Companies › PCVX

PCVX 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Vaxcyte, Inc. · Nasdaq · Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances) · CIK 1649094 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Vaxcyte, Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

14 / 11risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
2new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
16Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-02-24 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-02-25 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

14new paragraphs
11removed paragraphs
82reworded paragraphs
37,087 → 36,245words in section

New heading “The development, review and approval of our product candidates are subject to the operational capacity, processes and resource levels of regulatory authorities, which may fluctuate over time and could delay or adversely affect our business.”

New heading “Significant changes and volatility in trade policies could materially affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, and stock price.”

Removed heading “Changes in funding for the FDA and other government agencies could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, or otherwise prevent new products and services from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner, which could negatively impact our business.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: liquidity
“Significant changes and volatility in trade policies could materially affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, and stock price.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: investigation, tariff
“However, the government has recently launched an investigation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to determine the effects on national security of imports of pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients, and their derivative products. This investigation is intended to cover both finished generic and branded drug products, medical countermeasures, critical inputs such as active pharmaceutical ingredients and key starting materials, and derivative products of those items. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Changes in funding for the FDA and other government agencies could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, or otherwise prevent new products and services from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner, which could negatively impact our business.”
see in full comparison
New text
“The development, review and approval of our product candidates are subject to the operational capacity, processes and resource levels of regulatory authorities, which may fluctuate over time and could delay or adversely affect our business.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: fine

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

In addition, the preclinical and clinical trial requirements of the FDA, European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) and other regulatory agencies and the criteria these regulators use to determine the safety and immunogenicity or efficacy of a vaccine candidate are determined according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use and market of the potential products, taking into consideration the benefits and risks for the intended population who will receive the vaccine, as well as the disease(s) to be prevented. Regulatory agencies also evaluate a sponsor’s data to determine whether the manufacturing and facility information assure product quality and consistency. Approvals by the FDA and EMA for existing pneumococcal vaccines, such as Pfizer Inc.'s (“Pfizer”) Prevnar 13® (“PCV13”) and Prevnar 20® (“PCV20”), and Merck & Co., Inc.'s (“Merck”) VAXNEUVANCETM (“PCV15”), CapvaxiveTMCapvaxive® (“PCV21”) and Pneumovax® 23 (“PPSV23”), may not be indicative of what these regulators may require for approval of our vaccine candidates. For example, in the adult population, these existing pneumococcal vaccines were previously approved based on the establishment of non-inferiority of OPA responses relative to the then current standard of care vaccine(s), on a strain-by-strain basis, where non-inferiority was defined as greater than or equal to 0.50 of the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the OPA geometric mean titer ratio. Following discussions with the FDA, the non-inferiority standard in our VAX-31 adult OPUS-1 Phase 3 pivotal, noninferiority trial is set at 0.667. The FDA may challenge our VAX-31 Phase 3 Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (“CMC”) strategy, which could cause significant delays or unanticipated costs. Additionally, novel aspects of our vaccine candidates and manufacturing processes may create further challenges in obtaining regulatory approval. The regulatory approval process for our novel vaccine candidates can be more complex and consequently more expensive and take longer than for other, better known or extensively studied pharmaceutical or other vaccine candidates. More generally, approvals by any regulatory agency may not be indicative of what any other regulatory agency may require for approval or what such regulatory agencies may require for approval in connection with new vaccine candidates. Moreover, our vaccine candidates may not perform successfully in clinical trials. InEvolving addition, leadership of the FDA’s Center for Biologic Evaluation and Research, which oversees vaccine development, is supportive of novelregulatory approaches to vaccine development.approval If that leadership changes, wedecisions may facepresent additional hurdles to development orthat maywould havenecessitate a change to change our approach to meet regulatory expectations.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: labor

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

A variety of risks associated with potentiallyour conducting researchcurrent and clinicalpotential trialsinternational abroadoperations and marketing our vaccine candidates internationallycollaborations could materially adversely affect our business.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (107)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 1 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

To date, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to performing research and development, undertaking preclinical studies, advancing our vaccine candidates through clinical trials, enabling manufacturing activities in support of our product development efforts, acquiring and developing our technology and vaccine candidates, organizing and staffing our company, performing business planning, establishing our intellectual property portfolio and raising capital to support and expand such activities. As an organization, we have not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully complete clinical development, obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a commercial-scale product or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful commercialization or arrange for a third party to conduct certain of these activities on our behalf. Consequently, any predictions about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history.

Reworded

Our current vaccine candidate pipeline includes two clinical and three preclinical programs. We may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays, changes in the regulatory environment, and other known or unknown factors in achieving our business objectives, including with respect to our vaccine candidates. We will need to transition at some point from a company with a research and development focus to a company capable of supporting commercial activities. We may not be successful in such a transition.

Reworded

As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had cash, cash equivalents and investments of $3,134.7$2,442.6 billion.million. We believe our existing cash, cash equivalents and investments will fund our current operating plans through at least 12 months from the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. However, our operating plan may change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us, and we may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned. Furthermore, we will need to raise substantial additional capital to complete the development, manufacturing and commercialization of our drug candidates. We expect to finance our cash needs through public or private equity or debt financings, third-party (including government) funding and marketing and distribution arrangements, as well as other collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements or any combination of these approaches.

Reworded

Our ability to raise additional capital may be adversely impacted by potential worsening global economic conditions, including higher inflation rates andrates, changes in interest rates and the recent disruptions to and volatility in the credit and financial markets in the United States and worldwide, including the trading price of common stock, resulting from civil and political unrest in certain countries and regions. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

Reworded

•the costs of establishing additional manufacturing capacity to meet potential incremental supply requirements following the initial commercial launchlaunches of VAX-31 in the adult population and VAX-31 or VAX-24 in the pediatric population, if approved;

Reworded

Our ability to raise additional funds will depend on financial, economic and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. We have no committed source of additional capital and if we are unable to raise additional capital in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, we may have to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development or commercialization of our vaccine candidates or other research and development initiatives. Our license agreements may also be terminated if we are unable to meet the payment obligations or milestones under the agreements. We could be required to seek collaborators for our vaccine candidates at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable or on terms that are less favorable than might otherwise be available, or relinquish or license on unfavorable terms our rights to our vaccine candidates in markets where we otherwise would seek to pursue development or commercialization ourselves. In addition, in February 2025, the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) announced that it would cap indirect costs for grants at 15%. If we cannot find additional funds to cover the gap created by the new funding gap, we may need to change or terminate our vaccine development program for VAX-GI, which is currently funded in part by grants obtained from the NIH and administered by the University of Maryland, Baltimore.

Reworded

Due to the significant resources required for the development of our vaccine candidates, we must decide which vaccine candidates to pursue and advance and the amount of resources to allocate to each. Our decisions concerning the allocation of research, development, management and financial resources toward particular vaccine candidates may not lead to the development of any viable commercial vaccines and may divert resources away from better opportunities. For example, although we allocated resources for the development of VAX-24 in the adult population through a Phase 1/2 program, we made the determination to suspend further development of VAX-24 for the adult indication because we have chosenchose to advance exclusively VAX-31 for an adult Phase 3 program following the positive results of the VAX-31 adult Phase 1/2 study. Additionally, in August 2025, we announced that as part of our continued focus on strategic capital deployment and in order to prioritize our resources towards our PCV franchise, we had paused the advancement, beyond preclinical development, of VAX-GI while remaining confident in its potential and preserving the option to advance the program in the future. We also discontinued further development of VAX-PG, a vaccine candidate we were developing for periodontal disease, which demonstrated an acceptable safety profile but not sufficient efficacy signals to warrant further investment. Similarly, our potential decisions to delay, terminate, license or collaborate with third parties in respect of certain vaccine candidates may subsequently also prove to be less than optimal and could cause us to miss valuable opportunities. If we make incorrect determinations regarding the viability or market potential of any of our vaccine candidates or misread trends in the biopharmaceutical industry, in particular for vaccines, our business could be seriously harmed. As a result, we may fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities, be required to forego or delay pursuit of opportunities with other vaccine candidates that may later prove to have greater commercial potential than those we choose to pursue or relinquish valuable rights to such vaccine candidates through collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been advantageous for us to invest additional resources to retain sole development, manufacturing and commercialization rights.

Reworded

We are developing a pipeline of vaccine candidates utilizing our cell-free protein synthesis platform, which is comprised of the XpressCFTMXpressCF® platform exclusively licensed from Sutro Biopharma, Inc. (“Sutro Biopharma”) and our proprietary know-how for vaccine applications against infectious disease. Our future success depends on the successful application of this approach to vaccine development. We are in the clinical or preclinical stages of developing our vaccine candidates and there can be no assurance that any development problems we may experience in the future will not cause significant delays or unanticipated costs, or that such development problems can be overcome. For example, although we have achieved proof-of-concept for our carrier-sparing approach with VAX-31 and VAX-24, our approach may not be validated for our other vaccine candidates or subsequent trials of VAX-31 or VAX-24. We may also experience delays in developing a sustainable, reproducible and scalable manufacturing process or transferring that process to manufacturing partners, which may prevent us from completing our clinical trials or commercializing our products on a timely or profitable basis, if at all. In addition, since we have not yet completed clinical development on any of our product candidates, we do not know the specific doses that may be effective in the clinic or, if approved, commercially. Finding a suitable dose may delay our anticipated clinical development timelines. We may also encounter difficulty recruiting sufficient participants for our clinical studies, or the FDA may impose additional requirements on us regarding trial size or a long-term safety study that will significantly slow or forestall our development program.

Reworded

Furthermore, our expectations with regard to our scalability and costs of manufacturing may vary significantly as we develop our vaccine candidates and learn more about these critical factors. Conjugate vaccine development is highly complex, and development of broad-valency pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (“PCVs”) is further complicated by the number of components, analytical assays and potential for adjustments, including, but not limited to, changes in raw materials, composition, formulation, manufacturing methods and dosing, which could result in drug substances and/or drug product that may vary between preclinical and clinical studies over time. Over the course of the development and manufacturing of VAX-24, we previously encountered process-related matters that required us to make adjustments to our processes. For example, in 2020 we encountered such process-related matters during our drug substance manufacturing campaign for VAX-24 at Lonza, Ltd. (“Lonza”). The cumulative impact of the time required to make adjustments to our processes led to a delay of our drug substance manufacturing campaign due to scheduling conflicts and capacity constraints at Lonza. There can be no assurance that we or Lonza will be able to successfully manufacture drug substances in a timely manner in the future, or at all. Such process changes and manufacturing delays have caused a change in our Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application timelines in the past and future changes or delays could impact future timelines for VAX-31, VAX-24 or for our other product candidates. In addition, if we encounter similar manufacturing issues after product approval, it will require inspection and approval of the new manufacturing site and submission of a Biologics License Application (“BLA”) supplement, which may further impede or delay commercialization.

Reworded

In addition, the preclinical and clinical trial requirements of the FDA, European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) and other regulatory agencies and the criteria these regulators use to determine the safety and immunogenicity or efficacy of a vaccine candidate are determined according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use and market of the potential products, taking into consideration the benefits and risks for the intended population who will receive the vaccine, as well as the disease(s) to be prevented. Regulatory agencies also evaluate a sponsor’s data to determine whether the manufacturing and facility information assure product quality and consistency. Approvals by the FDA and EMA for existing pneumococcal vaccines, such as Pfizer Inc.'s (“Pfizer”) Prevnar 13® (“PCV13”) and Prevnar 20® (“PCV20”), and Merck & Co., Inc.'s (“Merck”) VAXNEUVANCETM (“PCV15”), CapvaxiveTMCapvaxive® (“PCV21”) and Pneumovax® 23 (“PPSV23”), may not be indicative of what these regulators may require for approval of our vaccine candidates. For example, in the adult population, these existing pneumococcal vaccines were previously approved based on the establishment of non-inferiority of OPA responses relative to the then current standard of care vaccine(s), on a strain-by-strain basis, where non-inferiority was defined as greater than or equal to 0.50 of the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the OPA geometric mean titer ratio. Following discussions with the FDA, the non-inferiority standard in our VAX-31 adult OPUS-1 Phase 3 pivotal, noninferiority trial is set at 0.667. The FDA may challenge our VAX-31 Phase 3 Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (“CMC”) strategy, which could cause significant delays or unanticipated costs. Additionally, novel aspects of our vaccine candidates and manufacturing processes may create further challenges in obtaining regulatory approval. The regulatory approval process for our novel vaccine candidates can be more complex and consequently more expensive and take longer than for other, better known or extensively studied pharmaceutical or other vaccine candidates. More generally, approvals by any regulatory agency may not be indicative of what any other regulatory agency may require for approval or what such regulatory agencies may require for approval in connection with new vaccine candidates. Moreover, our vaccine candidates may not perform successfully in clinical trials. InEvolving addition, leadership of the FDA’s Center for Biologic Evaluation and Research, which oversees vaccine development, is supportive of novelregulatory approaches to vaccine development.approval If that leadership changes, wedecisions may facepresent additional hurdles to development orthat maywould havenecessitate a change to change our approach to meet regulatory expectations.

Reworded

Our ability to achieve and sustain profitability depends on obtaining regulatory approvals for and successfully commercializing our vaccine candidates, either alone or with third parties, and we cannot guarantee that we will ever obtain regulatory approval for any of our vaccine candidates. We have limited experience in conducting and managing the clinical trials necessary to obtain regulatory approvals, including approval by the FDA. None of our vaccine candidates have been the subject of late-stage or pivotal clinical trials,FDA, and we may never be able to obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates. Before obtaining regulatory approval for the commercial distribution of our vaccine candidates, we must conduct extensive preclinical studies and clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and immunogenicity or efficacy of our vaccine candidates.

Reworded

In addition, changes to the standard-of-care or the approval standards for new vaccines have, and could again in the future, change the threshold for achievement of non-inferiority using the established surrogate immune endpoints that our PCVs will need to meet in our clinical trials.

Reworded

Our business is highly dependent on the success of our PCV candidates, VAX-31 and VAX-24, both of which are in clinical development.candidates. If we are unable to successfully develop, obtain approval for and effectively commercialize VAX-31our orPCV VAX-24,candidates, our business would be significantly harmed.

Reworded

Our business and future success depends on our ability to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval of, and then commercialize our PCV candidates, which include VAX-31, our 31-valent clinical PCV candidate in development for both the adult and pediatric populations, and VAX-24, our 24-valent clinical PCV candidate in development for the pediatric population.population, and VAX-XL, our third-generation PCV candidate designed to provide the broadest coverage of any PCV currently in development. Although VAX-31 has produced positive topline results in a Phase 1/2 clinical study in adults, it may not demonstrate the same results in futurethe adult pivotal Phase 3 studiesstudy needed to obtain marketing approval from the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities or in infant clinical studies. In addition, past VAX-24 results in adults may not be indicative of future results in infant clinical trials. VAX-31 and VAX-24 will require additional clinical and non-clinical development, regulatory review and approval in multiple jurisdictions, substantial investment, access to sufficient clinical and commercial manufacturing capacity and significant marketing efforts before we can generate any revenue from product sales. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to successfully advance VAX-31our andPCV VAX-24candidates through the development process.

Reworded

•our ability to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities the safety and immunogenicity or efficacy and acceptable risk to benefit profile of VAX-31,our VAX-24PCV candidates and any future vaccine candidates;

Reworded

•the pace and prevalence of serotype replacement following the introduction of VAX-31,our VAX-24PCV candidates or other vaccines targeting pneumococcal disease;

Reworded

•obtaining and maintaining an Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (“ACIP”) preferred recommendation or, comparable foreign regulatory authority’sauthority, professional society, or other clinical recommendation of our vaccine candidates and the willingness of physicians, operators of clinicsclinics, and patients to utilize or adopt any of our future vaccine candidates to prevent or treat age-associated diseases;

Reworded

Vaccine candidates that we successfully develop and commercialize may compete with existing vaccines and new vaccines that may become available in the future. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, lobbying, technical, human and other resources than we do and may be better equipped to develop, manufacture and market technologically superior vaccines, including the potential that our competitors may develop chemical processes or utilize novel technologies for developing vaccines that may be superior to those we employ. In addition, many of these competitors have significantly greater experience than we have in undertaking preclinical studies and clinical trials of new products and in obtaining regulatory approvals, including for many vaccine franchises. Accordingly, our competitors may succeed in obtaining FDA approval or a preferred recommendation from ACIP for their products. For example, PCV13 obtained FDA approval for the prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease (“IPD”) in infants based on non-inferior IgG antibody responses relative to Prevnar, using the surrogate immune endpoints established by the prior Prevnar field efficacy study. Pfizer implemented a similar approach to the development of its 20-valent PCV vaccine candidate, PCV20, which was approved by the FDA in June 2021 for use in adults and in April 2023 for use in infants and children. Pfizer announced in July 2024 and October 2024 that it is developing a 25-valent PCV candidate ("PCV25") that is currently in adult and pediatric Phase 2 clinical trials.trials, Pfizer also announced in October 2024and that it is working on a 30-plus valent PCV candidate that is in preclinical development. Pfizer announced in November 2025 that it plans to initiate adult and pediatric pivotal trials evaluating PCV25 in 2026. Merck received approval for PCV15, its 15-valent PCV, in July 2021 for use in adults and in June 2022 for use in infants and children. Merck announced in June 2024 that PCV21, its 21-valent PCV, received approval from the FDA for use in adults. In September 2025, Merck announced positive results from its Phase 3 study evaluating PCV21 in children aged 2–17 with increased risk for pneumococcal disease. Merck is also advancing additional next-generation PCV candidates through multiple early-phase clinical studies evaluating different formulations. In addition, Sanofi and SK Chemicalsbioscience have partnered to develop a 21-valent PCV and, in June 2023, announced positive results from their Phase 2 clinical trials in infants. In December 2024, Sanofi and SK Chemicalsbioscience announced the initiation of a global pediatric Phase 3 clinical studyprogram of their 21-valent PCV candidate, as well as an expanded agreement to develop, license and commercialize "next-generation" PCVs for both pediatric and adult populations. In February 2026, SK bioscience announced that it expected topline results from this Phase 3 study to be available in 2027, and that a next-generation PCV candidate, also co-developed with Sanofi, was in preclinical development with clinical trial entry expected in 2026. GSK, which previously acquired Affinivax, iswas previously developing a 24-valent24‑valent affinity-boundaffinity‑bound pneumococcal vaccine for infants, which is currentlycandidate in aadults pediatricand Phase 2 clinical trial with data anticipated in 2026 or later.infants. In October 2024, GSK announced they have ceased the developmenttermination of their adult 24-valent program in adults in favor of a preclinical 30-plus valent candidate. In October 2025, GSK announced the initiation of a Phase 1 study in Australia evaluating its 30-plus valent candidate in adults. In the fourth quarter of 2025, GSK removed its pediatric 24-valent candidate, which had previously advanced into a Phase 2 clinical trial program, from its publicly disclosed pipeline.

Reworded

While we are designing and developing a manufacturing process that we believe can scale to address clinical and commercial vaccine supply, we do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities. We rely on contract manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”), including our strategic partnership with our contract manufacturer, Lonza, to access resources to facilitate the development and, if approved, commercialization of VAX-31 or VAX-24 and our other vaccine candidates. Advancing our vaccine candidates may create significant challenges for our CMOs, including:

Reworded

Before we can initiate a clinical trial or commercialize any of our vaccine candidates, we must demonstrate to the FDA that the CMC for our vaccine candidates meet applicable requirements, and prior to authorization in the European Union (“EU”), a manufacturing authorization must be obtained from the appropriate EU regulatory authorities. Because no product manufactured on a cell-free manufacturing platform has been approved in the United States, there is no manufacturing facility that has demonstrated the ability to comply with FDA requirements, and, therefore, the timeframe for demonstrating compliance to the FDA’s satisfaction is uncertain. Personnel changes at regulatory agencies could impact or delay the timing of pre-approval inspections or the issuance of required authorizations. Delays in establishing our manufacturing process and ensuring the facilities we utilize for manufacturing comply with cGMP or disruptions in our manufacturing processes, implementation of novel technologies or scale-up activities, may delay or disrupt our development efforts.

Reworded

•receiving the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”), and ACIP recommendations for use, as well as recommendations ofACIP, comparable foreign regulatory andauthority, advisoryprofessional bodiessociety, or other clinical recommendation for use;

Reworded

In the United States, the CDC and ACIP develop vaccine recommendations for both children and adults, as do professional societies and similar agencies around the world. To develop its recommendations, the ACIP forms working groups that gather, analyze and prepare scientific information. The ACIP also considers many of the factors above, as well as myriad additional factors such as the value of vaccination for the target population regarding the outcomes, health economic data and implementation issues. The ACIP recommendations are also made within categories, such as in an age group or a specified risk group. For example, the ACIP may determine that a preferred recommendation in a smaller child population may be more economical than recommending vaccinations for a larger adult population, which could adversely impact our market opportunity.

Added

New pediatric vaccines that receive an ACIP preferred recommendation are almost universally adopted, and adult vaccines that receive a preferred recommendation are widely adopted. Recent changes to federal vaccine policy have introduced new uncertainties regarding the regulatory, legal, and reimbursement landscape for vaccines in the United States. Such changes have resulted in the American Academy of Pediatrics and other recommending bodies or organizations to generate their own recommended pediatric vaccine schedule. We may need to engage with additional professional societies or organizations to secure access for both adults and infants.

Removed

New pediatric vaccines that receive an ACIP preferred recommendation are almost universally adopted, and adult vaccines that receive a preferred recommendation are widely adopted. For example, in 2014, the ACIP voted to recommend PCV13 for routine use to help protect adults aged 65 years and older against pneumococcal disease, which caused PCV13 to become the standard-of-care along with continued use of PPSV23. The ACIP can also modify its preferred recommendation. For instance, in June 2019, the ACIP voted to revise the pneumococcal vaccination guidelines and recommend PCV13 for adults 65 and older based on the shared clinical decision making of the provider and patient, rather than a preferred use recommendation, which means the decision to vaccinate should be made at the individual level between health care providers and their patients. In October 2021, the ACIP voted to recommend the use of either PCV20, or PCV15 with PPSV23, for routine use in adults aged 65 years and older as well as for those between the ages of 19 and 64 years with certain underlying medical conditions or other risk factors who had not previously received a PCV or whose previous vaccination history was unknown. In June 2022, the ACIP voted to recommend that PCV15 may be used as an option to the then recommended PCV13 for children aged under 19 years according to then recommended PCV13 dosing and schedules. In June 2023, the ACIP voted to recommend the use of PCV20 as an option to PCV15 for routine use in children under the age of two, and as a “catch up” vaccination for healthy children between the ages of 24 and 59 months with incomplete PCV vaccination status and children between the ages of 24 and 71 months with certain underlying conditions and an incomplete PCV vaccination status. Further, the ACIP voted to recommend that children between the ages of two and 18 years with any risk condition who have received all recommended PCV doses before the age of six do not need additional doses if they have received at least one dose of PCV20. If children between the ages of two and 18 years with any risk condition received PCV13 or PCV15, but not PCV20, the ACIP recommend that they should receive a dose of PCV20 or PPSV23. The ACIP also voted to recommend that children between the ages of six and 18 years with any risk condition who have not received any dose of PCV13, PCV15 or PCV20 should receive a single dose of PCV15 or PCV20. When PCV15 is used in this instance, the ACIP recommended that it should be followed by a dose of PPSV23 at least eight weeks later if not previously given. In June 2023, the ACIP also recommended shared clinical decision-making regarding PCV20 use for adults aged 65 years and older who have completed the recommended vaccine series with both PCV13 and PPSV23. In June 2024, the ACIP voted to recommend PCV21 as an option to either PCV20, or PCV15 with PPSV23 for (i) adults aged 65 years and older who have not previously received a PCV or whose previous vaccination history is unknown, (ii) adults between the ages of 19 and 64 with certain underlying medical conditions or other risk factors who have not previously received a PCV or whose previous vaccination history is unknown and (iii) adults aged 19 years and older who have received PCV13 but not all recommended doses of PPSV23. Additionally, the ACIP recommended shared clinical decision-making regarding a supplemental dose of PCV21 for adults aged 65 and older who have completed their vaccine series with both PCV13 and PPSV23. In October 2024, the ACIP voted to recommend lowering the age-based pneumococcal vaccination guidelines for pneumococcal vaccination in adults from 65 years and older to 50 years and older. In line with this recommendation, the ACIP voted to recommend either a dose of PCV20 or PCV21, or PCV15 with PPSV23, for (i) adults aged 50 and older who have not previously received a PCV or whose previous vaccination history is unknown and (ii) adults between the ages of 19 and 49 with certain underlying medical conditions or other risk factors who have not previously received a PCV or whose previous vaccination history is unknown.

Reworded

The membershipACIP's ofcomposition and decisions could influence the ACIPpathway is influenced by the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”). Changes in the ACIP representation could impact the viability offor new vaccines receivingto receive a positive recommendation,recommendation particularlyor ifthe thereimpact isof a changepositive in the federal government’s posture towards vaccines.recommendation. If our vaccine candidates are approved but fail to receive CDCCDC, andACIP, ACIPcomparable foreign authority, professional society, or other clinical recommendations, or recommendationsfail of other comparable foreign regulatory and advisory bodies, orto achieve market acceptance among physicians, healthcare providers, patients, third-party payors or others in the medical community, we will not be able to generate significant revenue. Even if our products achieve market acceptance, we may not be able to maintain that market acceptance over time if new products or technologies are introduced that are more favorably received than our products, are more cost effective or render our products obsolete.

Reworded

The success of our business depends in large part upon our ability to identify, develop and commercialize products based on our cell-free protein synthesis platform. WeIn intendaddition to pursueour clinicalPCV developmentfranchise, ofour additionalpipeline includes preclinical vaccine candidates beyond VAX-31 and VAX-24 for IPD, including VAX-A1 for Group A Streptococcus (“Group A Strep”), VAX-PG for periodontitis and VAX-GI for dysentery and shigellosis. Our research programs may fail to identify potential vaccine candidates for clinical development for a number of reasons or we may focus our efforts and resources on potential programs or vaccine candidates that ultimately prove to be successful in a smaller subset of patients than expected or completely unsuccessful. In addition, we cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to successfully advance any of our existing or future vaccine candidates through the development process.

Added

For example, we announced in August 2025 that preclinical data for VAX-PG demonstrated an acceptable safety profile but not sufficient efficacy signals to support further investment, and we therefore discontinued further development of that candidate.

Reworded

We currently rely on third-party manufacturing and supply partners, including Lonza and Sutro Biopharma,partners to supply raw materials and components for, and the manufacture of, our preclinical and clinical supplies as well as our vaccine candidates. Our inability to procure necessary raw materials or to have sufficient quantities of preclinical and clinical supplies or the inability to have our vaccine candidates manufactured, including delays or interruptions at our third-party manufacturers, or our failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements or to supply sufficient quantities at acceptable quality levels or prices, or at all, would materially and adversely affect our business.

Reworded

We rely on third-party contract manufacturers to manufacture preclinical and clinical trial product materials and supplies for our needs. There can be no assurance that our preclinical and clinical development product supplies will not be limited or interrupted or be of satisfactory quality or continue to be available on acceptable terms. Over the course of the development and manufacturing of VAX-24, we previously encountered process-related matters that required us to make adjustments to our processes. For example, in 2020 we encountered such process-related matters during our drug substance manufacturing campaign for VAX-24 at Lonza. The cumulative impact of the time required to make adjustments to our processes led to a delay of our drug substance manufacturing campaign due to scheduling conflicts and capacity constraints at Lonza. There can be no assurance that we or Lonza will be able to successfully manufacture drug substances in a timely manner in the future, or at all. Such process changes and manufacturing delays have caused a change in our IND timelines in the past and future changes or delays could impact future timelines for VAX-31, VAX-24, or for our other product candidates. Since we utilize a third-party manufacturer,manufacturers, we are also subject to Lonza’stheir scheduling commitments for itstheir other clients. Scheduling conflicts with Lonza’s other clients have contributed to manufacturing delays in the past, and there is no guarantee that future scheduling conflicts or related capacity constraints will not affect our manufacturing campaigns and related timelines. Certain aspects of our manufacturing process for our clinical trial product materials and supplies have also been adversely affected by macroeconomic factors in the past and may in the future be adversely affected by these and numerous other factors, including earthquakes and other natural or man-made disasters, economic downturns, equipment failures, labor shortages, health epidemics, power failures and tariffs.significant changes in trade policies.

Reworded

If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, or if they cannot pass a pre-approval inspection, we may not be able to rely on their manufacturing facilities for the manufacture of elements of our vaccine candidates. Moreover, we do not control the manufacturing process at our contract manufacturers and are completely dependent on them for compliance with current regulatory requirements. In the event that any of our manufacturers failsfail to comply with such requirements or to perform itstheir obligations in relation to quality, timing or otherwise, or if our supply of components or other materials becomes limited or interrupted for other reasons, we may be forced to manufacture the materials ourselves or enter into an agreement with another third party, which we may not be able to do on reasonable terms, if at all. In some cases, the technical skills, raw materials or technology required to manufacture our vaccine candidates may be unique or proprietary to the original manufacturer or supplier, and we may have difficulty applying such skills or technology or sourcing such raw materials ourselves, or in transferring such skills, technology or raw materials to another third party, or such transfer may be subject to certain consent obligations and payment terms to Lonza.the original manufacturer. These factors would increase our reliance on such manufacturer or require us to obtain a license from such manufacturer in order to enable us, or to have another third party, manufacture our vaccine candidates. If we are required to change manufacturers for any reason, we will be required to verify that the new manufacturer maintains facilities and procedures that comply with quality standards and with all applicable regulations and guidelines, and we may be required to repeat some of the development program and submit a supplement to our application. The delays associated with the verification of a new manufacturer could negatively affect our ability to develop vaccine candidates in a timely manner or within budget.

Reworded

We expect to continue to rely on third-party manufacturers and suppliers, including Lonza,suppliers if we receive regulatory approval for any PCV or any other vaccine candidates. For example, in October 2023, we entered into a pre-commercial services and commercial manufacturing supply agreement (the “Lonza Commercial Manufacturing and Supply Agreement”) with Lonza, pursuant to which Lonza will (i) construct and build out a dedicated suite (“Suite”) at Lonza’s facilities in Visp, Switzerland to manufacture certain key components (including drug substance) for our proprietary PCV franchise and any other products or intermediates we may choose (collectively, the “Products”), and (ii) maintain and operate the Suite (utilizing Lonza’s employees) to manufacture the Products as a service provided to us, including conducting related quality control and quality assurance operations. PursuantIn September 2025, we also entered into a master services agreement with Patheon Manufacturing Services LLC, part of Thermo Fisher Scientific (collectively, “Thermo Fisher”), pursuant to which Thermo Fisher will commercially manufacture and supply drug product for our PCV candidates, if approved (the “Thermo Fisher Commercial Manufacturing and Supply Agreement, Lonza will be a preferred, non-exclusive, supplier of the Products to us, and we retain the right to procure the Products from one or more alternate and/or backup manufacturers of the Products (including at our own facilitiesAgreement”).

Reworded

To the extent that we have existing, or enter into future, manufacturing arrangements with third parties, we will depend on these third parties to perform their obligations in a timely manner consistent with contractual and regulatory requirements, including those related to quality control and assurance. In December 2019, we exercised our right to require Sutro Biopharma to establish a second supplier for extract and custom reagents to support our anticipated clinical and commercial needs. In December 2022, we entered into an option grant agreement with Sutro Biopharma (the “Option Agreement”). Pursuant to the Option Agreement, we acquired from Sutro Biopharma (i) authorization to enter into an agreement with an independent alternate CMO to directly source Sutro Biopharma’s cell-free extract, allowing us to have direct oversight over financial and operational aspects of the relationship with the CMO; and (ii) a right, but not an obligation, to obtain certain exclusive rights to internally manufacture and/or source extract from certain CMOs and the right to independently develop and make improvements to extract (including the right to make improvements to the extract manufacturing process as well as cell lines) for use in connection with the exploitation of certain vaccine compositions (the “Option”). We and Sutro Biopharma agreed to negotiate the terms and conditions of a form definitive agreement to be entered into in the event we exercise the Option, which would include the terms and conditions set forth in an executed term sheet between us (the “Term Sheet”) and such terms that were necessary to give effect to each of the terms and conditions set forth in the Term Sheet (the “Form Definitive Agreement”). On September 28, 2023, we and Sutro Biopharma mutually agreed in writing upon the Form Definitive Agreement to become effective in the event that we exercise the Option. In November 2023, we exercised the Option and entered into a manufacturing rights agreement (the “Manufacturing Rights Agreement”) with Sutro Biopharma to obtain control over the development and manufacture of cell-free extract. Pursuantpursuant to the Manufacturing Rights Agreement,which we obtained exclusive rights to independently, or through certain third parties, develop, improve and manufacture cell-free extract for use in connection with our vaccine candidates. If Sutro Biopharma, the independent alternate CMO or the designated third parties are unable to provide a sufficient supply of cell-free extract, our third-party manufacturers may be delayed in their production of intermediate components, which may lead to delays of our drug substance manufacturing campaigns.

Removed

Changes at the HHS could alter regulators' postures, or the public’s views, toward vaccines. For example, the HHS could disband the ACIP or fill the committee with membership that has a skeptical view of vaccines, change legal protections for vaccine manufacturers, and work with state governments as well as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) to remove requirements or reimbursement for childhood vaccines.

Reworded

Increases in negative perceptions of vaccines or the technologies that we rely on by regulators may result in the FDA not approving our products or, if approved, fewer physicians prescribing our products. It also may reduce the willingness of patients to utilize our products or participate in clinical trials for our vaccine candidates.

Reworded

For example, based on the positive topline results from the VAX-24 Phase 1/2 proof-of-concept study, which evaluated the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of VAX-24 in adults 18-64 years of age, the FDA supported the initiation of a pediatric study in infants. This study could uncover risks in this study population that could have potentially been discovered during a child and/or toddler study, which could then delay or stop the completion of clinical development. Any inability to successfully complete preclinical and clinical development could result in additional costs to us or impair our ability to generate revenue. In addition, if we make manufacturing or formulation changes to our vaccine candidates, we may be required to or we may elect to conduct additional studies to bridge our modified vaccine candidates to earlier versions. Clinical trial delays could also shorten any periods during which our products have patent protection and may allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do, which could impair our ability to successfully commercialize our vaccine candidates and may harm our business and results of operations.

Reworded

We may experience difficulties in enrolling subjects in any clinical trials we may conduct for a variety of reasons. The timely completion of clinical trials in accordance with their protocols depends, among other things, on our ability to enroll a sufficient number of subjects who remain in the study until its conclusion. The enrollment of subjects depends on many factors, includingincluding, but not limited to:

Reworded

Based on our VAX-24VAX-31 End-of-Phase 2 meeting with the FDA in October 2023,FDA, we believe there was agreement with the FDA on the clinical design of the then planned VAX-24 adult Phase 3 program, including the approximate overall number of subjects, the primary and secondary endpoints for the pivotal, non-inferiority study as well asis confirmation that the planned immunogenicity analyses would have beenare sufficient to support licensure and an efficacy study is therefore would not have been required. Following the topline results of the VAX-31 Phase 1/2 study in adults 50 and older, we selected VAX-31 to exclusively advance to an adult Phase 3 program. We plan to hold an End-of-Phase 2 meeting for the VAX-31 adult program in advance of commencing a Phase 3 program. However, we believe the FDA position related to the previously discussed VAX-24 adult Phase 3 program will also apply to the VAX-31 adult Phase 3 program. In the event that we are required to conduct any field efficacy studies for VAX-31 or any of our other product candidates, enrollment of a sufficient number of subjects may require additional time and resources given widespread vaccination rates in the United States, particularly in the pediatric population. As a result, we may be required to conduct any such trials outside the United States, which could cause additional complexity and delay. Delays in enrollment may result in increased costs or may affect the timing or outcome of any clinical trials we may conduct, which could prevent completion of these trials and adversely affect our ability to advance the development of our vaccine candidates.

Reworded

From time to time, we may publish interim topline or preliminary data from our preclinical or clinical trials. Interim topline data from clinical trials that we may complete are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as more patient data become available. We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data when we publish such data. As a result, the topline results that we report may differ from future results of the same studies, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Preliminary or topline data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we may publish. As a result, interim and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Adverse differences between preliminary or interim data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects. Additionally, disclosure of interim topline or preliminary data by us or by our competitors has and may continue to result in volatility in the price of our common stock.

Reworded

We have in the past and may in the future seek BTD or Fast Track designation for some of our vaccine candidates. For instance, in August 2022 we announced that the FDA granted Fast Track designation to VAX-24 in adults ages 18 and older and,older, in January 2023,2023 we announced that the FDA granted a BTD for VAX-24 for the prevention of IPD in adults, in November 2024 we announced that the FDA granted a BTD for VAX-31 for the prevention of IPD in adults, and in August 2025 we announced that the FDA extended the BTD for VAX-31 to include the prevention of pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae in adults. A sponsor may seek FDA designation of its vaccine candidate as a breakthrough therapy if the vaccine candidate is intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the therapy may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. For vaccines that have been designated as Breakthrough Therapies, the FDA may take actions to expedite the development and review of the application, and interaction and communication between the FDA and the sponsor of the trial can help to identify the most efficient path for clinical development while minimizing the number of patients placed in ineffective control regimens.

Reworded

Even whenif we obtain Fast Track designation for one or more of our vaccine candidates, we may not experience a faster development process, review or approval compared to non-expedited FDA review procedures. In addition, the FDA may withdraw Fast Track designation from any of our vaccine candidates that may receive the designation in the future, if it believes that the designation is no longer supported. Fast Track designation alone does not guarantee qualification for the FDA’s Priority Review procedures.

Reworded

We currently have no sales, marketing or distribution capabilities and as an organization have no experience in marketing products. If we develop an in-house marketing organization and sales force, we will require significant capital expenditures,expenses, management resources and time, and we will have to compete with other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to recruit, hire, train and retain marketing and sales personnel.

Reworded

A variety of risks associated with potentiallyour conducting researchcurrent and clinicalpotential trialsinternational abroadoperations and marketing our vaccine candidates internationallycollaborations could materially adversely affect our business.

Reworded

As we pursue approval and commercialization for our vaccine candidates overseas and conduct CMC and other operations overseas, we will be subject to additional risks related to operating in foreign countries, includingincluding, but not limited to:

Added

•significant changes in trade policies, price and exchange controls and other regulatory requirements;

Removed

•tariffs (including tariffs that have been or may in the future be imposed by the U.S. and other countries), trade barriers (including further legislation or actions taken by the U.S. or other countries that restrict trade), trade protection measures, price and exchange controls and other regulatory requirements, as well as protectionist or retaliatory measures taken by the U.S. and other countries;

Added

For example, our agreements with Lonza are denominated in Swiss Franc (“CHF”). Fluctuations in the exchange rate for CHF may increase our costs and affect our operating results.

Reworded

As our discovery, development, manufacturing and commercialization plans and strategies develop, we have rapidly expanded our employee base and expect to continue to add managerial, operational, sales, research and development, marketing, financial and other personnel. Current and future growth imposes significant added responsibilities on members of management, includingincluding, but not limited to:

Reworded

If our information technology systems or those of the third parties upon which we rely, are or were compromised, we could experience adverse consequences resulting from such compromise, includingincluding, but not limited toto, significant fines or other liability; regulatory investigations or actions; disruptions of our development programs or business operations; harms to our reputation,reputation; and other adverse consequences.

Reworded

We and the third parties upon which we rely are subject to a variety of evolving threats, includingincluding, but not limited toto, software bugs; malicious code (such as viruses and worms); social-engineering attacks (including through deep fakes, which may be increasingly more difficult to identify as a fake, and phishing attacks); employee error, theft or misuse; denial-of-service attacks (such as credential stuffing); malware (including as a result of advanced persistent threat intrusions); natural disasters; terrorism; war; telecommunication and electrical failures; supply-chain attacks; ransomware attacks; attacks enhanced or facilitated by artificial intelligence (“AI”); and other similar threats. In particular, severe ransomware attacks, including those perpetrated by organized criminal threat actors, nation-states, and nation-state-supported actors, are becoming increasingly prevalent and can lead to significant interruptions in our operations, loss of data and income, reputational harm and diversion of funds. Extortion payments may alleviate the negative impact of a ransomware attack, but we may be unwilling or unable to make such payments due to, for example, applicable laws or regulations prohibiting such payments. We may also be the subject of server malfunction, software or hardware failures, supply-chain cyberattacks, loss of data or other computer assets and other similar issues.

Reworded

We cannot be sure that our insurance coverage, if any, will be adequate or otherwise protect us from or adequately mitigate liabilities or damages with respect to claims, costs, expenses, litigation, fines, penalties, business loss, data loss, regulatory actions or other materially adverse impacts arising out of our processing activities, privacy and security practices, or security breaches we may experience. The successful assertion of one or more large claims against useus that exceeds our available insurance coverage, or results in changes to our insurance policies (including premium increases or the imposition of large excess or deductible or co-insurance requirements), could result in substantial cost increase or prevent us from obtaining insurance on acceptable terms. Additionally, our contracts may not contain limitations of liability, and even where they do, there can be no assurance that limitations of liability in our contracts are sufficient to protect us from liabilities, damages, or claims related to our data privacy and security obligations.

Reworded

Our operations, and those of our CMOs, CROs and other contractors and consultants, could be subject to earthquakes, power shortages, telecommunications failures, water shortages, floods, hurricanes, typhoons, fires, extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics and other natural or man-made disasters or business interruptions, for which we are predominantly self-insured. The impact of climate change may increase these risks due to changes in weather patterns, such as increases in storm intensity, sea-level rise, melting of permafrost and temperature extremes on facilities or operations. The occurrence of any of these business disruptions could seriously harm our operations and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses.

Removed

The occurrence of any of these business disruptions could seriously harm our operations and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses.

Added

On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act ("OBBBA") was signed into law in the United States, and contains a wide range of tax reform provisions, including extending and modifying certain key Tax Act provisions, such as 100% bonus depreciation and the business interest expense limitation. Additionally, the OBBBA repealed mandatory capitalization and amortization of domestic R&D expenses, reverting to the immediate expensing of R&D expenditures for tax years beginning in 2025. Further, the OBBBA provided for an election to deduct the remaining unamortized domestic R&D expense as of December 31, 2024, either entirely in 2025 or over two years, in 2025 and 2026.

Removed

In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”) was signed into law. The Tax Act, among other things, contains significant changes to corporate taxation, including (i) changes to the expensing of research and development expenses for tax years beginning after December 31, 2021, (ii) reduction of the corporate tax rate from a top marginal rate of 35% to a flat rate of 21%, (iii) limitation of the tax deduction for interest expense to 30% of adjusted earnings (with certain exceptions, including for certain small businesses), (iv) limitation of the deduction for post-2017 net operating losses (“NOL”) to 80% of current-year taxable income and elimination of net operating loss carrybacks for post-2017 NOLs, (v) immediate deductions for certain new investments instead of deductions for depreciation expense over time and (vi) modifying or repealing many business deductions and credits (including reducing the business tax credit for certain clinical testing expenses incurred in the testing of certain drugs for rare diseases or conditions generally referred to as “orphan drugs”). Effective January 1, 2022, we are also subject to mandatory capitalization of Section 174 research and development expenditures. The capitalized expenses are subject to amortization over five and fifteen years for expenses incurred within the U.S. and outside of U.S., respectively.

Removed

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act was signed on November 15, 2021, and it contained several tax provisions, including changes to the Employee Retention Tax Credit and changes to excise taxes. These provisions do not have a material impact to our current tax provision.

Removed

In accordance with the 2017 Tax Act, research and experimental (“R&E”) expenses under Internal Revenue Code Section 174 are required to be capitalized beginning in 2022. R&E expenses are required to be amortized over a period of five years for domestic expenses and 15 years for foreign expenses. We have capitalized research and experimental expenditures in our current tax provision as a result.

Removed

The IRA of 2022 specifically introduces the topic of corporate alternative minimum tax on adjusted financial statement income on applicable corporations for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022. There is no impact to our current tax provision.

Reworded

The American Rescue Plan Act (“ARPA”) was signed on March 11, 2021. One of the provisions of the ActARPA included a modification to the provision limiting the deductibility of executive compensation expense, expanding the definition of covered employees subject to IRC 162(m) to include an additionalthe top five highest compensated employees beyond the CEO, CFO and three highest paid officersofficers. currentlyThe coveredprovision was further modified by the OBBBA, which made the provision applicable to publicly traded companies and all members of their controlled group (as opposed to members of the affiliated group, as prescribed under IRCprior 162(mlaw). ThisAll expandedchanges provisionare is applicableeffective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2026.2025. WeWhile we do not believe that thisthese updatemodifications to IRC 162(m) wouldwill have a material impact on our income tax provision currentlycurrently, andwe will continue to monitor this provision.

Reworded

Our ability to utilize our net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.

Reworded

We have incurred substantial losses since inception and do not expect to become profitable in the near future, if ever. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had federal and state NOL carryforwards of $430.2$796.1 million and $1,188.1$1,907.7 million, respectively. The federal and state loss carryforwards, except the federal loss carryforward arising in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, begin to expire in 2034 unless previously utilized. Federal NOLs arising in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 have an indefinite carryforward period and do not expire. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we also had federal and state research credit carryforwards of $28.3$40.3 million and $8.1$12.3 million, respectively. The federal research and development tax credit carryforwards expire beginning in 2039 unless previously utilized, and the state research and development tax credits can be carried forward indefinitely. In general, under Sections 382 and 383 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” (generally defined as a greater than 50 percentage point change (by value) in its equity ownership by certain stockholders over a rolling three-year period) is subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its pre-change NOLs to offset future taxable income. We have experienced ownership changes in the past. There were no ownership changes identified in 2024,2025, as such we have determined that no federal research credits will expire unutilized or are excluded from our research carryforwards as of December 31, 2024.2025. Subsequent ownership changes may affect the limitation in future years. As a result, if, and to the extent that we earn net taxable income, our ability to use our pre-change NOLs to offset such taxable income may be subject to limitations.

Showing the first 60 of 107 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

57new paragraphs
29removed paragraphs
48reworded paragraphs
11,168 → 15,033words in section

New heading “Other Pipeline Programs:”

New heading “Lonza Ltd. (“Lonza”)”

New heading “2026 Development and Manufacturing Services Agreement”

New heading “Thermo Fisher Scientific”

Removed heading “Completed two Follow-On Financings Totaling $2.4 Billion in Gross Proceeds”

Removed heading “Commercial Manufacturing and Supply Agreement”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: bankruptcy, fine, breach
“In February 2023, we entered into another non-exclusive development and manufacturing services agreement with Lonza effective as of March 1, 2023 (the “2023 Lonza DMSA”). Pursuant to the 2023 Lonza DMSA, Lonza will perform manufacturing process development and the manufacture of components for our PCV candidates, including the polysaccharide antigens, our proprietary eCRM protein carrier and conjugated drug substances. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine, breach
“In April 2022, we entered into a non-exclusive development and manufacturing services agreement with Lonza effective as of March 22, 2022, which was subsequently amended on May 12, 2022, November 21, 2022 and October 31, 2023 (as amended, the “2022 Lonza DMSA”). Pursuant to the 2022 Lonza DMSA, Lonza is obligated to perform services, including manufacturing process development and clinical manufacture and supply of our proprietary PCV candidates. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: investigation, fine
“•Initiated Phase 3 OPUS-2 and OPUS-3 Trials: In January 2026, we dosed the first participants in OPUS-2, a Phase 3 descriptive study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of VAX-31 when administered concomitantly with, or one month following, a licensed, high-dose seasonal influenza vaccine in approximately 1,300 pneumococcal-naïve adults aged 50 years and older (defined as having no known prior history of IPD, pneumococcal pneumonia, or receipt of any licensed or investigational pneumococcal vaccine). …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: fine, breach

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

In May 2018, we entered into a supply agreement with Sutro Biopharma, which was subsequently amended on February 22, 2021 and November 21, 2023 (as amended, the “Sutro Biopharma Supply Agreement”) pursuant to which we purchase from Sutro Biopharma extract and custom reagents for use in manufacturing non-clinical and certain clinical supply of vaccine compositions utilizing the technology licensed under the Sutro Biopharma License at prices not to exceed a specified percentage above Sutro Biopharma’s fully burdened manufacturing cost. If any extracts or custom reagents do not meet the specifications and warranties provided, then we will not have an obligation to pay for the non-conforming product, and Sutro Biopharma will be obligated to replace the non-conforming product within the shortest possible time with conforming product at our cost. The term of the Sutro Biopharma Supply Agreement is from execution until the later of (i) July 31, 2022, or (ii) the date that we and Sutro Biopharma enter into the Phase 3/Commercial Supply Agreement and Sutro Biopharma is supplying to us each Product under the Phase 3/Commercial Supply Agreement (each term as defined in the Sutro Biopharma Supply Agreement). The Sutro Biopharma Supply Agreement may be terminated by either party for the other party’s material breach uncured within 60 days’ notice, by us at will with 60 days’ notice, or by mutual agreement of the parties. In December 2019, we exercised our right to require Sutro Biopharma to establish a second supplier for extract and custom reagents to support our anticipated clinical and commercial needs. For additional information about the Sutro Biopharma Supply Agreement, see “Manufacturing and Supply—Sutro Biopharma Agreements—Supply Agreement with Sutro Biopharma” included in Part I, Item 1. Business of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine
“Concurrent with the payment of the first installment of the Option exercise price pursuant to the Option Agreement, on November 21, 2023, the manufacturing rights agreement (in the form of the Form Definitive Agreement) between us and Sutro Biopharma (the “Manufacturing Rights Agreement”) became effective. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: penalt
“Under the Lonza Commercial Manufacturing and Supply Agreement, prior to completion of construction and certification of the Suite for commercial operation, we will contribute to the capital expenditure costs to construct the Suite (and will own certain equipment in the Suite to be purchased or otherwise acquired by us), and will pay Lonza a fixed-rate monthly service fee for Lonza’s pre-commercial services prior to commencement of commercial operations (which monthly service fee amount is subject to increases in subsequent years). …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (134)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 5 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

We are a clinical-stage vaccine innovation company engineering high-fidelity vaccines to protect humankind from the consequences of bacterial diseases. We are developing broad-spectrum conjugate and novel protein vaccines to prevent or treat bacterial infectious diseases. We are re-engineering the way highly complex vaccines are made through modern synthetic techniques, including advanced chemistry and the XpressCF™ cell-free protein synthesis platform, exclusively licensed from Sutro Biopharma, Inc. (“Sutro Biopharma”).platform. Unlike conventional cell-based approaches, our system for producing difficult-to-make proteins and antigens is intended to accelerate our ability to efficiently createdevelop and deliver high-fidelity vaccines with enhanced immunological benefits.benefits that are beyond the capabilities of conventional approaches.

Reworded

•Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (“PCV”) candidates that we believe are among the broadest-spectrum PCV candidates currently in development, targeting the approximately $8 billion global pneumococcal vaccine market. Pneumococcal disease ("PD") is an infection caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria. It can result in invasive pneumococcal disease (“IPD”), including meningitis and bacteremia, and non-invasive pneumococcal disease,PD, including pneumonia, otitis media and sinusitis. Our broad-spectrum, carrier-sparing PCV candidates, VAX-31VAX-31, VAX-24 and VAX-24,VAX-XL, are designed to improve upon the standard-of-care PCVs for both adults and children by covering the serotypes that are responsible for aincreasing significant portionportions of IPD in circulation and are associated with high case-fatality rates, antibiotic resistance and meningitis, while maintaining coverage of previously circulating strains that are currently contained through continued vaccination practice.vaccination.

Reworded

▪VAX-31 is a 31-valent, broad-spectrum, carrier-sparing investigational PCV being developed for the prevention of IPD.IPD and pneumonia. VAX-31 is the broadest-spectrum PCV in the clinic, and has the potential to provide protection against both currently circulating and historically prevalent serotypes. VAX-31 was designed to increase coverage, in a single vaccine, to more thanapproximately 95% of IPD and approximately 88% of pneumococcal pneumonia circulating in adults in the United States aged 50 and older, with the potential to provide an incremental 12-40%14-34% of coverage for IPD and an incremental 19-31% of coverage for pneumococcal pneumonia over current standard-of-care adult PCVs.

Added

Based on these positive results, we selected the High Dose of VAX-31 to advance to an adult Phase 3 program.

Removed

Based on these positive results, we selected VAX-31 to advance to an adult Phase 3 program, and plan to select the dose prior to the initiation of such program. Following an FDA End-of-Phase 2 meeting, we plan to initiate a Phase 3 pivotal, non-inferiority study by mid-2025 and announce topline safety, tolerability and immunogenicity data from this study in 2026. We plan to initiate the remaining Phase 3 studies in 2025 and 2026 and announce data from those studies in 2026 and 2027.

Reworded

•In November 2024, we announced that the FDA granted a breakthrough therapy designation ("BTD") for VAX-31 for the prevention of IPD in adults.adults and, in August 2025, we announced that the FDA expanded the BTD for VAX-31 to include the prevention of pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Added

•In December 2025, following an FDA End-of-Phase 2 meeting, we announced that the first participants were dosed in a Phase 3 pivotal, non-inferiority trial evaluating VAX-31 for the prevention of IPD and pneumonia in adults compared to standard-of-care PCVs ("OPUS-1"). We expect to announce topline safety, tolerability and immunogenicity data from this study in the fourth quarter of 2026.

Added

•In January 2026, we announced the initiation of an additional Phase 3 trial evaluating VAX-31 when administered concomitantly with a licensed, high-dose seasonal influenza vaccine in pneumococcal-naïve adults aged 50 years and older (“OPUS-2”). In February 2026, we announced the initiation of a separate Phase 3 study evaluating VAX-31 in adults previously vaccinated with a lower-valency pneumococcal vaccine (“OPUS-3”). We expect to report safety, tolerability and immunogenicity data from the OPUS-2 and OPUS-3 studies in the first half of 2027. We are also planning for a manufacturing consistency study (e.g., a lot-to-lot study).

Added

▪VAX-31 is a 31-valent, broad-spectrum, carrier-sparing investigational PCV also being developed for the prevention of IPD in children. VAX-31 is the broadest-spectrum PCV in the clinic designed to cover approximately 92% of IPD in U.S. children under five years of age and approximately 96% of otitis media due to Streptococcus pneumoniae in U.S. children five years of age or under.

Added

▪In December 2024, we announced that the first participants were dosed in the first stage of a Phase 2, randomized, dose-finding study of VAX-31 in infants. Stage 1 of the study evaluated the safety and tolerability of VAX-31 at three dose levels (Low, Middle and High) and compared to PCV20 in 48 infants in a dose-escalation approach. In the Low, Middle and High Doses, all serotypes were dosed at 1.1mcg, 2.2mcg and 3.3mcg, respectively, except serotypes 1, 5 and 22F, which were dosed at 1.65mcg, 3.3mcg, and 4.4mcg, respectively. Participants who received VAX-31 in Stage 1 continued the standard dosing regimen as part of Stage 2.

Added

▪In February 2025, we announced that the Phase 2, randomized, dose-finding study of VAX-31 in healthy infants had advanced to the second stage of the study. Stage 2 of the study is evaluating the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of VAX-31 at the same three dose levels evaluated in Stage 1 and compared to PCV20. In line with recommendations from the ACIP, the study design includes a primary immunization series consisting of three doses given at two months, four months and six months of age, followed by a subsequent booster dose at 12-15 months of age.

Added

▪In September 2025, we announced advancement of the VAX-31 infant Phase 2 randomized, dose-finding study to the third and final stage following modifications to the protocol to add a new dose arm to evaluate a VAX-31 Optimized Dose (majority of serotypes dosed at 4.4mcg and the balance dosed at 3.3mcg) and discontinue enrollment in the Low Dose arm. The Middle and High Dose arms continued as planned.

Added

▪The modified study is evaluating the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of VAX-31 and compared to PCV20 in 900 participants, including the 100 participants previously enrolled in the Low Dose arm.

Added

▪In January 2026, we announced that we completed enrollment of this study. We expect to announce topline safety, tolerability and immunogenicity data from the primary three-dose immunization series and booster dose either sequentially or together by the end of the first half of 2027.

Added

▪Pending the VAX-31 Phase 2 infant study readout, we plan to initiate a Phase 3 program in infants with an Optimized Dose formulation of VAX-24 or VAX-31.

Added

•In March 2025, we announced positive topline, interim data from the VAX-24 infant Phase 2 study, a randomized, observer-blind, dose-finding two-stage clinical study evaluating the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of VAX-24 in healthy infants that enrolled 803 participants.

Added

•In November 2025, we announced final safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity results from the VAX-24 infant Phase 2 study that were consistent with the positive interim data reported in March 2025 and showed that VAX-24 elicited robust, dose-dependent immune responses, with little to no evidence of carrier suppression observed. The final data analysis included full 6-month safety results and complete post-dose 3 (primary immunization series) and post-dose 4 (booster dose) IgG and OPA results. The key immunogenicity endpoints included an assessment of immune responses for each of the VAX-24 dose levels (Low, Mid, Mixed) in comparison with PCV20 for the 20 common and 4 unique serotypes in VAX-24. At 1-month post-dose 3 and post-dose 4, immune responses were assessed based on serotype-specific IgG seroconversion rates (IgG threshold value of ≥0.35mcg/mL). IgG GMRs were also assessed at 1-month post-dose 3 and post-dose 4, along with other key immunogenicity endpoints, including OPA.

Added

In this study, VAX-24 was well-tolerated and demonstrated a safety profile similar to PCV20 across all doses studied. Post-dose 3 and post-dose 4, all VAX-24 doses evaluated demonstrated robust IgG and OPA immunogenicity responses.

Added

•Post-dose 3, all VAX-24 doses met target precedent Phase 2 non-inferiority criteria on relative seroconversion rates (lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportion of participants achieving the pre-defined seroconversion rate (IgG concentration ≥0.35 mcg/mL) is > -15% for each serotype) for the highest circulating serotypes, as defined by the percentage of IPD caused in individuals <5 yrs of age in the U.S. in 2023 based on the U.S. Center for Disease Control ("CDC") active bacterial core ("ABC") surveillance data, contained in VAX-24. The Low and Mid doses met the seroconversion rate criteria for 20 of 24 serotypes overall and the Mixed Dose met such criteria for 19 of 24 serotypes. The Mid and Mixed Doses met the target Phase 2 IgG GMR point estimate of >0.6 for 21 of 24 serotypes.

Added

•Post-dose 4, all VAX-24 doses met our target Phase 2 IgG GMR point estimate of >0.6 for the three highest circulating serotypes contained in VAX-24. The Mixed Dose met this target for 19 of 24 serotypes overall and the Mid dose met this target for 18 of 24 serotypes. Post-dose 4, VAX-24 elicited robust memory responses across all doses for all serotypes.

Added

•Additionally, the four incremental serotypes unique to VAX-24 that provide expanded serotype coverage relative to PCV20 elicited robust immune responses and met all target criteria across all endpoints at all doses evaluated.

Added

•The final positive data from the VAX-24 infant Phase 2 dose-finding study further validated our rationale for exploring higher doses in the ongoing VAX-31 infant Phase 2 study.

Added

◦VAX-XL is a third-generation PCV candidate designed to provide the broadest coverage of any PCV currently in development.

Removed

•In March 2023, we announced that the first participants were dosed in the first stage of a Phase 2 study of VAX-24 in healthy infants. The Phase 2 infant study is being conducted in two stages and compares VAX-24 to the broadest-spectrum standard-of-care PCVs currently available. Stage 1 of the study evaluated the safety and tolerability of a single injection of VAX-24 at three dose levels, 1.1mcg, 2.2mcg and 2.2mcg/4.4mcg, and compared to VAXNEUVANCETM (“PCV15”), the broadest-spectrum standard-of-care PCV at that time, in 48 infants in a dose-escalation approach.

Removed

•In July 2023, we announced that the Phase 2 study of VAX-24 in healthy infants had advanced to the second and final stage of the study. An independent data safety monitoring board ("DSMB") approved advancing to the second stage of the study following the review of the safety and tolerability results from the first stage. Additionally, in agreement with the FDA, we amended the study protocol for Stage 2 of the study, changing the study comparator to PCV20, which became the broadest-spectrum PCV recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (“ACIP”) in June 2023. This Phase 2 study is evaluating the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of VAX-24 in healthy infants at the same three dose levels, 1.1mcg, 2.2mcg and 2.2mcg/4.4mcg, that were evaluated in Stage 1. Per ACIP guidelines, the primary immunization series includes three doses given at two months, four months and six months of age, followed by a booster dose at 12-15 months of age.

Removed

•In March 2024, we announced the completion of enrollment in the VAX-24 Phase 2 study in infants. A total of 802 healthy infants (48 from stage 1 and 754 from Stage 2) were enrolled. We expect to announce topline safety, tolerability and immunogenicity data from the Phase 2 primary three-dose immunization series by the end of the first quarter 2025, followed by topline data from the booster dose by the end of 2025.

Removed

▪VAX-31 is a 31-valent, broad-spectrum, carrier-sparing investigational PCV being developed for the prevention of IPD in not only adults, but also in children. VAX-31 is the broadest-spectrum PCV in the clinic designed to cover approximately 94% of IPD and 93% of acute otitis media due to streptococcus pneumonia in children under five years of age in the United States.

Removed

•In December 2024, we announced that the first participants were dosed in the first stage of a Phase 2 study of VAX-31 in infants. Stage 1 of the study evaluated the safety and tolerability of VAX-31 at three dose levels (low, middle and high) and compared to PCV20 in 48 infants in a dose-escalation approach. In the low, middle and high doses, all serotypes were dosed at 1.1mcg, 2.2mcg and 3.3mcg, respectively, except serotypes 1, 5 and 22F, which were dosed at 1.65mcg, 3.3mcg, and 4.4mcg, respectively. Participants who received VAX-31 in Stage 1 will continue the standard dosing regimen as part of Stage 2 and will be included in the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity analysis of the study.

Removed

•In February 2025, we announced that the Phase 2 study of VAX-31 in healthy infants had advanced to the second and final stage of the study. Stage 2 of the study is evaluating the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of VAX-31 at the same three dose levels evaluated in Stage 1 and compared to PCV20 in approximately 750 infants. In line with recommendations from the ACIP, the study design includes a primary immunization series consisting of three doses given at two months, four months and six months of age, followed by a subsequent booster dose at 12-15 months of age. We expect to share topline data from the primary three-dose immunization series of the study in mid-2026, followed by topline data from the booster dose approximately nine months later.

Reworded

•VAX-A1, a novel conjugate vaccine candidate designed to prevent disease caused by Group A Streptococcus (“Group A Strep”). Group A Strep is pervasive globally and causes an estimated 800 million cases of illness annually, including pharyngitis, or strep throat, and certain severe invasive infections and sequelae. There is currently no vaccine against Group A Strep, which is one of the leading infectious disease-related causes of death and disability worldwide and a significant contributor to the prescription of antibiotics in children. We believe we have demonstrated preclinical proof of concept for VAX-A1, the data for which were published in December 2020. We nominatedplan theto finalinitiate vaccinea candidatePhase 1 adult study for VAX-A1 in 2026, with the firstprimary quarterobjective of 2021assessing safety and initiated Investigational New Drug ("IND")-enabling activities in the second half of 2021. We continue to advance the development of VAX-A1 and we intend to provide further information about the anticipated timing of an IND application as the program progresses.tolerability.

Removed

•VAX-PG, a novel protein vaccine candidate targeting the keystone pathogen responsible for periodontitis, a chronic oral inflammatory disease affecting an estimated 65 million adults in the United States. We believe we have generally demonstrated preclinical proof of concept for a periodontitis protein vaccine, the data for which was published in February 2019. We nominated a final vaccine candidate for VAX-PG in 2022 and are conducting large-animal confirmatory studies prior to advancing the program to potential IND-enabling activities. Our initial goal is to develop a therapeutic vaccine to slow or stop disease progression; however, the results from clinical trials may inform the potential adoption of prophylactic immunization.

Reworded

•VAX-GI, a novel preclinical vaccine candidate being developed as a preventative treatment for dysentery and shigellosis, which is caused by Shigella bacteria. Shigella is a bacterial illness estimated to cause 80 million to 165 million cases of disease and 600,000 deaths annually, mostly among children. The central antigen in VAX-GI is IpaB, a well-appreciated antigen that other developers have been unable to produce in an amount sufficient to enable a commercial product. With our cell-free technology, we believe we can produce this antigen at substantially improved yields, allowing for commercial-scale production. VAX-GI is being developed in collaboration with the University of Maryland, Baltimore as well as with partial funding from two research grants awarded by the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”). As part of our continued focus on strategic capital deployment and in order to prioritize our resources towards our PCV franchise, we announced in August 2025 that we had paused the advancement, beyond preclinical development, of VAX-GI while remaining confident in its potential and preserving the option to advance the program in the future.

Added

•FDA Expanded VAX-31 Adult BTD to Include Prevention of Pneumonia Caused by Streptococcus Pneumoniae in Addition to IPD: In May 2025, the FDA expanded the adult BTD for VAX-31 to include the prevention of pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae in addition to the prevention of IPD based on the positive topline results from the VAX-31 adult Phase 1/2 study, indicating that VAX-31 may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies.

Added

•Advanced Comprehensive Phase 3 Clinical Program to Support Planned BLA Submission and Validate VAX-31 as Potential New Standard-of-Care Adult PCV to Prevent IPD and Pneumonia: In August 2025, we announced that through a series of interactions with the FDA, including an End-of-Phase 2 meeting, regarding the VAX-31 adult Phase 3 clinical program, the FDA provided input on the adult commercial licensure requirements, including the approximate number of study participants in the Phase 3 program; key immunogenicity and safety endpoints for the pivotal, non-inferiority study; and a continued indication that the scale of the planned immunogenicity and safety assessments are in line with precedent requirements and will be sufficient to support potential licensure. Additionally, as part of ongoing discussions granted under the VAX-31 adult BTD, the FDA provided input on the chemistry, manufacturing and controls (“CMC”) licensure requirements in support of our path to delivering a BLA submission. The VAX-31 High Dose (all serotypes dosed at 3.3mcg or 4.4mcg) has been selected to advance into Phase 3.

Added

•Initiated Phase 3 OPUS-1 Trial: In December 2025 we announced we dosed the first participants in the OPUS-1 trial, with topline data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026. This trial is evaluating the safety, tolerability and immune responses of VAX-31 in approximately 3,560 adults aged 50 and older through direct, head-to-head comparisons with both Capvaxive® ("PCV21") and PCV20, the current standard-of-care PCVs, with the objective of establishing a best-in-class profile for VAX-31. The trial is also evaluating the safety, tolerability and immune responses of VAX-31 in approximately 440 adults aged 18-49. OPUS-1 is being conducted at approximately 50 sites in the United States.

Added

•Initiated Phase 3 OPUS-2 and OPUS-3 Trials: In January 2026, we dosed the first participants in OPUS-2, a Phase 3 descriptive study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of VAX-31 when administered concomitantly with, or one month following, a licensed, high-dose seasonal influenza vaccine in approximately 1,300 pneumococcal-naïve adults aged 50 years and older (defined as having no known prior history of IPD, pneumococcal pneumonia, or receipt of any licensed or investigational pneumococcal vaccine). OPUS-2 is being conducted at approximately 25 sites in the United States. In February 2026, we dosed the first participants in OPUS-3, a Phase 3 descriptive study evaluating the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of a single dose of VAX-31 in approximately 720 adults aged 50 years and older who have previously received lower-valency pneumococcal vaccines. OPUS-3 is being conducted at approximately 30 sites in the United States. We expect to report safety, tolerability and immunogenicity data from the OPUS-2 and OPUS-3 studies in the first half of 2027. We are also planning for a manufacturing consistency study (e.g. a lot-to-lot study).

Added

•Advancing Toward BLA Submission: Subject to the results of the Phase 3 studies, which are expected to read out in 2026 and 2027, we plan to submit a BLA shortly following the completion of the last Phase 3 study.

Removed

•Reported Positive Topline Data from Phase 1/2 Study of VAX-31 in Adults Aged 50 and Older: In September 2024, we announced positive topline results from the Phase 1/2 clinical study evaluating the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of VAX-31 in 1,015 healthy adults aged 50 and older. Based on the strength of the results from this study, we selected VAX-31 to exclusively advance to an adult Phase 3 program and plan to determine the VAX-31 dose prior to the initiation of the adult Phase 3 program.

Removed

Following an FDA VAX-31 End-of-Phase 2 meeting, we plan to initiate a Phase 3 pivotal, non-inferiority study by mid-2025 and announce topline safety, tolerability and immunogenicity data in 2026. We plan to initiate remaining VAX-31 Phase 3 studies in 2025 and 2026 and announce data from these studies in 2026 and 2027.

Removed

•VAX-31 Granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the FDA for the Prevention of IPD in Adults: In November 2024, we announced that the FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy designation ("BTD") for VAX-31 for the prevention of IPD in adults. With BTD, Vaxcyte has access to all the elements of the FDA’s Fast Track program, as well as the ability to receive guidance and support from the FDA on an efficient drug development program and an organizational commitment from senior managers within the FDA.

Removed

•Positive Results from VAX-24 Phase 2 Study in Adults Aged 65 and Older Published in the Journal Vaccine Adds to Body of Evidence Validating the Potential of Our Carrier-Sparing Platform: In July 2024, the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity results from the VAX-24 Phase 2 study in adults aged 65 and older were published in the journal Vaccine.

Added

•Completed Enrollment of Ongoing VAX-31 Infant Phase 2 Dose-Finding Study: In August 2025, we announced that we had modified the ongoing VAX-31 infant Phase 2 randomized, dose-finding study to add a new dose arm to evaluate a VAX-31 Optimized Dose with the majority of serotypes dosed at 4.4mcg and the balance dosed at 3.3mcg. Both the Middle Dose and High Dose VAX-31 arms in the study are proceeding as planned while we elected to discontinue enrollment in the Low Dose arm. In September 2025, we announced that the first participants had received the Optimized Dose and subsequently announced in January 2026 that we had completed enrollment of the study. The modified study will evaluate VAX-31 in 900 dosed participants, including the 100 participants previously enrolled in the Low Dose arm. We expect to announce topline safety, tolerability and immunogenicity data from the primary three-dose immunization series and booster dose either sequentially or together by the end of the first half of 2027.

Added

•Reported Positive Interim and Final VAX-24 Infant Phase 2 Dose-Finding Study Data: In March 2025, we announced positive topline, interim data from the VAX-24 infant Phase 2 study that enrolled 803 participants. In November 2025, we announced the final safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity results from the study, which were consistent with the positive interim data reported in March 2025 and showed that VAX-24 elicited robust, dose-dependent immune responses, with little to no evidence of carrier suppression observed. The final data analysis included full 6-month safety results and complete post-dose 3 (primary immunization series) and post-dose 4 (booster dose) IgG and OPA results. The totality of data from this study affirms the Company’s strategy to include the higher doses that are being evaluated in the ongoing VAX-31 infant Phase 2 dose-finding study.

Added

Other Pipeline Programs:

Added

•Advancing VAX-A1, a Vaccine Candidate Designed to Prevent Disease Caused by Group A Strep, Into the Clinic: In February 2026, we announced we are planning to initiate a Phase 1 adult study for VAX-A1, a prophylactic vaccine candidate designed to prevent disease caused by Group A Strep, in 2026 with the primary objective of assessing safety and tolerability. Group A Strep remains a major global cause of morbidity and mortality in adults and children and is a leading driver of antibiotic use, underscoring the significant public health burden.

Added

•Introduced Development of VAX-XL, Third-Generation PCV Candidate Designed to Further Expand Disease and Serotype Coverage: In March 2025, we announced VAX-XL, our third-generation PCV candidate designed to provide the broadest coverage of any PCV currently in development for infants or adults.

Removed

•Completed Enrollment of Phase 2 Study Evaluating VAX-24 for the Prevention of IPD in Infants: In March 2024, we announced the completion of enrollment in the Phase 2 clinical study evaluating VAX-24 in healthy infants.

Removed

We plan to announce topline safety, tolerability and immunogenicity data from the primary three-dose immunization series of the Phase 2 study, which is fully enrolled with 802 healthy infants, by the end of the first quarter 2025, followed by topline data from the booster dose by the end of 2025.

Removed

•Initiated Phase 2 Study Evaluating VAX-31 for the Prevention of IPD in Infants: In December 2024, we announced the initiation of the Phase 2 study of VAX-31 in healthy infants and that the first study participants have been dosed. In February 2025, we announced that the Phase 2 study of VAX-31 in healthy infants had advanced to the second and final stage of the study.

Removed

We plan to announce topline safety, tolerability and immunogenicity data from the ongoing VAX-31 infant Phase 2 study primary three-dose immunization series in mid-2026, followed by topline data from the booster dose approximately nine months later.

Removed

Completed two Follow-On Financings Totaling $2.4 Billion in Gross Proceeds

Reworded

•Completed Public Offering Generating Gross Proceeds of $632.5 million: In February 2024,2026, we completed an underwritten public offering of 12,695,31212,650,000 shares of our common stock, which included the full exercise of the underwriters’underwriters' option to purchase an additional 1,757,8121,650,000 shares, at a public offering price of $64.00$50.00 per share and pre-funded warrants to purchase 781,250 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $63.999 per underlying share. The aggregate gross proceeds to us from thethis offering were $862.5$632.5 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses payable by us, and excluding the exercise of any pre-funded warrants.us.

Removed

•In September 2024, we completed an underwritten public offering of 12,087,378 shares of our common stock, which included the full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase an additional 1,893,203 shares, at a public offering price of $103.00 per share and pre-funded warrants to purchase 2,427,184 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $102.999 per pre-funded warrant. The aggregate gross proceeds to us from the offering were $1.5 billion, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses payable by us, and excluding the exercise of any pre-funded warrants.

Added

•Appointed Dr. Olivier Brandicourt to our Board of Directors: In May 2025, we appointed Dr. Olivier Brandicourt to our Board of Directors. Dr. Brandicourt is a veteran biopharmaceutical industry executive and the former Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi S.A. and Bayer HealthCare AG. He brings a wealth of expertise, with significant experience in commercial strategy and execution within the global vaccine market. Dr. Brandicourt is currently a Senior Advisor at Blackstone Life Sciences and serves on the boards of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AvenCell Therapeutics, Inc., BeOne Medicines Ltd. and Dewpoint Therapeutics, Inc.

Added

•Appointed Chris Griffith as Chief Business and Strategy Officer: In July 2025, Chris Griffith joined Vaxcyte as Chief Business and Strategy Officer. With more than 20 years of experience spanning corporate and business development, portfolio strategy and business operations, Mr. Griffith brings deep expertise to this newly expanded role. His leadership will help ensure strong cross-functional alignment and execution as we advance our late-stage programs and prepare for the next phase of growth.

Added

•Announced Plan to Establish Fill-Finish Manufacturing in North Carolina as Key Element of Long-Term U.S. Commercial Supply Strategy Representing Up to $1 Billion in Manufacturing and Services: In September 2025, we announced a new agreement with Patheon Manufacturing Services, LLC, part of Thermo Fisher Scientific (collectively, "Thermo Fisher") to provide custom commercial fill-finish capacity for our broad-spectrum PCVs at Thermo Fisher's Greenville, North Carolina facility. The initiative, which includes both manufacturing and related services, represents a long-term U.S. commercial manufacturing commitment of up to $1 billion.

Added

•Appointed Mike Mullette as Chief Commercial Officer to Lead Commercialization Strategy and Execution: In October 2025, Michael Mullette joined Vaxcyte as Chief Commercial Officer, bringing more than 20 years of global experience in vaccines and biopharmaceuticals, including senior leadership roles at Moderna, Sanofi Pasteur and Lykos Therapeutics. As part of our strategy to prepare for future commercialization of our PCV programs, Mr. Mullette will lead the continued development and execution of global commercialization, including pre-launch planning and cross-functional readiness. He brings extensive launch leadership, having led Moderna’s first ever commercial organization in North America during the COVID-19 pandemic and launched multiple vaccines at Sanofi Pasteur across the U.S., France, Japan, Australia and Canada.

Removed

•National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”) Grant Awarded for Preclinical Chlamydia Vaccine Development Program: In July 2024, the NIAID awarded a five-year, $9.5 million grant to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Vaxcyte and the University of Chicago to develop a vaccine candidate for the prevention of Chlamydia. There is a significant need for a vaccine to protect against Chlamydia. It is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection worldwide, with nearly 130 million new cases per year. While it is treatable when detected early, it can cause permanent damage to the female reproductive system, potentially leading to complications such as infertility and ectopic pregnancy.

Removed

•Appointed John Furey to Board of Directors: In July 2024, we appointed John Furey to our Board of Directors. Mr. Furey is an accomplished biopharmaceutical executive with over 30 years of experience developing and implementing operational strategies and leading commercial and technical teams, including senior leadership roles in the U.S., Europe and Asia. He currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of Imvax, a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing novel immunotherapies for cancer.

Reworded

We have incurred net losses in each year since inception and expect to continue to incur net losses in the foreseeable future. Our net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year, depending in large part on the timing of our preclinical studies, clinical trials and manufacturing activities, and our expenditures on other research and development activities. Our net losses were $766.6 million, $463.9 million, $402.3 million and $223.5$402.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2024,2025, 20232024 and 2022,2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $1,388.3$2,154.9 million and cash, cash equivalents and investments of $3,134.7$2,442.6 million. We believe our cash, cash equivalents and investments will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements through at least 12 months from the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Showing the first 60 of 134 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-05 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-06 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

1new paragraphs
1removed paragraphs
12reworded paragraphs
36,322 → 36,407words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: cybersecurity incident
“Further, we may experience delays in developing and deploying remedial measures designed to address any such identified vulnerabilities. Vulnerabilities could be exploited and result in a cybersecurity incident.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: cybersecurity incident

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

While we have implemented security measures designed to protect against cybersecurity incidents, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective. We take steps designed to detect, mitigate, and remediate vulnerabilities in our information systems (such as our hardware and/or software, including that of third parties upon which we rely). We may not, however, be able to detect and remediate all such vulnerabilities, including on a timely basis. Despite our efforts to identify and remediate vulnerabilities, if any, in our information technology systems, our efforts may not be successful. Further, we may experience delays in developing and deploying remedial measures designed to address any such identified vulnerabilities. Vulnerabilities could be exploited and result in a cybersecurity incident.
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We currently have noonly recently begun to build our marketing and sales organization, and as an organization we have nonever experiencemarketed in marketingany products. If we are unable to further establish marketing and sales capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to market and sell our vaccine candidates, we may not be able to generate product revenue.
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We currently have noonly recently begun to build our sales, marketing orand distribution capabilitiesorganization and, as a company, have never marketed any products. Although we have begun hiring sales and asmarketing anpersonnel, we have not yet established a fully developed organization have no experience in marketingthese products.areas. IfContinuing weto develop anthese in-house marketing organization and sales force, wecapabilities will require significant expenses, management resources and time, and we will have to compete with other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to recruit, hire, train and retain marketing and sales personnel.
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Vaccine candidates that we successfully develop and commercialize may compete with existing vaccines and new vaccines that may become available in the future. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, lobbying, technical, human and other resources than we do and may be better equipped to develop, manufacture and market technologically superior vaccines, including the potential that our competitors may develop chemical processes or utilize novel technologies for developing vaccines that may be superior to those we employ. In addition, many of these competitors have significantly greater experience than we have in undertaking preclinical studies and clinical trials of new products and in obtaining regulatory approvals, including for many vaccine franchises. Accordingly, our competitors may succeed in obtaining FDA approval or a preferred recommendation from ACIP for their products. For example, PCV13 obtained FDA approval for the prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease (“IPD”) in infants based on non-inferior IgG antibody responses relative to Prevnar, using the surrogate immune endpoints established by the prior Prevnar field efficacy study. Pfizer implemented a similar approach to the development of its 20-valent PCV vaccine candidate, PCV20, which was approved by the FDA in June 2021 for use in adults and in April 2023 for use in infants and children. Pfizer previously announced that it was developing a 25-valent PCV candidate ("PCV25") that was in adult and pediatric Phase 2 clinical trials, and that it was working on a 30-plus valent PCV candidate that was in preclinical development. Pfizer announced in November 2025 that it planned to initiate adult and pediatric pivotal trials evaluating PCV25 in 2026. In May 2026, Pfizer announced the initiation of a Phase 3 pediatric studyprogram evaluating PCV25 and thatthe termination of its adult 25-valent program wasin advancingfavor directly toof a preclinical 35-valent candidate, which it expects will enter clinical development in 2026. Merck received approval for PCV15, its 15-valent PCV, in July 2021 for use in adults and in June 2022 for use in infants and children. Merck announced in June 2024 that PCV21, its 21-valent PCV, received approval from the FDA for use in adults. In September 2025, Merck announced positive results from its Phase 3 study evaluating PCV21 in children aged 2–17 with increased risk for pneumococcal disease. In June 2026, Merck announced that the FDA approved an additional indication for PCV21 in children aged 2–17 with increased risk of pneumococcal disease who have previously completed a primary pediatric pneumococcal series. Merck is also advancing additional next-generation PCV candidates through multiple early-phase clinical studies evaluating different formulations. In addition, Sanofi and SK bioscience have partnered to develop a 21-valent PCV and, in June 2023, announced positive results from their Phase 2 clinical trials in infants. In December 2024, Sanofi and SK bioscience announced the initiation of a global pediatric Phase 3 clinical program of their 21-valent PCV candidate, as well as an expanded agreement to develop, license and commercialize "next-generation" PCVs for both pediatric and adult populations. In February 2026, SK bioscience announced that it expected topline results from this Phase 3 study to be available in 2027, and that a next-generation PCV candidate, also co-developed with Sanofi, was in preclinical development with clinical trial entry expected in 2026. In March 2026, SK bioscience announced that it was targeting 2029 for commercialization of its 21-valent PCV candidate, which it is co-developing with Sanofi. GSK, which previously acquired Affinivax, was previously developing a 24‑valent affinity‑bound pneumococcal vaccine candidate in adults and infants. In October 2024, GSK announced the termination of their adult 24-valent program in favor of a preclinical 30-plus valent candidate. In October 2025, GSK announced the initiation of a Phase 1 study in Australia evaluating its 30-plus valent candidate in adults. In the fourth quarter of 2025, GSK removed its pediatric 24-valent candidate, which had previously advanced into a Phase 2 clinical trial program, from its publicly disclosed pipeline.
see in full comparison
Removed text
“As a result of these factors, our competitors may obtain regulatory approval of their products before we are able to, which may limit our ability to develop or commercialize our vaccine candidates, or achieve a competitive position in the market.”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (14)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

We are a clinical-stage biotechnology vaccine company. Investment in clinical-stage companies and vaccine development is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that any potential vaccine candidate will not gain regulatory approval or become commercially viable. We do not have any products approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. As a result, we are not profitable and have incurred losses in each year since inception. Our net losses were $766.6 million and $463.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and $320.6$284.3 million and $140.7$166.6 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $604.9 million and $307.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $2.5$2.8 billion.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had cash, cash equivalents and investments of $2.7$2.5 billion. We believe our existing cash, cash equivalents and investments will fund our current operating plans through at least 12 months from the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. However, our operating plan may change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us, and we may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned. Furthermore, we will need to raise substantial additional capital to complete the development, manufacturing and commercialization of our drug candidates. We expect to finance our cash needs through public or private equity or debt financings, third-party (including government) funding and marketing and distribution arrangements, as well as other collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements or any combination of these approaches.

Reworded

Vaccine candidates that we successfully develop and commercialize may compete with existing vaccines and new vaccines that may become available in the future. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, lobbying, technical, human and other resources than we do and may be better equipped to develop, manufacture and market technologically superior vaccines, including the potential that our competitors may develop chemical processes or utilize novel technologies for developing vaccines that may be superior to those we employ. In addition, many of these competitors have significantly greater experience than we have in undertaking preclinical studies and clinical trials of new products and in obtaining regulatory approvals, including for many vaccine franchises. Accordingly, our competitors may succeed in obtaining FDA approval or a preferred recommendation from ACIP for their products. For example, PCV13 obtained FDA approval for the prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease (“IPD”) in infants based on non-inferior IgG antibody responses relative to Prevnar, using the surrogate immune endpoints established by the prior Prevnar field efficacy study. Pfizer implemented a similar approach to the development of its 20-valent PCV vaccine candidate, PCV20, which was approved by the FDA in June 2021 for use in adults and in April 2023 for use in infants and children. Pfizer previously announced that it was developing a 25-valent PCV candidate ("PCV25") that was in adult and pediatric Phase 2 clinical trials, and that it was working on a 30-plus valent PCV candidate that was in preclinical development. Pfizer announced in November 2025 that it planned to initiate adult and pediatric pivotal trials evaluating PCV25 in 2026. In May 2026, Pfizer announced the initiation of a Phase 3 pediatric studyprogram evaluating PCV25 and thatthe termination of its adult 25-valent program wasin advancingfavor directly toof a preclinical 35-valent candidate, which it expects will enter clinical development in 2026. Merck received approval for PCV15, its 15-valent PCV, in July 2021 for use in adults and in June 2022 for use in infants and children. Merck announced in June 2024 that PCV21, its 21-valent PCV, received approval from the FDA for use in adults. In September 2025, Merck announced positive results from its Phase 3 study evaluating PCV21 in children aged 2–17 with increased risk for pneumococcal disease. In June 2026, Merck announced that the FDA approved an additional indication for PCV21 in children aged 2–17 with increased risk of pneumococcal disease who have previously completed a primary pediatric pneumococcal series. Merck is also advancing additional next-generation PCV candidates through multiple early-phase clinical studies evaluating different formulations. In addition, Sanofi and SK bioscience have partnered to develop a 21-valent PCV and, in June 2023, announced positive results from their Phase 2 clinical trials in infants. In December 2024, Sanofi and SK bioscience announced the initiation of a global pediatric Phase 3 clinical program of their 21-valent PCV candidate, as well as an expanded agreement to develop, license and commercialize "next-generation" PCVs for both pediatric and adult populations. In February 2026, SK bioscience announced that it expected topline results from this Phase 3 study to be available in 2027, and that a next-generation PCV candidate, also co-developed with Sanofi, was in preclinical development with clinical trial entry expected in 2026. In March 2026, SK bioscience announced that it was targeting 2029 for commercialization of its 21-valent PCV candidate, which it is co-developing with Sanofi. GSK, which previously acquired Affinivax, was previously developing a 24‑valent affinity‑bound pneumococcal vaccine candidate in adults and infants. In October 2024, GSK announced the termination of their adult 24-valent program in favor of a preclinical 30-plus valent candidate. In October 2025, GSK announced the initiation of a Phase 1 study in Australia evaluating its 30-plus valent candidate in adults. In the fourth quarter of 2025, GSK removed its pediatric 24-valent candidate, which had previously advanced into a Phase 2 clinical trial program, from its publicly disclosed pipeline.

Removed

As a result of these factors, our competitors may obtain regulatory approval of their products before we are able to, which may limit our ability to develop or commercialize our vaccine candidates, or achieve a competitive position in the market.

Reworded

As a result of these factors, our competitors may obtain regulatory approval of their products before we are able to, which may limit our ability to develop or commercialize our vaccine candidates, or achieve a competitive position in the market. This would adversely affect our ability to generate revenue. Our competitors may also develop vaccines that are safer, more effective, more widely accepted or less expensive than ours, and may also be more successful than we are in manufacturing and marketing their products. These advantages could render our vaccine candidates obsolete or non-competitive before we can recover the costs of such vaccine candidates’ development, manufacturing and commercialization.

Reworded

The success of our business depends in large part upon our ability to identify, develop and commercialize products based on our cell-free protein synthesis platform. In addition to our PCV franchise, our pipeline includes preclinicalVAX-A1, a clinical vaccine candidates VAX-A1candidate for Group A Streptococcus (“Group A Strep”), and VAX-GIVAX-GI, a preclinical vaccine candidate for dysentery and shigellosis. Our research programs may fail to identify potential vaccine candidates for clinical development for a number of reasons or we may focus our efforts and resources on potential programs or vaccine candidates that ultimately prove to be successful in a smaller subset of patients than expected or completely unsuccessful. In addition, we cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to successfully advance any of our existing or future vaccine candidates through the development process.

Reworded

We expect to continue to rely on third-party manufacturers and suppliers if we receive regulatory approval for any PCV or any other vaccine candidates. For example, in October 2023, we entered into a pre-commercial services and commercial manufacturing supply agreement (the “Lonza Commercial Manufacturing and Supply Agreement”) with Lonza, pursuant to which Lonza will (i) constructconstructed and buildbuilt out a dedicated suite (“Suite”) at Lonza’s facilities in Visp, Switzerland to manufacture certain key components (including drug substance) for our proprietary PCV franchise and any other products or intermediates we may choose (collectively, the “Products”), and (ii) will maintain and operate the Suite (utilizing Lonza’s employees) to manufacture the Products as a service provided to us, including conducting related quality control and quality assurance operations. In September 2025, we also entered into a master services agreement with Patheon Manufacturing Services LLC, part of Thermo Fisher Scientific (collectively, “Thermo Fisher”), pursuant to which Thermo Fisher will commercially manufacture and supply drug product for our PCV candidates, if approved (the “Thermo Fisher Commercial Manufacturing and Supply Agreement”).

Reworded

We currently have noonly recently begun to build our marketing and sales organization, and as an organization we have nonever experiencemarketed in marketingany products. If we are unable to further establish marketing and sales capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to market and sell our vaccine candidates, we may not be able to generate product revenue.

Reworded

We currently have noonly recently begun to build our sales, marketing orand distribution capabilitiesorganization and, as a company, have never marketed any products. Although we have begun hiring sales and asmarketing anpersonnel, we have not yet established a fully developed organization have no experience in marketingthese products.areas. IfContinuing weto develop anthese in-house marketing organization and sales force, wecapabilities will require significant expenses, management resources and time, and we will have to compete with other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to recruit, hire, train and retain marketing and sales personnel.

Reworded

If we are unable or decide not to further establish internal sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, we will pursue collaborative arrangements regarding the sales and marketing of our products; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to establish or maintain such collaborative arrangements, or if we are able to do so, that they will have effective sales forces. Any revenue we receive will depend upon the efforts of such third parties, which may not be successful. We may have little or no control over the marketing and sales efforts of such third parties and our revenue from product sales may be lower than if we had commercialized our vaccine candidates ourselves. We also face competition in our search for third parties to assist us with the sales and marketing efforts of our vaccine candidates.

Reworded

There can be no assurance that we will be able to further develop in-house sales and distribution capabilities or establish or maintain relationships with third-party collaborators to commercialize any product that receives regulatory approval in the United States or overseas. If we are unable to further develop in-house sales and distribution capabilities or enter into relationships with third-party collaborators on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our products. If we are not successful in commercializing our products or any future products, either on our own or through arrangements with one or more third parties, we may not be able to generate any future product revenue and we would incur significant additional losses.

Reworded

While we have implemented security measures designed to protect against cybersecurity incidents, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective. We take steps designed to detect, mitigate, and remediate vulnerabilities in our information systems (such as our hardware and/or software, including that of third parties upon which we rely). We may not, however, be able to detect and remediate all such vulnerabilities, including on a timely basis. Despite our efforts to identify and remediate vulnerabilities, if any, in our information technology systems, our efforts may not be successful. Further, we may experience delays in developing and deploying remedial measures designed to address any such identified vulnerabilities. Vulnerabilities could be exploited and result in a cybersecurity incident.

Added

Further, we may experience delays in developing and deploying remedial measures designed to address any such identified vulnerabilities. Vulnerabilities could be exploited and result in a cybersecurity incident.

Reworded

We do not have the infrastructure or capability internally to manufacture supplies for our vaccine candidates or the materials necessary to produce our vaccine candidates for use in the conduct of our preclinical studies or clinical trials, and we lack the internal resources and the capability to manufacture any of our vaccine candidates on a preclinical, clinical or commercial scale. Pursuant to the Manufacturing Rights Agreement with Sutro Biopharma, we obtained exclusive rights to independently, or through certain third parties, develop, improve and manufacture cell-free extract for use in connection with our vaccine candidates. We have engaged Lonza to perform manufacturing process development and clinical manufacture and supply of components for our PCV candidates. Lonza is currently in the process of manufacturing certain components of our vaccine candidates on a clinical scale. In addition, we entered into the Lonza Commercial Manufacturing and Supply Agreement pursuant to which Lonza will (i) constructconstructed and buildbuilt out a Suite at Lonza’s facilities in Visp, Switzerland to manufacture the Products, and (ii) will maintain and operate the Suite (utilizing Lonza’s employees) to manufacture the Products as a service provided to us. In September 2025, we also entered into the Thermo Fisher Commercial Manufacturing and Supply Agreement, pursuant to which Thermo Fisher will commercially manufacture and supply drug product for our PCV candidates, if approved.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

6new paragraphs
9removed paragraphs
27reworded paragraphs
13,094 → 13,080words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: supply chain, labor
“•Progressed Manufacturing and Supply Chain Capabilities to Support Commercial Launch: In collaboration with Lonza, we completed construction of a dedicated, large-scale manufacturing facility designed to support potential global commercial manufacturing of its PCV candidates for all indications.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: investigation

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

•AdvancingInitiated Phase 1 Study Evaluating VAX-A1, a Potential Best-in-Class Vaccine Candidate Designed to Provide UniversalBroad Protection Against Disease Caused by Group A Strep, into the ClinicStreptococcus: In FebruaryJune 2026, we announced plans to advancethat the clinicalfirst developmentparticipant ofwas ourdosed mostin advancedthe preclinicalPhase program,1, first-in-human study evaluating VAX-A1, aan investigational prophylactic vaccine candidate designed to prevent disease caused by Group A Strep, with the primary objective of assessing safety and tolerability, along with a secondary objective of evaluating initial immunogenicity data, to support potential further advancement. All participants enrolled in Stage 1 of the study have received the first of two planned doses. The Stage 2 portion of the study is expected to proceed contingent upon the Data Safety Monitoring Board's approval following the review of unblinded Stage 1 safety and tolerability data. All participants in the study will be evaluated for safety through six months after receiving the second dose. Group A Strep remains a major global cause of morbidity and mortality in adults and children and is a leading driver of antibiotic use, underscoring the significant public health burden. We expect to initiate a Phase 1 adult study in mid-2026.burden.'
see in full comparison
New text topics: interest rate
“Other income, net decreased by $56.0 million, or 56.2%, during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the corresponding period in 2025. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $44.4 million reduction in unrealized and realized foreign currency gains due to fluctuations in the foreign currency exchange rates and a $11.6 million decrease in interest income as a result of lower cash and investment balances and lower interest rates during the period.”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“•Positive VAX-31 Phase 1/2 Adult Data Published in The Lancet Infectious Disease: In March 2026, we announced the publication of positive results from the VAX-31 Phase 1/2 clinical study in the journal The Lancet Infectious Diseases. The study results showed that VAX-31 at all doses studied was observed to be well tolerated and demonstrated a safety profile similar to PCV20 through the full six-month evaluation period. At all doses studied, VAX-31 demonstrated robust OPA and IgG immune responses, with high geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) across all 31 serotypes. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“•Appointment and Retirement of Directors: The Board of Directors has appointed two new members, Dr. Moncef Slaoui and Dr. John Markels, to replace retiring members, Mr. Jacks Lee and Dr. Heath Lukatch. We thank both retiring members for their considerable contributions during their service. Dr. Slaoui most recently served as Chief Scientific Advisor of Operation Warp Speed, the U.S. government effort to accelerate the development of COVID-19 vaccines. Prior to that, Dr. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“Research and development expenses increased by $238.3 million, or 69.6% during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the corresponding period in 2025. The increase was driven by external costs, which grew by $216.7 million largely due to increased activities related to product manufacturing and clinical trials in connection with our PCV programs. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (42)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 1 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

▪VAX-31 is a 31-valent, broad-spectrum, carrier-sparing investigational PCV being developed for the prevention of IPD and pneumonia. VAX-31 is the broadest-spectrum PCV in the clinic, and has the potential to provide protection against both currently circulating and historically prevalent serotypes. VAX-31 was designed to increase coverage, in a single vaccine, to approximately 95% of IPD and approximately 88% of pneumococcal pneumonia circulating in adults in the United States aged 50 and older, with the potential to provide an incremental 14-34%13-36% ofbroader coverage for IPD and an incremental 19-31% ofbroader coverage for pneumococcal pneumonia over current standard-of-care adult PCVs.

Reworded

•In December 2025, following an FDA End-of-Phase 2 meeting, we announced that the first participants were dosed in a Phase 3 pivotal, non-inferiority trial ("OPUS-1") evaluating the safety, tolerability and immune responses of VAX-31 in healthy, pneumococcal-naïve (defined as having no known prior history of IPD or pneumococcal pneumonia, or receipt of any licensed or investigational pnemococcalpneumococcal vaccine) adults aged 50 and older through direct, head-to-head comparisons with both PVC20 and PCV21, the current standard-of-care PCVs. In March 2026, we announced that we completed enrollment of this trial. We expect to announce topline safety, tolerability and immunogenicity data from this study in the fourth quarter of 2026.

Reworded

•In January 2026, we announced the initiation of an additional Phase 3 trial evaluating VAX-31 when administered concomitantly with a licensed, high-dose seasonal influenza vaccine in pneumococcal-naïve adults aged 50 years and older (“OPUS-2”). In February 2026, we announced the initiation of a separate Phase 3 study evaluating VAX-31 in adults previously vaccinated with a lower-valency pneumococcal vaccine (“OPUS-3”). In March 2026, we announced we completed enrollment of the OPUS-2 trial and in May 2026, we announced we completed enrollment of the OPUS-3 trial. We expect to report safety, tolerability and immunogenicity data from the OPUS-2 and OPUS-3 studies in the first half of 2027. We are also planning for a manufacturing consistency study (e.g., a lot-to-lot study) as the final Phase 3 study to enable the submission of the Biologics License Application (BLA).

Reworded

•VAX-A1, a novel conjugate vaccine candidate designed to prevent disease caused by Group A Streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes) (“Group A Strep”). Group A Strep is pervasive globally and causes an estimated 800 million cases of illness annually, including pharyngitis, or strep throat, and certain severe invasive infections and sequelae. There is currently no vaccine against Group A Strep, which is one of the leading infectious disease-related causes of death and disability worldwide and a significant contributor to the prescription of antibiotics in children. We believe we have demonstrated preclinical proof of concept for VAX-A1, the data for which were published in December 2020. WeIn planJune to2026, initiatewe initiated a Phase 1 adult study for VAX-A1 in mid-2026,VAX-A1, with the primary objective of assessing safety and tolerability, along with a secondary objective of evaluating initial immunogenicity data, to support potential further advancement. We expect to report topline data from this study in the second half of 2027.

Reworded

Since JanuaryMarch 1,31, 2026, key developments affecting our business include the following:

Added

•Advanced VAX-31 Adult Phase 3 Program: All three ongoing VAX-31 Phase 3 clinical trials (OPUS-1, OPUS-2 and OPUS-3) are now fully enrolled with 6,191 adults dosed in total, approximately 3,500 of whom received VAX-31. These studies, which were finalized in consultation and alignment with the FDA, are designed to generate a broad and robust safety, tolerability and immunogenicity dataset. In addition, we are planning a manufacturing consistency study (e.g., a lot-to-lot study) as the final Phase 3 study to enable the submission of the BLA.

Removed

•Advanced VAX-31 Adult Phase 3 Program: In the first quarter of 2026, we announced several clinical milestones related to our VAX-31 adult program, which was designed in consultation and alignment with the FDA. These included:

Removed

◦OPUS-1: In March 2026, we announced we completed enrollment of this Phase 3 pivotal, noninferiority trial comparing VAX-31 to the standard-of care PCVs, PCV20 and PCV21, with 4,049 participants dosed.

Removed

◦OPUS-2: In January 2026, we announced the first patients had been dosed in this Phase 3 trial evaluating VAX-31 when administered concomitantly with a licensed seasonal influenza vaccine in pneumococcal-naïve adults aged 50 years and older. In March 2026, we announced we completed enrollment of this trial with 1,390 participants dosed.

Removed

◦OPUS-3: In February 2026, we announce the first patients had been dosed in this Phase 3 trial evaluating VAX-31 in adults who have previously received pneumococcal vaccination. In May 2026, we announced we completed enrollment of this trial with 752 participants dosed.

Removed

•Positive VAX-31 Phase 1/2 Adult Data Published in The Lancet Infectious Disease: In March 2026, we announced the publication of positive results from the VAX-31 Phase 1/2 clinical study in the journal The Lancet Infectious Diseases. The study results showed that VAX-31 at all doses studied was observed to be well tolerated and demonstrated a safety profile similar to PCV20 through the full six-month evaluation period. At all doses studied, VAX-31 demonstrated robust OPA and IgG immune responses, with high geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) across all 31 serotypes. The VAX-31 High Dose, which is currently being evaluated in the OPUS Phase 3 program, met or exceeded the OPA response noninferiority criteria (lower bound of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval of the OPA GMR is greater than 0.5) for all 20 serotypes common with PCV20 and met the superiority criteria (lower bound of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval of the difference in the proportions of participants with a ≥4-fold increase from day 1 to month 1 is greater than 10%, and lower bound of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval of the OPA GMR is greater than 2.0) for the 11 incremental serotypes unique to VAX-31 and not in PCV20. The VAX-31 High Dose average OPA immune responses were greater for 18 of 20 serotypes compared to PCV20 (GMR greater than 1.0), with seven of these serotypes achieving statistically higher immune responses compared to PCV20.

Removed

•Completed Enrollment of VAX-31 Phase 2 Infant Study: In January 2026, we announced we completed enrollment of the VAX-31 infant Phase 2 dose-finding study, with 900 healthy infants dosed. Participants have received at least their second dose in the primary immunization series.

Reworded

•AdvancingInitiated Phase 1 Study Evaluating VAX-A1, a Potential Best-in-Class Vaccine Candidate Designed to Provide UniversalBroad Protection Against Disease Caused by Group A Strep, into the ClinicStreptococcus: In FebruaryJune 2026, we announced plans to advancethat the clinicalfirst developmentparticipant ofwas ourdosed mostin advancedthe preclinicalPhase program,1, first-in-human study evaluating VAX-A1, aan investigational prophylactic vaccine candidate designed to prevent disease caused by Group A Strep, with the primary objective of assessing safety and tolerability, along with a secondary objective of evaluating initial immunogenicity data, to support potential further advancement. All participants enrolled in Stage 1 of the study have received the first of two planned doses. The Stage 2 portion of the study is expected to proceed contingent upon the Data Safety Monitoring Board's approval following the review of unblinded Stage 1 safety and tolerability data. All participants in the study will be evaluated for safety through six months after receiving the second dose. Group A Strep remains a major global cause of morbidity and mortality in adults and children and is a leading driver of antibiotic use, underscoring the significant public health burden. We expect to initiate a Phase 1 adult study in mid-2026.burden.'

Added

•Appointment and Retirement of Directors: The Board of Directors has appointed two new members, Dr. Moncef Slaoui and Dr. John Markels, to replace retiring members, Mr. Jacks Lee and Dr. Heath Lukatch. We thank both retiring members for their considerable contributions during their service. Dr. Slaoui most recently served as Chief Scientific Advisor of Operation Warp Speed, the U.S. government effort to accelerate the development of COVID-19 vaccines. Prior to that, Dr. Slaoui spent nearly 30 years at GlaxoSmithKline, where he served as a member of the board of directors of GSK plc; Chairman of Pharmaceutical R&D; Chairman of Global R&D, Vaccines and Oncology; and Chairman of Global Vaccines, during which he was directly involved in building the company's vaccine pipeline. Dr. John Markels brings over 35 years of leadership experience in the pharmaceutical industry, including a longstanding tenure with Merck where he most recently served as President of Merck Global Vaccines. He has worked across global commercial leadership, strategy and organizational development, as well as manufacturing, development and technology transfer.

Removed

•Completed Public Offering Generating Gross Proceeds of $632.5 Million: In February 2026, we completed an underwritten public offering of 12,650,000 shares of common stock, which included the full exercise of the underwriters' option to purchase an additional 1,650,000 shares, at a public offering price of $50.00 per share. The aggregate gross proceeds to us from this offering were $632.5 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses payable by us.

Removed

•Progressed Manufacturing and Supply Chain Capabilities to Support Commercial Launch: In collaboration with Lonza, we completed construction of a dedicated, large-scale manufacturing facility designed to support potential global commercial manufacturing of its PCV candidates for all indications.

Removed

•Established North Carolina Presence Including Buildout of Custom PCV Fill-Finish Line: In January 2026, we announced the establishment of a dedicated local North Carolina presence, comprising full-time employees focused on chemistry, manufacturing and controls (CMC) activities as part of our commitment to expand U.S.-based fill-finish manufacturing capacity for our PCVs in North Carolina. As we advance our long-term domestic manufacturing strategy, we are recruiting experienced scientific and manufacturing professionals in one of the country’s most established vaccine-development hubs. In parallel, the buildout of the custom PCV fill-finish line at the North Carolina facility is well underway.

Reworded

We have incurred net losses in each year since inception and expect to continue to incur net losses in the foreseeable future. Our net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year, depending in large part on the timing of our clinical trials and manufacturing activities, and our expenditures on other research and development activities. Our net loss was $320.6$284.3 million and $604.9 million for the three monthsand six months, respectively, ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $2.5$2.8 billion and cash, cash equivalents and investments of $2.7$2.5 billion. We believe our cash, cash equivalents and investments will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements through at least 12 months from the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Reworded

We do not expect to generate any revenue from commercial product sales unless and until we successfully complete development and obtain regulatory approval for one or more of our vaccine candidates, which we expect will take a number of years. We expect our expenses will increase substantially in connection with our ongoing activities, as we:

Reworded

Pursuant to the Lonza Commercial Manufacturing and Supply Agreement, Lonza will (i) constructconstructed and buildbuilt out a dedicated suite (the “Suite”) at Lonza’s facilities in Visp, Switzerland to manufacture certain key components (including drug substance) for our proprietary PCV franchise and any other products or intermediates we may choose (collectively, the “Products”). Following completion of construction and (ii)certification of the Suite for commercial operation, the Suite was handed over to the Lonza operations team on August 1, 2026, and Lonza will now maintain and operate the Suite (utilizing Lonza’s employees) to manufacture the Products as a service provided to us, including conducting related quality control and quality assurance operations. Lonza will beis a preferred, non-exclusive, supplier of the Products to us, and we retain the right to procure the Products from one or more alternate and/or backup manufacturers of the Products (including at our own facilities).

Reworded

Under the Lonza Commercial Manufacturing and Supply Agreement, prior to completion of construction and certification of the Suite for commercial operation, we will contributecontributed to the capital expenditure costs to construct the Suite (and will own certain equipment in the Suite tothat bewas purchased or otherwise acquired by us), and will paypaid Lonza a fixed-rate monthly service fee for Lonza’s pre-commercial services prior to commencement of commercial operationsoperations. (which monthly service fee amount is subject to increases in subsequent years). Following commencement of commercial operations of the Suite to manufacture the Products, weWe will now pay Lonza (i) Suite fees based on allocations of certain of Lonza’s costs to maintain the facility in which the Suite is located and to provide shared services to us and Lonza’s other customers in such facility, (ii) service fees based upon Lonza’s actual full-time equivalent employee (“FTE”) costs to operate the Suite to manufacture the Products, and (iii) equipment expenditures and certain other pass-through costs, including for raw materials. In addition, we may be obligated to pay or reimburse Lonza for certain other fees and expenses under the Lonza Commercial Manufacturing and Supply Agreement. Lonza will be eligible for certain financial bonuses, and subject to certain financial penalties, as incentives for the timely completion of certain scale-up activities, receipt of certain regulatory approvals for the Suite and manufacture of the Products in accordance with our commercial requirements.

Reworded

Our PCV programs include VAX-31, VAX-24 and VAX-XL, and our non-PCV programs include VAX-A1, VAX-GI, and other discovery-stage programs. In August 2025, we announced that we paused the advancement, beyond preclinical development, of VAX-A1 and VAX-GI while remaining confident in their potential and preserving the option to advance the programs in the future. WeIn nowJune plan2026, towe initiateinitiated a Phase 1 adult study for VAX-A1 in mid-2026.VAX-A1. The majority of our external costs relate to our PCV programs compared to the costs related to non-PCV programs. Most of the external costs associated with our vaccine candidates, particularly our PCV programs, are common in nature, and can be deployed across multiple candidates or redeployed as our vaccine development strategy evolves; as a result, we do not track external costs by candidate, program or project. We do not allocate internal personnel-related costs by program or project because several of our departments support multiple vaccine candidate programs and the hours are not tracked separately by program.

Reworded

Our vaccine development program for VAX-GI, a novel preclinical vaccine candidate being developed as a preventative treatment for dysentery and shigellosis, which is caused by Shigella bacteria, is currently funded in part by two grants obtained from the NIH administered by the University of Maryland, Baltimore. Our first grant from the NIH was awarded in April 2021 and provides for potential funding up to five years totaling approximately $0.5 million. In June 2023, we received another grant from the NIH that provides for potential funding up to five years totaling approximately $4.6 million. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we have received and expect to continue to receive funding under each of these grants.

Reworded

We are currently working on a discovery program with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the University of Chicago to develop a vaccine candidate for the prevention of Chlamydia, which is funded in part by a grant from the NIAID that provides potential funding up to five years totaling approximately $9.5 million. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we have received and expect to continue to receive funding under this grant.

Reworded

Income from grants is recognized in the period during which the related specified expenses are incurred, provided that the conditions under which the grants were provided have been met. The amount of grant income was not material during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Grant income is included as a component of Other income, net in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Reworded

Comparison of the Three and Six Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025

Reworded

Research and development expenses increased by $164.6$73.7 million, or 111.1%,37.9%, during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, compared to the corresponding period in 2025. The increase was largely driven by external costs, which grew by $152.6$64.1 million largelyprimarily due to increased developmentactivities related to clinical trials and product manufacturing activities in connection with our PCV programs. Clinical trials-related expenses increased by $25.4 million primarily due to the activities associated with the VAX-31 OPUS-1, OPUS-2, and OPUS-3 Phase 3 studies. Product manufacturing costs increased by $101.8$23.2 million,million primarily driven by an increase inincreased manufacturing activities, includingactivities to support the potential future commercial launches,launches. clinical trials-relatedResearch expenses increased by $45.0$13.3 million, primarily due to the initiation of and enrollment in the VAX-31 OPUS-1, OPUS-2 and OPUS-3 Phase 3 studies, facility and other allocatedexternal costs increased by $3.9 million, and research expenses increased by $1.3$1.9 million compared to the corresponding period in 2025. The increase was further driven by internal personnel-related costs, which grew by $12.0$9.6 millionmillion, largelyprimarily due to headcount growth.

Added

Research and development expenses increased by $238.3 million, or 69.6% during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the corresponding period in 2025. The increase was driven by external costs, which grew by $216.7 million largely due to increased activities related to product manufacturing and clinical trials in connection with our PCV programs. Product manufacturing costs increased by $127.0 million due to an increase in manufacturing activities, including to support the potential future commercial launches, Clinical trials-related expenses increased by $70.5 million, primarily due to the initiation of and enrollment in the VAX-31 OPUS-1, OPUS-2 and OPUS-3 Phase 3 studies, Research expenses increased by $16.1 million, and other external costs increased by $2.5 million compared to the corresponding period in 2025. The increase was further driven by internal personnel-related costs, which grew by $21.6 million largely due to headcount growth.

Reworded

General and administrative expenses increased by $0.4$2.9 million, or 1.3%, and remained relatively flat9.0% during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the corresponding period in 2025.2025, which was driven primarily by an increase in internal personnel-related costs due to headcount growth.

Added

General and administrative expenses increased by $3.3 million, or 5.1%, during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the corresponding period in 2025 which was driven primarily by an increase in internal personnel-related costs due to headcount growth

Reworded

Other income, net decreased by $14.8$41.2 million, or 37.0%,69.0%, during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the corresponding period in 2025. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $9.4$35.9 million reduction in unrealized and realized foreign currency gains due to fluctuations in the foreign currency exchange rates and a $6.3$5.3 million decrease in interest income as a result of lower cash and investment balances and lower interest rates during the period.

Added

Other income, net decreased by $56.0 million, or 56.2%, during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the corresponding period in 2025. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $44.4 million reduction in unrealized and realized foreign currency gains due to fluctuations in the foreign currency exchange rates and a $11.6 million decrease in interest income as a result of lower cash and investment balances and lower interest rates during the period.

Reworded

From inception through MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we have incurred losses and negative cash flows from operations and have funded our operations primarily through the issuance of common stock, pre-funded warrants to purchase our common stock and, prior to our IPO, redeemable convertible preferred stock, totaling approximately $5.3 billion in aggregate gross proceeds and $5.1 billion net of underwriting discounts, commissions and offering expenses. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $0.3$0.2 billion in cash and cash equivalents, $2.5$2.3 billion in investments and an accumulated deficit of $2.5$2.8 billion.

Reworded

On February 24, 2026, we entered into a Sales Agreement (the "2026 ATM Sales Agreement") with Leerink Partners LLC ("Leerink Partners"), to issue and sell, from time to time at our discretion, shares of our common stock at an aggregate offering price up to $500.0 million through Leerink Partners as our sales agent. We will pay Leerink Partners a commission of up to 3.0% of the gross sales proceeds of any common stock sold through Leerink Partners under the 2026 ATM Sales Agreement; however, we are not obligated to make any sales of common stock. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we have not sold any shares of our common stock under the 2026 ATM Sales Agreement.

Reworded

During the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, 3,500,000640,705 and 4,140,705 shares underlying the pre-funded warrants were exercisedexercised, respectively, to receive 3,499,959640,685 and 4,140,644 shares of common stock, respectively, net of exercise costs. No shares underlying the pre-funded warrants were exercised during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. As of both MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, a total of 5,463,793 shares underlying pre-funded warrants were outstanding.

Added

In July 2026, a total of 3,946,094 shares underlying the pre-funded warrants from various underwritten public offerings were exercised to receive 3,946,020 shares of common stock, net of exercise costs.

Reworded

Net cash used in operating activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $280.6$513.1 million, an increase of $114.4$225.7 million compared to the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to higher cash expenditures to support our business growth, including increased development and manufacturing activities in connection with the adult and infant PCV programs to support the potential future commercial launches, as well as timing of payments.

Reworded

Net cash used in investing activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $233.4$85.7 million, an increase of $356.7$286.8 million compared to net cash provided by investing activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The change was primarily attributable to a $269.6$189.3 million increase in purchases of investments and a $99.0$114.6 million decrease in maturities and sales of investments, which were partially offset by a $12.0 million decrease in purchases of property and equipment, manufacturing facility build-out and equipment construction-in-progress.investments.

Reworded

Net cash provided by financing activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $601.6$607.3 million, an increase of $600.8$604.0 million compared to the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to the proceeds of $601.8 million,million in net of issuance costs,proceeds from the follow-on offering during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, whereas no such offerings occurred during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.

Reworded

We have operating lease agreements for our office spaces. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had total lease payment obligations of $161.0$158.2 million, of which $12.8$13.7 million is payable within one year.

Reworded

We have certain payment obligations under various license agreements. Under these agreements, we are required to make milestone payments upon successful completion and achievement of certain intellectual property, clinical, regulatory and sales milestones. The payment obligations under the license agreements are contingent upon future events such as our achievement of specified development, clinical, regulatory and commercial milestones, and we will be required to make development milestone payments and royalty payments in connection with the sale of products developed under these agreements. As the achievement and timing of these future milestone payments are not probable or estimable, such amounts have not been included in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 or December 31, 2025.

Reworded

We enter into agreements in the normal course of business with CMOs and other vendors for manufacturing services and raw materials purchases. We rely on several third-party manufacturers for our manufacturing requirements. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had the following amounts of non-cancelable purchase commitments related to manufacturing services and raw materials purchased due to our key manufacturing partners. These amounts represent our minimum contractual obligations, including termination fees. If we terminate certain firm orders with our key manufacturing partners, we will be required to pay for the manufacturing services scheduled or raw materials purchased under our arrangements. The actual amounts we pay in the future to the vendors under such agreements may differ from the purchase order amounts.

PCVX insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 16 filings (5 insiders, 14 trade dates, 167,338 shares, about $10.4M; 14 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -167,338 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$10.4M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-10-05Wassil Jim
EVP, Chief Scientific Ofc, COO
Option exercise
10b5-1 plan
18,000$5.35 $96.3K163,435 SEC
2026-10-05Wassil Jim
EVP, Chief Scientific Ofc, COO
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
18,000$86.74 $1.6M145,435 SEC
2026-10-05Cowan Elvia
SVP, Finance & CAO
Option exercise
10b5-1 plan
19,000$25.92 $492.5K46,860 SEC
2026-10-05Cowan Elvia
SVP, Finance & CAO
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
19,000$86.74 $1.6M27,860 SEC
2026-10-01Wassil Jim
EVP, Chief Scientific Ofc, COO
Option exercise
10b5-1 plan
2,250$5.35 $12.0K147,685 SEC
2026-10-01Wassil Jim
EVP, Chief Scientific Ofc, COO
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
2,155$56.65 $122.1K145,530 SEC
2026-10-01Wassil Jim
EVP, Chief Scientific Ofc, COO
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
95$57.09 $5.4K145,435 SEC
2026-09-09Wassil Jim
EVP, Chief Scientific Ofc, COO
Open-market sale 1,334$59.52 $79.4K145,435 SEC
2026-09-08Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Shares withheld for tax 17,056$60.36 $1.0M429,902 SEC
2026-09-08Guggenhime Andrew
PRESIDENT AND CFO
Shares withheld for tax 7,155$60.36 $431.9K95,316 SEC
2026-09-08Dhaliwal Harpreet S.
Chief Technical Ops Officer
Shares withheld for tax 7,651$60.36 $461.8K68,085 SEC
2026-09-08Cowan Elvia
SVP, Finance & CAO
Shares withheld for tax 1,327$60.36 $80.1K27,860 SEC
2026-09-08Wassil Jim
EVP, Chief Scientific Ofc, COO
Shares withheld for tax 5,459$60.36 $329.5K146,769 SEC
2026-09-04Wassil Jim
EVP, Chief Scientific Ofc, COO
Open-market sale 1,381$61.16 $84.5K152,228 SEC
2026-09-04Jodar Luis
Chief Medical Officer
Grant/award 52,632— —52,632 SEC
2026-09-02Wassil Jim
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Shares withheld for tax 1,432$61.58 $88.2K153,609 SEC
2026-09-02Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Shares withheld for tax 3,427$61.58 $211.0K446,958 SEC
2026-09-02Guggenhime Andrew
PRESIDENT AND CFO
Shares withheld for tax 1,432$61.58 $88.2K102,471 SEC
2026-09-02Dhaliwal Harpreet S.
Chief Technical Ops Officer
Shares withheld for tax 659$61.58 $40.6K75,736 SEC
2026-09-02Cowan Elvia
SVP, Finance & CAO
Shares withheld for tax 326$61.58 $20.1K29,187 SEC
2026-09-01Wassil Jim
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Open-market sale 303$61.42 $18.6K155,041 SEC
2026-09-01Wassil Jim
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Option exercise 2,250$5.35 $12.0K158,518 SEC
2026-09-01Wassil Jim
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Open-market sale 1,537$60.89 $93.6K156,981 SEC
2026-09-01Wassil Jim
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Open-market sale 713$61.48 $43.8K156,268 SEC
2026-09-01Wassil Jim
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Open-market sale 924$60.96 $56.3K155,344 SEC
2026-08-31Wassil Jim
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Shares withheld for tax 1,273$60.74 $77.3K156,268 SEC
2026-08-31Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Shares withheld for tax 2,862$60.74 $173.8K450,385 SEC
2026-08-31Guggenhime Andrew
PRESIDENT AND CFO
Shares withheld for tax 1,273$60.74 $77.3K103,903 SEC
2026-08-31Dhaliwal Harpreet S.
Chief Technical Ops Officer
Shares withheld for tax 361$60.74 $21.9K76,395 SEC
2026-08-31Cowan Elvia
SVP, Finance & CAO
Shares withheld for tax 243$60.74 $14.8K29,513 SEC
2026-08-05Dhaliwal Harpreet S.
Chief Technical Ops Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
17,000$55.00 $935.0K76,756 SEC
2026-08-05Dhaliwal Harpreet S.
Chief Technical Ops Officer
Option exercise
10b5-1 plan
17,000$24.79 $421.4K93,756 SEC
2026-08-03Wassil Jim
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Option exercise
10b5-1 plan
2,250$5.35 $12.0K159,791 SEC
2026-08-03Wassil Jim
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
861$53.50 $46.1K158,930 SEC
2026-08-03Wassil Jim
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
1,389$54.09 $75.1K157,541 SEC
2026-08-03Guggenhime Andrew
PRESIDENT AND CFO
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
6,956$53.76 $374.0K108,220 SEC
2026-08-03Guggenhime Andrew
PRESIDENT AND CFO
Option exercise
10b5-1 plan
10,000$5.35 $53.5K115,176 SEC
2026-08-03Guggenhime Andrew
PRESIDENT AND CFO
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
3,044$54.18 $164.9K105,176 SEC
2026-07-27Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Option exercise
10b5-1 plan
16,198$2.03 $32.9K469,445 SEC
2026-07-27Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
622$55.54 $34.5K133,593 SEC
2026-07-27Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
244$55.96 $13.7K133,215 SEC
2026-07-27Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
756$55.52 $42.0K133,459 SEC
2026-07-27Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
4,415$55.93 $246.9K453,247 SEC
2026-07-27Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
11,783$55.52 $654.2K457,662 SEC
2026-07-27Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
378$55.91 $21.1K133,215 SEC
2026-07-06Guggenhime Andrew
PRESIDENT AND CFO
Option exercise
10b5-1 plan
10,000$5.35 $53.5K114,395 SEC
2026-07-06Guggenhime Andrew
PRESIDENT AND CFO
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
2,087$57.76 $120.5K104,395 SEC
2026-07-06Guggenhime Andrew
PRESIDENT AND CFO
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
7,913$57.16 $452.3K106,482 SEC
2026-07-01Wassil Jim
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Option exercise
10b5-1 plan
516$5.35 $2.8K159,010 SEC
2026-07-01Wassil Jim
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
6$57.82 $347156,760 SEC
2026-07-01Wassil Jim
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
456$57.47 $26.2K156,766 SEC
2026-07-01Wassil Jim
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
1,788$56.03 $100.2K157,222 SEC
2026-06-26Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
207$54.22 $11.2K135,008 SEC
2026-06-26Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
602$55.30 $33.3K134,406 SEC
2026-06-26Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
191$56.27 $10.7K134,215 SEC
2026-06-26Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
6,683$54.28 $362.8K468,020 SEC
2026-06-26Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
9,137$55.27 $505.0K458,883 SEC
2026-06-26Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
6,417$56.12 $360.1K452,466 SEC
2026-06-26Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
312$54.35 $17.0K134,903 SEC
2026-06-26Pickering Grant
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
356$55.23 $19.7K134,547 SEC

Showing the 60 most recent of 78 transactions.

Well-known investors holding PCVX (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
D. E. Shaw & Co. COM2026-06-301,901,872$110.6M0.07%Reduced 34%
Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) COM2026-06-30620,401$36.1M—Sold out
Two Sigma Investments COM2026-06-30273,876$15.9M0.01%Added 146%
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM2026-06-30136,625$7.9M0.01%Reduced 53%
Bridgewater Associates COM2026-06-3050,217$2.9M0.01%Added 289%
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COM2026-06-3034,563$2.0M0.0%Added 36%
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-3019,634$1.1M0.0%Reduced 64%
Baupost Group (Seth Klarman) COM2026-06-30800,000$46.5K—Sold out

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when PCVX files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.