Companies › MNTK

MNTK 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Montauk Renewables, Inc. · Nasdaq · Gas & Other Services Combined · CIK 1826600 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Montauk Renewables, Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

12 / 30risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
0new risk-factor headings
1Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-03-11 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-03-14 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

12new paragraphs
30removed paragraphs
46reworded paragraphs
15,229 → 14,292words in section

Removed heading “Any future acquisitions, investments or other strategic relationships that we make could disrupt our business, cause dilution to our stockholders or harm our business, financial condition or operating results.”

Removed heading “We are subject to volatility in prices of RINs and other Environmental Attributes.”

Removed heading “The failure of our hedge counterparties or significant customers to meet their obligations to us may adversely affect our financial results.”

Removed heading “Our business is subject to risks arising out of climate change, which could result in increased operating costs.”

Removed heading “Our issuance of additional capital stock in connection with financings, acquisitions, investments, our equity incentive plans or otherwise will dilute stockholders.”

Removed heading “Our ability to pay regular dividends on our common stock is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: default, liquidity
“To the extent we hedge our RNG revenues, our hedging transactions expose us to the risk that a counterparty fails to perform under a derivative contract. Volatility in the market index to which we hedge our RNG revenues could expose us to variability in our commodity based revenues. Disruptions in the financial markets could lead to sudden decreases in a counterparty’s liquidity, which could make them unable to perform under the terms of the derivative contract and we may not be able to realize the benefit of the derivative contract. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: climate
“Our business is subject to risks arising out of climate change, which could result in increased operating costs.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: fine, impairment
“Volatility of commodity prices creates volatility in the price of Environmental Attributes. The value of RINs is inversely proportionate to the wholesale price of unleaded gasoline. Further, the production of RINs significantly in excess of the RVOs set by the EPA for a calendar year could adversely affect the market price of RINs, particularly towards the end of the year, if refiners and other RFS obligated parties have satisfied their RVOs for the year. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: fine, regulation

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We depend on Environmental Attributes, which are federal, state and local government incentives in the United States, provided in the form of RINs, RECs, LCFS credits, rebates, tax credits and other incentives to end users, distributors, system integrators and manufacturers of renewable energy projects, that promote the use of renewable energy. RINs are created through the RFS program administered by the EPA, which requires transportation fuel sold in the United States to contain a minimum volume of renewable fuel and has historically permitted refineries and importers of transportation fuel to satisfy their RVOs by purchasing either (i) D5 RINs and cellulosic waiver credits (“CWCs”) or (ii) D3 RINs. In a December 1, 2022 proposed rule, EPA proposed to not utilize its cellulosic waiver authority for the years 2023-2025. However, if actual production is lower than the RVO, the EPA will have discretion to utilize CWC. This rule was finalized inon July 12, 2023. On December 12, 2024, EPA proposed a partial waiver of 2024 Cellulosic Biofuel Volume Requirements due to the projected shortfall of D3 RINs available to meet the 2024 RVO. This proposal is still pending and, with a new presidential administration, it is unknown when this proposed rule will bewas finalized (ifon atJuly all) in7, 2025. InEPA addition,made CWCs available for purchase under the RFS, EPA was required to finalize RVO volumes for 2026 by November 1, 2024 but did not meet that deadline. According to the White House Office of Management and Budget’s Fall Unified Agenda and Regulatory Plan, published on December 13, 2024, EPA indicates that it expects in March 2025 to (i) publish afinal rule finalizingalong itswith December 12, 2024 proposedthe partial waiver of the 2024 cellulosic biofuel volume requirement. The final rule also requires the use of a new data source for the average wholesale price of gasoline to be used in the calculation of the CWC price. The EPA proposed the 2026 and 2027 RVOs and a Partial Waiver of the 2025 Cellulosic Biofuel Volume RequirementsRequirement andon June 17, 2025. On August 22, 2025, the EPA issued decisions on 175 Small Refinery Exemptions (iiSREs) proposefor RVOthe years 2023-2025. EPA subsequently proposed a Supplemental Rule (referred to as the SRE reallocation volume) on September 18, 2025, which would account for the for 2023-2025 exempted RVOs. EPA co-proposed SRE reallocation volumes that would account for 2026100 (whichpercent or 50 percent of the exemptions granted for the 2023-2025 compliance years. EPA expectsis aiming to finalize innew Decemberbiofuel 2025). There can be no assurance that EPA will meet its proposed timelinesmandates for these2025, actions.2026 and 2027 along with the Supplemental Rule in late March 2026. RECs are created through state law requirements for utilities to purchase a portion of their energy from renewable energy sources. 74%Approximately, 67% and 76%74% of our operating revenues for 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively, were generated from the sale of Environmental Attributes. These government economic incentives could be reduced or eliminated altogether,altogether or interpretations of existing regulations or the categories of renewable energy qualifying for such government economic incentives could be changed. These renewable energy program incentives are subject to regulatory oversight and could be administratively or legislatively changed in a manner that could adversely affect our operations. Further, the generation of LCFS credits on our dairy farm project is expected to increase the percentage of our revenues generated from Environmental Attributes. Reductions in, changes to, or eliminations or expirations of governmental incentives could result in decreased demand for, and lower revenues from, our projects. Changes in the level or structure of the RPS of a state for electricity could also result in a decline in our revenues or decreased demand for, and lower revenues from, our electricity projects.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: default

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress the market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. Many of our existing equity holders have substantial unrecognized gains on the value of the equity they hold and may take steps to sell their shares or otherwise secure the unrecognized gains on those shares. Additionally, pursuant to the terms of the Fourth Amended and Restated Promissory Note, MNK is required to use the proceeds from any sale of the 976,623 shares of our common stock pledged as security for MNK’s loan obligations to repay the amounts due under the Note. These sales may have a downward impact on the prevailing market price of our common stock. The maturity of the loan has been extended until 2033 but MNK will continue to evaluate options to complete the sale of these shares including but not limited to register sale or underwritten offering in the US or direct sale to a South African investor. We also have default provisions in the underlying note whereby MNK can satisfy the note by delivering the shares back to us as permitted by applicable law. We are unable to predict the timing of or the effect that such sales, by MNK or by other shareholders, may have on the prevailing market price of our common stock.
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: regulation, climate
“Since 2015, EPA has been attempting to regulate carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from existing fossil-fuel fired electric power generation facilities under section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. Depending on how these regulations are structured, they could result in favorable treatment for renewable energy, as happened with the 2015 Clean Power Plan, which allowed facility owners to reduce emissions with “outside the fence” measures, including those associated with renewable energy projects. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (88)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 2 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Landfills contain organic material whose decomposition causes the generation of gas consisting primarily of methane, which our RNG projects use to generate power or renewable natural gas, and carbon dioxide. The estimation of landfill gas production volume is an inexact process and dependent on many site-specific conditions, including the estimated annual waste volume, composition of waste, regional climate and the capacity and construction of the landfill. Production levels are subject to a number of additional risks, including a failure or wearing out of our or our landfill operators’, customers’ or utilities’ equipment; an inability to find suitable replacement equipment or parts; less than expected supply or quality of the project’s source of biogas and faster than expected diminishment of such biogas supply; or volume disruption in our fuel supply collection system. Any extended interruption and/or volume disruption in the project’s operation, or failure of the project for any reason to generate the expected amount of output, could adversely affect our business and operating results. For example, certain of our Houston-based operating sites were impacted by severe weather events during the first nine month of 2024 including multiple day extended outages from Hurricane Beryl in July 2024. Furthermore, we produced fewer MMBTuMMBtu and MWh in the third quarter of 2023 compared with the third quarter of 2022 due to dry weather conditions and higher ambient temperatures. In addition, we have in the past, and may in the future, incur material asset impairment charges if any of our renewable energy projects incurshas operational issues that indicate our expected future cash flows from the project are less than the project’s carrying value. Any such impairment charge could adversely affect our operating results in the period in which the charge is recorded.

Reworded

In addition, in order to maximize collection of LFG, we will need to take various measures, such as drilling additional gas wells in the landfill to increase LFG collection, balancing the pressure on the gas field based on the data collected by the landfill operator from the gas wells to ensure optimum landfill gas utilization and ensuring that we match availability of engines and related equipment to availability of LFG. There can be no guarantee that we will be able to take all necessary measures to maximize collection. For example, we do not operate the wellfields at all sites. In addition, the LFG available to our projects is dependent in part on the actions of other persons, such as landfill operators. We may not be able to ensure the responsible management of the landfill site by owners and operators,operators whichor maythere could be a change in operations and maintenance providers that results in less effective operations. This could result in less than optimalless-than-optimal gas generation or increase the likelihood of “hot spots” occurring. Hot spots can temporarily reduce the volume of gas which may be collected from a landfill site, resulting in a lower gas yield. Landfill owner negligence such as covering gas wells with landfill material and breaking gas lines could also result in decreased output. Other events that can result in a reduction in LFG output include: extreme hot or cold temperatures or drought or excessive rainfall; liquid levels within a landfill increasing; oxidation within a landfill, which can kill the anaerobic microbes that produce landfill gas; and the buildup of sludge. The occurrence of thesesludge or anyinorganic othermaterials changes(such withinas anyconstruction ofmaterials) thethat landfillsdo wherenot ourproduce projectsgases operateas couldthey lead to a reduction in the amount of LFG available to operate our projects, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.decompose.

Added

The occurrence of these or any other changes within any of the landfills where our projects operate could lead to a reduction in the amount of LFG available to operate our projects, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Reworded

A substantial portion of our revenues are generated from five project sites. For the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, excluding the effect of derivative instruments, approximately 69.1%67.7% and 68.4%,69.1%, respectively, of operating revenues were derived from these locations. During 2024,2025, RNG production at our Rumpke, Atascocita, Rumpke, McCarty and GalvestonApex facilities accounted for approximately 20.7%, 20.3%, 18.9%, 16.4%16.0% and 11.0%7.7% of our RNG revenues, respectively, and 18.7%,20.7%, 21.4%,20.3%, 15.0%16.0% and 8.7%7.7% of the RNG we produced, respectively. During 2024,2025, Renewable Electricity production at our Bowerman Power LFG, LLC (“Bowerman”) facility accounted for approximately 92.2%94.9% of our Renewable Electricity Generation revenues and 82.6%85.5% of the Renewable Electricity we produced during 2024.2025. A lengthy interruption of production or transmission of renewable energy from one or more of these projects, asdue a result ofto a severe weather event, failure or degradation of our or a landfill operator’s equipment or interconnection transmission problems could have a disproportionate effect on our revenues and cash flow.

Reworded

Our Atascocita, McCarty, Galveston and Coastal Plains projects are located within 20 miles of each other near Houston, Texas and six of our other RNG projects are located in relatively close proximity to each other in Pennsylvania and Ohio. Regional events, such as gas transmission interruptions, regional availability of replacement parts and service in the event of equipment failures and severe weather events in either of those geographic regions have previously adversely affected, and if the future could adversely affect, our RNG production and transmission. These impacts are greater than would be if our business was more geographically diverse.

Added

In 2025, RIN sales to Valero and ExxonMobil represented approximately 17.4% and 11.3%, respectively, of our operating revenue. In 2024, RIN sales to Valero, GE Warren, ExxonMobil and Mercuria represented approximately 17.6%, 15.7%, 13.8 and 11.8%, respectively, of our operating revenue. Five customers made up approximately 68.2% of our accounts receivable as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024. Revenues from our largest customers may fluctuate from time to time based on our customers’ business needs, market conditions or other factors outside of our control. If any of our largest customers terminates its relationship with us, such termination could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.

Reworded

We have insurance policies covering certain risks associated with our business. Our insurance policies do not, however, cover all losses, including, in some situations, those as a resultbecause of force majeure, which is generally defined as events that are beyond the control of the parties. For example, we did not receive any insurance recovery from the shutdowns in Houston in February 2021 due to the extreme cold or from the Bowerman shutdown in October 2020 due to wildfires. Even if insurance policies for some of our projects cover losses as a result of certain types of force majeure events, such coverage is subject to important limitations. Furthermore, insurance liabilities are difficult to assess and quantify due to unknown factors, including the severity of an injury, the determination of our liability in proportion to other parties, the number of incidents not reported and the effectiveness of our safety program. Insurance coverage is not always available on commercially reasonable terms (if at all) and is often capped at predetermined limits. In addition, our insurance policies are subject to annual review by our insurers and may not be renewed on similar or favorable terms or at all. A serious uninsured loss or a loss significantly exceeding the limits of our insurance policies could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Reworded

Our success will dependdepends on our ability to create and maintain a competitive position in the renewable energy industry. Other than the patented technology acquired through the Montauk Ag Renewables Acquisition, our internally developed condensate neutralization technology and an RNG processing skid we developed, weWe do not have any exclusive rights to anymany of the technologies that we utilize, and our competitors may currently use and may be planning to use identical, similar or superior technologies. While significant to the development associated with our emerging North Carolina Montauk Ag Renewables business, we do not currently consider patented technology material to the total business. In addition, theour technologies thatmay weultimately useprove ineffective, may be hampered by frequent mechanical breakdowns, or rendered obsolete or uneconomical by technological advances, more efficient and cost-effective processes or entirely different approaches developed by one or more of our competitors or others.

Reworded

We may also face competition based on technological developments that reduce demand for electricity, increase power supplies through existing infrastructure or that otherwise compete with our projects. We also encounter competition in the form of potential customers electing to develop solutions or perform services internally rather than engaging an outside provider such as us.

Reworded

Our projects generally are, and any of our future projects are likely to be, located on land occupied pursuant to long-term easements, leases and rights of way. The ownership interests in the land subject to these easements, leases and rights-of-way may be subject to mortgages securing loans or other liens (such as tax liens) and other easement,easements, lease rights and rights-of-way of third parties (such as leases of oil or mineral rights) that were created prior to our projects’ easements, leases and rights-of-way. As a result, certain of our projects’ rights under these easements, leases or rights-of-way may be subject, and subordinate, to the rights of those third parties. In the future, our existing projects may need new easements or rights-of-way and there is no guaranty that we will be able to secure these. For example, our Shade facility in Johnstown needs a change in the easement due to road construction. We may not be able to protect our operating projects against all risks of loss of our rights to use the land on which our projects are located, and any such loss or curtailment of our rights to use the land on which our projects are located and any increase in rent due on such lands could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Reworded

We aim to maintain and grow our position as a leading producer of RNG in the United States. Our specific focus on the renewable energy sector exposes us to risks related to the supply of, demand for and the ultimate price of energy commodities and Environmental Attributes, inflation, taxes, tariffs, dutiesduties, or other assessments on necessary equipment, the cost of capital expenditures, government regulation, world and regional events and economic conditions, labor market conditions and the acceptance of alternative power sources. As a renewable energy producer, we may also be negatively affected by lower energy output resulting from variable inputs, mechanical breakdowns, faulty technology, competitive electricity markets or changes to the laws and regulations that mandate the use of renewable energy sources by refiners and importers of gasoline and diesel fuel and electric utilities.

Reworded

regulatory changes,changes whetherand asstatements aand resultpolicies of the newcurrent presidential administration orthat otherwise,make thatit more difficult and expensive for us to borrow and raise capital, reduce investment in the infrastructure we rely on and affect the demand for orand supply of our RNG, REG, and the Environmental Attributes and the prices thereof, which could have a significant effect on the financial performance of our projects and the number of potential projects with attractive economics;

Reworded

substantial construction risks, including the risk of delay,delay that may arise due to forces outside of our control, including those related to reduced parts supply, delays in parts supply, increased costs of parts, engineering and environmental problems, aslabor ashortages resultand ofdisruptions inclementand adverse weather or labor disruptionsconditions;

Reworded

a decrease in the availability and timeliness of delivery of raw materials and components necessary for the projects to functiondevelop and function, such as our collaboration with European Energy which relies on parts from Denmark, or an increase in the costs of raw materials and components due to, among other reasons, inflation, tariffs, duties, taxes or assessments;

Reworded

penalties, including potential termination, under short-term and long-term contracts for failing to deliver RNGRNG, RECs, or REG in accordance with our contractual obligations;

Reworded

unknown regulatory changes with respect to RECs, RINs, REG, or RNG which may increase the transportation cost for delivering under contracts in place;

Reworded

In addition, new projects have no operating history and may employ recently developed technology and equipment. The technology may not be successful or our use of intellectual property may be challenged for infringement. A new project may be unable to fund principal and interest payments under its debt service obligations or may operate at a loss, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. This may also make it more difficult to obtain capital for new projects.

Reworded

If there is not sufficient demand for renewable energy, or the associated Environmental Attributes, or if renewable energy projects do not develop or take longer to develop than we anticipate, we may be unable to achieve our investment objectives.

Reworded

If demand for renewable energy or Environmental Attributes fails to grow sufficiently, we may be unable to achieve our business objectives. In addition, demand for renewable energy projects and Environmental Attributes in the markets and geographic regions that we target may not develop or may develop more slowly than we anticipate. Many factors will influence the widespread adoption of renewable energy and demand for renewable energy projects, including:

Reworded

We plan to expand our business in part through developing RNG recovery projects at landfills and livestock farms, including our Turkey, North Carolina location, but we may not be able to identify suitable locations or complete development of new projects.successful.

Reworded

We plan to continue to develop new RNG projects at landfills and livestock farms but we may be unable to implement this growth strategystrategy. ifWe wemay cannotnot be able to identify suitable landfills and livestock farms on which to develop projects, reach agreements with landfill or livestock farm owners to develop RNG projects or arrange required financing for new projects. While the EPA has identified an additional 463444 landfills as candidates for biogas projects, we believe that approximately 3832 of these sites produce sufficient quantities of LFG to support commercial-scale projects, with 2524 of the approximately 3832 sites being operated by Waste Management or Republic Waste, with whom we would need to negotiate with to secure sufficient LFG rights to support an RNG project. In the future, additional candidate landfills may become economically viable as their growth increases LFG production and requires installation of LFG collection systems. However, the time and effort involved in attempting to identify suitable sites and development of new projects may divert members of our management from our operations.

Added

While our Montauk AG swine manure facility in Turkey, North Carolina is scheduled to begin commercial operations in April 2026, we have experienced delays due to inclement weather, construction delays, mechanical breakdowns and failure of technology to perform as expected. As of December 31, 2025, we have spent approximately $142 million to develop the facility and expect that total capital investment will be approximately $200 million. There can be no assurances that the facility will produce the projected amount of renewable electricity and swine RECs or that the project will not need additional capital investment to become fully operational. Furthermore, while we are contracted to sell a portion of the swine RECs produced, we do not have a contract to sell all projected swine RECs we produce. There is no established market for swine RECs so we are unsure at what price we will be able to sell them, if we are able to sell them at all.

Reworded

Our Pico dairy farm project produces significantly less RNG than our landfill facilities. As a result, we will beare even more dependent on the LCFS credits and RINs produced at our dairy farm project than on the RINs produced at our landfill facilities for the project’s commercial viability. InAs a result of the event2025 thatAFPR CARBreview, worsens theour CI score thatworsened. itThe worsening CI score is primarily due to increased biogas upgrading and fugitive emissions from the biogas upgrading process. We are currently conducting an analysis to determine the benefit of installing a combustion device to eliminate fugitive emissions. As a result of this, we may be subject to a claw back of LCFS credits related to the overgeneration of LCFS credits using the old CI Score. While we do not believe the penalty applies to wasteus, conversionthe projects,legislation suchdoes allow for a penalty of four times the number of LCFS credits to be taken away from a producer as dairya digesters,penalty if its score is lowered. As a result, the number of LCFS credits for RNG generated at our dairy farm project will decline. Additionally, revenue from LCFS credits also depends on the price per LCFS credit, which is driven by various market forces, including the supply of and demand for LCFS credits, which in turn depends on the demand for traditional transportation fuel and the supply of renewable fuel from other renewable energy sources, and mandated CI targets, which determine the number of LCFS credits required to offset LCFS deficits, and which increase over time. Fluctuations in the price of LCFS credits or the number of LCFS credits assigned will have a significantly greater impact on the success of our dairy farm project than the value that RINs have on our landfill facilities. A significant decline in the value of LCFS credits could require us to incur an impairment charge on our dairy farm project and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Reworded

Our business is currently focused on converting methane into renewable energy. In the future, we may expand our strategy to include other types of projects. For example, we have entered into an agreement with European Energy North America under which we supply biogenic carbon dioxide for the creation of e-methanol and have announced a pilot project with Emvolon in which we will recover and convert biogas into green methanol. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify attractive opportunities outside of our current area of focus or acquire or develop such projects at a price and on terms that are attractive or that, once acquired or developed, such projects will operate profitably. Risks include a lack of supply offtake, lower than expected prices for generated supplies, malfunctioning equipment, unsuccessful new technologies, and intellectual property challenges. In addition, these projects could expose us to increased operating costs, unforeseen liabilities or risks, and regulatory and environmental concerns associated with entering into new sectors of the energy industry, including requiring a disproportionate amount of our management’s attention and resources, which could adversely affect our business, as well as place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to more established market participants. A failure to successfully integrate such new projects into our existing project portfolio as a result of unforeseen operational difficulties or otherwise, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Removed

Any future acquisitions, investments or other strategic relationships that we make could disrupt our business, cause dilution to our stockholders or harm our business, financial condition or operating results.

Removed

We expect future acquisitions of companies, purchases of assets and other strategic relationships to be an important part of our growth strategy. We plan to use acquisitions to expand our capabilities, expand our geographic markets, add experienced management and add to our project portfolio. However, we may not be able to identify suitable acquisition or investment candidates, reach agreements with acquisition targets on acceptable terms or arrange for any required financing for an acquisition on acceptable terms, any of which would materially impact our present strategy. While we perform due diligence on prospective acquisitions, we may not be able to discover all potential operational deficiencies in such projects. Further, if we are successful in consummating acquisitions, those acquisitions could subject us to a number of risks, including:

Removed

the purchase prices we pay could significantly deplete our cash reserves or result in dilution to our existing stockholders;

Removed

we may find that the acquired companies or assets do not improve our customer offerings or market position as planned;

Removed

we may have difficulty integrating the operations and personnel of the acquired companies;

Removed

key personnel and customers of the acquired companies may terminate their relationships with the acquired companies as a result of or following the acquisition;

Removed

we may experience additional financial and accounting challenges and complexities in areas such as tax planning and financial reporting;

Removed

we may experience delays in construction and development or regulatory approvals impacting, among other projects, the Pico, Apex or Montauk Ag development cycle;

Removed

we may incur additional costs and expenses related to inflation and complying with additional laws, rules or regulations in new jurisdictions;

Removed

we may assume or be held liable for risks and liabilities (including for environmental-related costs) as a result of our acquisitions, some of which we may not discover during our due diligence or adequately adjust for in our acquisition arrangements;

Removed

our ongoing business and management’s attention may be disrupted or diverted by transition or integration issues and the complexity of managing geographically diverse enterprises;

Removed

we may incur one-time write-offs or restructuring charges in connection with an acquisition;

Removed

we may acquire goodwill and other intangible assets that are subject to amortization or impairment tests, which could result in future charges to earnings; and we may not be able to realize the cost savings or other modeled financial benefits we anticipated.

Removed

Any of these factors could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Reworded

OurThe profitability of our renewable fuel projects may be exposedlimited by our ability to dispense fuel to separate RINs and the volatility of the price of RINs.

Added

A RIN is separated by dispensing RNG through permitted channels. If we are unable to dispense RNG through such permitted channels because of a lack of demand, we are unable to separate RINs. Furthermore, if the supply of RNG to be separated through the permitted channels is greater than the demand for the RNG, the price we pay to separate the RIN could be higher.

Reworded

TheFurthermore, the price of RINsEnvironmental Attributes, including RINs, is driven by various market forces, including regulatory action, gasoline prices and the availability of renewable fuel from other renewable energy sources and conventional energy sources. For example, following the EPAsEPA’s releaseissuance of theannual 2023Renewable RVOVolume Obligations in Decemberrecent 2022, theyears, market priceprices offor a D3certain RIN declinedcategories fromhave $2.43experienced onsignificant thevolatility datein of the releaseresponse to $1.88changes in Februarymandated 2023.volumes, Furthermore,compliance flexibility, and market expectations. In addition, refiners are permitted to carry-overcarry over up to 20% of RINs generated for one calendar year after the RINs are generated to satisfy their RVOs.RVOs for the following year. As a result, we are generally only able to sell RINs on a forward basis for the year in which the RINs are generated and the followingsubsequent year. We may be unable to manage the risk of volatility in RIN pricing for all or a portion of our revenues from RINs, which would expose us to the volatility of commodity prices with respect to all or the portion of RINs that we are unable to sell through forward contracts, including risks resulting from changes in regulations, general economic conditions and changes in the level of renewable energy generation. We expect to have quarterly variations in the revenues from the projects in which we generate revenue from the sale of RINs that we are unable to sell through forward contracts.

Added

We may be unable to manage the risk of volatility in RIN pricing for all or a portion of our revenues from RINs, which would expose us to the volatility of commodity prices with respect to all or the portion of RINs that we are unable to sell through forward contracts, including risks resulting from changes in regulations, general economic conditions and changes in the level of renewable energy generation. We expect quarterly variations in the revenues from the projects in which we generate revenue from the sale of RINs that we are unable to sell through forward contracts and may experience reduced revenues if we are unable to separate RINs through the dispensing of produced RNG through permitted channels or reduced net income if we must pay a higher price to separate such RINs due to excess supply.

Reworded

The operations and financial performance of projects in the renewable energy sectors may be affected by the prices of energy commodities, such as natural gas, wholesale electricity and other energy-related products. For example, the price of renewable energy resources changes in relation to the market prices of natural gas and electricity. The market price for natural gas is sensitive to cyclical demand and capacity supply, changes in weather patterns,patterns (including extreme temperatures spells), natural gas storage levels, natural gas production levels, general economic and geopolitical conditions (including the current conflictsconflict in the Middle East and Ukraine) and the volume of natural gas imports and exports. The market price of electricity is sensitive to cyclical changes in demand and capacity supply,supply (including both cyclical demand and increased long term demand due to, among others, data storage centers and artificial intelligence), and in the economy and geopolitical conditions (including the current conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine),conditions, as well as to regulatory trends and developments impacting electricity market rules and pricing, transmission development and investment to power markets within the United States and in other jurisdictions through interconnects and other external factors outside of the control of renewable energy power-producing projects. Volatility of commodity prices also creates volatility in the prices of Environmental Attributes, which are inversely related to the wholesale price of unleaded gasoline. In addition, volatility of commodity prices, such as the market price of gas and electricity, may also make it more difficult for us to raise any additional capital for our renewable energy projects that may be necessary to operate, to the extent that market participants perceive that a project’s performance may be tied directly or indirectly to commodity prices. Accordingly, the potential revenues and cash flows of these projects may be volatile and adversely affect the value of our investments.

Reworded

Our off-take agreements for the sale of RNG are typically shorter in duration than our fuel supply agreements. Accordingly, if we are unable to renew or replace an off-take agreement for a project for which we continue to produce RNG, we would be subject to the risks associated with selling the RNG produced at that project at then-current market prices. We may be required to make such sales at a time when the market price for natural gas as a whole or in the region where that project is located,located is depressed. If this were to occur, we would be subject to the volatility of gas prices and be unable to predict our revenues from such project, and the sales prices for such RNG may be lower than what we could sell the RNG for under an off-take agreement.

Removed

We are subject to volatility in prices of RINs and other Environmental Attributes.

Removed

Volatility of commodity prices creates volatility in the price of Environmental Attributes. The value of RINs is inversely proportionate to the wholesale price of unleaded gasoline. Further, the production of RINs significantly in excess of the RVOs set by the EPA for a calendar year could adversely affect the market price of RINs, particularly towards the end of the year, if refiners and other RFS obligated parties have satisfied their RVOs for the year. A significant decline in the price of RINs and price of LCFS credits for a prolonged period could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and could require us to take an impairment charge relating to one or more of our projects.

Removed

The failure of our hedge counterparties or significant customers to meet their obligations to us may adversely affect our financial results.

Removed

To the extent we hedge our RNG revenues, our hedging transactions expose us to the risk that a counterparty fails to perform under a derivative contract. Volatility in the market index to which we hedge our RNG revenues could expose us to variability in our commodity based revenues. Disruptions in the financial markets could lead to sudden decreases in a counterparty’s liquidity, which could make them unable to perform under the terms of the derivative contract and we may not be able to realize the benefit of the derivative contract. Any default by the counterparty to these derivative contracts could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Removed

We also face credit risk because we sell our RNG to a limited number of significant customers who do not post collateral. The inability or failure of our significant customers to meet their obligations to us or their insolvency or liquidation may adversely affect our financial results.

Reworded

We depend on Environmental Attributes, which are federal, state and local government incentives in the United States, provided in the form of RINs, RECs, LCFS credits, rebates, tax credits and other incentives to end users, distributors, system integrators and manufacturers of renewable energy projects, that promote the use of renewable energy. RINs are created through the RFS program administered by the EPA, which requires transportation fuel sold in the United States to contain a minimum volume of renewable fuel and has historically permitted refineries and importers of transportation fuel to satisfy their RVOs by purchasing either (i) D5 RINs and cellulosic waiver credits (“CWCs”) or (ii) D3 RINs. In a December 1, 2022 proposed rule, EPA proposed to not utilize its cellulosic waiver authority for the years 2023-2025. However, if actual production is lower than the RVO, the EPA will have discretion to utilize CWC. This rule was finalized inon July 12, 2023. On December 12, 2024, EPA proposed a partial waiver of 2024 Cellulosic Biofuel Volume Requirements due to the projected shortfall of D3 RINs available to meet the 2024 RVO. This proposal is still pending and, with a new presidential administration, it is unknown when this proposed rule will bewas finalized (ifon atJuly all) in7, 2025. InEPA addition,made CWCs available for purchase under the RFS, EPA was required to finalize RVO volumes for 2026 by November 1, 2024 but did not meet that deadline. According to the White House Office of Management and Budget’s Fall Unified Agenda and Regulatory Plan, published on December 13, 2024, EPA indicates that it expects in March 2025 to (i) publish afinal rule finalizingalong itswith December 12, 2024 proposedthe partial waiver of the 2024 cellulosic biofuel volume requirement. The final rule also requires the use of a new data source for the average wholesale price of gasoline to be used in the calculation of the CWC price. The EPA proposed the 2026 and 2027 RVOs and a Partial Waiver of the 2025 Cellulosic Biofuel Volume RequirementsRequirement andon June 17, 2025. On August 22, 2025, the EPA issued decisions on 175 Small Refinery Exemptions (iiSREs) proposefor RVOthe years 2023-2025. EPA subsequently proposed a Supplemental Rule (referred to as the SRE reallocation volume) on September 18, 2025, which would account for the for 2023-2025 exempted RVOs. EPA co-proposed SRE reallocation volumes that would account for 2026100 (whichpercent or 50 percent of the exemptions granted for the 2023-2025 compliance years. EPA expectsis aiming to finalize innew Decemberbiofuel 2025). There can be no assurance that EPA will meet its proposed timelinesmandates for these2025, actions.2026 and 2027 along with the Supplemental Rule in late March 2026. RECs are created through state law requirements for utilities to purchase a portion of their energy from renewable energy sources. 74%Approximately, 67% and 76%74% of our operating revenues for 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively, were generated from the sale of Environmental Attributes. These government economic incentives could be reduced or eliminated altogether,altogether or interpretations of existing regulations or the categories of renewable energy qualifying for such government economic incentives could be changed. These renewable energy program incentives are subject to regulatory oversight and could be administratively or legislatively changed in a manner that could adversely affect our operations. Further, the generation of LCFS credits on our dairy farm project is expected to increase the percentage of our revenues generated from Environmental Attributes. Reductions in, changes to, or eliminations or expirations of governmental incentives could result in decreased demand for, and lower revenues from, our projects. Changes in the level or structure of the RPS of a state for electricity could also result in a decline in our revenues or decreased demand for, and lower revenues from, our electricity projects.

Reworded

Our operations inherently risk incurring significant environmental costs and liabilities due to the need to manage waste from our processing facilities. Spills or other releases of regulated substances, including spills and releases that occur in the future, could expose us to material losses, expenditures and liabilities under applicable environmental laws, rules and regulations. Under certain of such laws and regulations, we could be held strictly liable for the removal or remediation of previously released materials or property contamination, regardless of whether we were responsible for the release or contamination and even if our operations met previous standards in the industry at the time they were conducted. In connection with certain acquisitions, we could acquire, or be required to provide indemnification against, environmental liabilities that could expose us to material losses. In addition, claims for damagesdamage to persons or property, including natural resources, may result from the EHS impacts of our operations. Our insurance may not cover all environmental risks and costs or may not provide sufficient coverage if an environmental claim is made against us.

Reworded

New laws, changes to existing laws, new interpretations of existing laws, increased governmental enforcement of environmental laws or other developments could require us to make significant additional expenditures. Continued governmentexpenditures and publicthese emphasisadditional onexpenditures environmental issues can be expected tomay result in increasedus futureterminating investmentsnew for environmental controls at our plants under federalprojects or stateceasing law.operations of existing projects. Present and future federal and state environmental laws and regulations, and interpretations of those laws and regulations, applicable to our operations, more vigorous enforcement policies and discovery of currently unknown conditions may require substantial expenditures that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. InOn January 2025,7, 2026, President Trump’sTrump Puttingsigned Americaa Firstpresidential inmemorandum Internationalto Environmental Agreements executive order withdrew the United States fromexit the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’sChange (UNFCCC) Parisalong Agreement, which aims to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions by 61% below 2005 levels by 2030. This order also withdrewwith the UnitedIntergovernmental StatesPanel fromon anyClimate similarChange climate-related agreements made under the UNFCCC. The stated purpose of Trump’s Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders(IPCC) and Actionsover executive60 orderother isinternational toorganizations, retractarguing certainthey practicesdid ofnot Presidentserve Biden,U.S. includinginterests. thoseWhile addressingfederal publicsupport healthfor renewable projects may decline, states and the environment,private thesector climateare crisis and climate-related financial risks. The order rescinds identified initiatives relatedexpected to environmentalcontinue justice,driving clean energy and electric vehicles, and energy and infrastructure. These executive orders present risks to federal incentives available to promote renewable energy, as can be seen in the Unleashing American Energy executive order signed by President Trump that explicitly calls for an immediate pause of the disbursement of funds under the IRA and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, both of which contain renewable energy incentives.development.

Reworded

Our ability to generate revenue from sales of RECs, RINs and LCFS credits depends on our strict compliance with these federal and state programs, which are complex and can involve a significant degree of judgment. If the agencies that administer and enforce these programs disagree with our judgments, otherwise determine that we are not in compliance, conduct reviews of our activities or make changes to the programs, then our ability to generate or sell these credits could be temporarily restricted pending completion of reviews or as a penalty, permanently limited or lost entirely, and we could also be subject to fines or other sanctions. Moreover, the inability to sell RINs and LCFS credits could adversely affect our business.

Reworded

Parties with an interest in other energy sources, including lawmakers, regulators, policymakers, environmental and advocacy organizations or other activists may invest significant time and money in efforts to delay, repeal or otherwise negatively influence regulations and programs that promote renewable energy. Many of these parties have substantially greater resources and influence than we have. Further, changes in U.S. federal, state or local political, social or economic conditions, including a lack of legislative focus on these programs and regulations, could result in their modification, delayed adoption or repeal. Any failure to adopt, delay in implementing, expiration, repeal or modification of these programs and regulations, or the adoption of any programs or regulations that encourage the use of other energy sources (such as coal) over renewable energy, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The current presidential administration’s focus on maximizing coal, oil, and gas production primarily hurts the renewable energy sector by reducing and eliminating financial incentives, pausing wind/solar projects on public lands, and creating regulatory uncertainty. Policies aimed at reversing climate change progress and prioritizing fossil fuels have slowed investment, though market forces and state-level actions continue to drive clean energy growth.

Added

On January 20, 2025, Executive Order 14154 was signed and directed agencies to review agency actions that may “impose an undue burden” on domestic energy resources. In particular, President Trump directed the EPA to make a recommendation within 30 days regarding the legality and continuing applicability of the 2009 Endangerment Finding for greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act.

Added

On March 12, 2025, the EPA Administrator Zeldin announced that the EPA would reconsider the 2009 Endangerment Finding, as well as “regulations and actions that rely on that Finding,” which likely include EPA’s 2024 GHG performance standards for the electric utility sector, the 2024 methane performance standards for the refining sector, and various light-, medium-, and heavy-duty vehicle emission standards, among other actions. On June 11, 2025, Zeldin proposed to repeal all “greenhouse gas” emissions standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants. On February 12, 2026, the EPA formally repealed the 2009 Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding, a foundational policy that determined carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases pose a threat to public health and welfare. This action, described by officials as the largest deregulatory move in U.S. history, removes the legal basis for federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles, power plants, and oil and gas operations. While these policies aim to boost fossil fuels, economic trends suggest that clean energy is increasingly competitive, leading some to view this approach as a temporary obstacle rather than a permanent halt to the energy transition.

Removed

Since 2015, EPA has been attempting to regulate carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from existing fossil-fuel fired electric power generation facilities under section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. Depending on how these regulations are structured, they could result in favorable treatment for renewable energy, as happened with the 2015 Clean Power Plan, which allowed facility owners to reduce emissions with “outside the fence” measures, including those associated with renewable energy projects. EPA’s first two efforts to regulate these emissions from power generation facilities, including the Clean Power Plan and the later Affordable Clean Energy Rule, have been struck down through a combination of changes in administration and judicial review. EPA’s most recent regulation is the 2024 Power Plant GHG Rule, which was published on May 9, 2024. The Power Plant GHG Rule rule includes performance-based mechanisms for EGUs burning coal and incentivizes the early retirement of coal-fired plants by having less stringent (or no) emission limits for plants that agree to retire by certain dates. States are required to submit their individual compliance plans by May 11, 2026. State plans could include compliance flexibilities such as emission trading. However, the Power Plant GHG Rule has been heavily litigated, and EPA recently filed a motion that was granted to hold the case in abeyance so that new leadership at EPA can review the rule and consider next steps. Given the emphasis in President Trump’s executive orders regarding favoring fossil fuel production and rescinding the Biden administration’s executive orders on climate change, it is expected that EPA will reconsider this rule. In addition, in the Unleashing American Energy executive order, President Trump also directed the EPA Administrator to submit a report on the “legality and continuing applicability” of its 2009 endangerment finding for GHGs under the CAA. Revoking this finding would undermine the EPA’s regulations covering CO2 and other GHG emissions from power plants and its climate regulatory authority in general.

Reworded

The market for renewable energy is influenced by U.S. federal, state and local government regulations and policies concerning renewable energy. These regulations and policies are continuously being modified, which could result in a significant future reduction in the potential demand for renewable energy, including RINs, RECs and LCFS credits, renewable energy project development and investments. For example, on December 12, 2024, EPA proposed a partial waiver of 2024 Cellulosic Biofuel Volume Requirements due to the projected shortfall of D3 RINs available to meet the 2024 RVO. This proposalrule iswas stillfinalized pending,on and,July 7, 2025. EPA made CWCs available for purchase under the final rule along with athe newpartial presidentialwaiver administration,of itthe is2024 unknowncellulosic whenbiofuel thisvolume proposed rule will be finalized (if at all) in 2025.requirement. Any new government regulations applicable to our renewable energy projects or markets for renewable energy may result in significant additional expenses or related development costs and, as a result, could cause a significant reduction in demand for our renewable energy. For additional information on regulatory developments, see “Item 7A.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —Key Trends—Regulatory, Environmental and Social Trends.”

Reworded

We are required to register an RNG project with the EPA and relevant state regulatory agencies to generate Environmental Attributes. As a participant of the EPA's RFS program, we qualify our RINs through a voluntary Quality Assurance Plan, which typically takes from three to five months from first injection of RNG into the commercial pipeline system. The Biogas Regulatory Reform Rule ("BRRR") implemented changes to the RFS program effective January 1, 2025. The BRRR requires that all unseparated K3 RINs generated by the RNG producer on RNG volumes injected into the commercial pipeline distribution system only become valid for sale once they are separated with the support of dispensing statements by a registered dispenser or RIN separator. This process couldhas proven to result in delays to the RNG producer's receipt of the separated K2 RINs from the dispenser. This rule change could also result in a RNG producer's failure to generate K3 RINs for a given gas flow month if the registered biogas producer negligently fails to generate the necessary biogas tokens before the end of the subsequent gas flow month. Furthermore, although no similar qualification process currently exists for LCFS credits, we expect such a process to be implemented and would expect to seek qualification on a state-by-state basis under such future programs. Changes to the LCFS program require annual verification of the CI score assigned to a project. Annual verification could significantly affect the profitability of a project, particularly in the case of a livestock farm project. Delays in obtaining registration, RIN qualification, and any future LCFS credit qualification, or change in CI rescoringscores through CARB annual audits, of a new project could delay future revenues from the project and could adversely affect our cash flow. Further, we typically make a large investment in the project prior to receiving the regulatory approval and RIN qualification. BRRR now requires that all RNG producers register their projects and use a Quality Assurance Plan (QAP). QAPs required third-party audits and semi-annual on-site visits of projects to validate generated RINs and overall compliance with the RFS program. We are also subject to a separate third party’s annual attestation review. The QAP provides a process for RIN owners to follow, for an affirmative defense to civil liability, if used or transferred QAP verified RINs were invalidly generated. A project’s failure to comply could result in remedial action by the EPA, including penalties, fines, retirement of RINs, or termination of the project’s registration, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For additional information on recent developments in this area, including the Pico facility’s CI score, see “Item 7A.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Trends—Regulatory, Environmental and Social Trends.”

Reworded

Furthermore, extreme weather events, such as lightning strikes, ice storms, tornados, extreme wind, hurricanes and other severe storms, wildfires and other unfavorable weather conditions or natural disasters, such as droughts, floods, fires, earthquakes, and rising sea-levels, could adversely affect the input and output commodities associated with the renewable energy sector. Such weather events or natural disasters could also require us to temporarily or permanently shut down the equipment associated with our renewable energy projects, such as our access to power and our power to biogas collection, separation and transmission systems, which would impede the ability of our projects to operate and decrease production levels and our revenue. Operational problems, such as degradation of our project’s equipment due to wear or weather or capacity limitations or outages on the electrical transmission network, could also affect the amount of energy that our projects are able to deliver. Any of these events, to the extent not fully covered by insurance, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Showing the first 60 of 88 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

33new paragraphs
31removed paragraphs
53reworded paragraphs
12,015 → 12,558words in section

New heading “Blue Granite RNG Project”

New heading “GreenWave Joint Venture”

New heading “Capital Investment and Progress towards Commercial Operation Date (COD)”

New heading “General and Administrative Revenues”

New heading “New Senior Credit Facility”

Removed heading “Waste-stream Biogas Recovery”

Removed heading “REG Facility Sale”

Removed heading “RNG Facility Sale”

Removed heading “Interconnection update”

Removed heading “Production construction update”

Removed heading “Conversion of Electricity Projects to RNG Projects:”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: default, fine, covenant
“The New Senior Credit Facility is subject to customary financial covenants. The New Senior Credit Facility is subject to customary events of default and contemplates that we would be in default if, for any fiscal quarter (x) the average monthly D3 RIN price is less than $1.00 per RIN and (y) the consolidated average quarterly trailing EBITDA over the previous four quarters is less than $10,000. The New Senior Credit Facility includes various affirmative and negative covenants that require us to meet specified financial ratios and financial tests, as defined in the underlying agreement.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine, interest rate
“requires that MEH provide additional financial information and analysis to the lenders within fifteen business days of the end of each month As of December 31, 2025, $44,000 was outstanding under the term loan and we had $85,000 of outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The term loan amortizes in quarterly installments of $3,000 quarterly through 2026 with a final payment of $32,000, on December 21, 2026. Interest rates were 6.44% and 6.01% at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: fine, interest rate
“As of December 31, 2024, $56,000 was outstanding under the term loan and we had no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The term loan amortizes in quarterly installments of $2,000 through December 2024, quarterly installments of $3,000 from 2025 through maturity, with a final payment of $32,000, on December 21, 2026. Interest rates were 6.01% and 6.11% at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“Capital Investment and Progress towards Commercial Operation Date (COD)”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Conversion of Electricity Projects to RNG Projects:”
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine
“In 2025, through our wholly-owned subsidiary Pesta Energy, LLC, we entered into an agreement with Pioneer Renewables Energy Marketing, LLC to form a joint venture, GreenWave Energy Partners, LLC (“Greenwave”). The primary goal of the joint venture is to help address the limited capacity of RNG utilization for transportation by offering third party RNG volumes access to exclusive unique and proprietary pathways. In the third quarter of 2025, Greenwave began matching available RNG volumes to dispensing opportunities through Greenwaves's transportation pathways. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (117)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 16 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Amounts are in thousands unless indicated otherwise.

Reworded

This section generally discusses our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. For discussion and analysis of our results for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. For discussion and analysis of our results for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022 ,2023, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2024.2025.

Reworded

Our profitability is highly dependent on the market price of Environmental Attributes, including the market price for RINs. As we self-market a significant portion of our RINs, a decision not to commit to transfer available RINs during a period will impact our revenue and operating profit. We decidedexpect tothe nottiming transfer all available D3between RINs generated and unseparated and RINs available for transfersale duringto only impact 2025 which is the fourthyear quarterBRRR ofbecame 2024. As a result, in the first quarter of 2025, we had approximately 9,885 RINs in inventory related to 2024 RNG production.effective. We have entered into commitments to transfer all RINs generated and available for sale from 20242025 RNG production. We had approximately 190 RINs generated and unseparated at December 31, 2025. We have not entered into commitments to transfer futureapproximately 2,500 RINs generated and available for sale from forecasted future 20252026 RNG production. The average D3 RIN index price for the fourth quarter of 20242025 and January 20252026 through February 28, 20252026 was approximately $2.80$2.39 and $2.42,$2.41, respectively. The following table summarizes select historical data related to RINs generated, RINs sold, and RINs generated but unsold. As we self-market a significant portion of our RINs and as the RFS is based on annual compliance, any strategic decision to not monetize available RINs in a quarter could impact the timing of operating revenues recognized during a fiscal year. Realized prices for Environmental Attributes monetized in a year may not correspond directly to index prices due to the forward selling of commitments. The timing of RIN transfers can vary year over year and by period within a year and is contingent on various factors including, but not limited to: (a) the Company’s expectations on RIN index price, (b) operational needs of the Company, (c) obligated parties’ purchase needs, or (d) the type of customer among other matters.

Reworded

The following summarizes our ongoing development growth plansplans, expected capacity contribution, anticipated commencement of operations, and capital expenditure estimate, respectively,excluding excludingthe Montauk Ag Renewables Development project:

Reworded

In 2024,2025, we successfullybegan commissioned the expansion of our digestion capacity which is necessary to processprocessing the final tranche of increased feedstock expected to be received in the second quarter of 2025.feedstock. Upon receipt of the final tranche, we will makemade the final contractual payment to the dairy host. As a result of the increased digestion capacity, we produced approximately 73.4%31.8% more MMBtu during 20242025 as compared to 2023.2024. During 2025, our digestion inlet feedstock averaged approximately 458 gallons per day, approximately 17% in excess of our contracted minimums of 390 gallons per day. We are currently evaluating additional development expansion opportunities to ensure beneficial processing of all available feedstock volumes.

Added

In 2025, we successfully completed the construction and commissioning of a second RNG processing facility at the Apex landfill. The construction of a second facility under our existing fuel supply agreement was triggered by biogas feedstock volumes exceeding production capabilities, discussions with the landfill host, and the host's waste intake forecasted projections. We continue to expect there will be a period where we have excess availability capacity after the second facility is commissioned while the landfill host increases its waste intake. We continue to collaborate with the landfill host to mitigate impacts from wellfield extraction factors which could impact capacity utilization. In connection with the commissioning of the second facility, we produced approximately 7.8% more MMBtu during 2025 as compared to 2024.

Added

Blue Granite RNG Project

Added

In 2025, we received notice from the utility that it will no longer accept RNG into its distribution system, which was in opposition of the letter of intent that was issued when we were awarded the gas rights to the site. As a result, we impaired the capital associated with the interconnection and equipment. We continue to have $1,000 recorded associated with the payment upon award of the gas rights agreement. We continue to review various alternatives related to interconnection opportunities as part of our considerations for offtake options with the understanding those alternatives may differ from initial development project assumptions, including physical and virtual and fixed interconnections. We are also reviewing alternatives for this site around producing energy other than RNG. We have paused capital expenditures related to this site while we consider all alternatives and continue discussions with the landfill host.

Added

In 2025, we announced the conversion of our Tulsa, Oklahoma Renewable Electric Generation facility to RNG project. The project will offer a variable inlet capacity, ranging from 550 scfm to 2,250 scfm per day, providing average production capacity we target to be approximately 1,500 MMBtu per day and designed to beneficially process all of available inlet gas feedstock from its landfill host. We expect commissioning in 2027 and to continue incurring capital expenditures for long lead items. For the second half of 2025, our wellfield development initiatives have yielded increased feedstock totaling an overage of 1200 scfm per day.

Added

GreenWave Joint Venture

Added

In 2025, through our wholly-owned subsidiary Pesta Energy, LLC, we entered into an agreement with Pioneer Renewables Energy Marketing, LLC to form a joint venture, GreenWave Energy Partners, LLC (“Greenwave”). The primary goal of the joint venture is to help address the limited capacity of RNG utilization for transportation by offering third party RNG volumes access to exclusive unique and proprietary pathways. In the third quarter of 2025, Greenwave began matching available RNG volumes to dispensing opportunities through Greenwaves's transportation pathways. The joint venture has matched available dispensing capacity with available third party RNG volumes to separate RINs. We recorded income from Greenwave of $1,485 in 2025. Our capital investment in the joint venture is estimated to be up to approximately $4,500, subject to various and certain requirements as defined in the underlying agreements.

Reworded

In 2024, we signed a contract for the delivery of 140 thousand tons per year of biogenic carbon dioxide (“CO2”) from our four Texas facilities. We intend to capture, clean and liquefy CO2 at select Texas facilities, at which point it will be transported to EE North America (“EENA”), a Texas-based e-methanol facility. The delivery term is expected to last at least 15 years with first delivery expected to begin in 2027. DuringIn 2024,2025, we have been recognizing an exclusivity fee related to the minimum tons of CO2. The annual price per ton under the contract is adjusted annually by the U.S. consumer price index. The agreement with EENA includes a 50% sharing component of any available tax attributes generated by us under code section 45Q, Carbon dioxide sequestration credit, in the Inflation Reduction Act, as applicable. We have completed the initial site surveys related to locatinglocation of the CO2 processing equipment, evaluated equipment suppliers, and started engineering design. We believe that we can fulfill the contracted volumes with the development of CO2 at two of our Texas facilities. We continue to targetmatch a commissioning start in 2027 and currently expect theour capital investment toin beginthese inproject opportunities with the seconddevelopment quartertimeline of 2025EENA’s for long lead equipment and design engineering.facility.

Removed

Waste-stream Biogas Recovery

Removed

In 2024, a collaboration with Emvolon was announced to transform methane emissions from waste stream biogas into high-value carbon negative fuel. Leveraging Emvolon's patented technology, the initial pilot at our Atascocita facility in Houston, Texas is a small-scale demonstration of recovering and converting biogas into green methanol. The pilot is designed to provide proof of concept and we may eventually move to a commercial facility capable of producing up to 15 thousand gallons of green methanol per year. The ultimate goal is to lead to a full-scale, commercial system capable of producing up to 2,400 gallons of methanol annually at the same or similar sites. We do not expect any short term financial benefits from this demonstration nor a disruption to our operations.

Removed

REG Facility Sale

Removed

In 2024, we reached an agreement with the site host to sell the gas rights ahead of the fuel supply expiration of one of our existing REG operating facilities. We received proceeds of $1,000 and no longer have obligations to decommission or remove any machinery or equipment at the site. The proceeds received were in excess of the carrying value of the site. The PPA at this site expired during 2024 at which time we estimated that the revenues from this site would significantly decrease adversely impacting this sites future cash flows from operations. The effective date of the sale was October 1, 2024. In connection with the sale, we secured fuel supply agreement amendments to extend the terms of our existing RNG operating facilities, Atascocita and Coastal Plains.

Removed

RNG Facility Sale

Removed

In December 2024, we entered into an asset purchase agreement to sell an RNG site for a purchase price of $1,000. We entered into the agreement regarding this immaterial site in advance of the expiration of the gas rights agreement at this site. The proceeds received were in excess of the carrying value of the site.

Removed

In 2025, we began an initiative to convert our Tulsa, Oklahoma Renewable Electric Generation facility project through the design and construction of an RNG facility. The project will offer a variable inlet capacity providing production capacity of approximately 1,500 MMBtu per day and designed to beneficially process all of the available inlet gas feedstock from its landfill host.

Removed

We expect the capital investment to range from approximately $25,000 to $35,000 and be commissioned during the first quarter of 2027.

Removed

In 2022, we announced the planned construction of a second RNG processing facility at the Apex landfill. The construction of a second facility under our existing fuel supply agreement was triggered by biogas feedstock volumes exceeding production capabilities discussions with the landfill host, and the host's waste intake forecasted projections. As the landfill host increases waste intake, we believe the additional 2,100 MMBtu per day of production capacity will enable us to process the forecasted increase in biogas feedstock volumes. We continue to expect there will be a period where we have excess availability capacity after the second facility is commissioned while the landfill host increases their waste intake. We are incurring capital expenditures for the project and expect commercial operations in the second quarter of 2025.

Reworded

In 2021, through a wholly-owned subsidiary Montauk Ag Renewables,Renewables we completed an asset purchase related to developingpurchased technology and aassets centralized(the processing“Montauk locationAg Renewables Acquisition”) to recover residual natural resources from theswine waste streams of modern agriculture and to refine and recycle such waste products through proprietary and other processes in order to produce high quality renewable naturalelectricity, gasNorth andCarolina recaptureswine nitrogen, phosphorus,RECs, and micronutrient organic fertilizer alternativesalternatives. (Upon completion of the “Montaukfirst Agphase Renewablesof Acquisition”).the project, we expect that it will annually produce 41 MWh of electric power, approximately 121 RECs and 8.7 tons of organic fertilizer alternative.

Reworded

Regulatory updateDevelopments

Added

In 2024, the North Carolina Utilities Commission ("NCUC") approved our Turkey, North Carolina location for a New Renewable Energy Facility (“NREF”) designation and Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. In October 2024, our amended NREF application was approved. In 2024, the North Carolina legislature approved a statutory change to its Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standards ("CEPS") governing the generation of RECs from swine waste that established a REC multiplier for swine waste produced in a Tier 1 county, which includes Sampson County, the location of our Turkey facility. For qualifying projects, for each swine REC generated, 2 enhanced RECs will be credited for a total three RECs for a period of 8 years, followed by one enhanced REC for a total two RECs for a period of 6 years and a credit of one REC thereafter. There is a limit of 80 enhanced RECs in a year.

Added

In September 2025, a joint motion was filed with the NCUC by various entities seeking to modify and delay certain aspects of the CEPS, specifically, the portfolio standards relating to swine RECs. In October 2025, we filed response comments to the joint motion with the NCUC requesting they grant modifications or delays only to individual power supplies that have demonstrated need, require power suppliers that have not achieved 100% compliance in 2025 to apply any cumulatively acquired swine RECs to the suppliers unsatisfied 2025 pro rata obligation, and modify the swine REC set-aside for 2026 and beyond to match the requirement originally set by North Carolina in 2018. In January 2026, the NCUC denied the request for waivers and determined that parties must use banked RECs to meet 2025 compliance targets with the ability to use solar RECs to fill any compliance shortage. The compliance obligations for those utilities filing the September 2025 joint motion continue to increase through 2029.

Removed

Our progress with regulatory agencies in North Carolina related to the resulting power generation derived from swine waste to confirm its eligibility for RECs under North Carolina’s Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards in anticipation of commercial production remains ongoing. The Turkey location was approved to participate in the Piedmont Natural Gas Renewable Gas Pilot Program which is a step towards obtaining the NREF designation under the NCUC. In January 2024, we received notification from the NCUC that the Turkey, NC location was approved for an NREF and Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. In October 2024, our amended NREF application was approved. In December 2024, as part of a broader North Carolina omnibus bill package, the State of North Carolina approved a change in the laws governing the generation of RECs from swine waste under its renewable energy portfolio standards. For qualifying projects in qualifying locations, qualifying swine REC generators have the ability to generate 3:1 RECs for a period of 8 years, followed by 2:1 RECs for a period of 6 years, with normal 1:1 REC generation thereafter. The implementation of this law is ongoing with the NCUC and is subject to limitations, including but not limited to, the annual generation of swine RECs under the change in law.

Reworded

Offtake updateDevelopments

Added

We have entered into a ten-year agreement to sell all of the renewable electricity generated by the project. Furthermore, we expect the annual REC capacity of the Turkey location to be approximately 120 RECs and have signed a REC agreement with Duke Energy for 47 RECs. We continue to optimize our monetization strategies for the currently uncontracted portion of annually generated RECs and are in various stages of negotiation and responses to requests from obligated purchasers. Many of these agreements contain competitive details and, while there remains a limited active swine REC market in North Carolina, we believe the prices we are negotiating will be market based. We believe the price per swine REC could fall within the range of $200 to $400 per REC.

Removed

In July 2023 we signed a REC agreement with Duke Energy (“Duke”). At full first phase capacity, we anticipate the ability to process feedstock from over 200 hog spaces per day, which equates to over two hundred tons of daily waste collection. We currently estimate the first phase of the project will annually produce approximately 45 to 50 MWh equivalents through the combination of 190 to 200 MMBtu and 25 to 30 MWh. We also estimate that at full processing capabilities, the first phase of the project will additionally produce annually 17 to 20 tons of organic fertilizer alternatives. Once the first phase and the facility has been fully commissioned, the project will provide sufficient capacity to satisfy the Duke REC agreement through the deployment of up to eight operational processing lines at the Turkey Creek facility.

Removed

With the change in REC generation passed by the state of North Carolina, we are in various other negotiations with other utility users to provide swine RECs from our expected first phase production of MWh.

Reworded

Feedstock collection updateCollection

Reworded

At full first phase capacity, we anticipate the ability to process feedstock from approximately 400 to 450 hog spaces per day, which equates to approximately 35 tons of annual waste collection. We have entered into long term agreements with over forty separate farming locations to provide access to waste from at least 200 thousand300 hog spaces to support our expected processing needs under our first phase for the Turkey, NCTurkey location. We continue to install collection equipment at these separate farms to access the waste. We currently estimate capital investment of up to approximately $250 at each farm related to the installed collection equipment. We intend to contract with additional farms to secure feedstock sources for future production processes. In advance of commercial operation date, feedstock collection has begun with collecting the dewatered feedstock from each farm and transporting to the project site for pelletization and storage.

Added

Capital Investment and Progress towards Commercial Operation Date (COD)

Added

We currently expect the first phase capital investment to be approximately $200,000 and have spent approximately $140,000 as of December 31, 2025. Winter storms in the Carolinas early 2026 and project deliveries have caused only nominal project delays. We have begun to commission the facility and expect our production and revenue generation activities to commence in April 2026.

Added

We estimate our Montauk Ag Renewables project to potentially generate tax attributes once placed into service consisting mainly of a mix of federal investment tax and production tax credits and North Carolina state tax attributes. Based on our Pico digestion expansion project experience, for other large and qualifying projects we believe that 50-75% of project capital will quality for IRC code section 48 investment tax credits and, depending on a variety of factors for projects started within various safe harbor guidelines, the tax benefits could be up to 30%. For qualifying projects which do not meet the various safe harbor guidelines, we expect the tax benefits to range between 6-12% for qualifying assets. As it relates to our capital expenditures and future electric power production, we estimate IRC code section 48 investment tax credits and production tax credits could range between $6,000 - $20,000. We give no assurances that our estimates on tax attributes for our Montauk Ag Renewables project will meet these expectations.

Removed

We continue to test the most efficient methods of transporting the swine feedstock from the collection farms to the centralized process location. Currently, we are testing a waste palletization process on the mobile equipment. This palletization will capture the energy content in the waste preventing energy decay from time as well as enabling more efficient processing through the reactor. We currently estimate that each mobile collection and transportation unit could range up to approximately $300.

Removed

Interconnection update

Removed

Our electricity interconnection is ongoing and expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2025. This timeline meets our expectations for the commissioning of our reactors and to begin revenue generating activities. Additionally, and to provide future optionality, the gas interconnection is expected to be commissioned in the second quarter of 2025. While the production of RNG is currently secondary to the generation of MWh and swine RECs, this gas interconnection could provide future revenue opportunities to the Turkey, NC location through either production on site or through the injection of gas from other providers.

Removed

Production construction update

Removed

Including the original equipment acquired in the Montauk Ag Renewables Acquisition, the Turkey, North Carolina asset acquisition, and the relocation of the Magnolia, NC site reactor to Turkey, NC, we currently expect the first phase capital investment to range between $140,000 and $160,000. We continue to use the pilot reactor that was relocated in 2023 and previously operated prior to the 2021 Montauk Ag Renewables Acquisition. The pilot reactor testing includes refining feedstock conveyance, equipment processing, product gas composition, and the composition of the solid output. We have processed and tested both the biogas and micronutrient organic fertilizer alternatives. We are also continuing to staff the Turkey, North Carolina location. With the engineering of the Turkey, NC location being substantively completed, we have finalized an EPC contract to complete the site construction.

Removed

Excluding capital expenditures related to feedstock processing but including the original 2021 Montauk Ag Asset Acquisition, we have incurred the following significant capital expenditures at the Turkey, NC site:

Removed

$16,856 related to the site including land and improvements

Removed

$15,891 associated with electrical and engineering related matters $8,369 related to production processing equipment $4,415 related to interconnection $1,841 related to the reactors We continue to develop the opportunities with Montauk Ag Renewables and can give no assurances that our plans related to this acquisition will meet our expectations. Utility interconnection, both inbound to and outbound from our centralized Turkey, NC processing facility is dependent on factors outside of our control. Regulatory development and offtake negotiations could delay our ability to fully optimize or meet the timing expectations related to revenue producing activities. Our current construction timeline and costs are subject to delays or costs increases, respectively. We continue to design and plan for the development of the Turkey, NC facility to be used for commercial production. We expect the Magnolia, NC location to be used for various feedstock processing needs. Based on our current development timeline expectations, we expect to commence significant revenue generating activities in 2026. We intend to contract with additional farms to secure feedstock sources for future production processes.

Reworded

In 2023, we announced a planned development of a renewable natural gas landfill project in Irvine, CA at the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill to process the large and growing volumes of biogas in excess of the existing capacity of the REG facility. We expect facility commissioning in 2027 and expect the capital investment to range between $85,000 - $95,000. As part of the agreement to develop the RNG plant, we agreed to work with the landfill host on the landfill's management of its wellfield and flare facility permit requirements.requirements Theand landfill has proposed corresponding changes to our agreement, which could impact our existing commissioning schedule. We continue tothis work withremains the landfill on these proposed changes to assess what, if any, impacts these changes could have on receipt of required regional regulatory construction permits.ongoing. The project is anticipated to have production nameplate capacity of approximately 3,600 MMBtu per day, assuming currently forecasted biogas feedstock volumes projected to be available from the host landfill at the time of commissioning. We continue to incur capital expenditures for this project. During 2025, wellfield initiatives have resulted in approximately 4,100 scfm of averaged unprocessed gas which is more than the anticipated inlet of the RNG facility currently under development.

Reworded

Blue GraniteRumpke RNG Relocation Project

Added

In connection with our gas rights agreement with our landfill host at our Rumpke RNG location, in 2025, we began the process of relocating our existing Rumpke RNG facility. The timing of this project and requirement to relocate the facility coincides with the landfill's filling practices moving into the existing area of our Rumpke RNG facility and is contractually obligated. We expect facility commissioning in 2028 and the capital expenditures to range between $70,000 - $90,000, which is dependent on the timing of capital expenditures and potential other production capabilities requested by the landfill host. We continue to incur capital expenditures for this project. Additionally, the landfill host has requested a modification of our current development design to accommodate a large CNG filling station for their fleet.

Removed

In 2023, we announced the planned entrance into South Carolina with the development of a new landfill gas-to-RNG facility. The planned project was expected to contribute approximately 900 MMBtu per day of production capacity upon commissioning.

Removed

We experienced delays with our interconnection, most recently due to the utility informing us of their near-term prioritization of remediation efforts from the impacts of Hurricane Helene. In February 2025, we received notice from the utility that it will no longer be honoring a letter of intent secured when we won the development rights to this location and will no longer accept RNG into its distribution system. We continue to review various alternatives related to interconnection opportunities as part of our considerations for offtake options with the understanding those alternatives may differ from initial development project assumptions, included but not limited to physical and virtual and fixed interconnections. We are also reviewing alternatives for this site around producing energy other than RNG. We have paused further capital expenditures related to this site while we consider all alternatives.

Removed

Conversion of Electricity Projects to RNG Projects:

Removed

We continue to evaluate opportunities to convert existing facilities from Renewable Electricity to RNG production. These opportunities tend to be most attractive for any merchant electricity facilities given the favorable economics for the sale of RNG plus RINs relative to the sale of market rate electricity plus RECs. This strategy has been an increasingly attractive avenue for growth since 2014 when RNG from landfills became eligible for D3 RINs. However, during the conversion of a project, there is a gap in production while the electricity project is offline until it commences operation as an RNG facility, which can adversely affect us. This timing effect may adversely affect our operating results as a result of our potential conversion of Renewable Electricity projects. Upon completion of a conversion, we expect that the increase in revenue upon commencement of RNG production will more than offset the loss of revenue from Renewable Electricity production. Historically, we have taken advantage of these opportunities on a gradual basis at our merchant electricity facilities, such as Atascocita and Coastal Plains.

Added

Impact of Higher Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Prior to the Commencement of a Project’s Operation: We incur significant expenses in the development of new RNG projects.

Removed

Impact of Higher Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Prior to the Commencement of a Project’s Operation: We incur significant expenses in the development of new RNG projects. Under the Biogas Regulatory Reform Rule, effective July 1, 2024, theoretical storage of RNG for future RIN generation prior to receiving EPA registration is no longer permitted and the receipt of RINs will no longer be delayed after injecting into a pipeline. We expect the elimination of theoretical storage, when combined with more timely EPA registration, to not materially impact the commencement of RIN revenue generation after pipeline injection.

Reworded

Regulatory, environmental and social factors are key drivers that incentivize the development of RNG and Renewable Electricity projects and influence the economics of these projects. We are subject to the possibility of legislative and regulatory changes to certain incentives, such as RINs, RECs and GHG initiatives. On July 12, 2023, the EPA issued final rules in the Federal Register for the RFS volume requirements for 2023-2025. Final volumes for cellulosic biofuel were set at 838, 1,090 and 1,376 million RINs for the three years 2023, 2024 and 2025, respectively. The EPA did not finalize the eRIN program in this ruling, however, it indicated that it will continue to work on potential paths forward for the eRIN program. However, the EPA did not set a new date for a revised eRIN program. The cellulosic biofuel volumes in the final rule for 2024 and 2025 are lower than the proposed volume as they do not include cellulosic biofuel from eRINs. The final rule also included significant changes to the existing RFS program, referred to as BRRR, that will requirerequired the RNG industry to modify how all RINs are generated.generated Onas of January 1, 2025, all RFS participants must comply with BRRR provisions.2025. We have registered all of our facilities under the BRRR provisions and have obtained Q-RIN status for RIN generation starting January 1, 2025. Under the BRRR provisions, the EPA finalized a limitation that biogas from one facility has a single use under the RFS as proposed (i.e., biointermediate, RNG or CNG/LNG via biogas closed distribution system). The EPA clarified that this does not preclude non-RFS uses at same facility.

Added

On June 13, 2025, the EPA released both the Partial Waiver of the 2024 Cellulosic Biofuel Volume Requirement (Final Rule) and RFS Standards for 2026 and 2027, Partial Waiver of 2025 Cellulosic Biofuel Volume Requirement, and Other Changes (Proposed Rule). The final 2024 cellulosic biofuel volume requirement was reduced from 1,090 to 1,010 million D3 RINs. This reduction was based on actual volumes of D3 RINs generated in 2024. In addition, the EPA is making Cellulosic Waiver Credits ("CWCs") available for 2024 as an additional compliance flexibility for obligated parties.

Added

In the EPA’s proposed rule released on June 13, 2025, the cellulosic biofuel volumes for 2025 were proposed to be reduced from 1,376 to 1,190 RINs and make CWCs available for 2025. The proposed cellulosic biofuel volume requirements for 2026 and 2027 are 1,300 and 1,360 D3 RINs, respectively. These volumes are less than the EPA had previously finalized for 2025 and are based on their belief that cellulosic RIN generation from biogas-derived CNG/LNG during 2026-2030 will be constrained by the total usage capacity of CNG/LNG as transportation fuel. These proposed rules are subject to comment periods prior to finalization.

Added

On August 22, 2025, EPA issued decisions on 175 Small Refinery Exemption (SRE) petitions. EPA granted full exemption (100%) to 63 petitions and partial exemptions (50%) to 77 petitions. The SRE decisions exempted corresponding volumes of gasoline and diesel for the 2023 and 2024 compliance years, and increased the number of RINs available for obligated parties to use for compliance with their RFS obligations. Taking into consideration the expected impacts of the SRE decisions on the RFS market, on September 16, 2025, EPA co-proposed a Supplemental Rule that provides additional volumes in 2026 and 2027 RVOs that will represent complete (100%) reallocation or partial (50%) reallocation for SREs granted in full or in part, respectively, for 2023 and 2024, as well as those projected to be granted for 2025.

Added

EPA has indicated an intention to finalize the Supplemental Rule & the RVOs for 2025, 2026 and 2027 by the end of 2025, however, the duration of the US federal government shut down and any residual impacts on EPA staffing after the shutdown concludes may extend finalization of these items into 2026.

Removed

The EPA did not meet the statutorily required deadline of November 2024 to finalize 2026 obligations under the RFS. The EPA is still expected to target March 2025 to propose RFS obligations for 2026 unless the EPA is directed otherwise by the Trump administration.

Reworded

In December 2023, CARB released the formal proposal for new LCFS rules. The proposed rules will increase the stringency of CI reduction targets from 20% to 30% in 2030 and create90% aby 2045 target of 90%.2045. This reduction would have the potential impact of reducing the number of net credits in the program. CARBOn approvedJuly these1, new2025, CARB’s amended LCFS rules inofficially Novembertook 2024,effect however in February 2025,setting the Californiaaggressive Officecarbon ofintensity Administrativereduction Lawtargets disapprovedlisted the changes because the regulations were not written in a way that persons directly affected by them could easily understand. CARB believes this disapproval to be routine and indicated its intention to resubmit the rules, which it has until June 2025 to do. Any substantive changes would be subject to a public comment period.above. The industry may seesee3 pricinggradual volatilityincreases including potential decreases toin LCFS credit prices whereasover the amendmentsnext asyear. originally approved were expected to increase LCFS credit prices. Also in theThe rules is aalso phase out of avoided methane crediting for dairy and swine manure pathways by 2040 for CNG usage and through 2045 for RNG used to produce hydrogen. The RNG deliverability/book and claim provisions for out-of-region projects will beare eliminated for all projects that break ground after 2030. These projects will be required to demonstrate physical deliverability requirements beginning in 2041. Changes to the LCFS program require annual verification of the CI score assigned to a project. Annual verification could significantly affect the profitability of a project, particularly in the case of a livestock farm project. In June 2025, California lawmakers introduced California Senate Bill SB-237, which includes a potential cap on LCFS credit prices of approximately $75/ton.

Added

On March 15, 2025, the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 was signed into law. In May 2025, we were informed that the law eliminated the United States Department of Agriculture Advanced Biofuel Payment Program. We received approximately $200 annually since 2021 under this program. In November 2025, we received notice that the program was reinstated and that retroactive payments would be issued for the missed quarters while the program was closed.

Showing the first 60 of 117 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-05 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-06 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
54 → 54words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

We face a number of risks that could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity, or financial condition. A discussion of our risk factors can be found in Part I, “Item 1A Risk Factors” in our 2025 Annual Report any of which could have a material effect on us.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

55new paragraphs
11removed paragraphs
51reworded paragraphs
10,760 → 12,941words in section

New heading “Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”

New heading “Revenues for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”

New heading “Renewable Natural Gas Revenues”

New heading “Renewable Electricity Generation Revenues”

New heading “General and Administrative Revenues”

New heading “Expenses for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”

New heading “General and Administrative Expenses”

New heading “Operating and Maintenance Expenses”

New heading “Renewable Natural Gas Expenses”

New heading “Renewable Electricity Expenses”

New heading “Royalty Payments”

New heading “Other (Income) Expenses”

New heading “Income Tax Expense”

New heading “Operating (Loss) Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”

Removed heading “Raeger Gas Rights Extension”

Removed heading “New Senior Credit Facility”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text
“Operating (Loss) Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
see in full comparison
New text
“Revenues for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
see in full comparison
New text
“Expenses for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
see in full comparison
New text
“Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
see in full comparison
New text
“Renewable Electricity Generation Revenues”
see in full comparison
New text
“General and Administrative Revenues”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (117)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

In addition to historical financial information, the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those discussed under “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,Statements” and elsewhere in this report, “Item 1A.–Risk Factors” of our 2025 Annual Report, and elsewhere in thisour report.other SEC filings.

Reworded

Our profitability is highly dependent on the market price of Environmental Attributes, including the market price for RINs. As we self-market a significant portion of our RINs and as the RFS is based on annual compliance, a decision not to commit to transfer and monetize available RINs during a period will impact the timing of our operating revenues and operating profit recognized during a period. We sold all 3,903 D3 RINs generated and available for sale from our 2025 RNG production in the first quarter of 2026. We had approximately 165137 RINs generated but unseparated at MarchJune 31,30, 2026. The average D3 RIN index price for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was approximately $2.41.$2.54. The following table summarizes select historical data related to RINs generated, RINs sold, and RINs generated but unsold.unsold from our RNG operations. Realized prices for Environmental Attributes monetized in a year may not correspond directly to index prices due to the forward selling of commitments. The results related to our GreenWave joint venture are excluded from the table below. The timing of RIN transfers can vary year over year and by period within a year and is contingent on various factors including, but not limited to: (a) the Company’s expectations on RIN index price, (b) operational needs of the Company, (c) obligated parties purchase needs, or (d) the type of customer among other matters.

Added

During the second quarter of 2026 we continued contract negotiations with other entities required to purchase RECs under the North Carolina Clean Energy and Portfolio Standard, specifically, the portfolio standards relating to swine RECs. These negotiations related to, among other matters, price, term, and mutual abilities to renegotiate any agreed contract. We have exchanged various versions of contracts with certain entities. We believe we are able to prioritize the sale of swine RECs generated from our Turkey facility to our executed REC agreement with Duke giving us this extended period during our ramp up to continue negotiations with these other entities. We believe that when we achieve our full first stage production, we will have contracts for all swine RECs generated.

Added

Under a NCUC joint motion, various stakeholders subject to the requirements of certain aspects of the North Carolina Clean Energy and Portfolio Standard, specifically, the portfolio standards relating to swine RECs, continue to have working meetings under the direction of the NCUC. Certain of these entities impacted by the NCUC motion are also entities we continue to negotiate swine REC sale agreements, including Duke Energy. While we continue to negotiate swine REC contracts with certain of these entities under the NCUC joint motion, this NCUC joint motion could impact our ability to successfully execute swine contracts.

Added

In July 2026, we began generating power for sale from our Turkey, North Carolina facility. This production of power is expected to be eligible to generate both swine RECs and enhanced RECs in subsequent months. As we work to increase the volumes of power and RECs that are able to be generated from our volume of produced syngas, we have identified specific programming modifications to our installed electrical switchgear. The installation of these modifications will provide for both the increase in production volumes and enhanced protection of our processing equipment and electrical transformers. We expect to have all programming completed by mid-August and consistently generate power and RECs from all available collected feedstock volumes.

Added

We continue to progress with our installation of feedstock collection at our targeted 400 to 450 hog spaces. As of the end of July, we have entered into long term agreements with over fifty separate farming locations providing us access to at least 350 hog spaces. We are currently able to collect from more than 250 hog spaces and will continue farm site collection equipment installations during the second half of 2026.

Added

Our capital investment expectation for this first phase of the project remains unchanged at $200,000. We continue to expect a ramp-up in production volumes throughout 2026 directly related to additional feedstock collection.

Removed

We have commissioned our Montauk Ag Renewables project and are producing syngas. We expect our production and sale of renewable electricity from our syngas to commence in May 2026, with revenue generation triggered upon the calibration of the sales meter from the interconnection utility. We have operated the full production line as part of the commissioning process and expect to be able to produce our targeted first phase of 47 MWh and 120 RECs annually with approximately 50 percent of our installed reactor capacity. Our capital investment expectation for this first phase of the project remains unchanged at $200,000. We expect a ramp-up in production volumes throughout 2026 directly related to additional feedstock collection.

Removed

Raeger Gas Rights Extension

Removed

In March 2026, we successfully negotiated a five-year gas rights extension at our Raeger facility. The extension secures our access to biogas feedstock at the site through 2031, supporting the continued operation of the facility.

Reworded

Through our wholly-owned subsidiary Pesta Energy, LLC, we entered into an agreement with Pioneer Renewables Energy Marketing, LLC to form a joint venture, GreenWave Energy Partners, LLC. The primary goal of the joint venture is to help address the limited capacity of RNG utilization for transportation by offering third party RNG volumes access to exclusive unique and proprietary pathways. We recorded income from GreenWave of approximately $3,320$7,092 in the first quartersix months of 2026. We also received 1,3982,909 in separated RINs distributed from GreenWave of which we have 425 available for sale as of March 31, 2026.GreenWave. Our capital investment in the joint venture is estimated to be up to approximately $4,500, subject to various and certain requirements as defined in the underlying agreements.

Removed

New Senior Credit Facility

Removed

On March 9, 2026, , we entered into a five year New Senior Credit Facility with HASI that consists of up to $200,000 in senior indebtedness, of which $155,000 is outstanding as of March 31, 2026. We used this facility to refinance our existing outstanding debt and have $45,000 available to borrow subject to terms of the agreement.

Reworded

Atascocita Carbon Dioxide Beneficial Use Opportunity

Reworded

In April 2026, we sent a letter confirming termination of our contract with European Energy North America (“EENA”) for the delivery of biogenic carbon dioxide (“CO2”). The termination was due to EENA’s failure to provide certain contractual assurances and notices related to the construction of their Texas-based e-methanol facility. We arecontinue currentlyto exploringexplore alternative offtake arrangements with interested parties at our Atascocita location. The timing of capital expenditures will be synchronous with the finalization of replacement offtake agreements. We continue to anticipate a capital investment between $30,000 and $40,000.$40,000, however our 2026 development capital range does not include additional capital outlay for this CO2 project.

Reworded

Shifts in Revenue Composition for Projects from New Fuel Sources: As we expand into agriculture projects, our revenue composition from Environmental Attributes will change. We believe that agriculture offers us a lucrative opportunity,opportunity asFor example, the value of LCFS credits for dairy farm projects, for example, are a multiple of those realized from landfill projects due to the significantly more attractive CI scoring. Additionally, we believe that REC generation from swine farm projects, increases revenues from regulatory frameworks other than the RFS. As we expand into agriculture projects, our revenue composition from Environmental Attributes will change.

Added

During the second quarter of 2026, legal challenges filed by various entities related to the finalized RFS standards for 2026 and 2027 were consolidated by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals . These challenges include claims relating to expected costs to comply with the RFS as well as challenges against partially waiving the 2025 RVO.

Reworded

On March 15, 2025, the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 was signed into law. In May 2025, we were informed that the law eliminated the United States Department of Agriculture Advanced Biofuel Payment Program. We received approximately $200 annually since 2021 under this program. In 2025, we received notice that the program was reinstated and that retroactive payments would be issued for the missed quarters while the program was closed. In the first quarter of 2026, we recorded approximately $265$327 related to the quartersAdvanced forBiofuel whichPayment the program was closed.Program.

Reworded

When placed into service, Montauk Ag Renewables will generate primarily a mix federal investment tax and production tax credits and North Carolina state tax attributes. Based on past experience with other large and qualifying projects, we believe that 50-75%50 to 75% of project capital will qualityqualify for IRC code sectionSection 48 investment tax credits and, depending on a variety of factors for projects started within various safe harbor guidelines, the tax benefits could be up to 30%. For qualifying projects that do not meet the various safe harbor guidelines, we expect the tax benefits to range between 6-12%6 and 12% for qualifying assets. As it relates to our capital expenditures and future electric power production, we estimate IRC code sectionSection 48 investment tax credits and section 45 production tax credits could range between $6,000 -and $20,000, collectively. We give no assurances that our estimates on tax attributes for our Montauk Ag Renewables project will meet these expectations but expect to begin reviewsto ofreview federal tax attributes and continue our review for North Carolina state income and property tax attributes in 2026.

Reworded

The evaluation of deferred tax assets requires judgment in assessing the likely future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns and forecasting future profitability by tax jurisdiction. We complete a full analysis annually of our deferred tax assets and liabilities. We expect our New Senior Credit Facility could generate additional tax attributes related to interest expense limitations under applicable IRC code sectionSection 163(j). We continue to review our future tax planning including but not limited to the ability to stack tax attributes, limitation on deductibility and expiration, but we do not currently expect to transfer, as applicable, any tax attributes generated.

Reworded

Renewable Natural Gas Revenues: We record revenues from the production and sale of RNG and the generation and sale of the Environmental Attributes derived from RNG, such as RINs and LCFS credits. Our RNG revenues from Environmental Attributes are recorded net of a portion of Environmental Attributes shared with off-take counterparties as consideration for such counterparties using the RNG as a transportation fuel. We entered into pathway renewals in the third quarter of 2025 for certain volumes at percentages consistent with our historical percentages. Historically, we have monetized less than 25% of our RNG volumes under these fixed-price agreements.

Reworded

RNG Production from Our Growth Projects: We anticipate increased production at certain of our existing projects as open landfills continue to take in additional waste and the amount of gas available for collection increases. Delays in commencement of production or extended commissioning issues at a new project or a conversion project, such as those we are currently experiencing at Blue Granite,project would delay any realization of production from that project.

Reworded

The sale of RINs, which is subject to market price fluctuations, accounts for a substantial portion of our revenues. We manage against the risk of these fluctuations through forward sales of RINs, although currently we only sell RINs in the calendar year they are separated. We have entered into commitments to transfer athe significant portionmajority of RINs generated and available for sale from our expected 2026 third quarter RNG production at an average price of $2.42.$2.66. Realized prices for Environmental Attributes monetized in a year may not correspond directly to index prices due to the forward selling of commitments.

Reworded

General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative expenses primarily consist of corporate expenses and unallocated support functions for our operating facilities, including personnel costs for executive, finance, accounting, investor relations, legal, human resources, operations, engineering, environmental registration and reporting, health and safety, IT and other administrative personnel and professional fees and general corporate expenses. From time to time, we may be parties to legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business which could increase our legal expenses. We continue to expect increased general and administrative expenses associated with our ongoing development of Montauk Ag Renewables in 2026. We account for share-based compensation related to grants made through its equity and incentive compensation plan under FASB ASC 718. We do not believe the May 2026 restricted stock unit awards granted by the Board of Directors will significantly increase share-based compensation expense for the second half of 2026. For more information, see Note 15 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements related to share-based compensation.

Reworded

Comparison of Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025

Removed

(1)

Reworded

Revenues for the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025

Reworded

Total revenues in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 were $46,428,$54,020, an increase of $3,825$8,893 (9.0%19.7%) compared to $42,603$45,127 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The increase is primarily related to environmental attribute revenues of approximately $4,236$8,402 from RINs sold related to the distribution of RINs from our GreenWave joint venture which had no RINs distributed and sold in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. Our firstsecond quarter of 2026 RNG volumes sold under fixed/floor-price contracts decreased approximately 82.1%80.0% as compared to firstsecond quarter of 2025 as a result of the expiration of fixed price pathway contract expiration.contracts. Our RNG commodity revenue decreased approximately 49.3%63.7% which was offset by an increase in RINs sold of 25.5%.29.1%. Also, our RINs generated and unseparated decreased approximately 95.4% as a result of the transition to BRRR in 2025.

Added

We produced 1,456 MMBtu of RNG during the second quarter of 2026, an increase of 43 MMBtu (3.0%) compared to 1,413 MMBtu produced in the second quarter of 2025. Our McCarty facility produced 53 MMBtu more in the second quarter of 2026 compared to the second quarter of 2025 as a result of landfill host wellfield operational and collection system enhancements. Our Apex facility produced 39 MMBtu more in the second quarter of 2026 as compared to second quarter of 2025 as a result of increased feedstock gas from our improvements related to the landfill collection system. Our Galveston facility produced 26 MMBtu fewer in the second quarter of 2026 compared to the second quarter of 2025 as a result of landfill host assuming responsibility of wellfield operations and maintenance beginning in 2026. Our Atascocita facility produced 37 MMBtu fewer in the second quarter of 2026 compared to the second quarter of 2025 as a result of landfill host wellfield operational and collection system enhancement project timing as well as planned facility maintenance.

Removed

We produced 1,354 MMBtu of RNG during the first quarter of 2026, a decrease of 35 MMBtu (2.5%) compared to 1,389 MMBtu produced in the first quarter of 2025. Our Galveston facility produced 41 MMBtu fewer in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the first quarter of 2025 as a result of landfill host assuming responsibility of wellfield operations and maintenance beginning in the first quarter of 2026. Our McCarty facility produced 88 MMBtu fewer in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the first quarter of 2025 as a result of landfill host wellfield bifurcation and changes to the wellfield collection system. Our Atascocita facility produced 43 MMBtu more in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the first quarter of 2025 as a result of landfill host wellfield operational and collection system enhancements. Our Apex facility produced 37 MMBtu more in the first quarter of 2026 as compared to first quarter of 2025 as a result of the June 2025 commissioning of our second Apex facility and increased feedstock gas from improvements we are making to the landfill collection system.

Reworded

Revenues from the Renewable Natural Gas segment in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 were $38,075,$40,936, aan decreaseincrease of $376$107 (1.0%0.3%) compared to $38,451$40,829 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. Average commodity pricing for natural gas for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was $5.04$2.90 per MMBtu, 38.1%15.7% higherlower than the firstsecond quarter of 2025. During the firstsecond quarter of 2026, we self-marketed 12,40314,265 RINs, representing a 2,5183,215 increase (25.5%29.1%) compared to 9,88511,050 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. Average pricing realized on RIN sales during the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was $2.42$2.45 as compared to $2.46$2.42 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025, aan decreaseincrease of 1.7%.1.2%. Average D3 RIN index price for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was $2.41$2.54 compared to $2.43$2.36 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025, aan decreaseincrease of approximately 0.6%.7.6%. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had approximately 431429 MMBtu available for RIN generation, 165137 RINs generated and unseparated, and 790 RINs generated and unsold. At MarchJune 31,30, 2025, we had approximately 336309 MMBtu available for RIN generation, 1,4823,009 RINs generated and unseparated, and 3,916108 RINs generated and unsold.

Reworded

We produced approximately 4344 MWh in Renewable Electricity in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, aan decreaseincrease of 32 MWh (6.5%4.8%) from 4642 MWh in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. Our PicoBowerman facility produced approximately 23 MWh fewermore in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The decreaseincrease is primarily related to decommissioningincreased ofgas one our engines in the second quarter of 2025flows due to thelandfill shifthost towardswellfield boiler heat for our digestion process. Our Bowerman facility produced approximately 1 MWh fewer in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the first quarter of 2025. The decrease is primarily related to original equipment manufacturer required lifecycle maintenance on our engines, beginning in the first quarter of 2026.improvements.

Reworded

Revenues from Renewable Electricity facilities in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 were $4,117,$4,505, aan decreaseincrease of $35$207 (0.8%4.8%) compared to $4,152$4,298 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The decreaseincrease was primarily driven by the decreaseincrease in production volumes.

Reworded

In both the firstsecond quarter of 2026,2026 and 2025, 100.0% of Renewable Electricity Generation segment revenues were derived from the monetization of Renewable Electricity at fixed prices associated with underlying PPAs, as compared to 100.0% in the first quarter of 2025.PPAs. This provides us with certainty of price resulting from our Renewable Electricity sites.

Reworded

Total general and administrative revenues in the second quarter of 2026 were $8,579. We recorded approximately $4,236$8,402 in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 related to RINs distributed from our joint venture, GreenWave. We sold approximately 1,7553,387 RINs distributed from GreenWave and the RINs related to pathway dispensing, which are not included within our operating metrics table. There were no such revenues incurred during the second quarter of 2025.

Reworded

Expenses for the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025

Reworded

Total general and administrative expenses in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 were $8,019,$7,666, a decrease of $735$1,378 (8.4%15.2%) compared to $8,754$9,044 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The decrease is primarily related to thea one-time accelerated vesting of $1,550 from certain restricted share awards in 2025.the Our corporate insurance fees decreased approximately $261 in first quarter of 2026 as compared to firstsecond quarter of 2025 due to the termination of an employee.

Reworded

Total operating and maintenance expenses in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 were $23,155,$29,061, an increase of $5,598$7,197 (31.9%32.9%) compared to $17,557$21,864 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025.

Reworded

We recorded approximately $4,247$8,348 in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 related to the cost of RINs distributed from GreenWave and the costs related to pathway dispensing associated with our dispensing RNG in exclusive unique and proprietary pathways, which are not included within our operating metrics table. There were no such expenses incurred during the firstsecond quarter of 2025.

Reworded

Operating and maintenance expenses for our RNG facilities in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 were $14,353,$15,568, ana increasedecrease of $263$1,387 (1.9%8.2%) as compared to $14,090$16,955 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. Our RumpkeMcCarty facility operating and maintenance expenses increaseddecreased approximately $397$891 primarily related to preventativethe timing of maintenance mediarelated changes.to gas processing equipment. Our Apex facility operating and maintenance expenses increaseddecreased approximately $262$451 primarily related to increased utility expense which was partially offset by decreased preventative maintenance media changes. Our Atascocita facility operating and maintenance expenses increased approximately $246 primarily related to wellfield operational enhancements. Offsetting the increase was our Galveston facility operating and maintenance expenses which decreased approximately $580. The decrease is primarily due to the timing of maintenance of gas processing equipment and preventative maintenance media changes.maintenance.

Reworded

Operating and maintenance expenses for our Renewable Electricity facilities in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 were $4,484,$5,062, an increase of $1,133$253 (33.8%5.3%) compared to $3,351$4,809 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The increase is primarily driven by an increase in non-capitalizable costs of approximately $808$1,162 at our Montauk Ag Renewables project. Our Bowerman facility operating and maintenance expenses increaseddecreased approximately $371$716 primarily related to decreased wellfield operational costs and timing of gas processing preventative maintenance.

Reworded

Royalties, transportation, gathering, and production fuel expenses in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 were $8,037,$8,814, ana increasedecrease of $466$354 (6.2%3.9%) compared to $7,571$9,168 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. We make royalty payments to our fuel supply site partners on the commodities we produce and the associated Environmental Attributes. These royalty payments are typically structured as a percentage of revenue subject to a cap, with fixed minimum payments when Environmental Attribute prices fall below a defined threshold. To the extent commodity and Environmental Attributes’ prices fluctuate, our royalty payments may fluctuate upon renewal or extension of a fuel supply agreement or in connection with new projects. Our fuel supply agreements are typically structured as 20-year contracts, providing long-term visibility into the margin impact of future royalty payments.

Removed

Royalties, transportation, gathering and production fuel expenses for our RNG facilities for the first quarter of 2026 were $7,581, an increase of $467 (6.6%) compared to $7,114 in the first quarter of 2025. There was a reduction to our Pico earnout that was recorded in the first quarter of 2025. We settled the Pico earnout obligation in fourth quarter of 2025. Royalties, transportation, gathering and production fuel expenses increased as a percentage of RNG revenues to 19.9% for the first quarter of 2026 from 18.5% in the first quarter of 2025.

Reworded

Royalties, transportation, gathering and production fuel expenses for our Renewable ElectricityRNG facilities for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 were $456,$8,293, a decrease of $1$375 (0.2%4.3%) compared to $457$8,668 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. Royalties, transportation, gathering and production fuel expenses increaseddecreased as a percentage of Renewable ElectricityRNG revenues to 11.1 %20.3% for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 from 11.0%21.2% in the firstsecond quarter of 2025.

Added

Royalties, transportation, gathering and production fuel expenses for our Renewable Electricity facilities for the second quarter of 2026 were $521, an increase of $22 (4.4%) compared to $499 in the second quarter of 2025. Royalties, transportation, gathering and production fuel expenses decreased as a percentage of Renewable Electricity revenues to 11.5% for the second quarter of 2026 from 11.7% in the second quarter of 2025.

Reworded

Depreciation and amortization in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was $8,373,$7,904, an increase of $2,109$875 (33.7%12.4%) compared to $6,264$7,029 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The increase was primarily driven by the timing of wellfield and maintenance capital investments placed into service and our Second Apex RNG Facility project being placed into service.

Reworded

We calculated and recorded impairment losses of $443$650 in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, aan decreaseincrease of $1,604$273 (78.4%72.4%) compared to $2,047$377 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The decrease primarilyincrease relates to the impairment of an RNG development project for which the local utility no longer accepted RNG into its distribution system in specifically identified assets deemed obsoletediscrete or non-operable.non-operable assets.

Reworded

Other income in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was $1,306,$2,291, an increase of $2,497$3,547 (209.7%282.4%) compared to other expenses of $1,191$1,256 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. In the firstsecond quarter of 2026, we recorded approximately $3,320$3,772 in income related to our joint venture investment in GreenWave. There was no such income reportedfrom duringGreenWave in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. Also in the first quarter of 2026, we recorded approximately $944 in debt extinguishment costs from refinancing our credit agreement.

Reworded

Income Tax BenefitExpense

Reworded

Income tax benefitexpense for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was calculated using an estimated effective tax rate which differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21.0% primarily related to the adjustment of Production Tax Credits as well as stock based compensation.

Reworded

The effective tax rate of 101.4%89.8% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was higher than the rate for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 of 40.6%(52.0%) primarily due to the change in our pre-tax book loss for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.

Reworded

Operating (Loss) Income for the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025

Reworded

Operating loss in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was $1,599$75, a decrease of $2,280 (96.8%) compared to operating income of $410$2,355 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. RNG operating income for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was $8,745,$9,643, aan decreaseincrease of $1,624$415 (15.7%4.5%) compared to $10,369$9,228 in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. Renewable Electricity Generation operating loss for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was $2,171,$2,132, ana increasedecrease of $1,150$216 (112.6%9.2%) compared to $1,021$2,348 for the firstsecond quarter of 2025.

Added

Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025

Added

The following table summarizes the key operating metrics described above, which are metrics we use to measure performance.

Added

RINs are generated in the month that the gas is dispensed to generate RINs, which occurs the month after the gas is produced. Volumes under fixed/floor-price arrangements generate RINs which we do not self-market. K3 RIN separation occurs after the gas is dispensed (RINs generated but unseparated).

Added

(2)

Added

One MMBtu of RNG has the same energy content as 11.6935 gallons of ethanol, and thus may generate 11.6935 RINs under the RFS program.

Added

(3)

Added

Represents RINs available to be self-marketed by us during the reporting period.

Showing the first 60 of 117 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

MNTK insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 1 Form 4 filing (1 insider, 1 trade date, 17,506 shares, about $25.4K) and open-market sales in 0 filings. Net open-market shares: 17,506 (purchases minus sales); net value about $25.4K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-05-20Shaw James A
Chief Operating Officer
Grant/award 282,842— —477,387 SEC
2026-05-20Mcclain Sean F
Director, President & CEO
Grant/award 383,183— —1,141,172 SEC
2026-05-20Van Asdalan Kevin A
Chief Financial Officer
Grant/award 302,982— —497,493 SEC
2026-05-20Ciroli John
Chief Legal Officer
Grant/award 302,982— —470,772 SEC
2026-05-11Copelyn John A
Director
Open-market purchase 17,506$1.45 $25.4K17,506 SEC

Well-known investors holding MNTK (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-30364,800$569.1K0.0%Added 3%
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COM2026-06-30238,152$371.5K0.0%Added 521%
D. E. Shaw & Co. COM2026-06-30101,497$158.3K0.0%Reduced 14%
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM2026-06-3058,826$91.8K0.0%New position
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM2026-06-3043,455$67.8K0.0%Reduced 79%
Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) COM2026-06-3010,871$12.5K—Sold out

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when MNTK files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.