SKYE 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Skye Bioscience, Inc. · Nasdaq · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1516551 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, and if we are unable to continue, you may lose your entire investment.”
New heading “Our ability to become profitable and continue as a going concern will be dependent on our ability to attract, employ and retain highly qualified personnel.”
New heading “We and any of our potential future collaborators will be required to report to regulatory authorities if any of our approved products cause or contribute to adverse medical events, and any failure to do so would result in sanctions that would materially harm our business.”
Removed heading “If we are not able to attract and retain highly qualified personnel, we may not be able to successfully implement our business strategy.”
Largest changes
In the European Economicsee in full comparisonArea,Areaor(EEA,“EEA”), the General Data Protection Regulation,or GDPR,(“GDPR”) imposes stringent requirements for controllers and processors of personal data, including, for example, high standards for obtaining consent from individuals to process their personal data, robust disclosures to individuals and a strong individual data rights regime, short timelines for data breach notifications, limitations on retention and secondary use of information, significant requirements pertaining to health data and pseudonymized (i.e., key-coded) data and obligations when we contract third-party processors in connection with the processing of the personal data. Companies that must comply with the GDPR face increased compliance obligations and risk, including more robust regulatory enforcement of data protection requirements and potential fines for noncompliance of up to €20 million or 4% of the annual globalrevenuesrevenue of the noncompliant company, whichever is greater. Among other requirements, the GDPR regulates transfers of personal data subject to the GDPR to third countries that have not been found to provide adequate protection to such personal data, including the United States; in July 2020, the Court of Justice of the EuropeanUnion,Unionor CJEU,(“CJEU”) invalidated the EU-US Privacy ShieldFramework,Frameworkor(“PrivacyShield,Shield”) under which personal data could be transferred from the EEA to US entities who had self-certified under the Privacy Shield scheme and imposed further restrictions on the use of standard contractualclauses, or SCCs.clauses. In March 2022, theUSU.S. and EU announced a new regulatory regime intended to replace the invalidated regulations with the Trans-Atlantic Data PrivacyFramework,Frameworkor(the “EU-U.S.DPF.DPF”). In July 2023, the European Commission adopted an adequacy decision in relation to the EU-U.S. DPF, allowing the EU-U.S. DPF to be utilized as a means of legitimizing EU-U.S. personal data transfers for participating entities. The EU-U.S. DPF may be subject to legal challenges from privacy advocacy groups or others, and the European Commission’s adequacy decision regarding the EU-U.S. DPF provides that the EU-U.S. DPF will be subject to future reviews and may be subject to suspension, amendment, repeal, or limitations to its scope by the European Commission. As supervisory authorities issue further guidance on personal data export mechanisms, including circumstances where the standard contractual clauses cannot be used, and/ or start taking enforcement action, we could suffer additional costs, complaints and/ or regulatory investigations or fines, and/ or if we are otherwise unable to transfer personal data between and among countries and regions in which we operate, it could affect the manner in which we provide our services, the geographical location or segregation of our relevant systems and operations, and could adversely affect our financial results. As we continue to expand into other foreign countries and jurisdictions, we may be subject to additional laws and regulations that may affect how we conduct business, including but not limited to the General Data Protection Regulation in the European Union. Compliance with U.S. and foreign data privacy and security laws, rules and regulations could require us to take on more onerous obligations in our contracts, require us to engage in costly compliance exercises, restrict our ability to collect, use and disclose data, or in some cases, impact our or our partners’ or suppliers’ ability to operate in certain jurisdictions. Each of these constantly evolving laws can be subject to varying interpretations. If we fail to comply with any such laws, rules or regulations, we may face government investigations and/or enforcement actions, fines, civil or criminal penalties, private litigation or adverse publicity that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
“As we continue to expand into other foreign countries and jurisdictions, we may be subject to additional laws and regulations that may affect how we conduct business, including but not limited to the General Data Protection Regulation in the European Union. Compliance with U.S. …”see in full comparison
“From time to time, the Company may be subject to litigation claims through the ordinary course of its business operations or otherwise, regarding, among other things, intellectual property rights matters, employment matters and tax matters. Litigation to defend the Company against claims by third parties, or to enforce any rights that the Company may have against third parties, may be necessary, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of the Company's resources, causing a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations. …”see in full comparison
“If we are not successful in improving our liquidity position and the profitability of our operations, we may need to consider all strategic alternatives, including reducing or delaying our business activities and strategic initiatives, selling assets or other strategic transactions and/or other measures, including obtaining relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In addition, the perception that we may not be able to continue as a going concern may cause vendors to choose not to do business with us due to concerns about our ability to meet our contractual obligations. …”see in full comparison
see in full comparisonFrom time to time, the Company may be subject to litigation claims through the ordinary course of its business operations or otherwise, regarding, among other things, intellectual property rights matters, employment matters and tax matters. Litigation to defend the Company against claims by third parties, or to enforce any rights that the Company may have against third parties, may be necessary, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of the Company's resources, causing a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations. Given the nature of the Company's business, it is, and may from time to time in the future be, party to various, and at times numerous, legal, administrative and regulatory inquiries, investigations, proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, as well as potential class action lawsuits.Because the outcome of such legal matters is inherently uncertain, if one or more of such legal matters were to be resolved against the Company for amounts in excess of management's expectations or any applicable insurance coverage or indemnification right, the Company's results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Any litigation to which the Company is a party may result in an onerous or unfavorable judgment that may not be reversed upon appeal, or in payments of substantial monetary damages or fines, the posting of bonds requiring significant collateral, letters of credit or similar instruments, or the Company may decide to settle lawsuits on similarly unfavorable terms. Moreover, the Company cannot be sure that the remedies available to it at law or under contract, will be sufficient in amount, scope or duration to fully or partially offset any such possible liabilities. Any of these factors, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations, cash flows or liquidity. For a description of certain currently pending legal and regulatory proceedings, including the CunningLawsuit,Lawsuit and the putative class action lawsuit and related stockholder derivative lawsuit, see Note1112 to the Notes to the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in Part IV, Item 15 of this AnnualReport on Form 10-K.Report.
The global credit and financial markets are currently, and have from time to time, experienced extreme volatility and disruptions, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, fluctuating interest and inflation rates, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, supply chain shortages, increases in unemployment rates and uncertainty about economic stability. For example, while the Federal Reserve recently raised interest rates multiple times in response to concerns about inflation, the Federal Reserve has indicated that it intends to closely monitor market conditions to determine whether it will consider making additional adjustments to short-term interest rates during the remainder of 2025. Higher interest rates, coupled with reduced government spending and volatility in financial markets may increase economic uncertainty and affect consumer spending. Increased inflation rates can adversely affect us by increasing our costs, including labor and employee benefit costs. The financial markets and the global economy may also be adversely affected by the current or anticipated impact of military and/or geopolitical conflict,see in full comparisonincluding the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the Israel-Hamas war,impact of a prolonged potential U.S. government shutdown, terrorism or other geopolitical events, with the potential to result in extreme volatility in the global capital markets and further global economic consequences, including the imposition of tariffs, disruptions of the global supply chain and energy markets. Sanctions imposed by the United States and other countries in response to such conflicts, including the one in Ukraine, may also adversely impact the financial markets and the global economy, and any economic countermeasures by the affected countries or others could exacerbate market and economic instability.Further, the closures of Silicon Valley Bank, or SVB, Signature Bank and First Republic Bank and their placement into receivership with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, created bank-specific and broader financial institution liquidity risk and concerns and future adverse developments with respect to specific financial institutions or the broader financial services industry may lead to market-wide liquidity shortages, impair the ability of companies to access near-term working capital needs, and create additional market and economic uncertainty. There can be no assurance that further deterioration in credit and financial markets and confidence in economic conditions will not occur.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (93)
You should consider carefully the following risk factors, together with the other information contained in this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and “Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” before making a decision to purchase or sell shares of our common stock. We cannot assure you that any of the events discussed in the risk factors below will not occur. If any of the following events actually occur, our business, operating results, prospects or financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. This could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline and you may lose all or part of your investment. The risks described below are not the only ones that we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business operations or financial condition.
Below is a summary of the principal factors that make an investment in our common stock speculative or risky. This summary does not address all of the risks that we face. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor summary, and other risks that we face, can be found below under the heading “Risk Factors” and should be carefully considered, together with other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, before making an investment decision regarding our common stock.
•We have incurred significant losses, have limited cash on hand and our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
•Our executive officers, directors and principal equityholders,equity holders, if they choose to act together, have the ability to control or significantly influence all matters submitted to stockholders for approval.
We have incurred significant operating losses since our inception. If nimacimab is not successfully developed and approved, we may never generate any revenue. We have incurred cumulative net losses since our inception, including a net loss of $26,567,123$55,924,814 and $37,644,784$26,567,123 for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and December 31, 2023,2024, respectively. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $130,949,672.$186,874,486. Our losses have primarily resulted from expenses incurred in connection with our research and development programs and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. Nimacimab will require substantial additional development time and resources before we would be able to apply for or receive regulatory approvals and begin generating revenue from product sales. We expect to continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future, and we anticipate these losses will increase substantially as we continue our clinical development of, seek regulatory approval for and potentially commercialize nimacimab. As noted in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, the uncertainties surrounding our ability to fund our operations raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, and if we are unable to continue, you may lose your entire investment.
We have incurred net losses of $55,924,814 and $26,567,123 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively, and negative cash flow from operating activities of $43,062,529 and $25,237,480 for same periods. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had $25,737,221 in cash, cash equivalents and short term investments. As a result of our losses and our projected cash needs, combined with our current liquidity level, substantial doubt exists about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern over the next 12 months.
Our historical consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern. Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued a report on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025 that included an explanatory paragraph referring to our recurring operating losses and expressing substantial doubt in our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to obtain, among other things, the successful resolution of the Cunning Lawsuit, our ability to obtain additional equity financing or other capital, our ability to implement further operating efficiencies and reduce expenditures, and, ultimately, our ability to successfully commercialize nimacimab and generate revenue, as further described elsewhere in this Annual Report. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty, and any such adjustments may be material. Therefore, you should not rely on our consolidated balance sheet as an indication of the amount of proceeds that would be available to satisfy claims of creditors, and potentially be available for distribution to shareholders, in the event of liquidation.
As of December 31, 2025, management estimates that we have sufficient capital to continue our operations through the fourth quarter of 2026, excluding the anticipated clinical cost of a proposed Phase 2b study and additional anticipated drug manufacturing costs to supply any such Phase 2b study. However, our continued operations beyond the fourth quarter of 2026 will depend on our ability to successfully raise additional capital through various potential sources, such as equity and/or debt financings, or strategic relationships. Our ability to access the capital markets is expected to be extremely limited. If we seek additional financing to fund our operations and there remains substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, our financing sources may be unwilling to provide additional funding to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all. In addition, the uncertainty as to the resolution of the Cunning Lawsuit could limit our ability to raise new capital from investors to operate our business. If adequate funds are not available to us when needed we will be required to curtail or perhaps cease our operations which would, in turn, further raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
If we are not successful in improving our liquidity position and the profitability of our operations, we may need to consider all strategic alternatives, including reducing or delaying our business activities and strategic initiatives, selling assets or other strategic transactions and/or other measures, including obtaining relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In addition, the perception that we may not be able to continue as a going concern may cause vendors to choose not to do business with us due to concerns about our ability to meet our contractual obligations. If we are unable to continue as a going concern, our stockholders may lose some or all of their investment in us.
•successfulour ability to obtain financing to fund the completion of preclinical studies and clinical trials;
•the successful outcome of preclinical studies and clinical trials;
The development of biopharmaceutical product candidates and conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials is time-consuming and capital-intensive. We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we conduct our ongoing Phase 2a clinical trial of nimacimabnimacimab, plan for additional clinical trials and continue our research and development activities. Furthermore, we incur, and expect to continue to incur, additional costs associated with operating as a public company. At the same time, our future commercial revenues, if any, will be derived from sales of products that we do not expect to be commercially available for many years, if at all. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or any future commercialization efforts.
WeThe believeuncertainties thatsurrounding our existing cash, cash equivalents and investment securities will enable usability to fund our operations forraise atsubstantial leastdoubt theabout nextour 12 months from the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In particular, we expect these funds will allow usability to completecontinue our ongoing Phase 2a study for nimacimab and manufacturing activities for our Phase 2b study for nimacimab in obesity. However, we do not expect these funds will be sufficient to complete our Phase 2b study for nimacimab or manufacturing activities necessary to supplyas a Phasegoing 3 clinical study or enable us to complete the clinical trials needed to seek marketing approval or commercialize nimacimab or any future product candidates.concern. We have based these estimates on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Furthermore, our operating plans and other demands on our cash resources may change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us, and we may need additional funds sooner than planned. Because the outcome of any preclinical study or clinical trial is highly uncertain, we cannot reasonably estimate the actual amounts necessary to successfully complete the development and commercialization of our product candidates. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
Because we have limited financial resources and we have limited employee bandwidth which could minimize the indications we pursue, we have historically focused our development efforts on certain selected product candidates in certain selected indications. For example, while we previously focused on nimacimab as a monotherapy, we are currently focused on the development of nimacimab, either as monotherapy ornimacimab in combinations with a GLP-1 receptor agonist, for obesity and overweight. As a result, we may forgo or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates, or other indications for our existing product candidates that later prove to have greater commercial potential. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. Our spending on current and future development programs and product candidates for specific indications may not yield any commercially viable product candidates. At any time, we may decide to discontinue the development or commercialization of nimacimab or any additional products or product candidates for a variety of reasons, including the appearance of new technologies that render our products obsolete, competition from a competing product, or changes in or inability to comply with applicable regulatory requirements. For example, in 2024 we determined to eliminate our prior ocular program and strategically redirected our efforts and capital resources to nimacimab. If we terminate a program in which we have invested significant resources, we will not receive any return on our investment and we will have missed the opportunity to allocate those resources to potentially more productive uses. In addition, if we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights to such product candidate.
Nonclinical and clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with an uncertain outcome, and results of earlier studies and trials may not be predictive of future trial results. InThe addition, someresults of ourprior assumptionsclinical aboutstudies whyand nimacimabpreclinical isstudies worthyare not necessarily predictive of future developmentresults, and potential approval are based on data collected by other companies. Nimacimab may not havebe favorablefavorable, resultsor inreceive itsregulatory Phaseapproval 2aon clinicala trialtimely inbasis, obesity.if at all.
Clinical drug development is expensive and can take severalmany years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. We cannot guarantee that any clinical trials will be conducted as planned or completed on schedule, if at all, and failure can occur at any time during the preclinical or clinical trial process. The historical failure rate for product candidates in our industry is high.
The results from preclinical studies or clinical trials of nimacimab or a competitor's product candidate in the same class may not predict the results of later clinical trials of nimacimab, and interim, top-line or preliminary results of a clinical trial are not necessarily indicative of final results. It is possible to observe results in clinical trials that are unexpected based on preclinical studies, such as DIO studies and early clinical trials, and many product candidates fail in clinical trials despite very promising early results. WhileFor example, the rationalePhase 2a nimacimab results and the length of the study and sample size may render these results not necessarily indicative of the results of our future clinical studies for nimacimab and may not be comparable to advance the development of nimacimab as a treatment for obesity is based in part on the efficacy of rimonabant, a non-peripherally restricted small molecule CB1 inhibitor that promotedother weight loss products or product candidates. Product candidates in Phaselater 3stages of clinical trials,studies may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy characteristics despite having progressed through preclinical studies and initial clinical studies. In particular, while we mayhave notconducted, observeor similarare efficacyconducting certain preclinical studies of our product candidates, the predictive value of these studies with respect to future testing in ourhumans Phaseis 2alimited, clinicalparticularly trialin ofindications nimacimab.where Moreover,animal thesemodels andare anyless future preclinical and clinical data may be susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses.developed.
If the results of our ongoing or future clinical trials are inconclusive with respect to the efficacy of nimacimab, if we do not meet our clinical endpoints with statistical significance or if there are safety concerns or adverse events associated with our product candidates, we may be prevented or delayed in obtaining marketing approval for our product candidates, or we may suspend or delay development of or abandon specific product candidates. For example, we suspended the development of our prior product candidate, SBI-100 Opthalmic Emulsion ("SBI-100 OE") when the Phase 2a clinical trial in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension did not meet its primary endpoint for lowering intraocular pressure. In addition, in October 2025, we announced the results from our CBeyond Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial of nimacimab administered as a subcutaneous injectable for the treatment of obesity and overweight in the United States. The nimacimab monotherapy arm did not achieve the primary endpoint of weight loss compared to placebo. As a result, we are currently focused on the development of nimacimab in combinations with a GLP-1 receptor agonist, for obesity and overweight.
•regulators or independent institutional review boards (IRBs) may not authorize us or our investigators to commence a clinical trial or conduct a clinical trial at a prospective trial site;
•we may experience delays in reaching, or fail to reach, agreement on acceptable clinical trial contracts or clinical trial protocols with prospective trial sites or contract research organizations, or CROs,CROs the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;
•third-party clinical investigators losing the licenses or permits necessary to perform our clinical trials, not performing our clinical trials on our anticipated schedule or consistent with the clinical trial protocol, good clinical practices, or GCP, or other regulatory requirements; third-party contractors not performing data collection or analysis in a timely or accurate manner;
If we experience delays or difficulties in the enrollment or retention of patients in clinical trials, our clinical development activities could be delayed or otherwise adversely affected.
We may not be able to initiate or continue clinical trials for nimacimab if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in these trials as required by the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside the United States. In addition, somethere ofare ourmany competitorscompanies that have products that treat, or have ongoing clinical trials for product candidates that treatfor the sametreatment indicationsof, asobesity ourand product candidates,overweight, and patients who would otherwise be eligible for our clinical trials may instead forgo participating in a clinical trial due to the availability of an approved treatment or may enroll in clinical trials of oura competitors’ product candidates.candidate. Patient enrollment is affected by a number of factors, including the size and nature of the patient population, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility and exclusion criteria for the trial, the design of the clinical trial, the risk that enrolled patients will not complete a clinical trial, our ability to recruit clinical trial investigators and associated staff with the appropriate competencies and experience, competing clinical trials and clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions as to the potential advantages and risks of the product candidate being studied in relation to other available therapies, including any new drugs that may be approved for the indications we are investigating as well as any drugs under development. We may not be able to initiate or continue clinical trials if we are unable to locate a sufficient number of eligible subjects to participate in the clinical trials required by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities.
Additionally, patients, including patients in a control group, may withdraw from or otherwise discontinue our clinical trials if they do not experience weight loss or changes in body composition at their desired rate, experience side effects, experience other difficulties or issues, do not comply (or do not wish to continue complying with) study protocol, or for other reasons. Withdrawals and other patient discontinuations may compromise the quality of our data and may cause or contribute to a trial’s failure to demonstrate proof-of-concept or meet its clinical endpoints with statistical significance, or may result in skewed safety results or adverse events associated with our product candidate. Even if we are able to enroll a sufficient number of patients in our clinical trials, delays in enrollment or retention issues may result in increased costs or may affect the timing or outcome of our clinical trials. Any of these conditions may negatively impact our ability to complete such trials or include results from such trials in regulatory submissions, which could adversely affect our product development efforts.
The timing of our clinical trials depends, in part, on the speed at which we can recruit patients to participate in our trials, as well as patient retention and completion of required follow-up periods. In addition, we expect to rely on CROs and clinical trial sites to ensure proper and timely conduct of our future clinical trials and, while we intend to enter into agreements governing their services, we will have limited influence over their actual performance.
We cannot assure you that our assumptions used in determining expected clinical trial timelines are correct or that we will not experience delays in enrollment,enrollment or patient retention issues, which wouldcould resultnegatively in the delay of completion of such trials beyondimpact our expectedproduct timelines.development efforts.
Serious adverse events or undesirable side effects caused by, or other unexpected properties of, nimacimab could cause us, an IRB, or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt our clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label, the imposition of distribution or use restrictions or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. If nimacimab is associated with serious adverse events or undesirable side effects or have properties that are unexpected, we may need to abandon its development or limit development to certain uses or subpopulations in which the undesirable side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective. In our completed Phase 12a study of nimacimab, reportedthe treatment200 emergentmg dose of nimacimab demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no increases in neuropsychiatric adverse events werereported diarrhea,resulting headache,from dizziness,the uppertreatment respiratorywith tract infection, nausea and vomiting.nimacimab. However, further analysis and clinical data from doses above the 200 mg dose used in the Phase 2a study may reveal adverse events inconsistent with the safety results previously observed. Many compounds that initially showed promise in clinical or earlier stage testing have later been found to cause undesirable or unexpected side effects that prevented further development of the compound. For example, in 2006, Sanofi developed a small molecule CB1 inverse agonist called rimonabant which demonstrated 10% weight loss after one year. Despite being approved by the European Medicines Agency, the drug was soon taken off the market due to severe adverse neuropsychiatric side effects, including suicidal ideation.
We are early in our development efforts for our product candidate,nimacimab, and we will need to successfully complete pivotal clinical trials in order to seek FDA or applicable foreign authority approval to market nimacimab and any future product candidates we may develop. Carrying out clinical trials and the submission of NDAs and BLAs are complicated. Based on the stage of development of our nimacimab, the Company has not conducted any later stage or pivotal clinical trials. This may be a difficult process to manage with our limited resources and may divert the attention of management. In addition, we cannot be certain how many clinical trials of our product candidates will be required or how such trials will have to be designed to obtain marketing authorization. Consequently, we may be unable to successfully and efficiently execute and complete necessary clinical trials in a way that leads to regulatory submission and approval of any of our product candidates. We may require more time and incur greater costs than our competitors and may not succeed in obtaining marketing approvals of product candidates that we develop. Failure to commence or complete, or delays in, our planned clinical trials, could prevent us from or delay us in submitting NDAs for and commercializing our product candidates.
Prior to obtaining approval to commercialize nimacimab in the United States or abroad, we must demonstrate with substantial evidence from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials, and to the satisfaction of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, that nimacimab is safe and effective for its intended uses. Results from nonclinical studies and clinical trials can be interpreted in different ways. Even if we believe the nonclinical or clinical data for nimacimab is promising, such data may not be sufficient to support approval by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities.authorities, Thewhich could require us to delay or abandon clinical development plans. Further, requirements regarding clinical trial data may evolve. For example, the FDA published a draft guidance, E6 (R3) Good Clinical Practice, in June 2023, and Annex 2 thereto in December 2024, which seeks to unify standards for clinical trial data for ICH member countries and regions. Changes to data requirements by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, as the case may be, may cause the applicable regulatory authorities to also require us to conduct additional preclinical studies or clinical trials for nimacimab either prior to or post-approval, or may object to elements of our clinical development program.
•such authorities may disagree with the design or implementation of our clinical trials;
• regulations of such authorities may significantly change in a manner rendering our or any of our potential future collaborators’ clinical data insufficient for approval; or
• such authorities may not accept a submission due to, among other reasons, the content or formatting of the submission.submission; or
•the FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities may experience disruptions to the review or approval process.
The FDA’s and other regulatory authorities’ policies may change, and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. We also cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the U.S. or abroad. For example, the prior presidential administrations have taken several executive actions that imposed significant burdens on, or otherwise materially delayed, the FDA’s ability to engage in routine oversight activities, such as implementing statutes through rulemaking, issuance of guidance, and review and approval of marketing applications. It is difficult to predict whether or how any current executive orders will be rescinded and replaced under the current administration. The policies and priorities of any administration and the U.S. Congress are unknown and could materially impact the regulations governing our product candidates. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we or they are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we or they may be subject to enforcement action, and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.
We have conducted our initial certain portions of the Phase 1 clinical trial nimacimab in Australia and we may in the future conduct, one or more of our clinical trials for nimacimab outside the United States. The acceptance of study data from clinical trials conducted outside the U.S. or another jurisdiction by the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority may be subject to certain conditions or may not be accepted at all. For example, in cases where data from foreign clinical trials are intended to serve as the sole basis for marketing approval in the U.S., the FDA will generally not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless (i) the data are applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice; (ii) the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and pursuant to GCP regulations; and (iii) the data may be considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection by the FDA, or if the FDA considers such inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. In addition, even where the foreign study data are not intended to serve as the sole basis for approval, the FDA will not accept the data as support for an application for marketing approval unless the study is adequately designed and well-controlled, conducted in accordance with GCP requirements and the FDA is able to validate the data from the study through an onsite inspection if deemed necessary. Many foreign regulatory authorities have similar approval requirements. In addition, such foreign trials would be subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the trials are conducted. If the FDA or other foreign equivalents do not accept any data generated from other jurisdictions, we would likely be required to conduct additional clinical trials, which would be costly and time consuming, and delay aspects of our development plan, which could harm our business.
Further,Moreover, others,preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses. Others, including regulatory agencies, may not accept or agree with our assumptions, estimates, calculations, conclusions or analyses or may interpret or weigh the importance of data differently, which could impact the value of the particular program, the approvability or commercialization of the particular product candidate or product and our company in general. In addition, the information we choose to publicly disclose regarding a particular study or clinical trial is based on what is typically extensive information, and you or others may not agree with what we determine is the material or otherwise appropriate information to include in our disclosure, and any information we determine not to disclose may ultimately be deemed significant with respect to future decisions, conclusions, views, activities or otherwise regarding a particular product, product candidate or our business. If the top-line or preliminary data that we report differ from actual results, or if others, including regulatory authorities, disagree with the conclusions reached, our ability to obtain approval for, and commercialize, our product candidates may be harmed, which could harm our business, operating results, prospects or financial condition.
The manufacture and maintenance of our clinical product candidatescandidate is complex and we may encounter difficulties in production and maintenance, particularly with respect to clinical material inventory, acquisition of materials, process development or scaling-up of our manufacturing capabilities.
The manufacture and maintenance of our biologic product candidate, nimacimab, is complex, highly regulated and subject to multiple risks. The complex processes associated with the manufacture of our nimacimab exposeexposes us to various manufacturing challenges and risks, which may include delays in manufacturing nimacimab, limits on our ability to increase manufacturing capacity, and the potential for product failure and product variation that may interfere with the timing and scope of our clinical development plans and add additional costs. It is possible that we will make changes to our manufacturing process for nimacimab at various points during product development or commercialization for various reasons, such as controlling costs, achieving scale, decreasing processing time, increasing manufacturing success rate, or other reasons. Such changes can be costly and carry the risk that they will not achieve their intended objectives, or these changes could cause nimacimab to perform differently and affect the results of current or future clinical trials, or the performance of a commercialized product. In some circumstances, changes in the manufacturing process may require us to perform analytical or clinical comparability studies and to collect additional data prior to undertaking more advanced clinical trials, and such studies may introduce additional costs or delays to the program. We may be required to collect additional clinical data from any modified process prior to obtaining marketing approval for the product candidate produced with such modified process. If clinical data are not ultimately comparable to that seen in the earlier trials in terms of safety or efficacy, we may be required to make further changes to our process and/or undertake additional clinical testing, either of which could significantly delay the clinical development or commercialization of the associated product candidate.
The ability of the FDA and applicableother foreigngovernment authoritiesagencies to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, staffing cuts, the FDA's ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory, and policy changes.changes, and other events that may otherwise affect the FDA's' ability to perform routine functions. Average review times at the FDA have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of other government agencies that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. The ability of the FDA and other government agencies to properly administer their functions is highly dependent on the levels of government funding and the ability to fill key leadership appointments, among various factors. Delays in filling or replacing key positions could significantly impact the ability of the FDA and other agencies to fulfill their functions and could greatly impact healthcare and the drug industry. Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new drugs and biologics or modifications to approved drugs and biologics to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, over the last several years, the U.S. government shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, furloughed critical employees and ceased critical activities. In the event of a partial or complete government shutdown, the FDA and certain other scientific agencies may temporarily cease certain operations. Furthermore, during such shutdown, the FDA may maintain only operations deemed to be essential for public health while suspending the acceptance of new medical product applications and routine regulatory and compliance work related to medical products, certain drugs, and foods. Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies, such as those resulting from a restructuring of these agencies, a prolonged government shutdown, or uncertainty regarding U.S. federal government funding, could significantly affect the ability of the FDA to review and process our regulatory submissions in a timely manner, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Government funding of research and development is subject to the political and budgetary process, which is inherently uncertain. Changes in federal funding priorities or reductions in funding from agencies such as the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) could adversely affect research programs related to our products and studies. In addition, proposals have periodically been made to reduce reimbursement of indirect costs associated with federally funded research. While certain such proposals have been challenged or blocked, there can be no assurance that similar policies will not be adopted in the future, which could adversely affect our business and financial results.
Further, in June 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed its longstanding approach under the Chevron doctrine, which provided for judicial deference to regulatory agencies, including the FDA. As a result of this decision, we cannot be sure whether there will be increased challenges to existing agency regulations or how lower courts will apply the decision in the context of other regulatory schemes without more specific guidance from the U.S. Supreme Court. For example, this decision may result in more companies bringing lawsuits against the FDA to challenge longstanding decisions and policies of the FDA, which could undermine the FDA’s authority, lead to uncertainties in the industry, and disrupt the FDA’s normal operations, which could impact the timely review of any regulatory filings or applications we submit to the FDA.
We expect our current injectable product candidate, nimacimab, will be regulated as a combination products,product, as our therapeutic candidates will be administered by the patient using a disposable injector device marketed together with the therapeutic candidate, if approved, and in at least one case, we anticipate combining a drug and biologic candidate together for administration using a device. Development of a product candidate as a combination product candidate requires close coordination within the FDA and within comparable regulatory agencies for review of each of the drug, biologic, and device components that comprise the product and would typically be reviewed by different centers within the FDA if offered for use as standalone products. For example, the FDA’s review of a marketing application for a biologic-device combination that has a primary mode of action as a biologic would likely be subject to a biologics license application with the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research as the lead center, with coordination with the Center for Devices and Radiological Health for the review of the device component. Although the FDA and comparable foreign agencies have or may have systems in place for the review and approval of such combination products, we may experience additional delays in the development and commercialization of such product candidates due to regulatory timing constraints and uncertainties in the product development and approval process. Moreover, although we anticipate that the device component of any combination product candidates we develop will be reviewed within the usual time frames expected for the marketing authorization application for underlying therapeutic candidate, and that no separate marketing application for the device components of such product candidates will be required in the United States, the FDA or comparable regulatory authorities may delay approval or require us to conduct additional studies with the device, which may delay the approval of the combination product.
Separately, to the extent we seek approval for use of any of our product candidates in combination with GLP-1 receptor agonists, FDA may require us to conduct additional studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination regimen, including to address potential additive or overlapping adverse events, dosing considerations, and patient selection. If we seek labeling that references use with a specific third-party GLP-1 product, we may be unable to obtain or maintain such labeling without cooperation from the applicable third party and/or changes to that third party’s labeling, which is outside of our control.
We expect to continue to rely on medical institutions, clinical investigators, contract laboratories and other third parties, such as contract research organizations, or CROs, to conduct our preclinical and clinical studies on our product candidates in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. For example, we are currently engaged with a CRO in the United States, to conduct our Phase 2 clinical study for nimacimab. These third parties will not be our employees and, except for restrictions imposed by our contracts with such third parties, we will have limited ability to control the amount or timing of resources that they devote to our programs. Although we expect to rely on these third parties to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials, we will remain responsible for ensuring that each of our preclinical studies and clinical trials is conducted in accordance with its investigational plan and protocol and the applicable legal, regulatory, and scientific standards, and our reliance on these third parties will not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. The FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions require us to comply with regulations and standards, commonly referred to as current good clinical practices, for conducting, monitoring, recording and reporting the results of clinical trials, in order to ensure that the data and results are scientifically credible and accurate and that the trial subjects are adequately informed of the potential risks of participating in clinical trials. If we or any of our third party contractors fail to comply with applicable current good clinical practices, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. In addition, we are required to report certain financial interests of our third party investigators if these relationships exceed certain financial thresholds and meet other criteria. The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may question the integrity of the data from those clinical trials conducted by principal investigators who previously served or currently serve as scientific advisors or consultants to us from time to time and receive cash compensation in connection with such services. Our clinical trials must also generally be conducted with products produced under current good manufacturing practice regulations. Our failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process.
•an inability to initiate or continue clinical trials of nimacimab, or any future product candidates under development, including our Phase 2a extension studydevelopment as well as subsequent clinical studies of nimacimab;
The development and commercialization of therapies for the treatment of obesity and overweight is highly competitive. Our product candidates,candidate, nimacimab, if approved, will face significant competition, including from well-established, currently marketed therapies that have been developed by large, well-known pharmaceutical companies, and our failure to demonstrate a meaningful improvement to the existing standard of care may prevent us from achieving significant market penetration. In particular, there is intense competition in the obesity and overweight field, especially with the advent of GLP-1 RAs, such as Wegovy, marketed by Novo Nordisk, and Zepbound, marketed by Eli Lilly. In addition to injectable therapies for overweight and obesity, Wegovy became the first FDA approved oral GLP-1 receptor agonist in December 2025 and other oral therapies are in development for treating overweight and obesity, including those being development by Eli Lilly, Structure Therapeutics, and Viking Therapeutics. There are numerous other companies that have commercialized or are developing treatments for obesity and overweight that we will compete with, including those entities listed in the section entitled "Competition" in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report. Competitors to nimacimab that are targeting peripheral inhibition of CB1 for the treatment of obesity and metabolic conditions include Novo Nordisk and their development effort of monlunabant. We face competition from these companies and other major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, including specialty pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, governmental agencies and public and private research institutions, among others.
We anticipate that we will continue to face increasing competition as new therapies and combinations thereof, and related data, emerge. Competitors, independently or through collaboration, are developing products that potentially directly compete with our current of future product candidates and which may be a longer lasting or a more efficacious treatment, or receive FDA or other applicable regulatory approval more rapidly than any of our current or future product candidates. Our commercial opportunity could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, are more convenient (such as oral therapies) or are less expensive than any products that we may develop. Our competitors also may obtain FDA or other applicable regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for ours, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market. In addition, our ability to compete may be affected in many cases by insurers or other third-party payors seeking to encourage the use of generic products. There are generic products currently on the market for certain of the indications that we are pursuing and additional products are expected to become available on a generic basis over the coming years. If our product candidates are approved, we expect that they will be priced at a significant premium over competitive generic products.
The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 ("BPCIA") established an abbreviated approval pathway for biolgoicalbiological products that are biosimilar to or interchangeable with an FDA-licensed reference biological product. Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years following the date that the reference product was first licensed by the FDA. In addition, the approval of a biosimilar product may not be made effective by the FDA until 12 years from the date on which the reference product was first licensed. During this 12-year period of exclusivity, another company may still market a competing version of the reference product if the FDA approves a full BLA for the competing product containing the sponsor’s own preclinical data and data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the safety, purity and potency (or efficacy) of its product.
We believe that nimacimab, if approved as a biological product under a BLA should qualify for the 12-year period of reference product exclusivity. However, there is a risk that this exclusivity could be shortened due to Congressional action or otherwise, or that the FDA will not consider our product candidates to be reference products for competing products, potentially creating the opportunity for biosimilar competition sooner than anticipated. Moreover, the extent to which a biosimilar, once approved, could be substituted for any one of our reference products in a way that is similar to traditional generic substitution for non-biological products will depend on a number of marketplace and regulatory factors that continue to develop.
Moreover, increasing efforts by governmental and third-party payors in the United States and abroad to cap or reduce healthcare costs may cause such organizations to limit both coverage and the level of reimbursement for newly approved products and, as a result, they may not cover or provide adequate payment for our products. For example, in May 2025, the current administration published an executive order that expressed support for equalizing the prices paid for drugs in the United States and other developed countries by employing a most favored nation, or MFN, approach to drug pricing and in September and October 2025, CMS submitted proposed rules for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) models, called the Global Benchmark for Efficient Drug Pricing (GLOBE) Model and Guarding U.S. Medicare Against Rising Drug Costs (GUARD) Model, to the White House for review. These models, if implemented, may allow CMS to pursue formalized approaches to MFN pricing for prescription drugs. In addition, in November 2025, CMS published a request for applications for another CMMI model, the GENEROUS (GENErating cost Reductions for U.S. Medicaid) Model. This is a voluntary model that tests the effect of supplemental rebate agreements between manufacturers and CMS, which align Medicaid prices with a defined MFN price. The scope of these models and the impact that they could have on any of our products is unclear at this time.
Moreover, increasing efforts by governmental and third-party payors in the United States and abroad to cap or reduce healthcare costs may cause such organizations to limit both coverage and the level of reimbursement for newly approved products and, as a result, they may not cover or provide adequate payment for our products. We expect to experience pricing pressures in connection with the sale of any of our products due to the trend toward managed healthcare, the increasing influence of health maintenance organizations and additional legislative changes. The downward pressure on healthcare costs in general, particularly prescription drugs and surgical procedures and other treatments, has become very intense. In addition, communications from government officials, media outlets, and others regarding health care costs and pharmaceutical pricing could have a negative impact on our stock price, even if such communications do not ultimately impact coverage or reimbursement decisions for our products. Further, we are unable to predict which or how many policy, regulatory, administrative or legislative changes may ultimately be, or effectively estimate the consequences to our business if, enacted and implemented. However, to the extent that payer actions further decrease or modify the coverage or reimbursement available for our products, require that we pay increased rebates or shift other costs to us, limit or affect our decisions regarding the pricing of or otherwise reduce the use of our products, such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
•unexpected changes in tariffs, trade barriers andbarriers, regulatory requirements;
•economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in particular domestic and foreign economies and markets;
Our ability to become profitable and continue as a going concern will be dependent on our ability to attract, employ and retain highly qualified personnel.
If we are not able to attract and retain highly qualified personnel, we may not be able to successfully implement our business strategy.
Our ability to compete in the highly competitive biotechnology and pharmaceuticals industries depends in part on upon our continued ability to attract, recruit, retain, manage and motivate highly qualified managerial, scientific and medical personnel. We are highly dependent upon our senior management, as well as our senior scientists and other members of our senior management team. The loss of services of any of these individuals could delay or prevent the successful development of our product pipeline, initiation or completion of our planned clinical trials or the commercialization of nimacimab. AlthoughFor example, in the first quarter of 2026, we haveexperienced executedthe employmentdeparture agreementsof certain key personnel and are supplementing any required resources for our business operations with eachsubject-matter-expert member(SME) of our senior management team, these agreements are terminable at will with or without notice, and therefore, we may not be able to retain their services as expected. We do not currently maintain “key person” life insurance on the lives of our executives or any of our employees.contractors. This lack of insurance means that we may not have adequate compensation for the loss of expertise and background knowledge may create challenges in maintaining operational continuity, meeting regulatory and financial reporting requirements, and supporting our strategic objectives. Replacing these personnel with qualified individuals may be difficult and could require additional and unanticipated costs and challenges including costs associated with engaging additional financial advisors and the serviceschallenges of thesebringing individuals.such third-party advisors current on our operations.
Although we have executed employment agreements with each member of our senior management team, these agreements are terminable at will with or without notice, and therefore, we may not be able to retain their services as expected. We do not currently maintain “key person” life insurance on the lives of our executives or any of our employees. This lack of insurance means that we may not have adequate compensation for the loss of the services of these individuals.
In addition, the competition for qualified personnel in the pharmaceutical industry is intense and there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to attract and retain all personnel necessary for the development and operation of our business. There is no guarantee that skilled persons will be available and willing to work for us in the future, nor is there any guarantee that we could afford to retain them if they are available at a future time. We also rely on, and have relied on in the past, consultants and advisors to assist us in formulating our strategy. Our consultants and advisors are either self-employed or employed by other organizations, and they may have conflicts of interest or other commitments, such as consulting or advisory contracts with other organizations, that may affect their ability to contribute to us.
As of March 19,9, 2025,2026, we had 1612 full-time employees. AsIn the first quarter of 2026, we reduced our workforce in order to reduce operating costs. However, as we continue development and pursue the potential commercialization of our product candidates, as well as function as a public company, we will need to expand our financial, development, regulatory, manufacturing, operational, marketing and sales capabilities or contract with third parties to provide these capabilities for us. As our operations expand, we expect that we will need to manage additional relationships with various strategic partners, suppliers and other third parties. Our future financial performance and our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates and to compete effectively will depend, in part, on our ability to manage any future growth effectively, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Removed heading “Cost to Acquire In-Process Research and Development ("IPR&D") Asset”
Removed heading “Cost to acquire IPR&D asset”
Largest changes
“As of December 31, 2025, management estimates that we have sufficient capital to continue our operations through the fourth quarter of 2026, excluding the anticipated clinical cost of a proposed Phase 2b study and additional anticipated drug manufacturing costs to supply any such Phase 2b study. However, our continued operations beyond the fourth quarter of 2026 will depend on our ability to successfully raise additional capital through various potential sources, such as equity and/or debt financings, or strategic relationships. …”see in full comparison
“The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of the Company continuing as a going concern for the next 12 months. Based on its current operational requirements, the Company believes that its current cash will be sufficient to fund its projected operations for at least 12 months from the date of the issuance of these consolidated financial statements. …”see in full comparison
“Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued a report on our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025 that included an explanatory paragraph referring to our recurring operating losses and expressing substantial doubt in our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. …”see in full comparison
“Cost to Acquire In-Process Research and Development ("IPR&D") Asset”see in full comparison
“Cash used in operating activities of $13,952,178 during the year ended December 31, 2023, reflected a net loss of $37,644,784, adjusted by aggregate non-cash charges of $24,161,913 and included a $469,307 decrease in our operating assets and liabilities. …”see in full comparison
“For the year ended December 31, 2023, we had net other expense of $2,906,011 primarily related to interest expense of $906,270 (including cash and non-cash interest), a non-cash charge of $1,383,285 related to the induced conversion of our multi-draw credit agreement with Emerald Health Sciences, Inc. (“Sciences”), dated October 5, 2018, as amended between April 29, 2020 and March 29, 2021 (the "Amended Credit Facility"), $409,347 in wind down costs associated with the EHT Acquisition (as defined below) and a $307,086 loss from the divestiture of VDL. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (71)
Unless otherwise provided in this Annual Report, references to “we,” “us,” “our” and “Skye” in this discussion and analysis refer to Skye Bioscience, Inc., a Nevada corporation ,corporation, together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, Nemus, a California corporation, SKYE Bioscience Pty Ltd ("SKYE Bioscience Australia"), an Australian proprietary limited company, Emerald Health Therapeutics, Inc. (EHT) a corporation governed by the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia), and Bird Rock Bio Sub, Inc. ("BRB"), a Delaware corporation and Ruiyi Acquisition Corp, a Delaware corporation.
In October of 2025, we reported topline data from our Phase 2a clinical trial, CBeyondTM, for nimacimab and in February 2026 we reported interim results from the combination cohort of the 26 week extension study. In response to the trial results, we have shifted focus to a combination therapy strategy while continuing to evaluate the monotherapy as a potential standalone or second-line therapy if efficacy can be achieved with higher doses. In March 2026, we initiated an expansion study (Part C) of the CBeyond Phase 2a trial to assess preliminary safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of nimacimab administered intravenously (IV). The expansion study will comprise two cohorts of nimacimab monotherapy (400 mg IV and 600 mg IV) compared to placebo administered weekly over 15 weeks (16 doses), with a 12 week follow up period.
In August of 2024, we commenced our Phase 2a clinical trial, CBeyondTM, for nimacimab. The CBeyondTM clinical trial includes 136 patients, 16 clinical trial sites and an exploratory combination arm with a GLP-1 receptor agonist to assess differences in weight loss, body composition, and other attributes. The CBeyondTM clinical trial is 100% enrolled and we expect to provide topline data near the end of the third quarter or the beginning of the four quarter 2025.
On September 6, 2023, we filed a Certificate of Change and Certificate of Correction with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada, which effected a reverse stock split, at a ratio of one-for-250, of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock (the "Reverse Split"). The Reverse Split was effective on September 8, 2023. As a result of the Reverse Split, each two-hundred fifty (250) shares of common stock was combined into one (1) share of common stock and the total number of shares of common stock authorized was reduced from 5,000,000,000 to 20,000,000 and the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding was reduced from 3,078,137,871 shares of common stock to 12,312,551 shares of common stock. Subsequently, on November 6, 2023, we increased our authorized shares of common stock to 100,000,000.
In January 2024 and March 2024, we completed two private placement equity transactions (the "January and March PIPE Financings") with institutional accredited investors, in which we raised combined net aggregate proceeds of $83,556,563. The net proceeds raised from the January and March PIPE Financings, along with the reallocation of funds from the elimination of our ocular program (as described below) willhave allowallowed us to fund our clinical trial of nimacimab for obesity through top-line Phase 2a data, complete process intensification manufacturing activities along with drug substance and product manufacturing work needed for our phasePhase 2b study and enable us to expand upon our metabolic program with our other research and development efforts. Our cash runway currently excludes the Phase 2b clinical studystudy, oradditional manufacturing activities necessaryexpected to supplycomplete athe Phase 32b clinicalresupply study.and costs related to future registrational studies.
In August of 2024, the Convertible Note (as defined in Note 6 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements). with a principal value of $5,000,000, was converted into 968,973 shares of our common stock.
During the fourth quarter of 2024, we were successful in our appeal in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (the "Ninth Circuit") of the judgment of a material litigation matter, which has been remanded to the District Court for a new trial, and the bond related to the judgement was exonerated, allowing us to recover $9,000,000 in restricted cash. Additionally, in a related case with our insurance carrier, we collected $2,000,000 during the fourth quarter of 2024. The recovered funds have beenwere reallocated to further our clinical pipeline and extended our cash runway.
We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on March 16, 2011, and our headquarters are based in San Diego, CA. We also maintain office space in San Francisco, CA. Since our incorporation, we have devoted substantially all of our efforts to building our product portfolio through the acquisition of clinical assets and licensing agreements, carrying out research and development, building infrastructure and raising capital.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, we incurred $42,361,879 in research and development expenses primarily related to our efforts in conducting the Phase 2a clinical trial of nimacimab for obesity and manufacturing costs in preparation of our Phase 2b trial. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we incurred $18,701,694 in research and development expenses primarily related to our efforts in conducting the Phase 2a clinical trial of nimacimab for obesity, manufacturing and residual costs from our legacy Phase 2a SBI-100 OE clinical trial. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we incurred $5,819,461 in research and development expense primarily related to our efforts in conducting the Phase 1 SBI-100 clinical trial and the manufacturing of the API required for the Phase 1 and Phase 2a SBI-100 OE clinical studies.
Cost to Acquire In-Process Research and Development ("IPR&D") Asset
During the year ended December 31, 2023, we incurred a one-time non-cash charge of $21,215,214 related to the acquisition of our lead clinical asset, nimacimab. This in-process R&D was expensed when purchased in exchange for shares of our common stock, as its only future use was determined to be for drug development.
Our general and administrative expenses have fluctuated year-over-year as we have entered into various strategic acquisitions to restructure and reposition our company. Additionally, as a business in the early stages of drug development we are in the process of scaling our operations by hiring additional employees and building the infrastructure necessary to increase efficiencies. These initiatives have resulted in additional costs related to the implementation of certain systems, insurance, facilities, legal, tax and accounting costs. As a public company, we expect to incur additional expenses related to insurance, investor relations activities, legal and other administration and professional services to comply with the rules and regulations of the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") and Nasdaq. Other significant costs are expected to include legal fees relating to patent and corporate matters, business development costs and fees for consulting services. To incentivize our employees and be competitive to retain strong talent we issued additional equity awards in 2024 and 2023,2024, which have resulted in increased stock-based compensation expense. We also expect that certain general and administrative expenses which are commensurate with headcount, will continue to increase in the future in order to support our expected increase in research and development activities, including increased salaries, technology, facilities and other related costs.
Estimated Legal Contingency and Income from Insurance Recovery
The estimated legal contingency relates to a material litigation matter that was related to our former management team. As of December 31, 2023, we had posted an appellate bond that was collateralized by an irrevocable letter of credit equal to, $9,080,202, approximately 150% of the liability recorded on our balance sheet. As of December 31,During 2024, we were successful in our appeal of the judgementjudgment in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the case was remanded back to the District Court for a new trial, as a result of which we adjustedreduced the estimated legal contingency based on new key assumptions. The final amount of the loss and loss recoveries remains uncertain. We believe that it is at least reasonably possible that the estimated amount of the potential loss may change in the near term. As of December 31, 2025, the estimated legal contingency, including accrued legal expenses, is $2,069,067. See Note 1112 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for more information.
Additionally, in a related case with our insurance carrier, we collected $2,000,000 during the fourth quarter of 2024. The recovered funds were reallocated to further our general operations.
Other (income) expense primarily includes a gaingains from installment payments related to the sale of Verdelite Sciences, Inc. ("VDL") and the sale of the Avalite Sciences, Inc. ("AVI") building (the "AVI building") (see Note 3 toin the accompanyingfirst consolidatedquarter financialof statements),2024, and interest expense. In 2023, we also reported wind-down costs from our 2022 acquisition of EHT which we did not incur in 2024. These expenses are offset by interest income earned on our cash balances.and cash equivalent balances and short term investments.
See Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for information on recently issued accounting pronouncements and recently adopted accounting pronouncements. WhileThe weadoption expect certainof recently adopted accounting pronouncements todid not have a material impact our estimates in future periods, the impact upon adoption was not significant toon our currentconsolidated estimatesfinancial and operations.statements.
•Clinical study costs increaseddecreased by $7,721,375$1,497,323 due to the planning and launch of the CBeyondTM study in August of 2024, which achieved 50% enrollment by the end of 2024.2024 and topline data in October 2025. During the first half of 2024, we also completed our Phase 2a SBI-100 trial for glaucoma.glaucoma which was the driver for the decrease as this program was eliminated in the first half of 2024.
•Contract manufacturing costs increased by $1,234,445$20,689,916 due to nimacimab drug product and drug substance runs to resupply the Phase 2a study and prepare for the Phase 2b study. Additional costs related to process intensification and drugdose resupplyconcentration manufacturing runsactivities which willare intended to allow us to seamlessly transition to a Phase 2b and build a scalable manufacturing process for future studies.
•Consulting costs increased by $691,185 to support our nimacimab program.
•Discovery research and development costs increased by $348,313$1,857,009 primarily from non-clinical studies related to the development of a diet induced obesity model to demonstrate proof of concept and mechanism of action studies related to nimacimab.
•Quality assurance costs increased by $108,747 from the use of consultants.
•Consulting and advisory fees increased by $724,360 to support our nimacimab program.
•General business expenses increaseddecreased by $459,054$350,061 due to increased travel and the write offnon-recurrence of non-refundablefees depositsassociated relatedwith toeliminating our glaucoma program.
•Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $223,456.
•In addition, we recognized additional depreciation of $156,628 on specialized manufacturing equipment that was purchased in 2024 to support manufacturing activities.
Cost to acquire IPR&D asset
Below is a summary of our cost to acquire the IPR&D asset during the December 31, 2024 and 2023:
Cost to acquire the IPR&D asset for the December 31, 2024, decreased by $21,215,214 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease is due to the cost to acquire nimacimab in the BRB Acquisition, which occurred in 2023.
General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 20242025 increaseddecreased by $9,873,401$1,924,055 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increasedecrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to the following:
•SalariesSalaries, benefits and stock-basedother compensationdirect increasedemployee related costs decreased by $6,980,398$742,057 primarily due to increased headcount and the recognitionlower of stock based compensation expense in the current period due to the achievement of certain performance based milestones related to RSUs granted to members of management and members of the board of directors of the Company. We also had an increase of $148,497Company in human2024, resourcesthe relateddecrease feeswas tooffset attractby newincreased talent.headcount.
•Investor relations, marketing and communications expenses increased by $580,995 due primarily to a market evaluation study for nimacimab and increased investor communications and marketing activities.
•Professional, fees decreased by $1,408,506 primarily due to the decrease in professional fees from tax and financial advisory services.
•Consulting and advisory fees increased by $499,909 primarily due to the increase in finance accounting and human resource consultants and the cost of the company's annual general meeting of shareholders.
•Recruiting fees expenses decreased by $176,176 due to the one time cost to hire an executive in the prior period.
•General business expenses decreased by $314,569 primarily due to the one time Nasdaq listing fee and filing fees in the prior period and lower insurance premiums in 2025, these decreases were offset by an increase in software costs.
•Legal fees decreased by $137,852 due to decreases in litigation related activities, one-time fees related to SEC filings in the prior period, decreases in external legal costs.
•General and administrative foreign exchange expenses decreased by $244,212 due to exchange rate fluctuation of the operation of our foreign subsidiaries.
•Legal, professional fees and consulting advisory increased by $1,397,512 due to one time services provided under a financial advisory agreement, professional services related to the registration of the resale of shares issued in the BRB Acquisition and the August 2023 PIPE Financing, the January and March 2024 PIPE Financings and general corporate legal fees associated with our uplisting to Nasdaq, the filing of our shelf registration statement, legal fees related to nimacimab patent prosecution, increased tax fees due to increased tax complexity and the entry into the ATM Agreement.
•General business expenses increased by $912,725 primarily due to increased insurance costs and regulatory fees associated with our uplisting to Nasdaq and the filing of our registration statements in connection with the January and March PIPE Financings. Other increases related to investments in building internal infrastructure and hosting internal and external corporate events.
•Travel and entertainment along with investor relations, marketing and public relations increased by $350,401, from increased activity to drive awareness for nimacimab.
Change in Estimate for Legal ContingencyContingencies
Below is a summary of the estimated legal contingencycontingencies during the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024:
TheThere was no change in estimate for legal contingency decreasedfor bythe $4,082,875year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the gain during the year ended December 31, 2024. The adjustment for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. The adjustment of $4,234,7172024 was due to a change in managements estimate related to the total liability due in the Cunning Lawsuit. For additional information regarding the adjustment to the legal contingency, see Note 1112 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
TheThere changewas in theno income from insurance recovery increasedfor bythe $2,000,000year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the income during the year ended December 31, 2024. The income for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase is due to the Company reaching a settlement with its former D&O carrier for coverage related to the Cunning Lawsuit.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, we had a decrease in other income, net of $1,391,515 as compared to the same period in 2024 primarily due to:
•Gain on sale of asset decreased by $997,662, due to the one-time sale of the AVL real estate during the year ended December 31, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company continued to collect installment payments from the sale of VDL totaling $360,750.
•Decreased interest expense of $749,308 due to the reduction of debt.
•Decreased interest income of $1,144,859 due to the decreased interest from our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments yields as a result of the decrease in cash equivalents and short-term investments on hand.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, we had net other income of $3,635,666, which was primarily related to interest income of $3,028,762 and a gain from the divestiture of the AVI real estate and collections from Verdelite Sciences, Inc. ("VDL") related to its sale in 2023. Income was offset by interest expense of $749,308 (including cash and non-cash interest).
For the year ended December 31, 2023, we had net other expense of $2,906,011 primarily related to interest expense of $906,270 (including cash and non-cash interest), a non-cash charge of $1,383,285 related to the induced conversion of our multi-draw credit agreement with Emerald Health Sciences, Inc. (“Sciences”), dated October 5, 2018, as amended between April 29, 2020 and March 29, 2021 (the "Amended Credit Facility"), $409,347 in wind down costs associated with the EHT Acquisition (as defined below) and a $307,086 loss from the divestiture of VDL. The increase was offset by interest income of 99,974.
LiquidityLiquidity, Going Concern and Capital Resources
We have incurred operating losses and negative cash flows from operations since our inception. We expect to continue to incur significant losses and negative cash flows from operations through 2026 and into the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will continue to incur net losses in order to advance and develop potential drug candidates into preclinical and clinical development activities and support our corporate infrastructure, which includes the costs associated with being a public company. Historically, we have funded our operations primarily through issuance of equity securities, borrowings from a related party and strategic transactions.
We have incurred operating losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception and asAs of December 31, 2024,2025, had working capital of $66,488,360$18,888,688 and an accumulated deficit of $130,949,672.$186,874,486. As of December 31, 2024,2025, the Company had cash and cash equivalents in the amount of $68,415,741.$25,737,221. For the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, the Company incurred losses from operations of $30,192,718$58,163,565 and $34,735,173,$30,192,718, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, the Company incurred net losses of $26,567,123$55,924,814 and $37,644,784,$26,567,123, respectively. The Company expects to continue to incur significant losses and negative cash flows from operations through 2025 and expects to incur significant losses and negative cash flows from operations in the future.
In January 2024 and March 2024, we completed the January and March PIPE Financings with institutional accredited investors, in which we raised combined net aggregate proceeds of $83,556,563.
In January 2024 and March 2024, we completed the January and March PIPE Financings with institutional accredited investors, in which we raised combined net aggregate proceeds of $83,556,563. The net proceeds raised from the January and March PIPE Financings, along with the reallocation of funds from the elimination of our ocular program, will allow us to fund our clinical trial for obesity through top-line Phase 2a data, complete process intensification manufacturing activities along with drug substance and product manufacturing work needed for future studies, plan for our Phase 2b dose ranging study and provide us with the ability to expand upon our metabolic program with our other research and development efforts.
InOn July 1, 2024, 1,301,573 pre-funded warrants,warrants issued in the January 2024 PIPE Financing with an intrinsic value of $10,424,294, were exercised on a cashless basis, resulting in the issuance 1,301,410 shares of ourCompany's common stock (see Note 78 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements).
On October 7, 2025, 1,059,441 pre-funded warrants issued in the January 2024 PIPE Financing with an intrinsic value of $2,012,938 were exercised on a cashless basis, resulting in the issuance of 1,059,441 shares of Company's common stock.
On December 18, 2025, 1,289,861 pre-funded warrants issued in the January 2024 PIPE Financing with an intrinsic value of $1,360,803 were exercised on a cashless basis, resulting in the issuance of 1,289,861 shares of Company's common stock.
On December 23, 2025, 25,192 pre-funded warrants issued in the January 2024 PIPE Financing with an intrinsic value of $23,177 were exercised on a cashless basis, resulting in the issuance of 25,192 shares of Company's common stock.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
New heading “Failure to complete, or delays in completing, the proposed Transaction with Redx could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, business, financial results and/or stock price.”
New heading “We are substantially dependent on our remaining employees to facilitate the consummation of the Transaction.”
New heading “The Transaction may be completed even though a material adverse effect may result from the announcement of the Transaction, industry-wide changes and/or other causes.”
New heading “Some of our executive officers and directors have interests in the Transaction that are different from our stockholders and that may influence them to support or approve the Transaction without regard to the interests of our stockholders.”
New heading “Our stockholders may not realize a benefit from the Transaction commensurate with the ownership dilution they will experience in connection with the Transaction.”
New heading “Our equityholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest in, and will exercise less influence over the management of, the combined company following the completion of the Transaction as compared to their current ownership and voting interests in the respective companies.”
New heading “Lawsuits may be filed against us and the members of our board of directors arising out of the proposed Transaction, which may delay or prevent the proposed Transaction.”
New heading “During the pendency of the Transaction , we may not be able to enter into a business combination with another party at a favorable price because of restrictions in the Transaction Agreement, which could adversely affect their respective businesses.”
New heading “Certain provisions of the Transaction Agreement may discourage third parties from submitting competing proposals, including proposals that may be superior to the arrangements contemplated by the Transaction Agreement.”
New heading “Our stockholders may not receive any payment on the Company Legacy CVRs and the Company Legacy CVRs may otherwise expire valueless.”
New heading “The tax treatment of the Company Legacy CVRs is uncertain.”
New heading “If the Transaction is not completed, our stock price may decline significantly.”
New heading “If we do not complete the Transaction, we may face substantial competition for attractive counterparties for any proposed strategic transactions.”
New heading “If we do not successfully consummate the Transaction or another strategic transaction, our board of directors may decide to pursue a dissolution and liquidation of our company. In such an event, the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders will depend heavily on the timing of such liquidation as well as the amount of cash that will need to be reserved for commitments and contingent liabilities, as to which we can give you no assurance.”
Largest changes
“Putative stockholder complaints, including stockholder class action complaints, and other complaints may be filed against us, our board of directors, Redx, the Redx board of directors and others in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreement. The outcome of litigation is uncertain, and we may not be successful in defending against any such future claims. …”see in full comparison
“In addition, on July 22, 2026, the SEC approved Nasdaq's recently proposed rule changes to (i) adopt Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(6) to require issuers listed on the Nasdaq to maintain a minimum Market Value of Listed Securities (as defined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5005(a)(23)) ("MVLS") of at least $5 million for a period of thirty (30) consecutive business days, and (ii) amend Rule 5810 to suspend trading and immediately delist from Nasdaq securities of issuers that do not satisfy the proposed new requirements, and Rule 5815 to set forth the procedures for requesting a hearing before a Hearings …”see in full comparison
“If Nasdaq delists our securities from trading on its exchange at some future date, we would take actions to restore our compliance with Nasdaq's listing requirements, but we can provide no assurance that any such action taken by us would allow our common stock to become listed again, stabilize the market price or improve the liquidity of our common stock, prevent our common stock from dropping below Nasdaq's minimum bid price requirement or prevent future non-compliance with Nasdaq's listing requirements. …”see in full comparison
“Lawsuits may be filed against us and the members of our board of directors arising out of the proposed Transaction, which may delay or prevent the proposed Transaction.”see in full comparison
“If we do not complete the Transaction, we may face substantial competition for attractive counterparties for any proposed strategic transactions.”see in full comparison
“In certain circumstances, and subject to compliance with the Transaction Agreement, our board of directors or the Redx board may change its recommendation to its respective stockholders if it determines such recommendation change is required to avoid a breach of its fiduciary duties. Additionally, subject to compliance with the procedures set forth in the Transaction Agreement, including paying the applicable termination fee, Redx may terminate the Transaction Agreement in order to enter into an agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Transaction Agreement).”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (83)
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq GlobalCapital Market,Market or Nasdaq.("Nasdaq"). In order to maintain this listing, we must satisfy the continued listing requirements and standards of Nasdaq, including a minimum closing bid price requirement for our common stock of $1.00 per share. On March 17, 2026, we received a notification letter from Nasdaq notifying us that, for the last 30 consecutive business days, the closing bid price for our common stock has been below the minimum $1.00 per share required for continued listing on Nasdaq pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(a)(1) (“Rule 5450(a)(1)”). We have 180 calendar days, or until September 14, 2026, to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement (which, following our transfer to the Nasdaq Capital Market described below, is set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 54505550(a)(12)) by maintaining a closing bid price of at least $1.00 per share for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days, subject to Nasdaq’s discretion. If we do not regain compliance with Rule 5450(a)(1) by September 14, 2026, we may be afforded a second 180 calendar day period to regain compliance, subject to meeting applicable listing standards and written notice of our intention to cure the deficiency during the second compliance period, including by effecting a reverse stock split if necessary.
Separately, on May 13, 2026, we received a notification letter from Nasdaq notifying us that our stockholders’ equity had fallen below the $10.0 million minimum required for continued listing on the Nasdaq Global Market under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(A). To resolve this deficiency, we applied to transfer the listing of our common stock to the Nasdaq Capital Market, which has lower continued listing requirements, including a lower minimum stockholders’ equity requirement. Nasdaq approved the transfer, which became effective on June 23, 2026, and, as a result, we regained compliance with the stockholders’ equity requirement. Our common stock continues to trade on Nasdaq under the symbol “SKYE.” The minimum bid price requirement described above continues to apply to our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
In addition, on July 22, 2026, the SEC approved Nasdaq's recently proposed rule changes to (i) adopt Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(6) to require issuers listed on the Nasdaq to maintain a minimum Market Value of Listed Securities (as defined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5005(a)(23)) ("MVLS") of at least $5 million for a period of thirty (30) consecutive business days, and (ii) amend Rule 5810 to suspend trading and immediately delist from Nasdaq securities of issuers that do not satisfy the proposed new requirements, and Rule 5815 to set forth the procedures for requesting a hearing before a Hearings Panel and the scope of the Hearings Panel’s discretion. MVLS is generally calculated by multiplying the consolidated closing bid price by the number of shares of listed securities outstanding and, where a company has more than one class or series of equity security listed on Nasdaq, the values are aggregated. Under the new rule, if a company’s MVLS remains below $5 million for 30 consecutive business days, Nasdaq will issue a Staff Delisting Determination and immediately suspend trading of the company’s securities.
Unlike many other Nasdaq continued listing standards, the new MVLS requirement does not provide a compliance or cure period before a Staff Delisting Determination is issued. Additionally, a request for a hearing before the Hearings Panel does not automatically stay the suspension of trading. While the Hearings Panel may reverse a Staff Delisting Determination if it concludes that Nasdaq made an error, or in limited circumstances grant an exception of up to 180 calendar days for a company to demonstrate compliance with Nasdaq’s initial listing standards — which are generally more stringent than the continued listing standards — there can be no assurance that any such relief would be granted. A company may further appeal an adverse Hearings Panel decision to the Nasdaq Listing and Hearing Review Council; however, the company’s securities would generally trade in the over-the-counter market during the pendency of any such appeal.
On July 29, 2026, Nasdaq’s new continued listing requirement requiring companies to maintain at least $5 million in MVLS was automatically stayed. The rule, which the SEC approved on July 22, would have required companies whose MVLS remained below $5 million for 30 consecutive business days to be immediately suspended and delisted, with no compliance period. Although companies would still have been able to appeal to a Nasdaq Hearings Panel, trading on Nasdaq would not have continued during the appeal.
For now, Nasdaq’s new $5 million MVLS continued listing requirement is not effective. The Commission must decide whether to review the Division’s approval and, if it does, whether to affirm, modify, reverse, set aside, or remand the matter for further proceedings. The Commission may also decline review. During that process, the stay remains in place, and there is no prescribed timeline for the Commission to reach a decision. Because filing a petition for Commission review is generally a prerequisite to seeking judicial review, the matter could ultimately proceed to a federal court of appeals. If that occurs, the listing requirement could remain stayed during the pendency of the litigation, potentially delaying implementation for a significant period of time.
There can be no assurance that our MVLS will remain at or above the $5 million threshold for periods long enough to comply with the new standard. Our MVLS may be adversely affected by factors outside of our control, including general market conditions, macroeconomic uncertainty, sector-specific developments, investor sentiment, and volatility in the trading price of our Common Stock. Because the rule is triggered by 30 consecutive business days below the threshold, even a sustained but temporary decline in our stock price could result in non-compliance and the immediate suspension and delisting of our Common Stock.
If Nasdaq delists our securities from trading on its exchange at some future date, we would take actions to restore our compliance with Nasdaq's listing requirements, but we can provide no assurance that any such action taken by us would allow our common stock to become listed again, stabilize the market price or improve the liquidity of our common stock, prevent our common stock from dropping below Nasdaq's minimum bid price requirement or prevent future non-compliance with Nasdaq's listing requirements. In the event of a delisting, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:
•a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;
•reduced liquidity with respect to our securities;
•a determination that our Common Stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in our ordinary shares to adhere to more stringent rules, possibly resulting in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our ordinary shares;
•a limited amount of news and analyst coverage for our company; and
•a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.
If the closing bid price of our common stock continues to trade below $1.00 per share, we intend to implement a reverse stock split to attempt to regain compliance, as disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 19, 2026.compliance. However, although, we may effect a reverse stock split requiresby action of our board of directors without a stockholder approval, andvote, there can be no assurance that our stockholders will approve the proposal or that a reverse stock split, if effected, would result in our regaining or maintaining compliance with Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements.
If we are unable to regain compliance within the applicable cure period, including any available extension, our common stock would be subject to delisting from Nasdaq. Further, even if we regain compliance, we may not be able to sustain compliance with Rulethe 5450(a)(1)minimum bid price requirement in the long term. A delisting could significantly reduce the liquidity and market price of our common stock, limit investors’ ability to buy and sell our common stock, reduce analyst coverage, and negatively affect our ability to access the capital markets or complete strategic transactions on favorable terms, or at all. Delisting could also trigger certain contractual provisions or investor concerns that may further adversely affect us.
Failure to complete, or delays in completing, the proposed Transaction with Redx could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, business, financial results and/or stock price.
Any failure to satisfy a required condition to closing may prevent, delay or otherwise materially and adversely affect the completion of the Transaction, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, business, financial results and/or stock price. We cannot predict with certainty whether or when any of the required closing conditions will be satisfied or if another uncertainty may arise and cannot assure you that the proposed Transaction will be successfully consummated or that we will be able to successfully consummate the proposed Transaction as currently contemplated under the Transaction Agreement or at all.
The conditions specified in the Transaction Agreement must be satisfied or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, waived to complete the Transaction. We cannot assure you that all of the conditions will be satisfied or waived.
Risks related to the failure to consummate, or delay in consummating, the proposed Transaction with Redx include, but are not limited to, the following:
•we would not realize any or all of the potential benefits of the Transaction, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, business or stock price;
•under certain circumstances, a termination fee may be payable by us to Redx, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Transaction Agreement;
•we would remain liable for significant transaction costs, including legal, accounting, financial advisory and other costs relating to the Transaction regardless of whether the Transaction is consummated;
•the trading price of our common stock may decline to the extent that the current market price for our common stock reflects a market assumption that the Transaction will be completed;
•the attention of our management and employees may have been diverted to the Transaction rather than to our historical operations and the pursuit of other opportunities that could have been beneficial to us;
•we could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the Transaction;
•we could potentially lose key personnel during the pendency of the Transaction; and
•under the Transaction Agreement, we are subject to certain customary restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to completing the Transaction, which restrictions could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business as we otherwise would have done if we were not subject to these restrictions.
The occurrence of any of these events individually or in combination could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, business, and our common stock price, and we may lose some or all the intended benefits of the Transaction.
We are substantially dependent on our remaining employees to facilitate the consummation of the Transaction.
Our ability to consummate a strategic transaction depends upon our ability to retain our remaining employees required to consummate such a transaction, the loss of whose services may adversely impact the ability to consummate such transaction. As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we had only two full-time employees. Our ability to successfully complete the Transaction depends in large part on our ability to retain key personnel that are necessary to maintain our operations between now and the Effective Time. Despite our efforts to retain these employees, one or more may terminate their employment with us on short notice. Our cash conservation activities may yield other unintended consequences, such as reduced employee morale, which may cause remaining employees to seek alternative employment. The loss of the services of certain employees could potentially harm our ability to consummate the Transaction, to run our day-to-day business operations, as well as to fulfill our reporting obligations as a public company.
The Transaction may be completed even though a material adverse effect may result from the announcement of the Transaction, industry-wide changes and/or other causes.
In general, either we or Redx can refuse to complete the Transaction if there is an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the Transaction Agreement) or a Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the Transaction Agreement), as applicable, between the date of the Transaction Agreement and the Closing. However, certain types of changes do not permit either party to refuse to complete the Transaction, even if such change could be said to have a material adverse effect on us or Redx, including:
•any changes in general United States or global economic conditions or other general business, financial or market conditions;
•any changes in conditions generally affecting the industry in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries operate;
•fluctuations in the value of any currency;
•regulatory, legislative or political conditions or conditions in securities, credit, financial, debt or other capital markets, in each case in the United States or any foreign country;
•any failure, in and of itself, by the Company or any of its subsidiaries to meet any internal or published projections, forecasts, estimates or predictions, revenues, earnings or other financial or operating metrics for any period (provided, that any events, changes, effects, circumstances, facts, developments or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such failure that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of Material Adverse Effect may be taken into account in determining whether there has been, or would reasonably be expected to be, a Material Adverse Effect);
•the execution and delivery of the Transaction Agreement, the public announcement or the pendency of the Transaction Agreement or the pendency or consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreement (including the Transaction), the taking of any action required by the Transaction Agreement (subject to certain exceptions), or the identity of, or any facts or circumstances relating to, Redx or any of its subsidiaries, including the impact of any of the foregoing on the relationships, contractual or otherwise, of the Company or any of its subsidiaries with governmental authorities, customers, suppliers, partners, officers, employees or other material business relations;
•any adoption, implementation, promulgation, repeal, modification, amendment, authoritative interpretation, change or proposal of any applicable law of or by any governmental authority or any recommendations, statements or other pronouncements made, published or proposed by professional medical organizations;
•any changes or prospective changes in IFRS (or authoritative interpretations thereof);
•geopolitical conditions, the outbreak or escalation of hostilities, civil or political unrest, any acts of war, sabotage, cyberattack or terrorism, or any escalation or worsening of the foregoing;
•any epidemic, pandemic or other outbreak of illness or public health event, any hurricane, earthquake, flood, calamity or other natural disasters, acts of God or any change resulting from weather conditions (or any worsening of any of the foregoing); or
• any claims, actions, suits or proceedings arising from allegations of a breach of fiduciary duty or violation of securities laws, in each case relating to the Transaction Agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Transaction).
If a material adverse change occurs with respect to either party or both parties and we and Redx still complete the Transaction, the stock price of the combined company following the Closing may suffer and may reduce the value of the Transaction to our stockholders.
Some of our executive officers and directors have interests in the Transaction that are different from our stockholders and that may influence them to support or approve the Transaction without regard to the interests of our stockholders.
Certain of our executive officers and directors are parties to arrangements that provide them with interests in the Transaction that are different from our stockholders, including severance benefits, the acceleration of equity award vesting and continued indemnification.
Our board of directors was aware of and considered these interests, among other matters, in reaching its determination (i) that the terms of the Transaction Agreement and the Transaction are fair to, advisable and in the best interest of us and our stockholders and (ii) to approve and declare advisable the Transaction Agreement, including the Transaction and the issuance of shares of our common stock to the stockholders of Redx pursuant to the Transaction Agreement. These interests, among other factors, may have influenced the directors and executive officers to support or approve the Transaction.
Our stockholders may not realize a benefit from the Transaction commensurate with the ownership dilution they will experience in connection with the Transaction.
If the combined company is unable to realize the full strategic and financial benefits currently anticipated from the Transaction, our stockholders will have experienced substantial dilution of their ownership interests without receiving any commensurate benefit, or only receiving part of the commensurate benefit to the extent the combined company is able to realize only part of the strategic and financial benefits currently anticipated from the Transaction.
Our equityholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest in, and will exercise less influence over the management of, the combined company following the completion of the Transaction as compared to their current ownership and voting interests in the respective companies.
After the completion of the Transaction, our current stockholders are expected to own a smaller percentage of the combined company than their ownership of their respective companies prior to the Transaction. Upon the Closing, on a pro forma basis and based upon the number of shares of Exchange Shares expected to be issued in connection with the Transaction and the Concurrent Financing, pre-Transaction equityholders of the Company are expected to own approximately 5.38% of the combined company, pre-Transaction equityholders of Redx are expected to own approximately 46.17% of the combined company and investors in the Concurrent Financing and the Series A Financing are expected to own approximately 48.45% of the combined company (assuming gross proceeds from the Concurrent Financing of $67.9 million and assuming gross proceeds from the Series A Financing of $36.0 million), in each case, calculated on a fully diluted basis, using the treasury stock method, and, subject to certain assumptions, including (i) a valuation for the Company of $14.5 million (assuming the Company has no net cash as a result of its pre-Closing distributions (“Company Net Cash”) as of the Closing), (ii) a valuation for Redx of $125.0 million (iii) the relative capitalization of the Company and Redx and (iv) assuming that the Concurrent Financing is not increased pursuant to the Side Letter. The percentage of the combined company that each party’s equityholders will own following the Closing is subject to certain adjustments as described in the Transaction Agreement, including the amount of the final Company Net Cash at Closing.
Lawsuits may be filed against us and the members of our board of directors arising out of the proposed Transaction, which may delay or prevent the proposed Transaction.
Putative stockholder complaints, including stockholder class action complaints, and other complaints may be filed against us, our board of directors, Redx, the Redx board of directors and others in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreement. The outcome of litigation is uncertain, and we may not be successful in defending against any such future claims. Lawsuits that may be filed against us, our board of directors, Redx, or the Redx board of directors could delay or prevent the Transaction, divert the attention of our management and employees from our day-to-day business and otherwise adversely affect our financial condition.
During the pendency of the Transaction , we may not be able to enter into a business combination with another party at a favorable price because of restrictions in the Transaction Agreement, which could adversely affect their respective businesses.
Covenants in the Transaction Agreement impede our ability to make acquisitions or complete other mergers, sales of assets or other business combinations pending completion of the Transaction. As a result, if the Transaction is not completed, the parties may be at a disadvantage to their competitors during that period. In addition, while the Transaction Agreement is in effect, each party is generally prohibited from soliciting, initiating, knowingly encouraging or entering into specified extraordinary transactions, such as a merger, sale of assets or other business combination, with any third party, subject to specified exceptions, even if any such transaction could be favorable to such party’s stockholders or stockholders, as applicable.
Certain provisions of the Transaction Agreement may discourage third parties from submitting competing proposals, including proposals that may be superior to the arrangements contemplated by the Transaction Agreement.
The terms of the Transaction Agreement prohibit each of us and Redx from soliciting competing proposals or cooperating with persons making unsolicited Acquisition Proposals (as defined in the Transaction Agreement), except in certain limited circumstances. With respect to us, the board of directors may respond to an unsolicited Acquisition Proposal if it determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisor and outside legal counsel, that the unsolicited competing proposal constitutes, or is reasonably likely to result in, a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Transaction Agreement) and, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that failure to take such action would be inconsistent with the fiduciary duties of our board of directors. With respect to Redx, following receipt of a bona fide acquisition proposal by any person that the Redx board has determined is reasonably likely to result in a superior competing proposal, Redx may solicit Acquisition Proposals and furnish information to, and enter into discussions with, any person (including persons not making such proposal) if the Redx board concludes in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor, that failure to take such action would be inconsistent with the fiduciary duties of the Redx board.
In certain circumstances, and subject to compliance with the Transaction Agreement, our board of directors or the Redx board may change its recommendation to its respective stockholders if it determines such recommendation change is required to avoid a breach of its fiduciary duties. Additionally, subject to compliance with the procedures set forth in the Transaction Agreement, including paying the applicable termination fee, Redx may terminate the Transaction Agreement in order to enter into an agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Transaction Agreement).
Upon termination of the Transaction Agreement in certain circumstances, a termination fee may be payable by us to Redx if (i)(a) the Transaction Agreement is terminated because the Transaction has not been consummated by the End Date or we (1) fail to obtain the requisite stockholder approval or (2) breach the Transaction Agreement, (b) an alternative acquisition proposal was announced or disclosed prior to such termination, and (c) within 12 months of the termination of the Transaction Agreement, we enter into a definitive agreement with respect to an alternative transaction, (ii) we fail to include our board recommendation in the related proxy statement/prospectus, or (iii) our board of directors changes or withdraws its recommendation in favor of the Transaction or approves an alternative transaction, or willfully and intentionally breaches its non-solicitation or certain other obligations under the Transaction Agreement.
Both we and Redx have also each agreed to reimburse the other party for certain third-party expenses, as applicable, if the Transaction Agreement is terminated in certain circumstances.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Results of CBeyond Phase 2a Proof-of-Concept Trial”
New heading “Recent Developments”
New heading “Termination of CBeyond Study”
New heading “Transaction with Redx Pharma Limited”
New heading “Company Contingent Value Rights Agreement”
New heading “Redx Contingent Value Rights Agreement”
New heading “Concurrent Financing”
New heading “Equity Line of Credit and Warrant”
New heading “Termination of Halozyme License Agreement”
New heading “Change in Estimate for Legal Contingencies”
New heading “For the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
New heading “Research and Development Expenses”
New heading “General and Administrative Expenses”
New heading “Change in Estimate for Legal Contingencies”
New heading “Other (Income) Expense”
Removed heading “Summary of Phase 2a Extension Study”
Largest changes
“As of March 31, 2026, management estimates that we have sufficient capital to continue our operations through the fourth quarter of 2026, excluding the anticipated clinical cost of a proposed Phase 2b study and additional anticipated drug manufacturing costs to supply any such Phase 2b study. However, our continued operations beyond the fourth quarter of 2026 will depend on our ability to successfully raise additional capital through various potential sources, such as equity and/or debt financings, or strategic relationships. …”see in full comparison
Our independent registered public accounting firm issued a report on our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31,see in full comparison20252025, that included an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern due to our recurring operating losses. Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the carrying amounts or classification of assets and liabilities that may be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. Refer to "Risks Related to Our Limited Operating History, Financial Position and Capital Requirements — Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, and if we are unable to continue, you may lose your entire investment" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
“Concurrently with entering into the Transaction Agreement, the Company entered in a binding term sheet (the “Term Sheet”) with a fund affiliated with Redmile Group, LLC (“Redmile”), pursuant to which, and subject to the terms and conditions therein, the Company and Redmile agreed to enter into definitive documentation with respect to an equity line of credit (the “ELOC”) and the Warrant (as defined below) within seven days of the date of the Term Sheet. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (127)
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, together with the notes thereto and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 10, 2026.
We are a clinical stage biotechnology company pioneering next-generation molecules that modulate G-protein-coupled receptors ("GPCRs") to treat obesity, overweight, and related conditions. Ourwith lead clinical candidate, nimacimab, is a peripherally restricted negative allosteric modulating antibody targeting cannabinoid receptor 1 ("CB1")—a key GPCR involved in metabolic regulation that is administered as a subcutaneous injectable initially for the treatment of obesity and overweight.
Results of CBeyond Phase 2a Proof-of-Concept Trial
We are conductingcompleted CBeyondTM, a Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial of nimacimab administered as a subcutaneous injectable for the treatment of obesity and overweight in the United States. The randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind CBeyond Phase 2a trial enrolled 136 adults with obesity or overweight, including individuals with a BMI ≥27 kg/m² with at least one comorbidity. Patients were randomized across four arms, 2:2:1:1 to arms with weekly nimacimab 200 mg subcutaneously, placebo, nimacimab 200 mg plus semaglutide (Wegovy®), or placebo plus semaglutide, and were dosed weekly for 26 weeks. Patients not participating in a 26-week extension were monitored for 13 weeks post-treatment.
In October 2025, we announced topline results from our CBeyond Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial of nimacimab administered as a subcutaneous injectable for the treatment of obesity and overweight in the United States. Nimacimab monotherapy arm did not achieve the primary endpoint of weight loss compared to placebo (-1.52% vs. -0.26 for placebo, mITT). Preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis suggested an association between exposure and response, indicating that the 200 mg, subcutaneous weekly dose was suboptimal as a monotherapy. At the tested dose and exposure levels, nimacimab 200 mg demonstrated a favorable safety profile with placebo-like tolerability. In combination with semaglutide, there was no increase in gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. Importantly, there were no increases in neuropsychiatric adverse events reported resulting from treatment with nimacimab. In the combination arm, nimacimab 200 mg, subcutaneous weekly dose plus semaglutide demonstrated a clinically meaningful magnitude of weight loss compared to semaglutide alone (-13.2% vs -10.25%, p=0.0372, mITT), with no plateau being observed through Week 26.
In October 2025, we announced topline results from our CBeyond Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial of nimacimab administered as a subcutaneous injectable for the treatment of obesity and overweight in the United States. We reported the following 26 week data from the CBeyond Phase 2a study:
•The nimacimab monotherapy arm did not achieve the primary endpoint of weight loss compared to placebo (-1.52% vs. -0.26 for placebo, mITT). Preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis suggested an association between exposure and response, indicating that the 200 mg, subcutaneous weekly dose was suboptimal as a monotherapy.
•At the tested dose and exposure levels, nimacimab 200 mg demonstrated a favorable safety profile with placebo-like tolerability. In combination with semaglutide, there was no increase in gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. Importantly, there were no increases in neuropsychiatric adverse events reported resulting from treatment with nimacimab.
•In the combination arm, nimacimab 200 mg, subcutaneous weekly dose plus semaglutide demonstrated a clinically meaningful magnitude of weight loss compared to semaglutide alone (-13.2% vs -10.25%, p=0.0372, mITT), with no plateau being observed through Week 26. In the combination arm, 100% of patients achieved greater than 5% weight loss (vs. 85% with semaglutide alone) and 67% achieved greater than 10% weight loss (vs. 50% with semaglutide alone) based on the per protocol analysis. This finding supports potential further studies to evaluate combinations of nimacimab and incretin-based therapies, like semaglutide or tirzepatide. Other findings in the combination arm included:
◦Nimacimab plus semaglutide showed a change of -11.26cm (1.16cm) in waist circumference versus -8.09cm (1.2cm) for semaglutide alone, resulting in a difference of -3.17cm (1.59cm) (p=0.0492, using least-squares mean (LSM)).
◦An improvement in lean mass to fat mass ratio was observed at week 26 when comparing the nimacimab plus semaglutide combination arm to the placebo arm (0.26 vs. 0.02, p <0.0001), and the combination arm compared to semaglutide alone (0.26 vs. 0.13, p = 0.0126).
◦A decrease in rebound weight gain in an analysis of participants 12 weeks post-treatment when nimacimab 200 mg (subcutaneous, weekly) was combined with semaglutide when compared to semaglutide alone (17.8% versus 37.3% weight rebound). Moreover, at 12 weeks post-treatment, the nimacimab plus semaglutide group maintained significant weight loss compared to the placebo group (p=0.006), while the semaglutide alone group lost significance over the placebo group (p=0.12) and followed a trajectory of rebound weight gain consistent with previously reported data (Wilding et al., 2022, STEP-1 Trial Extension), which demonstrated that patients will gain a majority of weight back within 1-year of stopping treatment with semaglutide.
Topline data from our CBeyond Phase 2a study was presented at ObesityWeek medical conference in November 2025.
Summary of Phase 2a Extension Study
In February 2026, we reported the following interim results from the combination cohort of our Phase 2a extension study:
•19 participants in the combination cohorts completed week 26 were eligible for, and enrolled in the extension study, which continued in a blinded manner for 26 weeks, maintaining their original treatment assignment (10 nimacimab plus semaglutide; 9 placebo plus semaglutide). An additional 22 participants completed week 26 and were either ineligible for the extension or chose not to join the extension study and continued on post-treatment follow-up (11 nimacimab plus semaglutide; 11 placebo plus semaglutide).
•Of the 1019 participants in the nimacimabcombination pluscohorts semaglutidecompleted armweek who26 joinedwere eligible for, and enrolled in the extension study,study. Seven participants in the meancombination weight loss at 26 weeks was 14.4%. 7 participantsgroup completed the additional 26 weeks of treatment and lost an additional 7.9% of weight, resulting in a mean weight loss of 22.3% after 52 weeks of treatment.. According to initial results in this limited cohort, the combination therapy remained safe and well tolerated. No SAEs or AESIs were reported during the extension period. Moreover, the 7 participants in the semaglutide-alone group completed treatment of the additional 26 weeks and lost an additional -5.8% of weight during the extension period, resulting in a mean weight loss of -19.7%. Full topline reporting of the CBeyond Phase 2a extension data including nimacimab monotherapy data and 13-week off-therapy follow-up has not yet been reported.
We believe multiple factors may have resulted in the lower than anticipated weight loss results for nimacimab as a monotherapy, including a lower systemic exposure than originally modeled, and a better understanding of tissue exposure required to drive weight loss with peripheral CB1 inhibition.
•Of the 9 participants in the placebo plus semaglutide arm that joined the extension study, mean weight loss at 26 weeks was -13.9%. 7 participants completed treatment of the additional 26 weeks and lost an additional -5.8% of weight during the extension period, resulting in a mean weight loss of -19.7% after 52 weeks of treatment.
Full topline reporting of the CBeyond Phase 2a extension data including nimacimab monotherapy data and 13-week off-therapy follow-up is expected to take place in the third quarter of 2026.
In March 2026, we initiated an expansion study (Part C) of the CBeyond Phase 2a trial to assess preliminary safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of nimacimab administered intravenously (IV). The expansion study willcomprised compriseof two cohorts of nimacimab monotherapy (400 mg IV and 600 mg IV) compared to placebo administered weekly over 15 weeks (16 doses), with a 12 week follow up period, to generate preliminary monotherapy safety, PK, and exploratory efficacy data. Within each dose cohort, 8 participants will be randomized in a 3:1 ratio to nimacimab (n=6) or placebo (n=2). WeOn expectMay to20, report2026 toplinewe announced that the Cohort Review Committee (CRC) responsible for reviewing safety data generated from the expansionCBeyond studyPart C Expansion Study, and for approving the opening of enrollment in Cohort 2 has unanimously approved opening the fourthsecond quartercohort of 2026.the CBeyond Part C Expansion study.
Recent Developments
Termination of CBeyond Study
With recent approvals of oral versions of GLP-1 receptor agonists (WEGOVY and FOUNDAYO), combined with continued development GLP-1, GIP, glucagon triple agonists, such as retatrutide demonstrating greater than 25% weight loss, Skye management determined that nimacimab's current target product profile which included at least a 600mg once-weekly dose, or 6 mL weekly injection, may not significantly penetrate the increasingly competitive anti-obesity medicine market. As a result, the Company terminated all clinical activities related to CBeyond, including enrollment for the CBeyond expansion (Part C) study, and paused all R&D activities associated with nimacimab in order to evaluate strategic options. In addition, the Company instituted multiple cost-cutting measures, including but not limited to, a reduction in workforce and termination of certain vendor contracts and licensing agreements.
Transaction with Redx Pharma Limited
On August 14, 2026, we entered into a transaction agreement (“Transaction Agreement”) with Redx Pharma Limited with registered number 07368089 (“Redx”), a private limited company incorporated in England and Wales. Pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, and subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, we will acquire the entire issued and to be issued share capital of Redx pursuant to a scheme of arrangement under Part 26 of the United Kingdom Companies Act 2006 (the “Scheme of Arrangement” and such transaction, the “Transaction”). Upon the consummation of the Transaction, the combined company will be led by the Redx management team and plans to operate under the name Fibrx Therapeutics, Inc. The Transaction Agreement was unanimously approved by our board of directors and is subject to certain customary closing conditions, including the approval by the stockholders of each company. See Note 11 Subsequent Events for additional information.
Company Contingent Value Rights Agreement
Immediately prior to the Effective Time, the Company and a rights agent are expected to enter into a contingent value rights agreement (the “Legacy CVR Agreement”), pursuant to which holders of record of Common Stock as of the close of business on the last business day prior to the day on which the Effective Time occurs will receive one contingent value right for each outstanding share of Common Stock held as of such date. Pursuant to the Legacy CVR Agreement, each Company Legacy CVR holder will be entitled to receive their pro rata share of an aggregate cash payment equal to 90% of the net proceeds, if any, received by the Company as a result of payments made to the Company of any upfront, milestone, royalty and other payments received under any disposition agreement related to certain of the Company’s pre-Transaction assets (the “Legacy Assets”).
The foregoing summary of the Legacy CVR Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the form of the Legacy CVR Agreement, which is filed herewith as Exhibit 10.1 and is incorporated by reference herein.
Redx Contingent Value Rights Agreement
Immediately prior to the Effective Time, Redx and a rights agent are expected to enter into a contingent value rights agreement (the “Redx CVR Agreement”), pursuant to which holders of record of Redx ordinary shares as of the close of business on the last business day prior to the day on which the Effective Time occurs will receive one contingent value right for each outstanding Redx ordinary share held as of such date. Pursuant to the Redx CVR Agreement, each Redx Legacy CVR holder will be entitled to receive, in the form of shares of common stock of the Company, their pro rata share of an aggregate cash payment equal to 100% of the net proceeds, if any, received by the Company as a result of payments made to the Company of any upfront, milestone, royalty and other payments received under any disposition agreement related to certain of Redx’s pre-Transaction assets.
The foregoing summary of the Redx CVR Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the form of the Redx CVR Agreement, which is filed herewith as Exhibit 10.2 and is incorporated by reference herein.
Concurrent Financing
Concurrently with entering into the Transaction Agreement, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited investors (the “Investors”). Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, and subject to the terms and conditions therein, the Company agreed to sell, and the Investors agreed to purchase, immediately after to the Effective Time, shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $67.9 million, which may increase to up to $72.9 million, subject to certain conditions (the “Concurrent Financing”). The closing of the Concurrent Financing is anticipated to occur immediately after the Closing on the Closing Date, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions.
Additionally, Redx entered into subscription agreements with new and existing Redx investors, including Redx's existing major shareholder, Redmile, for a Series A private placement of $36.0 million in gross proceeds (the “Series A Financing” and, together with the Concurrent Financing, the “Financing”). The Series A Financing has been approved by the Redx board of directors and, subject to Redx shareholder approval, is expected to close shortly after the execution of the Transaction Agreement. The Financing is expected to provide the combined company with an aggregate total gross proceeds of approximately $103.9 million, which may increase to up to $108.9 million, subject to certain conditions set forth in the Side Letter (the “Concurrent Financing”). See Note 11 Subsequent Events for additional information.
Equity Line of Credit and Warrant
Concurrently with entering into the Transaction Agreement, the Company entered in a binding term sheet (the “Term Sheet”) with a fund affiliated with Redmile Group, LLC (“Redmile”), pursuant to which, and subject to the terms and conditions therein, the Company and Redmile agreed to enter into definitive documentation with respect to an equity line of credit (the “ELOC”) and the Warrant (as defined below) within seven days of the date of the Term Sheet. Pursuant to the Term Sheet, the ELOC will be effective for a period of three years following the closing of the Concurrent Financing and obligate the Company to sell shares of Common Stock and/or Non-Voting Common Stock having an aggregate purchase price of up to $22.0 million to Redmile from time to time, subject to cetain volume limitations, at a purchase price set in accordance with the terms therein. In addition, pursuant to the Term Sheet, the Company agreed to issue to Redmile at the Closing Time, a warrant to purchase up to $5.0 million of shares of Common Stock and/or Non-Voting Common Stock in accordance with the terms set forth therein (the “Warrant”).
Termination of Halozyme License Agreement
In December 2025, the Company entered into a Non-exclusive Global Collaboration and License Agreement (the “Halozyme License Agreement”) with Halozyme, Inc. (“Halozyme”).
Under the terms of the Halozyme License Agreement, Halozyme granted the Company a non-exclusive license to Halozyme’s ENHANZE® drug delivery technology for the development of a subcutaneous co-formulation with nimacimab (such combination, the “Product”). Halozyme will also be the Company’s exclusive supplier of clinical and commercial supplies of the active pharmaceutical ingredient ("API") for Halozyme’s rHuPH20 bulk drug product.
On August 11, 2026, the Company notified Halozyme of its intent to terminate the Halozyme License Agreement.
We believe multiple factors support evaluation of nimacimab at higher doses, including the combination of preclinical toxicology safety margins and modeling; preclinical pharmacology data showing dose-dependent increases in weight loss with nimacimab monotherapy and GLP-1 combinations; and the notable safety profile in the Phase 2a study. However, there can be no assurance that nimacimab at higher doses will result in the desired end points.
We have received comments from the agency regarding our Type C meeting request in which they responded to our proposed Phase 2b clinical trial design, we intend to use data from the CBeyond trial, including the CBeyond expansion study (Part C), to inform the design of a potential Phase 2b study and potential registration path for nimacimab as a combination therapy with GLP-1s. Key design elements under evaluation include patient selection, dose selection, treatment duration, and endpoints. Final trial design and timing remain subject to ongoing data analysis, regulatory feedback and capital considerations.
We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on March 16, 2011. Our headquarters are based in San Diego, CA. Since our incorporation, we have devoted substantially all of our efforts to building our product portfolio through the acquisition of clinical assets and licensing agreements, carrying out research and development, building infrastructure and raising capital.
To date, we have not commercialized any products and have never generated revenue from the commercialization of any product. If we are unable to complete the proposed transaction with Redx, we may need to raise additional capital. There can be no assurances, however, that additional funding will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
To date, we have not generated any revenue. We do not expect to receive any revenue from our drug candidate, nimacimab, or any future drug candidates that we develop unless and until we obtain regulatory approval for, and commercialize, nimacimab or future drug candidates or generate revenue from collaborative agreements with third parties.
During the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we incurred $7,935,680$3,941,932 and $11,877,612 in research and development expensesexpenses, respectively, primarily related to our Phase 2a clinical trial of nimacimab for obesity and the manufacturing costs associated with future trials. During the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, we incurred $7,197,257$14,337,753 and $21,535,010 in research and development expenseexpense, respectively, primarily related to our efforts in conducting our Phase 2a clinical trial related to our Phase 2a clinical trial for nimacimab for obesity.
As a result of terminating the CBeyond trial and any other research and development expenses associated with nimacimab, including workforce reduction, vendor contracts and license agreements, we expect research and development expenses in the future will be significantly reduced until the completion of the proposed transaction with Redx.
We expect that our ongoing research and development expenses will consist of costs incurred for the development of our drug candidate, nimacimab, or any future drug candidates, including but not limited to:
• employee-related expenses, which include salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation;
• payments to third party contract research organizations and investigative sites;
• payments to third party manufacturing organizations and consultants; and
• payments to third parties related to our discovery research and development efforts to build our pipeline.
We expect to incur future research and development expenditures to support our preclinical, nonclinical, and clinical studies. Preclinical and nonclinical activities include early discovery efforts with novel molecules, laboratory evaluation of product chemistry, toxicity and formulation, as well as animal studies to assess safety and efficacy.
The process of conducting the necessary clinical research to obtain regulatory approval is costly and time consuming and the successful development of our drug candidate, nimacimab, and any future drug candidate is highly uncertain. Our future research and development expenses will depend on the clinical success of nimacimab and any future drug candidates as well as ongoing assessments of the commercial potential of such drug candidates. In addition, we cannot forecast with any degree of certainty whether nimacimab or any future drug candidates may be subject to future collaborations, when such arrangements will be secured, if at all, and to what degree such arrangements would affect our development plans and capital requirements. We expect to incur increased research and development expenses in the future as we continue our efforts towards advancing our lead program for nimacimab.
Our general and administrative expenses have fluctuated year-over-year as we have entered into various strategic acquisitions to restructure and reposition our company. Additionally, as a business in the early stages of drug development we are continually evaluating our operations and infrastructure to identify areas where we can increase efficiencies. As a public company, we expect to incur additional expenses related to insurance, investor relations activities, legal and other administration and professional services to comply with the rules and regulations of the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") and Nasdaq. Other significant costs are expected to include legal fees relating to patent and corporate matters, business development costs and fees for consulting services. To incentivize our employees and be competitive to retain strong talent we issued additional equity awards in 2026 and 2025 and we repriced certain options in the first quarter of 2026, which have resulted in increased stock-based compensation expense. We also expect that certain general and administrative expenses whichto arereduce commensuratein withthe headcount,future resulting from workforce reduction activities and will continue to increasereduce inuntil the futureproposed intransaction orderwith toRedx supportis our expected increase in research and development activities, including increased salaries, technology, facilities and other related costs.complete.
The estimate for legal contingencies and related expenses relates to a litigation matter that related to a former employee of the Company. As of December 31, 2023, we had posted an appellate bond that was collateralized by an irrevocable letter of credit equal to, $9,080,202, approximately 150% of the liability recorded on our balance sheet. As of December 31, 2024, we were successful in our appeal of the judgment in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the case was remanded back to the District Court for a new trial, as a result of which we recovered the appellate bond and reduced the estimated legal contingency based on new key assumptions. As of June 30, 2026, the estimated legal contingency, including accrued legal expenses, is $5,417,250, an increase of $3,348,183 from December 31, 2025. The increase primarily reflects a $3,250,000 change in the estimated legal contingency recognized during the second quarter of 2026, as well as changes in accrued legal expenses. The final amount of the loss and loss recoveries remains uncertain. We believe that it is at least reasonably possible that the estimated amount of the potential loss may change in the near term. As of March 31, 2026, the estimated legal contingency, including accrued legal expenses, is $2,574,759, an increase of $505,692 from December 31, 2025, due to accrual adjustments for services by legal firms in relation to the ongoing Cunning litigation.
Other (income) expense primarily includes a gain from the sale of the Avalite Sciences, Inc. ("AVI") building (the "AVI building") in the first quarter of 2024 and interest income earned on our cash and cash equivalent balances and short term investments.
For the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025
Below is a summary of our research and development expenses during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and for the same period in 2025:
SKYE insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 6 filings (4 insiders, 6 trade dates, 1,115,622 shares, about $889.2K). Net open-market shares: -1,115,622 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$889.2K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | Schwab Andrew J. |
Open-market sale | 4,528 | $1.61 | $7.3K |
| 2026-09-23 | Schwab Andrew J. |
Open-market sale | 114,851 | $1.61 | $184.9K |
| 2026-09-23 | 5am Ventures Ii Lp |
Open-market sale | 4,528 | $1.61 | $7.3K |
| 2026-09-23 | 5am Ventures Ii Lp |
Open-market sale | 114,851 | $1.61 | $184.9K |
| 2026-09-22 | Schwab Andrew J. |
Open-market sale | 1,088 | $1.65 | $1.8K |
| 2026-09-22 | Schwab Andrew J. |
Open-market sale | 27,612 | $1.65 | $45.6K |
| 2026-09-22 | 5am Ventures Ii Lp |
Open-market sale | 1,088 | $1.65 | $1.8K |
| 2026-09-22 | 5am Ventures Ii Lp |
Open-market sale | 27,612 | $1.65 | $45.6K |
| 2026-09-16 | Schwab Andrew J. |
Open-market sale | 32,607 | $1.91 | $62.3K |
| 2026-09-16 | Schwab Andrew J. |
Open-market sale | 1,285 | $1.91 | $2.5K |
| 2026-09-16 | Parmar Kush |
Open-market sale | 1,285 | $1.91 | $2.5K |
| 2026-09-16 | Parmar Kush |
Open-market sale | 32,607 | $1.91 | $62.3K |
| 2026-08-20 | Schwab Andrew J. |
Open-market sale | 1,159 | $0.32 | $371 |
| 2026-08-20 | Schwab Andrew J. |
Open-market sale | 6,495 | $0.32 | $2.1K |
| 2026-08-20 | Schwab Andrew J. |
Open-market sale | 46 | $0.32 | $15 |
| 2026-08-20 | 5am Partners Ii, Llc |
Open-market sale | 46 | $0.32 | $15 |
| 2026-08-20 | 5am Partners Ii, Llc |
Open-market sale | 6,495 | $0.32 | $2.1K |
| 2026-08-20 | 5am Partners Ii, Llc |
Open-market sale | 1,159 | $0.32 | $371 |
| 2026-08-19 | Schwab Andrew J. |
Open-market sale | 57,476 | $0.35 | $20.1K |
| 2026-08-19 | Schwab Andrew J. |
Open-market sale | 409 | $0.35 | $143 |
| 2026-08-19 | Schwab Andrew J. |
Open-market sale | 10,255 | $0.35 | $3.6K |
| 2026-08-19 | 5am Partners Ii, Llc |
Open-market sale | 10,255 | $0.35 | $3.6K |
| 2026-08-19 | 5am Partners Ii, Llc |
Open-market sale | 57,476 | $0.35 | $20.1K |
| 2026-08-19 | 5am Partners Ii, Llc |
Open-market sale | 409 | $0.35 | $143 |
| 2026-08-18 | Schwab Andrew J. |
Open-market sale | 253,080 | $0.38 | $96.2K |
| 2026-08-18 | Schwab Andrew J. |
Open-market sale | 1,830 | $0.38 | $695 |
| 2026-08-18 | Schwab Andrew J. |
Open-market sale | 45,090 | $0.38 | $17.1K |
| 2026-08-18 | 5am Partners Ii, Llc |
Open-market sale | 45,090 | $0.38 | $17.1K |
| 2026-08-18 | 5am Partners Ii, Llc |
Open-market sale | 1,830 | $0.38 | $695 |
| 2026-08-18 | 5am Partners Ii, Llc |
Open-market sale | 253,080 | $0.38 | $96.2K |
| 2026-08-07 | Dhillon Punit |
Grant/award | 1,090,000 | — | — |
Well-known investors holding SKYE (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 198,524 | $137.6K | 0.0% | Reduced 23% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 25,684 | $15.8K | — | Sold out |