UNP 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Union Pacific Corp. · NYSE · Railroads, Line-Haul Operating · CIK 100885 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Pending acquisition risks”
Largest changes
“The mergers are subject to the receipt of the requisite regulatory approvals, which requisite regulatory approvals may never be obtained, therefore preventing completion of the mergers. In addition, in granting such approvals, regulatory authorities may impose conditions that could have a significant adverse effect on the Company, Norfolk Southern, or the combined company and the expected benefits of the mergers therefore preventing completion of the mergers — Before the mergers may be completed, the requisite regulatory approvals must have been obtained, including the approval, authorization, …”see in full comparison
“We may and have been a target of securities class action and derivative lawsuits that could result in substantial costs and may delay or prevent the mergers from being completed, whether or not such lawsuits have any merit — Securities class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits are often brought against public companies that have entered into merger agreements. Even if the lawsuits are without merit, defending against or otherwise resolving these claims can result in substantial costs and divert management time and resources. …”see in full comparison
“Various risks, uncertainties, and events beyond the combined company’s control could affect its ability to comply with the covenants contained in its financing agreements. Failure to comply with any of the covenants in its existing or future financing agreements could result in a default under those agreements and under other agreements containing cross-default provisions. A default would permit lenders to accelerate the maturity of the debt under these agreements and to foreclose upon any collateral securing the debt. …”see in full comparison
Asee in full comparisonSignificantsignificantPortionportion ofOurourRevenuesrevenuesInvolvesinvolvesTransportationtransportation ofCommoditiescommodities to and fromInternationalinternationalMarketsmarkets – Although revenues from our operations are attributable to transportation services provided in the U.S., a significant portion of our revenues involves the transportation of commodities to and from international markets, including Mexico, Canada, and Southeast Asia, by various carriers and, at times, various modes of transportation. Significant and sustained interruptions of trade with Mexico, Canada, or countries in Southeast Asia, including China, could adversely affect customers and other entities that, directly or indirectly, purchase or rely on rail transportation services in the U.S. as part of their operations, and any such interruptions, including international armedconflictsconflicts, such as the Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Hamas wars, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Any one or more of the following could cause a significant and sustained interruption of trade with Mexico, Canada, or countries in Southeast Asia: (a) a deterioration of security for international trade and businesses; (b) the adverse impact of new laws, rules, and regulations or the interpretation or enforcement of laws, rules, and regulations by government entities, courts, or regulatory bodies, including the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) or other international trade agreements; (c) actions of taxing authorities that affect our customers doing business in or with foreign countries; (d) any significant adverse economic developments, such as extended periods of high inflation, material disruptions in the banking sector or in the capital markets of these foreign countries, and significant changes in the valuation of the currencies of these foreign countries that could materially affect the cost or value of imports or exports; (e) shifts in patterns of international trade, including as a result of changes to international trade agreements or policies, that adversely affect import and export markets; (f) a material reduction in foreign direct investment in these countries; and (g) public health crises, including the outbreak of pandemic or contagious disease, such as the coronavirus and its variant strains (COVID). Changes to trade policy both U.S. and foreign, including imposition of tariffs on imports, could cause demand for shipping from international markets to decrease, and if the declines are significant enough, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
“materially affect the cost or value of imports or exports; (e) shifts in patterns of international trade, including as a result of changes to international trade agreements or policies, that adversely affect import and export markets; (f) a material reduction in foreign direct investment in these countries; and (g) public health crises, including the outbreak of pandemic or contagious disease, such as the coronavirus and its variant strains (COVID). An imposition of tariffs on imports or other changes to U.S. …”see in full comparison
“Under the terms of the merger agreement, each of the Company and Norfolk Southern is subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of its business prior to completing the first merger (as defined in the merger agreement), which may adversely affect its ability to execute certain of its business strategies, including, in the case of Norfolk Southern, the ability in certain cases to enter into or amend contracts, acquire or dispose of assets, incur indebtedness, incur capital expenditures, settle litigation, amend organizational documents, declare dividends, enter new business lines, and invest …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (56)
We urge you to consider carefully the factors described below and the risks that they present for our operations as well as the risks addressed in other reports and materials that we file with the SEC and the other information included or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. When the factors, events, and contingencies described below or elsewhere in this Form 10-K materialize, our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or prospects can be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment. SomeThe ofdisclosures thein factors,this events,section reflect our beliefs and contingenciesopinions discussedas belowto mayfactors havethat occurredcould materially and adversely affect us in the past,future. References to past events are provided by way of example only and the disclosures below are not representationsintended to be a complete listing or a representation as to whether or not thesuch factors, events, or contingenciesfactors have occurred in the past,past butor aretheir provided because future occurrenceslikelihood of suchoccurring factors,in events,the or contingencies could have a material adverse effect.future. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and prospects.
WeThe Relyability onto Technologyupdate andor Technologymaintain Improvementstechnology incould Ouradversely Businessaffect Operationsour operations – We rely on information technology in all aspects of our business, including technology systems operated by us (whether created by us or purchased), under control of third parties, and open-source software. If we do not have sufficient capital or do not deploy sufficient capital in a timely manner to acquire, develop, or implement new technology or maintain or upgrade current systems, such as Positive Train Control (PTC), NetControl, or the latest version of our transportation control systems, we may suffer a rail service outage or competitive disadvantage within the rail industry and with companies providing other modes of transportation service, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
A Significantsignificant Portionportion of Ourour Revenuesrevenues Involvesinvolves Transportationtransportation of Commoditiescommodities to and from Internationalinternational Marketsmarkets – Although revenues from our operations are attributable to transportation services provided in the U.S., a significant portion of our revenues involves the transportation of commodities to and from international markets, including Mexico, Canada, and Southeast Asia, by various carriers and, at times, various modes of transportation. Significant and sustained interruptions of trade with Mexico, Canada, or countries in Southeast Asia, including China, could adversely affect customers and other entities that, directly or indirectly, purchase or rely on rail transportation services in the U.S. as part of their operations, and any such interruptions, including international armed conflictsconflicts, such as the Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Hamas wars, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Any one or more of the following could cause a significant and sustained interruption of trade with Mexico, Canada, or countries in Southeast Asia: (a) a deterioration of security for international trade and businesses; (b) the adverse impact of new laws, rules, and regulations or the interpretation or enforcement of laws, rules, and regulations by government entities, courts, or regulatory bodies, including the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) or other international trade agreements; (c) actions of taxing authorities that affect our customers doing business in or with foreign countries; (d) any significant adverse economic developments, such as extended periods of high inflation, material disruptions in the banking sector or in the capital markets of these foreign countries, and significant changes in the valuation of the currencies of these foreign countries that could materially affect the cost or value of imports or exports; (e) shifts in patterns of international trade, including as a result of changes to international trade agreements or policies, that adversely affect import and export markets; (f) a material reduction in foreign direct investment in these countries; and (g) public health crises, including the outbreak of pandemic or contagious disease, such as the coronavirus and its variant strains (COVID). Changes to trade policy both U.S. and foreign, including imposition of tariffs on imports, could cause demand for shipping from international markets to decrease, and if the declines are significant enough, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
materially affect the cost or value of imports or exports; (e) shifts in patterns of international trade, including as a result of changes to international trade agreements or policies, that adversely affect import and export markets; (f) a material reduction in foreign direct investment in these countries; and (g) public health crises, including the outbreak of pandemic or contagious disease, such as the coronavirus and its variant strains (COVID). An imposition of tariffs on imports or other changes to U.S. trade policy could cause demand for shipping from international markets to decrease, and if the declines are significant enough, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
We Areare Dependentdependent on Certaincertain Keykey Supplierssuppliers of Locomotiveslocomotives and Railrail – Due to the capital-intensive nature and sophistication of locomotive equipment, parts, and maintenance, potential new suppliers face high barriers to entry. Therefore, if oneany of theour two domestic suppliers of locomotives discontinues manufacturing locomotives, supplying parts, or providing maintenance for any reason, including bankruptcy or insolvency or the inability to manufacture locomotives that meet efficiency or regulatory emissions standards, we could experience significant cost increases and reduced availability of the locomotives that are necessary for our operations. Additionally, we utilize a limited number of steel producers that meet our rail specifications. Rail is critical to our operations for rail replacement programs, maintenance, and for adding additional network capacity, new rail and storage yards, and expansions of existing facilities. This industry similarly has high barriers to entry, and if there is any significant consolidations or mergers in this industry, or one of these suppliers discontinues operations for any reason, including bankruptcy or insolvency, we could experience both significant cost increases for rail purchases and difficulty obtaining sufficient rail for maintenance and other projects. Changes to trade agreements or policies that result in increased tariffs on goods imported into the United States could also result in significant cost increases for rail purchases and difficulty obtaining sufficient rail.
We Areare Subjectsubject to Significantsignificant Governmentalgovernmental Regulationregulation – We are subject to governmental regulation by a significant number of federal, state, and local authorities covering a variety of health, safety, labor, employment, environmental, economic (as discussed below), tax, social, and other matters. Many laws and regulations require us to obtain and maintain various licenses, permits, and other authorizations, and we cannot guarantee that we will continue to be able to do so. Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on us as a result of litigation or proceedings by private parties, governments, or regulators, including and in addition to those described in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements entitled "Commitments and Contingencies." Governments or regulators may change the legislative or regulatory frameworks that we operate in without providing us any recourse to address any adverse effects on our business, including, without limitation, regulatory determinations or rules regarding dispute resolution, increasing the amount of our traffic subject to common carrier regulation, business relationships with other railroads, use of embargoes, calculation of our cost of capital or other inputs relevant to computing our revenue adequacy, the prices we charge, changes in tax rates, enactment of new tax laws or tariffs, and revision in tax regulations. Significant legislative activity in Congress or regulatory activity by other government branches or agencies, such as the STB, could expand regulation of railroad operations and pricing for rail services, which could reduce the viability of capital spending on our rail network, facilities, and equipment, and increase our costs for purchased goods and services. Such legislative or regulatory activity, or recent tariff activity imposed in the U.S. and retaliatory tariffs implemented in other countries, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. During fiscal year 2025, new tariffs were imposed in the U.S. for imports from a broad range of countries and materials. Several countries also implemented or proposed retaliatory tariffs on imports from the U.S., as well as other barriers to trade. Incremental import tariffs adversely affected demand for our services and increased our costs for purchased goods and services during fiscal year 2025 and may continue to do so in 2026. In addition, retaliatory tariffs by regions outside the U.S., currently in effect or adopted in the future, may impact demand for our services and our costs for purchased goods and services.
We Faceface Competitioncompetition from Otherother Railroadsrailroads and Otherother Transportationtransportation Providersproviders – We face competition from other railroads, motor carriers, ships, barges, and pipelines. Our main railroad competitor is Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC. Its primary subsidiary, BNSF Railway Company (BNSF), operates parallel routes in many of our main traffic corridors. In addition, we operate in corridors served by other railroads and motor carriers. Motor carrier competition exists in all three of our commodity groups. Because of the proximity of our routes to major inland and Gulf Coast waterways, barges can be particularly competitive, especially for grain and bulk commodities in certain areas where we operate. In addition to price competition, we face competition with respect to transit times, quality, and reliability of service from motor carriers and other railroads. Motor carriers in particular cangenerally have an advantage over railroads with respect to transit times and timeliness of service. Additionally, we must build or acquire and maintain our rail system, while trucks, barges, and maritime operators are able to use public rights-of-way maintained by public entities. Any of the following could also affect the competitiveness of our transportation services for some or all of our commodities, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity: (a) improvements or expenditures materially increasing the quality or reducing the costs of these alternative modes of transportation, such as autonomous or more fuel efficient trucks, (b) legislation that eliminates or significantly increases the existing size or weight limitations applied to motor carriers, or (c) legislation or regulatory changes that impose operating restrictions or requirements on railroads or that adversely affect the profitability of some or all railroad traffic. Many movements face product or geographic competition where our customers can use different products (e.g., natural gas instead of coal, sorghum instead of corn) or commodities from different locations (e.g., grain from states or countries that we do not serve, crude oil from different regions). Sourcing different commodities or different locations allows shippers to substitute different carriers, and such competition may reduce our volumes or constrain prices. Additionally, any future consolidation of the rail industry could materiallyresult affectin ourincreased competitivecompetition environment.among industry participants.
We Maymay Bebe Affectedaffected by Climateclimate Changechange and Marketmarket or Regulatoryregulatory Responsesresponses to Climateclimate Changechange – Climate change, including the impact of global warming and transition risks involving policy, legal risks, and market risks, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity on both a long-term and near-term basis. Restrictions, caps, taxes, or other controls on emissions of GHGs,greenhouse gases (GHGs), including diesel exhaust, could significantly increase our operating costs. Restrictions on emissions could also affect our customers that (a) use commodities that we carry to produce energy, (b) use significant amounts of energy in producing or delivering the commodities we carry, or (c) manufacture or produce goods that consume significant amounts of energy or burn fossil fuels, including chemical producers, farmers and food producers, and automakers and other manufacturers. Significant cost increases, government regulation, or changes of consumer preferences for goods or services relating to alternative sources of energy, emissions reductions, and GHG emissions can materially affect the markets for the commodities we carry and demand for our services, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Government incentives encouraging the use of alternative sources of energy, including modifications or elimination of such incentives, also can affect certain of our customers and the markets for certain of the commodities we carry in a manner that could unpredictably alter our traffic patterns or reduce demand.
encouraging the use of alternative sources of energy also can affect certain of our customers and the markets for certain of the commodities we carry in a manner that could unpredictably alter our traffic patterns or reduce demand.
Our efforts to achieve emission reduction targets or aspirations could significantly increase our operational costs and capital expenditures. In addition, stakeholder expectations regarding some of these matters may be evolving and there may be differing views among stakeholders, which could harm our reputation or increase our costs. Our ability to meet such targets or aspirations can depend on significant technological advancements, including, for example, suitable alternative fuels and zero-emissions locomotives, and when such technological advancements will take place, if at all, and whether they will be readily available on commercially reasonable terms is currently unknown. There can be no assurances we will achieve our emission reduction targets or aspirations, or that the associated costs will not be higher than expected, or that the regulatory landscape will not have a negative impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Government mandates may lead to the premature adoption of unproven and unreliable technology, which could negatively affect operational reliability, customer serviceservice, and supply chain continuity.
We Areare Affectedaffected by Fluctuatingfluctuating Fuelfuel Pricesprices – Fuel costs constitute a significant portion of our transportation expenses. Diesel fuel prices can be subject to dramatic fluctuations, and significant price increases could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Although we currently are able to recover a significant amount of our fuel expenses from our customers through revenues from fuel surcharges, we cannot be certain that we will always be able to mitigate rising or elevated fuel costs through our fuel surcharges. Additionally, future market conditions or legislative or regulatory activities could adversely affect our ability to apply fuel surcharges or adequately recover increased fuel costs through fuel surcharges. As fuel prices fluctuate, our fuel surcharge programs trail such fluctuations in fuel prices by approximately two months and are from time-to-time a significant source of quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year volatility, particularly in periods of rapidly changing prices. International, political, and economic factors, events and conditions, including international armed conflicts such as the Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Hamas wars, and other geopolitical tensions in the Middle East,East and elsewhere, affect the volatility of fuel prices and supplies. Weather can also affect fuel supplies and limit domestic refining capacity. A severe shortage of, or disruption to, domestic fuel supplies could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Alternatively, lower fuel prices could have a negative impact on certain commodities we transport, such as coal and domestic drilling-related shipments, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
Pending acquisition risks
The mergers are subject to conditions, some or all of which may not be satisfied or completed on a timely basis, if at all. Failure to complete the mergers could have material adverse effects on our business — On July 28, 2025, the Company, Norfolk Southern, Ruby Merger Sub 1 Corporation, and Ruby Merger Sub 2 LLC, entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the merger agreement). The completion of the mergers (as defined in the merger agreement) is subject to a number of conditions, including, among others, the receipt of the requisite regulatory approvals, which make the completion of the mergers and timing thereof uncertain. Also, either the Company or Norfolk Southern may terminate the merger agreement if the mergers have not been consummated by January 28, 2028, which is referred to as the end date (subject to an automatic extension in certain circumstances), except that this right to terminate the merger agreement will not be available to any party whose failure to perform any obligation under the merger agreement has been the primary cause of the failure of the mergers to be consummated on or before that date.
If the mergers are not completed, our ongoing business may be materially adversely affected and, without realizing any of the benefits of having completed the mergers, we will be subject to a number of risks, including the following:
•the market price of our common stock could decline;
•we could owe substantial termination fees to Norfolk Southern under certain circumstances;
•time, resources, and costs committed by our management team to matters relating to the mergers could otherwise have been devoted to pursuing other beneficial opportunities;
•we may experience negative reactions from the financial markets or from customers, suppliers, employees, labor unions, or other business partners; and
•we will be required to pay our respective costs relating to the mergers, such as legal, accounting, and printing fees, whether or not the mergers are completed.
In addition, if the mergers are not completed, we could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the mergers or related to any enforcement proceeding commenced against us to perform our obligations under the merger agreement, and whether or not any such litigation has any merit, the cost of defending such litigation may be significant. The materialization of any of these risks could adversely impact our ongoing business.
Similarly, delays in the completion of the mergers could, among other things, result in additional transaction costs, loss of revenues, or other negative effects associated with uncertainty about completion of the mergers.
The merger agreement contains provisions that limit our ability to pursue alternatives to the mergers, and, in specified circumstances, could require us to pay substantial termination fees to Norfolk Southern — The merger agreement contains certain provisions that restrict our ability to initiate, solicit, knowingly encourage, or, subject to certain exceptions, engage in discussions or negotiations with respect to, or approve or recommend, any alternative proposal.
In some circumstances, upon termination of the merger agreement in connection with an alternative proposal, we may be required to pay a termination fee of $2.5 billion to Norfolk Southern.
These provisions could discourage a potential acquiror of us or alternative merger partner that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant portion of the Company or pursuing an alternative acquisition transaction with us from considering or proposing such a transaction, even if it were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per-share value than the per-share value proposed to be realized in the mergers. In particular, a termination fee, if applicable, could result in a potential acquiror of us or alternative merger partner proposing to pay a lower price to our shareholders than it might otherwise have proposed to pay absent such a fee.
If the merger agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms, and we or Norfolk Southern seek another business combination, we may not be able to negotiate a transaction with another party on terms comparable to, or better than, the terms of the merger agreement.
The mergers are subject to the receipt of the requisite regulatory approvals, which requisite regulatory approvals may never be obtained, therefore preventing completion of the mergers. In addition, in granting such approvals, regulatory authorities may impose conditions that could have a significant adverse effect on the Company, Norfolk Southern, or the combined company and the expected benefits of the mergers therefore preventing completion of the mergers — Before the mergers may be completed, the requisite regulatory approvals must have been obtained, including the approval, authorization, or exemption by the U.S. Surface Transportation Board (STB) of the mergers and other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement within the jurisdiction of the STB. The terms and conditions of the approvals that are granted may impose requirements, concessions, limitations, or costs or place restrictions on the conduct of the combined company’s business. Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, the Company and Norfolk Southern have each agreed to use their reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to be done, and to assist and cooperate with each other in doing, all things necessary, proper, or advisable to cause the conditions to closing set forth in the merger agreement to be satisfied and to consummate and make effective the mergers and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement prior to the end date, except that we are not required to take, or commit to take, or agree to or accept any “materially burdensome regulatory condition” (as defined in the merger agreement). For purposes of the foregoing, “reasonable best efforts” includes, among others, (i) proposing, negotiating, committing to, and effecting, by consent decree, hold separate order, or otherwise, the sale, divestiture, license, hold separate, or disposition of any and all of the share capital or other equity interest, assets, products, or businesses of the Company or of Norfolk Southern and its subsidiaries and (ii) otherwise taking or committing to take any actions that after the first effective time (as defined in the merger agreement) would limit our freedom of action with respect to, or our ability to retain, or otherwise agreeing to any restriction, requirement, or limitation with respect to our assets, products, or businesses, in each case as may be required in order to avoid the entry of, or to effect the dissolution of, any injunction, temporary restraining order, or other order that would otherwise have the effect of preventing or delaying the closing. The STB and other regulatory and governmental authorities may impose requirements, concessions, and other conditions on the granting of such approvals. If such regulatory and governmental authorities seek to impose such requirements, concessions, or conditions, lengthy negotiations may ensue among such authorities, the Company and Norfolk Southern. Such requirements, concessions, and conditions and the process of obtaining regulatory approvals could have the effect of delaying completion of the mergers and such requirements, concessions, and conditions may not be identified or satisfied for an extended period of time. Such requirements, concessions and conditions may also impose additional costs or limitations on the combined company following the completion of the mergers and the parties have agreed to accept such requirements, concessions, and conditions, even if significant, subject to the agreed-upon materially burdensome regulatory condition limitation in favor of us. These requirements, concessions, and conditions may therefore reduce the anticipated benefits of the mergers, including synergies, which could also have a significant adverse effect on the combined company’s business and cash flows and results of operations, and we cannot predict what, if any, requirements, concessions, and conditions may be required by regulatory or governmental authorities whose approvals are required. The requisite regulatory approvals may not be obtained at all, may not be obtained in a timely fashion, and may contain conditions on the completion of the mergers. In January 2026, the STB announced its finding that the major merger application filed by the Company and Norfolk Southern was incomplete, as a result of which the STB rejected the application without prejudice. The decision does not result in the dismissal of the mergers, and the Company is permitted to file a revised application, which will commence a new review by the STB for completeness. If we experience further delays as a result of the STB’s review process or we are unable to obtain other
regulatory approvals on a timely basis, any such delays may increase our costs and reduce the anticipated benefits of the mergers, which could also have a significant adverse effect on the combined company’s business.
In addition, under existing law, our railroad competitors and customers, Norfolk Southern’s railroad competitors and customers, and other interested parties may intervene to oppose the STB application or seek protective conditions in the event approval by the STB is granted, which might affect the decision of the STB, delay the approval process, or reduce the anticipated benefits of the mergers. Furthermore, if the STB does not provide final approval or imposes conditions on its approval in a final order, and the Company and Norfolk Southern decide to appeal such final order from the STB, any such appeal might not be resolved for a substantial period of time after the entry of such order by the STB.
The Company and Norfolk Southern are each subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the mergers are pending, which could adversely affect both our business and operations and the combined company’s business and operations — In connection with the pendency of the mergers, some customers, suppliers, and other persons with whom the Company or Norfolk Southern has a business relationship have or may delay or defer certain business decisions or terminate, change, or renegotiate their relationships with us or Norfolk Southern, as the case may be, as a result of the mergers, which could negatively affect our or Norfolk Southern’s respective revenues, earnings, and cash flows, as well as the market price of our common stock, regardless of whether the mergers are completed.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, each of the Company and Norfolk Southern is subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of its business prior to completing the first merger (as defined in the merger agreement), which may adversely affect its ability to execute certain of its business strategies, including, in the case of Norfolk Southern, the ability in certain cases to enter into or amend contracts, acquire or dispose of assets, incur indebtedness, incur capital expenditures, settle litigation, amend organizational documents, declare dividends, enter new business lines, and invest in third parties. Such limitations could adversely affect each party’s businesses and operations prior to the completion of the mergers.
Each of the risks described above may be exacerbated by delays or other adverse developments with respect to the completion of the mergers.
Uncertainties associated with the mergers may cause a loss of management personnel and other key employees, and the Company and Norfolk Southern may have difficulty attracting and motivating management personnel and other key employees, and combining cultures between the two companies could be challenging, which could adversely affect the future business and operations of the combined company — The Company and Norfolk Southern are dependent on the experience and industry knowledge of their respective management personnel and other key employees to execute their business plans. The combined company’s success after the completion of the mergers will depend in part upon our ability, and Norfolk Southern’s ability, to attract, motivate, and retain key management personnel and other key employees as well as develop a singular culture framed in the strategy of Safety, Service, and Operational Excellence. Prior to completion of the mergers, our current and prospective employees, and Norfolk Southern’s current and prospective employees, may experience uncertainty about their roles within the combined company following the completion of the mergers, which may have an adverse effect on our ability, and Norfolk Southern’s ability, to attract, motivate, or retain management personnel and other key employees. In addition, no assurance can be given that the combined company will be able to attract, motivate, or retain management personnel and other key employees of the Company and Norfolk Southern to the same extent that the Company and Norfolk Southern have previously been able to attract or retain employees.
We may and have been a target of securities class action and derivative lawsuits that could result in substantial costs and may delay or prevent the mergers from being completed, whether or not such lawsuits have any merit — Securities class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits are often brought against public companies that have entered into merger agreements. Even if the lawsuits are without merit, defending against or otherwise resolving these claims can result in substantial costs and divert management time and resources. An adverse judgment could result in monetary damages, which could have a negative impact on our liquidity and financial condition. Additionally, if a plaintiff is successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting completion of the mergers, then that injunction may delay or prevent the mergers from being completed, or from being completed within the expected timeframe, which may adversely affect our business, financial position, and results of operation.
Completion of the mergers may trigger change in control or other provisions in certain agreements to which Norfolk Southern or its subsidiaries are a party, which may have an adverse impact on the combined company’s business and results of operations — The completion of the mergers may trigger change in control and other provisions in certain agreements to which Norfolk Southern or its subsidiaries are a party. If the Company and Norfolk Southern are unable to negotiate waivers of those provisions, the counterparties may exercise their rights and remedies under the agreements, potentially terminating the agreements or seeking monetary damages. Even if the Company and Norfolk Southern are able to negotiate waivers, the counterparties may require a fee for such waivers or seek to renegotiate the agreements on terms less favorable to Norfolk Southern or the combined company. Any of the foregoing or similar developments may have an adverse impact on the combined company’s business and results of operations.
The combined company may be unable to successfully integrate the businesses of the Company and Norfolk Southern and realize the anticipated benefits of the mergers — The success of the mergers will depend, in part, on the combined company’s ability to successfully combine the businesses of the Company and Norfolk Southern, which currently operate as independent public companies, and realize the anticipated benefits, including synergies, cost savings, innovation, and operational efficiencies, from the combination. If the combined company is unable to achieve these objectives within the anticipated time frame, or at all, the anticipated benefits may not be realized fully, or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected and the value of its common stock may be harmed. Additionally, as a result of the mergers, rating agencies may take negative actions against the combined company’s credit ratings, which may increase the combined company’s financing costs, including in connection with any financing of the mergers.
The mergers involve the integration of Norfolk Southern’s business with our existing business, which is a complex, costly, and time-consuming process. Neither the Company nor Norfolk Southern have previously completed a transaction comparable in size or scope to the mergers. The integration of the two (2) companies may result in material challenges, including, without limitation:
•the diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business concerns and performance shortfalls at one or both of the companies as a result of the devotion of management’s attention to the mergers;
•managing a larger combined company;
•creating, implementing, and executing a unified business strategy, and operational, financial, and managerial control with respect to the combined entity;
•the inherent risk and complexity of integrating railroad operations, including operating, information technology, safety, and managerial systems and processes, particularly on a large scale, in the context of ongoing business operations and customer commitments;
•maintaining employee morale and attracting, motivating, and retaining management personnel and other key employees;
•the possibility of faulty assumptions underlying expectations regarding the integration process;
•retaining existing business and operational relationships and attracting new business and operational relationships;
•consolidating corporate and administrative infrastructures and eliminating duplicative operations and inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, and policies;
•coordinating geographically separate organizations;
•unanticipated changes in federal or state laws or regulations or international trade agreements, including additional regulatory scrutiny or additional regulatory requirements as a result of the transaction or the size, scope, and complexity of the combined company’s business operations; and
•unforeseen expenses or delays associated with the mergers.
Many of these factors will be outside of the combined company’s control and any one of them could result in delays, increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues, and diversion of management’s time and energy, which could materially affect the combined company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
The Company and Norfolk Southern have operated, and until completion of the mergers will continue to operate, independently. The Company and Norfolk Southern are currently permitted to conduct only limited planning for the integration of the two (2) companies following the mergers and have not yet determined the exact nature of how the businesses and operations of the two (2) companies will be combined after the mergers. The actual integration may result in additional and unforeseen expenses, and the anticipated benefits of the integration plan may not be realized.
The future results of the combined company may be adversely impacted if the combined company does not effectively manage its expanded operations following the completion of the mergers — Following the completion of the mergers, the size of the combined company’s business will be significantly larger than the current size of our business. The combined company’s ability to successfully manage this expanded business will depend, in part, upon management’s ability to design and implement operational, managerial, financial, and strategic initiatives that address not only the integration of two (2) independent stand-alone companies, but also the increased scale and scope of the combined business with its associated increased costs and complexity. There can be no assurances that the combined company will be successful or that it will realize the expected operating efficiencies, cost savings, and other benefits currently anticipated from the mergers.
The combined company is expected to incur substantial expenses related to the completion of the mergers and the integration of the Company and Norfolk Southern — The combined company is expected to incur substantial expenses in connection with the completion of the mergers and the integration of the Company and Norfolk Southern. There are a large number of processes, policies, procedures, operations, technologies, and systems that must be integrated, including purchasing, accounting and finance, sales, payroll, pricing, revenue management, marketing, and benefits. In addition, our business and Norfolk Southern’s business will continue to maintain a presence in Omaha, Nebraska and Atlanta, Georgia, respectively. The substantial majority of these costs will be non-recurring expenses related to the mergers (including any financing of the mergers), facilities, and systems consolidation costs. The combined company may incur additional costs to retain employees and/or maintain employee morale and to attract, motivate, or retain management personnel and other key employees. We will also incur transaction fees and costs related to formulating integration plans for the combined business, and the execution of these plans may lead to additional unanticipated costs. Additionally, as a result of the mergers, rating agencies may take negative actions with regard to the combined company’s credit ratings, which may increase the combined company’s financing costs, including in connection with any financing of the mergers. These incremental transaction and merger-related costs may exceed the savings the combined company expects to achieve from the elimination of duplicative costs and the realization of other efficiencies related to the integration of the businesses, particularly in the near term, and in the event there are material unanticipated costs.
The combined company’s indebtedness may limit its flexibility and increase its borrowing costs — The combined company’s consolidated indebtedness may have the effect of, among other things, increasing borrowing costs. In addition, the amount of cash required to service the indebtedness levels will be greater than the amount of cash flows required to service the indebtedness of the Company or Norfolk Southern individually prior to completion of the mergers. The level of indebtedness could also reduce dividend payments, share repurchases, and other activities and may create competitive disadvantages relative to other companies with lower debt levels. The combined company may be required to raise additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, or other general corporate purposes. The combined company’s ability to arrange additional financing or refinancing will depend on, among other factors, its financial condition and performance, as well as prevailing market conditions, the terms of third party debt financing incurred in connection with the consummation of the mergers (if any), and other factors beyond its control. There can be no assurance that the combined company will be able to obtain additional financing or arrange refinancing on terms acceptable to it or at all, and any such failure could materially adversely affect its operations and financial condition.
The financing arrangements that the combined company will enter into in connection with the mergers may, under certain circumstances, contain restrictions and limitations that could significantly impact the combined company’s ability to operate its business — We expect to incur significant new indebtedness in connection with the mergers. We also expect that the agreements governing the indebtedness that the combined company will incur in connection with the mergers will contain covenants that, among other things, may, under certain circumstances, place limitations on the dollar amounts paid or other actions we or the combined company can or will be able to take.
In addition, the combined company will likely be required to comply with a leverage covenant as set forth in these agreements.
The combined company’s ability to comply with the leverage covenant in future periods will depend on its ongoing financial and operating performance, which in turn will be subject to economic conditions and to financial, market, and competitive factors, many of which are beyond the combined company’s control. The ability to comply with this covenant in future periods will also depend on the combined company’s ability to successfully implement its overall business strategy and realize the anticipated benefits of the mergers, including synergies, cost savings, innovation, and operational efficiencies.
Various risks, uncertainties, and events beyond the combined company’s control could affect its ability to comply with the covenants contained in its financing agreements. Failure to comply with any of the covenants in its existing or future financing agreements could result in a default under those agreements and under other agreements containing cross-default provisions. A default would permit lenders to accelerate the maturity of the debt under these agreements and to foreclose upon any collateral securing the debt. Under these circumstances, the combined company might not have sufficient funds or other resources to satisfy all of its obligations. In addition, the limitations imposed by financing agreements on the combined company’s ability to incur additional debt and to take other actions might significantly impair its ability to obtain other financing.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “[1]Represents the hypothetical interest expense we would incur (using the incremental borrowing rate) if the property under our operating leases were owned or accounted for as finance leases.”
Largest changes
Premium – Premium includes shipments of finished automobiles, automotive parts, and merchandise in intermodal containers, both domestic and international. Freight revenues from premium shipmentssee in full comparisonincreaseddecreased in 2025 drivenby higher volumes and core pricing gains, partially offsetby lower fuel surchargerevenuesrevenues, negative business mix from reduced automotive shipments, andnegativelowermix.volumes,Startingpartiallyinoffsetthebythirdcorequarterpricingofgains.2024, international intermodal experiencedThe heavy demanddue tofrom increased U.S. West Coastimports,importsacontinuedresultinto the first half offreight shifting from the East Coast and Canadian ports2025 due to uncertainty related tolabortradenegotiations,policies,drivingresulting in first half international intermodal volumes upover17%.30%Traffic shifted back to historical trade patterns in the second half ofthe2025yearand international intermodal volumes decreased 24% compared to the second half of2023.2024,Inresultingaddition,in 6% lower international intermodal volumes for 2025. Strong domestic intermodal volumes helped to offset the decline in international shipments as a result of business developmentefforts in domestic intermodal drove volume growth in 2024 compared to 2023.wins. Automotive shipments wereflatdown 4% year-over-yearasduebusinesstodevelopmenttariffwinsuncertaintieswereinoffsetthebyfirstmarkethalfweaknessof 2025 andunplannedreduced manufacturer productiondecreases.from softer consumer demand.
“[1]Represents the hypothetical interest expense we would incur (using the incremental borrowing rate) if the property under our operating leases were owned or accounted for as finance leases.”see in full comparison
Purchasedsee in full comparisonServicesservices andMaterialsmaterials – Expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers (including equipment maintenance and contract expenses incurred by our subsidiaries for external transportation services); materials used to maintain the Railroad’s lines, structures, and equipment; costs of operating facilities jointly used by UPRR and other railroads; transportation and lodging for train crew employees; trucking and contracting costs for intermodal containers; leased automobile maintenance expenses; and tools and supplies. Purchased services and materialsdecreasedincreased 4% in20242025 compared to20232024 driven bydeclinesinflationin(including tariff-related material expenses), acquisition-related expenses, and higher locomotive maintenance expenseduewastopartiallyaoffsetsmaller active fleet asby productivityimprovedandyear-over-year,lowerdecreased volume-related drayage costexpenses incurredat one ofby oursubsidiaries,subsidiaries.andThe comparison was also negatively impacted by a favorable contractsettlement,settlementpartiallyinoffset by inflation and volume-related costs.2024.
Cash flow conversion is defined as cash provided by operating activities less cash used in capital investments as a ratio of net income. Cash flow conversion rate is not considered a financial measure under GAAP by SEC Regulation G and Item 10 of SEC Regulation S-K and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner. We believe cash flow conversion rate is important to management and investors in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financing. Cash flow conversion rate should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, cash provided by operating activities. The following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities (GAAP measure) to cash flow conversion rate (non-GAAP measure):see in full comparison
“Cash flow conversion is defined as cash provided by operating activities less cash used in capital investments as a ratio of net income. Cash flow conversion rate is not considered a financial measure under GAAP by SEC Regulation G and Item 10 of SEC Regulation S-K and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner. We believe cash”see in full comparison
“Operating expenses decreased $500 million, or 3%, in 2024 compared to 2023 driven by lower fuel prices, productivity, a gain on the sale of intermodal equipment in 2024, partially offset by inflation, volume-related costs, and higher depreciation. In addition, positively impacting the year-over-year comparison are lower labor agreement ratification charges as we reached agreements impacting crew staffing in both years, and lower weather-related costs from less impactful winter weather in the first quarter of 2024 compared to 2023.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (64)
•Safety – 2024Building wason the foundation and commitment to our safety culture, 2025 furthered our progress towards world-class safety. With a transformational yearfocus on ourfour journey to becoming the safest railroad. Our strategy is broken into fourcentral pillars – Injury Prevention, Leverage Technology, Situational Awareness Testing, and Peer-to-Peer Engagement.Engagement, we are cultivating a safety-focused mindset so all of our employees return home safely each day.
Injury Prevention efforts focus on specific, critical tasks to reduce the risk of injury or derailment. These critical tasks are those where any form of non-compliance can result in a serious injury. Training is keyvital to helpingteach our employees understand how to safely execute those critical tasks safely.in order to reduce the risk of injury or derailment.
We areBy Leveraging TechnologyTechnology, we seek to eliminate or automate activities with the most risk. We have more thanOver 7,000 wayside detectors that monitor freight cars and locomotives in real time, generating 1672 million data points daily to proactively identify and mitigate risks. We are building safer trains with our proprietary Physics Train Builder technology, which allows us to evaluate train and route characteristics to enable proactive intervention by our Operating Practices Command Center to prevent derailments. We utilize our autonomous geometry car fleet to inspect 500,000 miles of track annually. This technology and the data it provides enable us to direct investments and resources in the right place, helping to significantly reduce track-caused derailments over the last 10 years.
Situational Awareness Testing (a program we call COMMIT) is our program that observes, tests, and coaches our employees to promote understanding and compliance with our work rules. ThisCOMMIT goes beyond thetraditional classroom,classroom learning, with an emphasis on beingin-the-field in the fieldtraining with the employees asactively they are performing the activities that runrunning the railroad.
Peer-to-Peer Engagement is drivingdrives employee ownership through engagement with our safety programs. ThisOur isculture our culture,embodies a personal commitment to do our jobs with a passion for safety so everyone goes home safely.safe. Employees are encouraged to speak up if they see unsafe behaviors.
The focus on these four pillars iscontinues drivingto drive improvement, resulting in our best-ever personal injury and derailment incident rate annual safety results. OurCompared to 2024, our personal injury rate (the number of reportable injuries for every 200,000 employee-hours worked) isof down0.68 23%decreased 24% and our derailment incident rate (the number of reportable derailment incidents per million train miles) downof 20%1.75 comparedimproved to 2023 results.19%.
•Service – Bolstered by sequentially improving freight car velocity and terminal dwell, our network remained fluid throughout 2025 as we achieved best-ever results for many of our operating metrics. For the year ended December 31, 2025, freight car velocity increased to 225 daily miles per car, an improvement of 8%, while terminal dwell declined 8% during the same period compared to 2024. Both service performance index measures improved to essentially three-year performance bests as we achieved intermodal service performance of 99% and manifest service performance of 100% for the full year 2025.
•Operational Excellence – We effectively adapted to shifts in business traffic mix throughout 2025 as we handled elevated international intermodal shipments in the first half of the year coupled with strong bulk shipments throughout the year. As customer demand changed, we efficiently modified our resources to match demand while improving our service performance.
•Service – Service performance index for both intermodal and manifest products improved 2 and 4 points, respectively, compared to 2023. Throughout the year we improved network fluidity as reflected in 2% faster freight car velocity and record terminal dwell, improved 3% from 2023.
•Operational Excellence – Network performance throughout 2024 was strong. While we experienced some powerful weather events in the second quarter and a second half surge in international intermodal shipments, most of our operating metrics improved year-over year. We maintained a resource buffer that allowed us to strategically integrate crews, locomotives, and freight cars into the network to efficiently handle the growth and recover from the weather events.
•Financial Resultsresults – Core pricing gains, strong productivity, and 3%1% volume growth positively impacted our financial results.results and offset the impact of inflation, negative business mix, and acquisition-related costs. Operating income of $9.7$9.8 billion increased 7%1% from 2023,2024, and our operating ratio wasimproved 59.9%,10 improving 2.4basis points fromto 2023.59.8% in 2025. Net income of $6.7$7.1 billion translated into earnings of $11.09$11.98 per diluted share, upimproving 6%8% from 2023.the prior year.
We generated $9.3 billion of cash provided by operating activities, yielded free cash flow of $2.8$2.3 billion after reductions of $3.3$3.8 billion for cash used in investing activities and $3.2 billion in dividends paid. Both cashCash provided by operating activities andwas freepositively cash flow were higherimpacted by $384 million$0.3 billion due to paymentsthe inenactment 2023of relatedH.R.1 toand backthe wagesreinstatement forof agreements100% reachedbonus with our labor unions.depreciation.
•Safety – Our goal is to be an industry leader in safety, and weWe are committed to our goal of world-class safety and are continuously findingidentifying newareas waysin towhich we can enhance safety. In 2025,2026, we will continue toour focus remains on our four pillars of safety. Critical safety tasks will be reinforced. Training thatto engagesengage both new and experienced employees is fundamental to our success. Critical safety tasks will be reinforced and enhanced by adding critical-thinking scenarios to the classroom curriculum. We will continue using a comprehensive safety management approach utilizing technology, hazard identification and risk assessments, employee engagement, training, quality control, and targeted capital investments. In addition, we will continue to collect and utilize data with the goal of identifying and mitigating exposure to risk, detect rail defects, improve or close grade crossings, and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs (including risk assessment strategies), industry programs, and local community activities across the network. SafetyOur culture is paramountingrained with a safety-first mindset, critical to theour successsuccess, ofboth the railroadoperationally and deeplyfinancially, ingrained inand our culture, and thisfocus will not changedeviate in 2025.2026.
•Business Volumesvolumes – MacroeconomicWe expect macroeconomic uncertainties remain to persist in 20252026, thatand those uncertainties could have a material impact on our 20252026 financial and operating results. Current forecasts for 20252026 industrial production showis aforecasted slightto increasebe versusessentially 2024.flat with 2025, coupled with reduced expectations for housing starts and light vehicle sales. Lower international intermodal business, largely due to the resumption of historical trade patterns, is expected to negatively impact volumes. However, higher coal demand, from elevated natural gas prices and increased coal-fired electricity production, is expected to positively impact volumes. In addition, other factors, such as impositiongeopolitical ofinstability higher tariffs andor changes in domestictrade andpolicies foreign monetary policythat may affect economic activity and demand for rail transportation; natural gas prices, weather conditions, and demand for other energy sources may impact the coal market; crude oil prices and spreads may drive demand for petroleum products and drilling materials; available truck capacity could impact our intermodal business; and international trade agreements could promote or hinder trade. Lower coal demand, resulting from ongoing competitive energy dynamics and reduced coal-fired electricity production, and lower international intermodal business, due to the west coast volume surge in 2024, are expected to negatively impact volumes. Additionally, the way our customers are affected by and respond to the implementation of new tariffs may influence our volume levels and traffic flows. Fuel prices may continue to fluctuate in the current economic environment. As prices fluctuate, there will be a timing impact on earnings, as our fuel surcharge programs trail increases or decreases in fuel prices by approximately two months. Regardless of macroeconomic or other external factors, we will focus remain focused on operating a safesafe, railroadfluid, and efficient rail network while delivering the service we sold to our customers as well as effective asset utilization, cost control, and seekingcapitalizing on new business opportunities.
Freight revenues of $23.2 billion increased 1%2% year-over-yearfrom to $22.8 billion2024 driven by core pricing gains and a 3%1% increase in volumes and core pricing gains,volumes, partially offset by lower fuel surcharge revenues and negativetraffic mix of traffic (for example, a relative increase in internationalcoal intermodaland rock shipments, which have a lower ARC, combined with a decline in lumber shipments, which have a higher ARC). and lower fuel surcharge revenues. Volume increases were primarily driven by international intermodal andcoal, grain and grain productproducts, industrial chemicals and plastics, and rock shipments, partially offset by weaker demand for coalautomotive and rockenergy and specialized markets shipments.
Our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $2.6$2.3 billion and $3.0$2.6 billion in 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. Fuel surcharge revenues in 20242025 decreased $0.4 billion$218 million due to a 15% decrease inlower fuel prices and the lag impact of fluctuating fuel prices (it can generally take up to two months for changing fuel prices to affect fuel surcharge recoveries), partially offset by higher volumes.
In 2024,2025, other subsidiary revenues decreased compared to 20232024 primarilydue driven by a weaker demand for intermodal shipments at our subsidiary that brokers intermodal and transload logistics services andto the partial transfer of our commuter operations to Metra. Accessorial revenues decreased in 20242025 compared to 20232024 drivenas bya result of lower intermodal accessorialcontainer revenues becausedue ofto ouran intermodal equipment sale,sale and a one-time contract settlement, both of which occurred in 2024, partially offset by ahigher one-timeintermodal contractaccessorial settlement.revenues.
Bulk – Bulk includes shipments of grain and grain products, fertilizer, food and refrigerated, and coal and renewables. Freight revenues from bulk shipments decreasedincreased in 20242025 compared to 20232024 due to lower6% higher volumes and core pricing gains, partially offset by negative mix, from increased coal shipments, and lower fuel surcharge revenues,revenues. partiallyBulk offsetvolume by positive mix, from decreased coal shipments, and core pricing gains. Volumes declined 4%growth compared to 20232024 was driven by reducedincreased use of coal in electricity generation becausedue ofto lowhigher natural gas prices,prices coalcoupled firedwith plantbusiness capacity,wins, andin mildaddition winter weather, partially offset byto, strength in export grain to Mexico and severalsoybean othercrush grainproduction. products. Additionally, theThese volume declinesgains were partially offset by increased fertilizer shipments due to strong demand and a 2023 customer outage. Volumes for coal and renewables andreduced food and refrigeratedbeverage shipments were negatively impacted by outages and service challenges due to repeated snow events in Wyoming and flooding in California in the first quarter of 2023 positively impacting the year-over-year comparisons.shipments.
Industrial – Industrial includes shipments of industrial chemicals and plastics, metals and minerals, forest products, and energy and specialized markets. Freight revenues from industrial shipments increased in 20242025 versus 20232024 due to core pricing gains and positivehigher volumes, partially offset by a negative mix of traffictraffic, from decreased short haulincreased rock shipmentsand lower lumber shipments, and lower fuel surcharge revenues. Volumes increased petroleum1% shipments,compared to 2024 due to stronger demand for rock, plastics, and industrial chemicals shipments partially offset by lower fueliron surchargeore revenues(as a result of tariff uncertainties), petroleum, and lowerlumber volumes. Volumes decreased 1% compared to 2023 driven by lower demand for rock, due to weather, high inventories, and softness in Southern markets, and decreased sand shipments due to the use of local sources, partially offset by strength in petroleum, industrial chemicals, and plastics.carloads.
Premium – Premium includes shipments of finished automobiles, automotive parts, and merchandise in intermodal containers, both domestic and international. Freight revenues from premium shipments increaseddecreased in 2025 driven by higher volumes and core pricing gains, partially offset by lower fuel surcharge revenuesrevenues, negative business mix from reduced automotive shipments, and negativelower mix.volumes, Startingpartially inoffset theby thirdcore quarterpricing ofgains. 2024, international intermodal experiencedThe heavy demand due tofrom increased U.S. West Coast imports,imports acontinued resultinto the first half of freight shifting from the East Coast and Canadian ports2025 due to uncertainty related to labortrade negotiations,policies, drivingresulting in first half international intermodal volumes up over17%. 30%Traffic shifted back to historical trade patterns in the second half of the2025 yearand international intermodal volumes decreased 24% compared to the second half of 2023.2024, Inresulting addition,in 6% lower international intermodal volumes for 2025. Strong domestic intermodal volumes helped to offset the decline in international shipments as a result of business development efforts in domestic intermodal drove volume growth in 2024 compared to 2023.wins. Automotive shipments were flatdown 4% year-over-year asdue businessto developmenttariff winsuncertainties werein offsetthe byfirst markethalf weaknessof 2025 and unplannedreduced manufacturer production decreases.from softer consumer demand.
Mexico Businessbusiness – Freight revenues from each of our commodity groups includes revenues from shipments to and from Mexico, which amountedequated to $3.0$2.9 billion in 2024,2025, updown 8%1% compared to 2023,2024, driven by a 3%2% volumes increase and a 4% increasereduction in ARC.ARC Thepartially volume increases were drivenoffset by 2% higher volumes. Compared to 2024, intermodal and grain and grain productproducts shipmentsvolumes increased and finished vehicle shipments,were partially offset by lower automotiveauto parts and finished vehicle shipments.
Operating expenses increased $127 million, or 1%, in 2025 compared to 2024 driven by inflation, volume-related costs, acquisition-related expenses, and higher depreciation, partially offset by productivity and lower fuel prices. In addition, the year-over-year comparison was negatively impacted by a gain on the sale of intermodal equipment in 2024 and higher crew staffing agreement ratification charges in 2025 as we reached agreements in both years.
Operating expenses decreased $500 million, or 3%, in 2024 compared to 2023 driven by lower fuel prices, productivity, a gain on the sale of intermodal equipment in 2024, partially offset by inflation, volume-related costs, and higher depreciation. In addition, positively impacting the year-over-year comparison are lower labor agreement ratification charges as we reached agreements impacting crew staffing in both years, and lower weather-related costs from less impactful winter weather in the first quarter of 2024 compared to 2023.
Compensation and Benefitsbenefits – Compensation and benefits include wages, payroll taxes, health and welfare costs, pension costs, and incentive costs. In 2024,2025, expenses increasedwere 2%essentially flat compared to 20232024 due to wage inflation, whichincreased includes the impact of labor agreements to modernize work rules and improve availability,volumes, higher incentive compensation, and increased crew needs associated with labor agreements and increased volumes,agreements, partially offset by 4%3% lower employee levels. Train,Active train, engine, and yard (TE&Y) force levels weredecreased flat3% comparedin 2025 on 1% increased carloads due to 2023 as improved network fluidity allowed us to handle a 3% increase in volumes and the increased needs associated with labor agreements without increasing the size of that workforce.fluidity.
Purchased Servicesservices and Materialsmaterials – Expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers (including equipment maintenance and contract expenses incurred by our subsidiaries for external transportation services); materials used to maintain the Railroad’s lines, structures, and equipment; costs of operating facilities jointly used by UPRR and other railroads; transportation and lodging for train crew employees; trucking and contracting costs for intermodal containers; leased automobile maintenance expenses; and tools and supplies. Purchased services and materials decreasedincreased 4% in 20242025 compared to 20232024 driven by declinesinflation in(including tariff-related material expenses), acquisition-related expenses, and higher locomotive maintenance expense duewas topartially aoffset smaller active fleet asby productivity improvedand year-over-year,lower decreased volume-related drayage costexpenses incurred at one ofby our subsidiaries,subsidiaries. andThe comparison was also negatively impacted by a favorable contract settlement,settlement partiallyin offset by inflation and volume-related costs.2024.
Fuel – Fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment. Fuel expense decreased compared to 20232024 due to a 6% decrease in locomotive diesel fuel prices, whichdeclining averagedfrom an average of $2.64 per gallon (including taxes and transportation costs) in 2024 compared to $3.09$2.49 per gallon in 2023,2025, resulting in a $0.4$138 billionmillion decrease in expense (excluding any impact from decreasedincreased volumes year-over-year), and a 1% improvement to the fuel consumption rate in 2024 (computed as gallons of fuel consumed divided by gross ton-miles),. Gross-ton miles increased 3% in 2025 and partially offset bythe aimpact 1%of increaselower infuel grossprices ton-miles.and improved fuel consumption rate.
Equipment and Otherother Rentsrents – Equipment and other rents expense primarily includes rental expense that the Railroad pays for freight cars owned by other railroads or private companies; freight car, intermodal, and locomotive leases; and office and other rent expenses, offset by equity income from certain equity method investments. Equipment and other rents expense decreased 3%1% compared to 20232024 due to lower operating equipment lease expense, which included favorable contract settlements in 2025, and reduced car hire expense as favorable haul length and improved cycle times,times partially offset byinflation and costs associated with increased demand in commodities utilizing freight cars owned by othersothers. Higher other rental expense and inflation.lower equity income partially offset the favorable expense drivers.
Other – Other expenses include state and localproperty taxes; freight, equipment, and property damage; utilities; insurance; personal injury; environmental; employee travel; telephone and cellular; computer software; bad debt; and other general expenses. Other expenses decreasedincreased 8%4% in 2024 2025 compared to 2023 2024 driven by lowerthe personalnegative injurycomparison costs,from a 2024 gain on the sale of intermodal equipment, in addition to, higher personal injury costs, and aproperty 2023 write-off,taxes, partially offset by higherlower environmental and freight loss and damage and other casualty cost.costs.
Other Income,income, net – Other income decreasedincreased $279 million in 20242025 compared to 2023 2024 driven by a $107$295 million in higher real estate transactionincome, including $250 million in 2023industrial andpark lowerland incomesales. fromThe otherhigher real estate transactions,income was partially offset by interest received in 2024 from the IRS on refund claims. See Note 6 to the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8, for additional detail.
Interest Expenseexpense – Interest expense decreasedincreased 3% in 20242025 compared to 2023 2024 due to aan decreasedincreased weighted-average debt level of $31.6$32.1 billion in 2024 2025 from $33.2$31.6 billion in 2023.2024. TheIn addition, the effective interest rate wasof 4.1% in 2025 increased from 4.0% in both periods.2024.
Income Taxtax Expenseexpense – Income tax expense increaseddecreased in 2024 2025 compared to 20232024. driven by higherWhile pre-tax income was higher in 20242025, andthe higherincrease was more than offset by a $115 million reduction in deferred tax expense reductionsresulting infrom 2023,newly partiallyenacted offsetKansas bylegislation, along with the benefitfavorable impact of purchased federal tax credits induring 2024.the year. In 2024, the states of Louisiana and Arkansas enacted legislation to reduce their corporate income tax rates for future years resulting in a $34 million reduction of our deferred tax expense. In 2023, the states of Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, and Arkansas enacted legislation to reduce their corporate income tax rates for future years resulting in a $114 million reduction of our deferred tax expense. Our effective tax rates for 20242025 and 20232024 were 23.3%22.1% and 22.5%,23.3%, respectively.
Gross and Revenuerevenue Ton-Mileston-miles – Gross ton-miles are calculated by multiplying the weight of loaded and empty freight cars by the number of miles hauled. Revenue ton-miles are calculated by multiplying the weight of freight by the number of tariff miles. In 2024,2025, gross ton-miles increased 1%3% and revenue ton-miles decreasedincreased 1%,4% whileon 1% higher carloadings were up 3% year-over-year. Changes in commodity mix drove the year-over-year variances between gross ton-miles, revenue ton-miles, and carloads due to lowerhigher coal shipments, which are heavier, and increased international intermodal shipments that are lighter.heavier.
Freight Carcar Velocityvelocity – Freight car velocity measures the average daily miles per car on our network. The two key drivers of this metric are the speed of the train between terminals (average train speed) and the time a rail car spends at the terminals (average terminal dwell time). FreightCompared to 2024, freight car velocity increased 2%8% driven by record terminal dwelldwell, levels.which Thealso 2023improved metrics were negatively impacted by operational challenges caused by weather in the first quarter8%, and 3% higher average train crew shortages in some locations in the first half of 2023, positively impacting the year-over-year comparison.speeds.
Locomotive Productivityproductivity – Locomotive productivity is gross ton-miles per average daily locomotive horsepower. Locomotive productivity improved 5%3% in 20242025 compared to 2023 2024 driven by improved network fluidity and asset utilization despite maintaining a buffer in 2024 to flex the fleet size as we experienced and subsequently recovered from certain weather events and reacted to higher volume levels.utilization.
Train Lengthlength – Train length is the average maximum train length on a route measured in feet. Our train length increased 1%2% compared to 20232024 due to train length improvement initiatives and increases in international intermodal shipments, which generally move on longer trains, partially offset by declines in coal train length.length, coinciding with increased shipments.
Service Performanceperformance Indexindex (SPI) – SPI is a ratio of the service customers are currently receiving relative to the best monthly performance over the last three years. Measuring our performance relative to a historical benchmark demonstrates our focus on continuously improving service for our customers, and we believe it is a better indicator of service performance than the previously disclosed trip plan compliance. SPI does not replace the service commitments we have contractually agreed to with a small number of customers. SPI is calculated for intermodal and manifest products. Intermodal SPI improved 29 points,points atas thewe sameadjusted timeto shifting international volumeintermodal surged.customer demand during 2025. Manifest SPI improved 411 points in 2024 2025 compared to 2023.2024 while handling more volume.
Workforce Productivityproductivity – Workforce productivity is average daily car miles per employee. Workforce productivity improved 6%7% in 20242025 as average daily car miles increased 2%3% andwhile employees decreased 4%3% compared to 2023.2024. OurWe adequately aligned our active TE&Y workforce increased to support carload demand and increased crew needs associated with labor agreements that went into effect in the third quarter of 2023. In addition, we arewhile maintaining an adequate training pipeline to provide a capacity buffer to enable responsiveness in an ever-changing demand and operating environment.
Operating Ratioratio – Operating ratio is our operating expenses reflected as a percentage of operating revenues. Our operating ratio of 59.9%59.8% improved 2.40.1 points compared to 20232024 driven by productivity initiatives, core pricing gains,gains and theproductivity year-over-year impact from lower fuel prices,initiatives, partially offset by inflationthe impact of negative business mix, inflation, and otheracquisition-related costs.expenses. In addition, operating ratio year-over-year comparison was positivelynegatively impacted by 2024 contract settlements, a 2024 gain on the sale of intermodal equipment, and lowerhigher labor agreement ratification charges than in 2023.2025.
[1]Represents the hypothetical interest expense we would incur (using the incremental borrowing rate) if the property under our operating leases were owned or accounted for as finance leases.
Adjusted debt (total debt plus operating lease liabilities plus after-tax unfunded pension and OPEB (other post-retirement benefit) obligations) to adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and adjustments for other income and interest on present value of operating leases) is considered a non-GAAP financial measure by SEC Regulation G and Item 10 of SEC Regulation S-K and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner. We believe this measure is important to management and investors in evaluating the Company’s ability to sustain given debt levels (including leases) with the cash generated from operations. In addition, a comparable measure is used by rating agencies when reviewing the Company’s credit rating. Adjusted debt to adjusted EBITDA should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, other information provided in accordance with GAAP. The most comparable GAAP measure is debt to net income ratio. The tables above provide reconciliations from net income to adjusted EBITDA, debt to adjusted debt, and debt to net income to adjusted debt to adjusted EBITDA. At December 31, 2025, 2024, 2023, and 2022,2023, the incremental borrowing rate on operating leases was 4.0%, 3.8%, 3.6%, and 3.3%,3.6%, respectively. Pension and OPEB were funded at December 31, 2025, 2024, 2023, and 2022.2023.
During 2024,2025, we generated $9.3 billion of cash provided by operating activities, paid down $1.3$1.4 billion of long-term debt, paid $3.2 billion in dividends, and repurchased shares totaling $1.5$2.7 billion. We also announced the pending acquisition of Norfolk Southern described in Note 20 to the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8, and paused our share repurchase program. We have been, and we expect to continue to be, in compliance with our debt covenants.
Our principal sources of liquidity include cash and cash equivalents, our Receivables Facility, our revolving credit facility, as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets. On December 31, 2024, we had $1.0 billion of cash and cash equivalents, $2.0 billion of committed credit available under our revolving credit facility, and up to $800 million undrawn on the Receivables Facility. As of December 31, 2024, none of the revolving credit
Our principal sources of liquidity include cash and cash equivalents, our Receivables Facility, our revolving credit facility, as well as, the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets. On December 31, 2025, we had $1.3 billion of cash and cash equivalents, $250 million of short-term investments, $2.0 billion of committed credit available under our revolving credit facility, and up to $600 million undrawn on the Receivables Facility. As of December 31, 2025, none of the revolving credit facility was drawn, and we did not draw on our revolving credit facility at any time during 2024.2025. Our access to the Receivables Facility may be reduced or restricted if our bond ratings fall to certain levels below investment grade. If our bond rating were to deteriorate, it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity. Access to commercial paperpaper, as well asas, other capital market financing is dependent on market conditions. Deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to access capital markets as a source of liquidity. Access to liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability. We expect that we will continue to have access to liquidity through any or all of the following sources or activities: (a) increasing the utilization of our Receivables Facility, (b) issuing commercial paper, (c) entering into bank loans, outside of our revolving credit facility, or (iv) issuing bonds or other debt securities to public or private investors based on our assessment of the current condition of the credit markets. The Company’s $2.0 billion revolving credit facility is intended to support the issuance of commercial paper by UPC and also serves as an additional source of liquidity to fund short-term needs. The Company currently does not intend to makeborrow any borrowings underfrom this facility.
[d]Includes estimated other post-retirement,post-retirement medical,medical and life insurance payments,payments and payments made under the unfunded pension plan for the next ten years.
[e]Represents total obligations, including an interest component of $9 million.
Cash provided by operating activities increaseddecreased in 20242025 compared to 20232024 due primarily to $384 milliontiming of payments in 2023 related to backtaxing wages for agreements reached with our labor unionsauthorities and increasedpurchased nettax income.credits.
On July 4, 2025, H.R.1 was enacted that makes key elements of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanent, including provisions for 100% bonus depreciation on qualified property and fully expensing internally developed software, which has and will continue to favorably impact our cash provided by operating activities.
Cash flow conversion is defined as cash provided by operating activities less cash used in capital investments as a ratio of net income. Cash flow conversion rate is not considered a financial measure under GAAP by SEC Regulation G and Item 10 of SEC Regulation S-K and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner. We believe cash
Cash flow conversion is defined as cash provided by operating activities less cash used in capital investments as a ratio of net income. Cash flow conversion rate is not considered a financial measure under GAAP by SEC Regulation G and Item 10 of SEC Regulation S-K and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner. We believe cash flow conversion rate is important to management and investors in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financing. Cash flow conversion rate should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, cash provided by operating activities. The following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities (GAAP measure) to cash flow conversion rate (non-GAAP measure):
Cash used in investing activities in 20242025 decreasedincreased compared to 20232024 primarily driven by lesshigher capital investments and the purchase of short term investments, partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales, including a sale of intermodal equipment. Roughly half of the year-over-year decrease in capital investments is attributable to the 2023 purchase of a small trucking and transload operator and related real estate assets.sales.
The following table detaildetails cash capital investments for the years ended December 31:
See Note 20 to the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8, for information regarding the pending acquisition of Norfolk Southern.
Capital plan
Capital Plan – In 2025,2026, we expect our capital plan to be approximately $3.4$3.3 billion, consistent with 2024.billion. We plan to continue to make investments to support our growth strategy, improve the safety, resiliency, and operational efficiency of the network, harden our infrastructure, and replace older assets, including modernization of our locomotive fleet and acquiring freight cars to support replacement and growth opportunities. In addition, the plan includes investments in growth-related projects to drive more carloads to the network and enhance productivity. This includes siding construction and extension projects, terminal investments supporting our manifest network,network and invest in certainintermodal ramps to efficiently handle volumes from new and existing intermodalcustomers, customers.along with siding investments (extensions and new), and second mainline track projects. The capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments.
Cash used in financing activities increaseddecreased in 20242025 compared to 20232024 driven by an increase of debt issued and a decrease in debt repaid, partially offset by an increase in share repurchases and a decrease in debt issued, partially offset by a decrease in the repayment of commercial paper.repurchases.
See Note 14 to the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8, for a description of all our outstanding financing arrangements and significant new borrowings, and Note 18 to the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8, for a description of our share repurchase programs.programs, and Note 20 to the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8, for the pending acquisition of Norfolk Southern.
Interest Ratesrates – At both December 31, 2025, and 2024, we did not have variable-rate debt.
Market risk for fixed-rate debt is estimated as the potential increase in fair value resulting from a hypothetical 1% decrease in interest rates as of December 31, 2025, and 2024, and totals an increase of approximately $3.2 billion and $3.0 billion to the fair value of our debt at December 31, 2024.2025, and 2024, respectively. We estimated the fair values of our fixed-rate debt by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on quoted market prices and current borrowing rates.
Tax Ratesrates – Our deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured based on current tax law. Future tax legislation, such as a change in the federal corporate tax rate, could have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. For example, as of December 31, 2025, a future, permanent 1% increase in our federal income tax rate would increase our deferred tax liability by approximately $525$550 million. Similarly, a future, permanent 1% decrease in our federal income tax rate would decrease our deferred tax liability by approximately $550 million. As of December 31, 2024, a permanent 1% increase or decrease in our federal income tax rate would have correspondingly increased or decreased our deferred tax liability by approximately $525 million.million, respectively.
Pending Acquisition – See Note 20 to the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8, and the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of July 28, 2025, by and among the Company, Ruby Merger Sub 1 Corporation, Ruby Merger Sub 2 LLC, and Norfolk Southern, which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 29, 2025.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
For a discussion of our potential risks and uncertainties, see the risk factors disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. These risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations (including revenues and profitability), and/or stock price. Our business also could be affected by risks that we are not presently aware of or that we currently consider immaterial to our operations.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
Operating expenses increasedsee in full comparison3%13% compared to thefirstsecond quarter of 2025 primarily due toinflation,higher fuel prices, as we experienced a 60% increase in the average price per gallon compared to last year as a result of supply chain pressures. Inflation, volume-related costs, acquisition-related expenses (see Note1718 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Item 1), and higherdepreciation,depreciation also drove increased operating expenses, which were partially offset by a favorable comparison for a $55 million 2025 crew staffing agreement ratification charge and productivity. Operating income increased4%9% to$2.5$2.8billion,billionandreflecting top-line growth, while the operating ratio of60.5%59.7%improveddeteriorated0.20.7points,pointsreflectingprimarilytop-lineresultinggrowthfromandtheproductivityimpactgainsof higher fuel prices compared to thefirstsecond quarter of 2025.
“Purchased services and materials – Expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers (including equipment maintenance and contract expense incurred by our subsidiaries for external transportation services); materials used to maintain the Railroad’s lines, structures, and equipment; costs of operating facilities jointly used by UPRR and other railroads; transportation and lodging for train crew employees; trucking and contracting costs for intermodal containers; leased automobile maintenance expense; …”see in full comparison
“Purchased services and materials – Expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers (including equipment maintenance and contract expense incurred by our subsidiaries for external transportation services); materials used to maintain the Railroad’s lines, structures, and equipment; costs of operating facilities jointly used by UPRR and other railroads; transportation and lodging for train crew employees; trucking and contracting costs for intermodal containers; leased automobile maintenance expense; …”see in full comparison
Interest expense – Interest expense decreasedsee in full comparisonslightlyininboth thefirstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to 2025 as a result of lower weighted-average debtlevels.levels, partially offset by higher effective interest rates. The effective interest rate was4.1%4.2% for bothperiods.periods in 2026 compared to 4.1% for the same periods in 2025. The weighted-average debt levels were$31.4$30.5 billion and$31.9$32.8 billion forfirstthe second quarter of 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $31.0 billion and $32.3 billion for the six month period of 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Operating ratio – Operating ratio is our operating expenses reflected as a percentage of operating revenues. For thesee in full comparisonfirstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026, our operating ratio of60.5% improved 0.2 points driven by productivity initiatives59.7% and 60.1% deteriorated 0.7 and 0.3 points, respectively, as the impact of higher fuel prices, inflation, and acquisition-related expenses more than offset core pricing gains,partiallyproductivityoffset by inflationinitiatives, andacquisition-relatedtheexpenses.positive comparison from the $55 million crew staffing agreement ratification charge in 2025.
[1]The trailing twelve months income statement information endedsee in full comparisonMarchJune31,30, 2026, is recalculated by taking the twelve months ended December 31, 2025, subtracting thethreesix months endedMarchJune31,30, 2025, and adding thethreesix months endedMarchJune31,30, 2026.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (44)
Three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to
three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
The preparation of these financial statements requires estimation and judgment that affect the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. If these estimates differ materially from actual results, the impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements may be material. Our critical accounting estimates are available in Item 7 of our 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K. During the first threesix months of 2026, there have not been any significant changes with respect to our critical accounting estimates.
The Company reported earnings of $2.87$3.36 per diluted share on net income of $1.7$2.0 billion and an operating ratio of 60.5%59.7% in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to earnings of $2.70$3.15 per diluted share on net income of $1.6$1.9 billion and an operating ratio of 60.7%59.0% in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. Freight revenues increased 4%12% in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to the same period in 2025 as core pricing gains, higher fuel surcharge revenues, 2% volume growth, and businesscore mixpricing gains more than offset the impact of unfavorable business mix (from higher domestic intermodal carloads). Second quarter of 2026 volume growth was attributable to a 1%19% reduction in volume. Higher carloadsincrease in domestic intermodal,intermodal coal,combined grain,with higher grain and industrialgrain chemicalsproducts and plastics werecarloads, moreoffsetting thanthe offsetimpact byof lower international intermodal carloads and coal carloads, which declined 28%14% inand 17%, respectively, compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2026, and fewer automotive shipments.2025.
Our second quarter of 2026 key operating metrics reflect the continuation of solid operational performance and network fluidity, improving many key measures from 2025. Freight car velocity increased 5% and terminal dwell improved 7%. We realigned operational resources to meet changing customer demands within the bulk business group as demand for export grain remained high while coal demand decreased. We leveraged capacity improvements to handle increased intermodal shipments, improving our system train length 2%. Workforce productivity improved 5% and locomotive productivity improved 1%, demonstrating efficient asset utilization in a strengthening demand environment. Both service performance index measures were 95% as we measured ourselves relative to our highest performance levels from the last three years.
Building on solid performance levels throughout 2025, our rail network remained fluid, while improving service levels and operational execution, to achieve best-ever first quarter key operating metric results. Freight car velocity increased 9% and terminal dwell improved 11%. We efficiently aligned operational resources to meet changing customer demands to more bulk and manifest carloads, while increasing train length 3%, despite lower intermodal carloads. Workforce productivity improved 7% and locomotive productivity improved 6% as we optimized network resources while improving both service performance index measures.
Operating expenses increased 3%13% compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025 primarily due to inflation, higher fuel prices, as we experienced a 60% increase in the average price per gallon compared to last year as a result of supply chain pressures. Inflation, volume-related costs, acquisition-related expenses (see Note 1718 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Item 1), and higher depreciation,depreciation also drove increased operating expenses, which were partially offset by a favorable comparison for a $55 million 2025 crew staffing agreement ratification charge and productivity. Operating income increased 4%9% to $2.5$2.8 billion,billion andreflecting top-line growth, while the operating ratio of 60.5%59.7% improveddeteriorated 0.20.7 points,points reflectingprimarily top-lineresulting growthfrom andthe productivityimpact gainsof higher fuel prices compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025.
Freight revenues increased 4% on 1% lower carloads12% in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to the same period in 2025 driven by higher fuel surcharge revenues, 2% carload growth, and core pricing gains, higherwhich fuel surcharge revenue, andoffset a moreslightly favorableunfavorable business mix (decreasesfrom an increase in shipments with lower ARC, such as internationaldomestic intermodal). Higher carloads inIncreased domestic intermodal, coal,grain grain,and grain products, and plastics shipments were partially reduced by lower international intermodal and coal carloads. Year-to-date 2026 freight revenues increased 8% compared to 2025 due to higher fuel surcharge revenues, core pricing gains, 1% volume growth, and slightly favorable business mix. Higher domestic intermodal, grain and grain products, and industrial chemicals and plastics shipments were more than offset by lower international intermodal carloads and automotive shipments.
Each of our commodity groups includes revenues from fuel surcharges. Freight revenues from fuel surcharge programs increased to $608$1.0 millionbillion in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to $565$569 million in the same period of 2025 due to higher fuel prices,prices whichand werehigher volume, partially offset by the fuel price lag impact (it generally takes up to two months for changing fuel prices to affect fuel surcharge recoveries) and lower volumes.impact.
Other subsidiary revenues decreasedincreased in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to 2025 primarily driven by the transfer of commuter operationsdue to Metra, lowerhigher demand for auto part shipments at our subsidiary that brokers intermodal and transload logistics services, andpartially offset by lower revenues from the sale of a portion of revenue-generating assets in late 2025 from our technology subsidiary. Additionally, other subsidiary revenues were negatively impacted in the year-to-date period from the transfer of commuter operations to Metra. Accessorial revenues increased in the firstsecond quarter and year-to-date 2026 compared to 2025 driven by increasedhigher storagecontainer, intermodal accessorial, and intermodal accessorialdemurrage revenues.
Bulk – Bulk includes shipments of grain and grain products, fertilizer, food and refrigerated, and coal and renewables. Freight revenues from bulk shipments increased 7% in the second quarter on 1% fewer carloads as higher fuel surcharge revenues, core pricing gains, and business mix (from lower coal shipments) more than offset the volume decline. Decreased coal shipments from lower natural gas prices, milder weather, and mine maintenance and outages in the second quarter of 2026, more than offset increased export grain and continued growth in renewable fuels and associated feedstock shipments. For the year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to 2025, freight revenues from bulk shipments increased 9% due to volume growth of 5% from increased export grain shipments, higher fuel surcharge revenues, and core pricing gains, partially offset by business mix (from lower food and refrigerated shipments).
Bulk – Bulk includes shipments of grain and grain products, fertilizer, food and refrigerated, and coal and renewables. Freight revenues from bulk shipments increased 10% in the first quarter of 2026 compared to 2025 due to 12% volume growth, core pricing gains, and higher fuel surcharge revenues, partially offset by business mix (from increased coal shipments). Bulk carload growth was driven by increased coal shipments from continued higher coal usage in electricity generation due to elevated natural gas prices combined with business wins, and also driven by increased export grain shipments, partially offset by lower food and refrigerated carloads.
Industrial – Industrial includes shipments of industrial chemicals and plastics, metals and minerals, forest products, and energy and specialized markets. Freight revenues from industrial shipments increased 5%8% in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to 20252025, respectively, due to increasedhigher volumes,fuel surcharge revenues, core pricing gains, and higher volume, partially offset by business mix (from higher plastics and lower soda ash shipments). Higher volume, core pricing gains, and higher fuel surcharge revenues, partially offset by business mixmix, (fromcontributed higherto rockthe shipments7% increase in industrial freight revenues year-to-date 2026. Industrial carloads improved 3% and lower lumber shipments). The 4% quarterlyin carloadthe improvementsecond wasquarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to 2025, respectively, driven by increased demand for industrial chemicals and plastics and construction project-related materials coupled with business development efforts, which morewas thanpartially offset by reduced shipmentssoda fromash continuedexport weak lumber demand.shipments.
Premium – Premium includes shipments of finished automobiles, automotive parts, and merchandise in intermodal containers, both domestic and international. Premium freight revenues decreasedincreased 5%21% in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to 2025 driven by 9%higher fuel surcharge revenues, 4% higher volume, core pricing gains, and business mix (from lower volumes,international intermodal shipments). Second quarter of 2026 intermodal volume increased 4% driven by strong domestic intermodal growth, which was up 19% in the quarter due to business development and reduced truck market capacity, offsetting lower international intermodal carloads. In addition, automotive shipments were partiallyessentially unchanged in the second quarter of 2026 as higher shipments of finished vehicles from business development efforts were offset by lower auto parts shipments. For the year-to-date period of 2026 compared to 2025, premium freight revenues increased 7% on 3% lower volume as higher fuel surcharge revenues, core pricing gains, and business mix (from reducedlower international intermodal shipments). Firstmore quarterthan ofoffset the volume decline. Year-to-date 2026 intermodal volumesvolume weredecreased down3% 9%compared to 2025 driven by a 28%21% reduction in international intermodal carloads as a result of elevated U.S. West Coast imports in the first quarterhalf of 20252025, thatwhich didmore not recur, partiallythan offset by continued strong domestic intermodal growth. Automotive shipments decreased 6%3% in the firstyear-to-date quarterperiods of 2026 compared to 2025 due to lower production as a result of weaker finished vehicle demand.
Mexico business – Freight revenues from each of our commodity groups includes revenues from shipments to and from Mexico, which increased 1%10% to $729$828 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and 6% to $1.6 billion year-to-date compared to 2025 driven by 3%volume growth of 5% and 4%, respectively, higher fuel surcharge revenues, and core pricing gains. For the second quarter, volume growth duewas attributable to increased intermodal, finished vehicles, and grain products shipments, partially offset by lower beverage, steel,petroleum and automotivegrain shipments. Lower auto parts and beverage shipments also impacted the year-to-date 2026 period.
Operating expenses increased 3%13% and 8%, respectively, compared to the firstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2025 due to inflation, higher fuel prices, inflation, volume-related costs, acquisition-related expenses (see Note 1718 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Item 1), and higher depreciation expense. These increases were partially offset by productivity.productivity and positively impacted by a $55 million crew staffing agreement ratification charge in 2025.
Compensation and benefits – Compensation and benefits include wages, payroll taxes, health and welfare costs, pension costs, and incentive costs. For the first quarter of 2026, compensationCompensation and benefits expense increaseddecreased 1% for the second quarter and was essentially unchanged in the first six months of 2026 compared to 2025 due toas wage inflation and higher incentive compensation costs,costs which was partiallywere offset by lower expense from a $55 million 2025 crew staffing agreement ratification charge and 3% and 4%, respectively, lower employee levels.
Purchased services and materials – Expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers (including equipment maintenance and contract expense incurred by our subsidiaries for external transportation services); materials used to maintain the Railroad’s lines, structures, and equipment; costs of operating facilities jointly used by UPRR and other railroads; transportation and lodging for train crew employees; trucking and contracting costs for intermodal containers; leased automobile maintenance expense; and tools and supplies. Purchased services and materials increased 7% in the first quarter of 2026 compared to 2025 driven by acquisition-related expenses and inflation offset by lower costs associated with improved locomotive productivity.
Depreciation – The majority of depreciation expense relates to road property, including rail, ties, ballast, and other track material. Depreciation expense increased 4% for the first quarter of 2026 compared to 2025 driven by a higher depreciable asset base.
Fuel – Fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment. Fuel expense increased in both the firstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to the same periodperiods in 2025 driven by an increase inhigher locomotive diesel fuel prices and increased gross ton-miles, partially offset by 4% improvement in the fuel consumption rate (computed as gallons of fuel consumed divided by gross ton-miles in thousands)., which improved 1% and 2%, respectively. Locomotive diesel fuel prices averaged $2.69$3.86 and $2.51$3.27 per gallon (including taxes and transportation costs) in the firstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to $2.42 and 2025,$2.46 respectively.per gallon in the corresponding periods of 2025.
Purchased services and materials – Expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers (including equipment maintenance and contract expense incurred by our subsidiaries for external transportation services); materials used to maintain the Railroad’s lines, structures, and equipment; costs of operating facilities jointly used by UPRR and other railroads; transportation and lodging for train crew employees; trucking and contracting costs for intermodal containers; leased automobile maintenance expense; and tools and supplies. Purchased services and materials increased 10% and 9%, respectively, in the second quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to 2025 driven by acquisition-related expenses, inflation, and increased intermodal and subsidiary volume-related costs.
Depreciation – The majority of depreciation expense relates to road property, including rail, ties, ballast, and other track material. Depreciation expense increased 4% for both the second quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to 2025 driven by a higher depreciable asset base.
Equipment and other rents – Equipment and other rents expense primarily includes rental expense that the Railroad pays for freight cars owned by other railroads or private companies; freight car, intermodal, and locomotive leases; and office and other rent expense, offset by equity income from certain equity method investments. Equipment and other rents expense decreased 9%7% and 8%, respectively, in the firstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to 2025 driven by lower operating equipment lease expense and lower car hire expense attributable toas improved cycle times andmore lower operating equipment lease expense, partiallythan offset by lower equity income. Additionally, increased demand in business (primarily intermodal and construction project-related materials) utilizing freight cars owned by others offset a portion of the second quarter 2026 car hire expense decline.
Other – Other expense includes state and local taxes; freight, equipment, and property damage; utilities; insurance; personal injury; environmental remediation; employee travel; telephone and cellular; computer software; bad debt; and other general expenses. Other expense increased 1%13% and 7%, respectively, in the firstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to 2025 driven by higher casualty costs from damaged freight and equipment in addition to increased environmental costs, other general expenses, and property damagetaxes. costs,The propertyyear-to-date taxes,2026 andperiod badwas debtalso expense. These increases are partially offsetimpacted by lower personal injury costs.costs, which were partially offset by higher bad debt expense.
Other income, net – Other income increaseddecreased in both the firstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to 2025 driven by higherlower real estate income. See Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Item 1, for additional detail.
Interest expense – Interest expense decreased slightlyin inboth the firstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to 2025 as a result of lower weighted-average debt levels.levels, partially offset by higher effective interest rates. The effective interest rate was 4.1%4.2% for both periods.periods in 2026 compared to 4.1% for the same periods in 2025. The weighted-average debt levels were $31.4$30.5 billion and $31.9$32.8 billion for firstthe second quarter of 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $31.0 billion and $32.3 billion for the six month period of 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Income tax expense – Income tax expense increased 29% and 16%, respectively, in the second quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to 2025. The increase in income tax expense in both periods is driven by the impact of $115 million in lower deferred tax expense in the second quarter of 2025 from legislation enacted in the state of Kansas to modify the corporate income tax apportionment and higher pre-tax income, partially offset by the second quarter of 2026 changes in state tax laws and other state tax matters resulting in a $27 million reduction of our deferred tax expense. Our effective tax rates were 22.0% and 18.9% for the second quarter of 2026 and 2025, respectively, and 22.8% and 21.1% for the six month period of 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Income tax expense – Income tax expense increased 5% in the first quarter of 2026 compared to 2025 due to higher pre-tax income. Our effective tax rates were 23.7% and 23.6% for the first quarter of 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Gross and revenue ton-miles – Gross ton-miles are calculated by multiplying the weight of loaded and empty freight cars by the number of miles hauled. Revenue ton-miles are calculated by multiplying the weight of freight by the number of rate miles. Gross ton-miles and revenue ton-miles both increased 4% and 7%, respectively,2% in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to 2025, consistent with the increase in carloads over the same time period. For the year-to-date period of 2026 compared to 2025, gross ton-miles increased 3% and revenue ton-miles increased 5% while corresponding carloads decreasedincreased 1%. Changes in business mix drove theThe variances betweenin gross ton-miles, revenue ton-miles, and carloads was driven by changes in business mix due to higher coal and grain shipments that are generally heavier and decreased intermodal shipments that are generally lighter.
Freight car velocity – Freight car velocity measures the average daily miles per car on our network. The two key drivers of this metric are the speed of the train between terminals (average train speed) and the time a rail car spends at the terminals (average terminal dwell time). Freight car velocity increased 9%5% and 7%, respectively, in the firstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to 2025 driven by an 11%a decrease in terminal dwell andcombined anwith 8%train speed improvement in trainboth speed.periods.
Locomotive productivity – Locomotive productivity is gross ton-miles per average daily locomotive horsepower available. Locomotive productivity increased 6%1% and 4%, respectively, in the firstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026, driven by improvedcontinued network fluidity and asset utilization as the average active fleet decreased 4%1% and 3%, respectively, even as gross ton-miles increased.increased during both periods.
Train length – Train length is the average maximum train length on a route measured in feet. Even with lower international intermodal volumes, trainTrain length increased 3%2% in the firstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to 2025 due to train length improvement initiatives, specifically driven by proprietary technology and mainline capacity investments.investments and optimization of the transportation plan, which enabled us to handle more carloads.
Service performance index (SPI) – SPI is a ratio of the service customers are currently receiving relative to the best monthly performance over the last three years. Measuring our performance relative to a historical benchmark demonstrates our focus on continuously improving service for our customers. Our SPI is calculated for intermodal and manifest products. Intermodal SPI improveddeclined 4 points and was unchanged, respectively, in the firstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to 2025. Manifest SPI improveddeclined 52 points while improving 1 point, respectively, in the firstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to 2025. The improvements inlower SPI areresults were driven by thecomparison continuedagainst network fluidity as we adjusted to changing customer demand fora higher grainbenchmark shipments, reduced intermodal shipments, and continued strong coal carloads.standard.
Workforce productivity – Workforce productivity is average daily car miles per employee. Workforce productivity improved 7%5% and 6%, respectively, in the firstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026 compared to 2025,2025. asIncreased average daily car milesmiles, increasedwhich grew 1% whilein each period, combined with 3% and 4% lower employee levels declinedin 5%the comparedsecond quarter and year-to-date periods, respectively, drove the improvement. Demonstrating our commitment to 2025.meet Wecustomer demands while maintaining operational fluidity, we continually align our active train, engine, and yard (TE&Y) workforce to meet customer demands in a dynamic economic environment, while maintaining operational fluidity. As a result, our active TE&Y decreased 4% during the first quarter of 2026 on a 1% reduction in carload levels compared to the same period in 2025.workforce.
Operating ratio – Operating ratio is our operating expenses reflected as a percentage of operating revenues. For the firstsecond quarter and year-to-date periods of 2026, our operating ratio of 60.5% improved 0.2 points driven by productivity initiatives59.7% and 60.1% deteriorated 0.7 and 0.3 points, respectively, as the impact of higher fuel prices, inflation, and acquisition-related expenses more than offset core pricing gains, partiallyproductivity offset by inflationinitiatives, and acquisition-relatedthe expenses.positive comparison from the $55 million crew staffing agreement ratification charge in 2025.
[1]The trailing twelve months income statement information ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, is recalculated by taking the twelve months ended December 31, 2025, subtracting the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, and adding the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
Adjusted debt (total debt plus operating lease liabilities plus after-tax unfunded pension and OPEB (other post-retirement benefit) obligations) to adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and adjustments for other income and interest on present value of operating leases) is considered a non-GAAP financial measure by SEC Regulation G and Item 10(e) of SEC Regulation S-K and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner. We believe this measure is important to management and investors in evaluating the Company’s ability to sustain given debt levels (including leases) with the cash generated from operations. In addition, a comparable measure is used by rating agencies when reviewing the Company’s credit rating. Adjusted debt to adjusted EBITDA should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, other information provided in accordance with GAAP. The most comparable GAAP measure is debt to net income ratio. The tables above provide reconciliations from net income to adjusted EBITDA, debt to adjusted debt, and debt to net income to adjusted debt to adjusted EBITDA. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and December 31, 2025, the incremental borrowing rate on operating leases was 4.1% and 4.0%, respectively. Pension and OPEB were funded at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and December 31, 2025.
Cash provided by operating activities increased 10%21% in the first threesix months of 2026 compared to the same period of 2025 driven by lower income taxes paid and higher net income.
Cash used in investing activities increased 5%12% in the first threesix months of 2026 compared to the same period of 2025 driven by anthe increasenet inpurchases earlyand leasematurities buyouts.of short-term investments.
[c]Weather-related damages for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, are immaterial.
Cash used in financing activities increased 17% in the first threesix months of 2026 compared to the same period of 2025 driven by a decrease in debt issued and increase in debt repaid, partially offset by the pause of our share repurchases as part of the pending acquisition of Norfolk Southern.
During the firstsix quartermonths ofended June 30, 2026, we generated $2.4$5.5 billion of cash provided by operating activities and paid our quarterly dividend.dividends. In the third quarter of 2025, we announced the pending acquisition of Norfolk Southern described in Note 1718 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Item 1, and paused our share repurchases. On MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $735$1.6 millionbillion of cash and cash equivalents, $300$500 million of short-term investments, $2.0 billion of credit available under our revolving credit facility, and up to $600 million undrawn on the Receivables Facility. We have been, and we expect to continue to be, in compliance with our debt covenants.
As described in the notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and as referenced in the table below, we have contractual obligations that may affect our financial condition.condition, including commitments related to the pending acquisition of Norfolk Southern described in Note 18 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Item 1. Based on our assessment of the underlying provisions and circumstances of our contractual obligations, other than the risks that we and other similarly situated companies face with respect to the condition of the capital markets, as of the date of this filing, there is no known trend, demand, commitment, event, or uncertainty that is reasonably likely to occur that would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. In addition, our commercial obligations, financings, and commitments described below are customary transactions that are like those of other comparable corporations, particularly within the transportation industry.
The following table identifies material contractual obligations as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026:
UNP insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Form 4 filings since 2026-04-11: 0 open-market purchases and 4 open-market sales (about $8.8M), across 38 filings with stock transactions. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-10 | Powers Carrie J |
Grant/award | 6 | $285.78 | $1.6K |
| 2026-09-10 | Conlin Christina B |
Grant/award | 2 | $285.78 | $634 |
| 2026-09-10 | Rocker Kenyatta G |
Grant/award | 3 | $285.78 | $743 |
| 2026-09-10 | Jalali Rahul |
Grant/award | 5 | $285.78 | $1.5K |
| 2026-09-10 | Hamann Jennifer L |
Grant/award | 7 | $285.78 | $2.1K |
| 2026-09-04 | Rocker Kenyatta G |
Gift | 431 | — | — |
| 2026-08-10 | Conlin Christina B |
Grant/award | 2 | $292.24 | $634 |
| 2026-08-10 | Rocker Kenyatta G |
Grant/award | 3 | $292.24 | $745 |
| 2026-08-10 | Powers Carrie J |
Grant/award | 5 | $292.24 | $1.6K |
| 2026-08-10 | Hamann Jennifer L |
Grant/award | 8 | $292.24 | $2.3K |
| 2026-08-10 | Jalali Rahul |
Grant/award | 8 | $292.24 | $2.4K |
| 2026-07-10 | Rocker Kenyatta G |
Grant/award | 5 | $286.96 | $1.4K |
| 2026-07-10 | Rocker Kenyatta G |
Grant/award | 3 | $286.96 | $743 |
| 2026-07-10 | Powers Carrie J |
Grant/award | 6 | $286.96 | $1.6K |
| 2026-07-10 | Jalali Rahul |
Grant/award | 8 | $286.96 | $2.4K |
| 2026-07-10 | Hamann Jennifer L |
Grant/award | 8 | $286.96 | $2.3K |
| 2026-07-10 | Conlin Christina B |
Grant/award | 2 | $286.96 | $634 |
| 2026-06-10 | Powers Carrie J |
Grant/award | 6 | $267.03 | $1.6K |
| 2026-06-10 | Rocker Kenyatta G |
Grant/award | 3 | $267.03 | $745 |
| 2026-06-10 | Rocker Kenyatta G |
Grant/award | 13 | $267.03 | $3.5K |
| 2026-06-10 | Jalali Rahul |
Grant/award | 9 | $267.03 | $2.4K |
| 2026-06-10 | Hamann Jennifer L |
Grant/award | 9 | $267.03 | $2.3K |
| 2026-06-10 | Gehringer Eric J |
Grant/award | 13 | $267.03 | $3.5K |
| 2026-06-10 | Conlin Christina B |
Grant/award | 7 | $267.03 | $1.9K |
| 2026-06-03 | Gehringer Eric J |
Open-market sale | 2,991 | $263.96 | $789.5K |
| 2026-05-10 | Rocker Kenyatta G |
Grant/award | 3 | $264.65 | $744 |
| 2026-05-10 | Rocker Kenyatta G |
Grant/award | 13 | $264.65 | $3.5K |
| 2026-05-10 | Powers Carrie J |
Grant/award | 6 | $264.65 | $1.6K |
| 2026-05-10 | Jalali Rahul |
Grant/award | 9 | $264.65 | $2.4K |
| 2026-05-10 | Hamann Jennifer L |
Grant/award | 9 | $264.65 | $2.3K |
| 2026-05-10 | Gehringer Eric J |
Grant/award | 14 | $264.65 | $3.8K |
| 2026-05-10 | Conlin Christina B |
Grant/award | 7 | $264.65 | $1.9K |
| 2026-04-24 | Hamann Jennifer L |
Open-market sale | 2,000 | $274.70 | $549.4K |
| 2026-04-24 | Rocker Kenyatta G |
Option exercise | 15,531 | $186.11 | $2.9M |
| 2026-04-24 | Rocker Kenyatta G |
Open-market sale | 15,531 | $271.76 | $4.2M |
| 2026-04-24 | Rocker Kenyatta G |
Option exercise | 11,856 | $161.57 | $1.9M |
| 2026-04-24 | Rocker Kenyatta G |
Open-market sale | 11,856 | $271.76 | $3.2M |
| 2026-04-10 | Hamann Jennifer L |
Grant/award | 9 | $250.51 | $2.3K |
| 2026-04-10 | Rocker Kenyatta G |
Grant/award | 3 | $250.51 | $744 |
| 2026-04-10 | Rocker Kenyatta G |
Grant/award | 14 | $250.51 | $3.5K |
| 2026-04-10 | Powers Carrie J |
Grant/award | 6 | $250.51 | $1.6K |
| 2026-04-10 | Jalali Rahul |
Grant/award | 10 | $250.51 | $2.4K |
| 2026-04-10 | Gehringer Eric J |
Grant/award | 15 | $250.51 | $3.8K |
| 2026-04-10 | Conlin Christina B |
Grant/award | 8 | $250.51 | $1.9K |
| 2026-04-10 | Vena Vincenzo J |
Grant/award | 12 | $250.51 | $3.0K |
Well-known investors holding UNP (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harris Associates (Oakmark Funds) | 2026-06-30 | 3,844,522 | $1.0B | 1.39% | Added 2% |
| Viking Global Investors (Andreas Halvorsen) | 2026-06-30 | 2,047,332 | $556.9M | 1.59% | New position |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 1,254,083 | $341.1M | 0.26% | Added 14% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 931,024 | $253.2M | 0.39% | Added 237% |
| PRIMECAP Management | 2026-06-30 | 775,740 | $211.0M | 0.12% | Reduced 6% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 532,393 | $144.8M | 0.08% | Added 47% |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2026-06-30 | 514,266 | $139.9M | 0.57% | Reduced 3% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 432,057 | $116.4M | 0.04% | Reduced 25% |
| Third Point (Dan Loeb) | 2026-06-30 | 350,000 | $95.2M | 2.05% | Added 250% |
| Dodge & Cox | 2026-06-30 | 260,902 | $71.0M | 0.04% | No change |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 221,100 | $60.1M | 0.08% | Added 948% |
| Markel Group (Tom Gayner) | 2026-06-30 | 161,028 | $43.8M | 0.33% | Added 7% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 57,811 | $15.7M | 0.01% | Reduced 66% |
| Gotham Asset Management (Joel Greenblatt) | 2026-06-30 | 42,527 | $11.6M | 0.03% | Reduced 19% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 30,907 | $8.4M | 0.01% | Reduced 12% |
| Gardner Russo & Quinn (Tom Russo) | 2026-06-30 | 25,841 | $7.0M | 0.08% | Reduced 7% |
| Tweedy, Browne | 2026-06-30 | 19,185 | $5.2M | 0.4% | No change |
| Baupost Group (Seth Klarman) | 2026-06-30 | 1,185,395 | $322.4K | 5.95% | Reduced 23% |