Companies › SEVN

SEVN 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Seven Hills Realty Trust · Nasdaq · Real Estate Investment Trusts · CIK 1452477 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Seven Hills Realty Trust's public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

6 / 2risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
1new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-02-18 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-02-18 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

6new paragraphs
2removed paragraphs
27reworded paragraphs
21,306 → 21,934words in section

New heading “We may suffer from difficulty or delays in deploying capital raised from capital market transactions, which may cause our financial performance to decline and adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders and the value of our securities.”

Removed heading “We may incur adverse tax consequences as a result of our acquisition of TRMT.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Reworded topics: default, liquidity, regulation

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

There remains a continued focus from regulators, investors, borrowers, tenants,tenants and their customers, employees, other stakeholders and regulators concerning corporate sustainability,sustainability. specificallyWe relatedare, and expect to ESGcontinue factors.to be, subject to various proposed, new and evolving sustainability laws and requirements adopted by certain states and regulators, including both voluntary and mandatory disclosure requirements that may impact how we conduct business, and we may incur significant costs in compliance with such rules if and when such regulations become effective. Some investors may use theseESG factors to guide their investment strategies and, in some cases, may choose not to invest in usus, and/or potential borrowers may choose not tootherwise do business with us if they believe ourour, RMR’s or Tremont’s policies relating to corporate sustainability are inadequate.not aligned with their own policies. Third party providers of corporate sustainability ratings and reports on companies have increased in number, resulting in varied and in some cases inconsistent standards. In addition, the criteria by which companies’ corporate sustainability practices are assessed are evolving, which could result in greater expectations of us, our borrowers and their tenants and cause us, our borrowers and their tenants to undertake costly initiatives to satisfy such new criteria. Alternatively, ifIf we, our borrowersRMR or their tenantsTremont elect not to or are unable to satisfy such newthe criteria by which companies’ corporate responsibility practices are assessed or do not meet the criteria of a specific third party provider, some investors may conclude that our or theirRMR’s policies with respect to corporate sustainability are inadequate. WePursuant to RMR’s zero emissions goal, RMR has pledged to reduce its Scope 1 and our2 borrowersemissions to net zero by 2050 with a 50% reduction commitment by 2029 from a 2019 baseline. We, RMR and their tenantsTremont may face reputational damage in the event that our or their corporate sustainability procedures or standards do not meet the goals wethat we, RMR or theyTremont have set or the standards set by various constituencies. If we fail to satisfy the expectations of investors or if our borrowers or their tenants fail to satisfy expectations of their customers, employees and other stakeholders or if any goals or initiatives we or they announce are not executed as planned, our and their reputations and financial results could be adversely affected, net operating income from operations of our borrowers’ and their tenants’ businesses may decrease, our borrowers’ ability to repay our loans may be impaired, risks of default and foreclosure may increase and our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and our ability to make or sustain distribution to our shareholders may be materially adversely impacted.
see in full comparison
New text topics: investigation, lawsuit, regulation
“In addition, there are efforts by some stakeholders and governmental authorities to reduce companies’ efforts regarding ESG, including human capital management-related matters, and anti-ESG or anti-diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, sentiment has gained momentum across the United States, with several states and governmental authorities enacting or proposing anti-ESG or anti-DEI policies or legislation and filing suits alleging that ESG or DEI measures or initiatives violate law. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: artificial intelligence, ai, regulation
“RMR uses generative artificial intelligence and/or machine learning technologies, or collectively, AI Technologies, to enhance certain workflows and processes used in its business, and its research into and continued deployment of such capabilities remain ongoing. AI Technologies are evolving, and the introduction and incorporation of AI Technologies may result in unintended consequences or other new or expanded risks and liabilities and RMR may not be able to anticipate, prevent, mitigate or remediate all potential risks and liabilities. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: default, interest rate
“Also, as interest rates increase, the cost of interest rate caps could also increase, which may limit borrowers’ ability to afford the loan or increase the risk of default. Additionally, rising or sustained high interest rates may reduce our ability to make investments, as fixed rate financing may be more attractive to potential borrowers or they may forgo or delay obtaining financing. Our operating results depend in large part on differences between the income from our investments, net of credit losses and financing costs. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: default, interest rate

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

•Changes in interest rates may affect our ability to make investments as well as borrower default rates. In a period of rising or sustained high interest rates, our interest income on our loan investments will increase; however, defaults on our loan investments may also increase. Our loan agreements typically require our borrowers to obtain interest rate caps to mitigate the risk of default caused by rising financing costs; however, there can be no assurance that these interest rate caps will prevent us from experiencing losses nor that such mechanisms will continue to be employed. Also, as interest rates increase, the cost of interest rate caps could also increase, which may limit borrowers’ ability to afford the loan or increase the risk of default. Additionally, rising or sustained high interest rates may reduce our ability to make investments, as fixed rate financing may be more attractive to potential borrowers or they may forgo or delay obtaining financing. Our operating results depend in large part on differences between the income from our investments, net of credit losses and financing costs. Even when our investments and borrowings are match funded, the income from our investments may respond more slowly to interest rate fluctuations than the cost of our borrowings;
see in full comparison
New text
“We may suffer from difficulty or delays in deploying capital raised from capital market transactions, which may cause our financial performance to decline and adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders and the value of our securities.”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (35)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 4 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

•unfavorable market, economic, CRE and capital market conditions have had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on our investment returns, ability to grow our investment portfolio, results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our shareholders;

Reworded

•the CRE loans that we originate or acquire are subject to the ability of the property owner to generate net operating income from the underlying property, as well as the risks of defaults and foreclosure, which may be impacted by current economic conditions, including inflation, uncertainty surrounding interest rates and sustained high interest rates, supply chain challenges, labor availability, and geopolitical instability and economic downturn,tensions, among other factors;

Reworded

•third party expectations relating to ESGsustainability factors may impose additional costs on us and expose us, our borrowers and their tenants to new risks;

Reworded

Unfavorable market, economic, CRE and capital market conditions have had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on our investment returns, ability to grow our investment portfolio, results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.

Reworded

Our business has been and may continue to be adversely affected by market and economic volatility experienced by the U.S. and global economies, the CRE industry and/or the local economies in the markets in which the properties relating to our investments are located. Unfavorable market, economic and CRE industry conditions may be due to, among other things, uncertainty surrounding interest rates or sustained high interest rates and inflation, labor market challenges, supply chain disruptions, volatility in the capital markets, pandemics or other public health safety concerns, geopolitical instability and tensions (such as the war in Ukraine and conflicts in the Middle East), the newcurrent presidential administration, changing tariffs and trade policies and related uncertainty, catastrophic events such as natural disasters, adverse weather and climate conditions, and other conditions beyond our control. Current and future economic conditions in the United States may affect the demand for real estate and real estate financing, real estate values, CRE transaction and leasing activity, rents, capital market stability and liquidity and capital costs. Current economic conditions, including high interest rates, inflation, reduced availability of financing or financing on favorable terms and increased CRE financing costs, have resulted in a reduction in CRE transaction volume and adversely impacted CRE lending, including alternative CRE lenders like us. If these conditions continue or worsen, or if other adverse market conditions arise, CRE transaction activity, capital market stability, financing availability and financing costs for CRE lending may be further negatively impacted. In addition, these conditions may result in a prolonged economic slowdown or recession, which may negatively impact our borrowers’ ability to pay their debt obligations owed to us. Further, these conditions may reduce the value of the properties relating to our investments, which may increase the likelihood that we incur losses if our borrowers default on our loans. If these risks are realized, they may have a material adverse effect on our investment returns, ability to grow our investment portfolio, results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.

Reworded

Additionally, events leading to limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments that affect one industry, such as the financial services industry, or concerns or rumors about any events of these kinds, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems, may spread to other industries, and could negatively affect our business. For example, in response2023, tomultiple theregional banks experienced rapidly declining financial conditioncondition, ofwhich regionalresulted banks Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) and Signature Bank (“Signature”), the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation and the New York State Department of Financial Services closed SVB and Signature on March 10, 2023 and March 12, 2023, respectively, andin the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) wasbeing appointed as receivera forreceiver. SVB and Signature. Although the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC have taken measures to stabilize the financial system, uncertainty and liquidity concerns in the broader financial services industry remain. Additionally, shouldShould there be additional systemic pressure on the financial system and capital markets, there can be no assurances of the response of any government or regulator, and any response may not be as favorable to industry participants as the current measures currentlyin being pursued.place. In addition, highly publicized issues related to the U.S. and global capital markets in the past have led to significant and widespread investor concerns over the integrity of the capital markets. The situation related to SVB, Signature and other regional banks could in the future lead to further rules and regulations for public companies, banks, financial institutions and other participants in the U.S. and global capital markets, and complying with the requirements of any such rules or regulations may be burdensome. Even if not adopted, evaluating and responding to any such proposed rules or regulations could result in increased costs and require significant attention from Tremont.

Reworded

Prior to our making any investment, Tremont conducts diligence that it considers reasonable based upon the facts and circumstances of the investment. When conducting diligence on our behalf, Tremont may be required to evaluate important and complex business, financial, tax, accounting, environmental and legal issues. Outside consultants, legal advisors, accountants and investment banks may be involved in the diligence process to varying degrees depending on the type of potential investment. Selecting and evaluating material due diligence matters is subjective by nature, and there is no guarantee that the criteria utilized or judgment exercised by Tremont will reflect the beliefs, values, internal policies or preferred practices of any particular investor or align with the beliefs or values or preferred practices of other commercial real estateCRE debt investors or with market trends. Tremont’s diligence may also not reveal all of the risks associated with our investments. We evaluate our potential investments based upon criteria Tremont deems appropriate for the relevant investment. Our underwriting assumptions and loss estimates may not prove accurate, and actual results may vary from estimates. Moreover, investment analyses and decisions by Tremont may frequently be required to be undertaken on an expedited basis to take advantage of investment opportunities. In such cases, the information available to Tremont at the time of making an investment decision may be limited. Therefore, we cannot be sure that Tremont will have knowledge of all circumstances that may adversely affect such investment. If we underestimate the risks and potential losses associated with an investment we originate or acquire, we may experience losses from the investment.

Added

We may suffer from difficulty or delays in deploying capital raised from capital market transactions, which may cause our financial performance to decline and adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders and the value of our securities.

Added

We generally expect to substantially deploy any additional capital raised from capital market transactions, including, for example, our transferable rights offering completed in December 2025 through which we issued 7,532,861 new common shares, or the Rights Offering. It is possible, however, that we could suffer from difficulty or delays in deploying capital, particularly if the capital we raise in connection with any capital market transaction outpaces Tremont’s ability to identify new loan investments and/or close on them. Such difficulty or delays, which may be caused by a number of factors, including, for example, changes in market, economic, CRE and/or capital market conditions and competition in the market for the same investment opportunities, may cause our financial performance to decline and adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders and/or the value of their overall returns on investment in our securities.

Reworded

We cannot predict the degree to which economic conditions generally, and the conditions for CRE and CRE debt financing in particular, will improve or decline. Current economic conditions, including inflation, high interest rates, supply chain challenges, labor availability, and geopolitical instability and economictensions, downturn,among other factors, have materially adversely impacted CRE transaction activity and valuations and have caused disruptions in the CRE lending market. If these conditions continue or worsen, or if further declines in the performance of the U.S. or global economies or in real estate debt markets are realized, we may experience a material adverse effect on us and our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Reworded

Changes in interest rates may be sudden and may significantly reduce our revenues or impede our growth. In efforts to combat rising inflation, the Federal Open Market Committee of the U.S. Federal Reserve, or FOMC, raised interest rates eleven times during 2022 and 2023 and then paused rate increases in the fourth quarter of 2023 following the deceleration of inflationary growth. The FOMC cut interest rates three times between Septemberin 2024 and three times between September 2025 and December 2024,2025, and it may seek to further reduce interest rates, increase interest rates or maintain current interest rates. Changes in interest rates may materially and negatively affect us in several ways, including:

Reworded

•Changes in interest rates may affect our ability to make investments as well as borrower default rates. In a period of rising or sustained high interest rates, our interest income on our loan investments will increase; however, defaults on our loan investments may also increase. Our loan agreements typically require our borrowers to obtain interest rate caps to mitigate the risk of default caused by rising financing costs; however, there can be no assurance that these interest rate caps will prevent us from experiencing losses nor that such mechanisms will continue to be employed. Also, as interest rates increase, the cost of interest rate caps could also increase, which may limit borrowers’ ability to afford the loan or increase the risk of default. Additionally, rising or sustained high interest rates may reduce our ability to make investments, as fixed rate financing may be more attractive to potential borrowers or they may forgo or delay obtaining financing. Our operating results depend in large part on differences between the income from our investments, net of credit losses and financing costs. Even when our investments and borrowings are match funded, the income from our investments may respond more slowly to interest rate fluctuations than the cost of our borrowings;

Added

Also, as interest rates increase, the cost of interest rate caps could also increase, which may limit borrowers’ ability to afford the loan or increase the risk of default. Additionally, rising or sustained high interest rates may reduce our ability to make investments, as fixed rate financing may be more attractive to potential borrowers or they may forgo or delay obtaining financing. Our operating results depend in large part on differences between the income from our investments, net of credit losses and financing costs. Even when our investments and borrowings are match funded, the income from our investments may respond more slowly to interest rate fluctuations than the cost of our borrowings;

Reworded

•Amounts outstanding under our Secured Financing Facilities will require interest to be paid by us at floating interest rates. When interest rates increase, our interest costs will increase. In a period of decreasing interest rates, our interest income on our loan investments may decrease. We typically structure our loan investments with benchmark interest rate floors to mitigate this risk; however, there can be no assurance that such floors will be sufficient to prevent material declines in interest income or that we will continue to structure our loan agreements with such floors. Additionally, our Secured Financing Facilities do not have such floors;

Reworded

ThirdSustainability partyinitiatives, requirements and market expectations relating to ESG factors may impose additional costs and expose us to new risks.

Reworded

There remains a continued focus from regulators, investors, borrowers, tenants,tenants and their customers, employees, other stakeholders and regulators concerning corporate sustainability,sustainability. specificallyWe relatedare, and expect to ESGcontinue factors.to be, subject to various proposed, new and evolving sustainability laws and requirements adopted by certain states and regulators, including both voluntary and mandatory disclosure requirements that may impact how we conduct business, and we may incur significant costs in compliance with such rules if and when such regulations become effective. Some investors may use theseESG factors to guide their investment strategies and, in some cases, may choose not to invest in usus, and/or potential borrowers may choose not tootherwise do business with us if they believe ourour, RMR’s or Tremont’s policies relating to corporate sustainability are inadequate.not aligned with their own policies. Third party providers of corporate sustainability ratings and reports on companies have increased in number, resulting in varied and in some cases inconsistent standards. In addition, the criteria by which companies’ corporate sustainability practices are assessed are evolving, which could result in greater expectations of us, our borrowers and their tenants and cause us, our borrowers and their tenants to undertake costly initiatives to satisfy such new criteria. Alternatively, ifIf we, our borrowersRMR or their tenantsTremont elect not to or are unable to satisfy such newthe criteria by which companies’ corporate responsibility practices are assessed or do not meet the criteria of a specific third party provider, some investors may conclude that our or theirRMR’s policies with respect to corporate sustainability are inadequate. WePursuant to RMR’s zero emissions goal, RMR has pledged to reduce its Scope 1 and our2 borrowersemissions to net zero by 2050 with a 50% reduction commitment by 2029 from a 2019 baseline. We, RMR and their tenantsTremont may face reputational damage in the event that our or their corporate sustainability procedures or standards do not meet the goals wethat we, RMR or theyTremont have set or the standards set by various constituencies. If we fail to satisfy the expectations of investors or if our borrowers or their tenants fail to satisfy expectations of their customers, employees and other stakeholders or if any goals or initiatives we or they announce are not executed as planned, our and their reputations and financial results could be adversely affected, net operating income from operations of our borrowers’ and their tenants’ businesses may decrease, our borrowers’ ability to repay our loans may be impaired, risks of default and foreclosure may increase and our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and our ability to make or sustain distribution to our shareholders may be materially adversely impacted.

Added

In addition, there are efforts by some stakeholders and governmental authorities to reduce companies’ efforts regarding ESG, including human capital management-related matters, and anti-ESG or anti-diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, sentiment has gained momentum across the United States, with several states and governmental authorities enacting or proposing anti-ESG or anti-DEI policies or legislation and filing suits alleging that ESG or DEI measures or initiatives violate law. Additionally, in January 2025, President Trump signed a number of executive orders focused on DEI, which indicate continued scrutiny of DEI initiatives and potential related investigations of certain private entities with respect to DEI initiatives, including publicly traded companies. If our, RMR’s and Tremont’s practices and programs are deemed to be in contradiction of such initiatives, we and RMR could be subject to government investigations or lawsuits that could negatively impact us, RMR or Tremont and affect our business, financial condition or reputation. Increasingly, different stakeholder groups and government authorities have divergent views on ESG matters, which increases the risk that any action or lack thereof with respect to ESG matters will be perceived negatively by at least some stakeholders or government authorities and adversely impact our reputation and business. If we, RMR or Tremont fail to comply with ESG and anti-ESG related regulations and to satisfy the expectations of investors and other stakeholders or our, RMR’s or Tremont’s announced goals and other initiatives are not executed as planned, our, RMR’s and Tremont’s reputation could be adversely affected, and our revenues, results of operations and ability to grow our business may be negatively impacted. In addition, we may incur significant costs in attempting to comply with regulatory requirements, ESG and anti-ESG policies or third party expectations or demands.

Reworded

RMR and Tremont rely on information technology and systems in their respective operations, and any material failure, inadequacy, interruption or security breach of that technology or those systems could materially and adversely affectharm us.

Reworded

RMR and Tremont rely on information technology and systems, including the Internet and cloud-based infrastructures,infrastructures and services, commercially available software and their respective internally developed applications, to process, transmit, store and safeguard information and to manage or support a variety of their business processes,processes (including managing our building systems), including financial transactions and maintenance of records, which may include personal identifying information of employees and borrower, guarantor, sponsor and investment data. If we, RMR, Tremont or our or their third party vendors experience material security or other failures, inadequacies or interruptions in our or their information technology systems, we could incur material costs and losses and our operations could be disrupted. RMR takes various actions, and incurs significant costs, to maintain and protect the operation and security of its information technology and systems, including the data maintained in those systems. However, these measures may not prevent the systems’ improper functioning or a compromise in security, such as in the event of a cyberattack or the improper disclosure of personally identifiable information.

Reworded

Security breaches, computer viruses, attacks by hackers, online fraud schemes and similar breaches have created and can create significant system disruptions, shutdowns, fraudulent transfer of assets or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyberattack or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. The cybersecurity risks to us, RMR, Tremont and third party vendors are heightened by, among other things, the evolving nature of the threats faced, advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography and new and increasingly sophisticated methods used to perpetrate illegal or fraudulent activities, including cyberattacks, email or wire fraud and other attacks exploiting security vulnerabilities in RMR’s, Tremont’s or other third parties’ information technology networks and systems or operations. Although muchmost of RMR’s and Tremont’s staff work from RMR’s offices for thea majority of the work week, flexible working arrangements have resulted in increased remote working. This and other possible changing work practices have adversely impacted, and may in the future adversely impact, RMR’s andRMR’s, Tremont’s abilityor other third parties’ abilities to maintain the security, proper function and availability of RMR’stheir and Tremont’srespective information technology and systems since remote working by their employees could strain RMR’stheir and Tremont’srespective technology resources and introduce operational risk, including heightened cybersecurity risk. Remote working environments may be less secure and more susceptible to hacking attacks, including phishing and social engineering attempts that have sought, and may seek, to exploit remote working environments. In addition, RMR’sRMR’s, Tremont’s or Tremont’sother third parties’ data security, data privacy, investor reporting and business continuity processes could be impacted by a third party’s inability to perform in a remote work environment or by the failure of, or attack on, itstheir information systems and technology.

Reworded

In July 2023, the SEC adopted rules requiring publicPublic companies are required to disclose material cybersecurity incidents on Form 8-K and periodic disclosure of a registrant’s cybersecurity risk management, strategy, and governance in Annualannual Reports on Form 10-K.reports. With the SECSEC’s particularlycontinued focusedfocus on cybersecurity, we expect increased scrutiny of our policies and systems designed to manage our cybersecurity risks and our related disclosures. We also expect to face increased costs to comply with these SEC rules, including increased costs for cybersecurity training and management. Many jurisdictions in which we operate have laws and regulations relating to data privacy, cybersecurity and protection of personal information, including, the California Consumer Privacy Act and the New York SHIELD Act. In addition, the SEC has indicated that one of its examination priorities for the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations is to continue to examine cybersecurity procedures and controls, including testing the implementation of these procedures and controls.

Reworded

Any failure by RMR, Tremont or other third party vendors to maintain the security, proper function and availability of their respective information technology and systems or to adequately protect personal data, or any failure by RMR, Tremont or other third party vendors to provide the appropriate regulatory and other notifications in a timely manner could result in financial losses, interrupt our operations, damage our reputation, cause us to be in default of material contracts and subject us to liability claims or regulatory penalties, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business and the market value of our securities.

Added

RMR incorporates artificial intelligence into some of its business workflows and processes, and challenges with properly managing its use could result in reputational harm, competitive harm, legal liability, and increased regulatory costs and could adversely affect our results of operations.

Added

RMR uses generative artificial intelligence and/or machine learning technologies, or collectively, AI Technologies, to enhance certain workflows and processes used in its business, and its research into and continued deployment of such capabilities remain ongoing. AI Technologies are evolving, and the introduction and incorporation of AI Technologies may result in unintended consequences or other new or expanded risks and liabilities and RMR may not be able to anticipate, prevent, mitigate or remediate all potential risks and liabilities. If the content, analyses or recommendations that AI Technologies applications assist in producing are, or are alleged to be, deficient, inaccurate or biased, such as due to limitations in AI Technologies algorithms, insufficient or biased base data or flawed training methodologies, our business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation may be adversely affected. Additionally, AI Technologies are continuously evolving, and RMR may adopt and deploy AI Technologies that could become obsolete earlier than expected, and there can be no assurance that we will realize the desired or anticipated benefits from AI Technologies. Also, our competitors or other third parties may incorporate AI Technologies into their products and services more quickly or more successfully than RMR, which could impair our ability to compete effectively and adversely affect our results of operations. The use of AI Technologies applications to support business processes carries inherent risks related to data privacy and security, such as unintended or inadvertent transmission of proprietary or sensitive information, including personal data. AI Technologies present emerging ethical issues, and RMR may be unsuccessful in identifying and resolving these issues before they arise. If RMR’s use of AI Technologies becomes controversial, it may experience brand or reputational harm, competitive harm, or legal liability. There is uncertainty in the legal and regulatory landscape for AI Technologies, which is not fully developed, and any laws, regulations or industry standards adopted in response to the emergence of AI Technologies may be burdensome, could entail significant costs and may restrict or impede RMR’s ability to successfully develop, adopt and deploy AI Technologies efficiently and effectively.

Reworded

We are subject to conflicts of interest arising out of our relationship with Tremont, RMR, their affiliates and entities to which they provide management services. Tremont is a subsidiary of RMR, which is the majority owned operating subsidiary of RMR Inc. One of our Managing Trustees and Chair of our Board of Trustees, Adam D. Portnoy, is the sole trustee, an officer and the controlling shareholder of ABP Trust, which is the controlling shareholder of RMR Inc., and he is also a director of Tremont, the chair of the board of directors, a managing director and the president and chief executive officer of RMR Inc., and an officer and employee of RMR. He is also a managing director or managing trustee of all the other public companies to which RMR or its subsidiaries provide management services, including us.

Reworded

Matthew P. Jordan, our other Managing Trustee, is a director and the president and chief executive officer of TremontTremont, and an officer of RMR Inc.Inc., and an officer and employee of RMR. Thomas J. Lorenzini, our President and Chief Investment Officer, is an officer of RMR and an officer and employee of Tremont. FernandoMatthew Diaz,C. Brown, our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, is an officer of RMR Inc., an officer and employee of RMR and an officer of Tremont. Messrs. Portnoy, Jordan, Lorenzini and DiazBrown have duties to RMR and to Tremont, as well as to us, and we do not have their undivided attention. They and other RMR personnel may have conflicts in allocating their time and resources between us and RMR and other companies to which RMR or its subsidiaries provide services. Certain of our Independent Trustees also serve as independent directors or independent trustees of other public companies to which RMR or its subsidiaries provide management services.

Reworded

In addition, we may in the future enter into additional transactions with Tremont, RMR, their affiliates or entities managed by them or their subsidiaries. In particular, we may provide financing to entities managed by Tremont, RMR or their subsidiaries, or co-invest with, purchase assets from, sell assets to or arrange financing from any such entities. In addition to his investments in RMR Inc. and RMR, Adam D. Portnoy holds equity investments in other companies to which RMR or its subsidiaries provide management services and some of these companies have significant cross ownership interests, including, for example: as of December 31, 2024,2025, Mr. Portnoy beneficially owned, in aggregate, 13.5%22.5% of our outstanding common shares (including through Tremont and ABP Trust), 9.8% of Diversified Healthcare Trust’s outstanding common shares, 1.3% of Industrial Logistics Properties Trust’s outstanding common shares, 1.2% of Service Properties Trust’s outstanding common shares and 1.1% of Office Properties Income Trust’s outstanding common shares.. Our executive officers may also own equity investments in other companies to which Tremont, RMR or their subsidiaries provide management services. These multiple responsibilities, relationships and cross ownerships may give rise to conflicts of interest or the perception of such conflicts of interest with respect to matters involving us, RMR Inc., RMR, our Managing Trustees, the other companies to which RMR or its subsidiaries provide management services and their related parties. Conflicts of interest or the perception of conflicts of interest could have a material adverse impact on our reputation, business and the market price of our common shares and other securities and we may be subject to increased risk of litigation as a result.

Reworded

Additionally, in the event our management agreement is terminated by us without a cause event or by Tremont for a material breach, we will be required to pay Tremont a termination fee equal to (i) three times the sum of (a) the average annual base management fee and (b) the average annual incentive fee, in each case paid or payable to Tremont during the twenty-four (24) month period immediately preceding the most recently completed calendar quarter prior to the date of termination, plus (ii) $1.6 million. Additionally,We acquired Tremont Mortgage Trust, or TRMT, by merger in 2021, or the Merger. In connection with the Merger and the termination of TRMT’s management agreement with Tremont, we agreed that certain of the expenses Tremont had paid pursuant to such management agreement will be included in the “Termination Fee” under and as defined in our existing management agreement with Tremont. These provisions increase the cost to us of terminating our management agreement and adversely affect our ability to terminate Tremont or not renew our management agreement without a cause event. These terms of our management agreement may discourage a change of control of us, including a change of control which might result in payment of a premium for our common shares.

Reworded

Companies with business dealings with related persons and entities may more often be the target of dissident shareholder trustee nominations, dissident shareholder proposals and shareholder litigation alleging conflicts of interest in their business dealings. Our relationships with Tremont, RMR, their affiliates and entities to which they provide management services, Adam D. Portnoy and other related persons of RMR may precipitate such activities. Shareholder litigation and dissident shareholder activities, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs, and diversion of our management’s attention and could have a material adverse impact on our reputation and business.

Reworded

Our bylaws currently provide that, other than any action arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland will be the sole and exclusive forum for: (1) any Internal Corporate Claim, as such term is defined under the Maryland General Corporation Law; (2) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; (3) any action asserting a claim for breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our Trustees, officers, manager or other agents to us or our shareholders; (4) any action asserting a claim against us or any of our Trustees, officers, manager or other agents arising pursuant to Maryland law, our declaration of trust or bylaws, including any disputes, claims or controversies brought by or on behalf of a shareholder, either on his, her or its own behalf, on our behalf or on behalf of any series or class of our shareholders or shareholders against us or any of our Trustees, officers, manager or other agents, including any claims relating to the meaning, interpretation, effect, validity, performance or enforcement of our declaration of trust or bylaws; or (5) any action asserting a claim against us or any of our Trustees, officers, manager or other agents that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine of the State of Maryland. The exclusive forum provision of our bylaws does not apply to any action for which the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland does not have jurisdiction. Unless we otherwise consent in writing, to the fullest extent of the law, the sole and exclusive forum for claims that arise under the Securities Act is the federal district courts of the United States of America, to the fullest extent of the law.America. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding any interest in our common shares shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to these provisions of our bylaws, as they may be amended from time to time. The exclusive forum provision of our bylaws may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that the shareholder believes is favorable for disputes with us or our Trustees, officers, manager, agents or employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our Trustees, officers, manager, agents or employees.

Reworded

Dividends payable by U.S. corporations to noncorporate shareholders, such as individuals, trusts and estates, are generally eligible for reduced U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to “qualified dividends.” Distributions paid by REITs generally are not treated as “qualified dividends” under the IRC and the reduced rates applicable to such dividends do not generally apply. However, for tax years beginning before 2026, REIT dividends paid to noncorporate shareholders are generally taxed at an effective tax rate lower than applicable ordinary income tax rates due to the availability of a deduction under the IRC for specified forms of income from passthrough entities. More favorable rates will nevertheless continue to apply to regular corporate “qualified” dividends, which may cause some investors to perceive that an investment in a REIT is less attractive than an investment in a non-REIT entity that pays dividends, thereby reducing the demand and market price of our common shares.

Reworded

The REIT provisions of the IRC substantially limit our ability to hedge our assets and liabilities. Any income from a qualifying hedging transaction that we enter into to manage risk of interest rate changes with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets does not constitute “gross income” for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests that we must satisfy in order to maintain our qualification for taxation as a REIT under the IRC. As a result, a qualifying hedge transaction will neither assist nor hinder our compliance with the 75% and 95% gross income tests. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions is likely to be treated as nonqualifying income for purposes of both of these gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement some hedges through a TRS. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because our TRS would be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in the hedged items than we might otherwise want to bear. In addition, losses in our TRS will generally not provide any tax benefit, except for being carried forward and deducted against 80% of future taxable income in the TRS.

Removed

We may incur adverse tax consequences as a result of our acquisition of TRMT.

Removed

As a successor to TRMT, we may face liability stemming from the tax liabilities (including penalties and interest) of TRMT and its subsidiaries. These liabilities and our efforts to remedy any tax dispute relating to these acquired entities could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Reworded

As with other publicly traded equity securities and REIT securities, the market price of our common shares and other securities depends on various market conditions that are subject to change from time to time. We believe that one of the factors that investors consider important in deciding whether to buy or sell equity securities of a REIT is the distribution rate, considered as a percentage of the market price of the equity securities, relative to interest rates. There is a general market perception that REIT shares outperform in low interest rate environments and underperform in rising interest rate environments when compared to the broader market. In efforts to combat rising inflation, the FOMC raised interest rates eleven times during 2022 and 2023 and then paused rate increases in the fourth quarter of 2023 following the deceleration of inflationary growth. The FOMC cut interest rates three times between Septemberin 2024 and three times between September 2025 and December 2024,2025, and it may seek to further reduce interest rates, increase interest rates or maintain current interest rates. In addition, the U.S. and global economies have continued to experience inflation above historic levels, constrained labor availability, supply chain challenges, global instability and economic downturn.uncertainty. These conditions have negatively impacted REIT share prices and, if they continue or worsen, may have further adverse impacts on the market value of our securities.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

14new paragraphs
18removed paragraphs
25reworded paragraphs
8,205 → 7,692words in section

New heading “Adjusted Book Value”

New heading “Rights Offering”

Removed heading “Adjusted Book Value per Common Share”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: liquidity, interest rate, regulation, competition
“The CMBS financing market was a key provider of debt liquidity to the CRE industry in 2024. Increasing demand from bond investors has translated into tighter credit spreads, particularly for 5-year loans which have become more popular among borrowers anticipating further interest rate reductions at the longer end of the yield curve. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: liquidity, interest rate, competition
“CRE transaction activity showed signs of recovery in the second half of 2025 as investors and lenders responded to three interest rate cuts by the FOMC in 2025. Additionally, a more stabilized monetary environment, improving property fundamentals and substantial liquidity in debt capital markets may give CRE investors and lenders renewed optimism and confidence in underwriting assumptions. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: tariff, interest rate
“Market Conditions. Earlier this year, U.S. trade and fiscal policy, coupled with ongoing geopolitical tensions, caused volatility in financial markets and uncertainty for CRE investors. As a result, transaction activity slowed as investors waited on the outcomes of negotiations with U.S. trade partners, new tariff announcements and domestic fiscal policy initiatives as well as the path of interest rates before making buy and sell decisions.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: inflation, interest rate
“Market Conditions. Early in 2024, CRE investors seemed cautiously optimistic that inflation had peaked, the U.S. economy was likely headed for a “soft-landing” and the FOMC was poised to reduce the federal funds rate by 125 to 150 basis points by year end. With the anticipation of lower interest rates in the future, investors delayed sale or refinancing decisions, which resulted in tepid CRE investment and transaction volume during the first half of 2024. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: liquidity, interest rate
“In addition to lower interest rates and increased liquidity from CRE debt providers, property fundamentals continue to stabilize as supply/demand imbalances across most property sectors continue to normalize.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: liquidity
“We present Adjusted Book Value, Adjusted Book Value per common share, Distributable Earnings and Distributable Earnings per common share, which are considered “non-GAAP financial measures” within the meaning of the applicable SEC rules. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (57)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 17 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Tremont is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. We believe that Tremont provides us with significant experience and expertise in investing in middle market and transitional CRE.

Reworded

Changes in Fair Value of our Assets. We generally intend to hold our investments for their contractual terms, unless repaid earlier by the borrowers. We evaluate the credit quality of each of our loans at least quarterly. If a loan is determined to be collateral dependent (because the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the underlying collateral property) and the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, but foreclosure is not probable, we willmay record an allowance for credit losses by comparing the collateral's fair value to the amortized cost basis of the loan. For collateral-dependent loans for which foreclosure is probable, the related allowance for credit losses is determined using the fair value of the collateral compared to the loan's amortized cost.

Added

Market Conditions. Earlier this year, U.S. trade and fiscal policy, coupled with ongoing geopolitical tensions, caused volatility in financial markets and uncertainty for CRE investors. As a result, transaction activity slowed as investors waited on the outcomes of negotiations with U.S. trade partners, new tariff announcements and domestic fiscal policy initiatives as well as the path of interest rates before making buy and sell decisions.

Added

CRE transaction activity showed signs of recovery in the second half of 2025 as investors and lenders responded to three interest rate cuts by the FOMC in 2025. Additionally, a more stabilized monetary environment, improving property fundamentals and substantial liquidity in debt capital markets may give CRE investors and lenders renewed optimism and confidence in underwriting assumptions. The relative value of CRE debt investments today compared to alternative corporate or private debt investments continues to drive demand from lenders, including banks, securitized lenders, life insurance companies, private debt funds and mortgage REITs. This increased competition amongst lenders has led to a tightening of credit spreads and lower overall borrowing costs for CRE debt investors across all property sectors.

Added

Barring potential risks associated with persistent inflation, increased geopolitical uncertainty that may negatively impact global economic conditions and a weakening labor market that could moderate economic growth, we believe the CRE sector is relatively well positioned, with expectations for increased transaction volume in 2026.

Removed

Market Conditions. Early in 2024, CRE investors seemed cautiously optimistic that inflation had peaked, the U.S. economy was likely headed for a “soft-landing” and the FOMC was poised to reduce the federal funds rate by 125 to 150 basis points by year end. With the anticipation of lower interest rates in the future, investors delayed sale or refinancing decisions, which resulted in tepid CRE investment and transaction volume during the first half of 2024. In September 2024, citing progress toward its 2% inflation target, the FOMC lowered the targeted federal funds rate by 50 basis points, providing CRE owners initial relief from high borrowing costs and reduced uncertainty regarding the timing and magnitude of future rate cuts. The FOMC then followed with two additional 25 basis point reductions by year end. Although the 100-basis point reduction fell short of expectations, the reduction in overall borrowing costs helped spur CRE refinancing activity through the fourth quarter of 2024, and we believe there is a renewed appetite amongst most lenders to increase CRE loan origination volume in 2025.

Removed

The CMBS financing market was a key provider of debt liquidity to the CRE industry in 2024. Increasing demand from bond investors has translated into tighter credit spreads, particularly for 5-year loans which have become more popular among borrowers anticipating further interest rate reductions at the longer end of the yield curve. Life insurance companies continue to expand their product offerings, providing low leverage, fixed rate term debt for stabilized assets as well as floating rate capital for more transitional properties, which were once reserved for banks and alternative lenders, like us. The banking sector, particularly smaller regional banks, continues to be impacted by increased regulations and capital charges related to legacy CRE and construction loan portfolios. However, larger banks have continued to work through these challenges and have found ways to begin to increase CRE exposure, including on a direct basis and through warehouse lines of credit to debt funds and mortgage REITs, like us. Agency lenders, such as Fannie-Mae and Freddie-Mac, continue to provide liquidity to the multifamily market. Volatility in long-term interest rates, however, has resulted in increased competition for multifamily loans from CMBS/conduit providers, life-insurance companies and alternative lenders. Despite an increase in delinquencies on loans financed by the CRE-CLO market in 2024, concerns about collateral and loan performance have waned. CLO bond investors continue to demonstrate an appetite for these bonds which has resulted in increased competition for new, quality multifamily loans to package and sell, driving down spreads and borrowers’ interest expense.

Removed

In addition to lower interest rates and increased liquidity from CRE debt providers, property fundamentals continue to stabilize as supply/demand imbalances across most property sectors continue to normalize.

Removed

The U.S. office market continues to navigate the impact of the post COVID-19 Pandemic remote workplace dynamics, and corporations are increasingly requiring return-to-office mandates. Additionally, fewer construction starts should improve the supply/demand imbalance in the office market. Retail assets, particularly needs based and grocery anchored retail, have benefited from a strong consumer market and a healthy job market. New supply in the industrial sector resulted in downward pressure on rent growth during 2024, but fewer new construction starts, strong consumer demand and onshoring of manufacturing is expected to bring equilibrium to the sector by the end of 2025. As for the multifamily market, the lack of affordable housing in the United States and the rent versus own dynamic continue to favor the sector. While there has been oversupply in certain markets and a subsequent decline in rents, it is expected that for most markets, the supply/demand imbalance will be short lived, and once equilibrium is reached, rent-growth will return.

Removed

Interest rate cuts in the latter half of 2024 have resulted in CRE investors again being cautiously optimistic heading into 2025. Over $2 trillion in CRE debt is expected to mature over the next two years. These maturities, coupled with a lower and more stabilized interest rate environment, are likely to provide investors with greater investment opportunities, which we expect will translate into more lending activity. Looking forward, it is unclear how geopolitical uncertainty, and the new presidential administration, may impact the commercial real estate sector, but we believe that the CRE lending market remains well positioned for 2025.

Reworded

The interest income on our loans and interest expense on our borrowings float with benchmark rates, such as SOFR. Because we generally intend to leverage approximatelyup 75%to 80% of the amount of our investments, as benchmark rates increase above the floors of our loans, our income from investments, net of interest and related expenses, will increase. Decreases in benchmark rates are mitigated by interest rate floor provisions in all but one of our loan agreements with borrowers, ranging from 0.10%0.25% to 5.20%4.34% with a weighted average floor of 2.81%; therefore, changes to income from investments, net, may not move proportionately with the increase or decrease in benchmark rates. As of December 31, 2024,2025, SOFR was 4.33%,3.69%, and as a result, oneseven of our loan investments had an active interest rate floor.

Reworded

Prepayment Risk. We are subject to risk that our loan investments will be repaid at an earlier date than anticipated, which may reduce the returns realized on those loans as less interest income may be received over time. Additionally, we may not be able to reinvest the principal repaid timely and/or at a similar or higher yield of the original loan investment. We seek to limit this risk by structuring our loan agreements with fees required to be paid to us upon prepayment of a loan within a specified period of time before the loan’s maturity; however, unanticipated prepayments could negatively impact our operating results.

Removed

We present Distributable Earnings, Distributable Earnings per common share and Adjusted Book Value per common share, which are considered “non-GAAP financial measures” within the meaning of the applicable SEC rules. These non-GAAP financial measures do not represent net income, net income per common share or cash generated from operating activities and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or net income per common share determined in accordance with GAAP or as an indication of our cash flows from operations determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, a measure of our liquidity or operating performance or an indication of funds available for our cash needs. In addition, our methodologies for calculating these non-GAAP financial measures may differ from the methodologies employed by other companies to calculate the same or similar supplemental performance measures; therefore, our reported Distributable Earnings and Distributable Earnings per common share may not be comparable to distributable earnings and distributable earnings per common share as reported by other companies.

Removed

We believe that Adjusted Book Value per common share is a meaningful measure of our capital adequacy because it excludes the impact of certain non-cash estimates or adjustments, including the unaccreted purchase discount resulting from the excess of the fair value of the loans TRMT then held for investment and that we acquired as a result of the Merger over the consideration we paid in the Merger and our allowance for credit losses for our loan portfolio and unfunded loan commitments. Adjusted Book Value per common share does not represent book value per common share or alternative measures determined in accordance with GAAP. Our methodology for calculating Adjusted Book Value per common share may differ from the methodologies employed by other companies to calculate the same or similar supplemental capital adequacy measures; therefore, our Adjusted Book Value per common share may not be comparable to the adjusted book value per common share reported by other companies.

Removed

Adjusted Book Value per Common Share

Removed

The table below calculates our book value per common share:

Removed

(1)Excludes the impact of the unaccreted purchase discount resulting from the excess of the fair value of the loans TRMT then held for investment and that we acquired as a result of the Merger over the consideration we paid in the Merger. The purchase discount of $36,443 was allocated to each acquired loan and was accreted into income over the remaining term of the respective loan. As of December 31, 2024, the purchase discount was fully accreted. As of December 31, 2023, the unaccreted purchase discount was $2,347.

Removed

(2)Excludes the impact of our allowance for credit losses. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, our allowance for credit losses for our loan portfolio and unfunded loan commitments was $8,908 and $5,828, respectively. For further information on our adoption of our allowance for credit losses, see Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Added

(4)In January 2026, the maturity date of this loan was extended to March 31, 2026.

Added

(5)These loans were acquired in November 2025.

Reworded

As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had $641,213$724,458 in aggregate loan commitments, consisting of a diverse portfolio, geographically and by property type, of 2124 first mortgage loans. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had five4 loans representing approximately 24%17% of the amortized cost of our loan portfolio with a loan risk rating of “4” or “higher risk”. As of December 31, 2025, we had no loans with risk rating of “5” or “impaired/ loss likely”.

Removed

In August 2024, we amended the agreement governing our loan secured by an office property in Dallas, TX. As part of this amendment, the loan commitment was reduced by $3,189, the borrower was required to contribute $2,900 to cash reserves and the maturity date was extended by two years to August 25, 2026. As of December 31, 2024, this loan had an amortized cost of $43,511 and a risk rating of 4.

Reworded

In AugustApril 2024,2025, we amended the agreement governing our loan secured by an office property in Plano,Bellevue, TX.WA. As part of this amendment, the borrower was required to contribute $1,625 to cash reserves, the coupon rate was reduced from SOFR + 4.75%3.85% to SOFR + 3.75%2.85% and the maturity date was extended by twothree years to JulyApril 1,7, 2026.2028. As of December 31, 2024,2025, this loan had an amortized cost of $26,635$20,245 and a risk rating of 4.

Reworded

In NovemberMay 2024,2025, we amended the agreement governing our loan secured by an office property in Carlsbad,Downers CA.Grove, IL. As part of this amendment, the borrower wasrepaid required$3,000 toof contributethe $1,100outstanding toprincipal cash reservesbalance and the maturity date was extended by twoone yearsyear to OctoberMay 27,22, 2026. As of December 31, 2024,2025, this loan had an amortized cost of $24,412$26,640 and a risk rating of 4.3.

Removed

In November 2024, we amended the agreement governing our loan secured by an office property in Bellevue, WA. As part of this amendment, the maturity date was extended by 90 days to February 5, 2025. Subsequently, in January 2025, the maturity date was extended by 60 days to April 7, 2025. As of December 31, 2024, this loan had an amortized cost of $19,997 and a risk rating of 4.

Removed

In September 2024, we amended our Citibank Master Repurchase Agreement. The amendment to the Citibank Master Repurchase Agreement made certain changes to the agreement and related fee letter, including extending the stated maturity date to September 27, 2026.

Removed

In October 2024, we amended our Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Agreement. The amendment to the Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Agreement made certain changes to the agreement and related fee letter, including extending the stated maturity date to March 11, 2026.

Reworded

In DecemberFebruary 2024,2026, we amended the feeWells letter to our UBSFargo Master Repurchase Agreement and made certain changes to extendthe agreement, including extending the stated maturity date to FebruaryMarch 18,13, 20262028 and increaseincreasing the maximum facility size by $125,000 to $250,000.

Added

In February 2026, we amended our UBS Master Repurchase Agreement to extend the stated maturity date to February 18, 2028.

Reworded

The table below is an overview of our Secured Financing Facilities as of December 31, 20242025, after giving effect to the above referenced amendments to the UBS and Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Agreements:

Reworded

Interest and related income. The decrease in interest and related income was primarily the result of lower outstandingweighted principalaverage balancescoupon underrates, which was partially offset by interest rate floors for seven of our loanloans investmentbecoming portfolioactive, lower interest income earned on cash invested due to decreased index rates and lower purchase discount accretion due to discounts becoming fully accreted during the year ended December 31, 2024.2025. The weighted average principalcoupon balancerate was approximately $603,0007.60% for the year ended December 31, 20242025, inclusive of the seven active floors, compared to approximately $646,0008.77% for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024.

Removed

Purchase discount accretion. The decrease in purchase discount accretion was due to the purchase discount recorded as part of the Merger becoming fully accreted during the year ended December 31, 2024.

Reworded

Interest and related expenses. The decrease in interest and related expenses was primarily the result of lower weighted average coupon rates offset by higher outstanding principal balances under our Secured Financing Facilities during the year ended December 31, 2025. The weighted average coupon rate was 6.25% for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to 7.24% for the year ended December 31, 2024. The weighted average principal balance was approximately $425,000 for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $411,000 for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to approximately $447,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024.

Reworded

Revenue from real estate owned. Revenue from real estate owned represents revenue from the operations of an office property located in Yardley, PA that was transferred to real estate owned through a deed in lieu of foreclosure in June 2023. The increase in revenue from real estate owned was primarily the result of higher operating expense reimbursements during the year ended December 31, 2025.

Reworded

Base management and incentive fees. We recognize base management and incentive fees payable to Tremont in accordance with our management agreement. The increase in base management andfees was due to higher “equity” as defined in our management agreement. The decrease in incentive fees was due to higherlower “core earnings”, as defined in our management agreement, during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024.

Reworded

General and administrative expenses. The decreaseincrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to aan decreaseincrease in professionalshare feesbased and cash compensation awarded to our Trustees, each resulting from the increase in the size of our Board of Trustees, higher share based compensation for employees of RMR and Tremont and higher legal expenses during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024.

Reworded

Reimbursement of shared services expenses. Reimbursement of shared services expenses represents reimbursement of the costs for the services that Tremont arranges on our behalf from RMR. The increasedecrease in reimbursement of shared services expenses was primarily the result of higherlower usage of shared services from RMR during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024.

Reworded

Provision for (reversal of) credit losses. The provision for (reversal of) credit losses represents the increase in the allowance for credit losses on our loan portfolio and unfunded commitments. The increase in the allowance for credit losses during the year ended December 31, 20242025 was primarily attributable to decliningincreased provisions for our office loans and a larger loan portfolio as of December 31, 2025, offset by increasing values for CRE and unfavorablefavorable CRE pricing forecasts used in our current expected credit loss, or CECL,CECL model and increasedloans provisionsnearing for certain of our office loans.maturity.

Reworded

Expenses from real estate owned. Expenses from real estate owned represent expenses from the operations of an office property located in Yardley, PA that was transferred to real estate owned through a deed in lieu of foreclosure in June 2023. The decrease in expenses from real estate owned was primarily the result of lower amortization expense related to acquired real estate leases during the year ended December 31, 2025.

Reworded

Income tax (expense) benefit.expense. Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 20242025 is a result of income taxes paid or payable by us in certain jurisdictions where we are subject to state income taxes.

Added

Net income and net income per common share - basic and diluted. The decrease in net income was due to the changes noted above. Additionally, net income per common share - basic and diluted includes the effect of the issuance of 7,532,861 common shares through the Rights Offering.

Added

We present Adjusted Book Value, Adjusted Book Value per common share, Distributable Earnings and Distributable Earnings per common share, which are considered “non-GAAP financial measures” within the meaning of the applicable SEC rules. These non-GAAP financial measures do not represent book value, book value per common share, net income, net income per common share or cash generated from operating activities and should not be considered as alternatives to book value, book value per common share, net income or net income per common share determined in accordance with GAAP or as an indication of our cash flows from operations determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, a measure of our capital adequacy, liquidity or operating performance or an indication of funds available for our cash needs. In addition, our methodologies for calculating these non-GAAP financial measures may differ from the methodologies employed by other companies to calculate the same or similar supplemental capital adequacy or performance measures; therefore, our reported Adjusted Book Value, Adjusted Book Value per common share, Distributable Earnings, and Distributable Earnings per common share may not be comparable to adjusted book value, adjusted book value per common share, distributable earnings and distributable earnings per common share as reported by other companies.

Added

Adjusted Book Value

Added

We believe that Adjusted Book Value and Adjusted Book Value per common share is a meaningful measure of our capital adequacy because it excludes the impact of certain non-cash estimates or adjustments, including our allowance for credit losses for our loan portfolio and unfunded loan commitments. The table below calculates our book value, Adjusted Book Value and Adjusted Book Value per common share:

Added

(1)Amounts include our allowance for credit losses for our loan portfolio and our unfunded commitments. The allowance for credit losses for our unfunded commitments is included in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.

Removed

Net income. The decrease in net income was due to the changes noted above.

Reworded

The table below demonstrates howour wecalculation calculateof Distributable Earnings and Distributable Earnings per common share, which are non-GAAP measures, and provides a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to net income:

Reworded

The decrease in cash provided by operating activities for 20242025 compared to 20232024 was primarily the result of lower net interest income earned on loan investments due to lower amountsSOFR invested,index partially offset by favorable changes in working capital, higher interest income earned on cash balances invested and increased cash earned from our real estate owned.rates. The decreasechange infrom cash provided by to cash used in investing activities was primarily due to increased fundings for our existing loan portfoliooriginations and acquisitions, as borrowerswell carryas out their business plans and decreasedlower loan repayments in 20242025 compared to 2023.2024. The increasechange infrom cash used in to cash provided by financing activities was primarily due to lower proceeds received from the Rights Offering and increased borrowing under our Secured Financing Facilities in 20242025 compared to 2023.net repayment activity under our Secured Financing Facilities in 2024.

Reworded

During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, we declared and paid regular quarterly distributions totaling $20,772,$18,835, or $1.40$1.26 per common share, using cash on hand.

Added

Rights Offering

Added

In November 2025, we commenced the Rights Offering, pursuant to which we issued transferable rights to our shareholders of record as of November 10, 2025. The record date shareholders received one transferable right for each outstanding common share they owned on the record date, which entitled them to purchase one new common share for every two rights held. The Rights Offering was fully backstopped by Tremont. In December 2025, we completed the Rights Offering, in which 7,532,861 common shares were issued at $8.65 per share, generating net proceeds of $61,530, after offering costs. For further information regarding the Rights Offering, see Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Reworded

(4)Lease related costs include capital expenditures used to improve tenants' spaces pursuant to lease agreements or leasing related costs, such as brokerage commissions, related to thereal Yardley,estate PA property.owned.

Added

Allowance for Credit Losses. We recognize the allowance for credit losses under the current expected credit loss, or CECL, model. The CECL measurement is based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts incorporating forward-looking information that affect the collectability of the reported amount. The CECL model is applicable to financial assets measured at amortized cost and off-balance sheet credit exposures, such as unfunded loan commitments.

Removed

Allowance for Credit Losses. On January 1, 2023, we adopted Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which replaces the “incurred loss” model for recognizing credit losses with a forward-looking “expected loss” model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of credit losses. We measure our allowance for credit losses using the CECL model, which is based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts incorporating forward-looking information that affect the collectability of the reported amount.

Reworded

The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the related loans’ amortized cost basis in our consolidated balance sheets. Our loans typically include commitments to fund incremental proceeds to borrowers over the life of the loan; these future funding commitments are also subject to the CECL model.loan. The allowance for credit losses related to unfunded loan commitments is included in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.

Reworded

Given the lack of historical loss data related to our loan portfolio, we estimate our expected losses using an analytical model that considers the likelihood of default and loss given default for each individual loan. This analytical model incorporates data from a third party database with historical loan loss information for commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, and CRE loans since 1998. Significant inputs to the model include certain loan specific data, such as LTV, property type, geographic location, occupancy, vintage year, remaining loan term, net operating income, expected timing and amounts of future loan fundings, and macroeconomic forecast assumptions, including the performance of CRE assets, unemployment rates, interest rates and other factors. We utilize the model to estimate credit losses over a reasonable and supportable economic forecast period of 12 months, followed by a straight-line reversion period of six12 months to average historical losses. Average historical losses are established using a population of third party historical loss data that approximates our portfolio as of the measurement date. We evaluate the estimated allowance for each of our loans individually and we consider our internal loan risk rating as the primary credit quality indicator underlying our assessment.

Reworded

Significant judgementsjudgments are required in our estimation of our allowance for credit losses, including but not limited to the amount and timing of future fundings, repayments and macroeconomic forecast assumptions. Therefore, actual results over time could differ materially from our estimates.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-07-28 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-04-28 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
17 → 17words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our 2025 Annual Report.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

17new paragraphs
4removed paragraphs
38reworded paragraphs
5,740 → 6,380words in section

New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025:”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: inflation, interest rate, labor
“The outlook for U.S. monetary policy remains uncertain. The Federal Open Market Committee held rates steady during the quarter, however, updated projections indicate increased concern regarding persistent inflation and the potential need for policy tightening. As a result, the timing and direction of future interest rate decisions will depend on incoming inflation data, labor market conditions, energy prices and the broader economic impact of geopolitical developments. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: middle east, interest rate, labor
“More recent geopolitical developments in the Middle East have the potential to affect U.S. economic conditions and has complicated the outlook for U.S. monetary policy. The potential for future Federal Open Markets Committee, or FOMC, interest rate cuts in the near term is lower today than at the beginning of the year. However, the FOMC has indicated it intends to remain patient as it evaluates the potential impact of these events on oil prices and, in turn, U.S. economic growth and labor market conditions.”
see in full comparison
New text
“Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025:”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: middle east, inflation
“To date, demand for CRE debt in the U.S. has not been materially impacted by geopolitical events and there continues to be a significant amount of maturing CRE debt to be refinanced in the coming year. While the duration and ultimate economic impact of the Middle East conflict remain uncertain, continued volatility in energy prices and financial markets could influence inflation trends, interest‑rate expectations, and economic growth, all of which may affect commercial real estate investment conditions in 2026.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: liquidity

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Market Conditions. During theThe first quarter of 2026, CRE market conditions2026 reflected a continuation of the stabilization trends that emerged in the second half of 2025. CRE transaction activity continued to show signs of recovery early this quarter,2025, supported by improving underlying property‑level fundamentals,fundamentals substantialalong liquiditywith inrelative debtinterest capitalrate marketsstability andallowing increasedfor greater confidence in underwriting assumptions.assumptions going forward.
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine
“Base management fees. We recognize base management fees payable to Tremont in accordance with our management agreement. The decrease in base management fees was due to lower “equity” as defined in our management agreement.”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (59)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Market Conditions. During theThe first quarter of 2026, CRE market conditions2026 reflected a continuation of the stabilization trends that emerged in the second half of 2025. CRE transaction activity continued to show signs of recovery early this quarter,2025, supported by improving underlying property‑level fundamentals,fundamentals substantialalong liquiditywith inrelative debtinterest capitalrate marketsstability andallowing increasedfor greater confidence in underwriting assumptions.assumptions going forward.

Added

During the second quarter of 2026, CRE capital markets continued to improve, however ongoing geopolitical uncertainty and renewed inflationary pressures are causing considerable volatility in U.S. Treasury yields. These conditions are again weighing on market participants’ buy, sell or refinance decision making process.

Added

To that end, CRE financing activity remains robust, but market activity is more heavily weighted toward refinancings with lower than usual acquisition financing volume. However, an abundance of upcoming loan maturities coupled with many lenders’ decreased tolerance for loan extensions may lead to higher transaction volume in the second half of 2026.

Reworded

The relative value of CRE debt investments today compared to alternative fixed income, corporate orcredit and private debtcredit investments continues to driveattract demandcapital from lenders, including banks, securitized lenders, life insurance companies, private debt funds and mortgage REITs. This increasedIncreased competition amongstamong lenders has ledcontributed to a tightening oftighter credit spreadsspreads, more flexible loan terms and lower overallall-in borrowing costs for high-quality, well-structured CRE debt investorsinvestments, acrossalthough alllender appetite remains differentiated by property sectors.type, market, sponsorship and leverage profile. Overall, borrowers are the beneficiaries of this competition among lenders.

Added

The outlook for U.S. monetary policy remains uncertain. The Federal Open Market Committee held rates steady during the quarter, however, updated projections indicate increased concern regarding persistent inflation and the potential need for policy tightening. As a result, the timing and direction of future interest rate decisions will depend on incoming inflation data, labor market conditions, energy prices and the broader economic impact of geopolitical developments. While CRE capital markets remain relatively well positioned, transaction volume, valuation trends and borrowing costs may remain subject to volatility if inflation proves persistent, geopolitical risks intensify or interest rates remain elevated for longer than currently expected.

Removed

More recent geopolitical developments in the Middle East have the potential to affect U.S. economic conditions and has complicated the outlook for U.S. monetary policy. The potential for future Federal Open Markets Committee, or FOMC, interest rate cuts in the near term is lower today than at the beginning of the year. However, the FOMC has indicated it intends to remain patient as it evaluates the potential impact of these events on oil prices and, in turn, U.S. economic growth and labor market conditions.

Removed

To date, demand for CRE debt in the U.S. has not been materially impacted by geopolitical events and there continues to be a significant amount of maturing CRE debt to be refinanced in the coming year. While the duration and ultimate economic impact of the Middle East conflict remain uncertain, continued volatility in energy prices and financial markets could influence inflation trends, interest‑rate expectations, and economic growth, all of which may affect commercial real estate investment conditions in 2026.

Reworded

The interest income on our loans and interest expense on our borrowings float with benchmark rates, such as SOFR. Because we generally intend to leverage up to 80% of the amount of our investments, as benchmark rates increase above the floors of our loans, our income from investments, net of interest and related expenses, will increase. Decreases in benchmark rates are mitigated by interest rate floor provisions in all but one of our loan agreements with borrowers, ranging from 0.25% to 4.34% with a weighted average floor of 2.83%2.96%; therefore, changes to income from investments, net, may not move proportionately with the increase or decrease in benchmark rates. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, SOFR was 3.66%,3.65%, and as a result, sevensix of our loan investments had an active interest rate floor.

Reworded

The table below details overall statistics for our loan portfolio as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025:

Reworded

The table below details our loan portfolio as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026:

Added

(4)In July 2026, the maturity date of this loan was extended by two years to July 1, 2028.

Removed

(4)This loan was repaid in April 2026.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $775,958$765,343 in aggregate loan commitments, consisting of a diverse portfolio, geographically and by property type, of 2627 first mortgage loans. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had five loans representing approximately 22% of the amortized cost of our loan portfolio with a loan risk rating of “4” or “higher risk”. We have no “5” or “loss likely” rated loans.

Removed

In April 2025, we amended the agreement governing our loan secured by an office property in Bellevue, WA. As part of this amendment, the borrower was required to contribute $1,625 to cash reserves, the coupon rate was reduced from SOFR + 3.85% to SOFR + 2.85% and the maturity date was extended by three years to April 7, 2028. As of March 31, 2026, this loan had an amortized cost of $20,817 and a risk rating of 4.

Reworded

In MayJuly 2025,2026, we amended the agreement governing our loan secured by an office property in DownersPlano, Grove, IL.TX. As part of this amendment, the borrower repaid $3,000 of the outstanding principal balance and the maturity date was extended by onetwo yearyears to MayJuly 22,1, 2026.2028. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, this loan had an amortized cost of $26,650$26,637 and a risk rating of 3.4.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and AprilJuly 24, 2026, all of our borrowers had paid their debt service obligations owed and due to us.

Reworded

We did not have any outstanding past due loans or nonaccrual loans as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. However, our borrowers' businesses, operations and liquidity may be materially adversely impacted by current inflationary pressures, interest rate fluctuations, supply chain issues or a prolonged economic slowdown or recessionrecession, any of which could amplify those negative impacts. As a result, they may become unable to pay their debt service obligations owed and due to us, which may result in an increased allowance for credit losses and/or recognition of income on a nonaccrual basis. For further information regarding our loan portfolio and risk rating policy, see Note 3 to our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1, "—Factors Affecting our Operating Results" and "Warning Concerning Forward-Looking Statements" elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the risk factors identified in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors”, of our 2025 Annual Report.

Reworded

The table below is an overview of our Secured Financing Facilities as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026:

Reworded

The table below details our Secured Financing Facilities activities during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026:

Added

The table below details our Secured Financing Facilities activities during the six months ended June 30, 2026:

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, outstanding advancements under our Secured Financing Facilities had a weighted average interest rate of 5.84%5.78% per annum, excluding associated fees and expenses. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and AprilJuly 24, 2026, we had a $467,469$471,744 and $463,157,$488,944, respectively, aggregate outstanding principal balance under our Secured Financing Facilities.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we were in compliance with all covenants and other terms under our Secured Financing Facilities.

Reworded

Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 Compared to Three Months Ended DecemberMarch 31, 20252026:

Reworded

Interest and related income. The increasedecrease in interest and related income was primarily due to a higherlower weighted average principal balance due to loan originationrepayment activity during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2025, offset by declines in the SOFR index rate.2026. The weighted average principal balance of our loan investments was approximately $699,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to approximately $712,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to approximately $656,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2025.2026. The weighted average coupon rate was approximately 7.25% during the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to approximately 7.33% during the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to approximately 7.60% during the three months ended December 31, 2025.2026.

Reworded

Interest and related expenses. The decrease in interest and related expenses was primarily the result of a lower weighted average SOFRcoupon indexrates, ratepartially offset by a higher weighted average principal balance during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2025 and the repayment of $40,931 under our Secured Financing Facilities related to our investment loan secured by a multifamily property in Olmsted Falls, OH in January 2026, partially offset by increased borrowings under our Secured Financing Facilities related to loan origination activity.2026. The weighted average coupon rate was approximately 5.81% during the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to approximately 5.86% during the three months ended March 31, 20262026. comparedThe toweighted average principal balance of our repurchase loans was approximately 6.08%$468,000 duringfor the three months ended DecemberJune 30, 2026 compared to approximately $462,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2025.2026.

Reworded

Revenue from real estate owned. Revenue from real estate owned represents revenue from the operations of an office property located in Yardley, PA that was transferred to real estate owned through a deed in lieu of foreclosure in June 2023. The increasedecrease in revenue from real estate owned was primarily due to higherlower operating expense reimbursements during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2025.2026.

Added

Base management fees. We recognize base management fees payable to Tremont in accordance with our management agreement. The decrease in base management fees was due to lower “equity” as defined in our management agreement.

Added

Incentive fees. We recognize management incentive fees payable to Tremont in accordance with our management agreement. The increase in management incentive fees was due to the incentive fee for the 12 month period ended June 30, 2026 exceeding the fee paid for the previous three calendar quarters by a higher margin, as compared to the fee for the 12 month period ended March 31, 2026.

Added

General and administrative expenses. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to an increase in share based compensation resulting from shares awarded to our Trustees during the three months ended June 30, 2026.

Added

Reimbursement of shared services expenses. Reimbursement of shared services expenses represents reimbursement of the costs for the services that Tremont arranges on our behalf from RMR.

Added

Provision for credit losses. The provision for credit losses represents the change in the allowance for credit losses on our loan portfolio and unfunded commitments. The increase in the allowance for credit losses during the three months ended June 30, 2026 is primarily due to increased allowances for certain of our “4” rated office loans with near-term maturities, and primarily reflects lower estimated collateral values for these loans within the office sector.

Added

Expenses from real estate owned. Expenses from real estate owned represent expenses from the operations of an office property located in Yardley, PA that was transferred to real estate owned through a deed in lieu of foreclosure in June 2023. The decrease in expenses from real estate owned was primarily due to lower utility expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2026.

Added

Income tax benefit (expense). Income tax benefit (expense) represents income taxes paid or payable by us in certain jurisdictions where we are subject to state income taxes.

Added

Net (loss) income and net (loss) income per common share - basic and diluted. The decrease in net (loss) income during the three months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2026 was due to the changes noted above.

Added

Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025:

Added

Interest and related income. The increase in interest and related income was primarily due to a higher weighted average principal balance resulting from loan origination activity during the six months ended June 30, 2026, partially offset by declines in the SOFR index rate. The weighted average principal balance of our loan investments was approximately $705,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to approximately $642,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The weighted average coupon rate was approximately 7.31% during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to approximately 8.03% during the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Added

Interest and related expenses. The decrease in interest and related expenses was primarily the result of declines in the SOFR index rate, offset by a higher weighted average principal balance during the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The weighted average coupon rate was approximately 5.80% during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to approximately 6.51% during the six months ended June 30, 2025. The weighted average principal balance of our repurchase loans was approximately $465,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to approximately $432,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Added

Revenue from real estate owned. Revenue from real estate owned represents revenue from the operations of an office property located in Yardley, PA that was transferred to real estate owned through a deed in lieu of foreclosure in June 2023. The increase in revenue from real estate owned was primarily due to higher operating expense reimbursements and higher rental rates from lease renewal activity during the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Reworded

Incentive fees. We recognize management incentive fees payable to Tremont in accordance with our management agreement. The decrease in management incentive fees was due to higher “equity” and lower “core earnings”, each as defined in our management agreement, for the 12 month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.

Reworded

General and administrative expenses. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to higheran legalincrease costsin share based compensation to our trustees during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the threesix months ended DecemberJune 31,30, 2025.

Reworded

Provision for (reversal of) credit losses. The provision for credit losses represents the change in the allowance for credit losses on our loan portfolio and unfunded commitments. The increase in the allowance for credit losses during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 reflectsis anprimarily increaseddue loan investment balance as of March 31, 2026 andto increased allowances for certain of our “4” rated office loans, partially offset by loans nearingwith maturity.near-term maturities, and primarily reflects lower estimated collateral values for these loans within the office sector.

Reworded

Expenses from real estate owned. Expenses from real estate owned represent expenses from the operations of an office property located in Yardley, PA that was transferred to real estate owned through a deed in lieu of foreclosure in June 2023. The increasedecrease in expenses from real estate owned was primarily due to higherlease utilityrelated expensesassets becoming fully amortized resulting in lower amortization expense during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the threesix months ended DecemberJune 31,30, 2025.

Reworded

Income tax expense.benefit (expense). Income tax expense represents income taxes paid or payable by us in certain jurisdictions where we are subject to state income taxes.

Reworded

We present Adjusted Book Value, Adjusted Book Value per common share, Distributable Earnings and Distributable Earnings per common share, which are considered “non-GAAP financial measures” within the meaning of the applicable SEC rules. These non-GAAP financial measures do not represent book value, book value per common share, net (loss) income, net (loss) income per common share or cash generated from operating activities and should not be considered as alternatives to book value, book value per common share, net (loss) income or net (loss) income per common share determined in accordance with GAAP or as an indication of our cash flows from operations determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, a measure of our capital adequacy, liquidity or operating performance or an indication of funds available for our cash needs. In addition, our methodologies for calculating these non-GAAP financial measures may differ from the methodologies employed by other companies to calculate the same or similar supplemental capital adequacy or performance measures; therefore, our reported Adjusted Book Value, Adjusted Book Value per common share, Distributable Earnings, and Distributable Earnings per common share may not be comparable to adjusted book value, adjusted book value per common share, distributable earnings and distributable earnings per common share as reported by other companies.

Reworded

We believe that Adjusted Book Value and Adjusted Book Value per common share is aare meaningful measuremeasures of our capital adequacy because itthey excludesexclude the impact of certain non-cash estimates or adjustments, including our allowance for credit losses for our loan portfolio and unfunded loan commitments. The table below calculates our book value, Adjusted Book Value and Adjusted Book Value per common share:

Reworded

In order to maintain our qualification for taxation as a REIT, we are generally required to distribute substantially all of our taxable income, subject to certain adjustments, to our shareholders. We believe that one of the factors that investors consider important in deciding whether to buy or sell securities of a REIT is its distribution rate. Over time, Distributable Earnings and Distributable Earnings per common share may be useful indicators of distributions to our shareholders and are measures that are considered by our Board of Trustees when determining the amount of distributions. We believe that Distributable Earnings and Distributable Earnings per common share provide meaningful information to consider in addition to net (loss) income, net (loss) income per common share and cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP. These measures help us to evaluate our performance excluding the effects of certain transactions and GAAP adjustments that we believe are not necessarily indicative of our current loan portfolio and operations. In addition, Distributable Earnings, excluding incentive fees, is used in determining the amount of base management and management incentive fees payable by us to Tremont under our management agreement.

Reworded

We calculate Distributable Earnings and Distributable Earnings per common share as net (loss) income and net (loss) income per common share, respectively, computed in accordance with GAAP, including realized losses not otherwise included in net (loss) income determined in accordance with GAAP, and excluding: (a) depreciation and amortization of real estate owned and related intangible assets, if any; (b) non-cash equity compensation expense; (c) unrealized gains, losses and other similar non-cash items that are included in net (loss) income for the period of the calculation (regardless of whether such items are included in or deducted from net (loss) income or in other comprehensive income under GAAP), if any; and (d) one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and certain non-cash items, if any. Distributable Earnings are reduced for realized losses on loan investments when amounts are deemed uncollectable. This is generally at the time a loan is repaid, or in the case of foreclosure, when the underlying asset is sold, but may also be when, in our determination, it is nearly certain that all amounts due will not be collected. The realized loss amount reflected in Distributable Earnings will equal the difference between the cash received or expected to be received and the carrying value of the loan.

Reworded

The table below demonstrates how we calculate Distributable Earnings and Distributable Earnings per common share, which are non-GAAP financial measures, and provides a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to net (loss) income:

Reworded

Loans issued under the BMO Facility are coterminous with the corresponding pledged mortgage loan investments, are not subject to margin calls and allow for up to an 80% advance rate, subject to certain loan to cost and LTV limits. Interest on advancements under the BMO Facility areis calculated at SOFR plus a premium. Loans issued under the BMO Facility are secured by a security interest and collateral assignment of the underlying loans to our borrowers which are secured by real property underlying such loans. We are required to pay an upfront fee equal to a percentage of the aggregate amount of the facility loan, such percentage to be determined at the time of approval of the separate facility loan agreements with BMO, or the BMO Facility Loan Agreements.

Reworded

The increase in cash provided by operating activities for the 2026 period compared to the 2025 period was primarily due to higher net interest income resulting from an increased loan portfolio size and favorable changes in working capital. The decreaseincrease in cash used in investing activities was primarily due to higher loan repaymentorigination activity, partially offset by higher loan originationrepayment activity during the 2026 period. The changeincrease in cash provided by financing activities to cash used in financing activities was primarily due to higher repayments on our Secured Financing Facilities in the 2026 period.

Reworded

During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we declared and paid regular quarterly distributions to our common shareholders totaling $6,327,$12,654, or $0.28$0.56 per common share, using cash on hand.

Reworded

On AprilJuly 9, 2026, we declared a regular quarterly distribution of $0.28 per common share, or $6,327,$6,346, to shareholders of record on AprilJuly 21,20, 2026. We expect to pay this distribution to our common shareholders on or about MayAugust 14,13, 2026 using cash on hand.

Reworded

In November 2025, we commenced the Rights Offering, pursuant to which we issued transferable rights to our shareholders of record as of November 10, 2025. The record date shareholders received one transferable right for each outstanding common share they owned on the record date, which entitled them to purchase one new common share for every two rights held. The Rights Offering was fully backstopped by Tremont. In December 2025, we completed the Rights Offering, in which 7,532,861 common shares were issued at $8.65 per share, generating net proceeds of $61,494, after offering costs. For further information regarding distributions,the Rights Offering, see NoteNotes 7 and 9 to our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Reworded

Our contractual obligations and commitments as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 were as follows:

Reworded

(3)Projected interest payments are attributable only to our debt service obligations at existing rates as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and are not intended to estimate future interest costs which may result from debt prepayments, additional borrowings, new debt issuances or changes in interest rates.

Reworded

Our principal debt obligations as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 were the outstanding balances under our Secured Financing Facilities. Our Master Repurchase Agreements provide for acceleration of the date of repurchase of any then purchased assets and the liquidation of the purchased assets by UBS, Citibank or Wells Fargo, as applicable, upon the occurrence and continuation of certain events of default, including a change of control of us, which includes Tremont ceasing to act as our sole manager or to be a wholly owned subsidiary of RMR. Our Master Repurchase Agreements also provide that upon the repurchase of any then purchased asset, we are required to pay UBS, Citibank or Wells Fargo the outstanding purchase price of such purchased asset and accrued interest and any and all accrued and unpaid expenses of UBS, Citibank or Wells Fargo, as applicable, relating to such purchased asset.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had a $382,437$386,712 aggregate outstanding principal balance under our Master Repurchase Facilities. Our Master Repurchase Agreements are structured with risk mitigation mechanisms, including a cash flow sweep, which would allow UBS, Citibank and Wells Fargo, as applicable, to control interest payments from our borrowers under our loans that are financed under our respective Master Repurchase Facilities, and the ability to accelerate dates of repurchase and institute margin calls, which may require us to pay down balances associated with one or more of our loans that are financed under our Master Repurchase Facilities.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had a $85,032 aggregate outstanding principal balance under the BMO Facility.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we were in compliance with all covenants and other terms under our Secured Financing Facilities.

SEVN insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-09-17Portnoy Adam D.
Director, 10% owner
Shares withheld for tax 4,966$7.40 $36.7K361,266 SEC
2026-09-17Lorenzini Thomas J.
President and CIO
Shares withheld for tax 2,732$7.40 $20.2K57,022 SEC
2026-09-17Jordan Matthew P.
Director
Shares withheld for tax 8,115$7.40 $60.1K118,244 SEC
2026-09-17Brown Matthew C.
CFO and Treasurer
Shares withheld for tax 2,624$7.40 $19.4K32,364 SEC
2026-09-10Portnoy Adam D.
Director, 10% owner
Grant/award 27,247— —366,232 SEC
2026-09-10Lorenzini Thomas J.
President and CIO
Grant/award 20,435— —59,754 SEC
2026-09-10Jordan Matthew P.
Director
Grant/award 27,247— —126,359 SEC
2026-09-10Brown Matthew C.
CFO and Treasurer
Grant/award 13,623— —34,988 SEC
2026-06-09Lamkin William A.
Director
Grant/award 9,976— —9,976 SEC
2026-06-09Lamkin William A.
Director
Gift 9,976— —38,784 SEC
2026-06-09Lamkin William A.
Director
Gift 9,976— —0 SEC
2026-06-09Jordan Matthew P.
Director
Grant/award 9,976— —99,112 SEC
2026-06-09Gilmore Barbara D.
Director
Grant/award 9,976— —43,688 SEC
2026-06-09Danner Ann Marie
Director
Grant/award 9,976— —26,005 SEC
2026-06-09Morea Joseph
Director
Grant/award 9,976— —73,562 SEC
2026-06-09Portnoy Adam D.
Director, 10% owner
Grant/award 9,976— —338,985 SEC
2026-06-09Talley Mark A.
Director
Grant/award 9,976— —9,976 SEC

Well-known investors holding SEVN (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-3087,034$733.7K0.0%Reduced 10%
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COM2026-06-3077,199$650.8K0.0%Added 383%

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when SEVN files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.