TLS 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Telos Corp. · Nasdaq · Services-Computer Integrated Systems Design · CIK 320121 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Artificial Intelligence ("AI") is an emerging technology and we may not be successful in our AI initiatives.”
New heading “The Administration's actions, such as tariffs and other changes in international trade policies, could adversely and unexpectedly impact our business.”
New heading “Certain of our U.S. federal government contracts involve work of a confidential nature, which may limit investor insight into portions of our business.”
Removed heading “Sales to customers outside the United States expose us to risks inherent in international operations.”
Removed heading “We are subject to payment processing risk.”
Removed heading “Artificial Intelligence is an emerging technology and may involve significant risks and uncertainties.”
Removed heading “Increased scrutiny of our environmental, social and governance responsibilities may result in additional costs and risks, and may adversely impact our reputation, employee retention, and willingness of customers and suppliers to do business with us.”
Largest changes
“We are continuing to develop and refine our disclosure controls, internal control over financial reporting and other procedures that are designed to ensure information required to be disclosed by us in our consolidated financial statements and in the reports that we file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and information required to be disclosed in reports under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive and financial officers. …”see in full comparison
Our long-term strategy may include identifying and acquiring, partnering with, investing in or merging with suitable candidates on acceptable terms, or divesting of certain business lines or activities. Partnerships, mergers, joint ventures, acquisitions, and divestitures include a number of risks and present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including but not limited to: diversion of management attention from running our existing business; possible material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting; increased expenses, including legal, administrative and compensation expenses related to newly hired or terminated employees; increased costs to integrate the technology, personnel, customer base and business practices of the acquired company with us; potential exposure to material liabilities not discovered in the due diligence process; potential adverse effects on reported operating results due to possible write-down of goodwill and other intangible assets associated with acquisitions; and unavailability of acquisition financing or unavailability of such financing on reasonable terms.see in full comparison
“Artificial Intelligence ("AI") is an emerging technology and we may not be successful in our AI initiatives.”see in full comparison
“The Administration's actions, such as tariffs and other changes in international trade policies, could adversely and unexpectedly impact our business.”see in full comparison
“We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), the rules and regulations of Nasdaq, and other securities rules and regulations that impose various requirements on public companies. Our management and other personnel devote substantial time and resources to comply with these rules and regulations. …”see in full comparison
“Recently, we launched Xacta.ai, the artificial intelligence capability at the core of our Xacta platform. The use of AI in our solutions may carry considerable risk, and we cannot guarantee the achievement of the intended outcome. The use of AI technologies involves issues associated with intellectual property, data privacy and security, consumer protection and equal opportunity laws. Given the nature of AI technology, we may face significant competition from other companies and evolving regulatory landscape. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (104)
In your evaluation of the Company and business, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties as described below, together with the information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents we file with the SEC. These factors, as well as additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial, may currently have, or may have, a significant impact on our business, operating results or financial condition. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as a result of the risk factors discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our business could be negatively affected by cyber or other information security threats, breaches, threats or other disruptions.
We routinely experience cybersecurity threats, threats to our information technology infrastructure and attempts to gain access to our sensitive information, as do our customers, suppliers, prime and subcontractors, and joint venturestrategic partners. We experience similar security threats at customer sites that we operate and manage as a contractual requirement. The threats we face vary from attacks common to most industries to more advanced and persistent, highly organized adversaries who target us because we protect national security information. While we have security measures in place to protect our data and the data of our customers or end-users of our services, our services and underlying infrastructure may in the future be materially breached or compromised as a result of the following:
•Third-party attempts to fraudulently induce employeesemployees, contractors or customers into disclosing sensitive information such as user names, passwords or other information to gain access to our customers' data, our data or our IT systems;
To the extent possible, these risks are mitigated by our ability to maintain and improve information security governance policies, enhanced processes and internal security controls, including our ability to escalate and respond to known and potential risks. Although we have developed systems and processes designed to assess, identify, and manage material cybersecurity risks, we can provide no assurances that such systems and processes will provide absolute security. In the normal course of business, we are the target of malicious cyberattack attempts. To date, any such attempts have not been material to us, including to our reputation or business operations, or had a material financial impact, but there can be no assurance that future cyberattacks will not be material.
If our customers do not renew their subscriptions or contracts for our solutions and servicesservices, or subscriptions, and expand our relationships with them, our revenue could decline and our results of operations would be adversely impacted.
To continue to maintain and grow our business, it is important that our existing customers renew their subscriptions or contracts for our solutions and services or subscriptions when existing contract terms expire. Our customers have no obligation to renew or extend their subscriptions or contracts for our solutions or services or subscriptions after the expiration of the contractual periods, which vary in length, and in the normal course of business, some customers have elected not to renew or extend. It is difficult to predict attrition rates given the varying needs of our customer base. Our attrition rates may increase or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including customer dissatisfaction with our solutions or services, customers' spending levels, mix of customer base, decreases in the number of users at our customers, competition, pricing increases or changes, and deteriorating general economic conditions or budgetary constraints.
The U.S. federal government may terminate, cancel, delay, modify or curtail our contracts at any time prior to completion and, if we do not replace them, this may adversely affect our future revenues and could adversely impact our earnings.
Many of the U.S. federal government programs in which we participate, both as a contractor or subcontractor, extend for several years and include one or more base years and one or more option years. These programs are typically funded on an annual basis. Under these contracts, the U.S. federal government generally has the right not to exercise options to extend or expand our contracts and may otherwise terminate, cancel, modifymodify, delay, or curtail our contracts at its convenience. Any decisions by the U.S. federal government to not exercise contract options or to terminate, cancel, delay, modify or curtail our major programs or contracts (including those on which we serve as a subcontractor) would adversely affect our revenues, revenue growth and profitability.
First, the process may be delayed or disrupted. Changes in congressional schedules, administration priorities, negotiations for program funding levels or unforeseen world events can interruptdelay or disrupt the funding for a program or contract. Second, fundsFunds for multi-year contracts can be changed in subsequent years in the appropriations process. In addition, the U.S. federal government has increasingly relied on IDIQ contracts and other procurement vehicles that are subject to a competitive bidding and funding process even after the award of the basic contract, adding an element of uncertainty to future funding levels. Delays in the funding process or changes in funding or funding priorities can impact the timing of available funds or can lead to changes in program content, delay or termination at the government's convenience.
Any decisions by the U.S. government to not exercise contract options or to terminate, cancel, delay, modify or curtail our major programs or contracts would adversely affect our revenues, revenue growth and profitability.
Because we derive a substantial amount of our revenue from contracts with the federal government, either as a prime contractor or a subcontractor, changes in federal government budgetary priorities or policy shift could directly affect our financial performance. Uncertainty exists regarding how future budget and program decisions will unfold, including the spending priorities of the new U.S. presidential administration and Congress, and what challenges budget reductions will present for us and our industry generally. The current administration's efforts to reduce the size and spending of the federal government pose several potential risks to our operations. The focus on reducing government spending may lead to fewer contracts being awarded, reduced contract values, or delays in the awarding of contracts. Changes in federal priorities may result in a shift away from governance, risk and compliance software solutions, cybersecurity, and digital identity services, potentially reducing demand for our offerings.
We continue to monitor these developments closely and are actively engaging with stakeholders to mitigate potential adverse impacts. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to fully offset the effects of any reductions in federal government spending, workforce changes, or policy shifts on our business operations and customer relationships.
We are dependentrely on a few key customer contracts for a significant portion of our future revenue,revenue. and aA significant reduction in goods and services or delay in implementation to one or more of these contracts would reduce or delay our future revenue and could materially affect our anticipated operating results.
A small number of our large customer contracts are expected to comprise a significant portion of our future revenue. Our business will likely be harmed if any of our key customer contracts generate less revenue than we forecast, and the termination or delay of a large contract or multiple contracts could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability. Adverse events affecting the programs subject to these contracts, such as inflation, labor challenges, shortage of materials, market volatility, a significant decline in the traveling public or any significant supply chain disruption or delay, could also negatively affect our ability to process transactions under those contracts, which could adversely affect our revenue and the results of operations.
We are also substantially dependent on the continued service of our existing highly trained and skilled personnel, particularly our business development and operations group,groups, because of the complexity of our services and technologies. The technology industry is subject to substantial and continuous competition for engineers and other subject matter experts with high levels of experience in designing, developing and managing software, cybersecurity, and Internet-related services, as well as competition for sales executives, data scientists and operations personnel. Competition for skilled personnel is intense and many U.S. government programs also require contractors to have security clearances, which can be difficult and time-consuming to obtain.
Many U.S. federal government contracts require us to have security clearances and employ personnel with specified levels of education, work experience, and security clearances. Depending on the level of clearance, security clearances can be difficult and time-consuming to obtain. Competition for skilled personnel is intense, and to the extent we cannot maintain or obtain the required level of expertise and clearances for our employees working on such contracts, we may not be able to fulfill our contractual obligations and may not generate the revenue anticipated from the contracts.
Due to the competitive bidding process to obtain U.S. federal government contracts, both upon initial issuance and re-competition, and the likelihood of bid protest, we may be unable to achieve or sustain revenue growth and profitability.
Many of our U.S. federal government contracts are awarded through a competitive bidding process upon initial award and renewal, and we expect this will continue. There is often significant competition and pricing pressure as a result of this process. TheFrom time to time, the competitive bidding process presents a number of risks, including the following:
•From time to time weWe expend substantial funds and time to prepare bids and proposals for contracts that are ultimately awarded to one of our competitors;
•From time to time weWe are unable to accurately estimate the resources and costs that will be required to perform any contract we are awarded, which results in substantial cost overruns and decreased margins;
•From time to time weWe encounter expense and delay when our competitors protest or challenge awards of contracts, and any such protest or challenge could result in a requirement to resubmit bids on modified specifications or in the termination, reduction or modification of the awarded contract; and
•From time to time the protest of contracts awarded to us results in the delay of program performance and the generation of revenue while the protest is pending; and
•From time to time weWe are not given the opportunity to re-compete for U.S. federal government contracts previously awarded to us, and we may incur expenses to protest such a decision and ultimately may not succeed in competing for or winning such contract renewal.
The U.S. federal government contracts for which we compete typically have multiple option periods, and if, as happens from time to time, we fail to win a contract or a task order, we generally will be unable to compete again for that contract for several years. If we fail to win new contracts or to receive renewal contracts upon re-competition, itour may result in additional costsbusiness and expensesprospects will be adversely affected and possiblethat losscould ofcause revenue,our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated. In addition, we will not have an opportunity to compete for these contract opportunities again until such contracts expire.
In the event a bid protest of contracts awarded to us are unsuccessful, the resulting delay of program performance and funding of work under protested contract awards may adversely affect our revenue and profitability.
Our ability to increase revenue from existing customers and attract new customers will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and respond effectively to rapid technological changes and market developments. Further, our future profitability partly depends on our ability to successfully implement our strategies to increase adoption of our solutions and services and develop new offerings.
Our ability to increase revenue from existing customers and attract new customers will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and respond effectively to rapid technological changes and market developments. Virtually all of the products we produce and sell are highly engineered and require sophisticated manufacturing and system integration techniques and capabilities. The government market in which we primarily operate is characterized by rapidly changing technologies. The product or program needs of our government and commercial customers change and evolve regularly. Accordingly, our future performance in part depends on our ability to identify emerging technological trends, devote adequate research and development resources, develop and manufacture competitive products, and bring those products to market quickly at cost-effective prices. If we fail to effectively anticipate, identify and respond to these changes in product or program needs in a timely manner, our business could be negatively impacted. Likewise, if we are unable to develop new products that meet customers' changing needs, future sales and earnings may be adversely affected.
Further, the market for identity verification solutions is still developing, and the evolution of this market may result in the development of different technologies and industry standards that may not be compatible with our current solutions, products, or technologies. Maintaining adequate research and development resources, such as the appropriate personnel and development technology, to meet the market demands is essential.
If we fail to effectively anticipate, identify and respond to these changes in product, solutions or program needs in a timely manner, our business could be negatively impacted. Likewise, if we are unable to develop new products that meet customers' changing needs, future sales and earnings may be materially affected. Our failure to maintain adequate research and development resources or to compete effectively with the research and development programs of our competitors would give an advantage to such competitors and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
We market the majority of our security solutions directly to U.S. federal government customers. The sale and implementation of our services to these entities typically involves a lengthy education process and a significant technical evaluation and commitment of capital and other resources, which adds uncertainty to our sales cycle. This process is also subject to the risk of delays associated with customers' internal budgeting and other procedures for approving large capital expenditures, deploying new technologies within their networks and testing and accepting new technologies that affect key operations.
We rely on the technology, infrastructure, and software applications of certain third parties in order to host or operate certain key platform features or functions of our business. Additionally, we rely on third-party computer hardware and cloud capabilities in order to deliver our solutions and services. Our business is dependent on the integrity, security and efficient operation of this technology and infrastructure, and we do not necessarily control the operation or data security of the third parties we utilize.
Moreover, to the extent that we do not effectively address capacity constraints, upgrade our systems as needed, and continually develop our technology and network architecture to accommodate actual and anticipated changes in technology, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected. TheFor example, the provisioning of additional cloud hosting capacity requires lead time. These third parties have no obligation to renew their agreements with us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If these third parties increase pricing terms, terminate or seek to terminate our contractual relationship, establish more favorable relationships with our competitors, or change or interpret their terms of service or policies in a manner that is unfavorable with respect to us, we may be required to (among other possible consequences) transfer to other cloud providers or invest in a private cloud. In that case, we could incur significant costs and experience possible service interruption in connection with doing so, or risk loss of customer contracts if they are unwilling to accept such a change.
We depend on third parties for certain operational services and components of our products in order to fully perform under our contracts, and the failure or disruption of a third party to perform these services or provide these goods could have an adverse impact on our business.
We rely on subcontractors and other suppliers (or contracting parties) to provide materials, major components and subsystems for our products or to perform a portion of the services that we provide to our customers. Occasionally,A wefailure rely on only one or two sources of supply, which, if disrupted, could have an adverse effect on our ability to meet our commitments to customers. We depend on these subcontractors and suppliers to fulfill their contractual obligations in a timely and satisfactory manner in full compliance with customer requirements. Ifby one or more of our suppliers or subcontractorscontracting is unableparties to satisfactorilyprovide provideagreed-upon materials, components or products, or perform agreed-upon services, on a timely basis theand agreed-uponin suppliesa orcost-effective performmanner, themay agreed-uponadversely services per its contractual obligations,affect our ability to perform our obligations as a contractor may beand adversely affected,impact andour weresults mayof be exposed to liability.operations.
Occasionally, we rely on only one or two sources of supply, which, if disrupted, could have an adverse effect on our ability to meet our commitments to customers, and could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
From time to time, we depend on these subcontractors and suppliers to fulfill their contractual obligations in a timely and satisfactory manner in full compliance with customer requirements. If one or more of our subcontractors or suppliers is unable to satisfactorily provide on a timely basis the agreed-upon supplies or perform the agreed-upon services per its contractual obligations, our ability to perform our obligations as a contractor may be adversely affected. Our subcontractors' or suppliers' deficiencies can result in a customer terminating our contract for default, and we may be exposed to liability. Additionally, we could experience cost overruns and delays in contract performance, both of which would negatively impact our business and results of operations.
We generated 73.3% of our 2025 revenues from fixed-price contracts. Under fixed-price contracts, we receive a fixed price irrespective of the actual costs we incur, and consequently, we carry the burden of any cost overruns. Fixed-price contracts require us to price our contracts by predicting our expenditures in advance. Due to their nature, fixed-price contracts inherently have more risk, particularly fixed-price development contracts where the costs to complete the development stage of the program can be highly variable, uncertain and difficult to estimate.
Generally, our customer contracts are either firm-fixed-price ("FFP") or cost-reimbursable. Under FFP contracts, which represented approximately 75% of our 2024 revenues, we receive a fixed price irrespective of the actual costs we incur, and consequently, we carry the burden of any cost overruns. Due to their nature, fixed-price contracts inherently have more risk than cost-reimbursable contracts, particularly fixed-price development contracts where the costs to complete the development stage of the program can be highly variable, uncertain and difficult to estimate. Under cost-reimbursable contracts, subject to a contract-ceiling amount in certain cases, we are reimbursed for allowable costs and paid a fee, which may be fixed or performance-based. In certain cases, cost-reimbursable contracts have a contract ceiling. If our costs exceed the contract ceiling and are not authorized by the customer or are not allowable under the contract or applicable regulations, we may not be able to obtain reimbursement for all such costs and our fees may be reduced or eliminated. In addition, because many of our contracts involve advanced designs and innovative technologies, we may experience unforeseen technological difficulties and cost overruns.
Under both types of contracts, we must accurately estimate the likely volume of work that will occur, costs and resource requirements involved, and assess the probability of completing individual transactions or milestones within the contracted time period and amount to maximize or earn profit on these contracts. In addition,Further, some of our contracts have provisions relating to cost controls and audit rights, and if we fail to meet the terms specified in thosethese contracts, we may notincur realizeadditional theircosts fullor benefits.penalties. Cost overruns or poor cost controls could lower earnings, or may incur a net loss on a contract, and cause a negative impact on our results of operations.
In addition, some of our contracts are under a time-and-material basis. While this type of contracts is generally subject to less uncertainty than fixed-price contracts, to the extent that our actual labor costs are higher than the contract rates, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.
Although sales to a new customer have often led to additional sales to the same customer or similarly situated customers, it is uncertain if we will achieve the same penetration and organic growth in the future, and our reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations could be negatively impacted. As we expand into and within new and emerging markets and heavily regulated industry verticals, we will likely face additional regulatory scrutiny, risks, and burdens from the governments and agencies that regulate those markets and industries.
Moreover, our revenues and operating results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated if these partner organizations chose to offer directly to the customers solutions or services of the type that we provide.
IfWe werely are unable to licenseon third-party technology that is used in our products and services to perform key functions,functions. If we are unable to license third-party technology or the losstechnology couldis havesubject to a security breach, without an adversealternative, effectit onmay negatively impact our revenues.business and results of operations.
In addition, our business is dependent on the integrity, security and efficient operation of the third-party technology, and we do not necessarily control the operations or data security of the third-party providers we utilize. Our systems and operations or those of our third-party providers and partners could be exposed to damage, interruption, security breach and other risks from, among other things, computer viruses, other malicious software, and other cyberattacks. The vulnerability of the technology to security breaches, failure of these systems to perform as designed, or inability to find suitable alternatives could result in significant disruptions to our operations and subject us to losses, liability or costs to remediate any of these system failures.
From time to time, we change our pricing modelmodels in response to competition, global economic conditions, and general reductions in our customers' spending levels, pricing studies, or changes in how our solutions are broadly consumed. Similarly, as we introduce new products and services, or as a result of the evolution of our existing solutions and services, we may have difficulty determining the appropriate price structure for our products and services. Further, as new and existing competitors introduce new products or services that compete with ours, or revise their pricing structures, we may be unable to attract new customers at the same price or based on the same pricing model as we have used historically. Moreover, as we continue to target selling our solutions and services to larger organizations, these larger organizations may demand substantial price concessions. We may also need to change pricing policies to accommodate government pricing guidelines for our contracts with federal, state, local,and local governments, and foreign governments and government agencies.governments.
Artificial Intelligence ("AI") is an emerging technology and we may not be successful in our AI initiatives.
The field of AI is characterized by rapid technological advancements and is subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Our future success may be dependent, in part, on our ability to develop, integrate, and effectively utilize AI technologies in our solutions or offerings. Given that this is a new and complex technology, we may face challenges related to the designing, developing, and implementing AI processes and procedures. There are significant risks involved in using AI and no assurances can be provided that our use of AI will enhance our products or services, produce the intended results or keep pace with the use of AI by our competitors. For example, AI algorithms may be flawed, insufficient, of poor quality, rely upon incorrect or inaccurate data, reflect unwanted forms of bias, or contain other errors or inadequacies, any of which may not be easily detectable; AI has been known to produce false or “hallucinatory” inferences or outputs; our use of AI can present ethical issues and may subject us to new or heightened legal, regulatory, ethical, or other challenges; and inappropriate or controversial data practices by developers and end-users, or other factors adversely affecting public opinion of AI, could impair the acceptance of AI solutions, including those incorporated in our products and services. Further, this technology is subject to evolving industry standards and regulatory constraints. Failures to effectively address these risks and uncertainties may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Recently, we launched Xacta.ai, the artificial intelligence capability at the core of our Xacta platform. The use of AI in our solutions may carry considerable risk, and we cannot guarantee the achievement of the intended outcome. The use of AI technologies involves issues associated with intellectual property, data privacy and security, consumer protection and equal opportunity laws. Given the nature of AI technology, we may face significant competition from other companies and evolving regulatory landscape. Our AI efforts may not be successful and our competitors may incorporate AI into their products or services more successfully than us. Further, AI-related changes to our products and services may affect our customers' expectation or requirements in ways we cannot adequately anticipate or adapt to; and may result to unsatisfied customers or inability to operate profitably and sustainably.
Sales to customers outside the United States expose us to risks inherent in international operations.
We sell our services outside the United States and are subject to unique risks and challenges associated with international business. These risks and challenges include, but are not limited to, (a) compliance with governmental laws and regulations, (b) foreign business practices, (c) tax environments, (d) protection of our intellectual property, and (e) regional economic and geopolitical conditions.
Although our international operations have historically generated a small proportion of our revenues, any of these factors could negatively impact our business and results of operations. In addition, these factors may also negatively impact our ability to successfully expand into emerging market countries, where we have little or no operating experience, where it can be costly and challenging to establish and maintain operations, including hiring and managing required personnel, and difficult to promote our brand, and where we may not benefit from any first-to-market advantage or otherwise succeed.
From time to time, in the ordinary course of business, we haveare beensubject involvedto ina variety of legal proceedings and, in the future, may be subject to lawsuits, claims, government investigations and other proceedings. These may include lawsuits and claims related to securities compliance, contracts, subcontracts, intellectual property, employment and wage claims, and other matters. Our business may be adversely affected by the outcome of legal proceedings and other contingencies that cannot be predicted with certainty. Those contingencies include, but are not limited to, the cost of litigation and unpredictable court decisions. Adverse outcomes with respect to litigation, or a government inquiry, or any of these legal proceedings may result in significant settlement costs or judgments, penalties and fines, or harm our reputation, all of which could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial conditions.
We have in the past acquired, and may in the future seek to acquire or invest inin, complementary businesses, products or technologies to enhance our technical capabilities or otherwise capture growth opportunities.
Our long-term strategy may include identifying and acquiring, partnering with, investing in or merging with suitable candidates on acceptable terms, or divesting of certain business lines or activities. Partnerships, mergers, joint ventures, acquisitions, and divestitures include a number of risks and present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including but not limited to: diversion of management attention from running our existing business; possible material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting; increased expenses, including legal, administrative and compensation expenses related to newly hired or terminated employees; increased costs to integrate the technology, personnel, customer base and business practices of the acquired company with us; potential exposure to material liabilities not discovered in the due diligence process; potential adverse effects on reported operating results due to possible write-down of goodwill and other intangible assets associated with acquisitions; and unavailability of acquisition financing or unavailability of such financing on reasonable terms.
•Diversion of management attention from running our existing business;
•Possible material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting;
•Increased expenses, including legal, administrative and compensation expenses related to newly hired or terminated employees;
•Increased costs to integrate the technology, personnel, customer base and business practices of the acquired company with us;
•Potential exposure to material liabilities not discovered in the due diligence process;
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Other Economic and Regulatory Policies”
New heading “Stock-Based Compensation”
Removed heading “Cybersecurity Landscape”
Removed heading “Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS”
Removed heading “Adjusted Gross Profit, Cash Gross Profit, Adjusted Gross Margin and Cash Gross Margin”
Removed heading “Other Financing Obligations”
Largest changes
“Artificial Intelligence: AI is set to play a critical role in cybersecurity. Cybercriminals are using AI to launch more sophisticated attacks that can quickly adapt to changing environments, making detection harder. AI's advanced data analysis capabilities are increasingly used for defensive measures over time. To protect against AI-powered cyberattacks, organizations must stay vigilant and adopt advanced cybersecurity tools and techniques that can detect and respond to these threats in a timely manner before they cause damage. …”see in full comparison
“Adjusted Gross Profit, Cash Gross Profit, Adjusted Gross Margin and Cash Gross Margin are supplemental measures of operating and cash flow performance that are not made under GAAP and do not represent, and should not be considered as alternatives to gross profit and gross margin as determined by GAAP. We define Adjusted Gross Profit as gross profit, plus stock-based compensation expense, impairment loss on intangible assets, and restructuring expenses charged under cost of sales. We define Adjusted Gross Margin as Adjusted Gross Profit as a percentage of total revenue. …”see in full comparison
“Adjusted Net (Loss) Income and Adjusted EPS are supplemental measures of operating and cash flow performance that are not made under GAAP and do not represent, and should not be considered as alternatives to, net (loss) income and earnings per share as determined by GAAP. We define Adjusted Net (Loss) Income as net (loss) income, adjusted for non-operating (income) expense, stock-based compensation expense, impairment loss on intangible assets, and restructuring expenses (adjustments). …”see in full comparison
see in full comparisonOperatingResearchExpenses:andOperatingdevelopment ("R&D") expenses decreased by3%$1.4 million, or 16.4% in2024,2025, compared to2023.2024.ResearchThisand development expenses decreased by $3.3 million in 2024, compared to 2023, primarilywas due to a $2.2 million reduction in amortization costs from the discontinued development of selected solutions or parts of solutions associated with the restructuring planand lower stock-based compensation expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $5.5 millionin2024,2024.comparedThistoreduction2023, primarily due to decreased cash incentive compensation expenses. These reductions werewas partially offset by an increase of $1.4 million inimpairmentstock-basedlosscompensation.onR&Dintangiblerestructuringassetsexpensesofwere$5.9approximatelymillion.flat year-over-year. The remaining R&D expenses decreased by $0.6 million due to the restructuring effort in 2024 and ongoing disciplined cost management Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses increased by $3.4 million, or 4.6%, in 2025, compared to 2024, due to a $7.6 million increase in stock-based compensation costs and $0.1 million increase in restructuring expenses. SG&A depreciation and amortization expenses were approximately flat year-over-year. These increases were partially offset by a $4.2 million reduction in the remaining SG&A expenses due to the 2024 restructuring effort and ongoing disciplined cost management.
“Rising Threats, Rising Liability: Ransomware remains arguably the most severe cyber threat to enterprises in the commercial, state, and local government and education sectors. Phishing is one of the top distribution channels for ransomware. Modern phishing attacks have become adept at bypassing traditional security measures, using more personalized and technically advanced tactics to deceive users. …”see in full comparison
“Goodwill is not amortized, but rather tested for potential impairment as of December 31 each year. The goodwill impairment test is performed at the reporting unit level. Accounting requirements provide that a reporting entity may perform an optional qualitative assessment on an annual basis to determine whether events occurred or circumstances changed that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (107)
For an overview of our business, including our business segments and a discussion of the services and products we provide, see Item 1, "Business" ofin thisPart 10-K.I Additional information regarding our segments is also presented inand Note 1816 – Segment Information of the notes to the consolidated financial statements atcontained Item 8 ofwithin this 10-K.
As discussed under Item 1A, "Risk Factors," we derive a substantial portion of our revenues from contracts and subcontracts with the U.S. federal government. Our revenues are generated from a number of contract vehiclesvehicle and task orders. The U.S. federal government has increasingly relied on contracts that are subject to a competitive bidding process (including IDIQ,BPA GSAand schedules,IDIQ OTA,Task Orders, OTAs, and other multi-awardGSA contractsschedule solicitations), resulting in greater competition and increased pricing pressure. We expect that a majority of the business that we seek in the foreseeable future will be awarded through a competitive bidding process.
Over the past several years we have sought to diversify and improve our operating margins through the evolution of our business from an emphasis on product reselling to that of an advanced solutions technologies provider. Although we continue to offer resold products through our contract vehicles or our prime partners' contracts, we have focused on the transformation and growth on sellingof our software and service solutions,solutions offerings, as well as designingthe design and deliveringdelivery Telosof our manufactured and branded technologies. We believeemphasize ourleveraging contracttechnology portfolioand isinnovation, characterizedspecifically asin havingcybersecurity, lowcloud, and identity solutions, to moderatedrive financialgrowth riskand dueensure a secure and defendable network. We continue to theinvest limited number of long-term fixed-price development contracts. Our firm-fixed-price activities consist primarily of contracts for productsin and servicesdevelop atin establishedAI contractintegration, prices.enhancing For 2024automation and 2023,improving theexisting Company'ssolutions revenueto derivedmaintain froma firm-fixed-pricecompetitive contracts was 75% and 79%, respectively; time-and-material contracts was 15% and 9%, respectively; and cost-plus contracts revenue was 10% and 12%, respectively.edge.
We believe our contract portfolio reflects low to moderate financial risk due to the limited number of long-term fixed-price development contracts, thus minimizing the risk of cost overruns. Our firm-fixed-price activities consist primarily of contracts for products and services at established contract prices that are designed to be repeatable solution offerings. For 2025 and 2024, the Company's revenue derived from firm-fixed-price contracts was 73.3% and 75.3%, respectively; time-and-material contract revenue was 21.8% and 14.6%, respectively; and cost-plus contract revenue was 4.9% and 10.1%, respectively.
Our business performance is affected by the overall level of U.S. government spending and the alignment of our offerings and capabilities with the budget priorities of the U.S. government. Approximately 88% of our revenues were generated from U.S. government agencies in fiscal year 2024. In addition, our overall performance depends, in part, on global economic and geopolitical conditions. Adverse changes in fiscal and economic conditions could materially impact our business. Some changes that could adversely impact our business include the implementation of future spending reductions, government shutdown and supply chain challenges. Despite the budget and competitive pressure affecting the industry, we believe we are well-positioned to expand existing customer relationships and benefit from opportunities that we have not previously pursued.
U.S. Federal Government Budget
In fiscal year ("FY") 2025, we generated approximately 91.0% of our revenues from the U.S. federal government, either as prime contractor or a subcontractor to other contractors engaged in work for the U.S. federal government, including 58.1% of our revenue from the DoW. Accordingly, our business performance is affected by the overall level of U.S. federal government spending and the alignment of our offerings and capabilities with current and future budget priorities of the U.S. federal government.
While we view the budget environment as constructive and believe there is bipartisan support for continued investment in the areas of defense and national security, it is uncertain when (and if) in any particular government fiscal year appropriations bills will be passed. During those periods of time when appropriations bills have not been passed and signed into law, U.S. federal government agencies operate under a continuing resolution ("CR"), a temporary measure that allows the government to continue operations at prior year funding levels.
The FY2025 U.S. federal government appropriations, which ran through September 30, 2025, were determined by a full-year CR. While the Administration has submitted its FY2026 budget proposal outlining its priorities, partisan disagreements over federal spending levels, among other things, have stalled progress on the required appropriations bills. Recently, on February 3, 2026, Congress passed another full-year CR for FY2026 to end the partial government shutdown. This enacted bill provides full-year funding for several programs, including defense and national security, through September 30, 2026; and also extended homeland security funding through February 13, 2026. A partial government shutdown began on February 14, 2026 after the lawmakers and the White House failed to reach a deal on legislation to fund DHS through September 2026. The impasse affects agencies such as the Transportation Security Administration, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Coast Guard, the Secret Service, U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Congress approved a FY2026 Defense Appropriations Bill that provides $838.7 billion in discretionary funding, including $838.5 billion in defense funding and $180 million in nondefense funding. This funding prioritizes restoring military strength, accelerating modernization, and supporting personnel through pay raises. This bill moves in parallel with the National Defense Authorization Act ("NDAA"), signed in December 2025, which authorizes up to approximately $900.6 billion for national defense.
The federal government's cybersecurity and IT spending priorities for fiscal years 2025 and 2026 present both significant opportunities and notable risks for our suite of security solutions. The FY2026 NDAA authorizes approximately $15.1 billion for DoW cyber activities, representing a 4.1% increase. The FY2026 NDAA emphasizes securing the defense industrial base, accelerating artificial intelligence ("AI") integration, and harmonizing cybersecurity requirements. This increase directly aligns with our core offerings in cyber risk management (e.g., Xacta).
Further, the FY2026 budget for AI reflects a massive strategic shift toward implementation and national dominance, particularly within the defense sector. FY26 is viewed as the year federal agencies move from experimenting with AI to adopting "agentic" AI. The FY26 budget request included a record-breaking $13.4 billion for AI and autonomy initiatives within the DoW, the largest single-year investment in the agency's history. Consistent with these initiatives, in October 2025, we launched Xacta.ai, which we believe will reduce cyber compliance timelines through AI-driven automation.
The federal government cybersecurity and AI-related initiatives continue to evolve and may be influenced by changes in Administration policy, legislative action and regulatory developments. These changes may affect funding allocations, procurement strategies and compliance expectations. While management continues to monitor the federal government's initiatives and seeks to align the Company's capabilities accordingly, there can be no assurance that the future government priorities will not impose new compliance obligations, or technological advancements that will require for additional investment or affect the Company's ability to compete for or perform under government contracts.
Other Economic and Regulatory Policies
Aside from the uncertainty in the budgetary environment, the Administration put in place a number of Executive Orders and actions that have affected, and could continue to affect, many businesses. The Administration continuously evaluates federal agencies and existing government contracts, grants, and programs for affordability, efficiency, and alignment with U.S. federal government priorities. Further, the Administration continues ever-changing actions that increase, invoke new and/or rescind tariffs on various goods imported from various countries. Changes in international trade policies, including higher tariffs on imported goods and materials, may increase the procurement costs of certain IT hardware we use internally, on our contracts, or sell to our customers.
The ongoing and potential future reforms to the U.S. federal government processes, including changes to procurement rules and regulations, could transform how contracts are awarded, negotiated, and managed. These initiatives could further delay contract awards and/or result in modifications to the scope or terms of contracts we hold. At the same time, the Administration's focus on efficiency, transparency, consolidation, and accountability could lead to certain traditionally government functions being transferred to private entities. This potential transition of services to the private sector could benefit Telos, given our wide array of capabilities and advanced solutions.
On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was enacted into law. The OBBBA includes significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code, with various provisions changing the U.S. federal income tax regulations and modifications to the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. Further, the OBBBA significantly impacts the defense sector through substantial funding allocations and strategic investments, including specific investments in areas like AI, and provides the DoW with extended time, until 2029, to make strategic investments in the defense industrial base. Increased funding and improved tax treatment for research and development could boost targeted defense investments, scale commercial technologies for military use, and support related programs.
We continue to monitor and assess the risks and opportunities presented to us, in light of ongoing political tensions and heightened global instability that we expect to persist in the near term. Initiatives to reduce governmental spending, federal budget and debt ceiling action, and U.S. federal government policy positions, including trade policy, tax reform and/or changes to the U.S. federal government priorities, could materially impact federal spending broadly.
In March 2024, the U.S. President proposed the annual appropriations for Fiscal Year ("FY") 2025 to fit within the tight caps set as part of the prior year's debt ceiling agreements. The FY2025 budget request included $850 billion for the DoD base budget, in alignment with levels agreed to in the Fiscal Responsibility Act ("FRA") of 2023. This proposed budget will enable the DoD to make the investments necessary to execute the Administrations' 2022 National Security Strategy and 2022 National Defense Strategy. The President's FY2025 budget also proposed several increases for new, key cyber programs and initiatives. For FY2025, the White House had directed agencies to prioritize cyber investments in "secure by design" technologies and the modernization of legacy technology. In the wake of the President's Executive Order ("EO") on artificial intelligence last fall, the 2025 budget proposal includes plenty of AI-related spending, much of which intersects with cybersecurity and AI safety.
Congress was unable to enact any of its annual appropriations bills before the start of FY2025, which began on October 1, 2024. Instead, on December 20, 2024, the U.S. House and Senate passed a second Continuing Resolution ("CR") to extend federal spending and avert a government shutdown through March 14, 2025. The CR keeps the government operating at FY2024 funding levels, and ensures the federal government can receive adequate funding to operate for the duration of the CR. The current CR provides $888 billion in base defense funding for 2025, an amount exceeding the $850 billion cap on such funding established under the FRA. As of January 6, 2025, $12 billion in Defense funding was designated as an emergency requirement, and is not constrained by the caps established by the FRA.
Appropriators in both chambers had been hoping to at least reach a topline spending agreement, but the momentum for a deal was derailed after the new Administration issued a slew of EOs since inauguration, including an order to freeze funding on several federal programs. While the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency ("CISA") is viewed as vital for national security purposes and its programs will still continue, the new Administration has sworn to reduce the size and scope of CISA.
Of note, the CR did not address the federal debt ceiling, which is the limit that Congress imposes on the federal budget for authorized spending. In January 2025, the federal debt limit was reinstated at $36.1 trillion to accommodate borrowing since its suspension through FRA. Until Congress acts to modify the limit, the Treasury Department relies on the available cash on hand and invoked authorities to use extraordinary measures to continue paying its debt obligations, without jeopardizing the "full faith and credit" of the U.S. government.
While there is no clear path to approval of the FY2025 budget, failure to do so poses uncertainty about actual funding and will impact federal customers' ability to move forward on their planned expenditures in FY2025.
Cybersecurity Landscape
The scope of cybersecurity is on the cusp of transformative changes. Cyber threats are not just escalating in frequency but are also becoming more sophisticated, thus challenging traditional security standards. In this rapidly evolving cybersecurity landscape, the need for vigilant defense is vital, and cybersecurity is a priority for organizations to mitigate their risk and keep safe from threats and exploitation. Understanding the threat environment and the impending trends (both current and future) is a matter of foresight and is crucial in designing effective security strategies. The DoD continues to invest in cybersecurity programs to protect the nation from malicious cyber actors and cyber campaigns. These investments strengthen cyber protection standards for the defense industrial base and cybersecurity of DoD networks. With this growing threat, below are some trends to consider when looking at the cybersecurity landscape:
Emerging Cyber and Counterintelligence Threats: The proposed FY2025 budget expands the Department of Justice’s ("DOJ") ability to pursue threats through investments in the FBI’s cyber and counterintelligence investigative capabilities. These investments sustain the FBI’s cyber intelligence, counterintelligence, and analysis capabilities and include funding to enhance those cyber response and counterintelligence capabilities. The budget also includes funding to expand a new section within the DOJ’s National Security Division to focus on cyber threats. These investments align with the National Cybersecurity Strategy that emphasizes a whole-of-nation approach to addressing ongoing cyber threats. Finally, the budget also provides for the DOJ to support the implementation of Executive Order 14110, “Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence.”
Rising Threats, Rising Liability: Ransomware remains arguably the most severe cyber threat to enterprises in the commercial, state, and local government and education sectors. Phishing is one of the top distribution channels for ransomware. Modern phishing attacks have become adept at bypassing traditional security measures, using more personalized and technically advanced tactics to deceive users. One reason for the rise of ransomware attacks is that it is exceedingly profitable for cybercriminals, and ransomware victims generally settle the ransom rather than restoring the system from backups or dealing with the fallout from a data breach. Aside from the financial costs of paying the ransom and restoring the system, the consequences of a successful ransomware attack can include damage to the organization's reputation, stolen sensitive data being used for malicious purposes, and loss of business.
The Nation's Critical Systems Are Still at Risk: Critical infrastructure and industrial IoT are among the categories at greatest risk of cyberattacks. The IoT continues its rapid growth, interconnecting an increasing number of devices. However, this expansion brings with it a host of security challenges. The wide range of IoT devices make them attractive targets for cyberattacks, and their interrelated nature can lead to pervasive vulnerabilities.
Navigating a Changing Regulatory Landscape and Compliance: The regulatory landscape governing cybersecurity is developing swiftly. Over time, the government mandates stronger security in highly regulated industries. These government initiatives and audit fatigue continue to burden highly regulated organizations, with automation solutions recognized as the most effective remedy for the many repetitive and redundant tasks that security compliance requires.
Additionally, the SEC adopted new rules on cybersecurity risk management, strategy, governance and incident disclosure by public companies. The required reporting of this information leads many companies to proactively establish policies that will improve their cyber risk management posture and enable them to better withstand heightened public and regulatory scrutiny.
Identity Assurance and Privacy Protection are Essential for Today's Enterprises: Identity and access management continue to be a major cybersecurity concern for organizations and individuals that need to ensure their security and protect their privacy. Trusted identities are essential to confidence in IT and physical security strategies and to the success of Zero Trust security models and architectures. The shift to a Zero Trust framework represents a fundamental change in approach to cybersecurity, focusing on identity and access management, continuous monitoring and robust authentication mechanisms to establish a secure digital environment.
Enhancing Identity Security: The shift towards biometric authentication methods is redesigning identity verification in the digital domain. Integrating biometrics with multi-factor authentication can provide a robust defense against unauthorized access.
Artificial Intelligence: AI is set to play a critical role in cybersecurity. Cybercriminals are using AI to launch more sophisticated attacks that can quickly adapt to changing environments, making detection harder. AI's advanced data analysis capabilities are increasingly used for defensive measures over time. To protect against AI-powered cyberattacks, organizations must stay vigilant and adopt advanced cybersecurity tools and techniques that can detect and respond to these threats in a timely manner before they cause damage. The proposed FY2025 budget provides $455 million to extend the frontiers of AI for science and technology and to increase AI’s safety, security, and resilience. These investments enhance the DoD’s computing capabilities and support the development of AI testbeds to build foundation models for energy security, national security, and climate resilience as well as tools to evaluate AI capabilities to generate outputs that may represent nuclear, nonproliferation, biological, chemical, critical-infrastructure, and energy security threats or hazards.
The primary financial performance measures we use to manage our business and monitor results of operations are revenue, gross profit, cash flow, and Adjusted EBITDA.EBITDA (a non-GAAP financial measure). We evaluate our results of operations by considering the drivers causing changes in these measures. We evaluate significant trends and fluctuations in our contract portfolio over time due to contract awards and completions, changes in customer requirements and changes in the volume of product and software sales.
Total backlog consists of the aggregate contract revenues remaining to be earned by us at a given time over the life of our contracts, whether funded or unfunded. Funded backlog consists of the aggregate contract revenues remaining to be earned at a given time, which, in the case of U.S. federal government contracts, means that they have been funded by the procuring agency. Unfunded backlog is the difference between total backlog and funded backlog and includes potential revenues that may be earned if customers exercise delivery orders and/or renewal options to continue these contracts.
Increases in backlog is a result of the award of new contracts and the renewal or extension of existing contracts. Reductions in backlog arise from the completioncompletion, modification, de-obligation, or the early termination of contracts. See the relevant industry, legal and regulatory risks under Item 1A, "Risk Factors,Factors" of this 10-K. We believe that comparisons of backlog period-to-period are difficult. We also believe that it is difficult to predict future revenue solely based on analysis of backlog. The actual timing of revenue from projects included in backlog will vary.
ASeveral numberkey highlights of factorsour havefinancial affectedperformance ourin fiscal year 20242025 results,are the most significant of which we have listeddescribed below. More details on these changes are presented below withinin our "Results of Operations" section.section below.
•Revenue increased 52.2% year-over-year due to 94.9% growth in Security Solutions, primarily due to the expansion of large programs in Telos ID.
•Gross margin expanded 523 basis points year-over-year.
•Operating expenses increased by $10.6 million, or 11.7%, year-over-year due to an $8.9 million increase in stock-based compensation, an $8.5 million increase in impairment loss and a $0.1 million increase in restructuring expenses. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $6.9 million, or 11.1%, of the remaining operating expenses due to the restructuring efforts undertaken in the third quarter of 2024 and ongoing disciplined cost management.
•Cash flow from operations improved by $56.1 million year-over-year from a $25.9 million outflow to a $30.2 million inflow, or 18.3% of revenue due to improved revenue and profitability, as well as improved working capital management.
•We deployed $13.6 million to repurchase approximately 3.1 million shares of our common stock at an average share price of $4.38 per share.
•The decline in year-over-year revenue was primarily driven by the successful completion of certain programs and ramp-down of programs in Secure Networks without corresponding new business wins to backfill completed programs.
•Growth in TSA PreCheck revenue partially offset the year-over-year revenue decline and was driven by the increase in our enrollment locations and a full year of renewal operations as compared to only a partial year in fiscal year 2023.
•The reduction in gross margin was mainly driven by the impact of an impairment loss on intangible assets of $5.3 million and higher amortization of software development costs. This was partially offset by a more favorable program mix.
•The assessment of our cost structure and investment priorities in fiscal year 2024 led to restructuring actions and the discontinued development and/or sale of selected solutions or parts of solutions that were not generating acceptable returns. These initiatives resulted in a $1.3 million restructuring charge and a $11.7 million of non-cash impairment of software development costs.
•Lower year-over-year gross profit was partially offset by reduced operating expenses.
Our business segments have different factors driving revenue fluctuations and profitability. TheA discussion of the changes in our net revenue and profitability is covered in greater detail under the section that follows: "Segment Results." We generate revenue from the delivery of products and services to our customers. Cost of sales, for both products and services, consists of labor, materials, subcontracting costs and an allocation of indirect costs.
Operating Expenses: Operating expenses increased by $10.6 million or 11.7% in 2025, compared to 2024. A goodwill impairment of $14.9 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2025 associated with our Secure Networks reporting unit (see Note 6 - Goodwill for more information), whereas an impairment loss on intangible assets of $6.4 million was recorded in 2024.
OperatingResearch Expenses:and Operatingdevelopment ("R&D") expenses decreased by 3%$1.4 million, or 16.4% in 2024,2025, compared to 2023.2024. ResearchThis and development expenses decreased by $3.3 million in 2024, compared to 2023, primarilywas due to a $2.2 million reduction in amortization costs from the discontinued development of selected solutions or parts of solutions associated with the restructuring plan and lower stock-based compensation expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $5.5 million in 2024,2024. comparedThis toreduction 2023, primarily due to decreased cash incentive compensation expenses. These reductions werewas partially offset by an increase of $1.4 million in impairmentstock-based losscompensation. onR&D intangiblerestructuring assetsexpenses ofwere $5.9approximately million.flat year-over-year. The remaining R&D expenses decreased by $0.6 million due to the restructuring effort in 2024 and ongoing disciplined cost management Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses increased by $3.4 million, or 4.6%, in 2025, compared to 2024, due to a $7.6 million increase in stock-based compensation costs and $0.1 million increase in restructuring expenses. SG&A depreciation and amortization expenses were approximately flat year-over-year. These increases were partially offset by a $4.2 million reduction in the remaining SG&A expenses due to the 2024 restructuring effort and ongoing disciplined cost management.
Other income: Other income decreased by 19.8% in 2025, compared to 2024, primarily due to the change in dividend income from money market placements, partially offset by the gain on fair value adjustment of an investment and the one-time tax refund recorded in the fourth quarter of 2025.
Other income: Other income decreased by 40% in 2024, compared to 2023, primarily due to the gain on early extinguishment of other financing obligation of $1.4 million in 2023, without a similar gain in 2024. The remaining variance is attributable to decreased dividend income from money market placements.
Security Solutions segment revenue decreased by 1% in 2024, compared to 2023, primarily due to the reduction in revenue from a long-term program, the completion of a short-term program in the prior year and the sale of a non-recurring perpetual license in the prior year, partially offset by the growth in the TSA PreCheck program.
Security Solutions segment gross profit decreased by 30% in 2024, compared to 2023, and gross margin decreased from 51.2% in 2023 to 36.1% in 2024, primarily due to the impairment loss on intangible assets in 2024, higher amortization of software development costs, and program mix within the portfolio.
SecureSecurity NetworksSolutions segment revenue decreasedincreased by 54%94.9% in 2024,2025, compared to 2023,2024, primarily due to the successful completionexpansion of certainmultiple large programs andin ramp-downTelos of certain programs without corresponding new business wins to backfill completed programs.ID.
Security Solutions segment gross profit increased by 108.0% in 2025, compared to 2024, primarily due to higher segment revenue and higher segment gross margin.
Security Solutions segment gross margin increased from 36.1% in 2024 to 38.5% in 2025, primarily due to the impairment loss on intangible assets in 2024 and the lower impact of depreciation and amortization expense on higher revenue. As expected, segment gross margin, excluding the impact of depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, restructuring expenses, and impairment on intangible assets, is down year-over-year due to revenue mix and higher non-cash infrastructure costs.
Secure Networks segment revenue decreased by 51.7% in 2025, compared to 2024, primarily due to the ramp down of several programs within the portfolio without corresponding new business wins to backfill completed programs.
Secure Networks segment gross profit decreased by 49%48.8% in 2024,2025, compared to 2023, primarily2024, due to lower revenues. By contrast, the segment gross margin increased from 19.6% in 2023 to 21.4% in 2024, primarily due to a favorable program mix and strong program management.revenues.
By contrast, the Secure Networks segment gross margin increased from 21.4% in 2024 to 22.7% in 2025, primarily due to program mix. Segment gross margin, excluding the impact of depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, and restructuring expenses, is also up year-over-year due to revenue mix.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
There were no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed under "Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Overview and Business Environment”
New heading “Operating Expenses”
New heading “Three Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Three Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”
Largest changes
“Three Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
“Three Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
“Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
“Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
“For the six months ended June 30, 2026, operating expenses decreased by $10.7 million, or 24.9%, compared with the same period in 2025. R&D expenses slightly declined by $0.4 million, or 12.4%, in the first half of 2026, compared to the same period in 2025. SG&A expenses decreased by $10.3 million, or 25.9%, in the first half of 2026, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to lower stock-based compensation expenses. Reductions in SG&A expenses, other than stock-based compensation, were due to ongoing cost discipline and restructuring. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (37)
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "expects," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Several important factors could cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. These factors include, without limitation, those set forth in the risk factors section included in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, as filed with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC on March 16, 2026.
Overview and Business Environment
Telos Corporation empowers and protects the world’s most security-conscious organizations with efficient, adaptable, and secure solutions that safeguard people, systems, and information. We deliver advanced capabilities across cyber governance, risk, and compliance ("GRC") with Xacta®; identity and biometric solutions; secure networks and communications; and TSA PreCheck® enrollment services. Our primary customers include the U.S. federal government, large commercial organizations, state and local governments, and global enterprises. Telos helps customers stay ahead of evolving threats, accelerate compliance, and achieve mission success. Driven by purpose and guided by our core values, we build trusted partnerships, deliver superior solutions, and help create a more secure, interconnected world.
Recently,In the fourth quarter of FY2025, Telos launched Xacta.aiTM, the artificial intelligence ("AI") capability at the core of the Xacta cyber GRC platform, dramatically reducing compliance time and effort. Xacta.ai delivers expert-level guidance and real-time insights, empowering organizations to move from reactive compliance to proactive risk management.
Our consolidated revenue is largely attributable to prime contracts or to subcontracts with prime contractors engaged in work for the U.S. federal government, with the remaining revenue attributable to state and local governments, and commercial markets. We generated approximately 93%92% and 89%90% of our total revenues from contracts with U.S. government agencies in the first quarterhalf of fiscal year ("FY") 2026 and 2025, respectively. Our business performance is affected by the overall level of U.S. government spending and the alignment of our offerings and capabilities with the budget priorities of the U.S. government. While certain administration priorities, such as cybersecurity, national security and AI, present greater opportunity for our products and services, turmoil within the federal government, including personnel and leadership turnover and budgetary uncertainty, has had the effect of lengthening our sales cycle in certain cases. We continuously monitor U.S. federal budget, legislative, and contracting trends and activities, and align our capabilities in response to these developments.
Our business performance is affected by the overall level of U.S. government spending and the alignment of our offerings and capabilities with the budget priorities of the U.S. government. While certain administration priorities, such as cybersecurity, national security and AI, present greater opportunity for our products and services, turmoil within the federal government, including personnel and leadership turnover and budgetary uncertainty, has had the effect of lengthening our sales cycle in certain cases. We continuously monitor U.S. federal budget, legislative, and contracting trends and activities, and align our capabilities in response to these developments.
During the currentfirst quarter,half of FY2026, the global economy has continued to experience volatility arising from geopolitical developments and broader economic and financial factors, specifically including the ongoing conflict in Iran and the Middle East. This volatility has resulted in, and may be expected to continue to result in, rising energy prices, supply chain disruptions, and inflationary pressures, among other consequences. However, in part due to the importance of our offerings to our customers, the type of solutions we provide, and the nature of our largest customers, to date our business has not been materially impacted by these consequences. If global volatility continues to increase and the conflict in the Middle East is prolonged or intensifies, the economic uncertainty inherent in such global instability may affect our results of operations. Management continues to monitor this evolving geopolitical situation.
Several key highlights of our financial performance in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 are described below. More details are presented in our "Results of Operations" section.
•Net income expanded by $10.6$10.2 million, from a net loss of $8.6$9.5 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2025 to a net income of $2.0$0.7 million in the current quarter.
•Cash flow from operations improved by $2.6$1.9 million year-over-yearyear-over-year, increasing from a $6.1$6.9 million inflow in the second quarter of 2025 to an $8.7$8.8 million inflow,inflow orin 18.1%the second quarter of revenue,2026, primarily due to improved revenue and profitability.
•$2.2Deployed $4.7 million was deployed to repurchase approximately 0.51.0 million shares of the Company’sCompany's common stock during the quarter at an average share price of $4.25$4.50 per share.
Our business segments have different factors driving revenue fluctuations and profitability. The discussion of the changes in our revenue and profitability isare covereddiscussed in greater detail in the following section, "Segment Results." We generate revenue from the delivery of products and services to our customers. Cost of sales, for both products and services, consists of labor, materials, subcontracting costs and an allocation of indirect costs.
Operating Expenses
OperatingIn the second quarter of 2026, operating expenses decreased by $5.3$5.4 million, or 24.9%, in the first quarter of 2026, compared to the same periodquarter in 2025. Research and development ("R&D") expenses slightly declineddecreased by $0.2 million, or 13.6%,11.0%, in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, compared to the same period in 2025. Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses decreased by $5.1$5.3 million, or 25.8%,25.9%, in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to lower stock-based compensation expenses. Excluding stock-based compensation, reductionsReductions in R&D and SG&A expensesexpenses, other than stock-based compensation, were due to ongoing cost discipline and restructuring. As a percentage of revenue, overall operating expenses were 33.3%34.3% and 69.3%60.7% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and 2025, respectively.
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, operating expenses decreased by $10.7 million, or 24.9%, compared with the same period in 2025. R&D expenses slightly declined by $0.4 million, or 12.4%, in the first half of 2026, compared to the same period in 2025. SG&A expenses decreased by $10.3 million, or 25.9%, in the first half of 2026, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to lower stock-based compensation expenses. Reductions in SG&A expenses, other than stock-based compensation, were due to ongoing cost discipline and restructuring. As a percentage of revenue, overall operating expenses were 33.8% and 64.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, and 2025, respectively.
Other income
Other income increaseddecreased by 24.2%9.4% in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to changes in dividend income from money market placements. However, other income for the six months ended June 30, 2026, increased by 7.5%, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to the refund in the current quarter2026 of a prior yearprior-year VAT claim that was previously determined to be uncollectible.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2025
For the quarter ended March 31, 2026, the Security Solutions segment revenue for the second quarter of 2026 increased by 78.1%,43.7%, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to the expansion of multiple large programs in Telos ID.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2026, the Security Solutions segment gross profit increased by 52.5%, compared with the same period in 2025, due to higher segment revenues. Segment gross margin decreased from 42.8% in 2025 to 36.7% in 2026, primarily due to revenue mix and higher non-cash infrastructure costs.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2026, the Secure Networks segment revenue decreased by 63.1%, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to the continued ramp down of several programs within the portfolio without corresponding new business wins to backfill completed programs.
ForSecurity the quarter ended March 31, 2026, the Secure Networks segmentSolutions gross profit decreasedfor the second quarter of 2026 increased by 54.4%,46.0%, compared with the same period in 2025, primarily due to lowerhigher revenue.segment Byrevenues. contrast,Likewise, segment gross margin expandedincreased from 23.4%34.8% into 35.4% for the first quarter of 2025 to 28.9% in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, primarilycompared duewith tothe programsame mix.period in 2025.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
Security Solutions segment revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2026, increased by 58.9%, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to the expansion of multiple large programs in Telos ID.
Segment gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2026, increased by 49.2%, compared to the same period in 2025, due to higher segment revenues. By contrast, segment gross margin decreased from 38.4% in 2025 to 36.0% in 2026, primarily due to higher non-cash infrastructure costs.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2025
Secure Networks segment revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2026, decreased by 69.0%, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to the continued ramp down of several programs within the portfolio without corresponding new business wins to backfill completed programs.
Segment gross profit for Secure Networks for the second quarter of 2026, decreased by 69.7%, compared with the same period in 2025, primarily due to lower segment revenues. Likewise, segment gross margin decreased from 18.1% to 17.7% for the second quarter of 2026, compared with the same period in 2025.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
Secure Networks segment revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2026, decreased by 65.6%, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to the continued ramp down of several programs within the portfolio without corresponding new business wins to backfill completed programs.
Segment gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2026, decreased by 59.9%, compared to the same period in 2025, due to lower segment revenues. By contrast, segment gross margin expanded from 21.2% in 2025 to 24.7% in 2026, primarily due to program mix.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of $50.2$50.6 million and our working capital was $58.6$56.2 million.
We place a strong emphasis on liquidity management. This focus gives us the flexibility forto deploy capital deployment while preserving a strong balance sheet to position us for future opportunities. We believe we have adequate funds on hand to execute our financial and operating strategy. Our overall financial position and liquidity are strong. Although no assurances can be given, we believe available cash balances and access to our revolving credit facility and Factoring Agreement are sufficient to maintain the liquidity we require to meet our operating, investing and financing needs for the next 12 months.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was $8.7$17.5 million, an increase of $2.6$4.4 millionmillion, compared to the same period in 2025. The change is attributable to favorable changes in working capital, primarily driven by the timing of receipts from customers, and the timing of payments to vendors, coupled with higher cash earnings (i.e., net income (loss), excluding non-cash items that do not impact cash flows from operating activities)., coupled with the timing of receipts from customers and the timing of payments to vendors.
Net cash used in investing activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, slightly decreased by $0.1$0.2 million, compared to the same period of the prior year, primarily due to the decreases in capital expenditures.expenditures in 2026.
Net cash used in financing activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, increased by $8.8$9.6 million, compared to the same period in 2025. This is primarily attributable to the repurchases of common stock under the share repurchase program (see Note 11 – Share Repurchases) amounting to $2.2 million in the first quarter of 2026 , with no similar activity in 2025, and an increaseincreases in payment of tax withholding related to net share settlement of equity awards byof $6.5$7.6 million in fiscalthe yearfirst 2026.half of 2026, compared with $1.1 million in the same period of 2025, and the repurchase of common stock of $6.9 million in 2026 under the share repurchase program (See Note 12 – Share Repurchases), compared with $4.0 million in 2025.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the amounts reported. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The 2025 Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 16, 2026, includes a summary of the critical accounting policies we believe are the most important to aid in understanding our financial results. There have been no changes to those critical accounting policies that have had a material impact on our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, or expenses during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
TLS insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 12 filings (5 insiders, 13 trade dates, 920,321 shares, about $4.0M). Net open-market shares: -920,321 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$4.0M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-21 | Wood John B |
Open-market sale | 96,151 | $4.05 | $389.4K |
| 2026-09-18 | Bendza Gary Mark |
Open-market sale | 174,539 | $4.05 | $706.9K |
| 2026-09-11 | Bendza Gary Mark |
Open-market sale | 25,461 | $4.33 | $110.2K |
| 2026-09-09 | Bendza Gary Mark |
Open-market sale | 200,000 | $4.55 | $910.0K |
| 2026-09-02 | Robbins Edward Hutchinson Jr. |
Open-market sale | 62,398 | $4.73 | $295.1K |
| 2026-08-21 | Dockery Derrick D. |
Open-market sale | 12,000 | $4.43 | $53.2K |
| 2026-08-14 | Terreri Donald Joseph |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,382 | $4.54 | $6.3K |
| 2026-08-12 | Dockery Derrick D. |
Open-market sale | 11,000 | $4.34 | $47.7K |
| 2026-06-26 | Bendza Gary Mark |
Open-market sale | 80,140 | $4.41 | $353.4K |
| 2026-06-25 | Bendza Gary Mark |
Open-market sale | 97,976 | $4.19 | $410.5K |
| 2026-06-24 | Bendza Gary Mark |
Open-market sale | 71,884 | $4.36 | $313.4K |
| 2026-06-24 | Dockery Derrick D. |
Open-market sale | 7,000 | $4.36 | $30.5K |
| 2026-06-22 | Jacobs Bradley W. |
Open-market sale | 55,772 | $4.31 | $240.4K |
| 2026-05-28 | Dockery Derrick D. |
Open-market sale | 8,000 | $4.78 | $38.2K |
| 2026-05-26 | Wood John B |
Grant/award | 362,734 | — | — |
| 2026-05-26 | Robbins Edward Hutchinson Jr. |
Grant/award | 92,225 | — | — |
| 2026-05-26 | Hill Donna K. |
Grant/award | 33,001 | — | — |
| 2026-05-26 | Griffin Mark D |
Grant/award | 106,763 | — | — |
| 2026-05-26 | Cooke Malcolm G. |
Grant/award | 52,787 | — | — |
| 2026-05-26 | Bendza Gary Mark |
Grant/award | 123,477 | — | — |
| 2026-05-26 | Terreri Donald Joseph |
Grant/award | 13,288 | — | — |
| 2026-05-26 | Jacobs Bradley W. |
Grant/award | 34,091 | — | — |
| 2026-05-26 | Maluda John W |
Grant/award | 34,091 | — | — |
| 2026-05-26 | Dockery Derrick D. |
Grant/award | 34,091 | — | — |
| 2026-05-26 | Carroll Bonnie Lynn |
Grant/award | 34,091 | — | — |
| 2026-05-26 | Borland David |
Grant/award | 34,091 | — | — |
| 2026-05-26 | Schaufeld Fredrick |
Grant/award | 34,091 | — | — |
| 2026-05-16 | Robbins Edward Hutchinson Jr. |
Shares withheld for tax | 59,675 | $4.20 | $250.6K |
| 2026-05-16 | Bendza Gary Mark |
Shares withheld for tax | 98,019 | $4.20 | $411.7K |
| 2026-05-16 | Griffin Mark D |
Shares withheld for tax | 77,097 | $4.20 | $323.8K |
| 2026-05-16 | Hill Donna K. |
Shares withheld for tax | 2,310 | $4.20 | $9.7K |
| 2026-05-16 | Cooke Malcolm G. |
Shares withheld for tax | 2,548 | $4.20 | $10.7K |
| 2026-05-14 | Dockery Derrick D. |
Open-market sale | 18,000 | $4.14 | $74.5K |
Well-known investors holding TLS (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.