Companies › UTMD

UTMD 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Utah Medical Products Inc. · Nasdaq · Surgical & Medical Instruments & Apparatus · CIK 706698 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Utah Medical Products Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

7 / 1risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
0new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-03-27 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-03-26 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

7new paragraphs
1removed paragraphs
14reworded paragraphs
1,004 → 1,062words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Reworded topics: tariff

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The Company’s reliance on third party distributors in some geographical markets can result in less predictable revenues. UTMD’s distributors have varying expertise in marketing and selling specialty medical devices. They also sell other devices that may result in less focus on the Company’s products. In some countries, notably China, Pakistan and India not subject to similarly rigorous standards, a distributor of UTMD’s products may eventually become a competitor with a cheaper but lower quality version of UTMD’s devices. In addition, unpredictable geopolitical relationships, such as in the indiscriminate deployment of tariffs, can eliminate an OUS third party’s ability to market UTMD’s devices within its country.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: tariff

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

TradeGovernment geopolitical policies which elicit reciprocal actions, including duties, trade restrictions and /or tariffs resulting from changing government geopolitical trade policiestariffs, have the potential to disrupt UTMD’s supply chain and/or significantly affect costs.
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Fluctuations in foreign currenciescurrency exchange (FX) rates relative to the USD can result in significant differences in period-to-period financial results:USD.
see in full comparison
Removed text
“The Company’s reliance on third party distributors in some markets may result in less predictable revenues:”
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

LegislativePotential orgovernment executive order healthcare interference in the United Statesinvolvement renders the U.S. medical device marketplace unpredictable. A fully government-run healthcare system would likely eliminate healthcare consumer choice as well as commercial incentives for innovation.
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The Company’s value-added approach may not be successful in the future. As the level of complexity and uncertainty in the medical device industry increases, evidenced, for example, by the unpredictable and overly cumbersome regulatory environment, the Company’s views of the future and product/ market strategy may not yield financial results consistent with the past.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (22)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Added

Legislative or executive order healthcare interference in the United States.

Reworded

LegislativePotential orgovernment executive order healthcare interference in the United Statesinvolvement renders the U.S. medical device marketplace unpredictable. A fully government-run healthcare system would likely eliminate healthcare consumer choice as well as commercial incentives for innovation.

Added

Increasing regulatory burdens, including premarketing approval delays.

Reworded

IncreasingRegulatory regulatory burdens, including premarketing approval delays,burdens may result in significant loss of revenue, unpredictable costs and loss of management focus on developing and marketing products that improve the quality of healthcare:healthcare.

Added

Group purchasing organizations (GPOs) in the U.S.

Reworded

Group Purchasing Organizations (GPOs) in the U.S. add non-productive costs, weaken the Company’s marketing and sales efforts and cause lower revenues by restricting access:access.

Reworded

GPOs, theoretically acting as bargaining agents for member hospitals, but actually collecting revenues from the companies that they are negotiating with, have made a concerted effort to turn medical devices that convey special patient safety advantages and better health outcomes, like UTMD’s, into undifferentiated commodities. GPOs have been granted an antitrust exemption by the U.S. Congress. In other industries their business model based on “kickbacks” would be a violation of law. Despite rhetoric otherwise, these bureaucratic entities do not recognize or adequately understand the overall cost of care as it relates to safety and effectiveness of devices, and they create a substantial administrative burden that is primarily driven by collection of administrative fees.

Reworded

The Company’s business strategy may not be successful in the future:strategy.

Reworded

The Company’s value-added approach may not be successful in the future. As the level of complexity and uncertainty in the medical device industry increases, evidenced, for example, by the unpredictable and overly cumbersome regulatory environment, the Company’s views of the future and product/ market strategy may not yield financial results consistent with the past.

Added

Bureaucracy in healthcare.

Reworded

As the healthcare industry becomes increasingly bureaucraticbureaucratic, it puts smaller companies like UTMD at a competitive disadvantage:

Added

Product liability lawsuits.

Reworded

A product liability lawsuit could result in significant legal expenses and a large award against the Company:Company.

Reworded

UTMD’s devices are frequently used in inherently risky situations to help physicians achieve a more positive outcome than what might otherwise be the case. In any lawsuit where an individual plaintiff suffered permanent physical injury, the possibility of a large award for damages exists whether or not a causal relationship exists.existed.

Added

Third party distributors.

Removed

The Company’s reliance on third party distributors in some markets may result in less predictable revenues:

Reworded

The Company’s reliance on third party distributors in some geographical markets can result in less predictable revenues. UTMD’s distributors have varying expertise in marketing and selling specialty medical devices. They also sell other devices that may result in less focus on the Company’s products. In some countries, notably China, Pakistan and India not subject to similarly rigorous standards, a distributor of UTMD’s products may eventually become a competitor with a cheaper but lower quality version of UTMD’s devices. In addition, unpredictable geopolitical relationships, such as in the indiscriminate deployment of tariffs, can eliminate an OUS third party’s ability to market UTMD’s devices within its country.

Reworded

The loss of one or more key employees could negatively affect UTMD performance:employees.

Reworded

Fluctuations in foreign currenciescurrency exchange (FX) rates relative to the USD can result in significant differences in period-to-period financial results:USD.

Reworded

Since a significant portion of UTMD’s sales are invoiced in foreign currencies and consolidated financial results are reported in USD terms, a stronger USD can have negative revenue effects. Conversely, a weaker USD would increase foreign subsidiary operating costs in USD terms. For the portion of sales to foreign entities made in fixed USD terms, a stronger USD makes the devices more expensive and weakens demand. For the portion invoiced in a foreign currency, not only USD-denominated sales are reduced, but also gross profits may be reduced because finished distributed devices and/or U.S. made raw materials and components are likely being purchased in fixed USD. FX rate fluctuations can create differences in comparative period-to-period financial results:

Added

Foreign trade restrictions.

Reworded

TradeGovernment geopolitical policies which elicit reciprocal actions, including duties, trade restrictions and /or tariffs resulting from changing government geopolitical trade policiestariffs, have the potential to disrupt UTMD’s supply chain and/or significantly affect costs.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

30new paragraphs
26removed paragraphs
53reworded paragraphs
9,981 → 9,804words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: litigation, lawsuit, china
“On the positive side, if replacing those lost revenues is achieved, it is likely that UTMD’s GPM can improve by about one percentage point relative to 2025, as the previous device sales to UTMD’s China distributor were at its lowest GPM. From an operating expense perspective, the U.S. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: tariff, china, regulation

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The Gross Profit Margin (GPM), in 2025, which is GPGross Profit divided by sales, although still healthy, contracted 0.81.9 percentage points infrom 20242024, mainly due to the fact that many fixed manufacturing overhead costs increased as expected while sales decreased. WhileManagement the 2024 GP margin decline was less than projected in UTMD’s 2023 SEC Form 10-K, a further overhead margin dilution effect is expected in 2025 because management has decided todid not reduce important manufacturing overhead resources in the same proportion as the expected 2025 decline in sales.sales Doingas doing so would limithave limited future UTMD capabilities to grow the Company. U.S. tariffs in 2025 were $140 (0.4%-points of consolidated sales) compared to $15 in 2024, representing about 20% of the margin change. Although supplier costs for raw materials haveoverall continued to increase and the Company implemented further cost-of-living salary adjustments during 20242025 for employees, management expects to be able to control the productivity of its variable manufacturing costs in 20252026 consistent with the past. InExcept addition,for qualitya assurancelate costsyear includedincrease in manufacturingdomestic overheadFilshie aredevice projectedprices to behelp higheroffset tariffs on Utah intercompany purchases of Filshie devices from implementingits requiredIreland clinicalmanufacturing reviewssubsidiary, underUTMD thedid newnot EUincrease Medicalprices Deviceto Regulationmedical forfacilities devicesin used OUS. Except on a selective basis after experiencing further variable cost increases,2025. UTMD does not intend to increase prices to customers again in 2025.2026, Thewith the exception of specific custom OEM products. If the Company is successful in its objective to replace all of the lost China Deltran low GPM 2025 revenues and remaining 2025 PendoTECH revenues with new product revenues in 2026, the resulting 20252026 GPM mightcould beexpand more than anothera full percentage point lowerhigher than in 2024,2025, resulting in a decline2% increase in GPGross inProfit for the rangesame level of 7-9%.revenues.
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: litigation, lawsuit
“Regarding the product liability litigation legal expenses looking forward, most of the active motion practice and discovery has been accomplished. Four cases have now been won on summary judgment and several other lawsuits were dismissed prior to the summary judgment phase. Decisions on other summary judgment motions are pending and expected in 2025. If any summary judgment motion is denied, the case must go to trial and that could drive up expenses significantly. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation, lawsuit
“Lower U.S. product liability lawsuit legal expenses, which were $783 lower for the year, offset the $690 unusual one-time expenses and FX rate impact. U.S. Filshie product liability litigation expenses were $1,355 (3.5% of sales) in 2025 compared to $2,139 (5.2% of sales) in 2024. As of March 2026, fifteen of nineteen courts where cases have been filed around the country have dismissed the lawsuits. Three more are awaiting court decisions on UTMD summary judgment motions. If a summary judgment motion is denied, the case would go to trial. No case has gone to trial as yet. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: lawsuit, china
“Looking forward to 2025 revenues: WW sales to PendoTECH, UTMD’s largest OEM customer, which were $2.7 million in 2024, declined from $8.6 million in 2023 and from $11.6 million in 2022. Since the current order backlog from PendoTECH for shipments in 2025 is just $151, not expecting additional orders, PendoTECH revenues may be an additional $2.5 million lower in 2025 compared to 2024. WW Filshie revenues declined to $10.8 million in 2024 from $12.3 million in 2023. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation, china
“Although WW operating expenses remained about the same as in the previous year, UTMD’s Operating Income margin in 2025 was lower than in 2024 as a result of lower sales. Legal costs associated with the Filshie clip litigation in the U.S., which are captured in G&A operating expenses, were $783 lower in 2025. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (109)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 12 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Added

With some unexpected circumstances in 2025, Utah Medical Products, Inc (UTMD) did not achieve its beginning of year financial projections. Nevertheless, the Company retained excellent profit margins, and increased its year-ending cash balances to $85.8 million despite paying $4.0 million in dividends to stockholders and repurchasing 4.5% (since the end of 2024) of its shares in the open market for $8.4 million.

Reworded

In 2024,2025, income statement measures of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (Nasdaq: UTMD) consolidated financial performance were substantially lower than in 2023,2024, as follows.

Reworded

Despite 19% lower sales, profitProfit margins in 4Q and year 20242025 heldwere uphampered comparedby tohigher 4Qoperating andcosts yearcoupled 2023,with forlower reasonssales, as described later in this report:

Reworded

Because revenue results for any given three-month period in comparison with a previous three-month period are not indicative of comparative results for the year as a whole, UTMD believessuggests that investors should focus primarily on the annual results in 2024. The $9.3 million consolidated worldwide (WW) decline in annual revenues in 2024, which drove income statement results overall, can be aggregated in the three following categories:2025.

Added

Focusing on the causes of the $2.4 million consolidated worldwide (WW) decline in annual revenues in 2025, the lower sales can be explained by the three following categories:

Added

UTMD’s China distributor for Deltran blood pressure monitoring kits (Item 2), for which a non-changeable/noncancellable order in late 2024 for 2025 shipments was surprisingly cancelled just before the final shipment in 3Q 2025, resulted in $431 lower revenues than had been committed, and $310 lower sales than in 2024. Furthermore, $0.4 million of the $2.1 million sales in 2025 was written off in G&A expense as an uncollectible receivable.

Removed

The OUS (Outside the U.S.) Distributor category (item 2 above) included UTMD’s China distributor for blood pressure monitoring kits for which 2024 shipments were $2.4 million compared to $4.0 million in 2023, representing $1.6 million (75%) of the $2.1 million decline in OUS Distributor revenue (excluding Filshie OUS distributors).

Reworded

OUS Direct Filshie revenues were sales by UTMD subsidiaries directly to medical facilities in the UK, France, Ireland, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. ForeignIn currencycontrast exchange (FX) rate changes hadto a minimallysales positiveincrease impactin onthe 2024U.S., USDOUS revenuesFilshie comparedsales towere 2023.significantly lower.

Added

Because of additional cost-of-living adjustments for employees in 2025 and continued inflation in raw material costs, UTMD realized an expected decrease in its 2025 gross profit margin compared to 2024. Notably though, UTMD was able to maintain its GP margin in 4Q 2025 consistent with 4Q 2024, in part due to the low gross profit margin of former sales to its China distributor which were absent in the 4Q of both years.

Added

Although WW operating expenses remained about the same as in the previous year, UTMD’s Operating Income margin in 2025 was lower than in 2024 as a result of lower sales. Legal costs associated with the Filshie clip litigation in the U.S., which are captured in G&A operating expenses, were $783 lower in 2025. But that benefit was more than offset by the following three unusual G&A expense elements: 1) recognition of $395 write-off of cancellation fees due from the China distributor, 2) recognition of a $195 loss from embezzled funds by UTMD’s Australia subsidiary manager, who pled guilty, but hasn’t repaid, and 3) a $100 increase in OUS G&A expenses relative to 2024 FX rates due to a much stronger EUR and GBP in 2025 relative to the USD. The remaining $93 increase in WW operating expenses was due essentially to higher salaries and recorded noncash option expense for the same number of people.

Added

Non-operating income was lower primarily as a result of lower interest rates on UTMD’s higher cash balances. Year-to-year income tax provision rates varied as a result of the mix of pretax profits in various sovereignties, including truing up for prior tax provisions after actually filing in 2025. EPS benefited from UTMD repurchasing over 4.5% of its shares during the year.

Removed

Despite additional cost-of-living adjustments for employees in 2024 and continued inflation in raw material costs, UTMD was nevertheless able to maintain its Gross Profit margin in 2024 by reducing manufacturing personnel, including closing down the assembly swing shift in Utah. The $1.6 million lower sales to UTMD’s China distributor for blood pressure monitoring kits, $1.3 million of which decline occurred in 4Q 2024 alone, actually helped UTMD’s average Gross Profit margin as that sales category has the lowest margin in UTMD’s business.

Removed

UTMD’s Operating Income margin was essentially the same in both years, despite retaining its critical mass of sales and marketing (S&M), product development (R&D) and general and administrative (G&A) resources at a higher cost. This occurred because the 2023 $3,684 G&A expense from amortization of the $21 million identifiable intangible asset (IIA) associated with UTMD’s 2019 purchase of CooperSurgical Inc’s (CSI’s) exclusive right to distribute the Filshie Clip System in the U.S., which was zero in 2024, offset the slightly lower Gross Profit margin as well as higher litigation expenses also captured in G&A expense.

Removed

On the other hand, non-operating income was lower than in the prior year as a result of a new excise tax levied on share repurchases in the U.S. and the fact that UTMD Ltd in Ireland received $232 less income in 2024 from renting unused warehouse space. EPS benefited from UTMD repurchasing over 8% of its shares during the year.

Reworded

Despite $4,260$3,983 in stockholder dividends and $19,968$8,355 in share repurchases in 2024,2025, which reduced both cash and Stockholders’ Equity, measures of the Company’s liquidity and overall financial condition remained strong as of the end of 20242025 compared to the end of 2023.2024. DespiteBecause of the increase in cash, 2025 year-end working capital decliningincreased $8,985,$2,570. theThe Company’s current ratio improved to 37.6 at the end of 2025 from 25.6 at the end of 2024 from 22.6 at the end of 2023.2024. As a result of continued strong positive cash flow from normal operations, 20242025 year-end Stockholders’ Equity declinedincreased just $10,886$1,841 despite the $24,228$12,338 share repurchases and cash dividends. In comparison, UTMD paid $4,282$4,260 in stockholder cash dividends and made no$19,968 in share repurchases in 2023.2024. The Company also used $231$371 in cash in 20242025 along with $639$231 in 20232024 to invest in new manufacturing equipment and fixtures, as well as maintaining existing Property, Plant and Equipment (PP&E) in good working order. Two-year net capital expenditures for PP&E were $511$955 less than depreciation.

Reworded

Year-end 20242025 total consolidated assets were $122,542 comprised of $97,742 in current assets, $9,908 in consolidated net PP&E and $14,892 in net intangible assets. This compares to $122,538 total assets at the end of 2024 comprised of $96,330 in current assets, $9,763 in consolidated net PP&E and $16,445 in net intangible assets. This compares to $135,458 total assets at the end of 2023 comprised of $106,269 in current assets, $10,551 in consolidated net PP&E and $18,637 in net intangible assets. Total asset turns (total consolidated sales divided by average total assets for the year) in 20242025 were 32%31% compared to 39%32% in 2023,2024, reflecting the large decrease in sales.

Reworded

Current assets decreasedincreased $9,938$1,412 due to the $9,892$2,780 decreaseincrease in year-end cash and investments and $770 lower inventories, offset by $704$877 higherlower inventories and $573 lower accounts and other receivablesreceivables. The remaining net increase was due to Other Current Assets $81 higher. Year-end 2025 and $20 higher other current assets. Year-end 2024 and 2023 cash and investment balances were $82,976$85,756 and $92,869,$82,976, representing 68%70% and 69%68% of total assets, respectively. Net (after allowance for doubtful accounts) year-end trade accounts receivable (A/R) balances were $760$573 higherlower at the end of 20242025 compared to 2023,2024 despitebecause 4Q 20242025 sales $3,176were $113 lower than in 4Q 2023.2024 and days in receivables were also lower. Ending 20242025 average days in A/R were 4035 based on 4Q trade sales, instead of 2440 days at the end of 2023.2024. A/R over 90 days from invoice date increaseddeclined fromto 3.3%2.2% of total A/R at the end of 20232025 tofrom 6.4% at the end of 2024. The Company believes any older A/R will be collected or are within its reserve balances for uncollectible amounts. Inventories net of reserves for obsolescence at 20242025 year-end were 8%10% lower from the end of 2023.2024 when 2025 sales were just 6% lower.

Reworded

Working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) at year-end 20242025 was 9%3% lowerhigher at $92,574$95,144 compared to $101,559$92,574 at year-end 2023,2024, primarily due to usingan $19,968increase in cash forfrom shareprofitable repurchases.operations. The end of 20242025 working capital exceeds UTMD’s needs for normal operations in an uncertain economic environment, funding of future organic growth and timely payment of accrued tax liabilities. Management believes that, despite the negative impact on Return on Stockholders’ Equity, retaining a high cash balance increases its likelihood of being able to allow for substantial funding of any future accretive acquisition without diluting stockholder interest, as well as repurchase of UTMD shares while paying a consistent dividend, and thus will leverage stockholder value in the long term.

Reworded

Compared to the end of 2023,2024, ending 20242025 net consolidated PP&E (depreciated book value of all fixed assets) declinedincreased $789$145 asdespite adepreciation resultexceeding of the combination ofnew capital expenditures ofby $231,$455 depreciationbecause of $730 and the effect of foreign currency exchange (FX) rates on year-end foreign subsidiary asset balancesbalances, asbecause OUSat fixedthe assetsend wereof depreciated2025 furthercompared byto athe strongerend of 2024, the EUR was 13% higher, the GBP was 7% higher, the AUD was 8% higher and the CAD was 5% higher relative to the USD.

Reworded

The year-end 20242025 net book value (after accumulated depreciation) of consolidated PP&E was 29%28% of purchase cost. End-of-year PP&E turns (Net Sales divided by Net PP&E) was 3.9 in 2025 compared to 4.2 in 2024 compared to 4.8 in 2023 due to 19%6% lower 20242025 sales togetherand withhigher lower USDUSD-denominated asset values of foreign subsidiaries.subsidiary assets. A future leverage in productivity of fixed assets which will not have to be further increased to support new business activity will be a source of incremental profitability.profitability because assets will not have to be increased in proportion to new business activity.

Reworded

Net intangible assets (after accumulated amortization) are comprised of the capitalized costs of obtaining patents and other intellectual property, as well as the value of identifiable intangible assets (IIA) and goodwill resulting from acquisitions. Net intangible assets were $14,892 (12% of total assets) at the end of 2025 compared to $16,445 (13% of total assets) at the end of 2024 compared to $18,637 (14% of total assets) at the end of 2023.2024. Per US GAAP, intangible assets are categorized as either 1) IIA, which are amortized over the estimated useful life of the assets, or 2) goodwill, which is not amortized or expensed until the associated economic value of the acquired asset becomes impaired. Those two categories of Femcare intangibles at year-end 20242025 were net IIA of $2,415$457 and goodwill of $6,389.$6,861. The accumulated amortization of Femcare IIA as of December 31, 20242025 since the March 18, 2011 acquisition was $27,632.$31,808. The remaining Femcare IIA will be fully amortized in March1Q 2026. The goodwill portion of intangible assets resulting from the Femcare acquisition, which is not amortized, decreasedincreased $111$472 due to a weakerstronger GBP at year-end, i.e. the different FX rate onat fixed goodwill in GBP terms. In early 2019, UTMD acquired an additional $21,000 IIA from the purchase of the remaining life of exclusive U.S. distribution rights for the Filshie Clip System from CSI, all of which was amortized before the end of 2023.year-end. UTMD’s goodwill balance from prior acquisitions including Femcare, Columbia Medical, Gesco and Abcorp was $13,580$14,052 at the end of 2024.2025.

Reworded

Because the products associated with UTMD’s acquisitions of Columbia Medical in 1997, Gesco in 1998, Abcorp in 2004 and Femcare in 2011 continue to be viable parts of UTMD’s overall business, UTMD does not expect the current goodwill value associated with the four acquisitions to become impaired in 2025.2026. Amortization of IIA was $2,065$2,126 in 20242025 compared to $5,692$2,065 in 2023.2024. The difference was mainlypredominantly due to the CSIGBP FX rate difference for Femcare IIA becoming fully-amortized in October 2023, resulting in $3,684 lower 2024 operating expense. In other words, the 2024 non-cash amortization expense of CSI IIA was zero compared to $3,684 in 2023.amortization. The Femcare IIA amortization expense was the same in both 20242025 and 20232024 at £1,589. But because of a difference in FX rates, the 20242025 non-cash amortization expense of Femcare IIA was $2,030$2,095 compared to $1,977$2,030 in 2023.2024. The 20252026 non-cash amortization expense (included as part of consolidated G&A operating expenses) of Femcare IIA will also be £1,589.340.

Reworded

As a reminder, payments for the Federal and State repatriation (REPAT) tax liability which resulted from the U.S. TCJA enacted in 2017 were 8% of the respective tax liability per year for the first five years, 15% in the sixth year, 20% in the seventh year and will be 25% in the eighth year. At the end of 2024, UTMD’s total remaining REPAT tax liability was $2,792.$698. Calendar year 2025 representsrepresented the eighth year, so $698the isend theof 2024 liability was a current liability and no REPAT tax liability remains at 25%the end of the total liability, the final payment year.2025.

Added

Year-end 2025 current liabilities were $1,158 lower than at the end of 2024. In addition to the elimination of the $698 REPAT tax current liability at the end of 2024, 2025 year-end accrued liabilities were $676 lower due mainly to lower customer deposits and tax liabilities as a result of lower sales activity in 2025. Accounts payable, on the other hand, were $215 higher at the end of 2025, which was just a function of timing. UTMD pays its vendors promptly, well within agreed payment terms, in order to maintain good supplier relationships.

Reworded

Year-end 2024 current liabilities were $953 lower than at the end of 2023 despite the $140 higher REPAT tax current liability for the ensuing year. Ending accrued liabilities were $1,020 lower due primarily to a $619 lower consolidated accrued income tax liability, $135 lower accrued employee profit-sharing bonuses, a $146 lower litigation expense reserve and $238 lower customer deposits. Total liabilities were $2,034$1,837 lower at the end of 20242025 compared to the end of 2023.2024. The resulting 20242025 year-end total debt ratio (total liabilities/ total assets) was just 4%3% compared to 5%4% at the end of 2023.2024. UTMD has no bank debt.

Reworded

The following table shows the 20242025 USD-denominated revenues by sales channel compared to 2023.2024. Because domestic sales in foreign countries were invoiced in native currencies, the comparison in USD terms includes the change in foreign currency translation (FX) rates. In other words, just the FX rate relative to the USD in 20242025 compared to 20232024 reduceddecreased Canada USD-denominated domestic sales by 1.3%2.3% and Australia sales by 0.9%.2.5%. On the other hand, the FX rate differencedifferences increased Ireland domestic sales by 0.4%, UK domestic sales by 2.8% and France domestic sales by 0.1%.5.0% and UK domestic sales by 3.2%.

Added

In summary, UTMD total worldwide (WW) consolidated USD sales in 2025 at $38,520 were $2,383 (5.8%) lower than in 2024 at $40,903. Consolidated sales including constant currency OUS sales (i.e. using the same FX rates as in the prior year) were 6.8% lower. The decline can be explained primarily from three sales categories highlighted in the overview at the beginning of this Item 7, page 19: 1) an expected $2,295 (85%) decrease in OEM sales of biopharma pressure sensors and accessories to PendoTECH, reducing Ireland OUS sales $429 and U.S. OEM sales $1,866; 2) in other device sales excluding Filshie devices, an unexpected $310 (13%) lower UTMD Ltd (Ireland) sales to UTMD’s China distributor of blood pressure monitoring kits, which was $431 lower than its “non-changeable” 2025 annual order; and 3) $745 (7%) lower WW sales of Filshie Clip System devices.

Added

Looking forward to 2026 WW consolidated sales, OEM sales to PendoTECH and blood pressure monitoring kits to China are expected to be zero, compared to $2.5 million in 2025. Although UTMD plans with substantial uncertainty to offset those losses entirely with new product sales including sales to other biopharma customers, combining that with modest growth in organic device sales including domestic Filshie device sales, as well as improvement in OUS Filshie device sales, this will yield 2026 consolidated sales about the same as in 2025.

Removed

In summary, UTMD total worldwide (WW) consolidated USD sales in 2024 at $40,903 were $9,321 (18.6%) lower than in 2023 at $50,224. The decline essentially resulted from the fact that 2024 WW shipments by UTMD to its largest OEM customer were $5,938 (68.8%) lower. Total U.S. domestic sales including OEM were $4,759 (16.9%) lower in 2024 at $23,444 compared to $28,204 in 2023. OUS sales including sales to foreign distributors were $4,562 (20.7%) lower at $17,458 compared to $22,020 in 2023. Constant currency OUS sales were 21.2% lower.

Added

Domestic sales in the U.S. in 2025 were $22,761 compared to $23,444 in 2024, which was $683 (2.9%) lower than in 2024. The $1,866 lower domestic PendoTECH OEM sales were offset by $1,183 higher other domestic sales. Domestic Filshie device sales, representing 20% of domestic sales, were $436 (+10.8%) higher. The unit volume of Filshie clips sold was 12% higher. Domestic direct sales of other devices were $872 (+5.9%) higher, led by a 16% increase in domestic NICU device sales. All other U.S.OEM (not PendoTECH) sales in 2025, which fluctuate from year-to-year, were $125 lower than in 2024.

Added

OUS Sales.

Added

OUS USD-denominated sales in 2025 were $1,700 (9.7%) lower at $15,758 compared to $17,458 in 2024. UTMD Ltd (Ireland) 2025 sales to PendoTECH which were zero in 2025 were $429 lower, and to its China distributor for pressure monitoring kits $310 lower. OUS Filshie device sales, both direct to OUS medical facilities and to OUS distributors combined, which are shipped from Ireland or the UK, were $1,181 lower. Sales of other UTMD devices to OUS distributors were $220 higher in 2025.

Removed

Domestic U.S. sales in 2024, which were $4,759 (16.9%) lower than in 2023, were $23,444 (57.3% of total consolidated sales) compared to $28,204 (56.2% of total sales) in 2023. All three categories of domestic sales were lower, led by U.S. OEM sales which were $3,857 (45.7%) lower than in 2023. Domestic sales to UTMD’s biopharma OEM customer PendoTECH were $4,157 (64.7%) lower. Aggregate sales to 133 other U.S. OEM customers were $300 higher. Domestic Filshie device sales, representing 17.3% of total domestic sales, were $729 (15.3%) lower in 2024 compared to 2023.

Removed

Direct device sales other than Filshie, representing 63.2% of total domestic sales, were $173 (1.2%) lower in 2024 than in 2023. UTMD expects 2025 domestic direct sales of its well-established devices to increase at a low single-digit percentage rate.

Removed

Filshie 2024 sales in the U.S., which represented 17% of domestic direct sales, declined $729 (15%) compared to 2023. Although a partial change in practice favoring salpingectomies over tubal ligation for permanent sterilization has continued, an article in the “Green Journal” of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology lamented to physician members that patients are tending to rely more on social media than on informed input from their own doctors to make clinical choices. Consequently, there appears to be some negative impact on patient choice as a result of attorneys advertising for complainants under false pretenses on social media, which underscores the importance of winning the current product liability lawsuits. Nevertheless, UTMD expects U.S. Filshie device sales in 2025 will not decline as much as happened in 2024, based on the well-established safety and effectiveness of the device.

Removed

Domestic OEM sales in 2024 were $3,857 (45.7%) lower than in 2023, representing 20% of total U.S. domestic sales compared to 30% in 2023. UTMD sold components and finished devices to 134 different U.S. companies in 2024 compared to 129 companies in 2023 for use in their product-market offerings. Sales to 133 OEM customers excluding PendoTECH were $300 (+15%) higher. U.S. sales to PendoTECH were $4,157 (65%) lower. UTMD’s largest OEM customer markets biopharmaceutical manufacturing control systems which previously exclusively utilized UTMD’s pressure monitoring sensors and other components. The good news is that domestic sales to PendoTECH in 2024 were $2,266. The bad news, looking forward to 2025, is that UTMD expects domestic demand from this customer may decline another $2 million as it continues to integrate manufacturing of its own marketed products.

Reworded

OUS USD-denominated sales in 2024 were $4,562 (20.7%) lower at $17,458 compared to $22,020 in 2023. Sales invoiced in foreign currencies, which were $12,911$11,388 when converted to USD, represented 74%72% of OUS sales and 32%30% of consolidated total sales. The stronger GBPEUR and EUR currenciesGBP added $113$397 in net OUS USD-denominated foreign currency sales compared to USD sales using the prior year’s foreign currency exchange (FX) rates (constant currency terms).terms. FX rates for income statement purposes are transaction-weighted averages. The weighted-average FX rates from the applicable foreign currency to USD during 20242025 and 20232024 for revenue purposes follow:

Reworded

The combined weighted-average favorable FX impact on 20242025 foreign currency OUS sales was 0.7%3.6%, (+0.3%increasing ofreported total2025 consolidated 2024USD sales). by $397 relative to the same foreign currency sales in 2024. In constant currency terms, OUS sales in 20242025 were 21.2%12.0% lower than OUS sales in 2023.2024. The portion of OUS sales invoiced in foreign currencies in USD terms was 32%30% of total consolidated 20242025 USD sales compared to 30%32% in 2023.2024. Including the impact of changed FX rates, OUS 20242025 direct to end-user sales by UTMD subsidiaries in USD terms were 7% higher in Ireland, 13% lower in Canada, 17% lower in France and 3% higher in the UK. Direct to end-user sales in Australia, which included New Zealand, were 18% lower. USD denominated sales to OUS distributors were $2,359 (18.9%) lower in 2024 than in 2023.

Added

Sales by Product Category

Removed

Seventy-four percent of (USD denominated) 2024 OUS sales were invoiced in foreign currencies compared to 68% in 2023. As a portion of total USD WW consolidated sales, 32% of UTMD’s USD-equivalent sales were invoiced in foreign currencies in 2023 compared to 30% in 2023. The GBP, EUR, AUD and CAD converted sales represented 9%, 18%, 2% and 2% of total 2024 consolidated USD sales, respectively. This compares to 8%, 18%, 2% and 2% of total 2023 USD sales.

Removed

USD-denominated trade (excludes intercompany) sales of devices to OUS customers (excluding France) by UTMD’s Ireland facility (UTMD Ltd) were $7,081 in 2024 (34% lower) compared to $10,686 in 2023. Explaining 93% of the decline, Ireland OUS sales to PendoTECH were $1,781 (81%) lower and sales to UTMD’s largest distributor of BPM kits located in China were $1,587 (40%) lower. In addition, UTMD Ltd also sold devices that it had manufactured directly to France in 2024 due to BREXIT, rather than by Femcare in the UK. USD-denominated sales to France in 2024 were $1,092 (17% lower) compared to $1,319 in 2023. The FX rate difference in 2024 relative to 2023 increased Ireland’s USD-denominated sales by $38.

Removed

In 2024, UTMD’s UK subsidiary, Femcare Ltd., had $3,470 trade sales of devices to domestic UK and certain international distributor customers, which was 4% higher compared to $3,347 in 2023. The FX rate difference increased the UK’s USD-denominated sales in 2024 by $91.

Removed

USD-denominated sales of devices to end-users in Australia and New Zealand by Femcare’s Australia distribution subsidiary (Femcare Australia Pty Ltd) were $866 (18% lower) in 2024 compared to $1,050 in 2023. A weaker AUD in 2024 reduced USD-denominated Australia sales by $8.

Removed

UTMD’s Canada distribution subsidiary (Utah Medical Products Canada, Inc.) USD-denominated sales of devices to end-users in Canada in 2024 were $955 (13% lower) compared to $1,102 in 2023. A weaker CAD reduced Canada sales by $13.

Removed

Looking forward to 2025 revenues: WW sales to PendoTECH, UTMD’s largest OEM customer, which were $2.7 million in 2024, declined from $8.6 million in 2023 and from $11.6 million in 2022. Since the current order backlog from PendoTECH for shipments in 2025 is just $151, not expecting additional orders, PendoTECH revenues may be an additional $2.5 million lower in 2025 compared to 2024. WW Filshie revenues declined to $10.8 million in 2024 from $12.3 million in 2023. Although a further decline in the U.S is expected in 2025 while lawsuits are unresolved, UTMD expects that increases OUS will offset that and 2025 Filshie revenues will be about the same as in 2024. UTMD’s largest OUS distributor located in China, representing $2.4 million in 2024 sales of BPM kits manufactured in Ireland, has placed its annual order for 2025 which is the same as in 2024. Expecting some low single-digit increases in UTMD’s remaining established business as well as initial modest direct sales of biopharma pressure sensors, not including release of any new products or price increases, management is projecting an overall revenue decrease of about $2 million (about 5%) in 2025 compared to 2024.

Reworded

b) Gross Profit (GP).Profit.

Reworded

UTMD’s 2024 consolidated GP,Gross Profit, the surplus after subtracting costs of manufacturing, which includes purchasing and transporting raw materials,materials (along with applicable tariffs), forming components, assembling, inspecting, testing, packaging and sterilizing products, from net revenues, was $22,001 (57.1% of sales) in 2025 compared to $24,143 (59.0% of sales) comparedin to2024. $30,038Gross (59.8% of sales)Profit in 2023. GP in 20242025 was $5,895$2,142 (19.6%8.9%) lower with ana 18.6%5.8% decrease in revenues.

Reworded

The Gross Profit Margin (GPM), in 2025, which is GPGross Profit divided by sales, although still healthy, contracted 0.81.9 percentage points infrom 20242024, mainly due to the fact that many fixed manufacturing overhead costs increased as expected while sales decreased. WhileManagement the 2024 GP margin decline was less than projected in UTMD’s 2023 SEC Form 10-K, a further overhead margin dilution effect is expected in 2025 because management has decided todid not reduce important manufacturing overhead resources in the same proportion as the expected 2025 decline in sales.sales Doingas doing so would limithave limited future UTMD capabilities to grow the Company. U.S. tariffs in 2025 were $140 (0.4%-points of consolidated sales) compared to $15 in 2024, representing about 20% of the margin change. Although supplier costs for raw materials haveoverall continued to increase and the Company implemented further cost-of-living salary adjustments during 20242025 for employees, management expects to be able to control the productivity of its variable manufacturing costs in 20252026 consistent with the past. InExcept addition,for qualitya assurancelate costsyear includedincrease in manufacturingdomestic overheadFilshie aredevice projectedprices to behelp higheroffset tariffs on Utah intercompany purchases of Filshie devices from implementingits requiredIreland clinicalmanufacturing reviewssubsidiary, underUTMD thedid newnot EUincrease Medicalprices Deviceto Regulationmedical forfacilities devicesin used OUS. Except on a selective basis after experiencing further variable cost increases,2025. UTMD does not intend to increase prices to customers again in 2025.2026, Thewith the exception of specific custom OEM products. If the Company is successful in its objective to replace all of the lost China Deltran low GPM 2025 revenues and remaining 2025 PendoTECH revenues with new product revenues in 2026, the resulting 20252026 GPM mightcould beexpand more than anothera full percentage point lowerhigher than in 2024,2025, resulting in a decline2% increase in GPGross inProfit for the rangesame level of 7-9%.revenues.

Reworded

UTMD’s Ireland subsidiary’s (UTMD Ltd’s) 20242025 GPGross Profit was EUR 6,2835,524 (22.3%12.1% lower) compared to EUR 8,0846,283 in 20232024 whenas total EUR revenues, including direct sales to France and intercompany sales of devices manufactured in Ireland, were 21.6%8.8% lower. The associated GPMs were 56.3% in 2025 and 58.4% in 2024 and 58.9% in 2023.2024. Femcare UK GPGross Profit was GBP 1,440 in 2025 compared to GBP 1,579 in both 2024 and 2023.2024. The 20242025 UK GPM was 55.7%54.6% compared to 55.3%55.7% in 20232024 while UK GBP sales including intercompany revenues were 0.7%7.0% lower. Femcare Australia and Femcare Canada are simplyjust distribution facilities for UTMD finished devices in their respective countries. GPGross Profit is the result of subtracting intercompany purchase prices of devices, plus incoming freight, duties and applicable tariffs, from revenues. Australia 20242025 GPGross Profit was AUD 518 (46.0% of sales) compared to AUD 623 (46.9% of sales) comparedin to2024. AUDCanada 8412025 Gross Profit was CAD 414 (53.0%40.4% of sales) incompared 2023. Canada 2024 GP wasto CAD 538 (41.2% of sales) compared to CAD 874 (58.6% of sales) in 2023.2024. The GPMs in both Australia and Canada were diluted not only by higher overhead costs on substantiallywith lower sales, but also higher direct material costs resulting from weaker local currencies for devices purchased from the U.S., Ireland and the UK. In the U.S., GPGross Profit was $13,991$13,846 (21.2%1.0% lower) in 20242025 compared to $17,750$13,991 in 20232024 when revenues including intercompany sales were 16.7%3.8% lower. The U.S. GPM was 48.5%49.9% in 20242025 compared to 51.2%48.5% in 2023.2024. A summation of the above GPsubsidiaries’ ofGross each subsidiaryProfit will not yield UTMD’s consolidated total GPGross Profit because of the elimination of profit in inventory for intercompany sales.

Reworded

bc)Operating Income.

Reworded

Operating Income results from subtracting Operating Expenses from GP.Gross Profit. For the year 2024,2025, Operating Income was $13,594$11,402 compared to $16,777$13,594 in 2023,2024, a 19.0%16.1% decrease. The $3,183$2,192 decrease in Operating Income was from a combination of $5,895$2,142 lower GPGross andProfit $2,712with lower$50 higher Operating Expenses.

Reworded

The UTMD Ltd (Ireland) Operating Income margin in 20242025 was 54.4%48.4% compared to 55.9%54.4% in 2023.2024. Femcare UK’s Operating Income margin per US GAAP, which includes the IIA amortization expense of the 2011 acquisition, was negative in both 20242025 and 2023.2024. Femcare Australia’s 20242025 US GAAP Operating Income margin was 23.6%negative as a result of the recognition in 4Q 2025 of a $195 loss of funds embezzled by UTMD’s former Australia subsidiary manager, about which she admitted guilt and promised to repay, but in fact hasn’t yet, compared to 32.2%23.6% in 2023.2024. Femcare Canada’s 20242025 Operating Income margin was 22.4%15.0% compared to 41.8%22.4% in 2023.2024. UTMD’s 20242025 Operating Income margin in the U.S. was 33.1%32.7% compared to 23.5%33.1% in 2023.2024. For clarity, in 2023both the CSI IIA amortization expense (none in 2024) hit the U.S. Operating Income margin,2025 and in both 2024 and 2023 the Femcare IIA amortization expense hit the Femcare UK Operating Income margin.

Reworded

Operating expenses include sales and marketing (S&M) expenses, product development (R&D) expenses and general and administrative (G&A) expenses. Consolidated WW operating expenses were $10,599 (27.5% of sales) in 2025 compared to $10,549 (25.8% of sales) in 2024 compared to $13,261 (26.4% of sales) in 2023.2024. The following table provides a comparison of operating expense categories, as well as a further segmentation of G&A expenses:

Removed

S&M expenses in 2024 were $1,901 (4.6% of sales) compared to $1,685 (3.4% of sales) in 2023. The higher expenses were due to higher salaries from cost-of-living adjustments to salaries and a $148 increase in U.S. medical benefit claims. Consolidated OUS S&M expenses in 2024 compared to 2023 were increased by a net $3 from FX rate changes due primarily to a stronger GBP.

Reworded

S&M expenses are the costs of communicating UTMD’s differences and product advantages, providing training and other customer service in support of the use of UTMD’s solutions, attending clinical meetings and medical trade shows, administering customer agreements, advertising, processing orders,orders and shipping, and paying commissions to outside independent representatives. In markets where UTMD sells directly to end-users, which in 2023-20242024-2025 included the U.S., Ireland, UK, Australia, New Zealand, France and Canada, the largest components of S&M expenses were the cost of customer service required to timely process orders and the distribution costs associated with shipping products.

Added

S&M expenses in 2025 were $2,051 (5.3% of sales) compared to $1,901 (4.6% of sales) in 2024. The higher expenses were due to higher salaries from cost-of-living adjustments, $48 higher med/surg distributor fees in the U.S., $38 lower reimbursement of shipping fees in the U.S. and Ireland, and $25 higher advertising and trade show fees in the U.S. Consolidated OUS S&M expenses in 2025 compared to 2024 were increased by a net $9 from FX rate changes due to weaker USD when converting OUS EUR and GBP S&M expenses to USD. UTMD plans to add marketing talent in the U.S. in 2026, with consolidated S&M expenses overall remaining less than 6% of projected revenues.

Reworded

R&D expenses in 20242025 were $668 (1.7% of sales) compared to $813 (2.0% of sales) compared to $560 (1.1% of sales) in 2023.2024. R&D expenses include the costs of investigating clinical needs, developing innovative concepts, testing concepts for viability, validating methods of manufacture and materials, completing any necessary premarketing clinical trials, regulatory documentation and other activities required for design control, responding to customer requests for product enhancements, and assisting manufacturing engineering on an ongoing basis in developing new processes or improving existing processes. Product development (R&D) expenses increaseddeclined in 20242025 primarily as a result of $222higher spentcosts forof independent testing and validation of materials used in UTMD’s own biopharma sensors,sensors andin from cost-of-living adjustments for employees.2024. R&D also continued to play a significant role in manufacturing process improvements and quality assurance. No new UTMD devices were launched in 2024. UTMD projectsexpects R&D expenses in 20252026 will again be between 1% and 2% of projected revenues.

Reworded

The major year-to-year changes in Operating Expense were in the G&A expense category, although the total consolidated 2025 G&A expenses were just $45 higher than in 2024. G&A expenses in 20242025 were $7,880 (20.5% of sales) compared to $7,835 (19.2% of sales) compared to $11,016 (21.9% of sales) in 2023.2024. G&A expenses include the “front office” functional costs of executive management and outside directors, finance and accounting, corporate information systems, human resources, stockholder relations, corporate risk management, corporate governance, protection of intellectual property, amortization of identifiable intangiblesintangibles, litigation and other legal costs.costs, and provision for bad debts. The table above helps identify certain specific categories of G&A expenses which might be of interest to stockholders.

Added

Two unexpected 2025 G&A expense increases were 1) the 3Q bad debt write-off of the $395 balance of a cancellation fee charged UTMD’s China distributor for work-in-process and custom materials used solely for that customer, based on a non-changeable annual order commitment, the last shipment of which in 3Q 2025 was surprisingly cancelled before shipment, and 2) the recognition in 4Q 2025 of a $195 loss of funds embezzled by UTMD’s former Australia subsidiary manager, about which she admitted guilt and promised to repay, but in fact hasn’t repaid yet. In addition to the two “one-time” unusual G&A expenses of $590 in 2025, the FX impact of G&A expense OUS added another $100.

Added

Lower U.S. product liability lawsuit legal expenses, which were $783 lower for the year, offset the $690 unusual one-time expenses and FX rate impact. U.S. Filshie product liability litigation expenses were $1,355 (3.5% of sales) in 2025 compared to $2,139 (5.2% of sales) in 2024. As of March 2026, fifteen of nineteen courts where cases have been filed around the country have dismissed the lawsuits. Three more are awaiting court decisions on UTMD summary judgment motions. If a summary judgment motion is denied, the case would go to trial. No case has gone to trial as yet. While there are currently fewer active cases, and thus less discovery and motion work anticipated in 2026, any case that must go to trial could drive up 2026 litigation expenses significantly.

Showing the first 60 of 109 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-12 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-12 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
101 → 101words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, investors should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in UTMD’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, which could materially affect its business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to UTMD or currently deemed to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and/or operating results.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

66new paragraphs
42removed paragraphs
24reworded paragraphs
5,002 → 6,859words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: tariff, china, labor
“UTMD’s 1Q 2026 Gross Profit was $256 (4.6%) lower in 1Q 2026 than in 1Q 2025, driven by 10.2% lower sales. Gross Profit results from subtracting the costs of manufacturing products, including direct labor, raw materials and manufacturing overhead (MOH) expenses, from revenues. MOH, which was higher due primarily to cost-of-living adjustments for employees, includes supervision, engineering, quality assurance, outside services, depreciation of manufacturing equipment, purchasing and freight for receiving raw materials from vendors. Higher MOH expense with lower sales decreases the GPM. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation, interest rate
“Despite a more favorable sales mix relative to 2Q 2025, UTMD’s Gross Profit margin in 2Q 2026 contracted somewhat as a result of lower sales than expected without proportionally lowering consolidated manufacturing overhead costs. Operating Income declined more than the Gross Profit decline due to $213 higher 2Q 2026 U.S. litigation costs compared to 2Q 2025, and $341 higher 1H 2026 litigation costs than in 1H 2025, which costs are included in Operating Expenses. Non-operating income in 2Q 2026 was about the same as in 2Q 2025, but $91 lower in 1H 2026 as a result of lower interest rates. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: tariff, labor
“Thankfully, the Section 122 tariff authority had a hard expiration date of July 24, 2026, and cannot be extended by the President without Congressional action, which UTMD believes is very unlikely. The administration, not to be deterred, has now indicated that it will continue to impose tariffs utilizing Section 301of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows tariffs on goods imported from countries deemed to produce products with forced labor. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: tariff, china
“In addition to Filshie device tariffs, UTMD’s 2Q 2026 GPM was negatively impacted relative to 2Q 2025 because both trade and intercompany shipments from UTMD’s Ireland facility (UTMD Ltd) were substantially lower while the Company retained the staffing that it had to support the former China distributor and will be needed again for projected higher production requirements for new products in 2H 2026. In contrast, UTMD’s consolidated 1H 2026 GPM was higher than in 1H 2025, as expected, due to a more favorable product mix without $1,658 low Gross Profit sales to the China distributor.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: tariff
“Tariffs on materials received from OUS suppliers are included in manufacturing costs, i.e. reducing Gross Profit. The tariffs are simply the equivalent of excise taxes intended to raise revenues for the federal government. U.S. tariffs paid independently by UTMD on certain goods purchased from OUS suppliers have not been significant to date, i.e. $27 in 1H 2026 compared to $16 in 1H 2025. However, UTMD’s raw material suppliers both in the U.S. and OUS continue to increase prices, in some cases citing “tariffs” that they paid on their raw materials as justification. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: tariff
“In 1H 2026, UTMD paid a more significant tariff on importing the Filshie Clip System devices manufactured in Ireland by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Utah Medical Products, Ltd., for distribution to U.S. medical facilities. It is not feasible, economically and otherwise, for these unique devices to be manufactured in the U.S. The tariffs were $156 in 1H 2026 and $48 in 2Q 2026, compared to zero in 1H 2025, as UTMD had sufficient inventory to cover 2025 U.S. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (132)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Utah Medical Products, Inc. (UTMD) manufactures and markets a well-established range of specialty medical devices. The Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2025 providedprovides a detailed description of products, technologies, markets, regulatory issues, business initiatives, resources and business risks, among other details, and should be read in conjunction with this report. Because of the relatively short span of time, results for any given three-monththree- or six-month period in comparison with a previous three-monththree- or six-month period may not be indicative of comparative results for the year as a whole. Currency amounts in the report are in thousands, except per share amounts or where otherwise noted. Currencies in this report are denoted as $ or USD = U.S. Dollars; AUD = Australia Dollars; £ or GBP = UK Pound Sterling; C$ or CAD = Canadian Dollars; and € or EUR = Euros.

Reworded

Income statement results in thesecond firstcalendar quarter (1Q2Q) ofand first half (1H) 2026 compared to 1Qthe same periods of 2025 were as follows:

Added

Consolidated total 2Q 2026 revenues were $1,424 (14.3%) lower than in 2Q 2025, with 1H 2026 revenues $2,411 (12.3%) lower than in 1H 2025. The lower sales in comparison with the prior year’s periods were primarily the result of a lack of sales to UTMD’s two previously largest customers, representing a combined $1,065 loss in 2Q 2025 sales, which was 75% of the 2Q decline; and representing a combined $1,923 loss in 1H 2025 sales, which was 80% of the 1H decline. The total 2025 sales to these two former customers were $2,889, which UTMD planned to recover in sales of new products in 2026, mainly to other biopharma OEM customers. Sales to other biopharma new customers were just $211 in 1H 2026, a slower than expected gain. Additional period-to-period sales comparisons follow below.

Reworded

ProfitUTMD’s profit margins in 1Q 2026 compared to 1Qthose 2025of the prior year’s same periods follow:

Added

Despite a more favorable sales mix relative to 2Q 2025, UTMD’s Gross Profit margin in 2Q 2026 contracted somewhat as a result of lower sales than expected without proportionally lowering consolidated manufacturing overhead costs. Operating Income declined more than the Gross Profit decline due to $213 higher 2Q 2026 U.S. litigation costs compared to 2Q 2025, and $341 higher 1H 2026 litigation costs than in 1H 2025, which costs are included in Operating Expenses. Non-operating income in 2Q 2026 was about the same as in 2Q 2025, but $91 lower in 1H 2026 as a result of lower interest rates. A lower estimated average income tax provision rate helped to decrease the percentage period-to-period declines in Net Income. Share repurchases during 1H 2026 were minimal compared to the 1H of 2025. Please see the financial statements on the last page of this report.

Added

UTMD’s June 30, 2026 Balance Sheet continued strong, with no debt. Ending Cash and Investments were $87.5 million compared to $85.8 million on December 31, 2025, after paying $2.0 million in cash dividends to stockholders, repurchasing $0.2 million of UTMD common stock, increasing non-cash working capital by $1.7 million (including increasing inventories by $1.1 million while reducing current liabilities by $0.5 million) and investing $0.3 million in capital expenditures during 1H 2026.

Removed

Consolidated sales in 1Q 2026 were $987 lower than in 1Q 2025. As expected and previously reported, UTMD did not have any 1Q 2026 sales to its previous largest medical device distributor of blood pressure monitoring kits in China, or to its previous OEM customer, PendoTECH. The combined sales to those two entities in 1Q 2025 were $857, representing 87% of the lower 1Q 2026 sales. Although overall domestic sales were about the same in both 1Q 2026 and 2025, sales outside the U.S. (OUS) excluding the China distributor were another $176 lower, due to lower Filshie Clip System sales OUS.

Removed

Using the same foreign currency exchange (FX) rates for sales not invoiced in USD, i.e. in “constant currency” terms, OUS sales would have been an additional $169 lower because of a weaker USD. FX rates for income statement purposes are transaction-weighted averages.

Removed

The average FX rates from the applicable foreign currency to USD during 1Q 2026 and 1Q 2025 follow:

Removed

UTMD’s 1Q 2026 Gross Profit at $5,282 was $256 lower than 1Q 2025 Gross Profit of $5,538. The 4.6% lower Gross Profit was less than the 10.2% decline in sales as a result of a more favorable product mix and a yearly one-time adjustment to standard costs which increased inventory value. Historically, sales to UTMD’s largest OUS distributor in China had a significantly lower Gross Profit Margin (GPM), Gross Profit/Revenues, than UTMD’s average GPM. Although manufacturing overhead costs were higher, which should lower the GPM when sales are lower, UTMD continues to effectively manage its variable manufacturing expenses.

Removed

Consolidated worldwide (WW) Operating Income, which is Gross Profit less Operating Expense (OE), in 1Q 2026 at $2,565 (29.4% of sales) was $588 lower than 1Q 2025 Operating Income of $3,154 (32.5% of sales). Operating Income was $332 lower in addition to the $256 lower Gross Profit, due to $127 higher litigation expenses, $147 higher employee health care costs in U.S. General and Administrative (G&A) expense and $65 higher same foreign currency exchange rate of OUS OE due to a weaker USD. In the aggregate, the components of WW OE in USD terms were Product Development (R&D) expenses about the same, Sales & Marketing (S&M) expenses $19 higher and G&A expenses $314 higher than in 1Q 2025, respectively.

Removed

Income Before Tax (EBT) declined more than the $588 lower Operating Income because net non-operating income (NOI) in 1Q 2026 was just $617 compared to $705 in 1Q 2025. The lower NOI was due to lower interest earned on cash balances. Combining the $588 lower Operating Income with the about $89 lower NOI yielded 1Q 2026 EBT $677 (17.5%) lower than in 1Q 2025. UTMD’s EBT Margin (EBT/sales) was 36.5% in 1Q 2026 compared to 39.7% in 1Q 2025.

Removed

UTMD’s consolidated income tax provision rate in 1Q 2026 was 18.2% compared to 21.2% in 1Q 2025. An EBT mix difference among subsidiary sovereignties caused the provision rate difference. The basic corporate income tax rate for the U.S. (including Utah state income tax) is 25.45% and for Ireland on EBT from exports is 12.5%. The lower income tax provision rate offset the 17.5% lower EBT, resulting in 1Q 2026 Net Income that was 14.4% lower than in 1Q 2025. Fewer outstanding shares as a result of UTMD’s share repurchases further reduced the decline in 1Q 2026 earnings per share (EPS), which is Net Income/diluted number of outstanding shares, to be just 11.0% lower than in 1Q 2025. During the four calendar quarters following the end of 1Q 2025, UTMD repurchased 96,864 of its shares in the open market. There was no dilution from outstanding employee stock options for purposes of calculating diluted EPS in either 1Q 2026 or 1Q 2025. In income statement summary, with revenues declining 10.5% in 1Q 2026 compared to 1Q 2025, EPS declined 11.0%.

Removed

UTMD’s March 31, 2026 Balance Sheet, in the absence of debt, remained strong. After using $9.5 million in cash during the most recent twelve-month period to make share repurchases, pay stockholder dividends and purchase new equipment, UTMD’s March 31, 2026 cash equivalent balances were $4.1 million higher than at March 31, 2025. Ending 1Q 2026 cash equivalent balances were about $1.7 million higher than three months earlier at December 31, 2025. Stockholders’ Equity at $120.4 million improved $1.1 million at the end of 1Q 2026 from three months earlier, despite the fact that dividends and share repurchases reduce Stockholders’ Equity.

Reworded

Foreign currency exchange (FX) rates for Balance Sheet purposes are the applicable rates at the end of each reporting period. The FX rates from the applicable foreign currency to USD for assets and liabilities at the end of 1Q2Q 2026 compared to the end of calendar year 2025 and the end of 1Q2Q 2025 followwere as follows:

Reworded

Terms of sale are established in advance of UTMD’s acceptance of customer orders. In the U.S., Ireland, UK, France, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, UTMD generally acceptedaccepts orders directly from and shippedships directly to end user clinicalmedical facilities, as well as third party medical/surgical distributors, under UTMD’s Standard Terms and Conditions (T&C) of Sale. UTMD’s T&C of Sale duringto bothend 1Quser 2026facilities are substantially the same in the U.S. and 1Q 2025.OUS. UTMD mayalso havehas separatestandard discounted pricing agreements with a specific clinical facility or groupT&C of affiliatedSale facilitiesfor basedOEM oncustomers, volumeother ofmedical purchases.device Pricingand agreementsnon-medical device customers for components manufactured by UTMD, which are documentedsubstantially arrangementsthe withsame, clinicalexcept facilities,that or groups of affiliated facilities, if applicable,prices are establishedgenerally in advance of orders accepted or shipments made. For existing customers, past actual shipment volumes typically determine the fixed price by part number for the next agreement period of one year. For new customers, the customer’s best estimate of volume is usually accepted by UTMD for determining the ensuing fixed prices for the agreement period. Prices are not adjusted after an order is accepted. For the sake of clarity, the separate pricing agreements with clinical facilities based on volume of purchases disclosure is not inconsistent with UTMD’s disclosure that the selling price is fixedquoted prior to the acceptance of a specific customereach order.

Added

UTMD may have separate discounted pricing agreements with a specific clinical facility, or group of affiliated facilities or large OEM customers based on volume of purchases. Pricing agreements which are documented arrangements with clinical facilities, or groups of affiliated facilities or OEM customers, if applicable, are established in advance of orders accepted or shipments made. For existing customers, past actual shipment volumes typically determine the fixed price by part number for the next agreement period of one year. For new customers, the customer’s best estimate of volume is usually accepted by UTMD for determining the ensuing fixed prices for the agreement period. Prices are not adjusted after an order is accepted. For the sake of clarity, the separate pricing agreements based on volume of purchases disclosure is not inconsistent with UTMD’s disclosure that the selling price is fixed prior to the acceptance of a specific customer order.

Added

2Q 2026 Sales

Added

Total consolidated 2Q 2026 UTMD worldwide (WW) sales in USD terms were $8,529 compared to $9,953 in 2Q 2025.

Added

Consistent with the projection in UTMD’s SEC 10-K Report at the beginning of the year, 1) sales of biopharma pressure monitoring devices and accessories to UTMD’s previously largest OEM customer, PendoTECH, were zero in 2Q 2026, which were $196 in 2Q 2025 domestic OEM sales, and 2) sales of blood pressure monitoring kits to UTMD’s previously largest distributor outside the U.S. (OUS) located in China were also zero, which were $870 in international sales in 2Q 2025. The combined sales to those two entities, which were zero in 2Q 2026, were $1,066 in 2Q 2025 and $1,007 in 2Q 2024.

Removed

Total consolidated 1Q 2026 UTMD revenues (sales) were $987 (10.2%) lower than in 1Q 2025. Constant currency sales, which are foreign currency sales converted to USD at 1Q 2025 currency exchange rates, were $1,156 (11.9%) lower. U.S. domestic sales were 0.4% lower, and OUS sales were 23.4% lower.

Reworded

Domestic sales are invoiced in 1QUSD 2026and wereobviously almostnot the same at $5,560 comparedsubject to $5,583foreign incurrency 1Qconversion 2025.(FX) rate fluctuations. The components of domestic sales include 1) “direct non-Filshie device sales” of UTMD’s medical devices to user facilities (and med/surg stocking distributors for hospitals), excluding Filshie device sales, 2) “OEM sales” of components and other products manufactured by UTMD for other medical device and non-medical device companies, and 3) “domestic Filshie device sales”,. manufacturedUTMD byseparates domestic Filshie device sales from other medical device sales direct to medical facilities because UTMD is simply a distributor for Femcare and distributed in the U.S. by UTMD.

Added

In the aggregate, 2Q 2026 domestic sales were 11.9% lower, at just $5,166 compared to $5,865 in 2Q 2025. Non-PendoTECH domestic OEM sales were $166 higher, $52 of which were higher sales to new domestic biopharma customers. Domestic sales of the Filshie Clip System at $843 in 2Q 2026 were $263 lower than in 2Q 2025, a weak quarter following unusually strong sales in 1Q 2026. Domestic direct sales of other devices were $406 lower than in 2Q 2025, about 90% of which were due to lower neonatal device sales.

Added

OUS sales in 2Q 2026 were $725 (17.7%) lower at $3,363 compared to $4,088 in 2Q 2025. Excluding the $870 lower sales to UTMD’s former China distributor mentioned above, 2Q 2026 OUS sales were $145 higher. In 2Q 2026, 39% of OUS sales were direct to medical facilities located in Ireland, the UK, France, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, compared to 37% in 2Q 2025. OUS direct to end-user sales are invoiced in foreign currencies. There was a negligible foreign currency impact from a slightly weaker USD compared to other invoiced currencies.

Added

Remaining OUS sales to distributors, excluding the China distributor, were $353 higher in 2Q 2026. These sales included export sales from the U.S. to OUS distributors invoiced in USD, and shipments to OUS distributors of products manufactured by UTMD subsidiaries in Ireland and the UK invoiced in EUR and GBP. The timing of shipments to OUS distributors can cause significant fluctuations in quarterly comparisons since distributors tend to order larger quantities each time in order to minimize transit and other logistical costs.

Added

The portion of OUS sales invoiced in foreign currencies in USD terms was 25% of total WW consolidated 2Q 2026 sales compared to 31% in 2Q 2025. The average USD FX rates increased 2Q 2026 total consolidated sales $16 for sales invoiced in foreign currencies. FX rates for income statement purposes are transaction-weighted averages. The average FX rates from the applicable foreign currency to USD during 2Q 2026 and 2Q 2025 for revenue purposes follow:

Added

The $16 weighted average favorable impact on 2Q 2026 consolidated sales was negligible, about 0.2%. In constant currency terms, foreign currency sales in 2Q 2026 in USD terms were 30.7% lower than in 2Q 2025. “Constant currency” sales means exchanging foreign currency sales into USD-denominated sales at the same FX rate as was in the previous period of time being compared.

Added

1H 2026 Sales

Added

Total consolidated 1H 2026 UTMD worldwide (WW) sales in USD terms were 12.3% lower at $17,252 compared to $19,663 in 1H 2025.

Added

Sales of biopharma pressure monitoring devices and accessories to UTMD’s previously largest OEM customer, PendoTECH, were zero in 1H 2026, compared to $265 in domestic OEM sales in 1H 2025. Sales of blood pressure monitoring kits to UTMD’s previously largest distributor outside the U.S. (OUS) located in China were also zero in 1H 2026, compared to $1,658 in international sales in 1H 2025. The combined 1H 2026 zero sales to those two entities were in comparison to $1,923 in 1H 2025 and $2,098 in 1H 2024.

Added

Looking forward, the combined year 2026 sales to those two entities are expected to be zero compared to $2,458 in 2025 and $5,063 in 2024. In its SEC Form 10-K at the beginning of 2026, UTMD planned to offset the 2025 revenue losses with new product sales in 2026, including sales to other biopharma OEM customers, projecting 2026 consolidated revenues about the same as in 2025. Unfortunately, in 1H 2026 the new sales did not develop as quickly as expected, so that the beginning plan for 2026 full year revenues is now unlikely. Management’s current year 2026 sales projection, with continued substantial uncertainty, is a sales decline of 10-13% compared to 2025.

Added

Domestic sales are invoiced in USD and obviously not subject to foreign currency conversion (FX) rate fluctuations. The components of domestic sales include 1) “direct non-Filshie device sales” of UTMD’s medical devices to user facilities (and med/surg stocking distributors for hospitals), 2) “OEM sales” of components and other products manufactured by UTMD for other medical device and non-medical device companies, and 3) “domestic Filshie device sales”. UTMD separates domestic Filshie device sales from other medical device sales direct to medical facilities because UTMD is simply a distributor for Femcare in the U.S.

Added

In the aggregate, 1H 2026 domestic sales were 6.3% lower, at $10,727 compared to $11,448 in 1H 2025. Non-PendoTECH OEM sales were $222 higher, $74 of which were higher sales to new domestic biopharma customers. Domestic sales of the Filshie Clip System at $2,376 in 1H 2026 were $230 (+10.7%) higher than in 1H 2025. Domestic direct sales of other devices were $909 lower than in 1H 2025, about 70% of which were due to lower neonatal device sales.

Added

OUS sales in 1H 2026 were $1,690 (20.6%) lower at $6,525 compared to $8,215 in 1H 2025. Excluding the $1,658 lower sales to UTMD’s former distributor mentioned above, 1H 2026 OUS sales were $32 (0.4%) lower than in 2025. In 1H 2026, 41% of OUS sales were direct to medical facilities located in Ireland, the UK, France, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, compared to 37% in 1H 2025. OUS direct to end-user sales are invoiced in foreign currencies.

Added

The portion of OUS sales invoiced in foreign currencies in USD terms was 26% of total WW consolidated 1H 2026 sales compared to 31% in 1H 2025. The average USD FX rates increased 1H 2026 total consolidated sales $185 for sales invoiced in foreign currencies. FX rates for income statement purposes are transaction-weighted averages. The average FX rates from the applicable foreign currency to USD during 1H 2026 and 1H 2025 for revenue purposes follow:

Added

The $185 weighted average favorable impact on 1H 2026 consolidated sales was 1.1%. In constant currency terms, foreign currency sales in 1H 2026 expressed in USD were 28.7% lower than in 1H 2025.

Removed

1)Direct medical device sales, representing 61% of total domestic sales, were $503 (12.8%) lower in 1Q 2026 than in 1Q 2025. Sales were lower in all product categories in what was hopefully just an abnormally weak demand quarter.

Removed

2)Total domestic OEM sales in 1Q 2026, representing 11% of all domestic sales, were $13 (2.1%) lower than in 1Q 2025, as the final $69 order backlog to PendoTECH was shipped in 1Q 2025.

Removed

3)Domestic Filshie device sales, representing 28% of all domestic sales, were $493 (+47.4%) higher in 1Q 2026 compared to 1Q 2025, which appears to be an abnormally high U.S. medical facility demand quarter.

Removed

OUS sales in 1Q 2026 were $965 (23.4%) lower at $3,162 compared to $4,127 in 1Q 2025. Sales to UTMD’s former distributor in China which were $789 in 1Q 2025 (and zero in 1Q 2026), which explains 82% of the $965 lower OUS sales. Although Filshie device sales directly to medical facilities in Ireland and the UK were about the same in both periods, direct Filshie device sales to medical facilities in Canada, France and Australia were $230 lower. OUS foreign currency sales actually benefited $169 from a weaker USD. On a constant currency basis, 1Q 2026 OUS sales were $1,133 (27.5%) lower than in 1Q 2025. OUS sales invoiced in foreign currencies in 1Q 2026 were $2,327, which was 74% of all OUS sales, and 27% of total 1Q 2026 UTMD consolidated sales. Foreign currency OUS sales in 1Q 2025 were $2,944, which was 71% of all OUS sales and 30% of total 1Q 2025 UTMD consolidated sales.

Reworded

The following table provides USD consolidatedUSD-denominated sales amounts divided into general product categories for total worldwide salesrevenues and the subset of OUS sales.revenues:

Removed

WW revenues (USD) by product category:

Reworded

OUS revenues (USD) by product category:

Reworded

*includes assemblies and molded components sold to OEM customers.

Added

Comments on tariffs

Added

Tariffs on materials received from OUS suppliers are included in manufacturing costs, i.e. reducing Gross Profit. The tariffs are simply the equivalent of excise taxes intended to raise revenues for the federal government. U.S. tariffs paid independently by UTMD on certain goods purchased from OUS suppliers have not been significant to date, i.e. $27 in 1H 2026 compared to $16 in 1H 2025. However, UTMD’s raw material suppliers both in the U.S. and OUS continue to increase prices, in some cases citing “tariffs” that they paid on their raw materials as justification. UTMD cannot estimate what portion of generally increased raw materials prices from its suppliers are due to tariffs, although UTMD does challenge this input. Due to strict regulatory standards, UTMD can’t easily change suppliers as materials typically needed in its medical devices require substantial validation for use.

Added

In 1H 2026, UTMD paid a more significant tariff on importing the Filshie Clip System devices manufactured in Ireland by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Utah Medical Products, Ltd., for distribution to U.S. medical facilities. It is not feasible, economically and otherwise, for these unique devices to be manufactured in the U.S. The tariffs were $156 in 1H 2026 and $48 in 2Q 2026, compared to zero in 1H 2025, as UTMD had sufficient inventory to cover 2025 U.S. demand after tariffs were imposed by the Trump administration under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) in February 2025. The 2026 Filshie device tariffs reduced UTMD’s Gross Profit margin by 0.9 percentage points in 1H 2026, and by 0.6 percentage points in 2Q 2026, explaining all of the lower 2Q 2026 Gross Profit margin compared to 2Q 2025.

Added

As investors likely know, the SCOTUS struck down tariffs imposed under IEEPA in February 2026, but following the ruling, the Trump administration issued a new tariff ruling under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 as a replacement. The Section 122 (19 USC 2132) tariffs granted the President the authority to impose temporary import restrictions or surcharges when the United States faces fundamental international payments problems. When applied to UTMD’s Ireland manufacturing subsidiary, this is obviously a red herring.

Added

Thankfully, the Section 122 tariff authority had a hard expiration date of July 24, 2026, and cannot be extended by the President without Congressional action, which UTMD believes is very unlikely. The administration, not to be deterred, has now indicated that it will continue to impose tariffs utilizing Section 301of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows tariffs on goods imported from countries deemed to produce products with forced labor. As UTMD believes that medical devices imported from Ireland are not subject to Section 301 tariffs, management does not expect additional Filshie device tariffs in 2H 2026.

Added

However, to the extent that other countries, which remain subject to U.S. tariffs on their goods imported into the U.S. are affected, “reciprocal tariffs” charged by other countries’ governments on goods sold by UTMD OUS may continue to negatively impact UTMD’s OUS sales.

Reworded

c) Gross Profit

Added

Gross Profit results from subtracting the cost of goods sold, comprised of costs of production, manufacturing engineering, depreciation of equipment, maintenance and repairs, quality assurance including regulatory compliance, and purchasing including freight for receiving materials from suppliers, from revenues. The cost of goods sold is divided into three categories: direct labor, raw materials and manufacturing overhead (MOH). Direct labor and raw materials are predominantly variable costs, i.e. vary directly with revenues. MOH contains many fixed costs consistent with the Company’s infrastructure, for example, supervision, quality assurance and engineering personnel, and depreciation of fixed assets.

Added

Gross Profit in 2Q 2026 was $837 (15.0%) lower than in 2Q 2025. Gross Profit in 1H 2026 was $1,093 (just 9.8%) lower than in 1H 2025 when sales were 12.3% lower. The consolidated 2Q 2026 Gross Profit margin (GPM) was 55.8% compared to 56.2% in 2Q 2025. The consolidated 1H 2026 GPM was 58.2% compared to 56.6% in 1H 2025.

Added

In addition to Filshie device tariffs, UTMD’s 2Q 2026 GPM was negatively impacted relative to 2Q 2025 because both trade and intercompany shipments from UTMD’s Ireland facility (UTMD Ltd) were substantially lower while the Company retained the staffing that it had to support the former China distributor and will be needed again for projected higher production requirements for new products in 2H 2026. In contrast, UTMD’s consolidated 1H 2026 GPM was higher than in 1H 2025, as expected, due to a more favorable product mix without $1,658 low Gross Profit sales to the China distributor.

Removed

UTMD’s 1Q 2026 Gross Profit was $256 (4.6%) lower in 1Q 2026 than in 1Q 2025, driven by 10.2% lower sales. Gross Profit results from subtracting the costs of manufacturing products, including direct labor, raw materials and manufacturing overhead (MOH) expenses, from revenues. MOH, which was higher due primarily to cost-of-living adjustments for employees, includes supervision, engineering, quality assurance, outside services, depreciation of manufacturing equipment, purchasing and freight for receiving raw materials from vendors. Higher MOH expense with lower sales decreases the GPM. Nevertheless, UTMD’s average GPM in 1Q 2026 was 60.6% compared to 57.0% in 1Q 2025. Although the lack of low GPM sales to UTMD’s former China distributor helped to improve the average GPM, the margin increase was further leveraged by an annual standard cost adjustment after the end of 2025, which increased the book value of inventories. As a side note, UTMD in the U.S. distributes Filshie devices direct to U.S. medical facilities, which are manufactured by its Ireland subsidiary. Tariffs paid to the U.S. government on Filshie devices purchased from UTMD’s own subsidiary “off the top” of intercompany sales were $108 higher in 1Q 2026 compared to 1Q 2025.

Added

Operating Income results from subtracting Operating Expenses from Gross Profit. Operating Expenses are comprised of Sales and Marketing (S&M) expenses, General and Administrative (G&A) expenses and Product Development (R&D) expenses.

Added

A lower GPM in 2Q 2026 on 14% lower sales compared to 2Q 2025 combined with $213 higher litigation expenses offset the beneficial impact of lack of intangible asset amortization expense in 2Q 2026, which was $531 in 2Q 2025. Consolidated Operating Income of $2,649 was $547 (17.1%) lower compared to 2Q 2025 Operating Income of $3,196. Despite the disappointing decline, UTMD’s 2Q 2026 Operating Income margin (OI as a percentage of sales) remained a healthy 31.1%.

Added

Operating Income in 1H 2026 was $5,215 compared to $6,349 in 1H 2025, a decrease of $1,134 (17.9%), although with a continuing healthy Operating Income margin of 30.2%. The lower Operating Income was the result of 12% lower sales despite a higher GPM, together with $41 higher Operating Expenses. Unexpectedly, G&A Operating Expenses in 1H were about the same in both years despite $574 lower Identifiable Intangible Asset amortization expense because of $341 higher 1H 2026 litigation expenses and $135 higher 1H 2026 U.S. G&A self-insured health plan expenses.

Added

The following table summarizes Operating Expenses in 2Q and 1H 2026 compared to the same periods in 2025 by Operating Expense (OE) category:

Added

Consolidated S&M expenses as a percentage of sales were higher due primarily to lower sales. The impact of differences in FX rates on foreign subsidiary S&M expenses added $2 in 2Q 2026 and $11 in 1H 2026. Excluding the FX rate impact, consolidated 2Q 2026 S&M expenses were the same and consolidated 1H 2026 S&M expenses were just 1% higher due to higher trade show expenses in the U.S. and higher salary expenses OUS.

Showing the first 60 of 132 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

UTMD insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-06-29Richins Paul O
Director
Gift 150$73.07 $11.0K20,765 SEC
2026-05-28Koopman Brian
Principal Financial Officer
Gift 50$66.27 $3.3K782 SEC

Well-known investors holding UTMD (13F)

None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.

Coming soon: email alerts when UTMD files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.