PRDO 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
PERDOCEO EDUCATION Corp · Nasdaq · Services-Educational Services · CIK 1046568 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “"Business - Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation - Eligibility and Certification by the Department," for more information.”
New heading “Recent changes to federal student loan programs that reduce annual, aggregate, and lifetime borrowing limits may limit students’ ability to finance their education and materially reduce enrollments.”
New heading “Elevated cohort default rates could result in operational restrictions or loss of Title IV eligibility and materially adversely affect our business.”
New heading “See Item 1, “Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation – Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations – Student Loan Cohort Default Rates.””
New heading “See Item 1, “Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation – Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations – Fraudulent Applications for Enrollment and Financial Aid.””
New heading “Our use of artificial intelligence may subject us to increased compliance obligations and legal risk.”
New heading “We cannot guarantee that our share repurchase program will be utilized to the full value approved or that it will enhance long-term stockholder value. Repurchases we consummate could increase the volatility of the price of our common stock and could have a negative impact on our available cash balance.”
Largest changes
“See Item 1, “Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation – Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations – Student Loan Cohort Default Rates.””see in full comparison
“In addition, as AI becomes increasingly prevalent in our operations, we will have increased risk of disputes over the ownership or use of AI-generated content, as well as the risk of inadvertently infringing on third-party intellectual property rights. The intellectual property landscape for AI is evolving, and new laws, regulations or interpretations may create further uncertainty or increase the likelihood of such claims. …”see in full comparison
“Elevated cohort default rates could result in operational restrictions or loss of Title IV eligibility and materially adversely affect our business.”see in full comparison
“Federal student loan repayment was suspended for an extended period beginning in 2020, during which defaults could not occur, resulting in historically low cohort default rates for affected repayment cohorts. In September 2025, the Department released official three-year cohort default rates for the 2022 cohort, which were 0% for each of our academic institutions. …”see in full comparison
“See Item 1, “Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation – Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations – Fraudulent Applications for Enrollment and Financial Aid.””see in full comparison
“"Business - Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation - Eligibility and Certification by the Department," for more information.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (125)
As a provider of postsecondary education and a participant in federal and state programs providing financial assistance to students, we are subject to extensive laws and regulationregulations at both the federal and state levelslevels, as well as by accrediting agencies. These requirements cover virtually all aspects of our business.
In particular, the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (“HEA”), authorizes participation in Title IV Programs and subjects participants to extensive regulations by the Department, state education authorizing agencies, and accrediting agencies. Our institutions’ participation in education assistance programs administered by the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs also subjects us to oversight by those agencies. In addition, other federal agencies such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and various state agencies and state attorneys general enforce a broad range of consumer protection and other laws applicable to activities of postsecondary educational institutions, such as recruiting, marketing, the protection of personal information, student financing and payment servicing.
Because of these regulatory requirements, we are subject to compliance reviews and audits, as well as claims of noncompliance and lawsuits by government agencies based on claims by students, current and former students or employees and other third parties. These matters often require the expenditure of substantial time and resources to address and, additionally, they may damage our reputation, even if such actions are eventually determined to be without merit. For example, the Department has broad powers to request information and review records of an institution participating in Title IV Programs. These requests can be open-ended and do not necessarily relate to any specific allegations of wrongdoing or assert any compliance failures of any kind. We received such a request from the Department in December 2021. The inquiry was subsequently closed in January 2025 without any findings. Due process safeguards and protections for institutions subjected to this type of information request are limited to the Department’s interpretation of the boundaries of its authority over institutions participating in Title IV programs.Programs.
The Department, under the Biden Administration, took an ever-expanding view on its authority over the administration of Title IV programs,Programs, institutionsinstitutions, and loans, including overruling or ignoring a number of historical precedents and due process safeguards. The Department partnered with advocacy groups critical of the for-profit education sector in numerous aspects of its agenda, which have lobbied for targeting the sector and our schools. The postsecondary education regulatory environment mayhas change in the futurechanged as a result of the U.S. federal election in November 2024. The new Presidential Administration and new Congress may act to change or eliminate currently effective ED regulations and final ED regulations that have been promulgated but are not yet effective.
In July 2025, President Trump signed into law a reconciliation bill, H.R. 1 (P.L. 1119-21), sometimes referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the “Reconciliation Act”), that made broad changes to many areas of federal spending. The Reconciliation Act includes a number of changes to federal student aid programs under the HEA, including eliminating Grad PLUS loans for new graduate and professional students, imposing new annual and lifetime borrowing limits across multiple loan programs, establishing an earnings-based accountability requirement for federal loans that applies equally to all higher education institutions, and adopting new loan repayment options. The changes generally take effect beginning July 1, 2026, and apply prospectively to new borrowers, however some of the changes require regulations to be promulgated by the Department.
For more information, see Item 1, “Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation” for more information on changes to federal student aid programs.
In addition to responding to compliance reviews andreviews, audits and other informational requests, we have hadsettled significant matters pending against us in the past which have resulted in the payment of significant amounts to settle the matters and our agreement to ongoing compliance and operational oversight. In this regard, seeSee Item I,1, “Business – Accreditation, State Regulation and Other Compliance Matters – Other Compliance Matters,” for discussion of agreements undertaken in connection with several matters resolved in recent years.
Compliance with reviews andreviews, audits and applicable laws, regulations, standards or policies may impose significant burdens and a failure to comply could result in substantial financial penalties, severe restrictions on or closure of our operations, loss of federal and state financial aid funding for our students, or loss of authorization to operate our institutions.institutions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
“Gainful Employment”Accountability regulations may subject us to significant disclosures and limitations, including program closures, which could materially reduce the enrollments and revenue at our institutions and negatively impact our future growth.
Federal accountability regulations governing eligibility for Title IV student financial aid impose program-level accountability standards and disclosure obligations that could result in required warnings to students, limitations, or loss of federal aid eligibility, or required program closures. These requirements include: the existing Gainful Employment (“GE”) rule, which applies only to proprietary institutions and to certain non-degree programs at other institutions; a statutory earnings premium measure that applies to all degree programs at all institutions; and a proposed revision to the GE rule that would apply the statutory earnings premium as the sole GE measure. Collectively, these requirements could materially and adversely affect programs offered by AIUS, CTU and USAHS, and our enrollments, revenues, operating results and growth prospects.
For a discussion of the Department’s October 2023 GE and Financial Value Transparency (“FVT”) regulations, see Item 1, “Business - Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation - Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations - Gainful Employment and Financial Value Transparency.”
The Reconciliation Act established an earnings premium measure that applies to all degree programs at all institutions that participate in the Direct Loan Program. Through the Accountability in Higher Education and Access through Demand-driven Workforce Pell (“AHEAD”) rulemaking, the Department has proposed regulations to implement that statutory earnings premium measure and to harmonize the existing GE framework with that statutory earnings premium measure, including by eliminating the current debt-to-earnings metric. Under the proposal, covered programs at participating institutions would be evaluated under an earnings-premium measure that compares program-level median earnings to statutory benchmarks, rather than under the existing GE rule’s dual metrics applicable to proprietary institutions. Programs that repeatedly fail the statutory measure or the new GE requirements would lose eligibility to participate in the Direct Loan Program, but, unlike the current GE rule, this failure would not generally by itself terminate Pell Grant eligibility.
To implement the statutory approach, the Department’s proposal would: (i) eliminate the debt-to-earnings metric in the GE rule; (ii) establish earnings premium thresholds based on reference to statutory benchmarks; and (iii) narrow institutional reporting obligations to data needed to calculate the earnings-premium measure and produce required net-price disclosures. In addition, the proposal would shorten the period of ineligibility for programs that fail the earnings-premium measure from three years to two years and revise required student warning requirements to track statutory notice language. Finally, the Department would expand its administrative capability authority for institutions with persistent low-earning program outcomes. An institution would be deemed administratively incapable if, in two of three consecutive award years, at least half of its Title IV aid recipients or Title IV funds are tied to programs that fail applicable earnings thresholds, resulting in provisional certification and Title IV ineligibility for the affected programs.
These proposals have not yet been implemented through final regulations and may be revised, delayed or not adopted. We continue to evaluate the potential impact of the new earnings-premium requirement and to monitor the ongoing rulemaking process. Given the complexity of the statutory and regulatory framework, the absence of final implementing regulations, and limited visibility into the underlying earnings data used to calculate the applicable metrics, we are unable to predict the timing or ultimate impact of these requirements on our business. Any failure to comply with applicable accountability requirements, including the existing GE rule or a final earnings premium rule, or an expansion of accountability standards, disclosure obligations, or adverse program-level determinations, could result in limitations or loss of Title IV eligibility and materially and adversely affect our student enrollments, profitability, business viability, financial condition and results of operations.
See Item 1, “Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation -- Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations - Gainful Employment and Financial Value Transparency,” above, for additional information regarding the statutory and regulatory changes to federal accountability standards and related timelines.
On October 10, 2023, the Biden Administration published final regulations for the GE rule. The GE rule includes a Title IV eligibility framework that imposes additional requirements on for-profit sector programs, including our schools. The regulation uses two key metrics: Debt-to-Earnings (“D/E”) and Earnings Premium (“EP”) metrics to determine whether a program prepares students for gainful employment. The D/E metrics measure student debt at a program level against a measure of earnings. The EP metric measures student earnings at a program level against working individuals with a high school diploma or equivalent. GE programs that fail either the D/E or the EP metric in two of three consecutive years will lose Title IV eligibility. Programs offered by AIUS, CTU and USAHS are subject to the GE Rule and could lose Title IV eligibility if their programs fail to pass the D/E rates and/or the EP measures. The rule also requires our institutions to warn current and prospective students if a program fails any metric in any year. The issuance of required GE warnings could deter prospective students from enrolling at our institutions and current students from continuing in their programs. Significantly, the 2023 GE rule is retroactive in its measurements as it evaluates data from previous student cohorts for the purpose of determining a program’s future Title IV eligibility. It is unclear the impact that state and federal mandated business closures experienced during the COVID pandemic and its resulting economic effects may have on our metrics, as data from this time period is applicable to the metrics.
See “GE and FVT Negotiated Rulemaking” above for information about the timeline of the GE and FVT rules. Given the recent challenges associated with implementation of the rules, we have concerns with the accuracy and effectiveness of the GE and FVT metrics.
Failure to comply with the GE Rule may result in a loss of Title IV eligibility which would materially impact student enrollments and profitability. It additionally may impact the continued viability of our business. Given the complexity of the rules and the lack of clarity, transparency and other challenges with the reporting and collection of the data, we are unable to determine the impact of the regulations on our business at this time.
Our institutions could lose their eligibility to participate in federal student financial aid programs, face significant limitations on their ability to serve new or former students or have other limitations placed upon them if the percentage of their revenues derived from certain federal programs is too high.
Our institutions, like all proprietary institutions of higher education, are subject to the “90-10 Rule” under the HEA. Under this rule, a proprietary institution will be ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs for at least two fiscal years if, for any two consecutive fiscal years, it derives more than 90% of its cash basis revenue, as defined in the rule, from federal funds, including Title IV Program funds or other qualifying federal funding sources, including tuition assistance programs offered by the U.S. Department of Defense (military tuition assistance) and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (veterans education benefits).
Under revised regulations effective for calendar year 2023, any of our institutions may lose eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs if, on modified cash basis accounting, the percentage of the cash receipts derived from federal funding programs for two consecutive fiscal years is greater than 90%. The Department specified the sources of federal funding to be included in the 90-10 Rule in mid-December 2022, well after a substantial majority of students for the upcoming 2023 calendar year, a majority of those students which were in the process of continuing through their program, had already enrolled and elected financing for upcoming classes. Federal funding now includes tuition assistance under the Title IV program as well as tuition assistance benefits provided to members of the military and veterans as well as a significant number of other federal programs supporting higher education and training. Under this modified 90-10 Rule, an institution that derives more than 90% of its cash receipts from federal funding sources for any fiscal year will be placed on provisional participation status for its next two fiscal years and is required to issue notices to existing students about the potential loss of Title IV funding. The issuance of any required notice could deter prospective students from enrolling at our institutions and current students from continuing in their programs. We have substantially no control over the amount of Title IV student loans and grants, military or veteran education benefits, or other federal education assistance funds sought by or awarded to our students and given the significant existing student populations at our institutions when these rules were adopted, the 90-10 Rule operates retroactively to capture the significant federal funding those students were already utilizing and entitled to.
Additionally,An weinstitution maythat notderives knowmore atthan 90% of its cash receipts from qualifying federal funding sources for any fiscal year will be placed on provisional participation status for its next two fiscal years and must provide notices to existing students about the timepotential loss of receiptTitle thatIV fundingfunding. used by a student was derived from a federal program. In addition, ifIf the institution violates the 90-10 Rule for two consecutive fiscal years and becomes ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs, but continues to disburse Title IV Program funds, the Department would require the repayment of all Title IV Program funds received by it after the effective date of the loss of eligibility. The Departmentissuance alsoof notedany required notice could deter prospective students from enrolling at our institutions and current students from continuing in itstheir publication of the new rule that its expectation was to encourage a shift in enrollment away from for-profit schools and toward taxpayer subsidized community colleges. As such, we expect unfavorable treatment from the Department in its interpretations, guidance, and enforcement with regard to institutional compliance.programs.
Several factorsWe have adverselylimited impactedability ourto 90-10control percentagesthe inamount recent years, including increases inof Title IV Program aidfunds, availabilitymilitary includingor year-roundveteran Pelleducation Grantbenefits, or other federal funds andsought budgetby reductionsor for state grant programs, workforce training programs, and other funding programs. We expect this negative trendawarded to continue.our students. Additionally, the lack of visibility into federal fund sources that students utilize, the timing of the identification of the federal fund sources applicable to the 90-10 Rule, and the lack of clarity regarding the definition of federal funds which funds count in the “10”, as well as other technical aspects of the calculation methodology, and interest levels and variability in the timing of receipts of future cash payments made for allowable non-Title IV programs offered by our institutions, all make it difficult to predict future compliance with the 90-10 Rule. WeAlthough we have implemented various measures intended to reduce the percentage of our institutions’ cash basis revenue attributable to designated federal funding sources, including efforts to diversify the sources of our revenue. However,revenue, these measures may not be adequatesufficient to preventensure our compliance with the 90-10 Rule and may not be sufficient to allow our institutions to serve degree-seeking prospective students atin the same rates as we have historically, or may require limiting the type or volume of new students we enroll or programs we offer.future. We may be required to modify our business operations, including reducing our investments in prospective student outreachoutreach, recruitment, and recruitment,enrollment growth in order to preserve Title IV eligibility for our existing students’ ability to continue benefitting from financial assistance for their education pursuant to Title IV Programs. For example, in 2023, we materially reduced prospective student enrollment, marketing and outreach processes at AIUS during the year to limit the volume of new federal funding that the institution would receive to preserve available funding for existing students. Any necessary business changes could materially impact our revenue, operating costs and opportunities for growth. Furthermore, these business changes could make more difficult our ability to comply with other important regulatory requirements.
The ability of our institutions to comply with the 90-10 Rule will depend upon the composition of our future student population and their personal circumstances, as well as on regulatory changes and other factors outside of our control, including those cited above.
WhileIn addition to the Departmentconsequences maydescribed attempt to impose additional sanctions on institutions that failabove, the 90-10 Rule, but there is only limited precedent available to determine their legality or predict what those additional sanctions might be. For example, the new financial responsibility rule, discussed further below, imposes a mandatory triggerconsequences for failure to comply withfor one year of the 90-10 Rule. ItA wouldone-year requireviolation triggers a minimumrequirement to provide financial protection ofequal to at least 10 percent of the previousinstitution’s year’sprior-year Title IV funds.funding, Thiswhich protection wouldmust remain in place until the institution passes the 90-10 Rule for two consecutive fiscal years. The Department has discretion to impose a wide range of additional conditions as part of its provisional certification and the institutions' continued participation in Title IV Programs.certification. These conditions may include,include but are not limited to: restrictions on the total amount of Title IV Program funds that may be distributed to students attending the institutions; restrictions on programmatic, enrollment, and geographic expansion; requirements to obtain and post letters of credit; and additional reporting requirements to include additional interim financial or enrollment reporting.
If any of our institutions were to lose eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs due to violation of the prior or modified 90-10 Rule, the institution would experience a dramatic decline in revenue and would be unable to continue its business as it currently is conducted. EffortsPast and future efforts to reducemanage compliance with the 90-10 Rule percentage for our institutions have and may inrequire the future involve taking measuresactions that reduce our revenue, increase our operating expensesexpenses, or involverely on interpretations of the 90-10 Rule or other Title IV regulations that are without clear precedentprecedent, (or allany of thewhich foregoing,could inmaterially eachand caseadversely perhapsaffect significantly).our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The extensive and evolving regulatory requirements applicable to our business may change, in particular as a result of the scrutiny of the for-profit postsecondary education sectorsector, which could require us to make substantial changes to our business, reduce our profitability and make compliance more difficult.
Our business is subject to extensive federal, state, and accreditor regulatory requirements that change frequently, are subject to differing interpretations, and may be applied retroactively or differently over time. Regulatory interpretations may also shift as a result of changes in presidential administrations or agency leadership. As a result, compliance obligations applicable to our institutions may become more complex, burdensome, or costly, and may require material changes to our operations.
In recent years, the Department has adopted or revised numerous regulations affecting Title IV participation, including the Financial Value Transparency and Gainful Employment Rule, financial responsibility, administrative capability, the 90-10 Rule, distance education and certification regulations. Depending on the rule, these regulations became effective, or are scheduled to become effective, on July 1 of 2023, 2024 or 2026.
In July 2025, President Trump signed into law the Reconciliation Act, which made broad changes to federal spending, including significant amendments to federal student programs under the HEA. Among other things, the Act eliminates and replaces Grad PLUS loans for new graduate and professional students, imposes new annual and lifetime borrowing limits across multiple loan programs, establishing a new earnings-based eligibility requirement for federal student loans that applies equally to all higher education institutions, and adopts new loan repayment options. The changes generally take effect beginning July 1, 2026, and apply prospectively to new borrowers. Some of the changes are the subject of current rulemaking by the Department. For more information, see Item 1, “Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation” for more information on changes to federal student aid programs We anticipate that a number of other regulatory changes may be forthcoming. We have been operating with dramatic shifts in regulatory approaches across different presidential administrations, resulting in a significant number of regulations being adopted, subsequently rescinded, or revised, then re-adopted.
The HEA governs the federal government’s support of postsecondary education and requires periodic reauthorization by Congress, which last occurred in 2008. The reauthorization of the HEA historically has resulted in significant changes to program requirements and institutional participation in Title IV Programs. Additionally, funding levels for student financial assistance programs are determined annually through the appropriations process and may be affected by broader federal budgetary or policy priorities. See Item 1, “Business—Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation—Legislative Action and Recent Department Regulatory Initiatives,” for more information about the reauthorization of the HEA.
The regulations, standards and policies of our regulators change frequently and are subject to interpretation, and interpretations may change over time or due to changes in presidential administrations. In particular, the Department under the Biden Administration promulgated a number of new regulations that depending on the date of publication became effective or will be effective on July 1, 2023, 2024 and 2026, including the Financial Value Transparency and Gainful Employment Rule, and revised financial responsibility, administrative capability, 90-10, distance education and certification rules. We have been operating with dramatic shifts in regulatory approaches across different presidential administrations, resulting in a significant number of regulations being adopted, subsequently rescinded or revised, then re-adopted. While President Trump’s previous priorities are apparent by actions taken in his first term, we have limited information on the priorities for private postsecondary education for his second term. We anticipate a number of regulatory changes may be forthcoming.
The Higher Education Act guides the federal government’s support of postsecondary education. The U.S. Congress is required to periodically reauthorize the Higher Education Act and other laws governing Title IV Programs and annually determines the funding level for each Title IV Program. Congress last reauthorized the Higher Education Act in 2008. The reauthorization of the Higher Education Act results in a change in the requirements for existing programs and its participation in Title IV programs. Additionally, funding for student financial assistance programs may be impacted during appropriations and budget actions. See Item 1, “Business—Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation—Legislative Action and Recent Department Regulatory Initiatives,” for more information about the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. In recent years, Congress, the Department, states, accrediting agencies, the CFPB, the FTC, state attorneys general, consumer advocacy groups, and the media have scrutinized the for-profit postsecondary education sector. See Item 1, “Business - Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation - Scrutiny of the For-Profit Postsecondary Education Sector,” for more information about the focus on our industry. This scrutiny andhas effortsresulted of the Biden Administration led toin significant regulatory changes and increased enforcement efforts designed to target and limit for-profit postsecondary education. See Item 1, “Business - Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation - Legislative Action and Recent Department Regulatory Initiatives,” for an overview of regulatory initiatives by the Department. OngoingIn addition, ongoing efforts by activistsstates and activist groups to change state authorization regulations, State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement ("SARA") reciprocity rules, and other state-by-state standards could further increase regulatory compliance burdens onand operational complexity related to our business. See Item 1, “Business - Accreditation, State Regulation and Other Compliance Matters - State Regulation,” for more information about state regulation and SARA.
As in the past, recent and future regulatory changes—whether arising from legislation, rulemaking, enforcement actions, or shifts in regulatory interpretation—may have significant impacts on our business, potentially requiring a large number of operational changes, changes to and elimination of certain educational programs, or other fundamental changes to our business. These actions maycould reduce our student enrollments and profitability or limit our ability to maintain or grow our business. These recent and future regulatory changes may also make compliance with regulatory requirements even more complex and difficult.
A failure to demonstrate "financial responsibilityresponsibility," or "administrative capability" or meet new "certification" requirements would have negative impacts on our operations.
See Item 1, “Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation -- Negotiated Rulemaking: Financial Responsibility,” “Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation -- Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations,” “Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation -- Negotiated Rulemaking: Administrative Capability” and “Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation -- Negotiated Rulemaking: Certification Procedures” above for an overview of the current rules relating to the financial responsibility, administrative capability and certification procedures.
If our institutions fail to maintain financial responsibility or administrative capability, they could lose their eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs, have that eligibility adversely conditioned or be subject to similar negative consequences under accreditor and state regulatory requirements, which would have a material adverse effect on our operations. In particular, limitations on participation in Title IV Programs resulting from the failure to demonstrate financial responsibility or administrative capability could materially reduce the enrollments and revenue at the impacted institution, and a termination of participation would cause a dramatic decline in revenuerevenue, and we would be unable to continue our business as it currently is conducted.
See theItem 1, “Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation -- Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations” above for an overview of the current rules relating to Borrower Defense to Repayment.
Federal “borrower defense to repayment” regulations, including closed school loan discharge provisions, permit the discharge of certain federal student loans under specified circumstances and may result in the assertion of repayment liability against institutions for discharged amounts. In addition, these regulations may require institutions to post letters of credit or other forms of financial protection, which could restrict liquidity and limit our ability to make investments in our business.
We cannot predict the impacteffect variousthat current or future borrower defense toand repaymentloan discharge regulations will have on student enrollments, the volume of claims submitted by borrowers for loan discharge (including closed school discharge claims), the number or amount of claims for loan discharge the Department approves, the amountextent ofto discharged loanswhich the Department assertsmay weseek haveto repaymentrecover liabilitydischarged for,loan amounts from us, our future financial responsibility as determined by the Department, or any sanctionssanctions, conditions, or otherenforcement actions that may be taken or imposed by the Department might take against our institutions based on loans discharged, allincluding any requirement to post a letter of whichcredit. Any such developments could berequire significant cash outlays, increase compliance costs, constrain capital resources, and materially adverseand toadversely affect our business.business, financial condition, results of operations, and future growth.
AnOur institutioninstitutions must bemaintain accreditedinstitutional byaccreditation from an accrediting agency recognized by the Department in order to participate in Title IV Programs. See Item 1, “Business – Accreditation, Jurisdictional Authorizations and Other Compliance Matters – Institutional Accreditation.” The failureFailure to comply with applicable accreditation standards subjectsmay subject an institution to additional oversight and reporting requirements, adverse accreditation proceedingsactions, such as aincluding show-cause directive,directives, anprobation, action to deferdeferral or deny action related to an institution's application for a new grantdenial of accreditation,accreditation anactions, actionsuspension toor suspendloss of an institution's accreditation or a program's approval, or other negative actions. Future inquiries or actions by state or federal agencies could negatively impact our accreditation status. If our institutions or programs are subject to accreditation actions or are placed on probationary or other negative accreditation status, we may experience adverse publicity, impaired ability to attract and retain students and substantial expense to obtain unqualified accreditation status. The inability to obtain reaccreditation following periodic reviews or any final loss of institutional accreditation after exhaustion of the administrative agency processes would result in a loss of Title IV Program funds for the affected institution and its students. In addition, if an accrediting body of our institutions loses recognition by the Department, that institution could lose its ability to participate in Title IV Programs. See Item 1, "Business - Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation - Eligibility and Certification by the Department," for more information.
If any of our institutions or programs were to be subject to negative accreditation actions or placed on probationary or other negative accreditation status, we could experience adverse publicity, impaired ability to attract and retain students, increased compliance costs, and substantial expense to restore good standing. The inability to obtain reaccreditation following periodic reviews or any final loss of institutional accreditation after exhaustion of the administrative agency processes would result in a loss of Title IV Program funds for the affected institution and its students. In addition, if an accrediting agency that accredits one of our institutions were to lose recognition by the Department, that institution could lose its ability to participate in Title IV Programs. See Item 1,
"Business - Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation - Eligibility and Certification by the Department," for more information.
ManyIn statesaddition to institutional accreditation, many states, licensing bodies, and professional associations require professionalcertain educational programs to be accredited.accredited by specialized accrediting agencies. While programmatic accreditation alone is not a sufficient basis to qualify for institutional Title IV Program certification, programmatic accreditationit may be a prerequisiterequired for graduates to obtain professional licensure or improve employment opportunities of program graduates in their chosen field. Those of our programs that do not have such programmatic accreditation, where available, or fail to maintain such accreditation, particularly in programs in the health sciences field, may experience adverse publicity, declining enrollments, litigation or other claims from students or suffer other adverse impacts, which could result in it being impractical for us to continue offering such programs.
Recent changes to federal student loan programs that reduce annual, aggregate, and lifetime borrowing limits may limit students’ ability to finance their education and materially reduce enrollments.
The Reconciliation Act made significant changes to federal student loan programs under the HEA, including imposing new annual, aggregate, and lifetime borrowing limits across multiple loan programs and eliminating or restricting certain loan options previously available to graduate and professional students. Many of these changes are scheduled to take effect beginning July 1, 2026, and generally apply prospectively to new borrowers, subject to further implementation through Department regulations.
These changes may materially reduce the amount of Title IV Program loan funding available to students seeking to enroll in, continue, or complete their educational programs. Students who are unable to access sufficient federal loan funds may be required to rely more heavily on personal savings, private loans, employer assistance, or other sources of financing, which may be unavailable, more expensive, or less predictable. As a result, some prospective students may choose not to enroll, delay enrollment, enroll part-time, select shorter or lower-cost programs, or discontinue their studies before completion.
Reduced borrowing capacity may have a disproportionate impact on students enrolled in longer-duration, higher-cost, in-person or graduate-level programs, as well as on students with limited financial resources. In addition, uncertainty regarding the availability of federal loan funding, evolving regulatory guidance, or changes in borrower eligibility may negatively affect student decision-making and demand for our programs.
Any sustained reduction in students’ ability or willingness to finance their education through federal loan programs could materially reduce student enrollments, persistence and completion rates, increase price sensitivity, and adversely affect our revenue, operating results, and growth prospects. We cannot predict the extent to which these loan program changes, individually or in combination with other regulatory developments, will affect student behavior or our institutions’ enrollment trends.
See Item 1, "Business - Legislative Action and Recent Department Regulatory Initiatives – 2025 Negotiated Rulemakings,” for more information.
Elevated cohort default rates could result in operational restrictions or loss of Title IV eligibility and materially adversely affect our business.
Our institutions’ eligibility to participate in Title IV student financial aid programs is subject to cohort default rate (“CDR”) requirements, which measure the percentage of former students who default on federally funded student loans during a three-year measurement period after entering repayment. If an institution’s three-year CDR exceeds specified thresholds, it may be required to delay loan disbursements, implement default prevention measures, or, in more severe cases, lose eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs.
Federal student loan repayment was suspended for an extended period beginning in 2020, during which defaults could not occur, resulting in historically low cohort default rates for affected repayment cohorts. In September 2025, the Department released official three-year cohort default rates for the 2022 cohort, which were 0% for each of our academic institutions. However, repayment resumed in October 2023, accompanied by a temporary repayment “on-ramp,” evolving income-driven repayment options, and significant operational challenges affecting federal loan servicers, including borrower communication issues and limited outreach to delinquent borrowers. The combined effects of the resumption of repayment, servicer disruptions, changes to repayment plans, litigation affecting repayment options, and borrower behavior following extended relief periods create uncertainty regarding future repayment performance. The Department has cautioned that default rates across the higher education sector may increase as temporary relief measures expire, and recent data indicate that repayment performance for loans re-entering repayment has been weaker than historical norms.
As a result, our cohort default rates beginning with the 2024 cohort may increase significantly from historically low levels until repayment behavior and servicing conditions stabilize. Any sustained increase in cohort default rates could subject our institutions to additional oversight, operational restrictions, or loss of Title IV eligibility and could materially and adversely affect our student enrollments, financial condition, results of operations, and business prospects.
See Item 1, “Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation – Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations – Student Loan Cohort Default Rates.”
If our institutions fail to maintain adequate systems and processes to detect and prevent fraudulent activity in student enrollment and financial aid, our institutions may lose the ability to participate in Title IV programs,Programs or have participation in these programs conditioned or limited.
Our institutions must maintain systems and processes to identify and prevent fraudulent applications for enrollment and financial aid. We cannot be certain that our institutions’ systems and processes will continue to be adequate in the face of increasingly sophisticated fraud schemes, or that we will be able to expand such systems and processes at a pace consistent with the changing nature of these fraud schemes. We believe the risk of outside parties attempting to perpetrate fraud in connection with the award and disbursement of Title IV programProgram funds, including as a result of identity theft, is heightened dueat toour beinginstitutions anthat are exclusively online education provider.providers.
The Department requires institutions that participate in Title IV Programs to refer to the Department’s Office of the Inspector General ("OIG") credible information about fraud or other illegal conduct involving Title IV programs.Programs. If the systems and processes that our institutions have established to detect and prevent fraud are inadequate, the Department may find that our institutions do not satisfy the Department’s administrative capability requirements, which could have the adverse effects described in the risk factor captioned “A failure to demonstrate "financial responsibility" or "administrative capability" or meet new "certification" requirements would have negative impacts on our operations.” In addition, our ability to participate in Title IV Programs is conditioned on maintaining accreditation by an accrediting agency that is recognized by the Department. Any significant failure to adequately detect fraudulent activity related to student enrollment and financial aid could cause us to fail to meet accreditors’ standards. Furthermore, accrediting agencies that evaluate institutions offering online programs,programs must require such institutions to have processes through which the institution establishes that a student who registers for such a program is the same student who participates in and receives credit for the program. Failure to meet the requirements of our institutions’ accrediting agencies could result in the loss of accreditation of one or more of our institutions, which could result in their loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs.
See Item 1, “Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation – Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations – Fraudulent Applications for Enrollment and Financial Aid.”
Our agreement with the FTC may lead to unexpected impacts on our student enrollments or higher than anticipated expenses,expenses. aA failure to comply with the agreement may lead to additional enforcement actions and continued scrutinyscrutiny, which may result in additional costs or new enforcement actions.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Depreciation and Amortization Expense”
Removed heading “Goodwill Impairment”
Removed heading “Business Combinations”
Largest changes
“Assumptions and judgment: During the current year, we performed a qualitative assessment for the annual review of goodwill balances for impairment. Management first considered events and circumstances, including business trends and current operating performance, that may affect the fair value of the reporting unit to determine whether it was necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test. …”see in full comparison
“When performing a quantitative assessment for the annual review of goodwill balances for impairment, we estimate the fair value of each of our reporting units based on projected future operating results and cash flows, market assumptions and/or comparative market multiple methods. …”see in full comparison
“Description: Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair market value of identifiable net assets acquired through business purchases. Goodwill often involves estimates based on third-party valuations, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analyses or other valuation techniques. Under ASC Topic 350, we review goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or when an event or other circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the asset below its carrying value, by applying a fair-value-based test. …”see in full comparison
“Impact if actual results differ from assumptions and judgment: Changes in these qualitative and quantitative factors, as well as downturns in economic or business conditions, could have a significant adverse impact on the fair value of our reporting units in relation to their respective carrying values of goodwill and could result in an impairment loss affecting our consolidated financial statements as a whole. …”see in full comparison
“We did not record any goodwill impairment charges during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, and have $258.0 million and $241.2 million of goodwill as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (93)
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The MD&A is intended to help investors understand the results of operations, financial condition and present business environment. The MD&A is organized as follows:
Perdoceo’s accredited academic institutions offer a quality postsecondary education to a diverse student population, with fully online, campus-based and hybrid learning programs. The Company’s academic institutions – Colorado Technical University (“CTU”), the American InterContinental University System (“AIUS” or “AIU System”) and University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences ("USAHS") – provide degree programs from the associate through doctoral level as well as non-degree seeking and professional development programs. Our academic institutions offer students industry-relevant and career-focused academic programs that are designed to meet the educational needs of today’s busy adults. CTU and AIUS continue to show innovation in higher education, advancing personalized learning technologies like their intellipath® learning platform and using data analytics and technology to serve and educate students while enhancing overall learning and academic experiences. USAHS isprepares amongmedical professionals to provide quality medical care to communities across the nation'scountry reputableprimarily universitiesthrough offeringits graduate health sciences degrees,degree primarilyofferings in physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech language therapy and nursing, as well as continuing education programs. Perdoceo's academic institutions are committed to providing quality education that closes the gap between learners who seek to advance their careers and employers and communities needing a qualified workforce.
See Note 1817 “Segment Reporting” for a description of each of our current reporting segments along with revenues, operating incomeincome, significant segment expenses and total assets by reporting segment.
As indicated in “Scrutiny of the For-Profit Postsecondary Education Sector” section,section within Item 1, "Business", the for-profit education industry is scrutinized by various policymakers, regulatory agencies and interest groups. Congressional hearings and roundtable discussions were previously held regarding certain aspects of the education industry, including issues surrounding student debtdebt, as well as publicly reported student outcomes that may be used as part of an institution’s recruiting and admissions practices, and reports were issued that are highly critical of for-profit colleges and universities. Many of the most highly criticized institutions have been closed now for several years. See “Scrutiny of the For-Profit Postsecondary Education Sector” for additional information on this matter.
Adjusted operating income and adjusted earnings per diluted share have limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for net income, operating income, earnings per diluted share, or any other performance measure derived in accordance with and reported under GAAP or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities or as a measure of our liquidity.
We believe certain non-GAAP measures allow us to compare our current operating results with respective historical periods and with the operational performance of other companies in our industry because it does not give effect to potential differences caused by items we do not consider reflective of underlying operating performance. We believe the items we are adjusting for are operating expenses which are not reflective of our underlying business. In evaluating the use of non-GAAP measures, investors should be aware that in the future we may incur expenses similar to the adjustments presented below. Our presentation of non-GAAP measures should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by expenses that are unusual, non-routine or non-recurring. A non-GAAP measure has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for net income, operating income, earnings per diluted share, or any other performance measure derived in accordance with and reported under GAAP or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities or as a measure of our liquidity.
During the year ended December 31, 2025 ("current year"), our academic institutions remained focused on enhancing student experiences and academic outcomes while aligning their academic programs with the current demands of the workforce. Student retention continued to trend near multi-year highs and we made purposeful investments in marketing and admissions to efficiently serve the prospective student interest our academic institutions experienced.
During the year ended December 31, 2024 ("current year"), our academic institutions continued to execute on our goal of changing lives through education and preparing learners for job skills necessary in today’s world. The positive student enrollment results we experienced as of the end of the current year demonstrated the execution on our strategy of prioritizing student experiences and academic outcomes, that we believe, will support sustainable and responsible growth.
On December 2, 2024, the Company completed the acquisition of the University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences ("USAHS"). USAHS is among the nation's reputable universities offering graduate health sciences degrees, primarily in physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech language therapy and nursing, as well as continuing education programs. Founded in 1979, USAHS educates students through its network of campuses in San Marcos, California; St. Augustine and Miami, Florida; and Austin and Dallas, Texas and through its online programs. This strategic acquisition allows us to diversify and significantly expand our academic offerings into the health sciences field, broadening our reach and community impact.
As of December 31, 2025, we experienced total student enrollment growth, supported by continued momentum in student retention and engagement as well as increased interest from prospective students looking to pursue a degree at our academic institutions. Total student enrollments increased 20.0%7.3% at December 31, 20242025 as compared to December 31, 2023,2024, withdriven bothby CTUenrollment andgrowth AIUSat contributingall tothree thisof increase,our alongacademic with the USAHS acquisition.institutions. CTU's total student enrollments increased 8.1%6.6% as compared to the prior year end, drivensupported by studenthigh enrollmentlevels growth within our corporate engagement programs as well as continued improvement in prospective student interest levels,of student retention and engagement, growth within the corporate student engagement.program and strong levels of prospective student interest. Total student enrollments increased 11.8%11.2% at AIUS for the current year end as compared to the prior year endend, driven by an additional academic session during the fourth quarter, as AIUS'well as underlying student retention and engagement trends. Lastly, for USAHS, total student enrollmentenrollments comparabilityincreased had2.6% continued to improve throughfor the current year sinceend revertingas compared to normalized levels of operations at the endprior ofyear 2023.end, primarily driven by growth in programs such as nursing and speech language pathology.
Strategic investments in technology have been strong contributors to enrollment growth across all three of our academic institutions, as it gives our students, faculty and support staff the enhanced resources to support enrollment processes, student experiences and academic outcomes. Additionally, we are continuing to refine our overall marketing, advising, and admissions investments with a focus on optimizing the effectiveness of our student enrollment and support processes. This approach is designed to further enhance student retention and engagement while maintaining a disciplined cost structure.
Through our corporate student programs, we provide accredited degree opportunities to employees of our partner organizations, supporting their career advancement while helping corporate partners strengthen employee development and retention. We continue to make strategic investments in technology and talent to expand these programs.
We expect the strong levels of student retention and student engagement we experienced over the past year, as well as the prospective student interest experienced, to continue into 2026. As a result, full year adjusted operating income is expected to be higher for 2026 as compared to 2025, primarily driven by expected total student enrollment and revenue growth.
We remain focused on further enhancing and supporting student retention and engagement, while making selective investments in student technology, including exploring AI based solutions, and leveraging data analytics to identify and engage with prospective students who are most likely to succeed at one of our academic institutions. We also continued to experience increased efficiencies within our student enrollment and onboarding processes that have been supported by the use of data analytics and technology and we have increased training and development within our admissions and enrollment teams. Lastly, we remained focused on investing in and improving processes that support our corporate engagement programs.
We expect the high levels of student retention and student engagement we experienced in 2024, as well as the prospective student interest experienced in the latter half of 2024, to continue into 2025. While we may see quarterly variability in revenue and student enrollment trends, our assumption is that the impact from the Department student loan initiatives that have ended or are expected to change or end in 2025 will mostly be offset with organic improvements in student retention, student engagement and higher levels of prospective student interest for our academic programs, including growth in corporate engagements. Full year revenue is expected to be higher for 2025 primarily due to the USAHS acquisition as well as growth in revenue and student enrollments within CTU and AIUS.
Revenue for the current year increased by 24.2% or $164.8 million as compared to the prior year, primarily due to an increase of $147.5 million of revenue from the USAHS acquisition which was completed in December 2024 and therefore did not have comparable results in the prior year. CTU also contributed to the increase in revenue due to growth in total student enrollments driven by strong student retention and engagement trends along with increased prospective student interest, while AIUS remained relatively flat as compared to the prior year.
Revenue for the current year decreased by 4.0% or $28.7 million as compared to the prior year, resulting from a decrease in revenue for CTU of 2.6% or $12.0 million and a decrease for AIUS of 11.1% or $26.8 million, which more than offset the revenue of $10.0 million from the USAHS acquisition in December of 2024. The decrease in revenue at CTU was mainly due to simplification of professional development program offerings. Excluding the impact from the simplification of professional development program offerings, 2024 revenue at CTU experienced organic growth. Strong underlying student retention and engagement and an increase in student enrollment from corporate engagements fully offset the negative impact of fewer revenue-earning days during the full year and resulted in this organic revenue growth. The decrease within AIUS was driven by a lag impact on revenue through the first three quarters of 2024 of the operational changes undertaken during 2023, which more than offset the revenue growth in the fourth quarter of 2024 for AIUS.
Operating income for the current year increased by 12.5% to $174.3$196.0 million as compared to operating income of $150.4$174.3 million in the prior year.year, driven by increased operating income within all three of our academic institutions as well as reduced operating losses within Corporate and Other. The increase in operating income for the current year was a result of decreasedrevenue growth and continued management of operating expenses, primarily in the areas of administrative, asset impairment, admissions and academics expenses, which more than offset the decrease in revenue during the current year as compared to the prior year.expenses.
The Company believes it is useful to present non-GAAP financial measures, such as adjusted operating income, which exclude certain significant and non-cash items, as a means to better understand the core performance of its operations. During the current year, the Company no longer adjusts for legal fees associated with certain matters as these amounts are no longer material to the results of operations and, as a result, prior period non-GAAP amounts have been recast to be comparable. (See tables below for a GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation.) Adjusted operating income was $192.2$237.6 million for the current year as compared to $174.9$188.9 million for the prior year. Adjusted operating income for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 is presented below (dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted):
Adjusted operating income and adjusted earnings per diluted share for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 is presented below (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
Legal fee expense associated with (i) responses to the Department relating to borrower defense to repayment applications from former students, and (ii) acquisition efforts.
Non-cash gain associated with the sale of the LCB tradename in exchange for outstanding shares of Perdoceo's stock.
Educational services and facilities expense includes costs attributable to the educational activities of our campuses, including: salaries and benefits of faculty, academic administrators and student support personnel, and costs of educational supplies and facilities, such as rents on leased facilities. Also included in educational services and facilities expense are rents on leased administrative facilities, such as our corporate headquarters, and costs of other goods and services provided by our campuses,services, including costs of textbooks and laptoplaptops, computers.and rents on leased campus and administrative facilities.
General and administrative expense includes operating expenses associated with, including salaries and benefits of personnel in,with corporate and campus administration, marketing, admissions, information technology, financial aid, accounting, human resources, legal and compliance. Other expenses within this expense category include costs of advertising and production of marketing materials and bad debt expense.
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025 ("current year") increased by 24.2% or $164.8 million, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily driven by the acquisition of USAHS, which was completed in December 2024 and therefore not included for the full comparative period of the prior year. Excluding the impact of the USAHS, revenue increased due to higher revenue at CTU as a result of growth in total student enrollments for the current year as compared to the prior year.
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 ("current year") decreased 4.0%, or $28.7 million, primarily due to decreases in revenue from both CTU and AIUS. The decline at AIUS was attributed to the delayed impact on revenue through the first three quarters of 2024 from operational changes made in the previous year. Typically, total student enrollment balances at the end of any given quarter have a delayed effect on revenue in the following quarter. CTU’s decline was driven by adjustments to our professional development program offerings. The current year's revenue benefited from the acquisition completed on December 2, 2024, which was not included in the full comparative period of the prior year.
Educational services and facilities expense for the current year decreasedincreased by 7.3%63.4% or $9.5$76.7 million as compared to the prior year,year. supportedThe byincrease improvementswas inprimarily bothdue academicsto anda studentfull year of expenses related coststo andthe occupancyUSAHS expenses,acquisition as compared to only one month of such expenses in the prior year. Excluding the impact of USAHS, expenses increased slightly, primarily driven by increased academic expenses at CTU to support the growth in total student enrollments.
Academics and student relatedstudent-related costs decreasedincreased by 6.5%54.2%, or $7.8$60.8 millionmillion, and occupancy-related costs increased by 183.7%, or $15.9 million, respectively, as compared to the prior year,year. These increases were primarily dueattributable to operationala changesfull madeyear of expenses related to simplificationUSAHS of professional development offerings. Occupancy expenses forin the current year improved by 16.1% or $1.7 millionyear, as compared to only one month of such expenses in the prior year,year driven by ongoing optimization of leased space.period.
The general and administrative expense for the current year increased by 12.0% or $43.9 million as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a full year of expenses related to the USAHS acquisition as compared to only one month of such expenses in the prior year. Excluding the impact of USAHS, expenses increased by 1.3% or $4.9 million, primarily driven by higher expenses at CTU to support the growth in total student enrollments for the current year as compared to the prior year.
The general and administrative expense for the current year decreased by 7.8% or $31.0 million, compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily driven by lower administrative, admissions and advertising and marketing expenses.
Administrative expense for the current year decreased by 11.9% or $20.3 million as compared to the prior year, primarily driven by operational efficiencies within our academic institutions and decreased legal fees within Corporate and Other for the current year.
Admissions expense decreased by 10.5% or $9.6 million as compared to the prior year. The current year improvement was primarily driven by decreased expenses within both CTU and AIUS as a result of operational changes made during the prior year.
The advertisingAdvertising and marketing expense for the current year decreasedincreased by 1.6%11.8% or $1.6$11.9 million as compared to the prior year,year. whichThe increase was driven by adjustments madedue to oura full year of advertising and marketing processesexpenses related to identifythe prospectiveUSAHS studentacquisition interest.in the current year, as compared to only one month of such expenses in the prior year. Excluding the impact of USAHS, advertising and marketing costs decreased slightly as compared to the prior year.
Admissions expense increased by 8.8% or $7.2 million as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily attributable to a full year of admissions expenses related to the USAHS acquisition in the current year, as compared to only one month of such expenses in the prior year. Excluding the impact of USAHS, admissions expenses would have slightly increased as compared to the prior year, primarily due to total student enrollment growth at both CTU and AIUS.
Administrative expense for the current year increased by 19.3% or $29.0 million as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily attributable to a full year of administrative expenses related to the USAHS acquisition in the current year, as compared to only one month of such expenses in the prior year. Excluding the impact of USAHS, administrative expenses would have increased as compared to the prior year, primarily due to non-recurring personnel investments in the current year period.
Bad debt expense decreased by 12.5% or $4.2 million for the current year as compared to the prior year. The improvement for the current year was primarily driven by decreases in bad debt expense at both CTU and AIUS as we experienced stronger student engagement and retention within our academic institutions.
Bad debt expense remained relatively consistent with a slight increase of 1.5% or $0.5 million for the current year as compared to the prior year. We regularly evaluate our reserve rates, which includes a quarterly update of our analysis of historical student receivable collectability based on the most recent data available and a review of current known factors which we believe could affect future collectability of our student receivables, such as the number of students that do not complete the financial aid process. We continue to expect quarterly fluctuations in bad debt expense.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by 184.2% or $27.0 million as compared to the prior year. This increase was primarily driven by amortization associated with intangible assets at USAHS as well as increased depreciation expense for assets within USAHS, including a failed sale lease-back transaction.
Operating income for the current year increased by 15.8%12.5% or $23.8$21.7 million as compared to the prior year. The current yearThis improvement was supportedprimarily driven by lowerincreased operating expenses across most categoriesrevenue, which more than offset the decreaseincreases in revenueoperating expenses, as compared to the prior year. Additionally, asset impairment expense decreased by $9.8 million as compared to the prior year which benefited the current year comparison.
The effective income tax rate for the current year was 26.3% compared to 26.7% for the prior year. The decrease in the effective income tax rate was primarily due a reduction in nondeductible compensation.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded a tax provision of $53.9 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 26.7% as compared to a tax provision of $44.5 million, with an effective rate of 23.1% for the prior year. The prior year provision includes a $4.5 million favorable adjustment related to the tax benefits associated with a previously disclosed prior year ordinary loss attributable to the stock of a worthless subsidiary, which decreased the 2023 effective tax rate by 2.4%.
The summary of segment financial information below should be referenced in connection with a review of the following discussion of our segment results from operations for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024 (dollars in thousands), including comparisons of our year-over-year performance between these years.performance. Please refer to Part II Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20232024 for a discussion of our results for the year ended December 31, 2022,2024, as well as the year-over-year comparison of our 20232024 financial performance to 2022.2023.
The prior year operating results for CTU and AIUS were recast to reflect the transition of Hippo Education from CTU to AIUS.
USAHS includes results of operations beginning on the acquisition date of December 2, 2024. Operating income (loss) for the current year includes $30.3 million of depreciation and amortization expense associated with acquired tangible and intangible assets, as well as finance leases, as compared to $2.5 million in the prior year.
CTU includes results of operations from Coding Dojo beginning on the acquisition date of December 1, 2022.
AIUS includes results of operations from CalSouthern beginning on the acquisition date of July 1, 2022.
USAHS includes results of operations beginning on the acquisition date of December 2, 2024.
CTU. Revenue for the current year increased by 4.1% or $18.2 million as compared to the prior year. The increase was driven by total student enrollment growth of 6.6% at December 31, 2025 as compared to December 31, 2024. CTU's total student enrollment growth was supported by high levels of student retention and engagement, growth in the corporate student program and higher levels of prospective student interest.
CTU. Revenue for the current year decreased by 2.6% or $12.0 million as compared to the prior year. This decline was mainly due to simplification of professional development program offerings at CTU. Excluding the impact from the simplification of professional development program offerings, 2024 revenue at CTU experienced organic growth. Strong underlying student retention and engagement and an increase in student enrollment from corporate engagements fully offset the negative impact of fewer revenue-earning days during the full year and resulted in this organic revenue growth. CTU's total student enrollments increased by 8.1% as of December 31, 2024 as compared to December 31, 2023. This increase was driven by student enrollment growth within our corporate engagement programs as well as continued improvement in prospective student interest levels, student retention and student engagement. CTU's academic calendar may impact the comparability of revenue-earning days and enrollment results in any given quarter, with the impact on revenue and total student enrollments not necessarily having the same magnitude or directional impact.
Current year operating income for CTU increased by 18.9% or $27.3 million as compared to the prior year. The improvement in operating income was driven by lower operating expenses across most categories, partially due to right-sizing of the cost structure to align with more simplified professional development offerings, which more than offset the declines in revenue.
AIUS. Revenue for the current year decreased by 11.1% or $26.8 million as compared to the prior year. This decline was driven by a lag impact through the first three quarters of 2024 from the operational changes made during the latter half of 2023. AIUS' total student enrollments increased by 11.8% as of December 31, 2024 as compared to December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily driven by the return to normalized operating levels starting in late 2023, which contributed to increasing student enrollments throughout 2024.
Current year operating income for AIUSCTU decreasedincreased by 20.1%3.4% or $9.1$5.9 million as compared to the prior year,year. This improvement in operating income was driven by the increase in revenue declinediscussed mentioned aboveabove, which wasmore only partiallythan offset with decreasedincreased operating expenses.expenses to support the student enrollment growth.
AIUS. Revenue for the current year decreased slightly by 0.4% or $0.9 million as compared to the prior year. Total student enrollments increased by 11.2% at December 31, 2025 as compared to December 31, 2024 due to an extra session start in December 2025, which will positively impact revenue into 2026. The slight decrease in revenue is driven by Trident University, as the recent government shutdown disparately impacted this institution.
Current year operating income for AIUS increased by 9.8% or $3.2 million as compared to the prior year, driven by lower operating expenses as compared to the prior year.
USAHS. Revenue for the current year was approximately $10.0$157.6 millionmillion, starting from the acquisition date of December 2, 2024. USAHS reported anwith operating lossincome of approximately $2.6$3.2 millionmillion. Operating income for the fourthcurrent quarteryear partiallyincludes driven$30.3 bymillion of depreciation and amortization expense associated with acquired tangible and intangible assets.assets, as well as finance leases, as compared to $2.5 million in the prior year.
Corporate and Other. This category includes unallocated costs that are incurred on behalf of the entire company. Total Corporate and Other operating loss for the current year improved by 21.4%22.2% or $8.3$6.8 million as compared to the prior year, primarily asdue a result ofto lower legalacquisition-related expenses.
We have identified the accounting policies and estimates listed below as those that we believe require management’s most subjective and complex judgments in estimating the effect of inherent uncertainties. This section should be read in conjunction with Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our audited consolidated financial statements which includes a discussion of these and other significant accounting policies.
Description: Our revenue, which is derived primarily from academic programs taught to students who attend our universities, is generally segregated into two categories: (1) tuition and fees, and (2) other. Tuition and fees represent costs to our students for educational services provided by our universities and are reflected net of scholarships and tuition discounts. Our universities charge tuition and fees at varying amounts and bill students a single charge that covers tuition, certain fees and required program materials, such as textbooks and supplies, which we treat as a single performance obligation. Generally, we bill student tuition at the beginning of each academic term for our degree programs and recognize the tuition as revenue on a straight-line basis over the academic term. As part of a student’s course of instruction, certain fees, such as technology fees and graduation fees, are billed separately to students. These fees are generally earned over the applicable term and are not considered separate performance obligations. We generally bill student tuition upon enrollment for our non-degree professional development programs and recognize the tuition as revenue on a straight-line basis over the length of the offering.
Description: We extend unsecured credit to a portion of the students who are enrolled at our academic institutions for tuition and certain other educational costs. Based upon past experience and judgment, we establish an allowance for credit losses with respect to student receivables which we estimate will ultimately not be collectible. As such, our results from operations only reflect the amount of revenue that is estimated to be reasonably collectible. Our standard student receivable allowance is based on an estimate of lifetime expected credit losses for student receivables. Our estimation methodology considers a number of quantitative and qualitative factors that, based on our collection experience, we believe have an impact on our repayment risk and ability to collect student receivables. Changes in the trends in any of these factors may impact our estimate of the allowance for credit losses. These factors include, but are not limited to: internal repayment history, changes in the current economic, legislative or regulatory environments, internal cash collection forecasts and the ability to complete the federal financial aid process with the student. These factors are monitored and assessed on a regular basis. Overall, our allowance estimation process for student receivables is validated by trendingtrend analysis andof comparingour estimatedcollections and actualwrite-off performance.experience as well as monitoring any emerging factors that we believe impact the ability to collect our student receivables.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
In addition to the information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the reader should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors,” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2026.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “our ability to successfully defend litigation and other claims brought against us; and changes in the overall U.S. economy.”
New heading “Regulatory Update”
New heading “Recent Regulatory Development - Federal Loan Limits”
Largest changes
“our ability to successfully defend litigation and other claims brought against us; and changes in the overall U.S. economy.”see in full comparison
“A number of the programs at USAHS fall into this category of temporarily added “professional programs,” including its Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Nursing and Speech Language Pathology programs. Historically, Title IV borrowing by graduate students at AIUS and CTU has generally fallen within the new graduate-level limits, and borrowing by USAHS students enrolled in its programs has generally fallen within the new professional program-level limits. …”see in full comparison
“As part of the changes, classification as a “professional program” allows post-baccalaureate students enrolled in these programs to borrow up to $50,000 per year (instead of $20,500 per year) and up to a $200,000 aggregate loan limit (instead of a $100,000 aggregate loan limit). The Department’s final regulations included a defined list of qualified “professional programs” and modified the regulatory definition of “professional degree” to include new conditions that programs must satisfy to qualify as professional degree programs eligible for the higher annual and lifetime loan limits. …”see in full comparison
“In American Association of Nurse Practitioners, et al. v. McMahon, No. 1:26-cv-01780 (D.D.C.), the judge issued a stay against the part of the final regulation that adopted additional non-statutory conditions and factors that exclude programs that met the bill’s definition from qualifying as “professional programs.” The rationale was that the statutory text was the clear expression of congressional intent in defining what programs qualified as “professional programs” and the additional factors adopted in the final regulation were not authorized by the bill. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (63)
our continued compliance with and eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, and the regulations thereunder (including the new 90-10,90/10 regulations, and earnings premium, financial responsibility and administrative capability standards prescribed by the U.S. Department of Education (the “Department”)), as well as applicable accreditation standards and state regulatory requirements;
the impact of management changes; and changes in the overall U.S. economy.
our ability to successfully defend litigation and other claims brought against us; and changes in the overall U.S. economy.
We encourage you to review "Regulatory Updates" below, and Item 1, “Business,” and Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 to learn more about our highly regulated industry and related risks and uncertainties.uncertainties, in addition to the MD&A in our 2026 Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
2026 FirstSecond Quarter Overview
During the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 ("current quarter"), our academic institutions remained focused on enhancing student experiences and academic outcomes while aligning their academic programs with the current demands of the workforce. We continued to make purposeful investments in marketing and admissions to efficiently serve prospective student interest in our academic institutions.
Total student enrollments increased 1.9%0.6% at CTU as compared to the prior year quarter end, supported by strong levels of student retention and engagement, growth within the corporate student program and consistent levels of prospective student interest. Offsetting some of these enrollment trends at CTU is an increase in the number of students graduating during 2026 as compared to 2025 as well as record prior year comparisons. Total student enrollments increased 3.1%6.0% at USAHS for the current quarter end as compared to the prior year quarter end, driven by growth in the nursing and speech language pathology programs and the introduction of new modalities for the occupational therapy program, as well as underlying student retention and engagement trends. Lastly, for AIUS, total student enrollments decreased 2.2%1.0% for the current quarter end as compared to the prior year quarter end, driven by a decrease in total student enrollments at Trident University.
Strategic investments in technology continue to improve student experiences across our academic institutions, while enhancing operating effectiveness within our functional areas. Ongoing artificial intelligence efforts focus on our students and classroom learning, as well as enhancing various operating and functional processes. Faculty, where feasible, are utilizing AI in their classrooms with the goal of enabling students to leverage AI both personally and professionally. We are also selectively leveraging generative artificial intelligence to identify and engage with prospective students who, we believe, are more likely to succeed at one of our academic institutions. We remain focused on keeping our programs visible and accessible as search behavior evolves to LLM-based, AI powered searches and are actively updating our content so that it is readily accessible to, and optimized for, AI-powered search, while also investing in our brands to strengthen the visibility of our academic institutions as these AI-engines shape discovery.
We expect full year adjusted operating income to be higher for 2026 as compared to 2025, supported by revenue growth across all our academic institutions, combined with lower operating expenses due to our disciplined expense management and investment philosophy.
Revenue for the current quarter increased by 4.1%1.8% or $8.7$3.8 million to $213.4 million as compared to the prior year quarter, driven by increased revenue at allUSAHS threeand ofCTU. ourUSAHS' academicrevenue institutions.increased 10.2% or $3.8 million and CTU’s revenue increased 4.0%0.9% or $4.7 million, and USAHS' revenue increased 9.8% or $3.8$1.1 million, for the current quarter as compared to the prior year quarter, driven by the increase in total student enrollments at both academic institutions.institutions, partially offset with a decline of 1.8% or $1.0 million at AIUS as compared to the prior year quarter primarily due to non-Title IV and professional development offerings.
Operating income for the current quarter increased by 22.0%6.8% to $63.1$54.9 million as compared to operating income of $51.7$51.4 million in the prior year quarter, driven by increased operating income within allUSAHS threeand of our academic institutions.AIUS. The increase in operating income for the current quarter was a result of revenue growth and continued disciplined management of operating expenses.
The Company believes it is useful to present non-GAAP financial measures, such as adjusted operating income,income and adjusted earnings per diluted share, which exclude certain non-cash items, as a means to better understand the core performance of its operations. (See tables below for a GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation.) Adjusted operating income was $72.5$64.2 million for the current quarter as compared to $63.5$61.5 million for the prior year quarter.
Adjusted operating income and adjusted earnings per diluted share for the quarters and years to date ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 is presented below (dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted):
Regulatory Update
Recent Regulatory Development - Federal Loan Limits
As part of the 2025 reconciliation bill noted above, federal student aid programs were modified to eliminate Grad PLUS loans, subject to some limited grandfathering for existing student borrowers as of July 1, 2026, for students enrolling in graduate and professional programs and to impose new annual and lifetime borrowing limits across the remaining loan programs. A negotiated rulemaking committee reached consensus on November 6, 2025 on an entire package of loan-related changes, including federal student loan limits and the elimination of Grad PLUS loans. Final regulations were published on May 1, 2026, and became effective on July 1, 2026, as directed by the reconciliation bill.
As part of the changes, classification as a “professional program” allows post-baccalaureate students enrolled in these programs to borrow up to $50,000 per year (instead of $20,500 per year) and up to a $200,000 aggregate loan limit (instead of a $100,000 aggregate loan limit). The Department’s final regulations included a defined list of qualified “professional programs” and modified the regulatory definition of “professional degree” to include new conditions that programs must satisfy to qualify as professional degree programs eligible for the higher annual and lifetime loan limits. These new conditions are more restrictive than the terms of the reconciliation bill. As a result, a number of legal actions were filed by various groups in multiple jurisdictions that challenge the regulations as arbitrary and capricious and contrary to the text of the bill.
In American Association of Nurse Practitioners, et al. v. McMahon, No. 1:26-cv-01780 (D.D.C.), the judge issued a stay against the part of the final regulation that adopted additional non-statutory conditions and factors that exclude programs that met the bill’s definition from qualifying as “professional programs.” The rationale was that the statutory text was the clear expression of congressional intent in defining what programs qualified as “professional programs” and the additional factors adopted in the final regulation were not authorized by the bill. While continuing to contest the court’s decision, the Department has published revised guidance implementing the court’s interpretation of an expanded listing of programs that temporarily qualify as professional programs by satisfying the statutory definition, pending the outcome of the litigation.
A number of the programs at USAHS fall into this category of temporarily added “professional programs,” including its Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Nursing and Speech Language Pathology programs. Historically, Title IV borrowing by graduate students at AIUS and CTU has generally fallen within the new graduate-level limits, and borrowing by USAHS students enrolled in its programs has generally fallen within the new professional program-level limits. In planning for the loan limit changes under the Department’s revised definition of professional degree programs, we have worked with private-lending partners to ensure supplemental funding is available for students on an as needed basis in the event the litigation results in these programs being required to revert to the lower “graduate degree” program loan limits. We are closely monitoring each of the ongoing legal challenges to these regulations and their associated impacts on the availability of federal student aid for our students.
For more information, see “Legislative Action and Recent Department Regulatory Initiatives” within Item 1. “Business” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
The summary of selected financial data table below should be referenced in connection with a review of the following discussion of our results of operations for the quarters and years to date ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 (dollars in thousands):
The current quarter and year to date revenue increased by 1.8% or $3.8 million and 3.0% or $12.5 million, respectively, as compared to the prior year periods. The improvement in revenue was primarily driven by the increase in total student enrollments at both USAHS and CTU, partially offset with a decline in revenue at AIUS as compared to the prior year quarter primarily due to non-Title IV and professional development offerings.
Revenue for the first quarter of 2026 ("current quarter") increased by 4.1% or $8.7 million as compared to the prior year quarter. The increase was supported by underlying student enrollment growth at our academic institutions.
TheCurrent quarter educational services and facilities expense for the current quarter decreasedincreased by 3.0%1.3% or $1.5$0.7 million, compared to the prior year quarter driven by lower academics and student related costs at AIUS, along with reduced occupancy costsmillion as compared to the prior year period.quarter. The increase was primarily driven by higher academics and student related expenses of 1.6% or $0.7 million as a result of increases in total student enrollments at USAHS and CTU. Occupancy expense remained relatively flat as compared to the prior year quarter.
The educational services and facilities expense for the current year to date decreased by 0.8% or $0.8 million as compared to the prior year period. This decrease was primarily driven by lower academics and student related costs at AIUS, as a result of lower total student enrollments as compared to the prior year period.
The general and administrative expense for the current quarter and year to date increased by 1.3%0.5% or $1.3$0.4 million and 0.9% or $1.7 million, respectively, as compared to the prior year quarterperiods, primarily duedriven toby higherincreased advertising and marketing andexpense for both comparative periods as well as increased administrative costs,expense whichfor wasthe onlycurrent partiallyyear offsetto withdate reducedas compared to the prior year period. Partially offsetting these increases were decreases in bad debt.debt expense as compared to the prior year periods.
Advertising and marketing expense for the current quarter and year to date increased by 1.3%4.7% or $0.4$1.3 million and 2.9% or $1.6 million, respectively, as compared to the prior year quarter.periods. IncreasedThe current quarter increase was primarily due to higher advertising and marketing spendingspend across all three institutions, while the year to date increase was primarily due to higher spend at CTU and AIUS was partially offset by reduced spending at USAHS asAIUS, compared to the respective prior year quarter.periods.
Admissions expense for the current quarter remained relatively flat as compared to the prior year quarter. Higher admissions expenses at CTU were fully offset by lower spending at USAHS as compared to the prior year quarter, while expenses at AIUS remained largely unchanged.
The increase in administrative expense for the currentyear quarterto date was primarily driven by increased bylegal 6.3%fees orfor $2.7previously milliondisclosed legal matters within CTU as compared to the prior year quarter, driven by increased legal fees.period.
Bad debt expense incurred by each of our segments during the quarters and years to date ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 was as follows (dollars in thousands):
Bad debt expense for the current quarter and year to date decreased by 24.0%11.5% or $1.8$0.6 million and 18.7% or $2.4 million, respectively, as compared to the prior year quarter.periods. The decrease infor the current quarter was primarily due to lower bad debt expense at AIUS and USAHS, which more than offset higher bad debt expense at CTU. The year to date decrease was primarily driven by reductionslower atbad bothdebt CTUexpense andacross AIUS.all three academic institutions as compared to the prior year period.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense for the current quarter and year to date decreased by 20.8% or $2.5$0.8 million and $3.3 million, respectively, as compared to the prior year quarter,periods, primarily driven by decreases withinacross USAHSall forthree academic institutions, with the year to date decrease primarily driven by leased assets.assets within USAHS.
Operating income for the current quarter and year to date increased by 22.0%6.8% or $11.4$3.5 million and 14.4% or $14.9 million, respectively, as compared to the prior year quarter.periods. TheThis improvement was primarily driven by higherincreased revenue at CTU and USAHSrevenue, as well as decreaseddisciplined depreciationmanagement andof amortizationoperating expenseexpenses, atparticularly USAHSin andthe decreasedcurrent badyear debtto expense at CTU and AIUSdate, as compared to the prior year quarter.periods.
For the quarter and year to date ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we recorded a provision for income taxes of $14.2$12.2 million orreflecting 20.8%an effective tax rate of 20.3% and $26.4 million reflecting an effective tax rate of 20.6%, respectively, as compared to a provision for income taxes of $12.8$15.2 million orreflecting 22.7%an effective tax rate of 27.0% and $28.0 million reflecting an effective tax rate of 24.9% for the respective prior year quarter.periods. The effective tax rate for the current quarter and year to date was benefittedbenefited by the tax effect of stock-based compensation and the release of previously recorded tax reserves, whichwhich, when combined, reduced the effective tax rate by 5.6%7.3% and 1.2%,7.0%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the prior year quarter and year to date was impactedbenefited by the tax effect of stock-based compensation and the release of previously recorded tax reserves, whichwhich, when combined, reduced the effective tax rate by 5.5%2.0% and 1.3%,4.4%, respectively. For the full year 2026, we expect our effective tax rate to be between 23.0% and 24.0%.
For the full year 2026, we expect our effective tax rate to be between 22.5% and 23.5%.
CTU. Current quarter and year to date revenue increased by 4.0%0.9% or $4.7$1.1 million and 2.5% or $5.7 million, respectively, as compared to the prior year quarter.periods. The increaseimprovement in revenue was primarily driven by increase in total student enrollment growth of 1.9%0.6% at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the prior year quarter.quarter end. CTU's total student enrollment growth was supported by stronghigh levels of student retention and engagement, growth in the corporate student program and consistenthigher levels of prospective student interest. Offsetting some of these enrollment trends at CTU is an increase in the number of students graduating during 2026 as compared to 2025 as well as record prior year comparisons.
Current quarter operating income for CTU decreased by 5.1% or $2.4 million as compared to the prior year period. The decrease was primarily driven by increased legal fees related to previously disclosed legal matters, partially offset by the increase in revenue as discussed above, as compared to the prior year period. Current year to date operating income increased by 1.5% or $1.4 million as compared to the prior year period. The increase was primarily driven by higher revenue as discussed above and lower bad debt expense, which more than offset increased legal fees during the current year to date.
Current quarter operating income for CTU increased by 8.1% or $3.8 million as compared to the prior year quarter driven by the increase in revenue discussed above as well as decreased bad debt expense, which partially offset increases within other operating expenses.
AIUS. Current quarter revenue increased slightly by 0.4% or $0.3 million as compared to the prior year quarter. Total student enrollments decreased by 2.2% at March 31, 2026 as compared to March 31, 2025, driven by a decrease in total student enrollments at Trident University.
Current quarter operating income for AIUS increased by 12.0% or $1.3 million as compared to the prior year quarter, primarily driven by decreased bad debt expense as well as reduced academics and student related costs.
USAHS.AIUS. Current quarter and year to date revenue increaseddecreased by 9.8%1.8% or $3.8$1.0 million and 0.7% or $0.8 million, respectively, as compared to the prior year quarter. The increase wasperiods, primarily drivendue byto totalnon-Title IV and professional development offerings. Total student enrollmentenrollments growthdecreased of 3.1%1.0% at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the prior year quarter.quarter end, driven by a decrease at Trident University.
Current quarter and year to date operating income for USAHSAIUS increased by $6.69.7% or $1.1 million and 10.8% or $2.5 million, respectively, as compared to the prior year quarterperiod, driven by thelower increaseoperating inexpenses revenueacross discussedmost above,expense as well as reduced depreciation and amortization on leased assetscategories as compared to the prior-yearprior quarter.year periods, which more than offset the decrease in revenue.
USAHS. Current quarter and year to date revenue increased by 10.2% or $3.8 million and 10.0% or $7.6 million, respectively, as compared to the prior year periods, primarily driven by total student enrollment growth of 6.0% at June 30, 2026, as compared to the prior year quarter end.
Current quarter and year to date operating income increased by $5.3 million and $12.0 million, respectively, as compared to the prior year periods, primarily driven by the increase in revenue as discussed above.
Corporate and Other. This category includes unallocated costs that are incurred on behalf of the entire company. Total Corporate and Other operating loss for the current quarter and year to date increased by 6.2%11.4% or $0.4$0.6 million and 8.7% or $1.0 million, respectively, as compared to the prior year quarterperiods, primarily driven by increased administrative costs for theboth currentcomparative quarter.periods.
A detailed discussion of the accounting policies and estimates that we believe are most critical to our financial condition and results of operations that require management’s most subjective and complex judgments in estimating the effect of inherent uncertainties is included under the caption “Summary of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 also includes a discussion of these and other significant accounting policies.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and available-for-sale short-term investments (“cash balances”) totaled $680.0$734.8 million. Restricted cash as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $0.8 million and primarily related to escrow balances for Hippo Education and required letters of credit for USAHS. Our cash flows from operating activities have historically been adequate to fulfill our liquidity requirements. We have historically financed our operating activities, organic growth and acquisitions primarily through cash generated from operations and existing cash balances. We expect to continue to generate cash during the remainder of 2026. We anticipate that we will be able to satisfy the cash requirements associated with, among other things, our working capital needs, capital expenditures, lease commitments, share repurchases and quarterly dividendsdividend payments through at least the next 12 months primarily with cash generated by operations and existing cash balances.
On January 2, 2026, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a common stock repurchase program, authorizing the Company to repurchase up to $100.0 million of its outstanding common stock on the open marketmarket, andwhich expires on June 30, 2027. The stock repurchase program may be modified, suspended or discontinued at any time in the Company's discretion without prior notice, and does not commit the Company to repurchase shares of its common stock. The timing of purchases and the number of shares repurchased under the program is determined by the Company’s management and will depend on a variety of factors including stock price, trading volume and other general market and economic conditions, its assessment of alternative uses of capital, regulatory requirements and other factors. See Note 11 "Stock Repurchase Program" to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional details.
The Board of Directors approved the aforementioned stock repurchase programsprogram believing it advantageous to the Company and its stockholders to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time at prices below what the Board of Directors believedbelieves to be the intrinsic value of the Company’s common stock.
On August 6, 2026 the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share, an increase of 13.3% as compared to the prior quarter, which will be paid on September 10, 2026 for holders of record of common stock as of September 1, 2026. Any decision to pay future cash dividends, however, will be made by the board of directors and depend on the Company's available retained earnings, financial condition and other relevant factors. The Company expects quarterly dividend payments to be an integral and growing part of its balanced capital allocation strategy that also prioritizes investments in student support and technology projects, while also evaluating acquisitions and share repurchases.
During the quartersyears to date ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, net cash flows provided by operating activities totaled $69.4$144.0 million and $65.1$143.9 million, respectively. The increase in net cash flows from operating activities for the current quarter was driven by increased operating income.
During the quarteryears to date ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 and 2025, net cash flows used in investing activities totaled $7.1$65.8 million comparedand to$7.3 netmillion, cash flows provided by investing activities of $1.2 million for the prior year quarter.respectively.
Purchases and Sales of Available-for-Sale Investments. Purchases and sales of available-for-sale investments resulted in a net cash outflow of $5.3$62.5 million and $3.6 million for the current quarter as comparedyears to adate netended cashJune inflow30, of2026 $2.9and million2025, for the prior year quarter.respectively.
Capital Expenditures. Capital expenditures weredecreased $1.7to $3.3 million for eachthe ofyear to date ended June 30, 2026 as compared to $4.5 million for the quartersyear to date ended MarchJune 31, 2026 and30, 2025. For the full year 2026, we expect capital expenditures are expected to be approximately 1.5%1.0% of revenue.
During the quartersyears to date ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, net cash flows used in financing activities totaled $29.5$46.8 million and $44.4$74.7 million, respectively. Payments to repurchase shares of our common stock were $8.1$15.0 million and $46.1 million for the quarteryears to date ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and $25.22025, million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025.respectively.
Payments of employee tax associated with stock compensation. Payments of employee tax associated with stock compensation were $10.3 million and $7.5 million for the quartersyears to date ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Payments of cash dividends and dividend equivalents. During the quartersyears to date ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, the Company made dividend and dividend equivalent payments of $10.3$19.7 million and $9.2$17.7 million, respectively.
Principal payments for finance leases and failed sale leaseback.sale-leaseback. During the quarteryear to date ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company made principal payments of $1.3$2.7 million for finance leases, and during the quarteryear endedto Marchdate 31,June 30, 2025, principal payments of $1.7$2.9 million were made for finance leases and failed sale-leaseback transactions, both related to USAHS.
Selected condensed consolidated balance sheet account changes from December 31, 2025 to MarchJune 31,30, 2026 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
PRDO insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 6 filings (6 insiders, 5 trade dates, 95,740 shares, about $3.2M; 1 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -95,740 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$3.2M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-15 | Nelson Todd S |
Open-market sale |
46,199 | $32.89 | $1.5M |
| 2026-08-11 | Jackson Gregory L. |
Option exercise | 11,271 | $9.69 | $109.2K |
| 2026-08-11 | Jackson Gregory L. |
Open-market sale | 11,271 | $31.78 | $358.2K |
| 2026-06-04 | Gonzales Kenda B |
Open-market sale | 9,308 | $34.79 | $323.8K |
| 2026-06-04 | Gonzales Kenda B |
Option exercise | 9,308 | $7.22 | $67.2K |
| 2026-05-21 | Gross Patrick W |
Grant/award | 3,987 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Wheat Alan Dupree |
Grant/award | 3,987 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Gonzales Kenda B |
Grant/award | 3,987 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Skandera Hanna |
Grant/award | 3,987 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Chookaszian Dennis |
Grant/award | 3,987 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Jackson Gregory L. |
Grant/award | 3,987 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Hansen William Dean |
Grant/award | 3,987 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Thornton Leslie T |
Grant/award | 3,987 | — | — |
| 2026-05-13 | Peppers Michele A |
Open-market sale | 14,000 | $34.50 | $483.0K |
| 2026-05-12 | Leeman Julia A. |
Open-market sale | 11,315 | $35.51 | $401.8K |
| 2026-05-12 | Gross Patrick W |
Open-market sale | 3,647 | $34.98 | $127.6K |
| 2026-05-12 | Gross Patrick W |
Option exercise | 21,129 | $5.96 | $125.9K |
Well-known investors holding PRDO (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 3,299,764 | $105.6M | 0.15% | Reduced 6% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 408,595 | $13.1M | 0.01% | Reduced 25% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 305,544 | $9.8M | 0.0% | Added 4% |
| Gotham Asset Management (Joel Greenblatt) | 2026-06-30 | 121,859 | $3.9M | 0.01% | Added 68% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 110,401 | $3.5M | 0.0% | Added 64% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 32,392 | $1.0M | 0.0% | Reduced 77% |