QETH 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF · CBOE · Commodity Contracts Brokers & Dealers · CIK 1995569 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
Removed heading “The Trust as well as the Sponsor and its service providers are vulnerable to the effects of public health crises, which may adversely affect the performance of the Trust’s investment in ether and your investment in the Trust.”
Largest changes
“On March 22, 2023, Coinbase and the Ethereum Custodian’s parent company, Coinbase Global Inc. (“Coinbase Global” and together, the “Relevant Coinbase Entities”) received a “Wells Notice” from the SEC staff stating that the SEC staff made a “preliminary determination” to recommend that the SEC file an enforcement action against the Relevant Coinbase Entities alleging violations of the federal securities laws, including the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). …”see in full comparison
“Former President Biden’s March 9, 2022 Executive Order, asserting that technological advances and the rapid growth of the digital asset markets “necessitate an evaluation and alignment of the United States Government approach to digital assets,” signals an ongoing focus on digital asset policy and regulation in the United States. A number of reports issued pursuant to the Executive Order have focused on various risks related to the digital asset ecosystem, and have recommended additional legislation and regulatory oversight. …”see in full comparison
“U.S. federal and state regulators have issued reports and releases concerning crypto assets, including Ethereum and crypto asset markets. Beginning in early 2025, the current administration took steps to strengthen U.S. leadership in the digital assets space, including through the use of executive orders and the establishment of an interagency working group that is tasked with proposing a regulatory framework governing the issuance and operation of digital assets in the United States. …”see in full comparison
“The Trust as well as the Sponsor and its service providers are vulnerable to the effects of public health crises, which may adversely affect the performance of the Trust’s investment in ether and your investment in the Trust.”see in full comparison
see in full comparisonIn addition,While, regulatory and enforcement scrutiny increased through the end ofdigital assets has increased,2024, including from, among others, the Department of Justice, the SEC, the CFTC, the White House and Congress, as well as state regulators andauthorities.authorities,Developmentsthe current U.S. presidential administration has signaled its desire to strengthen U.S. leadership in theregulationdigital assets space through the issuance of executive orders and the establishment of an interagency working group that is tasked with proposing a regulatory framework governing the issuance and operation of digital assetsareinongoing.theForUnitedexample,States inJulyearly2023,2025. Meanwhile, theU.S.SECDistrictofficiallyCourtrescindedforStafftheAccountingSouthernBulletinDistrict121ofandNewestablishedYorkarulednew “Crypto Task Force” focused on providing clarity on theSEC’sapplicationactionofagainsttheRipplefederalLabs,securitiesInc.lawsThetocourtdigitalfound that offersassets andsalescollaborating with the digital assets industry and the public towards establishing an appropriate regulatory framework. Certain members ofXRP,Congress have also outlined a proposed bicameral roadmap for digitaltoken,asset legislation toinstitutionsaddressandinconsistenciessophisticatedinindividualsdigitalconstitutedassetsecuritiesclassifications.transactions,Inbut that offers and sales of XRP on crypto trading platforms, distributions to employees, and other third-party developers were not securities transactions. More recently,2023 the D.C. Circuit Court found that the SEC’s denial of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust’s listing was “arbitrary and capricious” under the Administrative Procedures Act in light of the SEC’s approval of two similar bitcoin futures-based exchange-traded products (“ETPs”). In the immediate aftermath of this court decision, the price of bitcoin increased from nearly $26,000 to over $28,100.ItBitcoin and other digital assets, including ether, continued to reach record highs during 2025 before retreating. The exact timeline and impact of these recent regulatory developments on the Trust’s business is uncertain and it is not possible to predict at this timeallwhatofrisks,theifrisksany, that regulatory developments may pose to the Trust, its service providers or to the digital asset industry as a whole.
“Pandemics and other public health crises may cause a curtailment of business activities which may potentially impact the ability of the Sponsor and its service providers to operate. The COVID-19 pandemic or a similar public health crises could adversely impact the Trust by causing operating delays and disruptions, market disruption and shutdowns (including as a result of government regulation and prevention measures). The COVID-19 pandemic, for example, had substantive effects on social, economic and financial systems, including significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial market.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (23)
An investment in Shares involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully all of the risks described below, together with the other information contained in this Report and the Trust’s prospectus dated JulyOctober 22,1, 20242025 (the “Prospectus”), before making a decision to invest in Shares. If any of the following risks occur, the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Trust may be adversely affected.
Ether has historically exhibited high price volatility relative to more traditional asset classes. For example, throughout ether’s existence, there have been repeated periods where steep increases in the value of ether were followed by steep drawdowns.
Ether has historically exhibited high price volatility relative to more traditional asset classes. For example, there were steep increases in the value of certain digital assets, including ether, over the course of 2021. These increases were followed by steep drawdowns throughout 2022. These episodes of rapid price appreciation followed by steep drawdowns have occurred multiple times throughout ether’s history, including, for example, in 2017-2018, before repeating again in 2021-2022. Over the course of 2023 and 2024, ether prices continued to exhibit significant volatility.
In addition,While, regulatory and enforcement scrutiny increased through the end of digital assets has increased,2024, including from, among others, the Department of Justice, the SEC, the CFTC, the White House and Congress, as well as state regulators and authorities.authorities, Developmentsthe current U.S. presidential administration has signaled its desire to strengthen U.S. leadership in the regulationdigital assets space through the issuance of executive orders and the establishment of an interagency working group that is tasked with proposing a regulatory framework governing the issuance and operation of digital assets arein ongoing.the ForUnited example,States in Julyearly 2023,2025. Meanwhile, the U.S.SEC Districtofficially Courtrescinded forStaff theAccounting SouthernBulletin District121 ofand Newestablished Yorka rulednew “Crypto Task Force” focused on providing clarity on the SEC’sapplication actionof againstthe Ripplefederal Labs,securities Inc.laws Theto courtdigital found that offersassets and salescollaborating with the digital assets industry and the public towards establishing an appropriate regulatory framework. Certain members of XRP,Congress have also outlined a proposed bicameral roadmap for digital token,asset legislation to institutionsaddress andinconsistencies sophisticatedin individualsdigital constitutedasset securitiesclassifications. transactions,In but that offers and sales of XRP on crypto trading platforms, distributions to employees, and other third-party developers were not securities transactions. More recently,2023 the D.C. Circuit Court found that the SEC’s denial of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust’s listing was “arbitrary and capricious” under the Administrative Procedures Act in light of the SEC’s approval of two similar bitcoin futures-based exchange-traded products (“ETPs”). In the immediate aftermath of this court decision, the price of bitcoin increased from nearly $26,000 to over $28,100. ItBitcoin and other digital assets, including ether, continued to reach record highs during 2025 before retreating. The exact timeline and impact of these recent regulatory developments on the Trust’s business is uncertain and it is not possible to predict at this time allwhat ofrisks, theif risksany, that regulatory developments may pose to the Trust, its service providers or to the digital asset industry as a whole.
Given the foundational role that stablecoins play in global digital asset markets, their fundamental liquidity can have a dramatic impact on the broader digital asset market, including the market for ether. Because a large portion of the digital asset market still depends on stablecoins such as Tether and USDC, there is a risk that a disorderly de-pegging or a “run” on Tether or USDC could lead to dramatic market volatility in digital assets more broadly. VolatilityIn the United States, the GENIUS Act, which establishes a federal regulatory framework for stablecoins, was passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Trump on July 18, 2025. Although increasing regulatory clarity for stablecoins is generally viewed in a positive light, volatility in stablecoins, operational issues with stablecoins (for example, technical issues that prevent settlement), concerns about the sufficiency of any reserves that support stablecoins or potential manipulative activity when unbacked stablecoins are used to pay for other digital assets (including ether), or regulatory compliance concerns about stablecoin issuers or intermediaries, such as trading platforms, that support stablecoins, could impact individuals’ willingness to trade on trading platforms that rely on stablecoins, reduce liquidity in the ether market, and affect the value of ether, and in turn impact an investment in the Shares.
On March 22, 2023, Coinbase and the Ethereum Custodian’s parent company, Coinbase Global Inc. (“Coinbase Global” and together, the “Relevant Coinbase Entities”) received a “Wells Notice” from the SEC staff stating that the SEC staff made a “preliminary determination” to recommend that the SEC file an enforcement action against the Relevant Coinbase Entities alleging violations of the federal securities laws, including the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). According to Coinbase Global’s public reporting company disclosure, based on discussions with the SEC staff, the Relevant Coinbase Entities believe these potential enforcement actions would relate to aspects of the Relevant Coinbase Entities’ Coinbase Prime service, spot market, staking service Coinbase Earn, and Coinbase Wallet and the potential civil action may seek injunctive relief, disgorgement, and civil penalties. On June 6, 2023, the SEC filed a complaint against the Relevant Coinbase Entities in federal district court in the Southern District of New York, alleging, inter alia: (i) that Coinbase has violated the Exchange Act by failing to register with the SEC as a national securities exchange, broker-dealer, and clearing agency, in connection with activities involving certain identified digital assets that the SEC’s complaint alleges are securities, (ii) that Coinbase has violated the Securities Act by failing to register with the SEC the offer and sale of its staking program, and (iii) that Coinbase Global is jointly and severally liable as a control person under the Exchange Act for Coinbase’s violations of the Exchange Act to the same extent as Coinbase. The SEC’s complaint against the Relevant Coinbase Entities does not allege that ether is a security nor does it allege that Coinbase’s activities involving ether caused the alleged registration violations, and the Ethereum Custodian was not named as a defendant. The SEC’s complaint seeks a permanent injunction against the Relevant Coinbase Entities to prevent them from violations of the Exchange Act or Securities Act, disgorgement, civil monetary penalties, and such other relief as the court deems appropriate or necessary. Coinbase could be required, as a result of a judicial determination, or could choose, to restrict or curtail the services it offers, or its financial condition and ability to provide prime brokerage services to the Trust could be affected. If Coinbase were to be required or choose as a result of a regulatory action (including, for example, the litigation initiated by the SEC), to restrict or curtail the services it offers, it could negatively affect the Trust’s ability to operate or process creations or redemptions of Creation Baskets, which could force the Trust to liquidate or adversely affect the price of the Shares. While the Ethereum Custodian is not named in the complaint, if Coinbase Global, as the parent of the Ethereum Custodian, is required, as a result of a judicial determination, or could choose, to restrict or curtail the services its subsidiaries provide to the Trust, or its financial condition is negatively affected, it could negatively affect the Trust’s ability to operate.
U.S. federal and state regulators have issued reports and releases concerning crypto assets, including Ethereum and crypto asset markets. Beginning in early 2025, the current administration took steps to strengthen U.S. leadership in the digital assets space, including through the use of executive orders and the establishment of an interagency working group that is tasked with proposing a regulatory framework governing the issuance and operation of digital assets in the United States. On January 23, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order that outlined the administration’s commitment to strengthening U.S. leadership in the digital asset space and established an inter-agency working group for artificial intelligence and crypto that is tasked with proposing a regulatory framework governing the issuance and operation of digital assets, including stablecoins, in the United States. The GENIUS Act, which establishes a federal regulatory framework for stablecoins, was passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Trump on July 18, 2025. In addition, proposed digital assets market infrastructure legislation, the CLARITY Act, continues to progress. In July 2025, the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued a statement for banking organizations regarding the safekeeping of digital assets, which focused on how existing laws, regulations and risk management principles apply to such activities, and signaled additional progress in the increasing regulatory clarity for digital assets by key financial regulators in the United States.
In January 2025, the then Acting SEC Chairman Uyeda established a new “Crypto Task Force,” led by Commissioner Hester Peirce, with the intent to develop a comprehensive and clear regulatory framework for digital assets. Subsequently, Commissioner Peirce announced a list of specific priorities to further that initiative, which included pursuing final rules related to a digital asset’s security status, a revised path to registered offerings and listings for digital asset-based investment vehicles, and clarity regarding digital asset custody, lending and staking, which has held a series of roundtables focused on digital asset-related initiatives. Moreover, the SEC dismissed or paused ongoing enforcement actions or investigations against certain digital asset platforms and companies, including Coinbase, Binance, Kraken and Uniswap, during the first quarter of 2025.
U.S. federal and state regulators have issued reports and releases concerning crypto assets, including Ethereum and crypto asset markets. Further, in 2023 the House of Representatives formed two new subcommittees: the Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion Subcommittee and the Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development Subcommittee, each of which were formed in part to analyze issues concerning crypto assets and demonstrate a legislative intent to develop and consider the adoption of federal legislation designed to address the perceived need for regulation of and concerns surrounding the crypto industry. However, the extent and content of any forthcoming laws and regulations are not yet ascertainable with certainty, and it may not be ascertainable in the near future. The Trust cannot predict how these and other related events will affect the Trust or the crypto asset business.
Former President Biden’s March 9, 2022 Executive Order, asserting that technological advances and the rapid growth of the digital asset markets “necessitate an evaluation and alignment of the United States Government approach to digital assets,” signals an ongoing focus on digital asset policy and regulation in the United States. A number of reports issued pursuant to the Executive Order have focused on various risks related to the digital asset ecosystem, and have recommended additional legislation and regulatory oversight. There have also been several bills introduced in Congress that propose to establish additional regulation and oversight of the digital asset markets. In May 2024, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 4763, the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (“FIT21”), which would amend existing securities and commodity regulatory statutes to facilitate the use of digital assets. While FIT21 received strong bipartisan support, its future is uncertain, however, a Republican-controlled Congress may result in the enactment of legislation governing cryptocurrencies, such as FIT21. During his campaign, President Trump indicated that his administration would be pro-cryptocurrency and reportedly discussed the creation of a national bitcoin reserve, and other potential policies related to cryptocurrencies including bitcoin. On January 23, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order that outlined the administration’s commitment to strengthening U.S. leadership in the digital asset space and established an inter-agency working group for artificial intelligence and crypto that is tasked with proposing a regulatory framework governing the issuance and operation of digital assets, including stablecoins, in the United States.
ItAt this time, it is not possible to predict with certainty whether, or when, any of these legislative and regulatory developments will lead to Congress granting additional authorities to the SEC or other regulators, what the nature of such additional authorities might be, how they might impact the ability of digital asset markets to function or how any new regulations or changes to existing regulations might impact the value of digital assets generally and etherbitcoin held by the Trust specifically. The consequences of increased federal regulation of digital assets and digital asset activities could have a material adverse effect on the Trust and the Shares.
While the Sponsor, its management team, and the Execution Agent operate other investment vehicles that, like the Trust, specifically invest in digital assets, including a spot bitcoin and spot solana exchange-traded product,products, they have a limited track record. This limited experience poses several potential risks to the effective management and operation of the Trust. Digital assets, such as ether, are known for their high volatility, unique technical, legal and regulatory challenges, and rapidly evolving market dynamics. The Sponsor’s limited experience in this specific field may not fully equip them to navigate these complexities effectively.
The SEC has not asserted regulatory authority over ether or trading or ownership of ether and has not expressed the view that ether should be classified or treated as a security for purposes of U.S. federal securities laws. In fact, senior members of the staff of the SEC have expressed the view that ether is not a security under the federal securities laws. However, the SEC has commented on ether and ether-related market developments and has taken action against investment schemes involving ether. In a recent letter regarding the SEC’s review of proposed rule changes to list and trade shares of certain bitcoin-related investment vehicles on public markets, the SEC staff stated that it has significant investor protection concerns regarding the markets for digital assets, including the potential for market manipulation and fraud. In March 2018, it was reported that the SEC was examining as many as 100 investment funds with strategies focused on digital assets. The reported focus of the examinations is on the accuracy of risk disclosures to investors in these funds, digital asset pricing practices, and compliance with rules meant to prevent the theft of investor funds, as well as on information gathering so that the SEC can better understand new technologies and investment products. It has further been reported that some of these funds have received subpoenas from the SEC’s Enforcement Division. The SEC also has determined that certain digital assets are securities under the U.S. securities laws. In these determinations, the SEC reasoned that the unregistered offer and sale of digital assets can, in certain circumstances, including ICOs, be considered illegal public offering of securities. A significant amount of funding for digital asset startups has come from ICOs, and if ICOs are halted or face obstacles, or companies that rely on them face legal action or investigation, it could have a negative impact on the value of digital assets, including ether. However, the SEC’s “Crypto Task Force” has indicated that it is re-examining how digital assets are considered “securities” under the federal securities laws and the timeline and outcome of such action is uncertain at this time. Finally, the SEC’s Division of Examinations (“Examinations”) has stated that digital assets are an examination priority. In particular, Examinations has expressed its intent to focus its examination on portfoliothe managementoffer, ofsale, digitalrecommendation, assets,advice, safety of client fundstrading, and assets,other pricingactivities involving crypto assets that are offered and valuationsold ofas clientsecurities portfolios,or compliancerelated andproducts, internalsuch controls,as andspot supervisionbitcoin ofor employeeether outside business activities.ETPs.
Investors should consult their personal tax advisors before making any decision to purchase the Shares of the Trust. Additionally, the tax considerations contained herein are in summary form and may not be used as the sole basis for the decision to invest in the Shares from a tax perspective, since the individual situation of each investor must also be taken into account. Accordingly, the considerations regarding taxation contained herein should not be used as any sort of material information or tax advice nor are they in any way to be construed as a representation or warranty with respect to specific tax consequences.
Accordingly, the considerations regarding taxation contained herein should not be used as any sort of material information or tax advice nor are they in any way to be construed as a representation or warranty with respect to specific tax consequences.
More recently, in February 2025, the crypto exchange Bybit was hacked, resulting in the theft of over $1.5 billion of ether. The attack has been attributed to the North Korea-sponsored threat actor Lazarus Group, which is believed to operate under the control of North Korea’s intelligence agency. Following the incident, the Bybit exchange remained solvent and Bybit covered all customer losses, however the complexity and interconnected nature of exchange architecture and processes highlights weak points associated with security measures that have become industry-standard.
The Ethereum blockchain may be subject to forks or airdrops that create new digital assets. Shareholders may not receive the benefits of any forks, the Trust may not choose, or be able, to participate in an airdrop, and the timing of receiving any benefits from a fork, airdrop or similar event is uncertain. The Sponsor refers to the right to receive any such benefit as an “Incidental Right” and any such virtual currency acquired through an Incidental Right as “IR Assets.” If a hard fork, airdrop or similar event occurs in the Ethereum blockchain, the Sponsor will instruct the Trust to immediately and irrevocably disclaim all rights to the IR Assets so created. Ether is the only digital asset that will beis held by the Trust. In the event the Trust seeks to change its treatment of Incidental Rights or IR Assets, an application would need to be filed with the SEC by the Exchange seeking approval to amend its listing rules.
The Trust as well as the Sponsor and its service providers are vulnerable to the effects of public health crises, which may adversely affect the performance of the Trust’s investment in ether and your investment in the Trust.
Pandemics and other public health crises may cause a curtailment of business activities which may potentially impact the ability of the Sponsor and its service providers to operate. The COVID-19 pandemic or a similar public health crises could adversely impact the Trust by causing operating delays and disruptions, market disruption and shutdowns (including as a result of government regulation and prevention measures). The COVID-19 pandemic, for example, had substantive effects on social, economic and financial systems, including significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial market.
An Authorized Participant may be able to create or redeem a Creation Basket at a discount or a premium to the public trading price per Share. To the extent creations or redemptions take place in kind in, theit future,is unlikely that the Trust’s operations will therefore not be directly impacted by any discount or premium in the market price of its Shares.Shares, however, there is no guarantee that the Trust will not be negatively affected by slippage.
The use of cash creations and redemptions, as opposed to in-kind creations and redemptions, could cause delays in trade execution due to potential operational issues arising from implementing a cash creation and redemption model, which involves greater operational steps (and therefore execution risk) than the originally contemplated in-kind creation and redemption model. Such delays could cause the execution price associated with such trades to materially deviate from the Benchmark price used to determine the NAV. Even though the Authorized Participant is responsible for the dollar cost of such difference in prices, Authorized Participants could default on their obligations to the Trust, or such potential risks and costs could lead to Authorized Participants, who would otherwise be willing to purchase or redeem Baskets to take advantage of any arbitrage opportunity arising from discrepancies between the price of the Shares and the price of the underlying ether, to elect to not participate in the Trust’s Share creation and redemption processes. This may adversely affect the arbitrage mechanism intended to keep the price of the Shares closely linked to the price of ether, and as a result, the price of the Shares may fall or otherwise diverge from NAV. If the arbitrage mechanism is not effective, purchases or sales of Shares on the secondary market could occur at a premium or discount to NAV, which could harm Shareholders by causing them buy Shares at a price higher than the value of the underlying ether held by the Trust or sell Shares at a price lower than the value of the underlying ether held by the Trust, causing Shareholders to suffer losses. Further, if and when In-Kind Regulatory Approval is obtained, the Trust may not be able to successfully implement in-kind creation and redemption transactions, which could put the Trust at a disadvantage compared to other digital asset ETPs that are able to implement in-kind creations and redemptions.
The Trust will process all creations and redemptions of Shares in transactions with financial firms that are authorized to do so (known as “Authorized Participants”).Participants. Shareholders that are not Authorized Participants or who are unable to transact in Creation Baskets through Authorized Participants may only purchase or sell their Shares in secondary trading markets, and the conditions associated with trading in secondary markets may adversely affect Shareholders’ investment in the Shares. Although shares of the Trust are listed for trading on the Exchange, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for such shares will develop or be maintained. Secondary market trading in Shares may be halted by the Exchange because of market conditions or for other reasons. Shares of the Trust, similar to shares of other issuers listed on a stock exchange, may be sold short and are therefore subject to the risk of increased volatility and price decreases associated with being sold short. Shares trade on the Exchange at prices at, above or below the most recent NAV. The NAV is calculated at the end of each Business Day and fluctuates with changes in the market value of the Trust’s ether. The trading price of the Shares fluctuates continuously throughout trading hours based on both market supply of and demand for Shares and the underlying value of the Trust’s ether or the Trust’s NAV. As a result, the trading prices of Shares may deviate significantly from NAV during periods of market volatility. Any of these factors, among others, may lead to the Shares trading at a premium or discount to NAV. While the creation/redemption feature is designed to make it more likely that Shares normally will trade on the Exchange at prices close to the next calculated NAV, market prices are not expected to correlate exactly with the Trust’s NAV due to timing reasons, supply and demand imbalances and other factors. In addition, disruptions to creations and redemptions, including disruptions at Authorized Participants, or other market participants, and during periods of significant market volatility, may result in trading prices for Shares that differ significantly from its NAV. Authorized Participants may be less willing to create or redeem Shares if there is a lack of an active market for such Shares or its underlying investments, which may contribute to the Shares trading at a premium or discount to NAV. Buying or selling Shares on the Exchange involves two types of costs that apply to all securities transactions. When buying or selling Shares through a broker, Shareholders will likely incur a brokerage commission and other charges. In addition, Shareholders may incur the cost of the “spread”; that is, the difference between what investors are willing to pay for Shares (the “bid” price) and the price at which they are willing to sell Shares (the “ask” price). The spread, which varies over time for Shares based on trading volume and market liquidity, is generally narrower if the Trust has more trading volume and market liquidity and wider if the Trust has less trading volume and market liquidity. In addition, increased market volatility may cause wider spreads. There may also be regulatory and other charges that are incurred as a result of trading activity. Because of the costs inherent in buying or selling Shares, frequent trading may detract significantly from investment results and an investment in Shares may not be advisable for investors who anticipate regularly making small investments through a brokerage account.
An Authorized Participant may be able to create or redeem a Creation Basket at a discount or a premium to the public trading price per Share. To the extent creations or redemptions take place in-kind in the future,in-kind, the Trust will therefore maintain its intended fractional exposure to a specific amount of ether per Share.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Operating Activities”
New heading “Financing Activities”
New heading “NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE TRUST NOR THE PRIOR BENCHMARK LEVELS AND CHANGES,”
New heading “POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE TRUST’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.”
Largest changes
“POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE TRUST’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.”see in full comparison
“NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE TRUST NOR THE PRIOR BENCHMARK LEVELS AND CHANGES,”see in full comparison
“Ether ended 2025 with a full‑year loss despite a strong mid‑year recovery. The token suffered steep declines of more than 45% in the first quarter, driven by deteriorating macroeconomic conditions, a broad selloff across risk assets, and the ByBit hack, which further weakened crypto market sentiment. Momentum shifted meaningfully in the second and third quarters, as ether staged a strong rebound supported by growing institutional demand, renewed ETP inflows, and improving risk appetite following the resumption of Federal Reserve rate easing. …”see in full comparison
“Net cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities was $(4.1) million and $(19.5) million for the year ended December 31, 2025 and the period June 17, 2024 to December 31, 2024, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2025, $38.9 million was paid to purchase ether and $34.8 million was received from sales of ether for redemptions. During the period June 17, 2024 to December 31, 2024, $30.2 million was paid to purchase ether and $10.7 million was received from sales of ether for redemptions.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (16)
You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Except as expressly required by the Federal securities laws, the Trust and the Managing OwnerSponsor undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or the risks, uncertainties or other factors described in this Report, as a result of new information, future events or changed circumstances or for any other reason after the date of this Report.
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities was $(4.1) million and $(19.5) million for the year ended December 31, 2025 and the period June 17, 2024 to December 31, 2024, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2025, $38.9 million was paid to purchase ether and $34.8 million was received from sales of ether for redemptions. During the period June 17, 2024 to December 31, 2024, $30.2 million was paid to purchase ether and $10.7 million was received from sales of ether for redemptions.
Financing Activities
The Trust’s net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities was $4.1 million and $19.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 and the period June 17, 2024 to December 31, 2024, respectively. This included $38.9 million and $30.3 million from Shares purchased by Authorized Participants and $34.8 million and $10.8 million from Shares redeemed by Authorized Participants during the year ended December 31, 2025 and the period June 17, 2024 to December 31, 2024, respectively.
FOR THE FISCALYEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 AND THE PERIOD JULY 23, 2024 TO DECEMBER 31, 2024
The following graph illustrates the percentage changes in (i) the market price of the Shares (as reflected by the line “Market”), (ii) the Trust’s NAV (as reflected by the line “NAV”), and (iii) the closing levels of the Benchmark (as reflected by the line “Lukka Prime Ethereum Reference Rate (USD)”). There can be no assurances that the price of the Shares or the Trust’s NAV will exceed the Benchmark levels. No representation is being made that the Benchmark will or is likely to achieve closing levels consistent with or similar to those set forth herein.
No representation is being made that the Benchmark will or is likely to achieve closing levels consistent with or similar to those set forth herein.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 AND FOR THE PERIOD JULY 23, 2024 TO DECEMBER 31, 2024
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE TRUST NOR THE PRIOR BENCHMARK LEVELS AND CHANGES,
POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE TRUST’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Exchange market value of each Share decreased from $33.39 per Share to $29.59 per Share. The Share price low and high for the year ended December 31, 2025 and related change from the Share price on December 31, 2024 was as follows: Shares traded at a low of $14.60 per Share (-56.27%) on April 8, 2025, and a high of $48.23 per Share (+44.44%) on August 22, 2025. Therefore, the total return for the Trust on a market value basis was -11.38%.
Ether ended 2025 with a full‑year loss despite a strong mid‑year recovery. The token suffered steep declines of more than 45% in the first quarter, driven by deteriorating macroeconomic conditions, a broad selloff across risk assets, and the ByBit hack, which further weakened crypto market sentiment. Momentum shifted meaningfully in the second and third quarters, as ether staged a strong rebound supported by growing institutional demand, renewed ETP inflows, and improving risk appetite following the resumption of Federal Reserve rate easing. Confidence in the Ethereum ecosystem also strengthened after the successful Pectra upgrade in the second quarter, which improved network efficiency and bolstered investor conviction in ether’s long‑term roadmap. On the policy front, the U.S. regulatory environment became a tailwind—especially in July—when passage of the GENIUS Act provided clarity and legitimacy for stablecoins, a category for which Ethereum remains the leading blockchain platform. However, ether was unable to sustain these gains into year‑end. The fourth quarter brought a sharp reversal as a broad risk‑off environment took hold. Hawkish Federal Reserve messaging ahead of the December rate cut, the U.S. government shutdown, widespread forced liquidations of leveraged positions, and a series of technical breakdowns at key support levels all contributed to renewed selling pressure. By November, market sentiment had deteriorated significantly, leaving ether unable to move back into positive territory into the close of 2025.
For the period July 23, 2024, through December 31, 2024, Ethereum (ETH)ether was initially pressured by broader risk aversion and generally lackluster ETP demand. The USU.S. equity market selloff to end July, reignited hard landing concerns in the US,U.S., the Chinese economic overhang, and rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East all played a role. However, the start of the Federal Reserve’s interest rate easing cycle in September was a positive performance catalyst. Another influencing factor was expectations for a second Trump term, especially prior to Vice President Harris joining the race in August, as he was viewed as more pro-crypto. However, ETHether made a strong comeback in the fourth quarter following President Trump’s re-election as President of the United States. In addition to saying that he would be a “crypto president”, he also touted major plans for the crypto industry that, if implemented, could lead to significant regulatory progress, increased institutional adoption, and formal legitimization of the asset class in traditional finance, all of which would support prices. For ETHether specifically, the prospect of a crypto-friendly stance in the new administration sparked optimism that more innovation and capital could return to the United States.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, the NAV of each Share decreased from $33.37 per Share to $29.61 per Share. Falling price for ether during the year ended December 31, 2025 contributed to an overall 11.03% decrease in the level of the Benchmark. Therefore, the total return for the Trust on a NAV basis was -11.27%.
Net income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $(1.8) million, primarily resulting from net realized gain (loss) of $(1.4) million, net change in unrealized gain (loss) of $(0.3) million and net operating expenses of $0.1 million.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
There are no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SEC on March 2, 2026.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (1)
There are no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the periodyear ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SEC on March 2, 2026.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2026 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2025”
New heading “FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2026 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2025”
New heading “Trust Share Price Performance”
New heading “Trust Share Net Asset Performance”
Removed heading “NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE TRUST NOR THE PRIOR BENCHMARK LEVELS AND CHANGES,”
Removed heading “POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE TRUST’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.”
Removed heading “NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE TRUST NOR THE PRIOR BENCHMARK LEVELS AND CHANGES,”
Removed heading “POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE TRUST’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.”
Largest changes
“FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2026 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2025”see in full comparison
“POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE TRUST’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.”see in full comparison
“POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE TRUST’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.”see in full comparison
“NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE TRUST NOR THE PRIOR BENCHMARK LEVELS AND CHANGES,”see in full comparison
“NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE TRUST NOR THE PRIOR BENCHMARK LEVELS AND CHANGES,”see in full comparison
“FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2026 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2025”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (37)
The Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (the “Trust”) is a Delaware statutory trust that was formed on September 27, 2023. The Trust continuously issues common shares representing fractional undivided beneficial interest in and ownership of the Trust (“Shares”). The Trust operates pursuant to its Second Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement, dated as of June 21, 2024 (the “Trust Agreement”). The Shares began trading on the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the “Exchange”) under the ticker symbol “QETH” on July 23, 2024. The Trust offers Shares only to certain eligible financial institutions (“Authorized Participants”) in one or more blocks of 5,000 Shares (“Creation Baskets”) based on the quantity of ether attributable to each Share of the Trust.
The following discussion and analysis was prepared to supplement information contained in the accompanying financial statements and is intended to explain certain items regarding the Trust'sTrust’s financial condition as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and its results of operations for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025. It should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and related notes thereto contained in this Report.
The investment objective of the Trust is for the Shares to reflect the performance of the spot price of ether as measured using the Lukka Prime Ethereum Reference Rate (the “Benchmark”) less the Trust’s expenses and other liabilities. The Shares are intended to provide institutional and retail investors with a simple, cost-effective means of gaining investment benefits similar to those of holding ether.
In seeking to achieve its investment objective, the Trust will holdholds ether. The Trust will value its Shares each Business Day as of 4:00 p.m. ET. The Trust applies FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, in the valuation of ether held by the Trust and for financial statement purposes. The value of ether held by the Trust is determined based on the FMV price for ether, reflecting the execution price of ether on its principal market as determined each day by the Benchmark Provider. The FMV price for ether reflects the price that would be received for ether in a current sale, which assumes an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date of ether on its “principal market,” generally, the most advantageous market. Market participants are defined as buyers and sellers in the principal or most advantageous market that are independent, knowledgeable, and willing and able to transact. The Trust determines its principal market (or in the absence of a principal market the most advantageous market) on a periodic basis to determine which market is its principal market for the purpose of calculating fair value for the creation of quarterly and annual financial statements. Issuer-specific events, market trends, bid/asked quotes of brokers and information providers and other data may be reviewed in the course of making a good faith determination of aan security’sinvestment’s fair value. The Benchmark is designed to provide an estimated fair market value price for ether, based on the execution price of ether on its principal market. In this regard, the Benchmark Provider seeks to identify a “principal market” for ether each day by evaluating eligible ether trading platforms across a variety of different criteria, including the trading platforms’ oversight and governance frameworks, microstructure efficiency, trading volume, data transparency and data integrity.
Net cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities was $(0.52.2) million and $(1.65.0) million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, $9.8$11.5 million was paid to purchase ether and $9.3 million was received from sales of ether for redemptions. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, $3.1$6.4 million was paid to purchase ether and $1.5 million was received from sales of ether for redemptions.
The Trust’s net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities was $0.5$2.2 million and $1.6$5.0 million during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. This included $9.8$11.5 million and $3.1$6.4 million from Shares purchased by Authorized Participants and $9.3 million and $1.5 million from Shares redeemed by Authorized Participants during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCHJUNE 31,30, 2026 AND 2025
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCHJUNE 31,30, 2026 AND 2025
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2026 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2025
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE TRUST NOR THE PRIOR BENCHMARK LEVELS AND CHANGES,
POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE TRUST’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE TRUST NOR THE PRIOR BENCHMARK LEVELS AND CHANGES,
POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE TRUST’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
For the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Exchange market value of each Share decreased from $29.59$20.86 per Share to $20.86$15.70 per Share. The Share price low and high for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and related change from the Share price on JuneMarch 30,31, 20252026 was as follows: Shares traded at a low of $18.51$15.49 per Share (-37.45%-25.74%) on FebruaryJune 24,25, 2026, and a high of $33.73$24.19 per Share (+13.99%15.96%) on JanuaryApril 14,17, 2026. The total return for the Trust on a market value basis was -29.50%.-24.74%.
Ether fell sharply during the second quarter of 2026 as digital asset markets remained under pressure from tighter financial conditions, weaker investor risk appetite, and ongoing geopolitical uncertainty. Similar to bitcoin, ether faced headwinds from a more hawkish U.S. interest rate backdrop and continued volatility across risk assets. Ether was also affected by softer activity across portions of the decentralized finance ecosystem as investors adopted a more cautious stance toward digital assets. While sentiment remained challenged, the quarter also saw progress toward a clearer U.S. regulatory framework for digital assets as the CLARITY Act advanced in Congress, a development viewed as constructive for the broader blockchain ecosystem. Despite incremental regulatory progress and continued innovation across the Ethereum network, these positive developments were insufficient to offset broader market weakness, resulting in negative performance during the period.
Ether declined nearly 30% during the first quarter of 2026, resulting in negative performance for the Trust. January and early February’s sharp selloff gave way to a more macro‑driven consolidation in February and March, as geopolitical tensions, tariff uncertainty, and mixed U.S. economic data kept risk appetite subdued and digital assets trading in compressed ranges. Ether fell to lows near $1,800 before stabilizing in the $2,050–$2,200 range, with weakness persisting despite record‑high network usage. Performance was further weighed down by broader deleveraging across crypto markets, early‑February outflows from spot crypto exchange-traded products, and cautious investor positioning. While prices and flows showed signs of stabilization toward quarter‑end, unfavorable price movements earlier in the quarter remained the primary driver of performance for the quarter.
For the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, the Exchange market value of each Share decreasedincreased from $33.39$18.24 per Share to $18.24$25.13 per Share. The Share price low and high for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 and related change from the Share price on DecemberMarch 31, 20242025 was as follows: Shares traded at a low of $18.24$14.60 per Share (-45.37%-19.96%) on MarchApril 31,8, 2025, and a high of $36.82$28.07 per Share (+10.27%53.93%) on JanuaryJune 6,11, 2025. The total return for the Trust on a market value basis was -45.37%.+37.77%.
Ether posted a strong recovery in the second quarter of 2025, climbing over 35% and delivering meaningful gains for the Trust. The rebound followed a challenging first quarter and was largely driven by improving investor sentiment after President Trump delayed the implementation of his “Liberation Day” tariffs by 90 days, easing macroeconomic pressures. A surge in stablecoin issuance and the expansion of real-world asset tokenization also helped boost demand across the Ethereum ecosystem. Staking activity reached all-time highs, introducing deflationary dynamics that supported price momentum and underscored long-term conviction among holders. Confidence was further reinforced by progress on the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act), signaling a more constructive regulatory environment. Meanwhile, the Pectra upgrade, with enhancements to security, user experience, and scalability, marked Ethereum’s most significant enhancement since its transition to Proof-of-Stake and was well received by the market. Institutional interest in ether also continued to build, contributing to positive momentum throughout the quarter.
Ether fell sharply in the first quarter of 2025, down over 50% and leading to significant losses for the Trust. While prices initially continued their year-end 2024 rally driven by the excitement from President Trump’s election, mounting economic concerns took the center stage for the rest of the quarter. The nosedive in U.S. financial markets eroded investor risk appetite which triggered a flight to safe havens and outflows from U.S. crypto ETPs. Another major headwind was the ByBit hack in late February, which dealt a heavy blow to ether because it was the digital asset that was exploited. This took a major toll on investor confidence in ether, and prevented it from regaining ground amid the broader market downturn. Despite the negative price action, regulatory progress for digital assets continued to provide optimism for the broader asset class. Most notably, President Trump signed the “Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology” executive order, which ordered the establishment of a strategic bitcoin reserve and digital assets stockpile, SAB 121 was repealed, and crypto-friendly policymakers were either nominated or appointed to the SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the two primary U.S. regulators for the crypto space.
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, the NAV of each Share decreased from $29.61 per Share to $20.86 per Share. The rising price of ether during the three months ended March 31, 2026 contributed to an overall 29.50% decrease in the level of the Benchmark. The total return for the Trust on a NAV basis was -29.55%.
Net income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $(7.5) million, primarily resulting from net realized gain (loss) of $(3.6) million and net change in unrealized gain (loss) of $(3.9) million.
For the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025,2026, the NAV of each Share decreased from $33.37$20.86 per Share to $18.24$15.71 per Share. The falling price of ether during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20252026 contributed to an overall 45.30%24.66% decrease in the level of the Benchmark. The total return for the Trust on a NAV basis was -45.34%.-24.69%.
Net income (loss) for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20252026 was $(11.45.0) million, primarily resulting from net realized gain(loss) of $(0.9) million and net change in unrealized gain (loss) of $(10.65.0) million.
For the three months ended June 30, 2025, the NAV of each Share increased from $18.24 per Share to $25.10 per Share. The rising price of ether during the three months ended June 30, 2025 contributed to an overall 37.70% increase in the level of the Benchmark. The total return for the Trust on a NAV basis was +37.61%.
Net income (loss) for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was $5.5 million, primarily resulting from net change in unrealized gain (loss) of $5.6 million.
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2026 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2025
Trust Share Price Performance
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Exchange market value of each Share decreased from $29.59 per Share to $15.70 per Share. The Share price low and high for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and related change from the Share price on December 31, 2025 was as follows: Shares traded at a low of $15.49 per Share (-47.65%) on June 25, 2026, and a high of $33.73 per Share (+13.99%) on January 14, 2026. The total return for the Trust on a market value basis was -46.94%.
Ether generated negative performance during the first half of 2026 as broader weakness across digital asset markets outweighed several constructive developments for the Ethereum ecosystem. During the first quarter, ether came under pressure from broad deleveraging across crypto markets, exchange-traded product outflows, and macroeconomic uncertainty that reduced investor risk appetite. While market conditions remained challenging in the second quarter, the regulatory outlook for digital assets became more constructive as the CLARITY Act and other market structure initiatives advanced through the U.S. legislative process, signaling potential progress toward greater regulatory certainty for the industry. Ether also continued to benefit from strong network activity and its central role in decentralized applications, stablecoin infrastructure, and blockchain-based financial services. However, these supportive developments were insufficient to offset broader market weakness, resulting in negative year-to-date performance for the Trust.
For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Exchange market value of each Share decreased from $33.39 per Share to $25.13 per Share. The Share price low and high for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and related change from the Share price on December 31, 2024 was as follows: Shares traded at a low of $14.60 per Share (-56.28%) on April 8, 2025, and a high of $36.82 per Share (+10.29%) on January 6, 2025. The total return for the Trust on a market value basis was -24.74%.
Ether experienced a volatile first half of 2025, with sharp losses in the first quarter followed by a strong rebound in the second quarter. Ether declined by over 45% in the first quarter, driven by deteriorating macroeconomic conditions, a broad selloff in risky assets, and the Bybit hack in late February, which severely dented investor confidence in the Ethereum network. Despite these headwinds, the second quarter saw a meaningful recovery, with ether rising more than 35% as broad market risk sentiment improved. The delay of President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs helped ease market pressures, while a surge in stablecoin issuance, real-world asset tokenization, and record high staking activity supported renewed demand. Regulatory developments also played a key role, with continued momentum from the President’s “Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology” executive order and progress on the GENIUS Act reinforcing optimism. The Pectra upgrade, Ethereum’s most notable improvement since its transition to Proof-of-Stake, further boosted confidence with enhancements to security, user experience, and scalability. Lastly, institutional participation continued to grow as illustrated by renewed inflows into U.S. spot ether exchange-traded products in the second quarter, helping ether regain its ground.
Trust Share Net Asset Performance
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, the NAV of each Share decreased from $29.61 per Share to $15.71 per Share. The falling price of ether during the six months ended June 30, 2026 contributed to an overall 46.89% decrease in the level of the Benchmark. The total return for the Trust on a NAV basis was -46.94%.
Net income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $(12.5) million, primarily resulting from net realized gain (loss) of $(3.6) million and net change in unrealized gain (loss) of $(8.8) million.
For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the NAV of each Share decreased from $33.37 per Share to $25.10 per Share. The falling price of ether during the six months ended June 30, 2025 contributed to an overall 24.67% decrease in the level of the Benchmark. The total return for the Trust on a NAV basis was -24.78%.
Net income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was $(5.9) million, primarily resulting from net realized gain (loss) of $(0.9) million and net change in unrealized gain (loss) of $(5.0) million.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Sponsor's managementSponsor to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of the assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period covered by this report. A description of the valuation of ether, a critical accounting policy that the Trust believes is important to understanding its results of operations and financial position, is provided in the section entitled “Valuation of Ether,” above. In addition, please refer to Note 2 to the financial statements of the Trust for further discussion of the Trust’s accounting policies and Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Estimates on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, as filed with the SEC on March 2, 2026.
QETH insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
No Form 4 stock transactions in this period.
Well-known investors holding QETH (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.