RS 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Reliance, Inc. · NYSE · Wholesale-Metals Service Centers & Of Fices · CIK 861884 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
Removed heading ““Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.””
Largest changes
““Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.””see in full comparison
“In addition, the Federal Reserve in the U.S. and other central banks in various countries have raised interest rates in response to concerns about inflation, which, coupled with volatility in financial markets and the possibility that such rates may remain elevated for longer than expected, has had and may continue to have the effect of further increasing economic uncertainty and heightening these risks. Interest rate increases or other government actions taken to reduce inflation have resulted in recessionary pressures in many parts of the world.”see in full comparison
“On February 1, 2025, the White House issued executive orders directing increased tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico and China with a threat of further increases for any country that retaliates. The proposed tariffs on Canada and Mexico were deferred for 30 days. The 10% additional tariff on imports from China was effected and China retaliated with tariffs on certain products it imports from the US. …”see in full comparison
“In 2025, the U.S. government altered its approach to international trade policy, both generally and with respect to matters directly and indirectly affecting the metals industry, including by undertaking certain unilateral actions affecting trade, renegotiating existing bilateral and multilateral trade agreements, and entering into new agreements with foreign countries. For example, in early 2025, the U.S. …”see in full comparison
“On March 1, 2018, the U.S. announced a plan to indefinitely impose a 25% tariff on certain imported steel products and a 10% tariff on certain imported aluminum products under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (the “Section 232”) tariffs. These Section 232 tariffs were imposed on national security grounds and addressed imported steel that was being unfairly traded by certain foreign competitors at artificially low prices. …”see in full comparison
We maintain substantial inventories of metal to accommodate the short lead times and delivery requirements of our customers. Our customers typically purchase products from us pursuant to purchase orders and typically do not enter into long-term purchase agreements or arrangements with us. Accordingly, we purchase metal in quantities we believe to be appropriate to satisfy the anticipated needs of our customers based on information derived from customers, market conditions, historic usage and industry research. Commitments for metal purchases are generally at prevailing market prices in effect at the time orders are placed or at the time of shipment. During periods of rising metal costs, our results may be negatively impacted by increases in the costs of the metals we purchase if we are unable to make equivalent increases in the selling prices of the products we sell. We believe it is more challenging to fully pass on higher metal costs to our customers when the higher costs are not driven by customer demand, but by external factors such as tariff actions. In addition, whensee in full comparisonmetalmetals pricesdecline,decrease, we often cannot replace oursellinghigherprices generally decline and, as we sellcost inventorypurchasedwith the lower cost metal athigheracosts,rateresultsthatinwouldlowerallow us to maintain a consistent gross profitmarginsmargin, which may reduce our gross profit margin andgross profit.profitability. Consequently, during periods in which wesellarethissellingexistinginventoryinventory,on hand that is costed above current replacement costs, the effects of changing metal pricescouldwould adversely affect our operatingresults.results until our inventory costs on hand align with current replacement costs.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (43)
The costs that we pay for metals fluctuate due to a number of factors beyond our control, and such fluctuations could adversely affect our operating results, particularly decreasesin periods in which metals prices.price increases are not supported by underlying demand and we are unable to fully pass our higher metal costs to our customers or during periods of declining metals prices and we are unable to quickly lower our inventory costs on hand.
We purchase large quantities of carbon steel, aluminum, carbon, stainless andsteel, alloy steelalloy, and other metals,metal products, which we sell to a variety of customers. Our profitability is largely dependent upon the prices of the steel, aluminum and other metals we sell to our customers. Pricing for our products generally has a much more significant impact on our results of operations than customer demand levels. If pricing declines, we will typically generate lower levels of gross profit and pretax income dollars. The price of metals we purchase and the price we charge our customers for the products we sell fluctuate based on many factors outside of our control, including general economic conditions (both domestic and international), competition, production levels, raw material costs, customer demand levels, governmental policies, import duties and other trade restrictions, currency fluctuations and surcharges imposed by our suppliers.
Pricing for our products generally has a much more significant impact on our results of operations than customer demand levels. If pricing declines, we will typically generate lower levels of gross profit and pretax income dollars. In addition, changes in metals prices that lower our gross profit margin can adversely affect our operating results. When metals prices decrease, we often cannot replace our higher cost inventory with the lower cost metal at a rate that would allow us to maintain a consistent gross profit margin, which would reduce our profitability during that interim period.
We maintain substantial inventories of metal to accommodate the short lead times and delivery requirements of our customers. Our customers typically purchase products from us pursuant to purchase orders and typically do not enter into long-term purchase agreements or arrangements with us. Accordingly, we purchase metal in quantities we believe to be appropriate to satisfy the anticipated needs of our customers based on information derived from customers, market conditions, historic usage and industry research. Commitments for metal purchases are generally at prevailing market prices in effect at the time orders are placed or at the time of shipment. During periods of rising metal costs, our results may be negatively impacted by increases in the costs of the metals we purchase if we are unable to make equivalent increases in the selling prices of the products we sell. We believe it is more challenging to fully pass on higher metal costs to our customers when the higher costs are not driven by customer demand, but by external factors such as tariff actions. In addition, when metalmetals prices decline,decrease, we often cannot replace our sellinghigher prices generally decline and, as we sellcost inventory purchasedwith the lower cost metal at highera costs,rate resultsthat inwould lowerallow us to maintain a consistent gross profit marginsmargin, which may reduce our gross profit margin and gross profit.profitability. Consequently, during periods in which we sellare thisselling existinginventory inventory,on hand that is costed above current replacement costs, the effects of changing metal prices couldwould adversely affect our operating results.results until our inventory costs on hand align with current replacement costs.
12 / 2025 Form 10-K
Our financial condition and results of operations are impacted by global markets and economic conditions over which we do not have control. A general global economic downturn or other adverse macroeconomic trends, including heightened inflation, capital markets volatility, currency rate fluctuations, trade policies, economic uncertainties, high unemployment levels, an economic slowdown or recession, or a slowing or stalled recovery therefrom, have in the past resulted in and may in the future result in unfavorable conditions that negatively affect demand and selling prices for our products and exacerbate some of the other risks that affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, the Federal Reserve in the U.S. and other central banks in various countries have raised interest rates in response to concerns about inflation, which, coupled with volatility in financial markets and the possibility that such rates may remain elevated for longer than expected, has had and may continue to have the effect of further increasing economic uncertainty and heightening these risks. Interest rate increases or other government actions taken to reduce inflation have resulted in recessionary pressures in many parts of the world.
The war in Ukraine has led, is currently leading, and for an unknown period of time will continue to lead to disruptions in local, regional, national, and global markets and economies affected thereby, including in the global steel market. These disruptions caused by the war included, and may continue to include, political, social, and economic disruptions and uncertainties and material increases in certain commodity prices that may affect our business operations. In addition, the duration and impact of conflicts in the Middle East are unknown but could have global economic and political ramifications.
In 2025, the U.S. government altered its approach to international trade policy, both generally and with respect to matters directly and indirectly affecting the metals industry, including by undertaking certain unilateral actions affecting trade, renegotiating existing bilateral and multilateral trade agreements, and entering into new agreements with foreign countries. For example, in early 2025, the U.S. government issued executive orders imposing Section 232 duties on steel and aluminum products from Canada and Mexico, eliminating the tariff rate quotas that had partially exempted imports from certain countries and eliminating product-specific exclusions. These executive actions also increased the aluminum tariffs from 10% to 25% effective on and after March 12, 2025. Subsequently, in June 2025, the Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs were generally increased to 50%. The tariffs were also expanded to cover a range of additional “derivative” steel-containing articles.
On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled that the president is not authorized to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. It is currently unclear what the overall impact of this ruling will be. The Supreme Court's ruling has no direct impact on the tariffs in place under Section 232, including tariffs on steel and aluminum.
2025 Form 10-K / 13
The current system of tariffs is fluid and the ultimate impacts of such tariffs on our revenues, financial results and cash flows will be based on a number of variables that are not known at this time. The impact on our business will be based on the actual tariffs imposed as well as their duration, which we are not able to predict at this time. Our business may be adversely impacted to the extent to which the threat of tariffs or effected/deferred tariffs or other trade actions result in a decrease in international demand for steel and aluminum produced in the U.S. or disruptions in customer buying patterns.
On March 1, 2018, the U.S. announced a plan to indefinitely impose a 25% tariff on certain imported steel products and a 10% tariff on certain imported aluminum products under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (the “Section 232”) tariffs. These Section 232 tariffs were imposed on national security grounds and addressed imported steel that was being unfairly traded by certain foreign competitors at artificially low prices. In retaliation against the Section 232 tariffs, the European Union subsequently imposed its own tariffs against certain steel products and other goods imported from the U.S. In recent years, negotiations between the U.S. government and other governments have resulted in revisions to these measures. In recent years, the U.S. government had agreed to modified tariff rate quota systems with each of the European Union, Japan and the United Kingdom that allow more imports from those trading partners to enter the U.S. market free of Section 232 tariffs.
On February 1, 2025, the White House issued executive orders directing increased tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico and China with a threat of further increases for any country that retaliates. The proposed tariffs on Canada and Mexico were deferred for 30 days. The 10% additional tariff on imports from China was effected and China retaliated with tariffs on certain products it imports from the US. On February 10, 2025, the White House issued executive orders reinstating a 25% tariff on all steel imports and an increase in aluminum tariffs from 10% to 25% effective on and after March 12, 2025. This expansion of 232 tariffs revokes previously negotiated country-specific exemptions and quota arrangements, and does not allow product exclusions at this time, established under the original Section 232 tariffs in 2018. The status of any such tariffs is fluid and the ultimate impact on our revenues, financial results and cash flows will be based on a number of variables that are not known at this time. The impact on our business will be based on the final tariffs imposed, which we are not able to predict at this time. The extent to which effected/deferred tariffs or other trade actions, or the threat of tariffs result in a decrease in international demand for steel and aluminum produced in the U.S., disruptions in customer buying patterns or otherwise negatively impact demand for our products, our business may be adversely impacted.
We expect that thesethe current system of tariffs, while in effect, will discourage metal imports from non-exempt countries. These tariffs have had a favorable impact to date on the prices of the products we sell and our results of operations. If these or other tariffs or duties expire or if others are relaxed or repealed, or if relatively higher U.S. metalmetals prices make it attractive for foreign metal producers to export their products to the U.S.,U.S. despite the presence of duties or tariffs, then the resurgence of substantial imports of foreign metal could create downward pressure on U.S. metal prices. If the Section 232 measures are removed or substantially lessened, whether through legal challenge, legislation, executive action or otherwise, then imports of foreign metals would likely increase and metal prices in the U.S. would likely fall, which could materially adversely affect our revenues, financial results and cash flows.
The metals service center industry is cyclical and impacted by both market demand and metals supply. Periods of economic slowdown (such as global or regional recessions) decrease the demand for our products and adversely affect our pricing. If either demand or pricing were to decline from the current levels, this could reduce our profitability and cash flows.
We compete with a large number of other general-line distributors and processors, and specialty distributors in the metals service center industry. Competition is based principally on price, inventory availability, timely delivery, customer service, qualityquality, processing capability and processingavailability capabilities.of products and services. Competition in the various markets in which we participate comes from companies of various sizes, some of which have more established brand names in the local markets that we serve. To compete for customer sales, we may lower prices or incur higher costs to offer increased services at a higher cost,services, which could reduce our profitability and cash flows. Rapidly declining prices and/or demand levels may escalate competitive pressures, with service centers selling at substantially reduced prices, and sometimes at a loss, in an effort to reduce their high-cost inventory and generate cash. Any increased and/or sustained competitive pressure could cause our share of industry sales to decline along with our profitability and cash flows.
We have few long-term contracts to purchase metals. Therefore, our primary suppliers of aluminum, carbon, stainless and alloy steel or other metals could curtail or discontinue their delivery of these metals to us in the 14 / 2025 Form 10-K quantities we need with little or no notice. Our ability to meet our customers’ needs and provide value-added inventory management services depends on our ability to maintain an uninterrupted supply of high-quality metal products from our suppliers. If our suppliers experience production problems, lack of capacity or transportation disruptions, the lead times for receiving our supply of metal products could be extended and the cost of our inventory may increase. If, in the future, we are unable to obtain sufficient amounts of the necessary metals at competitive prices and on a timely basis from our customary suppliers, we may not be able to obtain these metals from acceptable alternative sources at competitive prices to meet our delivery schedules. Even if we do find acceptable alternative suppliers, the process of locating and securing these alternatives may be disruptive to our business, which could have an adverse impact on our ability to meet our customers’ needs and reduce our profitability and cash flows. In addition, if a significant domestic supply source is discontinued and we cannot find acceptable domestic alternatives, we may need to find foreign sources of supply. Using foreign sources of supply could result in longer lead times, increased price volatility, less favorable payment terms, increased exposure to foreign currency movements and certain tariffs and duties and require greater levels of working capital. Alternative sources of supply may not maintain the quality standards that are in place with our current suppliers that could impact our ability to provide the same quality of products to our customers that we have provided in the past, which could cause our customers to move their business to our competitors or to file claims against us, and such claims may be more difficult to pass through to foreign suppliers.
We rely on mill certifications that attest to the physical and chemical specifications of the metal received from our suppliers for resale and generally, consistent with industry practice, we do not undertake independent testing of such metals unless independent tests are required by customers. We rely on customers to notify us of any metal that does not conform to the specifications certified by the supplying mill. Although our primary sources of products have beenare domestic mills, we have and will continue to purchase productproducts from foreign suppliers when we believe it is appropriate. In the event that metal purchased from domestic suppliers is deemed to not meet quality specifications as set forth in the mill certifications or customer specifications, we generally have recourse against these suppliers for both the cost of the products purchased and possible claims from our customers. However, such recourse will not compensate us for the damage to our reputation that may arise from substandard products and possible losses of customers. Moreover, there is a greater level of risk that similar recourse will not be available to us in the event of claims by our customers related to products from foreign suppliers that do not meet the specifications set forth in the mill certifications. In such circumstances, we may be at greater risk of loss for claims for which we do not carry, or carry insufficient, insurance.
2025 Form 10-K / 15
There also has been increased stakeholder focus, including by U.S. and foreign governmental authorities, investors, customers, media and nongovernmental organizations, on environmental sustainability matters, such as climate change, the reduction of greenhouse gases and water consumption. Legislative, regulatory or other efforts to combat climate change or other environmental concerns could result in future increases in taxes, restrictions on or increases in the costs of supplies, transportation and utilities, any of which could increase our operating costs, and necessitate future investments in facilities and equipment. Further, our customers may impose emissions reduction or other environmental standards and requirements. As a result, we may experience increased compliance burdens, and the sourcing of our products may be adversely affected. These risks also include the increased pressure to make commitments, set targets, or establish additional goals to take actions to meet them, which could expose us to market, operational, execution and reputational costs or risks.
Developing and acting on initiatives within the scope of social and environmental sustainability, and collecting, measuring and reporting environmental sustainability-related information and metrics can be costly, difficult and time consuming and is subject to evolving reporting standards. Further, statements about our social and environmental sustainability-related initiatives and goals, and progress against those goals, may be based on standards for measuring progress that are still developing, internal controls and processes that continue to evolve, and assumptions that are subject to change in the future. If our social and environmental sustainability-related data, processes and reporting are incomplete or inaccurate, or if we fail to achieve progress with respect to our goals within the scope of social and environmental sustainability on a timely basis, or at all, our reputation, business, financial performance and growth could be adversely affected.
Our insurance coverage, customervendor indemnifications or other liability protections may be unavailable or inadequate to cover all of our significant risksrisks, or our insurers may deny coverage of or be unable to pay for material losses we incur, which could adversely affect our profitability and overall financial position.
In some circumstances we may be entitled to certain legal protections or indemnifications from our customersvendors through contractual provisions, laws, regulations or otherwise. However, these protections are not always available, are typically subject to certain terms or limitations, including the availability of funds, and may not be sufficient to cover all losses or liabilities incurred.
16 / 2025 Form 10-K
We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates or successfully complete any acquisitions or integrate any other businesses into our operations. If we cannot identify suitable acquisition candidates or are otherwise unable to complete acquisitions, we may not be able to continue to grow our business as expected and, if we cannot successfully integrate recently acquired businesses, we may incur increased or redundant expenses. Moreover, any additional indebtedness we incur to pay for these acquisitions could adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition.
Portions of our business have been, and may in the future be, the subject of restructuring, realignment and cost reduction initiatives. While we may undertake these initiatives with the goal of realizing potential efficiencies, we may not be successful in achieving efficiencies and cost reduction benefits we expect in full or at all. Further, such benefits might be realized later than expected, and the ongoing costs of implementing these measures might be greater than anticipated. If these measures are not successful or sustainable, we might undertake additional realignment and cost reduction efforts, which could result in future charges. Moreover, our ability to achieve our other strategic goals and business plans might be adversely affected, and we could experience business disruptions,disruptions if our restructuring and realignment efforts and our cost reduction activities prove ineffective.
2025 Form 10-K / 17
We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates or successfully complete any acquisitions or integrate any other businesses into our operations. If we cannot identify suitable acquisition candidates or are otherwise unable to complete acquisitions, we may not be able to continue to grow our business as expected and, if we cannot successfully integrate recently acquired businesses, we may incur increased or redundant expenses or management’s attention may be distracted from other strategic priorities. Moreover, any additional indebtedness we incur to pay for these acquisitions could adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition.
We are a decentralized company,company which presents certain risks.
With a diverse geographic footprint both in both North America and internationally, we believe our decentralized structure has catalyzed our growth and enabled us to remain responsive to opportunities and to our customers’ needs by leaving significant control and decision-making authority and accountability in the hands of local management. BecauseHowever, because we are decentralized, we may be slower to detect compliance-related problems (e.g., a rogue employee undertaking activities that are prohibited by applicable law or by our internal policies) and “company-wide” business initiatives, such as the integration of disparate information technology systems, are often more challenging and costly to implement than they would be in a more centralized 18 / 2025 Form 10-K environment. Depending on the nature of the problem or initiative in question, such failure could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Approximately seven percent6% of our 20242025 consolidated net sales were from operations outside the U.S., subjecting us to the risks of doing business on a global level. These risks include changes in tax rates, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, economic instability and disruptions, restrictions on the transfer of funds and the imposition of duties and tariffs. Additional risks from our multinational business include transportation delays and interruptions, war, terrorist activities, epidemics, pandemics, political instability, import and export controls, local regulation, changes in governmental policies, inflation, labor unrest and current and changing regulatory environments. International political and military conflict, such as the war in Ukraine, increasing tensions between Taiwan and China, or evolving conflicts in the Middle East could materially adversely affect the global economy. In addition, government policies on international trade and investment such as import quotas, tariffs, and capital controls, whether adopted by individual governments or addressed by regional trade blocs, can affect the demand for our customers’ products and services. The implementation of more restrictive trade policies, such as higher tariffs or new barriers to entry, in countries in which our customers sell large quantities of products and services could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”) has created a framework among 140 countries with the objective of implementing a global minimum effective tax rate of 15%. While we do not anticipate a material impact to our effective income tax rate under these changes, as additional jurisdictions adopt this legislation and the rules continue to evolve, our effective income tax rate and income taxestax paidpayments could increase in future years.
Our operating results could be negatively affected by the global laws, rules and regulations, as well as political environments in the jurisdictions in which we operate. For example, we are subject to the FCPA, and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom’s Bribery Act 2010, which generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from corruptly paying, offering to pay, or authorizing the payment of money, a gift, or anything of value, to a foreign official or foreign political party, for purposes of 2025 Form 10-K / 19 obtaining or retaining business. A company can be held liable under these anti-bribery laws not just for its own direct actions, but also for the actions of its foreign subsidiaries or other third parties, such as agents or distributors. In addition, we could be held liable for actions taken by employees or third parties on behalf of a company that we acquire. If we fail to comply with the requirements under these laws and regulations, we may face possible civil and/or criminal penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial results.
Given the unpredictability of the timing, nature and scope of security incidents such as cybersecurity attacks or potential disruptions, we are subject to production downtimes, operational delays, other detrimental impacts on our operations or ability to provide products and services to our customers, the compromising, misappropriation, destruction or corruption of data, unauthorized access to or acquisition of data, other manipulation or improper use of our systems or networks, financial losses from remedial actions, loss of business or potential liability, and/or damage to our reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. Any significant compromise of our information management systems and networks or data could impede or interrupt our business operations and may result in negative consequences including loss of revenue, fines, penalties, litigation, reputational damage, regulatory actions or increased regulatory scrutiny, inability to accurately and/or timely complete required filings with government entities including the SEC and the Internal Revenue Service, unavailability or disclosure of confidential information (including personal data), negative impact on our stock price, environmental damage, and personal injury or death. Furthermore, we may be required to expend 20 / 2025 Form 10-K significant attention and financial resources to protect against physical or security incidents that could result in the misappropriation of our information or the information of our employees and customers.
Under global data privacy and data protection regulations, the failure to maintain compliant data practices could result in consumer complaints, regulatory inquiry, civil or criminal penalties, litigation, legal liability, as well as brand impact or other harm to our business. In addition, increased consumer sensitivity to real or perceived failures in maintaining acceptable data practices could damage our reputation and deter current and potential users or customers from using our products and services. Because many of these laws are new, there is little clarity as to their interpretation, as well as a lack of precedent for the scope of enforcement. Other foreign, state and local jurisdictions have adoptedadopted, and are considering adopting,adopting laws and regulations imposing obligations regarding personal data. In some cases, these laws provide a private right of action that would allow customers to bring suit directly against us for mishandling their data or security incidents involving their personal information. The cost of compliance with these laws and regulations will be high and is likely to increase in the future.
We review the recoverability of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually or whenever significant events or changes in circumstances occur that might impair the recovery of recorded costs. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances, indicating that the carrying value of our goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets may not be recoverable, include a decline in stock price and market capitalization, declines in the market conditions for our products, viability of end markets, loss of customers, reduced future cash flow estimates, and slower growth rates in our industry. If prices for the products our 2025 Form 10-K / 21 customers sell fall substantially or remain low for a sustained period, we may be (i) unable to realize a profit fromoperate businesses that service such customers,customers profitably, (ii) required to record additional impairments, or (iii) required to suspend or reorganize operations that service such customers. An impairment charge, if incurred, could be material.
Our business substantially depends on the continued service of key members of our management and other key employees. The loss of the services of a significant number of members of our management or other key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business. Our future success also will depend on our ability to attract, retain and develop highly skilled personnel and skilled labor. Competition for these types of employees is intense and has increased recently,intense, and we could experience difficulty from time to time in hiring, developing and retaining the personnel necessary to support our business. If we do not succeed in retaining and developing our current employees and attracting new high-quality employees, our business could be materially adversely affected.
22 / 2025 Form 10-K
Our existing debt agreements contain financial and restrictive covenants that limit the total amount of debt that we may incur and may limit our ability to engage in other activities that we may believe are in our long-term best interests. Our failure to comply with these covenants may result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could accelerate the maturity of our indebtedness or prevent us from accessing additional funds under our revolving credit facility. If the maturity of our indebtedness is accelerated, we may not have sufficient cash resources to satisfy our debt obligations and we may not be able to continue our operations as planned. See discussion regarding our financial covenants in the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
“Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Because alla substantial portion of our available borrowing capacity on our revolving credit facilityindebtedness bears interest at rates that fluctuate with changes in certain prevailing short-term interest rates, if we increase our leverage in the future, we are vulnerable to increases in interest rates.
A substantial portion of our indebtedness bears interest at rates that fluctuate with changes in certain short-term prevailing interest rates based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”). SOFR tends to fluctuate based on changes in interest rate policy by the Federal Reserve. As of December 31, 2025, we had a total of $677.0 million of outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility and a term loan that bore interest at variable rates based on SOFR. Assuming the same level of variable-interest debt, a hypothetical 100-basis point increase in SOFR would result in approximately $6.8 million of additional interest expense on an annual basis. We currently do not use derivative financial instruments to manage the potential impact of interest rate risk. Accordingly, our interest expense for any particular period will generally fluctuate based on changes in SOFR and outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility, which can adversely impact our results of operations and profitability.
As of December 31, 2024, we had an insignificant amount of variable interest rate debt outstanding. However, as of December 31, 2024, we had approximately $1.5 billion available for borrowing on our revolving credit facility at variable interest rates. We currently do not use derivative financial instruments to manage the potential impact of interest rate risk. Accordingly, if we borrow on our revolving credit facility, our interest expense will fluctuate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate and other variable interest rates.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Removed heading “2023 Acquisition”
Removed heading “Other (Income) Expense, Net”
Removed heading “Operating Activities”
Removed heading “Investing Activities”
Removed heading “Financing Activities”
Largest changes
“The Credit Agreement, Term Loan and indentures governing our debt securities include customary representations, warranties, covenants and events of default provisions. The covenants under the Credit Agreement and Term Loan include, among other things, a financial maintenance covenant that requires us to comply with a maximum total net leverage ratio. As of December 31, 2025, our total net leverage ratio, calculated in accordance with the Credit Agreement and Term Loan, was 17% compared to the debt covenant maximum of 60%.”see in full comparison
“The Credit Agreement and indentures governing our debt securities include customary representations, warranties, covenants and events of default provisions. The covenants under the Credit Agreement include, among other things, a financial maintenance covenant that requires us to comply with a maximum total net leverage ratio. As of December 31, 2024, our total net leverage ratio, calculated in accordance with the Credit Agreement, was 13% compared to the debt covenant maximum of 60%.”see in full comparison
“We believe we will continue to have sufficient liquidity to fund our future operating needs and to repay our debt obligations as they become due. In addition to funds generated from operations and approximately $1.22 billion available under our unsecured revolving credit facility, we expect to continue to be able to access the capital markets to raise funds, if desired. We believe our investment grade credit ratings enhance our ability to effectively raise capital. …”see in full comparison
“We believe that we will continue to have sufficient liquidity to fund our future operating needs and to repay our debt obligations as they become due. In addition to funds generated from operations and approximately $1.5 billion available under our unsecured revolving credit facility, we expect to continue to be able to access the capital markets to raise funds, if desired. We believe our investment grade credit ratings enhance our ability to effectively raise capital. …”see in full comparison
“See Note 20—“Impairment and Restructuring Charges” to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further information on our impairment and restructuring charges.”see in full comparison
“Included in Expenses are $11.7 million of impairment losses in 2024, which included $11.2 million related to the discontinued use of a trade name intangible asset in connection with an operational restructuring.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (92)
The following sets forth certain income statement data for each of the last three fiscal years (in millions, except per share amounts, and certain percentages may not calculate due to rounding):
Net sales were $14.29 billion in 2025, an increase of 3.3% compared to 2024, driven by record tons sold, which increased 6.2% and more than offset a 2.6% decline in average selling price per ton sold. Fourth quarter 28 / 2025 Form 10-K 2025 net sales increased 11.9% year-over-year, with tons sold increasing 5.8%, representing the strongest fourth quarter growth since 2021. Shipments grew across most of the end markets we serve, with notably strong underlying demand in non-residential construction, our largest end market by tons.
Operating results reported under our LIFO method of inventory accounting declined in 2025 due to temporary tariff-related pressure on gross profit margin and higher SG&A expense. However, excluding significant LIFO impacts in both 2025 and 2024, FIFO gross profit margin and profitability improved.
Growth in tons sold during 2025 exceeded the industry-wide decline of 1.0% reported by the Metals Service Center Institute (“MSCI”) by more than 7 percentage points. We believe that our scale, diversified business model, and customer service capabilities, including next-day delivery and extensive value-added processing, enabled us to expand our market share despite a declining industry trend.
Tariff-related carbon steel and aluminum cost increases during the first half of 2025 initially supported higher metals pricing following the declining pricing environment experienced throughout 2024. However, because these increases were not demand-driven, our gross profit margin softened beginning in the third quarter as higher metal costs were not fully passed through to customers, particularly for aluminum products amid soft demand and ample supply in the commercial aerospace and semiconductor markets.
Our LIFO gross profit margin was 28.7% in 2025, down 100 basis points year-over-year, mainly due to a swing in LIFO inventory valuation adjustments—from $144.4 million of income in 2024 to $113.7 million of expense in 2025—driven in part by higher aluminum costs that had a disproportionate impact on LIFO expense. However, higher metal prices supported by tariff actions drove FIFO gross profit margin up 80 basis points to 29.5%.
Same-store SG&A expense increased 4.2% while tons sold grew 5.3% in 2025 compared to 2024, resulting in a 1.0% decline in same-store SG&A expense per ton sold and demonstrating improved operating leverage. Increases in total and same-store SG&A expense reflected inflationary wage adjustments and higher variable warehousing and delivery costs associated with increased shipment volumes. Higher FIFO profitability also contributed to increased incentive-based compensation.
Earnings per diluted share were $13.98 in 2025 compared to $15.56 in 2024, a decrease of 10.2%. The impacts of a lower average selling price per ton sold and tariff-related gross profit margin pressure on our earnings per share were partially mitigated by significant growth in tons sold, lower SG&A expense per ton sold, and a 4% reduction in outstanding shares resulting from share repurchases. However, profitability excluding the impacts of LIFO inventory valuation adjustments increased 14.5% year-over-year.
Cash flow from operations was $831.4 million in 2025, a decrease of $598.4 million from $1.43 billion in 2024, which represented the third-highest level in our history. The decline in operating cash flow was driven primarily by higher working capital requirements related to higher tons sold volume and higher metals pricing.
Spending on growth-related activities decreased by $463.5 million in 2025 compared to 2024, primarily due to the absence of acquisition activity ($361.8 million) and a $101.7 million reduction in capital expenditures.
In 2024, demand was relatively healthy in the majority of our end markets, supported by same-store growth in tons sold compared to 2023. Despite growing our tons sold, our operating results declined mainly due to lower metals prices and our net sales of $13.84 billion declined 6.6% compared to $14.81 billion in 2023.
Our same-store and total tons sold increases of 1.0% and 4.0%, respectively, in 2024 compared to 2023 benefited from one additional shipping day and outperformed the 2.0% decline in industry shipments reported by the Metals Service Center Institute (“MSCI”). We believe our outperformance of industry peers is supported by our organic growth activities along with our customer service.
Gross profit margin was 29.7% in 2024 compared to 30.7% in 2023. Our gross profit margin remained strong but was impacted by declines in metals pricing. However, we believe the impact from the decline in metals pricing was mitigated by effective inventory management, our focus on small orders with quick turnaround and value-added processing services.
Earnings per diluted share of $15.56 in 2024 declined 31.3% compared to $22.64 in 2023. Despite increases in our same-store tons sold and total tons sold, our earnings per share declined mainly due to lower metals prices.
Although cash flow from operations of $1.43 billion in 2024 was the third highest in our history, it decreased $241.5 million, or 14.4%, from $1.67 billion in 2023, the second highest in our history, mainly due to lower net income partially offset by lower working capital investment.
Returns to stockholders totaled $848.8 million in 20242025, totaled $1.34 billion, comprisedconsisting of a$594.1 record $1.09 billionmillion of share repurchases which reduced our outstanding common shares by six percent year-over-year, and $249.7$254.7 million of cash dividends, which reflectedreflecting a 10.0%9.1% increase in ourthe regular quarterly dividend rate.
Organic growth activities were substantially comprised of capital expenditures of $430.6 million in 2024 compared to $468.8 million in 2023. We also invested $364.6 million in four acquisitions in 2024.
Customer demand has a significant impact on our results of operations. When volume increases, our revenue dollars generally increase, which contributes to increased gross profit dollars. Conversely, when volume declines, we typically produce fewer revenue dollars, which can reduce our gross profit dollars. Variable costs such as certain warehouse, delivery and selling, general and administrative expenses also increase with 2025 Form 10-K / 29 volume. While we can and do reduce certain variable expenses when volumes decline, we cannot easily reduce our fixed costs.
We primarily purchase and sell inventory in the spot market, with the majority valued using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. Under this method, cost of sales reflects current inventory costs associated with the corresponding sales. During periods of fluctuating metals prices, we believe the LIFO method can provide stability in our reported gross profit margin as compared to the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method, which is used in our day-to-day operations and incentive-based compensation programs at many of our operating locations.
In addition, when volume or pricing increases, our working capital requirements typically increaseincrease, which decreases operating cash flow. Conversely, when customer demand or pricing falls, our investment in working capital typically decreasesdecreases, which improves operating cash flow.
Acquisitions
With cash on hand, we acquired (i) Cooksey Iron & Metal Company on February 1, 2024; (ii) American Alloy Steel, Inc. on April 1, 2024; (iii) Mid-West Materials, Inc. on April 1, 2024; and (iv) certain assets of the FerrouSouth division of Ferragon Corporation on August 16, 2024. Included in our net sales for 2025 and 2024 were combined net sales of $389.2 million and $286.2 million, respectively, from our 2024 acquisitions.
To further our growth strategy, we completed four acquisitions in 2024. The consideration of each acquisition in 2024 was funded with cash on hand. Our acquisition strategy enhances our product breadth and value-added processing capabilities, with a continued focus on the diversification of our products, end markets and geographies. Our 2024 acquisitions broaden our geographic base and processing capabilities in new and existing markets.
Our 2024 acquisitions contributed $286.2 million to our 2024 net sales.
2023 Acquisition
On May 1, 2023, with cash on hand, we acquired Southern Steel Supply, LLC (“Southern Steel”). Headquartered in Memphis, Tennessee, Southern Steel distributes and processes merchant and structural steel, pipe and tube, steel plate, ornamental products and laser cut and fabricated parts. Southern Steel contributed $36.1 million to our 2024 net sales.
InDuring 2025 and 2024, we spent $328.9 million and $430.6 million on capital expenditures, respectively. We continued to maintain our focus on internal growth by building new facilities,facilities and expanding existing facilities, relocatingpurchasing leased facilities to facilities we own,facilities, expanding our processing capabilities and capacity, upgrading processing equipment to increase efficiency, improving the safety and energy efficiency of our operations and enhancing the working environments of our employees. Our capital expenditure budgets have been at historically high levels in recent years and, we believe, significantly contribute to our industry leadingindustry-leading financial results. During 2024 and 2023, we spent $430.6 million and $468.8 million on capital expenditures.
We believe the increase in our level of orders that include value-added processing over time has provided stability to our gross profit margin during periods of declining metals prices and contributed to a higher sustainable gross profit margin level. We have made significant investments in capital expenditures in recent years that have expanded our value-added processing capabilities and increased the level of our sales orders that include value-added processing to atapproximately least50%. 50%,We whichbelieve we believehave hasindustry been supportive to increases in our sustainableleading gross profit margin,margins whichbased ison currentlyour estimatedpeer atgroup 29%-31%.of publicly traded metal service center companies. Our current processing and estimated sustainable gross profit margin level is significantly higher than what we believe to be our historical levels from approximatelyover a decade agoago, in which the percentage of our orders that included value-added processing rangedwas fromcloser 40%-45%to 40% and our gross profit marginsmargin werelevel approximatelywas 25%-27%.under 27%.
We believe that our ability to make significant investments in processing equipment and in new and improved facilities is a competitive advantage, as we can expand our services and provide higher quality productproducts to our customers. We believe many of our metals service center company competitors do not have 30 / 2025 Form 10-K the ability to expand their processing services in response to their customers’ needs as quickly andor at the same scale as Reliance.
The following sets forth certain income statement data for each of the last three fiscal years (dollars are shown in millions, except per share amounts, and certain percentages may not calculate due to rounding):
Year Ended December 31, 20242025 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20232024 (in millions, except tons in thousands and average selling price per ton sold)
Our tonsTons sold and average selling price per ton sold exclude our toll processed tons. Our average selling price per ton sold includes intercompany transactions that are eliminated from our consolidated net sales. Same-store amounts exclude the contributionsresults fromof our 2024 and 2023 acquisitions.
Net sales in 2025 increased due to record tons sold that offset a moderate decline in average selling price per ton sold. Our tons sold increases reflect market share gains during a period of ongoing trade policy uncertainty. We believe uncertainty in the market has led our customers to purchase more frequently and in smaller quantities which are core tenets of our operational strategy. We believe these shifts in customer buying patterns, combined with our scale, diverse product offerings, extensive value-added processing capabilities, and high levels of customer service supported our record tons sold in 2025 which surpassed the industry performance reported by the MSCI by over 7 percentage points.
Our same-store net sales declined from 2023 mainly due to declines in carbon steel pricing that lowered our average selling price per ton sold despite an increase in tons sold. Demand remained relatively healthy in the majority of the end markets we serve, supported by same-store growth in tons sold.
Since we primarily purchase and sell our inventories in the spot market, our average selling prices generally fluctuate with the changes in replacement costs of the various metals we purchase. The mix of products sold can also have an impact on our overall average selling price per ton sold. As carbon steel sales representedrepresent 53%a majority of our gross sales in 2024,sales, changes in carbon steel prices have the most significant impact on changes in our overall average selling price per ton sold.
2025 Form 10-K / 31
The decrease in cost of sales was attributable to lower average costs per ton sold, mainly due to declines in replacement costs for carbon steel products, partially offset by an increase in tons sold.
Gross profit decreased despite contributions from four acquisitions and an increase in same-store tons sold mainly due to lower net sales as a result of a decrease in average selling price per ton sold.
Our gross profit margin remained strong, but was pressured by lower metals pricing which we believe was mitigated by effective inventory management, our focus on small orders with quick turnaround and value-added processing services.
InWe addition, we recordrecord, in cost of salessales, non-cash adjustments to our LIFO method inventory valuation reserve that, in effect, reflectsreflect cost of sales at current replacement costs. The change in LIFO expense (income) was due to the rising metals pricing environment in 2025 compared to the declining metals pricing trend in 2024. As of December 31, 2025, the inventory captionbalance ofin our consolidated balance sheet includes a LIFO method inventory valuation reserve of $434.9$548.6 million at December 31, 2024.million.
See “Overview” for further discussion of the impact of tariff actions on LIFO expense and our gross profit margin. See “Net Sales” above for trends in both demand and costs of our products, and product pricing.
Our same-store SG&A expense declined 1.0% on a per ton sold basis from 2024. Our SG&A expense reflected inflationary wage adjustments and increased variable warehousing and delivery expenses associated with higher tons sold. SG&A expense in 2025 also included higher incentive-based compensation due to an approximately 8.8% increase in FIFO pretax income profitability.
Our SG&A expense is made up largely of compensation costs (approximately 60-65% historically), which fluctuate based on changes in our headcount levels in response to demand and general inflation, and incentive-based compensation.
Same-store SG&A expense increased mainly due to higher costs associated with wage inflation and increased headcount related to our organic growth activities offset by lower incentive-based compensation resulting from lower profitability. Our SG&A expense as a percentage of sales increased mainly due to lower sales levels.
In addition, same-store SG&A expense in 2024 included non-recurring net settlement charges of $4.1 million, mainly related to our withdrawal from certain multiemployer pension plans, and 2023 included $3.8 million of nonrecurring gains related to the sale of non-core property, plant and equipment.
The increase in same-store depreciation and amortization expense is mainly due to significant increases in capital expenditures in 2023.
Included in Expenses are $11.7 million of impairment losses in 2024, which included $11.2 million related to the discontinued use of a trade name intangible asset in connection with an operational restructuring.
32 / 2025 Form 10-K
Operating income and margin declined mainly due to a 100-basis point decline in gross profit margin due to LIFO method inventory valuation adjustments that outweighed an increase in tons sold.
See Note 20—“Impairment and Restructuring Charges” to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further information on our impairment and restructuring charges.
Operating income declined mainly as a result of lower metals pricing that decreased gross profit along with a moderate increase in same-store SG&A expense, partially offset by operating income contributions from acquisitions. Our operating income margin was lower mainly due to decreased operating leverage of our SG&A expense due to lower net sales and a lower gross profit margin.
Other (Income) Expense, Net
The change in other income, net was mainly due to a decrease in interest income as a result of lower cash and cash equivalent balances and interest earned thereon. See Note 16—“Other (Income) Expense, Net” to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for further information on other (income) expense, net.
Our effective income tax rate wasof 23.5% in 2025 increased from 23.0% in 20242024, andprimarily 2023.due to a reduced favorable impact from company-owned life insurance policies. The differencedifferences between our effective income tax raterates and the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21.0% waswere mainly due to state income taxes partially offset by the net effects of company-owned life insurance policies. See Note 12—“Income Taxes” to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 88, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for further information on the differences between our effective income tax rates and the U.S. federal statutory rate.
As of December 31, 2025, we had $216.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and our net debt-to-total capital ratio (net debt-to-total capital is calculated as carrying amount of debt, net of cash, divided by total Reliance stockholders’ equity plus carrying amount of debt, net of cash) was 14.4% compared to 10.2% as of December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily attributable to increased borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operations of $831.4 million in 2025 decreased $598.4 million from $1.43 billion in 2024. The decrease was mainly due to a $136.4 million decline in net income and increased working capital requirements. Higher tons sold volume and the rising metals pricing environment in 2025 required a greater working capital investment (primarily accounts receivable and inventories) than in 2024 during which metals prices were declining.
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operations of $1.43 billion in 2024 decreased $241.5 million from $1.67 billion in 2023. The decrease was mainly due to a $462.1 million decline in net income partially offset by lower working capital investment. To manage our working capital, we focus on our days sales outstanding and inventory turnover rate as receivables and inventory are the two most significant elements of our working capital. Our average days sales outstanding rates were 41.5 days and 40.5 days in 2024 and 2023, respectively. Our inventory turnover rate (based on tons) during 2024 was 4.6 times (or 2.6 months on hand) compared to 4.7 times (or 2.6 months on hand) in 2023.
Income taxes paidpaid, net of $163.7 million in 2025 decreased from $244.9 million in 2024 decreased from $386.3 million in 2023,2024, mainly due to our lower pretax income.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
“The increases in SG&A expense were primarily due to variable warehousing and delivery costs associated with higher tons sold, increased incentive compensation resulting from higher profitability, inflationary impacts on transportation costs from higher fuel prices and wage and benefit inflation. On a per ton basis, SG&A expense increases were more moderate at 0.9% and 2.3% in the second quarter and first six months of 2026. The U.S. …”see in full comparison
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in these forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including, but not limited to, actions taken by us, as well as developments beyond our control, including, but not limited to: changes in domestic and worldwide political and economic conditions; changes in U.S. and foreign trade policies and programs, including tariffs and trade policies and programs specifically affecting metal product markets and pricing; slowing economic growth, inflation, rising unemployment or other macroeconomic factors that could materially impact us, our customers and suppliers; metals pricing; demand for our products and services; the possibility that the expected benefits of government contracts, including the U.S. border wall project, acquisitions and capital expenditures may not materialize as expected; and the impacts of labor constraints and supply chain disruptions. Deteriorations in economic conditions, including as a result of tariffs or trade barriers, economic policies, inflation, economic recession, slowing growth, outbreaks of infectious disease, or geopolitical conflicts such as insee in full comparisonUkraine, IranUkraine andthe Middle East,Iran, could lead to a decline in demand for our products and services and negatively impact our business, and may also impact financial markets and corporate credit markets which could adversely impact our access to financing, or the terms of any financing. Other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements include those disclosed in this report and in other reports we have filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Important risks and uncertainties about our business can be found elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 filed with the SEC and in other documents Reliance files or furnishes with the SEC. The Company cannot at this time predict all of the impacts of domestic and foreign tariffs and trade policies, inflation, product price fluctuations, economic recession, outbreaks of infectious disease, geopolitical conflicts and related economic effects, but these factors, individually or in any combination, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
“The increases in SG&A expense were primarily due to variable warehousing and delivery costs associated with higher tons sold, increased incentive compensation resulting from higher profitability, inflationary impacts on transportation costs from higher fuel prices and wage and benefit inflation. On a per ton basis, SG&A expense increases were more moderate at 0.9% and 2.3% in the second quarter and first six months of 2026, respectively.”see in full comparison
“SG&A expense per ton increased 3.7%, reflecting higher incentive-based compensation associated with increased profitability, inflationary impacts on compensation and related benefits, and on certain warehousing and delivery costs. However, higher average selling price per ton sold improved operating leverage, resulting in a 150 basis point decline in SG&A margin.”see in full comparison
“SG&A expense per ton increased 3.7%, reflecting higher incentive-based compensation associated with increased profitability, inflationary impacts on compensation and related benefits, and on certain warehousing and delivery costs. SG&A margin improved as higher average selling price per ton sold improved operating leverage.”see in full comparison
see in full comparisonFirstSecond Quarter and Six Months EndedMarchJune31,30, 2026 Compared toFirstSecond Quarter and Six Months EndedMarchJune31,30, 2025 (in millions, except tons in thousands and average selling price per ton sold (“ASP”))
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (49)
This report contains certain statements that are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Our forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, discussions of our: industry and end markets; business strategies; acquisitions; expectations concerning our future growth and profitability; ability to generate industry leading returns for our stockholders; future demand and metals pricing; results of operations; margins; profitability; taxes; liquidity; cash flows; capital expenditures; expectations for and impacts from macroeconomic conditions, including inflation, and the possibility of an economic recession or slowdown; anticipated effects from regulations and regulatory changes, including taxation, tariffs and other trade barriers; litigation matters and capital resources. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “preliminary,” “range,” “intend” and “continue,” the negative of these terms, and similar expressions. All statements contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s estimates, projections and assumptions as of the date of such statements. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in these forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including, but not limited to, actions taken by us, as well as developments beyond our control, including, but not limited to: changes in domestic and worldwide political and economic conditions; changes in U.S. and foreign trade policies and programs, including tariffs and trade policies and programs specifically affecting metal product markets and pricing; slowing economic growth, inflation, rising unemployment or other macroeconomic factors that could materially impact us, our customers and suppliers; metals pricing; demand for our products and services; the possibility that the expected benefits of government contracts, including the U.S. border wall project, acquisitions and capital expenditures may not materialize as expected; and the impacts of labor constraints and supply chain disruptions. Deteriorations in economic conditions, including as a result of tariffs or trade barriers, economic policies, inflation, economic recession, slowing growth, outbreaks of infectious disease, or geopolitical conflicts such as in Ukraine, IranUkraine and the Middle East,Iran, could lead to a decline in demand for our products and services and negatively impact our business, and may also impact financial markets and corporate credit markets which could adversely impact our access to financing, or the terms of any financing. Other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements include those disclosed in this report and in other reports we have filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Important risks and uncertainties about our business can be found elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 filed with the SEC and in other documents Reliance files or furnishes with the SEC. The Company cannot at this time predict all of the impacts of domestic and foreign tariffs and trade policies, inflation, product price fluctuations, economic recession, outbreaks of infectious disease, geopolitical conflicts and related economic effects, but these factors, individually or in any combination, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The following sets forth certain income statement data for the second quarters and first quartersix months of 2026 and 2025 (dollars are shown in millions, except per share amounts, and certain percentages may not calculate due to rounding):
Record tons sold and significant increases in average selling price per ton sold drove net sales to $4.63 billion in the second quarter and $8.66 billion in the first six months of 2026, up 26.5% and 21.2%, respectively, from the prior year periods. For the second quarter of 2026, tons sold increased 10.8% and average selling price per ton sold improved 14.5% year-over-year, reflecting strong underlying demand across most end markets. In the first quarter of 2026, we were awarded a multi-year contract by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to provide steel and steel logistics support services for the construction of the border wall along the Southwest U.S. border (the U.S. border wall project). Steel deliveries under the contract began in the second quarter of 2026 and contributed 5.2 percentage points to year-over-year tons sold growth in the quarter.
Net sales were $4.03 billion in the first quarter of 2026, an increase of 15.5% compared to 2025, driven by record tons sold, which increased 2.7%, and a 12.6% increase in average selling price per ton sold. Shipments grew across most end markets, with notably strong underlying demand across the broader manufacturing sector, primarily due to growth in industrial machinery, shipbuilding, military, consumer products and construction machinery. Demand in our largest end market by tons sold, non-residential construction, including infrastructure and data centers, also improved year-over-year.
GrowthOur second quarter of 2026 year-over-year growth in tons sold exceeded the industry-wide declineincrease of 5.1%5.5% reported by the Metals Service Center Institute (“MSCI”) by nearlyover 8five percentage points, continuing a multi-year trend of outperformance relative to industry shipments. We believe our scale, diversified business model, and customer service capabilities, including next-day delivery and value-added processing, enabled us to gain market share in a complex operating environment.
Carbon steel prices have benefited from tight supply conditions and solid underlying demand. Aluminum prices arecontinue to be at recordhistorically elevated levels, drivenlargely primarilydue byto the 50% tariff imposed under Section 232 in June 2025.
Gross profit margin under our LIFO method was 28.1% for the second quarter and 28.6% for the first six months of 2026, compared to 29.7% for the same 2025 periods. Higher carbon steel and aluminum product costs significantly increased our LIFO expense, year-over-year. On a FIFO basis, which excludes the impact of LIFO accounting and is how management evaluates operating performance, gross profit margin improved 10 basis points in the second quarter of 2026 compared to the prior year period despite shipments under the U.S. border wall project reducing gross profit margin by approximately 40 basis points. The contract, however, was accretive to pretax income margin due to our ability to leverage our existing infrastructure, resulting in lower incremental operating costs.
The increases in SG&A expense were primarily due to variable warehousing and delivery costs associated with higher tons sold, increased incentive compensation resulting from higher profitability, inflationary impacts on transportation costs from higher fuel prices and wage and benefit inflation. On a per ton basis, SG&A expense increases were more moderate at 0.9% and 2.3% in the second quarter and first six months of 2026. The U.S. border wall project generated favorable operating leverage due to a below-average SG&A expense per ton profile, contributing approximately 30 basis points to our pretax income margin in the second quarter of 2026.
Driven by higher selling prices, improved operating leverage, and a $0.41 EPS contribution from the U.S. border wall project, earnings per diluted share increased 42.3% for the second quarter of 2026 and 39.6% for the first six months of 2026 compared to 2025.
Gross profit margin under our LIFO method was 29.1% compared to 29.7% in 2025. On a FIFO basis, which excludes the impact of LIFO accounting and is how we evaluate our ongoing operating performance, gross profit margin declined approximately 40 basis points to 30.0%. Despite the lower margin, gross profit per ton increased for most of the products we sold.
SG&A expense per ton increased 3.7%, reflecting higher incentive-based compensation associated with increased profitability, inflationary impacts on compensation and related benefits, and on certain warehousing and delivery costs. However, higher average selling price per ton sold improved operating leverage, resulting in a 150 basis point decline in SG&A margin.
Pretax income increased $87.1 million, or 33.2%, driven by volume growth, improved gross profit per ton, and improved operating leverage. As a result, pretax income margin improved 120 basis points to 8.7%.
Earnings per diluted share were $5.10 compared to $3.74 in 2025, an increase of 36.4%. The increase was primarily driven by higher profitability and, to a lesser extent, a 3% reduction in outstanding shares from continued share repurchase activity.
Operating cash flow in the first six months of 2026 increased $86.9$20.1 million to $151.4$313.6 million, primarilydespite duea significant working capital increase related to improvedstrong profitability.shipment volume and higher metals pricing.
Investments in capital expenditures declined $22.7 million in the first quarter of 2026 compared to 2025.
We did not repurchase any shares in the second quarter of 2026. Returns to stockholders in the first six months of 2026 totaled $300.8$364.6 million, consisting of $234.2 million of share repurchases and $66.6$130.4 million of cash dividends, including a 4.2% increase in our regular quarterly dividend.dividend in the first quarter.
FirstSecond Quarter and Six Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 Compared to FirstSecond Quarter and Six Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 (in millions, except tons in thousands and average selling price per ton sold (“ASP”))
Net Sales
Tons sold and average selling price per ton soldASP exclude our toll processed tons. Our average selling price per ton soldASP includes intercompany transactions that are eliminated from our consolidated net sales.
Net sales increased due to record tons sold, including a 5.2 percentage point contribution from the U.S. border wall project, and higher ASP.
The increases in tons sold reflect improved demand across most of our end markets, as well as market share gains despite ongoing trade policy uncertainty. Underlying demand was notably strong across the broader manufacturing sector, primarily due to growth in the industrial machinery, shipbuilding, military, consumer products and construction machinery sectors. Demand in our largest end market by tons sold, non-residential construction, including infrastructure and data centers, also improved year-over-year.
Net sales increased due to record tons sold and an increase in average selling price per ton sold.
Our increase in tons sold reflects improved demand across most of our end markets, as well as market share gains achieved against a backdrop of ongoing trade policy uncertainty. We believe customers have continued to purchase in smaller quantities more frequently in the current operating environment, and that our diversified business model and high levels of customer service support growth in tons sold, enabling us to outperform the industry-wide decline in shipments.
Since we primarily purchase and sell our inventories in the spot market, our average selling pricesASP generally fluctuatefluctuates with the changes in replacement costs of the various metals we purchase. TheProduct mix of products sold can also have an impact on our averageASP. selling price per ton sold. AsBecause carbon steel sales represent a majority of our gross sales, changes in carbon steel prices have the most significant impact on changes in our average selling price per ton sold.ASP.
Carbon steel prices have benefited from tight supply conditions and solid underlying demand. Aluminum prices arecontinue to be at recordhistorically elevated levels, drivenlargely primarilydue byto the 50% tariff imposed under Section 232 in June 2025.
The following presents the mix of our total sales by major commodityproduct productscategory and year-over-year changes in selling prices are presented belowASP:
We record,record in cost of sales,sales noncash adjustments to our LIFO method inventory valuation reserve that, in effect, reflect cost of sales at current replacement costs. The increaseincreases in LIFO expense waswere due to more significant increases in metal pricing in 2026 compared to 2025. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the inventory balance in our consolidated balance sheet includes a LIFO method inventory valuation reserve of $586.1$698.6 million.
Our FIFO gross profit margins, which exclude the impact of LIFO accounting, were generally consistent year-over-year.
See “Overview” and “Net Sales” above for further discussion of our LIFO and FIFO gross profit marginmargins and discussion of trends in both demand and costs of our products, and product pricing.
The increases in SG&A expense were primarily due to variable warehousing and delivery costs associated with higher tons sold, increased incentive compensation resulting from higher profitability, inflationary impacts on transportation costs from higher fuel prices and wage and benefit inflation. On a per ton basis, SG&A expense increases were more moderate at 0.9% and 2.3% in the second quarter and first six months of 2026, respectively.
SG&A margin improved as higher ASP enhanced operating leverage. Shipments under the U.S. border wall project also generated favorable operating leverage due to a below-average SG&A expense per ton profile, contributing to increases in our operating income margins.
SG&A expense per ton increased 3.7%, reflecting higher incentive-based compensation associated with increased profitability, inflationary impacts on compensation and related benefits, and on certain warehousing and delivery costs. SG&A margin improved as higher average selling price per ton sold improved operating leverage.
Operating income increased as record tons sold and higher ASP more than offset increases in LIFO and SG&A expenses.
Improved operating leverage increased operating margin, including a benefit of approximately 30 basis points and 20 basis points from shipments under the U.S. border wall project in the second quarter and first six months of 2026, respectively.
Operating income increased due to record tons sold and a higher average selling price per ton sold that offset a moderate decline in gross profit margin. Operating margin increased 120 basis points from improved operating leverage of our operating expenses.
Our effective income tax rates for the firstsecond quarters ofand six months ended June 30, 2026 were 24.7% and 24.4%, respectively, compared to 23.0% and 23.3% for the respective 2025 were 24.0% and 23.6%, respectively.periods. The differences between our effective income tax rates and the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21.0% were mainly due to state income taxes partially offset by the net effects of company-owned life insurance policies.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $249.7$235.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, and our net debt-to-total capital ratio was 16.9%,16.2%, compared to 14.4% at December 31, 2025, reflecting increased borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
Net cash provided by operating activities in the first six months of 2026 increased $86.9$20.1 million year-over-year to $151.4$313.6 million, primarily due to improveda profitability.significant increase in profitability, which was largely offset by higher working capital requirements associated with stronger shipment volumes and higher metals pricing.
Net cash used in investing activities ofwas $70.0$146.8 million in the first quartersix months of 20262026, decreaseda $17.6decrease of $12.0 million comparedfrom to $87.6$158.8 million in 2025. OurThe investmentdecrease was primarily attributable to a $16.9 million reduction in capital expendituresexpenditures. declined $22.7 million in the first quarter of 2026 compared to 2025. The majority of our capitalCapital expenditures in theboth firstperiods quarterincluded ofsignificant 2026investments and 2025 were related toin growth initiatives.
Net cash used in financing activities ofwas $46.6$146.2 million in the first quartersix months of 20262026, increaseda $28.0decrease of $75.8 million from $18.6$222.0 million in 2025. The increasedecrease wasprimarily mainlyresulted thefrom result$98.9 ofmillion reducedlower share repurchases, partially offset by a $39.0 million decrease in net debt borrowings under our revolving credit facilityfacility. of $57.7 million, partially offset by a $19.0 million decrease in share repurchases. Our returnsReturns to stockholders also includedreflected a 4.2% increase in our quarterly dividend raterate, effective in the first quarter of 2026;2026. however, totalTotal dividend payments ofwere $66.6$130.4 million in the first quartersix months of 20262026, wereup consistentslightly withfrom 2025,the asfirst oursix months of 2025 due to the offsetting impact of share repurchase activity reduced outstanding shares by 3.0% year-over-year.activity.
Income taxes paid were $142.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to $71.0 million in 2025. The increase was mainly due to higher estimated tax payments as a result of increased pretax income.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $400.0 million outstanding under our Term Loan that matures prior to the September 10, 2029 maturity of our $1.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility.
We believe we will continue to have sufficient liquidity to fund future operating needs and repay debt obligations as they become due. In addition to funds generated from operations and $950.0$980.0 million of remaining borrowing capacity under our unsecured revolving credit facility, we expect to be able to access the capital markets to raise funds, if desired. We believe our investment grade credit ratings enhance our ability to effectively raise capital. We believeexpect our sources of liquidity will continue to beremain adequate to maintain operations, make necessary capital expenditures, finance strategic growth through acquisitions and internal initiatives, and fund our stockholder return activities.
We were in compliance with the financial maintenance covenant under our Credit Agreement and Term Loan as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
On AprilJuly 17, 2026, our Board of Directors declared the 2026 secondthird quarter cash dividend of $1.25 per share.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $529.3 million of remaining authorization under our $1.5 billion share repurchase program that was most recently amended by our Board of Directors on October 22, 2024. The program does not require the repurchase of any specific number of shares in any prescribed period, does not have a specific expiration date and may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
Decisions regarding the timing and amount of share repurchases are made within the context of our overall capital allocation priorities, including funding operating needs, planned capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions, maintaining targetedfinancial leverage metricsflexibility and returning capital to stockholders. The execution of repurchases may be affected by market conditions, business performance, liquidity considerations and other factors.
During the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, there were no material changes to our critical accounting estimates as compared to the critical accounting estimates disclosed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
RS insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 4 filings (3 insiders, 4 trade dates, 9,595 shares, about $3.7M). Net open-market shares: -9,595 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$3.7M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-26 | Colonias Karen Winifred |
Open-market sale | 1,542 | $390.13 | $601.6K |
| 2026-07-31 | Ajemyan Arthur |
Open-market sale | 2,200 | $410.11 | $902.2K |
| 2026-07-28 | Smith William A Ii |
Open-market sale | 962 | $413.90 | $398.2K |
| 2026-07-28 | Smith William A Ii |
Open-market sale | 1,391 | $414.42 | $576.5K |
| 2026-05-20 | Sznewajs John G |
Grant/award | 469 | — | — |
| 2026-05-20 | Stotlar Douglas |
Grant/award | 469 | — | — |
| 2026-05-20 | Seeger David W |
Grant/award | 469 | — | — |
| 2026-05-20 | Mcevoy Robert Ambrose |
Grant/award | 469 | — | — |
| 2026-05-20 | Kamsickas James Kevin |
Grant/award | 469 | — | — |
| 2026-05-20 | Dellaquila Frank J |
Grant/award | 469 | — | — |
| 2026-05-20 | Colonias Karen Winifred |
Grant/award | 469 | — | — |
| 2026-05-20 | Baldwin Lisa |
Grant/award | 469 | — | — |
| 2026-04-27 | Ajemyan Arthur |
Open-market sale | 1,604 | $358.64 | $575.3K |
| 2026-04-27 | Ajemyan Arthur |
Open-market sale | 74 | $359.18 | $26.6K |
| 2026-04-27 | Ajemyan Arthur |
Open-market sale | 1,822 | $357.61 | $651.6K |
Well-known investors holding RS (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yacktman Asset Management | 2026-06-30 | 698,566 | $261.0M | 3.23% | Added 1% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 335,144 | $125.2M | 0.09% | Added 327% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 275,606 | $103.0M | 0.06% | Added 568% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 103,354 | $38.6M | 0.01% | No change |
| Gotham Asset Management (Joel Greenblatt) | 2026-06-30 | 87,467 | $32.7M | 0.08% | Added 3% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 66,252 | $24.8M | 0.03% | New position |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 14,714 | $5.5M | 0.0% | Added 1380% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 3,708 | $1.4M | 0.0% | Reduced 32% |
| First Eagle Investment Management | 2026-06-30 | 1,458 | $544.7K | 0.0% | Added 36% |