NVNO 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
enVVeno Medical Corp · Nasdaq · Surgical & Medical Instruments & Apparatus · CIK 1661053 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “The Company received a not-approvable letter from the FDA.”
Largest changes
If we successfully develop product candidates, which at this time will likely take several years at a minimum, we will have to demonstrate the efficacy and financial viability of our products to doctors, hospitals, insurance companies, and other stakeholders.see in full comparison
“In October 2025, the Company completed an in-person meeting with the FDA. In addition to representatives from an outside firm specializing in FDA matters and appeals and representatives from the Company, the meeting also included a patient advocate from VenoValve U.S. pivotal study as well as one of the Company’s primary investigators from the trial. Several employees from the FDA attended the meeting including the Director of the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, who elected to hear the appeal and who will be issuing the appeal decision. …”see in full comparison
“On August 19, 2025, the Company received a not-approvable letter from the FDA in response to its PMA application for the VenoValve. The letter indicated that the FDA completed its review of the VenoValve PMA application and determined that it is unable to approve the PMA for the VenoValve in its current form. …”see in full comparison
“On September 18, 2025, the Company filed a request for supervisory appeal of the not-approvable letter from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) of the FDA received on August 19, 2025, in response to its PMA application for the VenoValve. The FDA provides several internal informal and formal mechanisms to challenge staff decisions, including scientific controversies. One mechanism is a request for supervisory review in which an appeal is made to the next line of supervision. These appeals involve a formal substantive request, an in-person meeting, and a decision. …”see in full comparison
“For example, with respect to the VenoValve, the FDA indicated that the favorable rVCSS data generated by the study to show clinical improvement, together with the improvements in pain scores and venous specific quality of life indicators was not sufficient on its own to determine favorability of the benefit risk profile for the VenoValve. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (25)
We
currently depend entirely on the successful and timely regulatory approval and commercialization of our current product candidates,candidate, and
any future product candidates, which may not receive regulatory approval or, if any of our product candidates do receive regulatory approval,
we may not be able to successfully commercialize them.
We
currently have twoone product candidates,candidate, the VenoValveenVVe and the enVVe,System, and our business presently depends entirely on our success with thesethis product
product candidates.candidate. In order for our product candidatescandidate to succeed theyit needneeds to be approved by regulatory authorities, which may never
happen. Our
product candidatescandidate areis based on technologies that have not been used previously in the manner we propose. Market acceptance
of our product
candidates will largely depend on our ability to demonstrate their relative safety, efficacy, cost-effectiveness and ease
of use. We
may not be able to successfully develop and commercialize our product candidates.candidate. If we fail to do so, we will not be able
to generate
substantial revenues, if any.
We
are subject to rigorous and extensive regulation by the FDA in the United States and by comparable agencies in other jurisdictions, including
the European Medicines Agency, or EMA, in the European Union, or EU. Our product candidatescandidate areis currently in development, and we have not
not received FDA approval for them.it. Our product candidatescandidate may not be marketed in the United States until they have been approved by
the FDA
and may not be marketed in other jurisdictions until they have received approval from the appropriate foreign regulatory agencies. A
Each product candidate requires significant research, development, preclinicalpre-clinical testing and extensive clinical investigation before submission
of any regulatory application for marketing approval. For example, on August 19, 2025, the Company received a not-approvable letter
from the FDA in response to its PMA application for the VenoValve. While the enVVe System is different than the VenoValve in that it
is a non-surgical, transcatheter based replacement venous valve, the enVVe System may also not receive FDA approval.
Obtaining
regulatory approval requires substantial time, effort and financial resources, and we may not be able to obtain approval of any of our
product candidates on a timely basis, or at all. The number, size, design and focus of preclinicalpre-clinical and clinical trials that will be
required required
for approval by the FDA, the EMA or any other foreign regulatory agency varies depending on the device, the disease or condition
that that
the product candidates are designed to address and the regulations applicable to particular products. PreclinicalPre-clinical and clinical
data can
be interpreted in different ways, which could delay, limit or preclude regulatory approval. The FDA, the EMA and other foreign
regulatory regulatory
agencies can delay, limit or deny approval of a product for many reasons, including, but not limited to:
For example, with respect to the VenoValve, the FDA indicated that the favorable rVCSS data generated by the study to show clinical improvement, together with the improvements in pain scores and venous specific quality of life indicators was not sufficient on its own to determine favorability of the benefit risk profile for the VenoValve. The FDA also referenced the use of a hemodynamic measurement that correlates with patient improvement, concerns about bias and the possibility that clinical improvement occurred as a result of the patients being enrolled in a study and safety concerns attributed to the VenoValve open surgical procedure, and that required re-hospitalizations.
If our current and future product candidates are not approved at all or quickly enough to provide net revenues to defray our operating expenses, our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects could be harmed.
If we successfully develop product candidates, which at this time will likely take several years at a minimum, we will have to demonstrate the efficacy and financial viability of our products to doctors, hospitals, insurance companies, and other stakeholders.
In
the United States, in order for surgeons to use our product candidates, the hospital facilities where these surgeons treat patients will
will typically require that the product candidates receive approval from the facility’s value analysis committee (“VAC”).
VACs VACs
typically review the comparative effectiveness and cost of medical devices used in the facility. The makeup and evaluation processes
for VACs vary considerably, and it can be a lengthy, costly and time-consuming effort to obtain approval by the relevant VAC. For example,
example, even if we have an agreement with a hospital system for the purchase of a product, in most cases, they must obtain VAC
approval by each
hospital within the system to sell at that particular hospital. Additionally, hospitals typically require separate
VAC approval for each
specialty in which a product is used, which may result in multiple VAC approval processes within the same
hospital even if such product
has already been approved for use by a different specialty group. VAC approval is often needed for
each different product to be used
by the surgeons in that specialty. In addition, hospital facilities and group purchasing
organizations, or GPOs, which manage purchasing
for multiple facilities, may also require us to enter into a purchasing agreement
and satisfy numerous elements of their administrative
procurement process, which can also be a lengthy, costly and time-consuming
effort. If we do not receive access to hospital facilities
in a timely manner, or at all, via these VAC and purchasing contract
processes, or otherwise, or if we are unable to secure contracts
on commercially reasonable terms in a timely manner, or at all, our
costs may increase, our sales may decrease and our operating results
may be harmed.
The
Company has incurred significant operating losses which have generated significant net operating loss carry-forwards for both
federal and state purposes.
Other than federal NOL carryforwards generated after 2017, our NOL carryforwards will expire if not used
over the next fivefour years. Our
ability to realize the benefits of these NOL carryforwards will depend on our ability to generate
income.
Further,
our ability to realize the benefits of NOL carryforwards are limited because of ownership changes. In general, a corporation that undergoes
undergoes an “ownership change” (generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its equity ownership over
a rolling three-yearthree
(3) year period) may be subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its NOLs and certain credit carryforwards to
offset future taxable
income and taxes. We have analyzed the tax impacts of ownership changes that occurred in 2018, 2021, 20232023, 2024, and
in 2024.2025. While those
ownership changes may have resulted in limits to the amount of NOLs that maycan be used in a given year, these are all
post 2017 NOLs and
are carried forward indefinitely.
To
the extent the Company utilizes its NOL carryforwards in the future, the tax years in which the attribute was generated may still be
adjusted upon examination by the Internal Revenue Service or state tax authorities of the future period tax return in which the attribute
is used.
The Company received a not-approvable letter from the FDA.
On August 19, 2025, the Company received a not-approvable letter from the FDA in response to its PMA application for the VenoValve. The letter indicated that the FDA completed its review of the VenoValve PMA application and determined that it is unable to approve the PMA for the VenoValve in its current form. In particular, the FDA indicated that the favorable rVCSS data generated by the study to show clinical improvement, together with the improvements in pain scores and venous specific quality of life indicators was not sufficient on its own to determine favorability of the benefit risk profile for the VenoValve. Without a specific hemodynamic measurement that correlates with patient improvement, the FDA raised concerns about bias and the possibility that clinical improvement occurred as a result of the patients being enrolled in a study. The FDA also focused on safety concerns which were attributed to the VenoValve open surgical procedure, and that required re-hospitalizations.
On September 18, 2025, the Company filed a request for supervisory appeal of the not-approvable letter from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) of the FDA received on August 19, 2025, in response to its PMA application for the VenoValve. The FDA provides several internal informal and formal mechanisms to challenge staff decisions, including scientific controversies. One mechanism is a request for supervisory review in which an appeal is made to the next line of supervision. These appeals involve a formal substantive request, an in-person meeting, and a decision. It also often includes multiple interactions even after an initial appeal decision is made. Internal Agency reviews are based on information already in the administrative file.
In October 2025, the Company completed an in-person meeting with the FDA. In addition to representatives from an outside firm specializing in FDA matters and appeals and representatives from the Company, the meeting also included a patient advocate from VenoValve U.S. pivotal study as well as one of the Company’s primary investigators from the trial. Several employees from the FDA attended the meeting including the Director of the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, who elected to hear the appeal and who will be issuing the appeal decision. The FDA meeting provided the Company with the opportunity to put the major adverse events—those tied to the SAVVE study’s safety endpoints—into the proper context. It also allowed the Company to re-emphasize the multiple physician-and patient-reported clinical benefits that comprise the totality of the evidence from the study, supported by firsthand perspectives shared by both the SAVVE study patient and investigator in attendance. Because there are no established industry or regulatory standards to determine the effectiveness for a replacement venous valve, it is necessary for the Company and the Agency to establish a new regulatory pathway for VenoValve effectiveness.
On November 13, 2025, the Company received an unfavorable decision from the FDA in response to its supervisory appeal of the not-approvable letter. The supervisory appeal upheld the review staff decision in the not-approvable letter that the VenoValve did not meet the standard of reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.
In light of receiving a not-approvable letter from the FDA and an unfavorable decision from the FDA in response to its supervisory appeal of the not-approvable letter, there can be no assurances that the Company will ever get regulatory approval for the VenoValve or for the enVVe System.
Our
product candidates maywill be subject to extensive governmental regulation in foreign jurisdictions, such as the EEA, and our failure to
comply with applicable requirements could cause our business, results of operations and financial condition to suffer.
In
the United States, our product candidates are regulated as medical devices. Before our medical device product candidates may be marketed
marketed in the United States, we must submit, and the FDA must approve a PMA application. For the PMA approval process, the FDA
must determine
that a proposed device is safe and effective for its intended use based, in part, on extensive data, including, but
not limited to, technical,
pre-clinical, clinical trial, manufacturing and labeling data. In addition, modifications to products
that are approved through a PMA
application generally require FDA approval. The time required to obtain approval, clearance or
license by the FDA to market a new therapy
is unpredictable but typically takes years and depends upon many factors, including the
substantial discretion of the FDA.FDA, especially
after the Company received a not-approvable letter from the FDA related to the VenoValve. This timeline may be further extended as a
result of the recent reduction in workforce that has taken place within
the federal government, including at the FDA.
For example, with respect to the VenoValve, the FDA indicated that the favorable rVCSS data generated by the study to show clinical improvement, together with the improvements in pain scores and venous specific quality of life indicators was not sufficient on its own to determine favorability of the benefit risk profile for the VenoValve. The FDA also referenced the use of a hemodynamic measurement that correlates with patient improvement, concerns about bias and the possibility that clinical improvement occurred as a result of the patients being enrolled in a study and safety concerns attributed to the VenoValve open surgical procedure, and that required re-hospitalizations.
In
addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the PPACA was enacted. On August 2,
2011, 2011,
the Budget Control Act of 2011 created measures for spending reductions by Congress. A Joint Select Committee on Deficit
Reduction, tasked
with recommending a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2013 through 2021, was
unable to reach required
goals, thereby triggering the legislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs. This
includes aggregate reductions
of Medicare payments to providers up to 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect on April 1, 2013,2013.
The and2% will remainreduction in effectMedicare payments to providers, originally triggered by the Budget Control Act of 2011, has been extended
multiple times. Most recently, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 extended this 2% sequester through
2024 unlessfiscal additionalyear Congressional action is taken.2032. On
January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, or the ATRA, was
signed into law which further reduced Medicare payments
to certain providers, including hospitals.
We
have filed patent applications for our products and related intellectual property with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and in other
jurisdictions. As of the December 31, 2024,2025, we have been granted thirty-nineforty-two (3942) patents including eightnine (89) in the United States and have
have another twenty-fourtwenty-one (2421) applications in various stages of review including fivesix (56) in the United States].States.
Our
patents may not have, or our pending patent applications that mature into issued patents may not include, claims with a scope sufficient
to protect our products, any additional features we develop for our current products or any new products. Other parties may have developed
technologies that may be related or competitive to our products, may have filed or may file patent applications and may have received
or may receive patents that overlap or conflict with our patent applications, either by claiming the same methods or devices or by claiming
subject matter that could dominate our patent position. The patent positions of medical device companies, including our patent position,
may involve complex legal and factual questions, and, therefore, the scope, validity and enforceability of any patent claims that we
may obtain cannot be predicted with certainty. Patents, if issued, may be challenged, deemed unenforceable, invalidated or circumvented.
Proceedings challenging our patents could result in either loss of the patent or denial of the patent application or loss or reduction
in the scope of one or more of the claims of the patent or patent application. In addition, such proceedings may be costly. Thus, any
patents that we may own may not provide any protection against competitors. Furthermore, an adverse decision in an interference proceeding
can result in a third party receiving the patent right sought by us, which in turn could affect our ability to commercialize our implant
systems.
The
medical device industry is characterized by frequent and extensive litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights.
Many medical device companies with substantially greater resources than us have employed intellectual property litigation as a way to
gain a competitive advantage. We may become involved in litigation, interference proceedings, oppositions, reexamination, protest or
other potentially adverse
intellectual property proceedings as a result of alleged infringement by us of the rights of others or as a
result of priority of invention
disputes with third parties, either in the United States or internationally. We may also become a party
to patent infringement claims
and litigation or interference proceedings declared by the USPTO to determine the priority of inventions.
Third parties may also challenge the validity of any of
our issued patents and we may initiate proceedings to enforce our patent rights
and prevent others from infringing on our intellectual
property rights. Any claims relating to the infringement of third-party proprietary
rights or proprietary determinations, even if not
meritorious, could result in costly litigation, lengthy governmental proceedings, diversion
of our management’s attention and resources,
or entrance into royalty or license agreements that are not advantageous to us. In
any of these circumstances, we may need to spend significant
amounts of money, time and effort defending our position. Some of our competitors
may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent
litigation more effectively than we can because they have substantially greater resources.
In addition, any uncertainties resulting from
the initiation and continuation of any litigation could have a material adverse effect
on our ability to raise the funds necessary to
continue our operations.
As
of theMarch date24, of this Annual Report,2026, we have issued and outstanding options to purchase 5,921,699181,996 shares of our common stock with a weighted
average exercise price of $7.17, 400,000 restricted stock units subject to vesting,$220.41 and warrants to purchase 12,662,953177,921 shares of our
common stock with a weighted average exercise price
of $6.11.$278.26. Further, we have 828,79838,154 shares available for issuance under our Amended
and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Recent Developments”
New heading “2026 Reverse Stock Split”
Largest changes
Thesee in full comparisonCompany’sCompanyleadfirstproduct isdeveloped the VenoValve®, whichiswas a first-in-class surgical replacement venousvalvevalve.thatOnisAugustcurrently19,being2025, the Companyevaluatedreceived a not-approvable letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) inaresponseU.S.topivotalitsstudy.PMA application for the VenoValve. The Company isalsonowdevelopingfocusedaonseconditsproductnext-generation, non-surgical venous valve product, called the enVVe®,whichsystem. The enVVe System consists of the enVVe Valve, enVVe Delivery System, enVVe Nose Cone, the enVVe Delivery System Accessories, and the enVVe Crimping System. The enVVe Valve is a first-in-class, non-surgical, transcatheter based replacement venousvalve.valve being developed for the treatment of severe CVI. TheCompanyenVVe Valve iscurrently conducting pre-clinical testing on enVVe. Both the VenoValve and enVVe aredesigned to act as a one-wayvalves,valve, to help assist in propelling blood up the veins of the leg, and back to the heart and lungs. The Company has completed pre-clinical testing on the enVVe System and has begun discussions with the FDA regarding the enVVe pivotal trial.
“For the year ended December 31, 2024, research and development expenses decreased by $1.4 million or 10%, to $12.2 million from $13.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease is due to a decrease of $2.2 million in costs for the SAVVE trial, and a $0.3 million decrease in other lab costs, partially offset by an increase of $0.9 million in employee compensation from the increases in staffing, and an increase of $0.2 million in costs related to the GLP study for the enVVe. …”see in full comparison
“For the year ended December 31, 2024, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $0.1 million or 1%, to $11.6 million from $11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease is primarily driven by share-based compensation which decreased $1.1 million from 2023 to 2024. Selling, general and administrative expenses also decreased $0.1 million from lower travel cost, and $0.1 million from lower insurance cost in 2024. …”see in full comparison
“As a late-stage clinical medical device Company, we are not currently generating revenue and our future revenue, if any, is dependent on our ability to commercialize our product candidates. We will not begin generating revenue with respect to any of our product candidates until after we obtain FDA approval, if at all. We hope to eventually achieve revenues by commercializing and selling our products or licensing our technologies to companies that have the resources and infrastructure in place to manufacture, market and sell our products. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (26)
Overview enVVeno
Medical Corporation is a late clinical-stage medical device company focused on the advancement of innovative bioprosthetic (tissue-based)
solutions to improve
the standard of care for the treatment of venous disease. Chronic Venous Disease (“CVD”) is the world’s most prevalent
prevalent chronic disease, impacting approximately 70% of the adult population of the U.S. Chronic Venous Insufficiency (“CVI”), is
a large
subset of CVD, which most often occurs when valves inside of the veins of the leg become damaged, resulting in the backwards
flow of
blood (reflux), blood pooling in the lower leg, increased pressure in the veins of the leg (venous hypertension) and in severe
cases, cases,
venous ulcers that are difficult to heal. The Company is developing surgical and non-surgicala replacement venous valvesvalve for patients
suffering from severe
CVI of the deep venous system of the leg.
The
Company’sCompany leadfirst product isdeveloped the VenoValve®, which iswas a first-in-class surgical replacement venous valvevalve. thatOn isAugust currently19, being2025, the Company
evaluatedreceived a not-approvable letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) in aresponse U.S.to pivotalits study.PMA application for
the VenoValve. The Company is alsonow developingfocused aon secondits productnext-generation, non-surgical venous valve product, called the enVVe®, whichsystem. The
enVVe System consists of the enVVe Valve, enVVe Delivery System, enVVe Nose Cone, the enVVe Delivery System Accessories, and the enVVe
Crimping System. The enVVe Valve is a first-in-class, non-surgical,
transcatheter based replacement venous valve.valve being developed for
the treatment of severe CVI. The CompanyenVVe Valve is currently conducting pre-clinical testing on enVVe. Both the VenoValve and
enVVe are designed to act as a one-way valves,valve, to help assist in propelling blood up the veins of
the leg, and back to the heart and lungs. The Company has completed pre-clinical testing on the enVVe System and has begun discussions
with the FDA regarding the enVVe pivotal trial.
TheenVVe
VenoValve and enVVe areis being developed first for approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).FDA. We expect the VenoValve to
be eligible for FDA approval first, followed two to three years later by enVVe. If approved, we expect the VenoValve and enVVe to co-exist,
with the VenoValve as a surgical replacement venous valve option and enVVe as a non-surgical replacement venous valve option, although
we cannot provide any assurance that either the VenoValve or enVVe will receive approval from the FDA (see the section entitled “Risk
Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). There are currently no devices approved as surgical or non-surgical replacement venous
valves, and there are currently no effective treatments for deep venous CVI caused by incompetent valves.
The Company has completed pre-clinical testing on the enVVe System and has begun discussions with the FDA regarding the enVVe pivotal trial, which it expects to begin in 2026.
OurWe
team of officers and directors has been affiliated with numerous medical devices that have received FDA approval or CE marking and that
have been commercially successful. We develop and manufacture our products in connection with our clinical trials in a 14,507 sq. ft.
leased manufacturing facility in Irvine,
California, which has been ISO 13485-2016 certified for the design, development and manufacturing
of tissue based implantable medical
devices.
Recent Developments
2026 Reverse Stock Split
At the annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders held on December 11, 2025 (the “2025 Annual Meeting”), the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of our common stock, at a ratio between one-for-five (1:5) and one-for-thirty-five (1:35).
On January 2, 2026, the Company’s board of directors approved a one-for-thirty-five (1:35) reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of our common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”). On January 16, 2026, the Company filed an amendment to the amended and restated certificate of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to effect the Reverse Stock Split, which became effective on January 20, 2026. The amendment did not change the number of authorized shares of our common stock.
Except as the context otherwise requires, all common stock share numbers, share price amounts (including exercise prices, conversion prices, and closing market prices) and shares issued upon the exercise of warrants contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock Split.
Overview
We reported net losses of $19.5 million and $21.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, representing a decrease in net loss of $2.3 million or 11%, resulting from, as described in further detail below, a decrease in operating expenses of $2.9 million, and a decrease in other income of $0.6 million.
As a developmental stage Company, our revenue, if any, is expected to be diminutive and dependent on our ability to commercialize our product candidates. We are not currently generating revenue and do not expect significant revenue until we successfully commercialize our lead product candidate after receiving FDA approval, if ever.
As
a late-stage clinical medical device Company, we are not currently generating revenue and our future revenue, if any, is dependent
on our ability to commercialize our product candidates. We will not begin generating revenue with respect to any of our product
candidates until after we obtain FDA approval, if at all. We hope to eventually achieve revenues by commercializing and selling our products or licensing
our technologies to companies that have the resources and infrastructure in place to manufacture, market and sell our products. The
commercialization and/or licensing of any of our products may take several years, if it is to occur at all, and depends on our
ability to obtain regulatory approval.
Net
Loss
We
reported net losses of $21.8 million and $23.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, representing a decrease
in net loss of $1.7 million or 7%, resulting from, as described in further detail below, a decrease in operating expenses of $1.5 million,
and an increase in other income of $0.2 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, research and development expenses decreased by $2.2 million or 19%, to $10.0 million from $12.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease primarily resulted from $2.4 million in lower costs related to the VenoValve study as the amount of follow-up for each participant decreases over time, partially offset by $0.2 million in higher compensation costs from additional personnel. We expect a moderate overall increase in expenses from current levels as costs related to the VenoValve pivotal study continue and costs related to the enVVe pivotal study would begin if IDE approval from the FDA is received.
For
the year ended December 31, 2024, research and development expenses decreased by $1.4 million or 10%, to $12.2 million from $13.6
million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease is due to a decrease of $2.2 million in costs for the SAVVE trial, and a
$0.3 million decrease in other lab costs, partially offset by an increase of $0.9 million in employee compensation from the
increases in staffing, and an increase of $0.2 million in costs related to the GLP study for the enVVe. Costs related to SAVVE
decreased in 2024 because, after full enrollment in 2023, activity shifted to ongoing monitoring, data collection, and preparation
and filing of the PMA. The increase in compensation cost is due to the hiring of additional personnel supporting ongoing VenoValve
testing and trial activity in addition to the preparation for the enVVe GLP study.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $0.7 million or 6%, to $10.9 million from $11.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. This decrease is primarily driven by $1.1 million in non-recurring legal costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2024 and $0.7 million from the net effect of lower stock-based compensation cost incurred as option grants are issued and vest. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.3 million non-recurring severance expense recorded in 2025, $0.4 million related to higher compensation costs from additional personnel, and a net $0.4 million increase related to various other expenses.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, selling, general and administrative
expenses decreased by $0.1 million or 1%, to $11.6 million from $11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease is primarily
driven by share-based compensation which decreased $1.1 million from 2023 to 2024. Selling, general and administrative expenses also decreased
$0.1 million from lower travel cost, and $0.1 million from lower insurance cost in 2024. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.7 million increase in legal costs and a $0.5 million increase in
costs related to conferences, and market research as the Company started increasing its market visibility in anticipation of commercialization activity if FDA approval
of the VenoValve PMA is received.
For
the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, other income increaseddecreased $0.3$0.6 million
to $2.0$1.4 million from $1.7$2.0 million for the year ended SeptemberDecember 30,31,
2024 2023.as a result of the Company holding less U.S. Treasury securities in 2025 than 2024. Other income in both periods reflects net realized
gains, interest,
and unrealized gainslosses from our program to invest excess cash in U.S. Treasury securities.
The
operating losses and the uses of cash are primarily due to the Company’s product research and development and administrative activities.
Administrative functions relate to costs to support the Company’s public reporting and investor relations activities as well as
internal administrative functions. Research and development activities arewere for continued product development and clinical trials for the VenoValve
VenoValve and for enVVe.the enVVe System. The Company will continue to incur these costs to complete its clinical trials,trials for the VenoValve and the enVVe
System, enhance products, develop new
products, and operate as a public company for the foreseeable future as we seek to obtain regulatory
approval for our studies and product
candidates.
We
are not currently generating revenue. However, with the filing of our final PMA module completed in December 2024, we hope to
receive FDA approval during 2026, and we have commenced limited activity toward commercial launch in anticipation of that approval.
To-date, this activity is primarily market research and attendance at conferences. If and when we receive FDA approval of our PMA,
we expect to significantly increase costs related to commercial launch and to direct spending toward establishing our market presence and
generating revenue.
We
do not currently have material commitments for capital expenditures or other expenditures with the exception of our facility lease commitment
of $0.3$0.4 million per year. We expect a modestnominal increase in purchases of property and equipment and in facility lease costs as we continuecommence
SAVVE, commence TAVVE, and plan for commercialization of the VenoValve.TAVVE.
Our
future capital requirements will remain dependent upon a variety of factors, especially including the success of our clinical trials
and related product development costs and our ability to successfully bring products to market. We anticipate that our cash burn rate
willmay increase from current levels of approximately $4 million per quarter to between $4 million and $5 million per quarter to $5 million to $6 million per quarter in 2025.2026. Even
Even after considering this increase, we should have sufficient cash to fund operations through mid-2026.mid-2027.
We
have historically funded our operations through financing activities such as the capital raises completed in 2024 and 2023.raises. We will need
to raise additional capital
in the future. Any inability to raise additional financing would have a material adverse effect on us.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide information required by this Item. Our current risk factors are set forth in our Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 26, 2026.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
New heading “Research and Development Expenses”
New heading “Selling, General and Administrative Expenses”
Largest changes
see in full comparisonOn AprilThe29, 2026, the Company announced that the FDA had approved the Company’s Investigational Device Exemption (“IDE”) application, authorizing the Company to commence a study of a non-surgical replacement venous valve. The Transcatheter Venous Valve Endoprosthesis (“TAVVE®”) pivotal study will evaluate the Company’s minimally invasive enVVe System for patients with severe deep CVI. Thefirst stage of the TAVVE study, which is expected to commencelaterinthistheyear,second half of 2026, will consist of 10 patients, whose 30-day safetysafetyresults will be submitted to the FDA for review. This group of 10 patients will continue to be followed as a separate cohort throughout the study, and their safety and efficacy data will be reported publicly from time to time. The second stage of the study, which will beginbeginimmediately after the 30-day safety results for the first group are reported to the FDA, will enroll 220 patients, with 165 patients receivingreceivingthe enVVe valve, and 55 patients randomized into a control arm who will receive standard of care treatment. The results from the patients who receive the enVVe valve will be compared to the results from the patients in the control arm of the study. The TAVVE study will enroll patients at up to 40 U.S. clinical sites and will include vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists and interventional cardiologists.cardiologists.One year after the 220th patient is enrolled in the second stage of the study, the Company would be eligible to file for FDAFDApost-marketing approval.
“In April 2026, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) awarded the Company an Investigational Device Exemption (“IDE”) approval to proceed with a U.S. pivotal study of the enVVe System. The Transcatheter Venous Valve Endoprosthesis (“TAVVE”) pivotal study will evaluate the Company’s minimally invasive enVVe System for patients with severe CVI.”see in full comparison
“Data from the SAVVE pivotal study has been presented at vascular conferences throughout the world and has been very well received. Clinicians recognize the need for a replacement venous valve for patients suffering from deep venous CVI and we believe that both the short-term and long-term VenoValve efficacy data has been extremely promising for this difficult to treat patient population. Although interest in a surgical replacement venous valve has been strong, clinicians recognize that long-term the large potential market is best served via a trans-catheter delivered iteration of the device. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (36)
Overview enVVeno
Medical Corporation is a late-stage medical device company focused on the advancement of innovative bioprosthetic (tissue-based)
solutions to improve
the standard of care for the treatment of venous disease. Chronic Venous Disease (“CVD”) is the
world’s most prevalent
chronic disease, impacting approximately 70% of the adult population of the U.S. Chronic Venous
Insufficiency (“CVI”), is
a large subset of CVD, which most often occurs when valves inside of the veins of the leg
become becomepermanently damaged, resulting in the backwards
flow of blood (reflux), blood pooling in the lower leg, increased pressure in
the veins of the leg (venous hypertension) and in severe
cases, venous ulcers that are difficult to heal. The Company is developing
a anon-surgical replacement venous valve for patients suffering from severe
CVI of the deep venous system of the leg.
The
Company first developed the VenoValve®, which was a first-in-class surgical replacement venous valve (the Company received a not-approvable
letter from the FDA in response to its PMA application for the VenoValve in August 2025). The Company is now focused on its next-generation,
non-surgical replacement venous valve product,valve, called the enVVe® System. The enVVe System consists
of the enVVe Valve, enVVe Delivery System,
enVVe Nose Cone, the enVVe Delivery System Accessories, and the enVVe Crimping System. The
enVVe Valve is a first-in-class,first-in-class non-surgical,
transcatheter based replacement venous valve being developed for the treatment of severesevere, deep venous
CVI. The enVVe Valve is designed to act as a
one-way valve, to help assist in propelling blood up the veins of the leg, and back to the
heart and lungs. The Company has completed
pre-clinical testing on the enVVe System.
In April 2026, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) awarded the Company an Investigational Device Exemption (“IDE”) approval to proceed with a U.S. pivotal study of the enVVe System. The Transcatheter Venous Valve Endoprosthesis (“TAVVE”) pivotal study will evaluate the Company’s minimally invasive enVVe System for patients with severe CVI.
The IDE approval positions the Company to advance what could become the first effective treatment option for the approximately 3 million U.S. patients who suffer from the debilitating impact of severe CVI due to malfunctioning valves in the deep veins of the leg.
On AprilThe
29, 2026, the Company announced that the FDA had approved the Company’s Investigational Device Exemption (“IDE”) application,
authorizing the Company to commence a study of a non-surgical replacement venous valve. The Transcatheter Venous Valve Endoprosthesis
(“TAVVE®”) pivotal study will evaluate the Company’s minimally invasive enVVe System for patients with severe
deep CVI. The first stage of the TAVVE study, which is expected to commence laterin thisthe year,second half of 2026, will consist of 10 patients, whose 30-day safety
safety results will be submitted to the FDA for review. This group of 10 patients will continue to be followed as a separate cohort throughout
the study, and their safety and efficacy data will be reported publicly from time to time. The second stage of the study, which will
begin begin
immediately after the 30-day safety results for the first group are reported to the FDA, will enroll 220 patients, with 165 patients
receiving receiving
the enVVe valve, and 55 patients randomized into a control arm who will receive standard of care treatment. The results from
the patients
who receive the enVVe valve will be compared to the results from the patients in the control arm of the study. The TAVVE
study will enroll
patients at up to 40 U.S. clinical sites and will include vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists and interventional
cardiologists. cardiologists.
One year after the 220th patient is enrolled in the second stage of the study, the Company would be eligible to file for
FDA FDA
post-marketing approval.
We
cannot provide any assurance that the enVVe System will receive pre-market approval from the FDA to be marketed and sold in the U.S.
(see the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 26, 2026). There
are currently no devices approved as surgical or non-surgical replacement venous valves, and there are currently no effective
treatments for deep venous CVI caused by incompetent valves.
The
human leg contains three vein systems: the deep vein system, the superficial vein system, and the perforator vein system which connects
the deep system to the superficial system. The deep venous system is located below the muscle and facia in the center portion of the
leg and is responsible for approximately 90% of the blood flow. In order for blood to return to the heart from the foot, ankle, and lower
leg, the calf muscle serves as a pump and pushes the blood up the veins of the leg against gravity and through a series of one-way valves.
Each valve is supposed to open as blood passes through, and then close as blood progresses up the veins of the leg to the next valve.
CVI occurs when the one-way valves in the veins of the leg fail and become incompetent.permanently damaged. When the valves fail, gravity causes the blood
to flow backwards and in the wrong direction (reflux). As blood pools in the lower leg, pressure inside the veins increases (venous hypertension).
Reflux, and the resulting venous hypertension, causes the leg to swell, resulting in debilitating pain, and in the most severe cases,
venous ulcers.
The
enVVe System is designed to treat severe deep CVI through a minimally invasive, catheter-based approach.procedure. The procedure is performed
without without
the need for open surgery or an overnight hospital stay. Built on the clinical foundation of the VenoValve® surgical
replacement venous valve program, which demonstrated significant clinical improvement in severe CVI patients, the enVVe Valve incorporatesSystem
design enhancements intended to improve performance, strength and long-term durability. The enVVe System seeks to address prior FDA concerns
discerned in the clinical trial process for the VenoValve related to venousthe valves implanted viaVenoValve’s open surgical procedures.implantation procedure. In addition to
to eliminating open surgical complications, itsthe enVVe System’s transcatheter approach is expected to broaden adoption by
appealing to a wider range
of implanting physicians including vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, and interventional
cardiologists.
TheOn
Company has completed pre-clinical testing on the enVVe System and, on April 29, 2026, the Company announced that the FDA had approved the Company’s IDE application, authorizing
the Company to
commence a pivotal study offor athe non-surgicalenVVe replacement venous valve.System. The TAVVE pivotal study will evaluate the
Company’s Company’s
minimally invasive enVVe System for patients with severe deep CVI. The first stage of the TAVVE study, which is
expected to commence later
this year, will consist of 10 patients, whose 30-day safety results will be submitted to the FDA for
review. This group of 10 patients
will continue to be followed as a separate cohort throughout the study, and their safety and
efficacy data will be reported publicly from
time to time. The second stage of the study, which will begin immediately after the
30-day safety results for the first group are reported
to the FDA, will enroll 220 patients, with 165 patients receiving the enVVe
valve, and 55 patients randomized into a control arm who will
receive standard of care treatment. The results from the patients who
receive the enVVe valve will be compared to the results from the
patients in the control arm of the study. The TAVVE study will
enroll patients at up to 40 U.S. clinical sites and will include vascular
surgeons, interventional radiologists and interventional
cardiologists. One year after the 220th patient is enrolled in the
second stage of the study, the Company would be
eligible to file for FDA post-marketing approval.
VenoValve
In March 2021, the Company received IDE approval from the FDA to initiate
the Surgical Anti-reflux Venous Valve Endoprosthesis (“SAVVE®”) U.S. pivotal clinical study evaluating the VenoValve.
The prospective, multi-center, single-arm study enrolled 75 patients with severe CVI. An application seeking pre-market approval for the
VenoValve was filed in November 2024. In August 2025, the Company received a non-approvable letter from the FDA for the VenoValve and
a subsequent appeal was unsuccessful.
Most
medical devices start out as surgical iterations and transition to less invasive, trans-catheter delivered versions over time. The Company’s
strategy was to first develop the VenoValve, and then to transition to enVVe. That strategy remains intact. The enVVe System could not
have been developed without the experience gained from the VenoValve. Because the VenoValve was not approved by the FDA, the Company
has elected to forego any potential approval and commercialization efforts outside of the U.S. for the VenoValve and to instead focus
its resources on bringing the enVVe System to market.
Data
from the SAVVE pivotal study has been presented at vascular conferences throughout the world and has been very well received. Clinicians
recognize the need for a replacement venous valve for patients suffering from deep venous CVI and we believe that both the short-term
and long-term VenoValve efficacy data has been extremely promising for this difficult to treat patient population. Although interest
in a surgical replacement venous valve has been strong, clinicians recognize that long-term the large potential market is best served
via a trans-catheter delivered iteration of the device. There continues to be significant interest from clinicians wanting to participate
in the TAVVE pivotal study.
We
finished 2025 with approximately $28.2 million of cash and investments and had approximately $24.9$21.5 million of cash and investments as
as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. Our future capital requirements will remain dependent upon a variety of factors, especially including the
success of
our clinical trials, related product development costs, and our ability to successfully bring products to market. We
anticipate that
our cash burn rate may increase from current levels of approximately $3 million to $4 million per quarter to between
$4 million and $5
million per quarter in the second half of 2026. Even after considering this increase, we should have sufficient cash and investments
to fund operations into the third quarter of 2027.
We
have historically funded our operations through financing activities such as the capital raises.raises and an at-the-market equity program. We will
need to raise additional capital
in the future. Any inability to raise additional financing would have a material adverse effect on us.
Based
upon our cash and working capital as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we have sufficient capital resources to meet our obligations as they become due
within at least one year after the date of this Quarterly Report and sustain operations.
Comparison
of the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025
We
reported net losses of $3.8$3.6 million and $4.5$6.7 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, representing a
decrease in net loss of $0.7$3.1 million, or 15%,46%, due to a decrease in operating expenses of $0.9$3.3 million, partially offset by a decrease
in other income of $0.2 million, as described in further detail below.
For
the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, research and development expenses decreased by $0.5$0.8 million or 17%,28%, to $2.1 million from $2.6$2.9 million
million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. This decrease primarily resulted from $0.7$1.1 million in lower costs related to the VenoValve
pivotal study as the amount of follow-up for each participant decreases over time and our focus has shifted to the development of the
enVVe System,time, as well as a net decrease of $0.2$0.1 million in various
other expenses. These decreases were partially offset by an increase
of $0.4 million inas our focus has shifted to product development,
testing and other expenses related to the enVVe System being developed for approval by the FDA.
For
the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $0.4$2.5 million or 19%,59%, to $2.0$1.7 million
from $2.4$4.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease was due to the net effect of lower stock-based compensation
cost incurred as option grants are issued and vest,vest representing $1.0 million, as well as a non-recurring $0.6 million reserve for potentially
uncollectible prepaid clinical costs and a non-recurring severance expense of $0.3 million recorded during the three months ended June
30, 2025, and a net decrease$0.6 inmillion related to various other expenses.
For
the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, other income decreased $0.3$0.2 million or 53%45% to $0.2 million from $0.5$0.4 million for the three months
ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Other income in both periods reflects realized gains, interest, and unrealized gains or losses from our program
to invest excess cash in U.S. Treasury securities.
Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
Overview
We reported net losses of $7.4 million and $11.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, representing a decrease in net loss of $3.8 million, or 33%, due to a decrease in operating expenses of $4.2 million, partially offset by a decrease in other income of $0.4 million, as described in further detail below.
Revenues
As a developmental stage Company, our revenue, if any, is expected to be diminutive and dependent on our ability to commercialize our product candidates. We are not currently generating revenue and do not expect significant revenue until we successfully commercialize our lead product candidate after receiving FDA approval, if ever.
Research and Development Expenses
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, research and development expenses decreased by $1.3 million or 23%, to $4.2 million from $5.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. This decrease primarily resulted from $1.8 million in lower costs related to the VenoValve pivotal study as the amount of follow-up for each participant decreases over time, as well as a net decrease of $0.4 million in various other expenses. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $0.9 million as our focus has shifted to product development, testing and other expenses related to the enVVe System being developed for approval by the FDA.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $2.9 million or 44%, to $3.7 million from $6.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was due to the net effect of lower stock-based compensation cost incurred as option grants are issued and vest representing $1.3 million, as well as a non-recurring $0.6 million reserve for potentially uncollectible prepaid clinical costs and a non-recurring severance expense of $0.3 million recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2025, and a net $0.7 million related to various other expenses.
Other Income
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, other income decreased $0.4 million or 49% to $0.4 million from $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Other income in both periods reflects realized gains, interest, and unrealized gains or losses from our program to invest excess cash in U.S. Treasury securities.
For
the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company incurred losses from operations of $4.1$7.9 million and used $3.2$6.8 million cash in operating
activities. The net cash used in operating activities during the 2026 period decreased by $0.8$0.9 million from $4.0$7.7 million for the threesix
months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 primarily due to the decrease in research and development expenses from 2025 to 2026. Our cash balance as
of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, is $2.6$2.8 million. In addition, we have $22.3$18.7 million in investments, for total cash and investments of $24.9$21.5 million.
Our
future capital requirements will remain dependent upon a variety of factors, especially including the success of our clinical trials
and related product development costs and our ability to successfully bring products to market. We anticipate that our cash burn rate
rate may increase from current levels of approximately $3 million to $4 million per quarter to between $4 million and $5 million per quarter
quarterin inthe second half of 2026. Even after considering this increase, we should have sufficient cash and investments to fund operations into
the the
third quarter of 2027.
We
have historically funded our operations through financing activities such as the capital raises.raises and an at-the-market equity program. We will
need to raise additional capital
in the future. Any inability to raise additional financing would have a material adverse effect on us.
Based
upon our cash and working capital as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we have sufficient capital resources to meet our obligations as they become due
within at least one year after the date of this Quarterly Report and sustain operations.
NVNO insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 2 filings (1 insider, 2 trade dates, 151 shares, about $1.6K; 2 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -151 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$1.6K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-11 | Duhay Francis |
Open-market sale |
11 | $11.21 | $123 |
| 2026-06-11 | Duhay Francis |
Open-market sale |
140 | $10.31 | $1.4K |
Well-known investors holding NVNO (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.