SQFT 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Presidio Property Trust, Inc. (also SQFTP, SQFTW) · Nasdaq · Real Estate Investment Trusts · CIK 1080657 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “To hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we may use derivative financial instruments that may be costly and ineffective, may reduce the overall returns on your investment and may expose us to the credit risk of counterparties”
New heading “We face significant competition for tenants, which could materially and adversely affect us, including our occupancy, rental rates, and results of operations.”
New heading “We may not be able to achieve growth through acquisitions at a rate that is comparable to our historical results, which could materially and adversely affect us.”
New heading “Representations and warranties made by us in connection with sales of our properties may subject us to liability that could result in losses and could harm our operating results and, therefore, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.”
New heading “Recent market conditions may make it more difficult to analyze potential opportunities for our portfolio of properties.”
New heading “Legislative or other actions affecting the single-family residential housing industry could have a negative effect on our business and financial results.”
Removed heading “Our portfolio of marketable securities, including covered call options, is subject to market, interest and credit risk that may reduce its value.”
Removed heading “Current legislative uncertainty and discourse could cause significant economic impact on markets, including the availability and access to capital markets and other funding sources, adverse changes in real estate values and increased interest rates. Such impacts could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results from operation and growth prospects.”
Largest changes
“From time to time, we maintain a portfolio of marketable securities. As of December 31, 2024, we did not own any common shares of publicly traded REITs and owned no written covered call options in any of those same REITs. The fair market value on our publicly traded REIT securities was $0, based on the December 31, 2024 closing prices. Changes in the value of our portfolio of marketable securities could adversely affect our earnings. …”see in full comparison
“Current legislative uncertainty and discourse could cause significant economic impact on markets, including the availability and access to capital markets and other funding sources, adverse changes in real estate values and increased interest rates. Such impacts could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results from operation and growth prospects.”see in full comparison
“To hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we may use derivative financial instruments that may be costly and ineffective, may reduce the overall returns on your investment and may expose us to the credit risk of counterparties”see in full comparison
“To control the rate of inflation, the Board of Governors of the U.S. Federal Reserve raised its benchmark federal funds rate from nearly zero in March 2022 to a range between 4.25% and 4.50% as of December 31, 2024. Although there are expectations that the U.S. Federal Reserve will be reducing the federal funds rate in 2025, these expectations might not materialize. An increase in the federal funds effective rate could cause an increase in rates related to lending for commercial real estate, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, including our ability to pay distributions. …”see in full comparison
“We face significant competition for tenants, which could materially and adversely affect us, including our occupancy, rental rates, and results of operations.”see in full comparison
“To the extent that we use derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we will be exposed to financing, basis risk and legal enforceability risks. In this context, credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (37)
Rising inflation and elevated U.S. budget deficits and overall debt levels, including as a result of federal spending, tariffs and/or economic or market and supply chain conditions, can put upward pressure on interest rates and could be among the factors that could lead to higher interest rates in the future. During inflationary periods, interest rates have historically increased. For instance, to control the rate of inflation, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “U.S. Federal Reserve”) raised its benchmark federal funds rate from nearly zero in March 2022 to a range between 4.25% and 4.50% as of December 31, 2024. Although there are expectations that the U.S. Federal Reserve will be reducingreduced the federal funds rate in September, October, and December 2025, thesefurther expectationsrate mightcuts may not materialize.materialize in 2026 and rates may be raised. Higher interest rates could adversely affect our overall business, income, and our ability to pay dividends, including by reducing the fair value of many of our assets and adversely affecting our ability to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all, and negatively impacting the value of properties and the ability of prospective buyers to obtain financing for properties we intend to sell. This may affect our earnings results, reduce our ability to sell our assets, or reduce our liquidity. Furthermore, our business and financial results may be harmed by our inability to accurately anticipate developments associated with changes in, or the outlook for, interest rates.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and in the future may continue to have, repercussions across regional and global economies and financial markets. Many countries, including the United States (including the states and cities that comprise the San Diego, California; DenverDenver, Westminster, Highlands Ranch, and Colorado Springs, Colorado; Fargo and Baltimore, Maryland; Houston, Texas; West Fargo and Bismarck, North Dakota; and other metro regions where we own and operate properties) had instituted quarantines, “shelter in place” mandates, and rules and restrictions on travel and the types of businesses that may continue to operate. While these restrictions have been lifted, new variants of the coronavirus and/or the spread of another highly infectious or contagious virus or disease could cause government authorities to extend, reinstitute and/or adopt new restrictions. As a result, the possibility remains that the COVID-19 pandemic or another public health crisis may negatively impact almost every industry, both inside and outside these metro regions, directly or indirectly and has created business continuity issues. For instance, a number of our commercial tenants temporarily closed their offices or stores and requested temporary rent deferral or rent abatement during the pandemic. In addition, jurisdictions where we own and operate properties had implemented rent freezes, eviction freezes, or other similar restrictions. The full extent of the impacts on our business over the long term are dependent on a number of factors beyond our control.
To hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we may use derivative financial instruments that may be costly and ineffective, may reduce the overall returns on your investment and may expose us to the credit risk of counterparties
To the extent consistent with maintaining our qualification as a REIT, we may use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to interest rate fluctuations on loans secured by our assets and investments in collateralized mortgage-backed securities. Derivative instruments may include interest rate swap contracts, interest rate cap or floor contracts, futures or forward contracts, options or repurchase agreements. Our actual hedging decisions will be determined in light of the facts and circumstances existing at the time of the hedge and may differ from time to time.
To the extent that we use derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we will be exposed to financing, basis risk and legal enforceability risks. In this context, credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. Basis risk occurs when the index upon which the contract is based is more or less variable than the index upon which the hedged asset or liability is based, thereby making the hedge less effective. Finally, legal enforceability risks encompass general contractual risks, including the risk that the counterparty will breach the terms of, or fail to perform its obligations under, the derivative contract. If we are unable to manage these risks effectively, our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make distributions to stockholders will be adversely affected.
Our portfolio of marketable securities, including covered call options, is subject to market, interest and credit risk that may reduce its value.
From time to time, we maintain a portfolio of marketable securities. As of December 31, 2024, we did not own any common shares of publicly traded REITs and owned no written covered call options in any of those same REITs. The fair market value on our publicly traded REIT securities was $0, based on the December 31, 2024 closing prices. Changes in the value of our portfolio of marketable securities could adversely affect our earnings. In particular, the value of our investments may decline due to increases in interest rates, downgrades of the securities included in our portfolio, instability in the global financial markets that reduces the liquidity of securities included in our portfolio, declines in the value of collateral underlying the securities included in our portfolio and other factors. In addition, macroeconomic factors, geopolitical instability and rising inflation have and may continue to adversely affect the financial markets. Each of these events may cause us to record charges to reduce the carrying value of our investment portfolio or sell investments for less than our acquisition cost. Although we attempt to mitigate these risks through diversification of our investments and continuous monitoring of our portfolio’s overall risk profile, the value of our investments may nevertheless decline.
We face significant competition for tenants, which could materially and adversely affect us, including our occupancy, rental rates, and results of operations.
We compete for tenants to occupy our office properties in all of our markets with numerous developers, owners, and operators of office properties, as well as owner occupied businesses, many of which own office properties in the same markets in which our office properties are located. If our competitors offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may lose existing or potential tenants or we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates or to offer more substantial rent abatements, tenant improvements, early termination rights, or below-market renewal options to retain tenants when our leases expire. Competition for tenants could decrease the rental rates we achieve and/or negatively impact the occupancy rates of our commercial properties, which could materially and adversely affect us.
We may not be able to achieve growth through acquisitions at a rate that is comparable to our historical results, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Our growth strategy depends significantly on acquiring new properties. Our ability to continue to grow requires us to identify and complete acquisitions that meet our investment criteria and depends on general market and economic conditions.
Changes in the volume of real estate transactions, the availability of acquisition financing, capitalization rates, interest rates, competition, market conditions or other factors may negatively impact our acquisition opportunities in 2026 and beyond. If we are unable to achieve growth through acquisitions at a rate that is comparable to our historical results, it could materially and adversely affect us. Furthermore, our acquisition volume has not always been consistent, nor can we guarantee it will be consistent in the future. As a result, our acquisition results may not meet investors’ expectations and could materially and adversely affect us.
In 2024,2025, approximately 65%58% of our net operating income was from our office properties, and approximately 54%65% in 2023.2024. Work from home, flexible work schedules, open workplaces, videoconferencing, and teleconferencing are becoming more common, particularly as a result ofof, and following the COVID-19 pandemic. These practices may enable businesses to reduce their office space requirements. There is also an increasing trend among some businesses to utilize shared office spaces and co-working spaces. A continuation of the movement towards these practices could, over time, erode the overall demand for office space and, in turn, place downward pressure on occupancy, rental rates and property valuations.
We own threetwo of our properties indirectly through limited liability companies and limited partnerships under a DownREIT structure. In a DownREIT structure, as well as some joint ventures or other investments we may make, we may utilize a limited liability company or a limited partnership as the holder of our real estate investment. We currently own a portion of these interests as a member, general partner and/or limited partner and in the future may acquire all or a greater interest in such entity. As a sole member or general partner, we are or would be potentially liable for all of the liabilities of the entities, even if we do not have rights of management or control over its operations. Therefore, our liability could far exceed the amount or value of investment we initially made, or then had, in such entities.
Representations and warranties made by us in connection with sales of our properties may subject us to liability that could result in losses and could harm our operating results and, therefore, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
When we sell a property, we may be required to make representations and warranties regarding the property and other customary items. In the event of a breach of such representations or warranties, the purchaser of the property may have claims for damages against us, rights to indemnification from us or otherwise have remedies against us. In any such case, we may incur liabilities that could result in losses and could harm our operating results and, therefore our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Our commercial properties are currently located in California, Colorado, Maryland, North Dakota and Texas. Our model home portfolio consists of properties currently located in threefour states, although a significant concentration of our model homes is located in Texas. As of December 31, 2024,2025, approximately 94%84% of our model homes were located in Texas. This concentration of properties in a limited number of markets may expose us to risks of adverse economic developments that are greater than if our portfolio were more geographically diverse. These economic developments include regional economic downturns and potentially higher local property, sales and income taxes in the geographic markets in which we are concentrated. In addition, our properties are subject to the effects of adverse acts of nature, such as winter storms, hurricanes, hailstorms, strong winds, wildfires, earthquakes and tornadoes, which may cause damage, such as flooding, to our properties. Additionally, we cannot assure you that the amount of casualty insurance we maintain would entirely cover damages caused by any such event, or in the case of our model homes portfolio or commercial triple net leases, that the insurance maintained by our tenants would entirely cover damages caused by any such event.
Recent market conditions may make it more difficult to analyze potential opportunities for our portfolio of properties.
Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to effectively analyze potential acquisition opportunities in order to assess the level of risk-adjusted returns that we should expect from any particular investment. To estimate the value of a particular property, we may use historical assumptions that may or may not be appropriate during the recent downturn in the real estate market and general economy. To the extent that we use historical assumptions that are inappropriate under current market conditions, we may overpay for a property or acquire an asset that we otherwise might not acquire, which could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
There are many factors that can affect the availability and timing of cash distributions to our stockholders. Distributions are expected to be based upon our funds from operations, or FFO, financial condition, cash flows and liquidity, debt service requirements and capital or other expenditure requirements for our properties, and any distributions will be authorized at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor, and their form, timing and amount, if any, will be affected by many factors, such as our ability to acquire profitable real estate investments and successfully manage our real estate properties and our operating expenses. Other factors may be beyond our control. We can therefore provide no assurance that we will be able to pay or maintain distributions or that distributions will increase over time. For example, our distributions were suspended for the periods from the third quarter of 2017 through the third quarter of 2018 and for the final three quarters of 2019 through the third quarter of 2020. We have made quarterly distributiondistributions to our holders of Series A Common Stock since the fourth quarter of 2020 through the fourth quarter of 2023. If we do not have sufficient cash available for distributions, we may need to fund the shortage out of working capital or borrow to provide funds for such distributions, which would reduce the amount of proceeds available for real estate investments and increase our future interest costs. Our inability to pay distributions, or to pay distributions at expected levels, could result in a decrease in the per share trading price of our Series A Common Stock, Series D Preferred Stock or Series A Warrants.
Current legislative uncertainty and discourse could cause significant economic impact on markets, including the availability and access to capital markets and other funding sources, adverse changes in real estate values and increased interest rates. Such impacts could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results from operation and growth prospects.
To control the rate of inflation, the Board of Governors of the U.S. Federal Reserve raised its benchmark federal funds rate from nearly zero in March 2022 to a range between 4.25% and 4.50% as of December 31, 2024. Although there are expectations that the U.S. Federal Reserve will be reducing the federal funds rate in 2025, these expectations might not materialize. An increase in the federal funds effective rate could cause an increase in rates related to lending for commercial real estate, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, including our ability to pay distributions. Further, the outcome of congressional and other elections creates uncertainty with respect to legal, tax and regulatory regimes in which we operate. These changes could result in sweeping reform in many laws and regulations, including without limitation, those relating to taxes and small business aid. In addition, political discourse continues to be abrasive and an inability of the legislative and executive branches to engage in bipartisan politics may lead to instability on legislative, economic and social matters. These factors could have significant economic impacts on the markets, including without limitation, the stability, availability and access to capital markets and other funding sources, reduced real estate values and increases to interest rates. Such impacts could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results from operation and growth prospects.
We have $30.5$25.5 million of principal payments on mortgage notes payable relating to commercial properties in 2025,2026, fourone of which are maturingmatures in 2025,2026, and one which matured in July 2024. The loans for UTC and Research Parkway were paid in full, when the properties were sold in February 2025. The loan on Dakota Center matured in July 2024 and management has been working with the lender and their special servicer of the loan to sell the property and settle the debt. The lender has agreed to the Company selling the property on the open market with the use of a broker. We have also begun the process to refinance the remaining two loans that arewere due in September 2025. IfAfter initially attempting to refinance our Shea Center II loan, we arereceived unsuccessfulnotice inthat refinancingour failure to repay the full balance of the loan on the property orprior changingto January 5, 2026 had triggered a default event according to the terms of the originalloan. loan,The managementCompany wouldhas considerreceived sellingnotification that the Shea Center II property andgoverned payingby thethis loan inagreement fullwill orbe surrenderingmoved theinto propertyreceivership, towhich thewill currentfulfill lender.its obligation for this non-recourse loan. The model homes division pays off the balance of its mortgages using proceeds from the sale of the underlying homes. Any deficiency in the sale proceeds would have to be paid from existing cash, reducing the amount available for distributions and operations.
A REIT’s ownership of securities of a taxable REIT subsidiary is not subject to the 5% or 10% asset tests applicable to REITs. Not more than 25% of the value of our total assets could be represented by securities, including securities of taxable REIT subsidiaries, other than those securities includable in the 75% asset test. Further, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, not more than 20% of the value of our total assets may be represented by securities of taxable REIT subsidiaries. However, under tax legislation enacted in 2025, this 20% asset value cap increases to 25% for calendar quarters commencing after December 31, 2025. We anticipate that the aggregate value of the stock and other securities of any taxable REIT subsidiaries that we own will be less than 20% of the value of our total assets, , and wein the future will not exceed 25% of the aggregate value of our total assets. We will monitor the value of these investments to ensure compliance with applicable asset test limitations. In addition, we intend to structure our transactions with any taxable REIT subsidiaries that we own to ensure that they are entered into on arm’s length terms to avoid incurring the 100% excise tax described above. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to comply with these limitations or avoid application of the 100% excise tax discussed above.
Income from “qualified dividends” payable to U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates is generally subject to tax at reduced rates. However, dividends payable by REITs to its stockholders generally are not eligible for the reduced rates for qualified dividends and are taxed at ordinary income rates (but U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates generally may deduct 20% of ordinary dividends from a REIT for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026).REIT. Although these rules do not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends payable by REITs, to the extent that the reduced rates continue to apply to regular corporate qualified dividends, investors that are individuals, trusts and estates may perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could materially and adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including the per share trading price of our common stock, and could be detrimental to our ability to raise additional funds through the future sale of our common stock.
We are required to meet certain qualitative and financial tests to maintain the listing of our securities on Nasdaq. As of the date of this report, we are in compliance with all of Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements. As previously disclosed, the Company received a written notice from Nasdaq on June 6, 2023 notifying the Company that it had failed to meet the $1.00 per share minimum bid price requirement for continued inclusion on Nasdaq. On December 21, 2023, the Company announced that it received formal notice from the Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC stating that the Company had regained compliance with the minimum bid price requirement set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). On June 7, 2024, the Company received a written notice from Nasdaq notifying the Company that it had failed to meet the $1.00 per share minimum bid price requirement for continued inclusion on Nasdaq. The letter also indicated that the Company would be provided with a compliance period of 180 calendar days, or until December 4, 2024, in which to regain compliance pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A). On December 5, 2024, Nasdaq notified the Company that it had determined that the Company is eligible for an additional 180 calendar day period, or until June 2, 2025, to regain compliance. If compliance cannot be demonstrated by June 2, 2025, Nasdaq will provide written notification that the common stock will be delisted. At that time, the Company may appeal the determination to a Hearings Panel.
On May 1, 2025, our Board of Directors determined to effect the Reverse Stock Split and approved the filing of Articles of Amendment (the “Articles of Amendment”) to its charter to effect the Reverse Stock Split. On May 16, 2025, the Articles of Amendment to effect the Reverse Stock Split were filed with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland. The implementation of the Reverse Stock Split took effect in the public markets at the opening of trading on Monday, May 19, 2025. All equity awards and warrants outstanding immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split were proportionately adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock Split. The Company regained compliance with Nasdaq’s bid price rule on June 2, 2025.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to regainmaintain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement or will otherwise be in compliance with other Nasdaq listing criteria. If we are unable to regainmaintain compliance with the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq, our common stock could be delisted, making it more difficult to buy or sell our securities and to obtain accurate quotations,quotations and the price of our securities could suffer a material decline. Delisting could also impair our ability to raise capital.
The Series D Preferred Stock ranks junior to all of our existing and future debt and to other non-equity claims on us and our assets available to satisfy claims against us, including claims in bankruptcy, liquidation or similar proceedings. Our future debt may include restrictions on our ability to pay distributions to preferred stockholders. Our charter currently authorizes the issuance of up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more classes or series, all of which are currently classified as shares of Series D Preferred Stock. Subject to limitations prescribed by Maryland law and our charter, our Board of Directors is authorized to issue, from our authorized but unissued shares of stock, preferred stock in such classes or series as our Board of Directors may determine and to establish from time to time the number of shares of preferred stock to be included in any such class or series. The issuance of additional shares of Series D Preferred Stock or another series of preferred stock designated as ranking on parity with the Series D Preferred Stock would dilute the interests of the holders of shares of the Series D Preferred Stock, and the issuance of shares of any class or series of our stock expressly designated as ranking senior to the Series D Preferred Stock or the incurrence of additional indebtedness could affect our ability to pay distributions on, redeem or pay the liquidation preference on the Series D Preferred Stock. The Series D Preferred Stock does not contain any terms relating to or limiting our indebtedness or affording the holders of shares of the Series D Preferred Stock protection in the event of a highly leveraged or other transaction, including a merger or the sale, lease or conveyance of all or substantially all our assets, that might adversely affect the holders of shares of the Series D Preferred Stock, so long as the rights, preferences, privileges or voting power of the Series D Preferred Stock or the holders thereof are not materially and adversely affected.
The issuance of additional shares of Series D Preferred Stock or another series of preferred stock designated as ranking on parity with the Series D Preferred Stock would dilute the interests of the holders of shares of the Series D Preferred Stock, and the issuance of shares of any class or series of our stock expressly designated as ranking senior to the Series D Preferred Stock or the incurrence of additional indebtedness could affect our ability to pay distributions on, redeem or pay the liquidation preference on the Series D Preferred Stock. The Series D Preferred Stock does not contain any terms relating to or limiting our indebtedness or affording the holders of shares of the Series D Preferred Stock protection in the event of a highly leveraged or other transaction, including a merger or the sale, lease or conveyance of all or substantially all our assets, that might adversely affect the holders of shares of the Series D Preferred Stock, so long as the rights, preferences, privileges or voting power of the Series D Preferred Stock or the holders thereof are not materially and adversely affected.
Distributions declared by us are and will be authorized by our Board of Directors in its sole discretion out of assets legally available for distribution and will depend upon a number of factors, including our earnings, our financial condition, restrictions under applicable law, our need to comply with the terms of our existing financing arrangements, the capital requirements of our Company and other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time.
As of January 28, 2026, the Board of Directors has suspended our monthly dividend for Series D Preferred Stock. In accordance with the terms of the Series D Preferred Stock, the unpaid monthly dividends will continue to accrue at $0.19531 per share each month. No interest, or sum of money in lieu of interest, is payable in respect of any dividend payments on the Series D Preferred Stock that are in arrears. The is no guarantee when or if accrued dividends will be paid and when the monthly dividend payments can be reinstated.
We have paid and intend to pay regular monthly distributions to holders of our Series D Preferred Stock. Distributions declared by us are and will be authorized by our Board of Directors in its sole discretion out of assets legally available for distribution and will depend upon a number of factors, including our earnings, our financial condition, restrictions under applicable law, our need to comply with the terms of our existing financing arrangements, the capital requirements of our Company and other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time. We may be required to fund distributions from working capital, proceeds of our equity offerings or a sale of assets to the extent distributions exceed earnings or cash flows from operations. Funding distributions from working capital would restrict our operations. If we are required to sell assets to fund distributions, such asset sales may occur at a time or in a manner that is not consistent with our disposition strategy. If we borrow to fund distributions, our leverage ratios and future interest costs would increase, thereby reducing our earnings and cash available for distribution from what they otherwise would have been. We may not be able to pay distributions in the future. In addition, some of our distributions may be considered a return of capital for income tax purposes. If we decide to make distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, such distributions would generally be considered a return of capital for federal income tax purposes to the extent of the holder’s adjusted tax basis in its shares. A return of capital is not taxable, but it has the effect of reducing the holder’s adjusted tax basis in its investment. If distributions exceed the adjusted tax basis of a holder’s shares, they will be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of such stock.
The Series A Warrants have an exercise price of $7.00$70.00 per share. This exercise price does not necessarily bear any relationship to established criteria for valuation of our Series A Common Stock, such as book value per share, cash flows, or earnings, and you should not consider this exercise price as an indication of the current or future market price of our Series A Common Stock. There can be no assurance that the market price of our Series A Common Stock will exceed $7.00$70.00 per share at any time on the expiration date of the Series A Warrants, January 24, 2027, or at any other time the Series A Warrants may be exercised. If the market price of our Series A Common Stock on such date does not exceed $7.00$70.00 per share prior to the expiration of the Series A Warrants, your warrants will be of no value except to the extent that there is a value in their automatic conversion at expiration of 0.10.01 shares of Series A Common Stock rounded down to the nearest whole share.share
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real property is responsible for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on its property. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated. In addition, many insurance carriers are excluding asbestos-related claims from standard policies, pricing asbestos endorsements at prohibitively high rates or adding significant restrictions to this coverage. Because of potential difficulty in obtaining specialized coverage at rates that correspond to the perceived level of risk, we may not obtain insurance for asbestos-related claims. We will continue to evaluate the availability and cost of additional insurance coverage from the insurance market. If we purchase insurance for asbestos, the cost could have a negative impact on our results of operations.
Legislative or other actions affecting the single-family residential housing industry could have a negative effect on our business and financial results.
Various legislative and regulatory bodies have been focused on the shortage and increases in the cost of residential housing in the U.S. There has been vigorous and continuing political debate and discussion, in which we participate, with respect to residential housing laws and regulations, with particular focus on the single-family residential housing industry. Since late 2023, legislation has been introduced that could, if enacted, discourage or deter the purchase of single-family properties by entities owned or controlled by institutional investors. Recently, the Trump Administration signaled that his administration is moving to ban certain financial firms from buying single-family homes. It is unclear whether these or similar changes will be enacted and, if enacted, how soon any such changes could take effect. If enacted, such changes could have an adverse impact on our business and financial results. In addition, there can be no assurance that any other future legislative or regulatory changes will not be proposed or enacted that could adversely affect our business and financial results.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2025:”
New heading “Dispositions during the year ended December 31, 2025:”
New heading “SECTOR SPECIFIC OUTLOOKS”
Removed heading “Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2023:”
Removed heading “Dispositions during the year ended December 31, 2023:”
Removed heading “Sponsorship of Special Purpose Acquisition Company”
Removed heading “Gain on deconsolidation of SPAC and remeasurement.”
Largest changes
Asset Impairments. We review the carrying value of goodwill and each of our real estate properties annually to determine if circumstances indicate an impairment in the carrying value of these investments exists. During the year ended December 31,see in full comparison2024,2025, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge of approximately$2.0$6.4 million ongoodwill andour real estate assets. Of the$2.0$6.4 million impairment for the year,approximately $1.4approximately$6.0 million was related to our commercial propertiesDakotaSheaCenterCener II and300DakotaNP,Center, approximately$0.4$0.3 million was related to model homes, and approximately$0.2$0.1 million was related to goodwill impairment. The impairment onourSheacommercialCenterproperty, Dakota Center,II was primarily related to suboptimal occupancy levels and theresultnear term conditions of theloanDenvermaturingmarketinconditions,July andwhile theCompany not being able to reach an agreement with the lenders regarding a loan modification or extension. In October, the lender has agreed to a sale of the property to settle the balance of the non-recourse loan. Due to the uncertainties in the Fargo market, we concluded it was necessary to impair the property’s book value, in accordance with ASC 360-10. As such, we recorded an impairment charge of approximately $0.7 million, during September 2024. The impairment on 300 NP, totaling approximately $0.7 million related to changing cap rates in the area and low historical occupancy. This property is not listed for sale and has no debt. Thenew impairment charges for the model homesreflectsreflect the estimated and actual sales prices for these specific modelhomes that were sold after the end of each quarter.homes. This was the result of an abnormally short hold period, less than twoyears, on model homes purchased in 2022. The builder changed their product style in the neighborhoods where these model homes are located, in Texas, after we had purchased the homes.years. We do not believe these losses are indicative of our overall model home portfolio. As noted above in the Overview section, during the year ended December 31,2024,2025, we sold5120 model homes for approximately$24.8$9.8 million and the Company recognized a gain of approximately$3.4$1.0 million.We expect to record a net gain on model home sales in the first quarter of 2025 as well. The impairment to goodwill was related to NTR Property Management and the fair market value adjustment based on future expected cash flows.
“When determining the fair value of real estate assets, goodwill and other liabilities the Company refers to the guidance in ASC 820. The term “Fair Value” is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (ASC 820-10-20). In particular, ASC 820 prescribes that the measurement of the Fair Value of an asset or liability should be based on assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. …”see in full comparison
As of December 31,see in full comparison2024,2025, all our commercial properties, except 300 NP which has no debt, had fixed-rate mortgage notes payable in the aggregate principal amount of$76.8$67.3 million, collateralized by a total of11nine commercial properties with loan terms at issuance ranging from 5 to 10 years. The weighted-average interest rate on these mortgage notes payable as of December 31,20242025 was approximately5.24%,5.78%, and our debt to estimated market value for our commercial properties was approximately67.2%.72.6%. As noted above,duringour only upcoming maturity date for 2026 is thenext 12 months our four commercial property loans, Dakota Center, Research Parkway, Union Town Center, Genesis Plaza andShea CenterII, haveII mortgageloansloan,withwhichmaturitytotalsdates,atotalingprincipal balance of approximately$30.1$16.4 million. Subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company received notice that the Company's failure to repay in full by January 5, 2026 the indebtedness related to the loan agreement governing Shea Center II had triggered a default event. The Company has received notification that the Shea Center II property governed by this agreement will be moved into receivership, which will fulfill its obligation for this non-recourse loan. In the year ended December 31, 2024, the non-recourse loan on the Dakota Center property matured on July 6, 2024. During December 2024, the lender agreed to the broker the Company would use to sell the property to settle the non-recourse debt. As of December 31, 2025, the property was included in the real estate assets held for sale, net on the consolidated balance sheet.
“We test for impairment of goodwill and other definite and indefinite lived assets at least annually, and more frequently as circumstances warrant. Impairment is recognized only if the carrying amount of the intangible asset is considered to be unrecoverable from its undiscounted cash flows and is measured as the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the asset.”see in full comparison
“On January 21, 2026, the Company and NetREIT SC II, LLC, a subsidiary of the Company (the “Borrower” or "Shea Center"), received a notice (the “Default Notice”) from Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Lender”) alleging that the Borrower’s failure to repay in full by January 5, 2026 the indebtedness owed under that certain promissory note dated as of December 24, 2015 issued to The Bancorp Bank (the “Original Lender”) in the original principal amount of $17,727,500 (the “Note”), the related loan agreement, dated as of December 24, 2015 by and between Borrower and the Original Lender …”see in full comparison
“According to Nareit's, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, 2025 REIT Market Outlook, as discussed at the FTSE Nareit U.S. Real Estate Indexes in Review and What’s Next webinar on January 14, 2025, "there is a real possibility for an environment with both moderating interest rates and robust economic growth, otherwise known as an economic soft landing. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (78)
Previously, the Company reported a multi-tenant portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2024 of:
Presidio Property Trust’s office, industrial and retail properties are located California, Colorado, Maryland, North Dakota and Texas. Our Model Home Properties are located in three states, primarily in Texas. We acquire properties that are stabilized or that we anticipate will be stabilized within two or three years of acquisition. We consider a property to be stabilized once it has achieved an 80% occupancy rate for a full calendar year, or has been operating for three years. Our geographical clustering of assets enables us to reduce our operating costs through economies of scale by servicing a number of properties with less staff, but it also makes us more susceptible to changing market conditions in these discrete geographic areas.
Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2025:
Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2023:
Dispositions during the year ended December 31, 2025:
During year ended December 31, 2025, we disposed of the following properties:
Dispositions during the year ended December 31, 2023:
During year ended December 31, 2023, we disposed of the following properties:
Sponsorship of Special Purpose Acquisition Company
On January 7, 2022, we announced our sponsorship, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Murphy Canyon Acquisition Sponsor, LLC (the “Sponsor”), of a special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”) initial public offering. Murphy Canyon Acquisition Corp. (“Murphy Canyon” or the “SPAC”) raised $132,250,000 in capital investment to acquire an operating business. We, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, owned approximately 23.49% of the issued and outstanding stock in the entity upon the initial public offering being declared effective and consummated (excluding the private placement units described below), and following the completion of its initial business combination, the SPAC operates as a separately managed, publicly traded entity. The SPAC offered $132,250,000 units, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and three-quarters of one redeemable warrant.
The Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 828,750 units (the “placement units”) of the SPAC at a price of $10.00 per unit, for an aggregate purchase price of $8,287,500. The placement units were sold in a private placement that closed simultaneously with the closing of the SPAC initial public offering. The Sponsor has agreed to transfer an aggregate of 45,000 placement units (15,000 each) to each of Murphy Canyon’s independent directors.
On November 8, 2022, the SPAC entered into an agreement and plan of merger with Conduit Pharmaceuticals Limited, a Cayman Islands exempted company (“Conduit Pharma”), and Conduit Merger Sub, Inc., a Cayman Islands exempted company and the SPAC’s wholly owned subsidiary. The merger agreement provided that the SPAC’s Cayman Island subsidiary will merge with and into Conduit Pharma, with Conduit Pharma surviving the merger as the SPAC’s wholly owned subsidiary and the public company renamed “Conduit Pharmaceuticals Inc.” (“Conduit”).
Initially, the SPAC was required to complete its initial business combination transaction by 12 months from the consummation of its initial public offering or up to 18 months if it extended the period of time to consummate a business combination in accordance with its certificate of incorporation. On January 26, 2023, at a special meeting of the stockholders, the stockholders approved a proposal to amend the SPAC’s certificate of incorporation to extend the date by which it has to consummate a business combination up to 12 times, each such extension for an additional one-month period, from February 7, 2023, to February 7, 2024. The stockholders also approved a related proposal to amend the trust agreement allowing the SPAC to deposit into the trust account, for each one-month extension, one-third of 1% of the funds remaining in the trust account following the redemptions made in connection with the approval of the extension proposal at the special meeting. Following redemptions made in connection with the special meeting, we owned approximately 65% of the issued and outstanding equity of the SPAC.
Throughout 2023, we loaned Murphy Canyon $1.0 million to fund its trust account and for operating expenses. The loan was non-interest bearing, unsecured and was repaid in full on the date of Murphy Canyon’s business combination with Conduit Pharma.
On September 22, 2023, Murphy Canyon completed its business combination with Conduit Pharma and changed its name to “Conduit Pharmaceuticals Inc.” Immediately prior to the business combination the Company owned approximately 65% of the SPAC’s outstanding common stock. Upon consummation of the business combination, the SPAC’s shares of Class B common stock were converted into shares of its Class A common stock and the shares of Class A common stock were then reclassified as a single class of Conduit common stock. As a result of the business combination, the Company was issued (i) 3,306,250 shares of Conduit’s common stock due to the conversion of the shares of the SPAC’s Class B common stock into shares of the SPAC’s Class A common stock and then reclassification into shares of Conduit common stock, (ii) 754,000 shares of Conduit common stock, which prior to the business combination were shares of the SPAC’s Class A common stock and (iii) private warrants to purchase 754,000 shares of Conduit common stock, which prior to the business combination were warrants to purchase 754,000 shares of the SPAC’s Class A common stock. Also in the business combination, shareholders and debtholders of Conduit Pharma were issued 65,000,000 shares of Conduit common stock. Immediately following the consummation of the business combination, the Company transferred 45,000 shares of Conduit common stock and warrants to purchase 45,000 shares of Conduit common stock to the SPAC’s independent directors as compensation for their services. As a result, the Company owned approximately 6.5% of Conduit’s common stock immediately following the business combination and currently own less than 1% of Conduit’s common stock. In connection with the business combination, the Company’s officers and directors who also served as officers and directors of the SPAC resigned from the SPAC, with the exception of the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer who resigned from the Company.
We believe that the US macroeconomic environment in 2026 is marked by cautious optimism in the face of generally uncertain headwinds: as Morgan Stanley notes in its market outlook for 2026, an expectation for sheepish growth in Q1 of 2026 dovetails into forecasts of moderate improvement as monetary policy moves to a more neutral position. Similar observations have been noted by other investor outlooks; for example Colliers Securities notes that while signs of economic distress have been present, the scale of these signals was beneath expectations and the reaction to them in the lending market has been to “kick the can," suggesting that the market has a tolerance for near term uncertainty on the belief that headwinds will lessen further down the road.
The general optimism for a resilient marketplace, coupled with the expectation for decreases in interest rates from the Federal Reserve, could position REITs more favorably in 2026 relative to recent periods as market conditions show signs of trending towards equilibrium. REIT-related experts like Nareit cite that a shift towards equilibrium would position REITs to improve their value as two key gaps close: the gap between public and private real estate valuations, and the gap between REITs and broader tech-focused equity. Below, two graphics highlight the ongoing gaps and the historical tendency for the narrowing of such gaps to favorably affect REIT valuations:
In the corresponding bar graph, REITs have dealt with a long-standing gap of 100+ basis points between public and private valuations. The closure of such a gap has historically corresponded with an increase in real-estate transactions as private appraisal valuations fall or the cost of purchasing continues to decrease as interest rates fall. Conversely speaking, the historical trend line of comparative earnings valuations illustrates that while current valuations favor broader-equity, REITs’ earnings multiples suggest an opportunity for relative outperformance as this gap narrows. While the timing of such a normalization remains uncertain, the current macroeconomic forecasts of moderate interest rate cuts and market resilience would support the gradual normalization of relative valuations over time. The tension within this current valuation gap seems to track with the broader real estate market sentiment in general; CBRE reports that across all sectors, capitalization rates have leveled off at a peak value over the last two fiscal quarters of 2025, a trend that would support the eventual increase in property valuations.
According to Nareit's, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, 2025 REIT Market Outlook, as discussed at the FTSE Nareit U.S. Real Estate Indexes in Review and What’s Next webinar on January 14, 2025, "there is a real possibility for an environment with both moderating interest rates and robust economic growth, otherwise known as an economic soft landing. Nevertheless, there are both lingering and emerging risks, including soft property fundamentals in some sectors, higher interest rates reflecting fiscal imbalances, and the possibility that shifting tariff policies could restrain commercial real estate (CRE) performance in 2025." Current U.S. economic conditions that seem to support a soft landing according to Nareit are:
According to Nareit, the lingering public-private real estate valuation phenomenon has impeded significant property transaction activity. Despite reaching its crest two years ago, the spread between REIT implied and private appraisal cap rates has been stubbornly slow to close. Recent REIT performance, however, has made material progress in closing the gap. The long goodbye to the current valuation divergence may finally be reaching its end. Quarterly total return differences and cap rate spreads have a negative relationship, for example:
The chart below displays occupancy rates for the four traditional property types from the fourth quarter of 2008 to the third quarter of 2024. In recent years, the retail sector has enjoyed a rising occupancy rate, but it appears to have plateaued. In contrast, occupancy rates for the apartment and industrial sectors have dropped off in the face of record amounts of new supply following record rent growth in the past few years. Office occupancy reflects a shifting and uncertain demand environment with the advent of more widespread remote work. As of the third quarter of 2024, CoStar occupancy rates for the retail, industrial, apartment, and office sectors were 95.9%, 93.4%, 92.1%, and 86.1%, respectively.
Occupancy rate trends will likely weigh on future property operational performance. They also underscore the need for realism in investment underwriting (1).
(1) Source: https://www.reit.com/news/blog/market-commentary/reit-cre-outlook-evolution-2025
For December 2025, the Federal Funds Rate was 3.72%, a decrease of 116 basis points from 2024, which ended the year at a rate of 4.88%. As of January 2026, the current market rate for fixed-rate mortgages ranged from 5.52% to 6.25%, while commercial real estate rates hovered between 5.17% to 6.50%, depending on the building type. While these rates reflect a decrease in the cost of borrowing for buyers and certain market observers believe there is a reasonable expectation for rate cuts in 2026, the credit market for 2026 may prove immobile due to long term expectations about the market, as noted by JP Morgan in its 2026 projections: “While markets are pricing short-term interest rates to come down by 0.5-0.75% over the coming year, mortgage rates and longer-term rates might stay elevated as fiscal concerns weigh on the long end of the yield curve. This could be an environment that keeps construction restricted and rewards patient capital investing in supply-constrained markets."
The trepidation about changes to long term credit market rates aligns with what can be observed in the Federal Reserve’s policy outlook for 2026 and beyond; according to reporting published by the Congressional Research Service, the Federal Reserve has positioned itself to pursue a “neutral policy” in relation to its targets for the Federal Funds Rate, and its internal modeling suggests that current rates would fit the bill of neutrality, despite the relative ambiguity of that modeling. Though past behavior is not an indicator of future decisions, forecasting modest movements from the Federal Reserve would align with its historical response to competing concerns about inflation and unemployment, as seen below:
As modestly decreased interest rates would be advantageous for our purposes, it is worth noting that decreased rates would not necessarily translate to loan refinancing or new mortgages, as these rates vary across properties and depend on a variety of performance indicators including but not limited to cash flows, occupancy rates, and lender credit.
SECTOR SPECIFIC OUTLOOKS
Colliers Securities notes the following for the primary real-estate sectors in their 2026 outlook for the US:
As it pertains to the wider housing market, the general indicators for 2026 market expectations largely reflect the same uncertainty felt across the broader US economy. According to the National Association of Homebuilders' housing market sentiments rose in Q4 of 2025 and fell slightly in January of 2026, as sales conditions, short term (6 month) sales expectations, and prospective buyer traffic collectively fell. As of January, homebuilder sentiment was at a value of 37 out of 100, which reflects an overall negative outlook about the expectations for and demand of single-family home sales over the next six months.
Though the January report reflects a broadly pessimistic near-term outlook, the current trend line for 2026 falls within the range of index scores observed over the past 24 months, with homebuilder sentiment charting as high as 44 as of January 2024 on the index and as low as 32 as of June 2025. In the context of our business operations, specifically our model homes segment, overall builder sentiment offers an understanding of the broader macroeconomic trends for the housing market but is nonspecific to model homes, thus limiting its utility to general forecasting about broader market forces.
Current market rates in February 2025 on fixed rate mortgages on homes ranged from 6.15% - 6.98%, depending on the term(2). Current market rates for 5–10 year fixed rate loans for commercial properties ranged from 5.55% - 6.88%, depending on the type of building (retail/industrial/office)(3). Interest rates decreased in 2024 compared to 2023 due to the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates 100 basis points, or 1%, in hopes of slowing down inflation going from 5.5% in July 2023 to 4.5% in December 2024. According to the Federal Reserve "The Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 4-1/4 to 4-1/2 percent. In considering the extent and timing of additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will carefully assess incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks. The Committee will continue reducing its holdings of Treasury securities and agency debt and agency mortgage‑backed securities. The Committee is strongly committed to supporting maximum employment and returning inflation to its 2 percent objective”(4). Although rates decreased in 2024, it does not necessarily indicate that we would be unable to refinance or obtain mortgages on new homes or commercial properties at the same rate we have historically when they come due, as rates vary by property and are dependent upon factors including property cash flows, occupancy rates and lender credit.
As noted by Colliers Securities in its Q32024 Office Outlook: "The U.S. office market ended 2024 with early signs of stability as metrics improved throughout the year, and much less space was returned to the market than in 2023. However, strong headwinds in 2025 suggest an uneven recovery and likely several bumps over the next few years. Occupiers continue to reduce space as their leases expire but are likely to upgrade to a higher quality space and building. Despite headlines focused on large companies' return-to-office efforts, most have evolved their office operations, embracing flexibility to encourage productivity. Large, sprawling campuses are being rethought, with the potential for redevelopment opportunities."
(2) Source: https://www.bankrate.com/mortgages/mortgage-rates/#mortgage-news (3) Source: https://selectcommercial.com/commercial-mortgage-rates.php (4) Source: https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20250129a.htm Going forward returning federal employees to offices five days a week could positively impact office occupancy, according to Colliers. However, initiatives to reduce overall leased space could negatively affect markets with a significant federal presence. Opportunities for the private sector to buy federally owned properties could stimulate redevelopment or conversion to another use, primarily if local municipalities assist with efforts to streamline approvals. Capital markets have been rebounding, noted Colliers. Price adjustments are leading investors back into the office market. While sales are not at pre-pandemic levels, Colliers noted that volume topped $21 billion in the fourth quarter, nearing year-end 2022 levels. Total sales increased 36% compared to one year ago, with central business district activity rebounding. Office sales have more than doubled from one year ago and have had the largest quarterly volume since first-quarter 2022.
Our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024 may not be indicative of those expected in future periods. ManagementDuring does2025, not expect the level of administrative expenses related to the 2024 annual meeting and the switching external auditors will be repeatedstagnations in 2025.previously Additionallyrising the de-SPAC transaction in 2023 resulted in the Company having an investment in Conduit which totaled approximately $18.3 million as of December 31, 2023, with a cost basis of approximately $7.5 million. The Company entered into a lock-up agreement with Conduit regarding the common stock held by the Company, for 180 days from the closing of the business combination which ended March 20, 2024. Due to the declining stock price of Conduit, the Company was unable to monetize our investment. As of December 31, 2024, the investment in Conduit was valued at approximately $0.2 million. During 2023, elevatedcommercial real estate pricesprices, in commercial real estate, increasingslow-to-decrease interest rates on lending,rates, and compressing capitalization rates across the US have made it challenging to acquire properties during 20242025 that fit our portfolio needs. As a result, we did not find any suitable commercial properties to acquire during 2024,2025, but we were able to acquire 1922 Model Home Properties. Management will continue to evaluate potential acquisitions in an effort to increase our portfolio of commercial real estate and model homes.
Impairment of Real Estate Assets. We regularly review for impairment on a property-by-property basis. Impairment is recognized on a property held for use when the expected undiscounted cash flows for a property are less than the carrying amount at which time the property is written-down to fair value. Impairment is recognized on a property held for sale when the fair value less costs to sell is less than the carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, we calculate an impairment loss by comparing the carrying amount to estimated fair value, using discounted cash flow models or third-party appraisals. The calculation of both discounted and undiscounted cash flows requires management to make estimates of future cash flows that are determined based on a number of inputs and assumptionsassumptions, suchincluding asbut not limited to, the intended hold period, market rental rates, leasing assumptions,terminal capitalization rates and discount rates.rate. Actual results could be significantly different from the estimates. Although our strategy is to hold our properties over the long-term, if our strategy changes or market conditions otherwise dictate an earlier sale date, an impairment loss may be recognized to reduce the property to fair value and such loss could be material.
Real Estate Held for Sale. We generally reclassify assets to "held for sale" when the disposition has been approved, it is available for immediate sale in its present condition, we are actively seeking a buyer, and the disposition is considered probable within one year. Additionally, real estate sold during the current period is classified as “real estate assets held for sale” for all prior periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Mortgage notes payable related to the real estate sold during the current period are classified as “mortgage notes payable related to properties held for sale” for all prior periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Additionally, we record the operating results related to real estate that has been disposed of as discontinued operations for all periods presented if the operations have been eliminated and represent a strategic shift and we will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the property following the sale. Properties considered held for sale are recorded at the lesser of the carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. As of December 31, 2025, only one commercial property, Dakota Center, met the criteria to be classified as "held for sale," and five model homes were classified as "held for sale" but are not considered discontinued operations or a strategic shift in our operations.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets. Intangible assets, including goodwill and lease intangibles, are comprised of finite-lived and indefinite-lived assets. Lease intangibles represent the allocation of a portion of the purchase price of a property acquisition representing the estimated value of in-place leases, unamortized lease origination costs, tenant relationships and land purchase options. Intangible assets that are not deemed to have an indefinite useful life are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Indefinite-lived assets are not amortized.
We test for impairment of goodwill and other definite and indefinite lived assets at least annually, and more frequently as circumstances warrant. Impairment is recognized only if the carrying amount of the intangible asset is considered to be unrecoverable from its undiscounted cash flows and is measured as the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the asset.
.
When determining the fair value of real estate assets, goodwill and other liabilities the Company refers to the guidance in ASC 820. The term “Fair Value” is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (ASC 820-10-20). In particular, ASC 820 prescribes that the measurement of the Fair Value of an asset or liability should be based on assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. Accordingly, the Company’s determination of the Fair Value measurements detailed above is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability at the measurement date, assuming a transaction takes place at that date (i.e., an exit price).
As of December 31, 20242025 and December 31, 2023,2024, our marketable securities (excluding our investments in Conduit's common stock and common stock warrants), held at a third party broker, presented on the balance sheet were measured at fair value using Level 1 market prices and totaled approximately zero and $45,149,zero, respectively, with a cost basis of approximately zero and $40,315,zero, respectively. Our investments in Conduit's common stock and common stock warrants presented on the consolidated balance sheets were measured at fair value using Level 1 market prices, which are currently held at Conduit's transfer agent, taking into account the adoption of ASU 2022-03 Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions, and totaled approximately $0.2 million$3,900 as of December 31, 2024,2025, with a cost basis of approximately $7.5 million. The Company entered into a lock-up agreement with Conduit regarding the common stock held by the Company, for 180 days from the closing of the business combination which ended March 20, 2024. There were no financial liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 20242025 and December 31, 2023.2024.
The following table presents as of December 31, 2025 the Company’s assets subject to measurement at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (in thousands):
The following table presents as of December 31, 2023 the Company’s assets subject to measurement at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (in thousands):
Additionally, when determining the fair value of a liability in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, we measure fair value using (i) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets or (ii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement, such as the income approach or the market approach. Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies can have a material effect on these estimated fair values. In this regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.
Revenues. Total revenue was approximately $18.9$16.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025 compared to approximately $17.6$18.9 million for the same period in 2023,2024, ana increasedecrease of approximately $1.3$2.1 million or 7.3%.11.2%. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had approximately $108.6 million in net real estate assets including 80 model homes, compared to approximately $127.6 million in net real estate assets including 78 model homes, compared to approximately $144.2 million in net real estate assets including 110 model homes aton December 31, 2023.2024. The average number of model homes held during the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024 was 9479 and 101,94, respectively. The change in revenue is directly related to the increasedecrease in modelcommercial homereal transactionestate feesrental income during the current period, newfrom the sale of our two commercial realproperties estateon leases,February mainly6, at Grand Pacific Center, and the management fees earned from Conduit during the current period, which was terminated in June 2024.2025. Below is additional revenue and asset information for real estate segments as of December 31, 20242025 and December 31, 2023.2024. Looking forward to 2026, it is worth noting that we expect the sale of Dakota Center and the loss of Shea Center II to result in a decrease of revenue of approximately $4.0 million.
Rental Operating Costs. Rental operating costs were approximately $6.3$6.2 million for the year ended December 31, 20242025 compared to approximately $6.0$6.3 million for the same period in 2023,2024, ana increasedecrease of approximately $0.3$0.1 million or 4.9%.1.6%. Rental operating costs as a percentage of total revenue were 33.1%36.6% and 33.8%33.1% for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively, as office property expenses continue to increase, specifically insurance costs. As of December 31, 20242025 our model home assets made up 29%33.8% of our total real estate assets, which is downup from 35%29.3% as of December 31, 2023,2024, and our gross revenue from model home assets represented approximately 23.4% of23.5%of our total revenue. This percentage is expected to increase in 20252026 as the percentage of our model home real estate assets has increased, with the sale of Union TownDakota Center in 2026 and Researchthe Parkwaystatus inof FebruaryShea 2025,Center whichII; willhowever, reduceif futurewe rentalpurchase incomeadditional untilproperties thoseduring proceeds2026, are reinvested but it will also reduceour rental operating costs.costs Thecould saleincrease. As for our commercial properties, we expect operating costs to decrease by $2.5 million as a result of ourthe Dakota Center buildingsale willand alsothe reduceloss rentalof operatingShea costs.Center II.
General and Administrative. General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses were approximately $7.5$5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to approximately $6.8$7.5 million for the same period in 2023,2024, representing ana increasedecrease of approximately $0.7$1.8 million or 10.8%.24.2%. As a percentage of total revenue, our general and administrative costs were approximately 39.8%33.9% and 38.5%39.8% for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. G&A expenses increasedcomparatively bydecreased approximatelyin $0.52025, millionlargely mainly relateddue to the one-time nature of the 2024 annual meeting and settlement with Zuma Capital and certain individuals and entities affiliated or associated with Zuma Capital Management, LLC ("Zuma Capital"). ThisThe includedcomparative decline was also due to additional consulting fees, higher proxy solicitation feesfees, and legal fees,fees in 2024, all of which increaseddecreased by an aggregate of approximately $0.6 million in 20242025 as compared to 2023.2024. Additionally, employee, ex-officer and board costs, including stock compensation and bonus accruals increased during the year ended December 31, 2024 by approximately $0.5 million as compared to the same period in 2023 related to De-SPAC success bonuses to current and former employees. This was slightly offset by the approximately $0.2 million reduction of D&O insurance related to the SPAC in 2023 that was not consolidated during 2024.million.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses were approximately $5.5$4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to approximately $5.4$5.5 million for the same period in 2023.2024. The decrease is directly related to the sale of our retail properties UTC and Research Parkway during February 2025. Looking ahead to 2026, we expect these costs to decrease as both Shea Center II and Dakota Center made up approximately $1.0 million in depreciation and amortization costs.
Asset Impairments. We review the carrying value of goodwill and each of our real estate properties annually to determine if circumstances indicate an impairment in the carrying value of these investments exists. During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge of approximately $2.0$6.4 million on goodwill and our real estate assets. Of the $2.0$6.4 million impairment for the year, approximately $1.4approximately$6.0 million was related to our commercial properties DakotaShea CenterCener II and 300Dakota NP,Center, approximately $0.4$0.3 million was related to model homes, and approximately $0.2$0.1 million was related to goodwill impairment. The impairment on ourShea commercialCenter property, Dakota Center,II was primarily related to suboptimal occupancy levels and the resultnear term conditions of the loanDenver maturingmarket inconditions, July andwhile the Company not being able to reach an agreement with the lenders regarding a loan modification or extension. In October, the lender has agreed to a sale of the property to settle the balance of the non-recourse loan. Due to the uncertainties in the Fargo market, we concluded it was necessary to impair the property’s book value, in accordance with ASC 360-10. As such, we recorded an impairment charge of approximately $0.7 million, during September 2024. The impairment on 300 NP, totaling approximately $0.7 million related to changing cap rates in the area and low historical occupancy. This property is not listed for sale and has no debt. The new impairment charges for the model homes reflectsreflect the estimated and actual sales prices for these specific model homes that were sold after the end of each quarter.homes. This was the result of an abnormally short hold period, less than two years, on model homes purchased in 2022. The builder changed their product style in the neighborhoods where these model homes are located, in Texas, after we had purchased the homes.years. We do not believe these losses are indicative of our overall model home portfolio. As noted above in the Overview section, during the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, we sold 5120 model homes for approximately $24.8$9.8 million and the Company recognized a gain of approximately $3.4$1.0 million. We expect to record a net gain on model home sales in the first quarter of 2025 as well. The impairment to goodwill was related to NTR Property Management and the fair market value adjustment based on future expected cash flows.
DuringPreviously for the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge of approximately $3.2$2.0 million related to goodwill and model homes. Of the $3.2$2.0 million impairment for the year, approximately $2.0$1.4 million was related to our One Park Center property, approximately $0.4 million was related to eight model homes, and approximately $0.8$0.2 million was related to goodwill impairment. The impairment charge for One Park Center reflects management’s revised estimate of the fair market value based on sales comparable of like property in the same geographical area as well as an evaluation of future cash flows or an executed purchase sale agreement. As of January 14, 2026, Dakota Center had sold for a value of $5,125,000.
Interest Expense-mortgage notes. Interest expense, including amortization of deferred finance charges, was approximately $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. This value is unchanged from the $6.1 million in interest expense incurred for December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2025 we carried total debt of $92.1 million which reflects a decrease of 9.8% from the year ended December 31, 2024. Simultaneously, the weighted average of our interest expenses increased from 5.63% as of December 31, 2024 to 6.16% for the year ended December 31, 2025. We expect these costs to decrease for 2026, as approximately $1.3 million of our current interest expenses were driven by Shea Center II and Dakota Center.
Interest Expense-mortgage notes. Interest expense, including amortization of deferred finance charges was approximately $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to approximately $5.0 million for the same period in 2023, an increase of approximately $1.0 million, or 20.9%. The increase in mortgage interest expense relates to the increase in weighted average interest rate from 5.18% to 5.63% over the same time period. With the sale of our commercial properties in 2025, we will expect interest expense to decrease.
Income allocated to non-controlling interests. Income allocated to non-controlling interests for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024 totaled approximately $2.5$0.7 million, and $3.0$2.5 million, respectively, and was directly impacted by the sale of 186 and 1318 model homes,homes held by our Model Home Partnerships during the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively, held by our Model Home Partnerships.respectively.
Gain on deconsolidation of SPAC and remeasurement.
On April 22, 2024, the Company entered into a lockup agreement with Conduit pursuant to which the Company agreed not to transfer or sell 2,700,000 of its 4,015,250 shares of Conduit common stock for a period of one year. In consideration for entering into the lockup agreement, Conduit issued the Company warrants to purchase 540,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.12 per share, a two year term and exercisable one year after the date of issue (the "Private CDT Warrants"). The Private CDT Warrants meet the ASC 321 scope exception for derivative instruments and are accounted for as a derivative under ASC 815. As such, the Private CDT Warrants were recorded at fair value on the date of issuance and subsequently measured at fair value each period, with changes in fair value reported in gain or loss on Conduit marketable securities. As of April 22, 2024, the Private CDT Warrants were valued at $891,000 based on a Level 3 fair value measurement. As of December 31, 2024, the Private CDT Warrants fair value was adjusted to zero, which is included in the total Investment in Conduit marketable securities on the December 31, 2024 consolidated balance sheet. Our investments in Conduit's common stock (2,944,514 shares of CDT) and public common stock warrants (709,000 warrants of CDTTW) presented on the consolidated balance sheets were measured at fair value using Level 1 market prices, taking into account the adoption of ASU 2022-03 Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions, and totaled approximately $0.2 million as of December 31, 2024. The combined value of our Investment in Conduit marketable securities, including the Private CDT Warrants, totaled $0.2 million as of December 31, 2024, resulting in a net loss on investment for the year ended December 31, 2024 totaling approximal $17.9 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, and in connection with the deconsolidation we recorded a gain of approximately $40.3 million. Of the total gain recognized on deconsolidation, approximately $34.1 million relates to the remeasurement of our retained investment in Murphy Canyon via the Sponsor shares which converted into shares of Conduit's common stock on September 22, 2023, and approximately $6.2 million relates to the deconsolidation of Murphy Canyon's assets and liabilities as of September 22, 2023. Since deconsolidating Conduit, on September 22, 2023, our investments in Conduit's common stock and common stock warrants presented on the consolidated balance sheets were measured at fair value totaled approximately $18.3 million as of December 31, 2023, with a cost basis of approximately $7.5 million. This resulted in net loss on investment for the year ended December 31, 2023 totaling approximal $23.4 million.
During October 2024, the Company paid part of an accrued bonus to the former CFO with shares of CDT common stock. The total number of CDT common stock shares transferred to our former CFO was 1,045,805 shares at $0.1087 per share with a fair market value of $113,679 at the time of transfer. After the transfer the Company still owned 2,944,514 shares of CDT common stock, 709,000 CDTTW warrants and 540,000 private warrants. Since December 31, 2024, CDT has affected a 1-for-100 reverse stock split of the CDT common stock, resulting in our 2,944,514 shares being converted into 29,445 shares.
Our short-term liquidity needs include paying our current operating costs, satisfying the debt service requirements of our existing mortgages, completing tenant improvements, paying leasing commissions, and funding dividends to stockholders. Future principal payments due on our mortgage notes payables during 2026, total approximately $30.0 million, of which $4.5 million is related to model home properties and approximately $16.4 million is related to our Shea Center II property in Colorado. Management expects certain model homes will be sold, and that the underlying mortgage notes will be paid off with sales proceeds, while other mortgage notes will be refinanced as the Company has done in the past. Additional principal payments will be made with cash flows from ongoing operations. The non-recourse loan for Shea Center matured on January 5, 2026. On January 14, 2026 the Dakota Center property sold to an unrelated third-party for approximately $5.1 million. The lender received approximately $4.3 million from the sale of the property, which was applied to settle the net loan balance of approximately $8.9 million. The Company was not responsible for the remaining balance on this non-recourse loan. No other commercial property loans mature during 2026.
On January 21, 2026, the Company and NetREIT SC II, LLC, a subsidiary of the Company (the “Borrower” or "Shea Center"), received a notice (the “Default Notice”) from Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Lender”) alleging that the Borrower’s failure to repay in full by January 5, 2026 the indebtedness owed under that certain promissory note dated as of December 24, 2015 issued to The Bancorp Bank (the “Original Lender”) in the original principal amount of $17,727,500 (the “Note”), the related loan agreement, dated as of December 24, 2015 by and between Borrower and the Original Lender (the “Loan Agreement”) and other related agreements (together with the Note and the Loan Agreement, the “Loan Documents”), constituted an event of default under the Loan Documents and alleging further that the Lender has the right to foreclose or partially foreclose certain real and personal property that the Borrower had pledged as security for the Note located in Douglas County, Colorado, known as the “Shea Center II” (the “Property”).
On February 13, 2026, in connection with an ex parte motion brought by the Lender, the Borrower entered into a stipulation with the Lender to appoint Trigild IVL (the “Receiver”) as receiver over the Property and for the entry of an Order for Appointment of Receiver (the “Order”). Pursuant to the Order, the Borrower, and certain defendant parties, which include the Company (the “Borrower Parties”) are enjoined and restrained from collecting any rents or fees from or incident to the Property and from interfering with the Property. The Borrower Parties agreed to turn over to the Receiver all sums in existence as of the date of entry of the Order that are related or pertain to, or are derived from, the Property. In addition, the Receiver shall have possession of the Property and shall have full power and authority to operate, manage, and preserve the Property.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Not available: the section could not be located automatically in one of the filings (non-standard layout or incorporated by reference). See the original filing. Open the filing on SEC.gov.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE six MONTHS ENDED June 30, 2026 and 2025”
Largest changes
“Interest Expense - mortgage notes. Interest expense, including amortization of deferred finance charges, was approximately $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to approximately $3.0 million for the same period in 2025. The weighted average interest rate on our outstanding debt was 6.28% and 5.44% as of June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Mortgage notes payable totaled approximately $80.9 million and $94.4 million as of June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. …”see in full comparison
Interest Expense - mortgage notes. Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financesee in full comparisonchargescharges, was approximately$2.1$1.2 million for the three months endedMarchJune31,30, 2026, compared to approximately $1.5 million for the same period in 2025. The weighted average interest rate on our outstanding debt was6.29%6.28% and5.83%5.44% as ofMarchJune31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Mortgage notes payable totaled approximately$82.4$80.9 million and$94.4$92.9 million as ofMarchJune31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.While mortgage interest expenses increased over the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, approximately $0.7 million of the interest expense attributed to the three months ended March 31, 2026 was related to one-time charge for the default interest on the loan for Dakota Center.Management expects future interest expenses to continue to decrease going forward for the yearendedending2026.2026Additionally, duringwith thethree months ended March 31, 2026, we recorded defaulted interest expenseloss ofapproximately $0.1 million related tothe Shea Center IIloan.property on July 1, 2026 and related mortgage.
“RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE six MONTHS ENDED June 30, 2026 and 2025”see in full comparison
“Asset Impairments. We review the carrying value of each of our real estate properties regularly to determine if circumstances indicate an impairment in the carrying value of these investments exists. During the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, we recognized non-cash impairment charges of approximately $3.5 million and $4.3 million, respectively. Approximately $3.1 million and $0.9 million of the impairment charge for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, was related to the Shea Center II.”see in full comparison
Asset Impairments. We review the carrying value of each of our real estate properties regularly to determine if circumstances indicate an impairment in the carrying value of these investments exists. During the three months endedsee in full comparisonMarchJune31,30, 2026 and 2025, we recognized non-cash impairment charges of approximately$524,373$3.0 million and$26,943,$4.3 million, respectively. Approximately$0.4$2.6 million and $0.9 million of the impairmentchargecharges for the three months endedMarchJune31,30, 2026 and 2025, was related to the Shea Center II. Additionally, during the three months ended June 30, 2025, we recorded an impairment charge on the Dakota Center property for approximately $3.3 million.
“General and Administrative Expenses. G&A expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 totaled approximately $3.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively. G&A expenses as a percentage of total revenue was 39.7% and 33.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. G&A expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 were up compared to the same period ending in 2025; however, the Company is actively looking to reduce G&A expenses during the year. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (44)
We may refer to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and MarchJune 31,30, 2025, as the "2026 Quarter" and the "2025 Quarter," respectively.
The Company operates as an internally managed, diversified REIT, with primary holdings in office, industrial, retail, and triple-net leased model home properties. In October 2017, we changed our name from "NetREIT, Inc." to "Presidio Property Trust, Inc." The Company acquires, owns, and manages a geographically diversified portfolio of real estate assets, including office, industrial, retail and model home residential properties leased to homebuilders located in the United States. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company owned or had an equity interest in:
Acquisitions during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026
Acquisitions during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
Dispositions during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026:
Dispositions during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025:
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025
Revenues. Total revenues were approximately $3.8 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to approximately $4.1$4.4 million for the same period in 2025. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had approximately $100.5$95.0 million in net real estate assets including 7571 model homes, compared to approximately $117.4$114.6 million in net real estate assets, including 8487 model homes at MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The average number of model homes held during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 was approximately 7873 and 81,85, respectively. TheAdditionally, the change in revenue is directly related to the decrease in commercial real estate rental income during the current period from the sale of Dakota Center.
Rental Operating Costs. Rental operating costs totaled approximately $1.5$1.3 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to approximately $1.6$1.5 million for the same period in 2025. Rental operating costs as a percentage of total revenue was approximately 35%33.0% and 39%33.4% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
General and Administrative Expenses. G&A expenses for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 totaled approximately $1.7$1.3 million and $1.7$1.2 million, respectively. G&A expenses as a percentage of total revenue was 44.4%35.2% and 40.3%27.9% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. G&A expenses for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 remainedwere constantslightly up compared to the same period ending in 2025 due to costs associated with downsizing our staff; however, the Company is still actively looking to reduce G&A expenses during the year. There has been a reduction of employee headcount during the first quarterand second quarters of 2026 with more expected this year. Starting in April 2026, the Chief Executive Officer has agreed to a voluntary 5% reduction in his annual salary. Additionally, the size of the Board of Directors havewas approved the reductionreduced by one Directordirector starting in June 2026, which will provide additional G&A savings.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense was approximately $1.0$0.9 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense is directly related to the decrease in commercial real estate rental income during the current period, from the sale of Dakota Center and the placement of Shea Center into receivership and listed as held for sale.
Asset Impairments. We review the carrying value of each of our real estate properties regularly to determine if circumstances indicate an impairment in the carrying value of these investments exists. During the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, we recognized non-cash impairment charges of approximately $524,373$3.0 million and $26,943,$4.3 million, respectively. Approximately $0.4$2.6 million and $0.9 million of the impairment chargecharges for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, was related to the Shea Center II. Additionally, during the three months ended June 30, 2025, we recorded an impairment charge on the Dakota Center property for approximately $3.3 million.
Interest Expense - mortgage notes. Interest expense, including amortization of deferred finance chargescharges, was approximately $2.1$1.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to approximately $1.5 million for the same period in 2025. The weighted average interest rate on our outstanding debt was 6.29%6.28% and 5.83%5.44% as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Mortgage notes payable totaled approximately $82.4$80.9 million and $94.4$92.9 million as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. While mortgage interest expenses increased over the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, approximately $0.7 million of the interest expense attributed to the three months ended March 31, 2026 was related to one-time charge for the default interest on the loan for Dakota Center. Management expects future interest expenses to continue to decrease going forward for the year endedending 2026.2026 Additionally, duringwith the three months ended March 31, 2026, we recorded defaulted interest expenseloss of approximately $0.1 million related to the Shea Center II loan.property on July 1, 2026 and related mortgage.
Income allocated to non-controlling interests. Income allocated to non-controlling interests for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 totaled approximately $0.1$40,230 of expense and $0.2 million andof $0.1 million,income, respectively. This was directly related to the gain on sales of model homes held by our affiliated limited partnerships.
Loss on Conduit remeasurement. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we held 709,000 public common stock warrants of CDTTW, and 540,000 private common stock warrants, with a combined value of approximately $5,885.$11,628. Conduit's public common stock warrants (CDTTW) and Private CDT Warrants presented on the consolidated balance sheets were measured at fair value using Level 1 and Level 3 market prices, taking into account the adoption of ASU 2022-03 Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE six MONTHS ENDED June 30, 2026 and 2025
Revenues. Total revenues were approximately $7.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to approximately $8.5 million for the same period in 2025. As of June 30, 2026, we had approximately $95.0 million in net real estate assets including 71 model homes, compared to approximately $114.6 million in net real estate assets, including 87 model homes at June 30, 2025. The average number of model homes held during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 was approximately 75 and 83, respectively. The change in revenue is directly related to the decrease in commercial real estate rental income during the current period from the sale of Dakota Center in January 2026, as well as the sale of two commercial properties on February 7, 2025.
Rental Operating Costs. Rental operating costs totaled approximately $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to approximately $3.1 million for the same period in 2025. Rental operating costs as a percentage of total revenue was approximately 36.9% and 36.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
General and Administrative Expenses. G&A expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 totaled approximately $3.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively. G&A expenses as a percentage of total revenue was 39.7% and 33.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. G&A expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 were up compared to the same period ending in 2025; however, the Company is actively looking to reduce G&A expenses during the year. There has been a reduction of employee headcount during the first and second quarter of 2026 with more expected this year. Starting in April 2026, the Chief Executive Officer has agreed to a voluntary 5% reduction in his annual salary. Additionally, the Board of Directors have approved the reduction of the size of the Board of Directors by one Director starting in June 2026, which will provide additional G&A savings.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense was approximately $1.9 million and $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense is directly related to the decrease in commercial real estate rental income during the current period, from the sale of Dakota Center and the placement of Shea Center into receivership and listed as held for sale.
Asset Impairments. We review the carrying value of each of our real estate properties regularly to determine if circumstances indicate an impairment in the carrying value of these investments exists. During the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, we recognized non-cash impairment charges of approximately $3.5 million and $4.3 million, respectively. Approximately $3.1 million and $0.9 million of the impairment charge for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, was related to the Shea Center II.
Interest Expense - mortgage notes. Interest expense, including amortization of deferred finance charges, was approximately $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to approximately $3.0 million for the same period in 2025. The weighted average interest rate on our outstanding debt was 6.28% and 5.44% as of June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Mortgage notes payable totaled approximately $80.9 million and $94.4 million as of June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. While mortgage interest expenses increased over the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, approximately $0.2 million of the interest expense attributed to the six months ended June 30, 2026 was related to one-time charge for the default interest on the loan for Dakota Center. Management expects future interest expenses to continue to decrease going forward for the year ending 2026. Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2026, we recorded defaulted interest expense of approximately $0.1 million related to the Shea Center II loan.
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Real Estate Assets, net. The change in gain or loss on the sale of real estate assets is dependent on the mix of properties sold and the market conditions at the time of the sale. See "Significant Transactions in 2026 and 2025" above for further detail.
Income allocated to non-controlling interests. Income allocated to non-controlling interests for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 totaled approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. This was directly related to the gain on sales of model homes held by our affiliated limited partnerships.
Loss on Conduit remeasurement. As of June 30, 2026, we held 709,000 public common stock warrants of CDTTW, and 540,000 private common stock warrants, with a combined value of approximately $11,628. Conduit's public common stock warrants (CDTTW) and Private CDT Warrants presented on the consolidated balance sheets were measured at fair value using Level 1 and Level 3 market prices, taking into account the adoption of ASU 2022-03 Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we recorded a gain on Conduit's marketable securities connected to the CDT warrants of $7,728, compared to a loss of approximately $184,459 during the six months ended June 30, 2025.
The following table shows a list of our commercial properties owned by the Company grouped by state and geographic region as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026:
The following table shows a list of our Model Home properties by state and geographic region as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026:
Our anticipated future sources of liquidity may include existing cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations, refinancing of existing mortgages, future real estate sales, new borrowings from our model home lines of credit, and the sale of our equity or issuance of debt securities or bonds. Our cash and restricted cash at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was approximately $5.2$5.9 million. Our future capital needs include paying down existing borrowings, maintaining our existing properties, funding tenant improvements, paying lease commissions (to the extent they are not covered by lender-held reserve deposits), and the payment of dividends to our stockholders. We also are actively seeking model home investments that are likely to produce income and achieve long-term gains in order to pay dividends to our stockholders. To ensure that we can effectively execute these objectives, we routinely review our liquidity requirements and continually evaluate all potential sources of liquidity.
On February 13, 2026, in connection with an ex parte motion brought by the Lender, the Borrower entered into a stipulation with the Lender to appoint Trigild IVL (the “Receiver”) as receiver over the Property and for the entry of an Order for Appointment of Receiver (the “Order”). Pursuant to the Order, the Borrower, and certain defendant parties, which included the Company (the “Borrower Parties”) were enjoined and restrained from collecting any rents or fees from or incident to the Property and from interfering with the Property. The Borrower Parties agreed to turn over to the Receiver all sums in existence as of the date of entry of the Order that are related or pertain to, or are derived from, the Property. In addition, the Receiver was given possession of the Property and has full power and authority to operate, manage, and preserve the Property. In the case of our non-recourse loan for Shea Center II, our obligation will be settled through the foreclosure process with the lender. On July 1, 2026, the foreclosure for Shea Center II took place with the property going to Argentic Services Company LP, who acquired the property by placing a minimum credit bid valued at $12.0 million, and no cash consideration was exchanged.
In the case of our non-recourse loan for Shea Center II, our obligation will be settled through the foreclosure process with the lender.
While we will continue to pursue value creating investments, the Board of Directors believes there is significant embedded value in our assets that is yet to be realized by the market. In December 2024, the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $6.0 million of outstanding shares of our Series A Common Stock and up to $4.0 million of our Series D Preferred Stock, which the Board of Directors did not renew in December 2025. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we repurchased 16,080 shares of our Series A Common Stock, with an average price of $4.79 per share, including a commission of $0.025 per share, for a total cost of $77,092 for the Series A Common Stock. This does not include the shares repurchased in the fixed price self-tender offer (the "Tender Offer") during April-May 2025. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company repurchased 23,346 shares of our Series D Preferred Stock at an average price of approximately $14.76 per share, including a commission of $0.035 per share, for a total cost of $344,503 for the Series D Preferred Stock. Any repurchased shares are treated as authorized and unissued in accordance with Maryland law and shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity at cost. There were no repurchases of Series A Common Stock or Series D Preferred Stock during threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as there were no repurchase plans in place.
For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company did not declare a cash dividend on shares of Series A Common Stock. For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company did not declare and did not pay dividends on shares of Series D Preferred Stock. As of January 28, 2026, the Board of Directors has suspended the Company’s monthly dividend on its Series D Preferred Stock commencing with the January 2026 monthly dividend that would have been paid on February 15, 2026. Since the Company’s Board of Directors did not declare a dividend during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an accrual was not recorded on the balance sheet. However, undeclared preferred stock dividends are reflected in earnings per share as discussed in ASC 260-10-45-11. In accordance with the terms of the Series D Preferred Stock, Preferredpreferred stock dividends that are not declared accumulate and are added to the liquidation preference as of the scheduled payment date for the respective series of the preferred stock. No interest, or sum of money in lieu of interest, is payable in respect of any dividend payments on the Series D Preferred Stock that are in arrears. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the cumulative preferred dividends in arrears on the Series D preferred stock was $0.6$1.1 million and $0, respectively.
The Board and the Company intend to reassess, on a quarterly basis, when accrued dividends on the Series D Preferred Stock may be paid and when the monthly dividend payments can be reinstated. Under the guidance of ASC 260-10-45-11, if the Company's Board of Directors dodoes not declare a dividend in a given period, an accrual is not recorded on the balance sheet, however; undeclared preferred stock dividends are reflected in earnings per share. Preferred stock dividends that are not declared accumulate and are added to the liquidation preference as of the scheduled payment date for the respective series of the preferred stock. Cash permitting, the Company intends to continue to pay dividends on a monthly basis to holders of our Series D Preferred Stock going forward, but there can be no guarantee the Board of Directors will approve any future dividends. The Company has not decided when it will resume dividends to our common stockholders on a quarterly basis. As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the cumulative preferred dividends in arrears on the Series D preferred stock was $0.6 million and $0, respectively.
At MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, we had approximately $5.2$5.9 million and $7.4 million in cash equivalents, respectively, including $3.6$4.4 million and $5.7 million of restricted cash, respectively. Our cash equivalents and restricted cash consist of invested cash, cash in our operating accounts, short-term bonds and cash held in bank accounts at third-party institutions. During 2026 and 2025, we did not experience any loss or lack of access to our cash or cash equivalents. Including any cash committed to current capital expenditures on our properties, the Company may spend approximately $0.6$1.6 million on capital expenditures, net of any construction financing (some of which is held in deposits reserve accounts by our lenders) during the rest of the year. We intend to use the remainder of our existing cash and cash equivalents for asset/property acquisitions, reduction of principal debt, general corporate purposes, common stock repurchases (if market conditions are met), or dividends to our stockholders.
As of
MarchJune 31,30, 2026, all our commercial properties, except 300 N.P. which has no debt, had fixed-rate mortgage notes payable in the aggregate principal amount of
$58.5$58.4 million, collateralized by a total of seven commercial properties with loan terms at issuance ranging from 5 to 10 years. The weighted-average interest rate on these mortgage notes payable as of
MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was approximately
5.78%,
5.93% , and our debt to estimated market value for our commercial properties was approximately
72.0%.69.2%. During the next 12 months, none of our commercial property loans will mature. The non-recourse loan on the Dakota Center property matured on July 6, 2024;2024. duringIn the month of July 2025, the lender approved a purchase offer from a third party for $5,125,000, and as of January 14, 2026, Dakota Center had sold for a value of $5,125,000. During January 2026, the Company received notice that the Company's failure to repay in full by January 5, 2026 the indebtedness related to the loan agreement governing Shea Center II had triggered a default event. On February 13, 2026 the Company received notification that the Shea Center II property governed by the loan agreement was moved into receivership. The foreclosure sale and public auction is scheduled for June 17, 2026.
The foreclosure sale for Shea Center II took place on July 1, 2026, with the property awarded to Argentic Services Company LP, who acquired the property by placing a minimum credit bid valued at $12.0 million. No cash consideration was exchanged.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company had fixed-rate mortgage notes payable related to model homes in the aggregate principal amount of $23.9$22.5 million, collateralized by a total of 7571 Model Homes. These loans generally have a term at issuance of three to five years. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the average loan balance per home outstanding and the weighted-average interest rate on these mortgage loans are approximately $323,577$316,844 and 7.13%,7.18%, respectively. Our debt to estimated market value on all our model home properties is approximately 59.0%.62.4%. We have been able to refinance maturing mortgages to extend maturity dates and we have not experienced any notable difficulties financing our acquisitions. The Company anticipates that any new mortgages used to acquire commercial properties or model homes in the near future will be at rates higher than our currently weighted average interest rate.
Cash Flow for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and MarchJune 31,30, 2025
Operating Activities: Net cash used in operating activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, totaled approximately $1.0 million,$24,839, as compared to cash used in operating activities of $0.1$1.0 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The change in net cash used in operating activities is primarily due to the sale of Dakota Center, combined with other changes in net income, which fluctuates due to new leases, leasing renewals, tenant move outs and model home sales and acquisitions, as well as changes in non-cash addbacks or subtractions such as straight-line rent, are the primary drivers of the increase in cash used in operating activities.
Investing Activities: Net cash provided by investing activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was approximately $6.9$8.3 million compared to approximately $13.6$11.4 million used in investing activities during the same period in 2025. The change from each period was primarily related to the sale of our commercial properties in February 2025 for approximately $4.7 million, net of selling costs, and the sale of model home propertiesproperties, fortotaling approximately $7.4$8.7 million during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.2026, Therecompared wereto noapproximately similar$21.5 commercial property salesmillion during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, however, model home sales during the three months ended March 31, 2025 totaled approximately $22.3 million.2025. Cash used in real estate acquisition and capital improvement totaled approximately $0.2$0.5 million, for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to $4.8$10.2 million for the same period in 2025.
Financing Activities: Net cash used in financing activities during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was $8.2$9.8 million compared to $9.5$11.1 million provided by financing activities for the same period in 2025 and was primarily due to the following activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026:
If all the potential Common Stock Warrants outstanding at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, were exercised at the price of $12 per share, gross proceeds to us would be approximately $2.4 million and we would as a result issue an additional 200,000 shares of common stock.
If all the potential Placement Agent Warrants outstanding at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, were exercised at the price of $62.50 per share, gross proceeds to us would be approximately $0.5 million and we would as a result issue an additional 8,000 shares of common stock.
If all the potential Series A Warrants outstanding at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, were exercised at the price of $70.00 per share, gross proceeds to us would be approximately $101.2 million and we would as a result issue an additional 1,445,007 shares of common stock.
SQFT insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 1 Form 4 filing (1 insider, 1 trade date, 300 shares, about $1.9K) and open-market sales in 3 filings (2 insiders, 2 trade dates, 9,384 shares, about $33.5K). Net open-market shares: -9,084 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$31.7K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | Heilbron Jack Kendrick |
Disposition to issuer | 11,563 | $6.25 | $72.3K |
| 2026-10-02 | Heilbron Jack Kendrick |
Disposition to issuer | 6,600 | $6.25 | $41.2K |
| 2026-10-02 | Heilbron Jack Kendrick |
Grant/award | 63,597 | $1.18 | $75.0K |
| 2026-10-02 | Heilbron Jack Kendrick |
Grant/award | 36,300 | $1.18 | $42.8K |
| 2026-10-02 | Katz Gary Morris |
Disposition to issuer | 265 | $6.25 | $1.7K |
| 2026-10-02 | Katz Gary Morris |
Grant/award | 1,458 | $1.18 | $1.7K |
| 2026-10-02 | Bentzen Edwin H Iv |
Disposition to issuer | 200 | $6.25 | $1.2K |
| 2026-10-02 | Bentzen Edwin H Iv |
Grant/award | 1,100 | $1.18 | $1.3K |
| 2026-09-21 | Heilbron Jack Kendrick |
Open-market purchase | 300 | $6.21 | $1.9K |
| 2026-06-16 | Durfey James Robert |
Open-market sale | 2,500 | $2.63 | $6.6K |
| 2026-04-10 | Heilbron Jack Kendrick |
Open-market sale | 5,884 | $3.92 | $23.1K |
| 2026-04-10 | Durfey James Robert |
Open-market sale | 1,000 | $3.89 | $3.9K |
Well-known investors holding SQFT (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.