PRLD 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Prelude Therapeutics Inc · Nasdaq · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1678660 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “International trade policies, including tariffs, sanctions and trade barriers may adversely affect our current and future business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.”
Largest changes
“International trade policies, including tariffs, sanctions and trade barriers may adversely affect our current and future business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.”see in full comparison
“We operate in a global economy, which includes utilizing third-party suppliers in certain countries outside the United States. There is inherent risk, based on the complex relationships among the U.S. and the countries in which we conduct our business, that political, diplomatic, and national security factors can lead to global trade restrictions and changes in trade policies and export regulations that may adversely affect our business and operations. The current international trade and regulatory environment is subject to significant ongoing uncertainty. In 2025, the U.S. …”see in full comparison
In addition, data protection requirements and risk are increasing in the United States. The state of California enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, which creates new individual privacy rights for California consumers (as defined in the CCPA), including the rights to access,see in full comparisoncorrection,correct, anddeletiondeleteandpersonalplacesinformation increased privacy and security obligations on entities handling certain personal data of consumers or households. The CCPA requires covered companies to provide detailed disclosures to consumers about such companies’ data collection, use and sharing practices, provide such consumersnewways to opt-out of certain sales or transfers of personal information, and provide consumers with additional causes ofaction. Following California’s lead, other states have adopted similar comprehensive consumer privacy laws, all of which may impact our business activities and exemplifies the vulnerability of our business to the evolving regulatory environment related to personal data and protected health information. The CCPA and other state privacy laws provide for significant civil penalties for violations, and California now provides for a private right ofaction for databreaches that is expected to increase data breach litigation. These regulatory changes may increase our compliance costs and potential liability, particularly in the event of a data breach.breaches.
“If AI fails to perform as intended by us in our business and operations, produces unreliable or biased outputs, or is perceived as contributing to operational disruptions, quality issues, regulatory noncompliance, or adverse product outcomes, our reputation could be harmed and we could be subject to increased regulatory scrutiny, enforcement action, and regulatory fines (including under HIPAA, state laws, the EU AI Act and GDPR and related laws in the EU/EEA, Switzerland and the UK), product liability claims, litigation, loss of valuable property and information, or other legal exposures …”see in full comparison
“State laws may be more stringent, broader in scope or offer greater individual rights with respect to health-related information or other personal information than HIPAA. Complying with these various state laws and regulations, which may differ from state to state, requires significant resources and may complicate our compliance efforts. Penalties for violation of any of these laws and regulations may include civil and/or criminal penalties these regulatory changes may increase our compliance costs and potential liability, particularly in the event of a data breach.”see in full comparison
“Trade disputes, tariffs, restrictions and other political tensions between the United States and other countries may also exacerbate unfavorable macroeconomic conditions including inflationary pressures, foreign exchange volatility, financial market instability, and economic recessions or downturns. The ultimate impact of current or future tariffs and trade restrictions remains uncertain. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (80)
We are highly dependent on the success of our product candidates which are in early clinical development. We have not completed successful late-stage pivotal clinical trials or obtained regulatory approval for any product candidate. We may never obtain approval for any of our product candidates or achieve or sustain profitability.
If we experience delays or difficulties in enrolling patients in our ongoing or planned clinical trials, our receipt of necessary regulatory approval could be delayed or prevented.
Our principal stockholders and management own a significant percentage of our stock and are able tocan exert significant control over matters subject to stockholder approval.
We are an “emerging growth company” and a “smaller reporting company” and we cannot be certain if the reduced reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.
We will continue to incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives and corporate governance practices.
Since our inception, we have focused substantially all of our efforts and financial resources on the research, preclinical and clinical development of our product candidates, and our research efforts on other potential product candidates targeting PRMT5, MCL1, CDK9, and BRM, otherwise known as SMARCA2.candidates. As of December 31, 2024,2025, our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities were $133.6$103.2 million.
Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with pharmaceutical product development, we are unable to accurately predict the timing or amount of increased expenses we will incur or when, or if, we will be able to achieve profitability. If we decide to or are required by the FDA or regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions to perform studies or clinical trials in addition to those currently expected, or if there are any delays in establishing appropriate manufacturing arrangements for, in initiating or completing our current and planned clinical trials for, or in the development of, any of our product candidates, our expenses could increase materially and profitability could be further delayed.
We expect to continue to incur expenses in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we advance our product candidates through clinical development and seek to design additional product candidates from our discovery programs. We expect to incur continued expenses as we continue our research and development, initiate additional clinical trials, and seek marketing approval for our lead programs and our other product candidates. In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution. Furthermore, we expect to continue to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. Adequate additional financing may not be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. For example, we received capital in connection with the exclusive option agreement entered into with Incyte Corporation (“Incyte”) in November 2025 in exchange for the option to acquire certain rights, titles and interests related to our mutative selective JAK2V617F inhibitor program. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on favorable terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs, our commercialization plans or other operations.
Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be adversely affected by general conditions in the global economy and in the global financial markets. A severe or prolonged economic downturn could result in a variety of risks to our business, including our ability to raise additional capital when needed on acceptable terms, if at all. A weak or declining economy could also strain our suppliers, service providers, manufacturers or other partners and there is a risk that one or more would not survive or be able to meet their commitments to us under such circumstances. Global credit and financial markets have experienced volatility and disruptions in the past several years partly due to widespread health concerns, pandemics and other outbreaks of illness as well as the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East.East and increasing tensions in Central and South America, including recent U.S. military operations in Venezuela. Such volatility includes severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, inflation, increases in unemployment rates and uncertainty about economic stability. There can be no assurances that further deterioration in credit and financial markets and confidence in economic conditions will not occur. For example, U.S. debt ceiling and budget deficit concerns have increased the possibility of additional credit-rating downgrades and economic slowdowns, or a recession in the United States. Although U.S. lawmakers passed legislation to raise the federal debt ceiling on multiple occasions, including a suspension of the federal debt ceiling in June 2023, ratings agencies have lowered or threatened to lower the long-term sovereign credit rating of the United States. The impact of this or any further downgrades to the U.S. government’s sovereign credit rating or its perceived creditworthiness could adversely affect the U.S. and global financial markets and economic conditions. Moreover, the uncertainty surrounding government funding debates and debt-ceiling negotiations can negatively affect market conditions, investor sentiment, and the liquidity of small-cap and microcap issuers such as ours. Accordingly, any future federal government shutdown or protracted budget impasse could materially and adversely affect our regulatory compliance, financing options and capabilities, and overall financial condition. Any of the foregoing could harm our business and we cannot anticipate all of the ways in which the current economic climate and financial market conditions could adversely impact our business.
We are highly dependent on the success of our product candidates whichthat are in early clinical development. We have not completed successful late-stage pivotal clinical trials or obtained regulatory approval for any product candidate. We may never obtain approval for any of our product candidates or achieve or sustain profitability.
Our future success is highly dependent on our ability to obtain regulatory approval for, and then successfully commercialize, our product candidates. We are early in our development efforts and our lead product candidates are each currently in early stage clinical development. Our other product candidates are in earlier stages of development.efforts. We currently have no products that are approved for sale in any jurisdiction. There can be no assurance that our product candidates in development will achieve success in their preclinical or clinical trials or obtain regulatory approval. Regulators may also request additional studies, data, and information, that we may need to develop and which were not originally planned. Any delays in clinical studies, obtaining regulatory approval, or if we never initiate clinical studies or obtain regulatory approval, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Many of these factors are beyond our control, and it is possible that none of our product candidates will ever obtain regulatory approval even if we expend substantial time and resources seeking such approval. If we do not achieve one or more of these factors in a timely manner or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully commercialize our product candidates, which would materially harm our business. For example, our business could be harmed if results of our ongoing clinical trials vary adversely from our expectations.
We currently have several product candidates in Phase 1 clinical development and additional product candidates in preclinical development, and the risk of failure for each is high. We are unable to predict when or if our product candidates will prove effective or safe in humans or will obtain marketing approval. Before obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of any product candidate, we must complete preclinical development and then conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in humans. Clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and is uncertain as to the outcome.
A failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. The outcome of preclinical testing and early clinical trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials or of clinical trials of the same product candidates in other indications, and interim or preliminary results of a clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results. Later-stage clinical trials could differ in significant ways from early-stage clinical trials, including changes to inclusion and exclusion criteria, efficacy endpoints, dosing regimen and statistical design. In particular, the small number of patients in our current Phase 1and clinical trialsdesign. Studies may also be subject to confounding factors that make it difficult to interpret the results ofor thesethat trialscould lessimpact predictivethe reliability of the outcome of later clinical trials.results.
The FDA may require us to conduct additional preclinical studies or additional manufacturing development for any product candidate before it allows us to initiate subsequent clinical trials under any IND, which may lead to additional delays and increase the costs of our preclinical development programs.
Any delays in the commencement or completion of our ongoing, planned or future clinical trials could significantly affect our product development costs. We may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, clinical trials that could delay or prevent our ability to obtain marketing approval or commercialize our product candidates, including:
the FDA may disagree as to the design or implementation of our clinical trials or with our proposed dose for any of our pipeline programs. For instance, in the oncology space, FDA has recently focusedassesses not only on maximum tolerated dose but also on dose optimization, with the issuance of a guidance on this topic. FDA has also expressed a preference for randomized controlled clinical trials to support accelerated approval, rather than single arm trials with response endpoint;
the number of patients required for clinical trials for our product candidates may be larger than we anticipate, enrollment in these clinical trials may be slower than we anticipate or may be lower than we anticipate due to challenges in recruiting and enrolling suitable patients that meet the study criteria, participants may drop out of these clinical trials at a higher rate than we anticipate or may not follow trial procedures or the duration of these clinical trials may be longer than we anticipate;
the supply or quality of our product candidates or other materials necessary to conduct clinical trials for our product candidates may be insufficient or inadequate and result in delays or suspension of our clinical trials; and the impact of any widespread outbreak of a communicable disease, which may slow potential enrollment, reduce the number of eligible patients for clinical trials, confound trial results, or reduce the number of patients that remain in our trials.
If we experience delays or difficulties in enrolling patients in our ongoing or planned clinical trials, our receipt of necessary regulatory approval could be delayed or prevented.
We may not be able to initiate or continue our ongoing or planned clinical trials for our product candidates if we are unable to identify and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in these trials as required by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. In addition, some of our competitors currently have ongoing clinical trials for product candidates that would treat the same patients as our clinical product candidates, and patients who would otherwise be eligible for our clinical trials may instead enroll in clinical trials of our competitors’ product candidates. Patient enrollment is also affected by other factors, including:
Results of our ongoing and planned clinical trials could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence of side effects or unexpected characteristics. Undesirable side effects caused by our product candidates could result in the delay, suspension or termination of clinical trials by us or regulatory authorities for a number of reasons or could result in a FDA determination not to approve the product. Furthermore, clinical trials by their nature utilize a sample of the potential patient population. With a limited number of subjects and limited duration of exposure, rare and severe side effects of our product candidates or those of our competitors may only be uncovered with a significantly larger number of patients exposed to the drug.
Additionally, due to the high mortality rates of the cancers for which we are initially pursuing development and the pretreated nature of many patients in our ongoing clinical trials,patients, a material percentage of patients in these clinical trials may die during a trial, which could impact the development of product candidates. If we elect or are required to delay, suspend or terminate any clinical trial, the commercial prospects of our product candidates will be harmed and our ability to generate product revenues from this product candidate will be delayed or eliminated. Adverse events observed in clinical trials could prevent approval of the product or, if approved, hinder or prevent market acceptance of our product candidates. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations significantly.
From time to time, we may publicly disclose preliminary, interim or topline data from our clinical trials. These updates are based on a preliminary analysis of then-available data, and the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular study or trial. Additionally, interim data from clinical trials that we may complete are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Therefore, positive interim results in any ongoing clinical trial may not be predictive of such results in the completed study or trial. We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. As a result, the topline results that we report may differ from future results of the same studies, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results, once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Topline data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, topline data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. In addition, we may report interim analyses of only certain endpoints rather than all endpoints. Adverse changes between preliminary or interim data and final data could significantly harm our business and prospects. Further, additional disclosure of interim data by us or by our competitors in the future could result in volatility in the price of our common stock. See the description of risks under the heading “Risks Related to our Common Stock” for more disclosure related to the risk of volatility in our stock price.
Because we have limited financial and managerial resources, we focus on research programs and product candidates that we identify for specific indications. As a result, we may forego or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or for other indications that later prove to have greater commercial potential. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. Our spending on current and future research and development programs and product candidates for specific indications may not yield any commercially viable products. As an example, on November 4, 2025, we announced that we were pausing the clinical development of our SMARCA2 degrader program, which is comprised of PRT3789 and PRT7732, for strategic reasons and not due to safety or regulatory concerns. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights to such product candidate.
In addition, we may experience delays or rejections based upon additional government regulation from future legislation or administrative action, or changes in regulatory authority policy during the period of product development, clinical trials, and the review process. For example, the Oncology Center of Excellence, or OCE, within the FDA advanced Project Optimus, which is an initiative to reform the dose optimization and dose selection paradigm in oncology drug development to emphasize selection of an optimal dose, which is a dose or doses that maximizes not only the efficacy of a drug but the safety and tolerability as well. This shift from the prior approach, which generally determined the maximum tolerated dose, may require sponsors to spend additional time and resources to further explore a product candidate’s dose-response relationship to facilitate optimum dose selection in a target population. Other OCE initiatives have included Project FrontRunner, a newan initiative with a goal of developing a framework for encouraging sponsors to consider developing cancer drugs in the earlier advanced setting rather than for treatment of patients who have received numerous prior lines of therapies or have exhausted available treatment options. We are considering these and any other policy changes, including initiatives with respect to accelerated approval and to coordinate review of oncology products among international regulators, as they relate to our programs.
Future changesChanges in legal and regulatory requirements may introduce new risks into our operations and future prospects, which we are not able to currently anticipate. By example, changes taking place in the United States associated with athe newcurrent federal administration, as well as changes in legal standards, including the reduced level of judicial deference due to administrative agencies following a 2024 Supreme Court decision, may introduce uncertainties with respect to our current and future operations and our future likelihood of success. It is possible that newNew federal or state laws or regulations may be passed or have been passed, or laws and regulations may be and have been enforced differently than they were before, which may expose us to additional legal and regulatory risk or uncertainty and require the expenditure of additional resources to ensure that we are able to comply. Such actions could also adversely restrict our business and operations. There could also be changes in FDA’s approval standards that could impact our ability to obtain product approval and market our product candidates within the currently anticipated timeframes or otherwise impact the competitive market for our product candidates. Such changes may necessitate the conduct of additional development work, including preclinical and clinical trials, and manufacturing development. By example, for products intended for rare and serious diseases with unmet medical needs, FDA is authorized to exercise regulatory flexibility when making a medical risk-benefit judgment. It is possible that whether and how FDA exercises any regulatory flexibility, including with respect to specialized pathways, such as accelerated approval, and with respect to our product candidates may change, which could impact our ability to obtain product approval. Further, legal and regulatory changes may impact how we may market and sell our products in the future, if they are approved, as well as how they are reimbursed. Moreover, there have and could be further changes in the federal workforce and agency policies that may result in regulatory delays, including with respect to FDA’s review of marketing applications and other submissions, and that may impact the ability to communicate with and obtain guidance from the agencies. At this time, it is too early to predict the exact nature of any changes that may take place or whether and how they may impact our business and results of operation.
In order to market and sell our products in any jurisdiction outside the United States, we must obtain separate marketing approvals and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. The approval procedure varies among countries and can involve additional testing. The time required to obtain approval may differ substantially from that required to obtain FDA approval. The regulatory approval process outside the United States generally includes all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA approval. In addition, in many countries outside the United States, it is required that the product beobtain approvedpricing forand reimbursement before the product can be approved for sale in that country.approval. We may not obtain approvals from regulatory authorities outside the United States on a timely basis, if at all. Approval by the FDA does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions, and approval by one regulatory authority outside the United States does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions or by the FDA. We may not be able to submit for marketing approvals and may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our products in any market.
Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the United States, may designate drugs for relatively small patient populations as “orphan drugs.” Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may designate a drug as an orphan drug if it is intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally defined as a patient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or if the disease or condition affects more than 200,000 individuals in the United States and there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing the drug for the type of disease or condition will be recovered from sales of the product in the United States. When seeking orphan drug designation, sponsors must also provide medically plausible basis for the use of the drug for the rare disease or condition.
Orphan drug designation can provide opportunities for financial incentives, such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax advantages and user-fee waivers. Additionally, if a product that has orphan designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease or condition for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan drug exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications to market the same drug for the same approved indication for seven years, except in certain circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority (i.e., another product is safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care) over the product with orphan exclusivity or where the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient product quantity. Competitors, however, may receive approval of different products for the same indication for which the orphan product has exclusivity, or obtain approval for the same product but for a different indication than that for which the orphan product has exclusivity.
A companion diagnostic is generally developed in conjunction with the clinical program for an associated therapeutic product. To date, the FDA has required premarket approval of the vast majority of companion diagnostics for cancer therapies, except in limited cases where FDA allows the usediagnostic ofis considered an LDT as a companion diagnostic (as discussed above,LDT. LDTs are generally not subject to FDA enforcement discretion and do not require FDA premarket approval,jurisdiction, but remain subject to CLIA regulatory requirements).requirements. Generally, when a companion diagnostic is essential to the safe and effective use of a drug product, the FDA requires that the companion diagnostic be approved before or concurrent with approval of the therapeutic product and before a product can be commercialized. The approval of a companion diagnostic as part of the therapeutic product’s labeling limits the use of the therapeutic product to only those patients who express the specific genetic alteration that the companion diagnostic was developed to detect.
We must also comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotion for any of our product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Promotional communications with respect to prescription drugs are subject to a variety of legal and regulatory restrictions and must be consistent with the information in the product’s approved labeling, among other requirements. Thus, we will not be able to promote any products we develop for indications or uses for which they are not approved. Over the last year, FDA has increased its enforcement of promotional and advertising requirements, especially in the area of direct to consumer advertising. Accordingly, there may be an increased risk of enforcement should promotional communications not comply with FDA’s requirements.
HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH, and their implementing regulations, impose requirements on certain covered entities, including healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses as well as their respective business associates and their subcontractors that perform services for them that involve the use, or disclosure, of individually identifiable health information, relating to the privacy, security, and transmission of such individually identifiable health information;
The ACA requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies to annually report to CMS information related to certain payments and other transfers of value provided to teaching hospitals and to U.S.-licensed physicians, (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified registered nurse anesthetists and anesthesiologist assistants, and certified nurse-midwives. Applicable manufacturers also must report ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members; and analogous state laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, and analogous non-U.S. fraud and abuse laws and regulations may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers. Some state laws require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines or the Compliance Program Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers published by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Inspector General; to implement gift bans, and to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers, marketing expenditures, or drug pricing, including price increases. Some state and local laws require the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives. Various state and non-U.S. laws also govern the privacy and security of individuals' health information in some circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.
Other legal, regulatory and commercial policy influences are subjecting our industry to significant changes, and we cannot predict whether new regulations or policies will emerge from U.S. federal or state governments, foreign governments, or third-party payors. Government and commercial payors may, in the future, consider healthcare policies and proposals intended to curb rising healthcare costs, including those that could significantly affect reimbursement for healthcare products such as our systems. These policies have included and may in the future include: basing reimbursement policies and rates on clinical outcomes, the comparative effectiveness, and costs, of different treatment technologies and modalities; imposing price controls and taxes on medical device providers; and other measures. These policies culminated in the enactment of the Inflation Reduction Act, or IRA, in August 2022, which, among other things, allows the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, to negotiate the selling price of certain drugs and biologics that CMS reimburses under Medicare Part B and Part D. The IRA requires manufacturers of selected drugs to negotiate discounted prices with the Secretary of HHS. Failure of a manufacturer to reach an agreement can subject manufacturers to an excise tax or withdraw of all drug products from coverage under Medicare and Medicaid. The negotiated prices, which will first become effective in 2026 and were capped at a statutory ceiling price beginning in October 2023, penalize drug manufacturers that increase prices of Medicare Part B and Part D drugs at a rate greater than the rate of inflation. The IRA permits the Secretary of HHS to implement many of these provisions through guidance, as opposed to regulation, for the initial years. Manufacturers that fail to comply with the IRA may be subject to various penalties, including civil monetary penalties. The IRA also extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in ACA marketplaces through plan year 2025. These provisions began taking effect in 2023 and2023, have since been subject to multiple legal challenges.challenges, and have since been allowed by Congress to expire. Future significant changes in the healthcare systems in the United States or elsewhere could also have a negative impact on the demand for our current and future products. These include changes that may reduce reimbursement rates for our products and changes that may be proposed or implemented by the current or future laws or regulations. It is unclear exactly howwhat, theif 2024 presidential election will impactany, healthcare reform measures of the existing administration or whether a new administration could impose other reform efforts, including what, if any, impact such changes will have on our business. For example, drug price negotiations and other IRA program implementation measures could potentially be affected by the Executive Order, Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions, issued by President Trump on January 20, 2025 and/or the anticipated changes in leadership at HHSHealth and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) under the new administration. In another example, the CMS issued an interim final rule on November 27, 2020, implementing a Most Favored Nation, or MFN, payment model under which reimbursement for certain Medicare Part B drugs and biologicals would be based on a price that reflects the lowest per capital Gross Domestic Product-adjusted, or GDP-adjusted, price of any non-U.S. member country of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD, with a GDP per capita that is at least sixty percent of the U.S. GDP per capita. Although this rule has since been rescinded, in November 2025, CMS introduced the GENEROUS Model, which is scheduled to launch in January 2026 and run for five years, pursuant to which manufacturers will provide supplemental rebates aligned with MFN pricing to participating in state Medicaid programs that opt into the program in exchange for standardized coverage criteria across all participating states.
In some countries, particularly the countries of the European Union, or the EU, the pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can take considerable time after the receipt of marketing approval for a product. To obtain reimbursement or pricing and reimbursement approval in some countries, we may be required to conduct a clinical trial that compares the cost-effectiveness of our product candidates to other available therapies. Some jurisdictions operate positive and negative list systems under which products may only be marketed once a reimbursement price has been agreed. Other countries allow companies to determine the prices for their medicines but monitor and control company profits and may limit or restrict reimbursement and can include retrospective rebates to the government. If reimbursement of our products is unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, our business could be harmed. Political, economic and regulatory developments may further complicate pricing negotiations, and pricing negotiations may continue after reimbursement has been obtained.obtained, or vice versa. Reference pricing used by various EU member states and parallel trade, such as arbitrage between low-priced and high-priced member states, can further reduce prices. There can be no assurance that any country that has price controls or reimbursement limitations for pharmaceutical products will allow favorable reimbursement and pricing arrangements for any products.
Various international trade, export control and sanctions laws, regulations and executive orders also restrict the use and dissemination outside of the United States, or the sharing with certain non-U.S. persons in the United States, of personalproducts identifying information and products,or technology orthat sensitive personal dataare controlled for export, as well as restricting our ability to deal with certain persons subject to sanctions. Specifically, certain biological agents, toxins, and related technology are restricted by the United States for export to certain countries for national security reasons and require an export authorization from the U.S. Department of Commerce. U.S. export controls also apply to genetic elements and genetically modified organisms that contain DNA associated with the pathogenicity of these biological materials. There are also a number of foreign parties on the U.S. Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Parties List and the Entity List, both of which prohibit certain transactions by U.S. persons or from the U.S. with designated persons. If we expand our presence outside of the United States, it will require us to dedicate additional resources to comply with these laws, and these laws may preclude us from developing, manufacturing or selling certain product candidates and products outside of the United States, which could limit our growth potential and increase our development costs.
U.S. laws may also restrict our ability to share personal data with certain foreign parties. A final rule (the Data Security Program or DSP Rule) was issued by the U.S. Department of Justice, or DOJ in 2025 to impose restrictions on access to U.S. bulk sensitive personal data and government-related data by certain foreign countries and persons. The DSP Rule prohibits and restricts certain "bulk" data transactions involving China (including Hong Kong and Macau) and other specified “countries of concern” and individuals and entities under their control. To the extent we are subject to these restrictions for cross-border data flows, it could potentially impact our business and restrict our collaboration opportunities.
We do not have the ability to independently conduct all aspects of our preclinical testing or clinical trials ourselves. As a result, we are dependent on third parties to conduct our ongoing and planned clinical trials of our product candidates and any preclinical studies and clinical trials of any other product candidates. The timing of the initiation and completion of these trials will therefore be partially controlled by such third parties and may result in delays to our development programs. Specifically, we expect CROs, clinical investigators, laboratories and consultants to play a significant role in the conduct of these trials and the subsequent collection and analysis of data. However, these CROs and other third parties are not our employees, and we will not be able to control all aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each clinical trial is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol and legal, regulatory and scientific standards, and our reliance on the CROs and other third parties does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. By example, we are required to monitor the activities of third parties undertaking clinical trials on our behalf, but our monitoring may not be able to detect any existing or emerging issues.
We and our CROs, as well as other third parties, including investigators, are required to comply with good clinical practices, or GCP, requirements, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA for product candidates in clinical development. Regulatory authorities enforce these GCP requirements through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, clinical trial investigators and clinical trial sites. If we or any of our CROs or clinical trial sites fail to comply with applicable GCP requirements or to conduct a trial in accordance with its investigational plan, we or they may be subject to enforcement actions, the data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable, and the FDA may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. We cannot assure you that, upon inspection, the FDA will determine that our clinical trials comply with GCPs. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with product produced under cGMP regulations applicable to the stage of product development and our preclinical trials must be conducted in accordance with good laboratory practices. Our failure or the failure of third parties on whom we rely on to comply with these regulations may require us to stop and/or repeat clinical trials or other studies, which would delay the marketing approval process.
Any performance failure on the part of our existing or future manufacturers could delay clinical development or marketing approval. We do not currently have arrangements in place for redundant supply or a second source for bulk drug substance. If our current CMOs for preclinical and clinical testing cannot perform as agreed, we may be required to replace such CMOs. Additionally, if legal and regulatory requirements change, we may need to seek CMOs outside of certain territories or domestically. Although we believe that there are several potential alternative manufacturers who could manufacture our product candidates, we may incur added costs and delays in identifying and qualifying any such replacement manufacturer or be able to reach agreement with any alternative manufacturer. Further, our third-party manufacturers may experience manufacturing or shipping difficulties due to resource constraints or as a result of natural disasters, labor disputes, unstable political environments, including the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East,East and increasing tensions in Central and South America, including recent U.S. military operations in Venezuela, or public health epidemics such as the COVID-19 pandemic.epidemics. If our current third-party manufacturers cannot perform as agreed, we may be required to replace such manufacturers and we may be unable to replace them on a timely basis or at all.
There have been Congressional legislative proposals, such as the recent bill titled the Biosecure Act,proposals to discourage contracting with Chinese companies on the development or manufacturing of pharmaceutical products. For example, the BIOSECURE Act was passed as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 and prohibits U.S. government contracts, loans and grants being made to any “biotechnology company of concern” or to any entity that uses biotechnology equipment or services from a “biotechnology company of concern”, including certain entities in China involved in the manufacturing, distribution, provision, or procurement of a biotechnology equipment or service. If our suppliers or our customers were to be designated under the Act, this could potentially harm our business and could severely restrict our ability to purchase services or products from, or otherwise collaborate with “biotechnology companies of concern” without losing the ability to contract with, or otherwise receive funding from, the U.S. government. If any new legislation, executive orders, tariffs, laws and/or regulations are implemented, if existing trade agreements are renegotiated or if the U.S. or Chinese governments take retaliatory actions due to the recent U.S.-China tension, such changes could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, our ability to raise capital and the market price of our shares.
International trade policies, including tariffs, sanctions and trade barriers may adversely affect our current and future business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We operate in a global economy, which includes utilizing third-party suppliers in certain countries outside the United States. There is inherent risk, based on the complex relationships among the U.S. and the countries in which we conduct our business, that political, diplomatic, and national security factors can lead to global trade restrictions and changes in trade policies and export regulations that may adversely affect our business and operations. The current international trade and regulatory environment is subject to significant ongoing uncertainty. In 2025, the U.S. government announced substantial new tariffs affecting a wide range of products and jurisdictions and has indicated an intention to continue developing new trade policies, including with respect to the pharmaceutical industry. For example, in September 2025, the current Presidential Administration announced plans to impose up to 100% tariffs on imported branded or patented pharmaceutical products, subject to certain exceptions. There is substantial uncertainty as to when such tariffs may go into effect and whether such tariffs would apply to the importation of active pharmaceutical ingredients or bulk drug products that are intended for use in clinical trials, and, more generally, about the duration of existing tariffs, implementation of announced tariffs, litigation seeking certain tariff refunds and whether additional tariffs or other retaliatory measures may be imposed, modified or suspended. In response, certain foreign governments have announced or implemented retaliatory tariffs and other protectionist measures. These developments have created a dynamic and unpredictable trade landscape, which may adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Current or future tariffs will result in increased research and development expenses. In addition, such tariffs will increase our supply chain complexity and could also potentially disrupt our existing supply chain. Trade restrictions affecting the import of materials necessary for clinical trials could result in delays to our development timelines. Increased development costs and extended development timelines could place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to companies operating in regions with more favorable trade relationships and could reduce investor confidence, negatively impacting our ability to secure additional financing on favorable terms or at all. In addition, as we advance toward commercialization in the future, tariffs and trade restrictions could hinder our ability to establish cost-effective production capabilities and international operations, negatively impacting our growth prospects.
Trade disputes, tariffs, restrictions and other political tensions between the United States and other countries may also exacerbate unfavorable macroeconomic conditions including inflationary pressures, foreign exchange volatility, financial market instability, and economic recessions or downturns. The ultimate impact of current or future tariffs and trade restrictions remains uncertain. While we actively monitor these risks, any prolonged economic downturn, escalation in trade tensions, or deterioration in international perception of U.S.-based companies could materially and adversely affect our business, ability to access the capital markets or other financing sources, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, trade developments have and may continue to heighten the risks related to the other risk factors described elsewhere in this report.
limitations or warningswarnings, as well as approved indication, contained in the labeling approved for our product candidates by the FDA;
The development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products is highly competitive. We face competition with respect to our current product candidates and will face competition with respect to any product candidates that we may seek to develop or commercialize in the future, from major pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and existing or emerging biotechnology companies, academic research institutions and governmental agencies and public and private research institutions worldwide. There are a number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that currently are pursuing the development of precision oncology therapies optimized to effectively target the key driver mechanisms in cancers with high unmet need, including Amgen Inc., Arvinas Inc., AstraZeneca plc, Aurigene, Boehringer Ingelheim, C4 Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Foghorn Therapeutics Inc., Gan & Lee, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc, Johnson & Johnson, Kronos Bio, Inc., Kymera Therapeutics Inc., Nanjing Zaiming Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Nurix Therapeutics, Oncopia Therapeutics, Pfizer Inc., Plexium, Sellas Life Science Group, Inc., Suzhou Zanrong Pharmaceutical Technology Co. Ltd, Vincerx Pharma, Inc., Novartis AG, and Shanghai Haiyan Pharmaceutical Technology Co Ltd.need.
For our SMARCAJAK2V617F 2 (BRM) degraderinhibitor program, othercompetition companies,includes includingIncyte Amgen,Corporation, Aurigene,Cogent C4Biosciences, Eilean Therapeutics, Foghorn Therapeutics, Inc., Kymera Therapeutics, Arvinas, Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, and LillyAtavistik Bio, all of which have publicly disclosed their pre-clinical research and development efforts.
For our KAT6A degrader program, other companies, including Pfizer, Olema Oncology, Menarini Group, BeOne Medicines (f/k/a BeiGene), Ideaya Biosciences, Isosterix and Beijing Konruns Pharmaceutical have publicly disclosed their research and development efforts.
More broadly, several global biopharmaceutical companies have prioritized precision oncology as an area of strategic focus, including but not limited to Amgen Inc., AbbVie Inc., AstraZeneca PLC, Astellas Inc., Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim AG, Bristol Myers Squibb, Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Inc., F. Hoffman-La Roche, Gilead Sciences Inc., GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Merck & Co. Inc., Novartis AG, and Pfizer Inc. In addition, there are multiple smaller biotech companies focused on discovery and development of precision oncology medicines, including but not limited to Arvinas Inc., Aurigene, Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc., C4 Therapeutics, Foghorn Therapeutics Inc., Ideaya Biosciences, Kura Oncology, Inc., Kymera Therapeutics Inc., Nuvation Bio Inc., Repare Therapeutics Inc., Revolution Medicines, Inc., Relay Therapeutics, Inc., Tango Therapeutics, Inc., and Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Many of the companies against which we are competing or against which we may compete in the future, either alone or through collaborations, have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than we do. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller and other early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific, management and sales and marketing personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs. Moreover, we face increased competition from other companies that are using artificial intelligence, some of whom may be able to more quickly and effectively identify and develop novel product candidates compared to us and our business partners, which could impair our ability to compete effectively and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had 13179 full-time employees. We expectmay experience significant growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in the areas of clinical development, clinical operations, manufacturing, regulatory affairs and, if any of our product candidates receives marketing approval, sales, marketing and distribution. To manage our anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our limited financial resources and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such anticipated growth and with developing sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. The expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources.
Our systems, and those of Third Parties, may also experience security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees, or from cyber-attacks by malicious third parties including the deployment of harmful malware, ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, social engineering and other means to affect service reliability and threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion, including by insiders, hacktivists, computer hackers, state sponsored actors, foreign governments, cyber terrorists and cyberother terrorists,threat actors, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. We may not be able to anticipate all types of security and operational threats, nor may we be able to implement preventive measures effective against all such security threats. The techniques used by cyberthreat criminalsactors change frequently, may not be recognized until launched and can originate from a wide variety of sources, including insiders, outside groups such as hacktivists, external service providers, organized crime affiliates, state sponsored actors, terrorist organizations ororganizations, hostile foreign governments or agencies.agencies, or other threat actors. If a disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or applications, or those of our Third Parties, or inappropriate disclosure and other compromise of confidential information,information or impacts to the integrity and availability of data or systems, we could incur liability and reputational damage and the further development and commercialization of our product candidates could be delayed. Any breach, loss or compromise of clinical trial participant personal data may also subject us to civil damages and penalties, under the GDPR (as defined below), HIPAA and other relevant international, state and federal privacy laws.laws, data protection, operational resilience, and cybersecurity. The costs related to significant security breachesbreaches, resilience events or disruptions could be material and exceed the limits of the cybersecurity insurance we maintain against such risks. If the information technology systems of our Third Parties become subject to disruptionsdisruptions, resilience events or security breaches, we may have insufficient recourse against such third parties and we may have to expend significant resources to mitigate the impact of such an event, and to develop and implement protections to prevent future events of this nature from occurring. Any such incident that leads to loss of integrity or availability, unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of personal information, including personal information regarding our clinical trial subjects or employees, could require public notification and/or notification to governmental entitiesentities, business partners, suppliers, customers, and individuals, harm our reputation directly, subject us to mandatory corrective action, and otherwise subject us to liability under laws and regulations that protect the privacy and security of personal information,information or data protection, operational resilience, and cybersecurity, which could result in significant legal and financial exposure and reputational damages that could potentially have an adverse effect on our business.
We and any potential collaborators may be subject to federal, state and foreign data protection laws and regulations (i.e., laws and regulations that address data protection, privacy and data security). In the United States, numerous federal and state laws and regulations, including federal health information privacy laws, state data breach notification laws, state health information privacy laws, state consumer privacy laws, and federal and state consumer protection laws (e.g., Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act), that govern the collection, use, disclosure and protection of health-related and other personal information could apply to our operations or the operations of our collaborators. In addition, we may obtain health information from third parties (including research institutions from which we obtain clinical trial data) that areis subject to privacy, data protection and security requirements under HIPAA, as amended by HITECH. Depending on the facts and circumstances, we could be subject to criminal penalties if we knowingly obtain, use, or disclose individually identifiable health information maintained by a HIPAA-coveredHIPAA-regulated entity in a manner that is not authorized or permitted by HIPAA.
In addition, data protection requirements and risk are increasing in the United States. The state of California enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, which creates new individual privacy rights for California consumers (as defined in the CCPA), including the rights to access, correction,correct, and deletiondelete andpersonal placesinformation increased privacy and security obligations on entities handling certain personal data of consumers or households. The CCPA requires covered companies to provide detailed disclosures to consumers about such companies’ data collection, use and sharing practices, provide such consumers new ways to opt-out of certain sales or transfers of personal information, and provide consumers with additional causes of action. Following California’s lead, other states have adopted similar comprehensive consumer privacy laws, all of which may impact our business activities and exemplifies the vulnerability of our business to the evolving regulatory environment related to personal data and protected health information. The CCPA and other state privacy laws provide for significant civil penalties for violations, and California now provides for a private right of action for data breaches that is expected to increase data breach litigation. These regulatory changes may increase our compliance costs and potential liability, particularly in the event of a data breach.breaches.
Following California’s lead, other states, including Virginia and Colorado, have adopted similar comprehensive consumer privacy laws. Further, additional states are in the process of enacting or will be considering these laws in the future. These state laws may impact our business activities and exemplify the vulnerability of our business to the evolving regulatory environment related to personal data and protected health information.
Some states, like Washington State, have passed healthcare-specific privacy laws. The My Health My Data Act became effective March 31, 2024 and restricts how entities collect, use, and process “consumer health data,” defined broadly as personal information that is linked or reasonably linkable to a consumer and that identifies the consumer's health status. While HIPAA-regulated entities may be exempt from the Act, the exemption is based on the data collected and used rather than on the entity’s status as a HIPAA covered entity or business associate. As such, some data may be subject to the Act and HIPAA, while other data may only be subject to HIPAA.
State laws may be more stringent, broader in scope or offer greater individual rights with respect to health-related information or other personal information than HIPAA. Complying with these various state laws and regulations, which may differ from state to state, requires significant resources and may complicate our compliance efforts. Penalties for violation of any of these laws and regulations may include civil and/or criminal penalties these regulatory changes may increase our compliance costs and potential liability, particularly in the event of a data breach.
Our company is located in Delaware. Any unplanned event, such as flood, fire, explosion, earthquake, extreme weather condition, medical epidemic, power shortage, telecommunication failure or other natural or manmade accidents or incidents that result in us being unable to fully utilize our facilities, or the manufacturing facilities of our third-party CMOs, may have a material and adverse effect on our ability to operate our business, particularly on a daily basis, and have significant negative consequences on our financial and operating conditions. For example, our operations are concentrated primarily on the east coast of the United States, and any adverse weather event or natural disaster, such as a hurricane or heavy snowstorm, could have a material adverse effect on a substantial portion of our operations. Extreme weather conditions or other natural disasters could further disrupt our operations and have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, the long-term effects of climate change on general economic conditions and the pharmaceutical industry in particular are unclear and may heighten or intensify existing risk of natural disasters. If a natural disaster, power outage or other event occurred that prevented us from using all or a significant portion of our headquarters, that damaged critical infrastructure, such as our research facilities or the manufacturing facilities of our third-party CMOs, or that otherwise disrupted operations, it may be difficult or, in certain cases, impossible, for us to continue our business for a substantial period of time. The disaster recovery and business continuity plans that we have in place may prove inadequate in the event of a serious disaster or similar event. We may incur substantial expenses as a result of the limited nature of our disaster recovery and business continuity plans, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. As part of our risk management policy, we maintain insurance coverage at levels that we believe are appropriate for our business. However, in the event of an accident or incident at these facilities, we cannot assure you that the amounts of insurance will be sufficient to satisfy any damages and losses. If our facilities, or the manufacturing facilities of our third-party CMOs, are unable to operate because of an accident or incident or for any other reason, even for a short period of time, any or all of our research and development programs may be harmed. Any business interruption could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Regained Nasdaq Compliance”
Largest changes
“Under the Option Agreement, Incyte received an exclusive option to acquire our entire right, title, and interest in and to certain assets, properties, and rights related to the Program, including the Company’s library of preclinical candidates (collectively, the “Transferred Assets”) by way of an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "APA"). We are continuing to advance the Program. …”see in full comparison
“As previously announced on November 4, 2025, we entered into an exclusive option agreement (the "Option Agreement") with Incyte Corporation ("Incyte") to acquire our mutative selective JAK2V617F inhibitor program (the “Program”) for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Under the Option Agreement, Incyte received an exclusive option to acquire our entire right, title, and interest in and to certain assets, properties, and rights related to the JAK2V617F inhibitor program, including our library of preclinical candidates (collectively, the “Transferred Assets”). …”see in full comparison
“We first evaluated whether the arrangement meets the definition of a derivative or contains any embedded derivatives under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Although the arrangement includes underlying IP‑related value, it qualifies for the scope exception as prescribed by ASC 815-10-15-59(b). We next evaluated whether the arrangement represents a funded research and development arrangement under ASC 730, Research and Development. …”see in full comparison
“During the third quarter of 2025, we amended our collaboration with AbCellera (the "Amended Agreement") and subsequently in October 2025, further expanded the collaboration (the "Expanded License Agreement"). The Amended Agreement and Expanded License Agreement provided AbCellera a non-exclusive license to use certain of our degrader payloads to independently discover, develop and commercialize a select number of novel DACs against undisclosed antibody targets. The agreements also entailed other changes to overall resource allocation and collaboration governance. …”see in full comparison
“The Company also initiated a Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating PRT3789 in combination with KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) in patients with SMARCA4-mutated cancers, per the previously announced collaboration with Merck & Co., Inc. PRT3789 has been shown to increase antigen processing and presentation of unique MHC class I peptides, and increased T-cell activity and IFN-γ production in SMARCA4-mutated cancer cells. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (73)
Overview
Prelude is a clinical-stage fully integratedprecision oncology company built on a foundation of drug discovery excellence to deliver novel precision cancer medicines to underserved patients. By leveraging our core competencies in cancer biology and medicinal chemistry, combined with our clinical development capabilities, we have built an efficient, drug discovery engine and the development expertise necessary to identify compelling biological targets and create new chemical entities, or NCEs, that we advance into clinical trials. We believe our approach could result in better targeted cancer therapies. Our discovery excellence has been supported by our steady progress in creatingadvancing a wholly-owned,pipeline internallyof developednovel pipeline.precision oncology development candidates, alone and with partners. We alsoare began workworking with our partner AbCellera Biologics, Inc. ("AbCellera") on an early-stage discovery program involving potent degraders as payloads for novel antibodies targeting tumor specific antigens. Since our inception in 2016, we have received clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, for multiple investigational new drug applications, or INDs, and successfully advanced several programs into clinical trials. In addition, we have other differentiated proprietary programs in various stages of preclinical development.
By focusing on developing molecules using broad mechanisms that have multiple links to oncogenic driver pathways in select patients, we have developed a diverse pipeline consisting of multiple distinct programs including kinases, targeted protein degraders, and precisiondegrader antibody drugconjugates conjugates.("DAC"). Our pipeline is designed to serve patients with high unmet medical need, where there are limited or no treatment options. We believe we can best address these diseases by developingharnessing therapiesadvances thatin targetnew primarytherapeutic modalities such as targeted protein degradation to develop highly potent and secondaryspecific resistanceagents mechanisms.against clinically validated targets in areas of high unmet need.
Myeloproliferative neoplasms ("MPN") are hematopoietic disorders arising from clonal expansion of hematopoietic stem cells ("HSC") in the bone marrow. Current treatment options for MPN patients offer symptomatic benefit but fail to eliminate disease-initiating clones leading to treatment resistance and progression to secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Therapeutic approaches that can selectively eliminate disease-initiating HSCs and induce molecular remission are an unmet medical need.
Mutations in JAK2, calreticulin ("CALR") and MPL are phenotypic drivers of disease in over 90% of MPN cases. CALR mutations are the second most common driver alteration in MPN, accounting for 20-30% of all cases. Selective expression of mutant CALR on diseased cells but not on normal cells makes CALR a high value target for antibody-directed therapies in MPN.
JAK2V617F is the primary driver mutation responsible for disease progression in the majority of patients living with MPNs. We have discovered novel allosteric inhibitors that bind into the JAK2 JH2 “deep pocket” where the V617F mutation resides. These candidates demonstrate mutant specific inhibition in multiple preclinical models of MPNs. We believe this approach may have the potential to reduce mutant allele burden, slow or even reverse disease progression, and transform treatment outcomes for MPN patients.
PRT12396 our lead, mutant-selective JAK2V617F inhibitor received IND clearance from the U.S. FDA, as announced in February 2026 and we anticipate initiating a Phase 1 study in the second quarter of 2026. The Phase 1 study of PRT12396 is an open-label, multi-center, safety and efficacy study in patients with high-risk polycythemia vera (PV) and intermediate and high-risk myelofibrosis (MF). The primary endpoints of the study include safety, efficacy and PK profile.
As previously announced on November 4, 2025, we entered into an exclusive option agreement (the "Option Agreement") with Incyte Corporation ("Incyte") to acquire our mutative selective JAK2V617F inhibitor program (the “Program”) for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Under the Option Agreement, Incyte received an exclusive option to acquire our entire right, title, and interest in and to certain assets, properties, and rights related to the JAK2V617F inhibitor program, including our library of preclinical candidates (collectively, the “Transferred Assets”). We expect to advance the JAK2V617F program to pre-defined milestones. Incyte may elect to exercise its exclusive option during the option period to acquire the program and associated assets from us for $100 million. As the JAK2V617F program candidates advance in the clinic, we would be eligible to receive up to $775 million in additional clinical and regulatory milestones, and single digit royalties on global net sales. Combined, total potential cash payments from the transaction, excluding royalties, could reach up to $910 million.
We have discovered and are developing a series of selective and orally bioavailable KAT6A selective degraders. We have selected a development candidate and remain on track to file an IND in mid-2026. We believe that selectively degrading KAT6A has the potential for improved efficacy, tolerability and combinability with other agents relative to non-selective inhibitors of KAT6A/B. We recently presented preclinical data supporting this hypothesis at the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025.
We have several drug candidates in clinical development and our objective is to generate proof-of-concept clinical data to guide our future regulatory pathways to approval.
Our novel, first-in-class SMARCA2 degrader compounds represent our best opportunities for demonstrating clinical proof-of-concept in 2025 and advancing into potential Phase 2/3 registration studies. In 2023, we announced a global partnership with AbCellera Biologics Incorporated ("AbCellera") that will allow us to combine our small molecules and degraders expertise with their antibody expertise to develop precision antibody drug conjugates. We also intend to explore continued clinical development with external partners for our CDK4/6 inhibitor.
PRT3789 is a first-in-class, highly selective degrader of SMARCA2 protein, which along with SMARCA4 controls gene regulation through chromatin remodeling. Cancer cells with SMARCA4 mutations are dependent on SMARCA2 for their growth and survival and selectively degrading SMARCA2 induces cell death in cancer cells while sparing normal cells in preclinical models. PRT3789 has been shown to be efficacious and well tolerated in multiple preclinical models of SMARCA4 deleted/mutated cancers as monotherapy and in combination with standards of care therapies. We believe a selective SMARCA2 degrader has the potential to be of benefit in up to 10% of non-small cell lung cancer ("NSCLC") patients in the United States including many other tumor types with the SMARCA4 mutation.
Patients with SMARCA4 mutated cancer have a poor prognosis. We believe this represents an area of high unmet medical need. Therefore, mutated or deleted SMARCA4 cancers provide a potential biomarker to select those patients most likely to respond to treatment with a highly selective SMARCA2 degrader.
PRT3789 is currently in Phase 1 clinical development in patients with biomarker selected SMARCA4 mutated cancers. Objectives for this first Phase 1 clinical trial are to establish the safety and tolerability profile of PRT3789 as both monotherapy and in combination with docetaxel, evaluate activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and determine a dose and potential indications for advancement into a future trial. We presented Phase 1 trial data updates at the 2025 Japanese Society of Medical Oncology Annual Meeting on March 8, 2025. As reported by investigators, PRT3789 was generally safe and well-tolerated at doses tested to date. Of the 32 advanced NSCLC, esophageal or gastric patients in monotherapy with Class 1 (loss of function) mutations who were evaluable for efficacy as of the November 30, 2024 data cutoff, RECIST confirmed partial responses (PRs) were observed in 5 patients (2 esophageal, 2 NSCLC, 1 gastric). Of the 13 patients with Class 1 mutations treated at doses of 283 mg or higher, three had RECIST confirmed partial responses (2 NSCLC, 1 gastric). Tumor shrinkage was observed in patients with both Class 1 and Class 2 SMARCA4 mutations.
Additional patients on-study demonstrated clinical benefit as measured by prolonged SD, including one advanced NSCLC patient on study for more than a year.
Initial observations of safety from evaluable patients in the PRT3789 plus docetaxel combination dose escalation arm of the trial were also presented. To date, PRT3789 in combination with docetaxel has demonstrated an acceptable safety profile.
The Company is nearing conclusion of monotherapy dose escalation, which is now at the 665mg once weekly IV dose and identifying dose(s) for advancement to any potential future trials. In addition, enrollment of patients in dose escalation in the combination of PRT3789 with docetaxel is ongoing.
The Company also initiated a Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating PRT3789 in combination with KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) in patients with SMARCA4-mutated cancers, per the previously announced collaboration with Merck & Co., Inc. PRT3789 has been shown to increase antigen processing and presentation of unique MHC class I peptides, and increased T-cell activity and IFN-γ production in SMARCA4-mutated cancer cells. SMARCA2 degradation by PRT3789 promoted the effects of anti-PD1 therapy in SMARCA4-deficient mouse models, and PRT3789 combined with pembrolizumab, promoted cell death of SMARCA4-deficient NSCLC cells. While inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis have shown clinical activity across a broad range of tumor types, some patients demonstrated an inadequate response and disease progression consistent with the natural disease course that may be tied to innate resistance mechanisms. Other patients progressed after a period of disease control, which may be associated with acquired resistance mechanisms. It is believed that PRT3789 plus pembrolizumab may re-sensitize resistant cancers to subsequent anti–PD(L)-1 therapy.
Our discovery team has identified a series of potent, selective and orally bioavailable SMARCA2 degraders. In July 2024, we received IND clearance for the lead oral molecule, PRT7732. PRT7732 is >1000-fold selective for SMARCA2 vs. SMARCA4 and demonstrates robust activity in SMARCA4 deficient cancer models both as monotherapy and in combination with docetaxel at well-tolerated doses. PRT7732 demonstrates good oral bioavailability and half suitable for once daily oral dosing. The Company initiated and enrolled our first patients in a phase 1 multi-dose escalation trial of PRT7732 (NCT06560645) in biomarker selected SMARCA4 mutated cancers.
As one of our first precision ADC programs we and our partner AbCellera began work on an early-stage discovery program involving potent degraders of the SMARCA family of proteins as payloads for novel antibodies targeting tumor specific antigens. Given the potent anti-tumor activity of these molecules in pre-clinical models of cancers beyond those targeted by our SMARCA2 selective degraders, we believe that these precision ADCs have the potential to extend the therapeutic utility of this class. The partnership includes up to five precision ADC targets. Under the terms of the agreement, we and AbCellera will jointly discover, develop, and commercialize products emerging from the collaboration. AbCellera will lead manufacturing activities and we will lead clinical development and global commercialization, subject to AbCellera’s option to co-promote any resulting commercial products in the United States.
OutsideDrawing ofon theour AbCelleraexpertise collaboration,in thetargeted Companyprotein hasdegradation, we have discovered and optimized a numberseries of pre-clinicalproprietary precisiondegrader payloads.payloads for use in discovering and developing DACs. We disclosed first data at the 36th EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium describing preclinical proof-of-concept using a novel, potent SMARCA2/4 dual degrader as a “Precisiondegrader Payload”payload conjugated to multiple antibodies. Prelude’s SMARCA2/4 dual degraders have shown picomolar potency with potential for increased efficacy, selectivity and improved therapeutic index. Precision ADCsDACs have potential to expand the reach of SMARCA degrader technology to cancers without SMARCA4 mutations.
During the second half of 2025, we restructured aspects of our collaboration agreement with AbCellera to allow AbCellera to independently discover, develop and commercialize select undisclosed DACs by providing a non-exclusive license to the Company’s degrader payloads among other changes to overall resource allocation, governance, and operational aspects of the collaboration.
In June 2025, at the European Hematology Association, we delivered an oral presentation about our mutated calreticulin ("mCALR") discovery efforts, including the first-in-class CALR-targeted DACs that selectively target mutant CALR expressing cells, with the potential to achieve responses by eliminating MPN clones. These data demonstrate that a CALRxSMARCA2/4 degrader antibody conjugate can selectively degrade SMARCA2/4 in CALR mutant cells and robustly inhibit CALR-mutant cell growth in vitro and in vivo.
On November 4, 2025 we announced that we decided to pause the clinical development of our SMARCA2 degrader program which is comprised of PRT3789 and PRT7732. We then reduced the number of employees to 79 employees as of December 31, 2025.
Our CDK9 candidate, PRT2527, is a potent and highly selective CDK9 inhibitor that has the potential to avoid off-target toxicities observed with other less selective CDK9 inhibitors. The Company presented interim phase 1 results of the dose-escalation study as part of a poster session at the 66th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting (ASH) in the fourth quarter of 2024. PRT2527 demonstrated activity across a range of relapsed/refractory lymphoid malignancies, including patients who received prior CAR-T therapy. The Company also announced that it intends to seek a partner for any future continued advancement of PRT2527, as a result of the Company’s strategic focus on the SMARCA2 degrader development program.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had $133.6$106.4 million in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities. We expect our existing cash, cash equivalentsequivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities will enable us to fund our operating expense and capital expenditures into the second quarter of 2026.2027.
Regained Nasdaq Compliance
On March 27, 2025, we received a letter (the “Bid Price Notice”) from the Listing Qualifications staff (the “Staff”) of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) indicating that, based upon the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock for the prior 30 consecutive business days, we were not in compliance with the requirement to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share for continued listing on Nasdaq, as set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Minimum Bid Price Requirement”). On September 18, 2025, we received a letter from Nasdaq notifying the Company that we had regained compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement and that the matter is now closed.
Revenue
On November 3, 2025, we entered into an Exclusive Option Agreement (the “Option Agreement”) with Incyte to acquire our mutative selective JAK2V617F JH2 inhibitor program (the “Program”) for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.
Under the Option Agreement, Incyte received an exclusive option to acquire our entire right, title, and interest in and to certain assets, properties, and rights related to the Program, including the Company’s library of preclinical candidates (collectively, the “Transferred Assets”) by way of an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "APA"). We are continuing to advance the Program. At any time commencing on the effective date of the Option Agreement until the later of (a) 30 days after the Company’s delivery of the investigational new drug ("IND") ready data package or (b) 15 months after the effective date of the Option Agreement (which 15 month period shall automatically toll for the Company to deliver the IND-ready package but such tolling will not exceed 3 months unless otherwise agreed by the parties) (the “Option Period”), Incyte may elect to exercise its exclusive option to acquire the Program and associated assets from us pursuant to the APA for $100 million. We received an initial upfront payment of $35 million in cash from the Option Agreement. Under the APA, we would be eligible to receive up to $775 million in additional clinical and regulatory milestones, and single digit royalties on global net sales. Combined, total potential cash payments from the transaction could reach up to $910 million.
Concurrently with the Option Agreement, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with Incyte (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which Incyte purchased 6,250,000 shares (the “Shares”) of our non-voting common stock at a price of $4.00 per share for gross proceeds of $25.0 million. Pursuant to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and subject to the non-voting common stock beneficial ownership limitation, Incyte may elect to convert the Shares into voting shares and in December 2025, Incyte converted 4,372,124 of the Shares into voting shares. Because the Option Agreement and Securities Purchase Agreement were entered into at the same time and negotiated as single commercial package, we accounted for the agreements as a single contract under ASC 606. Based on this exercise, the consideration in the Option Agreement plus any excess consideration paid over the fair value of the equity issued to Incyte is a component of transaction price. In determining the fair value of the common stock issued to Incyte, we considered the closing price of the common stock on the date of the transaction, which was $3.98 per share, which resulted in a premium paid by Incyte of $0.02 per share, or $0.1 million (“Equity Premium”). The remaining $24.9 million was recorded as an issuance of common stock in stockholders’ equity.
We first evaluated whether the arrangement meets the definition of a derivative or contains any embedded derivatives under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Although the arrangement includes underlying IP‑related value, it qualifies for the scope exception as prescribed by ASC 815-10-15-59(b). We next evaluated whether the arrangement represents a funded research and development arrangement under ASC 730, Research and Development. The payments received by Prelude are non-refundable, and there is no contractual requirement, guarantee, or other provision that would require us to repay any of the funds received from Incyte. We also concluded that any presumption that there is an obligation to repay the funds received due to the subsequent related party relationship with Incyte is overcome, and therefore the agreements are not within the scope of ASC 730-20. We also concluded that the agreements are not within the scope of ASC 808, Collaborative Arrangements. We assessed the Option Agreement in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer, and concluded that Incyte is a customer in the context of the Option Agreement. The Option Agreement includes the transfer of the following goods or services: (i) to conduct research and development activities related to the Program and (ii) Incyte's exclusive option to acquire the Company’s entire right, title, and interest in and to certain assets, properties, and rights related to the Program. We determined that the exclusive option granted was not a material right and, thus, not a performance obligation.
We determined that the transaction price totaled $35.1 million, which includes the $35 million upfront cash payment received and the equity premium. We allocated $35.1 million to our performance obligations to conduct research and development activities related to the Program. We will recognize revenue related to the Option Agreement over time as the performance obligations are satisfied using an inputs approach, by applying actual expenses against total budgeted costs. As of December 31, 2025, $32.4 million of the upfront payment was included in deferred revenue within the balance sheets which we estimate will be recognized within thirteen months from year-end. We recognized $2.6 million in revenue related to the Option Agreement during the year ended December 31, 2025.
During the third quarter of 2025, we amended our collaboration with AbCellera (the "Amended Agreement") and subsequently in October 2025, further expanded the collaboration (the "Expanded License Agreement"). The Amended Agreement and Expanded License Agreement provided AbCellera a non-exclusive license to use certain of our degrader payloads to independently discover, develop and commercialize a select number of novel DACs against undisclosed antibody targets. The agreements also entailed other changes to overall resource allocation and collaboration governance. For the newly licensed DAC programs, AbCellera received world-wide rights to lead and fully control the licensed programs at its sole cost and expense and we are not responsible for any additional financial responsibilities or go forward development costs associated with those programs. We received an upfront non-refundable payment from AbCellera of $6.5 million upon signing the Amended Agreement and an upfront non-refundable payment of $6 million upon signing of the Expanded License Agreement. For the additional licensed DACs, we are also eligible to receive customary downstream milestones and single digit royalties on future product sales. The original collaboration agreement with AbCellera, whereunder the companies can jointly discover, develop, and commercialize novel DACs for up to five programs remains in effect.
We assessed the Amended Agreement signed in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer, and concluded that AbCellera is a customer in the context of the Amended Agreement. The Amended Agreement required us to transfer certain intellectual property and related know-how to AbCellera which represented the only performance obligation in the Amended Agreement and was satisfied at a point in time, when the intellectual property and related know-how were transferred to AbCellera during the third quarter of 2025.
We assessed the Expanded Agreement signed in accordance with ASC 606 and concluded that AbCellera is a customer in the context of the Expanded Agreement. We determined the promised goods and services included discovering degrader payloads and granting the licenses to the payloads to AbCellera for them to use to research, develop, and commercialize products related to each of the initial targets mutually agreed upon. Each of these licenses is distinct, as AbCellera can derive benefit from each license independent of any other payload. Each performance obligation will be fully satisfied at the point in time when the license is transferred to AbCellera. For the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized revenue $3.0 million in the statement of operations related to the Expanded Agreement. We estimate the remaining performance obligations will be completed in the second half of 2026.
In May 2024, the Company and Pathos AI, Inc. ("Pathos") entered into a license agreement under which the Companywe granted to Pathos an exclusive, sublicensable, world-wide license to its selective, brain-penetrant PRMT5 inhibitor, PRT811. Under the terms of the license agreement, the Companywe received a $3.0 million upfront, non-refundable payment. The agreement also included a near term $4.0 million payment upon the earlier of 180 days following the effective date of the license agreement or the execution of a quality agreement between the parties pursuant to which thewe Company will transfertransferred title to certain quantities of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (“API”). In addition, the Companywe may receive potential developmental milestone payments up to $37.0 million, potential sales milestone payments up to $100 million and a range of high single-digit to low double-digit royalties on PRT811 global net sales.
The CompanyWe assessed the license agreement with Pathos in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and concluded that Pathos is a customer. The CompanyWe evaluated all of the promised goods or services within the contract and determined which goods and services were separate performance obligations. The CompanyWe determined that the exclusive license and transfer of related know-how and materials representsrepresent one combined performance obligation. The execution of a quality agreement pursuant to which thewe Company will transfertransferred title to certain API was identified as a separate performance obligation. Both performance obligations were satisfied in 2024.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company satisfied both performance obligations identified and recognized revenue of $7.0 million.
costs of funding research performed by third parties, including pursuant to agreements with clinical research organizations,organizations or CROs,("CROs"), that conduct our clinical trials, as well as investigative sites, consultants and CROs that conduct our preclinical and nonclinical studies;
expenses incurred under agreements with contract manufacturing organizations,organizations or CMOs,("CMOs") including manufacturing scale-up expenses and the cost of acquiring and manufacturing preclinical study and clinical trial materials;
We track outsourced development costs and other external research and development costs to specific product candidates on a program-by-program basis, fees paid to CROs, CMOs and research laboratories in connection with our preclinical development, process development, manufacturing and clinical development activities. However, we do not track our internal research and development expenses on a program-by-program basis as they primarily relate to compensation, early research and other costs,costs which are deployed across multiple projects under development.
Research and development activities are central to our business model. Product candidates in later stages of clinical development generally have higher development costs than those in earlier stages of clinical development, primarily due to the increased size and duration of later-stage clinical trials. We expect to continue to incur research and development expenses over the next several years related to personnel costs, including stock-based compensation, our clinical trials, including later-stage clinical trials, for current and future product candidates and preparing regulatory filings for our product candidates.
We expect to continue to incur general and administrative expense in the future to support our continued research and development activities and potential commercialization efforts. These expenses will likely include costs related to personnel and fees to outside consultants and legal support, among other expenses. The costs associated with being a public company include expenses related to services associated with maintaining compliance with the requirements of Nasdaq and the Securities and Exchange Commission,Commission or SEC,("SEC") insurance and investor relations costs. If any of our current or future product candidates obtains U.S. regulatory approval, we expect that we would incur significantly increased expenses associated with building a sales and marketing team.
Other income, net consists primarily of interest earned on our cash equivalents and marketable securities, research and development tax credits, and grant income received from the State of Delaware. We anticipate re-applying for the grant from the State of Delaware from time to time as long as we maintain qualifying headcount levels in the State of Delaware.
Since our inception, we have not recorded any income tax benefits for the net operating losses,losses or NOLs,("NOLs") we have incurred or for our research and development tax credits, as we believe, based upon the weight of available evidence, that it is more likely than not that all of our NOLs and tax credits will not be realized.
Revenue increased by $5.1 million to $12.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025 included $2.6 million related to our Option Agreement and $9.5 million from our Amended Agreement and Expanded Agreement. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024, was solely related to our license agreement with Pathos.
Revenue
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 related solely to our license agreement. In 2024, we satisfied both performance obligations related to the exclusive license and transfer of related know-how and materials and transferred title to certain API which resulted in the recognition of revenue for $7.0 million.
Research and development expenses increaseddecreased by $14.6$23.7 million to $94.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $118.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $103.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. Included in research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, was $12.1$6.9 million of non-cash expense related to stock-based compensation expense, including employee stock options, compared to $12.6$12.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. ResearchAlong with the decrease in stock-based compensation expense, research and development expenses increaseddecreased due to a higher number of patients enrolleddecrease in clinical trials during 2024 driving an increase inexpense related costs,to suchour asdiscontinued chemistry,clinical manufacturingtrials, primarily PRT3789 and controls (“CMC”) expense, to support the trials.PRT2527. Research and development expenses may fluctuate from period to period depending upon the stage of certain projects and the level of preclinical and clinical trial-related activities.
Research and development expenses by program are summarized in the table below. ExpensesIncluded forin Other are programs thatsuch haveas beenPRT2527, discontinuedPRT1419, areand included in Other.PRT3645.
General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.2$6.3 million to $22.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $28.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $28.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. Included in the general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was $9.2$5.0 million of non-cash expense related to stock-based compensation expense, including employee stock options, as compared to $13.0$9.2 million for the same period in 2023.2024. The decrease in general and administrative expense was primarily due to a decrease in stock-based compensation,compensation offsetalong bywith ana increasedecrease in professionalemployee feesrelated incurred to support our research and development efforts.expenses.
Other income, net increaseddecreased by $2.1$7.5 million to $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $12.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $10.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, primarily due to thelower receiptincome earned on our investments due to lower balances and recognition oflower research and development tax credits from the State of Delaware of $2.4 millionreceived in 2024 compared to $1.3 million in 2023.2025.
Overview
Since our inception, we have not recognized any product revenue and have incurred operating losses and negative cash flows from our operations. We have not yet commercialized any product and we do not expect to generate revenue from sales of any products for several years, if at all. Since our inception, we have funded our operations through the sale of convertible preferred stockstock, common stock, and commonpre-funded stock.warrants. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had $133.6$106.4 million in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities and had an accumulated deficit of $583.6$683.1 million. We expect our existing cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities will enable us to fund our operating expense and capital expenditures into the second quarter of 2026.2027.
As described in Note 8, in November 2025 the Company received $60 million in capital, comprised of an initial payment of $35 million in cash plus a $25 million equity investment, from Incyte Corporation. We also received an upfront non-refundable payment from AbCellera of $6.5 million upon signing the Amended Agreement and an upfront non-refundable payment of $6.0 million upon signing of the Expanded License Agreement.
During the second quarter of 2023, we sold 6,761,200 shares of common stock which comprised of (i) 5,312,978 shares of voting common stock and (ii) 1,448,222 shares of non-voting common stock at a price of $5.75 per share and to certain investors in lieu of common stock, we sold pre-funded warrants to purchase 12,895,256 shares of voting common stock at a price of $5.7499 per pre-funded warrant, resulting in gross proceeds of $113.0 million. We incurred offering costs of $2.6 million which resulted in net proceeds of $110.4 million. The purchase price per share of each pre-funded warrant represents the per share offering price for the common stock, minus the $0.0001 per share exercise price of such pre-funded warrant. Of the voting common stock sold, 2,264,456 were purchased by our underwriters in connection with a 30-day option at a price of $5.75 per share.
During the fourth quarter of 2023, we sold in a private placement pre-funded warrants to purchase 7,936,759 shares of voting common stock at a price of $3.1499 per pre-funded warrant, resulting in net proceeds of $24.8 million after deducting offering costs of $0.2 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, we used $102.9$56.3 million of cash in operating activities. Cash used in operating activities reflected our net loss of $127.2$99.5 millionmillion, partially offset by noncash charges of $20.1$14.8 million, which consisted primarily of $21.3$11.9 million in stock-based compensation, along with a $4.2$28.4 million net decreaseincrease in our operating assets and liabilities.liabilities, which related primarily to an increase in deferred revenue. The primary use of cash was to fund our operations related to the development of our product candidates.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before making your decision to invest in shares of our common stock, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described under Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2026.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
New heading “Research and Development Expenses”
New heading “General and Administrative Expenses”
New heading “Other Income, net”
Largest changes
“We presented preclinical data from our lead development candidate, PRT13722, at the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026 on April 20, 2026. PRT13722 is being developed for the treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2-) breast cancer (BC). Based on preclinical data, we believe PRT13722 is a highly differentiated, first-in-class, orally bioavailable, potent and highly selective KAT6A degrader. …”see in full comparison
“In April 2026, under the 2024 Shelf Registration Statement (defined below), we sold an aggregate of (a) 16,611,014 shares of our voting common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at a price of $4.44 per share, and (b) pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 3,659,252 shares of our common stock, at a price of $4.4399 per pre-funded warrant with an exercise price of $0.0001 per share (collectively, the "April Offering"). We received net proceeds of approximately $85.4 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses of approximately $4.6 million.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (40)
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and the related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In addition to historical financial information, this discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations, intentions and belief.beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth in the section titled “Risk Factors” under Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 10, 2026, or our 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, our ability to develop our clinical candidates, inflation and interest rate risk, recessionary concerns, the effect of continued federal government shutdown, business strategy, market size, potential growth opportunities, preclinical and clinical development activities, efficacy and safety profile of our product candidates, use of net proceeds from our offerings, our ability to maintain and recognize the benefits of certain designations received by product candidates, the timing and results of preclinical studies and clinical trials, commercial collaborations with third parties and the receipt and timing of potential regulatory designations, approvals and commercialization of product candidates. The words “believes,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “plans,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “potential,” “likely,” “projects,” “continue,” “will,” “schedule,” and “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words.
Prelude is a precision oncology company built on a foundation of drug discovery excellence to deliver novel precision cancer medicines to underserved patients. By leveraging our core competencies in cancer biology and medicinal chemistry, combined with our clinical development capabilities, we have built an efficient,efficient drug discovery engine and the development expertise necessary to identify compelling biological targets and create new chemical entities,entities or NCEs,("NCEs") that we advance into clinical trials. We believe our approach could result in better targeted cancer therapies. Our discovery excellence has been supported by our steady progress in advancing a pipeline of novel precision oncology development candidates, alone and with partners. We are working with our partner AbCellera Biologics, Inc. ("AbCellera") on an early-stage discovery program involving potent degraders as payloads for novel antibodies targeting tumor specific antigens. Since our inception in 2016, we have received clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,Administration or (the FDA,"FDA") for multiple investigational new drug applications,applications or INDs,("INDs") and successfully advanced several programs into clinical trials. In addition, we have other differentiated proprietary programs in various stages of preclinical development.
We have discovered and are developing a series of selective and orally bioavailable lysine acetyltransferase 6A ("KAT6A") selective degraders. We believe that selectively degrading KAT6A has the potential for improved efficacy, tolerability and combinability with other agents relative to non-selective inhibitors of KAT6A/B.
We presented preclinical data from our lead development candidate, PRT13722, at the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026 in April 2026. PRT13722 is initially being developed for the treatment of hormone receptor positive ("HR+")/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ("HER2-") breast cancer ("BC"). Based on preclinical data, we believe PRT13722 is a highly differentiated, first-in-class, orally bioavailable, potent and highly selective KAT6A degrader. Pending clearance of the IND application, we expect the Phase 1 study of PRT13722 in HR+ breast cancer to be initiated in the fourth quarter of 2026.
Myeloproliferative neoplasms ("MPN") are hematopoietic disorders arising from clonal expansion of hematopoietic stem cells ("HSC") in the bone marrow. Current treatment options for MPN patients offer symptomatic benefit but fail to eliminate disease-initiating clonesclones, leading to treatment resistance and progression to secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Therapeutic approaches that can selectively eliminate disease-initiating HSCs and induce molecular remission are an unmet medical need.
PRT12396PRT12396, our lead, mutant-selective JAK2V617F inhibitorinhibitor, received IND clearance from the U.S. FDA, as announced in February 2026, and recentlyis weenrolling initiated and commenced enrollmentpatients into a Phase 1 study of PRT12396 in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and myelofibrosis (MF). The Phase 1 study of PRT12396 is an open-label, multi-center, safety and efficacy study. The primary endpoints of the study include safety, efficacy and PK profile.
As previously announced onin November 4, 2025, we entered into an exclusive option agreement (the "Exclusive Option Agreement") with Incyte Corporation ("Incyte") to acquire our mutative selective JAK2V617F inhibitor program (the “Program”) for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Under the Option Agreement, Incyte received an exclusive option to acquire our entire right, title, and interest in and to certain assets, properties, and rights related to the JAK2V617F inhibitor program, including our library of preclinical candidates (collectively, the “Transferred Assets”). We expect to advance the JAK2V617F program to pre-defined milestones. Incyte may elect to exercise its exclusive option during the option period to acquire the program and associated assets from us for $100 million. As the JAK2V617F program candidates advance in the clinic, we would be eligible to receive up to $775 million in additional clinical and regulatory milestones, and single digit royalties on global net sales. Combined, total potential cash payments from the transaction, excluding royalties, could reach up to $910 million.
We have discovered and are developing a series of selective and orally bioavailable K(lysine) acetyltransferase 6A (KAT6A) selective degraders. We believe that selectively degrading KAT6A has the potential for improved efficacy, tolerability and combinability with other agents relative to non-selective inhibitors of KAT6A/B.
We presented preclinical data from our lead development candidate, PRT13722, at the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026 on April 20, 2026. PRT13722 is being developed for the treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2-) breast cancer (BC). Based on preclinical data, we believe PRT13722 is a highly differentiated, first-in-class, orally bioavailable, potent and highly selective KAT6A degrader. PRT13722 is on track for an investigational new drug (IND) filing in mid-2026, and, pending IND clearance, initiation of a Phase 1 study is anticipated in the second half of 2026.
Drawing on our expertise in targeted protein degradation, we have discovered and optimized a series of proprietary degrader payloads for use in discovering and developing DACs. We disclosed first data at the 36th EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium in October 2024 describing preclinical proof-of-concept using a novel, potent SMARCA2/4 dual degrader as a degrader payload conjugated to multiple antibodies. Prelude’s SMARCA2/4 dual degraders have shown picomolar potency with potential for increased efficacy, selectivity and improved therapeutic index. DACs have potential to expand the reach of SMARCA degrader technology to cancers without SMARCA4 mutations.
Since inception, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to developing product and technology rights, conducting research and development, organizing and staffing our company, business planning and raising capital. We have incurred recurring losses, the majority of which are attributable to research and development activities, and negative cash flows from operations. We have funded our operations primarily through the sale of convertible preferred stock and common stock. Our net loss was $10.4$24.3 million and $32.1$63.3 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $693.4$707.4 million. Our primary use of cash is to fund operating expenses, which consist primarily of research and development expenditures, and to a lesser extent, general and administrative expenditures. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of one or more of our current or future product candidates. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future as we advance our product candidates through all stages of development and clinical trials and, ultimately, seek regulatory approval. In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution. Our net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year, depending on the timing of our clinical trials and our expenditures on other research and development activities.
To date, we have not recognized any revenue from product sales, and we do not expect to generate any revenue from the sale of products in the foreseeable future. During the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we recognized revenue from our Exclusive Option Agreement with Incyte. If our development efforts for our product candidates are successful and result in regulatory approval, or license agreements with third parties, we may generate revenue in the future in the form of milestone payments, royalties, or product sales. However, there can be no assurance as to when we will generate such revenue, if at all.
costs of funding research performed by third parties, including pursuant to agreements with clinical research organizations,organizations or CROs,("CROs") that conduct our clinical trials, as well as investigative sites, consultants and CROs that conduct our preclinical and nonclinical studies;
expenses incurred under agreements with contract manufacturing organizations,organizations or CMOs,("CMOs") including manufacturing scale-up expenses and the cost of acquiring and manufacturing preclinical study and clinical trial materials;
We expect to continue to incur general and administrative expense in the future to support our continued research and development activities and potential commercialization efforts. These expenses will likely include costs related to personnel and fees to outside consultants and legal support, among other expenses. The costs associated with being a public company include expenses related to services associated with maintaining compliance with the requirements of Nasdaq and the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), insurance and investor relations costs. If any of our current or future product candidates obtains U.S. regulatory approval, we expect that we would incur significantly increased expenses associated with building a sales and marketing team.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025
Revenue for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was related to our Exclusive Option Agreement with Incyte.
Research and development expenses decreased from $28.8$25.8 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 to $13.6$16.1 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. Included in research and development expenses for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was $1.1$1.0 million of non-cash expense related to stock-based compensation expense, including employee stock options, compared to $2.3$2.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Research and development expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in expense related to our SMARCA2 clinical trials which we paused in 2025 along with a decrease in employee related expenses due to the workforce reduction in the second half of 2025. Research and development expenses may fluctuate from period to period depending upon the stage of certain projects and the level of preclinical and clinical trial-related activities.
Research and development expenses by program are summarized in the table below. During the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company announced that it decided to pause the clinical development of its SMARCA2 degrader program which is comprised of PRT3789 and PRT7732 and prioritize allocation of resources to advancing the JAK2 V617F and K(lysine) acetyltransferase 6A (KAT6A) selective degrader programs. The expense included in other arerepresents programs that the Company has paused or discontinued, including the previously mentioned SMARCA2 degrader programs. Corresponding program expenseexpenses for earlier periods have been recast. The following table summarizes the significant expense categories for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025.
General and administrative expenses decreased from $5.8$6.4 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 to $5.2$5.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in non-cash expense related to stock-based compensation expense. Included in general and administrative expenses for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was $0.9$1.0 million of non-cash expense related to stock-based compensation expense compared to $1.6 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in non-cash expense related to stock-based compensation expense.
Other income, net increased from $2.5$1.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to $3.8$1.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 primarily due to interest earned on the receipt and recognitioninvestment of researchour andcash developmentreceived taxfrom credits.the April Offering.
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
The following table sets forth our results of operations.
Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was related to our Exclusive Option Agreement with Incyte.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses decreased from $54.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 to $29.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026. Included in research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026, was $2.1 million of non-cash expense related to stock-based compensation expense, including employee stock options, compared to $4.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Research and development expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in expense related to our SMARCA2 clinical trials which we paused in 2025 along with a decrease in stock-based compensation expense. Research and development expenses may fluctuate from period to period depending upon the stage of certain projects and the level of preclinical and clinical trial-related activities.
Research and development expenses by program are summarized in the table below. During the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company announced that it decided to pause the clinical development of its SMARCA2 degrader program which is comprised of PRT3789 and PRT7732 and prioritize allocation of resources to advancing the JAK2 V617F and KAT6A selective degrader programs. The expense included in other represents programs that the Company has paused or discontinued, including the previously mentioned SMARCA2 degrader programs. Corresponding program expenses for earlier periods have been recast. The following table summarizes the significant expense categories for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses decreased from $12.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 to $10.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in non-cash expense related to stock-based compensation expense. Included in general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026, was $1.9 million of non-cash expense related to stock-based compensation expense compared to $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025.
Other Income, net
Other income, net increased from $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, to $5.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 primarily due to the receipt and recognition of research and development tax credits along with higher interest earned on the investment of our cash received from the April Offering.
At MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, the Company had cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities totaling $84.8$155.2 million. Subsequent to March 31, 2026, the Company sold 16,611,014 shares of its voting common stock at a price of $4.44 per sharemillion and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 3,659,252 shares of its common stock at a price of $4.4399 per pre-funded warrant, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $90.0 million. See Note 13 - Subsequent Events for additional information. Based on preliminary estimates, the Company believes these funds will be sufficient to fund its operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve months from the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
In April 2026, under the 2024 Shelf Registration Statement (defined below), we sold an aggregate of (a) 16,611,014 shares of our voting common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at a price of $4.44 per share, and (b) pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 3,659,252 shares of our common stock, at a price of $4.4399 per pre-funded warrant with an exercise price of $0.0001 per share (collectively, the "April Offering"). We received net proceeds of approximately $85.4 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses of approximately $4.6 million.
In May 2024, we filed a shelf registration statement (the "2024 Shelf Registration Statement") with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the issuance of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants, subscription rights and units up to an aggregate amount of $400 million. The 2024 Shelf Registration statementStatement was declared effective on June 10, 2024. The 2024 Shelf Registration statementStatement expires in May 2027,2027. and asAs of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, there was $400$310 million remaining under the 2024 Shelf Registration Statement. Subsequent to March 31, 2026, the Company sold 16,611,014 shares of its voting common stock at a price of $4.44 per share and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 3,659,252 shares of its common stock at a price of $4.4399 per pre-funded warrant, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $90.0 million under the 2024 Shelf Registration Statement.
In March 2023, we entered into an Open Market Sales Agreement (the "Sales Agreement") with Jefferies LLC, as the sales agent, pursuant to which we may offer and sell shares of our common stock. In accordance with the terms of the Sales Agreement on March 12, 2026, we filed a prospectus supplement under our 2024 Shelf Registration Statement, pursuant to which we may offer and sell shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $25.0 million from time to time through Jefferies acting as sales agent. At June 30, 2026, there was $25.0 million remaining under the Sales Agreement.
During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we used $21.7$37.3 million of cash in operating activities. Cash used in operating activities reflected our net loss of $10.4$24.3 million and a $13.7$17.8 million net decrease in our operating assets and liabilities offset by noncash charges of $2.4$4.8 million, which primarily consisted of stock-based compensation. The primary use of cash was to fund our operations related to the development of our product candidates.
During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, we used $34.2$60.3 million of cash in operating activities. Cash used in operating activities reflected our net loss of $32.1$63.3 million and a $6.9$6.1 million net increasedecrease in our operating assets and liabilities offset by noncash charges of $4.7$9.1 million, which primarily consisted of stock-based compensation. The primary use of cash was to fund our operations related to the development of our product candidates.
During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, net cash providedused byin investing activities of $8.5$57.0 million consisted of $90.0 million in purchases of marketable securities, partially offset by $33.0 million in proceeds from maturities of marketable securities. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, net cash usedprovided inby investing activities of $62.2$73.7 million consisted primarily of $71.7$107.9 million in proceeds from maturities of marketable securities, partially offset by $9.5$34.1 million in purchases of marketable securities.
During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, net cash usedprovided inby financing activities primarily related to paymentsthe ofproceeds received from the April Offering, partially offset by offering costs.costs related to the April Offering. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20252025, net cash used in financing activities was primarily for principal payments on our finance lease.
During the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, there were no other material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from those described under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Critical Accounting Estimates” in our 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
PRLD insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 2 Form 4 filings (2 insiders, 1 trade date, 5,630,630 shares, about $25.0M) and open-market sales in 0 filings. Net open-market shares: 5,630,630 (purchases minus sales); net value about $25.0M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-27 | Shah Rajeev M. |
Other | 1,407,000 | — | — |
| 2026-04-21 | Bonita David P |
Open-market purchase | 1,689,189 | $4.44 | $7.5M |
| 2026-04-21 | Bonita David P |
Open-market purchase | 1,126,126 | $4.44 | $5.0M |
| 2026-04-21 | Orbimed Genesis Gp Llc |
Open-market purchase | 1,689,189 | $4.44 | $7.5M |
| 2026-04-21 | Orbimed Genesis Gp Llc |
Open-market purchase | 1,126,126 | $4.44 | $5.0M |
Well-known investors holding PRLD (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 993,369 | $5.3M | 0.0% | Added 8% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 844,993 | $4.5M | 0.0% | Added 121% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 281,200 | $1.5M | 0.0% | Added 2% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 22,554 | $120.2K | 0.0% | Reduced 82% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 16,329 | $55.8K | — | Sold out |