TTGT 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
TechTarget, Inc. · Nasdaq · Telegraph & Other Message Communications · CIK 2018064 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
Removed heading “Our significant indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition.”
Largest changes
“Data privacy laws also are expanding across the United States in ways that may impact our business. For example, the state of California has adopted a comprehensive data privacy law, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect in January 2020 and became enforceable in July 2020. The CCPA was amended in January 2023 by the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), which expanded consumers’ rights and data collection and processing obligations, including with respect to certain sensitive personal information. …”see in full comparison
“The GDPR of the EU became effective in May 2018 and was designed to, among other things, harmonize disparate data privacy laws found across Europe. The GDPR implemented more rigorous principles relating to the data privacy and protection, including enhanced disclosure requirements regarding how personal information is obtained, used and shared; limitations on the purpose and storage of personal information; mandatory data breach notification requirements and enhanced standards for data controllers to demonstrate that they have obtained valid consent for certain data processing activities. …”see in full comparison
“Globally, data privacy regulations are expanding. Jurisdictions such as the EU, UK, and others have established comprehensive frameworks governing the collection, processing, and transfer of personal data. For example, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), imposes stringent requirements, including enhanced disclosure, data breach notifications, and valid consent for data processing. Non-compliance with GDPR can result in significant fines of up to €20 million or 4% of global revenue. …”see in full comparison
“While we believe we are materially compliant with applicable international, federal, and state laws, the introduction of more restrictive privacy and data protection laws could impact our ability to collect and use data. Such laws may limit our ability to provide targeted content, detailed lead data, and marketing solutions to our customers, potentially affecting audience growth and revenue. Regulatory authorities, such as the FTC, state attorneys general, and courts, may interpret or enforce consumer and data protection laws in ways that impose additional compliance obligations. …”see in full comparison
“We are subject to a variety of laws and regulations, including regulation by various federal government agencies, including the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) and state and local agencies, as well as privacy, data protection and cybersecurity laws in jurisdictions outside of the United States. We use e-mail as a significant means of communicating with our members and users. We may also use contact information provided during the enrollment process, including e-mail addresses and telephone numbers, for marketing purposes to our members and users. …”see in full comparison
Our customers may implement compliance measures thatsee in full comparisondo not alignconflict withtheirour services,which could limitlimiting the scopeand deliveryofserviceswhat weare able tocan provide.CustomersThey may also requireus to implementadditional privacy and security measures or imposeothercontractualobligationsobligations,including,suchbut not limited to,as indemnificationandor liability obligations, whichmaycouldcauseincreaseus to incur potential business disruptionscosts andexpenses.disrupt operations. If ourpolicies andpractices, or those of our customers,are, orare perceivedtoasbe, insufficient or if our members, users, visitors or customers have concerns regarding our data privacy and protection practices,insufficient, we couldbefacesubjectregulatorytoinvestigations,enforcement actionslawsuits, orinvestigations by regulators, lawsuits by private parties or experiencereducedmember, user and visitoraudience engagement,eachall of which couldhavemateriallya material adverse effect onharm our business.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (78)
The integration of our legacy TechTarget business and the legacy business of Informa PLC’s (“Informa”) Informa Tech division (“Informa Tech Digital Businesses”)businesses presents challenges that may prevent us from realizing all the anticipated benefits of the transactions.Transactions.
Our management team will needcontinue to devote significant attention and resources to integrating the business practices and operations of our legacy TechTarget business and the legacy Informa Tech Digital Businesses,operations, which operated as independent businesses prior to the business combination. Potential difficulties we may encounter in the integration process include the following:
the difficulty in successfully integrating, or the inability to successfully integrate, our legacy TechTarget business and the legacy Informa Tech Digital Businesses,businesses, including their respective operations, technologies, products and services, and customer contracts, in a manner that permits us to achieve the cost savings and revenue synergies anticipated to result from the combination, which could result in the anticipated benefits of the combination not being realized partly or wholly in the time frame currently anticipated or at all;
lost sales and customers as a result of certain customers of any of the businesses deciding not to do business with us, or deciding to decrease theirthe amount of business they do with us in order to reduce their reliance on a single company;
consolidating and rationalizing IT platforms and administrative infrastructures as well as accounting systems and related financial reporting activities and difficulty implementing effective internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures in particular; and preservingWe importantcould relationshipsbe adversely affected by the diversion of our legacymanagement’s TechTarget businessattention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the legacyintegration Informaof Techour Digitalbusiness. BusinessesThe andprocess resolvingof potentialintegrating conflictsoperations thatcould maycause arise.an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of one or more of our segments.
Furthermore, it is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of key employees or skilled workers of either or both of our legacy TechTarget business and the legacy Informa Tech Digital Businesses. The loss of key employees and skilled workers could adversely affect our ability to successfully conduct our business because of their experience and knowledge of our legacy TechTarget business and the legacy Informa Tech Digital Businesses. In addition, we could be adversely affected by the diversion of our management’s attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the integration of our legacy TechTarget business and the legacy Informa Tech Digital Businesses. The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of one or more of our segments.
Informa has agreed that until the First Trigger Date (as such term is defined in that certain Stockholders Agreement, dated as of December 2, 2024, by and among us, Informa PLC and Informa US Holdings Limited (the “Stockholders Agreement”)), which applies when Informa and its subsidiaries (“Informa Group”) hold less than 50% of our common stock, the Informa Group will not acquire a Competitive Business (as defined in the Stockholders Agreement), subject to certain exceptions. Subject to the terms of the Stockholders Agreement, Informa or any of its subsidiaries may engage in certain activities notwithstanding the fact that they may compete directly or indirectly with our business. To the extent that the Informa Group engages in the same or similar business activities or lines of business as us, or engages in business with any of our partners, customers or vendors, our ability to successfully operate and expand our business may be adversely affected.
On December 2, 2024, we entered into a Data Sharing Agreement with Informa. Among other things, the Data Sharing Agreement allows us and Informa to share data.data for certain agreed use cases. If we are unsuccessful at implementing and operating under the Data Sharing Agreement, some of the potential benefits from the combination might not be realized, such as our ability to monetize event data through our product offerings.
Because we will depend on our ability to generate revenues from the sale and support of purchase intent driven marketing and advertising campaigns, material reductions in marketing and advertising spending will likely have an adverse effect on our revenues and operating results.
The primary source of our revenues is the sale and support of purchase intent-driven advertising campaigns to our customers. Any material reduction in marketing and advertising expenditures will likely have an adverse effect on our revenues and operating results. We believe that advertising spending on the internet, as in traditional media, fluctuates significantly as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. Some of these factors include:
general global economic conditions and the availability of capital, as well as economic conditions specific to the internet and online and offline media industry; and the occurrence of extraordinary events, such as natural disasters, pandemics or infectious disease outbreaks (such as the novel coronavirus),outbreaks, acts of terrorism and international or domestic political and economic unrest.
We generate revenue from sales of subscriptions to our platforms and data,data and research reports, and any decline in demand or changes in preference trends for the types of products and services that we offer would negatively impact our business.
We derive a substantial amount of revenue from the sale of subscriptions to our platforms and data.data and research reports. Demand and preference trends for these platforms and data isand research reports are affected by various factors, many of which are beyond our control. Some of these potential factors include:
integration with customer relationship management and similar systems; and the potential for the development of new systems and protocols for business-to-business (“B2B”) communication.
compliance with domestic and international regulatory requirements;
AI functionality and capabilities; and the potential for the development of new systems and protocols for business-to-business (“B2B”) communication.
The U.S. and international economies have experienced inconsistent, unpredictable growth and a certain degree of instability, magnified at times by factors including changes in the availability of credit, inflation, tariffs and trade disputes, volatile business and consumer confidence, unemployment, responses to public health crisis, including pandemics like COVID-19 and epidemics and geopolitical unrest, including from the impacts of the ongoing conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East. These and other macro-economic conditions have contributed to unpredictable changes in the global economy and expectations of future global economic growth. Additionally, continued economic weakness in the United States and international markets have adversely affected our customers and their spending decisions, causing them to reduce or delay their purchases of our offerings, which has adversely affected and are expected to continue to affect our business.
Because all components of our budgeting and forecasting are dependent upon estimates of growth or contraction in the economy generally, and in the IT market specifically, it will be difficult for us to accurately estimate future income and expenditures. We will not be able to predict the duration of current economic conditions or the duration or strength of an economic recovery in the United States or worldwide generally or in the IT industry or in any of its segments. Further adverse changes may occur as a result of global, domestic or regional economic conditions, changing consumer and customer confidence, inflation, unemployment, tariffs, declines in stock markets, or other factors affecting economic and geopolitical conditions generally. These macro-economic conditions may also result in increased expenses due to higher allowances for doubtfulcredit accountslosses and potential goodwill and asset impairment charges and may make it more difficult for us to make accurate forecasts of revenue, gross margin, cash flows and expenses. We recognize that these challenging macro-economic conditions have and are expected to continue to negatively affect sales of our offerings, both in the United States and internationally and could increase our exposure to lossescredit from bad debts,losses, increase the cost and decrease the availability of financing, or increase the risk of loss on investments. The impact in the future of these macro-economic conditions on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity is uncertain and will depend on future developments that we may not be able to accurately predict.
Because most of our customers are in the enterprise technology industry, the success of our business is closely linked to the health, and subject to market conditions, of the enterprise technology industry. The enterprise technology industry is characterized by, among other things, volatile quarterly results, uneven sales patterns, short product life cycles, rapid technological developments, frequent new product introductions and enhancements and evolving domestic and international laws and regulations, particularly with respect to data privacy and data protection. As a result, our customers’ advertising budgets, which are often viewed as discretionary expenditures, may increase or decrease significantly over a short period of time. Many of our customers will continue to scrutinize their spending on advertising campaigns. Prior market downturns in the enterprise technology industry have resulted in declines in advertising spending, which can cause longer sales cycles, deferral or delay of purchases by B2B technology companies and generally reduced expenditures for advertising and related services. For example, recent macroeconomic headwinds have caused general anxiety, elongated sales cycles, budget cuts and freezes at many of our customers. Our revenues and profitability depend on the overall demand for advertising services from our customers. We believe that demand for our offerings have been in the past, and could be in the future, be disproportionately affected by fluctuations, disruptions, instability or downturns in the enterprise technology industry, which may cause customers and potential customers to exit the industry or delay, cancel, reduce or reallocate any planned expenditures for our purchase intent driven marketing and sales products. Any slowdown in the formation of new B2B technology companiescompanies, or decline in the growth of existing B2B technology companies, may cause a decline in demand for our offerings.
Our success depends on our ability to deliver original and compelling content and services to attract and retain members and users, as well as our ability to garner a critical mass of members on our websites or users of theour BrightTALK platform.platforms. Our member and user base is primarily comprised of business professionals who demand specialized websites and content tailored to the enterprise technology product sectors for which they are responsible and that they purchase. Our content and services may not generate engagement with our websites or theour BrightTALK platformplatforms or continue to attract and retain a critical mass of members and users necessary to attract customers and generate revenues consistent with those of our legacy TechTarget business or the legacy Informa Tech Digital Businesses’ (together, our “Legacy Businesses”)businesses’ historical results and expectations of our future results. We also may not develop new content or services in a timely or cost-effective manner. Our ability to develop and produce this specialized content successfully will be subject to numerous uncertainties, including our ability to:
attract and retain qualified editors, writers, producers, freelancers and technical personnel;
fund new development for our programsprograms, platforms, and other offerings;
successfully expand our content offerings into new platform and delivery mechanisms; and promote and strengthen the brands of our websites, webinarpublications, platformplatforms and our name.
We depend on internet search engines to attract a significant portion of visitors to our websites, virtual events, and our platforms. If our websites were to become listed less prominently in search results due to changes in the search engines’ algorithms, the integration of AI-driven search technologies, or other factors, our business and operating results could be materially harmed.
We derive a significant portion of our website traffic from users who search for enterprise technology research and editorial content through internet search engines. A critical factor in attracting members and users to our websites, virtual eventsevents, and webinar platform will be whether we are prominently displayed in response to an internet search relating to enterprise technology content. Search result listings are determined and displayed in accordance with a set of formulas or algorithms developed by the particular internet search engine.engine, which increasingly incorporate AI and machine learning models to generate search results and summaries. The algorithms determine the order of the listing of results in response to the user’s internet search. From time to time, search engines revise their algorithms.algorithms, including the integration of AI-generated answers or summaries that may reduce the visibility of traditional search result listings. In some instances, these modifications may be detrimental and cause our websites to be listed less prominently in unpaid search results or not at all, which we expect would result in decreased traffic from search engine users to our websites. Additionally, AI-driven search engines may prioritize direct answers, summaries, or other AI-generated content over links to external websites, which could further reduce traffic to our websites, virtual events, and webinar platform. Our websites, virtual events and webinar platform may also become listed less prominently in unpaid search results, for other reasons, such as search engine technical difficulties, search engine technical changes and changes we make to our websites, virtual events and webinar platform. In addition, search engines have deemed the practices of some companies to be inconsistent with search engine guidelines and have decided not to list their websites in search result listings at all. Although we could mitigate certain algorithm changes affecting our traffic with increased marketing expenditures, if our websites, virtual events and webinar platform are listed less prominently or not at all, in search result listings, traffic to our websites could decline, which could impact our operating results. Increased marketing spend to increase site traffic could also impact our operating results.
Further, we use search engine optimization (“SEO”) to enhance the visibility of our websites and optimize ranking in search engine results. Our ability to successfully manage our SEO efforts across our owned and operated websites depends on our ability to adapt and respond to changes in search engine algorithmsalgorithms, andmethodologies, methodologiesthe increasing use of AI in search engines, and changes in search query trends. This includes responding to changes in how AI-driven search engines generate and display content, such as featured snippets, AI-generated summaries, or direct answers that may reduce the likelihood of users clicking through to our websites. If we fail to successfully manage our SEO strategy,strategy or adapt to the evolving landscape of AI-driven search engines including the utilization of AI Engine Optimization (AEO) or Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), our owned and operated websites may receive less favorable placement in organic or paid listings, which would reduce the number of visitors to our sites, decrease conversion rates and repeat businessbusiness, and have a detrimental effect on our ability to generate revenue.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from customers with billing addresses outside of the United States. We have offices in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Singapore, Australia, Malaysia, China, Bangladesh, Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea and India. We also publish websites in English, Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese, Japanese and Korean, targeting members worldwide who speak those languages.
We compete for potential customers with a number of different types of offerings and companies, including: broad based media outlets such as television, newspapers and business periodicals that are designed to reach a wide audience; general purpose portals and search engines; and offline and online offerings of companies that produce content specifically for enterprise technology and business professionals, including Gartner, Forrester, IDC, Frost and Sullivan, Bombora, Inc., Madison Logic, Inc., Demand Science, Inc., 6Sense Inc.,6Sense, Demandbase, Inc., ZoomInfo Technologies Inc and ON24, Inc.ON24. Customers may choose the offerings of our competitors over our offerings not only because they prefer the online offerings of our competitors over our offerings but also because customers prefer to utilize forms of marketing and advertising servicesservices, including integrations and partnership structures, not offered by us and/or to diversify their marketing and advertising expenditures. Many of our expected competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, greater brand recognition and significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than we possess. They may also offer different pricing than we offer, which could be more attractive to customers. Competitors of our Legacy Businessesbusiness have historically responded, and our competitors may in the future respond, to challenging market conditions by lowering prices to try to attract our customers. As a result, we could lose market share to our competitors and our revenues could decline.
In addition, legacycertain TechTarget technologies allowof our platforms to interoperate with various third-party applications which are critically important to our business. The functionality of these integrations will depend on access to the third-party applications, and access is not within our control. Some of our expected competitors own, develop, operate or distribute, or have material business relationships with companies that own, develop, operate or distribute, CRM and similar systems into which our legacy platforms integrate. Moreover, some of these competitors have inherent advantages developing products and services that more tightly integrate with their CRM and similar systems or those of their business partners.
The industry in which we operate is rapidly adopting new technologies and standards (includingincluding, thefor example, our adoption and deployment of AI to both enhance our product offerings and customers' experience and to streamline our operating processes) to create and satisfy the demands of users and advertisers. It is critical that we innovate by anticipating and adapting to these changes (including the potential adoption of additional AI solutions) to ensure that our content-delivery, demand generation and data-driven products and services remain effective and interesting to our members, customers and partners. In addition, we may need to make significant expenditures to achieve these goals. If we fail to accomplish these goals, we may lose members and the customers that seek to reach those members, which could harm our operating results. Existing and planned efforts to develop new products, including any subscription-based offerings, may be costly and ultimately not successful, which could harm our operating results.
Building recognition of our brands and maintaining recognition of theour historical brands of our Legacy Businesses will be critical to our ability to attract and retain our member base. We intend to continue to build the brands of our Legacyhistorical Businessesbusinesses and introduce new brands that will resonate with our targeted audiences. In order to promote these brands, we may find it necessary to increase our marketing budget, hire additional marketing and public relations personnel or otherwise increase our financial commitment to creating and maintaining brand loyalty among our customers. If we fail to promote our brands and maintain the brands of our Legacylegacy Businessesbusinesses effectively, or incur excessive expenses attempting to promote and maintain these brands, our business and financial results may suffer.
Our success depends to a significant extent upon the recruitment, retention and effective succession of our executive officersofficers, senior leaders, and keycritical management. Our management team has significant industry experience and would be difficult to replace.talent. These individualscolleagues possess sales, marketing, financial and administrative skills that are critical to the operation of our business.business and would be difficult to replace. The competition for these employees is intense. The loss of the services of one or more of our key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
In July 2025, we committed to the Restructuring Plan designed to reshape, optimize, and support the Company’s financial and operational efficiency. The Restructuring Plan involved streamlining certain areas and functions and reinvesting in others to improve the delivery of products and services to customers and enhance the Company’s global go-to-market capabilities. The Restructuring Plan included the net reduction of approximately 10% of the Company’s colleague base. We may find it more difficult to hire and retain qualified personnel as a result of the Restructuring Plan.
In December 2022, our legacy TechTarget business committed to a restructuring plan intended to generate operational efficiencies, strengthen our financial position through reducing costs, and better align our operations with our strategic objectives. The plan involved streamlining the operations of certain of our legacy TechTarget business units and included the elimination of approximately 60 positions, or approximately 5% of our legacy TechTarget workforce. We may find it more difficult to hire and retain qualified personnel as a result of the 2022 restructuring plan of our legacy TechTarget business.
Our Legacybusiness Businesses havehas acquired, and we may in the future acquire or invest in, complementary businesses, products or technologies. Acquisitions and investments involve numerous risks including:
We and our Legacyhistorical Businessesbusinesses have both claimed common law and registered trademark protections in certain brands. Despite claiming and applying to register some of theirour marks in the United States and other countries where we do business, neither we norhave our Legacy Businesses havenot been able to obtain registration of theirour respective marks in certain U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions due to prior registration or use by third parties employing similar marks and other challenges. We claim common law protection on certain names and marks that ourhave Legacy Businesses havebeen used in connection with our business activities and the activities we conduct in connection with our business activities, however, there is a risk that challenges that were faced individually by our Legacyvarious Businesseshistorical businesses will also be raised for the brands and marks of our businesses. New challenges may also be raised against us as we seek intellectual property protections. In addition to U.S. and foreign laws and registration processes, we and our Legacy Businesses have relied on confidentiality agreements and intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees and third parties and other protective contractual provisions to safeguard our intellectual property. Despite efforts to protect intellectual property by our Legacy Business,property, unauthorized activities may take place and could impact us as we rely on prior protections put in place and future protections that we put in place. We may also experience issues from prior acquisitions of intellectual property made by our Legacy Businesses,property, together with the costs and difficulties of combining and integrating the intellectual property of our Legacy Businesses into our business.
Changes in laws and standards relatingrelated to marketing, data collectioncollection, and use, and the privacy ofcould internet users couldsignificantly impact our ability to conduct ourbusiness, business and thereby decreasereduce our marketing and advertising service revenuesrevenues, whileand imposingimpose significantsubstantial compliance costs on us.costs.
We are subject to a wide range of laws and regulations, including oversight by various federal agencies such as the FTC, various state and local agencies, and privacy, data protection, and cybersecurity laws in jurisdictions outside the United States. A significant portion of our communication with members and users relies on email, and we also use contact information provided during registration, such as email addresses and phone numbers, for marketing purposes. Our partners may also use this information to market their products or services.
The legal landscape governing the use of email and other contact information for marketing purposes is constantly evolving. The growth of internet commerce may lead to new legislation or changes to existing laws, potentially imposing additional restrictions on our ability to communicate with website visitors, members, and users. If such laws are enacted or existing ones are interpreted to limit our ability to send emails or use other contact methods, our communication efforts could become less effective or more costly. Additionally, internet service providers, software programs, or other systems may block emails they consider or identify as “spam,” which could prevent us from reaching our intended audience. Any inability to communicate effectively with website visitors, members, and users could harm our business, operating results, and financial condition.
We are subject to a variety of laws and regulations, including regulation by various federal government agencies, including the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) and state and local agencies, as well as privacy, data protection and cybersecurity laws in jurisdictions outside of the United States. We use e-mail as a significant means of communicating with our members and users. We may also use contact information provided during the enrollment process, including e-mail addresses and telephone numbers, for marketing purposes to our members and users. Our partners may also use contact information to market their products or services to our members and users. The laws and regulations governing the use of e-mail and other contact information for marketing purposes continues to evolve, and the growth and development of commerce over the Internet may lead to the adoption of additional legislation, changes to existing laws. If new laws or regulations are adopted, or existing laws and regulations are interpreted and/or amended or modified to impose additional restrictions on our ability to send e-mails or use other means to contact our actual or potential members and users, we may not be able to communicate with such members and users in a cost-effective manner. In addition, Internet service providers, software programs and others may block the transmission of unsolicited e-mail, commonly known as “spam.” If such a provider or program identifies us emails as “spam,” our emails could be blocked to our actual or potential members and users. If we are unable to communicate by e-mail with our actual or potential members and users as a result of legislation, blockage or otherwise, our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed.
We collect and process information from website visitors, membersmembers, orand users through our websites, platforms, and co-branded sites. Our privacy policies, posted on our websites, platforms,outline orhow co-brandedwe sites. Privacy policies and practices concerning the collection,collect, use, and disclosuredisclose ofthis member, user and visitor information are posted on our websites.information. Subject to applicable lawlaws and eachuser member’s, user’s and visitor’s permission (depending on the applicable needs and requirements of different countries’ laws),permissions, we may use thethis information we collectdata to inform ourindividuals members, and users and visitors ofabout services may be of interest to them. We may alsoand share this informationit with our customers for membersmarketing and users who have elected to receive additional promotional materials and have expressly or implicitly granted us permission to share their information with third parties.purposes. We also collect activity-based information basedto on the activity ofenhance our visitors, members and users on our websites.services.
While we believe we are materially compliant with applicable international, federal, and state laws, the introduction of more restrictive privacy and data protection laws could impact our ability to collect and use data. Such laws may limit our ability to provide targeted content, detailed lead data, and marketing solutions to our customers, potentially affecting audience growth and revenue. Regulatory authorities, such as the FTC, state attorneys general, and courts, may interpret or enforce consumer and data protection laws in ways that impose additional compliance obligations. Non-compliance could result in civil or criminal penalties, adverse publicity, and harm to our business and reputation.
Data privacy laws in the United States are rapidly evolving. For example, California’s Consumer Privacy Act, and its amendment, the California Privacy Rights Act, have expanded consumer rights and imposed stricter data collection and processing obligations. Other states have enacted or are considering similar laws, creating a complex and fragmented regulatory environment. These laws may increase compliance costs and impact our ability to conduct business effectively. Additionally, federal data privacy legislation is under consideration, but its timing, scope, and interaction with state laws remain uncertain. Compliance with such legislation could require significant resources and adversely affect our operations.
Globally, data privacy regulations are expanding. Jurisdictions such as the EU, UK, and others have established comprehensive frameworks governing the collection, processing, and transfer of personal data. For example, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), imposes stringent requirements, including enhanced disclosure, data breach notifications, and valid consent for data processing. Non-compliance with GDPR can result in significant fines of up to €20 million or 4% of global revenue. Additionally, evolving regulations in the EU, UK, and other jurisdictions regarding cross-border data transfers could disrupt our operations and increase compliance costs. Failure to comply with these laws could result in fines, reputational harm, and loss of customer trust.
Although we believe our efforts materially comply with applicable international, federal and state laws and regulations and such efforts will not materially harm our business, additional, more burdensome laws or regulations, including more restrictive consumer privacy and data security laws, could be enacted or applied to us or our customers. Such laws or regulations could impair our ability to collect member and user information and provide more targeted content and detailed lead data to our customers which may limit the growth of our audience and revenues. Additionally, governmental authorities, such as the FTC, U.S. state attorneys general, and courts may interpret or apply consumer and data protection laws to require that the online collection, use and dissemination of data, and the presentation of website content, comply with certain standards for notice, choice, security and access, which could also be subject to conflicting or differing interpretations. We believe that we are in material compliance with applicable consumer and data protection laws, but a determination by a state or federal agency or court that any of our practices do not comply with applicable laws and regulations could result in civil or criminal liability, adverse publicity and negatively affect our businesses. New interpretations of these standards could also require us to incur additional compliance costs and restrict our business operations.
Data privacy laws also are expanding across the United States in ways that may impact our business. For example, the state of California has adopted a comprehensive data privacy law, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect in January 2020 and became enforceable in July 2020. The CCPA was amended in January 2023 by the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), which expanded consumers’ rights and data collection and processing obligations, including with respect to certain sensitive personal information. In addition, other states, such as Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, Utah, Tennessee, Oregon, and Texas, among others, have passed comprehensive state data privacy laws similar to the CCPA and CPRA, which are either in effect or will go into effect in the near future. Additional states may likely pass similar data privacy laws in the future. These data privacy laws and regulations create obligations related to the collection and processing of personal information that may impose additional costs and obligations on us and impact our ability to conduct our business. Governmental authorities also are addressing certain data practices (such as marketing), the collection of certain types of personal data (e.g., biometrics or children’s data) or otherwise addressing privacy concerns in various ways. These data privacy laws and regulations may impact our business activities, including our identification of research subjects, relationships with business partners and ultimately the marketing and distribution of our products. We may be required to devote substantial resources to implement and maintain compliance with these laws, and noncompliance could result in regulatory investigations and fines or private litigation.
The U.S. Congress also is considering comprehensive federal data privacy legislation. At this time, it is unclear whether Congress will pass such a law and if so, when and what it will require and prohibit, and how it will interact with currently enacted or future comprehensive state data privacy laws and requirements under existing US federal laws related to personal data, including the CAN-SPAM Act and TCPA. The adoption of comprehensive federal data privacy legislation may require us to incur significant costs for compliance, which may adversely affect our business and operating results.
Data privacy laws are also growing in many countries around the world that may impact our business. The regulatory framework for the collection, use, safeguarding, sharing, transfer and other processing of information worldwide is rapidly evolving and is likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. Globally, virtually every jurisdiction in which we operate has established their own data security and privacy regulatory frameworks with which we need to comply. For example, the EU and its member states, and the United Kingdom enacted laws and regulations governing the collection, processing and use of personal information obtained from their citizens. We may also be subject data privacy and protection laws in other jurisdictions, such as Canada’s Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, Brazil’s Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, Australia’s Privacy Act, India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act, Saudi Arabia’s Personal Data Protection Law, China’s Personal Information Protection Law, and Japan’s Act on the Protection of Personal Information. Regulations in these and other jurisdictions have focused on the collection, processing, transfer, use, disclosure and security of personal information, such as an individual’s name, e-mail address or online identifier (such as an IP address). These laws may also provide consumers the right to access the information that a company has collected on them, correct it, request that it be deleted, or to stop the sale of such information to third parties.
The GDPR of the EU became effective in May 2018 and was designed to, among other things, harmonize disparate data privacy laws found across Europe. The GDPR implemented more rigorous principles relating to the data privacy and protection, including enhanced disclosure requirements regarding how personal information is obtained, used and shared; limitations on the purpose and storage of personal information; mandatory data breach notification requirements and enhanced standards for data controllers to demonstrate that they have obtained valid consent for certain data processing activities. The GDPR’s application and scope are extensive and penalties for non-compliance are significant, including fines of up to 20 million Euros or 4% of total worldwide revenue. Further, other laws that the EU is considering, if enacted, could disrupt our ability to use or transfer data or to market and sell our products and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results. New and evolving requirements may also impact transfers of personal data from other countries to the United States, particularly transfers from members of the EU. In addition, we may also be required to meet standards for cross-border personal data transfers imposed by UK regulatory authorities. In the event that we are deemed not in compliance with the GDPR or EU or UK law, or fails to maintain compliance, then we would be exposed to material damages, costs and/or fines if a EU or UK regulator or resident commenced an action and could cause considerable harm to us and our reputation (including requiring notification to customers, regulators, members and/or users), loss of confidence in our services and deter customers from using our services.
Our customers may implement compliance measures that do not alignconflict with theirour services, which could limitlimiting the scope and delivery of serviceswhat we are able tocan provide. CustomersThey may also require us to implement additional privacy and security measures or impose other contractual obligationsobligations, including,such but not limited to,as indemnification andor liability obligations, which maycould causeincrease us to incur potential business disruptionscosts and expenses.disrupt operations. If our policies and practices, or those of our customers, are, or are perceived toas be, insufficient or if our members, users, visitors or customers have concerns regarding our data privacy and protection practices,insufficient, we could beface subjectregulatory toinvestigations, enforcement actionslawsuits, or investigations by regulators, lawsuits by private parties or experience reduced member, user and visitoraudience engagement, eachall of which could havematerially a material adverse effect onharm our business.
We also work with our partners to deliver targeted marketing and advertisements based on website visitors’, members’, users’ and visitors’ perceived commercialusers’ interests. Many of our members, users and visitorsindividuals voluntarily provide us with contact and other informationinformation, whenwhich theywe visit or interactsupplement with our websites. We utilizethird-party data from third-party sources to augmentenhance ourpersonalization, memberanalytics, and userlead profiles,qualification, including data providedobtained bythrough Informa under the Data Sharing Agreement and marketing databases so we can personalize content, enhance analytical capabilities, better target our marketing programs and better qualify leads for our customers.Agreement. However, ifchanges visitor, member and/orin user sentiment regardingor therefusal sharingto ofshare information changes,could such as visitors to our websites refusing to provide contact and other information,impair our ability to personalize content and provideoffer targeted marketing solutions would be materially impaired.solutions. If members and users choose to opt-outopt out of behavioral targeting, it would be more difficult for us to offer targeted marketing programs for our customers. IfSimilarly, weif are unable to acquirethird-party data frombecomes third-party sources for whatever reason,unavailable or ifprohibitively there is a marked increase in the cost of obtaining such data,expensive, our ability to personalize content and provide marketing solutions could be negatively impacted.
Proposals for “Do Not Track” regulations and other privacy laws may give users greater control over their online data, potentially restricting data collection and use. U.S. regulatory agencies have also increased scrutiny of online advertising practices, including the use of cookies and tracking tools. Industry self-regulatory codes and best practices for online behavioral advertising (“OBA”) impose additional requirements, such as providing notice and consumer choice. Compliance with these evolving standards may require significant resources and could impact our advertising and data-driven businesses.
New and expanding proposals for laws and regulations regarding “Do Not Track” requirements that protect visitors’, members’ and users’ and right to choose whether or not to be tracked online may allow consumers to have greater control over the use of their information collected online, forbid the collection or use of such information, demand a business to comply with their choice to opt-out of such collection or use and place limits upon the disclosure of such information to third-party websites. Any such laws and regulations could have a significant impact on the operation of our advertising and data businesses. U.S. regulatory agencies have also placed an increased focus on online privacy matters and, in particular, on online advertising activities that utilize cookies or other tracking tools. Consumer and industry groups have expressed concerns about online data collection and use by companies, which has resulted in the release of various binding industry self-regulatory codes of conduct and best practice guidelines for online behavioral advertising (“OBA”) and similar activities. These codes of conduct and best practice guidelines govern, among other things, the ways in which companies can collect, use and disclose user information for OBA purposes, including how companies must give notice of these practices, and what choices companies must provide to consumers regarding these practices.
We may be required or otherwise choose to adopt “Do Not Track” mechanisms and abide by certain self-regulatory principles promulgated by the Digital Advertising Alliance and others for OBA and similar activities,activities. whichThese measures may impair our ability to use our existing tracking technologies, to collect and sell member and user behavioral data, and engage with other third parties. This could cause our net revenues to decline and adversely affect our operating results.
We endeavor to beremain in material compliance with all applicable laws, regulationsregulations, and self-regulatory data privacy and protection regimes. However, as referenced above, these laws, regulationslaws and self-regulatory regimesregulations may be modified, and/or new lawsones may be enacted in the future,enacted, which could materially affect our business. Further, dataData protection authorities may also interpret existing laws in new or conflicting ways. WeAdditionally, maythe deploydeployment of new products and services from time to time, which may also require uschanges to change our compliance practices. Any such developments (or developments stemming from the enactment or modification of other laws) or our failure to anticipate the application or interpretationadapt ofto these laws accuratelydevelopments could create liability for us,liability, result in adverse publicity, increase our future compliance costs, makereduce the attractiveness of our products and services less attractive to our members, users, visitors and customers,services, or causeforce us to change or limit our business practicespractices. andSuch outcomes could materially affect our business and operating results. Further, any failure or perceived failure on our part to comply with any relevant laws or regulations maycould subject us to significant civil, criminalcriminal, or contractual liabilities.
We retain personal, confidential, and/or proprietary information relating to our website visitors, members and users, employees, and customers in secure database servers. The industry in which we operate is prone to cyber-attacks by third parties seeking access to our data or the data we collect from our website visitors and members, or to disrupt our ability to provide service. The Legacy BusinessesWe have experienced and we will likely experience additional cyber-attacks targeting our database servers and information systems. Cyber-attacks may involve viruses, malware, ransomware, distributed denial-of-service attacks, phishing or other forms of social engineering (predominantly spear phishing attacks), and other methods seeking to gain unlawful access. We may not be able to prevent unauthorized access to these secure database servers and information systems as a result of these third party actions, including intentional misconduct by criminal organizations and hackers or as a result of employee error, malfeasance or otherwise. A security breach could result in intentional malfunctions or loss or corruption of data, software, hardware or other computer equipment, the misappropriation of personal, confidential and/or proprietary information, disruptions in our service, and in the unauthorized access to the data of our customers or our data, including intellectual property, business opportunity, and other confidential business information. Additionally, third parties may attempt to fraudulently induce our employees, vendors, or customers into disclosing access credentials such as usernames, passwords or access keys in order to gain access to our database servers and information systems.
Our online networks could also be affected by cyber-attacks, and we could inadvertently transmit viruses across our networks to our members, customers or other third parties. Cyber-attacks continue to evolve in sophistication and volume, and inherently may be difficult to detect for long periods of time. Although ourwe Legacy Businesseshave developed systems and processes that are designed to protect their data and user data, to prevent data loss, to disable undesirable accounts and activities on their platforms, and to prevent or detect security breaches, we cannot assure that such measures will provide absolute security, and we may incur significant costs in protecting against or remediating cyber-attacks.
If we were to experience a significant cybersecurity breach of our information systems or data, the costs associated with the investigation, remediation and potential notification of the breach to counterparties and data subjects could be material, in addition to potential costs related to regulatory investigations in the United States or other countries. In addition, our remediation efforts may not be successful. If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build and sustain the proper technology and cybersecurity infrastructure, we could suffer significant business disruption, including transaction errors, processing inefficiencies, data lossloss, or the loss of or damage to intellectual property or other proprietary information.
In addition to the foregoing, any breach of privacy laws or data security laws, particularly resulting in a significant security incident or breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized use or disclosure of sensitive or confidential consumerpersonal information, could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and financial condition. There is no assurance that privacy and security-related safeguards we implement will protect us from all risks associated with the processing (by us or our service providers), storage and transmission of such information.
Our ability to attract and maintain relationships with our members,members and users, customers and partners will depend on the satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our internet infrastructure. Our internet marketing and advertising revenues will relate directly to the number of advertisements and other marketing opportunities delivered to our members.members and users. System interruptions or delays that result in the unavailability of websites or slower response times for members and users would reduce the number of advertising impressions and leads delivered to our customers. This could reduce our revenues as the attractiveness of our websites to our members and advertisersplatforms decreases. Our insurance policies provide only limited coverage for service interruptions and may not adequately compensate us for any losses that may occur due to any failures or interruptions in our systems. Further, we do not have multiple site capacity for all of our services in the event of any such occurrence.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Related party interest expense”
New heading “Income tax benefit (expense)”
New heading “Comparison of Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024”
New heading “Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities”
Removed heading “Cost of Revenues”
Removed heading “Operating Expenses and Other”
Removed heading “Comparison of Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022”
Largest changes
“During the fourth quarter of 2024, as a result of the lower realized pricing attributable to shifts in the coverage mix for certain products, discontinuation of certain products as a result of the impact of recent legislation, and revised expectations of future selling, advertising, and promotion costs required to mitigate further revenue erosion, the Company’s assessment of future business performance indicated that the reporting unit’s future financial results were below the assumptions used in the last quantitative fair value test as of December 31, 2023. …”see in full comparison
“Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $0.7 million and $42.7 million was recognized during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2025, respectively. The carrying value of goodwill in the Canalys reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 was $9.4 million post-impairment. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 0.5% increase in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate would have resulted in no impairment in the period. …”see in full comparison
“Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $7.1 million and $34.7 million was recognized during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2025, respectively. The carrying value of goodwill in the NetLine reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 was $6.8 million post-impairment. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 6.6% increase in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate would have resulted in no impairment in the period. …”see in full comparison
“Based on the quantitative fair value testing, there was no impairment recognized during the three months ended December 31, 2025. A goodwill impairment of $243.4 million was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2025. The carrying value of goodwill in the Industry Dive reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 was $25.7 million post-impairment. …”see in full comparison
“During the first quarter of 2025, Informa TechTarget did observe a substantial sustained decline in the price of the Company's stock from the closing price of $19.82 as of December 31, 2024 to the closing price of $14.81 as of March 31, 2025. After considering other qualitative factors, the Company concluded there is a triggering event as of March 31, 2025 indicating goodwill may be impaired in the Company's reporting units. Accordingly, the Company is performing a quantitative impairment test for each of the Company's reporting units during the interim period ended March 31, 2025. …”see in full comparison
see in full comparisonABased10%onchangethe quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $2.1 million and $174.1 million was recognized during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2025, respectively. The carrying value of goodwill in the Bluefin reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 was $3.7 million post-impairment. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 1.7% decrease in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31,20242025 would haveincreasedresultedorindecreasedall goodwill being impaired. For thegoodwillthreeimpairmentmonthsrecognizedendedbyDecember$7.031,million.2025,Aa10%0.8%changedecrease in the weighted average EBITDA margin used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31,20242025, would haveincreasedresultedorindecreasedall goodwill being impaired. For thegoodwillthreeimpairmentmonthsrecognizedendedbyDecember$29.031,million.2025,Aa 100 basis-pointchangeincrease in the discount rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31,20242025 would have increasedor decreasedthe goodwill impairment recognized by$32$5.5millionmillion.andFor$42themillion,threerespectively.monthsAended December 31, 2025, a 100 basis-pointchangedecrease in the long-term growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31,20242025 would have increasedor decreasedthe goodwill impairment recognized by$26$3.4million and $33 million, respectively.million. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as they do not include interplay among assumptions.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (123)
Informa TechTarget helps technology companies accelerate growth through first party business-to-business (“B2B”) data, market insight and market access.
Following a period of expansion, the specialist technology research business of Informa TechTarget is now among the largest providers of these services. It employs more than 300 expert analysts and consultants to create data-driven intelligence products and advisory services for product managers, corporate strategistsstrategists, channel chiefs and the C-suite, challenging market strategies, sharpening product roadmaps and accelerating time to market and revenue.
Omdia,Through Industrythe Dive,Omdia NetLine,brand, Canalyswhich now incorporates the formerly separate specialist brands Canalys, Wards Intelligence and WardsEnterprise Strategy Group, we provide research and Formerintelligence TechTargetservices areto importanttechnology componentsproviders ofbased Informaon TechTarget.expert analysis and data-driven intelligence and reports. These products or businesses and their portfolio of digital media brands inform, educate and influence tech buyers, creating engaged and specialist audiences.
For Informa TechTarget, investment in innovation and growth in research & development (“R&D”) budgets provide a leading indicator of demand for its products and services. This growth in technology-related R&D is driving a new wave of investment and innovation, enhancing existing products and inspiring the next generation of products and services.
The majority of the B2B buyer journey is now completed before a buyer might contact the sales team of a vendor. For technology vendors, online presence and digital brand visibility are therefore critical, leading to more companies focusing their spend on branded content services, thought leadership and whitepaper distribution, digital event participation and advertising on the most relevant platforms and media.
Management believes Informa TechTarget is at the center of this shift in B2B buyer behavior, delivering highly relevant content and research to technology buyers that informs, educates and influences them along the different stages of their buyer journey.
These interactions with the content — who reads what, who clicks to find out more, how long buyers spend on specific websites, which white papers do they read, which webinars do they join, etc. — and general online behavior, when captured, enriched and analyzed, provide deep insights into who potential customers are, what products and services they might be interested in, where they are in their purchasing cycle and how significant is the intent to purchase.
Because most of Informa TechTarget’s clients are B2B technology companies, the success of Informa TechTarget is intrinsically linked to the health, and subject to the market conditions of, the technology industry. Informa TechTarget has recently been affected by macro-economic conditions, in particular the negative impact of economic uncertainty, rising inflation and interest rates on the technology industry, which has impacted investment levels and overall client marketing expenditure. Although management cannot quantify the impact of macro-economic factors on Informa TechTarget's future results, any worsening of market conditions could negatively impact its financial position and liquidity. Marketing, advertising services and sponsorship revenue is more immediately impacted by changes in client spending and current macro-economic conditions than other revenue categories.
Recent performance has also been impacted by subdued sales and marketing budgets amongst many of Informa TechTarget’s enterprise technology customers as more of their expenditures have been concentrated on R&D activities, particularly around artificial intelligence. Informa TechTarget believes that, as these vendors ultimately seek to achieve a ROI on the results of their R&D, this will result in a resurgence in growth of sales and marketing activity and budgets to support new product launches and enhancements.
Brand solutions: Brand solutions offer B2B marketers the opportunity to grow brand awareness through direct exposure to specialist technology and business audiences across the businesses’ portfolio of 14 online products and off-network through audience extension programs. Solutions include digital display banners, newsletter sponsorships and email marketing, enabling technology vendors to gain exposure and benefit from association with the businesses’ specialist brands and high quality editorial content amongst the Company's readership base of engaged technology buyers. Brand solutions include the Industry Dive portfolio of more than 35 specialist brands, which deliver high quality business journalism to niche audiences, offering outbound email sponsorship opportunities to vendors looking to build awareness and reach key decision makers.
Custom content services: Through StudioID, BrightTALK Studio, and Enterprise Strategy Group custom content offerings, the Company support marketers with their end-to-end content strategy by offering proprietary audience research to inform campaigns, strategic design and development, and original content production. Marketers leverage the Company's award-winning deep industry expertise to create journalistic or analyst-sourced content across more than 40 different formats and multiple languages, which can then be distributed across the Company's network. The Company also offers content licensing through Marketplace, whereby marketers curate relevant content from a selection of publishers and then distribute the content on their own channels to align themselves with top voices in their industries.
Intelligence subscription services: Operating through the Omdia brand, as well as niche brands Canalys and Wards Intelligence, the specialist tech research business is primarily an “intelligence” subscription service, providing clients with a core “data backbone” in addition to qualitative analyst-produced content across the technology industry spectrum. The data is typically comprised of market trackers, market sizing, market share analyses and forecasts, and is complimented by expert industry reports, analyst opinions and an “Ask an Analyst” service. Covering more than 3,000 topics and tracking over 12,000 companies, the businesses’ 300+ expert analysts and consultants provide quantitative and qualitative insights that help companies make better decisions, faster.
IT Deal AlertIntent: A comprehensive B2B technology solution that collects and analyzes purchase intent data from actively engaging enterprise technology professionals across the Company's website network and BrightTALK(TM) webinar platform. The suite includes two key products. PriorityInforma Engine™TechTarget Portal is a subscription service that enables direct engagement with targeted prospects by identifying and prioritizing potential customers actively researching technology purchases using proprietary Activity Intelligence(TM) and integrates this data with major CRM and marketing automation platforms. Qualified Sales Opportunities™ is a profiling service that surveys and interviews technology professionals showing purchase intent, providing detailed information on ongoing purchase projects, including project scope, purchase criteria, and vendor considerations and delivers these as sales qualified leads.
Brand solutions: Brand solutions offer B2B marketers the opportunity to grow brand awareness through direct exposure to specialist technology and business audiences across the businesses’ portfolio and off-network through audience extension programs. Solutions include digital display banners, newsletter sponsorships and email marketing, enabling technology vendors to gain exposure and benefit from association with the businesses’ specialist brands and high quality editorial content amongst the Company's readership base of engaged technology buyers. Brand solutions include the Industry Dive portfolio, which delivers high quality business journalism to niche audiences, offering outbound email sponsorship opportunities to vendors looking to build awareness and reach key decision makers.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes represent the business referred to as the Informa Tech Digital Businesses and include the performance of Former TechTarget from the closing date of the Merger through December 31, 2024. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Prior to the Contribution, the Informa Tech Digital Businesses previously were operated as part of the Informa Tech division of Informa PLC (“Informa” or “Parent”) and not as a standalone entity and had no separate legal status or existence. As such, the financial position and results of operations, for the periods prior to the Contribution, have been derived from Informa’s historical accounting records and are presented on a carve-out basis. Intercompany transactions, profits and balances among the Informa Tech Digital Businesses’ entities have been eliminated. Sale and purchase transactions between Informa TechTarget and other Informa affiliates are included in the consolidated financial statements.
During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, the Company operated as one segment. In January 2025, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (its Chief Operating Decision Maker), in order to better execute the strategic vision of the Merger,Merger (as defined in Note 1. Business overview and basis of presentation to the consolidated financial statements included under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K), began the integration and reorganization of the combined businesses. The Company expects to complete the integration and reorganization, including the establishment and reporting of information such as key performance indicators for the following business segments: Intelligence and AdvisoryAdvisory, and Brand to Demand, which the Company will report on once the ability to assess performance and make resource allocation is complete.
When performance obligations are combined into a single contract, Informa TechTarget utilizes the relative stand-alone selling price (“SSP”) of each product or service to allocate the transaction price among the performance obligations, which is generally determined based on the prices charged to the clients when sold on a stand-alone basis or using expected cost plus a margin, with any discounts allocated across the performance obligations. Revenue for each category type of revenue is typically fixed at the date of the order and is not variable.
The Company may assess goodwill for impairment initially using a qualitative approach to determine whether conditions exist that indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Among the factors that could trigger an impairment review are a reporting unit’s operating results declining relative to its operating plan or historical performance, competitive pressures, changes in the general markets in which it operates, and a sustained decline in share price. If the Company concludes, based on its assessment of relevant events, facts, and circumstances that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s carrying value is greater than its fair value, then a quantitative analysis will be performed to determine if there is any impairment. Alternatively, the Company may elect to initially perform a quantitative analysis instead of starting with a qualitative analysis. These assessments require the Company to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates about projected cash flows, discount rates and other factors. The non-cash goodwill impairment loss is the difference between the reporting unit's fair value and carrying value, not to exceed the carrying amount of the goodwill.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, the Company hadhas five reporting units: Legacy TechTarget, Bluefin, NetLine, Industry Dive, and Canalys. In addition to its annual impairment analysis performed on December 31, 2024,2025, the Company also identified a sustained decline in share price during 2025 that, along with other qualitative considerations including the fourthcontinued quarterimpact offrom 2024the asconditions in the macroeconomic environment, constituted an impairment trigger for all reporting units.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, Informa TechTarget performed the required impairment tests of goodwill on its reporting units using a quantitative impairment analysis with the following key assumptions in the fair value calculations:
Projected cash flows: For 2025, the Company used a two-stage valuation approach to projected cash flows, which included key assumptions of forecasted revenue growth rate and EBITDA margin followed by a steady state period of long-term growth. Forecasts for the first stage include management expectations of Informa TechTarget's financial performance with key assumptions of forecasted revenue growth rate and EBITDA margin and represent the best estimate of the future performance of the relevant reporting units, followed by a steady state period of long-term growth. Forecasts for the second stage are based on determining the Company’s terminal value, which is the value of the business beyond the discrete forecast period and utilizes a two‑stage growth model with an initial high‑growth rate stage, followed by a perpetual normalized growth stage.
Discount rate: For 2025, a post-tax discount rate using a weighted average cost of capital methodology. For the cost of debt, Informa TechTarget considered market rates, based on entities with a comparable credit rating. The cost of equity is calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model methodology. The discount rates include appropriate risk premiums to reflect additional risks of the specific reporting units being tested.
Long-term growth rate: For 2025, long-term growth rates are based on external factors such as long-term Consumer Price Index rates and external market reports for the main geographic markets in which each reporting unit operates and therefore are not considered to exceed the long-term average growth prospects for the individual markets. Long-term growth rates have not been risk adjusted to reflect any of the specific reporting unit uncertainties noted above, as these uncertainties are already reflected in the discount rates used.
Tax rate: For 2025, the tax rate is based on external reports of the weighted-average corporate tax rates for the main geographic markets in which each reporting unit operates.
Net working capital rate: For 2025, the net working capital rate is based on the market participant level of cash free net working capital, and a comparison of guideline public companies.
Capital expenditures rate: For 2025, the capital expenditures rate is based on the Company’s historical depreciation expense.
There is a significant degree of uncertainty associated with these key assumptions. Projected cash flows, including key assumptions of forecasted revenue growth rates and EBITDA margin, are contingent on the Company’s ability to accurately forecast future financial performance, which is subject to factors beyond the Company’s control such as changes in market conditions, economic downturns, and competitive pressures. The discount rate also incorporates market-based rates and risk premiums that are subject to fluctuations due to shifts in macroeconomic factors, investor sentiment, and changes in the Company's perceived risk profile. Moreover, the long-term growth rate assumption, although derived from reputable external sources, can be influenced by unforeseeable changes in industry dynamics, regulatory environments, and technological advancements that may impact growth trajectories. Consequently, while these assumptions are grounded in established financial theories and best estimates, there is an inherent degree of uncertainty.
Canalys
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $0.7 million and $42.7 million was recognized during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2025, respectively. The carrying value of goodwill in the Canalys reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 was $9.4 million post-impairment. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 0.5% increase in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate would have resulted in no impairment in the period. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 9.7% decrease in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2025, would have resulted in all goodwill being impaired. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 0.3% increase in the weighted average EBITDA margin would have resulted in no impairment in the period. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 6.3% decrease in the weighted average EBITDA margin used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 would have resulted in all goodwill being impaired. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 100 basis-point increase in the discount rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 would have increased the goodwill impairment recognized by $2.0 million. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 30 basis-point decrease in the discount rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 would have resulted in no impairment in the period. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 100 basis-point change in the long-term growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2025, would have increased or decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by $2.0 million and $1.0 million, respectively. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as they do not include interplay among assumptions.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $7.1 million and $34.7 million was recognized during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2025, respectively. The carrying value of goodwill in the NetLine reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 was $6.8 million post-impairment. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 6.6% increase in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate would have resulted in no impairment in the period. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 6.3% decrease in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 would have resulted in all goodwill being impaired. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 3.8% increase in the weighted average EBITDA margin would have resulted in no impairment in the period. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 3.2% decrease in the weighted average EBITDA margin used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 would have resulted in all goodwill being impaired. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 100 basis-point change in the discount rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 would have increased or decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by $2.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 100 basis-point change in the long-term growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2025, would have increased or decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by $2.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as they do not include interplay among assumptions.
The quantitative fair value test for the Canalys reporting unit utilized the most recent cash flow projections for the reporting unit as revised in the fourth quarter of 2024 to reflect current market conditions and current trends in business performance. The quantitative assessment utilized a long-term growth rate of 3.0%, a weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate of 9.1%, a weighted average forecasted EBITDA margin of 38.0%, net working capital rate of 5.0% and a discount rate of 13% in the estimation of the reporting unit’s fair value. After completing the testing, the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 60.3%, and therefore, there was no impairment to goodwill. The carrying value of the goodwill in the Canalys reporting unit as of December 31, 2024 was $49.3 million.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $436.7 million was recognized during the twelve months ended December 31, 2025. There was no carrying value of goodwill in the Legacy TechTarget reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 post-impairment.
The quantitative fair value test for the Legacy TechTarget reporting unit utilized the cash flow projections as of the closing of the Merger, December 2, 2024, for the reporting unit to reflect current market conditions and current trends in business performance. The quantitative assessment utilized a long-term growth rate of 3.0%, a weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate of 10.9%, a weighted average forecasted EBITDA margin of 32.9%, a net working capital rate of 5.1% and a discount rate of 10.4% in the estimation of the reporting unit’s fair value. After completing the testing, the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by less than one percent. There was no impairment to goodwill as of December 31, 2024. The carrying value of goodwill in the Legacy TechTarget reporting unit as of December 31, 2024 was $436.7 million.
The quantitative fair value test for the Bluefin reporting unit utilized the most recent cash flow projections for the reporting unit as revised in the fourth quarter of 2024 to reflect current market conditions and current trends in business performance. The quantitative assessment utilized a long-term growth rate of 3%, a weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate of 6.7%, a weighted average forecasted EBITDA margin of 26.0%, a net working capital rate of 5.0% and a discount rate of 13.5% in the estimation of the reporting unit’s fair value. After completing the testing, the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 21.4%, and therefore, there was no impairment to goodwill. The carrying value of goodwill in the Bluefin reporting unit as of December 31, 2024 was $176.8 million.
During the fourth quarter of 2024, as a result of the lower realized pricing attributable to shifts in the coverage mix for certain products, discontinuation of certain products as a result of the impact of recent legislation, and revised expectations of future selling, advertising, and promotion costs required to mitigate further revenue erosion, the Company’s assessment of future business performance indicated that the reporting unit’s future financial results were below the assumptions used in the last quantitative fair value test as of December 31, 2023. After considering the limited headroom as a result of the impairment to goodwill of the Industry Dive reporting unit when last tested on December 31, 2023, the Company determined that due to these changes in facts and circumstances, as well as increases in market interest rates during the fourth quarter of 2024, the Industry Dive reporting unit was impaired. The quantitative assessment utilized a long-term growth rate of 3.0%, a weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate of 6.6%, a weighted average forecasted EBITDA margin of 24.2%, a net working capital rate of 5.0% and a discount rate of 10.5% in the estimation of the reporting unit’s fair value. Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $66.2 million was recognized. The carrying value of goodwill in the Industry Dive reporting unit as of December 31, 2024 was $186.1 million post impairment.
ABased 10%on changethe quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $2.1 million and $174.1 million was recognized during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2025, respectively. The carrying value of goodwill in the Bluefin reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 was $3.7 million post-impairment. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 1.7% decrease in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 20242025 would have increasedresulted orin decreasedall goodwill being impaired. For the goodwillthree impairmentmonths recognizedended byDecember $7.031, million.2025, Aa 10%0.8% changedecrease in the weighted average EBITDA margin used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 20242025, would have increasedresulted orin decreasedall goodwill being impaired. For the goodwillthree impairmentmonths recognizedended byDecember $29.031, million.2025, Aa 100 basis-point changeincrease in the discount rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 20242025 would have increased or decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by $32$5.5 millionmillion. andFor $42the million,three respectively.months Aended December 31, 2025, a 100 basis-point changedecrease in the long-term growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 20242025 would have increased or decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by $26$3.4 million and $33 million, respectively.million. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as they do not include interplay among assumptions.
Industry Dive
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, there was no impairment recognized during the three months ended December 31, 2025. A goodwill impairment of $243.4 million was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2025. The carrying value of goodwill in the Industry Dive reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 was $25.7 million post-impairment. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 10.0% decrease in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2025, would have increased the goodwill impairment recognized by $11.1 million. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 6.2% decrease in the weighted average EBITDA margin used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 would have resulted in all goodwill being impaired. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 100 basis-point increase in the discount rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 would not have resulted in goodwill impairment. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, a 100 basis-point decrease in the long-term growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2025 would not have resulted in goodwill impairment. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as they do not include interplay among assumptions.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Informa Tech Digital Businesses had been affected by macro-economic conditions, in particular the negative impact of rising interest rates on the technology industry, which impacted investment levels and overall marketing expenditure. As a result, during the first quarter of 2023, when remeasuring the fair value of the contingent consideration related to the Industry Dive acquisition, a reduction was made to the short-term 2023 revenue forecast for the Industry Dive reporting unit. As this was considered to be an indicator of impairment, a quantitative analysis was performed, which concluded that the fair value continued to exceed the carrying value because the long-term projections of the business remained unchanged.
Subsequently, in the second quarter of 2023, with macro-economic conditions remaining challenging, management revised its long-term revenue projections for the Industry Dive business, lowering expectations for its core email and website sponsorship/advertising products to reflect more constrained budgets among its current and expected key customers. Following this change in assumptions, another quantitative impairment analysis was performed for the Industry Dive reporting unit, which indicated that its carrying value now exceeded its fair value. Therefore, an impairment charge of $139.6 million was recognized against the goodwill of the Industry Dive reporting unit.
The fair value of Industry Dive was determined by discounting its projected cash flows at the post-tax discount rate of 12.1% and using a 2.2% long-term growth rate, as determined following the methodology above. A sensitivity analysis considered the impact of changes to several key assumptions that were considered in isolated scenarios, including a hypothetical 10% reduction in all cash flow years including the perpetuity year, a 1% increase in the discount rate, and a 0.50% reduction in the long-term growth rate, with higher total levels of impairment ranging from $150.1 million to $177.1 million under these sensitivities scenarios.
The quantitative fair value test for the NetLine reporting unit utilized the most recent cash flow projections for the reporting unit as revised in the fourth quarter of 2024 to reflect current market conditions and current trends in business performance. The quantitative assessment utilized a long-term growth rate of 3%, a weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate of 16.1%, a weighted average forecasted EBITDA margin of 43.0%, a tax rate of 27.9%, capital expenditures rate of 1.0%, a net working capital rate of 5.0% and a discount rate of 12.5% in the estimation of the reporting unit’s fair value. After completing the testing, the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 80.1%, and therefore, there was no impairment to goodwill. The carrying value of goodwill in the NetLine reporting unit as of December 31, 2024 was $41.5 million.
During the second quarter of 2023, as the macro-economic conditions described above also impacted NetLine, the Informa Tech Digital Business performed a quantitative impairment analysis for the NetLine reporting unit which indicated the fair value exceeded its carrying value by 14.5%. The fair value of NetLine was determined by discounting its projected cash flows at the post-tax discount rate of 14.1% and using a 2.2% long-term growth rate, as determined following the methodology above. A sensitivity analysis considered the impact of changes to several key assumptions that were considered in isolated scenarios, including a hypothetical 10% reduction in all cash flow years including the perpetuity year which would reduce headroom to $1.8 million, a 1% increase in the discount rate, which would reduce headroom to $3.2 million, and a 0.5% reduction in the long-term growth rate, which would reduce headroom to $7.2 million.
During the annual goodwill impairment test for the year ended December 31, 2023, there were either no indicators of impairment, or where such indicators existed, the results of the December 31, 2023 impairment test showed that fair value exceeded the carrying amount for all reporting units and therefore that no further impairment charge was required.
For the 2024 and 2023 reporting periods, Informa TechTarget performed the required annual impairment tests of goodwill on its reporting units using the following key assumptions in the fair value calculations:
Projected cash flows: For the 2024 reporting period, the Company used a two-stage valuation approach to projected cash flows, which included key assumptions of forecasted revenue growth rate and EBITDA margin. The first stage consisted of Board of Director approved projected financial information for a period of three years, followed by a steady state period of long-term growth. Forecasts for the first stage include management expectations of Informa TechTarget's financial performance with key assumptions of forecasted revenue growth rate and EBITDA margin and represent the best estimate of the future performance of the relevant reporting units. For the 2023 reporting period, the Company used a three-stage valuation approach to project impairment test cash flows. The first stage consisted of BOD approved projected financial information for a period of four years, followed by a transitional period of two years of normalizing and declining growth rates and, thereafter, a steady state period of long-term growth.
Discount rate: For the 2024 and 2023 reporting periods, a post-tax discount rate using a weighted average cost of capital methodology. For the cost of debt, Informa TechTarget considered market rates, based on entities with a comparable credit rating. The cost of equity is calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model methodology. The discount rates include appropriate risk premiums to reflect additional risks of the specific reporting units being tested.
Long-term growth rate: For the 2024 and 2023 reporting periods, long-term growth rates are based on external factors such as long-term Consumer Price Index rates and external market reports for the main geographic markets in which each reporting unit operates and therefore are not considered to exceed the long-term average growth prospects for the individual markets. Long-term growth rates have not been risk adjusted to reflect any of the specific reporting unit uncertainties noted above, as these uncertainties are already reflected in the discount rates used.
Tax rate: For the 2024 reporting period, the tax rate is based on external reports of the weighted-average corporate tax rates for the main geographic markets in which each reporting unit operates.
Net working capital rate: For the 2024 reporting period, the net working capital rate is based on the market participant level of cash free net working capital, and a comparison of guideline public companies.
Capital expenditures rate: For the 2024 reporting period, the capital expenditures rate is based on the Company’s historical depreciation expense.
There is a degree of uncertainty associated with these key assumptions. Projected cash flows, including key assumptions of forecasted revenue growth rates and EBITDA margin, are contingent on the Company’s ability to accurately forecast future financial performance, which is subject to factors beyond the Company’s control such as changes in market conditions, economic downturns, and competitive pressures. The discount rate also incorporates market-based rates and risk premiums that are subject to fluctuations due to shifts in macroeconomic factors, investor sentiment, and changes in the Company's perceived risk profile. Moreover, the long-term growth rate assumption, although derived from reputable external sources, can be influenced by unforeseeable changes in industry dynamics, regulatory environments, and technological advancements that may impact growth trajectories. Consequently, while these assumptions are grounded in established financial theories and best estimates, there is an inherent degree of uncertainty.
During the first quarter of 2025, Informa TechTarget did observe a substantial sustained decline in the price of the Company's stock from the closing price of $19.82 as of December 31, 2024 to the closing price of $14.81 as of March 31, 2025. After considering other qualitative factors, the Company concluded there is a triggering event as of March 31, 2025 indicating goodwill may be impaired in the Company's reporting units. Accordingly, the Company is performing a quantitative impairment test for each of the Company's reporting units during the interim period ended March 31, 2025. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on the Company's statement of financial position and results of operations. The Company anticipates a non-cash impairment of goodwill, in the first quarter of 2025, as a result of the decline in the Company’s stock price and the reduction in its market capitalization relative to current book values. The Company is still performing its quantitative assessment for each reporting unit at this time and the potential amount of impairment for each reporting unit, if any, is unknown at this time.
The Company is subject to U.S. federal, state and foreign income taxes with respect to income or loss the Company generate.generates. Significant judgment is required in determining the Company's provision or benefit for income taxes and in evaluating uncertain tax positions.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs, facility expenses and related overheads, accounting, legal and other professional fees, badallowance debtfor provision,credit losses, and stock-based compensation expenses.
Impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill primarily relates to lease impairment and goodwill impairmentimpairments inacross onethe reporting unit,units Industryof Dive,the Company as the carrying amount exceeded the fair value.
Restructuring costs primarily relate to the Restructuring Plan designed to reshape, optimize, and support the Company’s financial and operational efficiency. The plan involves streamlining certain areas and functions and reinvesting in others to improve the delivery of products and services to customers and enhance the Company’s global go-to-market capabilities.
Remeasurement of contingent consideration relates to the fair value adjustment of acquisition related contingent consideration. Any remaining contingent consideration as of the Transaction was assumed by Parent.
Related party interest expense
Other income (expense), net consists primarily of unrealized/realized foreign currency transaction gains and losses.losses This includesand the remeasurement of the convertible notes utilizing the fair value option.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
The Company's business is subject to a number of risks that could have a material effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity and that could cause the Company's operating results to vary significantly from period to period. In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risk factors the Company previously disclosed in Item 1A – “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SEC on March 11, 2026. The Company may disclose changes to any risk factors presented or disclose additional factors from time to time in our future filings with the SEC.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Comparison of The Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
New heading “Operating expenses and other”
Removed heading “Related party interest expense”
Largest changes
“Selling and Marketing. Selling and marketing expenses decreased by $7.3 million, or 10%, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by $5.6 million decrease in labor and related costs post the company-wide restructuring and workforce reduction program initiated in August 2025 and a $3.8 million decrease in marketing spend. This was partially offset by a $2.1 million increase in sales commissions, reflecting changes towards more performance‑based compensation.”see in full comparison
“Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $8.1 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. The carrying value of goodwill in the Canalys reporting unit after the impairment charge was $1.1 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, an 8.8% increase in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate would have resulted in no impairment in the period. …”see in full comparison
“Impairment of Goodwill. As a result of the impairment analysis in the six months ended June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2025, impairment charges of $45.0 million and $841.3 million were recorded, respectively. Due to decreases in our stock price and overall market capitalization, along with other qualitative considerations including the continued impact from the conditions in the macroeconomic environment, it was determined a triggering event occurred in each of the three month periods ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025, indicating goodwill may be impaired. …”see in full comparison
“Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $6.8 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. There was no carrying value of goodwill remaining in the NetLine reporting unit after the $6.8 million impairment charge. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 9.5% increase in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate would have resulted in no impairment in the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 5.6% increase in the weighted average EBITDA margin would have resulted in no impairment in the period. …”see in full comparison
“Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $3.7 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. There was no carrying value of goodwill remaining in the Bluefin reporting unit after the $3.7 million impairment charge. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, an 8.0% increase in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate would have resulted in no impairment in the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 4.2% increase in the weighted average EBITDA margin would have resulted in no impairment in the period. …”see in full comparison
“Impairment of Goodwill. There was no goodwill impairment recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2026. As a result of the impairment analysis in the three months ended June 30, 2025, an impairment charge of $382.2 million was recorded. Due to decreases in our stock price and overall market capitalization, along with other qualitative considerations including the continued impact from the conditions in the macroeconomic environment, it was determined a triggering event occurred in the prior year period, indicating goodwill may be impaired. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (77)
In connection with the 2024 Transactions, during the first quarter of 2026, the Company made changes to its organizational structure to take advantage of the combined product offering portfolio. In connection with these changes to organizational structure, starting in the first quarter of 2026, the Company operates in two segments: Brand to Demand (“B2D”) and Intelligence & Advisory (“I&A”). The B2D segment primarily generates revenues through the provision of services that enable marketers to raise their brands’ awareness and directly engage prospective buyers through a portfolio of brand content marketing programs (including webinars, whitepapers, playbooks, virtual events and surveys) to create demand, the creation of custom content offerings, and the ability to comprehensively analyze purchase intent data from actively engaged enterprise technology and business professionals. The I&A segment primarily generates revenues through the provision of its “intelligence” subscription service, providing clients with a core “data backbone” in addition to qualitative analyst-produced content across the technology industry spectrum (Intelligence). The Company, leveraging insights gathered through Intelligence, provides advisory services working as an extension of client teams, working together to provide strategic support in assessing critical business challenges and providing bespoke solutions.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, goodwill was $1.1 million and $45.6 million, respectively. Informa TechTarget's goodwill represents the excess purchase price of an acquired entity over the amounts assigned to assets and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Informa TechTarget performs an assessment of goodwill for impairment annually as of December 31 or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate there may be an impairment.
During the first quarter of 2026, the Company made changes to its organizational structure to take advantage of the combined product offering portfolio. As a result, the Company, as of March 31, 2026, had two reporting units: Brand to Demand, and Intelligence & Advisory. As of the last prior date that the Company assessedCompany's goodwill forimpairment impairment,assessment whichperformed wason December 31, 2025, the company had five reporting units. See further discussion at Note 4, Goodwill. The Company identified a sustained decline in share price during the first quarter of 2026 that, along with other qualitative considerations including the continued impact from the conditions in the macroeconomic environment, constituted an impairment triggering event for its reporting units. During the second quarter of 2026, there was no triggering event requiring an impairment assessment. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, Informa TechTarget performed the required impairment tests of goodwill on its previous five reporting units (pre-reorganization basis), and then on its current two reporting units (post-reorganization basis), using a discounted cash flow model with the following key assumptions in the fair value calculations:
Projected cash flows: For the first quarter of 2026, theThe Company used a two-stage valuation approach to projected cash flows, which included key assumptions of forecasted revenue growth rate and EBITDA margin followed by a steady state period of long-term growth. Forecasts for the first stage include management expectations of Informa TechTarget's financial performance with key assumptions of forecasted revenue growth rate and EBITDA margin and represent the best estimate of the future performance of the relevant reporting units, followed by a steady state period of long-term growth. Forecasts for the second stage are based on determining the Company’s terminal value, which is the value of the business beyond the discrete forecast period and utilizes a two‑stage growth model with an initial high‑growth rate stage, followed by a perpetual normalized growth stage.
Discount rate: For the first quarter of 2026, aA post-tax discount rate using a weighted average cost of capital methodology. For the cost of debt, Informa TechTarget considered market rates, based on entities with a comparable credit rating. The cost of equity is calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model methodology. The discount rates include appropriate risk premiums to reflect additional risks of the specific reporting units being tested.
Long-term growth rate: For the first quarter of 2026, long-termLong-term growth rates are based on external factors such as long-term Consumer Price Index rates and external market reports for the main geographic markets in which each reporting unit operates and therefore are not considered to exceed the long-term average growth prospects for the individual markets. Long-term growth rates have not been risk adjusted to reflect any of the specific reporting unit uncertainties noted above, as these uncertainties are already reflected in the discount rates used.
Tax rate: For the first quarter of 2026, theThe tax rate is based on external reports of the weighted-average corporate tax rates for the main geographic markets in which each reporting unit operates.
Net working capital rate: For the first quarter of 2026, theThe net working capital rate is based on the market participant level of cash free net working capital, and a comparison of guideline public companies.
Capital expenditures rate: For the first quarter of 2026, theThe capital expenditures rate is based on the Company’s historical depreciation expense.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $8.1 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. The carrying value of goodwill in the Canalys reporting unit after the impairment charge was $1.1 million.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $8.1 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. The carrying value of goodwill in the Canalys reporting unit after the impairment charge was $1.1 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, an 8.8% increase in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate would have resulted in no impairment in the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 1.5% decrease in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of March 31, 2026 would have resulted in all goodwill being impaired. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 7.1% increase in the weighted average EBITDA margin would have resulted in no impairment in the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 1.0% decrease in the weighted average EBITDA margin used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of March 31, 2026 would have resulted in all goodwill being impaired. For the three months ended March 31, 2026 a 100 basis-point change in the discount rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit would have increased or decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by $1.0 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 100 basis-point increase in the long-term growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit would have decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by $1.0 million. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as they do not include interplay among assumptions.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $6.8 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. There was no carrying value of goodwill remaining in the NetLine reporting unit after the $6.8 million impairment charge.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $6.8 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. There was no carrying value of goodwill remaining in the NetLine reporting unit after the $6.8 million impairment charge. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 9.5% increase in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate would have resulted in no impairment in the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 5.6% increase in the weighted average EBITDA margin would have resulted in no impairment in the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, a 100 basis-point decrease in the discount rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit would have decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by $2.0 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 100 basis-point increase in the long-term growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit would have decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by $1.0 million. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as they do not include interplay among assumptions.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $3.7 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. There was no carrying value of goodwill remaining in the Bluefin reporting unit after the $3.7 million impairment charge.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $3.7 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. There was no carrying value of goodwill remaining in the Bluefin reporting unit after the $3.7 million impairment charge. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, an 8.0% increase in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate would have resulted in no impairment in the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 4.2% increase in the weighted average EBITDA margin would have resulted in no impairment in the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 100 basis-point decrease in the discount rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit would have decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by $4.0 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 100 basis-point increase in the long-term growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit would have decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by $2.0 million. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as they do not include interplay among assumptions.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, no goodwill impairment was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. The carrying value of goodwill in the Industry Dive reporting unit was $26.4 million prior to the reorganization.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, no goodwill impairment was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. The carrying value of goodwill in the Industry Dive reporting unit was $26.4 million prior to the reorganization. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 10% decrease in the weighted average forecasted revenue growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of March 31, 2025 would have increased the goodwill impairment recognized by $15.0 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 6.0% decrease in the weighted average EBITDA margin used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting would have resulted in all goodwill being impaired. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as they do not include interplay among assumptions.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $26.4 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. There was no carrying value of goodwill in the Brand to Demand reporting unit after the impairment charge as of March 31, 2026. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 100 basis-point decrease in the discount rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit would have decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by $17.0 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 100 basis-point increase in the long-term growth rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit would have decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by $10.0 million. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as they do not include interplay among assumptions.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, there was noa goodwill impairment of $26.4 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. TheThere was no carrying value of goodwill in the IntelligenceBrand &to AdvisoryDemand reporting unit after the impairment charge was $1.1 million as of March 31, 2026. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 6.1% decrease in the weighted average EBITDA margin used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of March 31, 2026 would have resulted in all goodwill being impaired. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as they do not include interplay among assumptions.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, there was no goodwill impairment recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. The carrying value of goodwill in the Intelligence & Advisory reporting unit on a post-reorganization basis was $1.1 million as of March 31, 2026.
These products and services are delivered under both short-term contracts that run for the length of a given marketing/sales program, typically less than nine months, and through integrated contracts exceeding 270 days (“longer-term contracts”) covering various client needs. Longer-term contracts include a range of annual subscription products, which are paid for in advance. In the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, approximately 28% and 2025, approximately 34% and 37%,29%, respectively, of our revenues were from longer-term contracts. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, approximately 33% and 35%, respectively, of our revenues were from longer-term contracts.
Related party interest expense
Other income (expense), net consists primarily of unrealized/realized foreign currency transaction gains and losses.losses, and other non-operating income and expense transactions.
The following table sets forth a summary of certain key financial information for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
Comparison of The Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025
Revenue for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $106.0$116.1 million, ana increasedecrease of $2.2$3.8 million, or 2%,3%, compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increasedecrease was primarily driven by the Brand to Demand segment, which contributed $3.4 million of incremental revenue, reflecting continued strength across the Demand Generation and Branding product lines. This growth was partially offset by a $1.2$2.3 million decrease in Intelligence & Advisory segment revenues, primarily due to strategiclower goResearch & Consulting services in the current period and a $1.5 million decrease in Brand to marketDemand consultingsegment areasrevenues, ofprimarily thedriven business.by a small decrease in our Demand Generation and Intent Data product lines.
Cost of revenues for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $48.0$51.7 million, representing an increase of $3.9$0.5 million, or 9%,1%, compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by a $3.2$0.3 million increase which was mainly attributable to higher content and editorial expenses and electronic fulfillment costs, consistent with increased activity levels. The remaining $0.6 million relates to an increase in amortization reflecting higher amortization of capitalized content and platform-related assets.assets, with a further $0.1 million increase attributable to increased labor and related costs.
Selling and Marketing. Selling and marketing expenses increased by $0.1 million, or less than 1%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by a $1.4 million increase in sales commissions, reflecting changes in sales mix and performance‑based compensation, and a $0.2 million increase in marketing costs related to ongoing promotional activity, partially offset by a $2.2 million reduction in marketing expenses.
GeneralSelling and Administrative.Marketing. GeneralSelling and administrativemarketing expenses decreased by $5.5$7.4 million, or 22%,20%, for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by a $5.0$6.3 million reductiondecrease in staff‑relatedstaff-related costs, reflectingcosts post‑transaction synergiesthe company-wide restructuring and headcountworkforce reductions.reduction program initiated in August 2025. The remaining decrease is attributable to a $1.8 million decrease in third-party spend and costs optimization initiatives. This was partially offset by a $2.2$0.7 million increase in ITsales and communication costs. Other decreases, totaling $2.6 million, primarily related to reduced office and facility expenses, lower professional fees, and decreased share‑based compensation.commissions.
Restructuring expense (income). Restructuring income was $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to no restructuring expense (income) in the three months ended March 31, 2025. Restructuring expense (income) primarily relate to a company‑wide restructuring and workforce reduction program initiated in August 2025, aimed at improving operational efficiency and reducing the overall cost base. The income recognized in the current period primarily reflects reversals of previously recorded expenses as a result of changes in estimates.
Product Development. Product development costs increased by $0.9 million, or 31% for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily due to higher staff and related personnel costs supporting product development activities.
Depreciation. Depreciation expense increased by $0.2 million, or 34% for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily due to an adjustment to the estimated useful lives of existing leasehold improvements in the anticipation of a relocation of the Newton office lease.
Amortization. Amortization expense decreased by $1.4 million, or 5.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily due to higher amortization included in cost of revenues in the current period.
Impairment of Goodwill. As a result of the impairment analysis in the three months ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025, impairment charges of $45.0 million and $459.1 million were recorded, respectively. Due to decreases in our stock price and overall market capitalization, along with other qualitative considerations including the continued impact from the conditions in the macroeconomic environment, it was determined a triggering event occurred in each period, indicating goodwill may be impaired. Accordingly, we conducted a quantitative impairment test of our goodwill at March 31, 2026 and 2025. We estimate the implied fair value of our goodwill primarily using an income approach. Changes in the estimates or assumptions used in our quantitative impairment test could materially affect the determination of fair value and the associated goodwill impairment assessment. Potential events and circumstances that could have an adverse impact on our estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to continued increases in costs and other macroeconomic factors.
AcquisitionGeneral and IntegrationAdministrative. Costs. AcquisitionGeneral and integrationadministrative expenses increased by $6.5$3.0 million, or 70%.,16%, for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase was primarily attributable to increaseda external$2.3 consultingmillion increase in staff-related costs, as the prior-year period reflected the timing of post-transaction synergies and advisorycost integrationoptimizations that resulted in a lower comparative base in the second quarter of 2025. Additionally, other operating costs comparedincreased due to thea prior$0.7 yearmillion period.increase in information technology costs.
Remeasurement of Contingent Consideration. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company recognized an immaterial amount of remeasurement expense related to contingent consideration. No contingent consideration remeasurement was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Interest Expense on Related Party Loans. Interest expense on related party loans increased $0.3 million, or 18%, in the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily due to the timing of the related party debt drawdown, which occurred in late January 2025, resulting in fewer months of incurred interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the current period.
InterestProduct Income.Development. InterestProduct incomedevelopment decreasedcosts increased by $0.8 million, or 93.7%,29%, for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to decreasedhigher cashstaff balancesand inrelated thepersonnel currentcosts period.supporting product development activities.
Depreciation. Depreciation expense decreased by $0.1 million, or 21%, for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to certain IT equipment and other fixed assets becoming fully depreciated during the period.
Amortization. Amortization expense decreased by $0.3 million, or 1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to higher amortization included in cost of revenues in the current period.
Impairment of Goodwill. There was no goodwill impairment recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2026. As a result of the impairment analysis in the three months ended June 30, 2025, an impairment charge of $382.2 million was recorded. Due to decreases in our stock price and overall market capitalization, along with other qualitative considerations including the continued impact from the conditions in the macroeconomic environment, it was determined a triggering event occurred in the prior year period, indicating goodwill may be impaired. Accordingly, we conducted a quantitative impairment test of our goodwill at March 31, 2025. We estimate the implied fair value of our goodwill primarily using an income approach. Changes in the estimates or assumptions used in our quantitative impairment test could materially affect the determination of fair value and the associated goodwill impairment assessment. Potential events and circumstances that could have an adverse impact on our estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to continued increases in costs and other macroeconomic factors.
Restructuring expense (income). Restructuring expense was $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to no restructuring expense (income) in the three months ended June 30, 2025. Restructuring expense (income) primarily relates to a company‑wide restructuring and workforce reduction program initiated in August 2025, aimed at improving operational efficiency and reducing the overall cost base.
Acquisition and Integration Costs. Acquisition and integration expenses decreased by $6.3 million, or 42%, for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily attributable to the substantial reduction of integration activities, resulting in lower external consulting and advisory fees as the business transitions from active integration to steady-state operations.
Interest Expense on Related Party Loans. Interest expense on related party loans decreased $0.6 million, or 23%, in the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to a higher balance drawn on the Credit Facility in the prior year period.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased by an immaterial amount for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025, due to relatively consistent cash balances in the current period.
Other Income (Expense), net. Other income for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $0.9$0.5 million compared to the other expense of $3.1$5.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025,2025. The improvement was primarily dueattributable to a $3.5 million decrease in unrealized gainsforeign exchange losses on intercompany balances denominated in foreign currenciescurrencies, reflecting more favorable currency movements in the current periodperiod, whileand a $1.8 million gain on the priorsale yearof periodcertain hadintangible unrealizedassets associated with the platform known as GDC Vault to Informa. The remaining $0.4 million favorable variance was due to net improvements in other foreign exchange gains and losses on intercompanyoperational balancestransactions denominatedand in foreign currencies.balances.
`Income Tax Benefit (Expense). Income tax benefit for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $11.4$2.0 million, ana increasedecrease of $37.8$17.6 million compared to the income tax expensebenefit of $26.4$19.6 million in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The effective tax rate was 13.8%(8.5)% and 5.3%(4.7)% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. In 2026, the effective tax rate was primarily driven by a non-deductible goodwill impairment and a geographic mix of earnings. In 2025, the effective tax rate was primarily driven by non-taxable contingent consideration and larger non-deductible goodwill impairment. Due to the Company’s history of impairments the effect of the non-deductible goodwill impairment was not treated as a discrete item in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
Comparison of The Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $222.2 million, a decrease of $1.6 million, or 1%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by a $3.5 million decrease in Intelligence & Advisory segment revenues, primarily due to lower Advisory services revenues and softer Intelligence subscription revenue. This was partially offset by the Brand to Demand segment, primarily driven by performance across the Demand Generation and Branding product lines.
Cost of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $99.7 million, representing an increase of $4.4 million, or 5%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by higher fulfillment costs. A further $0.9 million relates to an increase in amortization, reflecting higher amortization of capitalized platform-related assets and $0.3 million in increased labor and related costs, consistent with increased activity levels.
Operating expenses and other
Selling and Marketing. Selling and marketing expenses decreased by $7.3 million, or 10%, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by $5.6 million decrease in labor and related costs post the company-wide restructuring and workforce reduction program initiated in August 2025 and a $3.8 million decrease in marketing spend. This was partially offset by a $2.1 million increase in sales commissions, reflecting changes towards more performance‑based compensation.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses decreased by $2.5 million, or 6%, for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by a $3.2 million decrease in professional fees, a $2.7 million reduction in staff-related costs driven by post-transaction synergies and organizational restructuring, and a $0.9 million decrease in property and office costs due to reduced office space requirements and associated lease obligations. These were partially offset by a $2.9 million increase in information technology costs, primarily due to enhanced corporate technology infrastructure investments and increased cost allocations from centralized IT services.
Product Development. Product development costs increased by $1.6 million, or 30%, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to higher staff and related personnel costs supporting product development activities.
Depreciation. Depreciation expense increased by $0.1 million, or 7%, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to an adjustment to the estimated useful lives of existing leasehold improvements in the anticipation of a relocation of the Newton office lease.
Amortization. Amortization expense decreased by $1.6 million, or 4%, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to higher amortization included in cost of revenues in the current period.
Impairment of Goodwill. As a result of the impairment analysis in the six months ended June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2025, impairment charges of $45.0 million and $841.3 million were recorded, respectively. Due to decreases in our stock price and overall market capitalization, along with other qualitative considerations including the continued impact from the conditions in the macroeconomic environment, it was determined a triggering event occurred in each of the three month periods ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025, indicating goodwill may be impaired. No triggering event occurred in the three months ended June 30, 2026. Accordingly, we conducted a quantitative impairment test of our goodwill at March 31, 2026, March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2025. We estimate the implied fair value of our goodwill primarily using an income approach. Changes in the estimates or assumptions used in our quantitative impairment test could materially affect the determination of fair value and the associated goodwill impairment assessment. Potential events and circumstances that could have an adverse impact on our estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to continued increases in costs and other macroeconomic factors.
Restructuring expense (income). Restructuring income was $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to no restructuring expense (income) in the six months ended June 30, 2025. Restructuring expense (income) primarily relates to a company‑wide restructuring and workforce reduction program initiated in August 2025, aimed at improving operational efficiency and reducing the overall cost base. The income recognized in the current period primarily reflects reversals of previously recorded expenses as a result of changes in estimates.
Acquisition and Integration Costs. Acquisition and integration expenses increased by $0.2 million, or 1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, based on levels of integration activities.
Remeasurement of Contingent Consideration. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company recognized an immaterial amount of remeasurement expense related to contingent consideration. No contingent consideration remeasurement was recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2025.
TTGT insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 10 filings (5 insiders, 6 trade dates, 103,800 shares, about $431.9K). Net open-market shares: -103,800 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$431.9K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | Noreck Daniel T |
Open-market sale | 4,889 | $3.74 | $18.3K |
| 2026-09-23 | Rennick Charles D |
Open-market sale | 4,146 | $3.74 | $15.5K |
| 2026-09-23 | Morelli William Thomas |
Open-market sale | 2,809 | $3.74 | $10.5K |
| 2026-09-23 | Nugent Gary John |
Open-market sale | 12,608 | $3.74 | $47.2K |
| 2026-09-23 | Niemiec Steven |
Open-market sale | 8,950 | $3.74 | $33.5K |
| 2026-09-22 | Noreck Daniel T |
Option exercise | 16,035 | — | — |
| 2026-09-22 | Rennick Charles D |
Option exercise | 9,421 | — | — |
| 2026-09-22 | Morelli William Thomas |
Option exercise | 11,097 | — | — |
| 2026-09-22 | Nugent Gary John |
Option exercise | 34,166 | — | — |
| 2026-09-22 | Niemiec Steven |
Option exercise | 19,437 | — | — |
| 2026-08-28 | Niemiec Steven |
Open-market sale | 21,427 | $3.85 | $82.5K |
| 2026-08-21 | Noreck Daniel T |
Open-market sale | 5,633 | $3.85 | $21.7K |
| 2026-08-21 | Rennick Charles D |
Open-market sale | 3,388 | $3.85 | $13.0K |
| 2026-08-13 | Niemiec Steven |
Option exercise | 47,187 | — | — |
| 2026-08-13 | Rennick Charles D |
Option exercise | 7,864 | — | — |
| 2026-08-13 | Noreck Daniel T |
Option exercise | 18,875 | — | — |
| 2026-08-11 | Flaschen David J S |
Grant/award | 1,867 | $3.75 | $7.0K |
| 2026-08-11 | Griffey Michael Sean |
Grant/award | 800 | $3.75 | $3.0K |
| 2026-08-11 | Hawk Don |
Grant/award | 800 | $3.75 | $3.0K |
| 2026-08-11 | Sanchez Perfecto |
Grant/award | 1,867 | $3.75 | $7.0K |
| 2026-08-11 | Van Houten Christina |
Grant/award | 2,400 | $3.75 | $9.0K |
| 2026-06-01 | Niemiec Steven |
Open-market sale | 629 | $4.75 | $3.0K |
| 2026-05-29 | Niemiec Steven |
Open-market sale | 19,321 | $4.75 | $91.8K |
| 2026-05-22 | Niemiec Steven |
Open-market sale | 20,000 | $4.75 | $95.0K |
Well-known investors holding TTGT (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 668,160 | $2.4M | 0.0% | Added 10% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 619,345 | $2.2M | 0.0% | Reduced 3% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 151,909 | $546.9K | 0.0% | New position |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 94,840 | $341.4K | 0.0% | New position |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 33,178 | $119.4K | 0.0% | Reduced 64% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 23,627 | $91.7K | — | Sold out |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 13,158 | $51.1K | — | Sold out |