Companies › SCYX

SCYX 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Scynexis Inc. · Nasdaq · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1178253 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Scynexis Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

6 / 9risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
1new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-03-04 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-03-12 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

6new paragraphs
9removed paragraphs
62reworded paragraphs
19,827 → 19,217words in section

New heading “If we fail to comply with the continued minimum closing bid requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market or other requirements for continued listing, our common stock may be delisted and the price of our common stock and our ability to access the capital markets could be negatively impacted.”

Removed heading “We may not be able to realize the benefits we expect under the GSK License Agreement if we are not able to develop ibrexafungerp.”

Removed heading “We were dependent on Merck for the establishment of our intellectual property rights related to ibrexafungerp, and if Merck did not establish our intellectual property rights with sufficient scope to protect ibrexafungerp, we may have limited or no ability to assert intellectual property rights to ibrexafungerp.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: delist
“If we fail to comply with the continued minimum closing bid requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market or other requirements for continued listing, our common stock may be delisted and the price of our common stock and our ability to access the capital markets could be negatively impacted.”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“We were dependent on Merck for the establishment of our intellectual property rights related to ibrexafungerp, and if Merck did not establish our intellectual property rights with sufficient scope to protect ibrexafungerp, we may have limited or no ability to assert intellectual property rights to ibrexafungerp.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: delist
“If the Staff concludes that we will not be able to cure the deficiency, the Staff will provide written notice to us that our common stock will be subject to delisting. At that time, we may appeal the Staff’s delisting determination to a Nasdaq Hearings Panel. However, there can be no assurance that, if we receive a delisting notice and appeal the delisting determination by Nasdaq to the panel, such appeal would be successful. If our common stock is delisted from trading, it could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock.”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“We may not be able to realize the benefits we expect under the GSK License Agreement if we are not able to develop ibrexafungerp.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: recall

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We currently have one product approved which is subject to a product recall, BREXAFEMME, which is approved for the treatment of VVC and for the reduction in the incidence of RVVC, and we cannot guarantee that we will obtain more marketable products. The development and commercialization of a product candidate, including preclinical and clinical testing, manufacturing, quality systems, labeling, approval, record-keeping, selling, promotion, marketing and distribution of products, is subject to extensive regulation by the FDA in the United States and regulatory authorities in other countries, with regulations differing from country to country. We are not permitted to market product candidates in the United States until and unless we receive approval of an NDA or NDA supplement from the FDA. An NDA supplement has not been submitted for ibrexafungerp for the treatment of refractory invasive fungal infections, invasive pulmonary aspergillosis or any other indications. Obtaining approval of an NDA is a lengthy, expensive and uncertain process. An NDA must include extensive preclinical and clinical data and supporting information to establish the product candidate’s safety and effectiveness for each indication. The approval application must also include significant information regarding the chemistry, manufacturing and controls for the product. The product development and regulatory review process typically takes years to complete, involves numerous uncertainties and the potential for concerns to emerge late in the development process, and approval is never guaranteed. Even if a product is approved, the FDA may limit the indications for which the product may be used, require extensive warnings on the product labeling or require costly ongoing requirements for post-marketing clinical studies and surveillance or other risk management measures to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product candidate, including the imposition of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS. Markets outside of the United States also have requirements for approval of drug candidates with which we must comply prior to marketing. Obtaining regulatory approval for marketing of a product candidate in one country does not ensure we will be able to obtain regulatory approval in other countries, but a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country may have a negative effect on the regulatory process in other countries. Also, any regulatory approval of a product candidate, once obtained, may be withdrawn. If ibrexafungerpSCY-247 or any of our other wholly-owned or partnered product candidates do not receive timely regulatory approval, or fail to maintain that regulatory approval, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to become profitable or to continue our operations. Moreover, the submission of our NDA or the receipt of regulatory approval does not assure commercial success of any approved product.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: russia

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Developing pharmaceutical products, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approval, establishing manufacturing capabilities and marketing approved products is expensive. Consequently, a portion of our strategy is to license to third parties rights to develop and commercialize product candidates, including candidates we have discovered other than ibrexafungerp, and if these third parties do not perform under our agreements with them, we will not receive any revenue from these collaborations. For example, we currently have a development license and supply agreement with R-Pharm, pursuant to which we license to R-Pharm rights to develop and commercialize ibrexafungerp in the field of human health in Russia and certain smaller non-core markets, and if ibrexafungerp receives marketing approval, we may enter into additional sales and marketing arrangements with third parties for international sales. If we are unable to enter into any of these arrangements on acceptable terms, or at all, we may be unable to market and sell ibrexafungerpSCY-247 and any future product candidates we may seek to develop in certain markets. We expect to face competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Moreover, collaboration arrangements are complex and time consuming to negotiate, document and implement and they may require substantial resources to maintain. We may not be successful in our efforts to establish and implement collaborations or other alternative arrangements for the development of product candidates. When we partner with a third party for development and commercialization of a product candidate, we can expect to relinquish to the third party some or all of the control over the future success of that product candidate. Our collaboration partner may not devote sufficient resources to the commercialization of product candidates or may otherwise fail in their commercialization. The terms of any collaboration or other arrangement that we establish may not be favorable to us. In addition, any collaboration that we enter into may be unsuccessful in the development and commercialization of product candidates. In some cases, we may be responsible for continuing preclinical and initial clinical development of a partnered product candidate or research program, and the payment we receive from our collaboration partner may be insufficient to cover the cost of this development. If we are unable to reach agreements with suitable collaborators for product candidates, we could face increased costs, we may be forced to limit the number of product candidates we can commercially develop or the territories in which we commercialize them and we might fail to commercialize products or programs for which a suitable collaborator cannot be found. If we fail to achieve successful collaborations, our operating results and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (77)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 1 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Removed

We may not be able to realize the benefits we expect under the GSK License Agreement if we are not able to develop ibrexafungerp.

Removed

Our ability to generate revenues under the GSK License Agreement is dependent upon our ability to further develop ibrexafungerp. The risks described below with respect to ibrexafungerp will continue to be risks for us as they may impede our ability to receive some or all of the development, regulatory, commercial and sales milestones, and royalties, contemplated by the GSK License Agreement, which would materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

Reworded

We have a limited history of profitability, we have only one product approved for commercial sale that is licensed to GSK and is subject to a product recall,GSK, and to date we have generated limited revenue from product sales. As a result, our ability to curtail our losses and sustain profitability is unproven.

Reworded

We do not expect to be profitable in the foreseeable future. We incurred net losses in each year since our inception except for the year ended December 31, 2023 which was primarily due to the $90.0 million upfront payment received under the GSK License Agreement in May 2023. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $376.5$385.1 million. On a prospective basis, our strategic focus, along with the commitment of our financial resources, will be directed towards the development of SCY-247 and ibrexafungerp.SCY-247. We had cash, cash equivalents, and investments of $75.1$56.3 million as of December 31, 2024.2025. We have suffered substantial losses from operations since inception and will require additional financing.

Reworded

the costs associated with completing the ongoing and anticipated clinical studies for ibrexafungerp and SCY-247, which are difficult for us to predict, including the potential costs associated with the anticipated resumption of the Phase 3 MARIO study if the clinical hold is liftedpredict;

Reworded

any delays in regulatory review and approval of ibrexafungerpSCY-247;

Reworded

market acceptance of BREXAFEMME and any future product candidates for which we obtain FDA approval;

Reworded

We will continue to require substantial additional capital, and if we are unable to raise capital when needed we would be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our development program for ibrexafungerpSCY-247 andor ourany plannedother developmentproduct forcandidates SCY-247.we may prioritize.

Reworded

When we are required to secure additional financing, the additional fundraising efforts may divert our management from our day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop ibrexafungerpSCY-247 and any product candidates we may seek to develop. In addition, we cannot guarantee that financing will be available in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital when required or on acceptable terms, we may be required to:

Reworded

We cannot be certain that ibrexafungerpSCY-247 will receive regulatory approval in the additional indications we are pursuing, and without regulatory approval it will not be possible to market ibrexafungerpSCY-247 for these indications. Regulatory approval is a lengthy, expensive and uncertain process and there is no guarantee that ibrexafungerpSCY-247 will be approved by the FDA for the additional indications we are pursuing.

Removed

Our ability to generate additional significant revenue related to sales of ibrexafungerp by GSK, will depend on the successful development and regulatory approval of ibrexafungerp for indications in addition to the treatment of VVC and RVVC.

Reworded

We currently have one product approved which is subject to a product recall, BREXAFEMME, which is approved for the treatment of VVC and for the reduction in the incidence of RVVC, and we cannot guarantee that we will obtain more marketable products. The development and commercialization of a product candidate, including preclinical and clinical testing, manufacturing, quality systems, labeling, approval, record-keeping, selling, promotion, marketing and distribution of products, is subject to extensive regulation by the FDA in the United States and regulatory authorities in other countries, with regulations differing from country to country. We are not permitted to market product candidates in the United States until and unless we receive approval of an NDA or NDA supplement from the FDA. An NDA supplement has not been submitted for ibrexafungerp for the treatment of refractory invasive fungal infections, invasive pulmonary aspergillosis or any other indications. Obtaining approval of an NDA is a lengthy, expensive and uncertain process. An NDA must include extensive preclinical and clinical data and supporting information to establish the product candidate’s safety and effectiveness for each indication. The approval application must also include significant information regarding the chemistry, manufacturing and controls for the product. The product development and regulatory review process typically takes years to complete, involves numerous uncertainties and the potential for concerns to emerge late in the development process, and approval is never guaranteed. Even if a product is approved, the FDA may limit the indications for which the product may be used, require extensive warnings on the product labeling or require costly ongoing requirements for post-marketing clinical studies and surveillance or other risk management measures to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product candidate, including the imposition of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS. Markets outside of the United States also have requirements for approval of drug candidates with which we must comply prior to marketing. Obtaining regulatory approval for marketing of a product candidate in one country does not ensure we will be able to obtain regulatory approval in other countries, but a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country may have a negative effect on the regulatory process in other countries. Also, any regulatory approval of a product candidate, once obtained, may be withdrawn. If ibrexafungerpSCY-247 or any of our other wholly-owned or partnered product candidates do not receive timely regulatory approval, or fail to maintain that regulatory approval, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to become profitable or to continue our operations. Moreover, the submission of our NDA or the receipt of regulatory approval does not assure commercial success of any approved product.

Reworded

Although both the oral and IV formulationsformulation of ibrexafungerpSCY-247 havehas been granted Qualified Infectious Disease ProductQIDP status and Fast Track designation, this does not guarantee that the length of the FDA review process will be significantly shorter than otherwise, or that ibrexafungerpSCY-247 will ultimately be approved by the FDA.

Reworded

We applied to the FDA for, and received, the designation of the oral tabletformulation andof SCY-247 for the IV formulationstreatment of ibrexafungerp for vulvovaginal candidiasis, invasive candidiasis (IC) and for prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosisfungal diseases (IFI) in patients who are at high risk of developing these infections due to being severely immunocompromised as Qualified Infectious Disease Product (QIDP) under the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now Act (GAIN Act). We also applied to the FDA for, and were granted, Fast Track designation for ibrexafungerpthe oral formulation of SCY-247 for these indications. Receipt of QIDP status and Fast Track designation in practice may not result in a faster development process, review or approval compared to drugs considered for approval under conventional FDA procedures and does not assure ultimate approval by the FDA or related GAIN Act exclusivity benefits.

Reworded

Delays in the commencement, enrollment and completion of clinical trials could result in increased costs to us and delay or limit our ability to obtain regulatory approval for ibrexafungerpSCY-247 or any future product candidates.

Reworded

We do not know whether our current clinical trials of ibrexafungerp and SCY-247 will be completed on schedule or at all, or whether any future clinical trials of ibrexafungerpSCY-247 or any future product candidates we may seek to develop will be allowed to commence or, if commenced, will be completed on schedule or at all. The commencement, enrollment and completion of clinical trials can be delayed for a variety of reasons, including:

Reworded

inability to reach agreements on acceptable terms with prospective clinical research organizations,organizations or CROs,(CROs) and trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;

Reworded

safety or efficacy issues or any determination that a clinical trial presents unacceptable health risks. During an extension of our Phase 1 program for the intravenous formulation in healthy volunteers, aimed to expand the safety margin that would allow greater flexibility of dosing options in patients, we observed adverse events secondary to thrombi formation at site of IV infusionrisks; or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial due to unforeseen costs resulting from enrollment delays, requirements to conduct additional trials and studies, increased expenses associated with the services of our CROs and other third parties, or other reasons.

Reworded

If we are required to conduct additional clinical trials or other testing of ibrexafungerpSCY-247 or any future product candidates we may seek to develop, we may be delayed in obtaining, or may not be able to obtain, marketing approval for these product candidates.

Reworded

In addition, if our current or any future partners have rights to and responsibility for development of ibrexafungerpSCY-247 or any future product candidates, they may fail to meet their obligations to develop and commercialize the product candidates, including clinical trials for these product candidates.

Reworded

Changes in regulatory requirements and guidance may occur and we or any of our partners may be required by appropriate regulatory authorities to amend clinical trial protocols to reflect these changes. Amendments may require us or any of our partners to resubmit clinical trial protocols to independent review boards for re-examination, which may impact the costs, timing or successful completion of a clinical trial. If we or any of our partners experience delays in the completion of, or if we or our partners terminate, clinical trials, the commercial prospects for ibrexafungerpSCY-247 and any future product candidates we may seek to develop will be harmed, and our ability to generate revenue from sales of these product candidates will be prevented or delayed. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of a product candidate.

Reworded

Clinical failure can occur at any stage of clinical development. Clinical trials may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we or our partners may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical or preclinical testing. In addition, data obtained from tests are susceptible to varying interpretations, and regulators may not interpret data as favorably as we do, which may delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. Success in preclinical testing and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will generate the same results or otherwise provide adequate data to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of a product candidate. Frequently, product candidates that have shown promising results in early clinical trials have subsequently suffered significant setbacks in later clinical trials. In addition, the design of a clinical trial can determine whether its results will support approval of a product application, or approval of a supplemental application to add a new indication or other changes, and flaws or shortcomings in the design of a clinical trial may not become apparent until the clinical trial is well advanced. We may be unable to design and execute a clinical trial to support regulatory approval, or approval of supplemental applications for new indications or other changes. Further, clinical trials of potential products often reveal that it is not practical or feasible to continue development efforts. If ibrexafungerpSCY-247 or any future product candidates are found to be unsafe or lack efficacy, we or our potential collaborators will not be able to obtain regulatory approval for them and our business would be harmed. For example, if the results of our completed and current Phase 3 clinical trials of ibrexafungerp do not achieve, to the satisfaction of regulators, the primary efficacy endpoints and demonstrate an acceptable level of safety, the prospects for approval of ibrexafungerp would be materially and adversely affected. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry, including those with greater resources and experience than us, have suffered significant setbacks in Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials, even after seeing promising results in earlier clinical trials.

Reworded

In some instances, there can be significant variability in safety and/or efficacy results between different trials of the same product candidate due to numerous factors, including differences in trial protocols and design, differences in size and type of the patient populations, adherence to the dosing regimen and the rate of dropout among clinical trial participants. Further, the patients taking ibrexafungerp often have other significant medical issues, such as organ transplants, cancer or other conditions in which their immune systems are suppressed, which makes it difficult to measure the effect of ibrexafungerp in the presence of these medical issues. We do not know whether any Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3 or other clinical trials we or any partners may conduct will demonstrate consistent and/or adequate efficacy and safety to obtain regulatory approval to market ibrexafungerpSCY-247 and any future product candidates we may seek to develop.

Reworded

We have only submitted one NDA and one efficacy supplemental NDA before, and we may be unable to do so for ibrexafungerpSCY-247 in additional indications or any future product candidate we may seek to develop.

Reworded

The conduct of successful Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials is essential in obtaining regulatory approval, and the submission of a successful NDA is a complicated process. We have limited experience in preparing and submitting regulatory filings, have previously only sponsored four Phase 2 clinical trials and six Phase 3 clinical trials, and we have only submitted one NDA and one NDA Efficacy Supplement. Consequently, we may be unable to successfully and efficiently execute and complete our ongoing and planned clinical trials in a way that is acceptable to the FDA and leads to an approval of additional indications for ibrexafungerpSCY-247 or any future product candidate we may seek to develop. We may require more time and incur greater costs than our competitors and may not succeed in obtaining regulatory approvals of product candidates that we may seek to develop. In addition, failure to commence or complete, or delays in, our planned clinical trials would prevent us from or delay us in commercializing ibrexafungerpSCY-247 or any future product candidate we may develop.

Reworded

If BREXAFEMME, ibrexafungerp for other indicationsSCY-247 or any other future product candidates for which we receive regulatory approval do not achieve broad market acceptance, the revenue that is generated from their sales will be limited.

Reworded

The commercial success of BREXAFEMME, ibrexafungerp for other indicationsSCY-247 or any other product candidates we may seek to develop will depend upon the acceptance of these product candidates among physicians, patients, the medical community and healthcare payors. The degree of market acceptance of product candidates will depend on a number of factors, including:

Reworded

If BREXAFEMME, or ibrexafungerp for other indicationsSCY-247 or any future product candidates we may seek to develop are approved, but do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance by physicians, healthcare payors and patients, sufficient revenue may not be generated from these product candidates, and we may not become or remain profitable. In addition, efforts to educate the medical community and third-party payors on the benefits of our product candidates may require significant resources and may never be successful.

Reworded

A significant use of antifungal drugs consists of treatment due to the presence of symptoms before diagnosis of the invasive fungal infections, and if recently approved diagnostic tools, or additional tools currently under development, for the quick diagnosis of invasive fungal infections are broadly used in the marketplace, the number of treatments using antifungal drugs may decrease significantly, decreasing the potential market for ibrexafungerp.SCY-247.

Reworded

We believe that a large portion of the treatments using antifungal drugs are administered when symptoms of invasive fungal infections are present but a diagnosis of the infection has not yet been made, due to the rapid and potentially fatal progression of invasive fungal infections. Diagnostic tools recently approved by the FDA, or currently under development, for the rapid diagnosis of invasive fungal infections may significantly diminish the need to treat patients in advance of diagnosis of invasive fungal infections, which will reduce the potential market for ibrexafungerp.SCY-247. Moreover, if a rapid and accurate test of the susceptibility of a fungal infection to generically available treatments is developed and widely adopted, the market for ibrexafungerpSCY-247 may suffer.

Reworded

If resistance to ibrexafungerpSCY-247 develops quickly or cross-resistance with echinocandins becomes more common, our business will be harmed.

Reworded

We recognize that, over time, resistance develops against every antibacterial and antifungal drug. One or more strains of fungal pathogens may develop resistance to ibrexafungerpSCY-247 more rapidly than we currently expect, either because our hypothesis of the mechanism of action is incorrect or because a strain of fungi undergoes some unforeseen genetic mutation that permits it to survive. Since we expect lower resistance relative to other antifungal drug classes to be a major factor in the potential commercialization of ibrexafungerp,SCY-247, rapid development of such resistance or development of cross resistance with echinocandins would have a major adverse impact on the acceptability and sales of ibrexafungerp.SCY-247.

Reworded

Our approved productSCY-247 and product candidates may have undesirable side effects that may delay or prevent marketing approval, or, if approval is received, require them to be taken off the market or otherwise limit their sales.

Added

It is impossible to predict when or if SCY-247 or any other product candidate we may seek to develop will prove effective or safe, or whether we will receive marketing approval for SCY-247 and any other products we may seek to develop. Serious adverse events (SAEs) are common when conducting clinical trials in a seriously ill population such as patients experiencing IC.

Removed

It is impossible to predict when or if ibrexafungerp for indications other than VVC, RVVC or any other product candidate we may seek to develop will prove effective or safe, or whether we or GSK will receive marketing approval for ibrexafungerp for the treatment of indications other than VVC, RVVC, or whether we will receive marketing approval for any other products we may seek to develop. Unforeseen side effects from any product candidates could arise either during clinical development or, if approved, after the product has been marketed. The most commonly reported adverse events after oral administration of ibrexafungerp have been gastrointestinal (GI) events (i.e., nausea, diarrhea, vomiting). The gastrointestinal events reported have typically been transient (i.e., short duration), mild or moderate and not leading to discontinuation. The most commonly reported adverse events after IV administration of ibrexafungerp have been local reactions at the site of infusion. During our Phase 1 IV program in healthy volunteers, aimed to expand the safety margin that would allow greater flexibility of dosing options in patients, we observed three mild-to-moderate thrombotic events in healthy volunteers receiving the IV formulation of ibrexafungerp at the highest doses and highest concentrations. These events were reported to FDA as 15-day alert reports because they were unexpected and required anticoagulant therapy. The potential contribution of the IV formulation of ibrexafungerp to these events cannot be ruled out even though rates of thrombotic events due to intravenous catheters reported in the literature are comparable to those observed in the Phase 1 study.

Removed

Serious adverse events (SAEs) are common when conducting clinical trials in a seriously ill population such as patients experiencing invasive candidiasis. Several SAEs have been reported in our clinical trials but only four of the events have been deemed by the investigator to be potentially related to ibrexafungerp, although other contributing factors could not be ruled out. These four serious adverse events include: one event of elevation of liver function tests in a subject who received a single dose of oral ibrexafungerp (resolved) and three events secondary to thrombi formation at site of IV infusion with the cyclodextrin-based IV formulation.

Reworded

Preclinical findings in the future could trigger the need to evaluate or monitor for specific potential safety concerns in clinical trials. The results of our clinical trials may show that ibrexafungerpSCY-247 and any future product candidates we may seek to develop cause undesirable or unacceptable side effects, which could interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials, resulting in delay of, or failure to obtain, marketing approval from the FDA and other regulatory authorities, or may lead us to abandon their development altogether.

Reworded

We or others may subsequently identify undesirable or unacceptable side effects caused by BREXAFEMMESCY-247 or any future product candidate we may seek to develop, in which case:

Reworded

we or GSK may be required to change the way the product is administered, conduct additional clinical trials or change the labeling of the product;

Reworded

regulatory authorities may require us or GSK to take our approved product off the market;

Reworded

We expect that BREXAFEMME, ibrexafungerp for the treatment of other indications,SCY-247 and any future product candidates we may seek to develop will face competition, and most of our competitors have significantly greater resources than we do.

Reworded

The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive, with a number of established, large pharmaceutical companies, as well as many smaller companies. There are many foreign and domestic pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, public and private universities, government agencies and research organizations actively engaged in research and development of products that may target the same markets as ibrexafungerpSCY-247 and any future product candidates we may seek to develop. We expect any products we develop to compete on the basis of, among other things, product efficacy, lack of significant adverse side effects and convenience and ease of treatment. For example, BREXAFEMME competes, and ibrexafungerp for other indicationsSCY-247 will compete,compete against current leading antifungal drugs, including voriconazole from the azole class, caspofungin from the echinocandin class, and liposomal amphotericin B from the polyenes class, many of which are currently available in generic form, or expected to be available in generic form at the time IVthe ibrexafungerpintravenous formulation of SCY-247 might be approved.

Reworded

Reimbursement decisions by third-party payors may have an adverse effect on pricing and market acceptance in the United States for BREXAFEMME, ibrexafungerp,SCY-247 and any future product candidates we may seek to develop. If there is not sufficient reimbursement for our products, it is less likely that our products will be purchased by patients and/or providers.

Reworded

We do not know the extent to which BREXAFEMMESCY-247 will be able to obtain favorable coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party payors. If we choose to bring other product candidates to market, they will be subject to similar uncertainty. We believe that ibrexafungerpSCY-247 and any other product candidates that are brought to market are less likely to be purchased by patients and/or providers if they are not adequately reimbursed by third-party payors.

Reworded

In the United States, no uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for drug products exists among third-party payors. As a result, the coverage determination process is often a time-consuming and costly process that will require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to each payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be obtained. Furthermore, the market for our product candidates may depend on access to third-party payors’ drug formularies, or lists of medications for which third-party payors provide coverage and reimbursement. Industry competition to be included in such formularies results in downward pricing pressures on pharmaceutical companies. Third-party payors may refuse to include a particular branded drug in their formularies when a competing generic product is available. The adoption of certain payment methodologies by third-party payors may limit our ability to profit from the sale of ibrexafungerp.SCY-247. For example, under Medicare, hospitals are reimbursed under an inpatient prospective payment system. This pricing methodology provides a single payment amount to hospitals based on a given diagnosis-related group. As a result, with respect to Medicare reimbursement for services in the hospital inpatient setting, hospitals could have a financial incentive to use the least expensive drugs for the treatment of invasive fungal infections, particularly the IVintravenous formulations of these drugs, as they are typically administered in the hospital, which may significantly impact our ability to charge a premium for ibrexafungerp.SCY-247. Coverage policies and third-party reimbursement rates may change at any time. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for BREXAFEMMESCY-247 or other products for which the Companywe receivesreceive regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.

Reworded

Further, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny in the United States of pharmaceutical pricing practices in light of the rising cost of prescription drugs. Such scrutiny has resulted in several recent congressional inquiries, Presidential executive orders, and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for products. Further, the IRA, among other things (i) directs the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,Services (HHS), to negotiate the price of certain high-expenditure, single-source drugs that have been on the market for at least 7 years covered under Medicare, or the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program and (ii) imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. These provisions take effect progressively starting in fiscal year 2023. On August 15, 2024, HHS announced the agreed-upon prices of the first ten drugs that were subject to price negotiations, although the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program is currently subject to legal challenges. On January 17, 2025, HHS selected fifteen additional products covered under Part D for price negotiation in 2025. Each year thereafter more Part B and Part D products will become subject to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Further, on December 7, 2023, an initiative to control the price of prescription drugs through the use of march-in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act was announced. On December 8, 2023, the National Institute of Standards and Technology published for comment a Draft Interagency Guidance Framework for Considering the Exercise of March-In Rights which for the first time includes the price of a product as one factor an agency can use when deciding to exercise march-in rights. While march-in rights have not previously been exercised, it is uncertain if that will continue under the new framework.

Reworded

We expect that a portion of the market for BREXAFEMME, ibrexafungerp for other indications,SCY-247 and any other product candidates we may seek to develop will be outside the United States. However, our product candidates may never receive approval or be commercialized outside of the United States.

Reworded

Before we or any commercial partners (including GSK) can market and commercialize any product candidates outside of the United States, there are numerous and varying regulatory requirements of other countries that will apply. Research and marketing authorization procedures vary among countries and can involve additional product testing and administrative review periods. The marketing authorization process in other countries may include all of the risks detailed above regarding failure to obtain FDA approval in the United States as well as other risks. Regulatory approval in one country does not ensure regulatory approval in another, but a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country, or identification of potential safety concerns in one country, may have a negative effect on the regulatory process in others. Failure to obtain regulatory approval in other countries or any delay or setback in obtaining such approval could have the same adverse effects detailed above regarding FDA approval in the United States. As described above, such effects include the risks that:

Reworded

ibrexafungerpSCY-247 and any future product candidates we may seek to develop may not generate preclinical or clinical data that are deemed sufficient by regulators in a given jurisdiction;

Reworded

ibrexafungerpSCY-247 may not be approved for all indications requested, or any indications at all, in a given jurisdiction which could limit the uses of ibrexafungerpSCY-247 and any future product candidates we may seek to develop and have an adverse effect on product sales and potential royalties; and such approval in a given jurisdiction may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or require costly post-marketing follow-up studies.

Reworded

BREXAFEMME, ibrexafungerp,SCY-247 or any other future product candidates we may seek to develop, may still face future development and regulatory difficulties.

Reworded

For BREXAFEMME, ibrexafungerp,SCY-247 or any other future product candidates we may seek to develop, regulatory authorities may still impose significant restrictions on a product’s indicated uses or marketing or impose ongoing requirements for potentially costly post-approval studies. Given the number of high profile adverse events with certain drug products, regulatory authorities may require, as a condition of approval, costly risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, which may include safety surveillance, restricted distribution and use, patient education, enhanced labeling, expedited reporting of certain adverse events, pre-approval of promotional materials and restrictions on direct-to-consumer advertising. For example, any labeling approved for any of our product candidates may include a restriction on the term of its use, or it may not include one or more intended indications. Furthermore, any new legislation addressing drug safety issues could result in delays or increased costs during the period of product development, clinical trials and regulatory review and approval, as well as increased costs to assure compliance with any new post-approval regulatory requirements. Any of these restrictions or requirements could force us or our potential partners to conduct costly studies.

Reworded

BREXAFEMME, ibrexafungerp,SCY-247 and any other future product candidates we may seek to develop will also be subject to ongoing regulatory requirements for the packaging, storage, advertising, promotion, record-keeping and submission of safety and other post-market information on the drug. In addition, approved products, manufacturers and manufacturers’ facilities are required to comply with extensive FDA requirements, including ensuring that quality control and manufacturing procedures conform to current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP). As such, we and our contract manufacturers, which we will be responsible for overseeing and monitoring for compliance, are subject to continual review and periodic inspections to assess compliance with cGMP. Accordingly, we and others with whom we work must continue to expend time, money and effort in all areas of regulatory compliance, including manufacturing, production and quality control. The FDA may hold us responsible for any deficiencies or noncompliance of our contract manufacturers in relation to ibrexafungerpSCY-247 and any other future product candidates we may seek to develop. Failure to follow cGMP can result in products being deemed adulterated, which carries significant legal implications. We will also be required to engage in pharmacovigilance activities and report certain adverse reactions and production problems, if any, to the FDA and to comply with certain requirements concerning advertising and promotion for products. Promotional communications with respect to prescription drugs are subject to a variety of legal and regulatory restrictions and must be consistent with the information in the product’s approved label. As such, we may not promote products for indications or uses for which they do not have approval. Failure to comply with FDA advertising and promotion standards, which are often subject to interpretation by regulators, may result in a wide range of exposure and liability for us.

Reworded

Regulations, guidelines and recommendations published by various government agencies and organizations may affect the use of ibrexafungerpSCY-247 and any future product candidates we may seek to develop.

Reworded

Government agencies may issue regulations and guidelines directly applicable to us, our partners or our potential future partners and our product candidates. In addition, professional societies, practice management groups, private health/science foundations and organizations involved in various diseases from time to time publish guidelines or recommendations to the healthcare and patient communities. These various sorts of recommendations may relate to such matters as product usage, dosage, and route of administration and use of related or competing therapies. Changes to these recommendations or other guidelines advocating alternative therapies could result in decreased use of ibrexafungerpSCY-247 and any future product candidates we may seek to develop, which may adversely affect our results of operations.

Reworded

Developing pharmaceutical products, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approval, establishing manufacturing capabilities and marketing approved products is expensive. Consequently, a portion of our strategy is to license to third parties rights to develop and commercialize product candidates, including candidates we have discovered other than ibrexafungerp, and if these third parties do not perform under our agreements with them, we will not receive any revenue from these collaborations. For example, we currently have a development license and supply agreement with R-Pharm, pursuant to which we license to R-Pharm rights to develop and commercialize ibrexafungerp in the field of human health in Russia and certain smaller non-core markets, and if ibrexafungerp receives marketing approval, we may enter into additional sales and marketing arrangements with third parties for international sales. If we are unable to enter into any of these arrangements on acceptable terms, or at all, we may be unable to market and sell ibrexafungerpSCY-247 and any future product candidates we may seek to develop in certain markets. We expect to face competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Moreover, collaboration arrangements are complex and time consuming to negotiate, document and implement and they may require substantial resources to maintain. We may not be successful in our efforts to establish and implement collaborations or other alternative arrangements for the development of product candidates. When we partner with a third party for development and commercialization of a product candidate, we can expect to relinquish to the third party some or all of the control over the future success of that product candidate. Our collaboration partner may not devote sufficient resources to the commercialization of product candidates or may otherwise fail in their commercialization. The terms of any collaboration or other arrangement that we establish may not be favorable to us. In addition, any collaboration that we enter into may be unsuccessful in the development and commercialization of product candidates. In some cases, we may be responsible for continuing preclinical and initial clinical development of a partnered product candidate or research program, and the payment we receive from our collaboration partner may be insufficient to cover the cost of this development. If we are unable to reach agreements with suitable collaborators for product candidates, we could face increased costs, we may be forced to limit the number of product candidates we can commercially develop or the territories in which we commercialize them and we might fail to commercialize products or programs for which a suitable collaborator cannot be found. If we fail to achieve successful collaborations, our operating results and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected.

Reworded

As we do not intend to own or operate facilities for manufacturing, storage and distribution of drug substance or drug product we are and will be dependent on third parties for the manufacture of ibrexafungerp.SCY-247. If we experience problems with any of these third parties, the commercial manufacturing of ibrexafungerpSCY-247 could be delayed.

Removed

The inability to manufacture sufficient commercial supplies of ibrexafungerp could adversely affect product commercialization. We do not currently have any agreements with third-party manufacturers for the long-term commercial supply of ibrexafungerp. We may encounter technical difficulties or delays in the transfer of ibrexafungerp manufacturing on a commercial scale to a third-party manufacturer, or may be unable to enter into agreements for commercial supply with third-party manufacturers, or may be unable to do so on acceptable terms.

Reworded

The inability to manufacture sufficient supplies of SCY-247 could adversely affect product development and commercialization. We may not be able to establish additional sources of supply for ibrexafungerpSCY-247 and any future product candidates we may seek to develop. These suppliers are subject to regulatory requirements covering manufacturing, testing, quality control and record keeping relating to product candidates and are also subject to ongoing inspections by the regulatory agencies. Failure by any of our suppliers to comply with applicable regulations may result in long delays and interruptions to our product candidate supply while we seek to secure another supplier that meets all regulatory requirements.

Reworded

Any of these factors could result in delays or higher costs in connection with our clinical trials, regulatory submissions, required approvals or commercialization of ibrexafungerpSCY-247 and any future product candidates we may seek to develop.

Showing the first 60 of 77 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

25new paragraphs
39removed paragraphs
20reworded paragraphs
7,150 → 5,671words in section

New heading “SCY-247 Development Update”

New heading “MARIO Study Update”

New heading “Nasdaq Minimum Bid Price Notification”

Removed heading “GSK License Agreement”

Removed heading “Product Recall and Clinical Hold”

Removed heading “Class Action Lawsuit”

Removed heading “Cost of Product Revenue”

Removed heading “Revenue Recognition”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: litigation, class action, recall
“On November 7, 2023, a securities class action was filed by Brian Feldman against us and certain of our executives in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey, alleging that, during the period from March 31, 2023 to September 22, 2023, we made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about our business, operations, and prospects, alleging specifically that we failed to disclose to investors: …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: lawsuit, class action
“Class Action Lawsuit”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: recall
“Product Recall and Clinical Hold”
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine, labor
“GSK has reiterated its commitment to continued collaboration with us regarding other aspects of the GSK License Agreement, including with respect to the commercialization of BREXAFEMME for VVC and rVVC indications. We completed the transfer of the BREXAFEMME NDA (as defined in the Binding 2025 MOU) to GSK in November 2025. GSK anticipates being able to initiate regulatory interactions with the FDA in 2026 to discuss the relaunch of BREXAFEMME for VVC and rVVC in the U.S. market.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: recall
“Net cash provided by operating activities of $60.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily consisted of the $67.0 million net income adjusted for non-cash charges that included the loss on change in fair value of the warrant liabilities of $3.2 million, stock-based compensation expense of $2.6 million, accretion of investment discount of $1.3 million, the loss on change in fair value of the derivative liability of $0.2 million, and the amortization of debt issuance costs and discount of $3.0 million, plus a net unfavorable change in operating assets and liabilities of $30.6 …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: recall
“The $18.7 million decrease in net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, was primarily due to the $24.8 million we received under the Binding 2025 MOU in the year ended December 31, 2025, offset by the continued development costs associated with SCY-247 and ibrexafungerp, Net cash used in operating activities of $5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, primarily consisted of the $8.6 million net loss adjusted for non-cash charges that included the gain on change in fair value of the warrant liabilities …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (84)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 8 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

SCYNEXIS, Inc. is pioneeringdedicated to advancing innovative medicinessolutions tofor overcomesevere rare diseases, with our lead program in the treatment and preventprevention of difficult-to-treat and drug-resistant fungal infections. We are developing our proprietary antifungal platform “fungerps”, a novel class of antifungal agents called triterpenoids, that are structurally distinct glucan synthase inhibitors and have generally shown in vitro and in vivo activity against a broad range of human fungal pathogens such as Candida and Aspergillus genera, including multidrug-resistant strains, as well as Pneumocystis, Coccidioides, Histoplasma and Blastomyces genera and most common mucorales species.

Reworded

Ibrexafungerp is the first representative of this novel class of antifungals withand additionalwas assetsapproved fromby the “fungerp” family under development, including SCY-247 which is currently in clinical stages of development. In June 2021 and December 2022, we announced that the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvedas BREXAFEMME (ibrexafungerp tablets) for treatment of patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), also known as vaginal yeast infection, and for the reduction in the incidence of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVCrVVC), in 2021 and 2022, respectively. OralIbrexafungerp ibrexafungerpwas islicensed alsoto underGlaxoSmithKline developmentIntellectual forProperty other(No. systemic3) fungalLimited diseases.(GSK) in May 2023.

Added

A second generation fungerp SCY-247 is currently being evaluated in clinical trials and additional compounds from our proprietary fungerp platform, targeted to address significant unmet needs, are in earlier stages of development. The FDA has granted Qualified Infectious Disease Product status and Fast Track designations for the oral formulation of SCY-247 which would provide regulatory exclusivity of at least 10 years, if approved.

Added

SCY-247 Development Update

Added

We continue to progress the development activities for SCY-247 and recently completed the single and multiple ascending dose portions of our ongoing Phase 1 study of oral SCY-247 in 88 healthy subjects. The study evaluated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of orally administered SCY-247 in healthy participants receiving single ascending doses (SAD) ranging from 50mg to 900mg and multiple ascending doses (MAD) ranging from 50mg to 300mg, once a day for 7 days. Each dose level was evaluated in eight participants, with six participants receiving SCY-247 and two receiving a matching placebo. A total of 66 participants received SCY-247 and 22 received placebo in the SAD and MAD cohorts.

Added

SCY-247 was well tolerated across all evaluated SAD and MAD cohorts. No serious or severe treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported. The incidence of TEAEs was low and not dose-dependent, with all events being mild or moderate in severity. One participant discontinued the study due to an adverse event that was deemed not to be related to the study drug.

Added

SCY-247 showed generally dose-proportional pharmacokinetics following single and multiple oral doses. The drug was rapidly absorbed (Tmax ranging from three to seven hours), and systemic exposure (Cmax and AUC) increased proportionally for doses up to 400mg QD and less than proportional for doses higher than 400mg QD. The MAD cohorts of 200mg and 300mg once-daily achieved or exceeded the preliminary target for efficacious exposure, based on preclinical models of invasive candidiasis (IC) available to date, including models with strains such as Candida auris and echinocandin-resistant Candida glabrata that are resistant to current antifungal treatment options. Overall, the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile observed in this study support the continued clinical development of SCY-247. Oral SCY-247 also achieved target exposures for invasive fungal disease at doses lower than first generation fungerps, which may confer distinct tolerability advantages.

Added

We intend to progress the development of SCY-247 towards addressing significant unmet needs in the antifungal space that also represent attractive commercial opportunities. We have initiated a Phase 1 study with the intravenous formulation of SCY-247 in the first quarter of 2026. The clinical proof-of-concept Phase 2 study of SCY-247 is currently planned for 2026 in patients with IC. Subsequent stages of development for SCY-247 are anticipated to include studies adequate to support an IC treatment indication, as well as evaluating SCY-247 for the prevention of invasive fungal diseases in patients at high risk.

Added

MARIO Study Update

Added

As previously disclosed, we and GSK entered into an exclusive license agreement dated March 30, 2023, which was subsequently amended by the binding memorandums of understanding dated December 26, 2023 and October 14, 2025 (collectively, the GSK License Agreement).

Added

Pursuant to the GSK License Agreement, we were responsible for conducting the MARIO study which resumed in April 2025 after the FDA notified us that the clinical hold of ibrexafungerp had been lifted, triggering us to bill a $10.0 million development milestone to GSK in the three months ended June 30, 2025. Subsequently, GSK notified us of their intention to immediately terminate the MARIO study based on GSK's purported rights under the GSK License Agreement. We did not believe that GSK had the right to unilaterally terminate the MARIO study under the GSK License Agreement.

Added

In October 2025, we entered into a binding memorandum of understanding (the Binding 2025 MOU) with GSK and we agreed to promptly wind-down and terminate the MARIO study and we received one-time, non-refundable payments totaling $24.8 million from GSK in November 2025. We will not receive any additional development milestone payments from GSK specifically associated with the MARIO study. Except as described above with respect to the MARIO study, the Binding 2025 MOU does not alter the potential milestones and royalties payable to us under the GSK License Agreement, including with regard to sales of BREXAFEMME for VVC and rVVC.

Added

The Binding 2025 MOU was considered to represent a contract modification pursuant to ASC 606. The Binding 2025 MOU does not include any additional distinct goods and services and the we therefore recognized a cumulative catchup of license agreement revenue of $17.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 for the updated progress of completing the performance obligation associated with the research and development activities for the Phase 3 MARIO Study. The cumulative catchup includes $2.2 million previously recorded as deferred revenue. The one-time, non-refundable payments totaling $24.8 million collected from GSK as part of the Binding 2025 MOU include $10.0 million to satisfy the license agreement receivable previously recognized as of June 30, 2025.

Added

GSK has reiterated its commitment to continued collaboration with us regarding other aspects of the GSK License Agreement, including with respect to the commercialization of BREXAFEMME for VVC and rVVC indications. We completed the transfer of the BREXAFEMME NDA (as defined in the Binding 2025 MOU) to GSK in November 2025. GSK anticipates being able to initiate regulatory interactions with the FDA in 2026 to discuss the relaunch of BREXAFEMME for VVC and rVVC in the U.S. market.

Added

We remain committed to developing novel antifungal solutions to the rising threat of deadly fungal infections including IC for which there are limited treatment options and significant concerns for emergence of resistances, as highlighted by the World Health Organization in their call to industry and other parties for research, development and public health action in this area of unmet need.

Added

Nasdaq Minimum Bid Price Notification

Added

On June 20, 2025, we received a letter from the Listing Qualifications Department staff (the Staff) of the Nasdaq notifying us that, for the last 30 consecutive business days, the closing bid price for our common stock was below the $1.00 per share minimum required for continued listing on the Nasdaq Global Market as set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(a)(1). The letter from Nasdaq had no immediate effect on the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market.

Added

In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), we had 180 calendar days from June 20, 2025, or until December 17, 2025 (the Compliance Date), to regain compliance with the minimum bid price rule. In December 2025, we announced that we had received an additional 180-calendar-day extension from the Nasdaq to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement, as outlined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2).

Added

We now have until June 15, 2026, to meet the requirement for our shares of common stock to maintain a closing bid price of at least $1.00 per share for a minimum of ten consecutive business days. Nasdaq granted the extension after determining that we continue to meet all other continued listing criteria for the Nasdaq Capital Market, including the market value of publicly held shares, and we have provided written notice of our intention to cure the deficiency within the extension period, if necessary, through a reverse stock split.

Removed

SCY-247, a second-generation antifungal compound from this novel class, is in clinical development and we initiated a Phase 1 study for SCY-247 in the fourth quarter of 2024.

Removed

The FDA has granted Qualified Infectious Disease Product (QIDP) and Fast Track designations to ibrexafungerp for the indications of VVC (including the prevention of recurrent VVC), invasive candidiasis (IC) (including candidemia), and invasive aspergillosis (IA), and has granted Orphan Drug designations for the IC and IA indications. The European Medicines Agency has granted Orphan Medicinal Product designation to ibrexafungerp for IC. We anticipate that the FDA may grant QIDP and Fast Track designations for the IV and oral formulations of SCY-247. These designations may provide us with additional market exclusivity and expedited regulatory paths.

Removed

GSK License Agreement

Removed

On March 30, 2023, we entered into a license agreement (as amended in December 2023, the GSK License Agreement) with GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property (No. 3) Limited (GSK). Pursuant to the terms of the GSK License Agreement, we granted GSK an exclusive (even as to us and our affiliates), royalty-bearing, sublicensable license for the development, manufacture, and commercialization of ibrexafungerp, including the approved product BREXAFEMME, for all indications, in all countries other than those in the Greater China region and certain other countries already licensed to third parties (the GSK Territory). The parties closed the transactions contemplated by the GSK License Agreement in May 2023 and we received an upfront payment of $90.0 million. In June 2023 and July 2024, we announced the achievement of a $25.0 million and a $10.0 million performance-based development milestone under the GSK License Agreement, respectively.

Removed

On December 26, 2023, we and GSK entered into a binding memorandum of understanding (Binding MOU) for amendment to the GSK License Agreement. The GSK License Agreement was amended in connection with the delay in the commercialization of BREXAFEMME (see "Product Recall and Clinical Hold" section) and further clinical development of ibrexafungerp associated with this event. Under the terms of the updated GSK License Agreement, as amended by the Binding MOU, we are eligible to receive potential:

Removed

regulatory approval milestone payments of up to $49 million (revised from up to $70 million as provided in the GSK License Agreement);

Removed

commercial milestone payments of up to $57.5 million based on first commercial sale in IC (U.S./EU) (revised from up to $115 million as provided in the GSK License Agreement); and and sales milestone payments of up to $179.5 / $169.75 / $145.5 million (depending on the date of GSK’s relaunch of BREXAFEMME in the U.S.) (revised from up to $242.5 million as provided in the GSK License Agreement).

Removed

These milestones are based on annual net sales in the GSK Territory, with a total of $64 / $54.25 / $46.5 million to be paid upon achievement of multiple sales thresholds up through $200 million; a total of $45.5 / $45.5 / $39 million to be paid upon achievement of multiple sales thresholds between $300 million and $500 million; and $35 / $35 / $30 million to be paid at each sales threshold of $750 million and $1 billion.

Removed

We will continue to be responsible for the execution and costs of the ongoing clinical studies of ibrexafungerp, which at this stage is only the Phase 3 MARIO study, but will have the potential to receive up to $72.35 million in development milestones (revised from up to $75.5 million as provided in the GSK License Agreement), which comprise: $25 million already paid; $10 million already paid for the delivery to GSK of the final clinical study reports for the completed FURI, CARES, and NATURE clinical studies; up to $30 million for the achievement of two interim milestones associated with our resumption and continued performance of the MARIO study after the clinical hold is lifted; and $7.35 million for the successful completion of the Phase 3 MARIO study.

Removed

In the case of each of the above milestones, such milestone events are defined in the GSK License Agreement, as amended by the Binding MOU. GSK will also pay royalties based on cumulative annual sales to us in the mid-single digit to mid-teen range. The royalty terms are not amended by the Binding MOU.

Removed

Product Recall and Clinical Hold

Removed

Following a review in 2023 by GSK of the manufacturing process and equipment at the vendor that manufactures the ibrexafungerp drug substance, we became aware that exetimibe, a non-antibacterial beta-lactam drug substance, was manufactured using equipment common to the manufacturing process for ibrexafungerp. Current FDA draft guidance recommends segregating the manufacture of non-antibacterial beta-lactam compounds from other compounds since beta-lactam compounds have the potential to act as sensitizing agents that may trigger hypersensitivity or an allergic reaction in some people. In the absence of the recommended segregation, there is a risk of cross contamination. It is not known whether any ibrexafungerp has been contaminated with a beta-lactam compound and we have not received any reports of adverse events due to the possible beta-lactam cross contamination. Nonetheless, out of an abundance of caution and in line with GSK’s recommendation, we recalled BREXAFEMME® (ibrexafungerp tablets) from the market and placed a temporary hold on clinical studies of ibrexafungerp, including the Phase 3 MARIO study.

Removed

We are in the process of destroying all of the patient-level and clinical drug product returned to date with the assistance of an experienced vendor and we are substantially complete with the product recall. In September 2023, after we announced our voluntary clinical hold, the FDA concurred with our voluntary hold and placed a clinical hold. We are working with the FDA to discuss paths for resolution of this issue. The clinical hold and recall affected the Phase 3 MARIO study. Our clinical stage compound, SCY-247, was not affected by these developments.

Removed

In response to the hold on clinical studies of ibrexafungerp by the FDA due to possible beta-lactam cross contamination, we have entered into certain new manufacturing agreements with third-party contract manufacturers to produce new batches of ibrexafungerp which we believe will allow us to lift the clinical hold and restart the Phase 3 MARIO study. We are working on the resolution of this issue and we anticipate the restart of the Phase 3 MARIO study, after the FDA's lifting of the clinical hold, in the second quarter of 2025.

Removed

SCY-247

Removed

We continue to progress the development activities for SCY-247. SCY-247 is a broad-spectrum antifungal with a potential oral and IV systemic therapeutic option for multiple drug-resistant pathogens. Some of these activities, including assessing the activity of the compound against multi-drug resistant pathogens such as Candida auris and Mucorales, are being supported by NIH grants. We initiated a Phase 1 study for SCY-247 in the fourth quarter of 2024. The Phase 1 study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of single and multiple ascending doses of oral SCY-247 in approximately 100 healthy subjects. The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability, and the secondary endpoint is pharmacokinetics. We expect to release the single ascending and multiple ascending dose data in the third quarter of 2025.

Removed

Loan Agreement

Removed

We, Hercules Capital, Inc. (Hercules Capital) and Silicon Valley Bridge Bank, N.A. (as successor to Silicon Valley Bank) (SVBB) were parties to a Loan and Security Agreement dated as of May 13, 2021 (the Loan Agreement), pursuant to which Hercules Capital, SVBB and each of the other lenders from time-to-time party to the Loan Agreement (collectively, the Lenders) loaned to us $35 million. In connection with the entering into of the GSK License Agreement, we entered into a First Amendment and Consent to Loan and Security Agreement with the Lenders pursuant to which the Lenders consented to us entering into the GSK License Agreement and we agreed to pay to the Lenders an amount equal to the sum of (i) all outstanding principal plus all accrued and unpaid interest with respect to the amounts loaned under the Loan Agreement (approximately $35.4 million), (ii) the prepayment fee payable under Loan Agreement ($262,500), (iii) the final payment payable under Loan Agreement ($1,382,500), and (iv) all other sums, if any, that shall have become due and payable with respect to loan advances under the Loan Agreement. These payments became due upon the earliest of (A) one business day following receipt by us of the $90 million upfront payment payable to us under the GSK License Agreement, (B) June 1, 2023, or (C) the termination of the GSK License Agreement.

Removed

Following the closing of the transactions under the GSK License Agreement, in May 2023, we received the upfront payment pursuant to the terms of the GSK License Agreement, which triggered the obligation of us to repay the amounts due under the terms of the First Amendment. In connection with the repayment of those amounts due, in May 2023, we and the Lenders executed a payoff letter confirming the amounts due under the First Amendment, and our confirmation that the Loan Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment, was terminated.

Removed

Class Action Lawsuit

Removed

On November 7, 2023, a securities class action was filed by Brian Feldman against us and certain of our executives in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey, alleging that, during the period from March 31, 2023 to September 22, 2023, we made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about our business, operations, and prospects, alleging specifically that we failed to disclose to investors: (1) that the equipment used to manufacture ibrexafungerp was also used to manufacture a non-antibacterial beta-lactam drug substance, presenting a risk of cross-contamination; (2) that we did not have effective internal controls and procedures, as well as adequate internal oversight policies to ensure that its vendor complied with current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP); (3) that, due to the substantial risk of cross-contamination, we were reasonably likely to recall its ibrexafungerp tablets and halt its clinical studies; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, our statements about our business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, interest, fees and costs on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased and/or acquired shares of our common stock between March 31, 2023 to September 22, 2023. We have filed a motion to dismiss. On May 1, 2024, and again on June 4, 2024, purported shareholder derivative complaints were filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey. The complaints name our directors and certain of our officers and assert state and federal claims based on the same alleged misstatements as the securities class action complaint. These cases were consolidated and are currently stayed. We disagree with the allegations and we intend to defend these litigations vigorously.

Removed

Liquidity

Removed

We have operated as a public entity since we completed our initial public offering in May 2014, which we refer to as our IPO. We also completed a follow-on public offering of our common stock in April 2015 and public offerings of our common stock and warrants in June 2016, March 2018, December 2019, December 2020, and April 2022. Our principal source of liquidity is cash, cash equivalents, and investments which totaled $75.1 million as of December 31, 2024.

Removed

As of December 31, 2024, our accumulated deficit was $376.5 million. We expect we will continue to incur significant research and development expense as we continue to execute our research and drug development strategy. We also expect that we will continue to incur significant selling, general and administrative expenses to support our public reporting company operations and ongoing operations. As a result, we will need additional capital to fund our operations, which we may obtain through one or more of equity offerings, debt financings, other non-dilutive third-party funding (e.g., grants), strategic alliances and licensing or collaboration arrangements. We may offer shares of our common stock pursuant to our effective shelf registration statements or our “at-the-market” offering program pursuant to the Sales Agreement.

Added

Revenue consists of license agreement revenue associated with the GSK License Agreement and product revenue, net.

Removed

Revenue consists of license agreement revenue associated with GSK and product sales of BREXAFEMME. Our product revenue, net comprised of sales of BREXAFEMME that we sold as principal given we control BREXAFEMME product until delivery to our wholesalers at which point control is transferred.

Removed

Cost of Product Revenue

Removed

Cost of product revenue consists primarily of inventory impairment expense, distribution, freight expenses, royalties due to Merck, and other manufacturing costs associated with BREXAFEMME.

Reworded

Research and development expense consists of expenses incurred while performing research and development activities to discover, develop, or improve potential product candidates we seek to develop. This includes conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials, manufacturing and other development efforts, and activities related to regulatory filings for product candidates. We recognize research and development expenses as they are incurred. Our research and development expense primarily consists of:

Added

We recognize research and development expenses as they are incurred. Our research and development expense primarily consists of:

Reworded

IbrexafungerpSCY-247 and SCY-247ibrexafungerp as part of the MARIO Phase 3 study were the only key research and development projects during the periods presented. We expect to continue to incur significant research and development expense for the foreseeable future as we continue our effort to develop ibrexafungerp and SCY-247, and to potentially develop our other product candidates, subject to the availability of additional funding.

Reworded

For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2024 and 2023,2024, our income tax expense recognized consists primarily of income tax expense for U.S. federal and state income taxes.

Added

Revenue. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, revenue consists of $20.6 million and $3.7 million primarily associated with the license agreement revenue recognized for the GSK License Agreement, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized a cumulative catchup of license agreement revenue of $17.2 million associated with the Binding 2025 MOU. For the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized $1.4 million in product revenue, net for a change in estimate related to prior period revenue associated with the product recall of BREXAFEMME.

Removed

Revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2024, revenue consists of the $3.7 million in license agreement revenue associated with the GSK License Agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2023, revenue primarily consists of the $130.1 million recognized upon the transfer of the license associated with the GSK License Agreement in May 2023.

Removed

Cost of Product Revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2023, cost of product revenue consists primarily of the $14.5 million in impairment expense recognized in the period in addition to manufacturing, distribution, freight, and royalty costs associated with BREXAFEMME.

Reworded

Research and Development. For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, research and development expenses decreased to $26.4$22.3 million from $30.9$26.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The decrease of $4.5$4.1 million, or 14.6%,15.6%, was primarily driven by a decrease of $7.4$3.8 million in clinicalchemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) expense, a decrease of $1.3$1.0 million in salary expenseexpense, primarilya associated$0.5 withmillion medicaldecrease affairs,in stock-based compensation and a net decrease in other research and development expense of $0.4$0.5 million, offset in part by an increase of $3.9 million in chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) expense, and an increase of $0.7$1.2 million in preclinical expense and a $0.5 million increase in clinical expense.

Added

The $3.8 million decrease in CMC expense is primarily associated with a $3.8 million decrease in expense associated with the manufacturing of drug product for SCY-247 and ibrexafungerp. The decreases of $1.0 million in salary expense and $0.5 million in stock-based compensation expense are due to the decrease in the number of employees in the year ended December 31, 2025. The $1.2 million increase in preclinical expense was primarily associated with certain preclinical costs associated with the continued development of SCY-247 in the current period.

Removed

The $7.4 million decrease in clinical expense was primarily due to a $4.4 million decrease in expense for the Phase 3 MARIO study as a result of the clinical hold on ibrexafungerp, a $1.6 million decrease in the expense associated with the FURI, CARES, and SCYNERGIA studies which were substantially complete by the second quarter of 2024, a $1.0 million decrease in expense associated with a Phase 1 study of oral ibrexafungerp that was substantially completed in the prior period and is intended to support the potential NDA filing for the treatment of IC, and a $1.0 million decrease in expense associated with the Phase 1 lactation study, offset in part by a $0.8 increase in expense recognized in the year ended December 31, 2024 for the Phase 1 study for SCY-247 which was initiated in the fourth quarter of 2024. The $3.9 million increase in CMC expense is primarily associated with a $1.8 million expense for drug product purchased in the year ended December 31, 2024 and a $1.9 million increase in expense associated with the manufacturing of drug product for SCY-247 and ibrexafungerp. The $0.7 million increase in preclinical expense was primarily associated with certain preclinical costs associated with the continued development of SCY-247.

Reworded

Selling, General and Administrative. For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $14.5$14.4 million from $20.9$14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The decrease of $6.5$0.1 million, or 30.9%,0.4%, was primarily driven by a decrease of $5.8$0.6 million in professional feesfees, andoffset ain decreasepart by an increase of $0.9$0.5 million in commercial expense due to the costs incurred in the prior period associated with BREXAFEMME, offset by a net increase of $0.2 million in other selling, general, and administrative expense. The $5.8 million decrease in professional fees was primarily due to a $3.1 million expense incurred during the prior period for business development associated with the GSK License Agreement, a $0.8 million nonrecurring legal expense incurred in the prior period, a $0.7 million decrease in legal costs associated with the GSK License Agreement, and a $0.5 million expense recognized in the prior period to write off a deferred asset for certain commitment fees associated with the Loan Agreement.expense.

Reworded

Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs and Discount. For the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, we recognized $1.7$0.3 million and $3.0$1.7 million in amortization of debt issuance costs and discount, respectively. The decrease of $1.3 million, or 42%, was primarily driven by the recognition, in the prior period, of $1.9 million in amortization for the remaining debt issuance costs and discount associated with the Loan Agreement which was fully paid in May 2023. The debt issuance costs and discount for our March 2019 convertible notesnotes, which were fully paid at maturity in March 2025, primarily consisted of an allocated portion of advisory fees and other issuance costs and the initial fair value of the derivative liability.

Reworded

Interest Income. For the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, we recognized $4.3$2.2 million and $4.0$4.3 million, respectively, in interest income associated with our money market accounts and investments. The increase was primarily due to the interest income being earned on our money market funds and investments for the full period in 2024.

Showing the first 60 of 84 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-10 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-11 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

We could not find a separate Risk Factors item in the latest 10-Q. Some companies leave it out of quarterly reports; see the annual 10-K risk factors and the original filing. Open the filing on SEC.gov.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

38new paragraphs
24removed paragraphs
30reworded paragraphs
5,306 → 4,930words in section

New heading “Recent Business Highlights”

New heading “Acquisition of SCY-770 Program”

New heading “SCY-770 for ADPKD”

New heading “ADPKD Market Opportunity”

New heading “SCY-247 Program”

New heading “Financing Activities”

New heading “Reverse Stock Split and Nasdaq Compliance”

New heading “Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”

Removed heading “Asset Purchase Agreement”

Removed heading “Nasdaq Minimum Bid Price Notification”

Removed heading “Securities Purchase Agreement”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: investigation, fine, labor
“In addition, several companies are advancing product candidates in clinical development for ADPKD. Novartis, following its acquisition of Regulus Therapeutics, is developing farabursen, a kidney-targeted oligonucleotide designed to inhibit microRNA-17; farabursen has completed Phase 1b clinical trial in ADPKD patients and is expected to advance into later-stage clinical development. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: fine
“Pursuant to the registration rights agreement that we entered into with the investors in connection with the March 2026 Private Placement, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-295493) (the Registration Statement), which was declared effective by the SEC on May 8, 2026, covering the resale of the Registrable Securities (as defined in the registration rights agreement). …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: fine
“SCY-247, the second agent in a novel antifungal class, acts through the inhibition of the glucan synthase complex, an established target in antifungal therapeutics. SCY-247 is being developed as oral and intravenous formulations and has demonstrated potent activity against a large collection of medically relevant strains of Candida and Aspergillus genera, including multidrug-resistant strains, as well as Pneumocystis, Coccidioides, Histoplasma and Blastomyces genera. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“Reverse Stock Split and Nasdaq Compliance”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Nasdaq Minimum Bid Price Notification”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (92)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Operating results for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, are not necessarily indicative of results that may occur in future interim periods or future fiscal years. Some of the statements in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management and involve significant elements of subjective judgment and analysis. Words such as “expects,” “will,” “anticipates,” “targets,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “potential,” “should,” “could,” variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results and the timing of events may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2026, and in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These and many other factors could affect our future financial and operating results. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In addition, statements that “we believe” and similar statements reflect our beliefs and opinions on the relevant subject. These statements are based on information available to us as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. While we believe that information provides a reasonable basis for these statements, that information may be limited or incomplete. Our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into or review of, all relevant information. These statements are inherently uncertain and investors are cautioned not to unduly rely on these statements.

Added

SCYNEXIS, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing innovative therapies for severe and difficult-to-treat diseases with significant unmet medical need. Our strategy is centered on advancing differentiated product candidates with novel mechanisms of action that may provide meaningful clinical benefit and commercial opportunity.

Reworded

SCYNEXIS,Our Inc.pipeline is aled clinical-stage biotech company dedicated to advancing innovative solutions for severe rare diseases. We have acquiredby SCY-770, a novel, highly selective,selective direct AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activator,activator being developed for the treatment of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD),. ADPKD is a progressive inherited kidney disorder characterized by thecyst developmentgrowth, and enlargement of fluid-filleddeclining renal cysts, progressive loss of kidney function and an increased risk of end-stage kidney disease. SCY-770 has been grantedreceived Orphan Drug Designation byfrom the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and is designed to addresstarget manymultiple ofbiological thepathways underlyingassociated drivers of ADPKD by reducingwith cyst growthformation and disease progression. SCY-770’s mechanism has the potential to address core drivers of disease biology and therefore may be applicable across a broad segment of the ADPKD patient population. As a result, if successfully developed, SCY-770 could offer a differentiated therapeutic profile with the potential for broader use relative to certain existing treatments.

Reworded

Our proprietary antifungal platformplatform, “fungerpsfungerps,” includes BREXAFEMME® (ibrexafungerp tablets), the first approved representative of this novel antifungal class, which waswe licensed to GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property (No. 3) Limited (GSK) in May 2023, and SCY-247, a next-generation antifungal compound currently in clinical stages of development. Ibrexafungerp was approved by the FDA as BREXAFEMME for the treatment of patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis in 2021 and for the reduction in the incidence of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis in 2022. We ownretain 100% of theworldwide rights to SCY-247,SCY-247 as well asand additional fungerp compounds in preclinical and discovery stage ofdiscovery-stage development. The FDA has granted Qualified Infectious Disease Product status, Fast Track, and Orphan Drug designations for the oral formulation of SCY-247.

Added

We believe our pipeline positions us to participate in multiple areas of significant unmet medical need, including rare kidney disease and invasive fungal infections, where treatment options remain limited and meaningful innovation continues to be needed.

Added

Recent Business Highlights

Added

Acquisition of SCY-770 Program

Removed

Asset Purchase Agreement

Reworded

On March 30, 2026 (the Effective Date),2026, we entered into an asset purchase agreement (the Asset Purchase Agreement) with Poxel SA, a French corporation (Poxel),SA pursuant to which we (i) acquired all of Poxel’s right, title and interest in Poxel’s direct AMP kinaseAMPK activator research and development program assets, including all patents, know-how, regulatory filings, inventory, records, assumed contracts and other assets specifically related to compounds that directly activate AMP kinase,assets, including the compound previously known as PXL-770PXL-770, (collectively,now the Assets); and (ii) assumed liabilities from Poxel relatedreferred to theas Assets arising after the effective date of the Asset Purchase Agreement (the Transaction).SCY-770.

Added

We believe the acquisition of SCY-770 significantly enhances our pipeline by adding a clinical-stage rare disease program with the potential to address a large and underserved patient population. The transaction also aligns with our strategic objective of expanding into high-value rare disease indications supported by differentiated science and potentially efficient development pathways.

Added

Pursuant to the agreement, we made an upfront payment of $8.0 million and may be required to make additional development and commercial milestone payments upon achievement of specified milestones.

Added

SCY-770 for ADPKD

Removed

Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, we are obligated to pay Poxel a one-time upfront payment of $8.0 million within thirty days after the Effective Date of the execution of the Asset Purchase Agreement. We recognized the $8.0 million upfront payment as an acquired in-process research and development (IPR&D) expense in research and development in the three months ended March 31, 2026 and as an Asset Purchase Agreement payable as of March 31, 2026. We paid the $8.0 million upfront payment to Poxel in April 2026. In addition, we are obligated to pay Poxel milestone payments upon the first achievement of certain development and commercial milestone events related to products containing an acquired compound, for up to a total of $8.0 million in aggregate development milestone payments including a $2.0 million development milestone due on the initiation of the first phase 2 clinical trial, and up to $180.0 million in commercial milestones, of which $125.0 million is triggered by annual net sales at or above $1.0 billion.

Removed

SCY-770 for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

Reworded

SCY-770 is an oralorally administered small-molecule therapydirect AMPK activator that has been evaluated in eightmultiple clinical trials to date,studies, including multiple Phase 1 trials and onea Phase 2a study in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).disease. Across thesestudies studies,completed to date, SCY-770 has demonstrated a favorable safetypharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetictolerability profile. The FDA has granted SCY-770 Orphan Drug designation.

Added

We are developing SCY-770 as a potential disease-modifying therapy for ADPKD. We believe SCY-770’s mechanism of action may offer a differentiated therapeutic approach by targeting key biological processes associated with cyst growth, inflammation and metabolic dysregulation implicated in ADPKD progression.

Added

We currently anticipate:

Added

completing a Phase 1 confirmatory study during the third quarter of 2026 which will assess food effect and exposure to support dose selection for a Phase 2 study in patients with ADPKD;

Reworded

We intend to develop SCY-770 as a potential disease-modifying therapy for ADPKD. We anticipate completing a Phase 1 confirmatory study assessing food effect and exposure in the third quarter of 2026 and initiating a Phase 2 proof-of-concept clinical study in ADPKD patients induring the fourth quarter of 2026,2026; withand obtaining an anticipated early efficacy readout induring the second half of 2027.

Added

We believe existing and newly generated preclinical and clinical data may support an efficient development strategy. Subject to discussions with the FDA, we believe there may be potential for a streamlined regulatory pathway utilizing imaging-based surrogate endpoints together with confirmatory clinical benefit measures; however, no agreement with the FDA regarding any such pathway has been reached.

Removed

We believe that prior clinical experience with SCY‑770, together with compelling preclinical pharmacology data demonstrating inhibition of cyst growth and improvements in disease‑relevant biomarkers in established in vitro and in vivo models of ADPKD, may support an efficient development path.

Removed

In addition, we believe the regulatory pathway in ADPKD may be streamlined, with the potential, subject to FDA agreement, for a single pivotal Phase 3 trial that could support Accelerated Approval based on an imaging‑based surrogate endpoint tied to kidney volume (TKV/htTKV), with confirmatory evidence of clinical benefit on kidney function (e.g., eGFR) required for full approval.

Reworded

Our development goal for SCY-770 is to limitdevelop SCY-770 as a therapy capable of slowing disease progression, limiting cyst growth, delay disease progressiongrowth and improveimproving long-term patient quality of life.outcomes.

Added

ADPKD Market Opportunity

Added

ADPKD is among the most common inherited kidney disorders and represents a leading genetic cause of kidney failure. The disease is associated with substantial morbidity, progressive loss of kidney function and significant healthcare burden.

Removed

Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Overview, Treatment Landscape & Market Opportunity ADPKD is among the most common monogenic disorders and a leading genetic cause of kidney failure. ADPKD is caused by mutations of the PKD1 or PKD2 genes, which encode polycystin-1 (PC1) or polycystin-2 (PC2) proteins, respectively, that are important for normal tubular epithelial cell function. In patients with ADPKD, fluid-filled cysts develop and progressively enlarge in the kidneys, and to a lesser extent, in other organs, leading to kidney enlargement and associated clinical manifestations including pain, hypertension, hematuria and progressive decline in renal function.

Reworded

ADPKDWe affectsestimate that approximately 140,000– to 160,000 diagnosed individuals in the United States and is estimated to have abeen diagnosed with ADPKD, with global prevalence ofestimated approximately 4–7 million people, althoughin the conditionmillions. isCurrent believedtreatment tooptions beremain significantlylimited, underdiagnosed.and Moreexisting thantherapies 50%may ofpresent patientstolerability, are reported to progress to end-stage kidney disease by 60 years of age, at which point renal replacement therapy, including dialysismonitoring or kidneyaccess-related transplantation,challenges isfor required.certain patients. We believe thesethere disease characteristics, together with the chronic and progressive nature of ADPKD, underscore ais substantial unmet need and potentially meaningful market opportunity for additional therapies capable of slowing disease progression in ADPKD while offering improved tolerability relative to currently available treatment options.

Added

We believe these dynamics create a substantial opportunity for new therapies capable of slowing disease progression while potentially offering improved tolerability, broader patient applicability and long-term treatment utility.

Removed

In addition, several companies are advancing product candidates in clinical development for ADPKD. Novartis, following its acquisition of Regulus Therapeutics, is developing farabursen, a kidney-targeted oligonucleotide designed to inhibit microRNA-17; farabursen has completed Phase 1b clinical trial in ADPKD patients and is expected to advance into later-stage clinical development. Vertex Pharmaceuticals is developing VX-407, a small molecule corrector currently in Phase 2a clinical development for a genetically defined subset of ADPKD patients with certain PKD1 variants, which Vertex has disclosed may represent approximately 10% of the overall patient population. AbbVie, in collaboration with Calico Life Sciences, is developing ABBV‑CLS‑628, an investigational anti–pregnancy‑associated plasma protein‑A (PAPP‑A) monoclonal antibody; ABBV‑CLS‑628 has completed a Phase 1 study and is currently being evaluated in a Phase 2 clinical trial. XORTX Therapeutics is developing XRx-008, an oxypurinol formulation intended for progressing kidney disease due to ADPKD, which the company has indicated is being positioned for Phase 3 development. While these programs reflect increasing interest in ADPKD, the number of therapies in advanced clinical stages remains limited, and there continues to be a significant unmet need for well‑tolerated treatments applicable to a broad ADPKD patient population.

Reworded

We believe SCY‑770SCY-770 may be differentiated by its direct activation of AMP‑activated protein kinase (AMPK),AMPK, a central regulator of cellular energy homeostasis that has been implicated in multiple pathways relevant to cystADPKD growth and disease progression in ADPKD.pathogenesis. Unlike approaches thattargeting target a singlenarrow genetic subsetsubsets or downstream consequencedisease ofmechanisms, theSCY-770 disease,may SCY‑770’s mechanism hashave the potential tofor address core drivers of disease biology and therefore may be applicableapplicability across a broader segment of the ADPKD patientpopulation, population. As a result, if successfully developed, SCY‑770 could offer a differentiated therapeutic profile with the potential for broader use relative to certain existing or emerging treatments; however,although these potential advantages have not yet been clinically established.

Added

SCY-247 Program

Reworded

SCY-247 is a next-generation antifungal compound being developed in oral and intravenous formulations for the Treatmenttreatment and Preventionprevention of Invasiveinvasive Fungalfungal Infections (IFI)infections.

Added

SCY-247 has demonstrated broad-spectrum antifungal activity in preclinical studies, including activity against multidrug-resistant Candida and Aspergillus strains. We believe SCY-247 possesses several potentially differentiated attributes, including oral bioavailability, potent antifungal activity, tissue penetration and pharmacokinetic characteristics supportive of once-daily dosing.

Added

SCY-247 is currently being evaluated in Phase 1 oral and intravenous formulation studies. The oral formulation studies are now complete, with data from the Phase 1 intravenous formulation study anticipated to be available in the third quarter of 2026. Subject to the results of the Phase 1 oral and intravenous studies and available funding, a clinical Phase 2 study of SCY-247 would be anticipated to be initiated in the first half of 2027 in patients with IC.

Added

The FDA has granted SCY-247 Qualified Infectious Disease Product, Fast Track and Orphan Drug designations.

Added

BREXAFEMME

Added

The transfer of the BREXAFEMME New Drug Application to GSK was completed in November 2025 and GSK will be able to initiate regulatory interactions with the FDA to discuss the relaunch of BREXAFEMME for vulvovaginal candidiasis and refractory vulvovaginal candidiasis in the U.S. market. We potentially stand to receive $146.0 million in annual net sales milestones plus royalties in the low-to-mid-single digits upon the relaunch of BREXAFEMME by GSK that could provide a significant future source of non-dilutive capital.

Added

Financing Activities

Added

In March 2026, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain institutional and accredited investors in a private placement financing transaction.

Added

The financing generated aggregate gross and net proceeds of $40.0 million and $36.9 million, respectively. We believe this financing strengthens our balance sheet and enhances our ability to advance the development of SCY-770 and SCY-247. We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents and investments are sufficient to fund our on-going operations into 2029.

Added

In addition, if the accompanying common warrants issued in the financing are fully exercised for cash, we could receive additional gross proceeds of up to approximately $52.2 million, subject to warrant exercise conditions.

Added

Reverse Stock Split and Nasdaq Compliance

Removed

SCY-247, the second agent in a novel antifungal class, acts through the inhibition of the glucan synthase complex, an established target in antifungal therapeutics. SCY-247 is being developed as oral and intravenous formulations and has demonstrated potent activity against a large collection of medically relevant strains of Candida and Aspergillus genera, including multidrug-resistant strains, as well as Pneumocystis, Coccidioides, Histoplasma and Blastomyces genera. Additionally, SCY-247 has shown in vitro, and in vivo activity against multidrug-resistant organisms such as Candida auris and synergistic/additive activity in combination with amphotericin B against fungi causing mucormycosis. SCY-247 has unique attributes that define its potential to address significant unmet medical needs and provide considerable commercial opportunities, including:

Removed

oral bioavailability, allowing for convenient long-term outpatient use;

Removed

activity against azole-resistant and most echinocandin-resistant Candida strains, including Candida auris and multidrug-resistant strains;

Removed

activity against azole-resistant Aspergillus strains;

Removed

fungicidal (i.e., killing the fungi) capabilities against the Candida genus compared to azoles, which are fungistatic (i.e., only inhibiting the growth of fungi);

Removed

high tissue penetration, allowing high concentrations in the organs commonly affected by fungal infections; and half-life adequate for once a day oral dosing with a low risk of drug-drug interactions.

Removed

We believe that SCY-247, if approved, has the potential to address significant gaps with commercially available therapies in IC (including resistant infections) and the prevention of IFI in patients at high risk.

Removed

SCY-247 is currently in a Phase 1 trial of the intravenous (IV) formulation, with data expected in the third quarter of 2026. SCY-247 has received QIDP, Fast Track and Orphan Drug designation from the FDA. We will continue to pursue non-dilutive funding opportunities to further support its development.

Removed

Nasdaq Minimum Bid Price Notification

Reworded

OnIn June 20, 2025, we received a letternotice from the Listing Qualifications Department staff of the Nasdaq (Nasdaq) notifying us that, for the last 30 consecutive business days,that the closing bid price for our common stock was below the $1.00 per share minimum required for continued listing on the Nasdaq Global Market as set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(a)(1). The letter from Nasdaq had no immediate effect on the listing of our common stock onhad fallen below the minimum bid price requirement for continued listing. Nasdaq Globalsubsequently Market.granted us a compliance period through June 15, 2026 to regain compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). As of May 28, 2026, we had not regained compliance with the minimum bid price requirement.

Added

On May 28, 2026, we filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a Certificate of Amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, to effect a one-for-eight reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock. On the effective date of May 29, 2026, the number of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock was decreased from 79,459,299 (pre-reverse stock split) to 9,932,359 and the par value per common share remained unchanged.

Added

On June 15, 2026, we received a letter from Nasdaq notifying us that Nasdaq has determined that for the last 10 consecutive business days, from June 1, 2026 to June 12, 2026, the closing bid price of our common stock has been at $1.00 per share or greater and that, accordingly, we have regained compliance with Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) and this matter is now closed.

Removed

In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), we had 180 calendar days from June 20, 2025, or until December 17, 2025 (the Compliance Date), to regain compliance with the minimum bid price rule. In December 2025, we announced that we had received an additional 180-calendar-day extension from the Nasdaq to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement, as outlined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2).

Removed

We now have until June 15, 2026, to meet the requirement for our shares of common stock to maintain a closing bid price of at least $1.00 per share for a minimum of ten consecutive business days, subject to Nasdaq's discretion to require up to twenty consecutive business days. Nasdaq granted the extension after determining that we continue to meet all other continued listing criteria for the Nasdaq Capital Market, including the market value of publicly held shares, and we have provided written notice of our intention to cure the deficiency within the extension period, if necessary, through a reverse stock split.

Removed

Securities Purchase Agreement

Removed

In March 2026, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain investors to issue and sell in a private placement (the March 2026 Private Placement) an aggregate of (i) 34,750,000 shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, (ii) pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 8,750,000 shares of our common stock (Pre-Funded Warrants) and (iii) accompanying warrants to purchase up to 43,500,000 shares of our common stock (Common Warrants). Each Pre-Funded Warrant is exercisable for one share of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.0001 per share, and is exercisable immediately and will expire once exercised in full. Each Common Warrant is exercisable for one share of common stock (or Pre-Funded Warrant in lieu thereof) at an exercise price of $1.20 per share, and will be exercisable beginning on the effective date of the stockholder approval relating to the proposed increase of our authorized shares of common stock and will expire on 5:00 p.m. (New York City time) on the earlier of (i) April 1, 2031 or (ii) the 30th day after we publicly release topline data at Week 48 from our Phase 2 proof-of-concept clinical study evaluating SCY-770 in patients with ADPKD. The March 2026 Private Placement closed on April 1, 2026.

Removed

The aggregate gross proceeds to us from the March 2026 Private Placement were $40.0 million, before deducting fees and expenses or any exercise of the Pre-Funded Warrants or Common Warrants. See Note 12 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further information regarding the March 2026 Private Placement.

Removed

Pursuant to the registration rights agreement that we entered into with the investors in connection with the March 2026 Private Placement, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-295493) (the Registration Statement), which was declared effective by the SEC on May 8, 2026, covering the resale of the Registrable Securities (as defined in the registration rights agreement). The Registration Statement covers the shares of common stock underlying the Common Warrants; however, the Common Warrants are not exercisable until the effective date of the stockholder approval relating to the proposed increase in our authorized shares of common stock, as more fully described in the Registration Statement. We have agreed to use reasonable best efforts to keep the Registration Statement effective until the earlier of the date on which all Registrable Securities covered thereby have been sold or may be resold pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act without restriction.

Showing the first 60 of 92 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

SCYX insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-09-18Burke Steven Keith
Director
Grant/award 5,750— —5,750 SEC
2026-06-26Tinmouth Brian Philippe
Director
Grant/award 2,875— —12,125 SEC
2026-06-26Macdonald Guy
Director
Grant/award 2,875— —12,625 SEC
2026-06-26Anido Armando
Director
Grant/award 2,875— —11,750 SEC
2026-06-26Hastings David C
Director
Grant/award 2,875— —11,522 SEC
2026-06-26Hanham Ann
Director
Grant/award 2,875— —11,577 SEC

Well-known investors holding SCYX (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM2026-06-30180,788$735.8K0.0%New position
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM NEW2026-06-30622,161$570.5K—Sold out
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-3076,525$311.5K0.0%New position
Renaissance Technologies COM NEW2026-06-30224,640$206.0K—Sold out
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM NEW2026-06-30130,831$120.0K—Sold out

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when SCYX files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.