains (Patient Global Assessment (“PGA”) of disease activity, total back pain, physical function, inflammation). More than 80% of patients have achieved a “clinically important improvement” as per ASDAS-CRP score by week 12, confirming the strong result in this clinically relevant endpoint.

Removed

PET and MRI imaging data collected as part of the clinical trial confirm a significant reduction in inflammation in the deep tissue of the spine and sacroiliac joint affected by axSpA in a pooled analysis comparing baseline to week 12. Additional objective biomarker and tissue analyses conducted as part of the clinical trial reinforce rapid and sustained effect of the treatment with SLK in axSpA patients. The safety profile of SLK in the S-OLARIS trial was consistent with previous trials with no new safety signals detected.

Removed

Additional Trials for Other Indications

Removed

SLK was also studied in a Phase 2b trial in PsO patients where it showed a significant improvement in the primary end point as compared with placebo and for which results were presented in peer-reviewed scientific publications and conferences. In addition, Phase 1 single ascending and multiple ascending dosing trials were previously completed.

Reworded

We do not have any product candidates approved for commercial sale, and we have not generated any revenue from product sales. Our ability to generate revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend on the successful development and eventual commercialization of SLK in one or more indications, which we expect to take a number of years.indications. We expect to continue to incur substantial expenses and operating losses for at least the next two years as we continue the development of SLK and prepare for commercial launches. We expect that operating losses will fluctuate notably from year to year depending on the timing of our planned clinical development programs, efforts to achieve regulatory approval, and planned marketing and sales expenditures to support a commercial launch.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $357.9$537.0 million of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term marketable securities. Based on our current operating plan and proceeds received from issuance of Class A ordinary shares under the Sales Agreement subsequent to the reporting period,plan, we believe that we have sufficient capital to fund our operations and capital expenditures to the end of 2027.mid-2028.

Reworded

•external research and development expenses incurred under agreements with Clinicalcontract Researchresearch Organizations (“CROs”)organizations as well as consultants that conduct our research program and development services;

Reworded

•facilities, depreciation and other allocated expenses, which include direct and allocated expenses for rent, utilitiesutilities, and insurance.

Reworded

We estimate research and clinical trial expenses based on the services performed pursuant to contracts with research institutions, CROs,contract research organizations, and Clinicalcontract Manufacturingmanufacturing Organizations (“CMOs”)organizations that conduct and manage research studies and clinical trials on our behalf based on actual time and expenses incurred by them or probable achievement of milestone events that are associated with contractually agreed milestone payments.

Reworded

General and administrative expense (“G&A”) consists primarily of employee related costs, including salaries, bonuses, benefits, share-based compensation and other related costs for our executive and administrative functions. G&A expense also includes professional services, including legal, accounting and audit servicesservices, and other consulting fees, as well as facility costs not otherwise included in research and development expenses, insurance and other general administrative expenses.

Reworded

•Completing the development of SLK in our current focus indications, HS, PsA, axSpA and PPP — We expect to incur considerable research and development expenses and G&A expenses as we: (i) conduct clinical trials for SLK including the ongoing Phase 3 clinical trials in HS, PsA and adolescent HS, the ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial in PsA, potential future Phase 3 clinical trials in PPP and axSpA, the ongoing open-label extension trials in HS, and potential future clinical trials of SLK in other indications; (ii) attract, hire and retain additional clinical, scientific, quality control, and administrative personnel; and (iii) add clinical, operational, financial and management information systems and personnel.

Reworded

•Strengthening the differentiation elements for future SLK patients — In parallel with our clinical trials, we expect to incur additional research expenditures as we conduct non-clinical research to continue refining our understanding of SLK/Nanobody biology and the potential impact in our selected and other therapeutic indications.

Reworded

•Preparing for commercialization of SLK — We have started preparing the BLA to seek approval of SLK in the United States in HS and adolescent HS. We expect to incur significant research and development and G&A expenses in this process, as we make milestone and commercial payments under the In-License Agreement, dated April 29, 2021, by and between MoonLake AG and MHKDG (the “In-License Agreement”) (based on regulatory filing acceptances, first commercial sales, and aggregate annual net sales) and as we establish a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure to commercialize SLK including further establishing a presence in the United States. We expect to submit the BLA at the end of the third quarter of 2026 after completion of the VELA program, and, subject to FDA approval, we expect a commercial launch in the U.S.United States in the second half of 2027.

Reworded

•Granting share-based compensation awards and vesting of existing plans — We expect to continue to grant awards to selected employees, directors and non-employees pursuant to the MoonLakeAmended Immunotherapeuticsand Restated 2022 Equity Incentive Plan.Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”). Further, we expect to continue to incur share-based compensation charges in connection with this plan.

Reworded

We also expect to incur additional IT, legal, accounting, leasing, and other expenses as we continue to grow our business. Our net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year, depending on the timing of our clinical trials and our expenditures on other research and development and commercialization activities.

Reworded

We expect our existing cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to advance the development of SLK in multiple indications, including the completion of all ongoing clinical trials and our planned Phase 3 clinical trial of SLK in PPP, to submit a BLA for SLK, and to advance preparations forsupport a first commercial launch of SLK in the U.S..United States, if approved. Clinical development involves a lengthy and expensive process with uncertain outcomes and is subject to risks described in Item 1A. Risk Factors, in our Annual Report, including that our non-clinical studies or clinical trials may not be conducted as planned or completed on schedule and may not satisfy the requirements of the FDA, EMA, or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities. If we are required to conduct additional preclinical studies or clinical trials of SLK beyond those that we currently contemplate, if we are delayed or unable to successfully complete clinical trials of SLK or other testing, or if the results of these trials or tests are not positive or are only modestly positive or if there are safety concerns, we may require additional funding. Moreover, we willmay require additional capital to commercialize SLK and to discover, develop, obtain regulatory approval and commercialize any future product candidates, as applicable. We expect to finance future cash needs through public or private equity, additional debt, or product collaborations. Additional capital may not be available in sufficient amounts or on reasonable terms, if at all. The current market environment for small biotechnology companies, like us, and broader macroeconomic factors may preclude us from successfully raising additional capital.

Reworded

Our functional currency is the U.S.United States dollar. Balances and transactions denominated in foreign currencies are converted as follows: monetary assets and liabilities are translated using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates and non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at historical exchange rates. Income and expenses are translated at the daily exchange rate on the respective transaction date.

Reworded

Gains or losses from foreign currency translations are included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss in “Other income, net”. We recognized a net foreign currency transaction gainloss of $56$294 thousand for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and a net foreign currency transaction loss of $35$238 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2026, and a foreign currency transaction gain of $378 thousand and $343 thousand for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.2025, respectively.

Reworded

Comparison of the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025

Added

Research and development expenses were $50.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $49.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase of $0.5 million, or 0.9%, is primarily related to an increase of $3.7 million in expenses pertaining to clinical development trials with CROs, including the Phase 3 IZAR program in PsA and startup activities for the Phase 3 NOVA program in PPP, and an increase of $0.5 million in other research and development fees. The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $3.3 million in manufacturing, supply and logistics expenses through CMOs, primarily reflecting the net impact of lower clinical supply costs following the completion of certain clinical programs. The remaining offsetting decrease was driven by a decrease of $0.8 million in advisory and consulting expenses.

Removed

Research and development expenses were $54.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $36.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase of $18.1 million, or 49.5%, is primarily related to an increase of $6.5 million in manufacturing, supply and logistics expenses through CMOs, which is primarily related to the production of stockpiled pre-launch inventory, an increase of $6.3 million in accelerated expense recognition due to a voluntary cancellation of unvested stock option awards for no consideration, and an increase of $5.4 million in expenses pertaining to clinical development trials with CROs, including the Phase 3 VELA program in HS and the Phase 3 IZAR program in PsA.

Reworded

General and administrative expenses were $15.5$11.4 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $11.0$10.9 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase of $4.5$0.5 million, or 40.7%,4.6%, is primarily related to an increase of $4.8$1.1 million in acceleratedmarketing expenseand recognitioncommunications dueexpenses related to apre-commercial voluntary cancellation of unvested stock option awards for no consideration, and an increase of $0.6 million in additional personnel-related costs.activities. The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $0.6$0.9 million in advisoryother general and professionaladministrative services.expenses.

Reworded

Interest expense was $2.3$2.6 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $18$2.0 thousandmillion for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase of $2.3$0.6 millionmillion, or 29.2%, is related to additional recognized interest on the First Amended Loan and Security Agreement (as defined below) and drawdown of a second debt tranche.tranche earlier in 2026.

Reworded

Other income, net was $3.2$2.6 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $7.1$6.8 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease of $3.9$4.2 million, or (54.862.0)%, is primarily related to a decrease of $4.2$3.6 million in realized interest on cash held in bank and cash investments in short-term marketable debt securities.securities and a decrease of $0.9 million in net realized currency gains.

Reworded

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Reworded

Other comprehensive lossincome was $0.3 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $2.7other comprehensive loss of $1.9 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease in other comprehensive loss of $2.4$2.2 million, or (89.4116.3)%, is primarily related to the unrealized gains from investments in short-term marketable debt securities recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income to other income, net during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.

Added

Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025

Added

Research and Development

Added

Research and development expenses were $104.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $86.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase of $18.5 million, or 21.5%, is primarily related to an increase of $8.2 million in expenses pertaining to clinical development trials with CROs, driven by higher costs from the Phase 3 IZAR program in PsA, partially offset by lower costs from the Phase 3 VELA program in HS, an increase of $7.0 million in share-based compensation and personnel-related costs to support research and development efforts, of which $6.3 million is a result of accelerated expense recognition due to a voluntary cancellation of unvested awards, and an increase of $3.2 million in manufacturing, supply and logistics expenses through CMOs, which is primarily related to the production of stockpiled pre-launch inventory. The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $0.6 million in consulting expenses.

Added

General and Administrative

Added

General and administrative expenses were $26.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $22.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase of $5.0 million, or 22.7%, is primarily related to an increase of $6.1 million in share-based compensation and personnel-related costs, of which $4.8 million is a result of accelerated expense recognition due to a voluntary cancellation of unvested awards, and an increase of $1.3 million in marketing and communications expenses related to pre-commercial activities. The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $2.5 million in legal and advisory expenses.

Added

Interest Expense

Added

Interest expense was $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase of $2.8 million, or 138.4%, is related to additional recognized interest on the First Amended Loan and Security Agreement and drawdown of a second debt tranche earlier in 2026.

Added

Other Income, Net

Added

Other income, net was $5.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $13.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease of $8.1 million, or (58.3)%, is primarily related to a decrease of $7.9 million in realized interest on cash held in bank and cash investments in short-term marketable debt securities and a decrease of $0.9 million in net realized currency gains.

Added

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Added

Other comprehensive income was $26 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to other comprehensive loss of $4.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease in other comprehensive loss of $4.6 million, or (100.6)%, is primarily related to the unrealized gains from investments in short-term marketable debt securities recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income during the six months ended June 30, 2026.

Reworded

For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we incurred a loss of $69.7$131.5 million, which includes non-cash items such as share-based compensation expense of $13.4$15.9 million, and cash outflow from operations of $66.3$121.8 million. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had a total of $357.9$537.0 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities. Based on our current operating plan and proceeds received from the issuance of Class A ordinary shares under the Sales Agreement (as defined below) subsequent to the reporting period,plan, we believe our available cash, cash equivalents, and short-term marketable securities will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements to the end of 2027.mid-2028.

Reworded

In March 2025, we entered into a loan and security agreement (the “Original Loan and Security Agreement”) with Hercules Capital, Inc. (“Hercules”) and certain of its affiliates (collectively with Hercules, the “Lenders”) comprised of five tranches for an aggregate principal amount of $500.0 million, of which $300.0 million was fully committed subject to achievement of milestones (the “Original Credit Facility”). An initial tranche of $75.0 million (the “Tranche 1 Loan”) was funded under the Loan and Security Agreement on March 31, 2025 (the “Closing Date”).

Reworded

On February 20, 2026 (the “Amendment Closing Date”), we executed the First Amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement (the “First Amended Loan and Security Agreement” and, together with the Original Loan and Security Agreement, the “Loan and Security Agreement”) with, among others, Hercules, as administrative and collateral agent for the Lenders, which amended the Original Loan and Security Agreement. The Loan and Security Agreement provides for asix non-dilutive senior secured term loan facility comprised of six tranchesfacilities in the aggregate principal amount of $500.0 million (the “Amended Credit Facility” and, together with the Original Credit Facility, the “Credit Facility”). A second tranche (the “Tranche 2 Loan”) in an aggregate principal amount of $25.0 million was fully funded on the Amendment Closing Date. In addition to the Tranche 1 Loan and Tranche 2 Loan, the Credit Facility provides for additional tranches as follows:

Reworded

a.Subject to our announcement that the IZAR-1 and IZAR-2 Phase 3 studies of SLK in patients with active psoriatic arthritis each achieved their protocol-specified primary endpoint and that the efficacy and safety data available together support the planned commercialization strategy and outlook of our Company (the “Tranche 3 Milestone”), a third tranche with additional term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $50.0 million, available on the Tranche 3 Milestone achievement date through the earlier of (i) 60 days following such date and (ii) March 15, 2027, b.Subject to our announcement that the VELA-1 and VELA-2 Phase 3 studies of SLK in adult patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa each demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements across the 52-week endpoints with SLK having demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, which together support (x) the planned commercialization strategy and outlook of our Company and (y) the filing of the BLA for SLK with the FDA for an indication for use generally consistent with the population studied in VELA-1 and VELA-2 of patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa as the next immediate step in development (together, the “Tranche 4 HS Milestone”), and immediately prior to the advance of a fourth tranche, we have closed the previous 10 consecutive trading days with a market capitalization of at least $1,500.0 million; provided that, the first trading day tested cannot be prior to the public announcement of the Tranche 4 HS Milestone (collectively with the Tranche 4 HS Milestone, the “Amended Tranche 4 Milestone”), this fourth tranche with additional term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $50.0 million, available on the Amended Tranche 4 Milestone achievement date through the earlier of (i) 60 days following the achievement of the Tranche 4 HS Milestone and (ii) December 15, 2026, c.Subject to our achievement of the Tranche 4 HS Milestone and the FDA’s approval of our submission of a BLA for SLK with an indication for use generally consistent with that sought in our BLA filing with the FDA and which supports the target product profile for SLK (the “Approval Milestone”) (collectively, the “Tranche 5 Milestone”), a fifth tranche with additional term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $100.0 million, available on the Tranche 5 Milestone achievement date through the earlier of (i) 60 days following such date and (ii) December 15, 2027, and d.Subject to approval by the Lenders’ in their discretion, a sixth tranche of additional term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $200.0 million.

Showing the first 60 of 79 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

MLTX insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 12 filings (3 insiders, 17 trade dates, 636,428 shares, about $12.4M; 11 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -636,428 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$12.4M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-07-27Reich Kristian
Chief Scientific Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
1,100$20.00 $22.0K2,711,198 SEC
2026-07-22Reich Kristian
Chief Scientific Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
2,448$20.00 $49.0K2,712,298 SEC
2026-07-21Reich Kristian
Chief Scientific Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
50,000$20.02 $1.0M2,714,746 SEC
2026-07-20Reich Kristian
Chief Scientific Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
43,700$20.09 $877.9K2,764,746 SEC
2026-07-15Reich Kristian
Chief Scientific Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
16,105$20.01 $322.3K2,808,446 SEC
2026-07-10Santos Da Silva Jorge
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
68,289$20.02 $1.4M2,774,893 SEC
2026-07-09Santos Da Silva Jorge
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
33,936$20.01 $679.1K2,843,182 SEC
2026-07-01Santos Da Silva Jorge
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
47,775$20.03 $956.9K2,877,118 SEC
2026-06-22Bodenstedt Matthias
Chief Financial Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
39,120$22.04 $862.2K1,115,435 SEC
2026-06-18Bodenstedt Matthias
Chief Financial Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
2,794$19.60 $54.8K1,154,555 SEC
2026-06-17Bodenstedt Matthias
Chief Financial Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
15,082$19.68 $296.8K1,157,349 SEC
2026-06-17Reich Kristian
Chief Scientific Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
50,000$19.43 $971.5K2,824,551 SEC
2026-06-16Reich Kristian
Chief Scientific Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
50,000$18.70 $935.0K2,874,551 SEC
2026-06-15Reich Kristian
Chief Scientific Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
50,000$18.89 $944.5K2,924,551 SEC
2026-05-11Bodenstedt Matthias
Chief Financial Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
13,653$20.02 $273.3K1,172,431 SEC
2026-04-14Bodenstedt Matthias
Chief Financial Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
2,426$19.56 $47.5K1,186,084 SEC
2026-04-13Santos Da Silva Jorge
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Open-market sale 51,873$18.23 $945.6K2,924,893 SEC
2026-04-10Santos Da Silva Jorge
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Open-market sale 98,127$18.41 $1.8M2,976,766 SEC

Well-known investors holding MLTX (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
D. E. Shaw & Co. CLASS A ORD2026-06-303,365,507$65.5M0.04%Added 41%
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) CLASS A ORD2026-06-301,972,893$38.4M0.02%Added 49%
Two Sigma Investments CLASS A ORD2026-06-301,715,349$33.4M0.03%Added 53%
Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) CLASS A ORD2026-06-301,158,732$22.6M0.03%Reduced 15%
Renaissance Technologies CLASS A ORD2026-06-30643,268$12.5M0.02%Added 132%
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) CLASS A ORD2026-06-30636,187$12.4M0.01%Added 10%
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) CLASS A ORD2026-06-30358,884$7.0M0.0%Added 677%

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when MLTX files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.