PREM 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. Our business, prospects, financial condition, or operating results could be harmed by any of these risks, as well as other risks not currently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial. The trading price of our securities could decline due to any of these risks, and, as a result, you may lose all or part of your investment.

In the course of conducting our business operations, we are exposed to a variety of risks. These risks are generally inherent to the private commercial aviation industry. Any of the risk factors we describe below have affected or could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The market price of shares of our Common Stock could decline, possibly significantly or permanently, if one or more of these risks and uncertainties occurs. Some statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including statements in the following risk factors constitute forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We will need additional capital to fund our operations, which, if obtained, could result in substantial dilution or significant debt service obligations. We may not be able to obtain additional capital on commercially reasonable terms, which could adversely affect our liquidity and financial position.

In order to continue operating, we may need to obtain additional financing, either through borrowings, private placements, public offerings, or some type of business combination, such as a merger, or buyout, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in such pursuits. We may be unable to acquire the additional funding necessary to continue operating. Accordingly, if we are unable to generate adequate cash from operations, and if we are unable to find sources of funding, it may be necessary for us to sell one or more lines of business or all or a portion of our assets, enter into a business combination, or reduce or eliminate operations. These possibilities, to the extent available, may be on terms that result in significant dilution to our shareholders or that result in our shareholders losing all of their investment in our Company.

We require significant capital in relation to our Premier operations, including continuing access to credit markets, to operate our current business and fund our growth strategy. The expansion of our business and pursuit of acquisitions or other business opportunities may require significant amounts of capital. Access to credit markets and pricing of our capital is dependent upon maintaining sufficient credit ratings from credit rating agencies. Sufficient credit ratings allow us to access cost competitive tier one commercial paper markets. If we are unable to maintain sufficiently high credit ratings, access to these commercial paper and other debt markets and costs of borrowings could be adversely affected. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow or maintain access to adequate external financing, including as a result of significant disruptions in the global credit markets, it could restrict our current operations and our growth opportunities. We manage this risk with constant monitoring of credit/liquidity metrics, cash forecasting, and routine communications with credit rating agencies regarding risk management practices.

If we need to raise additional capital, we do not know what the terms of any such capital raising would be. In addition, any future sale of our equity securities could dilute the ownership and control of your shares and could be at prices substantially below prices at which our shares currently trade. We may seek to increase our cash reserves through the sale of additional equity or debt securities. The sale of convertible debt securities or additional equity securities could result in additional and potentially substantial dilution to our shareholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could result in operating and financing covenants that would restrict our operations and liquidity. In addition, our ability to obtain additional capital on acceptable terms is subject to a variety of uncertainties. We cannot assure you that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Any failure to raise additional funds on favorable terms could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition.

Geopolitical Conflicts in the Middle East, Including the War in Iran, Could Materially Increase Jet Fuel Prices and Adversely Affect Our Business, Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The ongoing war in Iran and associated geopolitical tensions in the Middle East pose significant risks to our air charter operations. Iran is a major global oil producer, and any escalation, prolongation or expansion of the conflict has the potential to disrupt crude-oil production, refining capacity and transportation infrastructure in the region. Such disruptions historically have caused, and could continue to cause, sharp and sustained increases in the price of crude oil and, by extension, jet fuel, which constitutes one of the largest variable costs in our business.

A material rise in jet-fuel prices would directly increase our operating expenses. We may be unable to pass these cost increases on to customers in the form of higher charter rates without adversely affecting demand for our private-aviation services, particularly from price-sensitive corporate and leisure clients. Even partial pass-throughs could reduce the competitiveness of our offerings relative to other charter providers or alternative travel options. In addition, sustained high fuel prices could compress our margins, impair our cash flow and liquidity, and require us to curtail flight operations or delay fleet maintenance and expansion plans.

Beyond fuel costs, the war in Iran and related regional instability may trigger secondary effects that further harm our business, including:

We cannot predict the duration, scope or ultimate resolution of the war in Iran or its full impact on energy markets or the aviation industry. Any prolonged disruption or material escalation could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, cash flows and overall financial condition. Our risk-mitigation strategies, including fuel-hedging programs (if and when implemented), may prove insufficient to offset these risks.

The private aviation industry is subject to competition.

Many of the markets in which we operate are competitive as a result of the expansion of existing private aircraft operators, expanding private aircraft ownership, and alternatives such as luxury commercial airline service. We compete against a number of private aviation operators with different business models, and local and regional private operators. Factors that affect competition in our industry include price, reliability, safety, regulations, professional reputation, aircraft availability, equipment and quality, consistency and ease of service, willingness and ability to serve specific airports or regions, and investment requirements. There can be no assurance that our competitors will not be successful in capturing a share of our present or potential customer base. The materialization of any of these risks could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The supply of pilots to the airline industry is limited and may negatively affect our operations and financial condition. Increases in our labor costs, which constitute a substantial portion of our total operating costs, may adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Our pilots are subject to stringent pilot qualification and crew member flight training standards (“FAA Qualification Standards”), which among other things require minimum flight time for pilots and mandate strict rules to minimize pilot fatigue. The existence of such requirements effectively limits the supply of qualified pilot candidates and increases pilot salaries and related labor costs. A shortage of pilots would require us to further increase our labor costs, which would result in a material reduction in our earnings. Such requirements also impact pilot scheduling, work hours, and the number of pilots required to be employed for our operations.

Due to an industry-wide shortage of qualified pilots, driven by the flight hours requirements under the FAA Qualification Standards and attrition resulting from the hiring needs of other industry participants, pilot training timelines have significantly increased and stressed the availability of flight simulators, instructors, and related training equipment. Future changes to FAA regulations and requirements could also prohibit or materially restrict our ability to train pilots in-house. As a result of the foregoing, the training of our pilots might not be accomplished in a cost-efficient manner or in a manner timely enough to support our operational needs.

Due to the flexibility on the types of aircraft and routes we offer, we might not have access to a qualified pilot at the departure location for a particular flight. We rely on commercial airlines to fly our pilots to the departure location when our pilots come onto a work rotation or when there is a grounded aircraft or other maintenance event where there is a need for a pilot to switch planes. Any disruption to such commercial airline activity may cause us to delay or cancel a flight and could adversely affect our reputation, business, results of operation, and financial condition. Aviation businesses are often affected by factors beyond their control including: air traffic congestion at airports; airport slot restrictions; air traffic control inefficiencies; increased and changing security measures; changing regulatory and governmental requirements; new or changing travel-related taxes; any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Pilot attrition may negatively affect our operations and financial condition.

We may experience volatility in our attrition, including volatility resulting from training delays, pilot wage and bonus increases at other industry participants, and the growth of cargo, low-cost, and ultra-low-cost airlines. In prior periods, these factors, at times, caused our pilot attrition rates to be higher than our ability to hire and retain replacement pilots. If our attrition rates are higher than our ability to hire and retain replacement pilots, our operations and financial results could be materially and adversely affected.

We may be subject to unionization, work stoppages, slowdowns, or increased labor costs and the unionization of our pilots, maintenance workers, and inflight crewmembers could result in increased labor costs.

Our business is labor intensive and while our employees, particularly our pilots and our maintenance workers, are not currently represented by labor unions, we may, in the future, experience union organizing activities of our pilots, maintenance workers, or other crewmembers. Such union organization activities could lead to work slowdowns or stoppages, which could result in loss of business. In addition, union activity could result in demands that may increase our operating expenses and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and competitive position. Any of the different groups or classes of our crewmembers could unionize at any time, which would require us to negotiate in good faith with the crew member group’s certified representative concerning a collective bargaining agreement. In addition, we may be subject to disruptions by unions protesting the non-union status of our other crewmembers. Any of these events would be disruptive to our operations and could harm our business.

We depend on our executive officers, the loss of whom could materially harm our business.

We rely upon the accumulated knowledge, skills and experience of our executive officers, significant employees and expertise of our hired consultants. Our executive officers, significant employees and hired consultants have significant experience in aviation industry. If they were to leave us or become incapacitated, we might suffer in our planning and execution of business strategy and operations, impacting our brand and financial results. We also do not maintain any key man life insurance policies for any of our employees.

Significant reliance on certain third-party aircraft engine manufacturers and engine management companies poses risks to our owned and leased aircraft and operations.

As part of our business strategy, we have historically relied on aircraft engines manufactured by Rolls Royce, General Electric, and Williams International to power substantially all of our owned and leased aircraft. If any of these engines fail to adequately fulfill their obligations towards us or experience interruptions or disruptions in production or provision of services due to, for example, bankruptcy, natural disasters, labor strikes, or disruption of its supply chain, we may experience a significant delay in the delivery of or fail to receive previously ordered aircraft engines and parts, which would adversely affect our revenue and profitability and could jeopardize our ability to meet the demands of our program participants.

We have entered into engine program agreements with various third-party providers, whom we rely on to provide engine related maintenance and services. If such third-party providers terminate their contracts with us, do not provide timely or consistently high-quality service, or increase pricing to terms we do not believe to be reasonable, we might not be able to replace them in a cost-efficient manner or in a manner timely enough to support our operational needs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We are exposed to operational disruptions due to maintenance.

Our fleet requires regular maintenance work, which may cause operational disruption. Our inability to perform timely maintenance and repairs can result in our aircraft being underutilized which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. On occasion, airframe manufacturers and/or regulatory authorities require mandatory or recommended modifications to be made across a particular fleet which may mean having to ground a particular type of aircraft. This may cause operational disruption to and impose significant costs on us. Furthermore, our operations in remote locations, where delivery of components and parts could take a significant period of time, could result in delays in our ability to maintain and repair our aircraft. We often rely on commercial airlines to deliver such components and parts. Any such delays may pose a risk to our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Moreover, as our aircraft base increases and our fleet ages, our maintenance costs could potentially increase. Additionally, certain parts may no longer be produced and adversely affect our ability to perform necessary repairs.

Significant increases in fuel costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Fuel is essential to the operation of our aircraft and to our ability to carry out our transport services. Fuel costs are a significant component of our operating expenses. A significant increase in fuel costs may negatively impact our revenue, operating expenses, and results of operations. The majority of our contractual service obligations allow for rate adjustments to account for changes in fuel prices. Wholesale rates are non-contractual, so rates are adjusted on an ad hoc basis. Given our contractual ability to pass on increased fuel costs, in whole or in part, to certain of our customers and mitigate the risk with others, we do not maintain hedging arrangements for the price of fuel. However, increased fuel surcharges may affect our revenue and retention if a prolonged period of high fuel costs occurs. A significant increase in fuel costs where we contractually have fixed rates could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations in the interim until we are able to make such jet fuel rate adjustments.

In addition, potential increased environmental regulations that might require new fuel sources (e.g., sustainable aircraft fuel) could lead to increased costs. To the extent there is a significant increase in fuel costs that affects the amount our customers choose to fly with us, it may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our insurance may become too difficult or expensive to obtain. If we are unable to maintain sufficient insurance coverage, it may materially and adversely impact our results of operations and financial position.

Hazards are inherent in the aviation industry and may result in loss of life and property, potentially exposing us to substantial liability claims arising from the operation of aircraft. We carry insurance for aviation hull, aviation liability, premises, hangar keepers, product, war risk, general liability, workers compensation, and other insurance customary in the industry in which we operate. Insurance underwriters are required by various federal and state regulations to maintain minimum levels of reserves for known and expected claims. However, there can be no assurance that underwriters have established adequate reserves to fund existing and future claims. The number of accidents, as well as the number of insured losses within the aviation and aerospace industries, and the impact of general economic conditions on underwriters may result in increases in premiums above the rate of inflation. To the extent that our existing insurance carriers are unable or unwilling to provide us with sufficient insurance coverage, and if insurance coverage is not available from another source (for example, a government entity), our insurance costs may increase and may result in our being in breach of regulatory requirements or contractual arrangements requiring that specific insurance be maintained, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Aviation businesses are often affected by factors beyond their control including: air traffic congestion at airports; airport slot restrictions; air traffic control inefficiencies; increased and changing security measures; changing regulatory and governmental requirements; new or changing travel-related taxes; any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Like other aviation companies, our business is affected by factors beyond our control, including air traffic congestion at airports, airport slot restrictions, air traffic control inefficiencies, increased and changing security measures, changing regulatory and governmental requirements, and/or new or changing travel-related taxes. Factors that cause flight delays frustrate passengers, increase operating costs, and decrease revenues, which in turn could adversely affect profitability. Any general reduction in flight volumes could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In the United States, the federal government singularly controls all U.S. airspace, and aviation operators are completely dependent on the FAA to operate that airspace in a safe, efficient, and affordable manner. The expansion of our business into international markets would result in a greater degree of interaction with the regulatory authorities of the foreign countries in which we may operate. The air traffic control system, which is operated by the FAA, faces challenges in managing the growing demand for U.S. air travel. U.S. and foreign air-traffic controllers often rely on outdated technologies that routinely overwhelm the system and compel aviation operators to fly inefficient, indirect routes resulting in delays and increased operational cost. In addition, there are currently proposals before Congress that could potentially lead to the privatization of the U.S. air traffic control system, which could adversely affect our business. Further, implementation of the Next Generation Air Transport System by the FAA would result in changes to aircraft routings and flight paths that could lead to increased noise complaints and lawsuits, resulting in increased costs.

The operation of aircraft is subject to various risks, and failure to maintain an acceptable safety record may have an adverse impact on our ability to obtain and retain customers.

The operation of aircraft is subject to various risks, including catastrophic disasters, crashes, mechanical failures, and collisions, which may result in loss of life, personal injury, and/or damage to property and equipment. We may experience accidents in the future. These risks could endanger the safety of our customers, our personnel, third parties, equipment, cargo, and other property (both ours and that of third parties), as well as the environment. If any of these events were to occur, we could experience loss of revenue, termination of customer contracts, higher insurance rates, litigation, regulatory investigations and enforcement actions (including potential grounding of our fleet and suspension or revocation of our operating authorities), and damage to our reputation and customer relationships. In addition, to the extent an accident occurs with an aircraft we operate or charter, we could be held liable for resulting damages, which may involve claims from injured passengers and survivors of deceased passengers. There can be no assurance that the amount of our insurance coverage available in the event of such losses would be adequate to cover such losses, or that we would not be forced to bear substantial losses from such events, regardless of our insurance coverage. Moreover, any aircraft accident or incident, even if fully insured, and whether involving us or other private aircraft operators, could create a public perception that we are less safe or reliable than other private aircraft operators, which could cause our customers to lose confidence in us and switch to other private aircraft operators or other means of transportation. In addition, any aircraft accident or incident, whether involving us or other private aircraft operators, could also affect the public’s view of industry safety, which may reduce the amount of trust by our customers.

We incur considerable costs to maintain the quality of (i) our safety program, (ii) our training programs, and (iii) our fleet of aircraft. We cannot guarantee that these costs will not increase. Likewise, we cannot guarantee that our efforts will provide an adequate level of safety or an acceptable safety record. If we are unable to maintain an acceptable safety record, we might not be able to retain existing customers or attract new customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Failure to comply with regulatory requirements related to the maintenance of our aircraft and associated operations may result in enforcement actions, including revocation or suspension of our operating authorities in the United States and potentially other countries.

We are subject to significant governmental regulation and changes in government regulations imposing additional requirements and restrictions on our operations could increase our operating costs and result in service delays and disruptions.

All FAA certified air carriers, including us, are subject to regulation by the DOT, the FAA, and other governmental agencies, including the DHS, the TSA, the CBP, and others. The laws and regulations enforced by these and other agencies impose substantial costs on us, may reduce air travel demand, and also may restrict the manner in which we conduct our business now or in the future, resulting in a material adverse effect on our operations. In April 2024, the FAA issued a new rule that expanded the requirement for a safety management system to all certificate holders operating under FAA Part 135, which will likely increase our regulatory compliance costs. We also incur substantial costs in maintaining our current certifications and otherwise complying with the laws to which we are subject. An adverse decision by a federal agency may have a material adverse effect on our operations, such as an FAA decision to ground, or require time consuming inspections of or maintenance on, all or any of our aircraft. Our business may also be affected if government agencies shut down for any reason or if there is significant automation or another operational disruption, such as those attributed to Air Traffic Control or weather.

We are subject to various environmental and noise laws and regulations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

We are subject to increasingly stringent federal, state, local, and foreign laws, regulations, and ordinances relating to the protection of the environment and noise, including those relating to emissions to the air, discharges (including storm water and de-icing fluid discharges) to surface and subsurface waters, safe drinking water, and the use, management, disposal, and release of, and exposure to, hazardous substances, oils, and waste materials.

We are subject to existing laws and regulations and might be subject to future laws and regulations that may have a direct effect (or indirect effect through our third-party relationships or airport facilities at which we operate) on our operations. Any such existing or future laws and regulations could have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Similarly, we are subject to environmental laws and regulations that require us to investigate and remediate soil or groundwater to meet certain remediation standards. Under certain laws, generators of waste materials, and current and former owners or operators of facilities, can be subject to liability for investigation and remediation costs at locations that have been identified as requiring response actions. Liability under these laws may be strict, joint, and several, meaning that we could be liable for the costs of cleaning up environmental contamination regardless of fault or the amount of wastes directly attributable to us.

Environmental regulation and liabilities, including new or developing laws and regulations, or our initiatives in response to pressure from our stakeholders may increase our costs of operations and adversely affect us.

In recent years, governments, customers, suppliers, employees, and other of our stakeholders have increasingly focused on climate change, carbon emissions, and energy use. Laws and regulations that curb the use of conventional energy or require the use of renewable fuels or renewable sources of energy, such as wind or solar power, could result in a reduction in demand for hydrocarbon-based fuels such as oil and natural gas. In addition, governments could pass laws, regulations, or taxes that increase the cost of such fuels, thereby decreasing demand for our services and also increasing the costs of our operations. Other laws or pressure from our stakeholders may adversely affect our business and financial results by requiring, or otherwise causing, us to reduce our emissions, make capital investments to modernize certain aspects of our operations, purchase carbon offsets, or otherwise pay for our emissions. Such activity may also impact us indirectly by increasing our operating costs. More stringent environmental laws, regulations, or enforcement policies, as well as motivation to maintain our reputation with our key stakeholders, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock and Lack of Liquidity

As a smaller reporting company, we are exempt from certain disclosure requirements, which could make our Common Stock less attractive to the potential investors.

Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act defines a “smaller reporting company” as an issuer that is not an investment company, an asset-backed issuer, or a majority-owned subsidiary of a parent that is not a smaller reporting company and that:

As a smaller reporting company, we will not be required and may not include a Compensation Discussion and Analysis section in our proxy statements; we will provide only two years of financial statements; and we need not provide the table of selected financial data. We also will have other “scaled” disclosure requirements that are less comprehensive than issuers that are not smaller reporting companies which could make our Common Stock less attractive to potential investors, which could make it more difficult for our stockholders to sell their shares.

As a public company, we will incur significant increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.

As a public company, we have incurred significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations have increased and will continue to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costlier. For example, we expect that these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, which could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors. We cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we will incur as a public company or the timing of such costs.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In particular, we must perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In addition, we will be required to have our independent registered public accounting firm attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting the later of our second annual report on Form 10-K or the first annual report on Form 10-K following the date on which we are no longer an emerging growth company. Our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act will require that we incur substantial accounting expense and expend significant management efforts. We currently do not have an internal audit group, and we will need to hire additional accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting knowledge. If we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, or if we or our independent registered public accounting firm identify deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses, the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the exchange we are listed on, the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources.

Our ability to successfully implement our business plan and comply with Section 404 requires us to be able to prepare timely and accurate financial statements. We expect that we will need to continue to improve existing, and implement new operational and financial systems, procedures and controls to manage our business effectively. Any delay in the implementation of, or disruption in the transition to, new or enhanced systems, procedures or controls, may cause our operations to suffer and we may be unable to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective and to obtain an unqualified report on internal controls from our auditors as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This, in turn, could have an adverse impact on trading prices for our common stock, and could adversely affect our ability to access the capital markets.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) sales practice requirements may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative, low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. The FINRA requirements may make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our Common Stock, which may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in our Common Stock. As a result, fewer broker-dealers may be willing to make a market in our common stock, reducing a stockholder’s ability to resell shares of our Common Stock.

Our stock price may be volatile.

The market price of our Common Stock has been highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various potential factors, many of which will be beyond our control, including the following:

In addition, the securities markets have from time-to-time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or publish negative reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Premier Holdings. For The Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our financial statements, including the notes thereto, included in this Report. Some of the information contained in this Report may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, and expectations, are generally identifiable by the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology.

These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that may be incorrect, and there can be no assurance that the projections included in these forward-looking statements will come to pass. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.

Going Concern and Liquidity

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, the realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

Premier Holdings incurred a net loss of $3,865,621 and $2,191,235 during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Although these losses were primarily the result of investments in aircraft and supporting operational infrastructure, these losses and limited working capital raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining additional funding, or that the Company’s projections of its future working capital needs will prove accurate, or that any additional funding will be sufficient to continue operations in future years. In addition, support of the Company’s operations is dependent on receiving support from related parties which primarily consists of financial support for revenue and operating expenses.

We will be required to raise substantial capital to fund our capital expenditures, working capital, and other cash requirements. We will continue to rely on related parties and seek other financing to complete our business plans. The successful outcome of future financing activities cannot be determined at this time and there are no assurances that, if achieved, we will have sufficient funds to execute our intended business plan or generate positive operational results.

In addition to our current deficit, we may incur additional losses during the foreseeable future, until we are able to successfully execute our business plan. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing through private placements and/or public offerings necessary to support our working capital requirements. To the extent that funds generated from any private placements and/or public offerings are insufficient, we will have to raise additional working capital through other sources, such as bank loans and/or financings. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available, or if available, will be on acceptable terms.

We are also incurring increased costs as a publicly traded company. As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as new rules subsequently implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, have required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. These new rules and regulations have increased our legal and financial compliance costs and have made some activities more time-consuming and costly. We cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur as a result of being a public company or the timing of such costs.

Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025, were $31,877,508 compared with revenue of $20,751,139 during the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $11,126,369, or 53.6%.

This growth was driven primarily by strong performance in our core aircraft charter operations. Charter revenue rose by $11,785,580 year-over-year, reflecting higher flight hours, increased aircraft / utilization of our fleet, expanded client demand for luxury private aviation services, and targeted marketing efforts within our broker / retail customer base. The company continues to benefit from robust demand in the private aviation sector.

The overall increase was partially helped in other revenue streams associated with a strategic transition in our business model. Specifically:

This transition is expected to enhance the Company’s long-term profitability and operational flexibility by aligning revenue more closely with flight activity and reducing reliance on lower-margin management and maintenance services. As a result, a larger portion of our revenue is now derived from higher-margin charter operations.

The Company anticipates that continued growth in charter demand, combined with the benefits of our optimized fleet strategy, will support further revenue expansion.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025, was $28,486,993, compared to cost of revenues of $18,356,827 during the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $10,130,166, or 55.2%.

The increase in cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025 was primarily driven by two factors related to the Company’s fleet expansion and optimization strategy:

• Higher costs associated with grounded aircraft undergoing scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, which temporarily reduced aircraft availability for charter operations while incurring ongoing fixed and variable maintenance expenses.

• Operating costs of newly acquired aircraft incurred prior to these aircraft generating meaningful charter revenue. These pre-revenue costs included crew training, initial positioning, insurance, hangar fees, and other preparatory operating expenses.

• Engine reserve costs increased as more flight hours were utilized during the year.

These additional costs were incurred in support of the Company’s long-term growth initiatives, including fleet modernization. As these aircraft become fully operational and integrated into our charter fleet, the Company expect improved utilization and contribution to higher-margin revenue in future periods.

The increase in Operating Expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025 was driven primarily by higher facility rent and consulting fees. Facility rent rose due to expanded office and hangar space required to support our growing fleet and operations following the transition to a leased aircraft model. Consulting fees increased as the Company engaged external advisors for strategic initiatives, public filings, fleet optimization, regulatory compliance, and support for business expansion in the premium private aviation sector. The Company also incurred $428,998 in rent expense associated with holdover costs for engine overhauls.

These higher costs reflect investments in infrastructure and expertise necessary to scale charter operations and improve long-term efficiency. Despite the percentage increase, operating expenses remain well-controlled relative to the 53.6% revenue growth achieved in the year.

Loss from Operations

The operating loss in 2025 was primarily driven by costs associated with grounded aircraft undergoing maintenance, engine reserve expenses and operating expenses for newly acquired aircraft incurred prior to these aircraft generating meaningful charter revenue. These included scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, crew training, positioning flights, insurance, and other preparatory costs.

Despite these temporary headwinds, the year-over-year reduction in operating loss reflects strong revenue growth of 53.6% and improved gross profit contribution from higher-margin charter operations. The strategic transition, combined with fleet expansion, continued to pressure near-term results but is expected to drive better aircraft utilization, operating leverage, and reduced losses in future periods as the expanded fleet becomes fully productive.

Other (Income) Expense

Other (income) expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $1,170,184 compared to $1,039,885 for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $130,299, or 12.5%. The other expenses incurred in the year ended December 31, 2025 are primarily attributable interest expense related to aircraft leases and additional debt.

Net Income (Loss)

Net income (loss) was $(3,865,621) and $(2,191,235) for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The loss incurred in the year ended December 31, 2025 was driven primarily by higher facility rent and consulting fees as well as an increase in interest expense related to aircraft leases and additional debt.

Cash Flows

Cash flow from Operating Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company incurred a loss of $3,865,621. This negative impact to cash was offset by an $2,738,371 increase in accounts receivable, and a $1,586,559 increase in accounts payable, providing a net positive cash flow from operations of $1,152,792.

Cash flow from Investing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company used $2,815,068 of cash primarily investing in $2,551,611 in aircraft assets and $263,457 in engine reserves.

Cash flow from Financing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company received $1,650,223 in cash of financing activity primarily from related party long term debt.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

At December 31, 2025, the Company had current assets of $3,727,772 and current liabilities of $16,333,220 compared with current assets of $997,117 and current liabilities of $5,358,619 at December 31, 2024. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon generating additional charter revenue growth by improving current aircraft fleet charter operations, and obtaining cost effective financing to invest in additional charter aircraft.

Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to June 30, 2025 totaled $5,783,795 and $7,427,321, respectively. Charter revenue decreased $1.7 million, or 23.9%, and other revenue, net, decreased $39,086. These decreases were partly offset by increases of $117,729 in maintenance revenue and $21,000 in management-fee revenue. The decrease in charter revenue primarily reflected the removal of the Paradigm fleet from our available charter fleet and the temporary unavailability of aircraft N450JB due to maintenance issues. Based on the current maintenance schedule, the Company expects N450JB to return to service by the end of August 2026, subject to completion of required maintenance and testing.

Cost of Sales for the three months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to June 30, 2025 totaled $5,5818,840 and $7,205,857, respectively, an decreases of $1,387,017, or 19.2%. The decrease primarily reflected fewer flight hours and a reduction in the contractual engine-reserve rate for the CJ3 fleet under a renegotiated arrangement with a third party, from $1,109 to $870. These savings were partly offset by costs associated with maintenance events. Because cost of sales declined more slowly than revenue, we recorded a gross loss of $35,045 compared with gross profit of $221,464. Gross margin decreased to (0.6)% from 3.0%

Operating Expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to June 30, 2025 totaled $870,912 and $1,045,126, respectively, a decrease of $174,214, or 16.7%. Payroll expense decreased $116,334, primarily reflecting reductions in employee headcount. Selling, general and administrative expense decreased $57,880, primarily reflecting cost-reduction initiatives. Despite these savings, operating expenses increased as a percentage of revenue to 15.1% from 14.1% because revenue declined more rapidly than operating expenses.

Loss from Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was ($905,957) compared to ($823,662) for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The loss from operations for the three months ending June 30, 2026 increased by $82,295, or 10.0%, reflecting a $1,643,526 decline in revenue that outpaced cost reductions in the quarter. Cost of Sales decreased by $1,387,017 (including the renegotiated CJ3 lease rates and lower charter flight activity) and Operating Expenses decreased by $174,214 (pilot efficiencies and cost reduction initiatives); however, these reductions were more than offset by the revenue decline, which compressed gross margin to a negative $35,045.

Results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025

Revenues

Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to June 30, 2025 decreased $315,590, or 2.4%, to $12,987,254 from $13,302,844, respectively. Charter revenue decreased $578,540, or 4.4%. This decrease was partly offset by increases of $231,985 in maintenance revenue and $56,465 in other revenue, net. The six-month comparison masks a sharp reversal in quarterly year-over-year performance: total revenue increased $1,327,936 in the first quarter but decreased $1,643,526 in the second quarter, while charter revenue increased $1,164,629 in the first quarter but decreased $1,743,169 in the second quarter. The second-quarter charter decline primarily reflected the removal of the Paradigm fleet from our available charter fleet and the temporary unavailability of aircraft N450JB due to maintenance issues.

Cost of Sales

Cost of Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to June 30, 2025 totaled $12,485,199 and $12,934,792, respectively, a decrease of $449,593, or 3.5%. The six-month decrease consisted of a $1,387,017 decrease in the second quarter that more than offset a $937,424 increase in the first quarter. The second-quarter decrease primarily reflected fewer flight hours and a reduction in the contractual engine-reserve rate for the CJ3 fleet under a renegotiated arrangement with a third party, partly offset by costs associated with maintenance events. Because cost of sales decreased more rapidly than revenue for the six-month period, gross profit increased $134,003 to $502,055 and gross margin improved to 3.9% from 2.8%.

Operating Expenses

Operating Expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to June 30, 2025 totaled $2,148,475 and $2,047,392, respectively, an increase of $101,083, or 4.9%. The six-month increase reflected a $275,297 increase in the first quarter, partly offset by a $174,214 decrease in the second quarter. Payroll expense decreased $77,396 for the six-month period, which primarily reflected reductions in employee headcount, more than offset a $38,938 first-quarter increase. Selling, general and administrative expense increased $178,479. Operating expenses increased to 16.5% of revenue from 15.4%.

Loss from Operations

Loss from Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was ($1,646,420) compared to ($1,679,340) for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The six-month improvement consisted of a $115,215 improvement in the first quarter, partly offset by an $82,295 deterioration in the second quarter. Operating margin was approximately (12.7)% compared with (12.6)%, indicating that the small dollar improvement did not produce a meaningful margin improvement.

Other Income (Expense)

Other (Income) Expense for the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to June 30, 2025 totaled $797,384 and $544,210, respectively, an increase of $253,174, or 46.5%. Interest expense increased $224,372, and other income decreased $28,802.

Net Income (Loss)

Net Loss for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was ($2,443,804) compared to ($2,223,550) for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The first-quarter net loss improved $67,199, but the second-quarter net loss worsened $287,453, resulting in the six-month deterioration. The six-month change reflected $253,174 of higher other expense, net, and $101,083 of higher operating expenses, partly offset by a $134,003 improvement in gross profit.