Companies › PUBM

PUBM 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

PubMatic, Inc. · Nasdaq · Services-Computer Programming, Data Processing, Etc. · CIK 1422930 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from PubMatic, Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

48 / 7risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
5new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
38Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-02-26 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-02-27 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

48new paragraphs
7removed paragraphs
51reworded paragraphs
22,041 → 24,711words in section

New heading “Our increasing reliance on artificial intelligence to operate our platform and differentiate our offerings creates new operational, competitive, and execution risks that may be difficult to predict or manage.”

New heading “The adoption of artificial intelligence by our customers, competitors, and other market participants may alter the competitive dynamics of the digital advertising ecosystem in ways that reduce demand for our platform or diminish our competitive position.”

New heading “Our litigation with Google LLC presents several risks to our business that could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.”

New heading “Our business depends on the lawful availability and utility of data signals used to enable advertising transactions, support analytics, optimization, and automation features, including those incorporating machine-learning or artificial-intelligence-based functionality, and any limitations on our ability to collect, process, or share such data could diminish the value of our platform and our financial results.”

New heading “Privacy-related class-action litigation poses increasing financial and operational risk.”

Removed heading “Our business depends on our ability to collect, use, and disclose data to deliver advertisements. Any limitation imposed on our collection, use or disclosure of this data could significantly diminish the value of our solution and cause us to lose publishers, buyers, and revenue. Consumer tools, regulatory restrictions and technological limitations all threaten our ability to use and disclose data.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Reworded topics: investigation, lawsuit, fine, penalt

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Some of our publishers may be unprepared to comply with the evolving complexity established as a result of an abundance of state, national, and other privacy laws and regulations which are no longer solely limited to the CCPA, GDPR, and the UK GDPR, and which may result in removing or limiting personal data from their inventory before passing it into the bid stream. This may lower their inventory, at least temporarily, resulting in loss of ad spend and revenue for us. Further, since we do not have direct relationships with end users, we rely on publishers to obtain such consents as required and may be subject to liability, including fines, lawsuits, and other penalties, if they fail to adhere to evolving consent requirements. While we can and do provide training and guidance on compliance, the nature of the digital advertising ecosystem and technology, without direct access to the end user, does not support 100% verification that consent from end users has been obtained, when required by applicable law or regulations, and we may inadvertently process personal data when we should not be. This exposes us to potential regulatory scrutiny, investigations, fines, penalties, and other legal and financial exposure. Additionally,As privacy and data protection laws arecontinue evolving,to andevolve, it is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our safeguards and practices that could result in fines, lawsuits, and other penalties, and significant changes to our publishers’ business practices and inventory. Even well-prepared publishers and buyers may be confronted with difficult choices and administrative and technical hurdles as they implement compliance programs and integrate with multiple other parties in the ecosystem. Further, compliance program design and implementation will be an ongoing process as understanding of the CCPA, CPRA, GDPR, UK GDPR, increasing numbers of U.S. state privacy laws, or other emerging regulations and industry compliance standards,standards (such as those related to the use of Artificial Intelligence), evolves and companies address sometimes conflicting compliance guidance. In addition to California, overapproximately a third of20 U.S. states have enacted regulations that may apply to our business, and we expect more state legislatures or regulatory agencies to do the same. The resulting process friction could result in substantial inefficiency and loss of inventory and demand, as well as increased burdens upon our organization as we seek to assist customers and adapt our own technology and processes as necessary to comply with laws and regulations and adapt to industry practice. The uncertain regulatory environment caused by the CCPA, GDPR, UK GDPR, increasing numbers of U.S. state privacy laws, or other emerging regulations may disadvantage us in comparison to larger, integrated competitors such as Google and Meta (Facebook), which have greater compliance resources and can take advantage of their direct relationships with end users to secure consent directly from those users. Changes in the business practices of such large integrated competitors could impose additional requirements with respect to the retention and security of our handling or ability to handle customer and end user data, could limit our marketing and core business activities, and have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: litigation, cybersecurity incident, ai, regulation
“We incorporate AI solutions into our development efforts and specialized cloud software, including audience solutions, and these applications and the use of AI may become more important in our operations over time. AI technologies are complex and rapidly evolving, and we face significant competition from other companies as well as an evolving regulatory landscape. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation, class action, fine, penalt
“The outcomes of privacy‑related class actions are uncertain and may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, or injunctive relief that could require changes to our products, data‑processing practices, or business operations. In addition, defending against such litigation may necessitate increased investment in compliance infrastructure, documentation, discovery processes, and external advisors, which could increase operating costs and negatively impact margins.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: investigation, fine, supply chain, regulation

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We are also subject to regulation with respect to political advertising activities, which are governed by various federal and state laws in the United States, EU, and national and provincial laws worldwide. Online political advertising laws are rapidly evolving, and our publishers may impose restrictions on receiving political advertising, especially in light of recent elections both in the United StatesStates, EU. and in foreign jurisdictions. The lack of uniformity and increasing compliance requirements around political advertising may adversely impact the amount of political advertising spent through our platform, increase our operating and compliance costs, and subject us to potential liability from regulatory agencies. Moreover, in the European Union, the Regulation on the Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (“TTPA”) introduces new obligations for participants in the digital political advertising ecosystem, including enhanced transparency, labeling, and recordkeeping requirements, as well as restrictions on the use of personal data and inferred characteristics for targeting or amplifying political advertisements. Although the precise scope and application of the TTPA will depend on implementing guidance and national enforcement practices, it may be interpreted to apply to multiple participants in the advertising supply chain, including intermediaries such as supply-side platforms. Compliance with the TTPA may require changes to our products, processes, contractual arrangements, or data flows, increase compliance and operational costs, reduce demand for political advertising in the EU, or expose us to regulatory investigations, fines, or other liability.
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation, artificial intelligence, ai, competition
“AI-powered features, including our machine learning algorithms for bid optimization, fraud detection, and audience targeting, are important to our competitive position and our ability to deliver value to publishers and buyers. However, AI technologies are complex and rapidly evolving, and we face significant competition from other companies as well as an evolving regulatory landscape. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation, lawsuit, class action
“The federal Video Privacy Protection Act (“VPPA”) has also been the basis for a growing number of lawsuits involving the alleged disclosure of consumers’ video-viewing information to third parties through pixels or similar technologies. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (106)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 1 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Our business depends on the overall demand for advertising and on the economic health of our current and prospective publishers and buyers. In recent years, macroeconomic factors such as general economic volatility, recessionary fears, inflation, risingvolatile interest rates and softening demand in certain verticals caused some advertisers to reduce their advertising budgets. Such macroeconomic factors, as well as broader economic downturns, recessions, transnational trade wars or disruptions, inflation, further changesvolatility in interest rates or foreign exchange rates or any supply chain disruptions, changes in the tax treatment of advertising expenses, or general uncertainty,financial uncertainty in North America, Europe, and Asia, where we do most of our business; could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, the conflict in Ukraine and the resumption of the conflict in Israel could cause unpredictable economic effects in Europe and EMEA, including potentially softening general consumer demand. Such conflicts havemay increasedincrease costs of labor and other items impacting our cost of revenue, and these conflictsfactors and potential others may do so in the future. Reductions in overall advertising spending due to these factors or other factors could make it difficult to predict our revenue and could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Reworded

If our existing customers do not expand their usage of our platform, or if we fail to attract new publishers and buyers,customers, our growth will suffer. Moreover, any decrease in the use of the advertising channels or formats that we primarily depend on, or failure to expand into emerging channels,channels or formats, could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Removed

A relatively small number of premium publishers have historically accounted for a significant portion of the ad impressions sold on our platform, as well as a significant portion of our revenue from publishers, including a relatively small number of channel partners.

Reworded

A limited number of large demand side platforms (“DSPs”) – The Trade Desk and Google DV360 in particular – account for a significant portion of the ad impressions purchased on our platform. We depend upon these DSPs for a large percentage of impressions purchased and expect to do so for the foreseeable future. We have no minimum commitments from buyers to spend on our platform, so the amount of demand available to us can change at any time with little or no prior notice, and we cannot assureprovide youassurance that we will have access to a consistent volume or quality of ad campaigns or demand for our ad impressions at a reasonable price, or at all. Any disruptions in our relationships with DSPs, agencies, advertisers, or buyers could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. If a buyer or group of buyers representing a significant portion of the demand in our marketplace decides to materially reduce use of our platform, it could cause an immediate and significant decline in our revenue and profitability and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, our business results, including revenues, may be impacted by changes in their pricing strategies, bidding algorithms, or go-to-market efforts.

Reworded

Historically, our buyers have predominantly used our platform to purchase mobile, display, and video advertising inventory from our publishers. We expect that these will continue to be significant channels used by our customers for digital advertising in the future. We also believe that our revenue growth may depend on our ability to expand within mobile, video, and in particular, CTV, and we are continuing to enhance such channels. We believe our ability to incorporate Artificial Intelligence, or “AI”, and specifically agentic AI, into our new and existing products will also be a key factor to encourage expanded use of our platform. We may not be able to accurately predict changes in overall advertiser demand for the channels in which we operate and cannot assure you that our investment in formats will correspond to any such changes or shifts in demand. Any decrease in the use of mobile, display, and video advertising, whether due to customers losing confidence in the value or effectiveness of such channels, regulatory restrictions or other causes, or any inability to further penetrate CTV or enter new and emerging advertising channels, could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Reworded

We operate in an evolving industry with ever-changing customer needs,needs and behavior, and, as a result, our business has evolved over time such that our operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our business and future prospects. Our results of operations have fluctuated in the past, and future results of operations are likely to fluctuate as well. Although we have experienced periods of prolonged revenue growth, we may not be able to sustain oura historicalconsistent growth rate, current revenue levels, or profitability. In addition, because our business is evolving, our historical results of operations may be of limited utility in assessing our future prospects. We expect to face challenges, risks, and difficulties frequently experienced by growing companies in rapidly developing industries, including those relating to:

Added

•changes in demand due to real or perceived economic stagnation or recession in certain markets;

Added

•changes in demand for certain formats of ad impressions;

Added

•changes in the bidding behavior of buyers of ad impressions;

Reworded

•changes in demand due to changes in macroeconomic environment, including as a result of an economic downturn, recession, inflation, changesvolatility in interest rates or foreign exchange rates, disruptions to supply chains, disruptions to global trade, or otherwise;

Reworded

Any one or more of the factors above may result in significant fluctuations in our results of operations. YouPast results should not relybe onrelied our past resultsupon as an indicator of our future performance.

Reworded

If we fail to make the right investment decisions in our platform, or if we fail to innovate and develop new solutions that are adopted by publishers,customers, we may not attract and retain publishers and buyers,customers, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Added

We face intense competition in the marketplace and are confronted by rapidly changing technology and artificial intelligence, evolving industry standards and consumer preferences, regulatory changes, and the frequent introduction of new solutions by our competitors that we must adapt and respond to. The pace of technological disruption in digital advertising is accelerating, and our ability to keep pace with or stay ahead of these changes is critical to our competitive position. We need to continuously update our platform and the technology we invest in and develop, including our machine learning and other proprietary algorithms, in order to attract customers and keep ahead of changes in technology, evolving industry standards and a rapidly changing regulatory environment.

Added

Our platform is complex and new solutions can require a significant investment of time and resources to develop, test, introduce, and enhance. These activities can take longer than we expect and may require the hiring of employees or contractors with new skill sets, which we may not be able to do in a cost-effective manner or at all. In an environment where competitors and market expectations move quickly, delays in product development or feature delivery, or missteps in product launches, can have outsized negative effects that compound over time as customers shift spend to alternative platforms.

Reworded

We face intense competition in the marketplace and are confronted by rapidly changing technology and artificial intelligence, evolving industry standards and consumer preferences, regulatory changes, and the frequent introduction of new solutions by our competitors that we must adapt and respond to. We need to continuously update our platform and the technology we invest in and develop, including our machine learning and other proprietary algorithms, in order to attract publishers and buyers and keep ahead of changes in technology, evolving industry standards and a rapidly changing regulatory environment. Our platform is complex and new solutions can require a significant investment of time and resources to develop, test, introduce, and enhance. These activities can take longer than we expect and may require the hiring of employees or contractors with new skill sets, which we may not be able to do in a cost-effective manner or at all. Moreover, we may not make the right decisions regarding these investments.investments, and new product or feature launches may fail to meet partner expectations, resulting in reduced adoption, loss of customer confidence, and adverse impact on our results. For example, we have launched two products, Activate and Convert,Commerce whichMedia mayproducts notto ultimatelyaddress beevolving widelymarket adoptedopportunities. orAdditionally, result in incremental value. Newernewer formats and channels, such as mobile header bidding and CTV, present unique challenges that we must address to succeed. Our success in new formats and channels depends upon our ability to integrate our platform with these new formats and channels. If we fall behind in this rapidly evolving environment, the effects may be difficult to reverse, as customers, publishers, and buyers may establish relationships with competitors that are challenging to displace. If our mobile, video, or CTV solutions are not widely adopted by publishers and buyers, we may not retain such publishers and buyers. In addition, new demands from publishers and buyers,customers, superior offerings by competitors, changes in technology,technology or format, or new industry standards or regulatory requirements could render our platform or our existing solutions less effective and require us to make unanticipated changes to our platform or business model. Our failure to adapt to a rapidly changing market and regulatory environment, anticipate publisher and buyer demand, or attract and retain publishers and buyerscustomers would cause our revenue or revenue growth rate to decline, and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Added

Our increasing reliance on artificial intelligence to operate our platform and differentiate our offerings creates new operational, competitive, and execution risks that may be difficult to predict or manage.

Added

Our business has evolved from a traditional programmatic advertising exchange toward an AI-powered platform in which machine learning algorithms, generative AI, and agentic workflows are increasingly embedded in our core operations and commercial offerings. We describe ourselves as an “AI-powered advertising technology company” and have made AI a central element of our competitive positioning and growth strategy. Our AI capabilities now influence or automate a range of functions that affect customer outcomes, including real-time bid pricing, yield optimization through products such as Intelligent Yield, fraud detection, traffic shaping, demand allocation, and the planning and activation workflows available through our buyer and publisher platforms. While our revenue is not yet heavily dependent on AI-specific products, we expect AI to become an increasingly material contributor to our platform's value proposition, competitive differentiation, and revenue over time.

Added

As AI becomes more deeply embedded in our operations, errors, underperformance, or unintended behavior in our AI systems could directly reduce publisher yields, misallocate advertiser spend, or degrade auction efficiency, any of which could damage customer relationships and reduce platform utilization. Because AI model performance depends on the volume, quality, and diversity of the data on which models are trained, any reduction in the data available to us, whether due to privacy regulations, customer restrictions on data sharing, or competitive dynamics, could degrade the effectiveness of our AI capabilities relative to competitors with larger or more proprietary data sets. If our AI capabilities fail to deliver the performance improvements we and our customers expect, or if we are unable to develop and deploy AI-driven features at the pace required to remain competitive, customers may choose alternative platforms, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Added

Our investments in AI may not produce the competitive advantages we expect. We have committed meaningful engineering and infrastructure resources to AI product development, including Intelligent Yield, AI Insights, and agentic workflow capabilities. These investments may not achieve the adoption, performance, or margin contribution we anticipate, and may divert resources from other product development priorities that could have generated more immediate returns. The transition from a primarily transaction-processing business model to one in which AI-powered capabilities are a principal driver of competitive differentiation also introduces operational complexity and execution risk. Maintaining, updating, and scaling AI models requires specialized engineering talent and infrastructure capabilities, including access to GPU and other accelerated computing resources that are subject to market constraints and rising demand across industries. Our historical operating results, which were generated in a period when our business was primarily defined by programmatic header bidding and auction exchange services, may be of limited value in predicting our future performance as AI-driven products and workflows become a larger component of our business.

Added

If we are unable to develop, deploy, and maintain AI capabilities that meet the evolving expectations of publishers and buyers, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

Added

The adoption of artificial intelligence by our customers, competitors, and other market participants may alter the competitive dynamics of the digital advertising ecosystem in ways that reduce demand for our platform or diminish our competitive position.

Added

AI-driven platforms operated by large technology companies with closed ecosystems, extensive first-party data, and direct consumer relationships may capture an increasing share of advertising spend by offering AI-powered targeting, optimization, and measurement capabilities that reduce advertiser reliance on the open internet. AI-powered “zero-click” discovery environments and conversational assistants may reduce the volume of traditional web traffic and referral-based content consumption that currently supports programmatic advertising. If consumer engagement increasingly shifts to AI-mediated surfaces that do not generate conventional ad impressions or that operate outside of established programmatic transaction models, the addressable market for our platform could contract. These dynamics could disproportionately affect independent sell-side platforms like ours that depend on the health of the open internet advertising ecosystem.

Added

The anticipated emergence of agentic buying, in which advertisers and agencies deploy AI agents to plan, negotiate, and execute media purchases with reduced human oversight, may also disrupt established demand patterns over time. While adoption of agentic buying remains in early stages across the industry, and we are actively investing in capabilities and industry standards to support it, including contributing to the development of the IAB Tech Lab’s Ad Creative Protocol (“AdCP”), there is no assurance that these efforts will position us favorably as AI-driven buying matures. AI buying agents, once widely deployed, may optimize spend toward platforms or inventory sources that offer the lowest cost or highest predicted performance, which could increase pricing pressure and diminish the value of our existing customer relationships and SPO agreements. These agents may prioritize direct publisher integrations, closed-loop measurement environments, or alternative transaction protocols over traditional SSP intermediation. The standards governing agent-based advertising transactions are still being defined and may evolve in ways that do not favor our platform architecture or business model.

Added

Publishers, buyers, and other participants in the digital advertising supply chain are also independently developing and deploying their own AI capabilities. Publishers may use AI to optimize yield, manage demand relationships, or execute transactions without intermediaries, reducing their reliance on our platform. Buyers may develop proprietary AI-driven media planning and execution tools that bypass sell-side platforms or that concentrate spend with a smaller number of preferred partners. Competitors with greater financial or technical resources, or with access to larger proprietary data sets, may deploy AI capabilities that are superior to ours or that achieve greater market adoption. New market entrants that build AI-native advertising platforms from the ground up, unburdened by legacy infrastructure or business models, may be able to compete effectively against established platforms like ours. If these trends accelerate and we are unable to position our platform as a preferred destination for AI-driven media execution, our market share, revenue, and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Added

If AI-driven changes in the competitive environment reduce the relevance of, or demand for, independent sell-side platforms, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

Reworded

Our business depends on processing advertising impressions in milliseconds, and we must handle an increasingly large volume of such transactions. The demands on our platform infrastructure have increased over time due to, among other factors, the addition of new solutions, such as our Activate or ConvertCommerce Media offerings, the need to support evolving advertising formats, the handling and increased use of large amounts of data, support of AI-enabled offerings, and overall growth in impressions. Expanding our platform infrastructure and the number of ad impressions we can process requires resource commitment over a period of months or years, and we may not be able to scale quickly or efficiently enough if demand increases rapidly as short-term solutions may be too costly or unavailable. The increasing use of AI by consumers and businesses has also increased the cost to grow our infrastructure and secure colocation services on financially beneficial terms. If we are unable to grow our platform to support substantial increases in the number of transactions and in the amount of data we process, on a high-performance, cost-effective basis, or we are slow in growing our infrastructure compared to demand, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected. We expect to continue to invest in our platform in order to meet these requirements, and that investment could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Additionally, if we overestimate future usage of our platform, we may incur expense in adding infrastructure without a commensurate increase in revenue, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Reworded

We believe there is significant and growing demand for our offerings and those we are developing, and we are making significant investments to meet that demand and grow our market share.share, including through the use of AI. That demand may not materialize and, even if it does so,does, we may not be able to take advantage of that increased demand if we cannot scale our offerings in a timely manner or if the demand for one of our offerings cannibalizes the demand for otheranother productsproduct we offer. In some cases, we have experienced fee pressure as we have built out our offerings, and we expect this fee pressure to increase as more competitors, including new entrants as well as publishers themselves, build their own technology and infrastructure to enter the markets in which we do business. Even if the market for these offerings develops as we anticipate, publishers and buyers might not embrace our offerings to the degree we expect due to various factors such as inertia from usage of existing implementations of competitive products.products or technological advances by our competitors. While continued investment in and use of our products has allowed us to achieve efficiencies, the investment cost to gain such efficiencies may grow over time, especially with our existing products which may be closer to technical and economic maturity, and the potential expansion of our business or offerings may increase regulatory scrutiny of our company. Additionally, even if publishers and buyers embrace our new or expanded offerings, the positive effect of these new or expanded offerings on our results of operations may be offset or negated if such adoption cannibalizes business from our existing solutions, if we are unable to scale our offerings to keep up with demand, if we are unable to hire or retain personnel with the requisite skills and experience related to our new or expanded offerings, if publishers and buyers prefer similar offerings from our competitors, or by other adverse developments.

Added

Our litigation with Google LLC presents several risks to our business that could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Added

On September 8, 2025, we filed a lawsuit against Google LLC ("Google"), seeking damages and injunctive relief in connection with Google's alleged anticompetitive behavior in the publisher ad server and ad exchange markets for open-web display (the "Google Lawsuit"). The Google Lawsuit followed an April 2025 ruling in a case brought against Google by the U.S. Department of Justice, where the U.S. District Court found that Google engaged in anticompetitive and monopolistic behavior in certain digital advertising markets.

Added

Google is a significant participant in the digital advertising ecosystem and both a major partner and competitor to PubMatic. A material portion of our revenue is generated through our relationship with Google and the Google DV360 DSP. The Google Lawsuit is in its early stages, and the outcome and timing of the Google Lawsuit is uncertain and difficult to predict.

Added

The Google Lawsuit presents several risks to our business, including the potential for retaliatory actions by Google. Such actions could include, but are not limited to, altering our access to their platforms, seeking to modify commercial terms between PubMatic and Google in a manner unfavorable to us, deprioritizing our services or offerings, or otherwise using their market position to negatively impact our operations. Any such actions could disrupt our ability to serve our customers and partners, reduce our revenue, and harm our relationships with publishers and advertisers.

Added

The Google Lawsuit may be costly, protracted, and divert management's attention and resources from our business operations. Any damages awarded may not be commensurate with our expectations, and we may not receive any monetary damages at all. The injunctive relief sought in the Google Lawsuit may not be granted, or may not be granted to the extent we have requested or in a manner that adequately protects us in the future. The existence of the Google Lawsuit and any potential retaliatory measures could also negatively affect our reputation and our ability to compete, potentially causing our business, financial condition, and results of operations to be materially and adversely affected.

Reworded

We use “cookies,” or small text files placed on consumer devices when an Internet browser is used, as well as mobile advertising identifiers, and other permitted tracking or contextual signals to gather data that enables our platform to better serve our customers. OurThese cookies and mobile advertising identifierssignals do not identify consumers directly, but allow for our customers to provide us accessinsight tointo suchfactors information,, such as whenad aexposure, consumerengagement, isdevice ablecharacteristics, to view or clicks on an advertisement, when a consumer uses a mobile app, the consumer’sapproximate location, and browserusage orpatterns otherthat generalare deviceused information.to improve relevance, measurement, and pricing efficiency. Publishers, buyers, third-party data providers, and partners may also choose to share their information about consumers’ interests or give us permission to use their cookies and mobile advertising identifiers. We then use this data from cookies, mobile device identifiers, and other tracking technologies to help advertisers decide whether to bid on, and how to price, an ad impression in a certain location, at a given time, for a particular consumer.

Reworded

Without cookies, mobile advertising identifiers, and other tracking technology data, transactions processed through our platform would be executed with less insight into consumer preferences, reducing the precision of advertisers' decisions about which impressions to purchase for an advertising campaign. This could make advertising through our platform less valuable and decrease our revenue as advertising budgets may be decreased or directed to alternatives that are not exclusively reliant on cookies, mobile advertising identifiers, and other tracking technology data.data, or favor platforms that rely more heavily on first-party data, authenticated users, or closed ecosystems. If our ability to use cookies, mobile advertising identifiers or other tracking technologies is limited as a result of consumers rejecting targeted advertising, we may be required to develop or obtain additional applications and technologies to compensate for the lack of cookies, mobile advertising identifiers and other tracking technology data, which may not be available to us or could be time consuming or costly to develop, less effective,effective than current services, and subject to additional regulation.

Reworded

Additionally, consumers can, with increasing ease, implement technologies that limit our ability to collect and use data to deliver targeted advertisements or otherwise limit the effectiveness of our platform. Cookies may be deleted or blocked by consumers. The most commonly used Internet browsers allow consumers to modify their browser settings to block first-party cookies (placed directly by the publisher or website owner that the consumer intends to interact with) or third-party cookies (placed by parties, like us, that have no direct relationship with the consumer), and some browsers block third-party cookies by default, throughor browser-basedimplement globalbrowser-level or operating system level privacy controls (alsoincluding knownglobal asprivacy universalcontrol optor outsimilar mechanisms), whichthat aremay newlyrestrict availabledata collection or use, as a result of changes to a growing list of US state privacy laws.

Reworded

Some consumers also download “ad blocking” software on their computers or mobile devices, not only for privacy reasons, but also to counteract the adverse effect advertisements can have on the consumer experience, including increased load times, data consumption, and screen overcrowding. Ad-blocking technologies and other global privacy controls may prevent some third-party cookies, or other tracking technologies, from being stored on a consumer's computer or mobile device. If more consumers adopt these measures, or more regulators mandate the use of specific controls, it could reduce the volume or effectiveness and value of targeted advertising, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, some ad blocking technologies block only ads that are targeted through use of third-party data, while allowing ads based on first-party data (i.e., data owned by the publisher). These ad blockers could place us at a disadvantage becauserelative we rely on third-party data, while some largeto competitors havewith troves ofextensive first-party data theyassets, useincluding tocompanies direct advertising. Mobile devices using Android and iOS operating systems do notthat operate withconsumer-facing cookies, but with mobile advertising identifiers, and these operating system developers offer ways for consumers to limit the ability to track consumers while they are using applications other than their web browser on the device. As a result, fewer mobile advertising identifiers may be be accessible in mobile devices, which could adversely impact our business. Other technologies allow ads that are deemed “acceptable,” which could be defined in ways that place us or our publishers at a disadvantage, particularly if such technologies are controlled or influenced by our competitors.platforms. Even if ad blockers do not ultimately have an adverse effect on our business, investor concerns about ad blockers could cause our stock price to decline.

Added

In mobile environments, advertising identifiers are governed by operating system‑level permission frameworks, and platform providers may modify or further restrict identifier access at their discretion. In emerging AI‑driven and “zero‑click” discovery environments, advertising may be delivered or measured through new mechanisms that reduce traditional referral traffic, alter attribution models, or require new forms of consent and governance. If we are unable to adapt our platform, measurement, and data‑governance capabilities to these evolving environments, our business, financial performance, and growth prospects could be adversely affected.

Reworded

The continued restriction, reduced utility, or future deprecation of third-partytracking cookies,technologies, andor the potential development of others to develop proprietary replacementsor forclosed alternatives to cookies, could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Reworded

Some prominent technology companies, including Google, have previously announced intentions to discontinue the use of third-party cookies, and to develop alternative methods and mechanisms for targeting advertisements, though the expected timeline for such changes is difficult to predict and has changed over time. While Google announced in July 2024 that it was discontinuing plans to phase out cookies in its Chrome browser, newlarge identitytechnology solutionsplatforms orand alternativesother aremarket likely toparticipants continue to beinvest ain, strongpromote, focusand expand the use of Googlealternative identity solutions, including deterministic identifiers, proprietary identity graphs, and others.authenticated Ifuser‑based companiestracking aremethods. forcedThese toapproaches may rely on targetinglogin methodologiescredentials, otherfirst‑party thandata cookies, such companies may instead rely on proprietary products, algorithms, or statistical methods to track consumers without cookies. Companies may also utilize log-in credentials entered by consumers into other web properties owned by those companies, such as their email services or other offerings, to track web usage, including usagecollected across multiple devices.owned properties, or closed technical systems that enable tracking and targeting outside of traditional cookie‑based mechanisms, including across devices and environments.

Reworded

Additionally, some companies may build different and potentially proprietary consumer tracking methods into their widely used web browsers, which we may not be able to effectively use for our publishers and buyers. Such proprietary methods may favor closed or vertically integrated ecosystems, limit interoperability, or restrict independent ad-tech providers’ access to data or functionality, which could reduce demand for our services. Many applications and other content creators also allow consumers to avoid receiving advertisements by paying for subscriptions or other downloads. Although we believe our platform is well-positioned to adapt and continue to provide key data insights to our publishers without cookies, this transition could be more disruptive, slower, or more expensive than we currently anticipate, or publishers and buyers could elect to move a larger proportion of their advertising inventory or spend to these providers to take advantage of proprietary consumer tracking methods, any of which could materially affect our ability to serve our customers, publishers, and buyers, and our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Added

Our business depends on the lawful availability and utility of data signals used to enable advertising transactions, support analytics, optimization, and automation features, including those incorporating machine-learning or artificial-intelligence-based functionality, and any limitations on our ability to collect, process, or share such data could diminish the value of our platform and our financial results.

Removed

Our business depends on our ability to collect, use, and disclose data to deliver advertisements. Any limitation imposed on our collection, use or disclosure of this data could significantly diminish the value of our solution and cause us to lose publishers, buyers, and revenue. Consumer tools, regulatory restrictions and technological limitations all threaten our ability to use and disclose data.

Added

The collection, use, and sharing of these data signals are subject to an increasingly complex and fragmented global regulatory environment, as well as evolving technical and policy restrictions imposed by browsers, operating systems, and other platform providers. Regulatory developments, enforcement actions, private litigation, platform policy changes, or increased exercise of consumer privacy controls may restrict the types of data that may be collected, the purposes for which data may be used, the duration for which data may be retained, or the parties with whom data may be shared.

Reworded

We collect this data and analyze it in order to enhance our services, including the pricing, placement, and scheduling of advertisements. As part of our real-time analytics service offering, we also share the data, or analyses based on it, with our publishers and buyers. Our ability to collect, use and share data about advertising transactions and consumer behavior is critical to the value of our services, and is subject to a rapidly evolving regulatory framework that is not always consistent across geographies and jurisdictions. Evolving and conflicting regulatory standards could place restrictions on the collection, management, aggregation and use of information, which could result in a material increase in the cost of collecting or otherwise obtaining certain kinds of data and could limit the ways in which we may use or disclose information.services. Internet users can, with increasing ease, implement practices or technologies that may limit our ability to collect and use data to deliver targeted advertisements, or otherwise inhibit the effectiveness of our platform. Although our publishers and buyers generally permit us to aggregate and use data from advertising placements, subject to certain restrictions, publishers or buyers might decide to restrict our collection or use of their data.data based on their own regulatory, commercial, or risk considerations. Any limitations on this ability could impair our ability to deliver effective solutions, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Reworded

Because we do not generally have direct relationships with consumers, we rely on publishers, buyers, and data providers, as applicable, to obtain the consent of the consumer on our behalf to process their data and deliver interest-based advertisements, and to implement any notice or choice mechanisms required under applicable laws. Our reliance on third parties for consent and notice creates inherent compliance risk, including situations where regulatory authorities or plaintiffs seek to impose liability on multiple participants in the advertising supply chain regardless of contractual allocations of responsibility. If publishers, buyers, or data providers do not follow the applicable requirements and processes or otherwise fail to secure any legally-required consents or provide required notice and choice mechanisms, which can be difficult given the rapidly evolving regulatory consent frameworks being promulgated, we could be subject to fines and liability. Additionally, if our data, privacy, or consent practices are found to be inadequate, or we make errors in the deployment of existing and future policies or technical safeguards, we may be subject to regulatory enforcement action or named in class-action lawsuits. We may not have adequate insurance or contractual indemnity arrangements to protect us against any such fines, penalties, claims, and losses.

Added

Privacy-related class-action litigation poses increasing financial and operational risk.

Added

The advertising technology industry has experienced a significant increase in privacy‑related class‑action litigation in recent years, and the focus of these claims has shifted from consumer‑facing publishers to intermediaries within the digital advertising supply chain. Plaintiff counsel have increasingly pursued novel and expansive legal theories alleging improper data collection, use, or sharing by intermediaries, often seeking to impose liability based on the operation of complex programmatic advertising systems rather than direct relationships with end users.

Added

Claims may involve allegations relating to consent, transparency, data sharing practices, or the use of identifiers and tracking technologies across web, mobile, CTV, or other environments. Even where such claims lack merit, class‑action litigation is inherently costly, time‑consuming, and unpredictable, and may require substantial management attention, diversion of internal resources, and significant legal expense over extended periods of time.

Added

The outcomes of privacy‑related class actions are uncertain and may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, or injunctive relief that could require changes to our products, data‑processing practices, or business operations. In addition, defending against such litigation may necessitate increased investment in compliance infrastructure, documentation, discovery processes, and external advisors, which could increase operating costs and negatively impact margins.

Added

Privacy‑related litigation may also have broader consequences beyond direct financial exposure. Public allegations of non‑compliance, even if ultimately unfounded, could damage our reputation with publishers, buyers, regulators, and partners, reduce trust in our platform, and negatively affect our ability to attract or retain customers. Increased litigation risk may also cause publishers, buyers, or data partners to restrict or reconsider their participation in our marketplace, limit data sharing, or impose additional contractual requirements, which could reduce platform liquidity and revenue opportunities.

Added

Furthermore, the evolving and fragmented nature of privacy regulation increases the likelihood that litigation will continue to be brought under differing legal standards across jurisdictions. Courts and regulators may adopt interpretations of privacy and data‑protection laws that are inconsistent, expansive, or difficult to reconcile with existing industry practices. As a result, we may be required to make business decisions or accept certain risks in an environment where legal standards remain unsettled, and there can be no assurance that our mitigation efforts or defenses will be successful.

Added

If privacy‑related class‑action litigation continues to increase in frequency or severity, or if we are unable to effectively defend against or resolve such claims, our business, results of operations, financial condition, and long‑term growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Reworded

The digital advertising ecosystem is competitive and complex due to a variety of factors. While programmatic header bidding and other digital advertising has enabled the purchasing and selling of vast amounts of digital advertising inventory, there are significant challenges related to proliferation of media across platforms, including maintaining competitive transaction speed, increased costs, transparency, and evolving regulatory requirements. To address these issues at scale for both buyers and sellers, we provide specialized software and hardware infrastructure to optimally power technology-driven transactions. To successfully grow our business, we compete with a range of SSPs, including large, publicly-traded SSPs like Magnite, Inc.,and smaller private SSPs in markets around the world, as well as divisions of larger companies like Google.

Reworded

Some of our competitors have greater financial, technical, sales, and marketing resources, longer operating histories, and greater name recognition. In addition, some competitors, particularly those with greater scale or a more diversified revenue base and a broader offering, have greater flexibility than we do to compete aggressively on the basis of price and other contract terms, or to compete with us by including in their product offerings services that we may not be able to provide. Competitors that are larger or more well-funded than our Company may be able to invest greater resources than we can in technological development and innovation, particularly in the area of AI where investments can be capital intensive without a guarantee of a return on the investment. Some of our competitors may also choose to sell products or services competitive to ours at lower prices by accepting lower margins and profitability, or they may be able to sell competitive products or services at lower prices given proprietary ownership of data, technical superiority, or economies of scale. The introduction of competitive products, pricing strategies, or other technologies by our competitors that are superior to or that achieve greater market acceptance than our products and services could adversely affect our business.

Reworded

We experience requests from publishers and buyers for discounts, fee concessions, rebates, refunds, and greater levels of pricing transparency, in some cases as a condition to maintain the relationship or to increase the amount of advertising spend that the buyer sends to our platform. In addition, we charge fees to publishers for use of our platform, and we may decide to offer discounts or other pricing concessions in order to attract more inventory or demand, or to compete effectively with other providers that have different or lower pricing structures and may be able to undercut our pricing due to greater scale or other factors. Our revenue, take rate, business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected if we cannot maintain and grow our revenue and profitability through volume increases that compensate for any price reductions, or if we are forced to make significant fee concessions, rebates, or refunds.

Reworded

Market pressure may reduce our revenue per impression.revenues.

Reworded

If changes in ad formatsformats, anddelivery digitalmechanisms, deviceor typesplatform develop in ways thatpolicies prevent advertisements from being delivered to consumers, our business, results of operations, and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Reworded

Our success depends upon the ability of our platform to provide advertising for a variety of digital devices, the major operating systems or Internet browsers that run on them, and the thousands of applications that are downloaded onto them. The design of digital devices and operating systems or browsers is controlled by third parties that may also introduce new devices and operating systems or modify existing ones, including by implementing technical, contractual, or policy-based restrictions on advertising, data access, or interoperability, and our access to content on certain devices may be limited. If our platform cannot operate effectively with popular devices, operating systems, or Internet browsers, including, for example, as a result of Google’s deactivation of cookies or other similar events, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected. as a result of browser- or operating system-level privacy controls, restrictions on identifiers, limitations on APIs, or other platform policy changes, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Reworded

Our success depends upon the continued service of members of our senior management team and other key employees. Our Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Rajeev K. Goel, is critical to our overall management, as well as the continued development of our platform and relationships with publishers, DSPs, and agencies, and our strategic direction. Our success also depends on our ability to hire, train, retain, and motivate new employees that align with our corporate culture that has fostered innovation, creativity, and teamwork across our business. Competition for employees in our industry can be intense, and we compete for experienced personnel with many companies that have greater resources than we have. Further, as our business grows and we introduce new offerings, we may need to hire employees with skills and experience that we have not historically required. This is especially true as our business increases focus and resources on emerging revenue streams or other offerings that were not historically a material part of our business. The market for talent in our key areas of operations, especially in engineering, and competition for qualified personnel is particularly intense in the San Francisco Bay Area, Pune, India, and New York, where we maintain offices. As we expand and change,evolve, in particular across multiple geographies or following acquisitions, it may be difficult to preserve our corporate culture, which could increase employee turnover or reduce our ability to innovate, create, and operate effectively.

Reworded

In addition, a prolonged economic downturn or prolonged period of elevated interest rates may lead additional buyers to slow or default on payments or in some cases seek bankruptcy protection. We cannot assureprovide youassurance that we will not experience bad debt in the future, and write-offs for bad debt could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition in the periods in which the write-offs occur. If our cash collections are significantly diminished as a result of these dynamics, our revenue and/or cash flow could be adversely affected, and we may need to use working capital to fund our accounts payable pending collection from the buyers. This may result in additional costs and cause us to forgo or defer more strategic uses of that working capital.

Showing the first 60 of 106 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

8new paragraphs
21removed paragraphs
33reworded paragraphs
6,985 → 6,267words in section

New heading “Expansion of SPO Agreements and Activate”

Removed heading “Interest income”

Removed heading “Stock-Based Compensation”

Removed heading “Acquisition-related Intangible Assets and Goodwill”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: impairment, climate, competition
“Events or changes in circumstances which could trigger an impairment review include a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, unanticipated competition, a loss of key personnel, significant changes in the manner of the Company’s use of the acquired assets, or the strategy for the Company’s overall business, significant negative industry or economic trends, or significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future results of operations.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: goodwill
“Acquisition-related Intangible Assets and Goodwill”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: tariff, interest rate, recession

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Additionally, recent macroeconomic uncertainty, including adopted or proposed changes in the trade policies and tariff rates of the United States and international trade partners, slowing domestic growth, economic recession concerns, interest rate fluctuations, volatility in domestic and international equity and debt markets, foreign currency fluctuation and weakening of the U.S. Dollar, and persistent inflation in the U.S. and other markets globallyglobally, continue to create economic volatility and dislocation in the capital and credit markets in the U.S. and globally. To date, we have not observed material impacts in our business or outlook, but we intend to continue to monitor macroeconomic conditions closely and may determine to take certain financial or operational actions in response to such conditions to the extent our business begins to be adversely impacted.
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: impairment, goodwill
“Acquisition-related intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis, while goodwill amounts are not amortized. Acquisition-related intangible assets and goodwill are tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the acquisition-related intangible assets or goodwill may be impaired.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: litigation, impairment

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

In addition to our results determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), includingincluding, in particularparticular, operating income,income (loss), net cash provided by operating activities, and net income,income (loss), we believe that Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, is useful in evaluating our operating performance. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) adjusted for stock-based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization, unrealizedlitigation (gain)related loss and impairment of equity investment,expenses, interest income, acquisition-related and other expenses, and provision for (benefit from) income taxes.
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: bankruptcy
“General and administrative expense increased primarily due to a $6.3 million increase in personnel costs associated with higher stock-based compensation costs, and a $1.1 million increase in professional services, offset by a $5.7 million decrease in provision for bad debt relating to a DSP buyer of our platform that filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on June 30, 2023.”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (62)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 10 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Added

We are an independent, artificial intelligence-powered advertising technology company that delivers digital advertising performance. Our mission is to fuel the endless potential of Internet content creators and to enable a thriving, advertisement-funded digital ecosystem where global audiences can gain free or affordable access to information and entertainment.

Removed

We are an independent technology company seeking to maximize customer value by delivering digital advertising’s supply chain of the future.

Reworded

Our integrated technology platform connects buyers, publishers, data providers, and commerce media networks on a single, unified platform, to deliver advertising performance, control, transparency and efficiency. Our platform empowers the world’s leading digital content creators (which we collectively refer to as “publishers”) across the open internet to maximize monetization of their advertising inventory.inventory Ourand platformaudiences alsoand provides control and transparency to buyers, which includes advertisers, agencies, agency trading desks, and demand side platforms (“DSPs”), (which we collectively refer to as “buyers”) and enables both publishers and buyers to drive better business outcomes. Our infrastructure-driven approach allows for the efficient processing and utilization of data in real time. By delivering scalable and flexible programmatic innovation, we believe we improve outcomes for our customers while championing a vibrant and transparent digital advertising supply chain..

Reworded

We continue to focus on the strengths that we believe provide us with long-term competitive advantages. These strengths include our global, omnichannel reach which targets a diverse set of publishers touching many ad formats and digital device types, including mobile app, mobile web, desktop, display, video, over-the-top video/connected TV (“OTT/CTV”), and rich media. Additionally, as an independent infrastructure provider prioritizing transparency, we can be more closely aligned with both publishers and buyers which has enabled us to build direct relationships with publishers, advertisers, agencies, and DSPs and create bespoke products that meet our customers’ needs. We have also maintained a demonstrated track record of stability and agility to address thesechanges in market conditions and provide superior outcomes for both publishers and buyers. Finally, we have designed our technology to efficiently process real-time advertising transactions while leveraging data to optimize outcomes for publishers and buyers. We own and operate our software and hardware infrastructure globally, which saves significant infrastructure expenditures as compared to public cloud alternatives.

Reworded

The digital advertising ecosystem continues to evolve and adapt at a rapid pace. Some noted trends include the continued growth of digital media across multiple platforms, aan continuedincreased increasefocus inon theperformance numberdriven of ad impressions processedmedia, and analyzed in real-time by each participant in the digital advertising ecosystem, a desire for transparency and control throughout the supply chain from both the buyers and publishers,publishers. andIn addition, rapidly evolving data and privacy regulations and standards.industry standards continue to impact our business.

Reworded

Additionally, recent macroeconomic uncertainty, including adopted or proposed changes in the trade policies and tariff rates of the United States and international trade partners, slowing domestic growth, economic recession concerns, interest rate fluctuations, volatility in domestic and international equity and debt markets, foreign currency fluctuation and weakening of the U.S. Dollar, and persistent inflation in the U.S. and other markets globallyglobally, continue to create economic volatility and dislocation in the capital and credit markets in the U.S. and globally. To date, we have not observed material impacts in our business or outlook, but we intend to continue to monitor macroeconomic conditions closely and may determine to take certain financial or operational actions in response to such conditions to the extent our business begins to be adversely impacted.

Removed

We believe we are positioned to benefit from tailwinds in the advertising industry, including the rapid proliferation of digital media, the need for purpose-built infrastructure to address the increasing complexity in the digital advertising landscape, and increasing consumer time spent online.

Reworded

(1)For a definition of Adjusted EBITDA, an explanation of our management’s use of this measure, and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income,income (loss), see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.

Added

Expansion of SPO Agreements and Activate

Reworded

Further, weWe work with DSPs to help them reduce their costs and improve advertiser ROI, which in turn makes us the specialized cloud infrastructure platform of choice for many of our buying partners. We depend upon a limited number of large DSPs for a large percentage of impressions purchased and our business results, including revenues, may be impacted by changes in their pricing strategies, bidding algorithms or go-to market efforts. As buyers increasingly consolidate their spending with fewer larger technology platforms, we seek to bring an increased proportion of their digital ad spending to our platform through direct deals. Supply Path Optimization (“SPO”) continues to be a major growth driver for us as we add new SPO relationships and expand existing ones. We have been investing in SPO technology and partnerships for six years and SPO represented approximately 50%55% of total activity for the year ended December 31, 2024.2025.

Removed

We generate revenue from the use of our platform for the purchase and sale of digital advertising inventory.

Removed

We primarily work with publishers and app developers who allow us direct access to their ad inventory, as well as select channel partners that meet our quality and scale thresholds. Our channel partners aggregate and provide further access to thousands of sites and apps from smaller publishers. We generate revenue through fees charged to our publishers, which are generally a percentage of the value of the advertising impressions that publishers monetize on our platform.

Reworded

Our platform and suite of solutions serve four primary customer types: publishers, buyers, data partners and curators, and retail and commerce media participants. Through these customers, we generate revenue primarily through fees charged to our publishers, which are generally a percentage of the value of the advertising impressions that publishers monetize on the platform. We also generate revenues from our other products such as OpenWrap, our header bidding solution, and Connect, our solution that provides additional data and insights to buyers, which are sold separate from or in conjunction with use of our platform. WeIn continue2023, towe invest in new features for our existing solutions and new solutions such as our new productlaunched Activate, which allows buyers to execute direct deals on our platform with publisher inventory, and Convert, our commerce media solution, both of which were launched in 2023.solution.

Reworded

We report revenue on a net basis. This represents gross billings to buyers, net of amounts we pay publishers.publishers and rebates associated with SPO agreements with buyers. We record our accounts receivable at the amount of gross billings to buyers, net of allowances, for the amounts we are responsible to collect, and we record our accounts payable at the net amount payable to publishers. Accordingly, both accounts receivable and accounts payable appear large in relation to revenue, which is reported on a net basis.

Removed

The global advertising industry experiences seasonal trends that affect the vast majority of participants in the digital advertising ecosystem. Most notably, advertisers have historically spent more in the fourth quarter of the calendar year to coincide with the holiday shopping season, and less in the first quarter. We expect seasonality trends to continue, thereby resulting in seasonality in our revenues and corresponding accounts receivable and accounts payable balances, and our ability to manage our resources in anticipation of these trends will affect our operating results.

Reworded

Cost of revenue consists of data center co-location costs, depreciation expense related to hardware supporting our platform, amortization expense related to capitalized internal useinternal-use software development costs and acquired developed technology,costs, personnel costs, and allocated facilities costs. Personnel costs include salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation, and employee benefit costs, and are primarily attributable to our networkcloud operations group, which maintains our servers, and our client operations group, which is responsible for the integration of new publishers and buyers and providing customer support for existing customers.

Reworded

Technology and Development. Technology and development expenses consist of personnel costs, including salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation, and employee benefits costs, allocated facilities costs, and professional services. These expenses include costs incurred in the development, implementation and maintenance of internal useinternal-use software, including platform and related infrastructure. We expenseexpend technology and development costs as incurred, except to the extent that such costs are associated with internal useinternal-use software development that qualifies for capitalization. We expect technology and development expenses to generally increase in absolute dollars in future periods.

Reworded

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist of personnel costs, including salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation, and employee benefits costscosts, for our employees engaged in sales, sales support, marketing, business development, and customer relationship functions. Sales and marketing expenses also include expenses related to promotional, advertising and marketing activities, allocated facilities costs, travel, and entertainment primarily related to sales activity and professional services. We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in absolute dollars in future periods.

Reworded

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist of personnel costs, including salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation, and employee benefits costs for our executive, finance, legal, human resources, information technology, and other administrative employees. General and administrative expenses also include outside consulting, legal and accounting services, allocated facilities costs, and travel and entertainment primarily related to inter-office travel and conferences. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in absolute dollars in future periods.

Reworded

Total other income (expense), net consists of interest income, unrealized gain (loss) on equity investmentincome and other income (expense), net. Interest income is generated by investing excess cash into money market accounts and marketable securities. Unrealized gain (loss) on equity investment consists of gains and losses on our investment in equity securities, including unrealized gains and losses from market price changes or impairment of securities we continue to hold. Other income (expense), net consists primarily of gains and losses from foreign currency exchange transactions.

Added

Revenue decreased $8.3 million, or (3)%, in 2025 as compared to 2024. Our revenues in 2025 were primarily driven by impressions processed on our platform, new revenue streams, and growth in customer relationships. The revenue decline in 2025 as compared to 2024 was primarily due to approximately $14.2 million from incremental political spend in the United States in 2024 due to the United States presidential election. Revenues for the year ended 2025 were also negatively impacted by platform changes implemented by one of our large DSP buyers in the second half of 2024 and subsequently platform changes implemented by another DSP buyer in the second half of 2025. These decreases were offset by an increase in growth of CTV (excluding the impact from political spend), mobile, and new revenue streams.

Reworded

Revenue increased $24.2 million, or 9%, in 2024 primarily due to an increase in the number of ad impressions processed from our publishers, growth in our emerging revenue streams, and increased demand from the growth of our buyer relationships primarily through SPO agreements. For the year ended 2024,2025, we served approximately 1,9001,980 publishers worldwide on our platform, compared to approximately 1,8001,900 publishers worldwide for the year ended 2023.2024. We ended fiscal 20242025 with approximately 10050 net new publishers, which represented over 60,00064,000 domains and 27,00044,000 apps in total, compared to approximately 150100 new publishers in 2023,2024, which represented approximately 66,00060,000 domains and 29,00027,000 apps in total. For purposes of our publisher count, we aggregate multiple business accounts from separate divisions, segments or subsidiaries into a single “master” publisher based on our assessment of the related nature of the group. In addition, in 2024 we completed a number of SPO initiatives which increased buyer spend on our platform.

Removed

Our revenues in 2024 benefited by approximately $14.2 million from incremental political spend in the United States due to the 2024 presidential election. Conversely, our business was negatively impacted by bidding methodology changes implemented by one of our buyers in the second half of the second fiscal quarter of 2024.

Reworded

We expect revenue to continue to increase in 2025,2026, primarily driven by growth in mobile and omnichannel video, which is the combination of short formconnected video (OTT/CTV), and OTT/CTV.new revenue streams including AI products. Additionally, we expect our revenues to be affected by macroeconomic conditions, and will continue to be impacted by the bidding methodology changes implemented by one of our buyers in the near term. The magnitude of these impacts on our future revenues is difficult to predict.

Reworded

Cost of revenue increased $1.8$2.1 million, primarily due to a $5.1$4.2 million increase in amortization of internal use software and a $1.3$3.5 million increase in personneldata costscenter as headcount increased by 4% in order to support our growing business,costs, offset by a $3.8$5.5 million decrease in depreciation of data center equipment. Overall, our cost of revenue per impression processed in 20242025 decreased by 18%20% compared to 2023.2024.

Reworded

Our gross margin of 65%64% in 20242025 increaseddecreased compared to 20232024 of 63%65% due to a higher decline in revenue growthas acceleratingopposed fasterto thanthe increase in cost of revenues.revenue.

Reworded

We expect the cost of revenue to be higher in 20252026 compared to 20242025 in absolute dollars primarily due to increases in depreciation and amortization expense fromour data center capacity expansion in 2024,costs as well as increases in in software, hardwarehardware, and equipment maintenance to support the data centers.

Reworded

The increase in technology and development costs was primarily due to an increase of $7.5$1.2 million in personnel costs associated with a headcount increase by 13% and higher stock-based compensation costs, an increase of $0.7 million in facilities costs associated with new offices, an increase in depreciation of $0.3 million, and an increase in travel and entertainment of $0.3 million, offset by a $2.3$0.6 million increase in the capitalization of internal use software.

Reworded

We expect technology and development expenses in 2026 to increasebe in 2025flat compared to 20242025 in absolute dollars, primarily due to the additional headcount investment in our key growth opportunities.dollars.

Reworded

Sales and marketing costs increased primarily due to a $11.7$6.0 million increase in personnel costs associated with a headcount increase by 7% and higher stock-based compensation costs and9%, a $1.1 million increase in facilities costs, and an increase in travel and entertainment expenses of $0.4 million, and increase in marketing expenses of $0.2$0.9 million, offset by a decrease in amortizationmarketing for acquisition-related intangible assetsexpenses of $0.9$0.5 million.

Removed

General and administrative expense increased primarily due to a $6.3 million increase in personnel costs associated with higher stock-based compensation costs, and a $1.1 million increase in professional services, offset by a $5.7 million decrease in provision for bad debt relating to a DSP buyer of our platform that filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on June 30, 2023.

Reworded

We expect generalGeneral and administrative expensesexpense to increase in 2025 compared to 2024 in absolute dollarsincreased primarily due to increasesa $1.0 million increase in expensesfacilities relatingcosts, toa our$0.9 personnel.million increase in personnel costs, and a $0.6 million increase in property taxes.

Added

We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in 2026 compared to 2025 in absolute dollars primarily due to increases in litigation related expenses.

Removed

Interest income

Removed

Interest income decreased due to the decrease in interest rates and a decrease in holdings in marketable securities.

Reworded

Total other income (expense), net increaseddecreased for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to the prior year period,period. primarilyInterest drivenincome bydecreased due to the decrease in interest rates and a decrease in holdings in marketable securities. Other income (expense), net for the year ended December 31, 2024 included approximately $4.0 million recognized as other income of $4.0 million from the Google Privacy Sandbox initiativeinitiative, in connection with their previous initiative to phase out the use of third-party cookies. The income from the Google Privacy Sandbox initiative was related to our efforts to build and test integrations with the privacy sandbox. Other income (expense), net, also benefiteddecreased fromdue to foreign currency fluctuations for the year ended December 31, 20242025 compared to the prior year period.

Reworded

Provision forFor (Benefit From) Income Taxes

Added

The difference between the effective tax rate in 2025 of 9% and the federal statutory income tax rate of 21% was primarily due to foreign derived intangible income (FDII) deduction and federal research and development credit, partially offset by stock-based compensation, Section 162(m) limitation, and acquisition-related costs.

Removed

The difference between the effective tax rate in 2023 of 15% and the federal statutory income tax rate of 21% was primarily due to federal research and development credit and foreign derived intangible income (FDII) deduction partially offset by state taxes, stock-based compensation, and Section 162(m) limitation.

Reworded

In addition to our results determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), includingincluding, in particularparticular, operating income,income (loss), net cash provided by operating activities, and net income,income (loss), we believe that Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, is useful in evaluating our operating performance. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) adjusted for stock-based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization, unrealizedlitigation (gain)related loss and impairment of equity investment,expenses, interest income, acquisition-related and other expenses, and provision for (benefit from) income taxes.

Reworded

The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss) for each of the periods indicated:

Added

(1)Litigation related expenses represents external legal fees and other expenses, net of insurance recoveries, associated with pending litigation that arose outside of the ordinary course of business. These costs related to a discrete matter, and are not representative of our underlying operating performance. We do not adjust for legal expenses incurred in our ordinary course of business.

Removed

(1)We exclude acquisition-related and other expenses incurred in connection with our acquisition of Martin from Adjusted EBITDA because we do not believe such expenses are reflective of our ongoing core operations. Acquisition-related expenses incurred in connection with our acquisition of Martin include third-party transaction costs. For additional information, see Note 7, “Business Combination” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Reworded

In addition to operating income (loss) and net income,income (loss), we use Adjusted EBITDA as a measure of operational efficiency. We believe that this non-GAAP financial measure is useful to investors for period to period comparisons of our business and in understanding and evaluating our operating results for the following reasons:

Reworded

We have financed our operations and capital expenditures primarily through utilization of cash generated from operations. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had cash,cash and cash equivalents, and marketable securitiesequivalents of $140.6$145.5 million and net working capital, consisting of current assets less current liabilities, of $156.7$146.8 million.

Reworded

We believe our existing cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and anticipated net cash provided by operating activities, together with available borrowings under our credit facility, will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. However, if our operating performance during the next 12 months is below our expectations, our liquidity and ability to operate our business could be adversely affected. Our future capital requirements and the adequacy of available funds will depend on many factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors.”

Added

For the year ended December 31, 2025, net cash provided by operating activities of $81.1 million resulted primarily from adjustments for non-cash expenses of $73.1 million, including $43.8 million for depreciation and amortization, $38.4 million for stock-based compensation, and $14.5 million for deferred income taxes, and a decrease in accounts receivable of $66.6 million, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable of $42.4 million.

Removed

For the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash provided by operating activities of $81.1 million resulted primarily from net income of $8.9 million, adjustments for non-cash expenses of $68.0 million, including $44.8 million for depreciation and amortization, $28.9 million for stock-based compensation, and $13.4 million for deferred income taxes, and an increase in accounts receivable of $75.7 million, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable of $79.7 million.

Reworded

For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, net cash provided by investing activities was $22.3$6.1 million of cash, consisting of a net inflows from investments of marketable securities of $60.8$13.8 million, sales of marketable securities prior to maturity of $27.1 million, offset by $17.6$14.3 million in purchases of property and equipment (primarily data center infrastructure), and $20.9$20.5 million of investments in capitalized internal use software.

Reworded

For the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, net cash usedprovided inby investing activities was $39.0$22.3 million, consisting of a net purchaseinflows offrom investments of marketable securities of $29.6$60.8 million, $10.6offset by $17.6 million in purchases of property and equipment (primarily data center infrastructure), $17.7and $20.9 million of investments in capitalized internal use software, offset by net inflows from sales of marketable securities prior to maturity of $18.9 million.software.

Removed

For the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash used in financing activities of $73.5 million was primarily due to $75.3 million in stock repurchases and $2.1 million in payment of a business combination indemnification holdback, offset by $1.8 million proceeds from stock option exercises and $2.4 million proceeds from the employee stock purchase plan.

Reworded

For the year ended December 31, 2023,2025, net cash used in financing activities of $56.0$42.7 million was primarily due to $59.3$46.5 million in stock repurchases, offset by $1.5$1.8 million in proceeds from stock option exercises and $1.9$2.1 million in proceeds from the employee stock purchase plan.

Added

For the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash used in financing activities of $73.5 million was primarily due to $75.3 million in stock repurchases and $2.1 million in payment of a business combination indemnification holdback, offset by $1.8 million in proceeds from stock option exercises and $2.4 million in proceeds from the employee stock purchase plan.

Removed

For additional information, see Note 5, “Loan and Security Agreement and Senior Secured Credit Facilities Agreement” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Reworded

We refer to our publishers, app developers, and channel partners collectively as our publishers. We generate revenue through the monetization of publisher ad impressions processed on our platform. Our platform allows publishers to sell, in real time, ad impressions to buyers and provides automated inventory management and monetization tools to publishers across various device types and digital ad formats. We charge publishers a fee, which is typically a percentage of the value of the impressions monetized through our platform.

Removed

Stock-Based Compensation

Removed

Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, restricted stock units, and awards granted under our employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) is measured and recognized in our consolidated financial statements based on the fair value of the awards granted. The fair values of our ESPP and stock option awards are estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair value of restricted stock is calculated using the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant.

Removed

Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally four years. Stock-based compensation expense for ESPP awards is recognized on a graded-vesting attribution basis over the requisite service period of each award.

Removed

For additional information regarding stock-based compensation and the assumptions used for determining the fair value of stock options and ESPP awards, refer to Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 10—Stockholders’ Equity and Equity Incentive Plans.

Removed

Acquisition-related Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Showing the first 60 of 62 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-06 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-07 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
57removed paragraphs
1reworded paragraphs
5,431 → 217words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. The Company’s business, operations, financial results, and our stock price can be affected by a number of factors, whether currently known or unknown, including those described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. When any one or more of these risks materialize from time to time, such developments could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and the trading price of our stock. These disclosures reflect the Company's beliefs and opinions as to factors that could materially and adversely affect the Company and its securities in the future. References to past events are provided by way of example only and are not intended to be a complete listing of such events or a representation as to whether or not such factors or similar events have occurred in the past or their likelihood of occurring in the future. Except as set forth in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2026, there are no material changes to our risk factors since our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Removed heading “Risks Related to Our Business, Results of Operations and Growth”

Removed heading “Our revenue and results of operations are highly dependent on the overall demand for advertising.”

Removed heading “Our results of operations may fluctuate significantly and may not meet our expectations or those of securities analysts and investors.”

Removed heading “Risks Related to Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning”

Removed heading “We rely on machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies that may produce inaccurate or biased outputs, and our models may become less effective over time.”

Removed heading “Generative artificial intelligence and AI-powered search features may reduce open-web publisher traffic and disrupt the programmatic advertising ecosystem.”

Removed heading “Competition from companies with greater artificial intelligence capabilities may adversely affect our business and market position.”

Removed heading “Evolving laws and regulations governing artificial intelligence may impose significant compliance obligations and expose us to liability.”

Removed heading “The proliferation of AI-generated content may create brand safety risks and inventory quality challenges that adversely affect our business.”

Removed heading “Risk Related to our Operations”

Removed heading “We cannot guarantee that our share repurchase program will be fully consummated or that it will enhance long-term stockholder value. Share repurchases could also increase the volatility of the trading price of our stock and diminish our cash reserves.”

Removed heading “Risks Related to Regulations”

Removed heading “We are subject to constantly evolving laws, regulations and industry requirements related to data privacy, data protection, information security, and consumer protection across the markets we operate in.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: tariff, ukraine, israel, middle east
“Our business depends on the overall demand for advertising and on the economic health of our current and prospective publishers and buyers. In recent years, macroeconomic factors such as general economic volatility, recessionary fears, inflation, volatile interest rates and softening demand in certain verticals caused some advertisers to reduce their advertising budgets. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: investigation, litigation, class action, penalt
“In Europe, the GDPR took effect on May 25, 2018, and applies to products and services that we provide in Europe, as well as the processing of personal data of European Union (“EU”) citizens, wherever that processing occurs. The United Kingdom (“U.K.”) implemented the Data Protection Act, effective May 2018, and statutorily amended it in 2019 to contain provisions, including its own derogations, for how GDPR is applied in the U.K. post-Brexit (the “UK GDPR”). The GDPR includes operational requirements for companies that receive or process personal data of residents of the EU. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: litigation, fine, penalt, regulation
“The U.S. federal government and various state and foreign governments have adopted or proposed limitations on the collection, distribution, use, and storage of data relating to individuals, including the use of contact information, precise geolocation information, and other data for marketing, advertising and other communications with individuals and businesses. In the United States, various laws and regulations apply to the collection, processing, disclosure, and security of certain types of data. Additionally, the U.S. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: lawsuit, fine, china, regulation
“In addition, some countries, including India, Brazil, Thailand, and Japan, are considering or have passed legislation implementing data protection requirements or requiring local storage and processing of data or similar requirements that could increase the cost and complexity of delivering our services or force us to change business practices to conform to local law. The U.S. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: penalt, artificial intelligence, ai, regulation
“Regulatory frameworks governing the development and use of artificial intelligence are evolving rapidly across the United States, the European Union, and other jurisdictions in which we operate. In particular, the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (“EU AI Act”) imposes obligations on providers and deployers of AI systems, with key provisions applicable to general-purpose AI and higher-risk applications taking effect on August 2, 2026. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: lawsuit, class action, regulation
“The collection and processing of health-related data presents heightened compliance risks due to the broad and ambiguous language of emerging privacy laws such as Washington’s My Health My Data Act (“MHMD”) and the Nevada Consumer Health Data Law. These laws expand the definition of “consumer health data” far beyond traditional medical information, potentially encompassing data points that are commonly used in digital advertising, such as location data, app usage, and browsing history when linked to health-related interests. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (58)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. The Company’s business, operations, financial results, and our stock price can be affected by a number of factors, whether currently known or unknown, including those described in Part I, Item 1A, "“Risk Factors"” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. When any one or more of these risks materialize from time to time, such developments could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and the trading price of our stock. These disclosures reflect the Company's beliefs and opinions as to factors that could materially and adversely affect the Company and its securities in the future. References to past events are provided by way of example only and are not intended to be a complete listing of such events or a representation as to whether or not such factors or similar events have occurred in the past or their likelihood of occurring in the future. BelowExcept as set forth in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2026, there are no material changes to our risk factors since our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Removed

Risks Related to Our Business, Results of Operations and Growth

Removed

Our revenue and results of operations are highly dependent on the overall demand for advertising.

Removed

Our business depends on the overall demand for advertising and on the economic health of our current and prospective publishers and buyers. In recent years, macroeconomic factors such as general economic volatility, recessionary fears, inflation, volatile interest rates and softening demand in certain verticals caused some advertisers to reduce their advertising budgets. Such macroeconomic factors, as well as broader economic downturns, recessions, transnational trade wars or disruptions, inflation, further volatility in interest rates or foreign exchange rates or any supply chain disruptions, changes in the tax treatment of advertising expenses, or general financial uncertainty in North America, Europe, and Asia, where we do most of our business; could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, the conflict in Ukraine and the resumption of the conflict in Israel could cause unpredictable economic effects in Europe and EMEA, including potentially softening general consumer demand. Additionally, the imposition of significant tariffs and retaliatory trade measures by the United States and its trading partners, and any resulting trade war or prolonged disruption to global trade flows, could dampen advertiser budgets, increase operating costs, reduce consumer spending, and adversely affect economic conditions in the markets in which we operate, including North America, Europe, and Asia. Escalating geopolitical tensions, including in the Middle East, could compound these effects by disrupting energy markets, global supply chains, and general consumer and business confidence. Such conflicts may increase costs of labor and other items impacting our cost of revenue, and these factors and potential others may do so in the future. Reductions in overall advertising spending due to these factors or other factors could make it difficult to predict our revenue and could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Removed

Our results of operations may fluctuate significantly and may not meet our expectations or those of securities analysts and investors.

Removed

We operate in an evolving industry with ever-changing customer needs and behavior, and, as a result, our business has evolved over time such that our operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our business and future prospects. Our results of operations have fluctuated in the past, and future results of operations are likely to fluctuate as well. Although we have experienced prolonged revenue growth, we may not be able to sustain this growth rate, current revenue levels, or profitability. In addition, because our business is evolving, our historical results of operations may be of limited utility in assessing our future prospects. We expect to face challenges, risks, and difficulties frequently experienced by growing companies in rapidly developing industries, including those relating to:

Removed

•changes in demand and pricing for ad impressions sold on our platform;

Removed

•changes in our access to valuable ad impressions from publishers;

Removed

•responding to evolving industry standards and government regulations that impact our business, particularly in the areas of data protection and consumer privacy;

Removed

•developing, maintaining, and expanding relationships with publishers, DSPs, agencies, advertisers, and buyers;

Removed

•seasonality in our business;

Removed

•changes in demand due to real or perceived economic stagnation or recession in certain markets;

Removed

•innovating and developing new solutions that are adopted by and meet the needs of publishers, DSPs, agencies, advertisers, and buyers;

Removed

•competing against companies with a larger customer base or greater financial or technical resources;

Removed

•changes in the structure of the buying and selling of ad impressions;

Removed

•changes in the pricing policies of publishers and competitors;

Removed

•changes in the bidding behavior of buyers of ad impressions;

Removed

•changes in buyer bidding algorithms, including the deployment of artificial intelligence or automated optimization technologies by buyers that reduce the volume or value of impressions purchased through our platform;

Removed

•disruption to the digital advertising ecosystem driven by artificial intelligence, including the displacement of traditional programmatic advertising channels or reduction in open-web publisher traffic resulting from AI-powered search features or large language model-based services;

Removed

•changes in demand due to changes in macroeconomic environment, including as a result of an economic downturn, recession, inflation, volatility in interest rates or foreign exchange rates, disruptions to supply chains, disruptions to global trade, or otherwise;

Removed

•further expanding our business internationally; and

Removed

•recruiting, integrating, and retaining qualified and motivated employees, particularly engineers.

Removed

Any one or more of the factors above may result in significant fluctuations in our results of operations. You should not rely on our past results as an indicator of our future performance.

Removed

Risks Related to Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Removed

We rely on machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies that may produce inaccurate or biased outputs, and our models may become less effective over time.

Removed

Our core platform operations, including real-time bidding, auction optimization, yield management, and audience targeting, depend on machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies that require large volumes of high-quality data. These models may produce inaccurate, incomplete, biased, or otherwise flawed outputs. If our training data contains errors, biases, or inconsistencies, or if market conditions, consumer behavior, or buyer and publisher dynamics change in ways not reflected in our historical training data, our models may perform below expectations. Poor model performance could result in suboptimal auction outcomes for our publishers and buyers, degraded platform competitiveness, loss of customer trust, and revenue decline. Our model validation and monitoring procedures may not detect all failures or performance degradation in a timely manner, particularly under novel or unanticipated conditions. Retraining or replacing models could be costly and time-consuming. Additionally, if our AI systems produce or inform decisions that are perceived as biased or unfair, we could face reputational harm, legal liability, or regulatory action. Any of these outcomes could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Removed

Generative artificial intelligence and AI-powered search features may reduce open-web publisher traffic and disrupt the programmatic advertising ecosystem.

Removed

Generative artificial intelligence technologies, including AI-powered search features, large language model-based assistants, and agentic AI systems, may reduce the volume of user traffic directed to publisher websites by providing direct answers to user queries and bypassing traditional web navigation. As publishers experience traffic declines resulting from AI-mediated content consumption, the volume and value of advertising inventory available on our platform may decrease. This risk is particularly acute for open-web publishers that rely on search-driven and algorithmically distributed traffic to monetize their content through programmatic advertising. Additionally, the emergence of AI agents—autonomous systems that act on behalf of consumers—could further disrupt traditional web browsing behavior and the programmatic advertising ecosystem in ways we cannot fully anticipate. If these shifts reduce advertiser and publisher reliance on programmatic supply-side platforms, we may be unable to develop alternative revenue streams or adapt our platform sufficiently to offset the disruption. Any such development could have a material adverse effect on our business, revenues, and results of operations.

Removed

Competition from companies with greater artificial intelligence capabilities may adversely affect our business and market position.

Removed

We compete with large technology platforms and other companies that have significantly greater resources to invest in artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities. These competitors are deploying generative AI and advanced machine learning systems to build advertising solutions, expand closed ecosystems, and develop identity-independent targeting approaches that may reduce the value of independent supply-side platforms. If our competitors develop AI capabilities that are superior to ours, or if AI-driven consolidation accelerates buyer and publisher preferences for closed ecosystems or vertically integrated platforms, we could lose market share, experience pricing pressure, or face reduced demand for our services. Competition for engineers and data scientists with AI and machine learning expertise is intense, and our ability to attract and retain such talent is essential to our competitive position. If we are unable to develop, acquire, or retain competitive AI capabilities, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Removed

Evolving laws and regulations governing artificial intelligence may impose significant compliance obligations and expose us to liability.

Removed

Regulatory frameworks governing the development and use of artificial intelligence are evolving rapidly across the United States, the European Union, and other jurisdictions in which we operate. In particular, the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (“EU AI Act”) imposes obligations on providers and deployers of AI systems, with key provisions applicable to general-purpose AI and higher-risk applications taking effect on August 2, 2026. Compliance with the EU AI Act may require us to classify our AI systems, conduct conformity assessments, implement risk management and human oversight procedures, maintain technical documentation, and provide transparency to affected parties. Failure to comply could expose us to penalties of up to €15 million or 3% of worldwide annual turnover, as well as operational disruptions and reputational harm. In the United States, numerous states are considering or have enacted legislation governing AI systems, automated decision-making, and algorithmic transparency, and the regulatory landscape continues to evolve. The cost of compliance with AI regulations, individually and in the aggregate, may be substantial, and evolving requirements could require us to modify product design, data practices, or business operations in ways that are difficult to predict. Any failure to comply with applicable AI laws and regulations could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Removed

The proliferation of AI-generated content may create brand safety risks and inventory quality challenges that adversely affect our business.

Removed

The rapid proliferation of AI-generated content across publisher websites presents emerging brand safety and inventory quality challenges. AI-generated content may contain inaccurate information, biases, or inappropriate material that advertisers may consider unsuitable for association with their brand. If advertisements served through our platform are placed alongside AI-generated content that harms an advertiser’s brand reputation, our customers may reduce their spending on our platform, seek alternative solutions, or pursue claims against us. Our ability to accurately identify and classify AI-generated content in real time as part of our inventory quality and brand safety processes is still developing, and we cannot guarantee that our detection and mitigation tools will be effective against all forms of AI-generated content. In addition, emerging regulatory requirements for the disclosure and labeling of AI-generated content may impose additional compliance obligations on us and our publisher customers. If we are unable to adequately address AI-generated content risks, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Removed

Risk Related to our Operations

Removed

We cannot guarantee that our share repurchase program will be fully consummated or that it will enhance long-term stockholder value. Share repurchases could also increase the volatility of the trading price of our stock and diminish our cash reserves.

Removed

In February 2023, our board of directors authorized and approved a program pursuant to which we could repurchase up to $75.0 million in aggregate of shares of our Class A common stock, with the authorization to expire on December 31, 2024 (as amended, the “2023 Repurchase Program”). On February 22, 2024, our board of directors authorized an increase and extension to the 2023 Repurchase Program from $75.0 million to $175.0 million through December 31, 2025. On May 7, 2025, our board of directors authorized a further increase and extension to the 2023 Repurchase Program, increasing the total amount authorized for repurchase from $175.0 million to $275.0 million and extending the 2023 Repurchase Program through December 31, 2026 (the “2025 Repurchase Program Extension”). As of March 31, 2026, we have repurchased approximately $189.9 million of our Class A common stock in aggregate under the 2023 Repurchase Program. Although our board of directors authorized the 2025 Repurchase Program Extension, the program does not obligate us to repurchase any specific dollar amount or to acquire any specific number of shares of our Class A common stock. The actual timing and amount of repurchases remain subject to a variety of factors, including stock price, trading volume, market conditions and other general business considerations, all of which may be negatively impacted by macroeconomic conditions and factors, including, for example, volatile interest rates, inflation, and geopolitical uncertainty. The 2023 Repurchase Program may be modified, suspended, or terminated at any time, and we cannot guarantee that the 2023 Repurchase Program will be fully consummated or that it will enhance long-term stockholder value. The program could affect the trading price of our Class A common stock, increase volatility and diminish our cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities, and any announcement of a termination of this program may result in a decrease in the trading price of our stock.

Removed

Risks Related to Regulations

Removed

We are subject to constantly evolving laws, regulations and industry requirements related to data privacy, data protection, information security, and consumer protection across the markets we operate in.

Removed

We receive, store, and process data about or related to consumers in addition to publisher, buyer, partner, employee, and services provider or vendor data. Our handling of this data is subject to numerous federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations that are constantly evolving and not always consistent across jurisdictions. We are also subject to regulation by various governmental authorities in addition to federal and state regulations. Our data handling is further subject to contractual obligations and may be deemed to be subject to industry standards and trade associations.

Removed

The U.S. federal government and various state and foreign governments have adopted or proposed limitations on the collection, distribution, use, and storage of data relating to individuals, including the use of contact information, precise geolocation information, and other data for marketing, advertising and other communications with individuals and businesses. In the United States, various laws and regulations apply to the collection, processing, disclosure, and security of certain types of data. Additionally, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and many state attorneys general are interpreting federal and state consumer protection laws as imposing standards for the online collection, use, dissemination, and security of data. These regulatory regimes are constantly evolving and not always interpreted in a consistent manner. If we fail to comply with any such laws or regulations, we may be subject to enforcement actions that may not only expose us to litigation, fines, and civil and/or criminal penalties, but also require us to change our business practices, each of which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Removed

The regulatory framework for data privacy worldwide is evolving and is likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. The occurrence of unanticipated events often rapidly drives the adoption of legislation or regulation affecting the use, collection, or other processing of data and manners in which we conduct our business. Restrictions have been placed upon the collection, management, aggregation, transfer, and use of information, and compliance with those restrictions may require us to change how we collect, manage, aggregate, transfer, and use data in the future, which could result in a material increase in the cost of collecting or otherwise obtaining certain kinds of data. These restrictions could further limit the ways in which we may use or disclose information or may require us to make changes to our offerings, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In particular, interest-based advertising, or the use of data to draw inferences about a user’s interests and deliver relevant advertising to that user, and similar or related practices (sometimes referred to as behavioral advertising or personalized advertising), such as cross-device data collection and aggregation, have come under increasing scrutiny by legislative, regulatory, and self-regulatory bodies in the United States and abroad that focus on consumer protection or data privacy. In addition, the steps taken by companies to de-identify personal data, to use and distribute the resulting data, including for purposes of personalization and the targeting of advertisements, have also been a frequent target of scrutiny by these authorities. Much of the related regulatory activity has focused on the use of cookies and other technology to collect information about Internet users’ online browsing activity on web browsers, mobile devices, and other devices, to associate such data with user or mobile advertising identifiers or de-identified identities across devices and channels. There is also increased regulatory focus on the use of geolocation data that aims to limit what can be collected, what kind of consent may be required with respect to the same, and how such data may be used, exchanged, or disclosed to others.

Removed

In addition to governmental authorities, providers of Internet browsers maintain significant control over cookies and similar technologies and the data collected using such technologies. Because we, and our customers, rely upon large volumes of such data collected primarily through cookies and similar technologies, it is possible that these providers could have a substantial impact on our ability to collect and use data from Internet users. It is essential that we engage in responsible privacy practices, including providing consumers with notice of the types of data we collect and how we use that data to provide our services.

Removed

In the United States, the U.S. Congress and state legislatures, along with federal regulatory authorities, have increased their attention on matters concerning the collection and use of consumer data. In the United States, non-sensitive consumer data generally may be used under current rules and regulations, subject to certain restrictions, so long as the person does not affirmatively “opt-out” of the collection or use of such data. If an “opt-in” model or other more restrictive regulations were to be adopted in the United States, less data would be available, and the cost of data would be higher. It is uncertain what steps the second Trump Administration in the United States may take to expand, curtail, or alter the current federal regulatory regime in which we operate.

Removed

California enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act (as amended, “CCPA”) which took effect in January 2020. The CCPA created individual privacy rights for California residents, including rights of deletion and access, and increased the privacy and security obligations of businesses handling personal data. The CCPA is also still enforceable by the California Attorney General, and there is a CCPA private right of action relating to certain data security incidents. The CCPA generally requires covered businesses to, among other things, provide disclosures to California consumers regarding the collection, use and disclosure of their personal data. The CCPA also affords California consumers the ability to opt-out of certain sales of personal data, a concept that is defined broadly and is subject to evolving regulations promulgated initially by the California Attorney General, and now the California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”), a newly created agency charged with CCPA rulemaking and enforcement.

Removed

CCPA amendments have also imposed additional data protection obligations on companies doing business in California, including additional consumer rights processes and opt-outs for certain uses of sensitive data and “sharing” of personal data for cross-context behavioral advertising. The effects of the CCPA, including from expected but not yet promulgated regulations, are potentially significant and may require us to modify our data collection or processing practices and policies and to incur substantial costs and expenses in an effort to comply, which will increase our potential exposure to regulatory enforcement and/or litigation. Decreased availability and increased costs of information due to implementing the CCPA, could adversely affect our ability to meet our customers’ requirements and could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Removed

In addition to regulations under the CCPA, the California Privacy Protection Agency have also promulgated regulations as a result of the California Delete Act, which applies to those entities defined as ‘data brokers’ under the CCPA amendments. The Delete Act requires the CPPA to establish an accessible data deletion mechanism by January 1, 2026, to allow California consumers to submit a single verifiable consumer request to delete their data across all data brokers. By providing an opportunity for mass data subject requests, the Delete Act imposes compliance and operational costs and has the potential to limit the availability of personal data that PubMatic may utilize for targeted advertising.

Removed

The California Invasion of Privacy Act (as amended, “CIPA”) has become the basis for a growing number of lawsuits against digital advertising companies. Plaintiffs have argued that CIPA prohibits certain forms of interception of communications and the use of pen registers or similar tracking devices without the consent of all parties to the communication. Plaintiffs in several recent cases have alleged that adtech intermediaries—including supply side platforms (SSPs)—have violated CIPA by participating in the interception of communications between consumers and websites through the use of tracking pixels, cookies, session replay scripts, or real-time bidding signals. Although we believe our practices comply with applicable laws, the legal framework surrounding CIPA is unsettled and continues to evolve through litigation and courts have issued conflicting decisions regarding the scope of CIPA’s application to modern internet technologies. Should plaintiffs successfully argue that our participation in the adtech ecosystem constitutes a violation of CIPA, we could be subject to significant statutory damages costly litigation, injunctions, or other regulatory actions. Even unmeritorious claims can result in substantial legal expenses and divert management attention. If similar claims are adopted by courts in other jurisdictions, or if regulators issue adverse guidance interpreting these practices as unlawful under CIPA or other statutes, our exposure could increase and our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Removed

The CCPA has encouraged “copycat” laws in other states across the country. Following California’s lead, over a third of other U.S. states have enacted comprehensive consumer privacy laws as well as privacy laws targeted at specific industries or types of data, and at data brokers specifically. Numerous other states have or are in the process of passing their own privacy or privacy-adjacent laws. Compliance with new privacy legislation adds complexity and may require investment in additional resources for compliance programs, thus potentially resulting in additional costs and expense of resources to maintain compliance. We cannot yet fully predict the impact of such state laws or subsequent guidance on our business or operations, but it may require us to further modify our data processing practices and policies and to incur substantial costs and expenses in an effort to comply, including the opportunity cost of devoting resources to developing compliance solutions over expanded platform capabilities. New and proposed legislation has added and may in the future add additional complexity, variation in requirements, restrictions, and potential legal risk, require additional investment in resources to compliance programs, and could impact strategies and availability of previously useful data and could result in increased compliance costs and/or changes in business practices and policies. In some cases, different regulatory regimes may interpret certain practices differently, and there may be contradiction among the regimes in which we operate. Although proposals are regularly introduced in Congress, it remains to be seen whether the U.S. will implement comprehensive federal consumer privacy legislation.

Removed

In Europe, the GDPR took effect on May 25, 2018, and applies to products and services that we provide in Europe, as well as the processing of personal data of European Union (“EU”) citizens, wherever that processing occurs. The United Kingdom (“U.K.”) implemented the Data Protection Act, effective May 2018, and statutorily amended it in 2019 to contain provisions, including its own derogations, for how GDPR is applied in the U.K. post-Brexit (the “UK GDPR”). The GDPR includes operational requirements for companies that receive or process personal data of residents of the EU. For example, we are required to offer consent mechanisms to data subjects in Europe before processing data for certain aspects of our service. Failure to comply with GDPR may result in significant penalties for non-compliance of up to the greater of €20 million (£17.5 million in the U.K.) or 4% of an enterprise’s global annual revenue. In addition to the foregoing, a breach of the GDPR could result in regulatory investigations, reputational damage, orders to cease/ change our processing of our data, enforcement notices, and/ or assessment notices (for a compulsory audit). We may also face civil claims including representative actions and other class action type litigation (where individuals have suffered harm), potentially amounting to significant compensation or damages liabilities, as well as associated costs, diversion of internal resources, and reputational harm.

Removed

Further, European regulators continue to be focused on compliance with requirements in the online behavioral advertising ecosystem and enforcing national laws that implement the ePrivacy Directive (commonly called the “Cookie Directive”) in those ecosystems. European court decisions and regulators’ recent guidance continue to drive increased attention to cookies and tracking technologies. As regulators start to enforce a stricter approach (which has already begun to occur in Germany, where data protection authorities have initiated a probe on third-party cookies), this could lead to substantial costs, require significant systems changes, limit the effectiveness of our marketing activities, divert the attention of our technology personnel, adversely affect our margins, increase costs, and subject us to additional liabilities.

Removed

In addition to the GDPR and ePrivacy Directive, the EU AI Act imposes further obligations on companies that develop or deploy AI systems that process personal data. Key provisions of the EU AI Act take effect on August 2, 2026, and may require us to document the data used to train and operate our AI and machine learning models, conduct assessments of AI system risks, implement human oversight mechanisms, and provide transparency to affected parties. These obligations intersect significantly with our existing GDPR compliance obligations and may require additional investment in compliance infrastructure, documentation, and personnel. Failure to comply with the EU AI Act could expose us to penalties of up to €15 million or 3% of worldwide annual turnover, reputational harm, or operational restrictions. As the EU AI Act is still being interpreted and guidance from regulators is developing, we cannot fully predict the compliance costs or operational impacts at this time.

Removed

IAB Europe previously collaborated with the digital advertising industry to create a user-facing framework (the Transparency and Consent Framework, or “TCF”) for establishing and managing legal bases under the GDPR and other U.K. and EU privacy laws including the ePrivacy Directive. In February 2022, the Belgian Data Protection Authority (“DPA”) issued an order against IAB Europe that imposes specific remedies on IAB Europe and its operation of TCF. IAB Europe appealed the Belgian DPA’s decision, and the Belgian Market Court issued an interim ruling on the appeal and referred preliminary questions to the CJEU for guidance. IAB Europe subsequently issued an updated version of the TCF, and following the CJEU’s March 2024 ruling, the appeal remains in the Belgian Market Court on the substantive questions posed.

Removed

In addition, some countries, including India, Brazil, Thailand, and Japan, are considering or have passed legislation implementing data protection requirements or requiring local storage and processing of data or similar requirements that could increase the cost and complexity of delivering our services or force us to change business practices to conform to local law. The U.S. federal government has additionally added restrictions on the flow of certain data to China and other so called “countries of concern” which has the potential to limit with whom we may partner or the data we are able to share with certain partners. Any failure to achieve required data protection standards (which are not currently clear when applied to the online advertising ecosystem) may result in lawsuits, regulatory fines, or other actions or liability, all of which may harm our results of operations and revenue opportunities. Because the interpretation and application of privacy and data protection laws, such as the CCPA and GDPR, and their related regulations and standards, are potentially uncertain and may be different across jurisdictions, it is possible that these laws, regulations and standards may be interpreted and applied in manners that are, or are asserted to be, inconsistent with our data management practices or the technological features of our solutions.

Removed

We are also subject to laws and regulations that dictate whether, how, and under what circumstances we can transfer, process and/or receive certain data that is critical to our operations, including data shared between countries or regions in which we operate, and data shared among our products and services.

Removed

We are also subject to regulation with respect to political advertising activities, which are governed by various federal and state laws in the United States, and national and provincial laws worldwide. Online political advertising laws are rapidly evolving, and our publishers may impose restrictions on receiving political advertising, especially in light of recent elections both in the United States and in foreign jurisdictions. The lack of uniformity and increasing compliance requirements around political advertising may adversely impact the amount of political advertising spent through our platform, increase our operating and compliance costs, and subject us to potential liability from regulatory agencies.

Removed

The collection and processing of health-related data presents heightened compliance risks due to the broad and ambiguous language of emerging privacy laws such as Washington’s My Health My Data Act (“MHMD”) and the Nevada Consumer Health Data Law. These laws expand the definition of “consumer health data” far beyond traditional medical information, potentially encompassing data points that are commonly used in digital advertising, such as location data, app usage, and browsing history when linked to health-related interests. Unlike HIPAA, which applies to specific entities such as healthcare providers, these new state laws cast a wider net, creating uncertainty around what constitutes health data and how it must be handled. Compliance obligations, including obtaining explicit consumer consent, offering broad deletion rights, and imposing strict contractual restrictions on data sharing, introduce operational complexity and potential liability for companies such as ours. Additionally, these laws contain private rights of action, exposing businesses to costly class action lawsuits even in cases where health-related data is inadvertently inferred rather than explicitly collected. As enforcement of these regulations ramps up, our company must continuously assess and adapt our data practices to mitigate risk, which may require limiting certain data-driven advertising use cases or investing in additional compliance infrastructure, impacting operational efficiency and revenue opportunities.

Removed

In addition to government regulation, privacy advocacy and industry groups may propose new and different self-regulatory standards that either legally or contractually apply to us or our customers. We are members of self-regulatory bodies that impose additional requirements related to the collection, use, and disclosure of consumer data. Under the requirements of these self-regulatory bodies, in addition to other compliance obligations, we are obligated to provide consumers with notice about our use of cookies and other technologies to collect consumer data and of our collection and use of consumer data for certain purposes, and to provide consumers with certain choices relating to the use of consumer data. Some of these self-regulatory bodies have the ability to discipline members or participants, which could result in fines, penalties, and/or public censure (which could in turn cause reputational harm) being imposed on us. Additionally, some of these self-regulatory bodies might refer violations of their requirements to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission or other regulatory bodies. If we were to be found responsible for such a violation, it could adversely affect our reputation, as well as our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

7new paragraphs
1removed paragraphs
29reworded paragraphs
5,098 → 5,365words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Reworded topics: interest rate

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Total other income (expense), net decreasedincreased for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025 mainlyprimarily due to theforeign decreasecurrency in interest rates and a decrease in holdings in marketable securities.fluctuations.
see in full comparison
New text
“The difference between the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2026 of (4)% and the federal statutory income tax rate of 21% was related to tax expense from nondeductible stock-based compensation and Section 162(m) limitation on the tax deductibility of officers’ compensation, partially offset by the tax benefits from research tax credits, deductions for equity awards. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Revenue for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 decreasedincreased by $1.3$7.5 million, or (2)%,11%, compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased by $6.2 million, or 5%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. Our revenues were primarily driven by an increase in impressions processed on our platform,platform newincluding CTV and mobile app, emerging revenue streams, and growth in customer relationships. These increases were negatively impacted by platform changes implemented by one of our DSP buyers in the second half of 2025, resulting in a year over year decline in revenues.
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Cost of revenue increaseddecreased $0.5$0.7 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to a $2.0$1.7 million decrease in depreciation and amortization and a decrease of $0.2 million in professional services, offset by a $1.4 million increase in data center costs, offset by a $1.5 million decrease in depreciation and amortization.costs. Overall, our cost of revenue per million impressions processed for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 decreased by approximately 19%18% compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The difference between the effective tax rate for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 of 17%164% and the federal statutory income tax rate of 21% was related to tax benefitsexpense from research tax credits and deductions for equity awards, partially offset by nondeductible stock-based compensation,compensation and Section 162(m) limitation on the tax deductibility of officers’ compensation.compensation, partially offset by the tax benefits from research tax credits and deductions for equity awards. The difference between the effective income tax rate of 16%14% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 and the federal statutory income tax rate of 21% was related to the tax benefits from foreign-derived intangible income (FDII), research tax credits, and deductions for equity awards, partially offset by nondeductible stock-based compensation and Section 162(m) limitation on the tax deductibility of officers’ compensation.
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, net cash provided by operating activities of $17.3$37.5 million resulted primarily from adjustments for non-cash expenses of $18.2$38.9 million, including $10.0$20.0 million for depreciation and amortization and $8.5$16.8 million for stock-based compensation, aan decreaseincrease in accounts receivablepayable of $21.3$36.6 million, and a decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets of $4.1$4.0 million, offset by a net loss of $12.5$13.7 million, aan decreaseincrease in accounts payablereceivable of $1.0$25.0 million, and a decrease in accrued liabilities of $11.4$1.7 million.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (37)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 1 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Our net dollar-based retention rate equals the Current Period Revenue divided by Prior Period Revenue. Our net dollar-based retention rate was 96%98% for the trailing twelve months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and 102% for the trailing twelve months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.

Reworded

We work with DSPs to help them reduce their costs and improve advertiser ROI, which in turn makes us the specialized cloud infrastructure platform of choice for many of our buying partners. We depend upon a limited number of large DSPs for a large percentage of impressions purchased and our business results, including revenues, may be impacted by changes in their pricing strategies, bidding algorithms or go-to market efforts. As buyers increasingly consolidate their spending with fewer larger technology platforms, we seek to bring an increased proportion of their digital ad spending to our platform through direct deals. Supply Path Optimization (“SPO”) continues to be a major growth driver for us as we add new SPO relationships and expand existing ones. We have been investing in SPO technology and partnerships for six years and SPO represented approximatelyover 56%55% of total activity for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.

Reworded

Our recent growth has been driven by a variety of factors including increased access to mobile web (display and video) and mobile app (display and video) impressions and desktop video impressions. Our performance is affected by our ability to maintain and grow our access to valuable ad impressions from current publishers as well as through new relationships with publishers. In MarchJune 2026, our platform processed approximately 11.0 trillion ad impressions daily, each in a fraction of a second.

Reworded

Revenue for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 decreasedincreased by $1.3$7.5 million, or (2)%,11%, compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased by $6.2 million, or 5%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. Our revenues were primarily driven by an increase in impressions processed on our platform,platform newincluding CTV and mobile app, emerging revenue streams, and growth in customer relationships. These increases were negatively impacted by platform changes implemented by one of our DSP buyers in the second half of 2025, resulting in a year over year decline in revenues.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we served approximately 1,9702,000 publishers and app developers worldwide on our platform, compared to approximately 1,9501,960 publishers and app developers worldwide as of MarchJune 31,30, 2025. For purposes of our publisher count, we aggregate multiple business accounts from separate divisions, segments or subsidiaries into a single “master” publisher based on our assessment of the related nature of the group.

Added

For the remainder of the year, we expect revenue growth to continue primarily due to CTV, mobile app and emerging revenue streams.

Removed

We expect our revenues to be affected by macroeconomic conditions for the remainder of 2026, and will continue to be impacted by the platform changes implemented by one of our buyers in 2025 in the near term. The magnitude of these impacts on our future revenues is difficult to predict.

Reworded

Cost of revenue increaseddecreased $0.5$0.7 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to a $2.0$1.7 million decrease in depreciation and amortization and a decrease of $0.2 million in professional services, offset by a $1.4 million increase in data center costs, offset by a $1.5 million decrease in depreciation and amortization.costs. Overall, our cost of revenue per million impressions processed for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 decreased by approximately 19%18% compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.

Added

Cost of revenue decreased $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to a $3.2 million decrease in depreciation and amortization and a $0.2 million decrease in facilities, offset by an increase of $3.4 million in data center costs.

Reworded

Our gross margin of 58%67% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 decreasedincreased compared to 60%63% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, and our gross margin of 63% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased compared to 61% for the six months ended June 30, 2025 primarily due to aan decreaseincrease in revenue.

Reworded

We expect the cost of revenue to be higher in 2026 compared to 2025 in absolute dollars as we continue to supportinvest ourin datarevenue centers.driving business initiatives. Cost of revenue may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and period to period, on an absolute dollar basis and as a percentage of revenue, depending on revenue levels and the volume of transactions we process supporting those revenues,levels, and the timing and amounts of depreciation and amortization of equipment and software.

Reworded

The decreaseincrease in technology and development costs for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was primarilynot due to a decrease of $1.5 million in personnel costs, offset by a $0.7 million decrease in capitalized internal-use software costs.material.

Added

The decrease in technology and development costs for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily due to a decrease of $2.3 million in personnel costs, offset by a $1.5 million decrease in capitalized internal-use software costs.

Reworded

We expect technology and development expenses to be flatincrease in 2026 compared to 2025 in absolute dollars.dollars, primarily due to investment in technological innovation.

Reworded

Sales and marketing costs for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 increased primarily due to a $2.4$0.8 million increase in personnel costs.

Added

Sales and marketing costs for the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased primarily due to a $2.6 million increase in personnel costs and a $0.6 million increase in facilities.

Reworded

We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in 2026 compared to 2025 in absolute dollars primarily due to additional headcount investments and marketing programs.investments.

Reworded

General and administrative expense increased for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 primarily due to a $0.7 million increase in professionalbusiness services,taxes offset byand a $0.4$0.3 million decreaseincrease in personnel costs.

Reworded

We expect generalGeneral and administrative expensesexpense toincreased increasefor inthe six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to 2025 in absolute dollars primarily due to additionala $1.0 million increase in professional services.services and a $0.7 million increase in business taxes.

Added

We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in 2026 compared to 2025 in absolute dollars primarily due to professional services and employee compensation.

Reworded

Total other income (expense), net decreasedincreased for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025 mainlyprimarily due to theforeign decreasecurrency in interest rates and a decrease in holdings in marketable securities.fluctuations.

Added

Total other income (expense), net increased for the six months ended June 30, 2026 primarily due to foreign currency fluctuations.

Reworded

Provision For (Benefit From) Income Taxes

Reworded

The difference between the effective tax rate for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 of 17%164% and the federal statutory income tax rate of 21% was related to tax benefitsexpense from research tax credits and deductions for equity awards, partially offset by nondeductible stock-based compensation,compensation and Section 162(m) limitation on the tax deductibility of officers’ compensation.compensation, partially offset by the tax benefits from research tax credits and deductions for equity awards. The difference between the effective income tax rate of 16%14% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 and the federal statutory income tax rate of 21% was related to the tax benefits from foreign-derived intangible income (FDII), research tax credits, and deductions for equity awards, partially offset by nondeductible stock-based compensation and Section 162(m) limitation on the tax deductibility of officers’ compensation.

Added

The difference between the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2026 of (4)% and the federal statutory income tax rate of 21% was related to tax expense from nondeductible stock-based compensation and Section 162(m) limitation on the tax deductibility of officers’ compensation, partially offset by the tax benefits from research tax credits, deductions for equity awards. The effective income tax rate of 16% for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was related to the tax benefits from FDII, research tax credits, and deductions for equity awards, partially offset by nondeductible stock-based compensation and Section 162(m) limitation on the tax deductibility of officers’ compensation.

Reworded

In addition to our results determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), including, in particular, operating loss,income (loss), net cash provided by operating activities, and net loss, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, is useful in evaluating our operating performance. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net loss adjusted for stock-based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization, litigation related expenses, interest income, and provision for (benefit from) income taxes.

Reworded

(1)Litigation related expenses represents external legal fees and other expenses, net of insurance recoveries, associated with pending litigation that arose outside of the ordinary course of business. These costs relatedrelate to a discrete matter, and are not representative of our underlying operating performance. We do not adjust for legal expenses incurred in our ordinary course of business.

Reworded

We have financed our operations and capital expenditures primarily through utilization of cash generated from operations as well as sales of equity securities. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had cash, cash equivalents, and cashmarketable equivalentssecurities of $144.9$137.5 million and net working capital, consisting of current assets less current liabilities, of $135.3$115.7 million.

Reworded

We believe our existing cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, and anticipated net cash provided by operating activities, together with available borrowings under our credit facility, will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. However, if our operating performance during the next 12 months is below our expectations, our liquidity and ability to operate our business could be adversely affected. Our future capital requirements and the adequacy of available funds will depend on many factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our material cash requirements included the contractual commitments set forth under “Contractual Obligations and Future Cash Requirements.”

Reworded

In February 2023, our board of directors authorized the 2023 Repurchase Program which was to terminate as of December 31, 2024 (as amended, the “2023 Repurchase Program”). In February 2024, our board of directors authorized an additional $100.0 million for repurchases under the 2023 Repurchase Program, and extended the termination date to December 31, 2025 (the “2024 Repurchase Program Extension”). In May 2025, the Company’s board of directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to an additional $100 million of its Class A common stock under the 2023 Repurchase Program (the “2025 Repurchase Program Extension”) in addition to the aggregate $175 million previously authorized under the 2023 Repurchase Program, and extended the expiration of the 2023 Repurchase Program to December 31, 2026. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we repurchased 1,048,6503,118,823 shares of Class A common stock under the 2023 Repurchase Program for an aggregate purchase price of $8.8$30.3 million. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, $85.1$63.6 million remained available for future share repurchases under the 2023 Repurchase Program.

Reworded

For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, net cash provided by operating activities of $17.3$37.5 million resulted primarily from adjustments for non-cash expenses of $18.2$38.9 million, including $10.0$20.0 million for depreciation and amortization and $8.5$16.8 million for stock-based compensation, aan decreaseincrease in accounts receivablepayable of $21.3$36.6 million, and a decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets of $4.1$4.0 million, offset by a net loss of $12.5$13.7 million, aan decreaseincrease in accounts payablereceivable of $1.0$25.0 million, and a decrease in accrued liabilities of $11.4$1.7 million.

Reworded

For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, net cash provided by operating activities of $15.6$30.5 million resulted primarily from adjustments for non-cash expenses of $17.9$36.6 million, including $11.7$23.5 million for depreciation and amortization and $9.7$19.5 million for stock-based compensation, a decrease in accounts receivable of $75.7 million, a decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets of $5.7$41.4 million, offset by a net loss of $9.5$14.7 million, a decrease in accounts payable of $62.6$25.9 million, and a decrease in accrued liabilities of $11.3$5.6 million.

Reworded

For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, net cash used in investing activities was $9.6$34.1 million, primarily due to the purchase of a non-marketable equity investmentinvestments of $3.0$3.5 millionmillion, and $6.6$10.2 million of investments in capitalized internal use software.software, and net purchases in investments of marketable securities of $17.4 million.

Reworded

For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, net cash used in investing activities was $10.1$0.1 million, consisting of $1.4$2.8 million in purchases of property and equipment (primarily data center infrastructure), $6.9and $11.2 million of investments in capitalized internal use software, andoffset by a net increase in investments of marketable securities of $1.7$13.8 million.

Reworded

For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, net cash used in financing activities of $8.1$28.6 million was primarily due to purchases of treasury stock of $8.5$30.5 million, offset by $0.5$0.9 million in proceeds from stock option exercises.exercises and proceeds from the ESPP of $1.1 million.

Reworded

For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, net cash used in financing activities of $4.5$41.2 million was primarily due to purchases of treasury stock of $5.0 million, including the prepayment of funds for future purchases of approximately $1.4$43.6 million, offset by proceeds from employee stock option exercises of $0.6$1.2 million and proceeds from the ESPP of $1.4 million.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $6.5$8.1 million of long-term income tax liabilities, including interest, related to uncertain tax positions. Because of the high degree of uncertainty regarding the settlement of these liabilities, we are unable to estimate the years in which future cash outflows may occur.

PUBM insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 38 filings (7 insiders, 27 trade dates, 1,059,294 shares, about $15.8M; 28 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -1,059,294 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$15.8M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-10-05Woods Andrew
GENERAL COUNSEL & SECRETARY
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
10,079$18.65 $188.0K39,761 SEC
2026-10-05Goel Amar K.
Director, CHAIRMAN, CHIEF INNOVATION OFF, 10% owner
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
10,795$18.66 $201.5K35,580 SEC
2026-10-05Pantelick Steven
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
22,173$18.66 $413.8K10,353 SEC
2026-10-02Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Open-market sale 45,758$18.93 $866.1K51,899 SEC
2026-10-02Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Open-market sale 4,475$19.43 $87.0K47,424 SEC
2026-10-02Woods Andrew
GENERAL COUNSEL & SECRETARY
Open-market sale 5,232$18.93 $99.0K50,352 SEC
2026-10-02Woods Andrew
GENERAL COUNSEL & SECRETARY
Open-market sale 512$19.43 $9.9K49,840 SEC
2026-10-02Pantelick Steven
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Open-market sale 21,398$18.93 $405.0K34,619 SEC
2026-10-02Pantelick Steven
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Open-market sale 2,093$19.43 $40.7K32,526 SEC
2026-10-02Kumar Mukul
PRESIDENT, ENGINEERING
Open-market sale 7,176$18.93 $135.8K125,743 SEC
2026-10-02Kumar Mukul
PRESIDENT, ENGINEERING
Open-market sale 702$19.43 $13.6K125,041 SEC
2026-10-02Goel Amar K.
Director, CHAIRMAN, CHIEF INNOVATION OFF, 10% owner
Open-market sale 6,651$18.93 $125.9K47,026 SEC
2026-10-02Goel Amar K.
Director, CHAIRMAN, CHIEF INNOVATION OFF, 10% owner
Open-market sale 651$19.43 $12.6K46,375 SEC
2026-10-01Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Option exercise 97,657— —97,657 SEC
2026-10-01Woods Andrew
GENERAL COUNSEL & SECRETARY
Option exercise 15,823— —55,584 SEC
2026-10-01Pantelick Steven
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Option exercise 45,664— —56,017 SEC
2026-10-01Kumar Mukul
PRESIDENT, ENGINEERING
Option exercise 19,974— —132,919 SEC
2026-10-01Goel Amar K.
Director, CHAIRMAN, CHIEF INNOVATION OFF, 10% owner
Option exercise 18,097— —53,677 SEC
2026-10-01Gimbel Lisa
CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
500$18.99 $9.5K15,927 SEC
2026-09-24Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
10,080$18.05 $181.9K40,373 SEC
2026-09-24Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
40,373$18.54 $748.5K0 SEC
2026-09-24Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Conversion
10b5-1 plan
34,370— —50,453 SEC
2026-09-16Kumar Mukul
PRESIDENT, ENGINEERING
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
8,000$16.78 $134.2K112,945 SEC
2026-09-16Kumar Mukul
PRESIDENT, ENGINEERING
Conversion
10b5-1 plan
8,000— —120,945 SEC
2026-09-03Goel Amar K.
Director, CHAIRMAN, CHIEF INNOVATION OFF, 10% owner
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
6,250$17.04 $106.5K35,580 SEC
2026-09-03Goel Amar K.
Director, CHAIRMAN, CHIEF INNOVATION OFF, 10% owner
Conversion
10b5-1 plan
6,250— —41,830 SEC
2026-09-01Gimbel Lisa
CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
500$16.43 $8.2K16,427 SEC
2026-08-20Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Conversion
10b5-1 plan
34,371— —66,063 SEC
2026-08-20Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
49,980$16.49 $824.2K16,083 SEC
2026-08-17Kumar Mukul
PRESIDENT, ENGINEERING
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
8,000$17.05 $136.4K112,945 SEC
2026-08-17Kumar Mukul
PRESIDENT, ENGINEERING
Conversion
10b5-1 plan
8,000— —120,945 SEC
2026-08-15Gimbel Lisa
CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
Option exercise 1,395— —15,956 SEC
2026-08-15Gimbel Lisa
CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
Option exercise 801— —17,529 SEC
2026-08-15Gimbel Lisa
CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
Option exercise 794— —18,323 SEC
2026-08-15Gimbel Lisa
CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
Option exercise 772— —16,728 SEC
2026-08-13Pantelick Steven
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
19,716$17.31 $341.3K10,353 SEC
2026-08-12Pantelick Steven
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
22,203$17.25 $383.0K30,069 SEC
2026-08-12Gimbel Lisa
CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
500$17.50 $8.8K14,561 SEC
2026-08-10Woods Andrew
GENERAL COUNSEL & SECRETARY
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
38,331$17.96 $688.4K39,761 SEC
2026-08-07Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
211,302$17.74 $3.7M31,692 SEC
2026-08-07Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Conversion
10b5-1 plan
211,302— —242,994 SEC
2026-07-23Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
49,979$12.35 $617.2K31,692 SEC
2026-07-23Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Conversion
10b5-1 plan
12,500— —81,671 SEC
2026-07-23Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Conversion
10b5-1 plan
21,870— —69,171 SEC
2026-07-16Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
8,962$13.94 $124.9K47,301 SEC
2026-07-16Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Conversion
10b5-1 plan
8,962— —56,263 SEC
2026-07-16Kumar Mukul
PRESIDENT, ENGINEERING
Conversion
10b5-1 plan
8,000— —120,945 SEC
2026-07-16Kumar Mukul
PRESIDENT, ENGINEERING
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
8,000$13.67 $109.4K112,945 SEC
2026-07-16Woods Andrew
GENERAL COUNSEL & SECRETARY
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
3,239$14.01 $45.4K78,092 SEC
2026-07-15Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
4,060$13.90 $56.4K47,301 SEC
2026-07-15Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Conversion
10b5-1 plan
4,060— —51,361 SEC
2026-07-06Pantelick Steven
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
12,548$13.42 $168.4K52,272 SEC
2026-07-06Klimenko Paulina
CHIEF GROWTH OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
9,009$13.42 $120.9K71,044 SEC
2026-07-02Pantelick Steven
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
23,548$13.65 $321.4K64,820 SEC
2026-07-02Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
50,354$13.65 $687.3K47,301 SEC
2026-07-02Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Conversion
10b5-1 plan
8,500— —55,801 SEC
2026-07-02Goel Rajeev K.
Director, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 10% owner
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
8,500$13.90 $118.2K47,301 SEC
2026-07-02Goel Amar K.
Director, CHAIRMAN, CHIEF INNOVATION OFF, 10% owner
Open-market sale 6,584$13.65 $89.9K35,580 SEC
2026-07-02Woods Andrew
GENERAL COUNSEL & SECRETARY
Open-market sale 5,758$13.65 $78.6K81,331 SEC
2026-07-02Kumar Mukul
PRESIDENT, ENGINEERING
Open-market sale 7,897$13.65 $107.8K112,945 SEC

Showing the 60 most recent of 92 transactions.

Well-known investors holding PUBM (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Renaissance Technologies COM CL A2026-06-301,421,049$18.6M0.03%Reduced 8%
Two Sigma Investments COM CL A2026-06-30638,102$8.4M0.01%Added 19%
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM CL A2026-06-30414,880$5.4M0.0%Added 178%
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COM CL A2026-06-30286,438$3.8M0.0%Added 129%
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM CL A2026-06-3086,059$1.1M0.0%Reduced 6%
Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) COM CL A2026-06-3079,362$1.0M0.0%Added 256%
D. E. Shaw & Co. COM CL A2026-06-3044,320$581.5K0.0%Reduced 90%

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when PUBM files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.