SPRO 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Spero Therapeutics, Inc. · Nasdaq · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1701108 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “If we engage in future acquisitions or strategic collaborations, this may increase our capital requirements, dilute our stockholders, cause us to incur debt or assume contingent liabilities and subject us to other risks.”
New heading “Changes in tax laws or in their implementation or interpretation could adversely affect our business and financial condition.”
New heading “Disruptions at the FDA and other government agencies from funding cuts, personnel losses, regulatory reform, government shutdowns and other developments could hinder our ability to obtain guidance from the FDA regarding our clinical development program and develop and secure approval of any of our product candidates in a timely manner, which would negatively impact our business.”
New heading “Changes in and uncertainty surrounding U.S. and international trade policies may adversely impact our business and operating results.”
Removed heading “Risks Related to Our U.S. Government Contracts and to Certain Grant Agreements”
Removed heading “Our use of government funding for certain of our programs adds complexity to our research and commercialization efforts with respect to those programs and may impose requirements that increase the costs of commercialization and production of product candidates developed under those government-funded programs.”
Removed heading “U.S. government agencies have special contracting requirements that give them the ability to unilaterally control our contracts.”
Removed heading “Our business is subject to audit by the U.S. government and other potential sources for grant funding, including under our contracts with BARDA and NIAID and a negative outcome in an audit could adversely affect our business.”
Removed heading “Laws and regulations affecting government contracts make it more expensive and difficult for us to successfully conduct our business.”
Removed heading “Provisions in our U.S. government contracts, including our contracts with BARDA, may affect our intellectual property rights.”
Removed heading “Disruptions of funding for the FDA, the SEC and other government agencies caused by funding shortages, mass layoffs, or global health concerns could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, prevent our product candidates from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal business functions on which the operation of our business relies, which could negatively impact our business.”
Removed heading “Our shares of common stock could be delisted from the Nasdaq GS, which could result in, among other things, a decline in the price of our common stock and less liquidity for our stockholders.”
Removed heading “We have received a “Wells Notice” from the SEC contemplating a civil enforcement action, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, prospects, and/or our stock price.”
Largest changes
“Our shares of common stock could be delisted from the Nasdaq GS, which could result in, among other things, a decline in the price of our common stock and less liquidity for our stockholders.”see in full comparison
“We have received a “Wells Notice” from the SEC contemplating a civil enforcement action, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, prospects, and/or our stock price.”see in full comparison
“Disruptions of funding for the FDA, the SEC and other government agencies caused by funding shortages, mass layoffs, or global health concerns could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, prevent our product candidates from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal business functions on which the operation of our business relies, which could negatively impact our business.”see in full comparison
“We, Dr. Mahadevia and Mr. Shukla are cooperating with the SEC and have made a submission in response to the Wells Notice explaining why an enforcement action would not be appropriate. We cannot predict the results of the Investigation and the Wells Notice process and any corresponding enforcement action against us and/or any of the identified individuals, and the costs, timing and other potential consequences of responding and complying therewith with any certainty. …”see in full comparison
see in full comparisonIn the past, securitiesSecurities litigationhasoftenfollowedfollows certain significant business activities, such as the announcement of a strategic restructuring, or the announcement of negative events, such as negative results from clinical trials. We may be exposed to such litigation even if no wrongdoing occurred. We have in the past, and may in the future, become subject to securities litigation. For example, two putative class action lawsuits were filed in 2022 against us and certain of our former officers and stockholder derivative actions were filed in 2023 and 2024 against us and certain of our former officers. Litigation is usually expensive and diverts management’s attention and resources, which could adversely affect our business and cash resources and our ability to execute on our partnership with GSK to eventually commercialize tebipenem HBr, or the ultimate value our stockholders receive in such partnership or other opportunity.
“Any potential delisting of our common stock could have a material adverse effect on the market for, and liquidity and price of, our common stock and would adversely affect our ability to raise capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Delisting from Nasdaq GS could also have other negative results, including, without limitation, the potential loss of confidence by investors, customers and employees and fewer business development opportunities. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (267)
Careful consideration should be given to the following risk factors, in addition to the other information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes, and in other documents that we file with the SEC, in evaluating our company and our business. If any of the events described in the following risk factors and the risks described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K actually occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations and future growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected, and the trading price of our securities could decline. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipatedcontained in the forward-looking statements aswe ahave result of factors that are described below and elsewheremade in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K and those we may make from time to time. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or other factors not perceived by us to present significant risks to our business at this time also may impair our business operations.
PursuantAs toof March 2025, we have ceased development of our previouslySPR206 announcedprogram, restructuring,and as of November 2025, we suspendedhave ceased development of our SPR720 oral programprogram, and have shifted our focus and resources to advancing the clinical development of ourthe tebipenem HBr program, as well as other corporate activities. We have also discontinued development of SPR206. Consequently, our business and prospects are substantially dependent on our tebipenem program and our collaboration with GSK. If we fail to execute successfully on this re-prioritized strategic focus, or our collaboration with GSK fails to advance the development of the tebipenem HBr program, our business and prospects may be materially adversely affectedaffected.
OnAs Octoberof 29,March 2024,2025, we announcedhave thatceased development of SPR206. Additionally, as of November 2025, we suspendedhave ceased development activities forof our SPR720 oral program basedand onhave anshifted interimour analysisfocus ofand resources to advancing the Phase 2a proof-of-concept study of SPR720 for the treatment of NTM-PD not meeting its primary endpoint. While the data showed antimicrobial activity associated with SPR720, the interim analysis did not show sufficient separation from placebo and highlighted potential dose limiting safety issues in subjects dosed at 1,000 mg orally once daily, including three cases of reversible grade 3 hepatotoxicity. In evaluating the totality of both the efficacy and safety data, we have elected to suspend our current development program for SPR720 and continue to evaluate other potential paths forward as the remaining data are collected and analyzed. As a result, we have restructured our operations to focus on supporting theclinical development of our tebipenem HBr andprogram, as well as other corporate activities while we continue to seek a pathway forward for SPR720. Further, in March 2025, we announced that we have discontinued development of SPR206.activities. We believe this re-prioritized strategic focus is the best way to optimize our financial and other resources to advance our goal of developingidentifying and commercializingdeveloping productnovel candidatestreatments tofor addressrare thediseases and diseases with high unmet need for solutions to antibiotic resistant pathogens.need. However, there is no assurance that we will successfully execute this strategy. As described below, there are risks inherent in the clinical development process, especially for earlier-stage programs, and the regulatory path for SPR720 remains uncertain at this time.programs. If we are unable to execute successfully on this re-prioritized strategic focus, our business and prospects may be materially adversely affected.
As a result, we are currently substantially dependent on our tebipenem program and our collaboration with GSK. As described under “Business—Collaboration,Note License13 andto Serviceour Agreements—Tebipenemconsolidated HBrfinancial Agreements”,statements, GSK has the right to terminate the GSK License Agreement (1) at any time upon a specified number of days’ notice, (2) upon a material breach by us or (3) upon a bankruptcy of Spero. Alternatively, in the case of a material breach by Spero, GSK may, in lieu of terminating the GSK License Agreement, elect to reduce any commercial milestone payments to Spero by 50%. In addition, in such circumstance, GSK may assume the responsibility and expense of development of tebipenem HBr in the United States, in which case no development milestone payments would be payable to Spero (including unpaid installments of any earned milestone payments).Spero. In the case of a Change of Control (as defined in the GSK License Agreement) of Spero, GSK similarly may, in lieu of terminating the GSK License Agreement, assume responsibility and expense of development of tebipenem HBr in the United States and no development milestones would be payable to Spero, as described above. Any termination of the GSK License Agreement or any failure to earn, or reduction in, milestone payments may materially adversely affect our business and prospects.
Our ability to realize the value of tebipenem HBr depends on obtaining FDA approval. Even if such approval is obtained, the timeline of, and any requirements imposed as part of, such approval may impact the attractiveness of eventual commercialization of tebipenem HBr through our partnership with GSK.
We currently have no products approved for sale and have invested a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources in the development of tebipenem HBr as a product candidate for the treatment of bacterial infections causing cUTI. Our ability to realize the value of tebipenem HBrHBr, currently our only product candidate, depends on the potential FDA approval, and the expected timeline and other requirements that would affect the attractiveness of eventual commercialization of tebipenem HBr through our partnership with GSK. Further, as part of any approval, the FDA could impose labeling requirements restricting the use of tebipenem HBr, which could reduce its commercial prospects, unless such requirements are subsequently modified to reduce such restrictions. If any of these outcomes occur, our business could be materially harmed.
If our clinical trials fail to produce favorable results, we may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of suchany existing and future product candidates.
We may not commercialize, market, promote or sell any product candidate in the United States without obtaining marketing approval from the FDA or in other countries without obtaining approvals from comparable foreign regulatory authorities, such as the EMA,European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), and we may never receive such approvals. We must complete extensive preclinical development and clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of ourany product candidates in humans before we will be able to obtain these approvals. Clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and is inherently uncertain as to outcome.
The clinical development of any ofexisting ouror future product candidates is susceptible to the risk of failure inherent at any stage of drug development, including failure to demonstrate efficacy in a trial or across a broad population of patients, the occurrence of severe adverse events, failure to comply with protocols or applicable regulatory requirements, and determination by the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority that a drug product is not approvable. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry, including biotechnology companies, have suffered significant setbacks in clinical trials, even after promising results in earlier nonclinical studies or clinical trials. The results of preclinical and other nonclinical studies and/or early clinical trials of ourany product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. Notwithstanding any promising results in early nonclinical studies or clinical trials, we cannot be certain that we will not face similar setbacks.
In addition, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses. Many companies that believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval for the product candidates. Even if we believe that the results of our clinical trials warrant marketing approval, the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree and may not grant marketing approval of our existing or future product candidates.
In some instances, there can be significant variability in safety and/or efficacy results between different trials of the same product candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in trial procedures set forth in protocols, differences in the size and type of the patient populations, adherence to the dosing regimen and other trial protocols and the rate of dropout among clinical trial participants, among others. It is possible that even if one or more of our existing or future product candidates has a beneficial effect, that effect will not be detected during clinical evaluation as a result of one of the factors listed or otherwise. Conversely, as a result of the same factors, our clinical trials may indicate an apparent positive effect of a product candidate that is greater than the actual positive effect, if any. Similarly, in our clinical trials, we may fail to detect toxicity of or intolerability of our existing or future product candidates or may determine that one of our existing or future product candidates are toxic or not well tolerated when that is not in fact the case. In the case of our clinical trials, results may differ on the basis of the type of bacteria with which patients are infected. We cannot make assurances that any clinical trials that we may conduct will demonstrate consistent or adequate efficacy and safety to obtain regulatory approval to market ourany product candidates.
We may encounter unforeseen events prior to, during, or as a result of, clinical trials that could delay or prevent us from obtaining regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, including:
clinical trials of ourany product candidates may produce unfavorable or inconclusive results;
the number of patients required for clinical trials of ourany product candidates may be larger than we anticipate, enrollment in these clinical trials may be slower than we anticipate, participants may drop out of these clinical trials at a higher rate than we anticipate or we may fail to recruit suitable patients to participate in clinical trials;
our third-party contractors, including those manufacturing ourany product candidates or conducting clinical trials on our behalf, may fail to comply with regulatory requirements or meet their contractual obligations to us in a timely manner, or at all;
regulators or institutional review boards may require that we or our investigators suspend or terminate clinical trials of ourany product candidates for various reasons, including noncompliance with regulatory requirements or a finding that the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks, undesirable side effects or other unexpected characteristics of the product candidate;
the supply or quality of ourany product candidates or other materials necessary to conduct clinical trials of ourany product candidates may be insufficient or inadequate; and the approval policies or regulations of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may significantly change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval.
If we are required to conduct additional clinical trials or other testing of any ofexisting ouror future product candidates beyond the trials and testing that we contemplate, if we are unable to successfully complete clinical trials or other testing of our existing or future product candidates, if the results of these trials or tests are unfavorable or are only modestly favorable or if there are safety concerns associated with any ofexisting ouror future product candidates, we may:
be delayed in obtaining marketing approval for ourany product candidates;
Our failure to successfully initiate and complete clinical trials of ourany product candidates and to demonstrate the efficacy and safety necessary to obtain regulatory approval to market any ofexisting ouror future product candidates would significantly harm our business. Our product candidate development costs will also increase if we experience delays in testing or marketing approvals and we may be required to obtain additional funds to complete clinical trials. We cannot make assurances that our clinical trials will begin as planned or be completed on schedule, if at all, or that we will not need to restructure our trials after they have begun. Significant clinical trial delays also could shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize ourany product candidates or allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do and impair our ability to successfully commercialize ourany product candidates, which may harm our business and results of operations. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, delays of clinical trials may ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of any of our product candidates.
The timely completion of clinical trials in accordance with their protocols depends, among other things, on our ability to enroll a sufficient number of patients who remain in the study until its conclusion. WeThe mayinitiation, notcontinuation beand ablecompletion toof initiate, continue or completeour clinical trials ofrelies on our product candidates if we are unableability to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in clinical trials as required by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, such as the EMA. Patient enrollment is a significant factor in the timing of clinical trials, and is affected by many factors, including:
Our inability to enroll a sufficient number of patients for our clinical trials would result in significant delays or might require us to abandon one or more clinical trials altogether. Enrollment delays in our clinical trials may result in increased development costs for ourany existing or future product candidates, slow down or halt our product candidate development and approval process and jeopardize our ability to seek and obtain the marketing approval required to commence product sales and generate revenue, which would cause the value of our company to decline and limit our ability to obtain additional financing if needed.
Congress also recently amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) to require sponsors of a Phase 3 clinical trial, or other “pivotal study” of a new drug to support marketing authorization, to design and submit a diversity action plan (“DAP”) for such clinical trial. The action plan must describe appropriate diversity goals for enrollment, as well as a rationale for the goals and a description of how the sponsor will meet them. In the future, we will be required to submit a diversity action planDAP to the FDA by the time we submit a Phase 3 clinical trial, or pivotal study, protocol to the agency for review, unless we are able to obtain a waiver for some or all of the requirements for a diversity action plan.DAP. It is unknown at this time how the diversity action planDAP may affect the planning and timing of any future Phase 3 clinical trial for ourany product candidates. However, initiation of such trials may be delayed if the FDA objects to our proposed diversity action plansDAPs for any future Phase 3 clinical trial for ourany product candidates, and we may experience difficulties recruiting a diverse population of patients in attempting to fulfill the requirements of any approved diversity action plan.DAP.
In June 2024, as mandated by the FDCA, the FDA issued draft guidance outlining the general requirements for DAPs. Unlike most guidance documents issued by the FDA, the DAP guidance when finalized will have the force of law because Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022 (“FDORA”) specifically dictates that the form and manner for submission of DAPs are specified in FDA guidance. On January 27, 2025, in response to an executive order issued by President Trump on January 21, 2025 on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs, the FDA removed the draft DAP guidance from its website. That action, along with similar actions by the Trump Administration to remove many other healthcare webpages, is currently the subject of ongoing litigation. On July 3, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the administration’s actions to remove these webpages, including the draft DAP guidance, is unlawful under the Administrative Procedure Act. The court ordered the restoration of many of these webpages. In late July 2025, the FDA restored the draft DAP guidance to its website with a statement that “information on this page may be modified and/or removed in the future subject to the terms of the court’s order and implemented consistent with applicable law.” Accordingly, in light of these ongoing actions, there is considerable uncertainty surrounding the draft DAP guidance and how the FDA will consider DAPs in connection with its review of marketing applications.
We currently have no products approved for sale and we cannot guarantee that we will ever have marketable products. Clinical failure can occur at any stage of clinical development. Clinical trials may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we or any future collaborators may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical trials or preclinical studies. We will be required to demonstrate through well-controlled clinical trials that our existing or future product candidates are safe and effective for use in a diverse population before we can seek marketing approvals for their commercial sale. Success in preclinical studies and early-stage clinical trials does not mean that future larger registration clinical trials will be successful. This is because product candidates in later-stage clinical trials may fail to demonstrate sufficient safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities despite having progressed through preclinical studies and early-stage clinical trials.
Analyses of preliminary or interim data from our clinical studies are not necessarily predictive of analyses of final data. Analyses of preliminary and interim data are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change, as more patient data become available and we issue our final clinical study report. Preliminary or interim data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, analyses of interim and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the analyses of final data are available. Adverse differences between preliminary or interim data and final data could affect our planned clinical path for any of our product candidates we advance into clinical trials, including potentially increasing cost and/or causing delay in such development.
In some instances, there can be significant variability in safety and efficacy results between different clinical trials of the same product candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in trial protocols, differences in size and type of the patient populations, differences in and adherence to the dosing regimen and other trial protocols and the rate of dropout among clinical trial participants. We therefore do not know whether any clinical trials we may conduct will demonstrate consistent or adequate efficacy and safety sufficient to obtain marketing approval to market our product candidates.
We therefore do not know whether any clinical trials we may conduct will demonstrate consistent or adequate efficacy and safety sufficient to obtain marketing approval to market our existing or future product candidates.
Serious adverse events or undesirable side effects or other unexpected properties of any of our product candidates may be identified during development or after approval that could delay, prevent or cause the withdrawal of regulatory approval, limit the commercial potential, or result in significant negative consequences following marketing approval.
Serious adverse events or undesirable side effects caused by, or other unexpected properties of, our existing or future product candidates could cause us, an IRB, or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt our clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label, the imposition of distribution or use restrictions or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. If any of our other product candidates are associated with serious or unexpected adverse events or undesirable side effects, the FDA, the IRBs responsible for overseeing our studies, or a DSMB, could suspend or terminate our clinical trials or the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities could order us to cease clinical trials or deny approval of our existing or future product candidates for any or all targeted indications. Treatment-related side effects could also affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients to complete the trial or result in potential product liability claims. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly.
If unexpected adverse events occur in any of our ongoing or planned clinical trials, we may need to abandon development of ourany product candidates, or limit development to lower doses or to certain uses or subpopulations in which the undesirable side effects or other unfavorable characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective. Many compounds that initially showed promise in clinical or earlier stage testing are later found to cause undesirable or unexpected side effects that prevented further development of the compound.
Undesirable side effects or other unexpected adverse events or properties of any of our other product candidates could arise or become known either during clinical development or, if approved, after the approved product has been marketed. If such an event occurs during development, our trials could be suspended or terminated and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities could order us to cease further development of, or could deny approval of ourany product candidates. If such an event occurs after such product candidates are approved, a number of potentially significant negative consequences may result, including:
we may be required to implement a REMS,risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (“REMS”), which may include the creation of a medication guide outlining the risks of such side effects for distribution to patients or restrictions on distribution or other elements;
we could be sued and held liable for harm caused to patients exposed to or taking our existing or future product candidates;
Even if we obtain FDA or other regulatory approvals and are able to launch any of our product candidates commercially, the approved product candidate may nonetheless fail to gain sufficient market acceptance among physicians, patients, hospitals (including pharmacy directors) and third-party payors and, ultimately, may not be commercially successful. For example, physicians are often reluctant to switch their patients from existing therapies even when new and potentially more effective or convenient treatments enter the market. Further, patients often acclimate to the therapy that they are currently taking and do not want to switch unless their physicians recommend switching products or they are required to switch therapies due to lack of coverage and reimbursement for existing therapies. If an approved product candidate does not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant product revenues or any profits from operations. The degree of market acceptance of any product candidate for which we receive approval depends on a number of factors, including:
Any failure of any of our product candidates that obtains regulatory approval to achieve market acceptance or commercial success would adversely affect our business prospects.
Because we have limited financial and managerial resources, we intend to focus on developing product candidates for specific indications that we identify as most likely to succeed, in terms of both their potential for marketing approval and commercialization. As a result, we may forego or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or for other indications that may prove to have greater commercial potential. For example, as of November 2025, we have ceased development of our SPR720 oral program and have shifted our focus and resources to advancing the clinical development of our tebipenem HBr program, as well as other corporate activities. Additionally, in March 2025, we announced that we have ceased development of SPR206.
If we or our collaborators are unable to establish sales, marketing and distribution capabilities or enter into sales, marketing and distribution agreements with third parties, we may not be successful in commercializing any of our product candidates if such product candidates are approved.
We intend to use collaborators to assist with the commercialization of any of our current and future product candidates, including the GSK License Agreement for the development and commercialization of tebipenem HBr. As a result of entering into arrangements with third parties to perform sales, marketing and distribution services, our product revenues or the profitability of these product revenues to us would likely be lower than if we were to directly market and sell products in those markets. Furthermore, we may be unsuccessful in entering into the necessary arrangements with third parties or may be unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us. In addition, we likely would have little control over such third parties, and any of them might fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our products effectively.
If we or our collaborators do not establish sales and marketing capabilities successfully, either on our own or in collaboration with third parties, we will not be successful in commercializing ourany product candidates.
If we engage in future acquisitions or strategic collaborations, this may increase our capital requirements, dilute our stockholders, cause us to incur debt or assume contingent liabilities and subject us to other risks.
We may evaluate various acquisitions and strategic collaborations, including licensing or acquiring complementary products, intellectual property rights, technologies or businesses. Any potential acquisition or strategic collaboration may entail numerous risks, including:
increased operating expenses and cash requirements;
the assumption of additional indebtedness or contingent liabilities;
assimilation of operations, intellectual property and products of an acquired company, including difficulties associated with integrating new personnel;
the diversion of our management’s attention from any existing product candidates and initiatives in pursuing such acquisition or strategic collaboration;
retention of key employees, the loss of key personnel and uncertainties in our ability to maintain key business relationships;
risks and uncertainties associated with the other party to such a transaction, including the prospects of that party and their existing products or product candidates and regulatory approvals; and our inability to generate revenue from acquired technology and/or products sufficient to meet our objectives in undertaking the acquisition or collaboration or even to offset transaction costs.
In addition, if we undertake acquisitions, we may issue dilutive securities, assume or incur debt obligations, incur large one-time expenses and acquire intangible assets that could result in significant future amortization expense. Moreover, we may not be able to locate suitable acquisition or collaboration opportunities and this inability could impair our ability to grow or obtain access to technology or products that may be important to the development of our business.
The development and commercialization of new drug products is highly competitive. We face competition from major pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies worldwide with respect to ourany product candidates that we may seek to develop and commercialize in the future. There are a number of large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that currently market and sell products or are pursuing the development of product candidates for the treatment of resistant infections. Potential competitors also include academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations. Our competitors may succeed in developing, acquiring or licensing technologies and drug products that are more effective or less costly than the product candidates that we are currently developing or that we may develop, which could render our existing or future product candidates obsolete and noncompetitive.
There are several IV-administered products marketed for the treatment of infections resistant to first-line therapy for Gram-negative infections, including Emblaveo (Aztreonam-avibactam) from Allergan, Avycaz (ceftazidime-avibactam) from Allergan plc and Pfizer Inc.,Pfizer, Zerbaxa (ceftolozane-tazobactam) from Merck & Co., imipenem/cilastatin and Recarbrio (relebactam) from Merck & Co., Zemdri (plazomicin) from Cipla Therapeutics, Inc., Fetroja (cefiderocol) from Shionogi & Co. Ltd., Xerava (eravacycline) from Innoviva, Inc. and Vabomere (meropenem-vaborbactam) from Melinta Therapeutics,CorMedix Inc., and Exblifep (cefepime/enmetazobactam) from Allecra Therapeutics.
Even if we or our partners are able to commercialize anyour ofexisting ouror future product candidates, the product may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations, or third-party payor coverage and reimbursement policies that could harm our business.
Marketing approvals, pricing, coverage and reimbursement for new drug products vary widely from country to country. Some countries require approval of the sale price of a drug before it can be marketed. In many countries, the pricing review period begins after marketing or product licensing approval is granted. In some foreign markets, prescription pharmaceutical pricing remains subject to continuing governmental control even after initial approval is granted. As a result, we might obtain marketing approval for a product in a particular country, but then be subject to price regulations that delay our commercial launch of the product, possibly for lengthy time periods, which may negatively affect the revenues that we are able to generate from the sale of the product in that country. Adverse pricing limitations may hinder our ability to recoup our investment in one or more product candidates, even if our existing or future product candidates obtain marketing approval.
We currently expect that some of our product candidates,candidate, if approved, will be administered in a hospital inpatient setting. In the United States, governmental and other third-party payors generally reimburse hospitals a single bundled payment established on a prospective basis intended to cover all items and services provided to the patient during a single hospitalization. Hospitals bill third-party payors for all or a portion of the fees associated with the patient’s hospitalization and bill patients for any deductibles or co-payments. Because there is typically no separate reimbursement for drugs administered in a hospital inpatient setting, some of our target customers may be unwilling to adopt our product candidatescandidate in light of the additional associated cost. If we are forced to lower the price we charge for our product candidates,candidate, if approved, our gross margins may decrease, which would adversely affect our ability to invest in and grow our business.
To the extent any of our product candidates we develop are used in an outpatient setting, the commercial success of our existing or future product candidates will depend substantially, both domestically and abroad, on the extent to which coverage and reimbursement for these products and related treatments are available from government health programs and third-party payors. If coverage is not available, or reimbursement is limited, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our existing or future product candidates. Even if coverage is provided, the approved reimbursement amount may not be high enough to allow us to establish or maintain pricing sufficient to realize a sufficient return on our investments. Government authorities and third-party payors, such as health insurers and managed care organizations, publish formularies that identify the medications they will cover and the related payment levels. The healthcare industry is focused on cost containment, both in the United States and elsewhere. Government authorities and third-party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular medications, which could affect our ability to sell our existing or future product candidates profitably.
We cannot predict whether bacteria may develop resistance to our product candidates,candidate, if approved, which could affect theirits revenue potential.
CertainTebipenem ofHBr our product candidates areis designed to treat bacterial infections, including drug-resistant infections. The bacteria responsible for these infections evolve quickly and readily transfer their resistance mechanisms within and between species. We cannot predict whether or when bacterial resistance to anytebipenem of such product candidatesHBr may develop.
For example, as a carbapenem, tebipenem HBr is not active against organisms expressing a resistance mechanism mediated by enzymes known as carbapenemases. Although occurrence of this resistance mechanism is currently rare, we cannot predict whether carbapenemase-mediated resistance will become widespread in regions where tebipenem HBr may be marketed if it is approved. The growth of drug resistantdrug-resistant infections in community settings or in countries with poor public health infrastructures, or the potential use of any of our product candidatescandidate outside of controlled hospital settings, could contribute to the rise of resistance. If resistance to any of our product candidatescandidate becomes prevalent, our ability to generate revenue from such product candidates could suffer.
If we are not successful in discovering, developing and commercializing additional product candidates, our ability to expand our business and achieve our strategic objectives would be impaired.
Although a substantial amount of our efforts willare focuscurrently focused on our ongoing and planned clinical trials and potential approval of our product candidate, tebipenem HBr, as well as exploring clinical and development pathways forward for SPR720, a key element of our strategy is to discover, develop and commercialize a portfolio of therapeutics to treat drug resistant bacterial infections. We are exploring, and intend to explore in the future, strategic partnerships for the development of new product candidates.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Impairment Charges”
Removed heading “Interim Leadership Changes”
Largest changes
“On February 25, 2025, we received a deficiency letter from the Listing Qualifications Department informing us that we were not in compliance with the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Global Select Market because the bid price for our common stock had closed below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days. We have until August 25, 2025, to regain compliance with the bid price requirement. If we do not regain compliance with the bid price requirement, our common stock will be subject to delisting. …”see in full comparison
We have experienced mostly net losses and significant cash outflows from cash used in operating activities since our inception. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend heavily on the successful development andsee in full comparisoneventualcommercialization ofonetebipenem HBr, ormore of ourany productcandidates.candidate we may develop in the future. As of December 31,2024,2025, we had an accumulated deficit of$459.6$451.1 million, and cash and cash equivalents of$52.9$40.3 million. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses forat leastthenextforeseeableyear.future. Based on our current operating plan, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents as of December 31,2024, together with earned and non-contingent development milestone payments from GSK, as well as other non-dilutive funding commitments, we believe that our cash runway2025 will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and required capital expenditures intothe second quarter of 2026.2028. During this period, weplanremain focused on supporting GSK in the FDA approval process pursuant toprioritizeouradvancing the Phase 3 clinical trial activities for tebipenem HBrobligations under our GSK License Agreement andcompletingadvancing other corporate activities, including exploring opportunities to grow ouranalysisportfolio oftheclinical-stagefullproductdatasetcandidates.fromBeyondthethis25point,treated patientsor in thePhaseevent2aweproof-of-conceptchangetrialourofcurrentSPR720.operatingBeyond this pointplan, we will need additionalfunding,fundingwhichto support our continuing operations. Until such time as we can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expectwilltoprimarilyfinanceconsistourof raising additional capitaloperations throughsomea combination of equityorofferings, debt financings,potentialgovernmentnewfundingcollaborationsarrangements, collaborations, strategic alliances and marketing, distribution oradditionallicensinggrant funding.arrangements. If we are not able to secure adequate additional funding, weplanwill have to make further reductions in spending. In that event, we may have to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of our planned development activities. The actions necessary to reduce spending under this plan at a level that mitigates the factors described aboveisare not considered probable, as defined in the accounting standards and therefore, the full extent to which management may extend our funds through these actions may not be considered in management’s assessment of our ability to continue as a going concern.As a result, management has concluded that substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern.
“In light of our decision to suspend planned development activities for our oral SPR720 program and our strategic restructuring, we expect that our future expenses relating to development activities with respect to SPR720 will be substantially reduced as we evaluate potential paths forward for SPR720 and implement our restructuring. …”see in full comparison
“In January 2025, the independent directors of our Board of Directors approved the following actions as a matter of corporate governance best practices and to enable the Company to maintain focus on pursuing our business objectives pending resolution of a “Wells Notice” received from the staff of the Boston Regional Office (the “Staff”) of the SEC. …”see in full comparison
As of December 31,see in full comparison2024,2025, we had cash and cash equivalents of$52.9$40.3 million. In accordance with ASU 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), we are required to evaluate whether there are conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern from the issuance date of our financial statements. Based onthe Company’sour current operatingplanplan,andweexisting cash and cash equivalents, the Company has determinedbelieve thatthere is substantial doubt regarding its ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that these consolidated financial statements are issued. Based onour cash and cash equivalents as of December 31,2024, together with earned and non-contingent development milestone payments from GSK, as well as other non-dilutive funding commitments, we believe that our cash runway2025 willbeenablesufficientus to fund our operating expenses and required capital expenditure requirementsintofor at least 12 months from thesecond quarterissuance of2026.the financial statements included in this report and into 2028.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (80)
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on identifying and developing novel treatments for rare diseases and diseases with high unmet need.
Our clinical-stage product candidate, tebipenem HBr, has completed a second Phase 3 trial, and we believe has the potential to be the first oral carbapenem to treat adult patients with cUTIs, including pyelonephritis, caused by certain microorganisms. In September 2022, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with GSK for the development, manufacture and commercialization of tebipenem HBr, which includes the transfer of the IND and the NDA ownership to GSK. In May 2025, we and GSK announced that the pivotal Phase 3 PIVOT-PO trial evaluating tebipenem HBr met its primary endpoint and was stopped early for efficacy. GSK has submitted the data from the trial as part of an NDA Class 2 resubmission for tebipenem HBr to the FDA in December 2025, which has been accepted by the FDA. GSK reported that the PDUFA date has been set as June 18, 2026.
Following the termination of our earlier stage programs (SPR206 and SPR720), we remain focused on supporting GSK in the FDA approval process pursuant to our obligations under the GSK License Agreement and advancing other corporate activities, including exploring opportunities to grow our portfolio of clinical-stage product candidates.
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on identifying and developing novel treatments for rare diseases and diseases caused by MDR bacterial infections with high unmet need. Since our inception in 2013, we have focused our efforts and financial resources on acquiring and developing product and technology rights, building our intellectual property portfolio and conducting research and development activities for our product candidates. We do not have any products approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. We believe that our novel product candidates, if successfully developed and approved, could provide meaningful benefits to patients suffering from serious rare diseases and life-threatening bacterial infections, in both the community and hospital settings. Our pipeline consists of mid-to late-stage clinical assets.
Our most advanced clinical stage product candidate, tebipenem HBr, is in Phase 3 development, with the potential to be the first broad-spectrum oral carbapenem to treat adult patients with cUTIs, including pyelonephritis, caused by certain microorganisms. The other programs in our pipeline are SPR206 and SPR720. SPR206 is an IV-administered next generation polymyzin product candidate for the treatment of HABP/VABP caused by MDR Gram-negative bacterial infections. In March 2025, following a reprioritization of our programs, we announced that we are no longer pursuing a planned Phase 2 clinical trial for SPR206. SPR720 is a product candidate for first-line treatment of NTM pulmonary disease. In October 2024, we announced that results from a planned interim analysis of our Phase 2a clinical trial for SPR720 demonstrated the oral agent did not meet its primary endpoint and we elected to suspend development of SPR720 in its oral formulation. We are currently completing analysis of remaining data from all 25 patients dosed in the trial ahead of determining next steps.
We have experienced mostly net losses and significant cash outflows from cash used in operating activities since our inception. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of onetebipenem HBr, or more of ourany product candidates.candidate we may develop in the future. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $459.6$451.1 million, and cash and cash equivalents of $52.9$40.3 million. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for at least the nextforeseeable year.future. Based on our current operating plan, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2024, together with earned and non-contingent development milestone payments from GSK, as well as other non-dilutive funding commitments, we believe that our cash runway2025 will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and required capital expenditures into the second quarter of 2026.2028. During this period, we planremain focused on supporting GSK in the FDA approval process pursuant to prioritizeour advancing the Phase 3 clinical trial activities for tebipenem HBrobligations under our GSK License Agreement and completingadvancing other corporate activities, including exploring opportunities to grow our analysisportfolio of theclinical-stage fullproduct datasetcandidates. fromBeyond thethis 25point, treated patientsor in the Phaseevent 2awe proof-of-conceptchange trialour ofcurrent SPR720.operating Beyond this pointplan, we will need additional funding,funding whichto support our continuing operations. Until such time as we can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect willto primarilyfinance consistour of raising additional capitaloperations through somea combination of equity orofferings, debt financings, potentialgovernment newfunding collaborationsarrangements, collaborations, strategic alliances and marketing, distribution or additionallicensing grant funding.arrangements. If we are not able to secure adequate additional funding, we planwill have to make further reductions in spending. In that event, we may have to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of our planned development activities. The actions necessary to reduce spending under this plan at a level that mitigates the factors described above isare not considered probable, as defined in the accounting standards and therefore, the full extent to which management may extend our funds through these actions may not be considered in management’s assessment of our ability to continue as a going concern. As a result, management has concluded that substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern.
We will not generate revenue from product sales unless and until we successfully complete clinical development and obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. If we obtain regulatory approval for any of our future product candidates and do not enter into a commercialization partnership, we expect to incur significant expenses related to developing our internal commercialization capability to support product sales, marketing and distribution. Further, we expect to incur additional costs associated with our continued operation as a public company.
As a result, we will need substantial additional funding to support our continuing operations and pursue our growth strategy. Until such time as we can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, government funding arrangements, collaborations, strategic alliances and marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements. We may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such other agreements or arrangements when needed on favorable terms, or at all. If we fail to raise capital or enter into such agreements as, and when needed, we may have to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development and commercialization of one or more of our product candidates.
Tebipenem HBr
In May 2025, we and GSK announced that the pivotal Phase 3 PIVOT-PO trial evaluating tebipenem HBr, an investigational oral treatment for cUTIs, including pyelonephritis, caused by certain microorganisms, met its primary endpoint and the trial was stopped early for efficacy. The decision followed a recommendation from an IDMC that completed a pre-specified interim analysis of data from 1,690 patients enrolled in the trial.
Following the review of the interim analysis data by the IDMC, it was determined that the Phase 3 PIVOT-PO trial met the primary endpoint of non-inferiority of tebipenem HBr compared to intravenous imipenem-cilastatin in hospitalized adult patients with cUTI, including pyelonephritis, on overall response (composite of clinical cure plus microbiological eradication) at the test-of-cure visit. The IDMC review did not identify any new safety concerns beyond what has been reported in other studies with tebipenem, with diarrhea and headache as the two most reported adverse events. In December 2025, GSK resubmitted the NDA for tebipenem HBr to the FDA. In accordance with the terms of the GSK License Agreement, we became entitled to receive a $25.0 million milestone payment upon the filing of the NDA with the FDA, which we received in February 2026.
Remaining potential payments under the GSK License Agreement, which include milestones and royalties based on commercial launch and achievement of pre-specified sales thresholds, are as follows (in millions):
*Under the terms of the GSK License Agreement, the maximum potential milestone amount was revised from $150.0 million after PIVOT-PO was stopped early for efficacy following completion of a pre-specified interim analysis of data from 1,690 patients enrolled in the trial, thereby reducing the overall cost of the trial to us; the maximum potential milestone payment of $150.0 million was contingent upon the trial continuing to full enrollment, with 2,637 patients enrolled in the trial.
In addition to the milestones described above, GSK is obligated to pay royalties to us on annual net sales of GSK Licensed Products in the GSK Territory. Such royalties are 1% for annual sales up to $750.0 million each year and range from high single-digit percentages on annual net sales above $750.0 million each year to low double-digit percentages on annual net sales above $1,000.0 million each year.
SPR206
In March 2025, following a reprioritization of our programs, we announced that we were no longer pursuing a Phase 2 clinical trial for SPR206 and had ceased further development of the program. On December 31, 2025, we mutually agreed with Pfizer to terminate the Pfizer License Agreement. Under the terms of the termination agreement, (i) in the event that a product is ever commercialized in the Pfizer Territory by Spero or any successor-in-interest to SPR206, such party will pay Pfizer royalties on the net sales in the Pfizer Territory at the rates set forth in the Pfizer License Agreement and (ii) we are liable to Pfizer for up to $5 million from any future sale, divestiture, license, transfer or partnering of SPR206.
SPR720
In November 2025, we announced that we ceased development of SPR720 and Vertex subsequently exercised its right to terminate the Vertex Assignment and License Agreement.
Interim Leadership Changes
In January 2025, the independent directors of our Board of Directors approved the following actions as a matter of corporate governance best practices and to enable the Company to maintain focus on pursuing our business objectives pending resolution of a “Wells Notice” received from the staff of the Boston Regional Office (the “Staff”) of the SEC. The Wells Notice was regarding the Staff's preliminary determination to recommend a civil enforcement action or administrative proceeding against the Company , its former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, Ankit Mahadevia, M.D. (“Dr. Mahadevia”), and its former Chief Financial Officer and President and Chief Executive Officer, Satyavrat “Sath” Shukla (“Mr. Shukla”), relating to certain public disclosures by the Company from March 31, 2022 leading up to the announcement on May 3, 2022 that we had determined to cease commercialization of tebipenem HBr based on feedback from the FDA, and whether our disclosures may have violated the federal securities laws.
The Board of Directors appointed director Frank Thomas to serve as the Chairman of the Board of Directors, stepping in for Ankit Mahadevia, M.D.
Mr. Shukla agreed to a paid administrative leave from his role as President and Chief Executive Officer, pending resolution of the Investigation. During such leave, Mr. Shukla remains an employee and continues to serve as a member of the Board of Directors for the duration of his directorship term.
The Board of Directors appointed Esther Rajavelu, our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Business Officer and Treasurer, to serve as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer during the term of Mr. Shukla’s administrative leave.
The terms of Ms. Rajavelu’s existing employment arrangement with the Company have been amended to provide that she will receive additional cash compensation of $20,000 per month while she serves as the Interim President and Chief Executive Officer, in addition to her role as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Business Officer.
To date, we have not generated any revenue from product sales. If our development efforts for any of our product candidates are successful and result in regulatory approval, we may generate revenue in the future from product sales. We cannot predict if, when, or to what extent we will generate revenue from the commercialization and sale of any of our product candidates. We may never succeed in obtaining regulatory approval for any ofexisting ouror future product candidates.
We expect aA portion of our revenue will continue tomay be derived from payments under our activeany government awards and any awards that we may receive in the future.
Current collaborationCollaboration revenue relates to our agreements with Pfizer and GSK.
Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred for our research activities, including our drug discovery efforts, and the development of any of our product candidates, which include:
expenses incurred in connection with the preclinical and clinical development of any of our product candidates, including under agreements with contract research organizations (“CROs”);
At this time, we cannot reasonably estimate or know the nature, timing and costs of the efforts that will be necessary to complete the preclinical and clinical development of any ofexisting ouror future product candidates. The successful development and commercialization of any of our product candidates is highly uncertain. This is due to the numerous risks and uncertainties, including the following:
launch of commercial sales of any of our product candidates, if approved, whether alone or in collaboration with others;
acceptance of any of our product candidates, if approved, by patients, the medical community and third-party payors;
competition with other therapies; and a continued acceptable safety profile of any of our product candidates, if approved.
Impairment Charges
In the third quarter of 2025, we evaluated our real estate leases in light of our new sublease agreements. As a result of the evaluation, we recorded an impairment charge of $0.6 million associated with the right-of-use asset in the third quarter of 2025.
In October 2024, we implemented a strategic restructuring initiative and corresponding reduction in workforce. We restructured our operations to reduce costs and reallocate resources in support of the development of tebipenem HBr and other corporate activities. During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we recognized $0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, in expense related to the restructuring. We do not expect to incur any further charges related to this restructuring.
In light of our decision to suspend planned development activities for our oral SPR720 program and our strategic restructuring, we expect that our future expenses relating to development activities with respect to SPR720 will be substantially reduced as we evaluate potential paths forward for SPR720 and implement our restructuring. In connection with our restructuring, we estimate that we will incur approximately $1.1 million of costs in connection with the reduction in workforce related to severance pay and other related termination benefits of which we incurred $0.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2024 and anticipate the remaining to be incurred in 2025. We may incur additional costs not currently contemplated due to events associated with or resulting from the workforce reduction. Most of the costs associated with our workforce reduction were incurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2024.
Except for year ended December 31, 2022, we have not recorded any income tax benefits for the net losses we have incurred in each year or for our earned research and development tax credits, as we believe, based upon the weight of available evidence, that it is more likely than not that all of our net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits will not be realized. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had federalUnited States federal, state and stateforeign net operating loss carryforwards ("NOLs") of $165.2$226.1 million, $184.8 million and $120.6$4.7 million, respectivelyrespectively. which may be available to offset future income tax liabilities. $152.0$212.8 million of the federal NOLs can be carried forward indefinitely and $13.2 million of the federal NOLs begin to expire in 2034. The state NOLs begin to expire in 20342035 and will expire at various dates through 2044.2045. In addition, as of December 31, 2024, we hadThe foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $4.6 million, which may be available to offset future income tax liabilities andNOLs do not expire. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we also had federal and state research and development tax credit carryforwards of $6.2$6.7 million and $2.1$1.7 million, respectively, and federal orphan drug tax credit carryforwards of $3.1 million, which may be available to offset future income tax liabilities. The federal and state research and development tax credits begin to expire in 20362035 and 2033,the respectively.federal orphan drug credits begin to expire in 2044. We have recorded a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets at each balance sheet date.
We generatehave generated revenue from government contracts that reimburse us for certain allowable costs for funded projects. For contracts with government agencies, when we have concluded that we are the principal in conducting the research and development expenses and where the funding arrangement is considered central to our ongoing operations, we classify the recognized funding received as revenue. Revenue from government grants is recognized as the qualifying expenses related to the contracts are incurred, provided that there is reasonable assurance of recoverability. Revenue recognized upon incurring qualifying expenses in advance of receipt of funding is recorded as unbilled receivables, a component of prepaid expenses and other current assets, in the consolidated balance sheet.
We recognize funding received from BARDA and the NIAID of the NIH, as revenue, rather than as a reduction of research and development expenses, because we are the principal in conducting the research and development activities and these contracts are central to our ongoing operations. We recognize revenue only after the qualifying expenses related to the contracts have been incurred, we are reasonably assured that the expenses will be reimbursed and the revenue is collectible. We record revenue recognized upon incurring qualifying expenses in advance of billing as unbilled revenue, which is included in other receivables in our consolidated balance sheet. The related costs incurred by us are included in research and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. In March 2025, we announced that we ceased development of SPR206 and in April 2025, NIAID communicated to us that it had terminated the contract for convenience effective immediately. We do not anticipate receiving any additional funding under the BARDA contract.
Our financial statements have been presented on the basis that we are a going concern, which contemplates the realization of revenues and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have incurred recurring cash outflows from operating activities, have an accumulated deficit and need to raise additional capital to fund future operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024 (in thousands):
Grant Revenue (in thousands):
Grant revenue recognized during 2024the years ended December 31, 2025 and 20232024 consisted of the reimbursement of qualifying expenses incurred in connection with our various government awards. The increasedecrease in grant revenue during 20242025 was primarily due to ana increasedecrease of $15.8$13.0 million in funding under our BARDA contract related to ourthe pivotalconclusion of the Phase 3 clinical trial of tebipenem HBr, partially offset byand a decrease of $2.3$0.4 million in qualified expenses incurred under our NIAID award relating to SPR206.SPR206 as we ceased development of SPR206 and the NIAID award was terminated in April 2025.
During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, collaboration revenue - related party related to revenue recognized under the GSK License Agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized $47.0 million in collaboration revenue - related party under the GSK License Agreement, of which $25.0 million was recognized upon GSK's filing of an NDA for tebipenem HBr with the FDA in December 2025, one of the milestones under the agreement. We received payment in February 2026. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized $27.0 million in collaboration revenue - related party under the GSK License Agreement.
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, collaboration revenue - related party related to revenue recognized under the GSK License Agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized $27.0 million in collaboration revenue - related party under the GSK License Agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized $95.8 million in collaboration revenue - related party, of which $21.2 million was recognized upon achievement of the $30.0 million milestone under the GSK License Agreement and $64.7 million upon achievement of the $95.0 million milestone under the GSK License Agreement.
During the year ended December 31, 2025 we recognized $12.6 million in collaboration revenue related to our agreement with Pfizer, all of which was recognized upon termination of our agreement with Pfizer in December 2025. During the year ended December 31, 2024 we recognized $0.4 million in collaboration revenue related to our agreement with Pfizer.
During the year ended December 31, 2024 we recognized $0.4 million in collaboration revenue related to our agreement with Pfizer. During the year ended December 31, 2023 we recognized $0.9 million in collaboration revenue related to our agreement with Pfizer.
Research and Development Expenses (in thousands):
Direct costs related to our tebipenem HBr program increaseddecreased by $43.8$37.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, due to increaseddecreased clinical activities related to our Phase 3 clinical trial of tebipenem HBr, which wemet initiatedits inprimary endpoint and was stopped early for efficacy during the fourthfirst quarterhalf of 2023.2025. In December 2025, GSK resubmitted the NDA for tebipenem HBr to the FDA. Direct costs related to our tebipenem HBr program during the yearyears ended December 31, 20242025 and 2024, reflect a $0.5 million and $3.6 million reduction to expense related to a purchase of drug substance material by GSK.GSK, respectively.
Direct costs related to our SPR720 program increased by $3.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, due to clinical activity during the period related to our Phase 2a clinical trial of SPR720, which completed enrollment in the second quarter of 2024. Subsequently, in October 2024, we announced that we would suspend current development activities for SPR720 based on an interim analysis of the Phase 2a proof-of-concept study of SPR720 for the treatment of NTM-PD not meeting its primary endpoint.
Direct costs related to our SPR206SPR720 program decreased by $2.7$15.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to decreased preclinicalclinical activity.activity during the period and the cessation of development on the program announced in November 2025.
Direct costs related to our SPR206 program decreased by $0.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, primarily due to decreased preclinical activity and the cessation of development of the program announced in March 2025.
In light of the suspension of development activities for our SPR720 program and the discontinuation of development of SPR206, we expect that direct research and development costs related to those programs will be reduced in future periods.
The increasedecrease in personnel-related costs of $0.3$4.5 million was primarily duea toresult increasedof decreased headcount costs in our research and development personnelfunctions costs.between the periods. Personnel-related costs for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024 included share-based compensation expenses of $2.6$1.7 million and $2.7$2.6 million, respectively.
General and Administrative Expenses (in thousands):
The decrease in personnel-related costs of $2.1$1.4 million was primarily a result of decreased headcount costs in our general and administrative functions duringbetween the period.periods. Personnel-related costs for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024 included share-based compensation expense of $5.2$2.6 million and $5.3$5.2 million, respectively.
The increasedecrease in professional and consultant fees was primarily due to increaseddecreased legal and consulting expenses incurred during the year ended December 31, 2024.2025.
During the yearyears ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we incurred restructuring expenses of $0.3 million and $0.9 millionmillion, respectively, related to our strategic restructuring that we announced in October 2024. Restructuring expenses for theboth periodperiods were primarily comprised of severance and other employee costs. For further information, refer to Note 9 – Restructuring to the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Impairment of Long-Term AssetCharges
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
New heading “We are substantially dependent on the success of our new product candidate, SP001, and focus on SP001 may not be successful.”
New heading “There can be no assurance that the FDA will accept data from any trials conducted outside of the United States, including any trials conducted in China.”
New heading “As part of our royalty financing transaction with HCRx, we transferred the GSK License Agreement and our rights thereunder, along with related intellectual property, to one of two newly formed special purpose subsidiaries of ours, and provided HCRx with a right of first recourse to such assets to satisfy our obligations to HCRx. As a result, if we are unable to satisfy our obligations under the royalty financing transaction, we could lose all retained rights to future royalty payments from HCRx and related assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and stock price.”
Removed heading “As of March 2025, we have ceased development of our SPR206 program, and as of November 2025, we have ceased development of our SPR720 oral program, and have shifted our focus and resources to advancing the development of the tebipenem HBr program, as well as other corporate activities. Consequently, our business and prospects are substantially dependent on our tebipenem program and our collaboration with GSK. If we fail to execute successfully on this re-prioritized strategic focus, or our collaboration with GSK fails to advance the development of the tebipenem HBr program, our business and prospects may be materially adversely affected.”
Removed heading “A fast track designation may not actually lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process.”
Removed heading “Priority review designation by the FDA may not lead to a faster regulatory review or approval process and, in any event, does not assure FDA approval.”
Removed heading “While we negotiated a SPA agreement with the FDA relating to our pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial of tebipenem HBr in patients with cUTI, including acute pyelonephritis, this agreement does not guarantee approval of tebipenem HBr or any other particular outcome from regulatory review of the clinical trial or the product candidate.”
Largest changes
“As a result, we are currently substantially dependent on our tebipenem program and our collaboration with GSK. As described under Note 9 to our condensed consolidated financial statements, GSK has the right to terminate the GSK License Agreement (1) at any time upon a specified number of days’ notice, (2) upon a material breach by us or (3) upon a bankruptcy of Spero. Alternatively, in the case of a material breach by Spero, GSK may, in lieu of terminating the GSK License Agreement, elect to reduce any commercial milestone payments to Spero by 50%. …”see in full comparison
“Additionally, in the case of certain defined breaches and defaults under the royalty financing transaction, HCRx may have recourse beyond the assets related to the Utebzi program, although in most instances our obligations in respect of such breaches and defaults are limited to actual damages, and such obligations are generally subject to a fixed cap. …”see in full comparison
The reciprocal tariffs and the fentanyl tariffs were imposed pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (the “IEEPA”). These tariffs were found to be unconstitutional by multiple federal courts in the spring and summer of 2025. On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court held that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs, invalidating both the reciprocal tariffs and the drug trafficking tariffs. Shortly thereafter, the President issued a new Executive Order revoking the IEEPA tariffs and Customs and Border Protection ceased collecting the tariffs as of 12:01 am on February 24, 2026. At the same time, however, the Trump Administration imposed a new 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, effective February 24, 2026. Pursuant to the statute,see in full comparisonabsent an extension by Congress,these tariffswill expire in 150 daysexpired on July 24, 2026.ForHowever, on July 23, 2026, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative announced final action under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 imposing new tariffs on imports from 60 trading partners based on findings that those countriesthathadhavefailedconcludedtotradeadoptdealsand effectively enforce prohibitions on imports of goods produced withtheforcedUnitedlabor.States,The new tariffs, set at either 10% or 12.5% depending on thetariffcountry’srateslevelagreedof commitment to–forced-laborincludingimportwithrestrictions,regardtooktoeffectpharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients – have now reverted to 10% untilon July 24,2026.2026, and replaced the tariffs that had been imposed under Section 122. The Administration has announced that it also plans to initiate new investigations related to excess capacity on “most major trading partners” under Section 301 of the same act, which will likely lead to additional tariffs.
“As of March 2025, we have ceased development of our SPR206 program, and as of November 2025, we have ceased development of our SPR720 oral program, and have shifted our focus and resources to advancing the development of the tebipenem HBr program, as well as other corporate activities. Consequently, our business and prospects are substantially dependent on our tebipenem program and our collaboration with GSK. …”see in full comparison
“There can be no assurance that the FDA will accept data from trials conducted outside of the United States to support our IND application. For example, the data generated by Innovent in China in its study of patients with SjD may not be acceptable to the FDA or other regulatory authorities. …”see in full comparison
“There can be no assurance that the FDA will accept data from any trials conducted outside of the United States, including any trials conducted in China.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (124)
Risks Related to ProductOur DevelopmentBusiness and CommercializationProduct Candidates
We are substantially dependent on the success of our new product candidate, SP001, and focus on SP001 may not be successful.
On June 17, 2026, we and GSK announced that the FDA approved Utebzi (tebipenem pivoxil). We are party to an exclusive license agreement with GSK for the development, manufacture and commercialization of Utebzi, which includes the transfer of the IND and the NDA ownership to GSK, and pursuant to which GSK is obligated to make milestone payments if certain milestones are achieved and to pay royalties based on commercial launch and achievement of pre-specified sales thresholds. On July 8, 2026, we and our affiliates entered into a non-recourse non-dilutive royalty financing transaction with affiliates of HCRx, pursuant to which HCRx will receive a portion of the future GSK Proceeds. As such, our receipt of royalty and milestone revenues from GSK is limited to 35% of the GSK Proceeds arising after payment in full of the Notes.
Following the FDA approval of Utebzi, and the termination of our earlier stage programs (SPR206 and SPR720), we remain focused on advancing other corporate activities, including growing our portfolio of clinical-stage product candidates. On July 8, 2026, we entered into a license agreement with Innovent pursuant to which we received exclusive rights to research, develop, manufacture, and commercialize SP001 worldwide, excluding the Innovent Territory, where Innovent retains rights. The in-licensing of SP001 represents a strategic pivot by us from the development of tebipenem pivoxil to the development of a new product candidate focused on new indications for which we believe we have relevant but limited prior experience.
Our business and future success depends on our ability to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for and successfully commercialize our new lead product candidate, SP001. SP001 is our only product candidate currently in clinical development, and our business depends on its successful development. SP001 will require additional clinical and non-clinical development, regulatory review and approval, substantial investment, access to sufficient commercial manufacturing capacity and significant marketing efforts before we can generate any revenue from product sales, if ever. We cannot be certain SP001 will receive regulatory approval or be successfully commercialized even if we receive regulatory approval. In addition, because SP001 is our only product candidate currently in clinical development, if SP001 encounters safety or efficacy problems, developmental delays or regulatory issues or other problems, our development plans and business would be significantly harmed.
Further, the success of SP001 will depend in part on our ability to integrate this new product candidate into our business and program in an efficient and effective manner. We may not be able to realize the full potential of business opportunities and growth prospects of SP001 to the extent anticipated or at all. Challenges associated with the integration of SP001 may include those related to building out our operational and administrative capabilities as well as the hiring of employees to support our strategic pivot. If we are unable to successfully integrate SP001, or if we experience delays in clinical development, we may incur unanticipated liabilities and be unable to fully realize the potential benefit of future revenue and other anticipated benefits resulting from the in-license of SP001, and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
There can be no assurance that the FDA will accept data from any trials conducted outside of the United States, including any trials conducted in China.
Subject to FDA clearance of the U.S. IND, we currently expect to advance SP001 into a Phase 2 trial in IgG4-RD patients in the second quarter of 2027, based in part on data generated by Innovent in its Phase 1b study conducted in China in patients with SjD. The acceptance of study data from clinical trials conducted outside the United States by the FDA may be subject to certain conditions, or such data may not be accepted at all. For example, in cases where data from foreign clinical trials are intended to serve as the sole basis for regulatory approval in the United States, the FDA will generally not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless the data are applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice; the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and pursuant to Good Clinical Practice (“GCP”) regulations; and the data may be considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection by the FDA, or if the FDA considers such inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. Even where the foreign study data are not intended to serve as the sole basis for approval, if the relevant study was not conducted pursuant to an IND, the FDA will generally not accept the data as support for a marketing application unless the study was conducted in accordance with GCP requirements and the FDA is able to validate the data from the study through an onsite inspection if deemed necessary.
There can be no assurance that the FDA will accept data from trials conducted outside of the United States to support our IND application. For example, the data generated by Innovent in China in its study of patients with SjD may not be acceptable to the FDA or other regulatory authorities. In May 2026, the United States House Appropriations Committee issued a draft, non-binding report accompanying its proposed Fiscal Year 2027 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act that would bar the FDA from accepting, reviewing, or considering any covered clinical data generated by a clinical investigation site in China, Russia, Iran or North Korea in support of an IND, including any amendment or supplement thereto. If the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data from our clinical trials of any of our current or future product candidates, we would need to conduct additional trials, which could be costly and time-consuming, and which may not ultimately support approval in the United States.
As of March 2025, we have ceased development of our SPR206 program, and as of November 2025, we have ceased development of our SPR720 oral program, and have shifted our focus and resources to advancing the development of the tebipenem HBr program, as well as other corporate activities. Consequently, our business and prospects are substantially dependent on our tebipenem program and our collaboration with GSK. If we fail to execute successfully on this re-prioritized strategic focus, or our collaboration with GSK fails to advance the development of the tebipenem HBr program, our business and prospects may be materially adversely affected.
As of March 2025, we have ceased development of SPR206. Additionally, as of November 2025, we have ceased development of our SPR720 oral program and have shifted our focus and resources to advancing the clinical development of our tebipenem HBr program, as well as other corporate activities. We believe this re-prioritized strategic focus is the best way to optimize our financial and other resources to advance our goal of identifying and developing novel treatments for rare diseases and diseases with high unmet need. However, there is no assurance that we will successfully execute this strategy. As described below, there are risks inherent in the clinical development process, especially for earlier-stage programs. If we are unable to execute successfully on this re-prioritized strategic focus, our business and prospects may be materially adversely affected.
As a result, we are currently substantially dependent on our tebipenem program and our collaboration with GSK. As described under Note 9 to our condensed consolidated financial statements, GSK has the right to terminate the GSK License Agreement (1) at any time upon a specified number of days’ notice, (2) upon a material breach by us or (3) upon a bankruptcy of Spero. Alternatively, in the case of a material breach by Spero, GSK may, in lieu of terminating the GSK License Agreement, elect to reduce any commercial milestone payments to Spero by 50%. In addition, in such circumstance, GSK may assume the responsibility and expense of development of tebipenem HBr in the United States, in which case no development milestone payments would be payable to Spero. In the case of a Change of Control (as defined in the GSK License Agreement) of Spero, GSK similarly may, in lieu of terminating the GSK License Agreement, assume responsibility and expense of development of tebipenem HBr in the United States and no development milestones would be payable to Spero, as described above. Any termination of the GSK License Agreement or any failure to earn, or reduction in, milestone payments may materially adversely affect our business and prospects.
Our ability to realize the value of tebipenem HBrpivoxil depends on obtaining FDA approval. Even if such approval is obtained, the timeline of, and any requirements imposed as part of, such approval may impact the attractiveness of commercialization of Utebzi (tebipenem HBrpivoxil) through our partnership with GSK.
WeIn currentlyJune have2026, nothe productsFDA approved GSK’s NDA resubmission for saleUtebzi. andWe have invested a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources in the development of tebipenem HBrpivoxil with GSK as a product candidate for the treatment of bacterial infections causing cUTI. Our ability to realize the value of tebipenem HBr, currently our only product candidate,pivoxil depends on the potential FDA approval, and the expected timeline and other requirements that would affect the attractivenesssuccess of GSK’s commercialization of tebipenemUtebzi. HBrFurther, throughon July 8, 2026, we and our partnershipaffiliates entered into a non-recourse non-dilutive royalty financing transaction with GSK. Further, as partaffiliates of anyHCRx, approval,pursuant to which HCRx will receive a portion of the FDAfuture couldGSK imposeProceeds. labelingAs requirementssuch, restrictingour receipt of royalty and milestone revenues from GSK is limited to 35% of the useGSK Proceeds arising after payment in full of tebipenemthe HBr,Notes. whichIf couldGSK’s reducecommercialization its commercial prospects, unless such requirementsefforts are subsequentlyunsuccessful modifiedor tosignificantly reducedelayed, suchour restrictions. If anyreceipt of theseroyalty outcomesand occur,milestone revenues from GSK may not align with our expectations and our business could be materially harmed.harmed
In June 2024, as mandated by the FDCA, the FDA issued draft guidance outlining the general requirements for DAPs. Unlike most guidance documents issued by the FDA, the DAP guidance when finalized will have the force of law because Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022 (“FDORA”) specifically dictates that the form and manner for submission of DAPs are specified in FDA guidance. On January 27, 2025, in response to an executive order issued by President Trump on January 21, 2025 on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs, the FDA removed the draft DAP guidance from its website. That action, along with similar actions by the Trump Administration to remove many other healthcare webpages, is currently the subject of ongoing litigation. On July 3, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the administration’s actions to remove these webpages, including the draft DAP guidance, is unlawful under the Administrative Procedure Act. The court ordered the restoration of many of these webpages. In late July 2025, the FDA restored the draft DAP guidance to its website with a statement that “information on this page may be modified and/or removed in the future subject to the terms of the court’s order and implemented consistent with applicable law.” Accordingly, in light of these ongoing actions, there is considerable uncertainty surrounding the draft DAP guidance and how the FDA will consider DAPs in connection with its review of marketing applications.
WeWhile we currently have noone productsproduct approved for sale andthrough our collaboration with GSK, we cannot guarantee that we will ever have additional marketable products. Clinical failure can occur at any stage of clinical development. Clinical trials may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we or any future collaborators may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical trials or preclinical studies. We will be required to demonstrate through well-controlled clinical trials that our existing or future product candidates are safe and effective for use in a diverse population before we can seek marketing approvals for their commercial sale. Success in preclinical studies and early-stage clinical trials does not mean that future larger registration clinical trials will be successful. This is because product candidates in later-stage clinical trials may fail to demonstrate sufficient safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities despite having progressed through preclinical studies and early-stage clinical trials.
If unexpected adverse events occur in any of our ongoing or planned clinical trials, we may need to abandon development of any product candidates, or limit development to lower doses or to certain uses or subpopulations in which the undesirable side effects or other unfavorable characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective. Many compounds that initially showed promise in clinical or earlier stage testing are later found to cause undesirable or unexpected side effects that prevented further development of the compound.
Even if we obtain FDA or other regulatory approvals and are able to launch any of our current or future product candidates commercially, the approved product candidate may nonetheless fail to gain sufficient market acceptance among physicians, patients, hospitals (including pharmacy directors) and third-party payors and, ultimately, may not be commercially successful. For example, physiciansUtebzi, which was approved in June 2026, may fail to gain sufficient market acceptance despite commercialization efforts by GSK. Physicians are often reluctant to switch their patients from existing therapies even when new and potentially more effective or convenient treatments enter the market. Further, patients often acclimate to the therapy that they are currently taking and do not want to switch unless their physicians recommend switching products or they are required to switch therapies due to lack of coverage and reimbursement for existing therapies. If an approved product candidate does not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant product revenues or any profits from operations. The degree of market acceptance of any product candidate for which we receive approval depends on a number of factors, including:
the emergence of bacterial resistance to the productproduct, in the case of Utebzi; and the rate at which resistance to other drugs in the target infections grows.grows, in the case of Utebzi.
Because we have limited financial and managerial resources, we intend to focus on developing product candidates for specific indications that we identify as most likely to succeed, in terms of both their potential for marketing approval and commercialization. As a result, we may forego or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or for other indications that may prove to have greater commercial potential. For example, as of November 2025, weexample,we have ceasedterminated developmentour ofSPR206 program and our SPR720 oral program and have shifted our focus and resources to advancing the clinical development of our tebipenem HBr program,SP001, as well as other corporate activities. Additionally, in March 2025, we announced that we have ceased development of SPR206.
If we or our collaborators are unable to establish sales, marketing and distribution capabilities or enter into sales, marketing and distribution agreements with third parties, we or our collaborators may not be successful in commercializing Utebzi or any of our future product candidatescandidates, if such product candidates are approved.
We intend to use collaborators to assist with the commercialization of any of our current and future product candidates, including the GSK License Agreement for the development and commercialization of tebipenem HBr.Utebzi. As a result of entering into arrangements with third parties to perform sales, marketing and distribution services, our product revenues or the profitability of these product revenues to us would likely be lower than if we were to directly market and sell products in those markets. Furthermore, we may be unsuccessful in entering into the necessary arrangements with third parties or may be unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us. In addition, we likely would have little control over such third parties, and any of them might fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our products effectively.
The development and commercialization of new drug products is highly competitive. We face competition from major pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies worldwide with respect to any product candidates that we may seek to develop and commercialize in the future. There are a number of large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that currently market and sell products or are pursuing the development of product candidates in immunology and inflammation for patients with serious diseases, and product candidates for the treatment of resistant infections. Potential competitors also include academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations. Our competitors may succeed in developing, acquiring or licensing technologies and drug products that are more effective or less costly than the product candidates that we are currently developing or that we may develop, which could render our existing or future product candidates obsolete and noncompetitive.
There are a number of approved products and product candidates in development that may compete with our product candidates in IgG4-related disease, SjD, and other autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. For example, UPLIZNA® (inebilizumab), a CD19-directed B-cell depleting antibody marketed by Amgen Inc., is approved for the treatment of IgG4-related disease. Additional product candidates are in clinical development for IgG4-related disease, including obexelimab (Zenas BioPharma, Inc./Bristol Myers Squibb Company), a bifunctional CD19/FcγRIIB-targeting antibody; rilzabrutinib (Sanofi S.A.), a BTK inhibitor, and efgartigimod (argenx SE), an FcRn inhibitor. In SjD and related autoimmune indications, numerous companies are developing therapies directed against pathways including CD40/CD40L, BAFF, APRIL, BAFF-R, FcRn, BTK, TYK2 and other immune targets. These companies include large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies such as Amgen, Novartis AG, argenx, Johnson & Johnson, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, UCB SA, and others, as well as emerging biotechnology companies developing novel therapies. Product candidates currently in development include dazodalibep, ianalumab, efgartigimod, nipocalimab, telitacicept and several additional investigational agents. We may also face competition from companies developing therapies that target the same biological pathway as SP001, including other CD40 or CD40L-directed therapies. In addition, future advances in immunology, autoimmune disease and inflammatory disease treatment may result in the development of products that are safer, more effective, more convenient to administer, less expensive or more rapidly adopted by physicians, patients and payors than our product candidates. If our competitors successfully develop or commercialize such products before us, our commercial opportunity could be materially reduced.
There are a variety of available oral therapies marketed for the treatment of cUTIs that we would expect wouldto compete with tebipenem HBr, if approved,Utebzi, such as Levaquin, Cipro and Bactrim. Many of the available therapies are well established and widely accepted by physicians, patients and third-party payors. Insurers and other third-party payors may also encourage the use of generic products, for example in the fluoroquinolone class. However, the susceptibility of urinary tract pathogens to the existing treatment alternatives is waning. IfIn tebipenemaddition, HBr is approved, theGSK’s pricing of Utebzi may be at a significant premium over other competitive products.products, Thiswhich may make it difficult for tebipenem HBrUtebzi to compete with these other products.
There are several IV-administered products marketed for the treatment of infections resistant to first-line therapy for Gram-negative infections, including Emblaveo (Aztreonam-avibactam) from Allergan, Avycaz (ceftazidime-avibactam) from Allergan and Pfizer, Zerbaxa (ceftolozane-tazobactam) from Merck & Co., imipenem/cilastatin and Recarbrio (relebactam) from Merck & Co., Zemdri (plazomicin) from Cipla Therapeutics, Inc., Fetroja (cefiderocol) from Shionogi & Co. Ltd., Vabomere (meropenem-vaborbactam) from CorMedix Inc., Exblifep (cefepime/enmetazobactam) from Allecra Therapeutics, and Contepo (fosfomycin) from Meitheal Pharmaceuticals.
Even if weUtebzi, or our partners are able to commercialize ourany existing or future product candidates,candidates thethat productwe may commercialize, may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations, or third-party payor coverage and reimbursement policies that could harm our business.business
We currently expect that our product candidate, if approved,Utebzi will be administered in a hospital inpatient setting. In the United States, governmental and other third-party payors generally reimburse hospitals a single bundled payment established on a prospective basis intended to cover all items and services provided to the patient during a single hospitalization. Hospitals bill third-party payors for all or a portion of the fees associated with the patient’s hospitalization and bill patients for any deductibles or co-payments. Because there is typically no separate reimbursement for drugs administered in a hospital inpatient setting, some of our target customers may be unwilling to adopt our product candidate in light of the additional associated cost. If we are forced to lower the price we charge for our product candidate, if approved, our gross margins may decrease, which would adversely affect our ability to invest in and grow our business.
We cannot predict whether bacteria may develop resistance to ourtebipenem product candidate, if approved,pivoxil, which could affect its revenue potential.
Tebipenem HBrpivoxil is designed to treat bacterial infections, including drug-resistant infections. The bacteria responsible for these infections evolve quickly and readily transfer their resistance mechanisms within and between species. We cannot predict whether or when bacterial resistance to tebipenem HBrpivoxil may develop.
For example, as a carbapenem, tebipenem HBrpivoxil is not active against organisms expressing a resistance mechanism mediated by enzymes known as carbapenemases. Although occurrence of this resistance mechanism is currently rare, we cannot predict whether carbapenemase-mediated resistance will become widespread in regions where tebipenem HBrpivoxil may be marketed if it is approved. The growth of drug resistant infections in community settings or in countries with poor public health infrastructures, or the potential use of our product candidate outside of controlled hospital settings, could contribute to the rise of resistance. If resistance to ourtebipenem product candidatepivoxil becomes prevalent, our ability to generate revenue could suffer.
Although a substantial amount of our efforts are currently focused on our potential approval of our product candidate, tebipenem HBr, aA key element of our strategy is to develop and commercialize a portfolio of therapeutics to treat drugimmunology resistantand bacterialinflammation infections.patients. We arerecently exploring,entered into the Innovent Agreement for the in-license of SP001, and intend tomay explore in the future, strategic partnerships for the development of new product candidates.
we may be unable to successfully modify candidate compounds to be active in Gram-negative bacteria or defeat bacterial resistance mechanisms or identify viable product candidates in our screening campaigns;
Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and those of our contract research organizations and other contractors and consultants are vulnerable to damage or disruption from hacking, computer viruses, malware, including ransomware, software bugs, unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, war, and telecommunication, equipment and electrical failures. We have measures in place that are designed to prevent, and if necessary, to detect and respond to such cybersecurity incidents and breaches of privacy and security mandates. Our measures to prevent, respond to, and minimize such risks may be unsuccessful. While we have not, to our knowledge, experienced any significant system failure, accident or material cybersecurity incident to date, if such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations or the operations of those third parties with which we contract, it could result in a material disruption of our programs and our business operations, as well as our financial condition. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or ongoing clinical trials for any of our current or future product candidates could result in delays in our development and regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. Such a loss could also expose us to regulatory enforcement, civil liability and reputational damage. To the extent that any disruption or cybersecurity incident results in a loss of or damage to our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure or theft of confidential or proprietary information, in addition to incurring liability, the further development of any product candidates could be delayed or our competitive position could be compromised. Additionally, such disruptions or cybersecurity incidents could result in enforcement actions by U.S. or foreign regulatory authorities, regulatory penalties, and other legal liabilities such as but not limited to private litigation, the incurrence of significant remediation costs, disruptions to our development programs, business operations and collaborations, diversion of management efforts and damage to our reputation, all of which could harm our business and operations.
We have not generated any revenue from the sale of our products and have incurred losses in most years since our inception in 2013. Our net loss was $7.2$9.6 million and $13.9$16.8 million for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025,2026, respectively. WeWhile the FDA approved GSK’s NDA resubmission for Utebzi, we do not have yetany to have aother product candidatecandidates approved for sale and we may never have aanother product candidate approved for commercialization. The success of Utebzi depends on GSK’s ability to commercialize the product.
In accordance with ASU 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), we have evaluated whether there are conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that these consolidated financial statements are issued. Based on our current operating plan, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents as of MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, together with and including the net proceeds from the royalty financing transaction that closed in July 2026, will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements at least into 2028.the second half of 2029. During this period, we remainare focused on supportingadvancing GSKnext-generation medicines in the FDA approval process pursuant to our obligations under our GSK License Agreementimmunology and advancinginflammation otherfor corporatepatients activities,with includingserious exploringdiseases opportunitiesand tomajor growtreatment our portfolio of clinical-stage product candidates.gaps. Beyond this point, or in the event we change our current operating plan, we will need additional funding, which we expect will primarily consist of raising additional capital through some combination of equity or debt financings, potential new collaborations or grant funding. If we are not able to secure adequate additional funding, we plan to make further reductions in spending. In that event, we may have to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of our planned development activities. The actions necessary to reduce spending under this plan at a level that mitigates the factors described above is not considered probable, as defined in the accounting standards and therefore, the full extent to which management may extend our funds through these actions may not be considered in management’s assessment of our ability to continue as a going concern.
conduct additional clinical trials and studies of our existing or future product candidates;
We currently have noone productsproduct approved for sale and have historically invested a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources in the development of any of our product candidates, including tebipenem HBr,pivoxil, SPR206, and SPR720. Although we decided to cease further development of SPR206 and SPR720, our business remains heavily dependent on the successful commercialization of tebipenem pivoxil, the success of which depends on GSK’s ability to commercialize Utebzi, and the successful development, regulatory approval, and, if approved, commercialization of tebipenem HBrSP001 and any future product candidates. We cannot be certain that any product candidate will receive regulatory approval or will be successfully commercialized even if it receives regulatory approval.
If any of our current or future product candidates fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy in clinical trials, do not gain regulatory approval, or do not achieve market acceptance following regulatory approval and commercialization, we may never become profitable. Even if we achieve profitability in the future, we may not be able to sustain profitability in subsequent periods. Our prior losses, combined with expected future losses, have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our stockholders’ equity and working capital. If we are unable to achieve and sustain profitability, the market value of our common stock will likely decline.
Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing biopharmaceutical products, we are unable to predict the extent of any future losses or when, if ever, we will become profitable. Our expenses would increase significantly if we are required by the FDA, or any comparable foreign regulatory authority to perform studies in addition to those currently expected, or if there are any delays in completing our clinical trials or the development of any of our current and future product candidates.
If we are unable to raise capital when needed, or do not receive payments from our collaboration partnership agreements or royalty financing agreements, it could limit our ability to support our operations.
Developing pharmaceutical products, including conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials, is a time-consuming, expensive and uncertain process that takes years to complete. OurWe expect that our expenses are likely towill increase if and as we commence and advance additional preclinical studies and clinical trials for any future product candidates. If we obtain marketing approval for any product candidate, we expect to incur significant expenses related to development, product sales, marketing, distribution and manufacturing. Some of these expenses may be incurred in advance of marketing approval and could be substantial. Accordingly, we will be required to obtain further funding through public or private equity offerings, debt financings, royalty financing transactions, collaborations, licensing arrangements, government funding or other sources. Adequate additional financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. Our failure to raise capital as and when needed would have a negative effect on our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategy.
Based on our current operating plan, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents as of MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, together with and including the net proceeds from the royalty financing transaction that closed in July 2026, will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements at least into 2028.the second half of 2029. During this period, we remainare focused on supportingadvancing GSKnext-generation medicines in the FDA approval process pursuant to our obligations under our GSK License Agreementimmunology and advancinginflammation otherfor corporatepatients activities,with includingserious exploringdiseases opportunitiesand tomajor growtreatment our portfolio of clinical-stage product candidates.gaps. Beyond this point, or in the event we change our current operating plan, we will need additional funding to support our continuing operations. Until such time as we can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, government funding arrangements, collaborations, strategic alliances and marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements. If we are not able to secure adequate additional funding, we plan to make further reductions in spending. In that event, we may have to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of our planned development activities, including:
the timing and terms of the potential FDA approval of tebipenem HBr;
the amount of funding that we receive under our government awards;
Unless and until we can generate a substantial amount of revenue from our existing and future product candidates, we expect to finance our future cash needs through public or private equity offerings, debt financings, royalty financing transactions, collaborations, licensing arrangements and government funding arrangements. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations, even if we believe that we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans.
If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties, or royalty financing transactions, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us.
Our operations to date have been limited to financing and staffing our company, and performing research and development activities to advance our existing or future product candidates. We have notonly yetrecently demonstrated an ability to successfully obtain marketing approval, through the FDA approval of Utebzi in June 2026, and have not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully manufacture a commercial scale product, or arrange for a third party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product commercialization. Consequently, predictions about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history or a history of successfully developing and commercializing pharmaceutical products.
We expect our financial condition and operating results to continue to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, stockholders should not rely upon the results of any quarterly or annual periods as indications of future operating performance.performance
We may not achieve the milestones triggering payments to usus, inor may not receive royalty payments pursuant to, our existing,existing or any future,future license and collaboration or royalty financing agreements with third parties.
We have and may continue to seek third-party collaborators for development and commercialization of certain of our existing or future product candidates. Currently we are party to license and collaboration agreements with third parties as described in Note 99, License, Collaboration and Service Agreements, and Note 12, Subsequent Events, to our condensed consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our likely collaborators for any other marketing, distribution, development, licensing or broader collaboration arrangements we may pursue include large and mid-size pharmaceutical companies, regional and national pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies.
We may derive revenue from research and development fees, license fees, milestone payments and royalties under any collaborative arrangement into which we enter. Our ability to generate revenue from these arrangements will depend on our collaborators’ abilities to successfully perform the functions assigned to them in these arrangements.arrangements and also the limitations of any royalty financing transaction we may have entered into. In addition, our collaborators may have the right to abandon research or development projects and terminate applicable agreements, including funding obligations, prior to or upon the expiration of the agreed upon terms. As a result, we can expect to relinquish some or all of the control over the future success of a product candidate that we license to a third party.
collaborators may not pursue development and commercialization of any of our current or future product candidates or may elect not to continue or renew development or commercialization programs based on clinical trial results, changes in the collaborators’ strategic focus or available funding or external factors, such as an acquisition, that divert resources or create competing priorities;
collaborators may not be able to develop, manufacture, market and sell any of our current or future product candidates and use our intellectual property without infringing or misappropriating the intellectual property and other proprietary rights of third parties;
product candidates discovered in collaboration with us may be viewed by our collaborators as competitive with their own product candidates or products, which may cause collaborators to cease to devote resources to the commercialization of any of our current or future product candidates;
We will require additional funds to complete the development and potential commercialization of our existing and future product candidates. For any of our current or future product candidates, we may decide to collaborate with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for the development and potential commercialization of those product candidates. Moreover, we intend to utilize a variety of types of collaboration arrangements for the potential commercialization of our existing or future product candidates outside the United States. Whether we reach a definitive agreement for a collaboration will depend, among other things, upon our assessment of the collaborator’s resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator’s evaluation of a number of factors. Those factors may include:
As part of our royalty financing transaction with HCRx, we transferred the GSK License Agreement and our rights thereunder, along with related intellectual property, to one of two newly formed special purpose subsidiaries of ours, and provided HCRx with a right of first recourse to such assets to satisfy our obligations to HCRx. As a result, if we are unable to satisfy our obligations under the royalty financing transaction, we could lose all retained rights to future royalty payments from HCRx and related assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and stock price.
We and our affiliates have entered into a $105.0 million non-recourse non-dilutive royalty financing transaction with HCRx, pursuant to which HCRx will receive a portion of the future milestone and royalty payments due to us from GSK arising under the GSK License Agreement. As part of the royalty financing transaction, the parties entered into, among other agreements, the NPA for senior secured notes in an aggregate principal amount of $105.0 million, referred to herein as the Notes, the RPA and the Limited Guaranty.
The royalty financing transaction creates obligations of the Company and our special purpose subsidiaries to make payments to HCRx from proceeds of the GSK License Agreement, which agreement provides GSK certain rights to develop and commercialize Utebzi. To the extent that the commercialization of Utebzi does not generate sufficient proceeds to satisfy the obligations to HCRx when due in accordance with the terms of the royalty financing transaction, HCRx will generally not have recourse to our assets unrelated to the Utebzi program. However, to the extent we are unable to pay the Notes and other obligations under the NPA in full when due, HCRx will have the right, as a secured creditor with a security interest in the assets related to the Utebzi program, to foreclose on and otherwise take control of the assets related to the Utebzi program, including our equity in the special purpose subsidiaries created to hold the assets related to the Utebzi program.
Additionally, in the case of certain defined breaches and defaults under the royalty financing transaction, HCRx may have recourse beyond the assets related to the Utebzi program, although in most instances our obligations in respect of such breaches and defaults are limited to actual damages, and such obligations are generally subject to a fixed cap. In the event that HCRx has recourse to our assets beyond those related to the Utebzi program, we may not have sufficient funds to satisfy our obligations to HCRx as and when those obligations become due and payable, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and stock price.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Royalty Financing Transaction”
New heading “Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
New heading “Grant Revenue (in thousands):”
New heading “Collaboration Revenue (in thousands):”
New heading “Research and Development Expenses (in thousands):”
New heading “General and Administrative Expenses (in thousands):”
New heading “Other Income (Expense), Net”
Removed heading “Government Contracts”
Largest changes
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (75)
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focusedadvancing onnext identifyinggeneration and developing novel treatmentsmedicines for rare diseases and diseasespatients with highimmune-mediated unmet need.diseases.
Our lead program, SP001, is a third-generation, fully humanized, Fc-silent IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting CD40L. On July 8, 2026, we entered into the Innovent Agreement with Innovent, pursuant to which Innovent granted the Company an exclusive (even as to Innovent and its affiliates, subject to Innovent’s right to directly or indirectly conduct certain research, non-clinical development and manufacturing activities), sublicensable right and license under certain Licensed Intellectual Property to research, develop, manufacture, and commercialize SP001, and the Licensed Compounds and Licensed Products worldwide, excluding the Innovent Territory (see Note 12, Subsequent Events).
SP001 targets CD40L, an immune signal protein that sits upstream of multiple immune pathways and has the potential to be developed across a range of immune-mediated diseases. We are developingSP001 for the treatment of patients with Immunoglobulin G4 related disease, or IgG4-RD. IgG4-RD is a rare disease with an estimated 20,000 to 40,000 diagnosed patients in the United States. Patients with IgG4-RD suffer from serious, chronic fibro-inflammation that can affect multiple organs, including the pancreas, salivary glands, lacrimal glands, kidneys, lungs, lymph nodes, and other tissues. Left untreated or under-treated IgG4-RD patients may progress to organ failure.
Our clinical-stage product candidate, tebipenem HBr, has completed a second Phase 3 trial, and we believe has the potential to be the first oral carbapenem to treat adult patients with complicated urinary tract infections (“cUTIs”), including pyelonephritis, caused by certain microorganisms. In September 2022, we entered into an exclusive licenselicensing agreement with GSK for theUtebzi development, manufacture and commercialization of (tebipenem HBr,pivoxil), which includes theincluded transfer of the IND application and the New Drug Application (“NDA”) ownership to GSK. We initially developed Utebzi as tebipenem HBr. In May 2025, we and GSK announced that the pivotal Phase 3 PIVOT-PO trial evaluating tebipenem HBrUtebzi met its primary endpoint and was stopped early for efficacy. GSK has submitted the data from the trial as part of an NDA Class 2 resubmission for tebipenem HBr to the FDA in December 2025,2025. whichOn hasJune been17, accepted2026, bywe the FDA.and GSK reportedannounced that the PrescriptionFDA Drugapproved UserUtebzi, Feean Actoral antibiotic for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (“PDUFA”cUTIs) dateincluding haspyelonephritis, beencaused setby ascertain Junesusceptible 18,pathogens 2026.in adult patients who have limited or no alternative oral treatment options.
Following the termination of our earlier stage programs (SPR206 and SPR720), we remain focused on supporting GSK in the FDA approval process pursuant to our obligations under the GSK License Agreement and advancing other corporate activities, including exploring opportunities to grow our portfolio of clinical-stage product candidates.
We have experienced mostly net losses and significant cash outflows from cash used in operating activities since our inception. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend heavily on the successful development of SP001 and commercializationany of tebipenem HBr, or anyother product candidate we may develop in the future.future, as well as GSK’s commercialization of Utebzi. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $458.3$467.8 million, and cash and cash equivalents of $56.1$50.8 million. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future. Based on our current operating plan, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents as of MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, together with and including the net proceeds from the royalty financing transaction that closed in July 2026, offset by the upfront payment the Company is obligated to pay to Innovent in connection with the Innovent Agreement, will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements at least into 2028.the second half of 2029. During this period, we remainare focused on supportingadvancing GSKnext-generation medicines in the FDA approval process pursuant to our obligations under our GSK License Agreementimmunology and advancinginflammation otherfor corporatepatients activities,with includingserious exploringdiseases opportunitiesand tomajor growtreatment our portfolio of clinical-stage product candidates.gaps. Beyond this point, or in the event we change our current operating plan, we will need additional funding to support our continuing operations. Until such time as we can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, government funding arrangements, collaborations, strategic alliances and marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements. If we are not able to secure adequate additional funding, we will have to make further reductions in spending. In that event, we may have to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of our planned development activities. The actions necessary to reduce spending under this plan at a level that mitigates the factors described above are not considered probable, as defined in the accounting standards and therefore, the full extent to which management may extend our funds through these actions may not be considered in management’s assessment of our ability to continue as a going concern.
We will not generate revenue from product sales on SP001 or any future product candidates unless and until we successfully complete clinical development and obtain regulatory approval for any of oursuch product candidates.candidate. If we obtain regulatory approval for any of our futuresuch product candidatescandidate and do not enter into a commercialization partnership, we expect to incur significant expenses related to developing our internal commercialization capability to support product sales, marketing and distribution. Further, we expect to incur additional costs associated with our continued operation as a public company.
SP001
On July 8, 2026, we entered into the Innovent Agreement to in-license SP001, a third-generation, fully humanized, Fc-silent IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting CD40L, an upstream immune activation signal involved in T-cell, B-cell, antigen-presenting cell, and platelet biology. SP001 is designed to address platelet activation concerns associated with earlier anti-CD40L antibodies, while preserving key monoclonal antibody properties, including FcRn interaction that supports IgG-like half-life. We received exclusive rights to research, develop, manufacture, and commercialize SP001 worldwide, excluding the Innovent Territory, where Innovent retains rights.
Innovent has evaluated this antibody in two healthy volunteer Phase 1 trials: a SAD study and a MAD study. It has also evaluated SP001 in a Phase 1b MAD study in patients with SjD. Data from the Phase 1b SjD study were presented in a poster session at the EULAR 2026 Congress.
Subject to FDA clearance of the U.S. IND, we currently expect to advance SP001 into a Phase 2 trial in IgG4-RD patients in the second quarter of 2027. IgG4-related disease is a serious, rare chronic fibroinflammatory condition that can affect multiple organs, including the pancreas, salivary glands, lacrimal glands, kidneys, lungs, lymph nodes, and other tissues. The disease can cause immune-mediated inflammation, fibrosis, organ damage, relapse risk, and significant treatment burden.
Tebipenem HBrPivoxil
On June 17, 2026, the FDA approved Utebzi (tebipenem pivoxil), an oral antibiotic for the treatment of cUTIs including pyelonephritis caused by certain susceptible pathogens in adult patients who have limited or no alternative oral treatment options.
In May 2025, we and GSK announced that the pivotal Phase 3 PIVOT-PO trial evaluating tebipenem HBr,pivoxil, an investigational oral treatment for cUTIs, including pyelonephritis, caused by certain microorganisms, met its primary endpoint and the trial was stopped early for efficacy. The decision followed a recommendation from an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (“IDMC”) that completed a pre-specified interim analysis of data from 1,690 patients enrolled in the trial.
Following the review of the interim analysis data by the IDMC, it was determined that the Phase 3 PIVOT-PO trial met the primary endpoint of non-inferiority of tebipenem HBrpivoxil compared to intravenous imipenem-cilastatin in hospitalized adult patients with cUTI, including pyelonephritis, on overall response (composite of clinical cure plus microbiological eradication) at the test-of-cure visit. The IDMC review did not identify any new safety concerns beyond what has been reported in other studies with tebipenem,tebipenem pivoxil, with diarrhea and headache as the two most reported adverse events. In December 2025, GSK resubmitted the NDA for tebipenem HBrpivoxil to the FDA. In accordance with the terms of the GSK License Agreement, we became entitled to receive a $25.0 million milestone payment upon the filing of the NDA with the FDA, which we received in February 2026.
Royalty Financing Transaction
On July 8, 2026, we and our affiliates entered into a $105.0 million non-recourse non-dilutive royalty financing transaction with affiliates of HCRx, pursuant to which HCRx will receive a portion of the future GSK Proceeds. Pursuant to the transaction, the parties entered into, among other documents, the NPA for the Notes, the RPA and the Limited Guaranty. Under the terms of the NPA, the Notes and other obligations under the NPA are generally payable solely from GSK Proceeds, unless voluntarily prepaid at our option prior to maturity with a premium or subject to certain mandatory prepayment triggers and foreclosure rights. Under the terms of the RPA, we sold 65% of the GSK Proceeds arising after the payment in full of the Notes while we retain an interest of 35% of the GSK Proceeds arising after payment in full of the Notes. Pursuant to the Limited Guaranty, we guarantee, subject to certain limitations set forth therein, the obligations of our affiliates under the NPA and RPA. In connection with the NPA and RPA, we will provide certain servicing, management and administrative functions on behalf of its affiliates (see Note 12, Subsequent Events, in the condensed consolidated financial statements).
To date, we have not generated any revenue from product sales. If our development efforts for any of our current or future product candidates are successful and result in regulatory approval, we may generate revenue in the future from product sales. We cannot predict if, when, or to what extent we will generate revenue from the commercialization and sale of any of our current or future product candidates. We may never succeed in obtaining regulatory approval for any existing or future product candidates.
Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred for our research activities and the development of any of our current or future product candidates, which include:
expenses incurred in connection with the preclinical and clinical development of any of our current and future product candidates, including under agreements with contract research organizations (“CROs”);
costs incurred in connection with our government awards;
At this time, we cannot reasonably estimate or know the nature, timing and costs of the efforts that will be necessary to complete the preclinical and clinical development of any existing or future product candidates. The successful development and commercialization of any of our current and future product candidates is highly uncertain. This is due to the numerous risks and uncertainties, including the following:
obtainment and maintenance of patent, trade secret protection and regulatory exclusivity, both in the United States and internationally,internationally includingfor our abilitycurrent toand maintainfuture ourproduct license agreement with Meiji with respect to tebipenem HBrcandidates;
launch of commercial sales of any of our current or future product candidates, if approved, whether alone or in collaboration with others;
acceptance of any of our current and future product candidates, if approved, by patients, the medical community and third-party payors;
competition with other therapies; and a continued acceptable safety profile of any of our current our future product candidates, if approved.
A change in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of any of our current or future product candidates would significantly change the costs and timing associated with the development of that product candidate. We may never succeed in obtaining regulatory approval for any of our current or future product candidates.
Interest income (expense) consists of interest income related to the significant financing component related to the GSK License AgreementAgreement, from the first quarter of 2024 through the third quarter of 2025, and interest earned on our cash equivalents, which are primarily invested in money market accounts, as well as interest earned on our investments in marketable securities.
Funding Received from Government Contracts and Collaborations
Since our inception, we were able to obtain partial funding for our research and development activities from government contracts, government tax incentives and collaboration arrangements. The classification within our statement of operations and comprehensive loss of the funding received under these arrangements was subject to management judgment based on the nature of the arrangements we enter into, the source of the funding and whether the funding is considered central to our business operations.
Government Contracts
We had generated revenue from government contracts that reimbursed us for certain allowable costs for funded projects. For contracts with government agencies, when we had concluded that we were the principal in conducting the research and development expenses and where the funding arrangement is considered central to our ongoing operations, we classify the recognized funding received as revenue. Revenue from government grants was recognized as the qualifying expenses related to the contracts were incurred, provided that there is reasonable assurance of recoverability. Revenue recognized upon incurring qualifying expenses in advance of receipt of funding was recorded as unbilled receivables, a component of prepaid expenses and other current assets, in the consolidated balance sheet. We did not receive any funding under the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (“BARDA”) contract in the three months ended March 31, 2026 and do not anticipate receiving any additional funding under the BARDA contract as the Company has utilized all fully committed funds under the contract.
CMOs in connection with the production of preclinical study and clinical trial materials;
CROs in connection with preclinical studies and clinical studiestrials; and investigative sites in connection with clinical trials.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
No grant revenue was recognized during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. Grant revenue recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2025 consisted of the reimbursement of qualifying expenses incurred in connection with our variousBARDA government awards.contract. The decrease in grant revenue during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was primarily due to a decrease of $0.7$2.4 million of committed funds remaining available under our BARDA contract for tebipenem HBr,pivoxil. On July 6, 2026, we and aBARDA decreasemutually ofagreed $0.1to millionterminate inthe qualifyingcontract expensesbetween incurred under our U.S. National Institute of Allergyus, and InfectiousBARDA Diseasesdeobligated (“NIAID”)all award relating to SPR206. We ceased development of SPR206 and the NIAID award was terminated in April 2025 and the committedremaining funds under the contract. We will not receive any additional funding from BARDA contractunder havethis been fully utilized by the Company.contract.
No collaboration revenue was recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2026. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, we recognized $11.8 million in collaboration revenue related to our agreement with GSK. The decrease in collaboration revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily related to the achievement of remaining development milestone activities under the agreement.
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, we recognized $0.3 million in collaboration revenue related to our agreement with GSK and no collaboration revenue related to our agreement with Pfizer as we terminated the Pfizer agreement in December 2025. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, we recognized $5.1 million in collaboration revenue related to our agreement with GSK and less than $0.1 million in collaboration revenue related to our agreement with Pfizer.
Direct costs related to our tebipenem HBrpivoxil program decreased by $8.3$5.4 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, due to decreased clinical activities related to our pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial of tebipenem HBr,pivoxil, which was stopped early for efficacy during the first half of 2025.2025 and later approved by the FDA in June 2026.
Direct costs related to our SPR720 program decreased by $0.4$0.3 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, due to the cessation of development and subsequent termination of the SPR720 program, which was announced in November 2025.
Direct costs related to our SPR206 program decreased by less than $0.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2026, primarily due to the cessation of development of the SPR206 program, which was announced in March 2025.
The decrease in personnel-related costs of $1.7$1.3 million was primarily a result of decreased headcount costs in our research and development functions between the periods. Personnel-related costs for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 included share-based compensation expense of $0.3 million and $0.5$0.4 million, respectively.
The decrease in personnel-related costs of $1.8$1.6 million was primarily a result of decreased headcount costs in our general and administrative functions between the periods. Personnel-related costs for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 included share-basedstock-based compensation expense of $0.8$0.5 million and $1.0$0.3 million, respectively.
The decreaseincrease in professional and consultant fees of $0.6$2.2 million was primarily due to aan decreaseincrease in business development, legal and consulting expenses incurred in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
Other income (expense), net was $0.3$0.4 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $0.9$0.7 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Total other income for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, included $0.4 million of interest income, offset by immaterial fluctuations in unrealized foreign currency. Total other income for the three months ended June 30, 2025, included $0.9$0.7 million of interest income, of which $0.4 million related to the significant financing component recognized under the GSK License Agreement, offset by immaterial fluctuations in unrealized foreign currency.
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Grant Revenue (in thousands):
No grant revenue was recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2026. Grant revenue recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2025 consisted of the reimbursement of qualifying expenses incurred in connection with our various government awards. The decrease in grant revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily due to a decrease of $3.1 million under our BARDA contract for tebipenem pivoxil, and a decrease of less than $0.1 million under our agreement with U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”) relating to SPR206. On July 6, 2026, we and BARDA mutually agreed to terminate the contract between us, and BARDA deobligated all remaining funds under the contract. We will not receive any additional funding from BARDA under this contract.
Collaboration Revenue (in thousands):
During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we recognized $0.3 million in collaboration revenue related to our agreement with GSK. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, we recognized $16.9 million in collaboration revenue related to our agreement with GSK and less than $0.1 million in collaboration revenue related to our agreement with Pfizer. The decrease in revenue under the GSK License Agreement was primarily related to the Phase 3 PIVOT-PO trial for tebipenem pivoxil stopping early for efficacy in the first half of 2025 following the pre-specified interim analysis.
Research and Development Expenses (in thousands):
Direct costs related to our tebipenem pivoxil program decreased by $13.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, due to a decrease in clinical activities related to our pivotal Phase 3 PIVOT-PO trial for tebipenem pivoxil, which met its primary endpoint and was stopped early for efficacy during the first half of 2025 and later approved by the FDA in June 2026.
Direct costs related to our SPR720 program decreased by $0.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, due to the cessation of development and subsequent termination of the SPR720 program, which was announced in November 2025.
Direct costs related to our SPR206 program decreased by less than $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026, primarily due to the cessation and subsequent termination of the SPR206 program, which was announced in March 2025.
The decrease in personnel-related costs of $2.9 million was primarily a result of decreased headcount costs in our research and development functions between periods. Personnel-related costs for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 included stock-based compensation expense of $0.6 million and $0.9 million, respectively.
Facility-related and other costs primarily reflect costs related to supporting our research and development staff.
General and Administrative Expenses (in thousands):
The decrease in personnel-related costs of $3.4 million was primarily a result of decreased headcount costs in our general and administrative functions between the periods. Personnel-related costs for both the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 included share-based compensation expense of $1.3 million.
SPRO insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 1 filing (1 insider, 1 trade date, 25,240 shares, about $63.4K). Net open-market shares: -25,240 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$63.4K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-03 | Zack Debra |
Grant/award |
162,311 | — | — |
| 2026-06-23 | Deshpande Milind |
Grant/award | 10,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-23 | Tregoning Kathleen |
Grant/award | 10,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-23 | Smith Cynthia |
Grant/award | 10,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-23 | Vink Patrick V.j.j. |
Grant/award | 10,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-23 | Thomas Frank E |
Grant/award | 10,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-23 | Jackson Scott Thomas |
Grant/award | 10,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-23 | Pottage John C Jr |
Grant/award | 10,000 | — | — |
| 2026-05-04 | Rajavelu Esther |
Open-market sale | 25,240 | $2.51 | $63.4K |
Well-known investors holding SPRO (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 947,904 | $2.1M | 0.0% | Reduced 20% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 376,458 | $880.9K | — | Sold out |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 382,814 | $846.0K | 0.0% | Reduced 57% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 104,377 | $230.7K | 0.0% | Added 75% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 19,298 | $42.6K | 0.0% | New position |