OBDC 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Blue Owl Capital Corp · NYSE · CIK 1655888 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Macroeconomic Factors”
New heading “Capital markets disruption and economic uncertainty could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.”
New heading “Cybersecurity risks and cyber data security incidents could adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information and confidential information in our possession and damage to our business relationships.”
New heading “Use of AI technologies by us could lead to the exposure of our data or other adverse effects and increase competitive, operational, legal, and regulatory risks in ways that we cannot predict.”
New heading “Economic sanction laws in the U.S. and other jurisdictions may prohibit us and our affiliates from transacting with certain countries, individuals and companies.”
New heading “Failure to comply with anti-corruption laws or with regulations regarding the prevention of money laundering or terrorism or national security could adversely affect our business.”
Removed heading “Risks Related to the Economy”
Removed heading “Global economic, political and market conditions, including uncertainty about the financial stability of the United States, could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.”
Removed heading “Economic recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and harm our operating results.”
Removed heading “Provisions in our current borrowings or any other future borrowings may limit discretion in operating our business.”
Removed heading “We are subject to risks associated with the market’s limited experience with SOFR, which will affect our cost of capital and results of operations.”
Removed heading “Internal and external cybersecurity threats and risks, as well as other disasters, may adversely affect our business or the business of our portfolio companies by impairing the ability to conduct business effectively.”
Removed heading “We are dependent on information systems and systems failures could significantly disrupt our business, which may, in turn, negatively affect our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.”
Removed heading “Risks Related to the Mergers”
Removed heading “We may be unable to realize the benefits anticipated by the Mergers, including estimated cost savings, or it may take longer than anticipated to achieve such benefits.”
Removed heading “Our Adviser or its affiliates may have incentives to favor their respective other accounts and clients and/or Blue Owl over us, which may result in conflicts of interest that could be harmful to us.”
Removed heading “The recommendations given to us by our Adviser may differ from those rendered to their other clients.”
Removed heading “Our Adviser’s inability to attract, retain and develop human capital in a highly competitive talent market could have an adverse effect on our Adviser, and thus us.”
Removed heading “Our investments in portfolio companies may expose us to environmental risks.”
Removed heading “We cannot assure you that the market price of shares of our common stock will not decline.”
Removed heading “Government intervention in the credit markets could adversely affect our business.”
Removed heading “We may experience fluctuations in our operating results.”
Largest changes
“Many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay our debt investments during these periods. In the past, instability in the global capital markets resulted in disruptions in liquidity in the debt capital markets, significant write-offs in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated credit market and the failure of major domestic and international financial institutions. …”see in full comparison
“Our business, financial conditions and results of operations may be affected by conditions and trends in the global financial markets and the global economic and political climate relating to, among other things, fluctuations in interest rates, the availability and cost of credit, future increases in inflation, economic uncertainty, changes in laws (including laws and regulations relating to our taxation, taxation of our clients and applicable to alternative asset managers), trade policies, commodity prices, tariffs (including retaliatory tariffs), currency exchange rates and controls …”see in full comparison
“The current worldwide financial markets situation, as well as various social, political, economic and other conditions and events (including political tensions in the United States and around the world, wars and other forms of conflict (including, for example, the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine and conflict in the Middle East and Northern Africa region), terrorist acts, security operations and catastrophic events, natural disasters such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, global health epidemics, pandemics and emergencies, fluctuations in interest rates, strikes …”see in full comparison
“Uncertainty can result in or coincide with, among other things: increased volatility in the financial markets for securities, derivatives, loans, credit and currency; a decrease in the reliability of market prices and difficulty in valuing assets (including portfolio company assets); greater fluctuations in spreads on debt investments and currency exchange rates; increased risk of default (by both government and private obligors and issuers); further social, economic, and political instability; nationalization of private enterprise; …”see in full comparison
“Global financial markets have experienced heightened volatility in recent periods, including as a result of economic and political events in or affecting the world’s major economies, such as the ongoing wars and conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, as well as continued political and social unrest in Venezuela, the Middle East and regions of North Africa. Concerns over economic recession, future increases in inflation, interest rate volatility, fluctuations in oil and gas prices resulting from global production and demand levels and geopolitical tension, have exacerbated market volatility. …”see in full comparison
“Any of the above factors, including sanctions, export controls, tariffs, trade wars and other governmental actions, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common shares and/or debt securities to decline. The United States has recently enacted and proposed to enact significant new tariffs. Additionally, the new U.S. Presidential administration has directed various federal agencies to further evaluate key aspects of U.S. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (192)
We are subject to risks related to themacroeconomic economy.factors.
•Global economic, political and market conditions, including uncertainty about the financial stability of the United States, could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
•TheDifficult current period of capital markets disruptionmarket and economicgeopolitical uncertaintyconditions could have a materialsignificant adverse effect on our business, financial condition orand results of operations.
•Capital markets disruption and economic uncertainty could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
•InflationFuture increases in inflation may adversely affect the business, results of operations and financial condition of our portfolio companies.
•Fluctuations in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our business and that of our portfolio companies.
•We are dependent on information systems and systems failures could significantly disrupt our business, which may, in turn, negatively affect our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.
•Defaults and provisions under our current borrowings or any future borrowing facility or notes may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
•BecauseOur ability to achieve our businessinvestment modelobjective also depends to a significant extent upon Blue Owl’s relationships with corporations, financial institutions and investment firms, the inability of Blue Owl to maintain or develop these relationships, or the failure of these relationships to generate investment opportunities, could adversely affect our business.
•Cybersecurity risks and cyber data security incidents could adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information and confidential information in our possession and damage to our business relationships.
•Use of AI technologies by us could lead to the exposure of our data or other adverse effects and increase competitive, operational, legal, and regulatory risks in ways that we cannot predict.
•Internal and external cybersecurity threats and risks, as well as other disasters, may adversely affect our business or the business of our portfolio companies by impairing the ability to conduct business effectively.
•We are subject to risks relatedin tousing thecustodians, Mergers.counterparties, administrators and other agents.
•We may be unable to realize the benefits anticipated by the Mergers, including estimated cost savings, or it may take longer than anticipated to achieve such benefits.
•We may be the target of litigation or similar proceedings in the future.
•Our Adviser and its affiliates may face conflicts of interest with respect to services performed for their respective other accounts and clients or issuers in which we may invest.
•Our Adviser or its affiliates may have incentives to favor their respective other accounts and clients and/or Blue Owl over us, which may result in conflicts of interest that could be harmful to us.
•Our Adviser’s inability to attract, retain and develop human capital in a highly competitive talent market could have an adverse effect on our Adviser, and thus us.
•We cannot predict how new tax legislation will affect us, our investments, or our stockholders, and any such legislation could adversely affect our business.
•We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed at corporate rates if we are unable to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code or if we make investments through taxable subsidiaries.Code.
Macroeconomic Factors
Risks Related to the Economy
Global economic, political and market conditions, including uncertainty about the financial stability of the United States, could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The current worldwide financial markets situation, as well as various social, political, economic and other conditions and events (including political tensions in the United States and around the world, wars and other forms of conflict (including, for example, the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine and conflict in the Middle East and Northern Africa region), terrorist acts, security operations and catastrophic events, natural disasters such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, global health epidemics, pandemics and emergencies, fluctuations in interest rates, strikes, work stoppages, labor shortages, labor disputes, supply chain disruptions and accidents), may disrupt our operations, contribute to increased market volatility, have long term effects on the United States and worldwide financial markets, and cause economic uncertainties or deterioration in the United States and worldwide. As global systems, economies and financial markets are increasingly interconnected, events that once had only local impact are now more likely to have regional or even global effects. Events that occur in one country, region or financial market will, more frequently, adversely impact issuers in other countries, regions or markets, including in established markets such as the United States. These impacts can be exacerbated by failures of governments and societies to adequately respond to an emerging event or threat.
Uncertainty can result in or coincide with, among other things: increased volatility in the financial markets for securities, derivatives, loans, credit and currency; a decrease in the reliability of market prices and difficulty in valuing assets (including portfolio company assets); greater fluctuations in spreads on debt investments and currency exchange rates; increased risk of default (by both government and private obligors and issuers); further social, economic, and political instability; nationalization of private enterprise; greater governmental involvement in the economy or in social factors that impact the economy; changes to governmental regulation and supervision of the loan, securities, derivatives and currency markets and market participants and decreased or revised monitoring of such markets by governments or self-regulatory organizations and reduced enforcement of regulations; limitations on the activities of investors in such markets; controls or restrictions on foreign investment, capital controls and limitations on repatriation of invested capital; the significant loss of liquidity and the inability to purchase, sell and otherwise fund investments or settle transactions (including, but not limited to, a market freeze); unavailability of currency hedging techniques; substantial, and in some periods extremely high rates of inflation, which can last many years and have negative effects on credit and securities markets as well as the economy as a whole; recessions; and difficulties in obtaining and/or enforcing legal judgments.
Any of the above factors, including sanctions, export controls, tariffs, trade wars and other governmental actions, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common shares and/or debt securities to decline. The United States has recently enacted and proposed to enact significant new tariffs. Additionally, the new U.S. Presidential administration has directed various federal agencies to further evaluate key aspects of U.S. trade policy and there has been ongoing discussion and commentary regarding potential significant changes to U.S. trade policies, treaties and tariffs. Global health emergencies, natural disasters, strikes, work stoppages or accidents could further weaken the domestic/global economies and create additional uncertainties, which may negatively impact the businesses in which we invest directly or indirectly and, in turn, could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. We monitor developments and seek to manage our investments in a manner consistent with achieving our investment objective, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so. Additionally, social unrest and other political and security concerns may not abate, may worsen and could spread. Losses from terrorist attacks, global health emergencies, natural disasters, strikes, work stoppages or accidents are generally uninsurable.
TheDifficult current period of capital markets disruptionmarket and economicgeopolitical uncertaintyconditions could have a materialsignificant adverse effect on our business, financial condition orand results of operations.
Our business, financial conditions and results of operations may be affected by conditions and trends in the global financial markets and the global economic and political climate relating to, among other things, fluctuations in interest rates, the availability and cost of credit, future increases in inflation, economic uncertainty, changes in laws (including laws and regulations relating to our taxation, taxation of our clients and applicable to alternative asset managers), trade policies, commodity prices, tariffs (including retaliatory tariffs), currency exchange rates and controls, political elections and administration transitions, and national and international political events (including contract terminations or funding pauses, government agency closures, prolonged government shutdowns, wars and other forms of conflict, terrorist acts, and security operations), work stoppages, labor shortages and labor disputes, supply chain disruptions and catastrophic events such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes and global health pandemics.
Changes in trade policies, including the imposition of new tariffs or increases in existing tariffs between the United States, Mexico, Canada, China or other countries, or reactionary measures in response thereto including retaliatory tariffs, legal challenges, or currency manipulation, could adversely affect the market conditions in which we operate. These factors are outside of our control and may negatively impact the businesses in which we invest directly or indirectly and, in turn, could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. We monitor developments and seek to manage our investments in a manner consistent with achieving our investment objective, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so.
Global financial markets have experienced heightened volatility in recent periods, including as a result of economic and political events in or affecting the world’s major economies, such as the ongoing wars and conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, as well as continued political and social unrest in Venezuela, the Middle East and regions of North Africa. Concerns over economic recession, future increases in inflation, interest rate volatility, fluctuations in oil and gas prices resulting from global production and demand levels and geopolitical tension, have exacerbated market volatility. Market volatility has been further exacerbated by social unrest, changes regarding immigration and work permit policies and other political and security concerns both in the United States and across various international regions. Due to interrelationships within the global financial markets, our business may be adversely affected by such issues both within and outside of the directly affected regions.
During periods of difficult market conditions or slowdowns, which may be across one or more industries, sectors or geographies, the companies in which we invest may experience decreased revenues, financial losses, credit rating downgrades, difficulty in obtaining access to financing and increased funding costs. During such periods, those companies may also have difficulty in pursuing growth strategies, expanding their businesses and operations and be unable to meet their debt service obligations or other expenses as they become due, including obligations and expenses payable us. Negative financial results in our portfolio companies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common shares and/or debt securities to decline.
Capital markets disruption and economic uncertainty could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In recent years, the U.S. corporate debt markets have experiencedbeen disruptionimpacted resultingby frominflation. the COVID-19 pandemic and an inflationary economic environment. TheseUncertain market conditions caused by increased inflation or other conditions may make it difficult to extend the maturity of or refinance our existing indebtedness or obtain new indebtedness with similar terms and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business. The debt capital that will be available to us in the future, if at all, may be at a higher cost and on less favorable terms and conditions than what we currently experience, including being in an elevated interest rate environment. If we are unable to raise or refinance debt, then our equity investors may not benefit from the potential for increased returns on equity resulting from leverage and we may be limited in our ability to make new commitments or to fund existing commitments to our portfolio companies. An inability to extend the maturity of, or refinance, our existing indebtedness or obtain new indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Significant disruption or volatility in the capital markets may also have a negative effect on the valuations of our investments. While most of our investments are not publicly traded, applicable accounting standards require us to assume as part of our valuation process that our investments are sold in a principal market to market participants (even if we plan on holding an investment through its maturity). Significant disruption or volatility in the capital markets may also affect the pace of our investment activity and the potential for liquidity events involving our investments. Thus, the illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments to access capital if required, and as a result, we could realize significantly less than the value at which we have recorded our investments if we were required to sell them for liquidity purposes. An inability to raise or access capital could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations and cause our net asset value to decline. In addition, adverse or volatile market conditions may make equity capital difficult to raise because, subject to some limited exceptions, as a BDC, we are generally not able to issue additional shares of our common stock at a price less than net asset value without first obtaining approval for such issuance from our shareholders and independent directors. In addition, adverseunfavorable or volatile marketeconomic conditions may makerequire equity capital difficultus to raisemodify because,the subjectpayment to some limited exceptions, as a BDC, we are generally not able to issue additional sharesterms of our commoninvestments, stockincluding atchanges in “payment in kind” or “PIK” interest provisions and/or cash interest rates, and also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a pricedecision lessby thanlenders netnot assetto valueextend withoutcredit firstto obtainingus approvalon forterms suchwe issuancedeem from our shareholders and independent directors.acceptable.
Economic recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and harm our operating results.
Many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay our debt investments during these periods. In the past, instability in the global capital markets resulted in disruptions in liquidity in the debt capital markets, significant write-offs in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated credit market and the failure of major domestic and international financial institutions. In particular, in past periods of instability, the financial services sector was negatively impacted by significant write-offs as the value of the assets held by financial firms declined, impairing their capital positions and abilities to lend and invest. In addition, continued uncertainty in connection with economic sanctions resulting from the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, uncertainty around the conflict in the Middle East, and uncertainty between the United States and other countries, including China, with respect to trade policies, treaties, and tariffs, among other factors, have caused disruption in the global markets. There can be no assurance that market conditions will not worsen in the future.
In an economic downturn, we may have non-performing assets or non-performing assets may increase, and the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease during these periods. Adverse economic conditions may also decrease the value of any collateral securing our loans and the value of our equity investments. A severe recession may further decrease the value of such collateral and result in losses of value in our portfolio and a decrease in our revenues, net income, assets and net worth. Unfavorable economic conditions may require us to modify the payment terms of our investments, including changes in “payment in kind” or “PIK” interest provisions and/or cash interest rates, and also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us on terms we deem acceptable. These events could prevent us from increasing investments and harm our operating results.
The occurrence of recessionary conditions and/or negative developments in the domestic and international credit markets may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the value of our investments, and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability. Any such unfavorable economic conditions, including elevated interest rates, may also increase our funding costs, limit our access to capital markets or negatively impact our ability to obtain financing, particularly from the debt markets. In addition, any future financial market uncertainty could lead to financial market disruptions and could further impact our ability to obtain financing.
These events could limit our investment originations, limit our ability to grow and negatively impact our operating results and financial condition.
InflationFuture increases in inflation may adversely affect the business, results of operations and financial condition of our portfolio companies.
Certain of our portfolio companies operate in industries that have been, or may be, impacted by inflation. RecentOngoing inflationary pressures have increased the costs of labor, energy and raw materials and have adversely affected consumer spending, economic growth and our portfolio companies’ operations. If such portfolio companies are unable to pass any increases in the costs of their operations along to their customers, it could adversely affect their operating results. Such conditions would increase the risk of default on their obligations as a borrower. In addition, any projected future decreases in our portfolio companies’ operating results due to inflation could adversely impact the fair value of those investments. Any decreases in the fair value of our investments could result in future unrealized losses and therefore reduce our net assets resulting from operations. Any decreases in the fair value of our investments could result in future realized or unrealized losses.
Fluctuations in interest rates could have a dampening effect on overall economic activity, the financial condition of our portfolio companies and the financial condition of the end customers who ultimately create demand for the capital we supply, all of which could negatively affect our business, financial condition or results of operationsoperations. .In addition, lower interest rates may increase prepayment risk for our portfolio company investments with higher interest rates. The Federal Reserve decreased the federal funds rate twicethree times in 2024.2025. Although the Federal Reserve has signaled the potential for additional federal funds rate cuts, there remains uncertainty around the rate and timing of decreases, including as a result of the transition to the new U.S. Presidential administration.decreases. Uncertainty surrounding future Federal Reserve actions may have a material effect on our business making it particularly difficult for us to obtain financing at attractive rates, impacting our ability to execute on our growth strategies or future acquisitions.
Our ability to service any borrowings that we incur will depend largely on our financial performance and will be subject to prevailing economic conditions and competitive pressures. Moreover, the management fee will be payable based on our average gross assets excluding cash and cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed amounts, which may give our Adviser an incentive to use leverage to make additional investments. See “— Our Adviser and its affiliates, including our officers and some of our directors, may face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us and our affiliates, which could result in increased risk-taking or speculative investments, or cause our Adviser to use substantial leverage.” The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on our Adviser’s and our Board’s assessment of market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain credit at all or on terms acceptable to us, which could affect our return on capital. However, to the extent that we use leverage to finance our assets, our financing costs will reduce cash available for distributions to shareholders. Moreover, we may not be able to meet our financing obligations and, to the extent that we cannot, we risk the loss of some or all of our assets to liquidation or sale to satisfy the obligations. In such an event, we may be forced to sell assets at significantly depressed prices due to market conditions or otherwise, which may result in losses.
In addition to having fixed-dollar claims on our assets that are superior to the claims of our common shareholders, obligations to lenders may be secured by a first priority security interest in our portfolio of investments and cash.
In addition to having fixed-dollar claims on our assets that are superior to the claims of our common shareholders, obligations to lenders may be secured by a first priority security interest in our portfolio of investments and cash. As a BDC, generally, the ratio of our total assets (less total liabilities other than indebtedness represented by senior securities) to our total indebtedness represented by senior securities plus any preferred stock, if any, must be at least 200%; however, the Small Business Credit Availability Act has modified the 1940 Act by allowing a BDC to increase the maximum amount of leverage it may incur from an asset coverage ratio of 200% to an asset coverage ratio of 150%, if certain requirements are met.200%. On June 8, 2020, our shareholders, approved the application of the modified asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 61(a)(2) of the 1940 Act, as amended by the Small Business Credit Availability Act. As a result, effective June 9, 2020, our asset coverage ratio applicable to senior securities was reduced from 200% to 150%, and the risks associated with an investment in us may increase. If this ratio declines below 150%, we cannot incur additional debt and could be required to sell a portion of our investments to repay some indebtedness when it may be disadvantageous to do so. This could have a material adverse effect on our operations, and we may not be able to service our debt or make distributions.
Defaults and provisions under our current borrowings or any future borrowing facility or notes may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Provisions in our current borrowings or any other future borrowings may limit discretion in operating our business.
A credit facility may be backed by all or a portion of our loans and securities on which the lenders will have a security interest. We may pledge up to 100% of our assets and may grant a security interest in all of our assets under the terms of any debt instrument we enter into with lenders. We expect that any security interests we grant will be set forth in a pledge and security agreement and evidenced by the filing of financing statements by the agent for the lenders. In addition, we expect that the custodian for our securities serving as collateral for such loan would include in its electronic systems notices indicating the existence of such security interests and, following notice of occurrence of an event of default, if any, and during its continuance, will only accept transfer instructions with respect to any such securities from the lender or its designee. If we were to default under the terms of any debt instrument, the agent for the applicable lenders would be able to assume control of the timing of disposition of any or all of our assets securing such debt, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, any security interests and/or negative covenants required by a credit facility may limit our ability to create liens on assets to secure additional debt and may make it difficult for us to restructure or refinance indebtedness at or prior to maturity or obtain additional debt or equity financing. In addition, if our borrowing base under a credit facility were to decrease, we may be required to secure additional assets in an amount sufficient to cure any borrowing base deficiency. In the event that all of our assets are secured at the time of such a borrowing base deficiency, we could be required to repay advances under a credit facility or make deposits to a collection account, either of which could have a material adverse impact on our ability to fund future investments and to make distributions.
In addition, we may be subject to limitations as to how borrowed funds may be used, which may include restrictions on geographic and industry concentrations, loan size, payment frequency and status, average life, collateral interests and investment ratings, as well as regulatory restrictions on leverage which may affect the amount of funding that may be obtained. There may also be certain requirements relating to portfolio performance, including required minimum portfolio yield and limitations on delinquencies and charge-offs, a violation of which could limit further advances and, in some cases, result in an event of default. An event of default under a credit facility could result in an accelerated maturity date for all amounts outstanding thereunder, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition and could lead to cross default under other credit facilities. This could reduce our liquidity and cash flow and impair our ability to manage our business.
We may want to obtain additional debt financing, or need to do so upon maturity of our credit facilities, in order to obtain funds which may be made available for investments. Our credit facilities, notes and CLOs currently expire between MarchJuly 20252026 and April 2036.2038. If we are unable to increase, renew or replace any such facilities and enter into new debt financing facilities or other debt financing on commercially reasonable terms, our liquidity may be reduced significantly. In addition, if we are unable to repay amounts outstanding under any such facilities and are declared in default or are unable to renew or refinance these facilities, we may not be able to make new investments or operate our business in the normal course. These situations may arise due to circumstances that we may be unable to control, such as lack of access to the credit markets, a severe decline in the value of the U.S. dollar, an economic downturn or an operational problem that affects us or third parties, and could materially damage our business operations, results of operations and financial condition. See “—The current period of capitalCapital markets disruption and economic uncertainty could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.”
Our ability to achieve our investment objective also depends on the ability of our Adviser to identify, analyze, invest in, finance, and monitor companies that meet our investment criteria. Our Adviser’s capabilities in structuring the investment process, and providing competent, attentive and efficient services to us depend on the involvement of investment professionals of adequate number and sophistication to match the corresponding flow of transactions. ToAny achieve our investment objective, our Adviser may needfailure to retain,find, hire, train, supervise,supervise and manage new investment professionals to participate in our investment selection and monitoring process. Our Adviser may not be able to find qualified investment professionals in a timely manner or at all. Any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
BecauseOur ability to achieve our businessinvestment modelobjective also depends to a significant extent upon Blue Owl’s relationships with corporations, financial institutions and investment firms, the inability of Blue Owl to maintain or develop these relationships, or the failure of these relationships to generate investment opportunities, could adversely affect our business.
Blue Owl depends on its relationships with corporations, financial institutions and investment firms, and we rely to a significant extent upon these relationships to provide us with potential investment opportunities. The investment management business is intensely competitive, with competition based on a variety of factors, including investment performance, business relationships, quality of service provided to clients, fund investor liquidity, fund terms (including fees and economic sharing arrangements), brand recognition and business reputation. If Blue Owl fails to maintain its reputation it may not be able to maintain its existing relationships or develop new relationships or sources of investment opportunities, and we may not be able to grow our investment portfolio. In addition, individuals with whom Blue Owl has relationships are not obligated to provide us with investment opportunities, and, therefore, there is no assurance that such relationships will generate investment opportunities for us.
Negative publicity regarding Blue Owl or its personnel could give rise to reputational risk that could significantly harm our existing business and business prospects. Similarly, events could occur that damage the reputation of our industry generally, such as the insolvency or bankruptcy of large funds or a significant number of funds or highly publicized incidents of fraud or other scandals, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, regardless of whether any of those events directly relate to us or our investments.
We may compete for investments with other BDCs and investment funds (including registered investment companies, private equity funds and mezzanine funds), including the other Blue Owl Credit Clients or other funds managed by our Adviser or its affiliates comprising Blue Owl’s Credit platform,platform (including Blue Owl's alternative credit products), the private funds managed by Blue Owl’s GP Strategic Capital platform andplatform, the funds and accounts managed by Blue Owl’s Real Assets platform, as well as traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and other sources of funding. Moreover, alternative investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, continue to increase their investment focus in our target market of privately owned U.S. companies. We may experience increased competition from banks and investment vehicles who may continue to lend to the middle market. Additionally, the U.S. Federal Reserve and other bank regulators may periodically provide incentives to U.S. commercial banks to originate more loans to U.S. middle-market private companies. As a result of these market participants and regulatory incentives, competition for investment opportunities in privately owned U.S. companies is strong and may intensify. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments than us. These characteristics could allow our competitors to consider a wider variety of investments, establish more relationships and offer better pricing and more flexible structuring than we are able to do.
•A numberSome of our competitors may have or are perceived to have more expertise or financial, technical, marketing and other resources and more personnel than we do;
•SeveralSome of our competitors have raised significant amounts of capital, and many of them have similar investment objectives to ours, which may create additional competition for investment opportunities;
Cybersecurity risks and cyber data security incidents could adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information and confidential information in our possession and damage to our business relationships.
We are subject to risks associated with the market’s limited experience with SOFR, which will affect our cost of capital and results of operations.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Specialty Financing Portfolio Companies and Joint Ventures”
New heading “2025 Stock Repurchase Program”
New heading “2026 Stock Repurchase Program”
Removed heading “Fifth Season Investments LLC”
Removed heading “LSI Financing 1 DAC”
Removed heading “LSI Financing LLC”
Removed heading “Blue Owl Credit SLF LLC”
Removed heading “For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022”
Removed heading “For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022”
Removed heading “Selected Financial Data”
Removed heading “Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)”
Removed heading “For the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022”
Removed heading “For the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021”
Removed heading “2020 Stock Repurchase Program”
Removed heading “Credit Facilities”
Removed heading “SPV Asset Facilities”
Removed heading “SPV Asset Facility II”
Removed heading “SPV Asset Facility III”
Removed heading “SPV Asset Facility IV”
Removed heading “SPV Asset Facilities Assumed in the Mergers”
Removed heading “Debt Securitization Transactions”
Removed heading “CLO I Refinancing”
Removed heading “CLO II Refinancing”
Removed heading “CLO III Refinancing”
Removed heading “CLO IV Refinancing”
Removed heading “CLO V Refinancing”
Removed heading “Debt Securitization Transactions Assumed in the Mergers”
Removed heading “Unsecured Notes”
Removed heading “July 2025 Notes”
Removed heading “July 2026 Notes”
Removed heading “Notes Assumed in the Mergers”
Removed heading “Note Assumption Agreement”
Removed heading “SPV Credit Facilities”
Removed heading “OBDE SPV Asset Facility I”
Removed heading “OBDE SPV Asset Facility II”
Removed heading “OBDE SPV Asset Facility III”
Removed heading “Debt Securitization Transaction”
Largest changes
“The Note Purchase Agreement also contains customary events of default with customary cure and notice periods, including, without limitation, nonpayment, incorrect representation in any material respect, breach of covenant, certain cross-defaults or cross-acceleration under other indebtedness of the Company, certain judgments and orders and certain events of bankruptcy.”see in full comparison
“The Revolving Credit Facility includes customary covenants, including certain limitations on the incurrence by us of additional indebtedness and on our ability to make distributions to our shareholders, or redeem, repurchase or retire shares of stock, upon the occurrence of certain events and certain financial covenants related to asset coverage and liquidity and other maintenance covenants, as well as customary events of default. …”see in full comparison
“The CLO XIV Debt is the secured obligation of the CLO XIV Issuer, and the CLO XIV Indenture and CLO XIV Class A-L Credit Agreement each includes customary covenants and events of default. The CLO XIV Secured Notes have not been registered under the Securities Act, or any state securities (e.g., “blue sky”) laws, and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission or pursuant to an applicable exemption from such registration.”see in full comparison
“The CLO VI Secured Notes were the secured obligation of the CLO VI Issuers, and the CLO VI Indenture included customary covenants and events of default. The CLO VI Secured Notes were not registered under the Securities Act, or any state securities (e.g., “blue sky”) laws, and were not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission or pursuant to an applicable exemption from such registration.”see in full comparison
“Certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries are parties to credit facilities (the “SPV Asset Facilities”). Pursuant to the SPV Asset Facilities, from time to time we sell and contribute certain investments to these wholly owned subsidiaries pursuant to sale and contribution agreements by and between us and the wholly owned subsidiaries. No gain or loss is recognized as a result of these contributions. Proceeds from the SPV Asset Facilities are used to finance the origination and acquisition of eligible assets by the wholly owned subsidiary, including the purchase of such assets from us. …”see in full comparison
Secular Trends Supporting Growth for Private Credit. We believe that periods of market volatility, such as the current period of market volatility caused, in part, by uncertainty regarding inflation and interest rates, and current geopolitical conditions, have accentuated the advantages of private credit. The availability of capital in the liquid credit market is highly sensitive to market conditions whereas we believe private lending has proven to be a stable and reliable source of capital through periods of volatility. We believe the opportunity set for private credit will continue to expand even as the public markets remain open. Financial sponsors and companies today are familiar with direct lending and have seen firsthand the strong value proposition that a private solution can offer. Scale, certainty of execution and flexibility all provide borrowers with a compelling alternative to the syndicated loan and high yield markets. Based on our experience,see in full comparisonthere is an emerging trend wherelarger, higher quality credits that have traditionally been issuers in the syndicated and high yield markets are increasingly seeking private solutions independent of credit market conditions. In our view, this is supported by financial sponsors wanting to work with collaborative financing partners that have scale and breadth of capabilities.WeThis has driven substantial growth in direct lending portfolio companies over time. Given the dynamics mentioned above, we believe this trend is poised to continue and that the large amount of uninvested capital held by funds of private equity firms broadly, estimated by Preqin Ltd., an alternative assets industry data and research company, to be$2.6$2.7 trillion as of December 31,2024,2025, will continue todriveservedealasactivity.a tailwind to the space Attractive Investment Dynamics. An imbalance between the supply of, and demand for, middle market debt capital creates attractive pricing dynamics. Weexpectbelieve the directly negotiated nature of middle market financings also generally provides more favorable terms to the lender, including stronger covenant and reporting packages, better call protection, and lender-protective change of control provisions. Additionally, we believe BDC managers’ expertise in credit selection and ability to manage through credit cycles has generally resulted in BDCs experiencing lower loss rates than U.S. commercial banks through credit cycles. Further, we believe thatprivatehistoricalequitymiddlesponsorsmarketwilldefaultcontinuerates have been lower, and recovery rates have been higher, as compared topursuetheacquisitionslarger market capitalization, broadly distributed market, leading to lower cumulative losses. Lastly, we believe that in the current environment, lenders with available capital may be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities as the economy reopens andleveragemaytheirbeequityableinvestmentstowithachievesecuredimprovedloanseconomicprovidedspreadsbyandcompaniesdocumentationsuch as us.terms.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (373)
The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with “ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATADATA.”. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or the future performance or financial condition of Blue Owl Capital Corporation and involves numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described in “ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.” This discussion also should be read in conjunction with the “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements” set forth on page 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report. Actual results could differ materially from those implied or expressed in any forward-looking statements.
Blue Owl Capital Corporation (the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”) is a Maryland corporation formed on October 15, 2015. Our investment objective is to generate current income, and to a lesser extent, capital appreciation by targeting investment opportunities with favorable risk-adjusted returns. Our investment strategy focuses on primarily originating and making loans to, and making debt and equity investments in, U.S. middle-marketmiddle market companies. Within this space, we predominantly focus on investing in institutionally-backed, upper middle market businesses, which we categorize as those generating greater than $50 million of EBITDA annually. We invest in senior secured or unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans, broadly syndicated loans and, to a lesser extent, equity and equity-related securities including warrants, preferred stock and similar forms of senior equity, which may or may not be convertible into a portfolio company’s common equity. We may hold our investments directly or through specialspecialty purposefinancing vehicles.portfolio companies and joint ventures. Except for our specialty financing company investments, our equity investments are typically not control-oriented investments and we may structure such equity investments to include provisions protecting our rights as a minority-interest holder.
We are managed by Blue Owl Credit Advisors LLC (“the Adviser” or “our Adviser”). The Adviser is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), an indirect affiliate of Blue Owl Capital Inc. (“Blue Owl”) (NYSE: OWL) and part of Blue Owl’s Credit platform, which includes several strategies, including direct lending, alternative credit, investment grade credit, liquid credit and other adjacent investment strategies.platform. Subject to the overall supervision of our board of directors (“the Board” or “our Board”), the Adviser manages our day-to-day operations, and provides investment advisory and management services to us. The Adviser or its affiliates may engage in certain origination activities and receive attendant arrangement, structuring or similar fees. The Adviser is responsible for managing our business and activities, including sourcing investment opportunities, conducting research, performing diligence on potential investments, structuring our investments, and monitoring our portfolio companies on an ongoing basis through a team of investment professionals.
The Adviser also serves as investment adviser to Blue Owl Capital CorporationOBDC II and Blue Owl Credit Income Corp.OCIC.
Blue Owl consists of three investment platforms: (1) Credit, which includes several strategies, including direct lending, alternative credit, investment grade credit, liquid credit and other adjacent investment strategies,strategies (2) GP Strategic Capital, which primarily focuses on acquiring equity stakes in, or providing debt financing to, large, multi-product private equity and private credit firms and (3) Real Assets, which primarily focuses on the strategies of net lease real estate andestate, real estate credit.credit and digital infrastructure, which focuses on acquiring, financing, developing and operating data centers and related digital infrastructure assets. The Adviser is part of the direct lending strategy of Blue Owl’s Credit platform which focuses on lending to primarily upper-middle-market companies, both private equity-sponsored and non-sponsored, and provides a range of customized financing solutions across debt and equity-related instruments. In addition to the Adviser, Blue Owl’s Credit platform’s direct lending strategy is comprised of the Adviser, Blue Owl Technology Credit Advisors LLC (“OTCA”), Blue Owl Technology Credit Advisors II LLC (“OTCA II”), Blue Owl Credit Private Fund Advisors LLC (“OPFA”) and Blue Owl Diversified Credit Advisors LLC (“ODCA” and together with the Adviser, OTCA, OTCA II, and OPFA, the “Blue Owl Credit Advisers”), which also are registered investment advisers. As of December 31, 2024,2025, the Adviser and its affiliates had $135.71$157.76 billion of assets under management across Blue Owl’s Credit platform.
The management of our investment portfolio is the responsibility of the Adviser and the Diversified Lending Investment Committee. The Investment Team is led by Douglas I. Ostrover, Marc S. Lipschultz and Craig W. Packer and is supported by certain members of the Adviser's senior executive team and Blue Owl’s Credit platform’s direct lending investment committees. Blue Owl’s four direct lending investment committees focus on a specific investment strategy (Diversified Lending, Technology Lending, First Lien Lending and Opportunistic Lending). Douglas I. Ostrover, Marc S. Lipschultz, Craig W. Packer and Alexis Maged sit on each of Blue Owl’s direct lending investment committees. In addition to Messers. Ostrover, Lipschultz, Packer and Maged, the Diversified Lending Investment Committee is comprised of Matthias Ederer, Patrick Linnemann, Meenal Mehta and Logan Nicholson. We consider the individuals on the Diversified Lending Investment Committee to be our portfolio managers.Themanagers. The Investment Team, under the Diversified Lending Investment Committee's supervision, sources investment opportunities, conducts research, performs due diligence on potential investments, structures our investments and will monitor our portfolio companies on an ongoing basis.
The Diversified Lending Investment Committee meets regularly to consider our investments, direct our strategic initiatives and supervise the actions taken by the Adviser on our behalf. In addition, the Diversified Lending Investment Committee reviews and determines whether to make prospective investments (including approving parameters or guidelines pursuant to which certain investments in broadly syndicated loans may be boughtmade andor sold consistent with our investment objective), structures financings and monitors the performance of the investment portfolio. Each investment opportunity requires the approval of a majority of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee. Follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies may require the Diversified Lending Investment Committee's approval beyond that obtained when the initial investment in the portfolio company was made. In addition, temporary investments, such as those in cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high quality debt investments that mature in one year or less, may require approval by the Diversified Lending Investment Committee. The compensation packages of Diversified Lending Investment Committee members from the Adviser include various combinations of discretionary bonuses and variable incentive compensation based primarily on performance for services provided and may include shares of Blue Owl.
We may be prohibited under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) from participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our directors who are not interested personspersons, and,and in some cases, the prior approval of the SEC. We rely on an order for exemptive relief (as amended, the “Order”) that has been granted to the Adviser and certain of its affiliates, including us, by the SEC that permits us to co-invest with other funds managed by ourthe Adviser or certain of its affiliates, in a manner consistent with our investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors. Pursuant to thesuch Order, we are generally are permitted to co-invest with certain of our affiliates if such co-investments are done on the same terms and at the same time, as further detailed in the Order. The Order requires that a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of ourthe independent directorsBoard make certain conclusions in connection with a co-investment transaction, including thatfindings (1) in most instances when we co-invests with our affiliates in an issuer where our affiliate has an existing investment in the issuer, and (2) if we dispose of an asset acquired in a transaction under the Order unless the disposition is done on a pro rata basis. Pursuant to the Order, the Board will oversee our participation in the co-investment program. As required by the Order, we have adopted, and the Board has approved, policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance with the terms of the transactions,Order, includingand the consideration to be paid, are reasonable and fair to usAdviser and our shareholdersChief andCompliance doOfficer notwill involveprovide overreaching in respect of us or our shareholders on the part of any person concerned, (2) the transaction is consistent with the interests of our shareholders and is consistent with our investment objective and strategies, (3) the investment by our affiliates would not disadvantage us, and our participation would not be on a basis different from or less advantageous than that on which our affiliates are investing and (4) the proposed investment by us would not benefit our Adviser, the other affiliated funds that are participating in the investment, or any affiliated person of any of them (other than the partiesreporting to the transaction), except to the extent permitted by the Order and applicable law, including the limitations set forth in Section 57(k) of the 1940 Act. In addition, we have received an amendment to the Order to permit us to participate in follow-on investments in our existing portfolio companies with certain affiliates that are private funds, when such private funds did not have an investment in such existing portfolio company.Board.
The Blue Owl Credit Advisers’ investment allocation policypolicies seeksseek to ensure equitable allocation of investment opportunities over time between us and other funds managed by our Adviser or its affiliates. As a result of the Order, there could be significant overlap in our investment portfolio and the investment portfolio of the business development companies (“BDCs”), interval fund, private funds and separately managed accounts managed by the Blue Owl Credit Advisers (collectively, the “Blue Owl Credit Clients”) and/or other funds managed by the Adviser or its affiliates that avail themselves of the Order. In addition, the Adviser and its affiliates are permitted to allocate an investment to a number of products across platforms that it views as appropriate for the particular investment objectives, strategies and characteristics of such products.
We have elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act and as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).purposes. As a result, we are required to comply with various statutory and regulatory requirements, such as:
•the requirement to distribute (or be treated as distributing) in each taxable year at least the sum of (i) 90% of our investment company taxable income and (ii) 90% of our tax-exempt interest for that taxable year.
On January 13, 2025, we consummated the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), dated August 7, 2024, with Blue Owl Capital Corporation III, a Maryland corporation (“OBDE”), Cardinal Merger Sub, Inc., a Maryland corporation and our wholly-owned subsidiary (“Merger Sub”), and, solely for the limited purposes set forth therein, the Adviser, and ODCA, investment adviser to OBDE. In connection therewith, Merger Sub merged with and into OBDE, with OBDE continuing as the surviving company and our wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Initial Merger”) and, immediately thereafter, OBDE merged with and into us, and we continued as the surviving company (together with the Initial Merger, the “Mergers”). See “Recent Developments” for additional discussion of the Mergers.
Our investment objective is to generate current income, and to a lesser extent, capital appreciation by targeting investment opportunities with favorable risk-adjusted returns. Our investment strategy focuses primarily on originating and making loans to, and making debt and equity investments in, U.S. middle-market companies. Since our Adviser and its affiliates began investment activities in April 2016 through December 31, 2024,2025, our Adviser and its affiliates have originated $141.83$187.04 billion aggregate principal amount of investments, of which $137.87$182.92 billion of aggregate principal amount of investments prior to any subsequent exits or repayments, was retained by either us or a corporation or fund advised by our Adviser or its affiliates. We seek to participate in transactions sponsored by what we believe to be high-quality private equity and venture capital firms capable of providing both operational and financial resources. We seek to generate current income primarily in U.S. middle-market companies, both sponsored and non-sponsored, through direct originations of senior secured loans or originations of unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans, broadly syndicated loans and, to a lesser extent, investments in equity and equity-related securities including warrants, preferred stock and similar forms of senior equity. We may hold our investments directly or through specialty financing portfolio companies and joint ventures. Except for our specialty financing company investments, our equity investments are typically not control-oriented investments and we may structure such equity investments to include provisions protecting our rights as a minority-interest holder.
WeIn general, we define “middle-market companies” generally to mean companies with earnings before interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization, or “EBITDA,” between $10$25 million and $250$500 million annually and/or annual revenue of $50$125 million to $2.5$5 billionbillion. atWithin thethis timespace, we predominantly focus on investing in upper middle market businesses, where we can structure larger transactions, which we believe to be more resilient and of investment.greater strategic significance. We categorize “upper middle market” companies as those generating $50 million or more of EBITDA annually. We may on occasion invest in smaller or larger companies if an attractive opportunity presents itself, especially when there are dislocations in the capital markets, including the high yield and large syndicated loan markets. We generallynote that over time, the average EBITDA of companies in our portfolio has grown significantly as the scale of private market solutions has grown. Across our investments, we typically seek to investbe senior in upperthe middle-marketcapital companiesstructure, withtargeting a loan-to-value ratio (the amount of outstanding debt as a percentage of the value of the company) of 50% or below.below on average, which may provide a level of downside protection and help preserve capital.
We expect that generally our portfolio composition will be majoritycomprised predominantly of directly originated debt orand income producing securities, which may include “covenant-lite” loans (as defined below), with a lesser allocation to equity or equity-linked opportunities,opportunities which we may hold directly or through specialspecialty purpose vehicles.vehicles and joint ventures. In addition, we may invest a portion of our portfolio in opportunistic investments and broadlypublicly syndicatedtraded loans,debt which will not be our primary focus, but will be intended to enhance returns to our shareholdersinvestments and from time to time, we may evaluate and enter into strategic portfolio transactions whichthat may result in additional portfolio companies whichthat we are considered to control. These types of investments are intended to supplement our core strategy and further enhance returns to our shareholders. These investments may include high-yield bonds and broadly-syndicated loans, including “covenant light” loans (as defined below), and other publicly traded debt instruments, which are typically originated and structured by banks on behalf of large corporate borrowers with employee counts, revenues, EBITDAs and enterprise values larger than those of middle-marketmiddle companiesmarket described above,companies, and equity investments in portfolio companies that make senior secured loans or invest in broadly syndicated loans orloans, structured products, asset-based solutions or other forms of specialty finance, which may include, but is not limited to, investments such as life settlementssettlement, royalty interests and royaltyequipment interests. In addition, we generally do not intend to invest more than 20% of our total assets in companies whose principal place of business is outside the United States, although we do not generally intend to invest in companies whose principal place of business is in an emerging market. Our portfolio composition may fluctuate from time to time based on market conditions and interest rates.finance.
In addition, we generally do not intend to invest more than 20% of our total assets in companies whose principal place of business is outside the United States, although we do not generally intend to invest in companies whose principal place of business is in an emerging market. Our portfolio composition may fluctuate from time to time based on market conditions and interest rates.
Covenants are contractual restrictions that lenders place on companies to limit the corporate actions a company may pursue. Generally, theThe loans in which we expect to invest willmay have financial maintenance covenants, which are used to proactively address materially adverse changes in a portfolio company’s financial performance.performance However, to a lesser extent, weor may investtake inthe form of “covenant-lite” loans.loans Wewhich use the term “covenant-lite” togenerally refer generally to loans that do not have a complete set of financial maintenance covenants. Generally, “covenant-lite” loans provide borrower companies more freedom to negatively impact lenders because their covenants are incurrence-based, which means they are only tested and can only be breached following an affirmative action of the borrower, rather than by a deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition. Accordingly, to the extent we invest in “covenant-lite” loans, we may have fewer rights against a borrower and may have a greater risk of loss on such investments as compared to investments in or exposure to loans with financial maintenance covenants.
We target portfolio companies where we can structure larger transactions. As of December 31, 2024,2025, our average debt investment size in each of our portfolio companies was approximately $53.1$64.7 million based on fair value. The investment size will vary with the size of our capital base.base and market conditions. As of December 31, 2024,2025, excluding certain investments that fall outside of our typical borrower profile, our portfolio companies representing 93.0%92.9% of our total debt portfolio based on fair value, had weighted average annual revenue of $912.7$1.01 million,billion, weighted average annual EBITDA of $201.7$237 million.million, an average interest coverage of 1.6x1.9x and an average net loan-to value of 44%.42%.
The companies in which we invest use our capital to support their growth, acquisitions, market or product expansion, refinancings and/or recapitalizations. The debt in which we invest typically is not rated by any rating agency, but if these instruments were rated, they would likely receive a rating of below investment grade (that is, below BBB- or Baa3), which is often referred to as “high yield” or “junkjunk.”.
We focus primarily on the direct origination of loans to middle-marketinstitutionally-backed, upper middle market companies domiciled in the United States.
Our level of investment activity (both the number of investments and the size of each investment) can and will vary substantially from period to period depending on many factors, including the amount of debt and equity capital available to middle-marketmiddle market companies, the level of merger and acquisition activity for such companies, the general economic environment and the competitive environment for the types of investments we make.
•U.S. federal, state and local taxes;
We believe the middle-marketmiddle market lending environment provides opportunities for us to meet our goal of making investments that generate attractive risk-adjusted returns.
Limited Availability of Capital for Middle-MarketMiddle Market Companies. The middle-marketmiddle market is a large addressable market. According to GE Capital’s National Center for the Middle Market Year-EndMid-Year 20242025 Middle Market Indicator, there are approximately 200,000 U.S. middle-marketmiddle market companies, which have approximately 48 million aggregate employees. Moreover, the U.S. middle-marketmiddle market accounts for one-third of private sector gross domestic product (“GDP”). GE defines U.S. middle-marketmiddle market companies as those between $10 million and $1 billion in annual revenue, which we believe has significant overlap with our definition of U.S. middle-marketmiddle market companies. We believe U.S. middle-marketmiddle market companies will continue to require access to debt capital to refinance existing debt, support growth and finance acquisitions. We believe that regulatory and structural factors, industry consolidation and general risk aversion, limit the amount of traditional financing available to U.S. middle-marketmiddle market companies. We believe that many commercial and investment banks have, in recent years, de-emphasized their service and product offerings to middle-marketmiddle market businesses in favor of lending to large corporate clients and managing capital markets transactions. In addition, these lenders may be constrained in their ability to underwrite and hold bank loans and high yield securities for middle-marketmiddle market issuers as they seek to meet existing and future regulatory capital requirements. We also believe that there is a lack of market participants that are willing to hold meaningful amounts of certain middle-marketmiddle market loans. As a result, we believe our ability to minimize syndication risk for a company seeking financing by being able to hold its loans without having to syndicate them, coupled with reduced capacity of traditional lenders to serve the middle-market, present an attractive opportunity to invest in middle-marketmiddle market companies.
Capital Markets Have Been Unable to Fill the Void in U.S. Middle-MarketMiddle Market Finance Left by Banks. Access to underwritten bond and syndicated loan markets is challenging for middle-marketmiddle market companies due to loan issue size and liquidity. For example, high yield bonds are generally purchased by institutional investors, such as mutual funds and exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) who, among other things, are focused on the liquidity characteristics of the bond being issued in order to fund investor redemptions and/or comply with regulatory requirements. Accordingly, the existence of an active secondary market for bonds is an important consideration in these entities’ initial investment decision. Syndicated loans arranged through a bank are done either on a “best efforts” basis or are underwritten with terms plus provisions that permit the underwriters to change certain terms, including pricing, structure, yield and tenor, otherwise known as “flex”, to successfully syndicate the loan, in the event the terms initially marketed are insufficiently attractive to investors. Furthermore, banks are generally reluctant to underwrite middle-marketmiddle market loans because the arrangement fees they may earn on the placement of the debt generally are not sufficient to meet the banks’ return hurdles. Loans provided by companies such as ours provide certainty to issuers in that we have a more stable capital base and have the ability to invest in illiquid assets, and we can commit to a given amount of debt on specific terms, at stated coupons and with agreed upon fees. As we are the ultimate holder of the loans, we do not require market “flex” or other arrangements that banks may require when acting on an agency basis. In addition, our Adviser has teams focused on both liquid credit and private credit and these teams are able to collaborate with respect to syndicated loans.
Secular Trends Supporting Growth for Private Credit. We believe that periods of market volatility, such as the current period of market volatility caused, in part, by uncertainty regarding inflation and interest rates, and current geopolitical conditions, have accentuated the advantages of private credit. The availability of capital in the liquid credit market is highly sensitive to market conditions whereas we believe private lending has proven to be a stable and reliable source of capital through periods of volatility. We believe the opportunity set for private credit will continue to expand even as the public markets remain open. Financial sponsors and companies today are familiar with direct lending and have seen firsthand the strong value proposition that a private solution can offer. Scale, certainty of execution and flexibility all provide borrowers with a compelling alternative to the syndicated loan and high yield markets. Based on our experience, there is an emerging trend wherelarger, higher quality credits that have traditionally been issuers in the syndicated and high yield markets are increasingly seeking private solutions independent of credit market conditions. In our view, this is supported by financial sponsors wanting to work with collaborative financing partners that have scale and breadth of capabilities. WeThis has driven substantial growth in direct lending portfolio companies over time. Given the dynamics mentioned above, we believe this trend is poised to continue and that the large amount of uninvested capital held by funds of private equity firms broadly, estimated by Preqin Ltd., an alternative assets industry data and research company, to be $2.6$2.7 trillion as of December 31, 2024,2025, will continue to driveserve dealas activity.a tailwind to the space Attractive Investment Dynamics. An imbalance between the supply of, and demand for, middle market debt capital creates attractive pricing dynamics. We expectbelieve the directly negotiated nature of middle market financings also generally provides more favorable terms to the lender, including stronger covenant and reporting packages, better call protection, and lender-protective change of control provisions. Additionally, we believe BDC managers’ expertise in credit selection and ability to manage through credit cycles has generally resulted in BDCs experiencing lower loss rates than U.S. commercial banks through credit cycles. Further, we believe that privatehistorical equitymiddle sponsorsmarket willdefault continuerates have been lower, and recovery rates have been higher, as compared to pursuethe acquisitionslarger market capitalization, broadly distributed market, leading to lower cumulative losses. Lastly, we believe that in the current environment, lenders with available capital may be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities as the economy reopens and leveragemay theirbe equityable investmentsto withachieve securedimproved loanseconomic providedspreads byand companiesdocumentation such as us.terms.
Attractive Investment Dynamics. An imbalance between the supply of, and demand for, middle-market debt capital creates attractive pricing dynamics. We believe the directly negotiated nature of middle-market financings also generally provides more favorable terms to the lender, including stronger covenant and reporting packages, better call protection, and lender-protective change of control provisions. Additionally, we believe BDC managers’ expertise in credit selection and ability to manage through credit cycles has generally resulted in BDCs experiencing lower loss rates than U.S. commercial banks through credit cycles. Further, we believe that historical middle-market default rates have been lower, and recovery rates have been higher, as compared to the larger market capitalization, broadly distributed market, leading to lower cumulative losses. Lastly, we believe that in the current environment, lenders with available capital may be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities as the economy reopens and may be able to achieve improved economic spreads and documentation terms.
Conservative Capital Structures. Following the global credit crisis, which we define broadly as occurring between mid-2007 and mid-2009, lenders have generally required borrowers to maintain more equity as a percentage of their total capitalization, specifically to protect lenders during economic downturns. With more conservative capital structures, U.S. middle-marketmiddle market companies have exhibited higher levels of cash flows available to service their debt. In addition, U.S. middle-marketmiddle market companies often are characterized by simpler capital structures than larger borrowers, which facilitates a streamlined underwriting process and, when necessary, restructuring process.
Attractive Opportunities in Investments in Loans. We invest in senior secured or unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans, broadly syndicated loans and, to a lesser extent, equity and equity-related securities. We believe that opportunities in senior secured loans are significant because of the floating rate structure of most senior secured debt issuances and because of the strong defensive characteristics of these types of investments. We believe that debt issues with floating interest rates offer a superior return profile as compared with fixed-rate investments, since floating rate structures are generally less susceptible to declines in value experienced by fixed-rate securities in a rising interest rate environment. Senior secured debt also provides strong defensive characteristics. Senior secured debt has priority in payment among an issuer’s security holders whereby holders are due to receive payment before junior creditors and equity holders. Further, these investments are secured by the issuer’s assets, which may provide protection in the event of a default.
Our business is impacted by conditions in the financial markets and economic conditions in the United States, and to a lesser extent, globally.
In spite of recent elevated volatility, during the fourth quarter of 2025, global equity and debt markets saw appreciation, with U.S. equity indices reaching new all-time highs while credit spreads remained relatively tight. The 10-year Treasury yield ended the quarter approximately flat quarter over quarter and down approximately 40 basis points from the beginning of the year, and the Federal Reserve cut the federal funds rate by an additional 50 basis points during the fourth quarter following a 25 basis point cut in September 2025.
Our platform continues to find attractive investment opportunities for deployment, predominantly in first lien originations to large borrowers; however, we have also used capital to intentionally reduce leverage and fund share repurchases and therefore have ample dry powder. Consistent with our last several quarters, a substantial portion of our financings are with existing borrowers, with approximately 60% coming from large, incumbent borrowers, reflecting the advantage of incumbency and scale and allowing us to support their continued growth and maintain the credit quality of our portfolio.
We continue to focus on investing in upper middle-market businesses in non-cyclical industries we view as recession resistant and that we are familiar with, including defensive service-oriented sectors that provide intangible mission-critical solutions and products such as healthcare, business services, technology and insurance brokerage. These companies have diversified revenue streams, strong recurring cash flow profiles and healthy liquidity.
Our technology portfolio is managed by 40 dedicated investment professionals who assess the risks and opportunities of our prospective and existing investments, which has included those related to AI, for many years. Our approach focuses on large-scale, market-leading companies that provide mission-critical solutions with high switching costs, which we believe makes our software portfolio defensible. In the quarter ended December 31, 2025, borrowers in our software portfolio saw revenue and EBITDA growth of 10% and 16% respectively. We also believe our healthcare investment portfolio is well-positioned, with an emphasis on large, market-leading businesses and low loan-to-values, and healthcare investments delivering 11% revenue growth and 10% EBITDA growth on average over the past year.
We have also leveraged Blue Owl’s expanded capabilities in alternative and asset-based credit, as well as digital infrastructure, to access attractive risk-adjusted opportunities and adding accretive, non-correlated returns.
Generally, we seek to invest not more than 20% of our portfolio in any single industry classification and target portfolio companies that comprise 1-2% of our portfolio and our current portfolio is highly diversified with an average investment size of less than 0.5% and our top ten investments representing less than 25% of the total portfolio.
As of December 31, 2024, based on fair value, our portfolio consisted of 75.6% first lien senior secured debt investments (of which 51.0% we consider to be unitranche debt investments (including “last out” portions of such loans)), 5.4% second lien senior secured debt investments, 2.3% unsecured debt investments, 2.8% preferred equity investments, 11.7% common equity investments and 2.2% joint ventures.
As of December 31, 2024, our weighted average total yield of the portfolio at fair value and amortized cost was 10.4% and 10.4%, respectively, and our weighted average yield of accruing debt and income producing securities at fair value and amortized cost was 11.1% and 11.2%, respectively. Refer to our weighted average yields and interest rates table for more information on our calculation of weighted average yields. As of December 31, 2024, the weighted average spread of total debt investments was 6.2%.
As of December 31, 2024, we had investments in 227 portfolio companies with an aggregate fair value of $13.19 billion. As of December 31, 2024 we had net leverage of 1.19x debt-to-equity, which is within our target range.
The current lending environment is challenging as the broadly syndicated loan markets have remained active while merger and acquisition activity remains below historical levels; however, our platform continues to find attractive investment opportunities for deployment, predominantly in first lien originations. In addition, a large portion of our originations across the platform this quarter were deployed into existing borrowers as part of add-on transactions.
The credit quality of our portfolio has been consistent. We continue to focus on investing in industries we view as recession resistant and that we are familiar with, including service-oriented sectors such as software and healthcare, all of which serve diversified and durable end markets. Blue Owl serves as the lead, co-lead or administrative agent on many of our investments and the majority of our investments are supported by sophisticated financial sponsors who provide operational and financial resources. Our borrowers have a weighted average EBITDA of $201.7approximately $237 million (up from approximately $115 million in 2021) and average revenue of approximately $1.01 billion (up from approximately $500 million in 2021) and we believe this scale contributes to the durability of our borrowers and their ability to adapt to different economic environments. In addition, Blue Owl’s direct lending strategy continues to invest in, and is often the lead lender or administrative agent on, transactions in excess of $1 billion in size, which gives us the ability to structure the terms of such deals to maximize deal economics and credit protection.protection and provide customized flexible solutions. The average hold size of Blue Owl’s direct lending strategy’s new investments has also increased tois approximately $350 million (up from approximately $200 million in 2021) and average total new deal size has increased tois approximately $1.0$1.5 billion (up from approximately $600 million in 2021).
We believe that the construction of our current portfolio coupled with our experienced investment team and strong underwriting standards leave us well-positioned for the current economic environment. Many of the companies in which we invest are continuing to see modest growth in both revenues and EBITDA. However, in the event of further geopolitical, economic and financial market instability, in the U.S. and elsewhere, it is possible that the results of some of the middle-market companies similar to those in which we invest could be challenged. While we are not seeing signs of an overall, broad deterioration in our results or those of our portfolio companies at this time, there can be no assurance that the performance of certain of our portfolio companies will not be negatively impacted by economic conditions, which could have a negative impact on our future results.
Although we marked down some of the positions on our watch list, across the portfolio we are not seeing a meaningful increase in amendment activity, requests for increased revolver borrowings, missed payments or other signs of an overall, broad deterioration in our results or those of our portfolio companies at this time, there can be no assurance that the performance of certain of our portfolio companies will not be negatively impacted by economic conditions, such as lower base rates and tighter credit spreads, which could have a negative impact on our future results.
We also continue to leverage the expanding role that private lenders are being asked to play in the broader credit markets to evaluate cross-platform opportunities including strategic equity and accretive joint venture investments that have cash flow and credit profiles that provide consistent income. We continue to invest in Credit SLF, Blue Owl Leasing and specialty financing portfolio companies, including Wingspire, Fifth Season, LSI Financing DAC, LSI Financing LLC, Amergin AssetCo and BOCSO. See “Specialty Financing Portfolio Companies and Joint Ventures.” These companies may use our capital to support acquisitions which could continue to lead to increased dividend income supported by well-diversified underlying portfolios. We view these companies as a complement to our lending strategy and expect them to help offset rate and spread volatility and support net asset value growth. These companies have strong underlying diversification and generate predictable income streams.
Subsequent to year-end, we entered into six separate loan sale agreements to sell a portion of our portfolio company investments having an aggregate fair value of $400.0 million. See “Recent Developments – Asset Sale.” This transaction will reduce our leverage by approximately 0.05x and position us to continue to deploy capital into new investments with favorable risk-adjusted returns.
As of December 31, 2025, based on fair value, our portfolio consisted of 73.1% first lien senior secured debt investments (of which 50% we consider to be unitranche debt investments (including “last out” portions of such loans)), 5.2% second lien senior secured debt investments, 2.4% unsecured debt investments, 1.0% specialty finance debt investments, 3.5% preferred equity investments, 3.9% common equity investments, 8.4% specialty finance equity investments and 2.5% joint ventures.
As of December 31, 2025, our weighted average total yield of the portfolio at fair value and amortized cost was 9.5% and 9.5%, respectively, and our weighted average yield of accruing debt and income producing securities at fair value and amortized cost was 10.0% and 10.1%, respectively. Refer to our weighted average yields and interest rates table for more information on our calculation of weighted average yields. As of December 31, 2025, the weighted average spread of total floating rate debt investments was 5.7%.
As of December 31, 2025, we had investments in 234 portfolio companies with an aggregate fair value of $16.47 billion. Our current target leverage ratio is 0.90x-1.25x. As of December 31, 2025, we had net leverage of 1.19x debt-to-equity.
We also continue to invest in Credit SLF and specialty financing portfolio companies, including Wingspire Capital Holdings LLC (“Wingspire”), Fifth Season Investments LLC (“Fifth Season”), LSI Financing 1 DAC (“LSI Financing DAC”) and LSI Financing LLC (“LSI Financing LLC”), and AAM Series 1.1 Rail and Domestic Intermodal Feeder, LLC and AAM Series 2.1 Aviation Feeder, LLC (collectively, “Amergin AssetCo”). In the future we may invest through additional specialty finance portfolio companies, joint ventures, partnerships or other special purpose vehicles. These companies may use our capital to support acquisitions which could continue to lead to increased dividend income supported by well-diversified underlying portfolios. See “Specialty Financing Portfolio Companies” and “Joint Ventures.”
(1)Includes scheduled paydowns.
(23)For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, assumesAssumes each floating rate commitment is subject to the greater of the interest rate floor (if applicable) or 3-month SOFR, which was 4.31%, 5.33%3.65% and 4.59%4.31% as of December 31, 2024, 20232025 and 2022,2024, respectively.
(3)This was disclosed as “Investment funds and vehicles” as of December 31, 2022.
(1)Includes debt investments in Amergin AssetCo.
(2)Includes equity investments in OBDC SLF as of December 31, 2023 and Credit SLF as of December 31, 2024.
(31)51%We consider 50% and 65%51% of whichfirst-lien wesenior considersecured debt investments to be unitranche loans as of December 31, 20242025 and December 31, 2023,2024, respectively.
(4)Includes equity investments in LSI Financing DAC.
(5)Includes equity investments in Wingspire, Amergin AssetCo, Fifth Season and LSI Financing LLC.
(1)Includes equity investments in WingspireWingspire, BOCSO and debt and equity investments in Amergin AssetCo.
(2)Includes equity investments in OBDC SLF as of December 31, 2023 and Credit SLF as of December 31, 2024.
(32)Includes equity investment in FifthCredit Season.SLF and Blue Owl Leasing.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, “ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. The risks described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “July 2026 Notes Repayment”
Removed heading “Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025”
Removed heading “Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025”
Removed heading “Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025”
Removed heading “Price Range of Common Stock”
Removed heading “September 2028 Notes”
Removed heading “CLO I Redemption”
Largest changes
“During the second quarter of 2026, global equity and debt markets adapted to shifts in expectations around major themes such as inflation and the trajectory of interest rates as well as ongoing geopolitical relations and the impact to energy prices. Stronger than previously indicated jobs growth and sticky inflation drove expectations of rate hikes, a reversal away from the forward rate cuts anticipated at the beginning of the second quarter. Deescalation in the Middle East, directional but not linear throughout the quarter, drove energy prices lower. …”see in full comparison
“During the first quarter of 2026, global equity and debt markets experienced elevated volatility, with spread widening in fixed income markets as a result of intensifying geopolitical conflicts and heightened focus on the evolution of artificial intelligence (“AI”). The 10-year Treasury yield ended the first quarter of 2026 up nearly 15 basis points since the end of 2025 and the CBOE Volatility Index peaked above 30 during the first quarter of 2026, its highest level since April 2025. …”see in full comparison
“In the ordinary course of business, we may guarantee certain obligations in connection with our portfolio companies (in particular, certain controlled portfolio companies). Under these guarantee arrangements, payments may be required to be made to third parties if such guarantees are called upon or if the portfolio companies were to default on their related obligations, as applicable.”see in full comparison
“Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025”see in full comparison
“Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025”see in full comparison
“Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (102)
Blue Owl Capital Corporation (the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”) is a Maryland corporation formed on October 15, 2015. Our investment objective is to generate current income, and to a lesser extent, capital appreciation by targeting investment opportunities with favorable risk-adjusted returns. Our investment strategy focuses on primarily originating and making loans to, and making debt and equity investments in, U.S. middle marketmiddle-market companies. Within this space, we predominantly focus on investing in institutionally-backed, upper middle marketmiddle-market businesses, which we categorize as those generating greater than $50 million of EBITDA annually. We invest in senior secured or unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans, broadly syndicated loans and, to a lesser extent, equity and equity-related securities including warrants, preferred stock and similar forms of senior equity, which may or may not be convertible into a portfolio company’s common equity. We may hold our investments directly or through specialty financing portfolio companies and joint ventures. Except for our specialty financing company investments, our equity investments are typically not control-oriented investments and we may structure such equity investments to include provisions protecting our rights as a minority-interest holder.
We are externally managed by Blue Owl Credit Advisors LLC (“the Adviser” or “our Adviser”). The Adviser is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), is an indirect affiliate of Blue Owl Capital Inc. (“Blue Owl”) (NYSE: OWL) and is part of Blue Owl’s Credit platform. Subject to the overall supervision of our board of directors (“the Board” or “our Board”), the Adviser manages our day-to-day operations, and provides investment advisory and management services to us. The Adviser or its affiliates may engage in certain origination activities and receive attendant arrangement, structuring or similar fees. The Adviser is responsible for managing our business and activities, including sourcing investment opportunities, conducting research, performing diligence on potential investments, structuring our investments, and monitoring our portfolio companies on an ongoing basis through a team of investment professionals.
The Adviser also serves as investment adviser to Blue Owl Capital Corporation II and Blue Owl Credit Income Corp. Blue Owl consists of three investment platforms: (1) Credit, which includes several strategies, including direct lending, alternative credit, investment grade credit, liquid credit and other adjacent investment strategies, (2) Real Assets, which focuses on three primary investment strategies: net lease, real estate credit and digital infrastructure, and (3) GP Strategic Capital, which primarily focuses on acquiring equity stakes in, or providing debt financing to, large, multi-product private equity and private credit firms. The Adviser is part of the direct lending strategy of Blue Owl’s Credit platform which offers private credit solutions to primarily upper-middle-market companies through differentiated access points. In addition to the Adviser, Blue Owl’s Credit platform’s direct lending strategy is comprised of Blue Owl Technology Credit Advisors LLC (“OTCA”), Blue Owl Technology Credit Advisors II LLC (“OTCA II”), Blue Owl Credit Private Fund Advisors LLC (“OPFA”) and Blue Owl Diversified Credit Advisors LLC (“ODCA” and together with the Adviser, OTCA, OTCA II, and OPFA, the “Blue Owl Credit Advisers”), which also are registered investment advisers. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Adviser and its affiliates had $159.24$158.12 billion of assets under management across Blue Owl’s Credit platform.
On January 13, 2025, we consummated the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), dated August 7, 2024, with Blue Owl Capital Corporation III, a Maryland corporation (“OBDE”), Cardinal Merger Sub, Inc., a Maryland corporation and our wholly-owned subsidiary (“Merger Sub”), and, solely for the limited purposes set forth therein, the Adviser, and ODCA, investment adviser to OBDE. In connection therewith, Merger Sub merged with and into OBDE, with OBDE continuing as the surviving company and our wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Initial Merger”) and, immediately thereafter, OBDE merged with and into us, and we continued as the surviving company (together with the Initial Merger,together, the “Mergers”).
Our investment objective is to generate current income, and to a lesser extent, capital appreciation by targeting investment opportunities with favorable risk-adjusted returns. Our investment strategy focuses primarily on originating and making loans to, and making debt and equity investments in, U.S. middle-market companies. Since our Adviser and its affiliates began investment activities in April 2016 through MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our Adviser and its affiliates have originated $193.98$197.54 billion aggregate principal amount of investments, of which $189.83$193.23 billion of aggregate principal amount of investments prior to any subsequent exits or repayments, was retained by either us or a corporation or fund advised by our Adviser or its affiliates. We seek to participate in transactions sponsored by what we believe to be high-quality private equity and venture capital firms capable of providing both operational and financial resources. We seek to generate current income primarily in U.S. middle-market companies, both sponsored and non-sponsored, through direct originations of senior secured loans or originations of unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans, broadly syndicated loans and, to a lesser extent, investments in equity and equity-related securities including warrants, preferred stock and similar forms of senior equity. We may hold our investments directly or through specialty financing portfolio companies and joint ventures. Except for our specialty financing company investments, our equity investments are typically not control-oriented investments and we may structure such equity investments to include provisions protecting our rights as a minority-interest holder.
In general, we define “middle-market companies” to mean companies with earnings before interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization, or “EBITDA,” between $25 million and $500 million annually and/or annual revenue of $125 million to $5 billion. Within this space, we predominantly focus on investing in upper middle marketmiddle-market businesses, where we can structure larger transactions, which we believe to be more resilient and of greater strategic significance. We categorize “upper middle marketmiddle-market” companies as those generating $50 million or more of EBITDA annually. We may on occasion invest in smaller or larger companies if an attractive opportunity presents itself, especially when there are dislocations in the capital markets, including the high yield and syndicated loan markets. We note that over time, the average EBITDA of companies in our portfolio has grown significantly as the scale of private market solutions has grown. Across our investments, we typically seek to be senior in the capital structure, targeting a loan-to-value ratio (the amount of outstanding debt as a percentage of the value of the company) of 50% or below on average, which may provide a level of downside protection and help preserve capital.
We expect that our portfolio composition will be comprised predominantly of directly originated debt and income producing securities, with a lesser allocation to equity or equity-linked opportunities which we may hold directly or through specialty purpose vehicles and joint ventures. In addition, we may invest a portion of our portfolio in opportunistic investments and publicly traded debt investments and we may evaluate and enter into strategic portfolio transactions that may result in additional portfolio companies that we are considered to control. These types of investments are intended to supplement our core strategy and further enhance returns to our shareholders. These investments may include high-yield bonds and broadly-syndicated loans, including “covenant light” loans (as defined below), and other publicly traded debt instruments, typically originated and structured by banks on behalf of large corporate borrowers with employee counts, revenues, EBITDAs and enterprise values larger than those of middle marketmiddle-market companies, and equity investments in portfolio companies that make senior secured loans or invest in broadly syndicated loans, structured products, asset-based solutions or other forms of specialty finance, which may include, but is not limited to, investments such as life settlement, royalty interests and equipment finance.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our average debt investment size in each of our portfolio companies was approximately $61.1$59.6 million based on fair value. The investment size will vary with the size of our capital base and market conditions. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, excluding certain investments that fall outside of our typical borrower profile, our portfolio companies representing 91.6%91.5% of our total debt portfolio based on fair value,value had weighted average annual revenue of $1.04$1.06 billion, weighted average annual EBITDA of $239$242 million, an average interest coverage of 1.9x2.0x and an average net loan-to value of 47%.
We focus primarily on the direct origination of loans to institutionally-backed, upper middle marketmiddle-market companies domiciled in the United States.
We generate revenues primarily in the form of interest income from the investments we hold. In addition, we generate income from dividends on either direct equity investments or equity interests obtained in connection with originating loans, such as options, warrants or conversion rights. Our debt investments typically have a term of three to ten years. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, 96.1%96.0% of our debt investments based on fair value bear interest at a floating rate, subject to interest rate floors, in certain cases. Interest on our debt investments is generally payable either monthly or quarterly.
Broader geopolitical developments, including the conflict involving Iran, have contributed to elevated market volatility, even if they have not altered the fundamental operating environment for the U.S. companies in which we invest. We actively monitor these dynamics alongside other sources of risk. As part of our standard valuation and risk management processes, we conduct reviews of every investment in our portfolio on a quarterly basis.basis Inand response to heightened uncertainty over the last year, we tooktake additional, proactive steps to reassess risk across our portfolio.portfolio We conductedthrough thematic stress teststests. twiceYear-to-date, –our firstregular incourse responseportfolio monitoring and risk-specific stress tests, including those related to tariff policies implemented in 2025,tariffs and more recently to evaluate the potential implications of rapid advancements in artificial intelligence.intelligence, These additional reviews reinforced our confidencesuggest that our portfolio is well positioned, supported by borrowers with strong business fundamentals and defensive characteristics.
We believe the middle marketmiddle-market lending environment provides opportunities for us to meet our goal of making investments that generate attractive risk-adjusted returns.
Limited Availability of Capital for Middle Market Companies — The middle market is a large addressable market. According to GE Capital’s National Center for the Middle Market Mid-Year 20252026 Middle Market Indicator, there are approximately 200,000 U.S. middle market companies, which have approximately 48 million aggregate employees. Moreover, the U.S. middle market accounts for one-third of private sector gross domestic product (“GDP”). GE defines U.S. middle market companies as those between $10 million and $1 billion in annual revenue, which we believe has significant overlap with our definition of U.S. middle market companies. We believe U.S. middle market companies will continue to require access to debt capital to refinance existing debt, support growth and finance acquisitions. We believe that regulatory and structural factors, industry consolidation and general risk aversion, limit the amount of traditional financing available to U.S. middle market companies. We believe thatReportedly, many commercial and investment banks have, in recent years, de-emphasized their service and product offerings to middle market businesses in favor of lending to large corporate clients and managing capital markets transactions. In addition, these lenders may be constrained in their ability to underwrite and hold bank loans and high yield securities for middle market issuers as they seek to meet existing and future regulatory capital requirements. We also believe that there is a lack of market participants that are willing to hold meaningful amounts of certain middle market loans. As a result, we believe our ability to minimize syndication risk for a company seeking financing by being able to hold its loans without having to syndicate them, coupled with reduced capacity of traditional lenders to serve the middle-market, present an attractive opportunity to invest in middle market companies.
Capital Markets Have Been Unable to Fill the Void in U.S. Middle Market Finance Left by Banks — Access to underwritten bond and syndicated loan markets is challenging for middle market companies due to loan issue size and liquidity. For example, high yield bonds are generally purchased by institutional investors, such as mutual funds and exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) who, among other things, are focused on the liquidity characteristics of the bond being issued in order to fund investor redemptions and/or comply with regulatory requirements. Accordingly, the existence of an active secondary market for bonds is an important consideration in these entities’ initial investment decision. Syndicated loans arranged through a bank are done either on a “best efforts” basis or are underwritten with terms plus provisions that permit the underwriters to change certain terms, including pricing, structure, yield and tenor, otherwise known as “flex”, to successfully syndicate the loan, in the event the terms initially marketed are insufficiently attractive to investors. Furthermore, banks are generally reluctant to underwrite sub-scale middle market loans because the arrangement fees they may earn on the placement of the debt generally are not sufficient to meet the banks’ return hurdles. Loans provided by companies such as ours provide certainty to issuers in that we have a more stable capital base and have the ability to invest in illiquid assets, and we can commit to a given amount of debt on specific terms, at stated coupons and with agreed upon fees. As we are the ultimate holder of the loans, we do not require market “flex” or other arrangements that banks may require when acting on an agency basis. In addition, our Adviser has teams focused on both liquid credit and private credit and these teams are able to collaborate with respect to syndicated loans.
Secular Trends Supporting Growth for Private Credit — We believe that periods of market volatility, such as the current period of marketincluding volatility caused,experienced in part,recent years driven by uncertainty regarding inflationinflation, interest rates and interestmonetary rates, and currentpolicy, geopolitical conditions, technological change, and exogenous shocks such as those to public health, have accentuated the advantages of private credit. The availability of capital in the liquid credit market is highly sensitive to market conditions whereas we believe private lending has proven to be a stable and reliable source of capital through periods of volatility. We believe the opportunity set for private credit will continue to expand even as the public markets remain open. Financial sponsors and companies today are familiar with direct lending and have seen firsthand the strong value proposition that a private solution can offer. Scale, certainty of execution and flexibility all provide borrowers with a compelling alternative to the syndicated loan and high yield markets. Based on our experience, larger, higher quality credits that have traditionally been issuers in the syndicated and high yield markets are increasingly seeking private solutions independent of credit market conditions. In our view, this is supported by financial sponsors wanting to work with collaborative financing partners that have scale and breadth of capabilities. This has driven substantial growth in direct lending portfolio companies over time. Given the dynamics mentioned above, we believe this trend is poised to continue and that the large amount of uninvested capital held by funds of private equity firms broadly, estimated by Preqin Ltd., an alternative assets industry data and research company, to be $2.7 trillion as of December 31, 2025, will continue to serve as a tailwind to the space.
Attractive Investment Dynamics — An imbalance between the supply of, and demand for, middle market debt capital creates attractive pricing dynamics. We believe the directly negotiated nature of middle market financings also generally provides more favorable terms to the lender, including stronger covenant and reporting packages, better call protection, and lender-protective change of control provisions. Additionally, we believe BDC managers’ expertise in credit selection and ability to manage through credit cycles has generally resulted in BDCs experiencing lower loss rates than U.S. commercial banks through credit cycles. Further, we believe that historical middle market default rates have been lower, and recovery rates have been higher, as compared to the larger market capitalization, broadly distributed market, leading to lower cumulative losses. Lastly, we believe that in the current environment, lenders with available capital may be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities as the economy reopens and may be able to achieve improved economic spreads and documentation terms.terms as financing activity rebounds from modest levels.
During the second quarter of 2026, global equity and debt markets adapted to shifts in expectations around major themes such as inflation and the trajectory of interest rates as well as ongoing geopolitical relations and the impact to energy prices. Stronger than previously indicated jobs growth and sticky inflation drove expectations of rate hikes, a reversal away from the forward rate cuts anticipated at the beginning of the second quarter. Deescalation in the Middle East, directional but not linear throughout the quarter, drove energy prices lower. Equity market dispersion continued, with single stock volatility outpacing index volatility by a wide margin as artificial intelligence (“AI”) hardware and other perceived beneficiaries of AI spend continued to drive thematic investment.
The 10-year Treasury yield ended the second quarter of 2026 approximately 15 basis points higher than March 31, 2026 and experienced a peak to trough range of more than 40 basis points during the quarter. The CBOE Volatility Index peaked above 25 during the second quarter of 2026, but mostly sat below 20 as tensions in the Middle East eased throughout the quarter.
During the first quarter of 2026, global equity and debt markets experienced elevated volatility, with spread widening in fixed income markets as a result of intensifying geopolitical conflicts and heightened focus on the evolution of artificial intelligence (“AI”). The 10-year Treasury yield ended the first quarter of 2026 up nearly 15 basis points since the end of 2025 and the CBOE Volatility Index peaked above 30 during the first quarter of 2026, its highest level since April 2025. As a result of this volatility and higher inflation expectations, the Federal Reserve is now expected to maintain current interest rates in the near term.
We approachedcontinue to approach this environment more conservatively resultingand inalthough repayments moderated, they continued to be in excess of originations in the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026; however, underlying credit performance remains strong, market spreads arehave beginningwidened compared to widenyear end and we have maintained a lowerour leverage level.level is at its lowest in over two years. As a result, we have available capital to deploy into attractive risk-adjusted opportunities asthat themeet pipelineour ofreturn compellingand investmentscredit builds.standards. We have also leveraged Blue Owl’s expanded capabilities in alternative and asset-based credit, as well as digital infrastructure, to access attractive risk-adjusted opportunities and adding accretive, non-correlated returns.returns over time. We have also continued to invest in our specialty finance vehicles and joint ventures where we continue to see opportunities for higher returns that are less correlated with our core direct lending strategy.
Consistent with our last several quarters, a substantial portion of our financings are with existing borrowers,borrowers. withMany theof majoritythese comingcome from large, incumbent borrowers, reflecting the advantage of incumbency and scale and allowing us to support their continued growth and maintain the credit quality of our portfolio.
We believe that the construction of our current portfolio coupled with our experienced investment team and strong underwriting standards leave us well-positioned for the current economic environment. Many of the companies in which we invest are continuing to see modest growth in both revenues and EBITDA. However, in the event of furtherfuture geopolitical, economic andor financial market instability, in the U.S. and elsewhere, it is possible that the results of some of the middle-market companies similar to those in which we invest could be challenged.
The markdownsmodest markdown on our investmentsportfolio werewas primarily driven by thea impactsmall number of credit spread wideninginvestments and not a deterioration in the underlyingoverall quality of our assets.portfolio. Across the portfolioGenerally we are not seeing a meaningful increase in amendment activity, requests for increased revolver borrowings, missed payments or other signs of an overall, broad deterioration in our results or those of our portfolio companies at this time although there can be no assurance that the performance of certain of our portfolio companies will not be negatively impacted by economic conditions, which could have a negative impact on our future results. The vast majority of our payment-in-kind (“PIK”) wasinvestments were structured as PIK from inception and not implemented as a result of credit underperformance.
Our technology portfolio is managed by 40 dedicated investment professionals who assess the risks and opportunities of our prospective and existing investments, which has included those related to AI, for many years. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, yearacross overthe year,industries we invest in, our software borrowers, which make up 16%approximately 18% of the portfolio, continued to deliver strong revenue and EBITDA growth consistent with our broader investments.year-over-year. We also believe that our software borrowers are well positioned to evolve as a result of developments in AI and believe that a limited portion of these investments are subject to risk of significant disruption.
In February 2026, we sold a portion of our portfolio company investments with aggregate fair value of $357.6 million, equivalent to 99.8% of par value to certain purchasers. Each investment sold represented a partial amount of our exposure to the respective portfolio company. The investments sold consisted of 91.9% first-lien investments, 4.7% second-lien investments and 3.4% unsecured investments and include investments in 74 portfolio companies across 24 industries. 98.3% of investments sold were floating rate and 100% were 1- or 2-rated on our 5-point internal investment ratings scale. The investments sold had an average investment size of $4.8 million and a weighted average spread of 5.5% and consist of partial sales representing approximately 5.0% of the Company’s exposure to each underlying portfolio company as of December 31, 2025. As a result of the sale, the Company recognized $1.7 million gain on the sale in the first quarter of 2026. We used the proceeds from the loans sale to repay indebtedness.
Additionally see, “Note 4 – Investments – Asset Sale.” This transaction enhances balance sheet flexibility, modestly increases portfolio diversity and creates additional capacity to deploy capital into attractive, risk-adjusted investment opportunities.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, based on fair value, our portfolio consisted of 72.1%73.2% first lien senior secured debt investments (of which 51%52% we consider to be unitranche debt investments (including “last out” portions of such loans)), 5.0%4.5% second lien senior secured debt investments, 2.4%2.5% unsecured debt investments, 1.0%1.1% specialty finance debt investments, 3.5%1.8% preferred equity investments, 4.3%4.8% common equity investments, 9.2%9.5% specialty finance equity investments and 2.5%2.6% joint ventures.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our weighted average total yield of the portfolio at fair value and amortized cost was 9.5% and 9.5%,9.4%, respectively, and our weighted average yield of accruing debt and income producing securities at fair value and amortized cost was 10.0%9.9% and 10.0%,9.9%, respectively. Refer to our weighted average yields and interest rates table for more information on our calculation of weighted average yields. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the weighted average spread of total floating rate debt investments was 5.6%.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had investments in 230229 portfolio companies with an aggregate fair value of $15.34$14.96 billion. Our current target leverage ratio is 0.90x-1.25x. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had net leverage of 1.13x1.11x debt-to-equity.
(3)Assumes each floating rate commitment is subject to the greater of the interest rate floor (if applicable) or 3-month SOFR, which was 3.68%3.73% and 4.29% as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
(1)We consider 51%52% and 50% of first-lien senior secured debt investments to be unitranche loans as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.
The Adviser focuses on downside protection by leveraging existing rights available under our credit documents; however, for investments that are significantly underperforming or which may need to be restructured, the Adviser’s workout team partners with the Investment Team and all material amendments, waivers and restructurings require the approval of a majority of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, seven of our portfolio companies are on non-accrual, which represents 1.0%0.8% of our portfolio at fair value. Our annual net gain/ (loss) ratio is approximately (0.310.32)%.
________________ (1) Totals presented may not sum due to rounding.
Wingspire is an independent diversified direct lender focused on providing asset-based commercial finance loans and related senior secured loans to U.S.-based middle-market borrowers. Wingspire offers a wide variety of asset-based financing solutions to businesses in an array of industries, including revolving credit facilities, machinery and equipment term loans, real estate term loans, first-in/last-out tranches, cash flow term loans, and opportunistic / bridge financings. We made our initial commitment to Wingspire on September 24, 2019, and subsequently made periodic additional commitments to increase our total commitment to $505$504.6 million. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the fair value of the Company’s investment in Wingspire was $606.8$607.1 million. We do not consolidate our equity interest in Wingspire.
Amergin was created to invest in a leasing platform focused on railcar, aviation and other long-lived transportation assets. Amergin acquires existing on-lease portfolios of new and end-of-life railcars and related equipment and selectively purchases off-lease assets and is building a commercial aircraft portfolio through aircraft financing and engine acquisition on a sale and lease back basis. Amergin consists of Amergin AssetCo and Amergin Asset Management LLC, which has entered into a Servicing Agreement with Amergin AssetCo. We made an initial equity commitment to Amergin AssetCo on July 1, 2022. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our commitment to Amergin AssetCo was $270.2$269.9 million, of which $110.6$98.6 million was equity and $159.6$171.3 million was debt. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the fair value of the Company’s investment in Amergin AssetCo was $254.2$266.2 million. We do not consolidate our equity interest in Amergin AssetCo.
Fifth Season is a portfolio company created to invest in life insurance based assets, including secondary and tertiary life settlement and other life insurance exposures using detailed analytics, internal life expectancy review and sophisticated portfolio management techniques. On July 18, 2022, we made an initial equity investment in Fifth Season. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our investment in Fifth Season was $303.1$302.7 million at fair value. We do not consolidate our equity interest in Fifth Season.
LSI Financing DAC is a portfolio company formed to acquire contractual rights to revenue pursuant to earnout agreements generally in the life sciences space. On December 14, 2022, we made an initial equity commitment to LSI Financing DAC. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the fair value of our investment in LSI Financing DAC was $6.8$5.2 million and our total commitment was $6.8$5.3 million. We do not consolidate our equity interest in LSI Financing DAC.
LSI Financing LLC is a separately managed portfolio company formed to indirectly own royalty purchase agreements and loans in the life sciences space. The Adviser provides consulting services to a subsidiary of LSI Financing LLC in exchange for a fee. The Adviser has agreed to waive a portion of the management fee payable by us pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement equal to the pro rata amount of such consulting fee. On November 25, 2024, we redeemed a portion of itsour interest in LSI Financing DAC in exchange for common shares of LSI Financing LLC. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our investment at fair value in LSI Financing LLC was $274.7$257.9 million and our total commitment was $354.6$297.3 million. We do not consolidate our equity interest in LSI Financing LLC.
BOCSO was formed to hold alternative credit assets, including ABF. ABF is a subsector of private credit focused on generating income from pools of financial, physical or other assets. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the portfolio consists of five investments totaling $1.03$1.25 billion and $1.24 billion at cost and fair value, respectively, and ranging in cost from $24.9 million to $379.6$454.4 million and with fair value ranging from $24.7$24.9 million to $378.0$450.6 million. The largest investment is 36.9%36.3% of the total cost of BOCSO’s portfolio. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the portfolio asset class composition was 65.6%71.7% ABF — Specialty finance, 32.0%26.3% ABF — Leasing, and 2.4%2.0% ABF — Commercial Real Estate. We do not consolidate our equity interest in BOCSO.
Owl-HP Finance is an investment partnership with Hearthstone Residential Holdings (“Hearthstone”), a majority-owned subsidiary of Five Point Holdings, LLC (“Five Point”) (NYSE:FPH). Owl-HP Finance was created to invest in residential land banking (or lot option) programs that provide capital to public home builders. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company’s investment at fair value in Owl-HP Finance was $17.3$40.9 million and our total commitment was $84.5 million. We do not consolidate our equity interest in Owl-HP Finance.
(1)Totals presented may not sum due to rounding.
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations can vary from period to period as a result of various factors, including the level of investment origination and exit activity, expenses, the recognition of realized gains and losses and changes in unrealized appreciation and depreciation on the investment portfolio. For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our net asset value per share decreased, primarily driven by widening spreads contributing to decreases in the fair values in certain of our portfolio investments and distributions in excess of our net investment income, partially offset by accretive share repurchases.
We expect that investment income will vary based on a variety of factors including the pace of our originations and repayments.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
Investment income decreased toby $396.8$84.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, fromas $464.6compared million forto the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower interest income, partially offset by higher other income and dividend income from our equity investments. Interest income was lower by $65.7$111.6 million period-over-period due to a reduction in our portfolio size from net repayments of approximately $2.1$1.6 billion, and a decrease in the weighted average yield of our debt portfolio from 10.2%10.1% to 9.5%.9.5% due to lower average interest rates. Included in interest income are other fees, such as prepayment fees and accelerated amortization of upfront fees from unscheduled paydowns, which are non-recurring in nature. Fees received from unscheduled paydowns decreased to $7.8$6.1 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $8.2$32.1 million for the same period in the prior year, due to a decreaseddecrease level ofin repayment related activity inperiod-over-period. the current year period. Payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interestOther income from investments decreasedincreased by $4.9$15.0 million period-over-period due to a decrease in the amount of PIK earning investments. PIK income as a percentage of overall income increased slightly to 11.7% from 10.7% in the prior period due to a larger decrease in total investment income relative to PIK income. Dividend income increased to $61.6 million from $56.5 million in the prior year period, primarily due to an increase in dividends earned from our equity investments as a result of growth in our strategic equity investments. Other income decreased period-over-period due to a decrease in incremental fee income, which are fees that are generally available to us as a result of closing investments and normally paid at the time of closing. WeDividend expectincome thatincreased by $11.0 million period-over-period, primarily due to an increase in dividends earned from our equity investments as a result of growth in our strategic equity investments. Payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest income from investments increased by $1.1 million remaining relatively flat period-over-period. PIK income as a percentage of overall income increased slightly to 10.7% from 9.1% in the prior period, due to a decrease in total investment income willrelative varyto basedPIK on a variety of factors including the pace of our originations and repayments.income.
Investment income decreased by $152.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower interest income, including lower interest income from our PIK investments, partially offset by dividend income and other income. Interest income decreased by $177.3 million as a result of a decrease in the par value of our debt investments period-over-period, as well as a decrease in the weighted average yield of our debt portfolio from 10.1% to 9.5%, due to lower average interest rates. Included in interest income are other fees, such as prepayment fees and accelerated amortization of upfront fees from unscheduled paydowns, which are non-recurring in nature. Fees received from unscheduled paydowns decreased to $13.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $40.3 million in the prior year period, due to a decrease in repayment activity. PIK interest income decreased by $3.8 million year-over-year. For the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, as a percentage of total income, PIK interest income increased to 11.2% from 9.9%, due to a decrease in total investment income relative to PIK income. Dividend income increased by $16.1 million from the prior year period, primarily due to an increase in dividends earned from our strategic equity investments. Other income increased by $12.7 million from the prior year period due to an increase in incremental fee income, which are fees that are generally available to us as a result of closing investments and normally paid at the time of closing.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
Total operating expenses decreased by $42.3 million year-over-year for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to the same period in the prior year,year period, primarily driven by decreases in interest expense, performance based incentive fees and management fees. Interest expense decreased by $28.6 million due to a decrease in daily average borrowings from $10.2$10.0 billion to $9.3$8.4 billion, largely due to repayments, as well as due to a decrease in the average interest rate from 5.6%5.5% to 5.2% period-over-period. Performance based incentive fees decreased by $7.4 million due to lower net investment income. Management fees decreased by $7.2 million due to a decreasedecreases in average adjusted gross assets driven by sales and repayments of portfolio investments. As a percentage of total assets, professional fees, directors’ fees and other general and administrative expenses remained relatively consistent period-over-period.
Total operating expenses decreased by $66.8 million year-over-year for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the prior year period, primarily driven by decreases in interest expense, performance based incentive fees and management fees. Interest expense decreased by $42.8 million due to a decrease in daily average borrowings from $10.1 billion to $8.9 billion, largely due to repayments, as well as a decrease in the average interest rate from 5.6% to 5.2% period-over-period. Performance based incentive fees decreased by $16.1 million due to lower net investment income. Management fees decreased by $8.7 million due to decreases in average adjusted gross assets driven by sales and repayments of portfolio investments. As a percentage of total assets, professional fees, directors’ fees and other general and administrative expenses remained relatively consistent period-over-period.
We have elected to be treated as a RIC under subchapter M of the Code, and we intend to operate in a manner so as to continue to qualify for the tax treatment applicable to RICs. To qualify for tax treatment as a RIC, we must, among other things, distribute to our shareholders in each taxable year generally at least the sum of (i) 90% of our investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code, and (ii) 90% of our net tax-exempt income for that taxable year. In addition, a RIC may, in certain cases, satisfy this distribution requirement by distributing dividends relating to a taxable year after the close of such taxable year under the “spillover dividend” provisions of subchapter M. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we have generated undistributed taxable earnings “spillover” of approximately $0.28$0.29 per share. The undistributed taxable earnings spillover will be carried forward toward distributions to be paid in accordance with RIC requirements. To maintain our tax treatment as a RIC, we, among other things, intend to make the requisite distributions to our shareholders, which generally relieves us from U.S. federal income taxes at corporate rates.
For the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025,2026, we recorded U.S. federal and state income tax expense/ (benefit) of $2.4$0.7 million, and $3.7$3.2 million, respectively, including U.S. federal excise tax expense (benefit) of $1.7$1.1 million and $2.0$2.8 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, we recorded U.S. federal and state income tax expense (benefit) of $2.3 million, and $6.0 million, respectively, including U.S. federal excise tax expense (benefit) of $1.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
Certain of our consolidated subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes. For the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, we recorded a tax expense (benefit) of approximately $(0.4) million and $0.4 million for taxable subsidiaries, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, we recorded a tax expense of approximately $0.8$1.3 millionmillion, and $1.7$3.0 million for taxable subsidiaries, respectively. The income tax expense for our taxable consolidated subsidiaries will vary depending on the level of investment income earnings and realized gains from the exits of investments held by such taxable subsidiaries during the respective periods.
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, the net unrealized losses were driven by decreases in the fair value of certain debt investments and reversals of prior period unrealized gains that were realized during the period, partially offset by reversals of prior period unrealized losses that were realized during the period and increases in the fair value of certain debt and equity investments as further detailed below.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
For the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2025, the net unrealized loss was driven by a decrease in the fair value of certain debt and equity investments, partially offset by reversals of prior period unrealized losses that were realized in the current quarter. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the net unrealized gain included $75.1 million of net unrealized gain due to purchase discount from the Mergers across 189 portfolio companies that were acquired. In addition, the net unrealized gain was driven by an increase in the fair value of certain debt and equity investments and reversals of prior period unrealized lossesgains that were realized in the quarter related to exited investments, partially offset by aan decreaseincrease in the fair value of certain debt investments as detailed below. The ten largest contributors to the change in net unrealized gain (loss) on investments consisted of the following:
The ten largest contributors to the change in net unrealized gain (loss) on investments consisted of the following:
(12)Portfolio company is a controlled,non-controlled, affiliated investment.
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, the net unrealized loss was driven by widening of credit spreads and decreases in the fair value of certain debt and equity investments, partially offset by increases in the fair value of certain debt and equity investments, as well as reversals of prior period unrealized losses that were realized in the current period.
For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the net unrealized gain included $63.7 million of net unrealized gain due to purchase discount from the Mergers across 189 portfolio companies that were acquired, an increase in the fair value of certain debt and equity investments, as well as reversals of prior period unrealized losses that were realized during the period related to exited investments. This is partially offset by a decrease in the fair value of certain debt investments and reversals of prior period unrealized gains that were realized in the quarter related to exited investments, as detailed below.
The ten largest contributors to the change in net unrealized gain (loss) on investments consisted of the following:
OBDC insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 5 Form 4 filings (2 insiders, 5 trade dates, 9,000 shares, about $102.3K) and open-market sales in 0 filings. Net open-market shares: 9,000 (purchases minus sales); net value about $102.3K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-28 | Kaye Eric A. |
Open-market purchase | 1,000 | $11.34 | $11.3K |
| 2026-08-20 | Nicholson Logan |
Open-market purchase | 675 | $11.29 | $7.6K |
| 2026-08-20 | Nicholson Logan |
Open-market purchase | 2,325 | $11.29 | $26.2K |
| 2026-06-02 | Nicholson Logan |
Open-market purchase | 2,600 | $11.31 | $29.4K |
| 2026-06-02 | Nicholson Logan |
Open-market purchase | 400 | $11.31 | $4.5K |
| 2026-05-11 | Kaye Eric A. |
Open-market purchase | 1,000 | $11.21 | $11.2K |
| 2026-02-25 | Kaye Eric A. |
Open-market purchase | 672 | $11.92 | $8.0K |
| 2026-02-25 | Kaye Eric A. |
Open-market purchase | 328 | $11.90 | $3.9K |
Well-known investors holding OBDC (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.