RYES 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Rise Gold Corp. · OTC · Metal Mining · CIK 1424864 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
Largest changes
We believe that mining operations on the I-M Mine Property are a vested use, protected under the California and federal Constitutions, and that a use permit is not required for mining operations to continue. The Company owns the I-M Mine Property, consisting ofsee in full comparison175109 acres of surface land and a 2,560 acre mineral estate, located in the County. Before the I-M Mine Property was consolidated into its current configuration in 1941, it existed as multiple historical mines and operations. The Company also has the option of repurchasing the 66 acres of land sold in November 2024 and May 2025, should the Company get all the approvals needed to perform mining operations.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (6)
In addition, the Company may incur significant legal costs going forward should it decide to litigate in pursuit of protecting its property rights under both California state and USU.S. federal laws, including asserting its 5th Amendment rights under the USU.S. Constitution and other due process rights under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, amongst other legal remedies that are available to the Company.
$3,260,358 for the year ended July 31, 2025
$1,603,878 for the year ended July 31, 2021
We believe that mining operations on the I-M Mine Property are a vested use, protected under the California and federal Constitutions, and that a use permit is not required for mining operations to continue. The Company owns the I-M Mine Property, consisting of 175109 acres of surface land and a 2,560 acre mineral estate, located in the County. Before the I-M Mine Property was consolidated into its current configuration in 1941, it existed as multiple historical mines and operations. The Company also has the option of repurchasing the 66 acres of land sold in November 2024 and May 2025, should the Company get all the approvals needed to perform mining operations.
In this situation, the lead agency for the purposes of CEQA would be the County. Other public agencies in charge of administering specific legislation will also need to approve aspects of the Project, such as the CDFW (the California Endangered Species Act), the Air Pollution Control District (Authority to Construct and Permit to Operate), and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (authorized to state governments by the USU.S. Environmental Protection Agency) and Report of Waste Discharge). However, CEQA's Guidelines provide that if more than one agency must act on a project, the agency that acts first is generally considered the lead agency under CEQA. All other agencies are considered "responsible agencies." Responsible agencies do need to consider the environmental document approved by the lead agency, but they will usually accept the lead agency's document and use it as the basis for issuing their own permits. There is no assurance that other agencies will not require additional assessments in their decision-making process. If such assessments are required, additional time and costs will delay the execution of, and may even require us to re-evaluate the feasibility of, our business plan.
Our share price on the CSE and the OTCQXOTCQB has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. Stock markets in general have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, and the market prices of securities have been highly volatile. These fluctuations are often unrelated to operating performance and may adversely affect the market price of the Shares. As a result, you may be unable to sell any Shares you acquire at a desired price.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
The Company expects to operate at a loss for at least the next 12 months. On October 24, 2025, the Company raised $7,000,000 through issuance of securities. Based on working capital at year end, and subsequent equity financing of $7,000,000, management estimates that it does have sufficient funds to continue as a going concern. It has no agreements for additional financing and cannot provide any assurance that additional funding will be available to finance its operations on acceptable terms in order to enable it to carry out its businesssee in full comparisonplan.plan long term. There are no assurances that the Company will be able to complete further sales of its common stock or any other form of additional financing.If the Company is unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue its plan of operations, then it will not be able to carry out any exploration work on the I-M Mine Property or the other properties in which it owns an interest and its business may fail. As such, these material uncertainties cast a substantial doubt regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
“During the year ended July 31, 2025, the Company received cash of $2,990,936 (2024 - $ 1,898,596) from financing activities related to the private placements. Proceeds received from loans during the year ended July 31, 2025 were $500,000 (2024 - $Nil). The cash paid by the Company to settle the outstanding loans during the year ended July 31, 2025 was $2,394,570 (2024 - $200,000). Net cash flow received from financing activities was $1,096,366 during the year ended July 31, 2025 (2024 - $1,698,596).”see in full comparison
“Significant non-operating items include write down of the value of the drilling equipment (loss of $411,530; 2024 - $Nil); note receivable sold at a discount to generate cash (loss of $155,727; 2024 - $Nil); accounting loss recognized with the repayment of the loans in May 2025 on the value of the warrants recorded as loan issuance costs (loss of $312,939; 2024 - $Nil).”see in full comparison
During the year ended July 31,see in full comparison2024,2025, the Company used$2,213,199$1,169,386 in net cash on operating activities, compared to$2,476,478$2,213,199 in net cash on operating activities during the prior year. Thedifferencehigherinamount of net cash used in operating activities during the prior year was due mainly tothe difference between the gain of the revaluation adjustment of the derivative liability, share-based compensation for options granted during the period, andhigher professional fees and associated costs related to the Use Permit and Vested Rights petition.
Decrease in consultingsee in full comparisonbut increaseand professional fees to $221,925 and $549,923 respectively (2024 - $310,718 and$1,000,394 respectively (2023 - $565,885 and $757,769,$1,000,394, respectively)due to the shift in strategyas the Companyreviewsincurred fewer advisory fees in 2025 compared to 2024 when the Company reviewed its litigation options relating to its Vested Rights;
As of July 31,see in full comparison2024,2025, the Company had$243,669$2,783,348 in cash,$894,638$2,980,679 in current assets,$5,155,398$4,442,507 in total assets,$2,661,598$1,050,421 in current liabilities and$2,777,728$1,179,422 in total liabilities, working capitaldeficitsurplus of$1,766,960$1,930,258 and an accumulated deficit of$30,234,617.$33,494,975.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (13)
For the notes referenced above, please see our audited financial statements and the notes for the years ended July 31, 2025 and July 31, 2024, included below under Item 8.
Our operating expenses decreased during the year ended July 31, 20242025 compared to the prior year primarily as a result of decreased activities by our Company. These activities include salaries,consulting, filing and regulatory, general and administrative, professional fees, driven by the need for expenses related to Vested Rights and Use Permit application and hearings while lowering consulting costs relating to planning and researching our mineral properties, along with activities relating to raising funds in the recent private placements.
IncreaseDecrease in mineral exploration costs to $808,832$96,520 (20232024 - $772,636$808,832) related to activities surrounding the Vested Rights and Use Permit application and hearings;
DecreaseIncrease in share-based payments to $345,507$697,122 (20232024 - $466,527$345,507) for the grant of options pursuant to our stock option plan to incentivize management and certain consultants;
Decrease in consulting but increaseand professional fees to $221,925 and $549,923 respectively (2024 - $310,718 and $1,000,394 respectively (2023 - $565,885 and $757,769,$1,000,394, respectively) due to the shift in strategy as the Company reviewsincurred fewer advisory fees in 2025 compared to 2024 when the Company reviewed its litigation options relating to its Vested Rights;
Significant non-operating items include write down of the value of the drilling equipment (loss of $411,530; 2024 - $Nil); note receivable sold at a discount to generate cash (loss of $155,727; 2024 - $Nil); accounting loss recognized with the repayment of the loans in May 2025 on the value of the warrants recorded as loan issuance costs (loss of $312,939; 2024 - $Nil).
Increase in other income to $18,365 (2022 - $11,863) as there was more rental income for property use in 2024;
As of July 31, 2024,2025, the Company had $243,669$2,783,348 in cash, $894,638$2,980,679 in current assets, $5,155,398$4,442,507 in total assets, $2,661,598$1,050,421 in current liabilities and $2,777,728$1,179,422 in total liabilities, working capital deficitsurplus of $1,766,960$1,930,258 and an accumulated deficit of $30,234,617.$33,494,975.
During the year ended July 31, 2024,2025, the Company used $2,213,199$1,169,386 in net cash on operating activities, compared to $2,476,478$2,213,199 in net cash on operating activities during the prior year. The differencehigher inamount of net cash used in operating activities during the prior year was due mainly to the difference between the gain of the revaluation adjustment of the derivative liability, share-based compensation for options granted during the period, andhigher professional fees and associated costs related to the Use Permit and Vested Rights petition.
During the year ended July 31, 2024,2025, we usedreceived net cash of $Nil$2,612,699 (20232024 - $Nil) infrom investing activities forof the Company.Company (i.e. sale of parcels of land).
During the year ended July 31, 2025, the Company received cash of $2,990,936 (2024 - $ 1,898,596) from financing activities related to the private placements. Proceeds received from loans during the year ended July 31, 2025 were $500,000 (2024 - $Nil). The cash paid by the Company to settle the outstanding loans during the year ended July 31, 2025 was $2,394,570 (2024 - $200,000). Net cash flow received from financing activities was $1,096,366 during the year ended July 31, 2025 (2024 - $1,698,596).
During the year ended July 31, 2024, the Company received cash from financing activities of $1,698,598 (2023 - $2,762,832) related to the private placements during the year ended July 31, 2024.
The Company expects to operate at a loss for at least the next 12 months. On October 24, 2025, the Company raised $7,000,000 through issuance of securities. Based on working capital at year end, and subsequent equity financing of $7,000,000, management estimates that it does have sufficient funds to continue as a going concern. It has no agreements for additional financing and cannot provide any assurance that additional funding will be available to finance its operations on acceptable terms in order to enable it to carry out its business plan.plan long term. There are no assurances that the Company will be able to complete further sales of its common stock or any other form of additional financing. If the Company is unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue its plan of operations, then it will not be able to carry out any exploration work on the I-M Mine Property or the other properties in which it owns an interest and its business may fail. As such, these material uncertainties cast a substantial doubt regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Largest changes
“Rise has been compelled to take court action to assert its rights to re-open the I-M Mine. On May 7, 2026, the Court has denied the Company's Writ of Mandamus asking the Court to compel the Board to follow applicable law and grant Rise recognition of its vested right to operate the I-M Mine. The Company plans to appeal the Court's ruling in Superior Court in California. Should the Company's Writ fail on appeal, Rise's mineral estate will lose all value, which will allow Rise to bring a takings action against the County under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. …”see in full comparison
“Rise has been compelled to take court action to assert its rights to re-open the I-M Mine. There can be no guarantee that the Company's legal actions will be successful.”see in full comparison
see in full comparison$2,583,608$3,198,410 for thesix-monthnine-month period endedJanuaryApril31,30, 2026
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (3)
$2,583,608$3,198,410 for the six-monthnine-month period ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026
Rise has been compelled to take court action to assert its rights to re-open the I-M Mine. On May 7, 2026, the Court has denied the Company's Writ of Mandamus asking the Court to compel the Board to follow applicable law and grant Rise recognition of its vested right to operate the I-M Mine. The Company plans to appeal the Court's ruling in Superior Court in California. Should the Company's Writ fail on appeal, Rise's mineral estate will lose all value, which will allow Rise to bring a takings action against the County under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The remedy for an unconstitutional taking is the payment of just compensation, which is the fair market value of the property taken. Based on comparable mines and historic yield at the Idaho-Maryland Mine, Rise's mineral estate is conservatively estimated to be worth at least $400 million. There can be no guarantee that the Company's legal actions will be successful.
Rise has been compelled to take court action to assert its rights to re-open the I-M Mine. There can be no guarantee that the Company's legal actions will be successful.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
“In September 2024, the Company received a notice from the Community Environmental Advocates Foundation ("CEA") of intent to file a citizen suit against the Company for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act. The Company was not served with a summons and complaint filed in the citizen suit, and the Company was dismissed. The citizen suit proceeds, however, against Rise Grass Valley Inc, the subsidiary of the Company. On May 18, 2026, the District Court for the Eastern District of California entered an Order granting Summary Judgment as to liability against Rise Grass Valley, Inc. …”see in full comparison
“The non cash share based compensation is higher during the nine month period ended April 30, 2026 because more stock options, RSUs, and DSUs grants were issued than during previous period. Other non-cash expenses include impairment of deferred financing assets recognized in connection with the repayment and cancellation of the line of credit facility in Q2 2026, a loss on early settlement of o note receivable in Q2 2025, and impairment of asset held for sale (drilling equipment) recognized in Q3 2025.”see in full comparison
see in full comparisonThe non cash share based compensation is higher during the six-month period ended January 31, 2026 ("H1 2026") because more stock options, RSUs, and DSUs grants were issued during H1 2026 compared to the six-month period ended January 31, 2025 ("H1 2025").With a larger budget available inH1the nine months ended April 30, 2026, professional fees were higher mainly because of legal fees incurred in connection with the I-M Mine Property litigationpursuit.pursuit and CEA citizen suit. Consulting fees were higher inH1current2026,period, as they include a departure bonus paid to the previous CEO. Having more cash available inH12026, the Company was able to generate more interest from cash and cash equivalents (interest income is recorded as other income). Interest and accretion expenses were higher inH1previous2025period as the Company had loans andaan outstanding line ofcreditcredit.outstanding.ThereAwerelossnoonsalariesearlypaidsettlementduring the nine months ended April 30, 2025, as the current CEO ofothenoteCompanyreceivableiswastherecognizedsole employee of the Company and began receiving salaries inH1November2025 The Company's operating results for the periods ended January 31, 2026 and 2025 are summarized as follows:2025.
“On May 13, 2024, the Company reported that it had submitted a Writ of Mandamus to the Superior Court of California (the "Court") asking the Court to compel the Board of Supervisors of Nevada County (the "Board of Supervisors") to follow applicable law and grant recognition of the Company's vested right to operate our I-M Mine Property. The Company's position in this matter is that the Board of Supervisors' December 2023 decision to deny the Company's vested rights petition adversely infringed on our fundamental and constitutional property rights. …”see in full comparison
“On May 7, 2026, the Court has denied the Company's Writ of Mandamus asking the Court to compel the Board to follow applicable law and grant Rise recognition of its vested right to operate the I-M Mine. The Company plans to appeal the Court's ruling in Superior Court in California. Should the Company's Writ fail on appeal, Rise's mineral estate will lose all value, which will allow Rise to bring a takings action against the County under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. …”see in full comparison
The Company received net cash ofsee in full comparison$6,992,641$6,976,922induringH1the nine months period ended April 30, 2026 from financing activities related to a $7,000,000 private placement secured in October 2025. Stock options and warrant exercises added$165,000$663,614, respectively $48,822 totreasury in H1 2026.treasury. In December 2025, the Company paid $228,098 to close a line of credit facility. DuringH1the nine-month period ended April 30, 2025, the Companyhadreceived $1,636,006 from anetprivatenegativeplacementcashfinancing,usedhadfrom financing of $359,873 (a $500,000 cash intake from a loan and cash outflow of $816,951 related to repayments ofloansoutstanding($816,951) and line of credit facility ($42,932).loans.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (14)
On May 7, 2026, the Court has denied the Company's Writ of Mandamus asking the Court to compel the Board to follow applicable law and grant Rise recognition of its vested right to operate the I-M Mine. The Company plans to appeal the Court's ruling in Superior Court in California. Should the Company's Writ fail on appeal, Rise's mineral estate will lose all value, which will allow Rise to bring a takings action against the County under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The remedy for an unconstitutional taking is the payment of just compensation, which is the fair market value of the property taken. Based on comparable mines and historic yield at the Idaho-Maryland Mine, Rise's mineral estate is conservatively estimated to be worth at least $400 million.
In September 2024, the Company received a notice from the Community Environmental Advocates Foundation ("CEA") of intent to file a citizen suit against the Company for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act. The Company was not served with a summons and complaint filed in the citizen suit, and the Company was dismissed. The citizen suit proceeds, however, against Rise Grass Valley Inc, the subsidiary of the Company. On May 18, 2026, the District Court for the Eastern District of California entered an Order granting Summary Judgment as to liability against Rise Grass Valley, Inc. Trial on remaining issues in the lawsuit is scheduled for July 12, 2027. Litigation is ongoing. Rise Grass Valley Inc denies all allegations made in the citizen suit. Management has determined that no estimate of a loss event can be determined at this time in connection with the notice.
On April 1, 2026, the Company, pursuant to an employment agreement, granted 62,500 RSUs to its CEO. The RSUs were exercised and converted to common stock of the Company.
On March 3, 2026, subsequent to quarter end, the Company entered into a strategic development partnership (the "Agreement") with Morgan Hughes Energy ("Morgan Hughes") to advance the I-M Mine Property as a U.S.-based gold and critical-minerals project. Under the Agreement, Morgan Hughes will work alongside Rise Gold to advance development planning, support capital formation in connection with progressing the project toward operations and position the project within applicable domestic critical-minerals and industrial initiatives.
As at JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026, the Company had a cash and cash equivalents balance of $8,028,205,$7,962,924, compared to a cash balance of $2,783,348 as at July 31, 2025.
On May 13, 2024, the Company reported that it had submitted a Writ of Mandamus to the Superior Court of California (the "Court") asking the Court to compel the Board of Supervisors of Nevada County (the "Board of Supervisors") to follow applicable law and grant recognition of the Company's vested right to operate our I-M Mine Property. The Company's position in this matter is that the Board of Supervisors' December 2023 decision to deny the Company's vested rights petition adversely infringed on our fundamental and constitutional property rights. The Company contends that the Court is compelled to use its independent judgement and consider the administrative record de novo (i.e., "afresh" or "from the beginning") and without deference to the Board of Supervisors arguments or conclusions.
For the Periods Ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025
The non cash share based compensation is higher during the six-month period ended January 31, 2026 ("H1 2026") because more stock options, RSUs, and DSUs grants were issued during H1 2026 compared to the six-month period ended January 31, 2025 ("H1 2025"). With a larger budget available in H1the nine months ended April 30, 2026, professional fees were higher mainly because of legal fees incurred in connection with the I-M Mine Property litigation pursuit.pursuit and CEA citizen suit. Consulting fees were higher in H1current 2026,period, as they include a departure bonus paid to the previous CEO. Having more cash available in H1 2026, the Company was able to generate more interest from cash and cash equivalents (interest income is recorded as other income). Interest and accretion expenses were higher in H1previous 2025period as the Company had loans and aan outstanding line of creditcredit. outstanding.There Awere lossno onsalaries earlypaid settlementduring the nine months ended April 30, 2025, as the current CEO of othe noteCompany receivableis wasthe recognizedsole employee of the Company and began receiving salaries in H1November 2025 The Company's operating results for the periods ended January 31, 2026 and 2025 are summarized as follows:2025.
The non cash share based compensation is higher during the nine month period ended April 30, 2026 because more stock options, RSUs, and DSUs grants were issued than during previous period. Other non-cash expenses include impairment of deferred financing assets recognized in connection with the repayment and cancellation of the line of credit facility in Q2 2026, a loss on early settlement of o note receivable in Q2 2025, and impairment of asset held for sale (drilling equipment) recognized in Q3 2025.
The Company's operating results for the periods ended April 30, 2026 and 2025 are summarized as follows:
As of JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026, the Company had $8,028,205$7,962,924 in cash and cash equivalents, $8,214,818$8,076,262 in current assets, $9,617,736$9,487,539 in total assets, $735,570$670,071 in current liabilities and $NIL in non-current liabilities, a working capital of $7,479,248$7,406,191 and an accumulated deficit of $36,078,583.$36,693,385.
During H1the nine-month period ended April 30, 2026, the Company used $1,684,686$2,281,684 (H1April 30, 2025 - $729,599$849,659) in net cash on operating activities.
The Company had $Nil received from investing activities during H1the nine-month period ended April 30, 2026, (H1April 30, 2025 - $1,589,349$1,614,349 was generated mainly from proceeds from land contracted for sale).
The Company received net cash of $6,992,641$6,976,922 induring H1the nine months period ended April 30, 2026 from financing activities related to a $7,000,000 private placement secured in October 2025. Stock options and warrant exercises added $165,000$663,614, respectively $48,822 to treasury in H1 2026.treasury. In December 2025, the Company paid $228,098 to close a line of credit facility. During H1the nine-month period ended April 30, 2025, the Company hadreceived $1,636,006 from a netprivate negativeplacement cashfinancing, usedhad from financing of $359,873 (a $500,000 cash intake from a loan and cash outflow of $816,951 related to repayments of loansoutstanding ($816,951) and line of credit facility ($42,932).loans.
RYES insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | Watkinson David George |
Grant/award | 62,500 | — | — |
| 2026-04-01 | Watkinson David George |
Grant/award | 62,500 | — | — |
| 2026-04-01 | Watkinson David George |
Grant/award | 62,000 | — | — |
Well-known investors holding RYES (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.