NSLR 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Neostellar Capital Corp. (also NSLRL) · Nasdaq · CIK 1509470 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Risks related to our indirect exposure to the cryptocurrency markets through investments.”
New heading “Financial Institution Risk and Distress Events may have a negative impact on our business and operations.”
New heading “Changes to U.S. tariff and import/export regulations may have a negative effect on our portfolio companies and, in turn, negatively impact us.”
New heading “Technological innovations and industry disruptions, including those related to artificial intelligence and machine learning, may negatively impact us.”
Largest changes
see in full comparisonDeterioration in theGlobal economic conditionsin the Eurozoneandothergeopoliticalregions or countries globally and the resulting instability in global financial markets maytensions poseaongoingriskrisks to ourbusiness.business and portfolio companies. Financial markets have been affectedat timesby a number ofglobal macroeconomic events,factors, including: geopolitical conflicts such as thefollowing:Russia-Ukrainelarge sovereign debtswar andfiscalongoingdeficits of several countriestensions inEuropethe Middle East; instability in global energy and commodity markets; persistent inflationary pressures and central bank policy responses; economic slowdowns in major economies including China and the European Union; sovereign debt concerns in emerging markets;jurisdictions,periodiclevelsbanking sector stress and liquidity events; and the lingering structural impacts ofnon-performingpriorloansglobalondisruptions. While thebalanceacutesheets of European banks, the effectphase of theUnitedCOVID-19Kingdompandemicleavinghasthepassed,EuropeanresidualUnion,effectsinstabilityon supply chains, labor markets,in the Chinese capital marketsandbankbusinessfailures.operations continue to affect certain sectors. Global market and economic disruptions have affected, and may in the future affect,affect,the U.S. capital markets, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We cannot assureyouthat market disruptions in Europe and other regions or countries, including the increased cost of funding for certain governments and financial institutions, will not impact the global economy, and we cannot assureyou that government assistance packages or central bank interventions will beavailable,available orif available, besufficient to stabilizecountries andmarketsin Europe or elsewhereaffected byafinancialcrisis.or economic crises. To the extentuncertainty regarding anythat economicrecoveryuncertainty,ingeopoliticalEuropeinstability, orelsewherepolicy changes negativelyimpactsimpact consumer confidence,confidencebusinessand consumerinvestment, creditfactors,availability, or capital markets functioning, our and our portfolio companies’ business, financial condition and results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected. Moreover, there is a risk of both sector-specific and broad-based corrections and/or downturns in the equity and credit markets. Any of the foregoing could have a significant impact on the markets in which we operate and could have a material adverse impact on our business prospects and financial condition.
Given the ongoing and dynamic nature of recent market disruption and instability, includingsee in full comparisonituncertainty with respect to, among other things, inflationary pressures, elevated interest rates, new tariffs and trade barriers,and geopolitical conditions, including the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the ongoing conflicts in Europe and the Middle East, as well as the failure of major financial institutions,significant volatility has been introduced in the financial markets. The effect of this volatility has materially impacted and could continue to materially impact our market risks. It is difficult to predict the full impact of these conditions on our business. The extent of any such impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain, including the duration or reoccurrence of any potential business or supply chain disruption, changes in interest rates and inflation rates, global conflicts, health epidemics and pandemics and the actions taken by governments in response to these conditions.
“Our business operations rely upon secure information technology systems for data processing, storage and reporting. Despite careful security and controls design, implementation and updating, our information technology systems could become subject to cyber-attacks, including malware and computer virus attacks, unauthorized access, physical and electronic break-ins, unauthorized tampering, system failures and disruptions. …”see in full comparison
“Changes to U.S. tariff and import/export regulations may have a negative effect on our portfolio companies and, in turn, negatively impact us.”see in full comparison
“We and our portfolio companies could be exposed to the risks of AI if third-party service providers or any counterparties use AI in their business activities. We are not in a position to control the use of AI in third-party products or services. A number of jurisdictions have passed laws and implemented regulations, or are considering the same, related to the use of AI and affecting AI companies, which could limit or adversely affect our business, the impact of which is unknown. …”see in full comparison
“Technological innovations and industry disruptions, including those related to artificial intelligence and machine learning, may negatively impact us.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (43)
Investing
in our securities involves a number of significant risks. In
addition to the other information contained in this annualAnnual reportReport on Form
10-K, 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, you should
consider carefully the following information before making an investment in our securities. Although the risks described
below represent
the principal risks associated with an investment in us, they are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties
not presently
known to us might also impair our operations and performance. If any of the following events occur, our business, financial condition
condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In such case, our NAV and the trading price of our common stock
stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
A
portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants
imposed by its lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially,
termination of its loans and foreclosure on its assets, which could trigger
cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize our
investments in such portfolio company. In addition, borrowers may file for bankruptcy
protection to stay foreclosure proceedings, which could delay our ability to enforce our rights. Deterioration in a portfolio company’s
financial condition is often accompanied by a corresponding deterioration in the value of any collateral securing our investment. We may
also incur significant expenses toin theconnection extentwith necessary to seekseeking recovery of our equity investment
or to negotiatenegotiating new terms with a financially
distressed portfolio company. Any or all of these events could negativelyhave impacta material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or
results of operations.
The IPO market is, by its very nature, unpredictable, and IPO activity in particular has slowed significantly in recent years, which trend may remain for the foreseeable future. A lack of IPO opportunities for venture capital-backed companies could lead to companies staying in our portfolio longer as private entities still requiring funding. If we need to dispose of certain investments to meet liquidity requirements or other operational needs, such investments may be sold for less than their potential value. This situation may adversely affect the amount of available venture capital funding to late-stage companies that cannot complete an IPO. Such stagnation could dampen our returns or could lead to unrealized depreciation and realized losses as some companies run short of cash and have to accept lower valuations in private fundings or are not able to access additional capital at all. A lack of IPO opportunities for venture capital-backed companies may also cause some venture capital firms to change their strategies, leading some of them to reduce funding to their portfolio companies and making it more difficult for such companies to access capital. This might result in unrealized depreciation and realized losses in such companies by other investment funds, like us, who are co-investors in such companies. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve our targeted return on our portfolio company investments if, as and when they go public.
In
addition, even if a portfolio company completes an IPO, we willare typically not be ableunable to sell our position until any applicable post-IPO lock-up
lock-up restriction expires. As a result of lock-up restrictions,result, the market price of securities that we hold may decline substantially
before we are able to sell them
following an IPO. There iscan alsobe no assurance that a meaningful trading market will develop for our publicly
traded portfolio companies
following an IPOIPO, towhich allowmay uslimit our ability to liquidate our positionpositions when wedesired. desire.The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely
affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Given the experience of our executive officers and investment professionals
within the technology space, a number of the companies in which we have invested and intend to invest operate in technology-related sectors,
and as of December 31, 2024,2025, our largest industry concentrations of our total investments at fair value were in the artificial intelligence
intelligence infrastructure & applications sector, which represented approximately 27.7%30.6% of our portfolio, and the software-as-a-serviceconsumer goods & services
(“SaaS”) sector, which represented approximately 23.5%21.2% of our portfolio. Additionally, our investments in the consumersoftware-as-a-service goods(“SaaS”)
& services sector represented approximately 14.5% of our portfolio, our investments in the educational technology sector represented
approximately 13.1%19.8% of our portfolio, and our investments in the logisticseducational & supply chaintechnology sector represented approximately 11.0%
10.5% of
our portfolio. Therefore, we are susceptible to the economic circumstances and market conditions in these industries, and a downturn
in one or more of these industries could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Our investment in the SaaS
sector is subject to substantial risks. ForThe
rapid example,emergence of AI-first companies and generative AI tools poses significant competitive threats to traditional SaaS business models.
AI-native companies are increasingly launching vertical-specific applications that directly compete with established SaaS vendors, demonstrating
how AI agents and autonomous AI systems could displace traditional business applications. Our portfolio companies may face margin pressure,
customer churn, and declining recurring revenue if they fail to effectively integrate AI capabilities, differentiate their offerings from
AI-native competitors, or adapt their technology platforms to meet evolving customer expectations for AI-powered functionality. The shifting
technology landscape may require significant investment in research and development, product reimagination, and go-to-market strategy
changes that our portfolio companies may be unable or unwilling to undertake. In addition, such portfolio companies may be subject to
consumer protection laws that are enforced
by regulators such as the Federal Trade Commission and private parties, and include statutes
that regulate the collection and use of information
for marketing purposes. Any new legislation or regulations regarding the Internet,
mobile devices, software sales or export and/or the
cloud or SaaS industry, and/or the application of existing laws and regulations to
the Internet, mobile devices, software sales or export
and/or the cloud or SaaS industry, could create new legal or regulatory burdens
on these portfolio companies that could have a material
adverse effect on their respective operations. In addition, ourOur SaaS portfolio companies may
incur significant operating losses and negative
cash flows during certain times of their respective life cycles, resulting in an adverse
impact on their operations. Because our SaaS
portfolio companies are generally investments that are underwritten and valued on “recurring
revenue” rather than EBITDA,
the fair value determinations of such companies are inherently uncertain and may fluctuate over short
periods of time. They are also subject
to the risks that their customers have financial difficulties that make them unable or unwilling
to pay for the software and services
that drive a portfolio company’s recurring revenue projections.projections or may switch to lower-cost
AI-native alternatives that offer superior functionality or automation capabilities. For these reasons, our financial results could be
materially adversely
affected if our portfolio companies in the SaaS industry encounter financial difficulty.
While
we invest primarily in U.S. companies, we may invest on an opportunistic basis in certain non-U.S. companies, including those located
in emerging markets, that otherwise meet our investment criteria. In regardsregard to the regulatory requirements for BDCs, non-U.S. investments
do not qualify as investments in “eligible portfolio companies,” and thus may not be considered “qualifying assets.”
In addition, investing in foreign companies, and particularly those in emerging markets, may expose us to additional risks not typically
associated with investing in U.S. issuers. These risks include changes in exchange control regulations, political and social instability,
expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets and less available information than is generally the case in the United
States, higher transaction costs, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws, difficulty
in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price volatility. Further, we may
have difficulty enforcing our rights as equity holders in foreign jurisdictions. In addition, to the extent we invest in non-U.S. companies,
we may face greater exposure to foreign economic developments.
Risks related to our indirect exposure to the cryptocurrency markets through investments.
Cryptocurrencies (also referred to as “virtual currencies” and “digital currencies”) are digital assets that are designed to act as a medium of exchange. Although we have no current intention of directly investing in cryptocurrencies, we have indirect exposure to cryptocurrencies by investing in securities of portfolio companies with operations in the cryptocurrency industry. Cryptocurrencies (some of the most well-known include Bitcoin and Ethereum) are not backed by any government, corporation, or other identified body. Trading markets for cryptocurrencies are subject to an evolving and fragmented regulatory framework. While certain jurisdictions, such as the European Union and the United States, have recently implemented or proposed regulatory regimes, other markets remain less regulated. As a result, cryptocurrency markets may be more exposed to operational or technical issues, as well as the potential for fraud or manipulation, compared with the established, regulated exchanges for securities, derivatives, and traditional currencies.
Cryptocurrencies have been subject to significant fluctuations in value. The value of a cryptocurrency may significantly fluctuate precipitously (including declining to zero) and unpredictably for a variety of reasons, including, but not limited to: investor perceptions and expectations; regulatory changes; general economic conditions; adoption and use in the retail and commercial marketplace; public opinion regarding the environmental impact of the creation (“minting” or “mining”) of cryptocurrency; confidence in, and the maintenance and development of, its network and open-source software protocols such as blockchain for ensuring the integrity of cryptocurrency transactional data; and general risks tied to the use of information technologies, including cybersecurity risks.
From
time to time, capital markets may experience periods of disruption
and instability, including during portions of the last threerecent fiscal
years. Since 2020, the U.S. capital markets have experienced extreme volatility and disruption.
Despite actions of the U.S. federal government
and foreign governments, these types of events contribute to unpredictable general economic
conditions that materially and adversely
impact the broader financial and credit markets and reduce the availability of debt and equity
capital for the market as a whole. These
conditions could continue for a prolonged period of time or worsen in the future.
Given
the ongoing and dynamic nature of recent market disruption and instability,
including ituncertainty with respect to, among other things, inflationary pressures, elevated interest rates, new tariffs and trade barriers,and
geopolitical conditions, including the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the ongoing conflicts in Europe and the Middle East,
as well as the failure of major financial institutions,significant volatility has been introduced in the financial markets. The effect
of this volatility has materially impacted and could continue to materially impact our market risks. It is difficult to predict the full
impact of these conditions
on our business. The extent of any such impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain,
including the duration
or reoccurrence of any potential business or supply chain disruption, changes in interest rates and inflation rates,
global conflicts,
health epidemics and pandemics and the actions taken by governments in response to these conditions.
Volatility
and dislocation in the capital markets can also create a challenging environment in which to raise or access debt capital, and our ability
to incur indebtedness (including by issuing preferred stock) is limited by applicable regulations such that our asset coverage (as defined
in the 1940 Act) must equal at least 200% (or 150% if certain requirements are met) immediately after each time we incur indebtedness.
The continuance or reappearance of market conditions similar to those experienced during portions of the last threerecent fiscal years for
any substantial length of time could make it difficult to extend the maturity of or refinance our existing indebtedness or obtain new
indebtedness with similar terms and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business. The debt capital that
will be available to us in the future, if at all, may be at a higher cost and on less favorable terms and conditions than what we currently
experience, including being at a higher cost in rising rate environments. If we are unable to raise or refinance debt, then our equity
investors may not benefit from the potential for increased returns on equity resulting from leverage and we may be limited in our ability
to make new commitments or to fund existing commitments to our portfolio companies. An inability to extend the maturity of, or refinance,
our existing indebtedness or obtain new indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results
of operations.
Significant
volatility and disruption,disruption has had, and in the future may have, a negative effect on the valuations of our investments and on the potential
for liquidity events involving these investments. While most of our investments are not publicly traded, applicable accounting standards
require us to assume, as part of our valuation process, that our investments are sold in orderly mark-to-market transactions between
market participants. As a result, volatility in the capital markets can adversely affect our investment valuations.
Financial Institution Risk and Distress Events may have a negative impact on our business and operations.
An investment in us is subject to the risk that one or more of our banks, brokers, hedging counterparties, lenders or other custodians of some or all of our assets (each, a “Financial Institution”) may fail to perform its obligations or experience insolvency, closure, receivership or other financial distress or difficulty, similar to that experienced by Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank in March 2023 (each, a “Distress Event”). Distress Events can be caused by various factors,including eroding market sentiment, significant withdrawals, fraud, malfeasance, poor performance or accounting irregularities. In the event a Financial Institution experiences a Distress Event, we may not be able to access deposits, borrowing facilities or other services for an extended period of time or at all. Although assets held by regulated Financial Institutions in the United States frequently are insured up to stated balance amounts by organizations such as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), in the case of banks, or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”), in the case of certain broker-dealers, amounts in excess of the relevant insurance limits are subject to risk of loss, and any non-U.S. Financial Institutions that are not subject to similar regimes pose increased risk of loss. In the event of a failure of a banking institution, access to our bank accounts could be restricted and FDIC protection may not be available for balances in excess of amounts insured by the FDIC (and similar considerations may apply to banking institutions in other jurisdictions not subject to FDIC protection). In such instances, we may not recover such excess, uninsured amounts and instead would only have an unsecured claim against the banking institution and participate pro rata with other unsecured creditors in the residual value of the banking institution’s assets. In addition, we may not be able to identify all potential solvency or stress concerns with respect to a Financial Institution or to transfer assets from one Financial Institution to another in a timely manner in the event a Financial Institution comes under stress or fails. Although in recent years governmental intervention has resulted in additional protections for depositors, there can be no assurance that governmental intervention will be successful or avoid the risk of loss, substantial delays or negative impact on banking or brokerage conditions or markets.
Distress Events affecting Financial Institutions may also adversely impact our portfolio companies, which may maintain deposits or banking relationships with such institutions. Banking disruptions affecting portfolio companies could impair their ability to access working capital, make payroll, meet operating expenses or service their obligations to us, which could result in defaults, reduced valuations or credit losses.Any such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The U.S. Federal Reserve
decreased the federal funds rate multiple times in 2024 afterFollowing a sustained period of historicallyelevated highinterest rates.rates implemented to address inflation
concerns, the Federal Reserve commenced a cycle of interest rate reductions in late 2024, with the most recent cut occurring in the fourth
quarter of 2025. The Feder Reserve has indicated that additional rate cuts may occur in the future; however, future reductions to benchmark
rates are not certain. We may borrow money and issue
debt securities or preferred stock to make investments, and if we do so, our net
investment income will be dependent upon the difference
between the rate at which we borrow funds or pay interest or dividends on such
debt securities or preferred stock and the rate at which
we invest these funds. While we are principally invested in the equity and equity-related
securities of our portfolio companies, to the
extent we have debt investments with floating rates, in periods of declining interest rates,
we may earn less interest income from investments
and our cost of funds will also decrease. Conversely,While a decrease in periodsinterest rates may reduce
our borrowing costs, it could also reduce the portfolio yield on our floating-rate investments, thereby decreasing our net income. Conversely,
any future increase in interest rates could decrease the value of risingany investments we hold which earn fixed interest rates,rates and could also
increase our our interest incomeexpense, thereby decreasing our net income. Additionally, fluctuations in interest rates available to investors
could make an investment in our common stock less attractive if we are not able to pay dividends at a level that provides a similar return,
which could reduce the value of our common stock. Further, changes in interest rates could also adversely affect our performance if such
changes cause our borrowing costs to rise at a rate in excess of the rate that our investments yield. It is possible that the Federal
Reserve’s recent interest rate reductions could also result in increased inflation, which may necessitate a return to a more restrictive
monetary policy or otherwise adversely affect the operating results of our portfolio companies, either of which could have a material
adverse effect on theseour investmentsbusiness, will
increase.results of operations and financial condition. There can be no assurance that a significant change in
market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our
net investment income.
In
the past, instability in the global capital markets resulted in disruptions in liquidity in the debt capital markets, significant
write-offs write-offs
in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated credit market and the failure
of major domestic
and international financial institutions. In particular, in past periods of instability, the financial services
sector was negatively
impacted by significant write-offs as the value of the assets held by financial firms declined, impairing
their capital positions and
abilities to lend and invest. In addition, continued uncertainty surrounding the negotiation ofinternational trade deals between the United Kingdom
and the European Union following the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union and tensions uncertainty between the United
States and other countries, including China and Russia, with respect to trade policies, treaties, sanctions, and tariffs, among other factors, have
caused disruption in the global markets. There can be no assurance that
market conditions will not worsen in the future.
Certain
of our portfolio companies may be impacted by inflation. If such portfolio companies are unable to pass any increases in their costs
along to their customers, it could adversely affect their results, which could in turn adversely impact our results of operations.
In In
addition, any projected future decreases in our portfolio companies’ operating results due to inflation could adversely
impact impact
the fair value of our investments.investments particularly if interest rates rise in response to inflation. Any decreases in the fair
value of our investments could result in future unrealized losses and therefore
reduce our net assets resulting from operations. See
“—We are exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates.”
Conversely,
“anti-ESG”
sentiment has gained momentum across the U.S., with a growing number of states, federal agencies, the executive
branch and Congress having
enacted, proposed or indicated an intent to pursue “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or issued
related legal opinions and engaged
in related investigations and litigation. If investors subject to “anti-ESG” legislation
view our investment activities as
being in contradiction of such “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or legal opinions, such
investors may not invest in us and
it could negatively impact the price of our common stock. In addition, corporate diversity, equity
and inclusion (“DEI”) practices
have recently come under increasing scrutiny. For example, some advocacy groups and federal
and state officials have asserted that the
U.S. Supreme Court’s decision striking down race-based affirmative action in higher
education in June 2023 should be analogized
to private employment matters and private contract matters and several media campaigns and
cases alleging discrimination based on such
arguments have been initiated since the decision. Additionally, in January 2025, President
Trump signed a number of Executive Orders focused
on DEI, which indicate continued scrutiny of DEI initiatives and potential related
investigations of certain private entities with respect
to DEI initiatives, including publicly traded companies. If we do not successfully
manage expectations across varied stakeholder interests,
it could erode stakeholder trust, impact our reputation and constrain our investment
opportunities. Such scrutiny of both ESG and DEI
related practices could expose our investment adviserus to the risk of litigation, investigations
or challenges by federal or state authorities
or result in reputational harm.
There
is also regulatory interest across jurisdictions in improving transparency regarding the definition, measurement
and disclosure of
ESG factors in order to allow investors to validate and better understand sustainability claims. For example, the SEC sometimes
sometimes reviews compliance with ESG commitments in examinations and has taken enforcement actions against registered investment advisers for
for not establishing adequate or consistently implementing ESG policies and procedures to meet ESG commitments to investors. In March
2024, the SEC adopted rules aimed at enhancing and standardizing climate-related disclosures; however, these rules are stayed pending
the outcome of consolidated legal challenges in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. At the
state level, in October 2023, California enacted
legislation (Senate Bills 253 and 261) that will ultimatelywould require certain
companies that do business in California to publicly disclose their Scopes 1, 2, and
3 greenhouse gas emissions, with third party
assurance of such data, and issue public reports on their climate-related financial risk
and related mitigation measures. As of November 2025, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has granted a temporary injunction of SB 261 (requiring climate-related
financial risk reporting), while SB 253 (requiring greenhouse gas emissions disclosure) remains in force with initial compliance deadlines
anticipated in 2026, subject to ongoing legal challenges. Compliance with any of these new laws or regulations increasescould increase our regulatory burden and could result in increased
legal, accounting and compliance
costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly, affect the manner in which we
or our portfolio companies
conduct our businesses and adversely affect our profitability.
Changes to U.S. tariff and import/export regulations may have a negative effect on our portfolio companies and, in turn, negatively impact us.
The U.S. government has imposed, and may in the future increase, tariffs on certain countries and commodities. In response, certain foreign trading partners have imposed, and may continue to impose, retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. goods. Although the Supreme Court recently invalidated the tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”), certain tariff rates and obligations established through trade agreements negotiated while IEEPA tariffs were in effect remain in force. In addition, the current administration has announced widely applicable tariffs pursuant to other statutory authorities, including the Trade Act of 1974, effective February 24, 2026, and has indicated that it will continue seeking to impose tariffs through additional statutory authorities. The scope and implications of the Supreme Court’s decision may create further market uncertainty, including with respect to the availability of refunds for tariffs previously collected under IEEPA and the imposition of new tariffs under alternative authorities.
These developments have created significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States and various other countries with respect to trade policies, treaties and the imposition of new or increased tariffs.Such developments, or the continued uncertainty relating to U.S. trade policies,could have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets, and may reduce global trade and, in particular, trade between the impacted nations and the United States. The uncertainty relating to U.S. trade policies has also contributed to increased market volatility. Any of these factors could depress economic activity,restrict our portfolio companies’ access to suppliers or customers, increase costs, decrease margins and reduce the competitiveness of products and services offered by our portfolio companies.These factors may adversely affect the revenues and profitability of such portfolio companies and, in turn, negatively affect our results of operations, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. The ultimate impact of these or similar future events on the United States and other economies, specific industries, our business or our portfolio companies cannot be predicted with certainty; however, any such impact could be material and adverse to us.
Under
the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a BDC, to issue
senior securities only in amounts such that our asset coverage ratio
equals at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities (or 150% if certain requirements are metsatisfied).
after each issuance of senior securities. If the value of our assets declines,
we may be unable to satisfy this test and we may be required
to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our
leverage, repay a portion of our senior securities at a time
when such sales may be disadvantageous.
We
may in the future issue additional debt securities or preferred stock and/or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions,
institutions, which we refer to collectively (along with the 6.00% Notes due 2026 and the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029) as “senior securities,”
up to the
maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a BDC, to issue senior
securities in amounts such that our asset coverage ratio, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% (or 150% if certain conditions
requirements are metsatisfied) of gross assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, after each
issuance of senior securities.
If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this test. If that happens, we may
be required to sell a portion of
our investments and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a portion of our indebtedness
at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous.
Furthermore, any amounts that we use to service our indebtedness would not be
available for distributions to our common stockholders.
We
have elected to be taxed for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. If we meet certain requirements,
requirements, including source of income, asset diversification and distribution requirements, and if we continue to operate as a
BDC, we will continue
to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC under the Code and will not be subject to U.S. income taxes on income we
distribute to our stockholders
as dividends, allowing us to substantially reduce or eliminate our U.S. federal income tax liability.
As a BDC, we are generally required
to meet a coverage ratio of total assets to total senior securities, which includes all of our
borrowings and any preferred stock we
may issue in the future, of at least 200% (or 150% if certain requirementsconditions are metsatisfied) at the
time we issue any debt or preferred stock.
This requirement limits the amount that we may borrow. Because we will continue to need
capital to grow our investment portfolio, this
limitation may prevent us from incurring debt or issuing preferred stock and require
us to raise additional equity at a time when it
may be disadvantageous to do so. We cannot assure you that debt and equity financing
will be available to us on favorable terms, or at
all, and debt financings may be restricted by the terms of any of our outstanding
borrowings. In addition, as a BDC, we are generally
not permitted to issue common stock priced below NAV without
stockholder approval. If additional funds are not available to us, we could
be forced to curtail or cease new lending and investment
activities, and our NAV could decline.
On
or after December 30, 2024, weWe may choose to redeem the 6.00% Notes due 2026 from time to time, especially
if prevailing interest rates
are lower than the rate borne by the 6.00% Notes due 2026. If prevailing rates are lower at the time of redemption,
and we redeem the
6.00% Notes due 2026, a holder likely would not be able to reinvest the redemption proceeds in a comparable security
at an effective
interest rate as high as the interest rate on the 6.00% Notes due 2026 being redeemed. Our redemption right also may adversely
impact impact
a holder’s ability to sell the 6.00% Notes due 2026 as the optional redemption date or period approaches.
The possibility
possibility that our shares will trade at a discount from NAV or at premiums that are unsustainable are risks separate and distinct from
the risk
that our NAV per share will decrease. The risk of purchasing shares of a BDC that might trade at a discount or unsustainable premium
premium is more pronounced for investors who wish to sell their shares in a relatively short period of time because, for those investors, realization
realization of a gain or loss on their investments is likely to be more dependent upon changes in premium or discount levels than upon increases
increases or decreases in NAV per share. As of March 11,10, 2025,2026, the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market
was $5.27$9.68 per share, which represented an approximately 21.1%19.7% discountpremium to our NAV of $6.68$8.09 per share as of December 31, 2024.2025.
Concerns about U.S. fiscal policy, including federal debt levels, budget
deficits, and recurring debates over the debt ceiling, could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact
both the perception of credit risk associated with our debt portfolio and our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms. Downgrades
by rating agencies to the U.S. government’s credit rating or concerns about its credit and deficit levels in general could cause
interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact both the perception of credit risk associated with our debt portfolio
and our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms. In addition, a decreased U.S. government credit ratingcreditworthiness could create broader
financial turmoil
and uncertainty, which may weigh heavily on our financial performance and the value of our common stock.
Deterioration
in theGlobal economic conditions in the Eurozone and othergeopolitical regions or countries globally and the resulting instability in global financial
markets maytensions pose aongoing risk risks
to our business.business and portfolio companies. Financial markets have been affected at times by a number of global macroeconomic events,factors, including: geopolitical conflicts
such as the following:Russia-Ukraine large sovereign debtswar and fiscalongoing deficits of several countriestensions in Europethe Middle East; instability in global energy and commodity markets; persistent
inflationary pressures and central bank policy responses; economic slowdowns in major economies including China and the European Union;
sovereign debt concerns in emerging markets; jurisdictions,periodic levelsbanking sector stress and liquidity events; and the lingering structural impacts
of non-performingprior loansglobal ondisruptions. While the balanceacute sheets of European banks, the effectphase of the UnitedCOVID-19 Kingdompandemic leavinghas thepassed, Europeanresidual Union,effects instabilityon supply chains, labor markets,
in the Chinese capital markets and bankbusiness failures.operations continue to affect certain sectors. Global market and economic disruptions have affected, and may in the future
affect, affect,
the U.S. capital markets, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We cannot assure you
that market disruptions in Europe and other regions or countries, including the increased cost of funding for certain governments and
financial institutions, will not impact the global economy, and we cannot assure you that government assistance packages or central bank interventions will be available,available or if
available, be sufficient to stabilize countries and markets in Europe or elsewhere affected by a
financial crisis.or economic crises. To the extent uncertainty
regarding anythat economic recoveryuncertainty, ingeopolitical Europeinstability, or elsewherepolicy changes negatively impactsimpact consumer
confidence, confidencebusiness and consumerinvestment, credit factors,availability, or capital markets functioning, our and our
portfolio companies’ business,
financial condition and results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected. Moreover,
there is a risk of both sector-specific
and broad-based corrections and/or downturns in the equity and credit markets. Any of the foregoing
could have a significant impact on
the markets in which we operate and could have a material adverse impact on our business prospects
and financial condition.
The
TrumpChanges Administrationin haspresidential administrations have called for significant changes
to U.S. trade, healthcare, immigration, foreign and government regulatory policy. Following the 2024 presidential election and transition
Into thisa regard,new administration in January 2025, there is significant uncertainty with respect to legislation, regulation and government policy
at the federal level,
as well as the state and local levels. RecentPolicy eventsshifts associated with changes in administrations have created a climate
of heightened uncertainty and introduced new and difficult-to-quantify
macroeconomic economic and political risks with potentially far-reaching implications.
There has been a corresponding meaningful increase in the
uncertainty surrounding interest rates, inflation, foreign exchange rates, trade
volumes and fiscal and monetary policy. To the extent
the U.S. Congress or the current administration implements changes to U.S. policy,
those changes may impact, among other things, the
U.S. and global economy, international trade and relations, unemployment, immigration,
corporate taxes, healthcare, the U.S. regulatory
environment, inflation and other areas. For example, the current administration has announced
or implemented policies affecting tariffs, trade relationships, federal agency operations, DEI initiatives, environmental regulations,
and financial services oversight, which may affect our business and portfolio companies.
A
particular area identified as subject to potential change, amendment
or repeal includes the Dodd-Frank Act, including the Volcker Rule
and various swaps and derivatives regulations, credit risk retention
requirements and the authorities of the Federal Reserve, the Financial
Stability Oversight Council and the SEC. Additionally, changes
to the structure, funding, or priorities of federal regulatory agencies, including the SEC, could affect the regulatory environment in
which we operate. Given the uncertainty associated with the manner in which and whether the provisions of the
Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented,
repealed, amended, or replaced, the full impact such requirements will have on our business, results
of operations or financial condition
is unclear. The changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act or any changes to the regulations already
implemented thereunder may require
us to invest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make necessary changes
in order to comply with new statutory
and regulatory requirements. Failure to comply with any such laws, regulations or principles, or
changes thereto, may negatively impact
our business, results of operations or financial condition. While we cannot predict what effect
any changes in the laws or regulations
or their interpretations would have on us as a result of recent financial reform legislation,
legislation or future policy changes, these changes could be
materially adverse to us and our stockholders.
Cybersecurity incidents and cyber-attacks have been occurring globally at a more frequent and severe level, and will likely continue to increase in frequency in the future. The rapid evolution and scale of artificial intelligence technologies also may increase the likelihood or effectiveness of cyber-attacks. The occurrence of a disaster, such as a cyber-attack against us or against a third party that has access to our data or networks, a natural catastrophe, an industrial accident, failure of our disaster recovery systems, or consequential employee error, could have an adverse effect on our ability to communicate or conduct business, negatively impacting our operations and financial condition. This adverse effect can become particularly acute if those events affect our electronic data processing, transmission, storage, and retrieval systems, or impact the availability, integrity, or confidentiality of our data.
Our business operations rely upon secure information technology systems for data processing, storage and reporting. Despite careful security and controls design, implementation and updating, our information technology systems could become subject to cyber-attacks, including malware and computer virus attacks, unauthorized access, physical and electronic break-ins, unauthorized tampering, system failures and disruptions. Network, system, application and data breaches could result in operational disruptions, information misappropriation, theft, publication, deletion or modification of private and sensitive information (including nonpublic personal information related to stockholders and material non-public information), damage to our reputation, financial losses, litigation, regulatory penalties, customer dissatisfaction or loss, and increased costs associated with mitigation and remediation. We and our portfolio companies are subject to numerous laws and regulations relating to privacy and data protection. The scope of data protection and privacy laws and regulations is rapidly evolving and subject to differing interpretations. Any inability or perceived inability to adequately address privacy concerns or comply with applicable laws and regulations could result in regulatory and third-party liability, increased costs, disruption to operations, and reputational damage.
Our
business operations rely upon secure information technology systems for data processing, storage and reporting. Despite careful security
and controls design, implementation and updating, our information technology systems could become subject to cyber-attacks. Network,
system, application and data breaches could result in operational disruptions or information misappropriation, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We
depend heavily upon computer systems to perform necessary business functions.
Despite our implementation of a variety of security measures,
our computer systems could be subject to cyber-attacks and unauthorized access, such as physical and electronic break-ins or unauthorized
tampering.access. Like other companies, we may experience threats to our data and systems,systems including malware and computer virus attacks, unauthorized
access, system failures and disruptions. If one or more of these events occurs, itthat could potentially jeopardize the confidential, proprietary
and other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks, or otherwise cause interruptions
or malfunctions in our operations, which could result in damage to our reputation, financial losses, litigation, increased costs, regulatory
penalties and/or customer dissatisfaction or loss, reputational damage, and increased costs associated with mitigation of damages and
remediation. If unauthorized parties gain access to such information and technology systems, they may be able to steal, publish, delete
or modify private and sensitive information, including nonpublic personal information related to stockholders (and their beneficial owners)
and material non-public information.operations. The systems we have implemented to manage cybersecurity risks relating to these types of events could prove to
be inadequate and, if
compromised, could become inoperable for extended periods of time, cease to function properly or fail to adequately
secure private information.
Breaches such as those involving covertly introduced malware, impersonation of authorized users and industrial
or other espionage may
not be identified even with sophisticated prevention and detection systems, potentially resulting in further harm
and preventing them
from being addressed appropriately. The failure of these systems or of disaster recovery plans for any reason could
cause significant
interruptions in our operations and result in a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive
data, including personal information relating to stockholders, material non-public information and other sensitive information in our
possession.data.
In
addition, cybersecurity has become a top priority for regulators around the world, and some jurisdictions have enacted laws requiring
companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving certain types of personal data. If we fail to comply with the relevant
laws and regulations, we could suffer financial losses, a disruption of our businesses, liability to investors, regulatory intervention
or reputational damage.
Technological innovations and industry disruptions, including those related to artificial intelligence and machine learning, may negatively impact us.
There continues to be significant evolution and developments in the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning technology (“AI”), such as ChatGPT. We cannot fully determine the impact or cybersecurity risk of such evolving technology to our business at this time. AI has the potential to result in significant and disruptive changes in companies, sectors or industries, including those in which we invest, and any such changes could render our models obsolete or create new and unpredictable operational, legal and/or regulatory risks. We may incorporate, directly or through third-party vendors, the use of AI into our business and operations, and anticipate that usage and adoption of AI in the marketplace will continue to grow.
As with many disruptive innovations, AI presents risks and challenges that could affect its accuracy, adoption and therefore our business. While we intend the use of any AI to make processes more efficient, AI models may not achieve sufficient levels of accuracy. AI algorithms may be flawed, the datasets on which such algorithms are trained may be insufficient, raise privacy concerns or contain biased information, and AI could provide results that contain, in whole or in part, inaccurate information, which may be difficult to identify. It may be difficult or impossible to modify such AI to eliminate these occurrences. Any such inaccuracies or errors could undermine the decisions, predictions or analysis AI applications produce, subjecting us to competitive harm, legal liability, and brand or reputational harm. Conversely, to the extent competitors utilize AI more extensively than we and our portfolio companies, there is a possibility that such competitors will gain a competitive advantage.
We and our portfolio companies could be exposed to the risks of AI if third-party service providers or any counterparties use AI in their business activities. We are not in a position to control the use of AI in third-party products or services. A number of jurisdictions have passed laws and implemented regulations, or are considering the same, related to the use of AI and affecting AI companies, which could limit or adversely affect our business, the impact of which is unknown. Further, we may not be able to control how third-party AI technologies that we choose to use are developed or maintained, or how data we input is used or disclosed, even where we have sought contractual protections with respect to these matters. Use of AI could include the input of confidential information (including material non-public information) in contravention of applicable policies, contractual or other obligations or restrictions, resulting in such confidential information becoming part of a dataset that is accessible by other third-party AI applications and users. The misuse or misappropriation of our data could have an adverse impact on our reputation and could subject us to legal and regulatory investigations and/or actions. AI and its applications, including in the private investment and financial sectors, are likely to continue to develop rapidly, and it is impossible to predict the future risks that may arise from such developments.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Year Ended December 31, 2025”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2023”
Removed heading “For the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023”
Removed heading “For the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “For the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023”
Removed heading “For the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “For the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023”
Removed heading “For the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “For the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023”
Removed heading “For the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “Modified Dutch Auction Tender Offer”
Removed heading “6.00% Notes Due 2026 - Note Repurchase Program”
Removed heading “6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029”
Largest changes
“For the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023”see in full comparison
“For the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022”see in full comparison
“For the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023”see in full comparison
“For the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022”see in full comparison
“For the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023”see in full comparison
“For the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (56)
We
are an internally managed, non-diversified closed-end management investment
company that has elected to be regulated as a business development
company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act,Act”), and has elected to be
treated, and intends to qualify annually,
as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Code.Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
Our
investment objective is to maximize our portfolio’s total return, principally by seeking capital gains on our equity and equity-related
investments, and to a lesser extent, income from debt investments. We invest principally in the equity securities of what we believe
to be rapidly growing venture capital-backed emerging companies. We acquire our investments through direct investments in prospective
portfolio companies, secondary marketplaces for private companies, negotiations with selling stockholders, and through investments in
special purpose vehicles (“SPVs”) and investment funds that invest directly in the equity or debt of a single private issuer.
In addition, we may invest in private credit and in the founders equity, founders warrants, venture capital investment funds, and private
investment in public equity (“PIPE”) transactions of SPACs.special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”). We may
also invest on an opportunistic basis in select publicly traded equity securities or certain non-U.S. companies that otherwise meet our
investment criteria, subject to applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. To the extent we make investments insecurities, private equity funds and
hedge funds that are excluded
from the definition of “investment company” under the 1940 Act by Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7)
of the 1940 Act, weor willcertain
non-U.S. limitcompanies suchthat investmentsotherwise meet our investment criteria, subject to noapplicable more than 15%requirements of ourthe net1940 assets.Act.
Our
investment philosophy
is based on a disciplined approach of identifying promising investments in high-growth, venture-backed
companies across several key
industry themes which may include, among others, Software-as-a-Service, Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure & Applications,
Consumer Goods &
Services, Education Technology, Logistics & Supply Chain,Software-as-a-Service, Financial Technology & Services, and SuRo
Sports.Logistics & Supply Chain. Our investment decisions are based on a disciplined analysis of available information regarding each potential
portfolio portfolio
company’s business operations, focusing on the portfolio company’s growth potential, the quality of recurring
revenues, revenues,
and path to profitability, as well as an understanding of key market fundamentals. Venture capital funds or other
institutional institutional
investors have invested in the vast majority of companies we evaluate.
On
and effective March 12, 2019, our Board of Directors approved our Internalization, and we began operating
as an internally managed non-diversified
closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a BDC under the
1940 Act. Our Board of Directors approved
the Internalization in order to better align the interests of our stockholders with its management.
As an internally managed BDC, we
are managed by our employees, rather than the employees of an external investment adviser, thereby allowing
for greater transparency to stockholders through robust disclosure regarding our compensation structure.adviser. As a result of the Internalization,
we no longer pay
any fees or expenses under an investment advisory agreement or administration agreement, and instead pay the operating
costs associated
with employing investment management professionals including, without limitation, compensation expenses related to salaries, discretionary
discretionary bonuses and restricted stock grants.
Year Ended December 31, 2025
The value of our investment portfolio will change over time due to changes in the fair value of our underlying investments, as well as changes in the composition of our portfolio resulting from purchases of new and follow-on investments and the sales of existing investments. The fair value as of December 31, 2025 of all of our portfolio investments was $225,511,505.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, we funded investments in an aggregate amount of $11,552,884 (not including capitalized transaction costs) as shown in the following table:
During the year ended December 31, 2025, we capitalized fees of $508,743.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, we exited or received proceeds from investments in the amount of $61,314,345, net of transaction costs, and realized a net gain on investments of $33,223,557 (including adjustments to amounts held in escrow receivable) as shown in following table:
During the year ended December 31, 2025, we wrote-off our investment in Rebric, Inc. (d/b/a Compliable) following its dissolution.
Year
Ended December 31, 2023
The
value of our investment portfolio will change over time due to changes in the fair value of our underlying investments, as well as changes
in the composition of our portfolio resulting from purchases of new and follow-on investments and the sales of existing investments.
The fair value, as of December 31, 2023, of all of our portfolio investments, excluding short-term U.S. Treasury bills, was $184,081,249.
During
the year ended December 31, 2023, we funded investments in an aggregate amount of $25,766,162 (not including capitalized transaction
costs or investments in short-term U.S. Treasury bills) as shown in the following table:
During
the year ended December 31, 2023, we capitalized fees of $49,269.
During
the year ended December 31, 2023, we exited or received proceeds from investments in the amount of $17,338,100, net of transaction costs,
and realized a net loss on investments of $11,947,504 (including adjustments to amounts held in escrow receivable) as shown in following
table:
During
the year ended December 31, 2023, our OneValley, Inc. (f/k/a NestGSV, Inc.) Series B preferred warrants with a strike price of $2.31
expired on December 31, 2023.
Investment income decreased to $1,686,298 for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $4,673,427 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The net decrease between periods was primarily due to the cessation of interest income from short-term U.S. Treasury bills, in addition to no longer receiving interest income from Architect Capital PayJoy SPV, LLC following the redemption of our investment in June 2024. Additional decreases were related to a decrease in interest income from interest accruals on our debt investment in Xgroup Holdings Limited (d/b/a Xpoint), a decrease in dividend income from CW Opportunity 2 LP, and a decrease in dividend income from Aventine Property Group, Inc. due to the pause placed on their declaration of dividends that began in August 2024, in addition to a decrease in dividend income from Treehouse Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. The decreases were offset by an increase in interest accruals on our investment in the Supplying Demand, Inc. (d/b/a Liquid Death) Convertible Note and an increase in interest income received on cash during the year ended December 31, 2025, relative to the year ended December 31, 2024.
For
the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023
For
the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022
Investment
income increased to $6,596,780 for the year ended December 31, 2023 from $3,456,193 for the year ended December 31, 2022. The net increase
between periods was due to increases in interest income from U.S. Treasury Bills and interest on idle cash, plus an increase in dividend
income from SPBRX, INC. (f/k/a GSV Sustainability Partners, Inc.). The increase was offset by a decrease in interest income from Architect
Capital PayJoy SPV, LLC, Residential Homes for Rent, LLC (d/b/a Second Avenue), and a decrease in dividend income from NewLake Capital
Partners, Inc. (f/k/a GreenAcreage Real Estate Corp.) during the year ended December 31, 2023, relative to the year ended December 31,
2022.
Total operating expenses decreased to $18,194,942 for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $18,624,714 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in operating expense was primarily due to decreases in compensation expense, professional fees, and other expenses, in addition to a decrease in income tax expense due to the receipt of a prior year tax refund. These decreases were partially offset by increases in interest expense and directors’ fees during the year ended December 31, 2025, relative to the year ended December 31, 2024.
For
the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023
For
the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022
Total
operating expenses increased to $20,036,389 for the year ended December 31, 2023 from $18,164,201 for the year ended December 31, 2022.
The increase in operating expense was primarily due to an increase in compensation expense associated with an increased headcount and
stock-based compensation expense, and income tax expense related to blocker corporations, offset by a decrease in professional fees during
the year ended December 31, 2023, relative to the year ended December 31, 2022.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized a net investment loss of $16,508,644, compared to a net investment loss of $13,951,287 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The change between periods resulted from a decrease in total investment income and operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2025, relative to the year ended December 31, 2024.
For
the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023
For
the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022
For
the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized a net investment loss of $13,439,609, compared to a net investment loss of $14,708,008
for the year ended December 31, 2022. The change between periods resulted from an increase in total investment income, offset by an increase
in operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2023, relative to the year ended December 31, 2022.
Net Realized Gain/(Loss) on Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized a net realized gain on our investments of $33,223,557, compared to a net realized loss of $5,020,314 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The components of our net realized gains or losses on portfolio investments for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, excluding short-term U.S. Treasury bills and fluctuations in escrow receivables estimates, are reflected in the tables above, under “—Portfolio and Investment Activity.”
For the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023
For the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022
For
the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized a net realized loss on our investments of $11,947,504, compared to a net realized loss
of $5,905,453 for the year ended December 31, 2022. The components of our net realized losses on portfolio investments for the year ended
December 31, 2023 and 2022, excluding short-term U.S. Treasury bills and fluctuations in escrow receivables estimates, are reflected
in the tables above, under “—Portfolio and Investment Activity.”
For
the year ended December 31, 2025, we had a net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of $32,114,638. For the year ended December
31, 2024, we had a net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of $(18,968,978). For the year ended December
31, 2023, we had a net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of $30,453,935. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we had
a net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of $(111,563,592).$30,453,935. The following tables summarize, by portfolio company, the significant
changes in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of our investment portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, 2023, and 2022.2023.
Our
liquidity and capital resources are generated primarily from the sales of our investmentsinvestments, recent private convertible debt issuances, and the net proceeds from public offerings
of our equity and debt securities, including pursuant to our continuous at-the-market offering of shares of our common stock as discussed
discussed below under “Equity Issuances and Debt Capital Activities — At-the-Market Offering”. InOn addition, on
December 17, 2021, we issued
$75.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 6.00% Notes due 2026,2026 (the “6.00% Notes due 2026”), of which $44.7$35.8 million
remain remain
outstanding,outstanding andas of December 31, 2025. In addition, on August 14, 2024 and October 9, 2024, we issued $25.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively, in aggregate
principal amount of
6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029, and on October 9, 2024 and January 16, 2025, we issued $5.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively,
in aggregate principal amount of the Additional Notes (as defined below), all of which remain
outstanding. For additional information,
see see“Equity Issuances and Debt Capital Activities—6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029” below and “Note 10—Debt
Capital Activities” to our Consolidated
Financial Statements as of December 31, 2024.2025.
Our
primary uses of cash are to make investments, pay our operating expenses, and make distributions to our stockholders. For the yearyears ended
December 31, 2024,2025, December
31, 20232024 and December 31, 2022,2023, our operating expenses, including interest payments on our debt obligations,
were $18,624,714,$18,194,942, $20,036,389$18,624,714 and $18,164,201,
$20,036,389, respectively.
As of December 31, 2025, $35.8 million in aggregate principal of our 6.00% Notes due 2026 remained outstanding, with a maturity date of December 30, 2026. We intend to fund the repayment from existing cash balances and evaluating refinancing alternatives. As of December 31, 2025, we held $49.0 million in cash, which we believe is sufficient to satisfy this obligation at maturity.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, cash increased to $49,072,895 from $20,035,640 at the beginning of the year. The increase in cash was primarily due to the sale of publicly traded portfolio companies, distributions received,proceeds from the sale of our common stock, and additional debt issuances. The increase was offset by investments made, payment of our operating expenses and interest expense on the 6.00% Notes due 2026 and 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029.
During
the year ended December 31, 2024, cash decreased to $20,035,640 from $28,178,352 at the beginning of the year. The decrease in cash
was primarily due to the purchase of new investments, payment of our operating expenses, repurchase of our common stock pursuant to a modified “Dutch
Auction” tender offer (the “Modified Dutch Auction Tender Offer”), and payment
of interest on the 6.00% Notes due 2026 and 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029. The decrease was offset the sale or exit of investments including the maturity of our investments
in short-term U.S. Treasury bills, and other investment income received. For additional information
relating to the Modified Dutch Auction Tender Offer, see “Modified Dutch Auction Tender Offer” below and “Note 5 -
Common Stock” to our Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2024.
During
the yearyears ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we did not repurchase any shares
of our common stock under the discretionary open-market Share Repurchase Program. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we repurchased
186,493 shares of our common stock under the Share Repurchase Program. As of December 31, 2024,2025, the dollar value of shares that remained
available to be purchased under the Share Repurchase
Program wasis approximately $25.0 million. On October 29, 2024, our Board of Directors
authorized an extension of, and an increase inCurrently, the amount of shares of our common stock that may be repurchased under the discretionary
Share Repurchase Program is authorized until the earlier of (i) October 31, 2025 2026
or (ii) the repurchase of $64.3 million in aggregate amount of our
common stock.
Under
the Share Repurchase Program, we may repurchase our outstanding common stock in the open market, provided that we comply with the prohibitions
under our insider trading policies and procedures and the applicable provisions of the 1940 Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the rules promulgated thereunder. For more information on the Share Repurchase Program,
see “Note 5—Common Stock” to our Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2024.2025.
Modified
Dutch Auction Tender Offer
On
February 20, 2024, we commenced the Modified Dutch Auction Tender Offer to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock from our
stockholders, which expired on April 1, 2024. In accordance with the terms of the Modified Dutch Auction Tender Offer, we selected the
lowest price per share of not less than $4.00 per share and not greater than $5.00 per share.
Pursuant
to the Modified Dutch Auction Tender Offer, we repurchased 2,000,000 shares, representing 7.9% of our then-outstanding shares, on or
about April 5, 2024 at a price of $4.70 per share. We used available cash to fund the purchase of our shares of common stock in the Modified
Dutch Auction Tender Offer and to pay for all related fees and expenses.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements, including any risk management of commodity pricing or other hedging practices. However, we may employ hedging and other risk management techniques in the future.
During
the yearsyear ended December 31, 20242025, andthe 2023,Company wesold 1,237,579 Shares under the ATM Program. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the
Company did not issue or sell Shares under the ATM Program. As of December 31, 2024,2025, up to
approximately $98.8$87.9 million in aggregate amount
of the Shares remain available for sale under the ATM Program.
On
August 6, 2024, our Board of Directors approved a discretionary note
repurchase program (the “Note Repurchase Program”) which
allows us to repurchase up to 46.67%, or $35.0 million in aggregate
principal amount, of our 6.00% Notes due 2026 through open market purchases, including block purchases, in
such manner as will comply
with the provisions of the 1940 Act and the Exchange Act. During the year ended December 31, 2024, wethe Company
repurchased and retired $30.3 million of aggregate principal amount of the 6.00% Notes due 2026. On October 29, 2025, our Board of Directors
approved an extension of the discretionary note repurchase program (the “Note Repurchase Program”), which allows us to repurchase
up to an additional $40.0 million or the remaining aggregate principal amount, of our 6.00% Notes due 2026 through open market purchases,
including block purchases, in such manner as will comply with the provisions of the 1940 Act and the Exchange Act. During the year ended
December 31, 2025, the Company repurchased and retired $8.8 million of aggregate principal amount of the 6.00% Notes due 2026. As of
December 31, 2024,2025, the aggregate principal dollar amount of 6.00% Notes
due 2026 that remained available to be purchased under the Note
Repurchase Program was approximately $5.0$35.8 million.
On
August 14, 2024, we issued $25.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029 to
a private purchaser (the
“Purchaser”), which bear interest at a rate of 6.50% per year, payable quarterly in arrears on March
30, June 30, September
30, and December 30 of each year, commencing on September 30, 2024. We received $24.3 million in proceeds from
the issuance, net of underwriting
discounts and commissions. Under
the purchase agreement governing the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 20292029, as Amended and Restated on December 12, 2025 (the “Notes Purchase Agreement”),
upon mutual agreement
between the Company and the Purchaser, we may issue additional 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029 for sale in subsequent
offerings to the
Purchaser (the “Additional Notes”), or issue additional notes with modified pricing terms (the “New
Notes”), in
the aggregate for both the Additional Notes and the New Notes, up to a maximum of $50.0 million in one or more private
offerings. Pursuant
to the Notes Purchase Agreement, on October 9, 2024, we issued $5.0 million of Additional Notes to the Purchaser,
and on January 16, 2025, we issued an additional $5.0 million of Additional Notes to the Purchaser, which Additional Notes
are treated
as a single series with the initial issuance of the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029. The 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029
mature on
August 14, 2029, unless previously repurchased, redeemed or converted in accordance with their terms. We do not have the right
to redeem
the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029 prior to August 6, 2027.
The 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029 are convertible into shares of our common stock at the Purchaser’s sole discretion at an initial conversion rate of 129.0323 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029, subject to adjustment as provided in the Notes Purchase Agreement. Effective as of July 21, 2025, the conversion rate applicable to the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029 was adjusted to $7.53 per share (132.7530 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029) from the initial conversion price of $7.75 per share (129.0323 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029), which had been effective since issuance. The adjustment to the conversion rate of the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029 was made pursuant to the Notes Purchase Agreement governing the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029 as a result of the Company’s cash dividend of $0.25 per share, paid on July 31, 2025 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on July 21, 2025. Effective as of November 21, 2025, the conversion rate applicable to the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029 was adjusted to $7.32 per share (136.5633 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029) from the most recent conversion price of $7.53 per share (132.7530 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029), which had been effective since July 21, 2025. The adjustment to the conversion rate of the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029 was made pursuant to the Notes Purchase Agreement governing the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029 as a result of the Company’s cash dividend of $0.25 per share, paid on December 5, 2025 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 21, 2025.
The
6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029 will be convertible into shares of our common stock at the Purchaser’s sole discretion at an initial
conversion rate of 129.0323 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029, subject to adjustment
as provided in the Notes Purchase Agreement.
Refer
to “Part II. Item 7—Recent Developments” and “Note 10—Debt Capital Activities” to our Consolidated
Financial Statements as of December 31, 20242025 for more information
regarding the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029.
Commissions
and other costs associated with an investment transaction, including legal expenses not reimbursed by the portfolio company, are included
in the cost basis of purchases and deducted from the proceeds of sales. We make certain acquisitions on secondary markets, which may
involve making deposits to escrow accounts until certain conditions are met, including the underlying private company’s right of
first refusal. If the underlying private company does not exercise or assign its right of first refusal and all other conditions are
met, then the funds in the escrow account are delivered to the seller and the account is closed. Such transactions would be reflected
on the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities as escrow deposits. As of December 31, 20242025 and December 31, 2023,2024, we had no
escrow deposits.
6.00% Notes Due 2026 - Note Repurchase
Program
Between January 1, 2025
and January 8, 2025, we repurchased an additional 199,990 units of the 6.00% Notes due 2026 under the Note Repurchase Program resulting
in the total use of the authorized available funds.
6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029
On January 16,
2025, we issued and sold $5.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Additional Notes to the Purchaser pursuant to the Notes
Purchase Agreement. The Additional Notes are treated as a single series with our initial issuance of $25.0 million in aggregate
principal amount of the outstanding 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029 and the additional $5.0 million issuance of the 6.50%
Convertible Notes due 2029 on October 9, 2024 (together, the “Initial Notes”) and have the same terms as the Initial
Notes. The Additional Notes are fungible and rank equally with the Initial Notes. Upon issuance of the Additional Notes on January
16, 2025, the outstanding aggregate principal amount of our 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029 became $35.0 million.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
New heading “We depend on the Adviser and its key investment professionals for our future success, we no longer have any employees, and the departure of those personnel could materially and adversely affect our ability to achieve our investment objective.”
New heading “We now bear advisory fees that we did not previously bear, and the base management fee is payable without regard to our performance.”
New heading “We may be obligated to pay the Adviser incentive fees even if we incur a net loss, and the incentive fee may create an incentive for the Adviser to make riskier or more speculative investments or to influence the timing of dispositions.”
New heading “The Externalization gives rise to conflicts of interest, and the Adviser is not required to provide services to us on an exclusive basis.”
New heading “Our application for co-investment exemptive relief is pending, and there can be no assurance if or when relief will be granted, which may reduce the investment opportunities available to us.”
New heading “Our relationship with Magnetar exposes us to additional risks, and the redemption of the Magnetar note could dilute existing stockholders.”
New heading “We may be unable to replace the Adviser or the Administrator on comparable terms if either agreement is terminated.”
New heading “The Investment Advisory Agreement limits the Adviser’s liability to us and requires us to indemnify the Adviser, which may cause the Adviser to act in a manner that is riskier than it otherwise would.”
Largest changes
“We pay the Adviser a base management fee at an annual rate of 1.75% of gross assets and a two-part incentive fee, and we reimburse the Administrator for our allocable portion of its costs and overhead, including our allocable portion of the compensation of personnel providing administrative, financial, accounting, legal and compliance services to us. We did not bear advisory fees of this nature under our former internally managed structure, and these fees may increase our expenses relative to the periods presented in this report. …”see in full comparison
“We depend on the Adviser and its key investment professionals for our future success, we no longer have any employees, and the departure of those personnel could materially and adversely affect our ability to achieve our investment objective.”see in full comparison
“We may be obligated to pay the Adviser incentive fees even if we incur a net loss, and the incentive fee may create an incentive for the Adviser to make riskier or more speculative investments or to influence the timing of dispositions.”see in full comparison
“The Investment Advisory Agreement limits the Adviser’s liability to us and requires us to indemnify the Adviser, which may cause the Adviser to act in a manner that is riskier than it otherwise would.”see in full comparison
“Our application for co-investment exemptive relief is pending, and there can be no assurance if or when relief will be granted, which may reduce the investment opportunities available to us.”see in full comparison
“The Externalization gives rise to conflicts of interest, and the Adviser is not required to provide services to us on an exclusive basis.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (18)
Investing
in our securities involves a number of significant risks. In addition to the other information contained in this report, you should carefully
consider the factors discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SEC on March
11, 2026, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. Although the risks described in our
annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 represent the principal risks associated with an investment in
us, they are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or that we currently deem to be
immaterial, might materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. ThereOther than as stated
below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors discussed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of Part I of our annual
report report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.
In connection with the Externalization, which became effective July 15, 2026, we became an externally managed BDC and no longer have any employees. Accordingly, the risk factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 that describe us as an internally managed BDC, including those relating to our dependence on our own management team and investment professionals and to the compensation of our employees, no longer apply to us and are superseded by the risk factors set forth below. In addition, on July 30, 2026, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form N-2 with the SEC, and on August 3, 2026, we, the Adviser and certain affiliated funds and accounts filed an application with the SEC for an order permitting us to engage in certain negotiated co-investment transactions. We are subject to the additional risks set forth below.
We depend on the Adviser and its key investment professionals for our future success, we no longer have any employees, and the departure of those personnel could materially and adversely affect our ability to achieve our investment objective.
All of our investment and administrative personnel are employees of the Adviser, the Administrator or their affiliates, and we no longer have any employees of our own. We do not determine the compensation, retention or allocation of time of those personnel, and we have no control over whether they remain employed by the Adviser or the Administrator. Our ability to achieve our investment objective depends on the Adviser’s ability to identify, evaluate, negotiate, structure, monitor and exit investments, which in turn depends on the continued service of its senior investment professionals, including Mr. Klein and Ms. Green. Those investment professionals have and will continue to have management responsibilities for other investment funds, accounts and investment vehicles sponsored or managed by the Adviser, Magnetar and their affiliates, and they are not required to devote any specific amount of time to our affairs. The departure of any of those individuals, or of a significant number of the Adviser’s investment professionals, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective. Our rights with respect to the Adviser and the Administrator are limited to those under the Investment Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement, each of which may be terminated without penalty on 60 days’ written notice.
We now bear advisory fees that we did not previously bear, and the base management fee is payable without regard to our performance.
We pay the Adviser a base management fee at an annual rate of 1.75% of gross assets and a two-part incentive fee, and we reimburse the Administrator for our allocable portion of its costs and overhead, including our allocable portion of the compensation of personnel providing administrative, financial, accounting, legal and compliance services to us. We did not bear advisory fees of this nature under our former internally managed structure, and these fees may increase our expenses relative to the periods presented in this report. The base management fee is calculated on gross assets, including investments held before the Effective Date and assets acquired with borrowed funds, and is payable without regard to our performance. The fact that the base management fee is payable based upon our gross assets, rather than our net assets, means that the base management fee as a percentage of net assets attributable to our common stock will increase when we use leverage. Accordingly, the Adviser may have an incentive to cause us to incur more leverage than is prudent, or not to repay our outstanding indebtedness when it may be advantageous for us to do so, in order to maximize its compensation. Under certain circumstances, the use of leverage may increase the likelihood of default, which would disfavor the holders of our securities, and would magnify losses as well as gains.
We may be obligated to pay the Adviser incentive fees even if we incur a net loss, and the incentive fee may create an incentive for the Adviser to make riskier or more speculative investments or to influence the timing of dispositions.
The incentive fee consists of an income-based fee and a capital gains fee, and no incentive fee is payable with respect to investments held prior to the Effective Date. As our portfolio shifts toward investments made on or after the Effective Date, the incentive fees we pay are expected to increase. Because of the structure of the incentive fee, it is possible that we may pay an incentive fee in a quarter in which we incur a loss. If our pre-incentive fee net investment income exceeds the applicable hurdle rate for a quarter, we will pay the income-based fee even if we have incurred a loss in that quarter as a result of realized and unrealized capital losses. The income-based fee may create an incentive for the Adviser to invest in assets with higher current yields, including riskier or more speculative assets, in order to increase the income on which that fee is calculated. The income-based fee may also create an incentive for the Adviser to invest in instruments with a deferred interest feature, such as original issue discount, payment-in-kind interest or zero-coupon securities, because we would be required to accrue, and to pay an incentive fee on, income that we have not yet received in cash and that we may never collect, and the Adviser is not obligated to reimburse us for any incentive fee previously paid on income that is not ultimately received.
The Externalization gives rise to conflicts of interest, and the Adviser is not required to provide services to us on an exclusive basis.
Certain of our executive officers, including Mr. Klein and Ms. Green, are equity owners and employees of the Adviser, and a portion of the fees we pay the Adviser inures to their benefit. Those persons participated in the negotiation of the terms of the Externalization while holding prospective ownership interests in the Adviser. The Adviser is not required to provide services to us on an exclusive basis and may in the future sponsor or advise other investment vehicles with investment objectives and strategies that overlap with ours. As a result, the Adviser and its investment professionals may face conflicts in allocating their time and investment opportunities between us and those other vehicles, and investments that would be suitable for us may be allocated elsewhere. The investment advice given to us by the Adviser may differ from, and the actions it takes on behalf of Magnetar and its other clients may compete with or be adverse to, the advice given to, or actions taken on behalf of, us. Because the Adviser, Magnetar and their affiliates may receive performance-based compensation from other funds and accounts, they may have an incentive to allocate investment opportunities to those other funds and accounts rather than to us. There can be no assurance that any allocation policy adopted by the Adviser will result in our participating in any particular investment opportunity or in an allocation that we would consider favorable.
Our application for co-investment exemptive relief is pending, and there can be no assurance if or when relief will be granted, which may reduce the investment opportunities available to us.
On August 3, 2026, we, the Adviser and certain affiliated funds and accounts filed an application with the SEC for an exemptive order permitting us to co-invest in negotiated transactions alongside funds and accounts advised by the Adviser, Magnetar and their affiliates in a manner consistent with our investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions, as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors. There can be no assurance if or when we will receive the requested exemptive relief, or that any relief granted will be on the terms requested. Until such relief is obtained, our ability to participate in negotiated co-investment transactions with affiliates is limited by the 1940 Act, which may reduce the investment opportunities available to us and may prevent us from participating in transactions sourced through the Magnetar platform, which was one of the anticipated benefits of the Externalization. Even if the requested relief is granted, the Adviser would be required to consider whether each investment opportunity is appropriate for us and for its other advised clients and, if so, to propose an allocation of the opportunity among them. As a consequence, it may be more difficult for us to maintain or increase the size of our portfolio, and we may not participate in any particular co-investment opportunity.
Our relationship with Magnetar exposes us to additional risks, and the redemption of the Magnetar note could dilute existing stockholders.
An affiliate of Magnetar holds a $20.0 million redeemable promissory note issued by us that bears interest at 6.50% per annum and matures in 2029, and a Magnetar partner serves on our Board of Directors as an interested director. If we consummate a qualified fundraising, the note is mandatorily redeemed through the issuance of shares of our common stock, which would dilute the interests of our existing stockholders, and upon a change of control we must repay 105% of the outstanding principal and accrued interest in cash. We have also agreed to file a resale shelf registration statement covering the resale of the shares issuable upon redemption of the note, and sales of those shares, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
We may be unable to replace the Adviser or the Administrator on comparable terms if either agreement is terminated.
The Investment Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement may each be terminated without penalty on 60 days’ written notice, and the Investment Advisory Agreement terminates automatically upon its assignment. If either agreement were terminated, we would need to identify and engage a replacement adviser or administrator, and there can be no assurance that we could do so on a timely basis or on terms as favorable as those of our current agreements. Because we no longer have any employees, any period during which we lacked an investment adviser or administrator could disrupt our investment activities, our compliance program and our financial reporting.
The Investment Advisory Agreement limits the Adviser’s liability to us and requires us to indemnify the Adviser, which may cause the Adviser to act in a manner that is riskier than it otherwise would.
Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Adviser and its affiliates and their respective personnel are not liable to us for acts or omissions taken in the performance of their duties absent willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of duty, and we are required to indemnify them against certain liabilities incurred in connection with their services to us. These provisions may reduce the incentive of the Adviser and its personnel to exercise the degree of care they would otherwise exercise and may limit the remedies available to us and our stockholders if the Adviser’s conduct causes us to incur losses.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Shelf Registration Statement”
New heading “Shelf Registration Statement”
Largest changes
“On July 30, 2026, we filed a registration statement on Form N-2 with the SEC covering the offer and sale, from time to time in one or more offerings, of up to $500.0 million of our common stock, preferred stock, subscription rights, debt securities and warrants. The registration statement had not been declared effective as of the date of this quarterly report. …”see in full comparison
Comparison of thesee in full comparisonThreethreeMonthsandEndedsixMarchmonths31,ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
“On July 30, 2026, we filed a registration statement on Form N-2 with the SEC pursuant to which we may offer, from time to time in one or more offerings, up to $500.0 million of our common stock, preferred stock, subscription rights to purchase shares of our common stock, debt securities, or warrants representing rights to purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock or debt securities. As of the date of this quarterly report, the registration statement had not been declared effective, and we had not offered or sold any securities thereunder. …”see in full comparison
see in full comparisonInOn June 12, 2026, followingconnectionapprovalwithof theExternalization,Externalizationon April 2, 2026,by ourCompensationstockholders,Committeeweapprovedgranted (a)a grant of350,000 restricted shares (with any aggregate income tax liability to be paid by us) to Mark D. Klein and (b) 60,000 restricted shares (with any aggregate income tax liability to be paid by us) toMarkAllison Green,D.andKlein;we(b) a grant of 60,000 restricted shares (with any aggregate income tax liability to be paid by us) to Allison Green; (c)approved a cash bonus of $850,000 to Mark D. Klein;and(d)a cash bonus of $500,000 to Allison Green.TheOnforegoingJunecompensation15,will2026,beour BoardpaidofonlyDirectorsifapproved theAdvisoryaccelerationAgreementinisfullapprovedofbytheourvestingstockholders.of all restricted shares then outstanding and unvested under the Amended and Restated 2019 Equity Incentive Plan and the Second Amended and Restated 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, effective as of June 15, 2026. Those shares vested on that date, subject to each holder’s entry into a lock-up agreement with us that replicates the holding periods of the vesting schedules that otherwise would have applied to such shares.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (54)
We
are an internallyexternally managed, non-diversified closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development
company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), and has elected to be
treated, and intends to qualify annually, as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Effective July 15, 2026, we are externally managed by Neostellar Advisors LLC (the
“Adviser”), which sources, evaluates and monitors our investments subject to the oversight of our Board of Directors, and
we pay the Adviser a base management fee and an incentive fee and reimburse the Administrator for certain expenses.
We
formed in 2010 as a Maryland corporation andand, operateuntil July 15, 2026, operated as an internally managed, non-diversified closed-end management investment company.
Our investment activities arewere supervised by our Board of Directors and managed by our executive officers and investmentsinvestment professionals,
all of whichwhom arewere our employees.
On
and effective March 12, 2019, our Board of Directors approved our Internalization, and we began operating as an internally managed non-diversified
closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. Our Board of Directors approved
the Internalization in order to better align the interests of our stockholders with its management. As an internally managed BDC, we
arewere managed by our employees, rather than the employees of an external investment adviser. AsOn June 10, 2026, our stockholders approved
a result of the Internalization, we no
longer pay any fees or expenses under annew investment advisory agreement orand, effective July 15, 2026, we transitioned to an externally managed BDC managed by Neostellar
Advisors LLC and changed our name to “Neostellar Capital Corp.” As an externally managed BDC, our
investment activities are managed by the Adviser, and we no longer have employees. Following the Externalization, we pay a base management
fee, an incentive fee and administration agreement,expense and instead pay the operating costs
associated with employing investment management professionals including, without limitation, compensation expenses related to salaries,
discretionary bonuses and restricted stock grants.reimbursements.
ThreeSix
Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026
The
value of our investment portfolio will change over time due to changes in the fair value of our underlying investments, as well as changes
in the composition of our portfolio resulting from purchases of new and follow-on investments and the sales of existing investments.
The fair value as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 of all of our portfolio investments was $388,534,651.$405,851,701.
During
the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we funded investments in an aggregate amount of $5,000,000$29,696,170 (not including capitalized transaction
costs) as shown in the following table:
During
the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we capitalized fees of $12,250.$124,628.
During
the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we exited or received proceeds from investments in the amount of $1,603,659,$13,746,165, net of transaction
costs, and realized a net gain on investments
of $890,513$5,940,033 (including adjustments to amounts held in escrow receivable) as shown in the following table:
ThreeSix
Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
The
value of our investment portfolio will change over time due to changes in the fair value of our underlying investments, as well as changes
in the composition of our portfolio resulting from purchases of new and follow-on investments and the sales of existing investments.
The fair value as of MarchJune 31,30, 2025 of all of our portfolio investments was $213,577,198.$243,798,547.
During
the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, we funded investments in an aggregate amount of $1,303,010$6,302,884 (not including capitalized transaction
costs) as shown in the following table:
During
the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, we capitalized fees of $4,568.$400,237.
During
the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, we did not exitexited or receivereceived proceeds from anyinvestments in the amount of our$41,251,774, investments,net of transaction
costs, and realized a net lossgain on investments
of $17,951$21,194,660 (including adjustments to amounts held in escrow receivable). as shown in
following table:
During
the three months ended March 31, 2025, we did not write-off any investments.
Comparison
of the Threethree Monthsand Endedsix Marchmonths 31,ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
Operating
results for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
Investment
income increased to $731,963$299,650 for the three months ended March
31,June 30, 2026 from $499,094$167,304 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The net
increase between periods was primarily due to an increase in
interest income received on cash,cash and an increase in interest accruals on
our investment in the Supplying Demand, Inc. (d/b/a Liquid Death) Convertible
Note, and an increase in dividend income from Treehouse Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. The increases were
offset by the cessation of dividend income from CW Opportunity 2 LP during the three months ended March 31, 2026, relative to the three months
ended March 31, 2025.Note.
Investment income increased to $1,031,613 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $666,398 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The net increase between periods was primarily due to an increase in interest income received on cash and an increase in interest accruals on our investment in the Supplying Demand, Inc. (d/b/a Liquid Death) Convertible Note.
Total
operating expenses increased to $4,710,455$23,654,334 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $4,160,863$3,889,464 for the three months ended June
March 31,30, 2025. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to increasesan increase in compensation expense,expense associated with the Externalization, including the acceleration of stock-based compensation expense and tax obligations associated with the vesting
of equity awards. The increase was also attributable to higher professional fees, income
tax expense, directors’ fees, and other expenses. These increases wereexpenses, partially
offset by a decrease in interest expense during the
three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, relative to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
Total operating expenses increased to $28,364,789 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $8,050,327 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to an increase in compensation expense associated with the Externalization, including the acceleration of stock-based compensation expense and tax obligations associated with the vesting of equity awards. The increase was also attributable to higher professional fees, directors’ fees, and other expenses, partially offset by a decrease in interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2026, relative to the six months ended June 30, 2025.
For
the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we recognized a net investment loss of $3,978,492,$23,354,684, compared to a net investment loss of $3,661,769$3,722,160
for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The change between periods resulted from an increase in operating expenses, partially offset
by an increase in total investment income, during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, relative to the three months ended MarchJune 31,
30, 2025.
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, we recognized a net investment loss of $27,333,176, compared to a net investment loss of $7,383,929 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The change between periods resulted from an increase in operating expenses, partially offset by an increase in total investment income, during the six months ended June 30, 2026, relative to the six months ended June 30, 2025.
For
the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we recognized a net realized gain on our investments of $890,513,$5,049,520, compared to a net realized
gain loss
of $17,951$21,212,611 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The components of our net realized gains or losses on portfolio investments
for for
the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, excluding short-term U.S. Treasury bills, are reflected in the tables above, under
“—Portfolio and Investment Activity.”
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, we recognized a net realized gain on our investments of $5,940,033, compared to a net realized gain of $21,194,660 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The components of our net realized gains or losses on portfolio investments for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, excluding short-term U.S. Treasury bills and fluctuations in escrow receivables estimates, are reflected in the tables above, under “—Portfolio and Investment Activity.”
For
the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had a net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of $158,724,039.$(398,509). For the three months
ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, we had a net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of $2,888,878.$44,837,619. The following table summarizes, by
portfolio company, the significant changes in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of our investment portfolio for the three months
ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025.
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, we had a net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of $158,325,530. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, we had a net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of $47,726,497. The following table summarizes, by portfolio company, the significant changes in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of our investment portfolio for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.
Our
liquidity and capital resources are generated primarily from the sales of our investments, recent private convertible debt
issuances, issuances,
and the net proceeds from public offerings of our equity and debt securities, including pursuant to our continuous
at-the-market offering
of shares of our common stock as discussed below under “Equity Issuances and Debt Capital
Activities—At-the-Market Offering”.
On December 17, 2021, we issued $75.0 million aggregate principal amount of our
6.00% Notes due 2026 (the “6.00% Notes due 2026”),
of which $35.8 million remain outstanding as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. In
addition, on August 14, 2024, we issued $25.0 million in aggregate
principal amount of 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029, and on
October 9, 2024 and January 16, 2025, we issued $5.0 million and $5.0 million,
respectively, in aggregate principal amount of the
Additional Notes (as defined below),. allOn July 30, 2026, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form N-2 with the SEC covering up
to $500.0 million of our common stock, preferred stock, subscription rights, debt securities and warrants, which remainhad outstanding.not been
declared effective as of the date of this quarterly report. For additional
information, see “Equity Issuances and Debt Capital
Activities—6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029” and “Equity Issuances and Debt Capital Activities—Shelf
Registration Statement” below and “Note
10—Debt Capital Activities” and “Note 12—Subsequent Events” to our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
Our
primary uses of cash are to make investments, pay our operating expenses, and make distributions to our stockholders. For the threesix months
ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 our operating expenses, including interest payments on our debt obligations, were $4,710,455$28,364,789 and $4,160,863,$8,050,327,
respectively.
As
of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, $35.8 million in aggregate principal of our 6.00% Notes due 2026 remained outstanding, with a maturity date of December
30, 2026. We have the right to redeem the 6.00% Notes due 2026, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price of 100%
of the
outstanding principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. We may also continue to repurchase the 6.00% Notes due 2026 in the open
open market under the Note Repurchase Program, which was extended by our Board of Directors on October 29, 2025 and authorizes us to repurchase
up to the remaining aggregate principal amount of the 6.00% Notes due 2026. We intendexpect to satisfy our repayment obligation at maturity
primarilythrough a combination of available cash and proceeds from existingthe cashsale balances,of portfolio investments, and we may also consider refinancing alternatives, including the issuance of new debt securities,
the sale of portfolio investments, or the issuance of equity under the ATM Program (under which approximately $87.9 million in aggregate
amount of shares remained available for sale as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026)., in each case subject to the effectiveness of our shelf registration statement on Form N-2 filed on July 30,
2026. Any refinancing involving the incurrence of new indebtedness would
require five business days’ prior written notice to the holder of our 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029 pursuant to the Notes Purchase
Agreement. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we held approximately $43.3$12.9 million in cash, which exceeds the outstanding principal amount of the 6.00%
Notes due 2026cash and which we believe is sufficient to satisfy this obligation at maturity. In addition, as of March 31, 2026, we held approximately
$2.7$1.7 million of unrestricted securities of publicly traded portfolio companies that could provide an additional source of liquidity.
We We
will continue to evaluate our overall liquidity position and may take additional proactive steps, including the potential early redemption
or open-market repurchase of some or all of the outstanding 6.00% Notes due 2026, to manage this near-term maturity.
On July 16, 2026, in connection with the Externalization, we issued a $20.0 million redeemable promissory note to MCP Investing LLC, an affiliate of Magnetar, bearing interest at 6.50% per annum, payable semi-annually in cash, and maturing in 2029, pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 2026. Following the Externalization, our operating expenses will include the base management fee and incentive fee payable to the Adviser and expense reimbursements payable to the Administrator, which will increase our expenses relative to the periods presented. See “Note 12—Subsequent Events.”
During
the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, cash decreased to $43,315,750$12,940,740 from $49,034,154 at the beginning of the year. The decrease in
cash was primarily due to the purchase of new investments, payment of our operating expenses, including payment of compensation and
payroll taxes related to the anticipated Externalization, and payment of interest on the
6.00% Notes due 2026 and 6.50% Convertible
Notes due 2029. The decrease was offset by the increase in cash from the sale of public securities and investment income
received.
A
summary of our significant contractual payment obligations as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 is as follows:
During
the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 and 2025, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock under the discretionary open-market
Share Repurchase Program. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the dollar value of shares that remained available to be purchased under the Share Repurchase
Program is approximately $25.0 million. Currently, the Share Repurchase Program is authorized until the earlier of (i) October 31, 2026
or (ii) the repurchase of $64.3 million in aggregate amount of our common stock.
Under
the Share Repurchase Program, we may repurchase our outstanding common stock in the open market, provided that we comply with the prohibitions
under our insider trading policies and procedures and the applicable provisions of the 1940 Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the rules promulgated thereunder. For more information on the Share Repurchase Program,
see “Note 5—Common Stock” to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
As
of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements, including any risk management of commodity pricing or other hedging
practices. However, we may employ hedging and other risk management techniques in the future.
During
the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, we did not issue or sell Shares under the ATM Program. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026,
up to approximately
$87.9 million in aggregate amount of the Shares remain available for sale under the ATM Program.
Refer
to “Note 5—Common Stock” to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 for more information
information regarding the ATM Program.
Shelf Registration Statement
On July 30, 2026, we filed a registration statement on Form N-2 with the SEC pursuant to which we may offer, from time to time in one or more offerings, up to $500.0 million of our common stock, preferred stock, subscription rights to purchase shares of our common stock, debt securities, or warrants representing rights to purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock or debt securities. As of the date of this quarterly report, the registration statement had not been declared effective, and we had not offered or sold any securities thereunder. We intend to use the net proceeds of any offering under the registration statement to make investments in portfolio companies in accordance with our investment objective and strategy, to repay indebtedness, including the 6.00% Notes due 2026, and for general corporate purposes. The offering price per share of our common stock, less any underwriting commissions or discounts, will not be less than our net asset value per share at the time of the offering, except in connection with a rights offering to our existing stockholders, with the requisite approval of our common stockholders or under such other circumstances as the SEC may permit. We did not seek stockholder authorization to issue shares of our common stock at a price below net asset value per share at our 2026 annual meeting of stockholders.
On
August 6, 2024, our Board of Directors approved a discretionary note repurchase program (the “Note Repurchase Program”) which
allows us to repurchase up to $35.0 million of our 6.00% Notes due 2026 through open market purchases, including block purchases, in
such manner as will comply with the provisions of the 1940 Act and the Exchange Act. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company
repurchased and retired $30.3 million of aggregate principal amount of the 6.00% Notes due 2026. On October 29, 2025, our Board of Directors
approved an extension of the discretionary note repurchase program (the “Note Repurchase Program”), which allows us to repurchase
up to an additional $40.0 million or the remaining aggregate principal amount, of our 6.00% Notes due 2026 through open market purchases,
including block purchases, in such manner as will comply with the provisions of the 1940 Act and the Exchange Act. During the year ended
December 31, 2025, the Company repurchased and retired $8.8 million of aggregate principal amount of the 6.00% Notes due 2026. As of
MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the aggregate principal dollar amount of 6.00% Notes due 2026 that remained available to be purchased under the Note Repurchase
Repurchase Program was approximately $35.8 million.
Refer
to “Note 10—Debt Capital Activities” to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 for more
more information regarding the 6.00% Notes due 2026.
For the six months ended June 30, 2026 the Company issued 1,092,504 shares of its common stock and cash for fractional shares upon the conversion of $8.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 6.50% Convertible Notes due 2029.
Refer
to “Note 10—Debt Capital Activities” and “Note 12—Subsequent Events” to our Condensed Consolidated
Consolidated Financial Statements as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 for more information regarding the 6.50% Convertible Notes due
2029.
The
timing and amount of our distributions, if any, will be determined by our Board of Directors and will be declared out of assets legally
available for distribution. The following table lists the distributions, including dividends and returns of capital, if any, per share
that we have declared since our formation through MarchJune 31,30, 2026. The table is divided by fiscal year according to record date:
So
long as we qualify as a RIC, we generally will not be subject to U.S.
federal and state income taxes on any ordinary income or capital
gains that we distribute at least annually to our stockholders as dividends.
To the extent all our ordinary income and capital gains
are timely distributed to our stockholders as dividends, any tax liability related
to income earned by the RIC will represent obligations
of our investors and will not be reflected in our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements. See “Note 2—Significant Accounting
Policies—U.S. Federal and State Income Taxes” and “Note
9—Income Taxes” to our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 for more information. The Taxable
Subsidiaries included in our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements are subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed at corporate rates
on their income, regardless of whether we are taxed as a
RIC. The Taxable Subsidiaries are not consolidated for U.S. federal income tax purposes and may generate income tax expenses as
a result
of their ownership of the portfolio companies. Such income tax expenses and deferred taxes, if any, will be reflected in our Condensed
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Critical
accounting policies and practices are the policies that are both
most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results,
and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or
complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about
the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. These include
estimates of the fair value of our Level 3 investments and other
estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
as of the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
and the reported amounts of certain revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. It is likely that changes in these estimates will
occur in the near term. Our estimates are inherently subjective in
nature and actual results could differ materially from such estimates.
See “Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies”
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026
for further detail regarding our critical accounting policies
and recently issued or adopted accounting pronouncements.
See
“Note 3—Related-Party Arrangements” to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 for more
more information.
Please
refer to “Note 12—Subsequent Events” to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 for details
details regarding activity in our investment portfolio from AprilJuly 1, 2026 through MayAugust 5, 2026.
On
April 2, 2026, our Board of Directors, including all of its independent directors, unanimously approved a proposal to transition us from
an internally managed BDC to an externally managed structure (the “Externalization”) and approved the related investment
advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) with Neostellar Advisors LLC (the “Adviser”), an entity jointly
owned by certain of our currentthen-current employees and Magnetar Holdings LLC (“Magnetar”), pursuant to which the Adviser would be
appointed as our investment adviser. Entry into the Advisory Agreement effectuating the Externalization iswas subject to approval by our
stockholders. IfAt oura special meeting held on June 10, 2026, the Company’s stockholders do not approveapproved the Investment Advisory Agreement,Agreement
with wethe willAdviser. continueAs toa operateresult, aseffective July 15, 2026 (the “Effective Date”), the Company transitioned from an internally
managed BDC to an externally managed BDC.BDC We
aremanaged notby beingthe sold,Adviser, and ifchanged theits Externalizationname isfrom consummated,“SuRo ourCapital stockholders immediately priorCorp.” to the“Neostellar
Capital ExternalizationCorp.” will be our
stockholders immediately following the Externalization and will hold the same number of shares of ourOur common stock
continues asto theytrade held prior
toon the Externalization.Nasdaq Global Select Market, now under the ticker symbol “NSLR.”
Key
terms of the Externalization include: (i) no incentive fee payable to the Adviser on realized gains attributable to our existing
portfolio;
(ii) expected annual expense savings of approximately 0.77% of average total assets compared to theour currentformer internal
management structure;
(iii) a $20 million capitalinvestment commitmentin us by Magnetaran toaffiliate investof Magnetar, which was made on July 16, 2026 in us, the form of whicha willredeemable
promissory depend on certain factorsnote; (iv) a base management
fee of 1.75% of our gross assets, which our Board of Directors determined to be competitive
with fees charged by comparable BDCs and
below the median fee charged by private market venture and technology funds; and (v)
management continuity, with our currentinvestment investment
team, including Mark D. Klein and Allison Green, continuing in their current
capacities, but as employees of the Adviser rather than
us following the Externalization. Upon effectiveness ofOn the AdvisoryEffective Agreement,Date, we also will enterentered into an administration agreement
(the
“Administration Agreement”) with Neostellar Administrative Services LLC, an affiliate of the Adviser (the
“Administrator”),
pursuant to which the Administrator will provide,provides, or overseeoversees the provision of, administrative services
necessary for our operations,
subject to our reimbursement of the Administrator’s costs and expenses, including our allocable
portion of overhead.
InOn June 12, 2026, following
connectionapproval withof the Externalization,Externalization on April 2, 2026,by our Compensationstockholders, Committeewe approvedgranted (a) a grant of 350,000 restricted shares (with any aggregate income tax liability
to be paid by us) to Mark D. Klein and (b) 60,000 restricted shares (with any aggregate income tax liability to be paid by us) to MarkAllison
Green, D.and Klein;we (b) a grant of 60,000 restricted shares (with any aggregate income
tax liability to be paid by us) to Allison Green; (c)approved a cash bonus of $850,000 to Mark D. Klein; and (d) a cash bonus of $500,000 to
Allison Green. TheOn foregoingJune compensation15, will2026, beour
Board paidof onlyDirectors ifapproved the Advisoryacceleration Agreementin isfull approvedof bythe ourvesting stockholders.of all restricted shares then outstanding and unvested under the Amended
and Restated 2019 Equity Incentive Plan and the Second Amended and Restated 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, effective as of June 15, 2026.
Those shares vested on that date, subject to each holder’s entry into a lock-up agreement with us that replicates the holding periods
of the vesting schedules that otherwise would have applied to such shares.
For
additional information regarding the Externalization and its impact on stockholders, the Advisory Agreement, the Administration
Agreement, Agreement,
Magnetar and the compensation of management relating to the Externalization, please refer to “Note
11—Stock-Based Compensation” and “Note 12—Subsequent Events”
to our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements as of MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, our definitive proxy statement for the Special Meeting of Stockholders filed April 29,
2026, and to theour Current ReportReports on Form 8-K we filed on April 7, 2026 and July 21, 2026.
Shelf Registration Statement
On July 30, 2026, we filed a registration statement on Form N-2 with the SEC covering the offer and sale, from time to time in one or more offerings, of up to $500.0 million of our common stock, preferred stock, subscription rights, debt securities and warrants. The registration statement had not been declared effective as of the date of this quarterly report. For additional information, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Equity Issuances and Debt Capital Activities—Shelf Registration Statement” above and “Note 12—Subsequent Events” to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2026.
NSLR insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 4 Form 4 filings (2 insiders, 5 trade dates, 86,040 shares, about $866.4K) and open-market sales in 3 filings (1 insider, 3 trade dates, 16,254 shares, about $194.5K). Net open-market shares: 69,786 (purchases minus sales); net value about $671.9K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-21 | Klein Mark D |
Open-market purchase | 5,000 | $7.91 | $39.5K |
| 2026-09-03 | Lott Ronald M. |
Open-market sale | 5,085 | $9.96 | $50.6K |
| 2026-08-26 | Falk Erik A |
Open-market purchase | 50,000 | $10.22 | $511.0K |
| 2026-08-10 | Klein Mark D |
Open-market purchase | 26,040 | $9.60 | $250.0K |
| 2026-06-23 | Lott Ronald M. |
Open-market sale | 500 | $12.35 | $6.2K |
| 2026-06-15 | Green Allison |
Shares withheld for tax | 41,815 | $13.56 | $567.0K |
| 2026-06-15 | Klein Mark D |
Shares withheld for tax | 293,265 | $13.56 | $4.0M |
| 2026-06-12 | Green Allison |
Grant/award | 60,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-12 | Klein Mark D |
Grant/award | 350,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Westley Lisa |
Grant/award | 3,536 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Mazur Marc |
Grant/award | 3,536 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Szuch Richard C. |
Grant/award | 3,536 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Lott Ronald M. |
Grant/award | 3,536 | — | — |
| 2026-06-10 | Potter Leonard |
Grant/award | 3,536 | — | — |
| 2026-04-28 | Lott Ronald M. |
Open-market sale | 10,669 | $12.90 | $137.6K |
| 2026-04-22 | Klein Mark D |
Open-market purchase | 2,500 | $13.25 | $33.1K |
| 2026-04-21 | Klein Mark D |
Open-market purchase | 2,500 | $13.08 | $32.7K |
Well-known investors holding NSLR (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.