Companies › ORGO

ORGO 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Organogenesis Holdings Inc. · Nasdaq · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1661181 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Organogenesis Holdings Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

11 / 13risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
1new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-02-26 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-02-27 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

11new paragraphs
13removed paragraphs
42reworded paragraphs
26,810 → 27,106words in section

New heading “The concentration of ownership of our capital stock limits your ability to influence corporate matters.”

Removed heading “Our products are subject to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and corresponding rebate obligations that took effect on January 1, 2023, and we may owe rebates, which could be material, on our Apligraf, Dermagraft, and PuraPly products and possibly other products.”

Removed heading “We face significant uncertainty in the industry due to government healthcare reform and other legislative action.”

Removed heading “The Significant Stockholder Group exercises significant control over us, and their interests may conflict with yours in the future.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: fine, penalt
“the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, an intent-based, federal criminal statute which prohibits, among other things, persons or entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering, or paying any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, recommendation, lease, order, or arrangement for, or recommendation of, any item or service for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, by a federal healthcare …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine, penalt
“the federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including the civil False Claims Act (“FCA”), which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented to the federal government, claims for payment or approval that are false, fictitious, or fraudulent; knowingly making, using, or causing to be made or used, a false statement or record material to a false or fraudulent claim or obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the federal government; …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: litigation, penalt
“There have been and continue to be laws enacted by the federal government, state governments, regulators, and third-party payers to control healthcare costs, and generally, to reform the healthcare system in the United States. For example, the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) and the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 substantially changed the way healthcare is delivered and financed by both governmental and private insurers. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation, penalt
“There have been and continue to be laws enacted by the federal government, state governments, regulators, and third-party payers to control healthcare costs, and generally, to reform the healthcare system in the United States. For example, the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (“ACA”) and the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 substantially changed the way healthcare is delivered and financed by both governmental and private insurers. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine, penalt
“the federal civil monetary penalties laws, which impose significant civil fines against individuals and entities that engage in activities including, among other things, knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a claim for services not provided as claimed or that is otherwise false or fraudulent in any way; arranging for or contracting with an individual or entity that is excluded from participation in federal healthcare programs to provide items or services reimbursable by a federal healthcare program; violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute; …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: investigation, regulation

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

OurAs of January 1, 2026, our skin substitute products are currentlyno longer paid as Part B drugs and instead, are reimbursed byas Medicareincident-to insupplies. physicianFor officecalendar settingsyear 2026, under the PFS final rule, CMS will pay for certain skin substitute products, at aan initial payment rate of ASPapproximately plus$127.14 6%.per square centimeter (prior to the application of the geographic adjustments) when they are used as part of a covered application procedure paid under the PFS in the non-facility setting. For calendar year 2026, under the OPPS final rule, CMS will apply the same per square centimeter payment for skin substitute products used in the hospital outpatient department and ambulatory surgery center settings. Beginning in April 2013, the Budget Control Act of 2011 created an automatic reduction of Medicare payments to providers of up to 2%. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, this reduction was temporarily suspended from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2022, with subsequent reductions to 1% from April 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022. The 2% reduction was then reinstated and has been in effect since July 1, 2022, and will remain in effect through the first eight months in which the fiscal year 2032 sequestration order is in effect, unless additional Congressional action is taken. Sequestration applies to the government’s payment portion, which is 80% of the total payment amount. Additionally, in future years, it is possible that an up-to 4% Medicare sequestration could be ordered under Statutory Pay-As-You-GO Act of 2010 (“PAYGO”), which requires deficit neutrality in most laws passed by Congress. UntilAs of January 2022,1, 2026, we wereare not required to report ASP for all our skin substitute products that are paid separately as biologics because they are regulated as medical devices by the FDA,, although we chosemay choose to report ASP for some of ourthese non-BLA products. However, starting with the reporting deadline for the first quarter of 2022, we have been required, and have submitted, ASP reports for all our skin substitute products that are paid separately as biologics as a result of provisions included in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2020. Pricing requirements and rebate/discount calculations are complex, vary among products and programs, and are often subject to interpretation by governmental or regulatory agencies and the courts. The requirements of these programs, including, by way of example, their respective terms and scope, change frequently. Responding to current and future changes may increase our costs, and the complexity of compliance will be time consuming. We are liable for errors associated with our submission of pricing data and for any overcharging of government payers. Failure to make necessary disclosures and/or to identify overpayments could result in allegations against us under the federal False Claims Act and other laws and regulations. Any required refunds to the United States government or response to a government investigation or enforcement action would be expensive and time consuming and could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (66)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

any change in government healthcare programs’ and private health plans’ policies regarding sales and reimbursement of durable medical equipment (“DME”), including a prohibition on physician-owned DME supplier entities;

Reworded

We continue tomay invest significant capital to maximize our sales and marketing infrastructure, and there can be no assurance that these efforts will result in significant increases in sales.

Reworded

We are committed to maximizing our internal sales and marketing capabilities, including by optimizing our sales force to further support the marketing and sales of the products acquired in connection with our 2017 acquisition of NuTech Medical and our 2020 acquisition of CPN Biosciences.capabilities. As a result, we continue tomay invest in sales and marketing resources for our products to allow us to reach new customers and potentially increase sales. These expenses impact our operating results, and there can be no assurance that we will continue to be successful in significantly increasing the sales of our products.

Reworded

Cyberattacks have become increasingly more prevalent and much harder to detect, defend against or prevent. As the frequency of cyberattacks and resulting breaches reported by other businesses and governments increases, we expect to continue to devote significant resources to improve and maintain our information technology (“IT”) infrastructure. We have incurred and may in the future incur significant costs in order to implement, maintain and/or update security systems we believe are necessary to protect our IT infrastructure. As the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and are often not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventive measures. A breakdown in existing controls and procedures around our cyber-security environment may prevent us from detecting, reporting or responding to cyber incidents in a timely manner and could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and value of our stock. We cannot guarantee that our implemented processes for IT and risk mitigation measures will be effective for IT systems under our control.

Reworded

We also have outsourced significant elements of our operations to third parties, including significant elements of our information technology infrastructure and, as a result, we are managing many independent vendor relationships with third parties who may or could have access to our confidential information. The size and complexity of our information technology and information security systems, and those of our third-party vendors with whom we contract (and the large amounts of confidential information that is present on them), make such systems potentially vulnerable to service interruptions or to security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees or vendors, or from malicious attacks by third parties. Such attacks are of ever-increasing levels of sophistication and are made by groups and individuals with a wide range of motives (including, but not limited to, industrial espionage and market manipulation) and expertise. While we have invested significantly in the protection of data and information technology, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent service interruptions or security breaches. For example, in August 2020, our information technology (“IT”) systems were exposed to a ransomware attack, which partially impaired certain IT systems for a short period of time. We finished investigating the incident, together with legal counsel and other incident response professionals. We did not experience any material losses related to the ransomware attack and were able to recover all data quickly, with only a minimal and temporary interruption to our business. While we have implemented measures to protect our data security and information technology systems, such measures may not prevent these events. Although we have cyber-insurance coverage that may cover certain events described above, this insurance is subject to deductibles and coverage limitations and we may not be able to maintain this insurance. Also, it is possible that claims could exceed the limits of our coverage.

Reworded

In addition, California has enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which came into effect on January 1, 2020. Pursuant to the CCPA, certain businesses are required, among other things, to make certain enhanced disclosures related to California residents regarding the use or disclosure of their personal information, allow California residents to opt-out of certain uses and disclosures of their personal information without penalty, provide Californians with other choices related to personal data in our possession, and obtain opt-in consent before engaging in certain uses of personal information relating to Californians under the age of 16. The California Attorney General may seek substantial monetary penalties and injunctive relief in the event of our non-compliance with the CCPA. The CCPA also allows for private lawsuits from Californians in the event of certain data breaches. Aspects of the CCPA remain uncertain, and we may be required to make modifications to our policies or practices in order to comply. Aside from California, Texas and several other major states impose rigorous local medical privacy requirements.

Reworded

We incurred non-cash impairment and write downwrite-down charges during 2025 and 2024 which adversely affected our fiscal year 2025 and 2024 operating results and we may be required to incur additional future impairment and write downwrite-down charges, which could adversely affect our operating results.

Reworded

Our long-term assets include property and equipment of $89.1$103.7 million and $116.2$89.1 million, of which $63.3$67.9 million and $60.8$63.3 million represents the value of improvements to our leased assets, and of which $21.9$26.7 million and $59.1$21.9 million represents construction in progress (each as described more fully in Note 8, Property and Equipment, Net, to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K), as of December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we recorded a write-down to fair value for asset held for sale in the amount of $11.2 million. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded an impairment of property and construction and a write-down of capitalized internal-use software costs in the amounts of $18.8 million and $4.0 million, respectively. We did not recognize any impairment charges with respect to our long-lived assets during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.2023.

Reworded

We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the asset is written down to fair value, which is determined based on appraised value.value or observable market conditions. Any such impairment could result in a non-cash charge equal to the full carrying value of the associated assets. Changes in our assumptions with respect to our expected use of our long-lived assets may result in additional impairment and write downwrite-down charges in the future, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Reworded

We are required under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) to test goodwill for impairment at least annually and to review our goodwill, amortizableother intangible assets, and other assets acquired through merger and acquisition activity, for impairment when events or changes in circumstance indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that could lead to impairment of goodwill, amortizableother intangible assets, and other assets acquired via acquisitions include significant adverse changes in the business climate and actual or projected operating results (affecting our company as a whole or affecting any particular segment) and declines in the financial condition of our business. We may be required in the future to record additional charges to earnings if our goodwill, amortizableother intangible assets, or other investments become impaired. Any such charge would adversely impact our financial results.

Reworded

As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had federal net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $19.6 million, which do not expire. We had state net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $7.4$16.3 millionmillion, expiring fromin the year ended December 31,years 2027 through 2038. We had federal and state research and development tax credits of approximately $1.1$3.3 million and $1.3 million, expiring in the yearyears ended2044 Decemberand 31,2038, 2038.respectively. It is uncertain whether and to what extent applicable federal and state tax laws will limit the deductibility of our operating loss and credit carryforwards, though we are already subject to limitations in net operating loss utilization in certain states.

Reworded

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and operate successfully as a public company. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) requires that companies evaluate and report on their systems of internal control over financial reporting.

Reworded

As disclosed in Item 9A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, weWe previously identified a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting relating to the design and maintenance of effective controls over information technology general controls and proper segregation of duties to support the initiation and recording of transactions and the resulting impact on business process controls and applications that rely on such data. We completed our remediation efforts related to the material weakness by, among other things, implementing certain modules in a new company-wide enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system to provide additional systematic controls and segregation of duties for our accounting processes; implementing additional controls to mitigate existing risks of proper segregation and change configurations; adding personnel to our accounting and finance team with the requisite accounting and internal controls knowledge and experience to sufficiently enhance our internal controls environment; designing and implementing new information technology general controls to ensure proper segregation of duties in our change management processes; engaging an outside firm to assist management with performing control design and operating effectiveness testing; reporting the results of control testing to the key stakeholders across our organization, including our Audit Committee, on testing progress and defined corrective actions; monitoring and reporting on the results of control remediation; and documenting and structuring the Company’s processes to meet SOX 404(b) requirements.

Removed

Our products are subject to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and corresponding rebate obligations that took effect on January 1, 2023, and we may owe rebates, which could be material, on our Apligraf, Dermagraft, and PuraPly products and possibly other products.

Removed

Section 90004 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, enacted in November 2021, requires manufacturers to pay a refund to the federal government if more than a certain applicable percentage of their single-use product is not administered to a patient and is discarded ("wasted") by providers. Because there is a lack of consistency and uniformity in wound sizes, it is likely that some skin substitute product is discarded with every treatment. The rebate obligation took effect January 1, 2023. In the calendar year 2024 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) rulemaking, CMS exempted skin substitutes from this refund requirement for calendar quarters in 2025. This exemption is based on a possibility that CMS will, in future rulemaking, stop paying for skin substitutes using the ASP methodology and bundle payment into the payment for the application of the product. It is unclear whether CMS will continue exempting skin substitute products from this refund requirement in subsequent years and what impact any future regulatory actions may have on the ASP reimbursement landscape and our products and/or product candidates.

Reworded

There is no guarantee that any of our clinical trials will be successful. In addition, there is a high failure rate for drugs, biologic productsproducts, medical devices and cell therapies proceeding through clinical trials. Many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in late-stage clinical trials even after achieving promising results in preclinical testing and earlier-stage clinical trials. Data obtained from preclinical and clinical activities are subject to varying interpretations, which may delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. Any such setbacks could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Reworded

As biological products and medical devices, manyMany of the products that we market require regulatory approvals or clearances from the FDA, or from similar regulatory authorities outside of the United States, before they may legally be distributed in commerce. In particular, such products may require FDA approval of BLAs, under Section 351 of the PHSA, Premarket Approval, or PMA, submissions under Section 515 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, or may require clearance under Section 510(k) of the FDCA. Although we believe that we have all necessary regulatory approvals or clearances legally required for the products that we currently market, the introduction of new or modified products, or new or modified FDA regulatory rules, may require us to secure new approvals or clearances. Additionally, the FDA may take the position that some of the products that we currently market without premarket approval or clearance in fact require such approval or clearance. The process of obtaining an approved BLA or PMA requires the expenditure of substantial time, effort and financial resources and may take years to complete. Although obtaining clearance under section 510(k) is somewhat less burdensome, it is also associated with significant costs and resource commitments. The fee for filing a BLA, PMA or 510(k) notification, and the annual user fees for any establishment that manufactures biologics or medical devices, as well as product fees applicable to each approved product are substantial.

Reworded

In May 2024, we announced that our Phase 3 RCT evaluating the safety and efficacy of ReNu, a cryopreserved ASA for the management of symptoms associated with knee OA, achieved its primary endpoint upon the analysis of positive top line data. In September 2025, we announced an update on our second Phase 3 RCT of ReNu. This second Phase 3 RCT of ReNu did not achieve statistical significance for its primary endpoint, despite results demonstrating a numerical improvement in baseline pain reduction over the first Phase 3 trial. In December 2025, we completed a planned Type B meeting with the FDA, resulting in confirmation to initiate a rolling Biologics License Application (“BLA”) for ReNu; shortly thereafter we initiated a rolling submission of the BLA and expect to complete this submission in the first half of 2026. There are significant costs associated with conducting clinical trials to support approvals that cannot necessarily be estimated with any accuracy until investigational plans have been developed. Moreover, data obtained from clinical activities may show a lack of safety or efficacy or may be inconclusive or susceptible to varying interpretations, any of which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. Failure or delay can occur at any time during the clinical trial process. Success in preclinical testing and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful. Even product candidates in later stages of clinical trials may fail to show the required safety profile or meet the efficacy endpoints despite having progressed through preclinical studies and initial clinical trials. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or adverse safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in earlier trials. We cannot be certain that we will not face similar setbacks. Even with positive clinical trial results, there may be other barriers to approval or clearance, and the FDA may not grant approval or clearance on a timely basis, or at all. Even if the FDA clears or approves our products, the clinical data submitted to the FDA may not be sufficient for payers to cover and/or adequately reimburse our customers for use of our products. Additionally, the FDA may limit the indications for use in an approval or clearance, or place other conditions on an approval, that could restrict the commercial application of the products.

Reworded

We may seek a breakthrough therapy designation for one or more product candidates. A breakthrough therapy is defined as a product candidate that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the product candidate may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. For product candidates that have been designated as breakthrough therapies, interaction and communication between the FDA and the sponsor of the trial can help to identify the most efficient path for clinical development while minimizing the number of patients placed in ineffective control regimens. Product candidates designated as breakthrough therapies by the FDA are also eligible for priority review if supported by clinical data at the time of the submission of the new drug application.BLA.

Reworded

Certain of the products that we manufacture, process and distribute are, or are derived from, human cells or tissues, including amniotic tissue. The FDA has specific regulations governing human cells, tissues and cellular and tissue-based products, or HCT/Ps. In particular, HCT/Ps that meet certain criteria set forth in the FDA’s regulations at 21 C.F.R. § 1271.10 are regulated solely under Section 361 of the PHSA, so-called "Section 361 HCT/Ps", and are not subject to any premarket clearance or approval requirements. They are also subject to less stringent post-market regulatory requirements than products regulated under Section 351 of the PHSA and/or under Sections 505, 510 or 515 of the FDCA. The Company has believed that certain of our HCT/Ps, including our products derived from amniotic membrane, qualify for regulation as Section 361 HCT/Ps. However, the regulatory classification of an HCT/P as a Section 361 HCT/P depends in part on the purposes for which the product is intended and in part on the processing to which an HCT/P is subject. On November 16, 2017, the FDA issued aA final guidance document entitled, "Regulatory Considerations for Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products: Minimal Manipulation and Homologous Use", or 361 HCT/P Guidance, whichoriginally issued on November 16, 2017, and last revised on July 20, 2020, provides FDA’s current thinking on how to apply the existing regulatory criteria for regulation as a Section 361 HCT/P. These include, in addition to other requirements, requirements that an HCT/P be both minimally manipulated and intended for homologous use. In general, "minimal manipulation" is a standard referring to the degree to which the original characteristics of an HCT/P have been altered by processing and "homologous use" refers to the requirement that an HCT/P perform the same basic function in the donor as in the recipient. FDA’s interpretation of the requirements for marketing of Section 361HCT/Ps and the principles set forth the 361 HCT/P Guidance continue to evolve over time. Any action by the FDA to apply the principles set forth in the 361 HCT/P Guidance to the HCT/Ps that we distributedistribute, including in ways that reflect new interpretations or expectations, could have adverse consequences for us and make it more difficult or expensive for us to conduct our business.

Reworded

In light of the 361 HCT/P Guidance, our labeling and marketing claims for our placental-based membrane products, including our Affinity, NuShield, and Novachor products, clarify that they are intended as protective barriers, and thus meet the homologous use requirement to qualify as Section 361 HCT/Ps. However, the FDA could disagree with our conclusion and require changes to our labeling and marketing and/or premarket approval or clearance for Affinity, NuShield, or any placental-based sheet product we market, which would disrupt the marketing of these products, potentially expose us to regulatory sanctions, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, we believe it is necessary to obtain FDA approval of a BLA for NuCel and ReNu because those products may be deemed to be more than minimally manipulated, not for homologous use, or otherwise not regulated as Section 361 HCT/Ps. We continue to conduct clinical studies of ReNu to support FDA approval of a BLA for the management of symptoms associated with knee OA and, based on favorable feasibility studies that are subject to further evaluation, we believe ReNu has potential as a treatment for additional OA and tissue regeneration applications. We have discontinued clinical development of NuCel. If we obtain BLA approval for ReNu, compliance with applicable post-market regulatory requirements will involve significant time and substantial costs. Even for those products that remain regulated as Section 361 HCT/Ps, increasing regulatory scrutiny within the industry in which we operate could lead to heightened requirements, compliance with which could be costly. The costs and other resource burdens associated with any of these regulatory outcomes may limit the resources available to us to fully exploit our technologies or may otherwise limit our ability to carry out other business activities.

Reworded

Our other products are regulated as biologics and medical devices, which are subject to even more stringent regulation by the FDA. As noted above, these products are subject to rigorous premarket review processes, and an approval or clearance may place substantial restrictions on the indications for which the product may be marketed or the population for whom it may be marketed, may require warnings to accompany the product or may impose other restrictions on the sale and/or use of the product. In addition, most of our products are subject to continuing obligations to comply with other substantial regulatory requirements, including the FDA’s cGTP regulations, the FDA’s Current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMP”) regulations, adverse event reporting, FDA inspections, and the FDA’s QSR, and the regulatory expectations for these types of regulatory obligations may evolve over time. For example, on January 31, 2024, the FDA issued a final rule amending the QSR for medical devices. This final rule is intended to more closely align the FDA QSR with the international consensus standard for device quality management and will become effective on February 2, 2026. We may need to dedicate considerable resources to come into compliance with the new QSR by the final rule’s effective date. The costs and other resource burdens associated with maintaining regulatory approvals or clearances for our products and otherwise meeting our regulatory obligations may limit the resources available to us to fully exploit our technologies or may otherwise limit our ability to carry out other business activities.

Added

the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, an intent-based, federal criminal statute which prohibits, among other things, persons or entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering, or paying any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, recommendation, lease, order, or arrangement for, or recommendation of, any item or service for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, by a federal healthcare program, such as Medicare or Medicaid. A person or entity need not have actual knowledge of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation. The term remuneration has been interpreted broadly to include anything of value. Further, courts have found that if any “one purpose” of an arrangement involving remuneration is to induce referrals of federal healthcare program business, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute has been violated. Violations may be subject to significant civil and criminal fines and penalties for each violation, imprisonment, and exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs. Although there are a number of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute that protect certain common industry activities from prosecution, these exceptions and safe harbors are narrowly drawn. Arrangements that do not fully satisfy all elements of an available exception or safe harbor are evaluated based on the specific facts and circumstances and are typically subject to increased scrutiny;

Removed

the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons or entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering, or paying any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind in return for, the purchase, recommendation, leasing or furnishing of an item or service reimbursable under a federal healthcare program, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs;

Added

the federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including the civil False Claims Act (“FCA”), which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented to the federal government, claims for payment or approval that are false, fictitious, or fraudulent; knowingly making, using, or causing to be made or used, a false statement or record material to a false or fraudulent claim or obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the federal government; or knowingly concealing or knowingly and improperly avoiding or decreasing an obligation to pay money to the federal government. Manufacturers can be held liable under the FCA even when they do not submit claims directly to government payors if they are deemed to “cause” the submission of false or fraudulent claims. Additionally, the ACA specified that any claims submitted as a result of a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitute false claims and are subject to enforcement under the FCA, and the government may further assert that a claim that includes items or services resulting from a violation of the FDCA or other law constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the FCA. The FCA also permits a private individual acting as a “whistleblower” to bring qui tam actions on behalf of the federal government alleging violations of the FCA and to share in any monetary recovery or settlement. Violations of the FCA may be subject to significant civil fines and penalties for each false claim, currently ranging from $14,308 - $28,619 per false claim, treble damages, and potential exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs;

Added

the federal civil monetary penalties laws, which impose significant civil fines against individuals and entities that engage in activities including, among other things, knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a claim for services not provided as claimed or that is otherwise false or fraudulent in any way; arranging for or contracting with an individual or entity that is excluded from participation in federal healthcare programs to provide items or services reimbursable by a federal healthcare program; violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute; failing to report and return a known overpayment; or offering or transferring any remuneration to a Medicare or Medicaid beneficiary if the person knows or should know it is likely to influence the beneficiary’s selection of a particular provider, practitioner, or supplier of items or services reimbursable by Medicare or Medicaid, unless an exception applies;

Added

the federal criminal statutes which impose criminal liability for knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private third-party payors, or to obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, any healthcare benefit program; knowingly and willfully embezzling or stealing from a healthcare benefit program; willfully preventing, obstructing, misleading, or delaying a criminal investigation of a healthcare offense; and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statements in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. Similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity need not have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;

Removed

federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws, which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment or approval from Medicare, Medicaid, or other government payers that are false or fraudulent;

Removed

18 U.S.C. § 1347, which created new federal criminal statutes that prohibit a person from knowingly and willfully executing a scheme or from making false or fraudulent statements to defraud any healthcare benefit program (i.e., public or private);

Reworded

the federal transparency laws, including the Physician Payments Sunshine ActAct, enacted as part of the ACA, which requiresimposes theannual tracking and disclosurereporting torequirements thefor, federalamong governmentothers, bycertain pharmaceuticalmanufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics, and medical devicesupplies manufacturersfor which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, of certain payments and other “transfers of value” provided to U.S.-licensed physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and licensed chiropractors), physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified registered nurse anesthetists, anesthesiology assistants, certified nurse midwives, and teaching hospitalshospitals, as well as tracking and reporting of ownership and investment interests that are held by U.S.-licensed physicians and their immediate family members; and state law equivalents of each of these federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws that may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payer, including commercial insurers; state laws that require pharmaceutical and medical device companies to comply with their industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the applicable compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict certain payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; state laws that require drug and medical device manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures; state laws that prohibit giving gifts to licensed healthcare professionals; and state laws governing the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts in certain circumstances, such as specific disease states.

Reworded

Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrow scope of the statutory or regulatory exceptions and safe harbors available, our business activities could be challenged under one or more of these laws. Relationships between medical product manufacturers and health care providers are an area of heightened scrutiny by the government. We engage in various types of activities, including the conduct of speaker programs to educate physicians, the provision of reimbursement advice and support to customers, and the provision of customer and patient support services, that have been the subject of government scrutiny and enforcement action within the medical devicehealthcare industry.

Reworded

We could be subject to legal exposure if we do not comply with our reporting and payment obligations under Medicare, the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program,Medicare or any other governmental pricing programs in which our products or product candidates may participate, including through additional rebate or discount requirements, fines, sanctions, and litigation.

Reworded

OurAs of January 1, 2026, our skin substitute products are currentlyno longer paid as Part B drugs and instead, are reimbursed byas Medicareincident-to insupplies. physicianFor officecalendar settingsyear 2026, under the PFS final rule, CMS will pay for certain skin substitute products, at aan initial payment rate of ASPapproximately plus$127.14 6%.per square centimeter (prior to the application of the geographic adjustments) when they are used as part of a covered application procedure paid under the PFS in the non-facility setting. For calendar year 2026, under the OPPS final rule, CMS will apply the same per square centimeter payment for skin substitute products used in the hospital outpatient department and ambulatory surgery center settings. Beginning in April 2013, the Budget Control Act of 2011 created an automatic reduction of Medicare payments to providers of up to 2%. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, this reduction was temporarily suspended from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2022, with subsequent reductions to 1% from April 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022. The 2% reduction was then reinstated and has been in effect since July 1, 2022, and will remain in effect through the first eight months in which the fiscal year 2032 sequestration order is in effect, unless additional Congressional action is taken. Sequestration applies to the government’s payment portion, which is 80% of the total payment amount. Additionally, in future years, it is possible that an up-to 4% Medicare sequestration could be ordered under Statutory Pay-As-You-GO Act of 2010 (“PAYGO”), which requires deficit neutrality in most laws passed by Congress. UntilAs of January 2022,1, 2026, we wereare not required to report ASP for all our skin substitute products that are paid separately as biologics because they are regulated as medical devices by the FDA,, although we chosemay choose to report ASP for some of ourthese non-BLA products. However, starting with the reporting deadline for the first quarter of 2022, we have been required, and have submitted, ASP reports for all our skin substitute products that are paid separately as biologics as a result of provisions included in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2020. Pricing requirements and rebate/discount calculations are complex, vary among products and programs, and are often subject to interpretation by governmental or regulatory agencies and the courts. The requirements of these programs, including, by way of example, their respective terms and scope, change frequently. Responding to current and future changes may increase our costs, and the complexity of compliance will be time consuming. We are liable for errors associated with our submission of pricing data and for any overcharging of government payers. Failure to make necessary disclosures and/or to identify overpayments could result in allegations against us under the federal False Claims Act and other laws and regulations. Any required refunds to the United States government or response to a government investigation or enforcement action would be expensive and time consuming and could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Added

Responding to current and future changes may increase our costs, and the complexity of compliance will be time consuming. We are liable for errors associated with our submission of pricing data and for any overcharging of government payers. Failure to make necessary disclosures and/or to identify overpayments could result in allegations against us under the federal False Claims Act and other laws and regulations. Any required refunds to the United States government or response to a government investigation or enforcement action would be expensive and time consuming and could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Removed

We face significant uncertainty in the industry due to government healthcare reform and other legislative action.

Removed

There have been and continue to be laws enacted by the federal government, state governments, regulators, and third-party payers to control healthcare costs, and generally, to reform the healthcare system in the United States. For example, the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) and the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 substantially changed the way healthcare is delivered and financed by both governmental and private insurers. These changes included the creation of demonstration programs and other value-based purchasing initiatives that provide financial incentives for physicians and hospitals to reduce costs, including incentives for furnishing low-cost therapies for chronic wounds even if those therapies may be less effective than our products. Since its enactment, there have been several efforts to modify or repeal all or part of ACA. Additionally, tax reform legislation was passed that includes provisions that impact healthcare insurance coverage and payment such as the elimination of the tax penalty for individuals who do not maintain health insurance coverage (the so-called "individual mandate"). On June 17, 2021, the United States Supreme Court dismissed a judicial challenge to the ACA brought by several states without specifically ruling on the constitutionality of the law. It is unclear how any future litigation and other healthcare reform efforts may impact the ACA.

Removed

Additionally, on August 16, 2022, Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which implements substantial changes to the Medicare program, including drug pricing reforms. Among other reforms, the IRA imposes inflation rebates on drug manufacturers for certain products reimbursed under Medicare Parts B and D if the prices of those products increase faster than inflation, and, beginning in 2026, establishes a “maximum fair price” for a fixed number of pharmaceutical and biological products covered under Medicare Parts B and D following a price negotiation process with CMS. CMS has continued to take steps to implement the IRA, including: releasing the negotiated maximum prices, which will be effective in 2026, for the first ten drugs that were subject to the IRA’s negotiation process, releasing quarterly lists of Medicare Part B products that are subject to adjusted coinsurance rates based on the inflationary rebate provisions of the IRA, and announcing a list of fifteen additional drugs that will be subject to price negotiations during 2025, with maximum prices to be effective starting in 2027.

Removed

The results of the 2024 Presidential and Congressional elections, and potential subsequent developments, further increase the uncertainty related to the healthcare regulatory environment. In addition, on June 28, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion holding that courts reviewing agency action pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) “must exercise their independent judgment” and “may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous.” The decision will have a significant impact on how lower courts evaluate challenges to agency interpretations of law, including those by CMS and other agencies with significant oversight of the healthcare industry. The new framework is likely to increase both the frequency of such challenges and their odds of success by eliminating one way in which the government previously prevailed in such cases. As a result, significant regulatory policies may be subject to increased litigation and judicial scrutiny. Any resulting changes in regulation may result in unexpected delays, increased costs, or other negative impacts that are difficult to predict but could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. For example, certain of these changes could impose additional limitations on the rates we will be able to charge for our future products or the amounts of reimbursement available for our future products from governmental agencies or third-party payers.

Reworded

We face significant uncertainty in the industry due to government healthcare reform and other legislative action. The medical device and biopharmaceutical industries are subject to extensive regulatory obligations and policies that are subject to change, including due to judicial challenges, election cycles, and resulting regulatory updates and changes in policy priorities. Inadequate funding for the FDA, the SEC and other government agencies, including from government shutdowns, or other disruptions to these agencies’ operations, could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, prevent new products and services from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal business functions on which the operation of our business may rely, which could negatively impact our business.

Added

There have been and continue to be laws enacted by the federal government, state governments, regulators, and third-party payers to control healthcare costs, and generally, to reform the healthcare system in the United States. For example, the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (“ACA”) and the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 substantially changed the way healthcare is delivered and financed by both governmental and private insurers. These changes included the creation of demonstration programs and other value-based purchasing initiatives that provide financial incentives for physicians and hospitals to reduce costs, including incentives for furnishing low-cost therapies for chronic wounds even if those therapies may be less effective than our products. Since its enactment, there have been several efforts to modify or repeal all or part of ACA. Additionally, tax reform legislation was passed that includes provisions that impact healthcare insurance coverage and payment such as the elimination of the tax penalty for individuals who do not maintain health insurance coverage (the so-called “individual mandate”). On June 17, 2021, the United States Supreme Court dismissed a judicial challenge to the ACA brought by several states without specifically ruling on the constitutionality of the law. It is unclear how any future litigation and other healthcare reform efforts may impact the ACA.

Reworded

In addition, federal agency priorities, leadership, policies, rulemaking, communications, spending, and staffing may be significantly impacted by election cycles, including, for example, the current administration’s commitment to significantly reduce government spending through cuts to federal healthcare programs and reductions in the workforces of key government agencies, such as the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), the FDA, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”). The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products or modifications to products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, the ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory and policy changes. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of CMS and other government agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and development activities, is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.

Reworded

Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new product candidates to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, future government shutdowns could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations. The administration and agencies have also made abrupt announcements about new or changed regulatory policies, such as policies related to use of AI to review product applications. These developments may lead to greater uncertainty regarding FDA policies, slower response times, longer review periods, unexpected delays, increased costs, or other negative impacts on both our business and that of our customers that are difficult to predict. These changes may potentially affect our ability to progress development of, or obtain regulatory clearance or approval for, any future product modifications or new products.

Added

Additionally, on June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion holding that courts reviewing agency action pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) “must exercise their independent judgment” and “may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous.” The decision will have a significant impact on how lower courts evaluate challenges to agency interpretations of law, including those by HHS, FDA, CMS and other agencies with significant oversight of the medical device industry. The new framework is likely to increase both the frequency of such challenges and their odds of success by eliminating one way in which the government previously prevailed in such cases. As a result, significant regulatory policies will be subject to increased litigation and judicial scrutiny. Any resulting changes in regulation may result in unexpected delays, increased costs, or other negative impacts on our business that are difficult to predict.

Reworded

The United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010, and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials, including government-employed physicians, for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws, including the requirements to maintain accurate information and internal controls. We operate in many parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree and in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices. There is no assurance that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from acts committed by our employees or agents. If we are found to be liable for FCPA or other violations (either due to our own acts or our inadvertence, or due to the acts or inadvertence of others), we could suffer from civil and criminal penalties or other sanctions, including contract cancellations or debarment, and loss of reputation, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Reworded

The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may have an adverse effect on our business operations. For example, the ACA, enacted in 2010, contains provisions for Medicare demonstration programs that create financial incentives to treat patients with chronic wounds conservatively and could result in decreased utilization of our products. Furthermore, CMS has historically maintained a policy in the Medicare hospital outpatient setting that bundles the administration and product costs associated with graft skin substitutes, which similarly creates incentives that may result in decreased utilization of our products in the outpatient hospital setting. On November 7, 2024, CMS rejected a recommendation by the Advisory Panel on Hospital Outpatient Payment that CMS end this bundling policy. Accordingly, even if coverage and reimbursement are provided, market acceptance of our products has been and will be adversely affected if access to coverage and/or use of our products is administratively burdensome to obtain and/or more costly than alternative treatments. In addition, in 2026, CMS in recent years has considered potentialimplemented payment reform for skin substitute products in the Medicare physician office setting under the PhysicianPFS Feeand Schedule.the hospital outpatient department setting and ambulatory surgery center setting under the OPPS. These changes categorize non-BLA skin substitutes into three categories based on FDA approval, namely 361 HCT/Ps, PMAs and 510(k)s. CMS establishes a set reimbursement rate of $127.14 for each category. For 2026, the reimbursement rate is the same across the three categories, but CMS noted that the rates may change in future rulemaking. Future changes to Medicare reimbursement for skin substitutes in thisthese settingsettings also could affect utilization of our skin substitute products.

Reworded

In addition, Medicare uses regional contractors called MACs, to process claims, develop coverage policies and make payments within designated geographic jurisdictions. On April 25, 2024, seven Medicare Part A/B MACs published new proposed LCDs for skin substitute grafts/CTPs for the treatment of DFUs and VLUs in the Medicare population. These LCDs were finalized by the MACs on November 14, 2024, and were originally set to become effective on February 12, 2025. However, on January 24, 2025, the MACs announced a delay in the implementation of the LCDs until AprilJanuary 13,1, 2025.2026. UnderOn December 15, 2025, CMS released a fact sheet stating that the newMACs will issue updated LCDs finalizedthat inwere Novemberto 2024,become shouldeffective theyJanuary take1, effect2026. The fact sheet included a new categorization of products as scheduled, eighteen products would remain covered, includingnon-covered, ouror Apligraf and Dermagraft products for DFU and VLU, and our Affinity and NuShield products for DFU; however, more than 200 products would be classified as “non-covered,” including our PuraPly, PuraPly AM, PuraPly XT, Novachor, TransCyte, Dual and Matrix products for DFU and VLU. The LCDs as finalized apply only to DFU and VLU indications for skin substitute products; other indications would remainthose subject to case-by-casea review12-month ofstatus medicalquo necessityperiod. However, on December 24, 2025, CMS announced that the LCDs had been withdrawn by the MACs ifand the most recent draft LCDs takewere effect.removed It is uncertain if there will be further delays in implementingfrom the newMedicare LCDsCoverage and/or if the new LCDs will be revised or rescinded going forward. If implemented, the LCDs could materially impact utilization of these products, our business, and our revenue.Database. Any future changes or other developments related to these or other LCDs also could materially and adversely affect utilization of our products, our business, and our revenue.

Added

On January 1, 2026, CMS began testing the Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction (“WISeR”) Model which uses technology-enabled prior authorization services on select Medicare services, including the use of skin substitutes. The WISeR Model will run in six states for five years and, according to CMS, is intended to reduce waste. Implementation of the WISeR Model could impact beneficiary access to our products in the applicable states, which could also materially and adversely impact utilization of our products, our business, our revenue and our profitability. On December 30, 2025, CMS published comments regarding discarded product, which have resulted in clinician confusion and material disruption in the market. While the longer-term impact of CMS’ updated 2026 Medicare reimbursement changes is still uncertain, we are experiencing a significant year-over-year decline in revenue in the first quarter of fiscal year 2026.

Reworded

Most of the key patents related to our marketed products are expired. We have no patent protection covering, for example, our Apligraf, Dermagraft, or NuShield products. However, in addition to trade secrets, trademarks, know-how, and other unpatented technology, we have pursued and plan to continue to pursue patent protection where we believe that doing so offers potential commercial benefits. However, we may be incorrect in our assessments of whether or when to pursue patent protection. Moreover, patents may not issue from any of our pending patent applications. Even if we obtain or in-license issued patents, such patent rights may not provide valid patent protection sufficiently broad to prevent any third party from developing, using, or commercializing products that are similar or functionally equivalent to our products or technologies, or otherwise provide any competitive advantage. In addition, these patent rights may be challenged, revoked, invalidated, infringed, or circumvented by third parties. Laws relating to such rights may in the future be changed or withdrawn in a manner adverse to us.

Added

In addition, these patent rights may be challenged, revoked, invalidated, infringed, or circumvented by third parties. Laws relating to such rights may in the future be changed or withdrawn in a manner adverse to us.

Reworded

As of the closing of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock offering in November 2024, there were approximately 34,285,653 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to the then applicable limitations under Nasdaq rules prior to stockholder approval. During the second quarter of 2025, our shareholders approved the issuance of shares of Class A common stock upon conversion of the outstanding shares of Convertible Preferred Stock in excess of the applicable Nasdaq limitations. Holders of Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to a regular dividend at the rate of 8.0% per annum, subject to adjustment and payable quarterly in cash or in-kind through an increase in the liquidation preference of each share of Convertible Preferred Stock. In addition, no dividend or other distribution on the Class A common stock will be declared or paid on the Class A common stock unless, at the time of such declaration and payment, an equivalent dividend or distribution is declared and paid on the Convertible Preferred Stock.

Reworded

Under various circumstances defined in the Certificate of Designation, shares of our Convertible Preferred Stock can be converted into shares of our Class A common stock. The number of shares of Class A common stock into which Convertible Preferred Stock may convert or be redeemed is based in part on the liquidation preference for the Convertible Preferred Stock, so any increase in the liquidation preference may lead to an increase in the number of deemed shares of Class A common stock held by the Investors on an “as-converted” basis. To date, regular dividends have been paid in-kind through an increase in the liquidation preference of the Convertible Preferred Stock such that, as of December 31, 2025, there were approximately 37,507,755 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding Convertible Preferred Stock.

Reworded

As of December 31, 2024,2025, the outstanding shares of our Convertible Preferred Stock represented approximately 28%30% of our outstanding Class A common stock, on an as-converted basis and without giving effect to limitations under applicable Nasdaq rules prior to stockholder approval.basis. In addition, the terms of the Convertible Preferred Stock grant the Investors consent rights with respect to certain actions by us, including:

Reworded

any increase to the size of the Board above 12 directors prior to our 2025 annual meeting and 11 directors after such meeting;

Removed

As described herein, the Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of Class A common stock at any time at the option of the Preferred Stockholders. However, until we receive stockholder approval (Requisite Stockholder Approval), as contemplated by Nasdaq listing rules, with respect to the issuance of shares of Class A common stock upon conversion of the Convertible Preferred Stock in excess of the limitations imposed by such rules, the Preferred Stockholders cannot convert the Convertible Preferred Stock into a number of shares of Class A common stock in excess of 26,502,042 shares, which represents 19.99% of the outstanding shares of Class A common stock at the time of signing the subscription agreement, or to the extent such conversion will result in a Preferred Stockholder beneficially owning greater than 19.99% of our then-outstanding shares (Ownership Limitations). If, prior to receipt of the Requisite Stockholder Approval, a Preferred Stockholder elects to convert any Convertible Preferred Stock that would result in the issuance, when aggregated with the number of shares previously issued upon conversion of the Convertible Preferred Stock, of more than 19.99% of the outstanding shares of Class A common stock at the time of signing the subscription agreement, then the Company will, in lieu of issuing shares of Class A common stock, pay the Preferred Stockholder a cash amount equal to the product of the number of shares of Class A common stock that could not be issued due to such limitation and the 10-day trailing volume weighted average price of the Class A common stock as of the trading day immediately prior to the conversion date (Cash-in-Lieu Payments), which Cash-in-Lieu Payments shall be paid no later than November 5, 2026, together with accrued interest of 10% per annum, to the extent an earlier cash payment is prohibited pursuant to the terms of the 2021 Credit Agreement as amended by the 2024 Amendment.

Reworded

These dividend and Cash-in-Lieu Payment obligations could adversely affect our liquidity and reduce the amount of cash available for working capital, capital expenditures, growth opportunities, acquisitions, and other general corporate purposes. Our obligations to the holders of Convertible Preferred Stock could also limit our ability to obtain additional financing or increase our borrowing costs, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition. The preferential rights could also result in divergent interests between the Investors and holders of shares of our Class A common stock.

Added

The concentration of ownership of our capital stock limits your ability to influence corporate matters.

Added

Alan A. Ades, Albert Erani, Glenn H. Nussdorf, Dennis Erani, Starr Wisdom, Josette Ades, and certain of their respective affiliates, including Alan Ades and the Robert Harry Erani Frick Trust, Organo PFG LLC, Organo Investors LLC, Dennis Erani 2012 Issue Trust, Alan Ades as Trustee of the Alan Ades 2014 GRAT, Albert Erani Family Trust dated 12/29/2012, GN 2016 Family Trust u/a/d August 12, 2016, GN 2016 Organo 10-Year GRAT u/a/d September 30, 2016, Glenn Nussdorf 10 Year Follow On Trust Dated 11-1-1998 and RED Holdings, LLC, along with Avista Healthcare Partners III, L.P. and AHP III Orchestra Holdings, L.P., control a significant amount of the voting power of the Company, collectively owning 88,945,369 shares, or 54.1%, of the Company’s Class A common stock, on an as-converted basis, as of December 31, 2025. This significant concentration of share ownership may adversely affect the trading price for our Class A common stock because investors often perceive disadvantages in owning stock in companies with concentrated ownership. Also, these stockholders, should they act together, may be able to control our management and affairs and matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and the approval of significant corporate transactions, such as mergers, consolidations or the sale of substantially all of our assets. Consequently, this concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control, including a merger, consolidation or other business combination involving us, or discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control, even if that change of control would benefit our other stockholders.

Removed

The Significant Stockholder Group exercises significant control over us, and their interests may conflict with yours in the future.

Removed

Alan A. Ades, Albert Erani, Glenn H. Nussdorf, Dennis Erani, Starr Wisdom, Josette Ades, and certain of their respective affiliates, including Organo PFG LLC, Organo Investors LLC, Dennis Erani 2012 Issue Trust, Alan Ades as Trustee of the Alan Ades 2014 GRAT, Albert Erani Family Trust dated 12/29/2012, GN 2016 Family Trust u/a/d August 12, 2016, GN 2016 Organo 10-Year GRAT u/a/d September 30, 2016 and RED Holdings, LLC, who we refer to collectively as the Significant Stockholder Group, control a significant amount of the voting power of the outstanding Class A common stock. As of February 24, 2025, the Significant Stockholder Group collectively beneficially owns approximately 40% of the Company’s Class A common stock. As a result of this voting control, the Significant Stockholder Group collectively can effectively determine the outcome of all matters requiring stockholder approval, including, but not limited to, the election and removal of the Company’s directors (including the right to designate four of our directors pursuant to the terms of an agreement between the Company and the Significant Stockholder Group), as well as other matters of corporate or management policy (such as potential mergers or acquisitions, payment of dividends, asset sales, and amendments to the Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws). This concentration of ownership may delay or deter possible changes in control and limit the liquidity of the trading market for the Company’s Class A common stock, which may reduce the value of an investment in its Class A common stock. This voting control could also deprive stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares of Class A common stock as part of a potential sale of the Company. So long as the Significant Stockholder Group and their affiliates continue to own a significant amount of the Company’s combined voting power, they may continue to be able to strongly influence or effectively control its decisions. The interests of the Significant Stockholder Group and their affiliates may not coincide with the interests of other holders of the Company Class A common stock.

Removed

In the ordinary course of their business activities, the Significant Stockholder Group and their affiliates may engage in activities where their interests conflict with our interests or those of our other stockholders. In addition, the Significant Stockholder Group may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions, divestitures, and other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance their investment, even though such transactions might involve risks to you.

Showing the first 60 of 66 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

28new paragraphs
23removed paragraphs
36reworded paragraphs
6,919 → 7,352words in section

New heading “Local Coverage Determinations and CMS Proposed and Final Rules”

New heading “Impairment and write-down expenses”

Removed heading “Local Coverage Determinations”

Removed heading “License And Manufacturing Agreement”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: impairment, write-down
“Impairment and write-down expenses”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: impairment, restructuring, write-down

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We define EBITDA as net income (loss) before depreciation and amortization, interest income (expense) and income taxes. We define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA, further adjusted for the impact of certain items that we do not consider indicative of our core operating performance. These items include non-cash equity compensation, restructuring charges, write-off of the capitalized costs related to certain unfinished construction work and other long-term assets, fees paid in connection with settlement of previously disputed GPO fees, the cancellation fee for terminating certain agreements or pausing a certain construction project, legal and consulting fees associated with, as well as compensation expense related to retention for certain sales employees impacted by the published and subsequently withdrawn LCDs, impairment charges of a purchased building and associated unfinished construction work, and the write-down of costs previously capitalized in the development of internal-use software, that the Company determined have no future value. We have presented Adjusted EBITDA in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because it is a key measure used by our management and Board of Directors to understand and evaluate our operating performance, generate future operating plans and make strategic decisions regarding the allocation of capital. In particular, we believe that the exclusion of certain items in calculating Adjusted EBITDA can produce a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business.
see in full comparison
New text topics: impairment, write-down
“Impairment and write-down of property relates to the pending sale of one of our buildings located on our Canton, Massachusetts campus that was adjusted to fair market value based on current market conditions. We recorded charges related to the impairment and write-down of the property during the second quarter of 2024 and each quarter of 2025. Write-down of capitalized internal-use software costs consists of the development costs for certain modules of our ERP system that were determined to have no future value. We recorded this charge during the second quarter of 2024.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: covenant
“In August 2021, we and our subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement with SVB and several other lenders (the “Lenders”), which we refer to as the 2021 Credit Agreement. The 2021 Credit Agreement, as amended, provides for a term loan facility not to exceed $75.0 million (the “Term Loan Facility”) and a revolving credit facility not to exceed $125.0 million (the “Revolving Facility”). …”
see in full comparison
New text
“Local Coverage Determinations and CMS Proposed and Final Rules”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: restructuring
“For the year ended December 31, 2023, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $14.1 million, or 5%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (87)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 1 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Unless the context otherwise requires, for purposes of this section, the terms “we," "us," "our," "the Company," "Organogenesis" and "ORGO" will refer to Organogenesis Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries as they currently exist.

Reworded

Organogenesis is a leading regenerative medicine and tissue innovations company focused on empowering healing through the development, manufacturing, and sale of products for the advanced wound care,care and surgical and sports medicine markets. Our products have been shown through clinical and scientific studies to support and in some cases accelerate tissue healing and improve patient outcomes. We are advancing the standard of care in each phase of the healing process through multiple breakthroughs in tissue engineering and cell therapy. Our solutions address large and growing markets driven by aging demographics and increases in comorbidities such as diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular and peripheral vascular disease. We offer our differentiated products and in-house customer support to a wide range of health care customers including hospitals, wound care centers, government facilities, ASCs and physician offices. Our mission is to provide an integrated portfolio ofadvancing healing and tissuerecovery solutionsbeyond that improve lives while lowering the overall cost of health care.expectations.

Reworded

In the Advanced Wound Care market, we focus on the development and commercialization of advanced wound care products for the treatment of chronic and acute wounds in various treatment settings. We have a comprehensive portfolio of regenerative medicine products capable of supporting patients from early in the wound healing process through wound closure regardless of wound type. Our Advanced Wound Care products include Apligraf for the treatment of VLUs and DFUs; Dermagraft for the treatment of DFUs (manufacturing and distribution currently suspended pending transition to aour new manufacturing facility orin engagementSmithfield, of a third-party manufacturerRI); PuraPly AM and PuraPly XT as antimicrobial barriers and native, cross-linked extracellular matrix (“ECM”) scaffold for a broad variety of wound types; CYGNUS Dual as a dual-layered amniotic membrane that promotes an optimal environment for wound healing; andCYGNUS Matrix as a dehydrated placental allograft that promotes an optimal environment for wound healing; VIA Matrix, Affinity, Novachor, and NuShield placental allografts to address a variety of wound sizes and types as a protective barrier and extracellularECM matrixscaffold, scaffold.and SimpliMax as a dehydrated amnion allograft that provides a protective barrier and supports an optimal environment for inherent healing of a wide range of acute and chronic wounds. We have a highly trained and specialized direct wound care sales force paired with comprehensive customer support services.

Reworded

In the Surgical & Sports Medicine market, we are leveraging our broad regenerative medicine capabilities to address chronic and acute surgical wounds and tendon and ligament injuries. Our Sports Medicine products include NuShield and Cygnus Matrix for surgical applications in targeted soft tissue repairs; and Affinity, Novachor, PuraPly MZ, PuraPly AM, and PuraPly SX for management of open wounds in the surgical setting. We currently sell these products through independent agencies and our direct sales force.

Added

Local Coverage Determinations and CMS Proposed and Final Rules

Added

On April 25, 2024, seven MACs published new proposed LCDs for skin substitute grafts/CTPs for the treatment of DFUs and VLUs in the Medicare population. These LCDs were finalized by the MACs on November 14, 2024, and were originally set to become effective on February 12, 2025. However, on January 24, 2025, the MACs announced a delay in the implementation of the LCDs until April 13, 2025, and on April 11, 2025, the MACs announced another delay in the implementation of the LCDs until January 1, 2026. On December 15, 2025, CMS released a fact sheet stating that the MACs will issue updated LCDs that were to become effective January 1, 2026. The fact sheet included a new categorization of products as covered, non-covered, or those subject to a 12-month status quo period. However, on December 24, 2025, CMS announced that the LCDs had been withdrawn by the MACs and the most recent draft LCDs were removed from the Medicare Coverage Database. Any future changes or other developments related to these or other LCDs or coverage decisions could negatively affect utilization of our products, our business, and our revenue.

Added

On November 5, 2025, CMS released a final rule adopting policy changes for Medicare payments under the PFS and other Medicare Part B issues, effective on or after January 1, 2026. On November 25, 2025, CMS issued a final rule that adopted policy changes for Medicare payments under the Hospital OPPS, effective on or after January 1, 2026. For calendar year 2026, under the PFS and OPPS final rules, CMS will pay for certain skin substitute products, at a payment rate of approximately $127.14 per square centimeter (prior to the application of the geographic adjustments, as applicable), as incident-to supplies when they are used as part of a covered application procedure paid in the non-facility setting or used in the hospital outpatient department and ambulatory surgery center setting. Both the PFS and OPPS final rules assign skin substitutes to categories based on their FDA regulatory status, namely 361 HCT/Ps, PMAs and 510(k)s. CMS stated that categorizing and paying for skin substitute products based on relevant product characteristics, consistent with their FDA regulatory status, recognizes the clinical and resource differences in product types and is intended to incentivize competition to create more innovative products, while also resulting in significant savings to the Medicare Trust Fund. For calendar year 2026, the final PFS and OPPS rules provide for use of a single initial payment rate across these three categories, with CMS indicating that in future years, it intends to propose payment rates that differentiate between the three FDA regulatory categories. CMS is implementing these policy changes in the non-facility setting paid under the PFS and in the hospital outpatient department and ambulatory surgical center settings paid under OPPS to remain consistent across these different sites of care. While we believe CMS’ finalized PFS and OPPS payment structure will curb abuse under the current system and the resulting rapid escalation in Medicare spending, and ensure a much-needed consistent payment approach across sites of care, the changes could also materially and adversely impact utilization of our products, our business, our revenue and our profitability.

Added

On January 1, 2026, CMS began testing the WISeR Model which uses technology-enabled prior authorization services on select Medicare services, including the use of skin substitutes. The WISeR Model will run in six states for five years and, according to CMS, is intended to reduce waste. Implementation of the WISeR Model could impact beneficiary access to our products in the applicable states, which could also materially and adversely impact utilization of our products, our business, our revenue and our profitability. On December 30, 2025, CMS published comments regarding discarded product, which have resulted in clinician confusion and material disruption in the market. While the longer-term impact of CMS’ updated 2026 Medicare reimbursement changes is still uncertain, we are experiencing a significant year-over-year decline in revenue in the first quarter of fiscal year 2026.

Added

In light of these developments and any future changes in the rate of reimbursement for our products, we may prioritize the sale of certain products (including licensed products) in our portfolio.

Added

ReNu

Added

In December 2025, we completed a planned Type B meeting with the FDA, resulting in confirmation to initiate a rolling BLA for ReNu. We have initiated our rolling BLA submission and expect to complete the submission in the first half of 2026.

Reworded

As previously disclosed, manufacturing of Dermagraft was suspended in the fourth quarter of 2021 and sales of Dermagraft were suspended in the second quarter of 2022. We currently plan to transition our Dermagraft manufacturing to our newly-leased biomanufacturing facility in Smithfield, Rhode Island, which we expect will begin in 2027, and will result in significant capacity and substantial long-term cost savings. We plan to resume sales of Dermagraft by the end of 2027. If there are significant delays in the build outbuild-out of the Smithfield Facility or in FDA approval of the facility for manufacturing of Dermagraft, it could have an adverse effect on our consolidated net product revenue and results of operations.

Removed

Local Coverage Determinations

Removed

On April 25, 2024, seven Medicare Part A/B MACs published new proposed LCDs for skin substitute grafts/CTPs for the treatment of DFUs and VLUs in the Medicare population. These LCDs were finalized by the MACs on November 14, 2024, and were originally set to become effective on February 12, 2025. However, on January 24, 2025, the MACs announced a delay in the implementation of the LCDs until April 13, 2025. Under the new LCDs finalized in November 2024, should they take effect as scheduled, eighteen products would remain covered, including our Apligraf and Dermagraft products for DFU and VLU, and our Affinity and NuShield products for DFU; however, more than 200 products would be classified as “non-covered,” including our PuraPly, PuraPly AM, PuraPly XT, Novachor, TransCyte, Dual and Matrix products for DFU and VLU. The LCDs as finalized apply only to DFU and VLU indications for skin substitute products; other indications would remain subject to case-by-case review of medical necessity by the MACs if the LCDs take effect. It is uncertain if there will be further delays in implementing the new LCDs and/or if the new LCDs will be revised or rescinded going forward. If implemented, the LCDs could materially impact utilization of these products, our business, and our revenue. Any future changes or other developments related to these or other LCDs also could affect utilization of our products, our business, and our revenue.

Removed

License And Manufacturing Agreement

Removed

We have a trademark license and manufacturing agreement with Vivex for Dual, Matrix, and VIA. We paid an upfront licensing fee to Vivex to sell Dual and Matrix, and also agreed to pay a fixed milestone payment for Dual in the event that its average sales price (ASP) is published by certain government agencies for a specified period of time, which we remitted in December 2024. Additionally, we are required to pay a low double-digit royalty on the Net Sales of Dual and VIA, and a high single-digit royalty on the Net Sales of Matrix, respectively, during the royalty term, as defined in the Vivex Agreement. The royalty term is commensurate with the initial term of the contract and will continue for each subsequent renewal period. The initial term of the agreement expires on December 31, 2026 and can be renewed for up to five additional one-year terms.

Reworded

Our management uses financial measures that are not in accordance with GAAP (“Non-GAAP”), in addition to financial measures in accordance with GAAP, to evaluate our operating results. These Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered supplemental to, and not a substitute for, our reported financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our management uses Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate our operating performance and trends and make planning decisions. Our management believes Adjusted EBITDA helps identify underlying trends in our business that could otherwise be masked by the effect of the items that we exclude. Accordingly, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results, enhancing the overall understanding of our past performance and future prospects, and allowing for greater transparency with respect to key financial metrics used by our management in its financial and operational decision-making.

Reworded

We define EBITDA as net income (loss) before depreciation and amortization, interest income (expense) and income taxes. We define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA, further adjusted for the impact of certain items that we do not consider indicative of our core operating performance. These items include non-cash equity compensation, restructuring charges, write-off of the capitalized costs related to certain unfinished construction work and other long-term assets, fees paid in connection with settlement of previously disputed GPO fees, the cancellation fee for terminating certain agreements or pausing a certain construction project, legal and consulting fees associated with, as well as compensation expense related to retention for certain sales employees impacted by the published and subsequently withdrawn LCDs, impairment charges of a purchased building and associated unfinished construction work, and the write-down of costs previously capitalized in the development of internal-use software, that the Company determined have no future value. We have presented Adjusted EBITDA in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because it is a key measure used by our management and Board of Directors to understand and evaluate our operating performance, generate future operating plans and make strategic decisions regarding the allocation of capital. In particular, we believe that the exclusion of certain items in calculating Adjusted EBITDA can produce a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business.

Reworded

Our Adjusted EBITDA is not prepared in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered in isolation of, or as an alternative to, measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. There are a number of limitations related to the use of Adjusted EBITDA rather than net income (loss),income, which is the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

Reworded

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect interestincome (expense) or the cash requirements necessary to service payments on our debt;

Reworded

Because of these limitations, we consider, and you should consider, Adjusted EBITDA together with other operating and financial performance measures presented in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA from net income (loss),income, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, has been included herein.

Reworded

Net Product Revenue

Reworded

We derive our net product revenue from our portfolio of Advanced Wound Care and Surgical & Sports Medicine products. We primarily sell our Advanced Wound Care products through direct sales representatives who manage and maintain the sales relationships with hospitals, wound care centers, government facilities, ASCs, and physician offices. We primarily sell our Surgical & Sports Medicine products through third-party agencies. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had 256approximately 224 direct sales representatives and approximately 160175 independent agencies. In addition to our owned products, in the ordinary course of business, we obtain the rights to license and distribute additional products, which contribute to our net product revenue.

Reworded

We recognize product revenue from sales of our Advanced Wound Care and Surgical & Sports Medicine products when the customer obtains control of our product, which occurs at a point in time and may be upon procedure date, shipment, or delivery, based on the contractual terms of a contract.terms. We record product revenue net of a reserve for returns, discounts and GPO rebates, which represent a direct reduction to the product revenue we recognize.

Reworded

Several factors affect our reported product revenue in any period, including product, payer and geographic sales mix, operational effectiveness, pricing realization, marketing and promotional efforts, the timing of orders and shipments, regulatory actions including healthcare reimbursement scenarios, competition and business acquisitions. In light of recent developments and any future changes in the rate of reimbursement for our products, we may prioritize the sale of certain products (including licensed products) in our portfolio.

Added

Grant income relates to a grant the Company received from a governmental agency during the second quarter of 2025 related to its Smithfield Facility. We expect to recognize grant income through 2026 as the Company recognizes the related expenses that the grant is intended to compensate.

Reworded

Gross profit is calculated as net product revenue less cost of goods sold and generally increases as product revenue increases. Our gross profit is affected by product and geographic sales mix, realized pricing of our products, the efficiency of our manufacturing operations and the costs of materials used and fees charged by third-party manufacturers to produce our products. Regulatory actions, including healthcare reimbursement scenarios, which may require costly expenditures or result in pricing pressures, may decrease our gross profit.

Reworded

Research and development expenses include expenses for clinical trials, personnel costs for our research and development personnel, expenses related to improvements in our manufacturing processes, enhancements to our currently available products, and additional investments in our product and platform development pipeline. We expense research and development costs as incurred. We generally expect that research and development expenses will increase as we continue to conduct clinical trials on new and existing products, move products through the regulatory pathway (e.g., seek BLA approval), add personnel to support product enhancements as well as to bring new products to market, and enhance our manufacturing process and procedures.

Added

Impairment and write-down expenses

Added

Impairment and write-down of property relates to the pending sale of one of our buildings located on our Canton, Massachusetts campus that was adjusted to fair market value based on current market conditions. We recorded charges related to the impairment and write-down of the property during the second quarter of 2024 and each quarter of 2025. Write-down of capitalized internal-use software costs consists of the development costs for certain modules of our ERP system that were determined to have no future value. We recorded this charge during the second quarter of 2024.

Reworded

Other expense,income (expense), net

Reworded

Other expense,income (expense), net comprises primarily of interest income generated from our interest-bearing sweep accounts offset by interest expense on our indebtedness that was outstanding until November 2024, including amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs, net of interest income recognized.costs.

Reworded

In determining whether a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is necessary, we analyze both positive and negative evidence related to the realization of deferred tax assets including projected future taxable income, recent financial results and estimates of future reversals of deferred tax assets and liabilities. In addition, we consider whether it is more likely than not that thea tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. We believe that our net U.S. deferred tax assets did not require a valuation allowance as of December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2025, the Company has established a valuation allowance on certain state research and development tax credits totaling $1,267, which the Company believes will more likely than not expire unutilized.

Reworded

Our U.S. provision for income taxestax expense for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2023 relates to currentincome tax expense associated with taxable income that could not be offset by net operating losses or research and development credits. TheOur utilizationU.S. ofprovision ourfor remainingincome federaltax netbenefit operatingfor lossesthe isyear subjectended December 31, 2024 relates to antax 80%benefit taxableassociated incomewith limitationpre-tax and for certain states we have no net operating losses remaining to offset state taxable income or the utilization of the remaining state net operating losses are subject to a limitation.loss. We have also recorded a foreign provision for income taxes related to our wholly-owned subsidiary in Switzerland.

Reworded

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our results of operations (amounts in thousands):

Added

Amount reflects the fair value adjustment of a purchased building classified as held for sale. See Note 8, Property and Equipment, Net.

Removed

Amount reflects the disposal of certain equipment related to construction in progress at one of our Canton, Massachusetts facilities. See Note 8, Property and Equipment, Net, to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Added

Amount reflects the legal and consulting fees incurred related to the published and subsequently withdrawn 2023 LCDs.

Removed

Amounts reflect the fee we paid to a GPO to settle previously disputed GPO fees. See Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Added

Amount reflects the compensation expenses related to retention for those sales employees impacted by the published and subsequently withdrawn 2023 LCDs.

Removed

Amount reflects the cancellation fees incurred in connection with the Company’s decision to pause one of its manufacturing facility construction projects. See Note 8, Property and Equipment, Net, to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Removed

Amount reflects the legal and consulting fees incurred related to the published and subsequently withdrawn 2023 LCDs. See Local Coverage Determinations above.

Removed

Amount reflects the compensation expenses related to retention for those sales employees impacted by the published and subsequently withdrawn 2023 LCDs. See Local Coverage Determinations above.

Added

Amount reflects fees paid to the FDA in connection with the ReNu BLA filing.

Added

Amount reflects non-recurring inventory write-down adjustments for excess and obsolete inventory resulting from a shift in product lines due to PFS regulatory changes of $3.0 million and an asset write-off of $0.7 million for upfront licensing cost related to this product line.

Added

(10)

Added

Amount reflects non-recurring inventory write-down adjustments for excess and obsolete inventory resulting from a one-time loss of key distributor in a certain international location.

Reworded

Product Revenue

Reworded

For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, net product revenue from our Advanced Wound Care products increased by $48.1$77.6 million, or 12%,17%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increase in Advanced Wound Care net product revenue was primarily attributable to an increase in salesintroduction of certainnewly productslicensed for new and existing customers.products.

Reworded

For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, net product revenue from our Surgical & Sports Medicine products increased by $0.8$3.4 million, or 3%,12%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increase in Surgical & Sports Medicine net product revenue was primarily due to growthan increase in newcertain customerscustomer andbuying product mix.patterns.

Removed

For the year ended December 31, 2023, net revenue from our Advanced Wound Care products decreased by $16.7 million, or 4%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease in Advanced Wound Care net revenue was primarily attributable to a decrease in sales of certain of our products due to changes in customer buying patterns as well as the impact of the 2023 withdrawn LCDs on sales of certain of our products, partially offset by an increase in sales of certain of our products to our existing and new customers.

Reworded

For the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, net product revenue from our SurgicalAdvanced &Wound Sports MedicineCare products decreasedincreased by $1.0$48.1 million, or 4%,12%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022.2023. The decreaseincrease in SurgicalAdvanced &Wound Sports MedicineCare net product revenue was primarily dueattributable to aan shiftincrease in distributorsales focus.of certain products for new and existing customers.

Added

For the year ended December 31, 2024, net product revenue from our Surgical & Sports Medicine products increased by $0.8 million, or 3%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in Surgical & Sports Medicine net product revenue was primarily due to growth in new customers and product mix.

Added

For the year ended December 31, 2025, cost of goods sold increased by $21.8 million, or 19%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in cost of goods sold was primarily driven by product mix, and non-recurring inventory write-down adjustments for excess and obsolete inventory.

Added

For the year ended December 31, 2025, gross profit increased by $59.2 million, or 16%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in gross profit resulted primarily from a shift in product mix.

Removed

For the year ended December 31, 2023, cost of goods sold increased by $1.5 million, or 1%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in cost of goods sold was primarily due to product mix.

Removed

For the year ended December 31, 2023, gross profit decreased by $19.2 million, or 6%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease in gross profit resulted primarily from a decrease in the pricing for certain of our products, as well as a shift in product mix.

Added

For the year ended December 31, 2025, selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $31.7 million, or 11%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily due to a $24.1 million increase in commissions expense and allowance for expected credit losses due to increased sales, an increase in headcount-related, facility expenses, and depreciation expenses of $12.1 million, and a one-time FDA fee of $4.7 million for the ReNu BLA. These increases in expenses were partially offset by a $9.6 million decrease in royalty expenses.

Removed

For the year ended December 31, 2023, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $14.1 million, or 5%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily due to a $6.1 million decrease in compensation and restructuring, largely related to decreased commissions paid to our sales force; a $4.4 million decrease primarily related to disposal of certain equipment related to the construction in progress in one of the Company's Canton, Massachusetts facilities; a $1.5 million decrease in royalty expenses, and a $3.3 million decrease in travel-related expenses. These expenses were partially offset by a $1.2 million increase in legal and consulting costs primarily related to efforts to convince three MACs to withdraw the final LCDs for skin substitutes for the treatment of DFUs and VLUs.

Added

For the year ended December 31, 2025, research and development expenses decreased by $5.7 million, or 11%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in research and development expenses was primarily driven by changes in timing of expenses associated with clinical research and trials, primarily related to ReNu.

Showing the first 60 of 87 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-06 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-07 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
1reworded paragraphs
208 → 208words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

Investing in our Class A common stock involves a high degree of risk. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, includes a detailed discussion of our risk factors under the heading “Part I, Item 1A—Risk Factors.” There have been no material changes from such risk factors during the quarter ended June 30, 2026. You should consider carefully the risk factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, and all other information contained in or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q before making an investment decision. If any of the risks discussed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, or herein actually occur, they may materially harm our business, financial condition, operating results, cash flows or growth prospects. As a result, the market price of our Class A common stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not yet identified or that we think are immaterial may also materially harm our business, financial condition, operating results, cash flows or growth prospects and could result in a complete loss of your investment.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (1)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Investing in our Class A common stock involves a high degree of risk. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, includes a detailed discussion of our risk factors under the heading “Part I, Item 1A—Risk Factors.” There have been no material changes from such risk factors during the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. You should consider carefully the risk factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, and all other information contained in or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q before making an investment decision. If any of the risks discussed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, or herein actually occur, they may materially harm our business, financial condition, operating results, cash flows or growth prospects. As a result, the market price of our Class A common stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not yet identified or that we think are immaterial may also materially harm our business, financial condition, operating results, cash flows or growth prospects and could result in a complete loss of your investment.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

9new paragraphs
6removed paragraphs
31reworded paragraphs
4,943 → 5,076words in section

New heading “Fair value adjustments to assets held for sale”

New heading “Fair Value Adjustment to Asset Held for Sale”

Removed heading “Impairment and write-down expenses”

Removed heading “Write Down Expenses”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: impairment, write-down
“Impairment and write-down expenses”
see in full comparison
New text
“Fair value adjustments to assets held for sale”
see in full comparison
New text
“Fair Value Adjustment to Asset Held for Sale”
see in full comparison
New text topics: restructuring
“The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily due to a decrease in commissions, royalty and allowance for credit losses due to decreased sales, partially offset by an increase in headcount-related expenses for severance and other costs associated with the Company’s restructuring activities, and accelerated amortization of intangible assets due to a facility closure.”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Write Down Expenses”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: covenant

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

As of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 and March 31, 2026, we were in compliance with the covenants under the 2021 Credit Agreement, as amended. As of December 31, 2025 and March 31, 2026,2025, we did not have outstanding borrowings under our Term Loan Facility or our Revolving Facility, which will expireexpired on August 6, 2026.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (46)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and accompanying notes included in this Form 10-Q and the financial statements and accompanying notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SECSEC, on February 26, 2026. Please refer to our cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements on page 3 of this Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

Reworded

On January 1, 2026, CMS began testing the WISeR Model which uses technology-enabled prior authorization services on select Medicare services, including the use of skin substitutes. The WISeR Model will run in six states for five years and, according to CMS, is intended to reduce waste. Implementation of the WISeR Model could impact beneficiary access to our products in the applicable states, which could also materially and adversely impact utilization of our products, our business, our revenue and our profitability. On December 30, 2025, CMS published comments regarding discarded product, which have resulted in clinician confusion and material disruption in the market. While the longer-term impact of CMS’ updated 2026 Medicare reimbursement changes is still uncertain, we experienced a significant year-over-year decline in revenue in the first quarterand second quarters of fiscal year 2026, and we are continuing to experience a significant year-over-year decline in revenue in the secondthird quarter of fiscal year 2026.

Reworded

In December 2025, we completed a planned Type B meeting with the FDA, resulting in confirmation to initiate a rolling BLA for ReNu. We initiated our rolling BLA submission in December 2025 and completed the submission on April 24, 2026. During June 2026, the FDA accepted the BLA for review and assigned a PDUFA target action date of April 24, 2027.

Reworded

As previously disclosed, manufacturing of Dermagraft was suspended in the fourth quarter of 2021 and sales of Dermagraft were suspended in the second quarter of 2022. We currently planplanned to transition our Dermagraft manufacturing to our newly-leased biomanufacturing facility in Smithfield, Rhode Island, which we expect will begin in 2027,Island and will result in significant capacity and substantial long-term cost savings. We plan to resumecommence sales of Dermagraft by the end of 2027.2027, however, given the decline in the skin substitute market and the decline in our net revenue we are delaying the relaunch of Dermagraft and cannot currently project specific timing. If there are continued significant delays in the build-out of the Smithfield Facility or inFacility, FDA approval of the facility for manufacturing Dermagraft or the relaunch of commercial sales of Dermagraft, it could have an adverse effect on our consolidated net product revenue and results of operations.

Reworded

We derive our net product revenue from our portfolio of Advanced Wound Care and Surgical & Sports Medicine products. We primarily sell our Advanced Wound Care products through direct sales representatives who manage and maintain the sales relationships with hospitals, wound care centers, government facilities, ASCs and physician offices. We primarily sell our Surgical & Sports Medicine products through third party agencies. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had approximately 191180 direct sales representatives and approximately 186187 independent agencies and after full implementation of the latest restructuring we had approximately 148 direct sales representatives and no change to independent agencies.

Reworded

We recognize product revenue from sales of our Advanced Wound Care and Surgical & Sports Medicine products when the customer obtains control of our product, which occurs at a point in time and may be upon procedure date, shipment, or delivery, based on the contractual terms. We record product revenue net of a reserve for returns, discounts and group purchasing organizations (“GPO”) rebates, which represent a direct reduction to the product revenue we recognize.

Added

Fair value adjustments to assets held for sale

Removed

Impairment and write-down expenses

Reworded

Impairment and write-downfair ofvalue propertyadjustments relatesto assets held for sale relate to the pending sale of one of our buildings located on our Canton, Massachusetts campus that was adjusted to fair market value based on current market conditions. We recorded charges related to the impairment and write-downfair value adjustments of the property during the second quarter of 2024 and2024, each quarter of 2025.2025 and the second quarter of 2026.

Reworded

Other income,income (expense), net

Reworded

Other income,income (expense), net comprises primarily of interest income generated from our interest-bearing sweep accounts offset by amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs and interest expense related to our finance lease obligations.costs.

Reworded

In determining whether a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is necessary, we analyze both positive and negative evidence related to the realization of deferred tax assets including projected future taxable income, recent financial results and estimates of future reversals of deferred tax assets and liabilities. In addition, we consider whether it is more likely than not that thea tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company has established a full valuation allowance onagainst certainour state research and developmentdeferred tax creditsassets that the Company believes are more likely than not to expire before being utilized.

Reworded

Our U.S. provision for income taxtaxes benefitrelates forprimarily to the threeestablishment monthsof endeda Marchvaluation 31, 2026allowance and 2025state relatesincome to tax benefit associated with pre-tax loss.taxes. We have also recorded a foreign provision for income taxes related to our wholly-owned subsidiary in Switzerland.

Reworded

Amount includes $4.9 million accelerated amortization of intangible assets due to a facility closure. See Note 8, Restructuring.

Reworded

Amount reflects inventory write-down adjustments for excess and obsolete inventory resulting from LCD regulatory changes of $3.3 million.million during the three months ended March 31, 2026.

Removed

(3)

Reworded

(3) Amount reflects employee severance and benefits as well as other exit costs associated with the Company’s restructuring activities of $2.8 millionactivities, and inventory write-down adjustments for excess and obsolete inventory resulting from a facility closureclosure. ofSee $1.0Note million.8, Restructuring.

Removed

(4)

Reworded

(4) Amount reflects the fair value adjustment of a purchasedbuilding buildingsold in July 2026 classified as held for sale. See Note 6, Asset Held for Sale.

Added

(5) Amount reflects termination costs associated with various R&D programs and vendors. See Note 13, Leases.

Reworded

Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025

Reworded

The decrease in net product revenue in the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was primarily due to a decrease in Advanced Wound Care net product revenue attributableattributed to increasedcontinued clinician confusion and material disruption in the market following the withdrawal of the LCD coverage policies for skin substitutes and CMS published comments regarding discarded product in December 2025.

Added

The decrease in cost of goods sold in the three months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily due to lower costs associated with the decrease in net product revenue.

Reworded

The increasedecrease in cost of goods sold in the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was primarily due to lower costs associated with the decrease in net product revenue, partially offset by increased inventory write-down adjustments for excess and obsolete inventory resulting from a facility closure and LCD regulatory changes, partially offset by lower costs associated with the decrease in net product revenue. Gross profit decreased as a percentage of revenue due to volume and pricing related impacts of the Medicare reimbursement changes and product mixes.changes.

Added

The decrease in gross profit in the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 as a percentage of revenue is due to volume and pricing related impacts of the Medicare reimbursement changes and product mixes.

Reworded

The increase in research and development expenses in the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was primarily due to pre-launch activities related to Dermagraft in our biomanufacturing facility in Smithfield, Rhode Island, andterminating timingcertain ofR&D expenses associated with clinical researchprograms and trials, primarily related tovendor ReNu,agreements and supportsupporting ofReNu BLA efforts.

Reworded

The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was primarily due to a decrease in commissions, royaltycommissions and royalty, partially offset by an increase in allowance for expected credit losses due to decreased sales, partially offset bylosses, an increase in headcount-related expenses for severance and other costs associated with the Company’s restructuring activities, and accelerated amortization of intangible assets due to a facility closure.activities.

Added

The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily due to a decrease in commissions, royalty and allowance for credit losses due to decreased sales, partially offset by an increase in headcount-related expenses for severance and other costs associated with the Company’s restructuring activities, and accelerated amortization of intangible assets due to a facility closure.

Added

Fair Value Adjustment to Asset Held for Sale

Removed

Write Down Expenses

Reworded

During the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, we recorded adecreases $6.6of $1.7 million writeand down$8.3 ofmillion, costsrespectively, to adjust certain assets held for sale to their fair market value. There were no such costs recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2026.

Added

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, we recorded an increase of $1.1 million to adjust certain assets held for sale to their fair market value.

Reworded

Other income,income (expense) net, decreased by $0.5$0.6 million in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. Other income (expense), net, decreased by $1.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2026. The decreasedecreases resulted primarily from decreased interest income generated from our interest-bearing sweep accounts offset by amortization of debt discount and increaseddebt interestissuance expense related to finance lease obligations.costs.

Reworded

Income Tax Benefit (Expense)

Added

The decrease in the income tax benefit (expense) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 is primarily attributable to establishing a valuation allowance against the Company’s deferred tax assets.

Removed

The increase in the income tax benefit is primarily attributable to a higher pre-tax loss for the three months ended March 31, 2026, partially offset by a lower estimated effective tax rate for the twelve months ending December 31, 2026 resulting from a decrease in expected pre-tax income in 2026 compared to 2025, offset by our research and development tax credits.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had working capital (excluding asset held for sale) of $190.1$139.7 million, which included $91.4$46.1 million in cash and cash equivalents. We have $75.0 million available for future revolving borrowings under our Revolving Facility through August 6, 2026 (see Note 9, Long-Term Debt Obligations to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q). We expect that our cash on hand and other components of working capital as of MarchJune 31, 2026, availability under the Revolving Facility through August 6,30, 2026, plus net cash flows from product sales,sales will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses,expenses and capital expenditure requirements and debt service payments for at least 12 months beyond the filing date of this Form 10-Q.10-Q notwithstanding the expiration of our credit facility on August 6, 2026.

Reworded

To the extent additional funds are necessary to meet our long-term liquidity needs as we continue to execute on our business strategy, we anticipate that they will be obtained through additional equity or debt financings, other strategic transactions or a combination of these potential sources of funds. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional funds on terms acceptable to us, on a timely basisbasis, or at all.

Removed

During the three months ended March 31, 2026, net cash provided by operating activities was $21.1 million, resulting from our net loss of $53.2 million, offset by net cash provided by changes in our operating assets and liabilities of $70.5 million and non-cash charges of $3.8 million. Net cash provided by changes in our operating assets and liabilities included a decrease in accounts receivable of $104.5 million and an increase in other liabilities of $0.3 million, partially offset by an increase in inventory of $8.7 million, an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets and other assets of $1.7 million, a decrease in operating lease liabilities of $2.4 million, a decrease in accounts payable of $2.0 million, and a decrease in accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $19.5 million.

Reworded

During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025,2026, net cash used in operating activities was $19.9$10.5 million, resulting from our net loss of $18.8$149.4 million and net cash usedprovided by in connection with changes in our operating assets and liabilities of $20.7$78.6 million, partially offset by non-cash charges of $19.6$60.3 million. Net cash used in changesChanges in our operating assets and liabilities included a decrease in accounts receivable of $119.5 million, an increase in inventory of $8.7$11.8 million, ana increasedecrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets and other assets of $5.1$4.8 million, a decrease in operating lease liabilities of $2.0 million, a decrease in accounts payable of $2.5$3.8 million, and a decrease in accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $8.0$29.3 million and a decrease in accounts payable of $1.4 million, partially offset by aan decreaseincrease in accountsother receivableliabilities of $5.7$0.6 million.

Added

During the six months ended June 30, 2025, net cash used in operating activities was $52.8 million, resulting from our net loss of $28.2 million and net cash used in connection with changes in our operating assets and liabilities of $58.8 million, partially offset by non-cash charges of $34.3 million. Net cash used in changes in our operating assets and liabilities included an increase in inventory of $15.9 million, an increase in accounts receivable of $13.6 million, an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets and other assets of $12.9 million, a decrease in accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $13.9 million, and a decrease in operating lease liabilities of $4.1 million, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable of $1.6 million.

Reworded

During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we used $3.1$4.2 million of cash in investing activities consisting exclusively of capital expenditures.

Reworded

During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, we used $3.6$7.3 million of cash in investing activities consisting exclusively of capital expenditures.

Reworded

During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, net cash used in financing activities was $20.2$32.7 million. This consisted of payments for construction of landlord assets, net of tenant allowance of $7.3$19.5 million, principal payments on finance lease obligations of $9.8$10.2 million and net cash payments associated with our stock awards activities of $3.1 million.

Reworded

During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, net cash used in financing activities was $2.1$2.3 million. This consisted of principal payments on finance lease obligations of $0.3$0.6 million and net cash payments associated with our stock awards activities of $1.8 million.

Reworded

As of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 and March 31, 2026, we were in compliance with the covenants under the 2021 Credit Agreement, as amended. As of December 31, 2025 and March 31, 2026,2025, we did not have outstanding borrowings under our Term Loan Facility or our Revolving Facility, which will expireexpired on August 6, 2026.

ORGO insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2025-01-10Grow Brian
Chief Commercial Officer
Option exercise 958$1.24 $1.2K900,682 SEC

Well-known investors holding ORGO (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COM2026-06-303,011,753$7.3M0.0%Added 242%
D. E. Shaw & Co. COM2026-06-302,888,313$7.0M0.0%Added 26%
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-301,017,113$2.5M0.0%Reduced 5%
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM2026-06-30867,929$2.1M0.0%Added 59%
Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) COM2026-06-30148,358$351.6K—Sold out
Two Sigma Investments COM2026-06-3011,461$27.9K0.0%Reduced 58%

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when ORGO files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.