NERV 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Minerva Neurosciences, Inc. · Nasdaq · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1598646 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “You should carefully consider the risks described below as well as the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The occurrence of any of the events or developments described below could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, reputation, and prospects. In such an event, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.”
New heading “Our business is highly dependent on the success of roluperidone, as well as any other potential future product candidates. If we are unable to successfully complete clinical development of, obtain regulatory approval for, or commercialize, roluperidone or any other potential future product candidates, or if we experience delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.”
New heading “There is no public market for our Series A Preferred Stock.”
New heading “Stockholders will be diluted by any conversions of outstanding Series A Preferred Stock and exercises of outstanding warrants.”
Removed heading “Changes in estimates regarding fair value of intangible assets may result in an adverse impact on our results of operations.”
Removed heading “The regulatory pathway for our product candidate, MIN-301, has not yet been determined in the US. Depending on the pathway, we may be subject to different regulatory requirements.”
Removed heading “The United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU may have a negative effect on global economic conditions, financial markets and our business, which could reduce the price of our common stock.”
Largest changes
“Additionally, the U.S. Department of Justice issued a rule entitled the Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countries of Concern or Covered Persons, which places additional restriction on certain data transactions involving countries of concern (e.g., China, Russia, Iran) and covered persons (i.e., individuals and entities who are designated as such by the U.S. …”see in full comparison
“There can be no assurance that we will maintain compliance with the requirements for listing our common stock on Nasdaq. If we are unable to satisfy the Nasdaq criteria for continued listing, our common stock would be subject to delisting. …”see in full comparison
“If we fail to comply with the continued listing standards of The Nasdaq Capital Market, we may seek to list our common stock on the NYSE American or on a regional stock exchange or, if one or more broker-dealer market makers comply with applicable requirements, the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market. Listing on such other market or exchange could reduce the liquidity of our common stock. If our common stock were to trade in the OTC market, an investor would find it more difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations for the price of, the common stock. …”see in full comparison
“In addition, on December 11, 2025, the European Commission, the Parliament and the European Council reached a political agreement on a comprehensive overhaul of EU pharmaceutical legislation (the “Pharma Package”). The reform has been under negotiation since the European Commission submitted its proposal in April 2023. This package - comprised of a new directive and regulation to replace existing legislation – aims to modernize the EU framework. The political agreement is still subject to formal approval by the European Parliament and Council. …”see in full comparison
“Delisting from The Nasdaq Capital Market could also result in other negative consequences, including the potential loss of confidence by suppliers, customers and employees, the loss of institutional investor interest, fewer business development opportunities and potential liabilities arising from stockholder litigation or other disputes.”see in full comparison
“The current administration is pursuing policies to reduce regulations and expenditures across government agencies including at HHS, the FDA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) and related agencies. These actions, presently directed by executive orders or memoranda from the Office of Management and Budget, may propose policy changes that create additional uncertainty for our business. For example, the current administration has announced agreements with pharmaceutical companies that require the drug manufacturers to offer, through a direct-to-consumer platform, U.S. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (71)
You should carefully consider the risks described below as well as the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The occurrence of any of the events or developments described below could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, reputation, and prospects. In such an event, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
We are a clinical development-stage biopharmaceutical company. In November 2013, we merged with Sonkei Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Sonkei”), and, in February 2014, we acquired Mind-NRG Sarl (“Mind-NRG”), which were also clinical development-stage biopharmaceutical companies. Investment in biopharmaceutical product development is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that any potential product candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate effect or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval or become commercially viable. We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales to date, and we may never generate product revenue or achieve profitability. Our net incomeloss was $1.4$293.4 million and our net lossincome was $30.0$1.4 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $395.4$688.8 million.
Our lead product candidate, roluperidone, is in development for the treatment of negative symptoms in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. In August 2022, we submitted a New Drug Application (“NDA”) with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for roluperidone for the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. On February 26, 2024, the FDA issued a Complete Response Letter (the “CRL”) to our NDA for roluperidone. Subsequent to the CRL, we have had multiple interactions with the FDA to confirm the design of an additional Phase 3 confirmatory clinical trial to address the deficiencies cited in the CRL and resubmit the NDA. See the section titled “Item 1. Business—Our Clinical-Stage Programs” for more information. While we are advancing plans for an additional confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial for roluperidone for the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia, which we refer to as the C19 trial, in consultation with the FDA and expect to fund such trial and our resubmission of the NDA in part with net proceeds from our October 2025 private placement, there can be no assurances that we will successfully resubmit the NDA and obtain approval for roluperidone in a timely manner, on favorable terms, or at all. As a result, the regulatory approval process for roluperidone in the United States is highly uncertain. If we do not obtain approval of roluperidone in the United States, or if the approval is delayed, it would have a material adverse impact on our business. Even if we are able to obtain approval, the expense and time to do so could adversely impact our ability to successfully commercialize roluperidone or conduct our other business operations and our financial condition could be materially harmed.
In August 2022, we submitted a New Drug Application (“NDA”) with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for our lead product candidate, roluperidone, for the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. The FDA subsequently notified us that they would not accept the file for review, issuing a refusal to file letter (“RTF”) in October 2022. In December 2022, following a Type A meeting held on November 30, 2022, the FDA confirmed the RTF remained in effect with respect to our NDA for roluperidone. On May 1, 2023, we announced that the FDA filed our NDA for roluperidone on April 27, 2023. The decision to file the NDA followed our request for formal dispute resolution and appeal of the October 2022 RTF. On May 8, 2023, we received confirmation from the FDA that the NDA for roluperidone has been assigned a standard review classification, and that the FDA has assigned a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”) goal date of February 26, 2024. The FDA advised that it identified potential review issues that had been previously cited in the RTF decision letter, which included those discussed at the Type C meeting in March 2022.
On February 26, 2024, the FDA issued a Complete Response Letter (the “CRL”) to our NDA for roluperidone for the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. The CRL provided that the FDA had completed its review of the NDA and had determined that it could not approve the NDA in its present form. Specifically, the FDA cited the following clinical deficiencies: (i) although one study (MIN-101C03) demonstrated statistical significance on the primary efficacy endpoint, it is insufficient on its own to establish substantial evidence of effectiveness; (ii) the NDA submission lacks data on concomitant antipsychotic administration; (iii) the NDA submission lacks data needed to establish that the change in negative symptoms of schizophrenia with roluperidone treatment was clinically meaningful; and (iv) the submitted safety database included an inadequate number of subjects exposed to roluperidone at the proposed dose (64 mg) for at least 12 months. To address these deficiencies, the FDA stated that we must submit at least one additional positive, adequate, and well-controlled study to support the safety and effectiveness of roluperidone for the treatment of negative symptoms. We must also provide additional data to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of roluperidone co-administered with antipsychotic medications, to support that observed effect on negative symptoms with roluperidone treatment corresponds to a clinically meaningful change, and to demonstrate the long-term safety of the proposed dose. See the section titled “Item 1. Business—Our Clinical-Stage Programs—Clinical and Regulatory Updates—Complete Response Letter” for more information. While we have continued to have interactions with the FDA since receiving the CRL, with the goal of addressing questions raised in the CRL, there can be no assurances that we will obtain approval for roluperidone in a timely manner, on favorable terms, or at all. As a result, the regulatory approval process for roluperidone in the United States is highly uncertain. If we do not obtain approval of roluperidone in the United States, or if the approval is delayed, it would have a material adverse impact on our business. Even if we are able to obtain approval, the expense and time to do so could adversely impact our ability to successfully commercialize roluperidone or conduct our other business operations and our financial condition could be materially harmed.
Our operations and the historic operations of Sonkei and Mind-NRG have consumed substantial amounts of cash since inception. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash of $21.5$82.4 million. We believe that ourthis existing cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cashamount will be sufficient to meet our cashoperating commitments for at least the next 12twelve months afterfrom the date that the year-end condensedour financial statements are issued. The process of drug development can be costly, and the timing and outcomes of clinical trials are uncertain. The assumptions upon which we have based our estimates are routinely evaluated and may be subject to change. The actual amount of our expenditures will vary depending upon a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the design, timing and duration of future clinical trials, the progress of our research and development programs, the infrastructure to support a commercial enterprise, the cost of a commercial product launch, and the level of financial resources available.
The process of drug development can be costly, and the timing and outcomes of clinical trials are uncertain, including the C19 trial required by the FDA for roluperidone. The assumptions upon which we have based our estimates are routinely evaluated and may be subject to change. The actual amount of our expenditures will vary depending upon a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the design, timing and duration of future clinical trials, the progress of our research and development programs, the infrastructure to support a commercial enterprise, the cost of a commercial product launch, and the level of financial resources available.
We will require additional capital in the short-term to continue advancing the development and regulatory approval process of roluperidone. We will also require additional capital in the long-term to advance the development, regulatory approval process and potential commercialization of roluperidone and other potential product candidates that we may develop in the future. Because the length of time and activities associated with successful development of product candidates are highly uncertain, we are unable to estimate with certainty the actual funds we will require for development and any approved marketing and commercialization activities. Additional capital may not be available in sufficient amounts, on the requisite timing or on reasonable terms, if at all, and our ability to raise additional capital may be adversely impacted by global economic conditions, geopolitical conflicts, such as the war in Ukraine and hostilities in the Middle East, and other factors. Our future funding requirements, both short and long-term, will depend on many factors, including:
Changes in estimates regarding fair value of intangible assets may result in an adverse impact on our results of operations.
We test goodwill and in-process research and development for impairment annually or more frequently if changes in circumstances or the occurrence of events suggest impairment exists. The test for impairment of in-process research and development requires us to make several estimates about fair value, most of which are based on projected future cash flows. Changes in these estimates may result in the recognition of an impairment loss in our results of operations. An impairment analysis is performed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any individual asset may not be recoverable. For example, if we or our counterparties fail to perform our respective obligations under an agreement, or if we lack sufficient funding to develop our product candidates, an impairment may result.
In addition, any significant change in market conditions, estimates or judgments used to determine expected future cash flows that indicate a reduction in carrying value may give rise to impairment in the period that the change becomes known.
As a result of our limited resources and development deferral combined with the overall market conditions, we recognized a non-cash charge of $15.2 million as of December 31, 2021 related to the impairment of the intangible asset for MIN-301. We had previously recognized in-process research and development for MIN-301 in conjunction with the acquisition of MIN-301 during 2014. No updates were made in respect of the development of MIN-301 during 2024.
Our ability to use our federal and state NOL carryforwards to offset potential future taxable income is dependent upon our generation of future taxable income before the expiration dates of the NOL carryforwards, and we cannot predict with certainty when, or whether, we will generate sufficient taxable income to use all of our NOL carryforwards. Under currentU.S. tax law, federal NOL carryforwards generated in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such NOL carryforwards is limited to 80% of taxable income. Many states have similar laws. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had approximately $156.8$188.2 million of federal net operating losses that will begin to expire in 2036, if not utilized. Of the total federal net operating loss, approximately $135.4$166.8 million has an unlimited carryforward and therefore will not expire. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had approximately $7.7 million of New Jersey and approximately $148.1$180.4 million of Massachusetts operating losses that will begin to expire in 2029 and 2037, respectively, if not utilized. Accordingly, certain of our federal and state NOL carryforwards could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities.
In addition, under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), federal NOL carryforwards may become subject to an annual limitation in the event of certainan cumulativeownership changeschange (generally defined as a greater than 50% change, by value, in ourits ownership. An “ownership change” pursuant to Section 382 of the Code generally occurs if one or more stockholders or groups of stockholders who own at least 5% of the company’s stock increase theirequity ownership by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest ownership percentage within a rolling three-year period.period). We may be subject to an annual limitations on the amount of NOL carryforwards that can be utilized in each year. It is also possible that some or all of our NOL carryforwards could be limited by the provisions of Section 382 of the Code as a result of future changes in ownership, including as a result of subsequent sales of securities by us or our stockholders. Further, state NOL carryforwards may be similarly limited. Any such disallowances may result in greater tax liabilities than we would incur in the absence of such a limitation and any increased liabilities could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.
The tax regimes we are subject to or operate under, including income and non-income taxes, are unsettled and may be subject to significant change. Changes in tax laws, regulations, or rulings, or changes in interpretations of existing laws and regulations, could materially affect our financial position and results of operations. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs ActAct, Taxthe Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, or the IRA, and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act enacted in 2017 (the “Tax Act”) made broadmany and complex changes to the U.S. tax code, includingsignificant changes to U.S. federaltax laws, including the imposition by the IRA of, among other rules, a 15% minimum tax rates, additional limitations on the deductibility of interest, both positive and negative changes to the utilization of future NOL carryforwards, allowing for the expensing of certain capital expenditures, and putting into effect the migration from a “worldwide” system of taxation to a territorial system. Moreover, the IRA provides for a minimum tax equal to 15% of the adjusted financial statementbook income of certain large corporations,corporations as well asand a 1% excise tax on certain sharecorporate buybacksstock byrepurchases. publicFurther, corporationsexisting thattax wouldlaws, statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances could be imposedinterpreted differently, changed, repealed, or modified at any time. Any such enactment, interpretation, change, repeal, or modification could adversely affect us, possibly with retroactive effect. In particular, changes in corporate tax rates, the realization of net deferred tax assets, the taxation of foreign earnings, and the deductibility of expenses could have a material impact on suchthe corporations. The issuancevalue of additionalour regulatorydeferred ortax accountingassets, guidanceresult relatedin tosignificant theone-time Taxcharges, Actand or the IRA could materially affectincrease our tax obligations and effectivefuture tax rate.expenses. In addition, our tax position could be adversely impacted by changes in tax laws applicable to corporate multinationals which have been proposed, and, in some cases, enacted by various countries, and by other international tax developments including the implementation of the base erosion and profit shifting project led by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and certain tax initiatives proposed by the European Commission. These changes and developments include changes to the existing framework in respect of income taxes, as well as the imposition of new types of non-income taxes (such as taxes based on a percentage of revenue) which could apply to our business. These types of changes to the taxation of our activities could increase our worldwide effective tax rate, increase the amount of taxes imposed on our business and our compliance costs, and harm our financial position. Such changes may also apply retroactively to our historical operations and result in taxes greater than the amounts estimated and recorded in our financial statements.
Our business is highly dependent on the success of roluperidone, as well as any other potential future product candidates. If we are unable to successfully complete clinical development of, obtain regulatory approval for, or commercialize, roluperidone or any other potential future product candidates, or if we experience delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.
Our future success and ability to generate revenue from roluperidone or any potential future product candidates, which we do not expect will occur for several years, if ever, is dependent on our ability to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize one or more product candidates. Subject to ongoing feedback from the FDA, we expect to initiate our C19 trial in the second quarter of 2026. We currently expect topline efficacy results in the second half of 2027 and relapse assessment data in the second half of 2028. If roluperidone encounters undesirable safety signals, insufficient efficacy results, development delays, regulatory issues or other problems, our development plans and business would be significantly harmed. See also the risk factor captioned “We have incurred significant losses since our inception. We expect to continue to incur losses over the next several years and may never achieve or maintain profitability.”
If, following submission, our application is not accepted for substantive review or approved, the EMA, FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require that we conduct additional clinical or pre-clinical trials, provide additional data, manufacture additional validation batches or develop additional analytical tests methods before they will reconsider our application. On October 14, 2022, we received a refusal-to-file communication from the FDA for our NDA submission for roluperidone, our lead product candidate, which decision was confirmed by the FDA in a subsequent Type A meeting. On April 27, 2023, the FDA filed our NDA for roluperidone following our request for formal dispute resolution and appeal of the refusal-to-file letter. On May 8, 2023, we received confirmation from the FDA that our NDA for roluperidone had been assigned a standard review classification and a PDUFA goal date of February 26, 2024. The FDA also advised that it identified potential review issues that had been previously cited in the RTF decision letter, which included those discussed at the Type C meeting in March 2022. See the section titled “Item 1. Business— Our Clinical-Stage Programs—Clinical and Regulatory Updates—Type C Meeting” for more information. On February 26, 2024, the FDA issued a CRL to our NDA for roluperidone. See the section titled “Item 1. Business—Our Clinical-Stage Programs—Clinical and Regulatory Updates—Complete Response Letter” for more information. See also the risk factor above titled “We have incurred significant losses since our inception. We expect to continue to incur losses over the next several years and may never achieve or maintain profitability.” As a result of the CRL, we potentiallyneed needto conduct an additional studies.Phase Additional3 studiestrail, andwhich data wouldwill impose increased costs and delays in the regulatory approval process,process. whichOur C19 Phase 3 confirmatory trial may requirenot usbe tosuccessful, expendmay morebe resourcessignificantly thandelayed, weand havemay available.not result in marketing authorization for roluperidone in any jurisdiction. In addition, the EMA, FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities may not consider any additional required trials, data or information that we perform or provide to be sufficient, or we may decide, or be required, to abandon the program.
The results of pre-clinical studies and early clinical trials of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. Interpretation of results from early, usually smaller, trials that suggest positive trends in some subjects require caution. Results from later stages of clinical trials enrolling more subjects may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy results or otherwise fail to be consistent with the results of earlier trials of the same product candidate. For example, our Phase 3 trial (C07) of roluperidone for the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia failed to meet its primary endpoint despite our Phase 2b trial (C03) of the same design achieving statistical significance on the same endpoint. Inconsistencies such as this may occur for a variety of reasons, including differences in trial design, trial endpoints (or lack of trial endpoints in exploratory studies), subject population, number of subjects, subject selection criteria, trial duration, drug dosage and formulation or due to the lack of statistical power in the earlier trials. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or unacceptable safety profiles, notwithstanding positive results in earlier trials.
We mayhave in the past and intend to conduct our future clinical trials at sites outside the United States. Although the FDA may accept data from clinical trials conducted outside the United States, acceptance of this data would be subject to certain conditions imposed by the FDA. For example, the study population must adequately represent the applicable United States population, and the data must be applicable to the American population and medical practice in ways that the FDA deems clinically meaningful. In addition, while clinical trials conducted outside of the United States are subject to the applicable local laws, FDA acceptance of the data from such trials will be dependent upon its determination that the trials were conducted consistent with all applicable United States laws and regulations. There can be no assurance the FDA will accept data from trials conducted outside of the United States as adequate support of an application for regulatory approval,approval. andFor itour isConfirmatory notPhase unusual3 fortrial, we agreed with the FDA tothat requirebest someefforts Phasewill 3be clinical trial datamade to besecure generated25-30% inof patients from the UnitedU.S., States.subject to competitive recruitment. If we are unable to enroll 25-30% of our C19 patients from the U.S. or if the FDA does not accept the data from our international clinical trials,trial sites, it would likely result in the need for additional trials in the United States,, which would be costly and time-consuming and could delay or permanently halt the development of one or more of our product candidates.roluperidone. Similar requirements and consequences apply outside the United States in relation to acceptance by for foreign regulatory authorities of data from clinical trials conducted outside their territory.
We rely on CROs and clinical trial sites to ensure the proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials in Europe and, we expect, eventuallyand in the United States and, while we have agreements governing their committed activities, we have limited influence over their actual performance. We may also experience difficulties enrolling subjects for our clinical trials relating to roluperidone due to the mental health of the subjects that we will need to enroll, related diagnoses and drop-out rates.
Our product candidates and the activities associated with their development and commercialization in the United States, including, but not limited to, their advertising and promotion, will further be heavily scrutinized by the FDA, the United States Department of Justice, the United States Department of Health and Human Services’ (“HHS’s”) Office of Inspector General, state attorneys general, members of Congress and the public. Violations of applicable law, including advertising, marketing and promotion of our products for unapproved (or off-label) uses, are subject to enforcement letters, inquiries and investigations, and civil, criminal and/or administrative sanctions by regulatory authorities. Additionally, comparable foreign regulatory authorities will heavily scrutinize advertising and promotion of any product candidate that obtains approval outside of the United States. In the EU, the advertising and promotion of medicinal products are subject to both EU and EU Member States’ laws governing promotion of medicinal products, interactions with physicians and other healthcare professionals, misleading and comparative advertising and unfair commercial practices. Although general requirements for advertising and promotion of medicinal products are established under EU legislation, the details are governed by regulations in individual EU Member States and can differ from one country to another. For example, applicable laws require that promotional materials and advertising in relation to medicinal products comply with the product’s Summary of Product Characteristics, or SmPC, as approved by the competent authorities in connection with a marketing authorization. Promotional activity that does not comply with the SmPC is considered off-label and is prohibited in the EU. Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medicinal products is also prohibited in the EU. Enforcement of advertising and promotional requirements relating to medicinal products in the EU is carried out at the national level by the national competent authorities of EU Member States. Furthermore, national or industry codes of conduct or practice, such as the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (the United Kingdom innovative pharmaceutical industry trade association) code of practice, may established additional, stricter requirements than applicable legislative requirements.
In addition, on December 11, 2025, the European Commission, the Parliament and the European Council reached a political agreement on a comprehensive overhaul of EU pharmaceutical legislation (the “Pharma Package”). The reform has been under negotiation since the European Commission submitted its proposal in April 2023. This package - comprised of a new directive and regulation to replace existing legislation – aims to modernize the EU framework. The political agreement is still subject to formal approval by the European Parliament and Council. If approved in the form proposed, the Pharma Package will, among other changes, reduce the baseline market protection period by one year, with limited opportunities for extensions; reshape the incentives regime for orphan medicinal products; and expand the Bolar exemption. A decrease in market exclusivity opportunities for our product candidates in the EU, combined with the expanded Bolar exemption, could open them to generic or biosimilar competition earlier than under the current regime, potentially impacting reimbursement status and the commercial prospects of our product candidates. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies governing clinical trials, our development plans may be impacted.
On April 26, 2023, the European Commission adopted a proposal for a new Directive and Regulation to revise the existing pharmaceutical legislation and on 10 April 2024, the Parliament adopted its related position. The proposed revisions remain to be agreed and adopted by the European Council. Moreover, on December 1, 2024, a new European Commission took office. The proposal could, therefore, still be subject to revisions. If adopted in the form proposed, the recent European Commission proposals to revise the existing EU laws governing authorization of drugs may result in a decrease in data and market exclusivity for our product candidates in the EU.
If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies governing clinical trials, our development plans may be impacted.
The regulatory pathway for our product candidate, MIN-301, has not yet been determined in the US. Depending on the pathway, we may be subject to different regulatory requirements.
MIN-301 is a peptide, and, as a peptide, may be subject to the Public Health Service Act (“PHSA”), and the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”). We have yet to meet with the FDA regarding the approval pathway for this product candidate. Based on the definition of a biologic in the PHSA, we believe that MIN-301 meets the definition of a biologic and, thus, we will need to submit a BLA, for product approval. Moreover, based on an FDA intercenter agreement, we believe that MIN-301 will be regulated by the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. However, we intend to discuss jurisdiction with the FDA to determine the appropriate regulatory pathway and corresponding requirements. Depending on the pathway, we may be subject to different regulatory requirements, including different regulatory and testing requirements, shorter or longer periods of market exclusivity, and different approval processes for generic drug and biosimilar competitors.
We currently have a limitedno marketing and sales organization. If we are unable to establish greater marketing and sales capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to market and sell our product candidates, we may not be able to effectively market and sell our product candidates, if approved, or generate product revenues.
We currently have a limitedno marketing or sales organization for the marketing, sales and distribution of pharmaceutical products. In order to commercialize any product candidates, we must build our marketing, sales, distribution, managerial and other non-technical capabilities or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services. We may not be successful in doing so on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Additionally, there has been increasing legislative and enforcement interest in the United States with respect to specialty drug pricing practices. For example, HHS imposes rebates on many Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D products to penalize price increases that outpace inflation on an annual basis. In addition, HHS has been empowered to negotiate the price of certain single-source drugs that have been on the market for at least seven (7) years covered under Medicare as part of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Each year up to twenty (20) products will be selected by HHS for the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Products subject to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program are expected to experience a significant reduction in reimbursement from the Medicare program on a per unit basis. If coverage and adequate reimbursement are not available, or are available only to limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our current and any future product candidates that we develop, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results and our overall financial condition. At the state level, legislatures are passing increasing amounts of legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.
Additionally, there has been increasing legislative and enforcement interest in the United States with respect to specialty drug pricing practices. Specifically, there have been several recent U.S. Presidential executive orders, Congressional inquiries and proposed federal and proposed and enacted state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drugs. For example, on August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) was signed into law which, among other things, (1) directs U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to negotiate the price of certain single-source drugs covered under Medicare that have been on the market for at least 7 years and (2) imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. The IRA permits HHS to implement many of these provisions through guidance, as opposed to regulation, for the initial years. HHS has and will continue to issue and update guidance as these programs are implemented. These provisions began to take effect progressively starting in fiscal year 2023. On August 15, 2024, HHS announced the agreed-upon price of the first ten drugs that were subject to price negotiations, although the Medicare drug price negotiation program is currently subject to legal challenges. On January 17, 2025, HHS selected fifteen additional products covered under Part D for price negotiation in 2025. Each year thereafter more Part B and Part D products will become subject to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. It is currently unclear how the IRA will be implemented but is likely to have a significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry. Further, on February 14, 2023, HHS released a report outlining three new models for testing by the CMS Innovation Center which will be evaluated on their ability to lower the cost of drugs, promote accessibility, and improve quality of care. It is unclear whether the models will be utilized in any health reform measures in the future. Further, on December 7, 2023, the Biden administration announced an initiative to control the price of prescription drugs through the use of march-in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act. On December 8, 2023, the National Institute of Standards and Technology published for comment a Draft Interagency Guidance Framework for Considering the Exercise of March-In Rights which for the first time includes the price of a product as one factor an agency can use when deciding to exercise march-in rights. While march-in rights have not previously been exercised, it is uncertain if that will continue under the new framework. At the state level, legislatures are passing increasing amounts of legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. For example, on January 5, 2024, the FDA approved Florida’s Section 804 Importation Program (SIP) proposal to import certain drugs from Canada for specific state healthcare programs. It is unclear how this program will be implemented, including which drugs will be chosen, and whether it will be subject to legal challenges in the United States or Canada. Other states have also submitted SIP proposals that are pending review by the FDA.
For example, in March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, “ACA”) broadened access to health insurance, reduced or constrained the growth of healthcare spending, enhanced remedies against healthcare fraud and abuse, add imposed new transparency requirements for healthcare and health insurance industries, imposed new taxes and fees on pharmaceutical manufacturers and imposed additional health policy reforms. Since the ACA’s enactment, there have been executive, judicial and Congressional challenges and amendments to certain aspects of the ACA. For example, on July 4, 2025, the IRA,One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was signed into law, which narrowed access to ACA marketplace exchange enrollment and declined to extend the ACA enhanced advanced premium tax credits that expired at the end of 2025, which, among other things,provisions extendsin enhancedthe subsidieslaw, are anticipated to reduce the number of Americans with health insurance. The OBBBA also is expected to reduce Medicaid spending and enrollment by implementing work requirements for individualssome purchasingbeneficiaries, healthcapping insurancestate-directed coveragepayments, inreducing federal funding, and limiting provider taxes used to fund the program. Congress is considering proposed legislation intended to further reduce healthcare costs with alternatives to replace the expired ACA marketplaces through plan year 2025. The IRA also eliminates the “donut hole” under the Medicare Part D program beginning in 2025 by significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost and creating a new manufacturer discount program.subsidies. It is possible that the ACA will be subject to judicial or Congressional challenges in the future. It is unclear how any such challenges and additional healthcare reform measures of the second Trumpcurrent administration will impact the ACA and our business.
The current administration is pursuing policies to reduce regulations and expenditures across government agencies including at HHS, the FDA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) and related agencies. These actions, presently directed by executive orders or memoranda from the Office of Management and Budget, may propose policy changes that create additional uncertainty for our business. For example, the current administration has announced agreements with pharmaceutical companies that require the drug manufacturers to offer, through a direct-to-consumer platform, U.S. patients and Medicaid programs prescription drug Most-Favored Nation pricing equal to or lower than those paid in other developed nations, with additional mandates for direct-to-patient discounts and repatriation of foreign revenues. Other recent actions, for example, include (1) directing agencies to reduce agency workforce and cut programs; (2) directing HHS and other agencies to lower prescription drug costs through a variety of initiatives, including by improving upon the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program and establishing Most-Favored-Nation pricing for pharmaceutical products; (3) imposing tariffs on imported pharmaceutical products; and (4) as part of the Make America Healthy Again Commission’s Strategy Report released in September 2025, working across government agencies to increase enforcement on direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising. Additionally, the current administration recently called on Congress to enact “The Great Healthcare Plan,” to codify and expand Most-Favored Nation pricing, lower government subsidies to private insurance companies, increase healthcare price transparency, expand pharmaceutical drugs available for over-the-counter purchase, and enact restrictions on pharmacy benefit manager payment methodologies, among other things. These actions and policies may significantly reduce U.S. drug prices, potentially impacting manufacturers’ global pricing strategies and profitability, while increasing their operational costs and compliance risks. In June 2024, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the U.S. Supreme Court greatly reduced judicial deference to regulatory agencies, which could increase successful legal challenges to federal regulations affecting our operations. Congress may introduce and ultimately pass health care related legislation that could impact the drug approval process and make changes to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program.
Further, Congress is considering additional health reform measures. We expect that federal and state healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and lower reimbursement, and in additional downward pressure on the price that may be charged for any of our product candidates, if approved.
There likely will continue to be healthcare reform measures, including legislative and regulatory proposals at the foreign, federal and state levels directed at broadening the availability of healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. Such reforms could have an adverse effect on anticipated revenues from product candidates that we may successfully develop and for which we may obtain regulatory approval and may affect our overall financial condition and ability to develop product candidates.
The United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU may have a negative effect on global economic conditions, financial markets and our business, which could reduce the price of our common stock.
Following Brexit, the UK and the EU signed a EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, or TCA, which became provisionally applicable on January 1, 2021 and entered into force on May 1, 2021. This agreement provides details on how some aspects of the UK and EU’s relationship will operate going forwards however there are still uncertainties. The TCA primarily focuses on ensuring free trade between the EU and the UK in relation to goods, including medicinal products. Among the changes that have occurred are that the UK is treated as a “third country”, a country that is not a member of the EU and whose citizens do not enjoy the EU right to free movement (Northern Ireland continues to follow certain limited EU regulatory rules, including in relation to medical devices, but not in relation to medicinal products) . As part of the TCA, the EU and the UK recognize GMP inspections carried out by the other party and the acceptance of official GMP documents issued by the other party. The TCA also encourages, although it does not oblige, the parties to consult one another on proposals to introduce significant changes to technical regulations or inspection procedures. Among the areas of absence of mutual recognition are batch testing and batch release. The UK has unilaterally agreed to accept EU batch testing and batch release. However, the EU continues to apply EU laws that require batch testing and batch release to take place in the EU territory. This means that medicinal products that are tested and released in the UK must be retested and re-released when entering the EU market for commercial use.
On February 27, 2023, the UK Government and the European Commission reached a political agreement on the so-called “Windsor Framework”. The Windsor Framework is intended to revise the Northern Ireland Protocol to address some of the perceived shortcomings in its operation. The agreement was adopted at the Withdrawal Agreement Joint Committee on March 24, 2023 and the arrangements under the Windsor Framework relating to medicinal products took effect on January 1, 2025. As it relates to marketing authorizations, the United Kingdom has a separate regulatory submission process, approval process and a separate national marketing authorization. Northern Ireland continued, until January 1, to be covered by the marketing authorizations granted by the European Commission but the Windsor Framework provides that the UK MHRA is the sole regulatory body responsible for granting marketing authorizations for Northern Ireland as of January 1, 2025.
A significant proportion of the regulatory framework in the UK applicable to medicinal products is currently derived from EU Directives and Regulations. The potential for UK legislation to diverge from EU legislation following Brexit could materially impact the regulatory regime with respect to the development, manufacture, import, approval, and commercialization of our product candidates in the UK or the EU. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies governing clinical trials, our development plans may be impacted.
All of these changes could increase our costs and otherwise adversely affect our business. Any delay in obtaining, or an inability to obtain, any regulatory approvals, as a result of Brexit or otherwise, would prevent us from commercializing our product candidates in the UK or the EU and restrict our ability to generate revenue and achieve and sustain profitability. In addition, we may be required to pay taxes or duties or be subjected to other hurdles in connection with the importation of our product candidates into the EU. If any of these outcomes occur, we may be forced to restrict or delay efforts to seek regulatory approval in the UK or the EU for our product candidates, or incur significant additional expenses to operate our business, which could significantly and materially harm or delay our ability to generate revenues or achieve profitability of our business. Any further changes in international trade, tariff and import/export regulations as a result of Brexit or otherwise may impose unexpected duty costs or other non-tariff barriers on us. These developments, or the perception that any of them could occur, may significantly reduce global trade and, in particular, trade between the impacted nations and the UK. It is also possible that Brexit may negatively affect our ability to attract and retain employees, particularly those from the EU.
Prior to November 2013, we operated without full-time employees, relying on the services of consultants, including representatives of our former affiliate, Care Capital LLC, to provide certain accounting and finance functions. We have since hired personnel and continue to develop our disclosure control procedures; however, if we are unsuccessful in building an appropriate infrastructure, or unable to develop procedures and controls to ensure timely and accurate reporting, we may be unable to meet our disclosure requirements under the Exchange Act, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and impair our access to the capital markets.
We are exposed to the risk of employee fraud or other misconduct. Misconduct by employees and independent contractors, such as principal investigators, CROs, manufacturers, consultants, commercial partners and vendors, could include failures to comply with regulations of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, to provide accurate information to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities to comply with manufacturing standards we have established, to comply with US federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and comparable foreign regulatory requirements, to report financial information or data accurately or to disclose unauthorized activities to us. For example, in our Phase 3 trial of roluperidone (C07) for the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia, one clinical site that recruited 17 patients reported implausible behavioral (schizophrenia symptoms) and physiological (blood pressure) data. As a result, these 17 patients were excluded and made part of an mITT analysis set. Sales, marketing and other business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws intended to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws may restrict or prohibit a wide range of business activities, including, but not limited to certain activities related to research, manufacturing, distribution, pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Employee and independent contractor misconduct could also involve the improper use of individually identifiable information, including, without limitation, information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in sanctions, monetary penalties, and serious harm to our reputation. In addition, federal procurement laws impose substantial penalties for misconduct in connection with government contracts and require certain contractors to maintain a code of business ethics and conduct.
Additionally, the U.S. Department of Justice issued a rule entitled the Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countries of Concern or Covered Persons, which places additional restriction on certain data transactions involving countries of concern (e.g., China, Russia, Iran) and covered persons (i.e., individuals and entities who are designated as such by the U.S. Attorney General or considered “foreign persons” and are majority owned by, organized under the laws of, a primary resident in, or a contractor of, a covered person or country of concern, as applicable) that may impact certain business activities such as vendor engagements, sale or sharing of data, employment of certain individuals, and investor agreements. Violations of the rule could lead to significant civil and criminal fines and penalties. The rule applies regardless of whether data is anonymized, key-coded, pseudonymized, de-identified or encrypted, which presents particular challenges for companies like ours and may impact our ability to engage in certain transactions or agreements with certain third parties in the future.
Obligations related to data privacy and security (and consumers’individuals’ data privacy expectations) are quickly changing, becoming increasingly stringent, and creating uncertainty. Additionally, these obligations may be subject to differing applications and interpretations, which may be inconsistent or conflict among jurisdictions. Preparing for and complying with these obligations requires us to devote significant resources. These obligations may, and certain cases have, necessitate changes to our information technologies, systems, and data processing practices and to those of any third parties that process personal data on our behalf.
Cyberattacks, malicious internet-based activity, online and offline fraud, and other similar activities threaten the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of our sensitive information and information technology systems, and those of the third parties with whom we work. Such threats are prevalent, continue to rise, are increasingly difficult to detect, and come from a variety of sources, including traditional computer “hackers,” threat actors, “hacktivists,” organized criminal threat actors, personnel (such as through theft or misuse), sophisticated nation states, and nation-state-supported actors. Some actors now engage and are expected to continue to engage in cyber-attacks, including without limitation nation-state actors for geopolitical reasons and in conjunction with military conflicts and defense activities. During times of war and other major conflicts, we and the third parties with whom we work may be vulnerable to a heightened risk of these attacks, including retaliatory cyber-attacks, that could materially disrupt our systems and operations, supply chain, and ability to produce, sell and distribute our goods and services. We and the third parties with whom we work may be subject to a variety of evolving threats, including but not limited to social-engineering attacks (including through deep fakes, which may be increasingly more difficult to identify as fake, and phishing attacks), malicious code (such as viruses and worms), malware (including as a result of advanced persistent threat intrusions), denial-of-service attacks, credential stuffing, personnel misconduct or error, ransomware attacks, supply-chain attacks, software bugs, server malfunctions, software or hardware failures, loss of data or other information technology assets, adware, telecommunications failures, earthquakes, fires, floods, attacks enhanced or facilitated by AI, and other similar threats.
During times of war and other major conflicts, we and the third parties with whom we work may be vulnerable to a heightened risk of these attacks, including retaliatory cyber-attacks, that could materially disrupt our systems and operations, supply chain, and ability to produce, sell and distribute our goods and services. We and the third parties with whom we work may be subject to a variety of evolving threats, including but not limited to social-engineering attacks (including through deep fakes, which may be increasingly more difficult to identify as fake, and phishing attacks), malicious code (such as viruses and worms), malware (including as a result of advanced persistent threat intrusions), denial-of-service attacks, credential stuffing, personnel misconduct or error, ransomware attacks, supply-chain attacks, software bugs, server malfunctions, software or hardware failures, loss of data or other information technology assets, adware, telecommunications failures, earthquakes, fires, floods, attacks enhanced or facilitated by AI, and other similar threats.
While we have implemented security measures designed to protect against security incidents, there can be no assurance that these measures, or those of the third parties with whom we work, will be effective. We take steps designed to detect, mitigate, and remediate vulnerabilities in our information systems (such as our hardware and/or software, including that of third parties with whom we work), but we may not be able to detect and remediate all such vulnerabilities including on a timely basis. Further, we may experience delays in developing and deploying remedial measures and patches designed to address identified vulnerabilities. Vulnerabilities could be exploited and result in a security incident. Also, threat actors may use an initial compromise of one part of our environment to gain access to other parts of our environment or leverage a compromise of our networks or systems to gain access to the networks or systems of third parties with whom we work, such as through phishing or supply chain attacks.
Any of the previously identified or similar threats could cause a security incident or other interruption that could result in unauthorized, unlawful, or accidental acquisition, modification, destruction, loss, alteration, encryption, disclosure of, or access to our sensitive information or our information technology systems, or those of the third parties with whom we work. A security incident or other interruption could disrupt (and has in the past disrupted) our ability (and that of third parties with whom we work) to provide our services or conduct our operations. For example, a cyber-attack on one of our external contractors during the summer of 2019 resulted in a disruption to patient recruitment in our Phase 3 clinical trial of roluperidone. We expend significant resources and may have to modify our business activities (including our clinical trial activities) to try to protect against security incidents. Certain data privacy and security obligations require us to implement and maintain specific security measures, industry-standard or reasonable security measures to protect our information technology systems and sensitive information.
Our contracts may not contain relevant limitations of liability, and even where they do, there can be no assurance that limitations of liability in our contracts are sufficient to protect us from liabilities, damages, or claims related to our data privacy and security obligations. We cannot be sure that our insurance coverage will be adequate or sufficient to protect us from or to mitigate liabilities arising out of our privacy and security practices, that such coverage will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or that such coverage will pay future claims.
We depend on our collaboration with Tanabe Pharma Corporation (formerly Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation) (“MTPCTanabe Pharma”) , and could be seriously harmed if our license agreement with MTPCTanabe Pharma was terminated.
We exclusively license roluperidone, our lead product candidate, from MTPC,Tanabe Pharma, with the rights to develop, sell and import roluperidone globally, excluding most of Asia. If our license agreement with MTPCTanabe Pharma was terminated, it could have a material impact on our operations.
On January 19, 2021, we entered into an agreement with Royalty Pharma under which Royalty Pharma acquired our royalty interest in seltorexant for an upfront payment of $60 million and up to $95 million in future milestone payments that are contingent upon the achievement of certain clinical, regulatory and commercial milestones for seltorexant by Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, one of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson (“Janssen”), or any other party in the event that Janssen sells seltorexant. For more information regarding this arrangement, see the sections titled “Item 1. Business—Overview” and “Item 1. Business—Our Clinical-Stage Programs—Seltorexant (MIN-202)” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting our product candidates might expire before or shortly after our product candidates obtain regulatory approval, which may subject us to increased competition and reduce or eliminate our ability to recover our development costs. As a result, our owned and licensed patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours. Finally, any patent that grants from our U.S. patent applications relating to methods of using MIN-301 to treat neurologic and psychiatric diseases is expected to expire as early as 2028. Although we expect to seek extensions of patent terms where available, including in the United States under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, which permits a patent term extension of up to five years beyond the expiration of the patent, we cannot be certain that an extension will be granted, or if granted, what the applicable time period or the scope of patent protection afforded during any extended period will be. The applicable authorities, including the FDA, and any equivalent regulatory authority in other countries, may not agree with our assessment of whether such extensions are available, and may refuse to grant extensions to our patents, or may grant more limited extensions than we request. If this occurs, our competitors may take advantage of our investment in development and trials by referencing our clinical and pre-clinical data and launch their product earlier than might otherwise be the case.
adverse results or delays in our preclinical or clinical trials or those of our competitors;
There is no public market for our Series A Preferred Stock.
There is no established public trading market for our Series A Preferred Stock, and we do not expect a market to develop. In addition, we do not intend to apply for listing of the Series A Preferred Stock on any national securities exchange or other nationally recognized trading system. Without an active market, the liquidity of the Series A Preferred Stock will be limited.
Stockholders will be diluted by any conversions of outstanding Series A Preferred Stock and exercises of outstanding warrants.
As of December 31, 2025, there were (i) 1,559,008 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding Series A Preferred Stock for no additional consideration, (ii) 37,840,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding tranche A warrants to purchase Series A Preferred Stock and (iii) 18,920,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding tranche B warrants to purchase Series A Preferred Stock. The outstanding Series A Preferred Stock is convertible any time at the option of the holder thereof subject to beneficial ownership limitations. The tranche A warrants became exercisable immediately upon issuance. The exercise of such warrants and conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock for shares of our common stock will result in further dilution of our stockholders’ investment and could negatively affect the market price of our common stock. In addition, stockholders may experience further dilution if we issue common stock, or securities convertible into common stock, in the future. As a result of this dilution, stockholders may receive significantly less than the full purchase price paid for the shares in the event of liquidation.
To our knowledge, our executive officers, directors, holders of 5% or more of our capitaloutstanding common stock and their respective affiliates beneficially ownowned approximately 42.2%55.9% of our votingoutstanding common stock as of December 31, 2024,2025. includingAccordingly, 19.3%if heldour byexecutive fundsofficers, affiliated with Federated Hermes, Inc. (“Federated”)directors and 18.2%stockholders heldwho byowned BImore (asthan defined5% below).of Accordingly,our Federatedoutstanding andcommon BIstock willacted havetogether, significantthey may be able to significantly influence in determining the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matter submitted to the stockholders for approval, including mergers, consolidations, and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets and other significant corporate actions. Unless full participation of all stockholders takes place in such stockholder meetings, Federatedthe and/orlarger BIstockholders may be able to approve such matters itself. This concentration of ownership may (i) delay or deter a change of control of our Company; (ii) deprive stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of our Company; and (iii) affect the market price and liquidity of our common stock. In conjunction with the Private Placement (as defined below), we provided BI with the right to designate an observer at all meetings of our board of directors and any committee thereof so long as BI holds not less than 10% of shares of our common stock (including shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of pre-funded warrants), unless a change of control of the Company occurs sooner. The interests of our executive officers, directors, holders of 5% or more of our capital stock and their respective affiliates may not always coincide with the interests of other stockholders and they may act in a manner that advances their best interests and not necessarily those of other stockholders. The effect of these rights and these principal stockholders’ influence may impact the price that investors are willing to pay for our securities. If these principal stockholders sell a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, the market price of our common stock could be adversely impacted. The perception among the public that these sales will occur could also contribute to a decline in the market price of our common stock.
In addition, in the future, we may issue shares of common stock, or other equity or debt securities convertible into common stock, in connection with a financing, acquisition, employee arrangement or otherwise. Any such issuance, including pursuant to any at-the-market agreements, such as the at-the-market offering program that we entered into with Jefferies LLC in September 2022, could result in substantial dilution to our existing stockholders and could cause the price of our common stock to decline.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Recent Developments”
New heading “Macroeconomic Considerations”
New heading “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”
New heading “Warrant Liability”
Removed heading “Clinical and Regulatory Updates”
Removed heading “Roluperidone (MIN-101)”
Removed heading “Complete Response Letter (CRL)”
Removed heading “Phase 1b Clinical Trial (MIN-101C18)”
Removed heading “New Drug Application Filed”
Removed heading “New Drug Application Submission”
Removed heading “At-the-Market Equity Offering Program”
Removed heading “Liability related to the sale of future royalties”
Largest changes
“Results of our operations have varied and may vary in the future based on the impact of changes in the domestic or global economy. Negative conditions in the general economy both in the United States and abroad, including conditions resulting from changes in inflation and fluctuations in interest rates, financial and credit market fluctuations, international trade relations and tariffs, pandemics, political turmoil, natural catastrophes and warfare in the United States or elsewhere, could negatively affect our business. …”see in full comparison
“Non-GAAP adjusted net (loss) income is defined as GAAP net (loss) income, adjusted to exclude non-cash items related to: (i) stock-based compensation expense, (ii) interest expense for the sale of future royalties, (iii) other non-cash income, (iv) loss on issuance of convertible preferred stock and warrants and (v) changes in fair value of warrant liability. …”see in full comparison
“On June 30, 2023, we received aggregate gross proceeds under the private placement of $20.0 million and incurred approximately $0.4 million in offering expenses. Pursuant to the securities purchase agreement, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-273686), which was declared effective by the SEC on August 9, 2023, covering the resale of the Registrable Securities (as defined in the securities purchase agreement). …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (85)
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of certain proprietary product candidates to treat patients suffering from central nervous system diseases. Leveraging our scientific insights and clinical experience, we have acquired or in-licensed compounds that we believe have innovative mechanisms of actions and therapeutic profiles that potentially address the unmet needs of patients with these(“CNS”) diseases.
We are developing roluperidone for the treatment of negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia and have exclusive rights to develop and commercialize MIN-301 for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. In addition, we previously co-developed seltorexant with Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, one of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson (“Janssen”), for the treatment of insomnia disorder and adjunctive treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (“MDD”). In June 2020, we exercised our right to opt out of our agreement with Janssen for the Phase 3 development of seltorexant and as a result, we were entitled to collect royalties in the mid-single digits on potential future worldwide sales of seltorexant in certain indications, with no further financial obligations to Janssen. In January 2021, we sold our rights to these potential royalties to Royalty Pharma plc (“Royalty Pharma”) for a $60 million cash payment and up to an additional $95 million in potential future milestone payments, subject to completion of Phase 3 trials by Janssen and regulatory approvals.
Our lead product candidate, roluperidone, is in development for the treatment of negative symptoms in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. In August 2022, we submitted a New Drug Application (“NDA”) with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for our lead product candidate, roluperidone,roluperidone for the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. On February 26, 2024, the FDA issued a Complete Response Letter (“CRL”) regarding our NDA for roluperidone. SinceSubsequent receivingto the CRL, we have continuedhad to havemultiple interactions with the FDA withto confirm the goaldesign of addressingan additional Phase 3 confirmatory clinical trial to address the questionsdeficiencies raisedcited in the CRL.CRL and resubmit the NDA.
As with the completed Phase 2b (C03) and Phase 3 (C07) clinical trials of roluperidone, the new Phase 3 confirmatory trial, which we refer to as the C19 trial, will include patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who present with stable impairing negative symptoms and stable positive symptoms for the six months prior to entering the trial. We agreed with the FDA that best efforts will be made to secure 25-30% of patients from the United States, subject to competitive recruitment. The FDA confirmed that roluperidone can be studied in monotherapy where patients will receive a double-blinded single daily 64 mg dose of roluperidone or placebo. The FDA advised that, to support a monotherapy indication, it would be necessary to assess relapses on an observational basis for at least 52 weeks, in patients treated in monotherapy with roluperidone, placebo or antipsychotics. The FDA also stated that it would consider a resubmission of the NDA that included a double-blind, placebo- or active-controlled trial of roluperidone with a duration of at least 52 weeks with the efficacy primary endpoint at week 12.
Subject to ongoing feedback from the FDA, the C19 trial is currently expected to be initiated, including first patient screened, in the second quarter of 2026. The trial is designed to enroll 380 patients, randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive either placebo or a double-blinded single daily 64 mg dose of roluperidone. The primary efficacy endpoint is expected to be the change from baseline in the PANSS Marder negative symptoms factor score (“NSFS”) at 12 weeks of treatment with roluperidone compared to placebo. Following the initial 12-week treatment period, patients are expected to enter a 40-week relapse assessment phase, during which patients will crossover to receive either a daily 64 mg dose of roluperidone or antipsychotics. We currently expect topline efficacy results in the second half of 2027 and relapse assessment data in the second half of 2028.
We have not received any regulatory approvals to commercialize any of our product candidates, and we have not generated any revenue from the sales or license of our product candidates. We routinely evaluate the status of our drug development programs as well as potential strategic options. We have incurred significant operating losses since inception and expect to continue to incur net losses and negative cash flows from operating activities for the foreseeable future in connection with the clinical and regulatory activities associated with advancing our product candidates. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had an accumulated deficit of $395.4 million and $396.8 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we recorded net income of $1.4 million and a net loss of $30.0 million, respectively.
Clinical and Regulatory Updates
Roluperidone (MIN-101)
Complete Response Letter (CRL)
On February 26, 2024, the FDA issued a CRL to our NDA for roluperidone for the treatment of negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. In the CRL, the FDA cited the following clinical deficiencies:
Although one study (MIN-101C03) demonstrated statistical significance on the primary efficacy endpoint, it is insufficient on its own to establish substantial evidence of effectiveness.
The NDA submission lacks data on concomitant antipsychotic administration.
The NDA submission lacks data needed to establish that the change in negative symptoms of schizophrenia with roluperidone treatment was clinically meaningful.
The submitted safety database included an inadequate number of subjects exposed to roluperidone at the proposed dose (64 mg) for at least 12 months.
To address these deficiencies, the FDA stated that we must submit at least one additional positive, adequate, and well-controlled study to support the safety and effectiveness of roluperidone for the treatment of negative symptoms. We must also provide additional data to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of roluperidone co-administered with antipsychotic medications, to support the observed effect on negative symptoms with roluperidone treatment corresponds to a clinically meaningful change, and to demonstrate the long-term safety of the proposed dose.
In addition to the clinical deficiencies described above, the FDA also provided comments on, among other items, clinical pharmacology, product quality, biopharmaceutics, and nonclinical issues.
Phase 1b Clinical Trial (MIN-101C18)
In the first quarter of 2024, we completed a clinical trial initiated in October 2023 to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the co-administration of roluperidone and olanzapine in adult subjects with moderate to severe negative symptoms of schizophrenia. This clinical trial (NCT06107803) was designed to investigate the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects and safety of the concomitant therapy of roluperidone with an established and widely used antipsychotic.
We enrolled 17 male and female subjects with moderate to severe negative symptoms of schizophrenia for this study. Out of the 17 enrolled subjects, 13 completed all 17 days of daily dosing with roluperidone 64 mg (for 7 days) and roluperidone with olanzapine 10 mg (for 10 additional days). Two subjects withdrew consent after enrollment, one patient was discontinued due to a major protocol deviation, and one was discontinued due to a treatment-unrelated serious adverse event. Roluperidone administered concomitantly with olanzapine was generally well tolerated and no unexpected safety signals were detected, with few treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported, most of which were mild, and all resolved without sequelae. We observed no emergent clinically significant electrocardiogram or laboratory abnormalities during the study. We observed no symptomatic worsening during the administration of roluperidone alone (7 days) or when administered in combination with olanzapine at 10 mg (10 days). The study demonstrated that pharmacokinetic interactions between the two drugs were not relevant.
New Drug Application Filed
On April 27, 2023, the FDA filed our NDA for roluperidone for the treatment of negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. The decision to file the NDA followed our request for formal dispute resolution and appeal of the RTF. The issues cited in the RTF decision included those discussed at the Type C meeting in March 2022. In granting the appeal, the FDA deciding official agreed with us that the issues cited in the RTF decision should be considered during the FDA’s review of the NDA.
On May 8, 2023, we received confirmation from the FDA that the NDA for roluperidone has been filed in accordance with the Appeal Granted letter dated April 27, 2023 and assigned a standard review classification and a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”) goal date of February 26, 2024. The FDA advised that it identified potential review issues that had been previously cited in the RTF decision letter, which included those discussed at a Type C meeting in March 2022, described further below.
New Drug Application Submission
In August 2022, we submitted an NDA to the FDA for roluperidone for the treatment of negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. The NDA submission is supported by results from two late-stage, well-controlled studies in patients with moderate to severe negative symptoms and stable positive symptoms of schizophrenia, referred to as Study MIN-101C03 (the Phase 2b trial) and Study MIN-101C07 (the Phase 3 trial). Both studies were planned to constitute the bulk of evidence of roluperidone’s effectiveness for the indication of treating negative symptoms of schizophrenia. This plan relied on both studies having the same overall study design: both were multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies in which patients received either 32 mg or 64 mg doses of roluperidone. In both studies, if patients were taking antipsychotic treatments, they were discontinued and a washout period of at minimum two days was implemented before beginning the assigned study treatment. Both studies capture comparative placebo-controlled data through their 12-week double-blind period. Both studies also provide long-term exposure data regarding the safety and tolerability of roluperidone, as well as efficacy based on blinded doses of roluperidone, specifically intended to demonstrate the maintenance of improvement in negative symptoms and the low rate of worsening of positive symptoms following 24-week (Study MIN-101C03) and 40-week (Study MIN-101C07) Open Label (“OL”) periods. With the exception of the duration of the OL period, these two studies were nearly identical with respect to patient population and main assessment tools (namely, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (“PANSS”), Personal and Social Performance Scale (“PSP”), and Clinical Global Impression (“CGI”)). As such, the data from these studies are the basis for the decision to submit the application at this stage of development as we believe they provide data to support the long-term safety and efficacy in adults in an area of high unmet medical need.
We are seeking approval for the 64 mg dose of roluperidone, and results described hereafter are for the 64 mg dose only.
Results of Study MIN-101C03 supported the primary hypothesis that after 12 weeks of treatment, roluperidone is superior to placebo in reducing negative symptoms of schizophrenia. In the primary efficacy analysis, 64 mg roluperidone resulted in a statistically significant reduction of negative symptoms of schizophrenia as measured by PANSS Pentagonal Structured Model Negative score (“PSM”) (p ≤ 0.0036). A post hoc analysis of the change from Baseline to Week 12 in the PANSS Marder’s Negative Symptoms Factor Score (“NSFS”) also demonstrated a statistically significant difference for 64 mg roluperidone compared with placebo (p ≤ 0.001). Statistically significant improvements with 64 mg roluperidone compared with placebo after 12 weeks of the Double Blind (“DB”) period were also seen for multiple secondary/exploratory efficacy analyses. Further improvements in the NSFS were also seen during the 24-week OL period.
The superiority of roluperidone over placebo was also demonstrated in Study MIN-101C07. Although the primary analysis (intent-to-treat (“ITT”)) of change from Baseline in the NSFS to Week 12 for roluperidone compared to placebo marginally missed statistical significance (p ≤ 0.064), the results were quantitatively superior for 64 mg roluperidone treatment. Furthermore, the analysis of the modified intent-to-treat (“mITT”) population (mITT data set excludes data from one clinical site with implausible results for the 17 patients recruited at this site) demonstrated a nominal statistically significant improvement in the NSFS for 64 mg roluperidone compared to placebo (p ≤ 0.044). In addition, statistically significant improvements (unadjusted) in the NSFS from Baseline were seen as early as Weeks 4 and 8 for 64 mg roluperidone compared to placebo for both the ITT and the mITT populations. PSP Total score (sole key secondary endpoint measuring vocational and social skills) reached statistical significance for both ITT and mITT populations (p ≤ 0.022 and p ≤ 0.017, respectively). Further improvements in the NSFS and PSP Total score were also seen during the 40-week OL period.
Type C Meeting
In April 2022, we received the official meeting minutes from the Type C meeting with the FDA held on March 2, 2022, in which the development of roluperidone for the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia was discussed. Four main topics (listed below) were highlighted by the FDA for which they requested input and further clarification from us. Following the meeting, we provided additional data to address:
1.
The potential impact of roluperidone administration on the efficacy and safety of antipsychotic drugs. More specifically, the psychiatric division (the “Division”) wanted reassurance that those patients administered roluperidone who manifest worsening of schizophrenia symptoms and in the opinion of the clinician/investigators need treatment with antipsychotics, do not experience a diminished benefit of the antipsychotic treatment or unexpected adverse effects.
2.
The comparability of US and non-US schizophrenia patients. More specifically, the Division wanted to be reassured that data collected in MIN-101C03 in non-US patients is applicable to US patients.
3.
Supporting statistical evidence of efficacy of roluperidone on negative symptoms.
4.
The ability of clinicians to identify patients who might benefit from roluperidone.
Seltorexant
In June 2020addition, we exercisedpreviously ourco-developed rightseltorexant towith optJanssen outPharmaceutica NV (“Janssen”), a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, for the treatment of insomnia disorder and adjunctive treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (“MDD”). As a result of our agreementcollaboration with Janssen for the future Phase 3 development and commercialization of seltorexant. Under the terms of the opt-out agreement,Janssen, we were entitled to collect royalties in the mid-single digits on potential future worldwide sales of seltorexant in certain indications, with no further financial obligations to Janssen. In January 20212021, we sold our rights to these potential royalties to Royalty Pharma plc (“Royalty Pharma”) for a $60 million cash payment and up to an additional $95 million in potential future milestone payments, subject to completion of Phase 3 trials by Janssen and regulatory approvals. The $60 million payment received from Royalty Pharma has been included onTo our balanceknowledge, sheetJanssen is currently recruiting patients under liabilitya relatedPhase to3 thetrial salewith of future royalties.seltorexant.
We have not received any regulatory approvals to commercialize any of our product candidates, and we have not generated any revenue from the sales or license of our product candidates. We routinely evaluate the status of our drug development programs as well as potential strategic options. We have incurred significant operating losses since inception and expect to continue to incur net losses and negative cash flows from operating activities for the foreseeable future. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of $688.8 million and $395.4 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we recorded net loss of $293.4 million and a net income of $1.4 million, respectively. We expect our clinical and administrative costs will increase as we begin to incur clinical trial costs and hire additional support staff to support the Phase 3 trial of roluperidone.
Recent Developments
On October 21, 2025, we entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited investors, pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell, in a private placement (the “Private Placement”), (i) 80,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Series A Preferred Stock”), at a purchase price of $1,000 per share, (ii) tranche A warrants (the “Preferred Tranche A Warrants”) to acquire shares of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Tranche A Warrant Shares”) and (iii) tranche B warrants (the “Preferred Tranche B Warrants,” together with the Preferred Tranche A Warrants, the “Preferred Warrants”) to acquire shares of Series A Preferred Stock for an aggregate offering price of up to $200 million. The closing of the Private Placement took place on October 23, 2025.
The gross proceeds of the Private Placement are estimated to be up to approximately $200 million, before deducting fees paid to the placement agent of the Private Placement and other estimated offering expenses payable by us, including initial upfront gross proceeds of $80 million in exchange for shares of the Series A Preferred Stock, up to an additional $80 million in gross proceeds if all Preferred Tranche A Warrants are exercised, subject to the terms and conditions specified therein, and up to an additional $40 million in gross proceeds if all Preferred Tranche B Warrants are exercised by cash payment upon the achievement of certain milestone event.
This private placement followed our announcement in August 2025 of our general alignment with the FDA on the design of a confirmatory Phase 3 trial of roluperidone. We expect to use the net proceeds of this private placement to fund the confirmatory Phase 3 trial of roluperidone and our resubmission of our NDA, to prepare for a potential commercial launch of roluperidone in the U.S., if approved, and for working capital and general corporate purposes.
Macroeconomic Considerations
Results of our operations have varied and may vary in the future based on the impact of changes in the domestic or global economy. Negative conditions in the general economy both in the United States and abroad, including conditions resulting from changes in inflation and fluctuations in interest rates, financial and credit market fluctuations, international trade relations and tariffs, pandemics, political turmoil, natural catastrophes and warfare in the United States or elsewhere, could negatively affect our business. It is not possible at this time to estimate the long-term impact that these and related events could have on our business, as the impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.
For further discussion of the sale of future royalties, please refer to Note 5, Sale of Future Royalties, to our financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
In 2021, we made the strategic decision to focus our limited resources on moving forward our lead drug candidate, roluperidone, and deferred the development of MIN-301 until additional resources become available. As a result of our limited resources and development deferral combined with the overall market conditions, we recognized a non-cash charge of $15.2 million as of December 31, 2021 related to the impairment of the intangible asset for MIN-301. We had previously recognized in-process research and development for MIN-301 in conjunction with the acquisition of MIN-301 during 2014. No updates were made in respect of the development of MIN-301 during 2024.
The historic direct costs relating to each of our product candidates are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Loss on issuance of convertible preferred stock and warrants consists of the loss recognized due to the issuance of Series A Preferred Stock and warrants at fair value, offset by the gross proceeds received from investors.
Warrant issuance costs are expensed as incurred and consist principally of legal, professional, and filing fees, as the warrants are classified as liabilities.
Changes in fair value of the warrant liability consist of the gain (loss) associated with the adjustment to the carrying amount of the warranty liability.
Research and development expenses were $11.9$5.8 million and $12.7$11.9 million for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively, a decrease of $0.8$6.1 million. The decrease in research and development expenses was primarily due to costs associatedincurred withduring the2024 C18for study and lower compensation expenses, partially offset by higher costs associated with oura drug substance validation campaign.campaign and safety study, as well as lower consultant fees and compensation expenses during 2025. Non-cash stock compensation costs included in research and development expenses were $0.5$0.4 million and $0.9$0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively.
General and administrative expenses were $9.9$9.3 million and $10.4$9.9 million for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively, a decrease of $0.5$0.6 million. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to lower compensation expenses, partially offset by higher professional service fees.fees and insurance costs. Non-cash stock compensation costs included in general and administrative expenses were $0.9 million andfor $1.1 million forboth the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023, respectively.2024.
Foreign exchange losses were $2$57 thousand and $40$2 thousand for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively, aan decreaseincrease of $38$55 thousand, primarily due to currency movements.
Non-cash interest expense for the sale of future royalties was $4.6 millionzero and $8.3$4.6 million for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively, a decrease of $3.7$4.6 million. The decrease in non-cash interest expense for the sale of future royalties was due to revising our estimates for the timing and amount of future royalty payments to be received under the royalty arrangement. During the third quarter of 2024,2024 webased adjustedon available data, a revision was made to the assumptions used to calculate estimated future cash flows to be received by us under the royalty purchase agreement with Royalty Pharma. Due to the reduction in future cash flow estimates, the carrying amount of ourthe liability related to the sale of future royalties was reduced from $86.6 million to the initial cash payment received of $60$60.0 million. This adjustment resulted in the recognition of $26.6 million in non-cash other income during the third quarter of 2024, representingwhich represented the amount of non-cash interest expense amortizedpreviously recognized through June 30, 2024. No further non-cash interest expense associated with the liability related to the sale of future royalties has been recognized, and as a result, no interest expense was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2024 or full year 2025.
Other income was zero and $26.6 million and zero for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively, ana increasedecrease of $26.6 million,million. The decrease in other income was due to recognizing $26.6 million in non-cash other income induring the third quarter of 2024 asdue to a resultreduction of the adjustment toin the carrying amount of the liability related to the sale of future royalties.
In conjunction with the October 2025 private placement, we issued 80,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, which was convertible into 37.8 million shares of common stock. The fair value of the Series A Preferred Stock on the date of issuance was $184.6 million, based upon the conversion ratio of the preferred shares and the closing price of the common stock on the date of issuance. In addition, we issued warrants for up to 120,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock which, if fully exercised, are convertible into 56.8 million shares of common stock. Based on the valuation model used, the fair value of the warrants on the date of issuance was calculated to be $216.9 million, which was recorded as a non-cash warrant liability. As these warrants have been classified as a liability, any unexercised and outstanding warrants are revalued at each reporting period with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in the statement of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2025, we recorded a loss on the issuance of convertible preferred stock and warrants of $321.5 million, reflecting the initial fair values of the warrants of $216.9 million and the Series A Preferred Stock of $184.6 million, offset by $80.0 million in gross proceeds received from investors. The warrant liability is decreased when warrants are exercised and the liability associated with such exercised warrants is reclassified to stockholders’ equity. The fair value of the warrant liability also decreases or increases based on the price of our common stock during the reporting period as well as any changes in other variables in the valuation model used to calculate the non-cash warrant liability.
In conjunction with the October 2025 private placement, we incurred offering issuance costs of $5.7 million, of which $2.6 million was recorded in the balance sheet as a reduction to the Series A Preferred Stock and $3.1 million as warrant issuance expense during the fourth quarter of 2025. The allocation of the offering costs was based upon the relative fair values of the Series A Preferred Stock and warrants issued in the private placement on the date of issuance.
Changes in fair value of the warrant liability were $45.4 million and zero for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, a decrease of $45.4 million. Gain (loss) on the change in fair value of the warrant liability is related to the warrants issued in conjunction with the October 2025 private placement. The fair value of the non-cash warrant liability at December 31, 2025 was calculated to be $171.5 million and, as a result, the decrease in fair value of $45.4 million for the three-month period ended December 31, 2025 was recognized as a non-cash component of other income in the statement of operations.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Largest changes
We are a clinical development-stage biopharmaceutical company. In November 2013, we merged with Sonkei Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Sonkei”), and, in February 2014, we acquired Mind-NRG Sarl (“Mind-NRG”), which were also clinical development-stage biopharmaceutical companies. Investment in biopharmaceutical product development is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that any potential product candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate effect or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval or become commercially viable. We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales to date, and we may never generate product revenue or achieve profitability. Our net loss wassee in full comparison$125.4$107.9 million and$3.8$7.0 million for thethreesix months endedMarchJune31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. As ofMarchJune31,30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately$814.2$796.7 million.
As ofsee in full comparisonMarchJune31,30, 2026, there were (i)1,559,0082,619,947 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding Series A Preferred Stock for no additional consideration, (ii)37,272,40032,826,200 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding tranche A warrants to purchase Series A Preferred Stock and (iii) 18,920,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding tranche B warrants to purchase Series A Preferred Stock. The outstanding Series A Preferred Stock is convertible any time at the option of the holder thereof subject to beneficial ownership limitations. The tranche A warrants became exercisable immediately upon issuance. The exercise of such warrants and conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock for shares of our common stock will result in further dilution of our stockholders’ investment and could negatively affect the market price of our common stock. In addition, stockholders may experience further dilution if we issue common stock, or securities convertible into common stock, in the future. As a result of this dilution, stockholders may receive significantly less than the full purchase price paid for the shares in the event of liquidation.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (3)
We are a clinical development-stage biopharmaceutical company. In November 2013, we merged with Sonkei Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Sonkei”), and, in February 2014, we acquired Mind-NRG Sarl (“Mind-NRG”), which were also clinical development-stage biopharmaceutical companies. Investment in biopharmaceutical product development is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that any potential product candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate effect or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval or become commercially viable. We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales to date, and we may never generate product revenue or achieve profitability. Our net loss was $125.4$107.9 million and $3.8$7.0 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $814.2$796.7 million.
Our operations and the historic operations of Sonkei and Mind-NRG have consumed substantial amounts of cash since inception. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and restricted cash of $78.2$75.4 million. We believe that this amount will be sufficient to meet our operating commitments for at least twelve months from the date that our interim condensed financial statements are issued.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, there were (i) 1,559,0082,619,947 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding Series A Preferred Stock for no additional consideration, (ii) 37,272,40032,826,200 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding tranche A warrants to purchase Series A Preferred Stock and (iii) 18,920,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding tranche B warrants to purchase Series A Preferred Stock. The outstanding Series A Preferred Stock is convertible any time at the option of the holder thereof subject to beneficial ownership limitations. The tranche A warrants became exercisable immediately upon issuance. The exercise of such warrants and conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock for shares of our common stock will result in further dilution of our stockholders’ investment and could negatively affect the market price of our common stock. In addition, stockholders may experience further dilution if we issue common stock, or securities convertible into common stock, in the future. As a result of this dilution, stockholders may receive significantly less than the full purchase price paid for the shares in the event of liquidation.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 versus June 30, 2025”
New heading “Research and Development Expenses”
New heading “General and Administrative Expenses”
New heading “Foreign Exchange Losses”
New heading “Investment Income”
New heading “At-the-Market Equity Offering Program”
Largest changes
“On May 27, 2026, we entered into a Sales Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Leerink Partners LLC (the “Agent”) with respect to an “at-the market” offering program, pursuant to which we may issue and sell, from time to time, shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. The issuance and sale, if any, of shares of our common stock under the Agreement will be effected pursuant to our registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. …”see in full comparison
Non-GAAP adjusted net income (loss) is defined as GAAP netsee in full comparisonloss, adjusted to exclude non-cash items related to:income (iloss)stock-based compensation expense and (ii) changes in fair value of the warrant liability. Non-GAAP adjusted net loss per share, basic and diluted, is defined as GAAP net loss per share, basic and diluted,, adjusted to exclude non-cash items related to: (i) stock-based compensation expense and (ii) changes in fair value of the warrant liability. Reconciliations of reported GAAP net income (loss) to non-GAAP adjusted netloss,incomeand reported GAAP net(lossper share, basic and diluted, to non-GAAP adjusted net loss per share, basic and diluted,) for the three and six months endedMarchJune31,30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows (inthousands, except share and per share amountsthousands):
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (44)
In connection with our interactions with the FDA subsequent to the CRL, the FDA stated that it would consider a resubmission of the NDA that included a double-blind, placebo- or active-controlled trial of roluperidone with a duration of at least 52 weeks with the efficacy primary endpoint at week 12. The FDA also advised that, to support a monotherapy indication, it would be necessary to assess relapses on an observational basis for at least 52 weeks, in patients treated in monotherapy with roluperidone or antipsychotics. We informed the FDA that best efforts will be made to secure 25-30% of patients from the United States, subject to competitive recruitment.
We submitted the protocol for the new Phase 3 confirmatory trial, which we refer to as the C19 trial, to the FDA on December 3, 2025. Consistent with the previous Phase 2b (C03) and Phase 3 (C07) clinical trials of roluperidone, the C19 trial will include patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who present with stable impairing negative symptoms and stable positive symptoms for the six months prior to entering the trial. The trial is designed to enroll 380 patients, randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive either placebo or a double-blinded single daily 64 mg dose of roluperidone.
Consistent with the previous Phase 2b (C03) and Phase 3 (C07) clinical trials of roluperidone, the new Phase 3 confirmatory trial, which we refer to as the C19 trial, will include patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who present with stable impairing negative symptoms and stable positive symptoms for the six months prior to entering the trial. We agreed with the FDA that best efforts will be made to secure 25-30% of patients from the United States, subject to competitive recruitment. The FDA confirmed that roluperidone can be studied in monotherapy where patients will receive a double-blinded single daily 64 mg dose of roluperidone or placebo. The FDA advised that, to support a monotherapy indication, it would be necessary to assess relapses on an observational basis for at least 52 weeks, in patients treated in monotherapy with roluperidone, placebo or antipsychotics. The FDA also stated that it would consider a resubmission of the NDA that included a double-blind, placebo- or active-controlled trial of roluperidone with a duration of at least 52 weeks with the efficacy primary endpoint at week 12.
On March 31, 2026, we announced that the first patient had been screened in the C19 trial. The trial is designed to enroll 380 patients, randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive either placebo or a double-blinded single daily 64 mg dose of roluperidone. The primary efficacy endpoint of the C19 trial is expected to be the change from baseline in the PANSS Marder negative symptoms factor score (“NSFS”) at 12 weeks of treatment with roluperidone compared to placebo. Following the initial 12-week treatment period, patients are expected to enter a 40-week52-week relapse assessment phase, during which patients will crossover to receive either a daily 64 mg dose of roluperidone or antipsychotics. On March 31, 2026, we announced that the first patient had been screened in the C19 trial. We currently expect topline efficacy results in the second half of 2027 and relapse assessment data in the second half of 2028.
In addition, we previously co-developed seltorexant with Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (“Janssen”), a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, for the treatment of insomnia disorder and adjunctive treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (“MDD”). As a result of our collaboration with Janssen, we were entitled to collect royalties in the mid-single digits on potential future worldwide sales of seltorexant in certain indications, with no further financial obligations to Janssen. In January 2021, we sold our rights to these potential royalties to Royalty Pharma plc (“Royalty Pharma”) for a $60 million cash payment and up to an additional $95 million in potential future milestone payments, subject to completion of Phase 3 trials by Janssen and regulatory approvals. To our knowledge, Janssen is currently recruitingconducting patients under atwo Phase 3 trialtrials with seltorexant.
We have not received any regulatory approvals to commercialize any of our product candidates, and we have not generated any revenue from the sales or license of our product candidates. We routinely evaluate the status of our drug development programs as well as potential strategic options. We have incurred significant operating losses since inception and expect to continue to incur net losses and negative cash flows from operating activities for the foreseeable future. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $814.2$796.7 million and $688.8 million, respectively. For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, we recorded net loss of $125.4$107.9 million and $3.8$7.0 million, respectively. We expect our clinical and administrative costs will increase as we begin to incur clinical trial costs and hire additional support staff to support the Phase 3 trial of roluperidone.
Changes in fair value of the warrant liability consist of the gain (loss) associated with the adjustment to the carrying amount of the warrantywarrant liability.
Comparison of Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 versus MarchJune 31,30, 2025
Research and development expenses were $5.3$7.2 million and $1.4$1.3 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of approximately $3.9$5.9 million. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to expenses related to the initiation of the C19 trial as well as higher compensation costs. Non-cash stock compensation costs included in research and development expenses were $0.7$1.0 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
General and administrative expenses were $11.4$3.5 million and $2.5$2.1 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of approximately $8.9$1.4 million. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to costs related to Mr. Race’s settlement agreement, which included a $6.6 million one-time, non-cash charge related to the modification of the terms of previously granted stock options, as well as higher professional service fees and compensation costs. Non-cash stock compensation costs included in general and administrative expenses were $8.0$1.3 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Foreign exchange losses were $2$14 thousand and $8$21 thousand for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, a decrease of $6$7 thousand, primarily due to currency movements.
Investment income was $0.6 million and $0.2$0.1 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of approximately $0.4$0.5 million, primarily due to higher cash equivalents and marketable securities balances and interest rates.balances.
Changes in fair value of the warrant liability were a lossgain of $109.4$27.6 million and zero for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, aan decreaseincrease of $109.4$27.6 million. The lossgain on the change in fair value of the warrant liability is related to the warrants issued in conjunction with the October 2025 private placement. The fair value of the non-cash warrant liability at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $278.6$232.7 million. Accordingly, we recognized a non-cash lossgain of $109.4$27.6 million for the three-month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, reflecting both the increasedecrease in fair value of the warrant liability and losses recognized upon the exercise of warrants during 2026. This non-cash lossgain was recorded within other income (expense) in the statement of operations.
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 versus June 30, 2025
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses were $12.4 million and $2.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of approximately $9.7 million. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to expenses related to the C19 trial as well as higher compensation costs. Non-cash stock compensation costs included in research and development expenses were $1.7 million and $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $14.9 million and $4.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of approximately $10.3 million. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to higher professional service fees as well as costs related to a severance agreement in the first quarter, which included a $6.6 million one-time, non-cash charge for the modification of the terms of previously granted stock options. Non-cash stock compensation costs included in general and administrative expenses were $9.2 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Foreign Exchange Losses
Foreign exchange losses were $16 thousand and $29 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, a decrease of $13 thousand, primarily due to currency movements.
Investment Income
Investment income was $1.2 million and $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of approximately $0.9 million, primarily due to higher cash equivalents and marketable securities balances.
Changes in fair value of the warrant liability were a loss of $81.8 million and zero for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, a decrease of $81.8 million. The loss on the change in fair value of the warrant liability is related to the warrants issued in conjunction with the October 2025 private placement. The fair value of the non-cash warrant liability at June 30, 2026 was $232.7 million. Accordingly, we recognized a non-cash loss of $81.8 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026, reflecting both the increase in fair value of the warrant liability and losses recognized upon the exercise of warrants during 2026. This non-cash loss was recorded within other income (expense) in the statement of operations.
Non-GAAP total liabilities is defined as GAAP total liabilities, excluding warrant liability and liability related to the sale of future royalties. Reconciliations of reported GAAP total liabilities to non-GAAP total liabilities foras theof threeJune months ended March 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 were as follows (in thousands):
Non-GAAP adjusted net income (loss) is defined as GAAP net loss, adjusted to exclude non-cash items related to:income (iloss) stock-based compensation expense and (ii) changes in fair value of the warrant liability. Non-GAAP adjusted net loss per share, basic and diluted, is defined as GAAP net loss per share, basic and diluted,, adjusted to exclude non-cash items related to: (i) stock-based compensation expense and (ii) changes in fair value of the warrant liability. Reconciliations of reported GAAP net income (loss) to non-GAAP adjusted net loss,income and reported GAAP net (loss per share, basic and diluted, to non-GAAP adjusted net loss per share, basic and diluted,) for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows (in thousands, except share and per share amountsthousands):
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $814.2$796.7 million. We anticipate that we will continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future as we continue the development and potential commercialization of our product candidates and to support our operations as a public company. We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales to date, and we may never generate product revenue or achieve profitability. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had approximately $78.2$75.4 million in cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and restricted cash, which we believe will be sufficient to meet our operating commitments for the next 12 months from the date our interim condensed financial statements are issued. Our cash requirements primarily relate to expenditures to support the development of roluperidone, which includes advancing the program through the regulatory process.
At-the-Market Equity Offering Program
On May 27, 2026, we entered into a Sales Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Leerink Partners LLC (the “Agent”) with respect to an “at-the market” offering program, pursuant to which we may issue and sell, from time to time, shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. The issuance and sale, if any, of shares of our common stock under the Agreement will be effected pursuant to our registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-294203), which became effective on March 19, 2026, and the related prospectus supplement dated May 27, 2026 (the “Prospectus Supplement”), in each case filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In accordance with the terms of the Agreement, under the Prospectus Supplement, we may offer and sell shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $75.0 million from time to time through the Agent (such program, the “ATM Offering”). No shares of common stock were sold in any ATM Offering during the three or six months ended June 30, 2026, and no proceeds have been received from the program.
On October 21, 2025, we entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited investors, pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell, in a private placement (the “Private Placement”), (i) 80,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Series A Preferred Stock”), at a purchase price of $1,000 per share, (ii) tranche A warrants (the “Preferred Tranche A Warrants”) to acquire shares of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Tranche A Warrant Shares”) and (iii) tranche B warrants (the “Preferred Tranche B Warrants,” together with the Preferred Tranche A Warrants, the “Preferred Warrants”) to acquire shares of Series A Preferred Stock for an aggregate offering price of up to $200 million. The Private Placement closed on October 23, 2025 (the “Closing Date”), pursuant to which we received aggregate gross proceeds of $80.0 million, before deducting placement agent fees, financial advisor fees, and other offering expenses. We incurred approximately $5.7 million in offering costs, including deferred issuance costs included within accounts payable as of March 31, 2026, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $74.3 million. $3.1 million of the offering costs were allocated to the Preferred Warrants, which are classified as liabilities, and expensed as incurred. $2.6 million of the offering costs attributable to the issuance of Series A Preferred Stock were recorded as a reduction of the carrying value of the Preferred Stock. On the Closing Date, we recorded a loss on issuance of convertible preferred stock and warrants of $321.5 million, reflecting the initial fair values of the Series A Preferred Stock of $184.6 million and the warrants of $216.9 million, offset by $80.0 million in gross proceeds received from investors. The value of the Series A Preferred Stock at issuance was determined based on the contractual conversion ratio multiplied by the closing price of our common stock on the Closing Date. For further discussion regarding the warrant liability and related valuation assumptions, please refer to Note 7, Warrant Liability, to our condensed consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
On December 23, 2025, following the announcement of the stockholders’ approval of the issuance of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock, we issued an aggregate of 36,280,992 shares of common stock upon the automatic conversion of an aggregate of 76,704 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in accordance with the terms set forth in the Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of the Series A Convertible Voting Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designation”). As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an aggregate of 3,296 shares of Series A Preferred Stock remain outstanding,outstanding after the automatic conversion in December 2025, which are convertible into an aggregate of 1,559,008 shares of common stock, subject to the limitations on conversion set forth in the Certificate of Designation. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock automatically converted into the number of shares of common stock at the conversion price of $2.11 per share, rounded down to the nearest whole share, subject to the terms and limitations contained in the Certificate of Designation, including that shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall not be convertible if the conversion would result in a holder beneficially owning more than 9.99% (the “Beneficial Ownership Limitation”) of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the applicable conversion date. By written notice to us, the holder may from time to time increase or decrease the Beneficial Ownership Limitation to any other percentage not in excess of 19.99% specified in such notice; provided, that any increase in the Beneficial Ownership Limitation will not be effective until the 61st day after such notice is delivered to us.
During the six months ended June 30, 2026, an additional 2,243 shares of Series A Preferred Stock became outstanding upon the exercise of Preferred Tranche A Warrants, which are convertible into an aggregate of 1,060,939 shares of common stock, subject to the limitations on conversion set forth in the Certificate of Designation.
Each Preferred Tranche A Warrant has an exercise price of $1,000 and may only be exercised for cash. The Preferred Tranche A Warrants are immediately exercisable upon issuance for an aggregate of 80,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for an aggregate cash exercise price of up to $80 million until the tenth day following the date of our public announcement that we have achieved, on a statistically significant basis, the primary endpoint of our Phase 3 confirmatory trial of roluperidone in schizophrenia at the 12-week timepoint (the “Milestone Event”). As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an aggregate of 78,80069,400 Preferred Tranche A Warrants remaining outstanding.
Each Preferred Tranche B Warrant has an exercise price of $1,000 and may be exercised by a cashless exercise. The Preferred Tranche B Warrants are exercisable for an aggregate of 40,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for an aggregate cash exercise price of up to $40 million commencing on the earlier of (i) our public announcement of the Milestone Event and (ii) the three year anniversary of the Closing Date. The Preferred Tranche B Warrants will expire on the four (4)-year anniversary of the Closing Date. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an aggregate of 40,000 Preferred Tranche B Warrants remaining outstanding.
The Preferred Warrants are subject to forfeiture in the event the applicable holder engages in any Short Sales (as defined in the Securities Purchase Agreement) involving our securities during the 48-months period following the Closing Date. In addition, the shares of common stock and/or Series A Preferred Stock, as applicable, underlying the Preferred Tranche B Warrants are subject to reduction if the applicable holder sells or transfers any shares of Series A Preferred Stock purchased on the Closing Date or shares of common stock received upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock purchased on the Closing Date, in either case before the Exercisability Date (as defined therein), except to affiliates for no consideration.
InDuring Marchthe three months ended June 30, 2026, 1,200an aggregate of 9,400 Preferred Tranche A Warrants were exercised at an exercise price of $1,000 per share, resulting in total proceeds of $1,200,000$9,400,000 to us. TheUpon warrantsexercise, were9,400 convertedshares intoof Series A Preferred Stock,Stock whichwere issued. Of these, 7,157 shares were immediately converted into 567,600an aggregate of 3,385,261 shares of our common stock.stock, Followingand thesethe exercises,remaining 78,8002,243 shares of Series A Preferred TrancheStock A Warrants remainremained outstanding.
During the six months ended June 30, 2026, an aggregate of 10,600 Preferred Tranche A Warrants were exercised at an exercise price of $1,000 per share, resulting in total proceeds of $10,600,000 to us. Upon exercise, 10,600 shares of Series A Preferred Stock were issued. Of these, 8,357 shares were immediately converted into an aggregate of 3,952,861 shares of our common stock, and the remaining 2,243 shares of Series A Preferred Stock remained outstanding.
No Preferred Tranche A Warrants were exercised during the three or six months ended June 30, 2025.
Net cash used in operating activities of approximately $5.4$18.8 million during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was primarily due to our net loss of $125.4$107.9 million,million and a $3.6 million increase in prepaid expenses, partially offset by a $109.4$81.8 million increase in fair value of the warrantywarrant liability, and a stock-based compensation expense of $8.7$11.0 million, a $1.5 million increase in accounts payable, and a $0.8 million increase in accrued expenses.million.
Net cash used in operating activities of approximately $4.1$6.1 million during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 was primarily due to our net loss of $3.8$7.0 million,million and a $1.0$0.7 million decrease in accounts payable, partially offset by stock-based compensation expense of $0.3$0.6 million, a $0.3$0.6 million decrease in prepaid expenses, and a $0.1$0.4 million increase in accrued expenses.
Net cash used in investing activities of approximately $45.3$50.1 million during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was primarily due to the purchase of marketable securities.securities of $55.1 million, partially offset by the maturity and redemption of marketable securities of $5.0 million.
Net cash used in investing activities was zero during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
Net cash provided by financing activities of approximately $1.1$11.3 million during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was primarily due to the proceeds from the exercise of Preferred Tranche A Warrants.
Net cash provided by financing activities was zero during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, our most critical accounting policies and estimates upon which our financial status depends were identified as those relating to research and development costs; goodwill; and the liability related to the sale of future royalties. We reviewed our policies and determined that those policies were our most critical accounting policies for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
NERV insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
No Form 4 stock transactions in this period.
Well-known investors holding NERV (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 533,602 | $3.0M | 0.0% | Reduced 25% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 73,300 | $406.8K | 0.0% | Reduced 18% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 25,675 | $142.5K | 0.0% | Added 20% |