Companies › NBBK

NBBK 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

NB Bancorp, Inc. · Nasdaq · Savings Institutions, Not Federally Chartered · CIK 1979330 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from NB Bancorp, Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

53 / 6risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
11new risk-factor headings
5Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
1Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-03-03 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-03-07 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

53new paragraphs
6removed paragraphs
36reworded paragraphs
12,533 → 14,599words in section

New heading “Summary of Material Risk Factors”

New heading “Risks Related to our Acquisition Strategy”

New heading “We may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of the Provident Acquisition, or those benefits may take longer to realize than expected. We may also encounter significant difficulties in integrating with Provident.”

New heading “Our future results will suffer if we do not effectively manage expanded operations following the Provident Acquisition.”

New heading “The Company may be unsuccessful identifying and competing for acquisitions.”

New heading “The Company may be unsuccessful in retaining our personnel or the personnel of any company we acquire.”

New heading “The Company has incurred and expects to continue to incur costs related to the acquisition and integration of Provident.”

New heading “Regulatory approvals related to proposed business acquisitions may not be received, may take longer to receive than expected, or may impose burdensome conditions, which could impose additional costs and could delay or prevent completion of the acquisition.”

New heading “To the extent that we acquire other companies, our business may be negatively impacted by certain risks inherent with such acquisitions.”

New heading “Changes in the secondary mortgage market may impede our ability to collect repayment on the mortgage warehouse facility lines.”

New heading “Regulatory scrutiny of BaaS solutions and related technology considerations has recently increased.”

Removed heading “The cost of additional finance and accounting systems, procedures and controls in order to satisfy our new public company reporting requirements will increase our expenses.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: fine, penalt, liquidity
“As a result of the Provident Acquisition, we provide banking products and services to our financial technology company (“fintech”) partners, which includes payments infrastructure and deposit services. Federal bank regulators have increasingly focused on the risks related to bank and fintech partnerships, raising concerns regarding risk management, oversight, internal controls, information security, change management, and information technology. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation, cybersecurity incident, regulation
“Threats to our reputation can come from many sources, including adverse sentiment about financial institutions generally, unethical practices, employee misconduct, failure to deliver minimum standards of service or quality, compliance deficiencies, cybersecurity incidents and questionable or fraudulent activities of our customers. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: litigation, cybersecurity incident, regulation

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We are a community bank, and our reputation is one of the most valuable components of our business. A key component of our business strategy is to rely on our reputation for customer service and knowledge of local markets to expand our presence by capturing new business opportunities from existing and prospective customers in our market area and contiguous areas. Threats to our reputation can come from many sources, including adverse sentiment about financial institutions generally, unethical practices, employee misconduct, failure to deliver minimum standards of service or quality, compliance deficiencies, cybersecurity incidents and questionable or fraudulent activities of our customers. Negative publicity regarding our business, employees, or customers, with or without merit, may result in the loss of customers and employees, costly litigation and increased governmental regulation, any or all of which could adversely affect our business and operating results.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: default, interest rate

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Factors beyond our control can significantly influence the fair value of AFS securities in our portfolio and can cause potential adverse changes to the fair value of these AFS securities. These factors include, but are not limited to, rating agency actions with respect to individual AFS securities, defaults by the issuer or with respect to the underlying AFS securities, and changes in market interest rates and continued instability in the capital markets. Any of these factors, among others, could cause credit losses and realized and/or unrealized losses in future periods and declines in other comprehensive income, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. The process for determining whether impairment of an AFS security is related to credit usually requires complex, subjective judgments about the future financial performance and liquidity of the issuer and any collateral underlying the AFS security in order to assess the probability of receiving all contractual principal and interest payments on the AFS security. Significant negative changes to valuations could result in credit losses on our AFS securities portfolio, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had approximately $8.2$3.1 million of accumulated other comprehensive losses. During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, we had $3.7$5.0 million of after-tax other comprehensive income, which resulted primarily from $4.9$6.4 million in pre-tax unrealized valuation gains on AFS securities.
see in full comparison
New text topics: default, interest rate
“Factors beyond our control can significantly influence the fair value of AFS securities in our portfolio and can cause potential adverse changes to the fair value of these AFS securities. These factors include, but are not limited to, rating agency actions with respect to individual AFS securities, defaults by the issuer or with respect to the underlying AFS securities, and changes in market interest rates and continued instability in the capital markets.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: antitrust, department of justice
“In September 2024, the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division and the FDIC announced that each respective agency has withdrawn the 1995 Bank Merger Competitive Review Guidelines (the “1995 Guidelines”). The Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division announced that it will instead evaluate the bank mergers using its 2023 Merger Guidelines that apply across all industries. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Federal Reserve Board has not released any new guidance on its approach to bank merger reviews, nor has it withdrawn from the 1995 Guidelines. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (95)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 2 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

In addition to factors discussed in the description of our business and elsewhere in this Annual Report,Report on form 10-K, the following are factors that could adversely affect our future results of operations and financial condition.

Added

We are subject to a number of risks potentially affecting our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. As a company offering banking and other financial services, certain elements of risk are inherent in our transactions and operations and are present in the business decisions we make. We, therefore, encounter risk as part of the normal course of our business, and we design risk management processes to help manage these risks. Our success is dependent on our ability to identify, understand and manage the risks presented by our business activities so that we can appropriately balance revenue generation and profitability. These risks include, but are not limited to, credit risk, capital risk, market risks, liquidity risks, cyber risk, interest rate risks, operational risks, model risks, technology, compliance, regulatory and legal risks, and strategic and reputational risks. We discuss our principal risk management processes and, in appropriate places, related historical performance in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section included in Part II, Item 7 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Added

You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as the other information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in evaluating whether to make or retain an investment in our common stock. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations would likely be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our common stock would likely decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment. The following risks are not the only risks we face. Additional risks that are not presently known or that we presently deem to be immaterial also could have a material adverse effect on our future business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Added

Summary of Material Risk Factors

Added

This section summarizes some of the material risks potentially affecting our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. These material risks and others risks are discussed in more detail further below in this section. You should consider this summary together with the more detailed information provided below.

Added

There are various risks associated with our acquisition growth strategy, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Added

Risks Related to our Acquisition Strategy

Added

We may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of the Provident Acquisition, or those benefits may take longer to realize than expected. We may also encounter significant difficulties in integrating with Provident.

Added

The success of the Provident Acquisition, including anticipated benefits and cost savings, will depend, in part, on the our ability to successfully integrate the operations of Provident in a manner that results in various benefits and that does not materially disrupt existing customer relationships or result in decreased revenues due to loss of customers.

Added

The process of integrating operations could result in a loss of key personnel or cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of one or more of the combined company’s businesses. Inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies could adversely affect the combined company. The diversion of management’s attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the Provident Acquisition and the integration of Provident’s operations could have an adverse effect on the business, financial condition, operating results and future prospects of the combined company. If the bank experiences difficulties in the integration process, including those listed above, we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits and synergies of the Provident Acquisition in a timely manner or at all.

Added

Our future results will suffer if we do not effectively manage expanded operations following the Provident Acquisition.

Added

Following the Provident Acquisition, the size and operation scope of the combined Company’s business has increased beyond its current size and scope. The Provident Acquisition has increased the combined Company’s asset size and will further increase the breadth and complexity of the combined Company’s business with the addition of new business lines in which we have not previously engaged, and exposure to industry sectors which the Company has not historically served. The size and scope of the combined Company’s commercial loan portfolio has also increased in size as a result of the Provident Acquisition. The commercial loan portfolio acquired from Provident includes loans that are concentrated in industry sectors that are relatively new to the Company. The Company’s future success depends, in part, on the Company’s ability to manage this expanded business, which poses challenges for management, including challenges related to the management and monitoring of new operations and associated increased costs and complexity. There can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in this regard or that the expected operating efficiencies, cost savings and other benefits currently anticipated from the Provident Acquisition will be realized.

Added

The Company may be unsuccessful identifying and competing for acquisitions.

Added

The Company will continue to look for acquisition opportunities of banks and financial institutions that meet our criteria, some of which may be material to the Company’s business and financial performance and could involve significant cash expenditures or result in a material increase in the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that are outstanding. The Company may face competition from other financial services institutions, some of which may have greater financial resources, when considering acquisition opportunities. Accordingly, attractive opportunities may not be available, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in identifying, completing or integrating future acquisitions. The Company may not be able to acquire other institutions on acceptable terms. The ability to grow may be limited if the Company is unable to successfully make acquisitions in the future.

Added

The Company may be unsuccessful in retaining our personnel or the personnel of any company we acquire.

Added

The success of any merger or acquisition that we pursue will depend in part on the Company’s ability to retain the key employees currently employed by the Company and employees who join the Company from the acquired company. If the Company is unable to retain key employees, including management, who are critical to the successful integration and future operations of the combined company, the Company could face disruptions in its operations, loss of existing customers, loss of key information, expertise or know-how and unanticipated additional recruitment costs.

Added

In addition, if key employees terminate their employment, the Company’s business activities may be adversely affected, and management’s attention may be diverted from successfully integrating the Company and the acquired company to hiring suitable replacements, all of which may cause the Company’s business to suffer. In addition, the Company may not be able to locate or retain suitable replacements for any key employees who leave the combined company.

Added

The Company has incurred and expects to continue to incur costs related to the acquisition and integration of Provident.

Added

The Company incurs significant, non-recurring costs when it agrees to acquire other businesses. In addition, the Company incurs integration costs following the completion of acquisitions as it integrates the acquired business, including facilities and systems consolidation costs and employment-related costs. The Company may also incur additional costs to retain key employees of the Company and the acquired business. There can be no assurances that the expected benefits and efficiencies related to the integration of the acquired businesses will be realized to offset these transaction and integration costs over time.

Added

Regulatory approvals related to proposed business acquisitions may not be received, may take longer to receive than expected, or may impose burdensome conditions, which could impose additional costs and could delay or prevent completion of the acquisition.

Added

Before a merger or acquisition may be completed, certain approvals or consents must be obtained from various bank regulatory and other authorities of the United States and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. These governmental entities, including the Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC and the Massachusetts Division of Banks, may impose conditions on the completion of the transaction, require changes to the terms of the transaction or require divestitures or place restrictions on our conduct after the completion of the transaction. Any such conditions or changes could have the effect of delaying completion of the transaction or imposing additional costs on or limiting the financial performance of the Company following the completion of the transaction, any of which might have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Added

The degree of scrutiny that our regulators give to mergers and acquisitions can change from time to time. In general, we anticipate that as the Company increases in size and complexity, our proposed mergers and acquisitions will receive greater regulatory scrutiny and the time that regulators will take to process the applications will increase.

Added

In September 2024, the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division and the FDIC announced that each respective agency has withdrawn the 1995 Bank Merger Competitive Review Guidelines (the “1995 Guidelines”). The Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division announced that it will instead evaluate the bank mergers using its 2023 Merger Guidelines that apply across all industries. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Federal Reserve Board has not released any new guidance on its approach to bank merger reviews, nor has it withdrawn from the 1995 Guidelines. Past statements from the Federal Reserve Board staff indicate that the Federal Reserve Board is not actively planning to alter its approach to bank merger reviews. The 2023 Merger Guidelines set forth more stringent concentration limits than the 1995 Bank Merger Guidelines. The 2023 Merger Guidelines provide additional, largely qualitative grounds on which the Department of Justice could object to a transaction beyond traditional local market concentration.

Added

At this time, we are unable to predict whether the actions taken by the FDIC and the Department of Justice will have a material adverse effect on our ability to acquire or merge with banking companies in our market area.

Added

To the extent that we acquire other companies, our business may be negatively impacted by certain risks inherent with such acquisitions.

Added

A significant component of our business strategy is to grow through acquisitions of other financial institutions or business lines as opportunities arise. Although we have been successful with this strategy in the past, we may not be able to grow our business in the future through acquisitions for a number of reasons, including:

Added

We anticipate that whenever we acquire a business, a portion of the purchase price of the acquisition will be allocated to goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets, and our subsequent evaluation of that goodwill, at least annually, will be a critical accounting estimate. Under current accounting rules, at the time we complete an acquisition, the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired will determine the amount of the purchase price that is allocated to goodwill acquired, and subsequently, if we determine that goodwill or intangible assets are impaired, we would be required to write down the value of these intangible assets. If such a write-down occurs, it may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

Added

All of these and other potential risks may serve as a diversion of our management’s attention from other business concerns, and any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business. Moreover, acquisitions typically involve the payment of a premium over book and market values, and therefore, some dilution of our tangible book value and net income per share may occur in connection with any future transaction.

Reworded

At December 31, 2024,2025, total commercial loans including commercial real estate loans, multifamily loans, construction and land development loans and commercial and industrial loans, totaled $2.84$4.18 billion, or 65.4%,69.7%, of our loan portfolio (reflective of the impact of the $930.6 million in commercial loans from the Provident Acquisition) compared to $2.49$2.84 billion, or 64.1%,65.5%, of our loan portfolio, at December 31, 2023.2024. These loans generally have more risk than the one-to four-familyone-to-four-family residential real estate loans we originate. Such loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans. In addition, the repayment of these types of loans depends on the successful management and operation of the borrower’s businesses or properties. The repayment of such loans can be affected by adverse conditions in the local real estate market or economy. Also, many of our commercial borrowers have more than one loan outstanding with us. At December 31, 2024,2025, our loans-to-one borrower limit was $131.2$158.3 million and our four largest borrower relationships, including available lines of credit, were $83.6$122.5 million, $80.1$107.0 million, $70.6$98.9 million and $68.5$93.9 million, respectively. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to a one-to-four-family residential real estate loan. Commercial and industrial loans expose us to additional risk since they typically are dependent on the borrower’s ability to make repayments from the cash flows of the business and are sometimes secured by non-real estate collateral that may depreciate over time, such as inventory and accounts receivable, the value of which may be more difficult to appraise, control or collect and may be more susceptible to fluctuation in value at the time of default. In addition, if we foreclose on commercial real estate loans, our holding period for the collateral may be longer than for a single-family residential property if there are fewer potential purchasers of the collateral. Furthermore, if loans that are collateralized by commercial real estate become troubled and the value of the real estate has been significantly impaired, then we may not be able to recover the full contractual amount of principal and interest that we anticipated at the time we originated the loan. Any of these risks could cause us to increase our provision for credit losses and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

Reworded

Based on these factors we could be deemed to have a concentration in commercial real estate lending, as such loans represent approximately 249.9%294.2% and 234.9%249.9% of the Bank’s total capital as of December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. The guidance focuses on exposure to commercial real estate loans that is dependent on the cash flow from the real estate held as collateral and that is likely to be at greater risk to conditions in the commercial real estate market (as opposed to real estate collateral held as a secondary source of repayment or as an abundance of caution). The guidance assists banks in developing risk management practices and capital levels commensurate with the level and nature of real estate concentrations. The guidance states that management should employ heightened risk management practices including board and management oversight and strategic planning, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing.

Added

The guidance assists banks in developing risk management practices and capital levels commensurate with the level and nature of real estate concentrations. The guidance states that management should employ heightened risk management practices including board and management oversight and strategic planning, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing.

Reworded

At December 31, 2024,2025, construction loans and loans to finance the acquisition of developable land which we refer to as “land development loans” totaled $730.6 million, or 12.2%, of our loan portfolio and 91.6% of the Bank’s total capital (reflective of the impact of the Provident Acquisition) compared to $583.8 million, or 13.5%, of our loan portfolio and 88.8% of the Bank’s total capital compared to $622.8 million, or 16.0%, of our loan portfolio and 100.4%85.8% of the Bank’s total capital at December 31, 2023.2024. Construction lending involves additional risks when compared with permanent finance lending because funds are advanced upon the security of the project, which is of uncertain value before its completion. Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, as well as the market value of the completed project and the effects of governmental regulation of real property, it is relatively difficult to accurately evaluate the total funds required to complete a project and the related loan-to-value ratio. In addition, generally during the term of a construction loan, interest may be funded by the borrower or disbursed from an interest reserve set aside from the construction loan budget. These loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project and the ability of the borrower to sell or lease the property or obtain permanent take-out financing, rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest. If the appraised value of a completed project proves to be overstated, we may have inadequate security for the repayment of the loan upon completion of construction of the project and may incur a loss. In addition, speculative construction loans, which are loans made to home builders who, at the time of loan origination, have not yet secured an end buyer for the home under construction, typically carry higher risks than those associated with traditional construction loans. These increased risks arise because of the risk that there will be inadequate demand to ensure the sale of the property within an acceptable time. As a result, in addition to the risks associated with traditional construction loans, speculative construction loans carry the added risk that the builder will have to pay the property taxes and other carrying costs of the property until an end buyer is found. Land loans have substantially similar risks to speculative construction loans. As our construction and land loan portfolio increases, the corresponding risks and potential for losses from these loans may also increase.

Reworded

At December 31, 2024,2025, $1.13$1.18 billion, or 26.1%19.6% of our loan portfolio, was secured by one-to-four-family residential real estate compared to $1.10$1.13 billion or 28.2%,26.1%, of our loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2023,2024, and we intend to continue to provide this type of lending for the foreseeable future. One-to-four-family residential mortgage lending is generally sensitive to regional and local economic conditions that significantly impact the ability of borrowers to meet their loan payment obligations, making loss levels difficult to predict. Declines in real estate values could cause some of our residential mortgages to be inadequately collateralized, which would expose us to a greater risk of loss if we seek to recover on defaulted loans by selling the real estate collateral.

Added

Changes in the secondary mortgage market may impede our ability to collect repayment on the mortgage warehouse facility lines.

Added

Mortgage warehouse loans are facility lines to non-bank mortgage origination companies. The underlying collateral of these facility lines are residential real estate loans. Loans are originated by the mortgage companies for sale into secondary markets. The primary source of repayment of the facility lines is the cash flow upon sale of the loans. Changes in the secondary mortgage market may impede the mortgage companies’ ability to sell the loans and repay their facility lines. Such events could result in an increase to our provision for credit losses, which could decrease our net income.

Reworded

Although there is not a single employer or industry in our market area on which a significant number of our customers are dependent, a substantial portion of our loan portfolio is composed of loans secured by property located in the Greater Boston metropolitan area. This makes us vulnerable to a downturn in the local economy and real estate markets. Decreases in local real estate values caused by economic conditions or other events could adversely affect the value of the property used as collateral for our loans, which could cause us to realize a loss in the event of a foreclosure.

Added

Moreover, a significant decline in general economic conditions, caused by inflation, recession, acts of terrorism, an outbreak of hostilities or other international or domestic calamities, unemployment, public health crises or other factors beyond our control could further impact these local economic conditions and could further negatively affect the financial results of our banking operations.

Reworded

Moreover, a significant decline in general economic conditions, caused by inflation, recession, acts of terrorism, an outbreak of hostilities or other international or domestic calamities, unemployment, public health crises or other factors beyond our control could further impact these local economic conditions and could further negatively affect the financial results of our banking operations. In addition, deflationary pressures, while possibly lowering our operating costs, could have a significant negative effect on our borrowers, especially our business borrowers, and the values of underlying collateral securing loans, which could negatively affect our financial performance. In the event of severely adverse business and economic conditions generally or specifically in the principal markets in which we conduct business, there can be no assurance that the federal government and the Federal Reserve Board would intervene. If economic conditions worsen or volatility increases, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. For more information about our market area, please see the section titled “Business of Needham Bank – Market Area.”

Reworded

If our allowance for credit lossesACL on loans is not sufficient to cover actual credit losses, our earnings could decrease.

Reworded

We maintain an allowance for credit losses on loans, which is established through a provision for credit losses that represents management’s best estimate of the current expected losses within the loan portfolio. We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. In determining the amount of the allowance for credit losses on loans, we review our loans and our loss and delinquency experience, and we evaluate economic conditions. If our assumptions or the results of our analyses are incorrect, our allowance for credit losses on loans may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio, resulting in additions to our allowance for credit losses on loans. In addition, our emphasis on loan growth and on increasing our portfolios of commercial real estate loans, as well as any future credit deterioration or changes in economic conditions could require us to increase our allowance for credit losses on loans in the future. At December 31, 2024,2025, our allowance for credit losses on loans was 0.89%1.46% of total loans and 280%201% of non-performing loans (reflective of the impact of the Provident Acquisition) compared to 0.83%0.89% and 298%280% at December 31, 2023.2024. Material additions to our allowance for credit losses on loans would materially decrease our net income.

Removed

We adopted the CECL standard on January 1, 2023. CECL requires financial institutions to determine periodic estimates of lifetime expected credit losses on loans, and recognize the expected credit losses as allowances for credit losses on loans. The CECL standard changed the current method of providing allowances for credit losses on loans that are incurred or probable, which has required us to increase our allowance for credit losses on loans, and to greatly increase the types of data we need to collect and review to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses on loans. Our day one CECL adjustment on January 1, 2023, was $2.1 million, net of tax.

Added

On December 18, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order directing the Department of Justice to move cannabis from a Schedule I to a Schedule III substance, a category for substances with accepted medical use and lower abuse potential. While not full legalization, the change is designed to ease financial and tax burdens on the cannabis industry, including, to some extent, banking access. Schedule III classification allows state-legal cannabis businesses to deduct ordinary business expenses under IRS Code Section 280E, which is expected to boost cash flow and profitability and it aims to encourage banks and financial institutions to work with the cannabis industry, as the risk of violating federal Anti-Money Laundering laws is reduced.

Added

The judicial foreclosure process is protracted, which delays our ability to resolve non-performing loans through the sale of the underlying collateral.

Reworded

The judicial foreclosure process is protracted, which delays our ability to resolve non-performing loans through the sale of the underlying collateral. The longer timelines have been the result of additional consumer protection initiatives related to the foreclosure process, increased documentary requirements and judicial scrutiny, and, both voluntary and mandatory programs under which lenders may consider loan modifications or other alternatives to foreclosure. These reasons and the legal and regulatory responses have impacted the foreclosure process and completion time of foreclosures for residential mortgage lenders. This may result in a material adverse effect on collateral values and our ability to minimize its losses.

Reworded

The reversal of the high interesthigh-interest rate environment may adversely affect our net interest income and profitability.

Reworded

The FOMC cut the target range for the federal funds during 20242025 by one75 percentagebasis point.points. Additional rate cuts may occur if inflationary pressures continue towards the FOMC’s 2% target and employment weakens.continues to weaken. Decreases to the target range for the federal funds rate, combined with ongoing geopolitical instability, could signal the risk of an economic recession. Any such downturn may adversely affect our asset quality, deposit levels, loan demand and results of operations.

Reworded

Lower interest rates generally are associated with a higher volume of loan originations and refinancing transactions, while higher interest rates are usually associated with lower loan originations and refinancing transactions. Our ability to generate gains on sales of mortgage loans is significantly dependent on the level of originations. Cash flows are affected by changes in market interest rates. Generally, in falling interest rate environments, loan prepayment rates are likely to increase, and in rising interest rate environments, loan prepayment rates are likely to decline. A significant amount of our commercial and industrial and commercial real estate, including multi-family residential real estate loans, are adjustable-rate loans and a decrease in the general level of interest rates may adversely affect our interest income levels. Changes in interest rates, prepayment speeds and other factors may also cause the value of our loans held for sale to change.

Added

A significant amount of our commercial and industrial and commercial real estate, including multi-family residential real estate loans, are adjustable-rate loans and a decrease in the general level of interest rates may adversely affect our interest income levels. Changes in interest rates, prepayment speeds and other factors may also cause the value of our loans held for sale to change.

Reworded

We derive our income mainly from the difference or “spread” between the interest earned on loans, securities and other interest-earning assets and interest paid on deposits, borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. In general, the larger the spread, the more we earn. When market rates of interest change, the interest we receive on our assets and the interest we pay on our liabilities will fluctuate. This can cause decreases in our spread and can adversely affect our income. For the past several years, we have been asset sensitive, which indicates that assets generally reprice faster than liabilities. In a falling rate environment, asset sensitivity is not preferable as it results in deterioration to our net interest margin.

Added

When market rates of interest change, the interest we receive on our assets and the interest we pay on our liabilities will fluctuate. This can cause decreases in our spread and can adversely affect our income. For the past several years, we have been asset sensitive, which indicates that assets generally reprice faster than liabilities. In a falling rate environment, asset sensitivity is not preferable as it results in deterioration to our net interest margin.

Reworded

Any substantial, unexpected, prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. Changes in the level of interest rates also may negatively affect the value of our assets, including the value of our AFS securities, which generally decrease when market interest rates rise, and ultimately affect our earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, we incurredearned other comprehensive income of $3.7$5.0 million, primarily related to net changes in unrealized holding gains in the AFS securities portfolio.portfolio and an increase in the value of our hedges.

Reworded

On occasion we have employed various financial risk methodologies that limit, or “hedge,” the adverse effects of rising or decreasing interest rates on our loan portfolios and short-term liabilities. We also engage in hedging strategies with respect to arrangements where our customers swap floating interest rate obligations for fixed interest rate obligations, or vice versa. Our hedging activity varies based on the level and volatility of interest rates and other changing market conditions. There are no perfect hedging strategies, and interest rate hedging may fail to protect us from loss. Moreover, hedging activities could result in losses if the event against which we hedge does not occur. Additionally, interest rate hedging could fail to protect us or adversely affect us because, among other things:

Added

There are no perfect hedging strategies, and interest rate hedging may fail to protect us from loss. Moreover, hedging activities could result in losses if the event against which we hedge does not occur. Additionally, interest rate hedging could fail to protect us or adversely affect us because, among other things:

Reworded

The majority of our loans are inside of our primary market area and, as a result, we have a greater risk of loan defaults and losses in the event of a further economic downturn in our market area, as adverse economic conditions may have a negative effect on the ability of our borrowers to make timely payments of their loans. A return of recessionary conditions and/or negative developments in the domestic and international credit markets may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the value of our loans, investments, and collateral securing our loans, and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability. Any of these negative events may result in higher-than-expected loan delinquencies, increase our levels of nonperforming and classified assets, and reduce demand for our products and services, which may cause us to incur losses and may adversely affect our capital, liquidity and financial condition.

Added

A return of recessionary conditions and/or negative developments in the domestic and international credit markets may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the value of our loans, investments, and collateral securing our loans, and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability. Any of these negative events may result in higher-than-expected loan delinquencies, increase our levels of nonperforming and classified assets, and reduce demand for our products and services, which may cause us to incur losses and may adversely affect our capital, liquidity and financial condition.

Removed

For example, on May 1, 2023, First Republic Bank went into receivership and its deposits and substantially all of its assets were acquired by JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association. Similarly, on March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank went into receivership, and on March 12, 2023, Signature Bank went into receivership.

Reworded

Unrealized losses on AFS securities result from changes in credit spreads and liquidity issues in the marketplace, along with changes in the credit profile of individual securities issuers. Under U.S. GAAP, we are required to review our AFS securities portfolio periodically for the presence of credit losses of our AFS securities, taking into consideration current and future market conditions, the extent and nature of changes in fair value, issuer rating changes and trends, volatility of earnings, current analysts’ evaluations, our ability and intent to hold investments until a recovery of fair value, as well as other factors. Adverse developments with respect to one or more of the foregoing factors may require us to deem particular AFS securities to be impaired, with the credit-related portion of the reduction in the value recognized as a charge to our earnings through an allowance. Subsequent valuations, in light of factors prevailing at that time, may result in significant changes in the values of these AFS securities in future periods. Any of these factors could require us to recognize further impairments in the value of our AFS securities portfolio, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations in future periods.

Added

Any of these factors could require us to recognize further impairments in the value of our AFS securities portfolio, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations in future periods.

Added

Factors beyond our control can significantly influence the fair value of AFS securities in our portfolio and can cause potential adverse changes to the fair value of these AFS securities. These factors include, but are not limited to, rating agency actions with respect to individual AFS securities, defaults by the issuer or with respect to the underlying AFS securities, and changes in market interest rates and continued instability in the capital markets.

Reworded

Factors beyond our control can significantly influence the fair value of AFS securities in our portfolio and can cause potential adverse changes to the fair value of these AFS securities. These factors include, but are not limited to, rating agency actions with respect to individual AFS securities, defaults by the issuer or with respect to the underlying AFS securities, and changes in market interest rates and continued instability in the capital markets. Any of these factors, among others, could cause credit losses and realized and/or unrealized losses in future periods and declines in other comprehensive income, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. The process for determining whether impairment of an AFS security is related to credit usually requires complex, subjective judgments about the future financial performance and liquidity of the issuer and any collateral underlying the AFS security in order to assess the probability of receiving all contractual principal and interest payments on the AFS security. Significant negative changes to valuations could result in credit losses on our AFS securities portfolio, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had approximately $8.2$3.1 million of accumulated other comprehensive losses. During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, we had $3.7$5.0 million of after-tax other comprehensive income, which resulted primarily from $4.9$6.4 million in pre-tax unrealized valuation gains on AFS securities.

Showing the first 60 of 95 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

64new paragraphs
35removed paragraphs
32reworded paragraphs
9,723 → 10,128words in section

New heading “Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024”

Removed heading “Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: impairment, goodwill
“The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment at least annually, or more often if warranted, using a qualitative assessment. If the qualitative assessment indicates potential impairment, management will perform a quantitative impairment test. The quantitative impairment test compares the book value to the fair value of each reporting segment. If the book value exceeds the fair value, an impairment is charged to net income. Management has identified one reporting segment for purposes of testing goodwill for impairment: the banking business.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: credit rating, interest rate
“AFS Securities Valuation and Credit Losses. The Company evaluates the fair value and credit quality of its AFS securities portfolio on a quarterly basis. In the event the fair value of a security falls below its amortized cost basis, the security is evaluated to determine whether the decline in value was caused by changes in market interest rates or security credit quality. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: restructuring, interest rate
“Modified Loans – ASU 2022-22 eliminated the concept of troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) from the accounting standards for companies that have adopted ASC 326. ASU 2022-02 also requires additional disclosures for certain loan modifications and disclosures of gross charge-offs by year of origination. Specifically, loan modification disclosures in periods subsequent to the adoption of ASC 326 must be made for modifications of existing loans to borrowers who were experiencing financial difficulties at the time of the modification. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: impairment, climate
“Other intangible assets, all of which are definite-lived, are stated at cost, less accumulated amortization. The Company evaluates other intangible assets for impairment at least annually, or more frequently based on specific events or changes in circumstances. The Company considers factors including, but not limited to, changes in legal factors and business climate that could affect the value of the intangible asset. Any impairment losses are charged to net income. The Company amortizes other intangible assets over their respective estimated useful lives. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (131)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 12 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

This discussion and analysis reflects our consolidated financial statements and other relevant statistical data,data and is intended to enhance your understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. The information in this section has been derived from the consolidated financial statements that appear beginning on page 7998 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. You should read the information in this section in conjunction with the business and financial information regarding the Company and the Bank and the consolidated financial statements provided in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company and, with respect to the years ended December 31, 20232025, 2024 and 2022,2023, the Company had not engaged in any material activities prior to December 28, 2023, the date of the consummation of the mutual to stock conversion.

Added

Our results of operations depend primarily on our net interest income.

Reworded

Our results of operations depend primarily on our net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets and the interest we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities. Our results of operations also are affected by our provision for credit losses, noninterest income and noninterest expense. Noninterest income currently consists primarily of customer service fees, swap contract income, and income on BOLI. Noninterest expense currently consists primarily of expenses related to salary and employee benefits and director fees, occupancy and equipment, data processing, marketing and charitable contribution expense, professional fees, FDIC assessments and other general and administrative expenses.

Added

On November 15, 2025 we completed our previously announced Provident Acquisition, which resulted in the addition of approximately $1.40 billion in total assets, $1.18 billion of total net loans and $1.14 billion in total deposits, all at fair value. Provident, a Massachusetts corporation, was a federally registered bank holding company headquartered in Amesbury, Massachusetts. BankProv, a Massachusetts-chartered bank, founded in 1828, was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Provident that operated through a network of 7 full-service banking offices in northeastern Massachusetts and southern New Hampshire, as well as a mortgage warehouse lending center in Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida.

Added

In accordance with the terms of the definitive merger agreement, through which we agreed to acquire Provident through a merger with the Company as the surviving entity, each share of Provident common stock was exchanged for 0.691 shares of the Company’s common stock or $13.00 in cash, subject to allocation procedures to ensure that the total number of shares of Provident common stock that receive the stock consideration represents 50% of the total number of shares of Provident common stock outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the acquisition.

Added

The transaction qualified as a tax-free reorganization for Federal income tax purposes and provided Provident shareholders with a tax-free exchange of their shares of Provident common stock in exchange for the Company’s common stock as the consideration they received in the merger. We issued 5.9 million shares of our common stock in the exchange and paid $111.8 million in cash, which resulted in a transaction value of approximately $226.5 million based upon the closing price of our common stock on November 14, 2025 of $19.29 per share.

Reworded

Summary of SignificantCritical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Reworded

The discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of income and expenses. We consider the accounting policies discussed below to be significantcritical accounting policies.

Reworded

The following represent our significantcritical accounting policies:

Added

ACL – The ACL represents management’s best estimate of credit losses over the remaining life of loans measured at amortized cost and unfunded lending commitments at the consolidated balance sheet date and is established through a provision for credit losses charged to net income. The allocation methodology applied by the Company includes allocations for individually evaluated loans and loss factor allocations for all remaining loans through a quantitative model with an assessment of certain qualitative factors.

Added

Management uses a methodology to systematically estimate the amount of expected lifetime losses in the loan portfolio. Expected lifetime losses are estimated on a collective basis for loans sharing similar risk characteristics and are determined using a quantitative model combined with an assessment of certain qualitative factors designed to address forecast and model risk inherent in the quantitative model output. Loss estimates within the collectively assessed population are based on a combination of pooled assumptions and loan-level characteristics. The weighted average remaining maturity (“WARM”) method is the primary credit loss estimation methodology used by the Company and involves estimating future cash flows and expected credit losses for pools of loans using their expected remaining WARM.

Added

The quantitative model estimates expected credit losses using loan level data over the estimated life of the exposure, considering the effect of prepayments. Economic forecasts, one of the most significant judgments influencing the ACL, are incorporated into the estimate over a reasonable and supportable forecast period of two years, beyond which is a reversion to our historical loss average which occurs over a period of four quarters.

Added

Qualitative adjustments to quantitative loss factors, either negative or positive, may include considerations of economic conditions including economic forecasts as detailed above, volume and severity of past due loans, value of underlying collateral, experience, depth, and ability of management, and concentrations of credit.

Added

The methodology includes evaluation and consideration of several factors which could affect potential credit losses.

Added

While management uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the ACL may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic conditions or circumstances underlying the collectability of loans. Because each of the criteria used is subject to change, the allocation of the ACL is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the trend of future credit losses in any particular loan category. The total ACL is available to absorb losses from any segment of the loan portfolio. Management believes the allowance for ACL was adequate at December 31, 2025. The allowance analysis is reviewed by the board of directors on a quarterly basis in compliance with regulatory requirements.

Added

For additional information on our ACL, refer to Note 4, “Loans Receivable and ACL” within the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Added

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets – Acquisitions of businesses are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the net assets of the companies acquired are recorded at their fair values at the date of acquisition. Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired. Other intangible assets represent acquired assets that lack physical substance but can be distinguished from goodwill because of contractual or other legal rights, or because the asset is capable of being sold or exchanged either on its own, or in combination with a related contract, asset, or liability.

Added

The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment at least annually, or more often if warranted, using a qualitative assessment. If the qualitative assessment indicates potential impairment, management will perform a quantitative impairment test. The quantitative impairment test compares the book value to the fair value of each reporting segment. If the book value exceeds the fair value, an impairment is charged to net income. Management has identified one reporting segment for purposes of testing goodwill for impairment: the banking business.

Added

Other intangible assets, all of which are definite-lived, are stated at cost, less accumulated amortization. The Company evaluates other intangible assets for impairment at least annually, or more frequently based on specific events or changes in circumstances. The Company considers factors including, but not limited to, changes in legal factors and business climate that could affect the value of the intangible asset. Any impairment losses are charged to net income. The Company amortizes other intangible assets over their respective estimated useful lives. The estimated useful lives of core deposit intangible assets are ten years. The Company reassesses the useful lives of other intangible assets at least annually, or more frequently based on specific events or changes in circumstances.

Added

Our discount rate was based upon the estimated cost of equity under the Capital Asset Pricing Model, which considers the risk-free interest rate, market risk premium, size premium, company specific premium and beta specific to a particular reporting unit.

Added

For additional information on our goodwill and other intangibles, refer to Note 7, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” within the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Added

Business Combinations – Acquisitions of businesses are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we recognize assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their respective fair values as of the date of acquisition, with the related transaction costs expensed in the period incurred.

Added

We use third party valuation specialists to assist in the determination of fair value of certain assets and liabilities at the merger date, including loans and core deposit intangibles.

Added

While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the acquisition date, the estimates are inherently uncertain.

Added

For further discussion of our methodology for estimating the fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities in connection with our Provident Acquisition, see Note 2, “Acquisition” within the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Added

The ACL on PCD loans and PSLs is recognized within business combination accounting.

Added

For further discussion of our accounting policies for estimating credit losses on acquired loans, see Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” within the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Removed

Loans Held for Investment and ACL. Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until loan maturity or pay-off are reported held for investment at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge-offs and net of any deferred fees (including purchase accounting adjustments) and origination costs (collectively referred to as “amortized cost”). Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are deferred and amortized as an adjustment of yield using the payment terms required by the loan contract.

Removed

Loans are generally placed into nonaccrual status when they are past due 90 days or more as to either principal or interest or when, in the opinion of management, the collection of principal and/or interest is in doubt. A loan remains in nonaccrual status until the loan is current as to payment of both principal and interest or past due less than 90 days and the borrower demonstrates the ability to pay and remain current. When cash payments are received, they are applied to principal first, then to accrued interest. It is the Company’s policy not to record interest income on nonaccrual loans until principal has become current. In certain instances, accruing loans that are past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest may not go on nonaccrual status if the Company determines that the loans are well-secured and are in the process of collection. In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 326, the Company elected to exclude accrued interest from the amortized cost basis in its determination of the ACL for loans receivable, and will instead reverse accrued but unpaid interest through interest income in the period in which the loan is placed on nonaccrual status.

Removed

The ACL represents management’s best estimate of credit losses over the remaining life of the loan portfolio. Loans are charged-off against the ACL when management believes the loan balance is no longer collectible. Subsequent recoveries of previously charged-off amounts are recorded as increases to the ACL. The provision for credit losses is an amount sufficient to bring the ACL to an estimated balance that management considers adequate to absorb lifetime expected losses in the Company’s held-for-investment loan portfolio. The ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from the loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans.

Removed

Management’s determination of the adequacy of the ACL under ASC 326 is based on an evaluation of the composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions, historical loan loss experience, reasonable and supportable forecasts, and other risk factors. The Company uses a third-party CECL model as part of its estimation of the ACL on a quarterly basis. Loans with similar risk characteristics are collectively assessed within pools (or segments).

Removed

Loss estimates within the collectively assessed population are based on a combination of pooled assumptions and loan-level characteristics. The Company has determined that using federal call codes is an appropriate loan segmentation methodology, as it is generally based on risk characteristics of a loan’s underlying collateral. Using federal call codes also allows the Company to utilize and assess publicly available external information when developing its estimate of the ACL. The weighted average remaining maturity (“WARM”) method is the primary credit loss estimation methodology used by the Company and involves estimating future cash flows and expected credit losses for pools of loans using their expected remaining weighted average remaining maturity In applying future economic forecasts, the Company utilizes a forecast period of up to two years. The Company considers economic forecasts of inflation, national gross domestic product, and unemployment rates sourced from the Federal Open Market Committee’s “Summary of Economic Projections” to inform the model for future loss estimation.

Removed

Additionally, interest rate forecasts sourced from CME Group’s “FedWatch”, Wells Fargo’s “U.S. Economic Outlook,” and FHN Financial’s “Economic Forecast” publications are used for consideration of rate sensitivity in the model’s loan prepayment speed estimation. Historical loss rates used in the quantitative model are primarily derived using both the Bank’s data and peer bank data obtained from publicly available sources (i.e., federal call reports). The Bank’s peer group is comprised of financial institutions of relatively similar size and in similar markets (i.e., $10 billion or less of total assets and headquartered in Massachusetts). Management also considers qualitative adjustments when estimating credit losses to take into account the model’s quantitative limitations. Qualitative adjustments to quantitative loss factors, either negative or positive, may include considerations of economic conditions, volume and severity of past due loans, value of underlying collateral, experience, depth, and ability of management, and concentrations of credit.

Removed

For those loans that do not share similar risk characteristics, the Company evaluates the ACL needs on an individual (or loan by loan) basis. This population of individually evaluated loans (or loan relationships with the same primary source of repayment) is determined on a quarterly basis and consists of: loans with a risk rating of substandard or worse or loan terms differing significantly from other pooled loans. In accordance with the Company’s policy, non-accrual residential real estate loans that are below $500,000 and well secured (loan-to-value <60%) are excluded from individually evaluated loans. Measurement of credit loss is based on the expected future cash flows of an individually evaluated loan, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or measured on an observable market value, if one exists, or the estimated market value of the collateral underlying the loan, discounted to consider estimated costs to sell the collateral for collateral-dependent loans. If the net value is less than the loan’s amortized cost, a specific reserve in the ACL is recorded, which is charged-off in the period when management believes the loan balance is no longer collectible.

Removed

The Company’s Troubled Asset Resolution Committee approves the key methodologies and assumptions, as well as the final ACL on at least a quarterly basis. While management uses available information at the time of estimation to determine expected credit losses on loans, future changes in the ACL may be necessary based on changes in portfolio composition, portfolio credit quality, and/or economic conditions. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review its ACL and may require an increase in the provision for credit losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management.

Removed

Collateral-dependent Loans – The Company has certain loans for which repayment is dependent upon the operation or sale of collateral, as the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. The underlying collateral can vary based upon the type of loan. The following provides more detail about the types of collateral that secure collateral-dependent loans:

Removed

Modified Loans – ASU 2022-22 eliminated the concept of troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) from the accounting standards for companies that have adopted ASC 326. ASU 2022-02 also requires additional disclosures for certain loan modifications and disclosures of gross charge-offs by year of origination. Specifically, loan modification disclosures in periods subsequent to the adoption of ASC 326 must be made for modifications of existing loans to borrowers who were experiencing financial difficulties at the time of the modification. The modification type must include a direct change in the timing or amount of a loan’s contractual cash flows. The additional disclosures are applicable to situations where there is: principal forgiveness, an interest rate reduction, an other-than-insignificant payment delay, a term extension, or any combination thereof.

Reworded

Income Taxes.Taxes – The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. The Company recognizes certain revenue and expense items in periods which are different for financial accounting purposes than for federal income tax purposes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed under the liability method based on differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Reworded

In accordance with U.S. GAAP, management assesses the likelihood that tax positions taken will be sustained upon examination based on their technical merit, considering the facts, circumstances and information available at the end of each period. The Company recognizes the effects of significant income tax positions taken on tax returns only if the positions are “more likely than not” to be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. Positions taken on tax returns that do not meet that threshold are not recognized in the Company’s provisions for income taxes. The measurement of uncertain tax positions is adjusted when new information is available, or when an event occurs that requires a change. The Company’s policy is to analyze its tax positions for all open tax years. Interest and penalties, if any, associated with uncertain tax positions, are classified as additional income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Added

Positions taken on tax returns that do not meet that threshold are not recognized in the Company’s provisions for income taxes. The measurement of uncertain tax positions is adjusted when new information is available, or when an event occurs that requires a change. The Company’s policy is to analyze its tax positions for all open tax years. Interest and penalties, if any, associated with uncertain tax positions, are classified as additional income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income (see Note 11).

Removed

AFS Securities Valuation and Credit Losses. The Company evaluates the fair value and credit quality of its AFS securities portfolio on a quarterly basis. In the event the fair value of a security falls below its amortized cost basis, the security is evaluated to determine whether the decline in value was caused by changes in market interest rates or security credit quality. The primary indicators of credit quality for the Company’s AFS securities portfolio are security type and credit rating, which is influenced by a number of security-specific factors that may include obligor cash flow, geography, seniority, and others. If unrealized losses are related to credit quality, the Company estimates the credit-related loss by evaluating the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security with the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis of the security and a credit loss exists, then an ACL is recorded for the credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than amortized cost basis.

Removed

For AFS securities, management evaluates all investments in an unrealized loss position on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such evaluation. If the Company has the intent to sell the security or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security, the security is written down to fair value and the entire loss is recorded in earnings through an allowance for credit loss.

Removed

If either of the above criteria is not met, the Company evaluates whether the decline in fair value is the result of credit losses or other factors. In making the assessment, the Company may consider various factors including the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, performance on any underlying collateral, downgrades in the ratings of the security by a rating agency, the failure of the issuer to make scheduled interest or principal payments and adverse conditions specifically related to the security. If the assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security and any excess is recorded as an allowance for credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Any amount of unrealized loss that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit loss is recognized in other comprehensive income. Changes in the allowance for credit loss are recorded as provision for (or reversal of) credit loss expense. Losses are charged against the allowance for credit loss when management believes an available for sale security is confirmed to be uncollectible or when either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met.

Removed

Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income, using the interest method, to arrive at periodic interest income at a constant effective yield, thereby reflecting the securities' market yield. Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade date and are determined using the specific identification method. Such gains and losses are recognized within non-interest income in the consolidated statements of income.

Reworded

Non-GAAP Financial Measures. In addition to results presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, this annualAnnual reportReport on Form 10-K contains certain non-GAAP financial measures, including pre-provision net revenue, operating net income, operating pre-tax income, operating noninterest expense, operating noninterest income, operating effective tax rate, operating earnings per share, basic, operating earnings per share, diluted, operating return on average assets, operating return on average shareholders’ equity, operating efficiency ratio, tangible shareholders’ equity, tangible assets,assets and tangible book value per share, and efficiency ratio.share. The Company presents certain non-GAAP financial measures, which management uses to evaluate the Company’s performance, and which exclude the effects of certain transactions, non-cash items and U.S. GAAP adjustments that we believe are unrelated to our core business and are therefore not necessarily indicative of the Company’s current performance or financial position. Management believes excluding these items facilitates greater visibility for investors into our core businesses as well as underlying trends that may, to some extent, be obscured by inclusion of such items in the corresponding U.S. GAAP financial measures. These disclosures should not be viewed as a substitute for financial results determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies. Because non-GAAP financial measures are not standardized, it may not be possible to compare these financial measures with other companies’ non-GAAP financial measures having the same or similar names.

Added

Because non-GAAP financial measures are not standardized, it may not be possible to compare these financial measures with other companies’ non-GAAP financial measures having the same or similar names.

Added

(1) These amounts are included in income tax expense and reflect amounts related to 2025 and 2024 BOLI surrender taxes and penalties and 2023 compensation and writedown for future LTIP vesting amounts that are not expected to be deductible on a tax return, respectively. These amounts are not included in the calculation of the tax impact on the non-GAAP adjustments.

Reworded

Total Assets. Total assets increased $624.3$1.85 million,billion, or 13.8%,35.8%, to $5.16$7.01 billion as of December 31, 20242025 from $4.53$5.16 billion at December 31, 2023.2024. The increase was primarily the result of increases in net loans, cash and cash equivalents, BOLIAFS securities, banking premises and AFSequipment, securities.goodwill and other intangibles and deferred tax assets from the Provident Acquisition.

Reworded

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents increased $91.3$43.7 million, or 33.5%,12.0%, to $407.6 million at December 31, 2025 from $363.9 million at December 31, 2024 from $272.6 million at December 31, 2023.2024. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was primarily duea toresult theof an increase in depositsFHLB outpacingborrowing and deposits, along with cash as part of the increaseProvident Acquisition, partially offset by growth in netloans loans.during the year.

Added

AFS Securities. AFS securities increased $40.8 million, or 17.9%, to $269.0 million at December 31, 2025 from $228.2 million at December 31, 2024 from purchases of U.S. treasury and mortgage-backed securities and the $24.5 million in securities acquired from the Provident acquisition, which were sold upon closing and redeployed into U.S. treasury and mortgage-backed securities.

Removed

AFS Securities. AFS securities increased $38.7 million, or 20.4%, to $228.2 million at December 31, 2024 from $189.5 million at December 31, 2023.

Removed

The increase in AFS securities during 2024 was a result of additional purchases of securities due to excess cash and unrealized gains due to interest rate changes. Additionally, a portfolio of $29.3 million of AFS securities was sold at a $1.9 million net loss during the year ended December 31, 2024, with the proceeds reinvested into higher-yielding securities, which were restructured to mitigate portfolio risk and increase yield. The securities sold had an average yield of 0.97% with a remaining duration of 2.4 years and were reinvested into securities with an average yield of 4.27% and an average duration of 4.1 years. The earn-back period on the loss from the sale of the securities is expected to be approximately 2.5 years. The newly purchased securities carry a lower risk weight than the securities sold, mitigating risk in the Company’s securities portfolio.

Reworded

Loans, net. Loans, net increased $437.4$1.60 million,billion, or 11.3%,37.4%, to $5.90 billion at December 31, 2025 from $4.29 billion at December 31, 2024 from $3.86 billion at December 31, 2023.2024. We experienced increases in each of our loan portfolio segments except for construction and land developmentconsumer loans, which decreased $39.0$41.1 million, or 6.3%,16.8%, to $583.8$203.5 million at December 31, 20242025 from $622.8$244.6 million at December 31, 2023.2024. The primary driver of the decline in consumer loans was the $67.0 million transfer of consumer loans to held for sale, partially offset by purchases made. During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, commercial real estate loans, including multi-family real estate loans, increased $316.6$745.1 million, or 22.9%43.9%; commercial and industrial loans increased $67.9$447.8 million, or 13.8%80.0%; construction and land development loans increased $146.8 million, or 25.1%; and one-to-four-family residential real estate loans, including home equity loans, increased $60.1$74.9 million, or 5.0%;6.0%. andAs consumerpart loansof increasedthe $39.7Provident million,acquisition, orthe 19.4%.Company acquired a warehouse loan portfolio of $280.9 million.

Added

The following tables contains information regarding the loan portfolio segments acquired from Provident and our organic loan portfolio growth during the year ended December 31, 2025:

Added

(1) Loans acquired at fair value

Reworded

The increase in these loan portfolio segments reflects the Provident Acquisition, coupled with our strategy to grow the balance sheet by continuing to diversify into higher-yielding loans to improve net margins and manage interest rate risk. In addition, to help manage interest rate risk and generate non-interest income, occasionally we sell one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans into the secondary market on a servicing-retained basis. During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, $23.6$9.0 million of loans were sold with gains recognized of $293,000.$165,000. Additionally, at December 31, 2025, we transferred a portfolio of consumer loans to held for sale in an amount of $67.0 million, with a net loss to reflect the fair value of $517,000.

Added

Non-public Investments. Non-public investments primarily consist of equity investments and FHLB stock and FRB stock holdings. These assets increased $9.4 million, or 38.5%, to $33.7 million as of December 31, 2025 from $24.4 million as of December 31, 2024. The increase resulted primarily from an low-income housing tax credit (“LIHTC”) equity investment of $6.7 million acquired from Provident, as well as increased FHLB stock holdings of $3.6 million correlated to the increase in outstanding FHLB borrowings at December 31, 2025.

Added

BOLI. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company received proceeds on surrendered BOLI policies of $48.8 million and acquired $47.1 million in BOLI policies from Provident, resulting in an increase of $1.6 million, or 1.5%, in BOLI to $104.3 million at December 31, 2025 from $102.8 million at December 31, 2024. The Company surrendered BOLI policies in September 2024 and the proceeds were received during the year ended December 31, 2025. The Company also surrendered $28.4 million of BOLI policies from the Provident Acquisition, the proceeds from which have not been received. The Company recorded an increase in the cash surrender value of the BOLI policies of $3.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to an increase in the cash surrender value of the BOLI policies of $2.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily the result of the surrender and redeployment of BOLI policies at a higher yield during the year ended December 31, 2025, along with a higher average balance during 2025.

Removed

Non-public Investments. Non-public investments primarily consist of equity investments in tax credit entities, FHLB stock and FRB stock.

Removed

BOLI. We invest in BOLI to help offset the costs of our employee benefit plan obligations. BOLI also generally provides noninterest income that is nontaxable. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Bank surrendered $46.7 million of existing BOLI policies that were earning an annualized yield of 3.08%. Prior to the surrender of the policies, the Bank purchased an additional $50.0 million of BOLI policies, which are currently yielding 4.80%. As a result of the surrender of the BOLI policies, the Bank incurred $1.4 million of income tax and penalty, which the Bank expects to earn back in less than two years.

Showing the first 60 of 131 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-07 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-08 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
39 → 39words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

There have been no material changes in risk factors applicable to the Company from those disclosed in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

38new paragraphs
17removed paragraphs
26reworded paragraphs
4,850 → 6,767words in section

New heading “Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”

Removed heading “Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text
“Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025”
see in full comparison
New text
“Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
see in full comparison
New text topics: interest rate
“Shareholders’ Equity. Total shareholders’ equity decreased $16.9 million, or 2.0%, to $842.0 million as of June 30, 2026 from $858.9 million as of December 31, 2025, due to the $43.0 million decrease in additional paid-in capital resulting from the completion of our share repurchase program in which we repurchased a total of 2,207,236 shares during the six months ended June 30, 2026 at an all-in weighted average cost of $20.96 per share totaling $46.3 million, together with a $4.8 million, or 153.9%, increase in other comprehensive loss as a result of the interest rate environment negatively …”
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

TheComparison tableof belowOperating sets forth our noninterest expenseResults for the quartersThree endedMonths MarchEnded 31,June 30, 2026 and 2025:
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased $14.0 million, or 48.9%, to $42.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, from $28.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“Interest Expense. Total interest expense increased $17.3 million, or 26.1%, to $83.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $66.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Interest expense on deposit accounts increased $16.3 million, or 25.6%, to $80.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $63.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (81)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations at and for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and the notes thereto, appearing on Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Reworded

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Reworded

Comparison of Financial Condition as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025

Reworded

Total Assets. Total assets increased $220.3$440.5 million, or 3.1%,6.3%, to $7.23$7.45 billion as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $7.01 billion as of December 31, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by increases in net loans,loans and non-public investments, offset partially offset by decreases in cash and cash equivalents.equivalents and BOLI.

Reworded

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $32.2$7.7 million, or 7.9%,1.9%, to $375.4$400.2 million as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $407.6$407.9 million as of December 31, 2025. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents was primarily duea toresult loan originations andof the repurchase of 1,288,5092,207,236 shares totaling $27.8 million, partially offset by the increase in deposits of $243.5 million during the currentsix quarter.months ended June 30, 2026.

Reworded

Available-for-Sale Securities. Available-for-sale securities increased $8.3$3.7 million, or 3.1%,1.4%, to $277.2$272.6 million as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $269.0 million as of December 31, 20252025, primarily dueas toa result of purchases of U.S. treasuries,Treasuries, mortgageGovernment backed-securitiesAgency debt securities and corporatemortgage-backed bonds.securities.

Reworded

Loans. Net loans increased $231.0$442.1 million, or 3.9%,7.5%, to $6.13$6.34 billion as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $5.90 billion as of December 31, 2025. The increase resulted primarily from increases in: commercial real estate loans, which increased $197.5 million, or 10.3%; commercial and industrial loans, which increased $135.4$140.1 million, or 13.4%,13.9%; residential real estate loans, including home equity loans, of $56.5 million, or 4.3%; multi-family loans of $50.2 million, or 9.7%; construction and land development loans,loans whichof increased $52.1$35.1 million, or 7.1%4.8%; and multi-familyconsumer residentialloans loans,of which increased $20.6$23.3 million, or 4.0%.11.4%, partially offset by a decrease in mortgage warehouse loans of $63.3 million, or 22.5%. The increase in our loan portfolio reflects our strategy to prudently grow the balance sheet by continuing to diversify into these higher-yielding loans to improve net margins and manage interest rate risk.

Added

Loans to borrowers in the cannabis loan industry increased $137.6 million, or 34.0%, to $542.4 million as of June 30, 2026 from $404.8 million as of December 31, 2025. Of those totals, $374.2 million and $228.8 million at June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, were direct loans to cannabis companies and were collateralized by real estate Collateral dependent loans increased $42.0 million, or 99.9%, to $84.1 million as of June 30, 2026, from $42.0 million as of December 31, 2025, primarily driven by one CRE relationship that is well collateralized, paying as expected and with no required specific reserve.

Removed

The Company had approximately $466.8 million and $404.8 million in loans to borrowers in the cannabis industry at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. Of that total, $321.0 million and $228.8 million were direct loans to cannabis companies and were primarily collateralized by real estate at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.

Reworded

Deposits. Deposits increased $243.5$466.3 million, or 4.2%,8.0%, to $6.10$6.32 billion as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $5.85 billion as of December 31, 2025. Core deposits (which we define as all deposits including certificates of deposit, other than brokered deposits) increased $209.1$282.1 million, or 3.9%,5.3%, to $5.53$5.60 billion as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $5.32 billion as of December 31, 2025. The increase in deposits was the result of growth in customer deposits, which primarily moneyincluded marketthe following: noninterest-bearing demand deposits, which increased $125.4 million, or 15.2%; NOW accounts, which increased $92.3$92.1 million, or 5.6%,13.9%; noninterestand bearingscustomer demand depositscertificates of $44.6deposit, which increased $59.0 million, or 5.4%,4.9%. certificatesBrokered ofdeposits depositincreased of $39.1$184.2 million, or 2.0%,34.4%, brokeredto deposits$719.9 million as of $34.4June million,30, or2026 6.4%from and$535.7 NOWmillion accountsas of $30.4December million,31, or 4.6%.2025.

Removed

The Company had $455.6 million and $453.0 million in deposits from the cannabis industry, representing 7.5% and 7.7% of total deposits, as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.

Removed

Shareholders’ Equity. Total shareholders’ equity decreased $16.2 million, or 1.9%, to $842.8 million as of March 31, 2026 from $858.9 million as of December 31, 2025, primarily as a result of the repurchase of 1,288,509 shares of common stock at an all-in weighted average cost of $21.55 per share totaling $27.8 million and $3.2 million in dividends paid during the quarter, partially offset by net income of $15.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2026.

Removed

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025

Removed

Net Income. Net income was $15.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, compared to net income of $12.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, an increase of approximately $2.3 million, or 18.4%. An increase of $21.3 million, or 49.0%, in net interest income was partially offset by a $14.0 million, or 48.9%, increase in noninterest expense and a $5.2 million, or 446.5%, increase in the provision for credit losses.

Removed

Operating net income, excluding one-time charges, amounted to $15.8 million, or $0.38 per diluted share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, compared to operating net income of $13.7 million, or $0.35 per diluted share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, representing an increase of $2.1 million, or 15.3%.

Removed

The material one-time charges for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 include:

Removed

The material one-time charges for the quarter ended March 31, 2025 include:

Removed

Interest and Dividend Income. Interest and dividend income increased $28.8 million, or 37.5%, to $105.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, from $76.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, primarily due to a $28.6 million, or 40.0% increase in interest and fees on loans. The increase in interest and fees on loans was primarily due to an increase of $1.72 billion, or 39.5%, in the average balance of the loan portfolio to $6.09 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, from $4.37 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, reflecting the growth of our commercial loan portfolio.

Removed

Average interest-earning assets increased $1.79 billion, or 36.7% to $6.68 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, from $4.89 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. The significant increase in the average balance of loans was a result of the Provident acquisition which closed during the quarter ending December 31, 2025. The yield on interest-earning assets was 6.41% for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, compared to 6.38% for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, representing a 3 basis point expansion. The ending balance of gross loans of $6.21 billion, is $119.7 million or 2.0%, higher than the average balance of gross loans at the end of the quarter, primarily the result of one large cannabis loan of $115.0 million closing near the end of the quarter, which includes a credit enhancement on a first out basis, and did not have a significant impact on loan yields during the quarter.

Reworded

InterestDeposits Expense.from Totalcustomers interestin expensethe cannabis industry increased $7.5$69.1 million, or 22.5%,15.2%, to $40.8$522.1 million foras theof quarterJune ended30, March 31, 2026,2026 from $33.3$453.0 million foras theof quarter ended MarchDecember 31, 2025.

Added

FHLB Borrowings. FHLB borrowings decreased $15.0 million, or 7.6%, to $181.2 million as of June 30, 2026 from $196.2 million as of December 31, 2025, primarily driven by deposit growth outpacing loan growth.

Added

Shareholders’ Equity. Total shareholders’ equity decreased $16.9 million, or 2.0%, to $842.0 million as of June 30, 2026 from $858.9 million as of December 31, 2025, due to the $43.0 million decrease in additional paid-in capital resulting from the completion of our share repurchase program in which we repurchased a total of 2,207,236 shares during the six months ended June 30, 2026 at an all-in weighted average cost of $20.96 per share totaling $46.3 million, together with a $4.8 million, or 153.9%, increase in other comprehensive loss as a result of the interest rate environment negatively impacting the value of our AFS securities portfolio and our balance sheet hedges, partially offset by net income of $36.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026.

Removed

Interest expense on deposit accounts increased $7.3 million, or 22.8%, to $39.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, from $32.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. The increase was due to the Provident acquisition and organic growth which resulted in increases in the average balance of money market accounts of $638.6 million, 59.5%, to $1.71 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, from $1.07 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2025 and certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts of $518.0 million, or 26.2%, to $2.50 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, from $1.98 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2025; offset partially by decreases in the weighted average rate on certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts of 60 basis points to 3.99% for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, from 4.59% for the quarter ended March 31, 2025 and money market accounts of 28 basis points to 3.02% for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, from 3.29% for the quarter ended March 31, 2025.

Removed

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $21.3 million, or 49.0%, to $64.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, from $43.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, primarily due to a $1.79 billion, or 36.7%, increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets to $6.68 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, from $4.89 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2025 and a decrease in the weighted average rate on interest-bearing liabilities of 44 basis points from 3.63% for the quarter ended March 31, 2025 to 3.19% for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. These increases were offset partially by a $1.46 billion increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities to $5.19 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, from $3.73 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2025.

Removed

Provision for Credit Losses. Based on management’s analysis of the adequacy of the ACL, a total provision for credit losses of $6.3 million was recorded for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, of which $6.4 million related to the provision for credit losses on loans, compared to a total provision for credit losses of $1.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, which included a $947 thousand provision for credit losses on loans. The provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments decreased $265,000, or 125.6%, during the three months ended March 31, 2026, as a result of an increase in net unfunded commitments of $58 million in the prior quarter, compared to a $14.5 million increase in the current quarter. The increase of $5.2 million, or 446.5%, in the total provision for credit losses was primarily due to growth in the balance of commercial and industrial loans, larger peer commercial real estate credit losses realized in the prior quarter impacting quantitative reserves, and an elevated qualitative factor risk grade for the commercial and industrial loan portfolio.

Removed

The Company recorded charge-offs of $13.9 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2026, compared to $1.6 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2025. The increase in charge-offs was primarily driven by two large charge-offs of PCD commercial and industrial loans, in amounts of $10.6 million and $1.8 million. These loans were previously reserved for through purchase accounting adjustments as of the acquisition date and resulted in no additional loss to the Company.

Removed

Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased $631 thousand, or 16.3%, to $4.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, from $3.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. The increase resulted primarily from increases in customer service fees of $573 thousand, or 22.4%, due to higher loan and cash management fees. The table below sets forth our noninterest income for the quarters ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:

Removed

Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased $14.0 million, or 48.9%, to $42.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, from $28.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. Salaries and employee benefit expenses increased $6.3 million, or 33.0%, resulting primarily from a $4.5 million increase in employee compensation, an $819 thousand increase in medical and dental benefits and $803 thousand increase in employee bonus expense due to a full quarter of increased headcount from the Provident acquisition and continued growth, along with a $495 thousand increase in stock compensation expense as result from grants made subsequent to March 31, 2025; partially offset by a $1.2 million decrease in pension expense due to completion of the plan liquidation during 2025. General and administrative expenses increased $2.2 million, or 156.2%, primarily due to a full quarter’s worth of core deposit intangible amortization resulting in an $854 thousand increase, a $353 thousand increase in tax credit amortization expenses resulting from additional investments and a $124 thousand increase in loan workout expenses related to the acquired Provident enterprise value loan portfolio. Director and professional service fees increased $1.9 million, or 88.5%, resulting from director stock compensation from grants made subsequent to March 31, 2025 of $948 thousand and the non-recurring $500 thousand business line expansion fee.

Removed

Data processing expenses increased $1.7 million, or 60.5%, primarily the result of our significant investment in technology and systems, as well as a full quarter of increased transactional volume from the Provident acquisition.

Reworded

TheComparison tableof belowOperating sets forth our noninterest expenseResults for the quartersThree endedMonths MarchEnded 31,June 30, 2026 and 2025:

Added

Net Income. Net income increased $6.5 million, or 44.9%, to $21.1 million, or $0.53 per diluted common share, for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, compared to net income of $14.6 million, or $0.39 per diluted common share, for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. Net interest income increased $22.1 million, or 47.1%, and noninterest income increased $1.3 million, or 29.9%, partially offset by increased noninterest expense of $14.6 million, or 49.7%, and increased income tax expense of $2.2 million, or 53.9%.

Added

Operating net income, excluding one-time charges, amounted to $21.9 million, or $0.55 per basic and diluted share for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 compared to operating net income, excluding one-time charges, of $15.0 million, or $0.40 per basic and diluted share, for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, which represents an increase of $6.8 million, or 45.4%.

Added

The material one-time charges for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 were:

Added

The material one-time charges for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 were:

Reworded

IncomeInterest Taxand Expense.Dividend IncomeIncome. taxInterest expenseand dividend income increased $454$31.9 thousand,million, or 9.2%,40.0%, to $5.4$111.8 million for the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 from $4.9$79.8 million for the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.2025, primarily due to increased interest and fees on loans of $31.9 million, or 42.6%. The increase in interest and fees on loans was primarily due to thean increase of $1.90 billion, or 42.4%, in pretaxthe incomeaverage balance of $2.8the million,loan orportfolio 15.8%.to The$6.38 effective tax rate was 26.4% and 28.0%billion for the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 andfrom $4.48 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, respectively, withreflecting the declineProvident attributableacquisition, towhich increasedwas investmentscompleted inon taxNovember credits.14, 2025 and the growth of our commercial and construction loan portfolios.

Added

Average interest-earning assets increased $1.99 billion, or 40.2%, to $6.93 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from $4.94 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. The yield on interest-earning assets decreased 1 basis point to 6.47% for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from 6.48% for the quarter ended June 30, 2025.

Added

Interest and dividend income included $2.0 million of fair value mark accretion related to the acquisition of Provident, representing 1.8% or 5 basis points of net interest margin, during the three months ended June 30, 2026. The Company recorded no fair value mark accretion during the three months ended June 30, 2025.

Added

Interest Expense. Total interest expense increased $9.8 million, or 29.9%, to $42.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from $32.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025.

Added

Interest expense on deposits increased $9.0 million, or 28.4%, to $40.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from $31.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. The increase in interest expense on deposits was primarily driven by an increase in the average balance of certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts of $629.6 million, or 32.0%, to $2.59 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from $1.96 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 and an increase in the average balance of money market accounts of $610.2 million, or 56.0%, to $1.70 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from $1.09 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, partially offset by a decrease in the weighted average rate on certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts of 42 basis points to 3.91% for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from 4.34% for the quarter ended June 30, 2025.

Added

Interest expense on borrowings increased $810,000, or 70.4%, to $2.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from $1.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, primarily from the increase in the average balance of FHLB borrowings of $105.6 million, or 102.1%, to $209.0 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from $103.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025.

Added

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $22.1 million, or 47.1%, to $69.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from $47.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to a $1.99 billion, or 40.2%, increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets to $6.93 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from $4.94 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 and a decrease in the weighted average rate on interest-bearing liabilities of 36 basis points to 3.16% for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from 3.52% for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. These increases were partially offset by an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities of $1.67 billion, or 44.5%, to $5.42 billion at June 30, 2026 from $3.75 billion at June 30, 2025.

Added

Provision for Credit Losses. Based on management’s analysis of the adequacy of the ACL, a provision of $3.2 million was recorded for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, of which $3.0 million related to the provision for credit losses on loans, compared to a provision of $3.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, which included a $4.2 million provision for credit losses on loans. The decrease in the provision for credit losses on loans was primarily driven by prior quarter reserve increases from updated peer proxies to better reflect geographic composition and construction to permanent amortization adjustments, partially offset by current quarter other consumer charge-off replenishment and higher C&I impaired reserves. The provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments increased $1.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2026 as a result of an increase in unfunded commitments during the quarter ended June 30, 2026.

Added

Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased $1.3 million, or 29.9%, to $5.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from $4.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. The increase resulted primarily from increased customer service fees of $1.1 million, or 44.1%, due to higher cash management, loan and debit card fees.

Added

The table below sets forth our noninterest income for the quarters ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:

Added

Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased $14.6 million, or 49.7%, to $44.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from $29.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. Salaries and employee benefit expenses increased $7.0 million, or 37.6%, resulting primarily from a $4.1 million increase in employee compensation, a $1.1 million increase in medical and dental benefits and a $541,000 increase in employee bonus expense, all due to headcount increases related to the Provident acquisition and the Company’s continued organic growth, and a $525,000 increase in stock-based compensation as a result of the grants made during the current year.

Added

Data processing expenses increased $2.4 million, or 96.5% primarily driven by our continued investment in technology and systems in support of upcoming revenue initiatives, requiring the operation of systems in parallel for a period of time while new systems are implemented. General and administrative expenses increased $2.1 million, or 98.6%, primarily driven by our acquisition of Provident resulting in $855,000 in additional core deposit intangible amortization expense, in addition to $319,000 in increased tax credit amortization expense, $169,000 in increased education and training expenses, $144,000 in increased utilities expenses and $124,000 in increased bank supplies expense all driven by our acquisition of Provident. Occupancy and equipment expenses increased $1.0 million, or 68.5%, primarily driven by our acquisition of Provident, as well as the opening of two new branches.

Added

The table below sets forth our noninterest expense for the quarters ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:

Added

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense increased $2.2 million, or 53.9%, to $6.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from $4.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. The effective tax rate was 23.2% and 22.1% for the quarters ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The increase in tax expense was from higher pre-tax income during the quarter ended June 30, 2026 compared to June 30, 2025.

Added

Average Balances and Yields. The following table sets forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the periods indicated. No tax-equivalent yield adjustments have been made, as the effects would be immaterial. Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances. All average balances are daily average balances. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts, and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or interest expense; such fees, discounts and premiums were not material for the periods presented.

Added

Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income for the periods indicated. The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The total column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate. There were no out-of-period items or adjustments required to be excluded from the table below.

Added

Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025

Added

Net Income. Net income increased approximately $8.9 million, or 32.6%, to $36.1 million, or $0.90 per diluted common share, for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to net income of $27.2 million, or $0.72 per diluted common share, for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to increased net interest income of $43.5 million, or 48.0%, partially offset by increased noninterest expense of $28.6 million, or 49.3%, and increased provision for credit losses of $5.2 million, or 120.4%.

Added

Operating net income, excluding one-time charges, amounted to $37.7 million, or $0.94 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to operating net income, excluding one-time charges, of $28.7 million, or $0.76 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2025, an increase of $8.9 million, or 31.1%.

Added

The material one-time charges for the six months ended June 30, 2026 were:

Added

The material one-time charges for the six months ended June 30, 2025 were:

Added

Interest and Dividend Income. Interest and dividend income increased $60.8 million, or 38.8%, to $217.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $156.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to a $60.5 million, or 41.4%, increase in interest and fees on loans, reflecting the Provident acquisition and the growth of our commercial and construction loan portfolios. The increase in interest and fees on loans was primarily due to an increase of $1.81 billion, or 40.9%, in the average balance of the loan portfolio to $6.23 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $4.42 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2025 reflecting the Provident acquisition, which was completed on November 14, 2025, and the growth of our commercial and construction loan portfolios.

Added

Average interest-earning assets increased $1.89 billion, or 38.5%, to $6.81 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $4.92 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The yield on interest-earning assets increased 1 basis point to 6.44% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from 6.43% for the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Added

Interest Expense. Total interest expense increased $17.3 million, or 26.1%, to $83.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $66.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Interest expense on deposit accounts increased $16.3 million, or 25.6%, to $80.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $63.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the average balance of certificate of deposit and individual retirement accounts of $574.1 million, or 29.1%, to $2.55 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $1.97 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2025, an increase in the average balance of money market accounts of $624.3 million, or 57.7% to $1.71 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $1.08 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and an increase in the average balance of FHLB borrowings of $75.1 million, or 77.2%, to $172.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $97.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, partially offset by a decrease in the weighted average rate on certificate of deposit and individual retirement accounts of 51 basis points to 3.95% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from 4.46% for the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Added

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $43.5 million, or 48.0%, to $134.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $90.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to a $1.89 billion, or 38.5%, increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets to $6.81 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $4.92 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and a decrease in the weighted average rate on interest-bearing liabilities of 40 basis points to 3.17% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from 3.57% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. These increases were offset partially by an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities of $1.57 billion, or 41.9%, to $5.30 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $3.74 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Added

Provision for Credit Losses. Based on management’s analysis of the adequacy of the ACL, a provision of $9.5 million was recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2026, of which $9.4 million related to the provision for credit losses on loans, compared to a provision of $4.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, which included a $5.2 million provision for credit losses on loans. The increase of $4.2 million, or 80.6%, in the provision for credit losses on loans was primarily driven by loan growth, additional specific reserves on PCD loans from our acquisition of Provident, larger peer commercial real estate credit losses impacting quantitative reserves, and an elevated qualitative factor risk grade for the commercial and industrial loan portfolio. The provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments increased $1.0 million, or 116.6%, during the six months ended June 30, 2026 as a result of increased unfunded commitments.

Showing the first 60 of 81 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

NBBK insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 5 Form 4 filings (3 insiders, 3 trade dates, 27,700 shares, about $543.3K) and open-market sales in 1 filing (1 insider, 1 trade date, 2,000 shares, about $45.9K). Net open-market shares: 25,700 (purchases minus sales); net value about $497.5K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-08-20Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 2,000$21.75 $43.5K379,790 SEC
2026-08-20Lapointe Jean-Pierre
SEVP and CFO
Open-market purchase 200$21.80 $4.4K110,531 SEC
2026-08-14Henkin Kevin
EVP, Chief Credit Officer
Open-market sale 2,000$22.93 $45.9K6,874 SEC
2026-05-15Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 247$19.21 $4.7K377,790 SEC
2026-05-15Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 100$19.18 $1.9K375,923 SEC
2026-05-15Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 400$19.18 $7.7K375,823 SEC
2026-05-15Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 500$19.19 $9.6K377,190 SEC
2026-05-15Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 253$19.20 $4.9K377,443 SEC
2026-05-15Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 100$19.21 $1.9K377,543 SEC
2026-05-15Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 767$19.18 $14.7K376,690 SEC
2026-05-15Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 500$19.16 $9.6K375,290 SEC
2026-05-15Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 133$19.17 $2.5K375,423 SEC
2026-04-24Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 100$19.47 $1.9K374,290 SEC
2026-04-24Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 178$19.46 $3.5K374,190 SEC
2026-04-24Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 722$19.45 $14.0K374,012 SEC
2026-04-24Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 500$19.63 $9.8K374,790 SEC
2026-04-24Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Shares withheld for tax 24,371$19.82 $483.0K372,290 SEC
2026-04-24Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 320$19.33 $6.2K372,610 SEC
2026-04-24Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 180$19.34 $3.5K372,790 SEC
2026-04-24Campanelli Joseph P
Director, President & CEO, Chairman of the Board
Open-market purchase 500$19.37 $9.7K373,290 SEC
2026-04-24Darcey William
Director
Shares withheld for tax 4,918$19.82 $97.5K77,721 SEC
2026-04-24Jackson Angela
Director
Shares withheld for tax 4,918$19.82 $97.5K76,337 SEC
2026-04-24Whalen Mark
Director
Shares withheld for tax 4,918$19.82 $97.5K72,721 SEC
2026-04-24Nolan Joseph R Jr
Director
Shares withheld for tax 4,918$19.82 $97.5K82,821 SEC
2026-04-24Montgomery Kenneth C.
Director
Shares withheld for tax 5,015$19.82 $99.4K80,125 SEC
2026-04-24Lynch Christopher R.
Director
Shares withheld for tax 4,150$19.82 $82.3K92,772 SEC
2026-04-24Roberts Christine
SEVP and COO
Shares withheld for tax 3,589$19.82 $71.1K71,081 SEC
2026-04-24Pascucci Hope
Director
Open-market purchase 10,000$19.44 $194.4K132,402 SEC
2026-04-24Pascucci Hope
Director
Open-market purchase 10,000$19.49 $194.9K142,402 SEC

Well-known investors holding NBBK (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM2026-06-30289,814$6.1M0.0%Added 149%
Two Sigma Investments COM2026-06-30277,027$5.9M0.0%Reduced 25%
D. E. Shaw & Co. COM2026-06-30149,931$3.2M0.0%Added 113%
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-30131,440$2.8M0.0%Reduced 50%
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COM2026-06-30116,349$2.5M0.0%Reduced 10%
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM2026-06-3081,447$1.7M0.0%Reduced 49%

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when NBBK files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.