TWO-PC 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Two Harbors Investment Corp. (also TWO-PB, TWO-PA, TWOD) · NYSE · Real Estate Investment Trusts · CIK 1465740 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Risk Factors Summary”
New heading “Risks Related to Our Business and Operations”
New heading “Risks Related to Our Assets”
New heading “Risks Related to the Proposed Merger”
New heading “Risks Related to the Proposed Merger”
New heading “The exchange ratio for the Merger consideration is fixed. Because the market price of UWM Common Stock may fluctuate, our common stockholders cannot be sure of the market value of the stock consideration they will receive in exchange for their Company common stock in connection with the Merger.”
New heading “The Merger is subject to a number of conditions which, if not satisfied or waived in a timely manner, would delay the Merger or adversely impact UWM’s and our ability to complete the transaction.”
New heading “Failure to consummate the Merger as currently contemplated or at all could adversely affect the price of our common stock and our future business and financial results.”
New heading “The Merger Agreement contains provisions that could discourage a potential competing acquirer or could result in any competing acquisition proposal being at a lower price than it might otherwise be.”
New heading “The pendency of the Merger could adversely affect our business and operations.”
New heading “Our common stockholders will have a significantly reduced ownership and voting interest after the Merger and will exercise less influence over the policies of UWM following the transaction than they now have on our policies.”
New heading “An adverse judgment in any litigation challenging the Merger may prevent the Merger from becoming effective or from becoming effective within the expected timeframe.”
Removed heading “We may not have the ability to raise funds necessary to pay principal amounts owed upon maturity of our outstanding convertible senior notes or to purchase such notes upon a fundamental change.”
Removed heading “Legal matters related to the termination of our Management Agreement with PRCM Advisers may adversely affect our business, results of operations, and/or financial condition.”
Largest changes
“On August 14, 2020, our Management Agreement with PRCM Advisers terminated and we thereafter became a self-managed company. In connection with the termination of our Management Agreement, PRCM Advisers filed a complaint in federal court that alleges, among other things, the misappropriation of trade secrets in violation of both the Defend Trade Secrets Act and New York common law, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair competition and business practices, unjust enrichment, conversion, and tortious interference with contract. …”see in full comparison
“An adverse judgment in any litigation challenging the Merger may prevent the Merger from becoming effective or from becoming effective within the expected timeframe.”see in full comparison
“It is possible that stockholders may file lawsuits challenging the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, which may name us and/or our board of directors as defendants. The outcome of such lawsuits cannot be assured, including the amount of costs associated with defending these claims or any other liabilities that may be incurred in connection with the litigation of these claims. …”see in full comparison
“The exchange ratio for the Merger consideration is fixed. Because the market price of UWM Common Stock may fluctuate, our common stockholders cannot be sure of the market value of the stock consideration they will receive in exchange for their Company common stock in connection with the Merger.”see in full comparison
“Our common stockholders will have a significantly reduced ownership and voting interest after the Merger and will exercise less influence over the policies of UWM following the transaction than they now have on our policies.”see in full comparison
“The Merger Agreement contains provisions that could discourage a potential competing acquirer or could result in any competing acquisition proposal being at a lower price than it might otherwise be.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (85)
Risk Factors Summary
The following summary highlights some of the principal risks that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. This summary is not complete and the risks summarized below are not the only risks we face. These risks are discussed more fully further below in this section entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These risks include, but are not limited to, the following:
Risks Related to Our Business and Operations
•Difficult conditions in the residential mortgage and real estate markets, the financial markets and the economy generally may adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
•Our business model depends in part upon the continuing viability of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, or similar institutions, and any changes to their structure or creditworthiness could have an adverse impact on us.
•Federal and state regulation of the mortgage industry is complex and constantly evolving, and changes to applicable rules, regulations and guidance may adversely impact our business.
•Our business could suffer if we fail to attract and retain a skilled management team and workforce.
•Loss of our 1940 Act exemptions would adversely affect us, the market price of shares of our common stock and our ability to distribute dividends, and could result in the termination of certain of our financing or other agreements.
•The lack of liquidity of our assets may adversely affect our business, including our ability to value, finance and sell our assets.
•We may not be able to grow or realize the benefits of our direct-to-consumer loan origination platform, which could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
•We use leverage in executing our business strategy, which may adversely affect the return on our assets and may reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders, as well as increase losses when economic conditions are unfavorable.
•We depend on repurchase agreements and other credit facilities to execute our business plan and any limitation on our ability to access funding through these sources could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
•If our warehouse lines of credit are terminated or reduced, we may be unable to find replacement financing on favorable terms, or at all, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
•Our inability to meet certain financial covenants related to our repurchase agreements, revolving credit facilities or other credit facilities could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
•If a counterparty to a repurchase agreement defaults on its obligation to resell the underlying security back to us at the end of the repurchase agreement term, or if we default on our obligations under the repurchase agreement, we may incur losses.
•We are highly dependent on information technology, and system failures or security breaches could disrupt our business.
•We enter into hedging transactions that expose us to contingent liabilities in the future, which may adversely affect our financial results or cash available for distribution to stockholders.
•Our ability to own and manage MSR and service mortgage loans is subject to terms and conditions established by the GSEs, which are subject to change.
•If our ability to sell loans in the secondary market is impaired, it could affect our volume and margins and we may not be able to continue to originate mortgage loans.
•We are directly subject to risks associated with mortgage servicing, including risks related to previous mortgage loan servicers.
Risks Related to Our Assets
•Declines in the market values of our assets may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
•Changes in mortgage prepayment rates may adversely affect the value of our assets.
•Our delayed delivery transactions, including TBAs, subject us to certain risks, including price risks and counterparty risks.
•Increases in interest rates could adversely affect the value of our assets and cause our interest expense to increase.
•An increase in interest rates may cause a decrease in the availability of certain of our target assets, which could adversely affect our ability to acquire target assets that satisfy our investment objectives and to generate income and pay dividends.
•The value of our Agency RMBS and MSR may be adversely affected by deficiencies in servicing and foreclosure practices, as well as related delays in the foreclosure process.
Tax Risks
•Our failure to qualify as a REIT would subject us to U.S. federal income tax and potentially increased state and local taxes, which would reduce the amount of our income available for distribution to our stockholders.
Risks Related to the Proposed Merger
•The Merger is subject to a number of conditions which, if not satisfied or waived in a timely manner, would delay the Merger or adversely impact UWM’s and our ability to complete the transaction.
•Failure to consummate the Merger as currently contemplated or at all could adversely affect the price of our common stock and our future business and financial results.
•The pendency of the Merger could adversely affect our business and operations.
•Our common stockholders will have a significantly reduced ownership and voting interest after the Merger and will exercise less influence over the policies of UWM following the transaction than they now have on our policies.
•An adverse judgment in any litigation challenging the Merger may prevent the Merger from becoming effective or from becoming effective within the expected timeframe.
Risk Factors
Our results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the residential mortgage and real estate markets, the financial markets and the economy generally. In past years, concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic, unemployment, the availability and cost of credit, rising government debt levels, inflation, energy costs, global supply chain disruptions, climate change, global economic lethargy, warfare, geopolitical unrest across various regions worldwide, European sovereign debt issues, U.S. budget debates, federal government shutdowns andshutdowns, international trade disputes, the imposition of sanctions orand new or increased tariffs,tariffs have from time to time contributed to increased volatility and uncertainty in the economy and financial markets. Adverse developments with respect to any of these factors may have an impact on new demand for homes and on homeowners’ ability to make their mortgage payments, which may compress home ownership rates and weigh heavily on future home price performance. There is a strong correlation between home price growth rates (or losses) and mortgage loan delinquencies. Any stagnation in or deterioration of the residential mortgage or real estate markets may limit our ability to acquire our target assets on attractive terms or cause us to experience losses related to our assets.
The continued flow of residential mortgage-backed securitiesRMBS from the GSEs is essential to the operation of the mortgage markets in their current form. A number of legislative proposals have been introduced in the past that would phase out or reform the GSEs. It is not possible to predict the scope and nature of the actions that the U.S. government could ultimately take with respect to the GSEs, including in light of recent changes in administration and executive offices of the U.S. government.GSEs. Although any phase out or reform may take several years to implement, if the structure of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac were altered, or if they were eliminated altogether, the amount and type of Agency RMBS and other mortgage-related assets available for investment would be significantly affected. A reduction in supply of Agency RMBS and other mortgage-related assets would result in increased competition for those assets and likely lead to a significant increase in the price for our target assets. Additionally, market uncertainty with respect to the treatment of the GSEs could have the effect of reducing the actual or perceived quality of, and therefore the market value for, the Agency RMBS that we currently hold in our portfolio.
In addition, as we seek to grow our subservicing business, we will compete with bank and non-bank servicers for third-party subservicing clients. The subservicing market is highly competitive, and we expect to face competition related to the pricing and services we offer. There can be no assurance that we will be able to attract and retain subservicing clients, which may adversely impact our ability to grow our servicing platform and achieve economies of scale.
Finally, asin weconnection seek to expandwith our mortgage loan origination business, we will compete with bank and non-bank originators to provide various residential mortgage loan and real estate services products. The mortgage loan origination market remains highly competitive. There can be no assurance that we will be able to recapture or identify, attract, and fund new or additional mortgage loan originations, which may adversely impact our ability to grow our mortgage loan origination business.
Our ability to purchase and hold assets and execute our business strategy is affected by our ability to secure repurchase agreements and other credit facilities on acceptable terms. We currently have repurchase agreements, revolving credit facilities, a warehouse facilitylines of credit and other credit facilities in place with numerous counterparties, but we can provide no assurance that lenders will continue to provide us with sufficient financing through the repurchase markets or otherwise. In addition, with respect to MSR financing, there can be no assurance that the GSEs will consent to such transactions or consent on terms consistent with prior MSR financing transactions. Because repurchase agreements and similar credit facilities are generally short-term commitments of capital, changing conditions in the financing markets may make it more difficult for us to secure continued financing during times of market stress.
If our warehouse facilitieslines of credit are terminated or reduced, we may be unable to find replacement financing on favorable terms, or at all, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
To finance our origination activities, we have entered into a warehouse facilityline of credit collateralized by the value of the mortgage loans pledged until they are sold to the GSEs or other third-party investors in the secondary market. Our borrowings are generally repaid with the proceeds we receive from mortgage loan sales. We depend upon one or more lenders to provide warehouse lines of credit for our loans. In the event that any of our warehouse facilitieslines of credit are terminated or not renewed, or if the principal amount that may be drawn under our funding agreements were to decrease significantly, we may be unable to find replacement financing on commercially favorable terms, or at all, which could limit our ability to maintain or grow our originations business.
In connection with certain of our repurchase agreements, warehouse facilities,lines of credit, revolving credit facilities and other credit facilities, we are required to comply with certain financial covenants, the most restrictive of which are disclosed within Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Compliance with these financial covenants will depend on market factors and the strength of our business and operating results. Failure to comply with our financial covenants could result in an event of default, termination of the lending facility, acceleration of all amounts owing under the lending facility, and may give the counterparty the right to exercise certain other remedies under the lending agreement, including without limitation the sale of the collateral securing the facility at the time of default, unless the counterparty granted a waiver. In addition, we may be subject to cross-default provisions under certain financing facilities that could cause an event of default under such financing facilities to be triggered by events of default under other financing arrangements.
We may not have the ability to raise funds necessary to pay principal amounts owed upon maturity of our outstanding convertible senior notes or to purchase such notes upon a fundamental change.
We have issued and have outstanding $261.9 million aggregate principal amount of 6.25% convertible senior notes due January 2026. To the extent these notes are not converted into common stock by the noteholders prior to their maturity date, we will be obligated to repay the principal amount of all outstanding notes upon maturity. In addition, if a fundamental change occurs (as described in the supplemental indenture governing the notes), noteholders have the right to require us to purchase for cash any or all of their notes. We may not have sufficient funds available at the time we are required to repay principal amounts or to purchase the notes upon a fundamental change, and we may not be able to raise additional capital or arrange necessary financing in order to make such payments on terms that are acceptable to us, if at all.
We have elected to not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815, Derivatives and Hedging,Hedging or (“ASC 815,815”) for our current derivative instruments. The economics of our derivative hedging transactions are not affected by this election; however, our earnings (losses) for U.S. generally accepted accounting principles,principles or (“U.S. GAAP,GAAP”) purposes may be subject to greater fluctuations from period to period as a result of this accounting treatment for changes in fair value of derivative instruments or for the accounting of the underlying hedged assets or liabilities in our financial statements, as it does not necessarily align with the accounting used for derivative instruments.
We originate residential mortgage loans and may sell them to the GSEs or other third-party investors in the secondary market. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to sell our loans into the secondary market at attractive prices, or at all. If we are unable to sell our mortgage loans to the GSEs or other third-party investors, or the prices for such loans decline, our liquidity may be negatively impacted, we may be unable to continue to fund such loans, our revenues and margins on new loan originations could be reduced and our ability to repay our warehouse facilitieslines of credit could be impaired.
Legal matters related to the termination of our Management Agreement with PRCM Advisers may adversely affect our business, results of operations, and/or financial condition.
On August 14, 2020, our Management Agreement with PRCM Advisers terminated and we thereafter became a self-managed company. In connection with the termination of our Management Agreement, PRCM Advisers filed a complaint in federal court that alleges, among other things, the misappropriation of trade secrets in violation of both the Defend Trade Secrets Act and New York common law, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair competition and business practices, unjust enrichment, conversion, and tortious interference with contract. The complaint seeks, among other things, an order enjoining the Company from making any use of or disclosing PRCM Advisers’ trade secret, proprietary, or confidential information; damages in an amount to be determined at a hearing and/or trial; disgorgement of the Company’s wrongfully obtained profits; and fees and costs incurred by PRCM Advisers in pursuing the action. Our board of directors believes the complaint is without merit and that the Company has complied with the terms of the Management Agreement. However, the results of litigation are inherently uncertain. It is possible that a court could enjoin us from using certain intellectual property. In addition, any damages or costs and fees that may be awarded to PRCM Advisers related to the litigation may be significant. While we dispute and intend to vigorously defend against the claims set forth in the complaint, it is possible that the results of the litigation with PRCM Advisers may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Under certain market conditions, TBA dollar roll transactions may result in negative carry income whereby the Agency RMBS purchased for a forward settlement date under TBA contract are priced at a premium to Agency RMBS for settlement in the current month. Under such conditions, it may be uneconomical to roll our TBA positions prior to the settlement date, and we may have to take physical delivery of the underlying securities and settle our obligations for cash. We may not have sufficient funds or alternative financing sources available to settle such obligations. In addition, pursuant to the margin provisions established by the Mortgage-Backed Securities Division,Division or MBSD,(“MBSD”), of the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation,Corporation or FICC,(“FICC”), we are subject to margin calls on our TBA contracts. Further, our prime brokerage agreements may require us to post additional margin above the levels established by the MBSD. Any failure to procure adequate financing to settle our obligations or meet margin calls under our TBA contracts could result in defaults or force us to sell assets under adverse market conditions or through foreclosure and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law,Law or MGCL,(“MGCL”), may have the effect of deterring a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change in control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of shares of our common stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of such shares. We are subject to the “business combination” provisions of the MGCL that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between our Company and an “interested stockholder” (as defined under the MGCL) or an affiliate thereof for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. In addition, the “unsolicited takeover” provisions of the MGCL (Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the MGCL) permit our board of directors, without stockholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in our charter or bylaws, to implement takeover defenses, some of which we do not currently have. These provisions may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making an acquisition proposal for our Company or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our Company.
We may issue additional shares of our common stock in public offerings, private placements as well as through equity awards to our directors, officers and employees pursuant to our 2021 Equity Incentive Plan. Additionally, shares of our common stock have also been reserved for issuance in connection with the potential conversion of our 6.25% convertible senior notes due January 2026 and our Series A, Series B and Series C preferred stock. We cannot predict the effect, if any, of future issuances or sales of our common stock on the market price of our common stock. We also cannot predict the amounts and timing of equity awards to be issued pursuant to our equity incentive plans, nor can we predict the amount and timing of any conversions of our convertible senior notes due January 2026 or our Series A, Series B and Series C preferred stock into shares of our common stock. Any stock offerings, awards or conversions resulting in the issuance of substantial amounts of common stock, or the perception that such awards or conversions could occur, may adversely affect the market price for our common stock.
We may from time to time issue securities which may rank senior and/or be dilutive to our stockholders. For example, our senior unsecured notes due January 2026 are convertible into shares of our common stock at the election of the noteholder, and our Series A, Series B and Series C preferred shares may be converted into shares of our common stock following the occurrence of certain events, as set forth in the articles supplementary for each series. Any election by noteholders or preferred stockholders to convert their notes or preferred shares into shares of our common stock will dilute the interests of other common stockholders.
In the future, we may again elect to raise capital through the issuance of convertible or non-convertible debt or common or preferred equity securities. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities and preferred stock, if any, and lenders with respect to other borrowings will be entitled to our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Convertible debt and convertible preferred stock may have anti-dilution provisions which are unfavorable to our common stockholders. Because our decision to issue debt or equity securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, our stockholders bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our common stock and diluting the value of their holdings.
We operate in a manner that will enable us to qualify as a REIT and have elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2009. We have not requested and do not intend to request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service,Service or IRS,(“IRS”) that we qualify as a REIT. The U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs and the assets they hold are complex, and judicial and administrative interpretations of the U.S. federal income tax laws governing REIT qualification are limited. To continue to qualify as a REIT, we must meet, on an ongoing basis, various tests regarding the nature of our assets and income, the ownership of our outstanding shares, and the amount of our distributions. Moreover, new legislation, court decisions, administrative guidance or actions by federal agencies or others to modify or re-characterize our assets may make it more difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT. Thus, while we intend to operate so that we qualify as a REIT, no assurance can be given that we will so qualify for any particular year.
In order to continue to qualify as a REIT, we must ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and designated real estate assets, including certain mortgage loans and shares in other REITs. Subject to certain exceptions, our ownership of securities, other than government securities and securities that constitute real estate assets, generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our total assets, other than government securities and securities that constitute real estate assets, can consist of the securities of any one issuer, no more than 20% (25% beginning January 1, 2026) of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more TRSs, and no more than 25% of the value of our total assets can consist of debt of “publicly offered” REITs that is not secured by real property or interests in real property. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must generally correct such failure within 30 days after the end of such calendar quarter to avoid losing our REIT qualification. As a result, we may be required to liquidate otherwise profitable assets prematurely, which could reduce our return on assets, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
If (i) all or a portion of our assets are subject to the rules relating to taxable mortgage pools, (ii) we are a “pension held REIT,” (iii) a tax exempt stockholder has incurred debt to purchase or hold our common stock, or (iv) we purchase residual REMIC interests that generate “excess inclusion income,” then a portion of the distributions to and, in the case of a stockholder described in clause (iii), gains realized on the sale of common stock by such tax exempt stockholder may be subject to U.S. federal income tax as unrelated business taxable income under the Internal Revenue Code.
The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code may limit our ability to hedge our assets and liabilities. Any income from a hedging transaction will not constitute gross income for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income test if we properly identify the transaction as specified in applicable Treasury Regulations and we enter into such transaction (i) in the normal course of our business primarily to manage risk of interest rate or price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made, or ordinary obligations incurred or to be incurred, to acquire or carry real estate assets or (ii) primarily to manage risk of currency fluctuations with respect to any item of income or gain that would be qualifying income under the 75% or 95% gross income tests. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions is likely to be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of both of these gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we intend to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a TRS. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities.
A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. A TRS may earn income that would not be qualifying REIT income if earned directly by the parent REIT. Both the TRS and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS. A corporation of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of the stock will automatically be treated as a TRS. Overall, no more than 20% (25% beginning January 1, 2026) of the value of a REIT’s total assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs. The value of our interests in and thus the amount of assets held in a TRS may also be restricted by our need to qualify for an exclusion from regulation as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Litigation Settlement Expense”
Removed heading “Gain (Loss) On Interest Rate Swap And Swaption Agreements”
Largest changes
“During the fourth quarter of 2024, interest rates increased across the Treasury curve as both job and inflation data firmed up, driving a shift from the third quarter of 2024 to a hawkish stance from the Fed. The Fed delivered two 25 basis point interest rate cuts during the fourth quarter of 2024, bringing the total to 100 basis points for the year, while the market’s expectations for more cuts in 2025 went from 4.5 to start the fourth quarter of 2024 to 1.5 cuts by quarter end, making it one of the most volatile episodes in recent Fed policy cycles. …”see in full comparison
“Net interest spread recognized for the accrual and/or settlement of the net interest expense associated with our interest rate swaps results from receiving either a floating interest rate (OIS or SOFR) or a fixed interest rate and paying either a fixed interest rate or a floating interest rate (OIS or SOFR) on positions held to economically hedge/mitigate portfolio interest rate exposure (or duration) risk. …”see in full comparison
“Net interest spread recognized for the accrual and/or settlement of the net interest income associated with our interest rate swaps results from receiving either a floating interest rate (OIS or SOFR) or a fixed interest rate and paying either a fixed interest rate or a floating interest rate (OIS or SOFR) on positions held to economically hedge/mitigate portfolio interest rate exposure (or duration) risk. …”see in full comparison
“As the servicer of record for our MSR assets, we may be required to advance principal and interest payments to security holders, and intermittent tax and insurance payments to local authorities and insurance companies on mortgage loans that are in forbearance, delinquency or default. We are responsible for funding these advances, potentially for an extended period of time, before receiving reimbursement from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. …”see in full comparison
“Gain (Loss) On Interest Rate Swap And Swaption Agreements”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (92)
We are a Maryland corporation that invests in, finances and manages MSR and Agency RMBS, and, through our operational platform, RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing LLC, or RoundPoint, we are one of the largest servicers of conventional loans in the country. We are structured as an internally-managed REIT and our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “TWO.” We seek to leverage our core competencies of understanding and managing interest rate and prepayment risk to invest in our portfolio of MSR and Agency RMBS. Our objective is to deliver more stable performance, relative to RMBS portfolios without MSR, across changing market environments, and we are acutely focused on creating sustainable stockholder value over the long term.
One of our wholly owned subsidiaries, TH MSR Holdings LLC (formerly Matrix Financial Services Corporation)Holdings, holds the requisite approvals from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to own and manage MSR, which represent a contractual right to control the servicing of a mortgage loan, the obligation to service the loan in accordance with applicable laws and requirements and the right to collect a fee for the performance of servicing activities, such as collecting principal and interest from a borrower and distributing those payments to the owner of the loan. TH MSR Holdings acquires MSR from third-party originators through flow and bulk purchases, as well as through the recapture of MSR on loans in its MSR portfolio that refinance. Beginning in 2024, TH MSR Holdings also acquires MSR on loans originated by its wholly owned subsidiary, RoundPoint, through purchases and recapture of MSR. TH MSR Holdings does not directly service mortgage loans; instead, it engages its wholly owned subsidiary, RoundPoint,RoundPoint to handle substantially all servicing functions for the mortgage loans underlying ourits MSR. Our MSR business leverages our core competencies in prepayment and interest rate risk analytics, and the MSR assets may provide offsetting risks to our Agency RMBS, hedging both interest rate and mortgage spread risk.
RoundPoint has approvals from Fannie Mae andMae, Freddie Mac and, beginning in the third quarter of 2025, Ginnie Mae to service residential mortgage loans,loans. andRoundPoint services originated or purchased mortgage loans held-for-sale, mortgage loans underlying TH MSR Holdings’ MSRMSR, asand wellmortgage asloans underlying MSR owned by third parties. Late in the second quarter of 2024, RoundPoint began operating its in-house, direct-to-consumer originations platform, which was established primarily to benefit our MSR portfolio through the retention or recapture of existing borrowers by providing them with competitive refinance and purchase mortgage options. The originations platform also originates loansboth first and second mortgages for new borrowers that do not currently have a mortgage loan serviced by RoundPoint and brokers second lien loans to our existing borrowers. For our own MSR portfolio, adding new or recaptured MSR through our origination platform is intended to hedge faster than expected MSR prepayment speeds in a refinance environment, and requires less capital relative to acquiring MSR through flow and bulk purchases from third-party originators. In addition, origination activities are generally counter-cyclical to MSR; MSR fair value tends to move opposite to origination volume. For example, the value of MSR typically increases in periods marked by low origination activity and vice versa. Thus, origination activities provide supplementary sources of profitability to our stockholders while also hedging our MSR.
We seek to deploy moderate leverage as part of our investment strategy. We generally finance our Agency RMBS through short- and long-term borrowings structured as repurchase agreements. We also finance our MSR through revolving credit facilities,facilities and repurchase agreements and convertible senior notes.agreements. Additionally, we finance our origination of mortgage loans through repurchase agreements and warehouse facilities.lines of credit. We have also issued unsecured debt, namely senior notes and convertible senior notes, the funds from which have been and may be used to purchase our target assets and/or for other general corporate purposes. Our convertible senior notes of $261.9 million in unpaid principal balance (“UPB”) were repaid in full on their January 15, 2026 maturity date.
We have elected to be treated as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. To qualify as a REIT we are required to meet certain investment and operating tests and annual distribution requirements. We generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income to the extent that we annually distribute all of our net taxable income to stockholders, do not participate in prohibited transactions and maintain our intended qualification as a REIT. However, certain activities that we may perform may cause us to earn income which will not be qualifying income for REIT purposes. We have designated certain of our subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs,TRSs as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, to engage in such activities. We also operate our business in a manner that will permit us to maintain our exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. Certain of our subsidiaries have obtained the requisite licenses and approvals to own and manage MSR and to originate and directly service residential mortgage loans.
On December 17, 2025, we, along with UWM, jointly announced that we entered into a definitive agreement for UWM to acquire all of the outstanding shares of our common stock in an all-stock transaction. In connection with the proposed Merger, Company common stockholders will exchange each share of Company common stock for 2.3328 shares of newly issued UWM Common Stock and cash payable in lieu of fractional shares. In addition, Company preferred stockholders will exchange each share of 8.125% Series A Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 7.625% Series B Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and 7.25% Series C Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock for one share of newly issued UWM Preferred Stock of the respective series. The Merger is expected to close in the second quarter of 2026, subject to our common stockholders’ approval and the satisfaction of other closing conditions, including customary regulatory approvals.
Our net interest income includes income from our securities portfolio, including the amortization of purchase premiums and accretion of purchase discounts, and mortgage loans held-for-sale. Net interest income,income (expense), as well as our servicing income, net of servicing costs, will fluctuate primarily as a result of changes in market interest rates, our financing costs and prepayment speeds on our assets. Interest rates, financing costs and prepayment rates vary according to the type of investment, conditions in the financial markets, competition and other factors, none of which can be predicted with any certainty.
A significant portion of our assets and liabilities are reported at fair value and, therefore, our consolidated balance sheets and statements of comprehensive income (loss) income are significantly affected by fluctuations in market prices. At December 31, 2024,2025, approximately 85.0%83.2% of our total assets, or $10.4$9.0 billion, consisted of financial instruments recorded at fair value. See Note 12 - Fair Value to the consolidated financial statements, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for descriptions of valuation methodologies used to measure material assets and liabilities at fair value and details of the valuation models, key inputs to those models and significant assumptions utilized. Although we execute various hedging strategies to mitigate our exposure to changes in fair value, we cannot fully eliminate our exposure to volatility caused by fluctuations in market prices.
Any temporary change in the fair value of our AFS securities, excluding certain AFS securities for which we have elected the fair value option, is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss and does not impact our reported income (loss) for U.S. GAAP purposes,purposes or (“GAAP net income (loss)”). However, changes in the provision for credit losses on AFS securities are recognized immediately in GAAP net income (loss). Our GAAP net income (loss) is also affected by fluctuations in market prices on the remainder of our financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, including interest rate swap and swaption agreements and certain other derivative instruments (i.e., Agency to-be-announced securities, or TBAs, options on TBAs, futures, options on futures, inverse interest-only securities, interest rate lock commitments and forward loan sale commitments), which are accounted for as derivative trading instruments under U.S. GAAP, fair value option elected AFS securities, MSR and mortgage loans held-for-sale.
We estimate the fair value of our MSR using a discounted cash flow model, which incorporates both observable and unobservable market data, including principal balance, note rate, geographical location, loan-to-value (LTV) ratios, FICO and other loan characteristics, along with servicing fee, ancillary income, earnings rates on escrow balances and recapture rates. Significant unobservable inputs include prepayment speeds; option adjusted spread,spread or OAS,(“OAS”), which represents the incremental spread added to the risk-free rate to reflect the effects of any embedded options and other risk inherent in MSR; and cost to service. We obtain third-party valuations, industry surveys and other available market data quarterly to assess the reasonableness of the the significant unobservable inputs used in the cash flow model, as well as fair value calculated by the cash flow model, subject to internally-established hierarchy and override procedures.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires us to make certain judgments and assumptions, based on information available at the time of our preparation of the financial statements, in determining accounting estimates used in preparation of the statements. Accounting estimates are considered critical if the estimate requires us to make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate was made and if different estimates reasonably could have been used in the reporting period or changes in the accounting estimate are reasonably likely to occur from period to period that would have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, included under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our most critical accounting policies involve our fair valuation of AFS securities, MSR and derivative instruments.
The methods used by us to estimate fair value for AFS securities, MSR and derivative instruments may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while we believe that our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies, or assumptions, to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. We use prices obtained from third-party pricing vendors or broker quotes deemed indicative of market activity and current as of the measurement date, which in periods of market dislocation, may have reduced transparency. For more information on our fair value measurements, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, included under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additionally, the key economic assumptions and sensitivity of the fair value of MSR to immediate adverse changes in these assumptions are presented in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, included under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Performance across the fixed income and equity markets was positive in 2025, with Agency RMBS delivering positive returns that exceeded other high credit-quality fixed-income assets. The Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) delivered a total of 75 basis points (“bps”) of interest rate cuts, reacting to the seemingly slowly deteriorating job market and contained yet elevated inflation expectations. As a result, the yield curve steepened, with 2-year Treasury yields down 77 bps to 3.47% while 10-year Treasury yields declined by 40 bps to 4.17%, returning the yield curve to its steepest level since January 2022. The S&P 500 increased by 16.3%, finishing the year close to its all-time high.
Interest rate volatility declined in 2025, with the 1-month realized volatility of 10-year swap rates falling into the bottom fifth percentile over the past decade, dragging implied volatility down as well. The implied volatility of 2-year options on 10-year swap rates closed the year at 79 bps, down 22 bps from the end of 2024 and just below its average level over the past ten years. RMBS spreads responded positively to the decline in volatility, the steepening of the yield curve, and demand from money managers, REITs and the GSEs. The nominal spread for current coupon RMBS tightened by 58 bps to 114 bps to the swap curve, while option-adjusted spreads finished 26 bps tighter at 46 bps. The Bloomberg US MBS Index generated an absolute return of 8.58% for 2025, exceeding the return of both the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Corporate Indices at 6.32% and 7.77%, respectively.
Demand for MSR was strong throughout the year with bank and non-bank originators vying to add to their MSR holdings to increase market share and generate more origination revenue. As a result, MSR price multiples remained near their peak levels, further enhanced by increased efficiency of recapturing the small percentage of loans that were eligible to be refinanced. While prepayment speeds for deeply out-of-the-money loans picked up, turnover rates for lower rate mortgage loans remained below historical averages, providing a tailwind to demand and valuations. In addition, the overall share of seriously delinquent loans remained near historical lows at around 1%.
Funding for MSR and RMBS securities remained stable and available during throughout the year. RMBS repurchase spreads generally ranged from SOFR plus around 15 to 25 bps.
Looking ahead, spreads for Agency RMBS have now fully retraced their widening over the past three plus years, leaving spreads historically rich on some measures, like U.S. Treasury-based OAS, for example, to fair versus swaps in periods when the GSEs have been active. As RMBS spreads have normalized, the potential for more tightening and resulting book value benefit of holding RMBS has been significantly reduced. Continued GSE buying and/or other future policy actions aimed at supporting mortgage spreads could keep spreads tight and limit their widening in risk-off scenarios. We expect that demand for MSR will remain strong among the origination and investor communities and remain bullish on the paired portfolio construction of MSR and Agency RMBS. Though RMBS spreads have tightened, the paired construction of our low mortgage rate MSR with RMBS generates attractive risk adjusted returns with lower expected volatility, relative to RMBS portfolios without MSR.
Interest rates remained volatile throughout 2024 as fixed-income market participants considered the impact on Federal Reserve’s policy (the Fed) of often conflicting economic signals on employment and inflation. By the third quarter, inflation data showed enough progress towards the Fed’s two percent target that the Fed cut rates by 50 basis points in September. The Treasury yield curve steepened as the Fed cut rates while robust supply of longer-term Treasuries kept longer end rates high. Mortgage spread volatility declined as the Fed began to cut rates, though nominal current coupon spreads remained wider than longer-term averages. MSR valuations were well supported throughout the year, with balanced supply and demand and favorable prepayment rates.
During the fourth quarter of 2024, interest rates increased across the Treasury curve as both job and inflation data firmed up, driving a shift from the third quarter of 2024 to a hawkish stance from the Fed. The Fed delivered two 25 basis point interest rate cuts during the fourth quarter of 2024, bringing the total to 100 basis points for the year, while the market’s expectations for more cuts in 2025 went from 4.5 to start the fourth quarter of 2024 to 1.5 cuts by quarter end, making it one of the most volatile episodes in recent Fed policy cycles. The bond market also had to contend with the outcome of the U.S. Presidential election, which fueled a rise in short-dated interest rate volatility in October, spiking to the 95th percentile of history in the post-COVID era. As the results of November’s U.S. Congressional and Presidential elections made it clear that the Republican Party would be in control of both the executive and legislative branches of government, expansionary fiscal policy and the potential economic impact from tariffs led to a bearish steepening of the Treasury rate curve. Over the fourth quarter of 2024, the 10-year Treasury yield increased by 79 basis points to finish at 4.57% while the 2-year increased by 60 basis points to 4.24%, steepening the Treasury yield curve by 19 basis points. The S&P 500 was higher by about 2.1%.
Mortgage performance was volatile from month-to-month, as spreads widened significantly in October as rates and volatility increased only to recover in November following the Presidential election. Mortgages gave back some of their gains in December in light of the continued strengthening economic data and a more hawkish Fed posture toward year end. Ultimately, our preferred implied volatility gauge, 2-year options on 10-year rates, increased from 94 to 101 basis points on an annualized basis, right in the middle of its range for 2024. The nominal spread on current coupon MBS finished 11 basis points wider at 117 basis points to the Treasury curve, while the option-adjusted spread finished 6 basis points wider at 23. Nominal spreads remained attractive to longer-term averages, while option-adjusted spreads are tighter on a historical basis. Given that the Treasury rate curve bear steepened and implied volatility ticked up, on a hedged basis lower coupon mortgages generally underperformed while higher coupon mortgages outperformed. Higher coupon specified pools were the best performer, outperforming TBAs by at least a quarter point.
Primary mortgage rates increased in the fourth quarter of 2024, tracking the increase in yields on the longer end of the Treasury curve. The Freddie Mac 30-year rate increased by 78 basis points to 6.85%. Overall prepayment rates for 30-year Agency RMBS increased by 0.4% percentage points quarter-over-quarter to 6.9% CPR, as higher coupon speeds reflected the mini-refinance wave triggered by the fall in rates in the third quarter of 2024. Borrowers with a refinance incentive responded to the lowest mortgage rates in September with a propensity similar to borrower behavior back in 2019. Our MSR portfolio, with a low gross mortgage rate of 3.46%, came in at 4.9% CPR in the fourth quarter of 2024, down 0.4% percentage points compared to the third quarter of 2024, as slower seasonal factors began to take effect.
The housing market has shown some signs of improvement with home sales running at about 10% more volume on a year-on-year basis and inventory has begun to climb, though homes available for sale and turnover in the housing market remain at historically low levels. Home prices finished the year with a small gain and we expect another small but steady increase in 2025.
The MSR market remained stable and well supported, with bulk deals consistently receiving double digit competitive bids. Some large scale bids/acquisitions in the fourth quarter lifted 2024 transfers to $622 billion UPB, approximately the same amount as 2023, though the number of bulk bid opportunities dropped by 25% year-over-year.
RMBS funding markets remained stable and available throughout the fourth quarter of 2024. Spreads for repurchase agreements widened with financing for RMBS between SOFR plus 25 to 35 basis points. The increased spreads were the result of several factors including potential year-end funding pressures and uncertainty around Fed actions at their November and December meetings. In retrospect, year-end was uneventful in the funding markets and early indications for 2025 are that spreads are normalizing into a tighter historical context.
Looking forward, given the fluidity of expectations on how the Fed will be managing rates, market participants are expected to remain keenly focused on incoming data on inflation and employment. New policy proposals and implementation by the incoming U.S. administration could add to market volatility. Nonetheless, driven by the rise in mortgage rates in the fourth quarter of 2024 plus weaker winter turnover seasonal factors, we anticipate prepayment rates will slow down in the near term. We expect our low mortgage rate MSR holdings, which remain hundreds of basis points below prevailing rates, to prepay below 4% CPR in the first quarter of 2025. Our portfolio is comprised primarily of lower interest rate mortgages, with less than 1% of the portfolio having incentive to refinance at current rates. We expect there to remain ample opportunities to add MSR at attractive spreads even as MSR transfer volume continues to normalize to pre-COVID levels. Nominal current coupon spreads remain wide compared to long-term history, and when either paired with MSR or hedged with rates, generate attractive levered returns. Though there are good reasons to believe that elevated interest rate volatility will persist for the short- to medium-term, the level of mortgage spread volatility has materially declined from early parts of this interest rate cycle, improving the risk adjusted return profile.
Our portfolio is subject to market risks, primarily interest rate risk and prepayment risk. We pair our MSR and interest-only Agency RMBS portfolio with a portion of our Agency pool portfolio to offset risk. During periods of decreasing interest rates with rising prepayment speeds, the market value of our Agency pools generally increases and the market value of our interest-only securities and MSR generally decreases. The inverse relationship occurs when interest rates rise and prepayments fall. Prepayment rates for the MSR portfolio declinedincreased to 4.9%6.4% over the fourththree quartermonths ofended 2024,December 31, 2025, which is consistent with the universe of mortgage loans with similar coupon rates.rates, Housing turnover rates tend to be slower in the fall and winter monthsprimarily due to schoollower schedules,mortgage holidays and colder weather.rates. In addition to changes in interest rates, changes in home price performance, key employment metrics and government programs, among other macroeconomic factors, can affect prepayment speeds. We believe our active portfolio management approach, including our asset selection process, positions us to respond to a variety of market scenarios. Although we are unable to predict future interest rate movements, our strategy of pairing MSR with Agency RMBS, with a focus on managing various associated risks, including interest rate, prepayment, credit, mortgage spread and financing risk, is intended to generate stable performance, relative to RMBS portfolios without MSR, with a low level of sensitivity to changes in the yield curve, prepayments and interest rate cycles.
The following table provides the three-month average conditional prepayment rate (“CPR”) experienced by our Agency RMBS and MSR during the three months ended December 31, 2024,2025, and the four immediately preceding quarters:
Our Agency RMBS are primarily collateralized by pools of fixed-rate mortgage loans. Our Agency portfolio also includes securities with implicit prepayment protection, including lower loan balances (securities collateralized by loans of less than $300,000$400,000 in initial principal balance), higher LTVs (securities collateralized by loans with LTVs greater than or equal to 80%), certain geographic concentrations, loans secured by investor-owned properties and lower FICO scores.scores.We also hold pools backed by Agency multi-family mortgage loans and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans. Our overall allocation of Agency RMBS and holdings of pools with specific characteristics are viewed in the context of our aggregate portfolio strategy, including MSR and related derivative hedging instruments. Additionally, the selection of securities with certain attributes is driven by the perceived relative value of the securities, which factors in the opportunities in the marketplace, the cost of financing and the cost of hedging interest rate, prepayment, credit and other portfolio risks. Accordingly, our Agency RMBS capital allocation reflects management’s flexible approach to investing in the marketplace.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had entered into repurchase agreements with 3634 counterparties, 1918 of which had outstanding balances. In addition, we held short- and long-term borrowings under revolving credit facilities, warehouse facilitieslines of credit, and unsecured borrowings under senior notes and convertible senior notes. As of December 31, 2024,2025, the debt-to-equity ratio funding our Agency and non-Agency investment securities, MSR and related servicing advances and mortgage loans held-for-sale, which includes unsecured borrowings under senior notes and convertible senior notes, was 4.34.8:1.0.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we held $504.6$842.3 million in cash and cash equivalents, approximately $5.4$6.5 million of unpledged Agency RMBS and $3.4$3.3 million of unpledged non-Agency securities. As a result, we had an overall estimated unused borrowing capacity on our unpledged securities of approximately $6.5$8.0 million. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we held approximately $5.2$4.3 million of unpledged MSR and $22.9$7.0 million of unpledged servicing advances. Overall, on December 31, 2024,2025, we had $70.1$102.1 million unused committed and $795.0$950.0 million unused uncommitted borrowing capacity on MSR financing facilities, and $59.7$78.5 million in unused committed borrowing capacity on servicing advance financing facilities. As of December 31, 2024,2025, allwe held approximately $0.3 million of ourunpledged mortgage loans were pledged for financing and we had $30.9$25.6 million unused committed borrowing capacity on our warehouse facilities.line of credit and $45.9 million unused uncommitted borrowing capacity on our loan repurchase agreement. Generally, unused borrowing capacity may be the result of our election not to utilize certain financing, as well as delays in the timing in which funding is provided, insufficient collateral or the inability to meet lenders’ eligibility requirements for specific types of asset classes.
As the servicer of record for our MSR assets, we may be required to advance principal and interest payments to security holders, and intermittent tax and insurance payments to local authorities and insurance companies on mortgage loans that are in forbearance, delinquency or default. We are responsible for funding these advances, potentially for an extended period of time, before receiving reimbursement from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Servicing advances are priority cash flows in the event of a loan principal reduction or foreclosure and ultimate liquidation of the real estate-owned property, thus making their collection reasonably assured. We are also a subservicer, which means we service loans on behalf of third-party clients who own the underlying MSR. Since we do not own the right to service those loans, we do not recognize an MSR asset for those loans in our consolidated financial statements. As a subservicer, we may be obligated to make servicing advances; however, advances are generally limited, with recoveries typically following within 30 days. Additionally, our exposure to foreclosure-related costs and losses is generally limited in our subservicing relationships given those risks are retained by the owner of the MSR.
Our total serviced mortgage assets consist of mortgage loans underlying our MSR assets, off-balance sheet mortgage loans owned by third parties and subserviced by us, off-balance sheet mortgage loans owned by third parties for which we act as servicing administrator (subserviced by appropriately licensed third-party subservicers), originated or purchased mortgage loans held-for-sale at period-end, and other assets. The following table presents the number of loans and unpaid principal balance of the mortgage assets for which we manage the servicing as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024:
Our book value per common share for U.S. GAAP purposes was $11.13 at December 31, 2025, an increase from $11.04 per common share at September 30, 2025, and a decrease from $14.47 per common share at December 31, 2024. The rise in book value for the three months ended December 31, 2025 was primarily driven by servicing income and mark-to-market gains recognized on investment securities, partially offset by net mark-to-market losses on MSR and dividends declared. The decline in book value for the year ended December 31, 2025 was primarily driven by the litigation settlement expense of $375.0 million that was recorded in connection with the resolution of our litigation with PRCM Advisers LLC, net mark-to-market losses on MSR and dividends declared, partially offset by servicing income and net mark-to-market gains recognized on investment securities. For further details regarding the litigation settlement recognized, refer to Note 14 - Commitments and Contingencies to the consolidated financial statements, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders was $50.4 million and comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders was $186.7 million for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2025, respectively, as compared to comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders of $1.6 million and comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders of $107.6 million for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024, respectively.
Our book value per common share for U.S. GAAP purposes was $14.47 at December 31, 2024, a decrease from $14.93 per common share at September 30, 2024, and a decrease from $15.21 per common share at December 31, 2023. The decline in book value for both the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024 was primarily driven by unrealized losses recognized on AFS securities and dividends declared, partially offset by net servicing income earned. Our comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders was $1.6 million and comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders was $107.6 million for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024, respectively, as compared to comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders of $38.9 million and comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders of $49.7 million for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2023, respectively.
Interest income decreased fromto $122.4$89.9 million and $480.4$412.0 million for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2023,2025 respectively, tofrom $103.8 million and $450.2 million for the same periods in 20242024, primarily due to a decrease in Agency RMBS portfolio sizesize, decreased usage of effectively borrowed U.S. Treasury securities under reverse repurchase agreement transactions, and lower averageoverall cashrates balancesearned heldon throughoutbank theand periods.margin account balances.
Interest expense decreased fromto $168.1$105.4 million and $643.2$490.9 million for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20232025, torespectively, from $138.7 million and $607.8 million for the same periods in 20242024, primarily due to lowerdecreases borrowingin balancesaverage borrowings outstanding on boththe AFSlower securitiesAgency RMBS and MSR,MSR partiallyportfolios, offsetas bywell increasesas inthe lower overall interest ratesrate throughout the first half of 2024.environment.
(2)Yields on Agency Derivatives not shown as the related interest income is included in (loss) gain on other derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). income.
(4)U.S. Treasury securities effectively borrowed under reverse repurchase agreements.
The increase in yields on AFS securities for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024,2025, as compared to the same periods in 20232024, was driven by net purchasessales of higherlower coupon AFS securitiessecurities, withwhich lowerwas unamortizedpartially premiums.offset by slightly higher premium amortization. The decrease in cost of funds associated with the financing of AFS securities for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024,2025, as compared to the same periodperiods in 2023,2024, was due to decliningthe lower interest rates.rate The increase in cost of funds associated with the financing of AFS securities for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to the same period in 2023, was due to rising interest rates throughout the first half of 2024.environment.
The decrease in yields on reverse repurchase agreements for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the same periods in 2024, was due to the lower interest rate environment.
The decrease in yields on reverse repurchase agreements for the three months ended December 31, 2024, as compared to the same period in 2023, was due to declining interest rates. The increase in yields on reverse repurchase agreements for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to the same period in 2023, was the result of rising interest rates throughout the first half of 2024. However, for the year ended December 31, 2023, these yields were offset by the cost of financing the associated repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities. We did not hold any repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024 or the three months ended December 31, 2023.
The decrease in cost of funds associated with the financing of MSR assets and related servicing advance obligations for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024,2025, as compared to the same periodperiods in 2023,2024, was primarily due to decliningthe lower interest rates, as well as a greater portion of our MSR financing from repurchase agreements versus revolving credit facilities. Our repurchase agreements, on average, carry lower floating rate spreads than our revolving credit facilities. The increase in cost of funds associated with the financing of MSR assets and related servicing advance obligations for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to the same period in 2023, was the result of rising interest rates throughout the first half of 2024.environment. We have one revolving credit facility in place to finance our servicing advance obligations, which are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets.
In May 2025, we issued $115.0 million of unsecured senior notes due in 2030, which pay interest quarterly at rate of 9.375% per annum. The cost of funds associated with our senior notes also includes amortization of deferred debt issuance costs.
The decrease in total servicing income for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024,2025, as compared to the same periodperiods in 2023,2024, was primarily due to lower servicing fee income on a smaller MSR portfolio as a result of salesrun-off and runoff,sales, as well as lower float income due to the lower interest rate environment, partially offset by higher ancillary and other fee income asfrom aRoundPoint’s resultsubservicing of themortgage acquisitionloans on behalf of RoundPoint.third-party The decrease in total servicing income for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to the same period in 2023, was primarily due lower servicing fee income on a smaller MSR portfolio as a result of sales and runoff, partially offset by higher float income as a result of the higher interest rate environment and higher ancillary and other fee income as a result of the acquisition of RoundPoint.clients.
PriorAs topreviously discussed, RoundPoint handles substantially all servicing functions for the acquisition of RoundPoint, we did not directly service mortgage loans; instead,underlying our MSR. For the remaining portion of our serviced mortgage assets, we contractedcontract with appropriately licensed third-party subservicers to handle substantially allthe servicing functions in the name of the subservicersubservicer. for the mortgage loans underlying our MSR. TheseAll third-party subservicing costs and other servicing expenses directly related to our MSR portfolio are included within the servicing costs line item on our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Post-acquisition,income. allAll servicing-related general and administrative expenses incurred by RoundPoint as an operating company are included within the compensation and benefits and other operating expenses line itemitems on our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). income. The decrease in servicing costs during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024,2025, as compared to the same periodsperiod in 2023,2024, was the result of lower non-recoverable advances and change in servicing reserves. The decrease in servicing costs during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024, was the result of lower third-party deboarding and subservicing fees due to the acquisition of RoundPoint.incurred.
Gain (Loss) Gain On Servicing Asset
The following table presents the components of gain (loss) gain on servicing asset for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024:
The increase in loss (decrease in gain) on servicing asset for the three months ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024, was driven by an unfavorable change in valuation assumptions used in the fair valuation of MSR, primarily due to decreasing interest rates with rising prepayment speeds, partially offset by slightly lower portfolio run-off on a lower portfolio balance as a result of sales of MSR. The increase in loss on servicing asset for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024, was driven by an unfavorable change in valuation assumptions used in the fair valuation of MSR and higher portfolio run-off as a result of the lower interest rate environment.
(1)During the year ended December 31, 2023, excess MSR was transferred to Agency-sponsored trusts in exchange for stripped mortgage backed securities, or SMBS. In each transaction, a portion of the SMBS was acquired by third parties, and we acquired the remaining balance of those SMBS, which were briefly included within Agency AFS securities until their sale in the same year.
The increase in gain (decrease in loss) on servicing asset for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024, as compared to the same periods in 2023, was driven by favorable change in valuation inputs and assumptions used in the fair valuation of MSR and higher realized gains on sales of MSR, partially offset by slightly higher portfolio run-off.
Gain (Loss) On Interest Rate Swap And Swaption Agreements
The following table summarizes the net interest spread and gains and losses associated with our interest rate swap and swaption positions recognized during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
Net interest spread recognized for the accrual and/or settlement of the net interest expense associated with our interest rate swaps results from receiving either a floating interest rate (OIS or SOFR) or a fixed interest rate and paying either a fixed interest rate or a floating interest rate (OIS or SOFR) on positions held to economically hedge/mitigate portfolio interest rate exposure (or duration) risk. We may elect to terminate certain swaps and swaptions to align with our investment portfolio, agreements may mature or options may expire resulting in full settlement of our net interest spread asset/liability and the recognition of realized gains and losses, including early termination penalties. The change in fair value of interest rate swaps and swaptions during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was a result of changes to floating interest rates (OIS or SOFR), the swap curve and corresponding counterparty borrowing rates. Swaps and swaptions are used for purposes of hedging our interest rate exposure, and therefore, their unrealized valuation gains and losses (excluding the reversal of unrealized gains and losses to realized gains and losses upon termination, maturation or option expiration) generally offset a portion of the unrealized losses and gains recognized on our Agency RMBS AFS portfolio, which are recorded either directly to stockholders’ equity through other comprehensive (loss) income or to loss on investment securities, in the case of certain AFS securities for which we have elected the fair value option.
Gain (Loss) On Other Derivative Instruments
The following table providessummarizes athe summarycomponents of the total net gainsgain (lossesloss) recognized on other derivative instruments we hold for purposes of both hedging and non-hedging activities, principally TBAs, futures, options on futures, and inverse interest-only securitiesrecognized during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024:
Net interest spread recognized for the accrual and/or settlement of the net interest income associated with our interest rate swaps results from receiving either a floating interest rate (OIS or SOFR) or a fixed interest rate and paying either a fixed interest rate or a floating interest rate (OIS or SOFR) on positions held to economically hedge/mitigate portfolio interest rate exposure (or duration) risk. We may elect to terminate certain swaps and swaptions to align with our investment portfolio, agreements may mature or options may expire resulting in full settlement of our net interest spread asset/liability and the recognition of realized gains and losses, including early termination penalties. The change in fair value of interest rate swaps and swaptions during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 was a result of changes to floating interest rates (OIS or SOFR), the swap curve and corresponding counterparty borrowing rates. Swaps and swaptions are used for purposes of hedging our interest rate exposure, and therefore, their unrealized valuation gains and losses (excluding the reversal of unrealized gains and losses to realized gains and losses upon termination, maturation or option expiration) generally offset a portion of the unrealized losses and gains recognized on our Agency RMBS AFS portfolio, which are recorded either directly to stockholders’ equity through other comprehensive income (loss) or to loss on investment securities, in the case of certain AFS securities for which we have elected the fair value option.
Operating Expenses
The following table presents the components of operating expenses for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024:
(1)CertainFor the time period prior to the resolution of the Company’s litigation with PRCM Advisers in the third quarter of 2025, certain operating expenses predominantly consists of expenses incurred in connection with the Company’s ongoing litigation with PRCM Advisers,litigation, as discussed within Note 1814 to the consolidated financial statements, included under Part II, Item 18 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ItBeginning alsoin includesthe fourth quarter of 2025, certain operating expenses consists of transaction expenses incurred in connection with the Company’sproposed acquisitionmerger ofwith RoundPoint.UWM.
The increase in total operating expenses during the three months ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024, was driven by expenses incurred in connection with the proposed merger with UWM, as well as higher compensation and benefits and other operating expenses. The increase in total operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024 was driven by higher expenses incurred in connection with the resolution of the Company’s litigation with PRCM Advisers, expenses incurred in connection with the proposed merger with UWM, and higher compensation and benefits and other operating expenses. The increase in our annualized operating expense ratios was also driven by the lower average equity balances in the denominator as a result of the comprehensive loss incurred and dividends declared during the year ended December 31, 2025.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Except as set forth in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2026, or the Q1 Form 10-Q, there have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, or the Form 10-K. The materialization of any risks and uncertainties identified in our Forward-Looking Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, together with those previously disclosed in the Form 10-K, the Q1 Form 10-Q or those that are presently unforeseen could result in significant adverse effects on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. See Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Forward-Looking Statements” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Removed heading “Risks Related to the Proposed CCM Merger”
Removed heading “The CCM Merger is subject to a number of conditions which, if not satisfied or waived in a timely manner, would delay the CCM Merger or adversely impact CCM’s and our ability to complete the transaction.”
Removed heading “Failure to consummate the CCM Merger as currently contemplated or at all could adversely affect the price of our common stock and our future business and financial results.”
Removed heading “The Amended CCM Merger Agreement contains provisions that could discourage a potential competing acquirer or could result in any competing acquisition proposal being at a lower price than it might otherwise be.”
Removed heading “The pendency of the CCM Merger could adversely affect our business and operations.”
Removed heading “An adverse judgment in any litigation challenging the CCM Merger may prevent the CCM Merger from becoming effective or from becoming effective within the expected timeframe.”
Largest changes
“An adverse judgment in any litigation challenging the CCM Merger may prevent the CCM Merger from becoming effective or from becoming effective within the expected timeframe.”see in full comparison
“Stockholders may file lawsuits challenging the CCM Merger or the other transactions contemplated by the Amended CCM Merger Agreement, which may name us and/or our board of directors as defendants. The outcome of such lawsuits cannot be assured, including the amount of costs associated with defending these claims or any other liabilities that may be incurred in connection with the litigation of these claims. …”see in full comparison
“In addition, we would be required to refund CCM the $25.4 million termination fee that CCM paid to UWM on our behalf in connection with the termination of the UWM Merger Agreement if the Amended CCM Merger Agreement is validly terminated (a) by CCM as a result of an uncured material breach by us of our representations, warranties, covenants or agreements or (b) in any circumstance in which the termination fee is payable as a result of UWM or one of its affiliates entering into an agreement providing for a superior proposal.”see in full comparison
“The Amended CCM Merger Agreement contains provisions that could discourage a potential competing acquirer or could result in any competing acquisition proposal being at a lower price than it might otherwise be.”see in full comparison
“The CCM Merger is subject to a number of conditions which, if not satisfied or waived in a timely manner, would delay the CCM Merger or adversely impact CCM’s and our ability to complete the transaction.”see in full comparison
“Failure to consummate the CCM Merger as currently contemplated or at all could adversely affect the price of our common stock and our future business and financial results.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (22)
Except as set forth below,in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2026, or the Q1 Form 10-Q, there have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.2025, The risk factors presented below amend and supplementor the risk factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and should otherwise be read in conjunction with all of the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The materialization of any risks and uncertainties identified in our Forward-Looking Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, together with those previously disclosed in the AnnualForm Report10-K, onthe Q1 Form 10-K10-Q or those that are presently unforeseen could result in significant adverse effects on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. See Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Forward-Looking Statements” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Risks Related to the Proposed CCM Merger
The CCM Merger is subject to a number of conditions which, if not satisfied or waived in a timely manner, would delay the CCM Merger or adversely impact CCM’s and our ability to complete the transaction.
The completion of the CCM Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions. In addition, under circumstances specified in the Amended CCM Merger Agreement, either party may terminate the Amended CCM Merger Agreement. In particular, completion of the CCM Merger requires the approval of the CCM Merger by our common stockholders and receipt of certain regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that the conditions to closing will be satisfied in a timely manner or at all, or that an effect, event, circumstance, occurrence, development or change will not transpire that could delay or prevent these conditions from being satisfied. Accordingly, we cannot provide any assurances with respect to the timing of the closing, whether the CCM Merger will be completed at all and when our common stockholders would receive the cash consideration for the CCM Merger, if at all.
Failure to consummate the CCM Merger as currently contemplated or at all could adversely affect the price of our common stock and our future business and financial results.
Completion of the CCM Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions, including approval by our common stockholders of the CCM Merger and receipt of certain regulatory approvals. We cannot guarantee when or if these conditions will be satisfied or that the CCM Merger will be successfully completed. The consummation of the CCM Merger may be delayed, the CCM Merger may be consummated on terms different than those contemplated by the Amended CCM Merger Agreement, or the CCM Merger may not be consummated at all. If the CCM Merger is not completed, or is completed on different terms than as contemplated by the Amended CCM Merger Agreement, we could be adversely affected and subject to a variety of risks associated with the failure to consummate the CCM Merger, or to consummate the CCM Merger as contemplated by the Amended CCM Merger Agreement, including the following:
•our common stockholders may be prevented from receiving cash consideration for the CCM Merger;
•the market price of our common stock could decline significantly;
•reputational harm due to the adverse perception of any failure to successfully consummate the CCM Merger;
•us being required, under certain circumstances, to pay to CCM a termination fee and to reimburse CCM for the UWM Termination Fee;
•incurrence of substantial costs relating to the proposed CCM Merger, such as legal, accounting, financial advisor, filing, printing and mailing fees; and
•the attention of our management and employees may be diverted from their day-to-day business and operational matters as a result of efforts relating to attempting to consummate the CCM Merger.
Any delay in the consummation of the CCM Merger or any uncertainty about the consummation of the CCM Merger on terms other than those contemplated by the Amended CCM Merger Agreement, or if the CCM Merger is not completed, could materially adversely affect our business, financial results and stock price.
The Amended CCM Merger Agreement contains provisions that could discourage a potential competing acquirer or could result in any competing acquisition proposal being at a lower price than it might otherwise be.
The Amended CCM Merger Agreement contains provisions that, subject to limited exceptions, restrict our ability to solicit, initiate, knowingly encourage or facilitate any competing proposal. With respect to any written, bona fide competing proposal received by us, CCM generally has an opportunity to offer to modify the terms of the Amended CCM Merger Agreement in response to such proposal.
Under the Amended CCM Merger Agreement, we may be required to pay CCM a termination fee of $50.0 million in certain circumstances, including if our board of directors withdraws or modifies its recommendation to our common stockholders or if we terminate the agreement to enter into a superior proposal. The termination fee may also be payable if the Amended CCM Merger Agreement is terminated following a failure to obtain our common stockholder approval after the public announcement of a competing acquisition proposal, together with our subsequent consummation of such proposal.
In addition, we would be required to refund CCM the $25.4 million termination fee that CCM paid to UWM on our behalf in connection with the termination of the UWM Merger Agreement if the Amended CCM Merger Agreement is validly terminated (a) by CCM as a result of an uncured material breach by us of our representations, warranties, covenants or agreements or (b) in any circumstance in which the termination fee is payable as a result of UWM or one of its affiliates entering into an agreement providing for a superior proposal.
These provisions could discourage a potential competing acquirer that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of our business from considering or proposing a competing acquisition, even if the potential competing acquirer was prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share value than the value proposed to be received or realized in the CCM Merger, or might result in a potential competing acquirer proposing to pay a lower price than it might otherwise have proposed to pay because of the added expense of the termination-related fees that may become payable in certain circumstances under the Amended CCM Merger Agreement.
The pendency of the CCM Merger could adversely affect our business and operations.
In connection with the pending CCM Merger, some of the parties with whom we do business may delay or defer decisions, which could negatively impact our revenues, earnings, cash flows and expenses, regardless of whether the CCM Merger is completed. In addition, under the Amended CCM Merger Agreement, we are subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to completing the CCM Merger. These restrictions may prevent us from pursuing certain strategic transactions, acquiring and disposing assets, undertaking certain capital projects, undertaking certain financing transactions and otherwise pursuing other actions that are not in the ordinary course of business, even if such actions could prove beneficial. These restrictions may impede our growth which could negatively impact our revenue, earnings and cash flows. Additionally, the pendency of the CCM Merger may make it more difficult for us to effectively retain and incentivize key personnel.
An adverse judgment in any litigation challenging the CCM Merger may prevent the CCM Merger from becoming effective or from becoming effective within the expected timeframe.
Stockholders may file lawsuits challenging the CCM Merger or the other transactions contemplated by the Amended CCM Merger Agreement, which may name us and/or our board of directors as defendants. The outcome of such lawsuits cannot be assured, including the amount of costs associated with defending these claims or any other liabilities that may be incurred in connection with the litigation of these claims. If plaintiffs are successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting the parties from completing the CCM Merger on the agreed-upon terms, such an injunction may delay the consummation of the CCM Merger in the expected timeframe, or may prevent the CCM Merger from being consummated altogether. Whether or not any plaintiff’s claim is successful, this type of litigation may result in significant costs and divert management’s attention and resources, which could adversely affect the operation of our business.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Loss Contingency Accrual”
Largest changes
“Amid the uncertainty, the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) left rates unchanged at both their February and March meetings. Market expectations for the Fed’s effective rate at 2026 year-end rose from 3.06% on December 31, 2025 to 3.57% at March 31, 2026, essentially wiping away any prospects of Fed cuts in 2026. Economic statistics over the quarter were mixed, punctuated by a weaker than anticipated employment report in March, with the unemployment rate unexpectedly rising to 4.4%. …”see in full comparison
“Looking into the second half of the year, although tensions in the Middle East are not as acute as they were earlier in the year, the situation remains volatile and could once again generate an uptick in volatility. Adding to the uncertainty is how the Fed will navigate this complex time period with a new Chairperson who has vowed to deliver price stability during a period of unprecedented amounts of investment in technology, in this iteration, artificial intelligence, while simultaneously changing how it communicates policy decisions to the markets. …”see in full comparison
“The performance of risk assets in the second quarter was bolstered by the de-escalation of tensions in the Middle East during the period. The price of crude oil finished the quarter around $70 per barrel, all but reversing the price increase in the first quarter. The S&P 500 Index surged higher by 14.9%, achieving a new record high during the quarter. Despite the decline in oil prices, the Treasury yield curve continued to “bear flatten” as it did in the first quarter. …”see in full comparison
“Looking ahead, the situation in the Middle East remains highly fluid, and the severity and length of the resulting economic disruptions are very hard to gauge. The steady decline of interest rate volatility in the later half of 2025 and into early 2026 accounted for much of the performance of RMBS spreads. The outbreak of war in the Persian Gulf reversed that, and geopolitical tensions will remain the primary driver of market sentiment and economic outlook. …”see in full comparison
“The performance of equity and fixed-income sectors in the first quarter was adversely affected by the conflict in the Middle East, which began at the end of February and remained uncertain at quarter-end. An oil price shock, triggered by an almost complete cessation of supply coming through the Persian Gulf, resulted in the price of crude oil almost doubling quarter-over-quarter to over $100 per barrel. As a result, forecasts for inflation and economic growth became more uncertain. For U.S. markets, the S&P 500 declined by 4.6%, and the Treasury yield curve bear-flattened. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (77)
We are a Maryland corporation that invests in, finances and manages mortgage servicing rights (“MSR”) and Agency residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), and, through our operational platform, RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing LLC (“RoundPoint”), we are one of the largest servicers of conventional loans in the country. Agency refers to a U.S. government sponsored enterprise (“GSE”), such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), or a U.S. government agency such as the Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”). We are structured as an internally-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) and our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “TWO.” We seek to leverage our core competencies of understanding and managing interest rate and prepayment risk to invest in our portfolio of MSR and Agency RMBS. Our objective is to deliver more stable performance, relative to RMBS portfolios without MSR, across changing market environments, and we are acutely focused on creating sustainable stockholder value over the long term.environments.
On March 27, 2026, we entered into a definitive agreement (the “Original CCM Merger Agreement”) with CrossCountry Intermediate Holdco, LLC (“CCM”) and CrossCountry Merger Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of CCM, pursuant to which CCM will acquire all of the outstanding shares of our common stock in an all-cash transaction (the “CCM Merger”). On May 7, 2026, we and CCM entered into a second amendment to the Original CCM Merger Agreement (the “Second Amendment”), as amended by the first amendment dated April 28, 2026 (the “First Amendment”) (the Original CCM Merger Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment and the Second Amendment, the “Amended CCM Merger Agreement”). The Second Amendment, among other things, provides that, at the effective time of the CCM Merger (the “Effective Time”), each outstanding share of our common stock will be converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to $12.00 per share, an increase from the $11.30 per share consideration under the First Amendment and an increase from the $10.80 per share consideration under the Original CCM Merger Agreement. Additionally, on May 13, 2026, CCM delivered to us a letter irrevocably waiving the restrictions set forth in Section 6.1(b)(i) of the Amended CCM Merger Agreement to permit us to declare and pay a pro-rated dividend on our common stock for the quarter in which the CCM Merger closes. The CCM Merger was approved by our common stockholders on July 2, 2026 and is expected to close on August 3, 2026, subject to the satisfaction of certain remaining closing conditions. On July 23, 2026, we declared a “stub period” dividend of $0.12196 per share of common stock for the third quarter of 2026, subject to the consummation of the CCM merger.
On March 27, 2026, we entered into a definitive agreement (the “Original CCM Merger Agreement”) for CrossCountry Intermediate Holdco, LLC (“CCM”) to acquire all of the outstanding shares of our common stock in an all-cash transaction (the “CCM Merger”). On April 28, 2026, we and CCM entered into an amendment to the Original CCM Merger Agreement (the “Amendment” and, the Original CCM Merger Agreement, as amended by the Amendment, the “Amended CCM Merger Agreement”). The Amendment, among other things, provides that, at the effective time of the CCM Merger, each outstanding share of our common stock will be converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to $11.30 per share, an increase from the $10.80 per share consideration under the Original CCM Merger Agreement. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Amended CCM Merger Agreement, at the effective time, each outstanding share of our 8.125% Series A Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 7.625% Series B Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and 7.25% Series C Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (collectively, the “Preferred Stock”), will remain issued and outstanding. Promptly after the effectiveEffective time,Time, the surviving company will deliver a notice of redemption to its preferred stockholders, in accordance with our Articles of Amendment and Restatement, and the Articles Supplementary thereto, and itsour Amended and Restated Bylaws. Following the effectiveEffective time,Time, when required in connection with the redemption of the Preferred Stock, CCM, on our behalf, will irrevocably set aside and deposit, separate and apart from its other funds, in trust for the benefit of our preferred stockholders, cash in immediately available funds in the amount of $25.00 per outstanding share of Preferred Stock, plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon (whether or not authorized or declared) to, but not including, the redemption date (the “Preferred Stock Redemption Amount”). On the redemption date set forth in the notice of redemption, each share of Preferred Stock will be redeemed for an amount in cash equal to the Preferred Stock Redemption Amount. The CCM Merger is expected to close in the second half of 2026, subject to approval of our common stockholders and the satisfaction of other closing conditions, including customary regulatory approvals.
As previously disclosed, on December 17, 2025, we entered into a definitive agreement and plan of merger (the “UWM Merger Agreement”) with UWM Holdings Corporation (“UWM”). Following the determination that we had received a “Company Superior Proposal,” as defined in the UWM Merger Agreement, from CCM, and after considering UWM’s proposed revisions to the UWM Merger Agreement in consultation with our financial advisors and outside legal counsel, on March 27, 2026, prior to entering into the Original CCM Merger Agreement, we delivered to UWM a written notice terminating the UWM Merger Agreement. In connection with the termination of the UWM Merger Agreement, CCM, on our behalf, paid UWM a termination fee of $25.4 million in cash as required by the terms of the UWM Merger Agreement (the “UWM Termination Fee”). For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we incurred the UWM Termination Fee of $25.4 million; however this amount was economically and contractually offset through the corresponding payment made by CCM, and accordingly, the UWM Termination Fee did not result in a net impact to our consolidated financial statements.
On March 27, 2026, we entered into the Original CCM Merger Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment onand Aprilthe 28,Second 2026,Amendment, pursuant to which we will merge with and into a merger subsidiary of CCM, with the merger subsidiaryus continuing as a wholly owned subsidiary of CCM. The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, other than the statements regarding the proposedpending CCM Merger, do not assume the consummation of the proposedpending CCM Merger unless specifically stated otherwise.
A significant portion of our assets and liabilities are reported at fair value and, therefore, our consolidated balance sheets and statements of comprehensive income (loss) income are significantly affected by fluctuations in market prices. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, approximately 85.2%85.0% of our total assets, or $9.0$7.5 billion, consisted of financial instruments recorded at fair value. See Note 11 - Fair Value to the consolidated financial statements, included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for descriptions of valuation methodologies used to measure material assets and liabilities at fair value and details of the valuation models, key inputs to those models and significant assumptions utilized. Although we execute various hedging strategies to mitigate our exposure to changes in fair value, we cannot fully eliminate our exposure to volatility caused by fluctuations in market prices.
Considerable judgment is used in forming conclusions and estimating inputs to our Level 3 fair value measurements. Level 3 inputs such as interest rate movements, prepayments speeds, credit losses and discount rates are inherently difficult to estimate. Changes to these inputs can have a significant effect on fair value measurements. Accordingly, there is no assurance that our estimates of fair value are indicative of the amounts that would be realized on the ultimate sale or exchange of these assets. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, 22.6%26.5% of our total assets were classified as Level 3 fair value assets.
The performance of risk assets in the second quarter was bolstered by the de-escalation of tensions in the Middle East during the period. The price of crude oil finished the quarter around $70 per barrel, all but reversing the price increase in the first quarter. The S&P 500 Index surged higher by 14.9%, achieving a new record high during the quarter. Despite the decline in oil prices, the Treasury yield curve continued to “bear flatten” as it did in the first quarter. The 2-year Treasury yield rose by 38 basis points (“bps”) to 4.17%, while the 10-year Treasury yield increased 15 bps to finish at 4.47%. Employment readings were above expectations throughout the quarter, with the average monthly increase coming in at a robust 164,000 jobs. As the labor market strengthened and inflation continued to run above the Federal Reserve’s (the “Fed”) stated 2% target, several voting members of the Fed turned more hawkish, resulting in the Fed dropping its easing bias. The Fed’s new Chairman, Kevin Warsh, presiding over his first meeting in June, focused his comments on combating inflation, with the post-meeting statement ending with a terse “the Committee will deliver price stability.” While the Fed left rates unchanged over its two meetings in the second quarter, market expectations for Fed action in 2026 shifted from a chance of a cut in rates by December to multiple hikes over the balance of the year, reflecting the incoming data and the hawkish shift in Fed’s stance.
Counter trend to the expectation of higher short rates, volatility declined in response to evolving developments in the Middle East conflict. Implied volatility, as measured by 2-year options on 10-year swap rates, fell by 6 bps to 79 bps over the quarter, close to its year-to-date average of 80 bps. Driven by the decline in implied volatility, a strong equity market, and demand from the GSEs, REITs and money managers, the Agency RMBS sector performed well. Nominal current coupon spreads versus swaps tightened by 13 bps, finishing at 128 bps, while option-adjusted spreads tightened by 10 bps to end at 50 bps, both slightly wider than year-to-date averages. The RMBS market delivered positive hedged returns across the coupon stack, with swap hedges outperforming Treasury-based hedge instruments. The Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index, which is hedged with Treasuries, delivered 30 bps of excess return in the second quarter.
The primary 30-year mortgage rate finished the second quarter roughly unchanged at around 6.5%. Spring’s higher mortgage rates suppressed rate-term refinancing activity, and with little media effect to attract the attention of homeowners, prepayment speeds for higher coupon RMBS declined. For lower coupon RMBS, whose prepayment rates are driven by housing turnover, the uptick from spring seasonality was apparent, with speeds increasing by 30-50% but still slow on both an absolute and historical basis. As a result, the prepayment “S-curve” flattened over the quarter. The prepayment speed for our MSR portfolio, which has a low weighted average mortgage rate of 3.54%, increased by approximately 12.6% quarter over quarter but still only prepaid at a historically slow rate of 6.3% CPR.
While the housing market has been slowly returning to an equilibrium in this “higher-for-longer” environment, the pace of activity remained sluggish on a historical basis. Compared to the first five months of 2025, existing home sales are up 0.65%, but as a percentage of overall ownership the rate of sales is at 40-year lows. Regional supply/demand mismatches continued to exist, with excess supply in Southern markets and constrained supply in Northern markets. Nationally, we anticipate home prices on an annual basis to rise in the low single digits this year.
The performance of equity and fixed-income sectors in the first quarter was adversely affected by the conflict in the Middle East, which began at the end of February and remained uncertain at quarter-end. An oil price shock, triggered by an almost complete cessation of supply coming through the Persian Gulf, resulted in the price of crude oil almost doubling quarter-over-quarter to over $100 per barrel. As a result, forecasts for inflation and economic growth became more uncertain. For U.S. markets, the S&P 500 declined by 4.6%, and the Treasury yield curve bear-flattened. The 2-year Treasury yield rose by 32 basis points (“bps”) to 3.79%, while the 10-year Treasury yield increased 15 bps to finish at 4.32%. From February 27, 2026 when the 10-year Treasury yield hit a quarterly low of 3.94%, which happened to coincide with the beginning of the military action in the Middle East, the effects on yields were more stark.
Amid the uncertainty, the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) left rates unchanged at both their February and March meetings. Market expectations for the Fed’s effective rate at 2026 year-end rose from 3.06% on December 31, 2025 to 3.57% at March 31, 2026, essentially wiping away any prospects of Fed cuts in 2026. Economic statistics over the quarter were mixed, punctuated by a weaker than anticipated employment report in March, with the unemployment rate unexpectedly rising to 4.4%. Rekindled concerns over inflation and from the oil price shock, were strong enough that despite the apparent deterioration of the labor conditions, interest rates rose into the end of the quarter. The Fed’s median rate forecast released in March continued to price in one 25 bps cut in 2026, though the forecast for inflation increased to 2.7% (versus the Fed’s 2.0% target), which Chairman Powell said incorporated the observed increase in inflation readings since the February report. The minutes from the Fed’s March meeting reinforced the conundrum the Fed faces from the Middle East conflict: potentially worsening inflation coupled with an economic slowdown.
At the start of the quarter, RMBS performance was buoyed by the continued decline of implied volatility and the announcement in early January by the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency directing the GSEs to purchase $200 billion of Agency MBS in an effort to explicitly tighten mortgage spreads. The effort is part of a larger campaign to lower mortgage rates and improve housing affordability. Implied volatility, as measured by 2-year options on 10-year swap rates, fell to 73 bps near the end of January, its lowest level since October 2021, and spreads ratcheted tighter after the announcement. Current coupon spreads reached quarterly narrows in mid-January, with nominal and option-adjusted spreads tightening by 10-15 bps from the beginning of the quarter. Unsurprisingly, the RMBS market delivered positive hedged returns in January, with the Bloomberg US MBS Index delivering 52 bps of excess return, its best month in over a year.
However, over the course of February and March, driven predominantly by the outbreak of the Middle East conflict, the attendant increase in realized and implied volatility and the flattening of the yield curve, performance deteriorated. Implied volatility on 2-year options on 10-year swaps finished the quarter up 5 bps to 85 bps. Current coupon spreads versus swaps, on a nominal and option-adjusted basis, widened by 26 and 15 bps, finishing the quarter at 141 and 60 bps, respectively. Hedged performance versus swaps across the coupon stack was mixed, with some belly coupons and higher coupon specified pools eking out a positive return, while performance for most of the stack between 4.5% and 6.0% was negative. Hedged performance versus U.S. Treasuries was better, as longer-end swap spreads tightened over the quarter. Even so, the Bloomberg US MBS Index, in which performance is measured against U.S. Treasuries, had an excess cumulative return of negative 36 bps over February and March.
The 30-year mortgage rate finished up about 25 bps quarter-over-quarter to about 6.5%, though it touched 6% in both January and February, allowing savvy and fast-acting borrowers to find the best rates in years. While overall prepayment speeds for the universe of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans were unchanged quarter-over-quarter, prepayments rates for refinanceable loans jumped higher in March reacting to the quarterly lows in mortgage rates earlier in the quarter. Though absolute prepayment rates reached similar levels as observed in October 2025, they were more benign after adjusting for rate incentive (i.e., the prepayment “S-curve” in the first quarter was not as reactive as it had been in October when the media effect was most elevated). Our MSR portfolio prepayment rate slowed to only 5.6% conditional prepayment rate (“CPR”) in the first quarter of 2026, reflecting declining housing turnover rates in winter months. With prepayment rates on worst-to-deliver high coupon collateral remaining elevated, the call protection offered by specified pools was evident. For the pools owned in our portfolio, they paid only about 9.8% CPR in the quarter, once again around 20% slower lower than model projections, as they benefit from unique and carefully-curated characteristics.
ActivityThe andMSR market continued to be well supported, with demand foroutstripping supply. Across the MSR in the first quarter remained high, withmarket, servicing transfers in the firstsecond quarter ofcontinued 2026 topping an estimated $93 billion UPB, outpacingat the firstsame quarterpace ofas 2025seen (approximatelyin $662025. billion), though below the fourth quarter of 2025 (approximately $154 billion). We continue to see mostMost of the supply cominghas come from non-bank originators with a broader array of buyer types including other non-bank originators, banks and REITs. PricingGiven the demand, pricing for bulk and flow channels was stabletightened in the firstsecond quarter. Given the increase in mortgage rates and wider spreads for RMBS in the first quarter, servicingServicing multiples generally increased.increased, owing to higher rates across the yield curve, including short rates which increase the float value of MSR. Delinquency rates for GSE servicing continued to remain low.
The housing market remains slow, and persistent inventory shortages in many markets is expected to continue to put upward pressure on prices. We anticipate home prices to rise in the single digits annualized, and for housing turnover to continue to trend about 5% higher year-on-year, especially as primary rates are currently lower year-on-year. Nevertheless, pockets of weakness in Southern markets persist with builders continuing to offer buydowns to move inventory. Housing affordability, which had been improving since mid-2025, is likely to reverse given the rise in mortgage rates.
RMBS funding markets remained stable and available during the quarter. WithSpreads extra cash moving into the market,for repurchase agreement spreads tightened fromin the fourthsecond quarter of 2025 to around 1312 to 2015 bps to SOFR in the firstSecured quarterOvernight ofFinancing 2026.Rate (“SOFR”).
Looking into the second half of the year, although tensions in the Middle East are not as acute as they were earlier in the year, the situation remains volatile and could once again generate an uptick in volatility. Adding to the uncertainty is how the Fed will navigate this complex time period with a new Chairperson who has vowed to deliver price stability during a period of unprecedented amounts of investment in technology, in this iteration, artificial intelligence, while simultaneously changing how it communicates policy decisions to the markets. Apart from the changes in yields across the Treasury curve, markets have largely shrugged off these risks, as evidenced by the performance of equities, the drop in implied volatility in fixed-income markets, and ultimately in spread products. The risk of material spread widening in Agency RMBS should continue to be mitigated by GSE buying, and the supply/demand picture remains favorable with the small amount of new net supply of conventional RMBS being bought by REITs, GSEs and money managers. While RMBS hedged with swaps possesses favorable nominal yield, total performance will be dependent on interest rate volatility. At quarter-end, less than 95% of our MSR portfolio had 50 bps or more of economic incentive to refinance, providing a substantial cushion to a refinance wave. The MSR market remains well supported, and the paired construction of low mortgage rate MSR with RMBS generates attractive risk adjusted returns with lower expected volatility, relative to RMBS portfolios without MSR.
Looking ahead, the situation in the Middle East remains highly fluid, and the severity and length of the resulting economic disruptions are very hard to gauge. The steady decline of interest rate volatility in the later half of 2025 and into early 2026 accounted for much of the performance of RMBS spreads. The outbreak of war in the Persian Gulf reversed that, and geopolitical tensions will remain the primary driver of market sentiment and economic outlook. However, it’s worth noting that while there was a substantial increase in implied volatility off the quarterly lows, implied volatility for much of the term structure only went back to levels last seen in the fourth quarter of 2025. Current coupon spreads are tighter than they were then, which reflects the explicit support the sector has received from the Administration. In addition to the demand from the GSEs, the Basel III Endgame should be beneficial for RMBS spreads as banks would have more capital to use to purchase MBS and hold mortgage loans, which should reduce securitization rates and RMBS supply. In total, RMBS hedged with swaps possesses favorable nominal yield with less downside compared to prior quarters given favorable supply/demand characteristics, though total performance will be very dependent on interest rate volatility. The MSR market remains well supported, and the paired construction of low mortgage rate MSR with RMBS generates attractive risk adjusted returns with lower expected volatility, relative to RMBS portfolios without MSR. At quarter-end, only about 1% of our MSR portfolio had 50 bps or more of economic incentive to refinance, providing a substantial cushion to a refinance wave. For those loans that are refinanceable, RoundPoint’s direct-to-consumer origination effort is efficiently recapturing those borrowers.
Our portfolio is subject to market risks, primarily interest rate risk and prepayment risk. We pair our MSR and interest-only Agency RMBS portfolio with a portion of our Agency pool portfolio to offset risk. During periods of decreasing interest rates with rising prepayment speeds, the market value of our Agency pools generally increases and the market value of our interest-only securities and MSR generally decreases. The inverse relationship occurs when interest rates rise and prepayments fall. Prepayment rates for the MSR portfolio decreased to 5.6% over the three months ended March 31, 2026, which is consistent with the universe of mortgage loans with similar coupon rates, primarily due to mortgage rates rising towards the end of the quarter. In addition to changes in interest rates, changes in home price performance, key employment metrics and government programs, among other macroeconomic factors, can affect prepayment speeds. We believe our active portfolio management approach, including our asset selection process, positions us to respond to a variety of market scenarios. Although we are unable to predict future interest rate movements, our strategy of pairing MSR with Agency RMBS, with a focus on managing various associated risks, including interest rate, prepayment, credit, mortgage spread and financing risk, is intended to generate stable performance, relative to RMBS portfolios without MSR, with a low level of sensitivity to changes in the yield curve, prepayments and interest rate cycles.
The following table provides the three-month average CPR experienced by our Agency RMBS and MSR during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and the four immediately preceding quarters:
Our Agency RMBS are primarily collateralized by fixed-rate mortgage loans. Our Agency portfolio also includes securities with implicit prepayment protection, including lower loan balances (securities collateralized by loans of less than $400,000 in initial principal balance), higher LTVs (securities collateralized by loans with LTVs greater than or equal to 80%), certain geographic concentrations, loans secured by investor-owned properties and lower FICO scores.Wescores. We also hold pools backed by Agency multi-family mortgage loans and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans. Our overall allocation of Agency RMBS and holdings of pools with specific characteristics are viewed in the context of our aggregate portfolio strategy, including MSR and related derivative hedging instruments. Additionally, the selection of securities with certain attributes is driven by the perceived relative value of the securities, which factors in the opportunities in the marketplace, the cost of financing and the cost of hedging interest rate, prepayment, credit and other portfolio risks. Accordingly, our Agency RMBS capital allocation reflects management’s flexible approach to investing in the marketplace.
Our MSR portfolio offers attractive spreads and has many risk reducing characteristics when paired with our Agency RMBS portfolio. The following table summarizes activity related to the UPB of loans underlying our MSR portfolio for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and the four immediately preceding quarters:
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had entered into repurchase agreements with 21 counterparties, 18 of which had outstanding balances. In addition, we held short- and long-term borrowings under revolving credit facilities, warehouse lines of credit, and unsecured borrowings under senior notes. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the debt-to-equity ratio funding our Agency and non-Agency investment securities, MSR and related servicing advances and mortgage loans held-for-sale, which includes unsecured borrowings under senior notes, was 4.83.8:1.0.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we held $476.3$642.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, approximately $7.3$5.7 million of unpledged Agency RMBS and $3.1$3.0 million of unpledged non-Agency securities. As a result, we had an overall estimated unused borrowing capacity on our unpledged securities of approximately $8.2$7.1 million. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we held approximately $1.6$2.1 million of unpledged MSR and $7.4$3.4 million of unpledged servicing advances. Overall, on MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $102.1$152.1 million unused committed and $875.0 million unused uncommitted borrowing capacity on MSR financing facilities, and $81.0$85.1 million in unused committed borrowing capacity on servicing advance financing facilities. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we held approximately $0.4$0.5 million of unpledged mortgage loans and had $22.3$30.7 million unused committed borrowing capacity on our warehouse line of credit and $44.8$42.5 million unused uncommitted borrowing capacity on our loan repurchase agreement. Generally, unused borrowing capacity may be the result of our election not to utilize certain financing, as well as delays in the timing in which funding is provided, insufficient collateral or the inability to meet lenders’ eligibility requirements for specific types of asset classes.
Our total serviced mortgage assets consist of mortgage loans underlying our MSR assets, off-balance sheet mortgage loans owned by third parties and subserviced by us, off-balance sheet mortgage loans owned by third parties for which we act as servicing administrator (subserviced by appropriately licensed third-party subservicers), and originated or purchased mortgage loans held-for-sale at period-end. The following table presents the number of loans and unpaid principal balance of the mortgage assets for which we manage the servicing as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025:
Our book value per common share for U.S. GAAP purposes was $10.68 at June 30, 2026, an increase from $10.57 per common share at March 31, 2026, and a decrease from $11.13 per common share at December 31, 2025. The declinerise in book value for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was primarily driven by servicing income, partially offset by MSR portfolio runoff, as well as dividends declared. The decline in book value for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily driven by net mark-to-market losses recognized on investment securities and MSR,MSR portfolio runoff, as well as dividends declared, partially offset by servicing income. Our comprehensive lossincome attributable to common stockholders was $24.7$47.9 million and $23.2 million for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, respectively, as compared to comprehensive incomeloss attributable to common stockholders of $64.9$221.8 million and $156.9 million for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.2025, respectively.
The following table presents the components of our comprehensive income (loss) income for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
Interest income decreased to $88.7$83.5 million and $172.2 million for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, respectively, from $111.4$117.1 million and $228.5 million for the same periodperiods in 2025, primarily due to a decrease in Agency RMBS portfolio size.
Interest expense decreased to $95.2$89.6 million and $184.7 million for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, respectively, from $131.7$136.7 million and $268.4 million for the same periodperiods in 2025, primarily due to decreases in average borrowings outstanding on the Agency RMBS and MSR portfolios, as well as the lower overall interest rate environment.
The following tabletables presentspresent the components of interest income and average net asset yield earned by asset type, the components of interest expense and average cost of funds on borrowings incurred by collateral type, and net interest income and average net interest spread for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
(2)Yields on Agency Derivatives not shown as the related interest income is included in gain (loss) on derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) income..
The increasedecrease in yields on AFS securities for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the same period in 2025, was driven by net sales of AFS securities with lower couponunamortized AFS securities, which waspremiums, partially offset by slightlythe higherportfolio’s premiumoverall amortization.shift up in coupon. The increase in yields on AFS securities for the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the same period in 2025, was primarily driven by net sales of lower coupon AFS securities. The decrease in cost of funds associated with the financing of AFS securities for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the same periodperiods in 2025, was due to the lower interest rate environment.
The decrease in yields on reverse repurchase agreements for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the same periodperiods in 2025, was due to the lower interest rate environment.
The decrease in cost of funds associated with the financing of MSR assets and related servicing advance obligations for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the same periodperiods in 2025, was primarily due to the lower interest rate environment. We have one revolving credit facility in place to finance our servicing advance obligations, which are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets.
The following table presents the components of the yield earned on our AFS securities portfolio as a percentage of our average amortized cost of securities for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
The following table presents the components of net servicing income for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
The decrease in total servicing income for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the same periodperiods in 2025, was primarily due to lower servicing fee income on a smaller MSR portfolio as a result of run-off and sales, and lower float income on lower custodial balances as well as a lower interest rate environment.
As previously discussed, RoundPoint handles substantially all servicing functions for the mortgage loans underlying our MSR. For the remaining portion of our serviced mortgage assets, we contract with appropriately licensed third-party subservicers to handle the servicing functions in the name of the subservicer. All third-party subservicing costs and other servicing expenses directly related to our MSR portfolio are included within the servicing costs line item on our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) income.. All servicing-related general and administrative expenses incurred by RoundPoint are included within the compensation and benefits and other operating expenses line items on our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) income.. The decreaseincrease in servicing costs during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the same period in 2025, was primarily the result of higher non-recoverable advances. The decrease in servicing costs during the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the same period in 2025, was primarily the result of lower interest on escrowescrows, balancespartially andoffset lowerby higher non-recoverable advances.
The following table presents the components of loss on investment securities for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
The following table presents the components of loss on servicing asset for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
The increase in loss on servicing asset for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the same periodperiods in 2025, was driven by a less favorable change in valuation assumptions used in the fair valuation of MSR, primarily due to decreasing interest rates with rising prepayment speeds, partially offset by lower portfolio run-off on a lower portfolio balance as a result of sales of MSR.
The following table summarizes the components of gain (loss) on derivative instruments recognized during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
Net interest spread recognized for the accrual and/or settlement of the net interest income associated with our interest rate swaps results from receiving either a floating interest rate (e.g., Overnight Index Swap Rate (“OIS”) or SOFR) or a fixed interest rate and paying either a fixed interest rate or a floating interest rate (OIS or SOFR) on positions held to economically hedge/mitigate portfolio interest rate exposure (or duration) risk. We may elect to terminate certain swaps to align with our investment portfolio, agreements may mature or options may expire resulting in full settlement of our net interest spread asset/liability and the recognition of realized gains and losses, including early termination penalties. The change in fair value of interest rate swaps during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 was a result of changes to floating interest rates (OIS or SOFR), the swap curve and corresponding counterparty borrowing rates. Swaps are used for purposes of hedging our interest rate exposure, and therefore, their unrealized valuation gains and losses (excluding the reversal of unrealized gains and losses to realized gains and losses upon termination, maturation or option expiration) generally offset a portion of the unrealized losses and gains recognized on our Agency RMBS AFS portfolio, which are recorded either directly to stockholders’ equity through other comprehensive (loss) income or to loss on investment securities, in the case of certain AFS securities for which we have elected the fair value option.
The following table provides a summary of the total net realized and unrealized gains (losses) recognized on mortgage loans held-for-sale and the related derivative instruments used to manage exposure to market risks primarily associated with fluctuations in interest rate risks related to our origination pipeline during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
The following table presents the components of operating expenses for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
(1)Merger-related compensation and other costs consist of expenses incurred in connection with the proposedpending CCM Merger, as well as the terminated UWM Merger.
The increase in total operating expenses during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the same periodperiods in 2025, was primarily driven by expenses incurred in connection with the proposedpending CCM Merger and the terminated UWM Merger, partially offset by lower non-cash equity compensation expensesexpenses, certain litigation-related costs incurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, as well as lower other operating expenses. The increase in our annualized operating expense ratios was also driven by the lower average equity balances in the denominator as a result of the comprehensive losses incurred andduring 2025, as well as dividends declared during 2025 and the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
Loss Contingency Accrual
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, we recorded a loss contingency accrual of $199.9 million in connection with our then ongoing litigation with PRCM Advisers LLC. The accrual was subsequently settled during the three months ended September 30, 2025 via a cash payment of $375 million pursuant to a Settlement Agreement and Release resolving all claims in our litigation with PRCM Advisers LLC, Pine River Capital Management L.P., and Pine River Domestic Management L.P.
During the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025,2026, we recognized a provision for income taxes of $4.1$6.0 million and $0.4$10.0 million, respectively, which was primarily due to net income from MSR servicing and mortgage loan origination activities, partially offset by net losses recognized on MSR and operating expenses incurred in our TRSs. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, we recognized a provision for income taxes of $1.7 million and $2.1 million, respectively, which was primarily due to net income from MSR servicing and mortgage loan origination activities, partially offset by net losses recognized on MSR and operating expenses incurred in our TRSs.
The following table provides a summary of the components of other comprehensive (loss) income during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
The following table presents significant components of our balance sheet as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025:
The table below summarizes certain characteristics of our Agency RMBS AFS at MarchJune 31,30, 2026:
One of our wholly owned subsidiaries, TH MSR Holdings, has approvals from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to own and manage MSR, which represent the right to control the servicing of residential mortgage loans. TH MSR Holdings acquires MSR from third-party originators through flow and bulk purchases, as well as through the recapture of MSR on loans in its MSR portfolio that refinance. TH MSR Holdings also acquires MSR on loans originated by its subsidiary, RoundPoint, through purchases and recapture of MSR. As of bothJune March 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, our MSR had a fair market value of $2.3 billion and $2.4 billion.billion, respectively.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our MSR portfolio included MSR on 665,942655,023 loans with an unpaid principal balance of approximately $158.9$155.1 billion. The following table summarizes certain characteristics of the loans underlying our MSR by gross weighted average coupon rate types and ranges at MarchJune 31,30, 2026:
At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, borrowings under repurchase agreements, revolving credit facilities, warehouse lines of credit and senior notes had the following characteristics:
(1)Includes unsecured borrowings under senior notes due August 2030, paying interest quarterly at a rate of 9.375% per annum on the aggregate principal amount, which was $115.0 million on MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
TWO-PC insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 2 filings (2 insiders, 1 trade date, 11,556 shares, about $145.3K; 2 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -11,556 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$145.3K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-25 | Greenberg William Ross |
Disposition to issuer | 1,213,933 | $12.00 | $14.6M |
| 2026-08-25 | Greenberg William Ross |
Disposition to issuer | 3,025 | $12.00 | $36.3K |
| 2026-08-25 | Greenberg William Ross |
Grant/award | 667,827 | — | — |
| 2026-08-25 | Hanson Alecia |
Disposition to issuer | 143,171 | $12.00 | $1.7M |
| 2026-08-25 | Hanson Alecia |
Grant/award | 65,204 | — | — |
| 2026-08-25 | Sandberg Rebecca B |
Disposition to issuer | 406,688 | $12.00 | $4.9M |
| 2026-08-25 | Sandberg Rebecca B |
Grant/award | 168,271 | — | — |
| 2026-08-25 | Rush Robert |
Grant/award | 99,912 | — | — |
| 2026-08-25 | Rush Robert |
Disposition to issuer | 242,470 | $12.00 | $2.9M |
| 2026-08-25 | Letica Nicholas |
Grant/award | 297,105 | — | — |
| 2026-08-25 | Letica Nicholas |
Disposition to issuer | 615,339 | $12.00 | $7.4M |
| 2026-08-25 | Boucher Nathan |
Disposition to issuer | 48,142 | $12.00 | $577.7K |
| 2026-08-25 | Boucher Nathan |
Grant/award | 20,893 | — | — |
| 2026-08-25 | Campbell James D |
Disposition to issuer | 56,049 | $12.00 | $672.6K |
| 2026-08-25 | Campbell James D |
Grant/award | 18,993 | — | — |
| 2026-08-25 | Dellal William |
Disposition to issuer | 83,388 | $12.00 | $1.0M |
| 2026-08-25 | Halm Jillian |
Disposition to issuer | 18,833 | $12.00 | $226.0K |
| 2026-08-25 | Woodhouse Hope B |
Disposition to issuer | 56,444 | $12.00 | $677.3K |
| 2026-08-25 | Stern James A |
Disposition to issuer | 64,843 | $12.00 | $778.1K |
| 2026-08-25 | Kasnet Stephen G |
Disposition to issuer | 95,993 | $12.00 | $1.2M |
| 2026-08-25 | Hammond Karen |
Disposition to issuer | 59,097 | $12.00 | $709.2K |
| 2026-08-25 | Das Sanjiv |
Disposition to issuer | 20,410 | $12.00 | $244.9K |
| 2026-08-25 | Bender James J |
Disposition to issuer | 47,166 | $12.00 | $566.0K |
| 2026-08-25 | Abraham Spencer |
Disposition to issuer | 35,039 | $12.00 | $420.5K |
| 2026-05-15 | Kasnet Stephen G |
Open-market sale |
7,034 | $12.57 | $88.4K |
| 2026-05-15 | Abraham Spencer |
Open-market sale |
4,522 | $12.58 | $56.9K |
Well-known investors holding TWO-PC (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.