MSPR 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
MSP Recovery, Inc. · Services-Computer Processing & Data Preparation · CIK 1802450 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Risks Related to IT Systems and Cybersecurity”
New heading “We have concluded there is a substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.”
New heading “High inflation may adversely affect our financial results.”
New heading “We completed a 1-for-25 reverse stock split of our shares of common stock, which may have adverse effects on the trading of our Class A Common Stock.”
New heading “Risks Related to IT Systems and Cybersecurity”
New heading “In this section “we,” “us,” “our,” and other similar terms refer to Legacy MSP Recovery prior to the Business Combination and to the Company following the Business Combination.”
New heading “If we fail to comply with applicable privacy, security, and data laws, regulations and standards, including with respect to third-party service providers that utilize sensitive personal information on our behalf, it could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations.”
New heading “In the event we fail to maintain our SOC 2, HITRUST or other certifications, we could be in breach of our obligations under our contracts; fines and other penalties could result, we may suffer reputational harm, and our business could be damaged, limiting our ability to generate revenue.”
New heading “If we fail to anticipate and adapt to the growing use of artificial intelligence in our industry, other competing products and services that do so more effectively could surpass us and lead to decreased demand for our platform and products.”
New heading “The use of new and evolving technologies, such as artificial intelligence, in our business may result in spending material resources and presents risks and challenges, which may expose the Company to reputational harm and liability that could have a material adverse effect on our revenue, earnings, and the value of our publicly traded securities.”
Removed heading “If we fail to comply with applicable privacy, security and data laws, regulations and standards, including with respect to third-party service providers that utilize sensitive personal information on our behalf, it could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations.”
Removed heading “In the event we fail to maintain our Security Organization Control 2, HITRUST or other certifications, we could be in breach of our obligations under our contracts; fines and other penalties could result, we may suffer reputational harm, and our business could be damaged, limiting our ability to generate revenue.”
Largest changes
“In the event we fail to maintain our Security Organization Control 2, HITRUST or other certifications, we could be in breach of our obligations under our contracts; fines and other penalties could result, we may suffer reputational harm, and our business could be damaged, limiting our ability to generate revenue.”see in full comparison
“In the event we fail to maintain our SOC 2, HITRUST or other certifications, we could be in breach of our obligations under our contracts; fines and other penalties could result, we may suffer reputational harm, and our business could be damaged, limiting our ability to generate revenue.”see in full comparison
“Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with federal or state laws or regulations, industry standards or other legal obligations, or any actual or suspected privacy or security incident, whether or not resulting in unauthorized access to, or acquisition, release or transfer of personal identifiable information or other data, may result in governmental enforcement actions and prosecutions, private litigation, fines and penalties, or adverse publicity and could cause our Assignors to lose trust in us, which could have an adverse effect on our reputation and business. …”see in full comparison
“Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with laws or regulations, industry standards, or other legal obligations, or any actual or suspected privacy or security incident, whether or not resulting in unauthorized access to, or acquisition, release or transfer of PHI or other data, may result in governmental enforcement actions and prosecutions, private litigation, fines and penalties, or adverse publicity and could cause our Assignors to lose trust in us, which could have an adverse effect on our reputation and business. …”see in full comparison
“In addition to government regulations and securities laws, we are subject to self-regulatory standards and industry certifications that may legally or contractually apply to us. These include Security Organization Control 2 (“SOC 2”), with which we are currently compliant. In the event we fail to maintain our SOC 2 compliance or fail to receive recertification from HITRUST, we could be in breach of our obligations under Assignor agreements and other contracts, fines, and other penalties could result, and we may suffer reputational harm and damage to our business. …”see in full comparison
“In addition to government regulations and securities laws, we are subject to self-regulatory standards and industry certifications that may legally or contractually apply to us. These include Security Organization Control 2 (“SOC 2”), with which we are currently compliant. In the event we fail to maintain our SOC 2 compliance or fail to receive recertification from HITRUST, we could be in breach of our obligations under Assignor and other contracts, fines, and other penalties could result, and we may suffer reputational harm and damage to our business. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (240)
Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those highlighted in the section entitled “Risk Factors” that represent challenges that we face in connection with the successful implementation of our strategy and growth of our business. The occurrence of one or more of the events or circumstances described in the section entitled “Risk Factors,” alone or in combination with other events or circumstances, may adversely affect our ability realize the anticipated benefits of the Business Combination, and may have an adverse effect on our business, cash flows, financial condition, and results of operations. Such risks include, but are not limited to:
We have concluded there is a substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
To the extent that we act as servicing agent, our clients may terminate or materially breachesbreach their agreement with us.
The data healthcare data analytics and healthcare payment markets are relatively new and unpenetrated, and may not develop, develop slowermore slowly than expected,we expect, or sustain negative publicity.publicity, which may adversely affect our business.
Our quiQui tam litigation may be subject to Government Intervention and Dismissal pursuant to 31federal U.S.C. § 3730(c)(2)(A).law.
We will be required to pay the Tax Receivable Agreement (“TRA”) Parties (as defined in the TRA).Parties.
If our shares are delisted from Nasdaq ,Nasdaq, it will become more difficult to trade our shares.
If the Company’s operating results do not meet investor expectations, the market price of our securities may decline.
We cannot predict the impact that our dual class capital structure may have on the market price of the shares of our stock.
OnceWhile wethe issue aYorkville Convertible Note,Notes are outstanding, we do not exercise absolute control over the timing and amount of the issuanceissuances of our stock upon conversion of such Convertible Note.stock.
Risks Related to IT Systems and Cybersecurity
If we fail to anticipate and adapt to the growing use of artificial intelligence in our industry could lead to decreased demand.
The use of new technologies in our business may result in spending material resources and presents risks and challenges.
An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, together with all of the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) before making an investment decision. The occurrence of one or more of the events or circumstances described in these risk factors, alone or in combination with other events or circumstancescircumstances, may have an adverse effect on our business, cash flows, financial condition, and results of operations. You should also carefully consider the following risk factors in addition to the other information included in this Annual Report, including matters addressed in the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” We may face additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial, which may also impair our business or financial condition. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to the financial statements included herein.
In this section “we,” “us,” “our,” and otherthe similar terms“Company” refer to Legacy MSP prior to the Business Combination and to the Company following the Business Combination.
We have a history of net losses and no substantial revenue to date, and we may not achieve recoveries, generate significant revenue, or achieve profitability. Our relatively limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our current business and future prospectsprospects, and increases the risk of your investment.
Our relatively limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our current business and plan for our future growth. The Company started in 2014 with its first assignment from a health plan headquartered in Miami, Florida. To date, we have achieved no substantial revenue and limited actual recoveries from our assigned Claims, and there is no guarantee that we will achieve recoveries, revenue, or profitability as projected. We have encountered, and will continue to encounter, significant risks and uncertainties frequently experienced by new and growing companies in rapidly changing industries, such as determining appropriate investments for our limited resources, competition from other data analytics companies, acquiring and retaining Assignors, hiring, integrating, trainingtraining, and retaining skilled personnel, unforeseen expenses, challenges in forecasting accuracyaccuracy, and successfully integrating new strategies. If we are unable to achieve meaningful recoveries, increase our Assignor base, successfully manage our recovery efforts from third-party payers or successfully expand, our revenue and our ability to achieve and sustain profitability would be impaired. If our assumptions regarding these and other similar risks and uncertainties, which we use to plan our business, are incorrect or change as we gain more experience operating our business or due to changes in our industry, or if we do not address these challenges successfully, our operating and financial results could differ materially from our expectations and our business could suffer.
The achievement of multiples above the PVPRC; and
The achievement of multiples above the Paid Amount of a given Claim; and The length (and cost) of litigation required to achieve recoveries.
Any of these assumptions may prove over time to be materially inaccurate. If our estimates of revenues are materially inaccurate, it could impact the timing and the amount of our revenue recognition and have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial conditioncondition, and cash flows.
We have concluded there is a substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
As described under Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources, Going Concern, the Company has evaluated its financial condition as of the date the accompanying consolidated financial statements are being issued (the “Filing Date”) and, based on this evaluation, the Company has determined that, as of the Filing Date, the existence of certain conditions and events raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year following the Filing Date.
The Company’s ability to meet its liquidity needs for one year following the Filing Date will largely depend on its ability to raise additional capital or generate future revenue. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $446.1 million and $12.3 million in cash and cash equivalents. The Company’s ability to raise cash in the future is subject to general economic, financial, legal, legislative, regulatory, and other factors, many of which are outside of the Company’s control, including, but not limited to: (i) the execution of definitive documents to implement the Restructuring Plan, as described in more detail in Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Recent Updates, Restructuring Plan, (ii) the ability of the Company to secure additional funding from lenders, if any, (iii) the Company’s ability to realize recoveries from the settlement of its claims, which to date have not been sufficient to cover the Company’s cost of operations on a yearly basis, (iv) the Company’s ability to secure new Assignor relationships and retain and obtain additional Claim assignments from existing Assignors, (v) the Company’s ability to execute on its strategic plans, (vi) the ability of the Company to manage expenses and grow the business to generate future cash flows from its operations, and (vi) the availability and terms of future financings.
Based on the Company’s financial projections as of the Filing Date,the Company does not believe that it will have adequate liquidity to meet its obligations for at least one year following the Filing Date. If the Company is unable to manage these risks and uncertainties, and is unable to meet its liquidity needs, its business would be jeopardized and may not be able to continue to operate. For more information, see “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources, Going Concern.
The Company’s determination of the existence of substantial doubt as to its ability to continue as a going concern itself may have adverse consequences. In addition, the report issued by our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, included in this Annual Report includes a going concern explanatory paragraph. The public announcement of this declaration may cause or result in:
harm to the Company’s reputation, investor confidence, relationships with the Company’s Assignors, business partners, and Lenders, and may adversely affect the willingness for third parties to do business with the Company on favorable terms, or at all, in the future;
disruption of the Company’s business;
distraction of the Company’s management and employees;
difficulty in recruiting, hiring, motivating, and retaining talented and skilled employees;
difficulty in maintaining or negotiating and consummating new business or strategic relationships or transactions;
increased volatility in the price of the Company’s shares of Class A Common Stock; and increased costs and advisory fees.
If the Company is unable to mitigate these or other potential risks related to the uncertainty caused by the Company’s determination that substantial doubt exists as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, it may disrupt the Company’s business or adversely impact the Company’s prospects, reputation, revenue, operating results, and financial condition.
In manysome instances, we pay our Assignors an upfrontup-front purchase price for assignment of their recovery rights to healthcare Claims. Accordingly, there is a risk that we may not successfully recapture the upfrontup-front purchase price if we fail to make recoveries with respect to the assigned Claims. Further, our ability to identify and recover on future Claims includes risks such as:
maintaining current customers and securing future customers of the combined businesses;
assumption of liabilities; and litigation-related charges.costs.
Finally, our potential ability to achieve recovery revenues is based largely on the Paid Value of Potentially Recoverable Claims of our portfolio and our ability to discover, quantify, and settle the gap between Billed Amount and Paid Amount on a large scale. Failure to accurately calculate the Paid Amount or the Paid Value of Potential Recoverable Claims, the Recoveryrecovery Multiple,multiple, or perfect our recovery rights are not appropriately perfected,rights, may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
Typically, we must file actions in court to recover monies related to those paid byon our Assignorscompensible andClaims. aA substantial portion of our recoveries are dependent on the courts. As such, we may beare subject to adverse court rulings, significant delays, differing damages calculations or other limitations, each of which can negatively impact our recovery efforts, potential to generate revenue, and the financial condition of our business.
For example, from time to time, the courts dismiss our cases, or Claims pursued in our cases, with or without prejudice. When dismissal is without prejudice, we can refile the action. Accordingly, we retain the ability to bring those Claims in a recovery action. When dismissal is with prejudice, we cannot refile the action to pursue recoveries using the dismissed cause of action. We cannot guarantee that we will not receive adverse rulings in court. Historically, we have received adverse rulings or dismissal for reasons such as:
Dismissal for failureFailure to file within the applicable statute of limitations. For example, on August 10, 2022, thea Unitedfederal Statesappellate Courtcourt ofapplied Appeals, Eleventh Circuit held thata four-year statute of limitations period for civil actions arising under an Act of Congress enacted after December 1, 1990 applies to certain claims brought under the MedicareMSP SecondaryLaws, Payerrunning private cause of action, and that the limitations period begins to run onfrom the date that the cause of action accrued. This opinion may render certain Claims held by the Company unrecoverable and may substantially reduce PVPRC and BVPRC as calculated. As our cases were filed at different times and in various jurisdictions, and prior to data matching with a defendant we are not able to accurately calculate the entirety of damages specific to a given defendant, we cannot calculate with certainty the impact of this ruling at this time. Although this opinion is binding only on federal courts in the Eleventh Circuit, if the application of this statute of limitations as determined by the Eleventh Circuit wasis applied to all Claims assigned to us, we estimate that the effect would be a reduction of PVPRC by approximately $7.02$9.8 billion. As set forth in our Risk Factors, PVPRC is based on a variety of factors. As such, this estimate is subject to change based on the variety of legal claims being litigated and statute of limitations tolling theories that apply.
Dismissal because anAn assignment did not include the Claim that was brought in court (or such assignment was found to be invalid).
Dismissal for lackLack of standing to assert Claims.
Dismissal for lackLack of personal jurisdiction.
Dismissal for pleadingPleading deficiencies.
Additionally, in certain of our cases, our recoveries may be limited as a function of a courts’ damages calculations. Adverse court rulings could also occur from:
For example,Moreover, in certain antitrust matters, recoveriesdamages mayare begenerally limited to the difference between the price that a drug manufacturer charged for the drug and the price of the drug absent anti-competitive conduct. The list above is not exhaustive of potentially unfavorable rulings, damages calculations, or other limitations which we have encountered or may encounter.
The list above is not exhaustive of potentially unfavorable rulings, damages calculations, or other limitations which we have encountered or may encounter.
We generate, and expect to generate, a significant portion of our revenue by collecting on settlements and/or judgments that are granted by courts in lawsuits filed against insurers, tortfeasors, and other liable parties. A decrease in the willingness of courts to grant these judgments, a change in the requirements for filing these cases or obtaining these judgments, or a decrease in our ability to collect on these judgments could have an adverse effect on our revenue, operating results, and the financial condition of our business. As we increase our use of the legal channels for collections, there could be an increase in upfrontup-front court costs and costs related to counterclaims. We may not be able to collect on certain aged Claims because of applicable statutes of limitations, and we may be subject to adverse effects of regulatory changes.
Our recoveries may be limited if courts decline to compel our counterparties to data match with us, or we are otherwise unable to force responsible parties to produce data they storestore, thatwhich would identifyidentifies the proper party to make a given payment. Among the ways we identify the proper payer for a given claim is by comparing our member data to that of propertyour and casualty or no-fault insurerscounterparties in a process called data matching. Members found in both data sets are scrutinizedidentified and analyzed to determine if a primary payer was responsible in the first instance to pay or reimburse the cost of care relating to an accident. Should a court decline to compel data matching, our recoveries against a given insurer would be limited to those representativemembers beneficiaries identified, and all matches that could be identified through a data matching exercise.identified.
The lawsuits we file in pursuit of recoveries often involve causes of action that are entirely novel, or novel as applied to the facts alleged in our complaints. For example, while the MSP LawAct was enacted in 1980, its use by an assignee to pursue recoveries on its own behalf is novel. As such, courts deciding litigated issues in our cases often have limited binding precedent on which to base an opinion, and often review our cases as a matter of first impression. As a result, litigation outcomes are unpredictable, and our cases may be delayed as courts require more time to analyze the legal issues, and outcomes are difficult to accurately predict.
Our lawsuits are brought in a diverse range of judicial venues across many jurisdictions, which may result in differentinconsistent outcomes on similar issues, adversely affect our recovery efforts, and limit our ability to generate revenue.
Our counterparties employ strategies to delay proceedings and the ultimate resolution of our cases. Dilatory tactics include, but are not limited to, frivolous court filings, extended and improper discovery objections and disputes, delayed negotiations for data matching protocols, and protracted settlement negotiations that may or may not yield a settlement. While these delays do not adversely affect the value of the underlying assets, and in some casecases, statutory interest continues to accrue, the costs associated with recoveries increase substantially, and our ability to successfully resolve our cases may be limited. As a result, our ability to recognize revenue is delayed and our ultimate recovery may be diminished or eliminated as a result.
There exists in various jurisdictions prohibitions or restrictions in connection with purchasing Claims from plaintiffs (known as maintenance, and a form of maintenance, called champerty), assignment of certain kinds of Claims, and/or participation in a lawyer’s contingent fee interests. Such prohibitions and restrictions, to the extent they exist, are governed by the rules and regulations of each state and jurisdiction in the United States and vary in degrees of strength and enforcement in different states and federal jurisdictions. Some jurisdictions in the U.S. and other jurisdictions may not, for legal and professional ethics reasons, permit us to pursue certain recoveries, or the law and regulations in those jurisdictions may be uncertain, and accordingly we may not have the ability or the desire to pursue recoveries in these jurisdictions, thereby limiting the size of the potential market. If we, our counterparties, or the lawyers handling the underlying matters, were found to have violated the relevant prohibitions or restrictions in connection with certain matters, there could be a materially adverse effect on the value of the affected assets, our ability to enforce the relevant contractual agreements with our counterparties, and the amounts we would be able to recover with respect to such matters, or our costs for such matters.
We enter into legal services agreements with the Law Firm and the various entities that hold Claims. The Law Firm is engaged to act as counsel to represent the Company and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates (or other applicable entity) on a contingency basis as it pertains to the assigned Claims. The Law Firm engages outside litigation counsel from around the U.S. as co-counsel and these arrangements are made directly between the Law Firm and other counsel. For the services provided, the Law Firm typically collects a fee equal to 40% of our 50% portion of the Net Proceeds (i.e., 20% of the total Net Proceeds), which is paid from our portion of the Net Proceeds. Co-counsel is paid from the Law Firm’s portion of the Net Proceeds. The Law Firm is also entitled to attorney’s fees that are awarded to the Law Firm pursuant to any fee shifting statute, by agreement, or court award. Any increase in attorneys’ fees and costs wouldmay reduce our potential net recoveries. For more information about our fee sharing arrangement, see Item 1. Business and “ —Fee Sharing Arrangements.”
Assignors may pursue recovery on Claims directly or may use other recovery agents other than us in connection with the Assignor’s efforts to recover on Claims.
With respect to the Assignors of the assigned Claims, some of our agreements exclude from the assignment of Claims those Claims that are assigned to or being pursued by other recovery vendors of the Assignor at the time of the assignment. We have identified instances where the Assignor did not filter its data provided to us to account forremove such exclusions.Claims. This resulted in some Claims being identified by us for purposes of our recovery estimates. This also has resulted in other recovery agents of the Assignor making collections on Claims that were assigned to us. Although we endeavor to seek appropriate clarification from Assignors to properly identify Claims that are being pursued by other recovery vendors, due to the nature and volume of data, it may not be possible to identify with precision all such Claims. While we do not believe that there is material overlap with other recovery vendors with respect to assigned Claims to be material, there can be no assurance as to the ultimate impact on our recoveries or our business. That notwithstanding, where other recovery vendors have made recoveries, the recoveries may not be the full amount of the potential recovery because it was not processed properly or against the correct responsible parties.
Our business and future growth depend on our ability to successfully expand the volume of our healthcareportfolio of assigned Claims and obtain data from new Assignors and healthcare Claims from our existing Assignor base.
We expect a significant portion of our future revenue growth to come from expanding the volumeportfolio of Claims that we are assigned; this includes obtaining Claims and data from new Assignors as well as our existing Assignors. Our efforts to do so may not be successful. If we are unable to successfully expand the scope of healthcare Claims assigned from potential and existing Assignors, it could have a material adverse effect on our growth and on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The positions we will typically acquire in connection with our acquisition of Claims are unsecuredunsecured, and may be effectively subordinated to other obligations andor areduplicated at riskdue to mistake, negligence, or fraud on the part of the Assignor of the Claim.
Further, Assignors may misrepresent or omit material information, such as the underlying beneficiary or other counterparty. For example, an Assignor may misrepresent the quality, validity, or existence of a Claim or other information provided to us, or provide duplicate Claim data, either due to unintentional negligence or intentional fraud. ThereAlthough we have procedures in place to identify duplicate Claims, there is no assurance we will detect such error. Any inaccuracy, duplication, or incompleteness, if undetected, may adversely affect the valuation of one or more Claims and adversely affect our business and performance. Under certain circumstances, recoveries may be reclaimed if any such payment or distribution is later determined to have been a fraudulent conveyance.
Moreover, the current administration has tasked the Department of Government Efficiency subcommittee (“DOGE”) with launching a “War on Waste,” to identify and eliminate fraud, waste, and abuse in governmental spending programs, including Medicare. DOGE has committed to, among other things, improve identity verification and refine payment tracking mechanisms at the federal and state level to ensure that federal payments systems are protected from future abuses. Although such measures will likely have minimal impact on payments already made, they may reduce the fraud, waste, and abuse associated with future Claims assigned to the Company, thus reducing the need for our existing solutions, which could have a material adverse effect on our growth and results of operations.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Discover Losses/Recover Reimbursements”
New heading “Industry Solutions”
New heading “The MSP Ecosystem”
New heading “MSP/Palantir Clearinghouse Platform”
New heading “Primary Market Transfer”
New heading “Yorkville Amendments”
New heading “Restructuring Plan”
New heading “Establishment of New Servicer”
New heading “Working Capital Funding for the New Servicer”
New heading “Additional Bridge Financing for the Company”
New heading “Debt Restructuring”
New heading “VRM Warrant Issuance and Restructuring”
New heading “Allowance for Credit Losses”
Removed heading “Hazel Transactions”
Removed heading “Virage Amendment”
Removed heading “Cano Health, LLC”
Removed heading “Yorkville Facility”
Removed heading “Off-Balance Sheet Commitments and Arrangements”
Removed heading “Impairment of Intangible Assets”
Largest changes
“As previously disclosed, on August 11, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) initiated an investigation of the Company, and requested documents relating to, among other matters, the business combination transaction with Lionheart Acquisition Corporation II consummated on May 23, 2022, certain historical and projected financial results, investor agreements, and data analytic platforms and algorithms. …”see in full comparison
“On August 10, 2023, MSP Recovery sued Cano in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida for declaratory relief and anticipatory breach of the CCRA, Purchase Agreement, and a Service Agreement (collectively, the “Cano Agreements”) between the parties. On the same day, Cano sued the Company in the same court, alleging fraud in the inducement, breach of contract, tortious interference, and unjust enrichment relating to the Cano Agreements. …”see in full comparison
“In addition, on March 10, 2023, the Company received a subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in connection with a grand jury investigation in the U.S. …”see in full comparison
“The Company has concluded that, despite the aforementioned financing arrangements, there is substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Unless we are successful in raising additional funds through the offering of debt or equity securities, we have concluded it is probable we will be unable to continue to operate as a going concern beyond the next twelve months. …”see in full comparison
“The Company anticipates sources of liquidity to include up to $9.75 million in bridge loan funding to the Company under the existing Operational Collection Floor facility (in addition to the $16.0 million previously funded under the facility) in the amounts of: (i) $1.75 million for March 2025, which was funded on February 28, 2025; (ii) $1.5 million for April 2025, which was funded on April 4, 2025; (iii) $1.5 million for May 2025, to be funded on or about April 30, 2025; …”see in full comparison
“The Company has cooperated, and will continue to cooperate, fully with these inquiries. In connection with its review of the matters related to the preparation and filing of the 2022 Form 10-K, the Special Committee, along with external advisors retained thereby, also reviewed the subject matter of information requests related to the foregoing subpoenas received prior to June 2023. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (217)
The following discussion and analysis provides information that management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”). Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this subsection to “we,” or “the Company,” or “MSPCompany” refers to Legacy MSP prior to the Business Combination and the Company after the Business Combination. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements based upon the Company’s current expectations, estimates, and projections that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements due to, among other considerations, the matters discussed under “Risk Factors” and “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
WeMSP areRecovery is a leading healthcare reimbursement recovery and data analytics company.company, providing historical and Near Real-Time solutions for payers, providers, and patients. We focus on thediscovering losses and recovering improper payments for Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial insurancehealth spaces. We areinsurers, disrupting the antiquated healthcare reimbursement system,system. usingWe dataalso provide innovative technology and analyticscomprehensive toservices identifyfor multiple industries including healthcare and recover improper payments made by Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial health insurers.legal.
Medicare and Medicaid are payers of last resort. Too often, they end up being the first and only payers, because the responsible payer is not identified or billed. As Medicare and Medicaid pay a far lower rate than what other insurers are often billed, this costs the healthcare system (and the supporting taxpayers) tens of billions of dollars a year inattributable to improper billing and lost recoveries. By discovering, quantifying, and settling the billed-to-paid gap on a large-scale basis, the Company is positioned to generate meaningful annual recovery revenue at high profit margins.
Our access to large volumes of data, sophisticated data analytics,analytics platforms, and a leadingadvanced technology platform provide a unique opportunity to discover and recover onimproper Claims.healthcare Claims payments. We have developed Algorithms to identify waste, fraud, and abuse in the Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial health insurance segments.sectors. Our team of experienced data scientists and medical professionals analyze historical medical Claims data to identify recoverable opportunities. Once potential recoveries are reviewed by our team, they are aggregated and pursued. Through statutory law and case law, we believe we have an established basis for future recoveries.
We differ from our competitors as we receive our recovery rights through irrevocable assignments of Claims. When we are assigned these rights by our clients, we assume risk that our competitors do not. Rather than provide services under a third-party vendor services contract, we receive the rights to certain recovery proceeds from our Assignors.Assignors’ AsClaims assignees,(and, wein havemost controlcases, overtake the directionassignment of the litigationClaims andthemselves, takeallowing onus ato riskstep thatinto ourthe competitorsAssignor doclients’ not.shoes). We,As we, or our affiliated entities, are assigned the recovery rights associated with Claims, we are the plaintiff in any action filed and havetherefore exercise control over the direction of the lawsuit.litigation. By receiving Claims through assignment, we can pursue additional recoveries under numerous legal theories that our competitors cannot. Although we typicallyown ownthe assigned Claims, for a significant portion of assigned Claims, our ability to pursue recoveries depends on our ongoing access to data associated with those Claims through data access rights granted to us. In these cases,The termination of suchsaid data access rights would substantially impair our ability to generate recoveries on those Claims.
Our current Claims portfolio has scaled significantly. We are entitled to a portion of any recovery rights associated with approximately $1,544$1,591 billion in Billed Amount (and approximately $370$380 billion in Paid Amount), which contains approximately $88.9$87.7 billion in Paid Value of Potentially Recoverable Claims, as of December 31, 2023.2024. We believe it would take any competitor significant time to amass the portfolio of Claims rights currently owned by us due to, among things, the volume of our Claims data retained and strength of our data analytics, which we believe are key to attracting new clients that are willing to assign Claims to us.
Our potentially serviceable market is impacted by the expansion or contraction of healthcare coverage and spending, which directly affects the number of Claims available. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) has projected that health spending will continue to grow at an average rate of 5.4%5.6% a year between 20222023 and 2031.2032. We also believe reimbursement models may become more complex as healthcare payers accommodate new markets and lines of business and as advancements in medical care increase the number of testing and treatment options available. As reimbursement models grow more complex and healthcare coverage increases, the complexity and number of Claims may also increase, which could impact the demand for our solutions. Such changes could have a further impact on our results of operations.
Discover Losses/Recover Reimbursements
Recovery Model
In our current business model, weWe receive irrevocable assignments of health ClaimClaims recovery rights through CCRAs from a variety of sources including, but not limited to, MAOs, MSOs, HMOs, hospitals, and other at-risk entities. Prior to executing a CCRA, weWe utilize our proprietary internal data analytics platformplatforms to review the set ofhealthcare Claims and identify Claims with probable recovery paths.
Once Claims have been assigned, our data analysts use ourrun proprietary Algorithms to identify potential recoveries. Results are then quality checked by our internal medical team. We contract with the Law Firm and various other law firms across the country to pursue recoveries through the legal system. Where appropriate, the Law Firm reachescontacts outprimary to the liable partiespayers to demand payment of amounts that are owed. Prior to litigation, there may be an incentive for the primary insurer to settle.settle Ifas, legalpursuant to the Medicare Secondary Payer Act, an action isfor requireddamages in the case of a primary plan which fails to pursueprovide recovery fromfor primary insurers,payment we(or seekappropriate “reimbursement) shall be in an amount double damages” under the MSPamount Act.otherwise provided.
We engage with each Assignor independently. We are typicallygenerally entitled to 100% of recoveries pursuant to our CCRA.CCRAs; Fromfrom those recoveries, we are typically contractually obligated to pay 50% of Net Proceeds to the Assignor. In certain cases, we have purchased the Assignor’s rights to recovery proceeds in advance of any collection; therefore, entitling the Company to retain 100% of the Net Proceeds. The “Net Proceeds” of any assigned Claim is defined as the gross amount recovered on an assigned Claim, minus any costs directly traceable to such assigned Claim(s) for which recovery was made. In some instances, we may purchase outright an Assignor’s recovery rights; in suchthis instances,instance, we are entitled to the entire recovery. In some cases, we have entered into arrangements to transfer CCRAs or rights to proceeds from CCRAs to other parties. Such sales include variable consideration in the form of payments that will be made only upon achievement of certain recoveries or based on a percentage of actual recoveries. In other cases, the Company has pledged proceeds which are due to the Company to repay certain obligations, such as the Purchase Money Loan, the Working Capital Credit Facility, and the MTA. We have yet to generate substantial revenue from the recovery model.
We have not yet generated substantial revenue from the recovery model. To date, the majority of our revenue has been generated by Claims recovery services which are either performance-based or fee for service arrangements as described below.
Chase to Pay
Over time, the Company believes that a large part of the flaws that exist in the marketplace can be significantly improved by the solutions that can be achieved by our “Chase to Pay” model. Chase to Pay is a near real-time analytics driven platform that identifies the proper primary insurer at the point of care or close enough in proximity for payers to determine primary and secondary payers. Chase to Pay is intended to plug into near real-time medical utilization platforms used by providers at the points of care. Rather than allow an MAO to make a wrongful payment whereby the payer needs to chase down the primary payer and collect a reimbursement for the MAO, Chase to Pay is intended to prevent the MAO from making a wrongful payment and ensure that the correct payer pays in the first instance. Furthermore, the primary payer typically will make payments at a higher multiple than the MAO would have paid, and MSP will be entitled to receive its portion of the recovery proceeds on the amounts paid by the primary payer. Chase to Pay is powered, in part, by Palantir Technologies’ Foundry platform utilizing LifeWallet’s industry knowledge.
As Chase to Pay works at or around the point of care, it is expected to substantially decrease legal costs of recovery. As a result, when implemented, Chase to Pay is expected to improve the net recovery margin as the recovery multiple grows and variable legal costs to recover decline. As a result of having already received data from 28 insurance carriers for historical claims, and based on the agreement with said carriers to receive data daily therefrom for one year from the date of the settlement, the Chase to Pay model can be utilized.
Although we have not yet generated revenue from this model, some customers send data to LifeWallet on a daily, monthly, or quarterly basis. The Company is working to increase the number of customers that provide daily data outputs. We are currently in the process of determining the pricing and form of these arrangements. As part of our “Chase to Pay” model, we launched LifeWallet in January 2022, a platform powered by our sophisticated data analytics, designed to locate and organize users’ medical records, facilitating efficient access to enable informed decision-making and improved patient care. See the section entitled The LifeWallet Ecosystem for more information about Chase to Pay.
We may also recognize Claims recovery service revenue from our services to customersclients, to assist thoseassisting entities with the pursuit of Claims recovery rights.rights Weby provide services to other parties to identifyidentifying recoverable Claims and provideproviding data matching and legal services. Under our Claims recovery services model, we do not own the rights to Claims but provide our services for a fee based on budgeted expenses for the month with an adjustment for the variance between budget and actual expense from the prior month. The fees received pursuant to a Claims recovery service agreement are related to expenses incurred and are not tied to the Billed Amount or potential recovery amounts. Although we believe our future business to be highly tied to the Recovery model and Chase to Pay, we may enter into these contracts as the market dictates. The Company did not recognize any Claims recovery service income during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Industry Solutions
The MSP Ecosystem
MSP Recovery has developed a comprehensive ecosystem to enhance healthcare reimbursement processes, integrating advanced data analytics, Near Real-Time insights, and technological tools to provide connectivity between property and casualty insurers, health plans, providers, patients, and stakeholders. This integrated ecosystem analyzes data from various sources to identify responsible parties, assists providers in receiving reasonable and customary rates for accident-related treatment, shortens the company’s collection time frame, and increases revenue visibility and predictability for its users.
The Chase to Pay platform was designed to significantly improve payment accuracy in our fragmented healthcare system. Chase to Pay is a near real-time analytics driven platform that identifies the proper primary insurer at or near the point of care, helping to determine primary and secondary payers. Chase to Pay is intended to integrate with medical utilization platforms used by providers during patient care and treatment. Rather than allow a wrongful payment whereby the secondary payer needs to chase down the primary payer to collect a reimbursement, Chase to Pay helps to prevent wrongful payments in the first place, and ensures that the correct payer pays. Furthermore, as primary payers typically pay a negotiated or commercially reasonable rate, rather than the deeply discounted Medicare rate; the Company is entitled to pursue the full amount that primary payer would have been responsible to pay, had they paid in the first instance.
As Chase to Pay was designed to work at or near the point of care, it is expected to substantially improve the propriety of payments and decrease the legal costs of recovery. As a result, when implemented, Chase to Pay is expected to improve the net recovery margin as the recovery multiple grows and variable legal costs to recover decline. As a result of having already received data from property & casualty insurance carriers we've settled with for historical claims, and based on the agreement with said carriers to receive data for one year from the date of the settlement, the Chase to Pay platform can be utilized to pursue additional recoveries by matching the insurance carrier with Claims data received from our Assignors.
Although we have not yet generated revenue from this platform, some Assignors send data to the Company on a monthly or quarterly basis. The Company is working to increase the number of Assignors that provide daily data outputs. We are currently in the process of determining the pricing and form of these arrangements.
MSP/Palantir Clearinghouse Platform
The clearinghouse platform, created in collaboration with Palantir, was developed to identify, quantify, and resolve outstanding liens. By law, Medicare and MA Plans are payers of last resort, making no-fault insurers the primary payers, responsible to exhaust their policy limits to pay for accident-related claims before Medicare bears any responsibility. Healthcare providers often submit Claims for the payment of medical services rendered after an accident to the patient’s health insurer, either seeking “conditional payments,” pending reimbursement by a primary payer, or entirely unaware that a primary payer has payment obligations. Medicare is unable to effectively verify if and how much is owed for any particular claimant if they are not aware that there is a Primary Payer involved.
Federal law requires primary payers to maintain and report the “key identifiers” for all claimants (such as their name, Social Security number, address, etc.) used to determine a claimant’s Medicare status before settling any injury claim. These steps are required to ensure that Medicare is alerted to primary payer obligations in order to seek reimbursement. Primary payers routinely fail to fulfill these two duties, resulting in improper Medicare payments, rather than payments made by responsible parties, as required by law. The Company has proven that, in some instances, primary payers have a reporting rate as low as 2%, thus those certain primary payers have failed to comply with the law 98% of the time.
We expect that the clearinghouse platform is a potential solution to this systemic problem, integrating advanced artificial intelligence (“AI”) tools, natural language processing (“NLP”), and machine learning (“ML”) to create a robust data analytics system capable of capturing and managing extensive healthcare data from multiple sources.
Key Features and Benefits:
Near Real-Time Data Analytics: The clearinghouse platform provides an expansive repository of data from patients, attorneys, healthcare providers, health insurers, and property and casualty insurers that can be utilized to determine payer obligations.
Enhanced Connectivity: With the ability to connect property and casualty insurers to health plans and downstream medical providers, the clearinghouse platform can address inefficiencies arising from improper payments related to accident-related injuries. This connectivity streamlines the reimbursement process, ensuring that healthcare payers and providers receive appropriate compensation, helping to reduce administrative burdens.
Advanced Data Management: The utilization of AI, NLP, and ML to process and analyze large volumes of healthcare data helps enhance the accuracy and efficiency of claims management and payment integrity.
Legal Integration: The clearinghouse platform integrates legal, data, and healthcare knowledge, providing a unified ecosystem that streamlines the processing of claims reconciliation. It may also be used by primary payers to proactively resolve liens and ensure compliance with federal laws.
Through the clearinghouse platform, the Company aims to transform the healthcare reimbursement system by leveraging advanced technologies to improve data connectivity and enhance operational efficiency, leading to improved patient outcomes.
EHR Platform
MSP Recovery has developed an Electronic Health Record (“EHR”) platform (the “EHR Platform”), enabling patients and their authorized third-party representatives to collect, distribute, and export their EHR securely, facilitating informed decision-making and improved healthcare outcomes. The EHR Platform streamlines the retrieval and analysis of medical data. It also provides comprehensive insights for healthcare providers, enhancing efficiency, and monitoring outcomes and key performance indicators. The use of blockchain technology tokenization helps improve accuracy in patient care and treatment while minimizing errors in billing and payment. This aims to prevent fraud and abuse while supporting proactive, patient-centered care.
We were a party to that certain Recovery Services Agreement (the “MSP RH Series 01 Recovery Services Agreement”), dated as of October 23, 2020, by and between MSP Recovery Holdings Series 01, LLC (“MSP RH Series 01”) and MSP Recovery, pursuant to which MSP Recovery provided services including identifying, processing, prosecuting, and recovering money for certain Claims of MSP RH Series 01. In return for these services, MSP RH Series 01 paid a one-time fee of approximately $7.2 million, and paid annual service fees of approximately $3.0 million commencing January 1, 2021, subject to adjustment based on the aggregate value of Claims of MSP RH Series 01 that is subject to the MSP RH Series 01 Recovery Services Agreement. On March 29, 2023, this service fee agreement was terminated in connection with the series agreements discussed in further detail in the Hazel Transactions section of Note 4, Asset Acquisitions. See also Note 2, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in this Annual Report for additional detail.
The fees received pursuant to this agreement are related to expenses incurred and are not tied to the Billed Amount or potential recovery amounts. Although we believe our future business to be highly tied to the recovery model and Chase to Pay, we will continue to enter into these contracts as the market dictates.
TheEffective 11:59 PM EDT on November 15, 2024, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware that became effective at 11:59 PM EDT on October 12, 2023 to effect a 1-for-25 reverse stock split of the Company’s commonCommon stockStock (the “2024 Reverse Split”). The stock began trading post split on OctoberNovember 13,18, 20232024 under the same symbol, LIFW.symbol. As a result of the 2024 Reverse Split, every 25 shares of the Company’s oldCommon common stockStock were converted into one share of the Company’s new commonCommon stock.Stock. Fractional shares resulting from the 2024 Reverse Split were rounded up to the nearest whole number. The 2024 Reverse Split automatically and proportionately adjusted, based on the 1-for-25 split ratio, all issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s commonCommon stock,Stock, as well as the terms of warrants and other derivative securities outstanding at the time of the effectiveness of the 2024 Reverse Split. Proportionate adjustments were made to the per share exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon the exercise of all outstanding stock options and warrants to purchase shares of commonCommon stock. Share and per share data (except par value) for the periods presented reflect the effects of the Reverse Split. References to numbers of shares of common stock and per share data in the accompanying financial statements and notes thereto for periods ended prior to October 13, 2023 have been adjusted to reflect the Reverse Split on a retroactive basis. Unless otherwise noted, the share and per share information in this Quarterly Report have been adjusted to give effect to the one-for-twenty-five (1-for-25) Reverse Split.Stock.
Primary Market Transfer
On December 6, 2024, the Company received notification from the Staff that the Company’s application to transfer the listing of its Class A Common Stock and publicly traded warrants from the Nasdaq Global Market to the Nasdaq Capital Market was approved. The Company’s securities transferred to the Nasdaq Capital Market at the opening of business on December 10, 2024. The Nasdaq Capital Market operates in substantially the same manner as the Nasdaq Global Market, and listed companies must meet certain financial requirements and comply with Nasdaq’s corporate governance requirements.
Symbol Change
Effective December 9, 2024, the Company consolidated all lines of business under the MSP Recovery brand, and the Company’s Class A Common Stock, New Warrants, and Public Warrants began trading on Nasdaq under the ticker symbols “MSPR,” “MSPRW,” and “MSPRZ,” respectively. Prior to this change, the Company was known as LifeWallet.
The Company has assessed its ability to continue as a going concern. Refer to the “Going Concern” section within Liquidity and Capital Resources below for analysis and conclusion.
During the Company’s fourth quarter review of its CCRAs, the Company identified potential impairment indicators, such as recurring operating losses, and a lack of substantial revenue generated from our Claims portfolio to date, which it considered in its evaluation of its definite-lived intangible assets. As a result, the Company performed a recoverability analysis on the definite-lived CCRA intangible assets in the fourth quarter of 2024. The recoverability analysis primarily included unobservable inputs, including internally developed assumptions about the estimated market share of insurance carriers that may not have paid claims due to Assignors, undiscounted cash flows of potential estimated recoveries from those carriers, the corresponding direct costs associated with those estimated recoveries, and the Company’s ability to successfully litigate or negotiate settlements.
An asset group is impaired if the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the asset group’s carrying value. Impairment is measured by the amount by which the carrying value exceeds fair value. The Company performed a probability-weighted undiscounted net cash flow analyses, taking into account various scenarios of expected cash flows, some of which rendered positive results, while others rendered negative results. Given that the probability-weighted average cash flows of all scenarios were below the carrying value, the Company performed a fair value assessment to measure impairment loss.
The fair value assessment of the intangible assets was determined using the income approach. The significant inputs and assumptions used in the estimate of fair value were primarily Level 3 inputs, and include internally developed assumptions used in the undiscounted analysis, as well as the determination of an appropriate discount rate. The Company’s estimation of the fair value of its CCRA intangible assets resulted in a non-cash impairment charge amount of $752.7 million recorded during the fourth quarter of 2024 in Impairment of intangible assets in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024. The estimation of the fair value requires significant management judgment with respect to the estimates discussed above. The estimates of the fair value are based on the best information available as of the date of the assessment. Small changes in the significant inputs and assumptions would increase or decrease estimated discounted future operating cash flows and could increase or decrease an impairment charge by a material amount. If actual results or future expectations are not consistent with the assumptions used in our estimate of fair value, it may result in the recording of additional impairment charges in the future which could be material.
Hazel Transactions
On March 29, 2023, the Company’s subsidiary, Subrogation Holdings, LLC, entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Working Capital Credit Facility”) with Hazel Partners Holdings LLC (“HPH”), an affiliate of Hazel, as the lender and administrative agent, which provides for up to $80 million (with a 40% original issue discount), consisting of a Term Loan A commitment to fund up to $30 million in proceeds (in multiple installments), and a Term Loan B Commitment to fund up to $18 million in proceeds (in multiple installments), the funding of each conditioned on certain milestones. The amended terms to the Working Capital Credit Facility were memorialized in the Second Amended and Restated First Lien Credit Agreement dated November 10, 2023.
At different points during the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company received funding with an aggregate amount of $20.5 million under Term Loan A, which was then terminated. The parties agreed to increase the Term Loan B commitment from $18 million to $27.5 million, after giving effect to the original issue discount on the Working Capital Credit Facility, which would be funded in multiple installments and in accordance with the terms of the Working Capital Credit Facility.
At different points during the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company received funding with an aggregate amount of $9.0 million under Term Loan B (after original issue discount), and received an additional $4.5 million on January 25, 2024. After considering the subsequent payment received, the Company has additional availability amounting to $14.0 million under Term Loan B.
Virage Amendment
On April 12, 2023, we entered into an amendment (the “Virage MTA Amendment”) to the Virage MTA and Virage Guaranty pursuant to which the VRM Full Return payment due date was extended from May 23, 2023 until September 30, 2024, subject to acceleration upon certain triggering events. The Virage MTA Amendment changed the payment methods to Virage to exclusively be, in the following order of priority: (a) a first priority lien on all sources of revenue of the Company not otherwise encumbered as of the date of the Virage MTA Amendment to the extent such revenues and liquidity exceed the amount of net of revenues necessary to establish and maintain an operating reserve (“Operating Reserve”) of $70 million (the Operating Reserve was reduced to $47.5 million on July 24, 2023) for certain Company expenses, (b) a sale of certain reserved shares of Messrs. John H. Ruiz and Frank C. Quesada, and the delivery of the resulting net cash proceeds thereof to VRM, (c) Parent’s sale of additional shares and delivery of proceeds to Virage, subject to certain anti-dilution provisions, (d) if not satisfied by the foregoing, a sale by Messrs. Ruiz and Quesada other shares of Messrs. Ruiz and Quesada, and the delivery of the resulting net cash proceeds thereof to VRM; provided that if the VRM Full Return is not fully paid by September 30, 2024 the VRM Full Return shall be payable by any of such payment methods in any order of priority. In addition, in connection therewith, Messrs. Quesada and Ruiz agreed to certain transfer restrictions applicable to their common stock, and agreed to effectuate sales of Company common stock in certain circumstances.
On November 13, 2023, the Company entered into the Second Virage MTA Amendment that extended the VRM Full Return payment due date to December 31, 2024, subject to acceleration upon certain triggering events. The Second Virage MTA Amendment also: (a) changed the Operating Reserve from $47.5 million to the budget of the Company (plus applicable taxes) plus 10%, and (b) required Virage and the Company negotiate and agree on a form of initial warrant and monthly warrant by no later than December 31, 2023. In addition, pursuant to the Second Virage MTA Amendment, on January 1, 2024, the Company was required to make a one-time, lump sum payment to Virage for the period starting May 24, 2023 and ending December 31, 2023, in one or a combination of: (a) cash, in an amount equal to 1.0% of each calendar month-end balance (which month-end balance shall be increased daily up to 20% per annum based on a formula set forth in the Virage MTA Amendment) of the amount owing to Virage as of each preceding calendar month end and/or (b) warrants to purchase Class A common stock at $0.0001 per share, in an amount equal to the quotient of 1.0% of each calendar month-end balance (which month-end balance shall be increased daily up to 20% per annum based on a formula set forth in the Virage MTA Amendment) of the amount owing to Virage as of each preceding calendar month end and the volume weighted average price of a share of our Class A common stock for the five day period prior to the issuance.
Accordingly, the Company issued the VRM Warrants. The Initial Virage Warrant, as amended, was issued effective January 1, 2024 and entitles Virage to purchase 28,298,329 shares of Class A Common Stock, with an expiration date of January 1, 2026. Further, as of April 5, 2024, Monthly Virage Warrants were issued for February 2024 entitling Virage to purchase 8,263,494 shares, March 2024 entitling Virage to purchase 11,955,994 shares, and April 2024 entitling Virage to purchase 13,556,181 shares. Until our obligations to Virage are paid in full, the Company has the option every month to continue to pay Virage in one or a combination of: (a) cash, in an amount equal to 1.0% of each calendar month-end balance (which month-end balance shall be increased daily up to 20% per annum based on a formula set forth in the Virage MTA Amendment) of the amount owing to Virage as of each preceding calendar month end and/or (b) the issuance of subsequent Monthly Virage Warrants.
On April 1, 2024, the Company entered into the Third Virage MTA Amendment (the “Third Virage MTA Amendment”) which: (i) extended the VRM Full Return payment due date to September 30, 2025, subject to acceleration upon certain triggering events; (ii) the Company agreed that, after the Convertible Notes are fully satisfied, 25% of the Company’s portion of any net proceeds from the Yorkville SEPA would be used to pay down the VRM Full Return; and (iii) Messrs. John H. Ruiz and Frank C. Quesada would commence the sale of certain of their reserved shares, and the delivery of the resulting net cash proceeds thereof to VRM.
On April 12, 2023, the Company amended the promissory note to Nomura originally issued on May 27, 2022, which increased the principal amount to approximately $26.3 million and extended the maturity date of the promissory note to September 30, 2024. On November 13, 2023, the Company fully amended and restated the Nomura promissory note (the “Amended and Restated Nomura Promissory Note”) to (a) increase the principal amount to approximately $28.9 million, (b) extend the maturity date to December 31, 2024, and (c) permit the Company to use the proceeds of an at-the-market offering to repay indebtedness incurred by the Company for which the proceeds are used for operating expenses, subject to certain enumerated restrictions. On March 26, 2024, the Company further amended and restated the Amended and Restated Nomura Promissory Note (the “Amendment to the Amended and Restated Nomura Promissory Note”) to (a) increase the principal amount to approximately $30.0 million, and (b) extend the maturity date to September 30, 2025. The Amended and Restated Nomura Promissory Note carries an interest rate of 16% per annum and is payable in kind or in cash, at the Company’s discretion, every 30 calendar days after March 26, 2024. Upon two days prior written notice to Nomura, the Company may prepay all or any portion of the then outstanding principal amount under the Amended and Restated Nomura Promissory Note together with all accrued and unpaid interest thereon.
Cano Health, LLC
On July 7, 2023, the Company issued 7,960,001 unregistered shares (after giving effect to the Reverse Split) of Class A Common Stock to Cano as payment for $61.7 million in deferred compensation related to the following agreements, which the Company had the option to pay in cash or in stock and has elected to pay in stock, of which (i) 3,225,807 shares of Common Stock were issued as a deferred consideration for the assignment of certain claims pursuant to that certain Purchase Agreement, effective as of September 30, 2022, as amended to date, by and between MSP Recovery and Cano, and (ii) 4,734,194 shares of Common Stock were issued as deferred consideration for the assignment of certain claims pursuant to that certain Amended and Restated Claims Recovery and Assignment Agreement effective as of December 31, 2021, as amended to date, by and between MSP Recovery and Cano.
On August 10, 2023, MSP Recovery sued Cano in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida for declaratory relief and anticipatory breach of the CCRA, Purchase Agreement, and a Service Agreement (collectively, the “Cano Agreements”) between the parties. On the same day, Cano sued the Company in the same court, alleging fraud in the inducement, breach of contract, tortious interference, and unjust enrichment relating to the Cano Agreements. The Company has outstanding a $5.0 million receivable from Cano; however, due to Cano’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the June 30, 2023 period, which includes a substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern, the Company established a reserve for the balance due under such receivable during 2023. These matters were automatically stayed as a result of the Cano’s bankruptcy filing.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Largest changes
“On October 22, 2025, the Company received a Staff Delisting Determination (the “Delisting Notification”), notifying the Company that trading of its common stock will be suspended from the Nasdaq Capital Market at the opening of business on October 31, 2025, and a Form 25-NSE will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which will remove the Company’s securities from listing and registration on Nasdaq.”see in full comparison
The Company had 45 calendar days from April 24, 2025, or through Monday, June 9, 2025, to submit a plan to regain compliance with Listing Rule 5550(b)(1). The Company submitted its plan on June 5, 2025, andsee in full comparisoniswasawaiting a response from the Nasdaq. If Nasdaq accepts the Company’s plan, Nasdaq may grantgranted an extension of up to 180calendar days from April 24, 2025,days, or through Tuesday, October 21, 2025, to regain compliance.Nasdaq may provide us insufficient time to implement our compliance plan or at the end of the compliance period, we may not be able to demonstrate compliance for any number of reasons. If any of these events occur, we could be delisted.
“The Company timely submitted a written request for a review of the Delisting Notification by a Hearings Panel (the “Panel”). A hearing request stays the suspension of the Company’s securities and the filing of the Form 25-NSE pending the Panel’s decision. The hearing is scheduled for December 11, 2025.”see in full comparison
“We are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and the trading price of our common stock. You should carefully read and consider the risks and uncertainties included herein and in the risk factors previously disclosed in the 2024 Form 10-K and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2025 (the “Q2 2025 Form 10-Q”). …”see in full comparison
“There can be no assurance that the Panel will grant the Company’s request for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market. If the Company’s Common Stock ceases to be listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Company expects that its Common Stock would continue to trade on the OTCQB Venture Market of the OTC Markets Group.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (5)
We are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and the trading price of our common stock. You should carefully read and consider the risks and uncertainties included herein and in the risk factors previously disclosed in the 2024 Form 10-K and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2025 (the “Q2 2025 Form 10-Q”). Prospective investors are encouraged to consider the risks described in our 2024 Form 10-K, our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in the Q2 2025 Form 10-Q and in our 2024 Form 10-K, and other information publicly disclosed or contained in documents we file with the SEC before purchasing our securities.
The Company had 45 calendar days from April 24, 2025, or through Monday, June 9, 2025, to submit a plan to regain compliance with Listing Rule 5550(b)(1). The Company submitted its plan on June 5, 2025, and iswas awaiting a response from the Nasdaq. If Nasdaq accepts the Company’s plan, Nasdaq may grantgranted an extension of up to 180 calendar days from April 24, 2025,days, or through Tuesday, October 21, 2025, to regain compliance. Nasdaq may provide us insufficient time to implement our compliance plan or at the end of the compliance period, we may not be able to demonstrate compliance for any number of reasons. If any of these events occur, we could be delisted.
On October 22, 2025, the Company received a Staff Delisting Determination (the “Delisting Notification”), notifying the Company that trading of its common stock will be suspended from the Nasdaq Capital Market at the opening of business on October 31, 2025, and a Form 25-NSE will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which will remove the Company’s securities from listing and registration on Nasdaq.
The Company timely submitted a written request for a review of the Delisting Notification by a Hearings Panel (the “Panel”). A hearing request stays the suspension of the Company’s securities and the filing of the Form 25-NSE pending the Panel’s decision. The hearing is scheduled for December 11, 2025.
There can be no assurance that the Panel will grant the Company’s request for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market. If the Company’s Common Stock ceases to be listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Company expects that its Common Stock would continue to trade on the OTCQB Venture Market of the OTC Markets Group.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Deferred Cash Portion of Director Compensation”
New heading “Financing Term Sheet”
New heading “2025 Reverse Stock Split”
New heading “Amended and Restated Nomura Promissory Note”
New heading “Nine months ended September 30, 2025 versus nine months ended September 30, 2024”
New heading “Yorkville Standby Equity Purchase Agreement”
Removed heading “Corporate Restructuring”
Removed heading “Six months ended June 30, 2025 versus six months ended June 30, 2024”
Largest changes
“The Yorkville SEPA is currently the Company’s sole source of liquidity to meet short-term obligations. If Yorkville is unwilling or unable to provide liquidity, the Company may be forced to initiate insolvency proceedings or seek protection under U.S. bankruptcy laws, which could include a court-supervised reorganization or a liquidation of the Company’s assets.”see in full comparison
“The Yorkville SEPA is currently the Company’s sole source of liquidity to meet short-term obligations. If Yorkville is unwilling or unable to provide liquidity, the Company may be forced to initiate insolvency proceedings or seek protection under U.S. bankruptcy laws, which could include a court-supervised reorganization or a liquidation of the Company’s assets.”see in full comparison
“Nine months ended September 30, 2025 versus nine months ended September 30, 2024”see in full comparison
“Six months ended June 30, 2025 versus six months ended June 30, 2024”see in full comparison
see in full comparisonTheThere is no guarantee that YorkvilleSEPA.willOnprovideJuneadditional26, 2025, the Company and Yorkville entered into a Supplemental Agreementliquidity to theYorkville SEPA, increasing the amount of advances by up to $3.0 million, to be advanced in multiple tranches. On June 27, 2025, July 16, 2025, and August 8, 2025, Yorkville agreed to fund principal amounts of $0.75 million pursuant to Convertible Notes issued by the Company under the Yorkville SEPA, resulting in a combined working capital funding of $2.1 million, of which $0.36 million remains unfunded as of the date hereof. On April 10, 2025, Yorkville agreed to: (i) extend the due date for the first Monthly Payment to November 30, 2026, (ii) extend the maturity date of the Convertible Notes to November 30, 2026, and (iii) to waive Volume Threshold and Maximum Advance Amount limitations set forth in the Yorkville SEPA.Company. As we have sold substantially all of the 2.0 million shares currently registered for resale to Yorkville, we need to file with the SEC one or more additional registration statements to register under the Securities Act the resale by Yorkville of any additional shares of our common stock, and the SEC would have to declare such registration statement or statements effective before we could sell additionalshares.shares under the Yorkville SEPA. There can be no assurances of such events occurring or the timing of such events occurring. For more information on the Yorkville SEPA, see Note7,3,ClaimsMaterialFinancing Obligations and Notes Payable,Agreements, to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (124)
As an early-stage growth company, theThe Company has incurred substantial net losses since inception. The Company’s liquidity remains extremely limited, resulting in the payment of only priority obligations on a monthly basis. Further, substantial outstanding payables owed to the Company’s professional advisors have significantly restricted, and in certain cases, precluded, the Company’s ability to access their services. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2025, the Company had unrestricted cash totaling $4.0$1.8 million, out of which $1.1 million is due to assignors andand, $1.1of which $0.8 million is due to Law Firm for collected legal fees and litigation costs. As of JulyNovember 31,17, 2025, the Company had unrestricted cash of $2.1$2.7 million. The Company anticipates sources of liquidity for 2025 to include: (i) the Yorkville SEPA, which is currently the Company’s sole source of liquidity to meet short termshort-term obligations, as described in more detail in Note 7,3, ClaimsMaterial Financing Obligations and Notes Payable,Agreements, to the condensed consolidated financial statements, (ii) funding to the Company for working capital under the Operational Collection Floor facility, which, as discussed in more detail in Note 3, Material Agreements is fully utilized and has no remaining capacity, and (iii) revenue from Claims recovery income and Claims recovery services income. If Yorkville is unwilling or unable to provide liquidity, the Company may be forced to initiate an insolvency proceedingproceedings or seek protection under U.S. bankruptcy laws, which could include a court-supervised reorganization or a liquidation of the Company’s assets. The Company is seeking to address liquidity concerns; however, as discussed further below, the Company has concluded management’s plans were not sufficient to alleviate the substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern:
The Yorkville SEPA. On June 26, 2025, the Company and Yorkville entered into a supplemental agreement to the Yorkville SEPA (the “Supplemental Agreement”), whereby Yorkville agreed to advance to the Company, in the form of Convertible Promissory Notes, funding of up to $3.0 million, from time to time in such amounts as the Company and Yorkville may mutually agree, and subject to the satisfaction of conditions precedent set forth therein. On June 26, 2025, July 16, 2025, and August 8, 2025, Yorkville agreed to fund principal amounts of $0.75 million pursuant to Convertible Promissory Notes issued by the Company under the Yorkville SEPA, resulting in a combined working capital funding of $2.1 million. On September 18, 2025, Yorkville agreed to fund a principal amount of $0.38 million, resulting in working capital funding of $0.36 million, and on September 29, 2025, Yorkville agreed to fund a principal amount of $0.38 million, resulting in working capital funding of $0.34 million.
On October 10, 2025, the Company and Yorkville entered into a second supplemental agreement to the Yorkville SEPA (the “Second Supplemental Agreement”), whereby Yorkville agreed to advance to the Company, in the form of Convertible Promissory Notes, additional funding of up to $3.0 million, from time to time in such amounts as the Company and Yorkville may mutually agree, and subject to the satisfaction of conditions precedent set forth therein. On October 28, 2025, Yorkville agreed to fund a principal amount of $0.5 million pursuant to a Convertible Promissory Note issued by the Company to Yorkville, on terms substantially the same as the previous Convertible Promissory Notes, issued pursuant to the Yorkville SEPA, which resulted in net proceeds to the Company of $0.45 million.
TheThere is no guarantee that Yorkville SEPA.will Onprovide Juneadditional 26, 2025, the Company and Yorkville entered into a Supplemental Agreementliquidity to the Yorkville SEPA, increasing the amount of advances by up to $3.0 million, to be advanced in multiple tranches. On June 27, 2025, July 16, 2025, and August 8, 2025, Yorkville agreed to fund principal amounts of $0.75 million pursuant to Convertible Notes issued by the Company under the Yorkville SEPA, resulting in a combined working capital funding of $2.1 million, of which $0.36 million remains unfunded as of the date hereof. On April 10, 2025, Yorkville agreed to: (i) extend the due date for the first Monthly Payment to November 30, 2026, (ii) extend the maturity date of the Convertible Notes to November 30, 2026, and (iii) to waive Volume Threshold and Maximum Advance Amount limitations set forth in the Yorkville SEPA.Company. As we have sold substantially all of the 2.0 million shares currently registered for resale to Yorkville, we need to file with the SEC one or more additional registration statements to register under the Securities Act the resale by Yorkville of any additional shares of our common stock, and the SEC would have to declare such registration statement or statements effective before we could sell additional shares.shares under the Yorkville SEPA. There can be no assurances of such events occurring or the timing of such events occurring. For more information on the Yorkville SEPA, see Note 7,3, ClaimsMaterial Financing Obligations and Notes Payable,Agreements, to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
The Working Capital Credit Facility. As of the date of this filing, no funding capacity remains under the Working Capital Credit Facility or Operational Collection Floor. On March 29, 2023, the Company’s subsidiary, Subrogation Holdings, LLC and its parent, MSP Recovery, and HPH entered into the Working Capital Credit Facility consisting of a commitment to fund up to $48 million in proceeds. On August 2, 2024, HPH agreed to, among other things, (i) extend the period for the Company to draw up to $14 million for working capital, accessible in eight tranches of $1.75 million, that can be drawn at least one month apart, until September 2025 and (ii) provide for a $2.0 million loan to be funded by August 31, 2024 for the purpose of acquiring additional Claims (the “Operational Collection Floor”). Pursuant to the Working Capital Credit Facility, HPH had the discretion to increase the Operational Collection Floor and, during quarter ending June 30, 2025, HPH exercised that discretion, funding $1.5 million on April 4, 2025, $0.55 million on April 11, 2025, and $0.75 million on May 2, 2025, May 16, 2025, and June 2, 2025, with a combined principal amount of $6.8 million. For more information on the Working Capital Credit Facility and Operational Collection Floor, see “Hazel Working Capital Credit Facility and Hazel Purchase Money Loan” in Note 7, Claims Financing Obligations and Notes Payable, to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
The Company has incurred recurring losses and negative operating cash flows since inception and has an accumulated deficit of $710.8$878.6 million as of JuneSeptember 30, 2025. For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2025, the Company used approximately $15.7$19.1 million of cash in operations. The Company’s liquidity is dependent on its ability to raise additional funds or generate substantial revenue in the near term, the timing and amount of which are uncertain, and on its ability to obtain financing from additional third-party capital sources. The Company’s primary liquidity requirements have been for working capital, debt service, and Claims financing obligations. If the Company is unable to raise sufficient capital or generate substantial revenue, it may be forced to initiate an insolvency proceedingproceedings or seek protection under U.S. bankruptcy laws, which could include a court-supervised reorganization or a liquidation of the Company’s assets.
Deferred Cash Portion of Director Compensation
As of the date of this Quarterly Report, the Company has not remitted the remaining cash portion of the Board of Directors’ compensation that was due on September 30, 2025 totaling $402,250. The unpaid amounts remain outstanding and will be satisfied when the Company’s liquidity allows.
We differ from our competitors as we receive our recovery rights through irrevocable assignments of Claims. When we are assigned these rights by our clients, we assume risk that our competitors do not. Rather than provide services under a third-party vendor services contract, we receive the rights to certain recovery proceeds from our Assignors’ Claims (and, in most cases, take assignment of the Claims themselves, allowing us to step into the Assignor clients’ shoes). As we, or our affiliated entities, are assigned the recovery rights associated with Claims, we are the plaintiff in any action filed and therefore exercise control over the direction of the litigation. By receiving Claims through assignment, we can pursue additional recoveries under numerous legal theories that our competitors cannot. Although we own the assigned Claims, for a significant portion of assigned Claims, our ability to pursue recoveries depends on our ongoing access to data associated with those Claims through data access rights granted to us. The termination of said data access rights would substantially impair our ability to generate recoveries on those Claims.
Although we own the assigned Claims, for a significant portion of assigned Claims, our ability to pursue recoveries depends on our ongoing access to data associated with those Claims through data access rights granted to us. The termination of said data access rights would substantially impair our ability to generate recoveries on those Claims.
We are entitled to a portion of any recovery rights associated with approximately $1,592 billion in Billed Amount (and approximately $381 billion in Paid Amount), which contains approximately $87.8 billion in Paid Value of Potentially Recoverable Claims, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2025. We believe it would take any competitor significant time to amass the portfolio of Claims rights currently owned by us due to, among things, the volume of our Claims data retained and strength of our data analytics, which we believe are key to attracting new clients that are willing to assign Claims to us.
As of JuneSeptember 30, 2025, approximately 95.9% of our expected recoveries arise from Claims being brought under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act. While we believe the MSP Act has bipartisan support, changes to the laws on which we base our recoveries, particularly the MSP Act, can adversely affect our business. Our ability to generate future revenue is therefore significantly dependent on factors outside our control.
We may also recognize Claims recovery service revenue from our services to clients, assisting entities with the pursuit of Claims recovery rights by identifying recoverable Claims and providing data matching and legal services. Under our Claims recovery services model, we do not own the rights to Claims but provide our services for a fee based on budgeted expenses for the month with an adjustment for the variance between budget and actual expense from the prior month. The fees received pursuant to a Claims recovery service agreement are related to expenses incurred and are not tied to the Billed Amount or potential recovery amounts. Although we believe our future business to be highly tied to the Recovery model and Chase to Pay, we may enter into these contracts as the market dictates. The Company did not recognize any Claims recovery service income during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2025 or 2024.
Financing Term Sheet
On August 29, 2025, the Company, together with Subrogation Holdings, LLC and certain other subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, the “Co-Borrowers”), entered into a term sheet (the “Term Sheet”) with one or more entities managed or advised by, or affiliated with an Investor with whom the Company has signed a non-disclosure agreement (the “Lender”). While the Term Sheet is generally non-binding and subject to the negotiation and execution of definitive documentation, it contains binding provisions relating to exclusivity, confidentiality, governing law, venue, and certain obligations with respect to healthcare claims assignments.
The Term Sheet provides for a potential first lien secured delayed draw term loan facility (the “Facility”) in an aggregate principal amount of up to $55.0 million, consisting of:
Tranche A Loans: up to $10.0 million, of which $5.0 million is expected to be funded at closing, and up to $5.0 million may be advanced at the Lender’s sole and absolute discretion prior to satisfaction of a specified contingency.
Tranche B Loan: up to $45.0 million, available after the closing date, subject to the same contingency and the Lender’s sole and absolute discretion.
The Facility would mature 36 months following closing, subject to two potential one-year extensions at the discretion of Lender. The obligations of the Co-Borrowers would be secured by a first-priority security interest in substantially all of their assets, subject to inter-creditor arrangements with existing creditors.
In connection with advances under the Facility, the Company would issue to the Lender warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s Class A common stock equal to specified percentages of the Company’s fully diluted equity, with an exercise price of $0.01 per share and a term of ten years. The warrant coverage ranges from 3.0% per $1.0 million drawn under the initial portion of Tranche A to 0.35% per $1.0 million drawn under later portions of Tranche B, for a maximum potential coverage of approximately 46.0% on a fully diluted basis if the Facility is fully drawn.
Additionally, Lender is committed to pursuing acquisition of additional assignor claim rights and working with the Company to expand its portfolio of assigned claims or provide the Company with servicing rights to claims acquired by Lender.
The Term Sheet further contemplates customary fees, budgets, financial reporting requirements, oversight, and approval rights for the Lender, the potential appointment of a Chief Restructuring Officer, and a voting trust arrangement for certain existing shareholders.
Certain extensions of credit and warrant issuances may be subject to shareholder approval under applicable Nasdaq rules.
The Term Sheet does not obligate the parties to consummate the Facility, and any financing will be subject to completion of due diligence, negotiation, and execution of definitive loan agreements, and other customary closing conditions. There can be no assurance that any transaction will be consummated in connection with the Term Sheet, or that it will be completed on the terms set forth in therein. To date, no substantive progress has been made toward negotiating or documenting a definitive agreement, and it is highly unlikely that a transaction will proceed absent material revisions or significant renegotiation of the currently proposed terms.
2025 Reverse Stock Split
Effective at 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 1, 2025, the Company amended its Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to effect a 1-for-7 reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Reverse Split”). The Company’s Class A Common Stock began trading post-split on September 2, 2025 under the same symbol, MSPR. As a result of the Reverse Split, every seven (7) shares of the Company’s old common stock were converted into one share of the Company’s new common stock. Fractional shares resulting from the Reverse Split were rounded up to the nearest whole number. The Reverse Split automatically and proportionately adjusted, based on the 1-for-7 split ratio, all issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, as well as the terms of warrants and other derivative securities outstanding at the time of the effectiveness of the Reverse Split. Proportionate adjustments were made to the per share exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon the exercise of all outstanding stock options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock. Share and per share data (except par value) for the periods presented reflect the effects of the Reverse Split. References to numbers of shares of common stock and per share data in the accompanying financial statements and notes thereto for periods ended prior to September 1, 2025 have been adjusted to reflect the Reverse Split on a retroactive basis. Unless otherwise noted, the share and per share information in this Quarterly Report have been adjusted to give effect to the one-for-seven (1-for-7) Reverse Split.
Corporate Restructuring
As previously disclosed in our Form 8-K dated June 5, 2025, the agreements set forth in the term sheets associated with the contemplated transactions which were part of the corporate restructuring previously disclosed have been terminated. On May 30, 2025, Hazel delivered written notice terminating the Term Sheet, asserting that the parties had failed to execute definitive agreements and satisfy the related conditions precedent by the April 30, 2025 deadline. In its termination notice, Hazel committed to making one additional funding advance, which was funded in the amount of $0.8 million on June 2, 2025. Hazel funded a $0.55 million loan to the Company for costs incurred in connection with the Term Sheet. Additionally, on June 4, 2025, Virage delivered notice that it was terminating, and no longer considered itself bound by the Term Sheet, citing Hazel’s termination as the basis for its decision.
At the close of Primary Market trading on October 18, 2024, the daily VWAP for MSP Recovery, Inc.’s (the “Company”) Class A Common Stock was below the Floor Price, as defined in the Exchangeable Promissory Notes (“Notes”) issued to YA II PN, Ltd. (“Yorkville”) pursuant to the Standby Equity Purchase Agreement dated November 14, 2023, as amended (the “SEPA”), by and between Yorkville and the Company, for ten consecutive Trading Days, resulting in a Floor Price Trigger pursuant to the Notes. Upon the occurrence of a Trigger Event, the Company shall make monthly payments (“Monthly Payments”) beginning on the 7th Trading Day after the date of the Trigger Event and continuing on the same day of each successive month.
On April 10, 2025, Yorkville agreed: (i) that the first Monthly Payment, as set forth in Section (1)(c) of the Notes, would be due from the Company no sooner than November 30, 2026, (ii) the maturity date of the Convertible Notes is extended to November 30, 2026, and (iii) to waive Volume Threshold and Maximum Advance Amount limitations set forth in the Yorkville SEPA.
On June 5, 2025, the Company and Yorkville reached an agreement to reduce the Floor Price under the Yorkville SEPA from $3.75 to $1.00. On August 5, 2025, the Company and Yorkville reached an agreement to reduce the Floor Price under the Yorkville SEPA from $1.00 to $0.50.
On June 26, 2025, the Company and Yorkville entered into a Supplemental Agreement to the Yorkville SEPA, whereby Yorkville agreed to increase the amount of pre-paid advances by up to $3.0 million, to be advanced in multiple tranches. On June 27,26, 2025, July 16, 2025, and August 8, 2025, Yorkville funded principal amounts of $0.75 million pursuant to additional Convertible Promissory Notes for $0.75 million each, with terms substantially the same as the previous Convertible Promissory Notes, issued pursuant to the Yorkville SEPA.SEPA, resulting in a combined working capital funding of $2.1 million. On September 18, 2025, Yorkville agreed to fund a principal amount of $0.38 million, resulting in working capital funding of $0.36 million, and on September 29, 2025, Yorkville agreed to fund a principal amount of $0.38 million, resulting in working capital funding of $0.34 million. Yorkville may convert the Convertible Promissory Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to the lower of the Fixed Price (as defined in each Convertible Promissory Note) or 95% of the lowest daily VWAP during the five consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of the conversion (the “Conversion Price”), which in no event may the Conversion Price be lower than the Floor Price of $0.50,Price, provided that the number of shares issued does not cause Yorkville to exceed the 9.99% ownership limitation.
On October 10, 2025, in connection with the SEPA, and subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, the Company and Yorkville entered into a second Supplemental Agreement (the “Second Supplemental Agreement”), whereby Yorkville agreed to advance to the Company, in the form of Convertible Promissory Notes, additional funding of up to $3.0 million, from time to time in such amounts as the Company and Yorkville may mutually agree, and subject to the satisfaction of conditions precedent set forth in the Second Supplemental Agreement. Advances pursuant to the Second Supplemental Agreement are subject to a 10% original issue discount, and may be issued in increments such that the net principal increase incurred by such advance under the Second Supplemental Agreement to the aggregate principal amount of all Pre-Paid Advances then outstanding does not exceed $1.0 million. On October 28, 2025, Yorkville agreed to fund a principal amount of $0.5 million pursuant to a Convertible Promissory Note issued by the Company to Yorkville, on terms substantially the same as the previous Convertible Promissory Notes, issued pursuant to the Yorkville SEPA, which resulted in net proceeds to the Company of $0.45 million.
During the fiscal quarter ending on September 30, 2025, the Company agreed to successive reductions of the Floor Price from $26.25 to $1.00 per share, and on October 28, 2025, the Floor Price was further reduced to $0.50.
The Yorkville SEPA is currently the Company’s sole source of liquidity to meet short-term obligations. If Yorkville is unwilling or unable to provide liquidity, the Company may be forced to initiate insolvency proceedings or seek protection under U.S. bankruptcy laws, which could include a court-supervised reorganization or a liquidation of the Company’s assets.
Amended and Restated Nomura Promissory Note
On May 27, 2022, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note to Nomura (as amended and restated on April 12, 2023; November 13, 2023; March 26, 2024; April 28, 2025; June 26, 2025, and October 24, 2025 the “Nomura Note”). Pursuant to the Nomura Note, 50% of the aggregate proceeds under the Yorkville SEPA will be used to pay amounts outstanding under the Amended and Restated Nomura Promissory Note (first towards accrued and unpaid interest, if any, then towards principal) and the remaining 50% of such proceeds will be used to pay amounts due under the Convertible Promissory Notes, if any, or be paid to the Company after the Convertible Promissory Notes are fully repaid.
On June 26, 2025, Nomura agreed to waive its entitlement to receive up to $3.0 million of proceeds from the Yorkville SEPA, subject to certain limitations described therein.
On October 24, 2025, the Company further amended and restated the Nomura Note to: (i) reflect the current principal amount outstanding of approximately $35.4 million, (ii) increase the limited waiver of the Company’s obligation to pay Nomura Note obligations using the proceeds from Convertible Promissory Notes issued pursuant to the Yorkville SEPA from $3.0 million up to an aggregate total of $6.0 million of principal borrowed, provided that such proceeds be used solely to fund the operations of the Company, and (iii) acknowledge Nomura’s entitlement to receive up to $0.1 million of proceeds under the Second Supplemental Agreement.
Capitalized but undefined terms have the same meaning as set forth in the Yorkville SEPA and the Notes.
LSA Amendment
On April 14, 2025, Opco entered into Amendment No. 1 to its Legal Services Agreement with the Law Firm dated May 23, 2022 (the “LSA”), which: (i) terminates any obligation by the Company or its subsidiaries to provide further advances to fund the Law Firm, and (ii) provides that any Compensation, as defined therein, earned by the Law Firm will first be used to repay the balance of funds advanced by Opco to the Law Firm pursuant to the LSA.
Pursuant to the first Amendment to the Master Transaction Agreement, dated April 11, 2023 (the “First Amendment”), for each calendar month beginning with January 31, 2024 and ending when the VRM Full Return (as defined in the Master Transaction Agreement dated March 9, 2022 (as amended, the “MTA”)) is paid in full, the Company is required to either: (i) pay in cash or (ii) issue a warrant to purchase a number of shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company, or some combination thereof, to Virage Recovery Master LP (“VRM”) equal to the quotient of 1% of the calendar month-end balance of the Unpaid Base Amount (as defined in the MTA) (the “Required Monthly Issuance”). On April 14, 2025, the Company issued VRM Monthly Warrants for November 2024 and December 2024, for 3,277,808 and 6,332,792 shares respectively, exercisable at a purchase price of $0.0001 per share for a period of two years from the original issuance date, exercisable on a cashless basis only. To date, the Company has issued 12 warrants to VRM pursuant to the First Amendment, entitling Virage to purchase 19,361,9392,765,996 shares of Class A Common Stock.
We differ from our competitors because we obtain our recovery rights through irrevocable assignments. When we are assigned these rights, we take on the risk that such Claims may not be recoverable. We are entitled to pursue a portion of any recovery rights associated with approximately $1,592 billion in Billed Amount (and approximately $381 billion in Paid Amount), which contained approximately $87.8 billion in Paid Value of Potentially Recoverable Claims, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2025. We are typically entitled to 100% of recovery rights pursuant to our CCRAs, but contractually obligated to pay 50% of gross recoveries to the Assignor. In certain cases, we have purchased from our Assignors the rights to 100% of the recovery. By discovering, quantifying, and settling the gap between Billed Amount and Paid Amount on a large scale, we believe we are positioned to generate substantial annual recovery revenue at high profit margins for our assigned Claims. In litigation, our experienced management and legal teams provide us with a competitive advantage. While our model of being assigned the Claim rights allows us the flexibility to direct the litigation and potentially generate higher margins, we have, on an opportunistic basis, paid the Assignor an up-front purchase price for these rights.
Our Claims recovery revenue is typically recognized upon reaching a binding settlement or arbitration with a counterparty or when the legal proceedings, including any appellate process, are resolved. A decrease in the willingness of courts to grant these judgments, a change in the requirements for filing these cases or obtaining these judgments, or a decrease in our ability to collect on these judgments could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results. Of the Claims identified as potentially recoverable, relating to our accident-related cases as of JuneSeptember 30, 2025, approximately 86.8%86.5% of claims are already in the recovery process, which are claims where either the recovery process has been initiated, data has been collected and matched, or resolution discussions are in process.
As of JuneSeptember 30, 2025, the Company has obtained settlements where the Recovery Multiple was or would be in excess of the Paid Amount, settlements at or below the paid amount, and settlements where the Recovery Multiple cannot be calculated with certainty on the settlement date, as these settlements include, in addition to cash payments, non-cash consideration, including, but not limited to agreements: (i) to assign Claims for the Company to pursue recoveries against plaintiffs’ attorneys and medical providers, (ii) to provide historical data and assistance in reconciling current and future Medicare claims; (iii) to implement the clearinghouse platform; and (iv) to resolve cooperatively, or through binding mediation, recoverable Medicare Claims that the Company owns today and/or obtains in the future.
During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2025, the Company has received total recoveries of $1.4$1.6 million of which the Recovery Multiple for recoveries obtained pursuant to the MSP Laws was 0.800.86 times the Paid Amount, and the Recovery Multiple for recoveries obtained pursuant to non-MSP Laws, including antitrust and unfair trade practice laws, was 0.06 times the Paid Amount. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company received gross recoveries of $18.1 million, of which the Recovery Multiple for recoveries obtained pursuant to the MSP Laws was 1.32 times the Paid Amount, and the Recovery Multiple for recoveries obtained pursuant to non-MSP Laws, including antitrust and unfair trade practice laws, was 0.04 times the Paid Amount. During the year ended December 31, 2023, recoveries were not meaningful, and so no multiple is provided.
The Company did not recognize any claims recovery service income during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2025 and 2024.
Other revenue consists of fee revenue generated by the Company’s new electronic health records (“EHR”) platform, which went live in the second quarter of 2024. Other revenue was not significant for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2025.
Other Income (Expense) Income
Net (Income) Loss Attributable to Non-Controlling Members
Three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2025 versus three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2024
The following table sets forth a summary of our condensed consolidated results of operations for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2025 to three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2024 indicated.
Claims recovery income. Claims recovery income increaseddecreased by $0.2$3.4 million to $0.5$0.2 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2025, compared to the same period in the prior year, driven by increaseddecreased settlements during the period.
Other revenue. Other revenue decreased $36$91 thousand to zero for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2025 compared to the same period in the prior year as no other revenue was earned from new services.
Cost of revenue. Cost of revenue decreased by $0.1 million to $18.0 thousand, for the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the same period in the prior year, driven by a reduction in commissions during the period.
Claims amortization expense. Claims amortization expense decreased by $2.4 million to $118.6 million for three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the same period in the prior year, driven by a lower amortizable asset base in the current year resulting from the impairment of CCRAs recorded during the fourth quarter of 2024.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses decreased by $1.9 million to $4.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily driven by decreases in payroll of $1.4 million and information technology expenses of $0.6 million. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $0.1 million in insurance expenses.
Professional fees. Professional fees decreased by $2.2 million to $2.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily driven by decreases of $0.9 million in corporate legal fees, $0.6 million in accounting fees, and $0.5 million in consulting fees.
Professional fees – legal. Professional fees – legal decreased by $3.5 million to zero for the three months ended June 30, 2025 primarily due to amortization of the advance to the Law Firm, discussed within “MSP Principals Promissory Note” in Sources of Liquidity further below, which completed its amortization during the third quarter of 2024.
MSPR insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
No Form 4 stock transactions in this period.
Well-known investors holding MSPR (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.