Companies › TROW

TROW 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Price T Rowe Group Inc. · Nasdaq · Investment Advice · CIK 1113169 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Price T Rowe Group Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

9 / 11risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
0new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
2Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-02-13 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-02-14 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

9new paragraphs
11removed paragraphs
42reworded paragraphs
10,334 → 10,036words in section

Removed heading “Our financial condition and liquidity would be adversely affected by losses on our seed capital and co-investments.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Reworded topics: cyberattack, liquidity, generative ai, ai

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We or our third-party vendors, clients or counterparties have developed, and may continue to develop or incorporate AI technology in certain business processes, services or products. The development and use of AI present a number of risks and challenges to our business. The legal and regulatory environment relating to AI is uncertain and rapidly evolving, in the U.S., and internationally, and includes regulation targeted specifically at AI technology, as well as provisions in intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection, employment and other laws applicable to the use of AI. For example, any failure to properly safeguard and maintain personal data in connection with our use of AI creates potential risk of usviolating violatingapplicable privacy laws and regulations in jurisdictions we operate in, and could subject us to disclosure obligations, regulatory investigations, actions or fines, and litigation. These evolving laws and regulations could require changes in our implementation of AI technology, increase our compliance costs and the risk of non-compliance, and restrict or impede our ability to develop, adopt and deploy AI technologies efficiently and effectively. AI models, particularly generative AI models, may produce output or take action that is incorrect or outdated, that result in the release of personal, confidential or proprietary information, that reflect biases included in the data on which they are trained or introduced during the training or fine tuning process, that infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, or that is otherwise harmful. In addition, the complexity of many AI models makes it challenging to understand why they are generating particular outputs. This limited transparency increases the challenges associated with assessing the proper operation of AI technology, understandingappreciating the risks and monitoring the capabilities of the AI technology developed by third parties, and, to that extent, are dependent in part on the manner in which those third parties develop and train their models, including for example, risks arising from the inclusion of any unauthorized material in the training data for their models, and the effectiveness of the steps these third parties have taken to limit the risks associated with the output of their models, matters over which we may have limited visibility. Further, the use of AI technologies requires ongoing operational controls and procedures and the development and deployment of appropriate protections and safeguards. AI technologies may also disrupt the competitive landscape for investment management and technology services, including in commercial and operational areas such as data aggregation and quantitative models. Any of these risks could expose us to liability or adverse legal or regulatory consequences and harm our reputation and the public perception of our business or the effectiveness of our security measures. In addition to our use of AI technologies, we are exposed to risks arising from the use of AI technologies by bad actors to commit fraud and misappropriate funds and to facilitate cyberattacks. Generative AI, if used to perpetrate fraud or launch cyberattacks, could result in losses, liquidity outflows, or other adverse effects at a particular financial institution or exchange. If our use of AI becomes controversial,Furthermore, we may experienceface brandcompetition orfrom reputationalinvestment harm,managers competitivewho harm,use orAI legalin liability.lieu of human managers, which may lead to lower cost solutions which could impact our business.
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation, supply chain, regulation, climate
“Our business and the assets we manage on behalf of clients could be impacted by climate change-related risks. Climate change may present risk to our business through changes in the physical climate or from the process of transitioning to a lower-carbon economy. Climate-related physical risks arise from the direct impacts of a changing climate in the short-, medium- and long-term. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: litigation, supply chain, regulation, climate
“Our business and the assets we manage on behalf of clients could be impacted by climate change-related risks. Climate change may present risk to our business through changes in the physical climate or from the process of transitioning to a lower-carbon economy. Climate-related physical risks arise from the direct impacts of a changing climate in the short-, medium- and long-term. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: cyberattack, liquidity, generative ai, ai
“In addition to our use of AI technologies, we are exposed to risks arising from the use of AI technologies by bad actors to commit fraud and misappropriate funds and to facilitate cyberattacks. Generative AI, if used to perpetrate fraud or launch cyberattacks, could result in losses, liquidity outflows, or other adverse effects at a particular financial institution or exchange. If our use of AI becomes controversial, we may experience brand or reputational harm, competitive harm, or legal liability.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: liquidity
“Our financial condition and liquidity would be adversely affected by losses on our seed capital and co-investments.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: restructuring, goodwill
“From time to time, we consider strategic opportunities, including potential acquisitions, dispositions, consolidations, organizational restructurings, joint ventures or similar transactions, any of which may impact our business. We cannot be certain that we will be able to identify, consummate and successfully complete such transactions, and no assurance can be given with respect to the timing, likelihood or business effect of any possible transaction. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (62)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

•Investment Performance. If the investment performance of our managed investment portfoliosproducts is less than that of our competitors or applicable third-party benchmarks, we could lose existing and potential clients and suffer a decrease in assets under management. Poor performance relative to other competing products tends to result in decreased sales and increased redemptions with corresponding decreases in our revenues.

Reworded

•General Financial Market Declines. We derive a significant portion of our revenues from advisory fees on managed investment portfolios.products. A downturn in financial markets would cause the value of assets under our management to decrease, and may also cause investors to withdraw their investments, thereby further decreasing the level of assets under our management.

Added

•Investment Concentration. Our fees vary depending on product offering, and our assets under management may be overly concentrated within limited market segments or strategies, which could impact our revenues should these fees be impacted.

Removed

•Investment Concentration. The allocation of investment products for assets under management within market segments or strategies may impact associated fees that can vary depending on product offerings.

Reworded

•Investor Mobility. Our investors may generally withdraw their funds at any time, without advance notice and with little to no significant penalty. Any redemptions and other withdrawals from, or shifting among, our investment portfoliosproducts could reduce our assets under management. These could be caused by investors reducing their investments in our portfoliosproducts in general or in the market segments in which we focus; investors taking profits from their investments; portfolioproduct risk characteristics, which could cause investors to move assets to other investment managers; and investor and market sentiments.

Reworded

•Investing Trends. Changes in investing trends, particularly investor preference for passive or alternativealternatives investment products as well as increasing investor preference for environmentally and socially responsible investment products, and changes in retirement savings trends, may reduce interest in our products and may alter our mix of assets under management.

Reworded

•Interest Rate Changes. Investor interest in and the valuation of our fixed income and multi-asset investment portfoliosproducts are affected by changes in,in as well as uncertainty about interest rates.

Reworded

•Geo-Political Exposure. Our managed investment portfoliosproducts may have significant investments in markets that are subject to risk of loss from political or diplomatic developments, government policies, wars, conflicts or civil unrest (such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine, therecent threatevents thatin Russia’s military aggression may expand,Venezuela and the recenton-going conflicts in the Middle East, including the Israel-Hamas war, and potential escalation of such conflictsEast), trade policies, wars or tariffs (including those imposed or threatened by the U.S. and retaliatory tariffs by U.S. trading partners), currency fluctuations, market volatility, illiquidity and capital controls, and changes in legislation related to ownership limitations.

Added

•Government Shutdown. The U.S. federal government periodically experiences funding gaps that result in partial or complete shutdowns of government operations. A prolonged shutdown could adversely impact the U.S. economy, financial markets, and our business directly and indirectly. During a shutdown, many federal agencies, such as the SEC, suspend or delay regulatory approvals. A delay in the approval of new products which we intend to offer could materially impact our performance and the timing with which we begin to attract investors. Additionally, a shutdown could have broader negative effects on consumer and business confidence, the financial markets, and the overall economy. Uncertainty regarding the duration or frequency of government shutdowns may contribute to market volatility and increased redemptions from our products.

Reworded

A majority of our revenues are based on contracts with collectivecommingled investment fundsvehicles that are subject to termination without cause and on short notice.

Reworded

We provide investment advisory, distribution, and other administrative services to collectivecommingled investment fundsvehicles under various agreements. Investment advisory services are provided to each sponsoredcollective investment fund under individual investment management agreements, which can be terminated on short notice. In addition, the Board of each T. Rowe Price U.S. mutual fund and ETF must annually approve the terms of the investment management and service agreements. If a T. Rowe Price collective investment fund seeks to lower the fees that we receive or terminate its contract with us, we would experience a decline in fees earned from the collective investment funds, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and net income.

Reworded

Furthermore, many aspects of the asset management industry are seeing increased regulatory activity and scrutiny, in particular related to environmental, social, and governance ("ESG") practices and related matters, transparency and unbundling of fees, inducements, conflicts of interest, risk management, cybersecurity, technology, privacy and data protection, sustainability, diversity, equity and inclusion, and compensation. We may respond to these regulatory matters or may be impacted by these actions in a manner different from our competitors, which may impact our AUM or result in the loss of clients and their assets.

Reworded

We have spent many years developing our reputation for integrity, strong investment performance, and superior client service. Our brand is a valuable intangible asset, but it is vulnerable to a variety of threats that can be difficult or impossible to control, and costly or even impossible to remediate, if damaged. Regulatory inquiries and rumors can tarnish or substantially damage our reputation, even if those inquiries are satisfactorily addressed. For example, ESG issues have been the subject of increased focus by regulators, clients and other stakeholders. Various clients and stakeholders have divergent views on ESG matters, with some aiming to increase their exposure to ESG investing and some choosing not to invest in products or strategies with an ESG investment objective, including in the countries in which we operate and invest, as well as states and localities where we serve public sector clients. These differences pose challenges for us to manage divergent goals and preferences, and increase the risk that any action or lack thereof by us concerning ESG, or any actual or perceived failure to adequately address the ESG expectations will be viewed negatively by some stakeholders, which could adversely impact our reputation and business. We also communicate certain initiatives and goals for our corporate and investing activities related to ESG matters. We could be scrutinized or criticized for the scope or nature of any such initiatives or goals, and may not be able to accomplish them within our anticipated timeframe or at all. Our global presence and investments on behalf of our clients around the world could also lead to heightened scrutiny and criticism in an increasingly fragmented geopolitical landscape.

Reworded

Misconduct by our personnel or third-party service providers could likewise adversely impact our reputation and lead to a loss of client assets. While we maintain policies, procedures, and controls to reduce the likelihood of unauthorized activities, we are subject to the risk that our personnel or third parties acting on our behalf may circumvent controls or act in a manner inconsistent with our policies and procedures. Real or perceived conflicts between our clients’ interests and our own, as well as any fraudulent activity or other exposure of client assets or information, may impair our reputation and subject us to litigation or regulatory action. In addition, should we be subject to a cybersecurity event or data breach, or the target of cyber criminals who seek to defraud our clients, our reputation could be harmed and we could suffer financial loss. Any damage to our brand could impede our ability to attract and retain clients and key personnel, and reduce the amount of assets under our management, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and net income.

Reworded

Our alternatives products include investments in private credit, real estate, infrastructure and equity investments in private companies, which may expose us to new or increased risks and liabilities and to reputational harm.

Reworded

Our alternatives products include investments in private credit, real estate, infrastructure and equity investments in private companies, which may expose our investment products, clients and us to new or increased risks and liabilities. These may include:

Reworded

•risks related to the potential illiquidity, valuationvaluation, concentration and disposition of such investments;

Removed

•risks associated with a lack of diversification, such that any adverse change in one or a small number of issuers could have a material adverse effect on an investment product or client’s investments;

Removed

•changes to the supply and demand for properties and/or tenancies;

Reworded

Our hedging strategies utilized to mitigate risk may not be effective, which could impact our earnings.net income.

Reworded

We employ hedging strategies related to our supplementaldeferred savings plan and other incentivecompensation plans in order to hedge the liability related to the plans. In the event that our hedging strategies are not effective, the resulting impact may adversely affect our resultsnet of operations, cash flows or financial condition.income.

Reworded

We are subject to income taxes as well as non-income-based taxes and complex tax regimes in both the United States and various foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. We cannot predict future changes in the tax regulations to which we are subject, and any such changes could have a material impact on our tax liability or result in increased costs of our tax compliance efforts. For example, a financial transaction tax on stocks, bonds and a broad range of financial instruments has been proposed in the United States and the EU.

Reworded

The occurrence of extreme events, such as armed conflicts, terrorist attacks, epidemic, pandemic or disease outbreaks (such as the COVID-19 pandemic), infrastructure failures, natural disasters or extreme weather events (which may increase in intensity or frequency as a result of climate change),events, and other events outside of our control could adversely affect our revenues, expenses, and net income by:

Reworded

•decreasing investment valuations in, and returns on, the investment portfoliosproducts that we manage;

Reworded

A significant portion of our business operations are concentrated in the Baltimore, Maryland region; Colorado Springs, Colorado; ForthFort Worth, Texas; New York City, New York; and London, England. In addition, we maintain offices with our personnel in many other global locations, including Sydney, Australia; Hong Kong; Singapore; Tokyo, Japan; and Luxembourg, some of which are in areas that are particularly vulnerable to extreme events. We have developed various backup systems and contingency plans, but we cannot be assured that those preparations will be adequate in all circumstances that could arise, or that material interruptions and disruptions will not occur. We also rely to varying degrees on outside service providers for service delivery in addition to technology and disaster contingency support, and we cannot be assured that these service providers will be able to perform in an adequate and timely manner. If we lose the availability of any personnel, or, if we are unable to respond adequately to such an event in a timely manner, we may be unable to service our clients or timely resume our business operations, which could lead to financial losses, a tarnished reputation and loss of clients that could result in a decrease in assets under management, lower revenues, and materially reduced net income, particularly if our responses to such events are less adequate than those of our competitors.

Reworded

Pandemics, epidemics or disease outbreaks, as well as measures enacted to prevent their spread, may create significant volatility, uncertainty and disruption to the global economy and may impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, the coronavirus pandemic adversely affected global financial markets and impacted global supply chains. Concerns and uncertainty regarding pandemics, epidemics or disease outbreaks could lead to increased volatility in global capital and credit markets, adversely affect our operations, key executives and other personnel, clients, investors, service providers and other vendors, suppliers, and other third parties, and negatively impact our assets under management, revenues, income, business and operations. Since our revenue is based on the market value and composition of the assets under our management, the impact of such events on global financial markets and our clients’ investment decisions could adversely affect our revenue and operating results.

Reworded

Furthermore, while we have in place robust and well-established plans for operational resiliency and business continuity that address the potential impact of pandemics, epidemics or disease outbreaks to our personnel and our facilities, and to date have been successful in navigating the challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic,continuity, no assurance can be given that the steps we have taken will continue to be effective or appropriate against future pandemics, epidemics or disease outbreaks. In the event that our personnel become incapacitated by pandemics, epidemics or disease outbreaks, our business operations may be impacted, which could lead to reputational and financial harm.

Added

Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty or other relationships. We, and the client portfolios that we manage, have exposure to many different counterparties, and routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry. Many of these transactions expose us or such client portfolios to credit risk in the event of default of its counterparty. While we regularly conduct assessments of counterparty risks, the risk of non-performance by such parties is subject to sudden swings in the financial and credit markets. Such non-performance could produce a financial loss for us or the products we manage. In addition, concerns regarding the soundness of other financial services institutions may generate public concerns regarding us or the financial services industry more broadly, which could harm our reputation and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, even if the underlying matters impacting other financial institutions are of limited or no direct applicability to us.

Added

From time to time, we consider strategic opportunities, including potential acquisitions, dispositions, consolidations, organizational restructurings, partnerships, any of which may impact our business. We cannot be certain that we will be able to identify, consummate and successfully complete such transactions, and no assurance can be given with respect to the timing, likelihood or business effect of any possible transaction. These initiatives typically involve a number of risks and present financial, managerial and operational challenges to our ongoing business operations. In addition, acquisitions and related transactions involve risks, including unanticipated problems regarding integration of investor account and investment security recordkeeping, additional or new regulatory requirements, operating facilities and technologies, and new personnel; adverse effects on our earnings in the event acquired intangible assets or goodwill become impaired; distracting management and other key personnel from our existing businesses; and the existence of liabilities or contingencies not disclosed to or otherwise known by us prior to closing a transaction.

Added

Our business and the assets we manage on behalf of clients could be impacted by climate change-related risks. Climate change may present risk to our business through changes in the physical climate or from the process of transitioning to a lower-carbon economy. Climate-related physical risks arise from the direct impacts of a changing climate in the short-, medium- and long-term. Such risks may include an increase in the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events, changes in temperature, rising sea levels and increase of wildfires, which may damage infrastructure and facilities, increase energy costs, negatively impact workforces, as well as disrupt connectivity or supply chains. Within our investment products, changes in weather patterns around the world can impact companies in which we invest on behalf of our clients. Weather pattern changes may cause investment professionals to re-evaluate investments in affected companies. Valuations may be impacted resulting in declines in asset values and potential loss of revenue. Climate-related transition risks arise from exposure to the transition to a lower-carbon economy through policy, regulatory, technology and market changes. For instance, new regulations and changes in existing regulations may lead to increased compliance costs, enhanced reporting obligations, regulation of existing products and/or services, exposure to litigation, and aggressive or inconsistent levels of regulatory enforcement globally. Additionally, climate change may influence client preferences by increasing the demand for investment products oriented toward climate change mitigation. Conversely, a climate-related backlash could negatively impact demand for climate or transition related products. Climate change may also impact our reputation if we are perceived to fall short of our own corporate commitments or stakeholder expectations. Any of these risks may have a material adverse effect on our AUM, revenue and earnings.

Added

We operate in a number of jurisdictions outside of the United States. Our international operations require us to comply with complex legal and regulatory requirements of various foreign jurisdictions that at times may be contradictory and expose us to political environments and risks that can compare less favorably than those in the United States. Our foreign business operations are also subject to the following risks:

Added

•the potential nationalization of our property or that of the companies in our investment products;

Removed

Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty or other relationships. We, and the client portfolios that we manage, have exposure to many different counterparties, and routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry. Many of these transactions expose us or such client portfolios to credit risk in the event of default of its counterparty. While we regularly conduct assessments of counterparty risks, the risk of non-performance by such parties is subject to sudden swings in the financial and credit markets. Such non-performance could produce a financial loss for us or the portfolios we manage. In addition, concerns regarding the soundness of other financial services institutions may generate public concerns regarding us or the financial services industry more broadly, which could harm our reputation and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, even if the underlying matters impacting other financial institutions are of limited or no direct applicability to us.

Removed

From time to time, we consider strategic opportunities, including potential acquisitions, dispositions, consolidations, organizational restructurings, joint ventures or similar transactions, any of which may impact our business. We cannot be certain that we will be able to identify, consummate and successfully complete such transactions, and no assurance can be given with respect to the timing, likelihood or business effect of any possible transaction. These initiatives typically involve a number of risks and present financial, managerial and operational challenges to our ongoing business operations. In addition, acquisitions and related transactions involve risks, including unanticipated problems regarding integration of investor account and investment security recordkeeping, additional or new regulatory requirements, operating facilities and technologies, and new personnel; adverse effects on our earnings in the event acquired intangible assets or goodwill become impaired; distracting management and other key personnel from our existing businesses; and the existence of liabilities or contingencies not disclosed to or otherwise known by us prior to closing a transaction.

Removed

We own a 23% investment in UTI Asset Management Company Ltd ("UTI"), an Indian asset management company, and we may consider non-controlling minority investments in other entities in the future. We may not realize future returns from such investments or any collaborative activities that may develop in the future.

Removed

Our business and the assets we manage on behalf of clients could be impacted by climate change-related risks. Climate change may present risk to our business through changes in the physical climate or from the process of transitioning to a lower-carbon economy. Climate-related physical risks arise from the direct impacts of a changing climate in the short-, medium- and long-term. Such risks may include an increase in the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events, changes in temperature, rising sea levels and increase of wildfires, which may damage infrastructure and facilities, increase energy costs, negatively impact workforces, as well as disrupt connectivity or supply chains. Within our investment portfolios, changes in weather patterns around the world can impact companies in which we invest on behalf of our clients. Weather pattern changes may cause investment professionals to re-evaluate investments in affected companies. Valuations may be impacted resulting in declines in asset values and potential loss of revenue. Climate-related transition risks arise from exposure to the transition to a lower-carbon economy through policy, regulatory, technology and market changes. For instance, new regulations and changes in existing regulations may lead to increased compliance costs, enhanced reporting obligations, regulation of existing products and/or services, exposure to litigation, and aggressive or inconsistent levels of regulatory enforcement globally. Additionally, climate change may influence client preferences by increasing the demand for investment products oriented toward climate change mitigation. Conversely, a climate-related backlash could negatively impact demand for climate or transition related products. Climate change may also impact our reputation if we are perceived to fall short of our own corporate commitments or stakeholder expectations. Any of these risks may have a material adverse effect on our AUM, revenue and earnings.

Removed

We operate in a number of jurisdictions outside of the United States. Our international operations require us to comply with the legal and regulatory requirements of various foreign jurisdictions and expose us to political environments and risks that can compare less favorably than those in the United States. Our foreign business operations are also subject to the following risks:

Removed

•the potential nationalization of our property or that of the companies in our investment portfolios;

Removed

Our financial condition and liquidity would be adversely affected by losses on our seed capital and co-investments.

Removed

We have capital held in investment products we manage in a variety of asset classes, including equities, fixed income products, multi-asset products, financial instruments, real estate and alternative investments. Investments in these products are generally made to establish a track record, meet purchase size requirements for trading blocks or demonstrate economic alignment with other investors in our funds. Adverse market conditions may result in the need to write down the value of these seed capital and co-investments, which may adversely affect our results of operations or liquidity.

Reworded

Our success depends on our highly skilled personnel, including our portfolio managers, investment analysts, sales and client relationship personnel, technology and operations professionals, and corporate officers, many of whom have specialized expertise and extensive experience in our industry. Professionals with financial services experience across functional areas are in demand, and we face significant competition for highly qualified personnel. Changes in workplace environment, such as return to office arrangements and remote and hybrid work models, have presented challenges to attracting and retaining talent. While our personnel can generally terminate their employment with us at any time, with most required to provide little to no notice, we have recently adopted more significant notification requirements for certain key positions, which may cause some personnel or candidates to be less willing to continue their employment with us or join our firm. We cannot assureguarantee that we will be able to attract or retain key personnel. In addition, due to the global nature of our investment advisory business, our key personnel may have reasons to travel to regions susceptible to higher risk of civil unrest, organized crime or terrorism, and we may be unable to ensure the safety of personnel traveling to these regions.

Reworded

We require significant quantities and types of technology to operate our business and would be adversely affected if we or our third party providers fail to maintain adequateadequate, resilient and secure technology to conduct or expand our operations or if our technology became inoperative or obsolete.

Reworded

All of our technology systems, including those provided or operated by third-party service providers, are not fully redundant and are vulnerable to disability or failures due to cyberattacks, natural disasters or extreme weather events (which may increase in frequency or intensity as a result of climate change),events, power failures, acts of war or terrorism, sabotage, coding errors, system outages, and other causes. An outage, suspension or termination of vendor-provided services, software licenses or related support, upgrades, and maintenance could cause system delays or interruption. Although we believe we have robust business and disaster recovery plans, if our technology systems, including those provided or operated by third-party service providers, were to fail and we were unable to recover in a timely way, we would be unable to fulfill critical business functions, which could lead to a loss of clients and could harm our reputation. A technological breakdown or disruption in services could also interfere with our ability to comply with financial reporting and controls and other regulatory requirements, exposing us to regulatory action and liability to our clients.clients, potentially resulting in financial losses that may not be sufficiently mitigated by insurance coverage.

Reworded

We are dependent on the effectiveness of the information and cybersecurity policies, procedures and technology-based capabilities we maintain to protect our systems and data. An externally caused data security incident, such as a cyberattack, phishingsocial scam,engineering attacks (including phishing, impersonation and identity takeover attempts), virus, ransomware attack, denial-of-service attack, or an attack launched from within our systems could compromise the integrity of personal data of clients, personnel and other parties, as well as confidential client or competitive information and materially interrupt our business operations. In addition, our third-party service providers and other intermediaries, with which we conduct business, could also be subject to cyberattacks or other data security events, and we cannot ensure that such third parties have all appropriate controls in place to protect the integrityintegrity, confidentiality and confidentialitysecurity of our data that is in their custody or to allow them to continue their business operations, including their services to us, in a timely manner.

Reworded

There have been increasing numbers of publicized cybersecurity incidents in recent years impacting financial services firms as well as firms in other industries, including incidents of increasing sophistication and scope, all of which have resulted in greater harm. Our use of third-party service providers could heighten this risk. Should the technology operationstechnologies on which we rely be compromised, we may have to make significant investments to upgrade, repair or replace our technology infrastructure or third-party service providers and may not be able to make such investments on a timely basis. Although we maintain insurance coverage, under terms that we believe are reasonable, prudent and adequate for the purpose of our business, it may be insufficient to protect us against all losses and costs stemming from breaches of security, cyberattacks and other types of unlawful activity, or any resulting disruptions from such events.

Reworded

As part of our normal operations, we maintain and transmit personal and confidential data about our clients, personnel and other parties, as well as proprietary data and intellectual property relating to our business operations. Our business operations rely on such data being available as and when needed, and not being subjected to loss or unauthorized access or alteration. We maintain a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that both inadvertent errors and fraudulent activity, including misappropriation of assets, fraudulent financial reporting, and unauthorized access to sensitivepersonal or confidential sensitive data, is either prevented or detected in a timely manner. We also leverage cloud-based solutions for the transmission and storage of data. Our systems, or those of the third-party service providers we use to maintain or transmit such data, could be accessed by unauthorized users or corrupted by computer viruses or other malicious software code. Additionally, authorized persons could inadvertently or intentionally release or alter confidential or proprietary data. Any of these types of events could, among other things:

Reworded

Furthermore, if any person, including any of our personnel, negligently disregards or intentionally overrides or circumvents our established controls with respect to personal or confidential data, or otherwise mismanages or misappropriates that data, we could be subject to significant monetary damages, regulatory enforcement actions, fines and/or criminal prosecution in one or more jurisdictions.jurisdictions and any insurance we have may not be sufficient to cover our liability which would impact our financial results.

Reworded

We or our third-party vendors, clients or counterparties have developed, and may continue to develop or incorporate AI technology in certain business processes, services or products. The development and use of AI present a number of risks and challenges to our business. The legal and regulatory environment relating to AI is uncertain and rapidly evolving, in the U.S., and internationally, and includes regulation targeted specifically at AI technology, as well as provisions in intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection, employment and other laws applicable to the use of AI. For example, any failure to properly safeguard and maintain personal data in connection with our use of AI creates potential risk of usviolating violatingapplicable privacy laws and regulations in jurisdictions we operate in, and could subject us to disclosure obligations, regulatory investigations, actions or fines, and litigation. These evolving laws and regulations could require changes in our implementation of AI technology, increase our compliance costs and the risk of non-compliance, and restrict or impede our ability to develop, adopt and deploy AI technologies efficiently and effectively. AI models, particularly generative AI models, may produce output or take action that is incorrect or outdated, that result in the release of personal, confidential or proprietary information, that reflect biases included in the data on which they are trained or introduced during the training or fine tuning process, that infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, or that is otherwise harmful. In addition, the complexity of many AI models makes it challenging to understand why they are generating particular outputs. This limited transparency increases the challenges associated with assessing the proper operation of AI technology, understandingappreciating the risks and monitoring the capabilities of the AI technology developed by third parties, and, to that extent, are dependent in part on the manner in which those third parties develop and train their models, including for example, risks arising from the inclusion of any unauthorized material in the training data for their models, and the effectiveness of the steps these third parties have taken to limit the risks associated with the output of their models, matters over which we may have limited visibility. Further, the use of AI technologies requires ongoing operational controls and procedures and the development and deployment of appropriate protections and safeguards. AI technologies may also disrupt the competitive landscape for investment management and technology services, including in commercial and operational areas such as data aggregation and quantitative models. Any of these risks could expose us to liability or adverse legal or regulatory consequences and harm our reputation and the public perception of our business or the effectiveness of our security measures. In addition to our use of AI technologies, we are exposed to risks arising from the use of AI technologies by bad actors to commit fraud and misappropriate funds and to facilitate cyberattacks. Generative AI, if used to perpetrate fraud or launch cyberattacks, could result in losses, liquidity outflows, or other adverse effects at a particular financial institution or exchange. If our use of AI becomes controversial,Furthermore, we may experienceface brandcompetition orfrom reputationalinvestment harm,managers competitivewho harm,use orAI legalin liability.lieu of human managers, which may lead to lower cost solutions which could impact our business.

Added

In addition to our use of AI technologies, we are exposed to risks arising from the use of AI technologies by bad actors to commit fraud and misappropriate funds and to facilitate cyberattacks. Generative AI, if used to perpetrate fraud or launch cyberattacks, could result in losses, liquidity outflows, or other adverse effects at a particular financial institution or exchange. If our use of AI becomes controversial, we may experience brand or reputational harm, competitive harm, or legal liability.

Reworded

There is uncertainty associated with the regulatory and compliance environments in which we operate. Our business is subject to extensive and complex, overlapping and/or conflicting, and frequently changing rules, regulations, policies and legal interpretations, around the world. Additionally, over the past several years the pace and scope of new rules, regulations, executive orders, directives, policies and legal interpretations has increased both in the U.S. and globally, which requires additional resources and expense in order for us to digest and institute processes to comply.

Reworded

Furthermore, in recent years several governments have proposed or enacted policies, legislation, and executive actions relating to ESGsustainability and DEIhuman capital initiatives for the private sector. More recently, interested parties on both sides of the debate have sought to utilize the courts, social media and other means to change the practices of companies. We communicate certain approaches regarding environmental, social, diversity,human capital, and other ESG-relatedrelated matters in our regulatory filings or in other public disclosures. We could be criticized for the accuracy or completeness of the disclosure and for the scope or nature of such initiatives or approaches, or for any changes to them over time.

Added

In addition, the U.S. administration and other foreign governments have pursued deregulation measures that may create regulatory uncertainty for our business, and potentially create divergent regulatory frameworks, as other state and local governments may take action to fill the vacuum. Any changes in the regulatory framework applicable to our business, may impose additional costs, require the attention of our senior management, result in limitations on the manner in which business is conducted, or may ultimately have an adverse impact on the competitiveness of our business.

Reworded

Legal and regulatory developments in the mutual fund, retirement and investment advisory industry could increase our regulatory burden, impose significant financial and strategic costs on our business, and cause a loss of, or impact the servicing of, our clients and fundproduct shareholders.

Reworded

Our regulatory environment is frequently altered by new laws and regulations and by revisions to, and evolving interpretations of, existing regulations. New laws and regulations present areas of uncertainty susceptible to alternative interpretations; regulators and prospective litigants may not agree with reasoned interpretations we adopt. Certain new regulatory proposals that may impact or relate to our business, include cybersecurity disclosures, sustainability, privacy and data protection, financial products, fiduciary and fund-related reforms, digital assets, tax compliance, and other investment management disclosure and compliance requirements. Future changes could require us to modify or curtail our investment offerings and business operations which may impact our expenses and profitability. Additionally, some laws and regulations may not directly apply to our business but may impact the capital markets, service providers, or have other indirect effects on our ability to provide services to our clients.

Reworded

•There has been increasing focus on the framework of the U.S. retirement system at the federal and state levels. We could experience adverse business impacts if legislative and regulatory changes limit retirement plans to certain products and services, or favor certain investment vehicles,vehicles that we do not offer, materially limit retirement savings opportunities or foster substantial outflows from retirement savings plans for non-retirement purposes.

Reworded

•There has been substantial regulatory and legislative activity at federal and state levels regarding standards of care for financial services firms, related to both retirement and taxable accounts. Actions taken by applicable regulatory or legislative bodies may impact our business activities and increase our costs. In September 2024, a new rule expanding the definition of, and requirements for, an investment advice fiduciary under ERISA (“Retirement Security Rule”) became effective, which applies to retirement plans and accounts that comprise a majority of our accounts. We are assessing the impact of the Retirement Security Rule on our business.

Reworded

•The Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") regulations may limit the ability of certain investment products to use futures, swaps, and other derivatives. We have registered certain subsidiaries with the CFTC, subjecting us to additional regulatory requirements and costs, but also providing us with additional flexibility to utilize such products. Nonetheless, there are still certain limitations on our investment products due to CFTC rules.

Reworded

•We remain subject to various state, federal and international laws and regulations (and associated judicial decisions) related to privacy, data collection and use, including the EU’sEU's General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) and laws enacted by a growing number of U.S. states; cybersecurity; current and emerging technology, including AI and automated decision-making technologies; storage, localization, retention and destruction of data; disclosure, transfer, availability, security and integrity of data; notification of regulators and/or impacted parties regarding adverse data-related events, including the SEC’s cybersecurity disclosure rules; amended Regulation S-P; and other similar matters that can concern the data of our clients and/or personnel. Requirements in these areas continue to expand and evolve throughout the globe, most commonly in ways that increase the complexity and costs of compliance. For example, the SEC proposed new rules in 2023 that would require broker-dealers and investment advisers, when engaging or communicating with investors using predictive data analytics, to evaluate such technologies for conflicts of interest and, where identified, eliminate or neutralize the conflict of interest. If adopted as proposed, these rules could encompass a wide range of forward-looking uses of technology applications and impose significant operational burdens and costs. Future changes to laws and regulations in these areas could impose significant limitations on our operations, require changes to our business, or restrict our collection, use or storage of data or related technologies, which may increase our compliance expenses and make our business more costly or less efficient to conduct.

Reworded

•Regulators have imposed certain clearing, margin, trade reporting, electronic trading and recordkeeping requirements on market participants aimed at market stabilization and risk reduction, such as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and related regulations in the U.S. and the European Market Infrastructure Regulation in the EU. These requirements have introduced operational complexity and additional costs to derivatives portfolios.products.

Reworded

•New laws or regulations involving ESGsustainability integration and disclosure may materially impact the asset management industry.industry, For example,including the EU’sEU's Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation imposes mandatory ESG disclosure obligations on asset managers and other financial markets participants, requiring all covered firms to disclose how financial products integrate sustainability risks in the investment process, including whether they consider adverse sustainability impacts, and sustainability-related information for products promoting sustainable objectives. The availability of such disclosures may impact the investment decisions of European investors. In addition,Regulation, the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive imposes enhanced sustainability reporting requirements for certain EU companiesDirective, and non-EUsimilar companies, with phased reporting requirements beginning in 2025 for certain companies. In the U.S., states haveinitiatives proposed or adopted lawsby and regulations to pursue similar initiatives, such as California’s Climate Accountability Package, federal regulations on ESG disclosures, such as the SEC's proposed climate disclosure rules that have been stayed, are expected to halt under the new administration in thevarious U.S. states. Conversely, some U.S. states and foreign governments have adopted or proposed legislation or otherwise have taken official positions restricting or prohibiting state government entities from doing certain business with entities they believe are discriminating against particular industries or considering ESGsustainability factors in their investment processes and proxy voting. As jurisdictions globally continue to develop legal frameworks on ESGsustainability and sustainability regulations, our industry and business may face increasingly fragmented regulatory frameworks, which may result in complex and potentially conflicting compliance obligations and legal and regulatory uncertainty.

Showing the first 60 of 62 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

53new paragraphs
46removed paragraphs
62reworded paragraphs
10,982 → 11,235words in section

New heading “(1) Includes assets in which T. Rowe Price and its affiliates have full discretionary authority and, beginning in 2025, managed account - model delivery assets.”

New heading “(5) Amount represents the net assets as of July 1, 2025 and all activity for the second half of 2025 is presented in the lines that follow.”

New heading “Results Overview - 2025 compared to 2024”

New heading “(1) n/m - The percentage change is not meaningful.”

New heading “(2) Capital allocation-based income compensation represents the change in accrued carried interest compensation along with acquisition-related, non-cash amortization and impairments.”

New heading “(3) See the reconciliation to the comparable U.S. GAAP measures at the end of the Results of Operations section of this Management's Discussion and Analysis.”

Removed heading “(2) Performance-based advisory fees were previously included in investment advisory fees. Prior periods were recast to reflect this change.”

Removed heading “Results Overview - 2023 compared to 2022”

Removed heading “(2) Performance-based advisory fees were previously included in investment advisory fees. Prior periods were recast to reflect this change.”

Removed heading “(1) See the reconciliation to the comparable U.S. GAAP measures at the end of the Results of Operations section of this Management's Discussion and Analysis.”

Removed heading “(1) State income tax benefits are reflected in the total benefits for net income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interests and stock-based compensation plans activity.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: tariff, artificial intelligence, china, inflation
“Major U.S. stock market indices rose in 2025. After a challenging start to 2025 stemming from new U.S. tariff and trade policies, equities advanced starting in April, as the U.S. and China made efforts to improve their trade relationship, economic growth and corporate earnings remained favorable, investors favored artificial intelligence-related businesses and other high-growth companies, and Congress passed tax legislation that should provide some fiscal stimulus to the economy. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: ai, inflation, interest rate, labor
“U.S. stocks produced strong gains for the second consecutive year in 2024, and various equity indexes reached new all-time highs during the year. The equity market was buoyed by generally favorable corporate earnings and by continuing interest in companies expected to benefit from AI developments. Although inflation remained above the Federal Reserve’s long-term 2% target, the central bank shifted its focus toward the moderating labor market in the second half of the year and began reducing interest rates starting in September. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: impairment
“(2) Capital allocation-based income compensation represents the change in accrued carried interest compensation along with acquisition-related, non-cash amortization and impairments.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: impairment, restructuring
“Restructuring charge of $177.3 million for 2025 relates to actions taken under our previously announced broad and ongoing expense management program, which is designed to reduce expense growth and realign resources to support investment in existing and future capabilities. The charge includes accelerated depreciation and impairment charges related to certain owned real estate of $127.3 million as well as compensation‑related costs, primarily severance.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: supply chain, inflation, interest rate
“In 2024 and 2023, strong market returns contributed to the increased valuation and gains of our investment portfolio, along with higher cash balances and interest rates increased dividend income. In 2022, our overall investment portfolio valuations were negatively impacted by market declines caused by the continued elevated inflation, supply chain disruptions, and a more aggressive pace of Federal Reserve interest rate increases.”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“(1) State income tax benefits are reflected in the total benefits for net income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interests and stock-based compensation plans activity.”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (161)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 15 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Our revenues and net income are derived primarily from investment advisory services provided globally to individual and institutional investors in a broad range of investment solutions across equity, fixed income, multi-asset, and alternativealternatives capabilities. We also provide certain investment advisory clients with related administrative services, including distribution, mutual fund transfer agent, accounting, and shareholder services; participant recordkeeping and transfer agent services for defined contribution retirement plans; brokerage; trust services; and non-discretionaryother advisory services.

Reworded

Investment advisory fees depend largely on the total value and composition of our assets under our management. Accordingly, fluctuations in financial markets and in the composition of assets under management affect our revenues and results of operations.

Reworded

The investment management industry hascontinues beento evolvingevolve and industry participants are facingface challenging trendstrends, including passivethe investmentsshift takingin market share from traditional active strategies; continuedto passive products, persistent downward fee pressure;pressure, demand for newlower cost investment vehicles to meet client needs;vehicles, and an ever-changing regulatory landscape. In this regard,environment, we havemaintain ample liquidity and resources that allow us to take advantage of attractive growth opportunities.opportunities Weand aredeliver new capabilities that meet the evolving needs of our clients globally. At the same time, we have developed a broad and ongoing plan to further align our expense growth with our anticipated revenue growth, which will allow us to realign resources and continue investing in key capabilities, including investment professionals, distribution professionals, technologies,existing and newfuture product offerings in order to provide our clients with strong investment management expertise and service.capabilities.

Added

In 2025, we took several steps to execute on this plan, including targeted role eliminations, outsourcing and expanding some of our technology capabilities through trusted vendor partnerships, and the decision to exit certain owned buildings with plans to dispose of the properties in 2026.

Added

The impact of these actions has been recorded as a restructuring charge in the consolidated statements of income and is discussed later in Item 7. and Item 8. These measures also help offset ongoing inflationary pressures on compensation and contractual spending. Our strategic investments include hiring investment and distribution professionals, adopting new technologies, offering new products, and growing and diversifying our business through innovative global partnerships.

Added

Major U.S. stock market indices rose in 2025. After a challenging start to 2025 stemming from new U.S. tariff and trade policies, equities advanced starting in April, as the U.S. and China made efforts to improve their trade relationship, economic growth and corporate earnings remained favorable, investors favored artificial intelligence-related businesses and other high-growth companies, and Congress passed tax legislation that should provide some fiscal stimulus to the economy. In addition, signs of a weakening labor market in the latter part of the year prompted the Federal Reserve to reduce short-term interest rates, despite continued elevated inflation. The central bank lowered rates in September, October, and December.

Removed

U.S. stocks produced strong gains for the second consecutive year in 2024, and various equity indexes reached new all-time highs during the year. The equity market was buoyed by generally favorable corporate earnings and by continuing interest in companies expected to benefit from AI developments. Although inflation remained above the Federal Reserve’s long-term 2% target, the central bank shifted its focus toward the moderating labor market in the second half of the year and began reducing interest rates starting in September. In the final months of the year, equity investors generally welcomed not only looser monetary policy, but also diminished political uncertainty following U.S. elections in early November. Market volatility increased, however, as investors curtailed their expectations for short-term interest rate cuts in 2025.

Reworded

Developed non-U.S. equity markets wereoutperformed mostlyU.S. positivestocks in 2024,U.S. dollar terms, helped by looser monetary policies from various central banks around the world. However, returns to U.S. investors were hurt by a strongerweaker dollar versus major non-U.S. currencies. In Europe, equity markets were widelymostly mixedpositive in U.S. dollar terms,terms. whereasStocks developedin Spain and Austria fared best, surging 80%, while equities in Finland, Ireland, and Italy advanced close to 60%. UK stocks rose 35%. Developed Asian markets were also mostly positive.positive with stocks in Hong Kong climbing 35% and Japanese stocks rising 25%.

Reworded

EmergingStocks equityin emerging markets generally appreciated and outperformed stocksequities in developed non-U.S. markets in U.S. dollar terms. EmergingIn Asianthe marketsemerging wereAsian, mostlyLatin positiveAmerican, in dollar terms, though South Korean stocks fell sharply due in large part to late-year political turmoil. Equities inand the emerging Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) regionregions, markets were also mostly positive. In Latin America, stocks in regional heavyweights Brazil and Mexico fell sharply, though some smaller markets produced positive returns.

Added

Global bond returns were positive in 2025. In the U.S., Treasury bill yields, which tend to track the federal funds target rate, declined about 70 basis points (0.70%) for the year, as the Federal Reserve reduced the federal funds target rate by 25 basis points (0.25%) three times in the final months of the year. At the end of the year, the federal funds target rate was in the 3.50% to 3.75% range. Short- and intermediate-term U.S. Treasury yields had a comparable decline, but the 10-year U.S. Treasury note yield fell 40 basis points (0.40%), from 4.58% to 4.18%. The 30-year U.S. Treasury bond yield rose modestly for the year.

Removed

Global bond returns were mostly positive in 2024, as many central banks around the world reduced short-term interest rates due to easing inflation pressures. In the U.S., Treasury bill yields declined as the Federal Reserve reduced the federal funds target rate by 100 basis points (1.00%) in three steps starting in mid-September. Intermediate- and long-term U.S. Treasury yields fluctuated throughout the year, but ultimately increased for the year amid expectations for fewer interest rate cuts in 2025 due to inflation remaining above the Federal Reserve’s 2% long-term goal. The 10-year U.S. Treasury note yield was 4.58% at December 31, 2024 compared to 3.88% at December 31, 2023 .

Reworded

In the U.S. investment-grade bond universe, sectormortgage-backed performancesecurities wasperformed broadlybest, positive.but Non-agencycorporate bonds and non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities also did well. Treasuries and asset-backed securities producedslightly solid gains. Corporate bonds rose to a lesser degree. Mortgage-backed securities performed in line with the broad investment-grade market. Treasuries lagged with slight positive returns.lagged. Tax-free municipal bonds slightly trailed the broadunderperformed taxable bondbonds, market.but Highhigh yield corporate bonds produced solid gains and stronglycorporates outperformed the investment-grade bond market.

Added

Bonds in developed non-U.S. markets produced positive returns in U.S. dollar terms, helped by a weaker dollar versus major non-U.S. currencies. In the eurozone, longer-term bond yields increased in many countries, though policymakers for the European Central Bank reduced short-term interest rates four times in the first half of 2025. In the UK, longer-term bond yields fell slightly for the year, as the Bank of England reduced the Bank Rate by 25 basis points (0.25%) four times in 2025. The euro strengthened more than 13% versus the U.S. dollar, while the British pound rose more than 7%. In Japan, long-term government bond yields climbed as the Bank of Japan raised its benchmark interest rate to 0.50% in January and to 0.75% in December. Bond yields were also pressured higher by late-year concerns that new Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi will pursue aggressive fiscal stimulus funded by debt issuance. The yen rose marginally versus the dollar.

Added

Emerging markets bonds produced strong positive returns in U.S. dollar terms. Bonds denominated in local currencies generally outperformed dollar-denominated bonds, as many emerging markets currencies appreciated versus the dollar, boosting returns to U.S. investors.

Removed

Bonds in developed non-U.S. markets produced negative returns in U.S. dollar terms due to weaker currencies versus the dollar and rising bond yields in some countries. Easing inflation pressures enabled central banks in Europe and the UK to reduce interest rates a few times. In Japan, longer-term interest rates rose as the Bank of Japan increased short-term rates in March, ending a multi-year period of negative interest rates. The Bank of Japan also unexpectedly raised rates at the end of July. In the emerging markets fixed income universe, dollar-denominated bonds produced gains in U.S. dollar terms, but local currency bonds produced negative returns, as most developing markets currencies declined versus the dollar.

Reworded

ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT.(1)

Reworded

Assets under management ended 20242025 at $1,606.6$1,775.6 billion, an increase of $162.1$169.0 billion from the end of 2023.2024. This increase was driven by net market appreciation and income, net of distributions not reinvested, of $205.3$216.7 billion, offset by net cash outflows of $43.2$56.9 billion. Beginning on July 1, 2025, assets under management include managed account - model delivery portfolios assets, which had $9.2 billion in assets as of that date, and are reflected in the increase from December 31, 2024.

Reworded

The following table details changes in our assets under managementmanagement, by asset classclass, during the last three years:

Added

(1) Includes assets in which T. Rowe Price and its affiliates have full discretionary authority and, beginning in 2025, managed account - model delivery assets.

Reworded

(12) The underlying AUMassets under management of the multi-asset portfoliosproducts have been aggregated and presented in this category and not reported in the equity and fixed income columns.

Reworded

(23) The alternatives asset class includes strategies authorized to invest more than 50% of its holdings in private credit, leveraged loans, mezzanine, real assets/CRE, structured products, stressed/distressed, non-investment grade CLOs, special situations, business development companies, or that have absolute return as its investment objective. Generally, only those strategies with longer than daily liquidity are included. Unfunded capital commitments ofwere $21.6 billion at December 31, 2025, $16.2 billion at December 31, 2024, and $11.6 billion at December 31, 2023, and $10.5 billion at December 31, 2022 are not reflected in fee basis AUM above.

Reworded

(34) ReflectsIncludes net distributions not reinvested of $6.8 billion in 2025, $5.9 billion in 2024, and $2.9 billion in 2023, and $3.3 billion in 2022.2023.

Added

(5) Amount represents the net assets as of July 1, 2025 and all activity for the second half of 2025 is presented in the lines that follow.

Reworded

Investment advisory clients outside the U.S.United accountedStates account for 8.8% of our assets under management at December 31, 2024,2025 and December 31, 2024 and 8.6% at December 31, 2023, and 9.1% at December 31, 2022.2023.

Reworded

Our net cash outflows in 20242025 were driven primarily by growth-oriented equity strategies. These outflows were partially offset by net cash inflows in fixed income, target date retirement products, and alternatives strategies. Financial intermediaries and institutional clients were the main sources of net outflows in 2025. From a geography perspective, net outflows were predominantly from U.S. clients invested in equity strategies, though all regions experienced net outflows. For 2024, net outflows were driven primarily by growth-oriented equity strategies and a multi-asset sub-advised variable annuity outflow. These outflows were partially offset by net cash inflows in our target date retirement products, fixed income and alternativealternatives strategies. Financial intermediaries were the main sources of net outflows in 2024. Geographically, while the EMEA and APAC regions experienced net inflows, these were outweighed by outflows in the Americas. For 2023, net outflows were driven primarily by our growth-oriented equity strategies sourced from Americas financial intermediaries and institutional clients. These outflows were partially offset by net cash inflows in our multi-asset strategies, predominately our target date retirement products, and alternativealternatives strategies. From a geography perspective, net outflows were predominantly from U.S. clients invested in equity strategiesstrategies, though all regions experienced net outflows. For 2022, net outflows were driven primarily by our growth-oriented equity strategies sourced from U.S. intermediaries. These outflows were partially offset by net cash inflows in our international fixed income, multi-asset, and alternative strategies. From a geographical perspective, the Americas and EMEA regions experienced net outflows predominantly in equities, while APAC had positive net flows.

Added

Our multi-asset investment division provides advisory solutions that include investment insights, strategic asset allocation design, tactical asset allocation recommendations, and portfolio rebalancing services. The assets in these solutions, predominantly in the United States, were $27.8 billion at December 31, 2025, compared with $8.0 billion at December 31, 2024.

Removed

We provide strategic investment advice solutions for certain portfolios. These advice solutions, the vast majority of which are overseen by our multi-asset division, may include strategic asset allocation, and in certain portfolios, asset selection and/or tactical asset allocation overlays. We also offer advice solutions through retail separately managed accounts and separately managed accounts model delivery. As of December 31, 2024, total assets in these solutions were $557 billion, of which $542 billion are reported in assets under management in the tables above.

Reworded

We provide participant accounting and plan administration for defined contribution retirement plans that primarily invest in the firm'sour U.S. mutual funds, collective investment trusts and funds managed outside of the firm'sour complex. As of December 31, 2024,2025, our assets under administration were $282$314 billion, of which $159$178 billion were assets we manage.

Reworded

INVESTMENT PERFORMANCEPERFORMANCE.(1).

Reworded

Strong investment performance and brand awareness is a key driver to attracting and retaining assets—and to our long-term success. Our performance disclosures include specific asset classes, assets under management weighted performance, U.S. fund performance against passive peers, and composite performance against benchmarks. The following tabletables presentspresent investment performance for the one-, three-, five-, and 10-years ended December 31, 2024.2025. Past performance is nonot a guarantee nor a reliable indicator of future results.performance.

Reworded

As of December 31, 2024,2025, 5468 of 90141 (60.0%48.2%) of ourthe firm's rated U.S. mutual funds (across primary share classes) received an overall rating of 4 or 5 stars. By comparison, 32.5% of Morningstar's fund population is given a rating of 4 or 5 stars(6). In addition, 63.0%60.4%(6) of AUM in ourthe firm's rated U.S. mutual funds (across primary share classes) ended 20242025 with an overall rating of 4 or 5 stars.

Reworded

(1) The investment performance reflects that of T. Rowe Price sponsoredU.S. mutual fundsfunds, ETFs, and composites AUM.composites.

Reworded

(3) Source: Morningstar. Primary share class only. Excludes money market mutual funds, funds with an operating history of less than one year, T. Rowe Price passive funds, and T. Rowe Price funds that are clones of other funds. The top chart reflects the percentage of T. Rowe Price funds with 1 year, 3 year, 5 year, and 10 year track record that are outperformingoutperformed the Morningstar category median. The bottom chart reflects the percentage of T. Rowe Price funds AUM that has outperformed for the time periods indicated. Total Fund AUM included for this analysis includes $322B$329B for 1 year, $318B$319B for 3 years, $317B for 5 years, and $316B for 10 years.

Reworded

(4) Passive Peer Median was created by T. Rowe Price using data from Morningstar. Primary share class only. Excludes money market mutual funds, funds with an operating history of less than one year, funds with fewer than three peers, T. Rowe Price passive funds, and T. Rowe Price funds that are clones of othera funds.retail Thisfund.This analysis compares T. Rowe Price active funds with the applicable universe of passive/index open-end funds and ETFs of peer firms. The top chart reflects the percentage of T. Rowe Price funds with 1 year, 3 year, 5 year, and 10 year track record that are outperformingoutperformed the passive peer universe. The bottom chart reflects the percentage of T. Rowe Price funds AUM that has outperformed for the time periods indicated. Total AUM included for this analysis includes $306B$272B for 1 year, $302B$262B for 3 years, $262B$260B for 5 years, and $257B$252B for 10 years.

Reworded

(5) Composite net returns are calculated using the highest applicable separate account fee schedule. Excludes money market composites. All composites compared to official GIPS composite primary benchmark. The top chart reflects the percentage of T. Rowe Price composites with 1 year, 3 year, 5 year, and 10 year track record that are outperforming their benchmarks. The bottom chart reflects the percentage of T. Rowe Price composite AUM that has outperformed for the time periods indicated. Total AUM included for this analysis includes $1,423B$1,565B for 1 year, $1,420B$1,557B for 3 years, $1,418B$1,551B for 5 years, and $1,367B$1,512B for 10 years.

Reworded

The following table and discussion set forth information regarding our consolidated financial results for 2024,2025, 20232024 and 20222023 on a U.S. GAAP basis and a non-GAAP basis. The non-GAAP basis adjusts for the impact of our consolidated investment products, the impact of market movements on the deferred compensation liabilities and related economic hedges, investment income related to certain other investments, acquisition-related amortization and costs, impairment charges, and certain nonrecurring charges and gains, ifincluding any.the restructuring charges.

Reworded

(1) Then/m - the percentage change is not meaningful (n/m).meaningful.

Removed

(2) Performance-based advisory fees were previously included in investment advisory fees. Prior periods were recast to reflect this change.

Added

Results Overview - 2025 compared to 2024

Added

Net revenues consist of investment advisory revenues; performance-based advisory fees; administrative, distribution, services, and other fees; and capital allocation-based income. More than 90% of our net revenues are related to investment advisory fees. Total net revenues were $7,314.8 million in 2025, a 3.1% increase compared to $7,093.6 million in 2024. The increase was driven primarily by higher investment advisory fees on higher average assets under management, as well as higher capital allocation-based income, which was partially offset by lower performance-based advisory fees.

Added

Investment advisory fees are generally earned based on the value and composition of our assets under management, which change based on fluctuations in financial markets and net cash flows. As our average assets under management increase or decrease in a given period, the level of our investment advisory fee revenue for that same period generally fluctuates in a similar manner. Our annualized effective fee rates can be impacted by market or cash flow related shifts among asset classes and products, including those with tiered-fee structures, along with price changes we make in existing products.

Added

The average annualized effective fee rate earned for 2025 declined from 2024 primarily due to client flows and transfers shifting assets under management toward lower-fee strategies and products, partially offset by market appreciation.

Added

Capital allocation-based income will fluctuate quarter-to-quarter to reflect the adjustment to accrued carried interest for the change in value of certain affiliated funds assuming the funds’ underlying investments were realized as of the end of the period.

Added

Operating expenses on a U.S. GAAP basis were $5,126.0 million in 2025, an increase of 7.7% compared to $4,760.3 million in 2024. On a non-GAAP basis, operating expenses were $4,666.5 million, an increase of 3.7% compared to $4,498.8 million in 2024.

Added

Compared to 2024, the increase in U.S. GAAP operating expenses was primarily due to the restructuring charge as well as higher technology and facility costs, compensation and related costs, and distribution and servicing costs. These increases were partially offset by lower advertising and promotion costs. The drivers of the increase in non-GAAP operating expenses were the same as those for the increase in U.S. GAAP operating expenses with the exception of the restructuring charge, which is excluded from our non-GAAP operating expenses measures.

Added

We currently estimate our 2026 non-GAAP operating expenses, excluding non-GAAP accrued carried interest compensation, will grow in the range of 3%-6% from the 2025 amount of $4,608.0 million. We could elect to adjust our expense growth should unforeseen circumstances arise, including significant market movements.

Added

Operating margin was 29.9% in 2025 compared to 32.9% in 2024. The decrease is primarily driven by the restructuring charge recognized in 2025, which largely contributed to operating expense growth exceeding net revenue growth.

Added

Diluted earnings per share was $9.24 in 2025 compared to $9.15 in 2024. The increase in GAAP basis diluted earnings per share was primarily due to higher non-operating income and fewer outstanding shares, partially offset by lower operating income.

Added

On a non-GAAP basis, diluted earnings per share was $9.72 in 2025 compared to $9.33 in 2024. The increase was primarily due to fewer outstanding shares and higher net income.

Reworded

On a non-GAAP basis, operating expenses were $4,498.8 million, an increase of 5.6% compared to 2023. The increase in our non-GAAP operating expenses was primarily driven by higher costs across compensation and benefits, distribution and servicing, advertising, professional fees, and a non-recurringnonrecurring recovery of general and administrative costs recognized in 2023. These increases were partially offset by lower external research fees, lower accrued carried interest compensation, and higher capitalized labor. In 2024, the firm changed its approach to paying for external research, consistent with regulations and general industry practice.

Removed

We currently estimate our 2025 non-GAAP operating expenses, excluding non-GAAP accrued carried interest compensation, will grow in the range of 4%-6% from the 2024 amount of $4,456.3 million. We could elect to adjust our expense growth should unforeseen circumstances arise, including significant market movements.

Removed

Results Overview - 2023 compared to 2022

Removed

Investment advisory fees are earned based on the value and composition of our assets under management, which change based on fluctuations in financial markets and net cash flows. As our average assets under management increase or decrease in a given period, the level of our investment advisory fees for that same period generally fluctuates in a similar manner. Our annualized effective fee rates can be impacted by market or cash flow related shifts among asset and share classes, price changes in existing products, and asset level changes in products with tiered-fee structures.

Removed

Investment advisory fees earned in 2023 decreased 3.7% over the comparable 2022 period as average assets under our management decreased $36.1 billion, or 2.6%, to $1,362.3 billion.

Removed

The average annualized effective fee rate earned on our assets under management was 41.9 basis points in 2023, compared to 42.6 basis points earned in 2022. Our effective fee rate has declined largely due to a mix shift toward lower fee asset classes and vehicles as a result of net equity outflows, partially offset by higher market returns. The average annualized fee rate earned on our assets under management was 41.5 basis points for the fourth quarter of 2023.

Removed

Operating expenses were $4,474.3 million in 2023, an increase of 8.7% over the comparable 2022 period. The impact of market movements on the supplemental savings plan liability accounted for about 70% of the increase in U.S. GAAP operating expenses. Non-operating income has a corresponding increase due to our economic hedge of the liability.

Removed

On a non-GAAP basis, operating expenses were $4,260.7 million, a 4.2% increase over the comparable 2022 period. The increase in our non-GAAP operating expenses was primarily driven by higher costs across compensation and benefits, accrued carried interest related compensation expense, technology, facility, advertising, and professional fees. These increases were offset in part by higher capitalized labor, lower stock-based compensation, and a non-recurring recovery of general and administrative costs incurred in 2022.

Removed

Operating margin was 30.7% in 2023, compared to 36.6% in 2022. The decrease in our operating margin in 2023 compared to 2022 is primarily driven by a decrease in investment advisory fees as a result of lower average assets under management and higher operating expenses.

Removed

Diluted earnings per share. Diluted earnings per share was $7.76 in 2023 compared to $6.70 in 2022. The increase in 2023 GAAP basis diluted earnings per share from 2022 was primarily due to net investment income in 2023 compared to net investment losses in 2022. These increases were partially offset by lower operating income and a higher effective tax rate.

Removed

On a non-GAAP basis, diluted earnings per share was $7.59 in 2023 compared to $8.02 in 2022. The decrease in 2023 was primarily due to lower operating income and a higher effective tax rate. These decreases were offset by net investment income earned on our cash and discretionary investment portfolio in 2023 compared to net investment losses in 2022.

Showing the first 60 of 161 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-07-31 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-04-30 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
22 → 22words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

There have been no material changes in the information provided in Item 1A of our Form 10-K Annual Report for 2025.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

18new paragraphs
9removed paragraphs
55reworded paragraphs
6,946 → 8,188words in section

New heading “Results Overview - Year-to-Date ended June 30, 2026”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: ai, taiwan, middle east
“International equity markets produced strong gains during the second quarter of 2026 despite periods of volatility related to geopolitical developments, trade negotiations, and evolving monetary policy expectations. Developed markets benefited from improving Middle East conditions, declining energy prices, stronger investor risk appetite, and continued enthusiasm surrounding AI and semiconductor-related companies. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: middle east, inflation
“International and emerging market bonds also produced positive second-quarter returns. Developed market sovereign yields moved unevenly as initial optimism surrounding the Middle East ceasefire later gave way to renewed inflation and monetary policy concerns before stabilizing as energy prices declined. Emerging market bonds advanced across both hard currency and local currency sectors, supported by improving geopolitical conditions, tighter sovereign credit spreads, and resilient demand for risk assets, though local currency gains moderated late in the quarter as the U.S. dollar strengthened.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: inflation, interest rate
“Global bond returns were modestly negative in the first quarter of 2026. In the U.S., fixed income markets were relatively flat during the quarter. Earlier gains were reversed later in the period as rising energy prices contributed to upward pressure on inflation expectations. Heightened geopolitical uncertainty increased interest rate volatility and complicated expectations regarding the duration of restrictive monetary policy. The Federal Reserve maintained its policy rate during the quarter, reflecting a continued data-dependent stance amid evolving economic and geopolitical conditions.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: middle east, inflation
“Global fixed income markets generated positive returns during the second quarter of 2026, although performance was volatile as investors weighed improving geopolitical conditions against persistent inflation pressures and a shifting monetary policy outlook. Easing tensions in the Middle East, lower oil prices, and several cooler-than-expected inflation readings supported bond prices early in the quarter, while subsequent moves in oil prices, stronger economic data, and evolving Federal Reserve communication periodically reshaped expectations for monetary policy.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: ai, middle east
“Global equity markets generated strong gains during the second quarter of 2026, recovering sharply from first-quarter volatility as geopolitical tensions eased, corporate earnings remained resilient, and investor enthusiasm surrounding AI and semiconductor-related companies continued to support risk assets. The quarter began with a broad rally after a series of Middle East ceasefire agreements reduced concerns about global energy and shipping disruptions, and oil prices declined from earlier highs as diplomatic progress continued through June.”
see in full comparison
New text
“Results Overview - Year-to-Date ended June 30, 2026”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (82)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 4 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

The investment management industry is evolving, facing challenging trends such as passive strategies taking market share from traditional active strategies; continued downward fee pressure; demand for new investment vehicles to meet client needs; and an ever-changing regulatory landscape. In this regard, we have ample liquidity and resources that allow us to take advantage of attractive growth opportunities. Furthermore, we have developed a broad and ongoing plan to align our expense growth with anticipated revenue growth. As a result, we have initiated certaintaken actions to reduce expense growth, realign resources, and invest in existing and future capabilities, while also helping to offset ongoing inflationary pressures on compensation and contractual spending. These investments include hiring investment and distribution professionals, adopting new technologies, and offering new products to provide our clients with strong investment management expertise and services.

Added

Global equity markets generated strong gains during the second quarter of 2026, recovering sharply from first-quarter volatility as geopolitical tensions eased, corporate earnings remained resilient, and investor enthusiasm surrounding AI and semiconductor-related companies continued to support risk assets. The quarter began with a broad rally after a series of Middle East ceasefire agreements reduced concerns about global energy and shipping disruptions, and oil prices declined from earlier highs as diplomatic progress continued through June.

Added

U.S. equities advanced broadly, although market leadership varied by capitalization, investment style, and sector. Small-cap shares outperformed mid- and large-cap shares, and growth stocks outperformed value stocks across market capitalizations. Within the S&P 500 Index, information technology led sector gains, while industrials and business services, consumer discretionary, financials, health care, real estate, and communication services advanced but generally lagged the broader index. Energy declined sharply, and utilities recorded a slight loss.

Added

International equity markets produced strong gains during the second quarter of 2026 despite periods of volatility related to geopolitical developments, trade negotiations, and evolving monetary policy expectations. Developed markets benefited from improving Middle East conditions, declining energy prices, stronger investor risk appetite, and continued enthusiasm surrounding AI and semiconductor-related companies. Emerging market equities also generated robust returns, supported by renewed capital flows into higher-risk markets and lower oil prices, which particularly benefited many energy-importing economies. Performance varied across regions, with Taiwan benefiting from continued semiconductor demand, Chinese equities supported by stronger-than-expected economic growth, targeted policy measures, and investor sentiment improving following the summit in Beijing despite the absence of a comprehensive trade agreement.

Removed

Global financial markets experienced increased volatility during the first quarter of 2026. In the U.S., equity markets produced mixed results during the quarter. Equity prices advanced early in the quarter amid solid corporate earnings and generally favorable economic data. Later in the quarter, heightened geopolitical tensions disrupted global energy supply conditions, leading to a sharp increase in oil prices and a corresponding reassessment of inflation risks. This shift contributed to increased market volatility and downward pressure on equity valuations, particularly toward the end of the quarter.

Removed

Performance varied across market capitalizations and investment styles. Small- and mid-capitalization stocks outperformed large-cap stocks, and value-oriented equities outperformed growth equities across capitalization ranges. Energy stocks significantly outperformed amid higher commodity prices along with materials and utilities. In contrast, consumer discretionary, financials, information technology, and communication services underperformed.

Removed

Developed international and emerging equity markets were modestly negative for the quarter. Early gains were offset by late-quarter declines as higher energy costs weighed on growth expectations, particularly in regions dependent on imported energy.

Added

Global fixed income markets generated positive returns during the second quarter of 2026, although performance was volatile as investors weighed improving geopolitical conditions against persistent inflation pressures and a shifting monetary policy outlook. Easing tensions in the Middle East, lower oil prices, and several cooler-than-expected inflation readings supported bond prices early in the quarter, while subsequent moves in oil prices, stronger economic data, and evolving Federal Reserve communication periodically reshaped expectations for monetary policy.

Added

The Federal Reserve maintained the federal funds target range at 3.50% to 3.75% at both its April and June meetings. Policy messaging evolved during the quarter including eliminating forward guidance language and announcing a review of the Federal Reserve’s policy framework and communications practices.

Added

In the U.S. investment-grade bond universe, sector performance was positive in absolute terms. Corporate bonds performed best, followed by asset-backed securities, with non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities, mortgage-backed securities, and U.S. Treasuries also recording gains. The U.S. dollar ultimately strengthened after a weak April as persistent inflation, more hawkish Federal Reserve communications, and residual geopolitical uncertainty supported renewed demand for the dollar.

Added

International and emerging market bonds also produced positive second-quarter returns. Developed market sovereign yields moved unevenly as initial optimism surrounding the Middle East ceasefire later gave way to renewed inflation and monetary policy concerns before stabilizing as energy prices declined. Emerging market bonds advanced across both hard currency and local currency sectors, supported by improving geopolitical conditions, tighter sovereign credit spreads, and resilient demand for risk assets, though local currency gains moderated late in the quarter as the U.S. dollar strengthened.

Removed

Global bond returns were modestly negative in the first quarter of 2026. In the U.S., fixed income markets were relatively flat during the quarter. Earlier gains were reversed later in the period as rising energy prices contributed to upward pressure on inflation expectations. Heightened geopolitical uncertainty increased interest rate volatility and complicated expectations regarding the duration of restrictive monetary policy. The Federal Reserve maintained its policy rate during the quarter, reflecting a continued data-dependent stance amid evolving economic and geopolitical conditions.

Removed

Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities outperformed, while corporate bonds underperformed as credit spreads widened later in the quarter. Treasury securities posted modest losses. The U.S. dollar weakened early in the quarter amid shifting global capital flows before strengthening later as risk aversion increased.

Removed

International fixed income markets posted negative returns for the quarter, driven primarily by rising sovereign yields late in the period. Earlier gains supported by easing inflation trends were offset as geopolitical developments led to sharp increases in energy prices and a broad reassessment of inflation outlooks and anticipated central bank policy actions across major regions.

Removed

Emerging market bonds also declined during the quarter. Hard-currency sovereign bonds were negatively affected by widening credit spreads as investors reassessed sovereign credit risk amid tighter global financial conditions. Local-currency emerging market debt experienced additional pressure from rising domestic yields and currency depreciation later in the period, reflecting increased risk aversion and U.S. dollar strength. Earlier supportive conditions for emerging market fixed income were outweighed as geopolitical risks intensified toward quarter-end.

Reworded

Assets under management ended the firstsecond quarter of 2026 at $1,709.7$1,893.4 billion, aan decreaseincrease of $65.9$183.7 billion from DecemberMarch 31, 2025.2026. The decreaseincrease was driven by market depreciationappreciation, net of $52.2distributions billionnot andreinvested, of $190.2 billion, offset by net cash outflows of $13.7$6.5 billion.

Added

For the six months ended June 30, 2026, the increase in assets under management was primarily driven by market appreciation, net of distributions not reinvested, of $138.0 billion, offset by net cash outflows of $20.2 billion.

Reworded

The following table details changes in our assets under management, by asset class, during the firstthree- quarterand ofsix-month periods ended June 30, 2026:

Reworded

(3) The alternatives asset class includes strategies authorized to invest more than 50% of its holdings in private credit, leveraged loans, mezzanine, real assets/CRE, structured products, stressed / distressed, non-investment grade CLOs, special situations, private equity, or have absolute return as its investment objective. Generally, only those strategies with longer than daily liquidity are included. Unfunded capital commitments were $21.0 billion at June 30, 2026, $20.9 billion at March 31, 20262026, and $21.6 billion at December 31, 20252025, and are not reflected in fee basis AUM above.

Reworded

(4) Includes net distributions not reinvested for the firstthree- quarterand ofsix-month periods ended June 30, 2026 of $0.6.$0.6 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively.

Reworded

InvestmentInvestors advisory clientsdomiciled outside the United States account for 8.6%9.1% of our assets under management at June 30, 2026, 8.6% at March 31, 20262026, and 8.8% at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

Assets under management in our target date retirement products, which are included in the multi-asset totals shown above, were $622.0 billion at June 30, 2026, $561.3 billion at March 31, 2026, compared withand $561.4 billion at December 31, 2025. Net flows into these portfolios were $4.9$1.7 billion and $6.6 billion in the firstthree- quarterand ofsix-month 2026.periods ended June 30, 2026, respectively.

Reworded

Our multi-asset investment division provides advisory solutions that include investment insights, strategic asset allocation design, tactical asset allocation recommendations, and portfolio rebalancing services. The assets in these solutions, predominantly in the United States, were $31.1 billion at June 30, 2026 and $27.8 billion at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025.2026.

Reworded

We provide participant accounting and plan administration for defined contribution retirement plans that primarily invest in our U.S. mutual funds, collective investment trusts and funds managed outside of our complex. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our assets under administration were $314$349 billion, of which $176$192 billion arewere assets we manage.managed.

Reworded

Strong investment performance and brand awareness is a key driver to attracting and retaining assets—and to our long-term success. Our performance disclosures include specific asset classes, assets under management weighted performance, U.S. fund performance against passive peers, and composite performance against benchmarks. The following tables present investment performance for the one-, three-, five-, and 10-years ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. Past performance is not a guarantee nor a reliable indicator of future performance.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, 6864 of 140142 (48.6%45.1%) of the firm's rated U.S. mutual funds (across primary share classes) received an overall rating of 4 or 5 stars. By comparison, 32.5% of Morningstar's fund population is given a rating of 4 or 5 stars(6). In addition, 61.0%57.0%(6) of AUM in the firm's rated U.S. mutual funds (across primary share classes) ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 with an overall rating of 4 or 5 stars.

Reworded

The following table and discussion sets forth information regarding our consolidated financial results for the firstthree- quarterand ofsix-month periods ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 on a U.S. GAAP and a non-GAAP basis. The non-GAAP basis adjusts for the impact of our consolidated investment products, the impact of market movements on the deferred compensation liabilities and related economic hedges, investment income related to certain other investments, acquisition-related amortization and costs, impairment charges, and certain nonrecurringnon-recurring charges and gains, including the restructuring charges.

Reworded

Results Overview - Quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026

Reworded

Net revenues consist of investment advisory revenues; performance-based advisory fees; capital allocation-based income; and administrative, distribution, servicing, and other fees; and capital allocation-based income.fees. More than 90% of our net revenues are related to investment advisory fees. Total net revenues were $1,857.0$1,907.4 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, a 5.3%10.7% increase over $1,763.9$1,723.3 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The increase was primarily driven by aan 5.3%11.3% increase in investment advisory fee revenue as higher overall markets increased average assets under management by 9.6% and a $29.3 million increase in capital allocation-based income (change in accrued carried interest) earned from investments in certain affiliated funds.15.7%.

Reworded

Operating expenses on a U.S. GAAP basis were $1,176.5$1,366.9 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, a 0.8%9.8% increase over the comparable 2025 period. On a non-GAAP basis, adjusted operating expenses were $1,155.2$1,203.2 million, a 1.8%4.9% increase over the comparable 2025 period.

Added

Compared to the second quarter of 2025, about 50% of the increase in U.S. GAAP operating expenses during the second quarter of 2025 was due to higher compensation expense related to deferred compensation liabilities, as stronger markets increased the investment values the liabilities are indexed against. Additionally, higher compensation and related benefits, distribution and servicing costs, technology, occupancy and facilities costs, and general, administrative, and other costs also contributed to the increase in U.S. GAAP operating expenses and were the main drivers of the increase in adjusted operating expenses compared to the 2025 period. The market-related impacts on the deferred compensation liabilities are not included in our adjusted operating expenses as these liabilities are economically hedged which is reflected in non-operating income (loss). See the GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation at the end of the Results of Operations section of this Management's Discussion and Analysis.

Removed

Compared to the first quarter of 2025, the increase in U.S. GAAP and adjusted operating expenses was driven by higher technology, occupancy, and facilities costs. Also, U.S. GAAP expenses were impacted by lower mark-to-market related to our deferred compensation liabilities and lower acquisition-related amortization costs, partially offset by the restructuring charge. These costs are not included in our non-GAAP operating expenses. See the GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation at the end of the Results of Operations section of this Management's Discussion and Analysis.

Reworded

Operating margin in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was 36.6%28.3% on a U.S. GAAP basis, compared to 33.8%27.8% earned in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The increase in our operating margin for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to the 2025 period was driven by net revenue growth outpacing operating expense growth primarily due to higher investment advisory fees.

Reworded

Diluted earnings per share was $2.23$2.88 for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to $2.15$2.24 for the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The increase was primarily driven by ahigher lowernet taxinvestment rategains and lowerhigher weightedoperating average shares outstandingincome compared to the 2025 period.

Reworded

On a non-GAAP basis, adjusted diluted earnings per share was $2.52$2.57 for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to $2.23$2.24 for the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The increase was primarily due to higher adjusted operating income and lower weighted average shares outstanding compared to the 2025 period.

Added

Results Overview - Year-to-Date ended June 30, 2026

Added

Net revenues consist of investment advisory revenues; performance-based advisory fees; capital allocation-based income; and administrative, distribution, servicing, and other fees. More than 90% of our net revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2026 were related to investment advisory fees. Total net revenues were $3,764.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2026, a 7.9% increase over $3,487.2 million in the 2025 period. The increase was primarily driven by an 8.3% increase in investment advisory fee revenue as average assets under management increased by 12.6%.

Added

Operating expenses were $2,543.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared with $2,412.6 million in the 2025 period. On a non-GAAP basis, adjusted operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased 3.3% to $2,358.4 million compared to the 2025 period.

Added

Compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, the primarily drivers of the increase in U.S. GAAP and non-GAAP operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2026 were higher technology and facility costs, compensation and related benefits costs, and distribution and servicing costs partially offset by lower advertising and promotion costs. The increase in U.S. GAAP operating expenses was also impacted by higher compensation expense related to the deferred compensation liabilities driven by stronger markets and the restructuring charge recognized in the second quarter of 2026. These costs are not included in our adjusted operating expenses. See the GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation at the end of the Results of Operations section of this Management's Discussion and Analysis.

Added

Operating margin in the six months ended June 30, 2026 was 32.4% on a U.S. GAAP basis, compared to 30.8% earned in the 2025 period. The increase in our U.S. GAAP operating margin for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the 2025 period was primarily driven by net revenue growth outpacing operating expense growth.

Added

Diluted earnings per share was $5.10 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to $4.38 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was driven by higher operating income, lower weighted average shares outstanding, and higher net investment gains compared to the 2025 period.

Added

On a non-GAAP basis, adjusted diluted earnings per share was $5.09 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to $4.47 for the 2025 period. The increase was primarily due to higher adjusted operating income and lower weighted average shares outstanding.

Reworded

Investment advisory fees in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 increased 5.3%11.3% over the comparable 2025 quarter as average assets under management increased $155.5$248.9 billion or 15.7%, to $1,837.7 billion. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, investment advisory revenues increased 8.3% over the comparable 2025 period as average assets under management increased $202.4 billion, or 9.6%,12.6%, to $1,775.8$1,806.9 billion.

Reworded

The average annualized effective fee rate earned for the firstthree- quarterand ofsix-month periods ended June 30, 2026 declined from the comparable 2025 periodperiods due to client flows and transfers creating a mix shift in assets under management toward lower fee products and asset classes.classes partially offset by market appreciation.

Reworded

Performance-based advisory fees in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and 2025 were primarily earned from alternative strategies. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, fees were primarily earned from alternative strategies, whereaswhile infor the 2025 comparativecomparable period feesof 2025, they were earned acrosson both alternative and equity and alternative strategies.

Reworded

Capital allocation-based income includes the change in accrued carried interest along with acquisition-related amortization and impairments. ForIn the 2026second quarter,quarter of 2026, accrued carried interest increased net revenues by $31.3$15.2 million, compared to $9.2$36.5 million in 2025,the 2025 period, reflecting weaker relative investment performance.performance in credit strategies. Capital allocation-based income for the second quarter of 2026 also includes carried interest earned on our late stage venture fund. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, accrued carried interest increased net revenues by $46.5 million compared to $45.7 million for the 2025 period. The decrease in acquisition-related amortization and impairments from the comparable 2025 periodperiods primarilywas reflectsdue amortization andto impairments recognized over time, which reducedin the remaining2025 carryingperiods valuethat ofdid thenot acquired-assets.recur. We realized carried interest of $41.0$8.2 million and $49.2 million in the firstthree- quarterand ofsix-month 2026periods ended June 30, 2026, respectively, compared to $43.1$10.9 million and $54.0 million in the 2025 period.periods, respectively.

Reworded

Administrative, distribution, servicing, and other fees in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 were $138.4$144.2 million, a decrease of $17.9$5.5 million, or 11.5%,3.7%, from the comparable 2025 quarter. TheFor the six months ended June 30, 2026, these fees were $282.6 million, a decrease of $23.4 million, or 7.6%, from the 2025 period. The decreases primarily reflectsreflect the reporting change implemented in Q3the third quarter of 2025, in which revenue earned from managed account - model delivery assets and certain other advisory services began being reported within investment advisory fees, asalong wellwith aslower recordkeeping fees. For the quarterly comparison, these decreases were partially offset by the timing of cost reimbursements from theour U.S. mutual funds.

Reworded

Our net revenues reflect the elimination of advisory and administrative fee revenue earned from our consolidated investment products. The corresponding expenses recognized by these products, and consolidated in our financial statements, were also eliminated from operating expenses. For the firstsecond quarter, we eliminated net revenue of $1.1$1.6 million in 2026 and $1.4 million in 2025. For the six months ended June 30, we eliminated net revenue of $2.7 million in 2026 and $2.8 million in 2025.

Reworded

(2) Capital allocation-based income compensation represents the compensation related to the change in accrued carried interest compensation along with acquisition-related, non-cash amortization and impairments.

Reworded

(3) In Q1 2026, we beganimplemented a reporting change the moved technology-related professional fees and servicing costs from general, administrative, and other costs to technology, occupancy, and facilities costs to better align with the nature of the expenses following the outsourcing and expansion of our technology capabilities through trusted vendor partnerships. Prior periods were recast to reflect this change. The amountamounts reclassified for the firstthree- quarterand ofsix-month periods ended June 30, 2025 waswere $13.6M.$15.5 million and $29.1 million.

Reworded

Compensation, benefits, and related costs were $655.1$675.9 million for the firstsecond quarter of 2026, aan decreaseincrease of $2.8$27.1 million, or 0.4%,4.2%, compared to the 2025 quarter. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, these costs were $1,331.0 million, an increase of $24.3 million, or 1.9%, compared to the 2025 period. The decreaseincreases wasin both periods were primarily due to a higher interim bonus accrual partially offset by lower salaries and related benefits, partially offset by higher long-term incentive compensation.benefits.

Added

The average associate headcount for the second quarter of 2026 was 7,535, a decrease of 6.6% compared to the 2025 period. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, average associate headcount was 7,582, a decrease of 6.3% compared to the 2025 period.The firm employed 7,544 associates at June 30, 2026, a decrease of 2.9% from the end of 2025.

Removed

The firm employed 7,507 associates at March 31, 2026, a decrease of 3.4% from the end of 2025 and a decrease of 7.1% from March 31, 2025. The average associate headcount for the first quarter of 2026 was 7,617, a decrease of 6.0% compared to the 2025 period.

Reworded

Distribution and servicing costs were $99.3$106.1 million for the firstsecond quarter of 2026, an increase of $5.7$13.6 million, or 6.1%,14.7%, from $93.6$92.5 million recognized in the 2025 quarter. TheFor the six months ended June 30, 2026, these costs were $205.4 million, an increase wasof 10.4%, from $186.1 million recognized in the comparable 2025 period. The increases in both periods were primarily driven by higher average assets under management distributed through intermediaries.

Reworded

The costs in this expense category include amounts paid to third-party intermediaries that source the assets of certain share classes of our U.S. mutual funds, ETFs, and ourcertain international products, such as our Japanese ITMs and SICAVs. These costs are offset entirely by the investment advisory revenue we earn from these products, or in the case of the Advisor and R share classes of the U.S. mutual funds, are12(b)-(1) fees recognized in administrative, distribution, servicing, and other fees.

Reworded

Advertising and promotion costs were $18.4$20.3 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, a decrease of $7.7$9.6 million, or 29.5%,32.1%, compared to the $26.1$29.9 million recognized in the 2025 quarter. TheFor the six months ended June 30, 2026, these costs were $38.7 million, a decrease wasof $17.3 million, or 30.9%, compared to $56.0 million recognized in the 2025 period. The decreases in both periods were primarily due to timing oflower media spend and events.agency costs.

Reworded

Product and recordkeeping related costs were $74.3$83.1 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, aan decreaseincrease of $9.5$8.3 million, or 11.3%,11.1%, compared to the $74.8 million recognized in the 2025 quarter. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, these costs were $157.4 million, a decrease of $1.2 million, or 0.8%, compared to $158.6 million recognized in the 2025 period. The decreaseincrease for the second quarter of 2026 over the comparable 2025 period was primarily due to the timing of costs reimbursed by our U.S. mutual funds. The offsetting reimbursement is recognized in administrative, distribution, servicing, and other fees revenue.

Reworded

Technology, occupancy, and facility costs were $204.4$205.9 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, an increase of $23.2$10.9 million, or 12.8%,5.6%, compared to the $181.2$195.0 million recognized in the 2025 quarter. TheFor the six months ended June 30, 2026, these costs were $410.3 million, an increase fromof $34.1 million, or 9.1%, compared with $376.2 million recognized in the 2025 quarterperiod. wasThe increases in both periods were primarily due to higher technology costs, includingincluding, hosted solutions, cloud services,services,and depreciation, and our decision in the prior year to outsource certain technology capabilities.capabilities which were partially offset by a reduction in compensation expenses.

Reworded

General, administrative, and other expenses were $92.4$104.9 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, an increase of $2.7$11.0 million, or 3.0%,11.7%, compared to the $89.7$93.9 million recognized in the 2025 quarter. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, these costs were $197.3 million, an increase of $13.7 million, or 7.5%, compared with $183.6 million recognized in the 2025 period. The increase was primarily due to higher externaltravel researchcosts and othercertain general andnon-recurring administrative costs.

Reworded

Acquisition-related amortization and impairment costs. As part of the purchase accounting for our acquisitions, we identified and separately recognized, at fair value, certain intangible assets. During the firstthree- quarterand ofsix-month periods ended June 30, 2026, we recognized $18.0$16.5 million and $34.5 million, respectively, in amortization and impairments compared to $28.7$31.2 million and $59.9 million, respectively, in the comparable 2025 period.periods. The decreasedecreases primarily reflectsreflect amortization and impairments recognized over time, which reduced the remaining carrying value of the related definite-lived intangibles.intangibles as well as impairments recognized in 2025 that did not recur in the 2026 period.

Showing the first 60 of 82 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

TROW insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 2 filings (2 insiders, 2 trade dates, 13,000 shares, about $1.4M). Net open-market shares: -13,000 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$1.4M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-09-29Wijnberg Sandra S
Director
Grant/award 164$104.51 $17.1K32,187 SEC
2026-09-29Wilson Alan D
Director
Grant/award 520$104.51 $54.4K42,338 SEC
2026-09-29Verma Richard R.
Director
Grant/award 61$104.51 $6.4K4,951 SEC
2026-09-29Stevens Robert J
Director
Grant/award 314$104.51 $32.8K25,560 SEC
2026-09-29Smith Cynthia F
Director
Grant/award 77$104.51 $8.1K8,776 SEC
2026-09-29Golston Allan C.
Director
Grant/award 61$104.51 $6.4K4,951 SEC
2026-09-29Maclellan Robert F.
Director
Grant/award 212$104.51 $22.2K55,920 SEC
2026-09-29Dublon Dina
Director
Grant/award 120$104.51 $12.6K15,654 SEC
2026-09-29Donnelly William P
Director
Grant/award 164$104.51 $17.1K13,348 SEC
2026-08-25Nelson Joshua B
Vice President
Open-market sale 10,000$111.82 $1.1M71,328 SEC
2026-08-25Nelson Joshua B
Vice President
Grant/award 4$101.04 $37071,332 SEC
2026-06-30Wilson Alan D
Director
Grant/award 691— —41,818 SEC
2026-06-30Stevens Robert J
Director
Grant/award 537— —25,246 SEC
2026-06-30Maclellan Robert F.
Director
Grant/award 658— —55,707 SEC
2026-06-30Donnelly William P
Director
Grant/award 576— —13,184 SEC
2026-06-29Wijnberg Sandra S
Director
Grant/award 148$114.38 $16.9K32,024 SEC
2026-06-29Wilson Alan D
Director
Grant/award 462$114.38 $52.9K41,127 SEC
2026-06-29Verma Richard R.
Director
Grant/award 55$114.38 $6.3K4,890 SEC
2026-06-29Stevens Robert J
Director
Grant/award 278$114.38 $31.8K24,709 SEC
2026-06-29Smith Cynthia F
Director
Grant/award 70$114.38 $8.0K8,698 SEC
2026-06-29Maclellan Robert F.
Director
Grant/award 185$114.38 $21.1K55,049 SEC
2026-06-29Golston Allan C.
Director
Grant/award 55$114.38 $6.3K4,890 SEC
2026-06-29Dublon Dina
Director
Grant/award 109$114.38 $12.4K15,533 SEC
2026-06-29Donnelly William P
Director
Grant/award 142$114.38 $16.2K12,608 SEC
2026-06-01Page Sebastien
Vice President
Grant/award 96,228— —171,855 SEC
2026-05-13Jackson Stephon A.
Vice President
Open-market sale 3,000$102.56 $307.7K83,883 SEC
2026-05-13Jackson Stephon A.
Vice President
Grant/award 175$98.08 $17.2K86,883 SEC
2026-05-08Wilson Alan D
Director
Grant/award 1,899— —40,665 SEC
2026-05-08Wijnberg Sandra S
Director
Grant/award 1,899— —31,876 SEC
2026-05-08Verma Richard R.
Director
Grant/award 1,899— —4,835 SEC
2026-05-08Stevens Robert J
Director
Grant/award 1,899— —24,432 SEC
2026-05-08Smith Cynthia F
Director
Grant/award 1,899— —8,629 SEC
2026-05-08Rominger Eileen P
Director
Grant/award 1,899— —10,867 SEC
2026-05-08Maclellan Robert F.
Director
Grant/award 1,899— —54,865 SEC
2026-05-08Golston Allan C.
Director
Grant/award 1,899— —4,835 SEC
2026-05-08Dublon Dina
Director
Grant/award 1,899— —15,424 SEC
2026-05-08Bartlett Mark S.
Director
Grant/award 1,899— —35,263 SEC
2026-05-08Donnelly William P
Director
Grant/award 1,899— —12,466 SEC

Well-known investors holding TROW (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Two Sigma Investments COM2026-06-30717,517$81.6M0.06%Reduced 27%
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COM2026-06-30618,600$70.3M0.02%Added 3%
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM2026-06-30345,590$39.3M0.02%Reduced 56%
Markel Group (Tom Gayner) COM2026-06-30314,000$35.7M0.27%No change
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM2026-06-30173,994$19.8M0.01%Reduced 75%
Gotham Asset Management (Joel Greenblatt) COM2026-06-3034,857$4.0M0.01%Reduced 4%
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-3034,500$3.9M0.01%Reduced 60%
Bridgewater Associates COM2026-06-3034,076$3.1M—Sold out

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when TROW files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.