VERU 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Veru Inc. · Nasdaq · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 863894 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “We currently have no commercial revenue and may never generate revenue or become profitable.”
New heading “We could experience delays or unanticipated costs in connection with our planned clinical development program of sabizabulin as a treatment to slow the progression of or promote regression of cardiovascular atherosclerotic disease if the FDA does not accept our trial design.”
New heading “Our business could be negatively impacted by disruptions at the FDA or other government agencies.”
New heading “Unstable market and economic conditions may have serious adverse consequences on our ability to raise funds, which may cause us to delay, restructure or cease our operations.”
New heading “We are subject to outstanding litigation filed by the purchaser of the FC2 Business, which could result in substantial legal fees or damages and may divert management’s time and attention from our business.”
New heading “Our common stock may be subject to delisting from the Nasdaq Capital Market if our common stock has a closing bid price of less than $1.00 per share.”
New heading “We may not receive any meaningful amount of, or potentially any, additional funds upon the exercise of our outstanding warrants.”
Removed heading “Disruptions to or significantly increased costs associated with transportation and other distribution channels for our products may adversely affect our margins and profitability.”
Removed heading “As a result of our failure to timely file two reports with the SEC, we are currently ineligible to file new registration statements on Form S-3 or to use our current effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 until March 1, 2025, which may impair our ability to raise capital on terms favorable to us, in a timely manner or at all.”
Removed heading “We may not receive any additional payments from ONCO in connection with the sale of our ENTADFI assets and may not receive any value for the shares of ONCO common stock that we might hold from time to time.”
Removed heading “Our FC2 business may be affected by contracting risks with government and other international health agencies.”
Removed heading “The FDA issued a final order reclassifying female condoms as Class II medical devices, which may result in increased competition for FC2 in the U.S. market.”
Removed heading “Our net revenues from sales of FC2 may not return to past levels.”
Removed heading “We may not be able to successfully implement our strategy to grow sales of FC2 in the U.S. market through our own telehealth portal.”
Removed heading “Since we sell FC2 in foreign markets, we are subject to international business risks that could adversely affect our operating results.”
Removed heading “Increases in the cost of raw materials, labor, and other costs used to manufacture FC2 could increase our cost of sales and reduce our gross margins.”
Removed heading “Currency exchange rate fluctuations could increase our expenses.”
Removed heading “We rely on a single facility to manufacture FC2, and single source suppliers for certain raw materials, which subjects us to the risk of supply disruptions.”
Removed heading “We may incur costs or experience supply interruptions relating to our need to transition the supply of the nitrile polymer for FC2.”
Removed heading “Any failure to comply with the FCPA and similar anti-bribery laws in non-U.S. jurisdiction could materially adversely affect our business and result in civil and/or criminal sanctions.”
Removed heading “We have received a notice of delisting from Nasdaq.”
Largest changes
“From time to time, global and domestic credit and financial markets have experienced extreme disruptions, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, increases in unemployment rates or inflation, and uncertainty about economic stability. In recent years, the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas war have created volatility and uncertainty. Recently, tensions in trading relations between the U.S. and other countries due to U.S. tariffs and retaliatory tariffs on U.S. …”see in full comparison
“The FCPA and similar anti-bribery laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Because of the importance of the global public health sector for sales of FC2, many of our customer relationships outside of the U.S. are with governmental entities and are therefore potentially subject to such laws. …”see in full comparison
“There is uncertainty as to whether and when we will receive any future installment payments of purchase price under the ONCO Promissory Notes or sales milestone payments under the Asset Purchase Agreement, and there is a risk of a future default by ONCO in performing its payment obligations, and we do not have a security interest in any of ONCO's assets and accordingly would be an unsecured creditor in the event that ONCO defaulted. …”see in full comparison
“On December 30, 2024, we sold the FC2 Business to Clear Future, Inc. (the “Purchaser”). We agreed in the Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement with the Purchaser (the “Purchase Agreement”) to indemnify the Purchaser against certain losses suffered as a result of certain breaches of our representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in the Purchase Agreement and related documents. …”see in full comparison
“Our common stock may be subject to delisting from the Nasdaq Capital Market if our common stock has a closing bid price of less than $1.00 per share.”see in full comparison
“Medical devices such as FC2 are cleared or approved for one or more specific intended uses and performance claims that must be adequately substantiated. Promoting a device for an off-label use or making misleading or unsubstantiated claims could result in government enforcement action. Any changes to the device, including labeling, post-clearance or approval must be assessed to determine if a new clearance or approval is required. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (95)
We currently have no commercial revenue and may never generate revenue or become profitable.
After the completion of the FC2 Business Sale on December 30, 2024, we do not currently have any source of revenue. Our ability to generate revenue and become profitable depends upon our ability to obtain regulatory approval for, and successfully commercialize, our product candidates that we may develop, in-license or acquire in the future.
Even if we are able to successfully achieve regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, we do not know what the reimbursement status of our product candidates will be or when any of these products will generate revenue for us, if at all. We do not expect to generate any revenue from our product candidates for the foreseeable future, and we expect to continue to incur significant operating losses for the foreseeable future due to the cost of research and development, preclinical studies and clinical trials and the regulatory approval process for our product candidates. The amount of future losses is uncertain and will depend, in part, on the rate of growth of our expenses.
Our ability to generate revenue from our product candidates also depends on a number of additional factors, including our ability to:
We are unable to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses, or when or if we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability. Even if we are able to complete the processes described above, we anticipate incurring significant costs associated with commercializing our product candidates.
We have limited experience in obtaining regulatory approval or emergency use authorization for a drug.
We have only obtained regulatory approval for one drug, ENTADFI (tadalafil and finasteride) capsules, for oral use, which we sold to ONCO in April 2023. We have never obtained an EUA in the U.S. or in any other jurisdiction. It is possible that the FDA or other regulatory authorities may refuse to accept any or all of our planned NDAs for substantive review or may conclude, after review of our data, that our applications are insufficient to obtain regulatory authorization or approval of any of our drug candidates. The FDA may also require that we conduct additional clinical or manufacturing validation studies, which may be costly and time-consuming, and submit that data before it will reconsider our applications. Depending on the extent of these or any other FDA required studies, approval of any NDA or authorization of any EUA application that we submit may be significantly delayed, possibly for years, or may require us to expend more resources than we have available or can secure. Any delay or inability in obtaining regulatory approvals would delay or prevent us from commercializing our drug candidates, generating revenue from these proposed products and achieving and sustaining profitability. It is also possible that additional studies, if performed and completed, may not be considered sufficient by the FDA to approve any NDA or any EUA we submit. If any of these outcomes occur, we may be forced to abandon our planned NDAs or EUAs for one or more of our drug candidates, which would materially adversely affect our business.
Before we can obtain regulatory approval for the commercial sale of our drug candidates, we may be required to complete preclinical development with respect to such drug candidates and/or extensive clinical trials in humans to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the drug candidates. To date, regulatory approval has not been obtained for any of our drug candidates.
We could experience delays or unanticipated costs in connection with our Phase 2bplanned clinical trialdevelopment program of enobosarm as a treatment to augment fat loss and to prevent muscle loss in sarcopenic obese or overweight elderlyolder patients receiving a GLP-1 RA.
Our future prospects are substantially dependent on our ability to successfully advance the development of enobosarm as a treatment to augment fat loss and to prevent muscle loss in sarcopenic obese or overweight elderly patients receiving a GLP-1 RA. We arehave currently conductingconducted a Phase 2b multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, dose-finding clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of enobosarm as a treatment to augment fat loss and to prevent muscle loss in sarcopenic obese or overweight elderly patients receiving a GLP-1 RA who are at-risk for developing muscle atrophy and muscle weakness, withand have announced topline results from the firstPhase 2b clinical study as well as complete unblinded safety data and topline data from thea trialPhase expected2b inextension study. Although we have sought and received feedback from the secondFDA quarteron the design of calendar 2025. Any delays of or unanticipated changes to theour planned Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical trialstudy maythat increasewill ourevaluate costs,the sloweffect downof ourenobosarm product3mg developmenton total body weight, physical function, and approvalsafety processin approximately 200 patients who have obesity (BMI ≥ 35) and jeopardizeage our≥ ability to develop enobosarm for65 and ultimatelyare generate revenue from enobosarm as a treatment to augment fat loss and to prevent muscle loss in sarcopenic obese or overweight elderly patients receiving ainitiating GLP-1 RA who are at-risktreatment for developingweight musclereduction, atrophythe and muscle weakness, whichFDA may causeultimately adisagree changewith inthe ourdesign developmentor strategy.conduct Additionalof costssuch trial. Delays or other issues may also result in the costs of our Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical study exceeding our expectations, and require usthat towe raise additional capital,capital to conduct this clinical study, which may not be available when needed or on terms acceptable to us.us As a result, we may be forced to abandon our development of enobosarm as a treatment to augment fat loss and to prevent muscle loss in sarcopenic obese or overweight elderly patients receiving a GLP-1 RA who are at-risk for developing muscle atrophy and muscle weakness.RA. There can be no assurances that the FDA will ultimately accept our Phase 2b trial design, that we will be able to cost-effectively continue development of enobosarm, or that enobosarm will receive FDA approval or be commercialized, for any application.
We could experience delays or unanticipated costs in connection with our planned clinical development program of sabizabulin as a treatment to slow the progression of or promote regression of cardiovascular atherosclerotic disease if the FDA does not accept our trial design.
We intend to submit an IND for sabizabulin as a treatment to slow the progression of or promote regression of cardiovascular atherosclerotic disease. Subject to receiving clearance of our IND, we plan to conduct a Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, efficacy and safety study of oral sabizabulin to treat inflammation to slow the progression or promote the regression of atherosclerosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Upon the review of our IND and clinical trial design, the FDA may require that we conduct preclinical studies or additional or earlier clinical trials or that we conduct larger and more expensive clinical trials than the planned Phase 2 clinical trial we have described in this report. The FDA may also disagree with the indication we have proposed and require us to more clearly define or otherwise alter the condition we are seeking to treat. Any delays of or unanticipated changes to the planned Phase 2 clinical trial may increase our costs, slow down our product development and approval process and jeopardize our ability to develop sabizabulin as a treatment to slow the progression of or promote regression of cardiovascular atherosclerotic disease. As we have prioritized our clinical programs to focus on enobosarm for obesity, the clinical development of sabizabulin to treat inflammation associated with atherosclerotic disease is subject to the availability of sufficient funding in excess of any funds we use for enobosarm for obesity or other uses. As a result, we may be forced to abandon our development of sabizabulin as a treatment to slow the progression of or promote regression of cardiovascular atherosclerotic disease. There can be no assurances that the FDA will accept our proposed trial design, that we will be able to cost-effectively continue development of sabizabulin, or that sabizabulin will receive FDA approval or be commercialized, for any application.
We may publicly disclose interim, preliminary or topline data from our preclinical studies and clinical trials.trials, such as our announcement on January 27, 2025, of topline results from our Phase 2b QUALITY clinical trial of enobosarm as a treatment to augment fat loss and to prevent muscle loss in obese or overweight elderly patients receiving a GLP-1 RA. These interim updates are based on preliminary analyses of then-available data, and the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular study or trial. For example, we may report responses in certain patients that are unconfirmed at the time and which do not ultimately result in confirmed responses to treatment after follow-up evaluations. We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. As a result, the interim, preliminary or topline results that we report may differ from future results of the same studies or trials, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results, once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Interim, preliminary and topline data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the interim, preliminary or topline data we previously published. As a result, interim, preliminary and topline data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. In addition, we may report interim analyses of only certain endpoints rather than all endpoints. Interim, preliminary and topline data from clinical trials are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Adverse changes between interim, preliminary or topline data and final data could significantly harm our business and prospects. Further, additional disclosure of interim, preliminary or topline data by us or by our competitors in the future could result in volatility in the price of our common stock.
We do not have the resources to independently conduct research and development activities. Therefore, we intend to and do rely on CROs to conduct research and development activities for our drug candidates and for the execution of our clinical studies. Although we will control only certain aspects of our CROs' activities, we will be responsible for ensuring that each of our studies is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol and legal, regulatory and scientific standards, and our reliance on the CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. We cannot be sure that the CROs will conduct the research properly in a timely manner or on a cost-effective basis, or that the results will be reproducible. We and our CROs are required to comply with the FDA'sFDA’s cGCPs,current Good Clinical Practices (cGCPs), which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA for all of our drug products in clinical development. The FDA enforces these cGCPs through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, principal investigators and clinical trial sites. If we or our CROs fail to comply with applicable cGCPs, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable or invalid and the FDA may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our drug candidates. In addition, to evaluate the safety and effectiveness compared to placebo of our drug candidates to a statistically significant degree, our clinical trials will require an adequately large number of test subjects. Any clinical trial that a CRO conducts abroad on our behalf is subject to similar regulation. Accordingly, if our CROs fail to comply with these regulations or recruit a sufficient number of patients, we may be required to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process.
In addition, regulatory requirements could pose barriers to the manufacture of our drug candidates. Third-party manufacturers are required to comply with the FDA’s cGMPs.current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMPs). As a result, the facilities used by any manufacturers of our drug candidates must maintain a compliance status acceptable to the FDA. Holders of NDAs, or other forms of FDA approvals or clearances, or those distributing a regulated product under their own name, are responsible for manufacturing even though that manufacturing is conducted by a third-party contract manufacturing organization (CMO). Our third-party manufacturers will be required to produce our drug candidates under FDA cGMPs in order to meet acceptable standards. Our third-party manufacturers may not perform their obligations under their agreements with us or may discontinue their business before the time required by us to gain approval for or commercialize our drug candidates. In addition, our manufacturers will be subject to ongoing periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and corresponding state and foreign agencies for compliance with cGMPs and similar regulatory requirements. Failure by any of our manufacturers to comply with applicable cGMPs could result in sanctions being imposed on us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, delays, suspensions or withdrawals of approvals, operating restrictions, interruptions in supply, recalls, withdrawals, issuance of safety alerts and criminal prosecutions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Finally, we also could experience manufacturing delays if our CMOs give greater priority to the supply of other products over our products or otherwise do not satisfactorily perform according to the terms of their agreements with us.
Disruptions to or significantly increased costs associated with transportation and other distribution channels for our products may adversely affect our margins and profitability.
We expect to rely on the uninterrupted and efficient operation of third-party logistics companies to transport, store and deliver our products, including FC2. These third-party logistics companies may experience disruptions to the transportation channels used to distribute our products, including disruptions caused by pandemics, increased airport and shipping port congestion, a lack of transportation capacity, increased fuel expenses and storage costs, and a shortage of manpower or capital or due to other business interruptions. Disruptions to the transportation channels experienced by our third-party logistics companies may result in increased costs, including the additional use of airfreight to meet demand. Disruptions to this business model or our relationship with the third party if, for example, performance fails to meet our expectations, could harm our business.
The FDA has established regulations, guidelines and policies to govern the drug development and approval process, as have foreign regulatory authorities. Any change in regulatory requirements resulting from the adoption of new legislation, regulations or policies may require us to amend existing clinical trial protocols or add new clinical trials to comply with these changes. Such amendments to existing protocols or clinical trial applications or the need for new ones, may significantly and adversely affect the cost, timing and completion of the clinical trials for our drug candidates. In addition, the FDA’s policies may change and additional government regulations may be issued that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our drug candidates, or impose more stringent product labeling and post-marketing testing and other requirements. The political environment in the U.S. could result in significant changes in, and uncertainty with respect to, legislation, regulation and government policy that could significantly impact our business and the health care industry. While it is not possible to predict whether and when any such changes will occur, specific proposals that have been discussed or implemented which could have a material impact on us include, but are not limited to, potential changes to the ACA,Affordable recentlyCare issuedAct regulations offering employers religious and moral exemptions from the ACA’s requirement to provide insurance covering birth control,(ACA), and the enactment of the 21st Century Cures Act. If we are slow or unable to adapt to any such changes, our business, prospects and ability to achieve or sustain profitability would be adversely affected.
We cannot be sure that, if our clinical trials for any of our drug candidates are successfully completed, we will be able to submit an NDA to the FDA or that any NDA we submit will be approved by the FDA in a timely manner, if at all, or that the submission of any NDA is commercially feasible. Similar risks apply to EUA applications in the U.S. and other jurisdictions. After completing clinical trials for a drug candidate in humans, a drug dossier is prepared and submitted to the FDA as an NDA, and includes all preclinical studies and clinical trial data relevant to the safety and effectiveness of the product at the suggested dose and duration of use for the proposed indication as well as manufacturing information, in order to allow the FDA to review such drug dossier and to consider a drug candidate for approval for commercialization in the United States. If we are unable to submit an NDA with respect to any of our current drug candidates, if any NDA we submit is not approved by the FDA, or we elect not to file an NDA, or if we are unable to obtain any required state and local distribution licenses or similar authorizations, we will be unable to commercialize that product. The FDA can and does reject NDAs and require additional clinical trials, even when drug candidates achieve favorable results in Phase 3 clinical trials.
Our development and commercialization of sabizabulin as a treatment forto ARDSslow the progression of or promote regression of cardiovascular atherosclerotic disease will depend on our ability to secure significant funding through government grants, pharmaceutical company partnerships or similarother external sources.
We currently plan to prioritize the use of our internal cash and the net proceeds of any future financings to the development of enobosarm, with a primary near-term focus on funding aour PLATEAU Phase 2b clinical trial to evaluate theenobosarm 3mg versus placebo on total body weight, body composition, physical function and safety and efficacy of enobosarm initially as a treatment to augment fat loss and to prevent lean mass loss in sarcopenicapproximately obese or overweight elderly200 patients with obesity receiving atirzepatide GLP-1 RA who are at-risk(ZEPBOUND) for developingweight muscle atrophy and muscle weakness,reduction., and to seek external funding through government grants, pharmaceutical company partnerships or similar sources to advance sabizabulin as a treatment forto viral-inducedslow ARDS.the progression of or promote regression of cardiovascular atherosclerotic disease. Such funding may not be available on a timely basis or at all, which may cause a significant delay in or the suspension of our development of sabizabulin as a treatment forto viral-inducedslow ARDS.the progression of or promote regression of cardiovascular atherosclerotic disease. Government funding for private sector research and development activities can be difficult to obtain and may contain limitations on its use. For example, in October 2023, we were notified that we were not selected for participation in the planned Phase 2 ARDS clinical trial to be sponsored by BARDA. There are also uncertainties regarding our ability to obtain funding through partnerships with pharmaceutical companies, including significant competition in seeking appropriate partners and the possibility that potential partners may not view sabizabulin as having the requisite potential to demonstrate safety and efficacy or adequate intellectual property protection.
We are subject to extensive and costly governmental regulation, including healthcare reform measures that may negatively impact sales of FC2.regulation.
Our marketed product, FC2, and our drug candidates are subject to extensive and rigorous domestic government regulation, including regulation by the FDA, the FTC,Federal Trade Commission, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), other divisions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, including its Office of Inspector General, the U.S. Department of Justice, the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs, to the extent our products arewill be paid for directly or indirectly by those departments, state and local governments and their respective foreign equivalents. The FDA regulates the research, development, preclinical and clinical testing, manufacture, safety, effectiveness, record keeping, reporting, labeling, storage, approval, advertising, promotion, sale, distribution, import and export of pharmaceutical products and medical devices under various regulatory provisions. The Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP) division of the FDA also regulates the advertising, marketing, and promotion of the Company’sdrug products. Many states and local governments require distribution licenses or similar authorizations to sell products in their jurisdictions. Any of our products that are tested or marketed outside the U.S. are also subject to extensive regulation by foreign governments, whether or not we have obtained FDA approval for a given product and its uses. Such foreign regulation may be equally or more demanding than corresponding U.S. regulation.
The ACA mandates coverage of FC2 by U.S. health insurance plans. The ACA is periodically subject to legal challenges and a continuing political effort to limit its scope or even potentially repeal it. We do not expect any imminent such modifications or repeal, but we can offer no assurance that the political situation regarding the ACA will not change in ways in the future that could have a material adverse effect on our ability to commercialize FC2 as a prescription product in the U.S.
Specific to the contraception coverage mandate, ACA regulations provide exemptions from this requirement for qualifying religious employers and individuals and non-governmental entities that object to providing the coverage on the basis of sincerely held religious beliefs. The Trump administration issued two interim final regulations in October 2017 expanding the exemptions to those entities objecting to the requirement on the basis of religious and moral convictions, which were finalized in November 2018. Federal court judges in Pennsylvania and California separately blocked enforcements of these exemption regulations, with appellate courts upholding the decisions. On July 8, 2020, the Supreme Court reversed the lower courts’ rulings, allowing the rules to go into effect. Even though the U.S. Department of Labor issued a statement on January 10, 2022, reminding plans and issuers subject to these requirements of their responsibility to fully comply with the requirements under PHS Act section 2713 and the HRSA Guidelines, challenges or future regulatory efforts to erode the contraception mandate may persist. If successful, such challenges may adversely impact sales of FC2 in states that do not separately provide for reimbursement of FC2.
Medical devices such as FC2 are cleared or approved for one or more specific intended uses and performance claims that must be adequately substantiated. Promoting a device for an off-label use or making misleading or unsubstantiated claims could result in government enforcement action. Any changes to the device, including labeling, post-clearance or approval must be assessed to determine if a new clearance or approval is required. Furthermore, the facility in which we manufacture FC2 is subject to periodic inspection by the FDA and other federal, state and foreign government authorities, which require manufacturers of medical devices to adhere to certain regulations, including the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, which requires, among other things, periodic audits, design controls, quality control testing and documentation procedures, as well as complaint evaluations and investigation. The FDA also requires the reporting of certain adverse events and product malfunctions and may require the reporting of recalls or other correction or removals of devices in commercial distribution. Issues identified through such inspections and reports may result in FDA enforcement action. Moreover, issues identified through such inspections and reports may require significant resources to resolve.
The FDA may inspect our facilities periodically to determine compliance with provisions of the FDC Act and FDA regulations. The FDA also requires the reporting of certain adverse events and product malfunctions and may require the reporting of recalls or other field safety corrective actions. Issues identified through such inspections and reports may result in FDA enforcement action. Moreover, issues identified through such inspections and reports may require significant resources to resolve.
Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could lead to the following actions:
Any of these actions could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Any of our products that are tested or marketed abroad are also subject to extensive regulation by foreign governments, whether or not we have obtained FDA approval for a given product and its uses. Such foreign regulation may be equally or more burdensome than U.S. regulation.
In addition, there has been a recent trend of increased federal and state regulation of payments made by drug and device manufacturers to health care practitioners. Some states, such as California, Connecticut, Massachusetts and Nevada, mandate implementation of corporate compliance programs, while other state laws prohibit, or require tracking and reporting of, certain gifts, compensation and other remuneration to physicians and other health care practitioners.
In addition, there has been a recent years, a numbertrend of states,increased including California, Minnesota, Oregon, Texasfederal and Washington,state regulation of payments made by drug manufacturers to health care practitioners. Some states mandate implementation of corporate compliance programs, while other state laws prohibit, or require tracking and reporting of, certain gifts, compensation and other remuneration to physicians and other health care practitioners. In addition, certain states have enacted laws requiring manufacturers to submit reports on drugs whose list price has increased by more than a certain percentage during a specified period and/or new drugs that are being launched at a price exceeding a specified amount. Among other things, the reports must explain the justifications for the price or price increase.
Our business could be negatively impacted by disruptions at the FDA or other government agencies.
The ability of the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including the transition to a new administration; government budget and funding levels; statutory, regulatory and policy changes: the FDA’s or foreign regulatory authorities’ ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees; and other events that may otherwise affect the FDA’s or foreign regulatory authorities’ ability to perform routine functions. Average review times at the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities have fluctuated in recent years as a result. Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new drugs to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, in recent years including most recently from October 1, 2025 to November 12, 2025, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, have had to furlough critical FDA employees and stop critical activities. Following the reopening of the U.S. government on November 12, 2025, there may be a backlog of regulatory submissions which could delay the ability of the FDA to review our regulatory submissions, including a pre-IND or other approvals required for our planned Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical study of enobosarm. Any such delays could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, the current U.S. Presidential administration has issued certain policies and certain Executive Orders directed towards reducing the employee headcount and costs associated with U.S. administrative agencies, including the FDA, and it remains unclear the degree to which these efforts may limit or otherwise adversely affect the FDA’s ability to conduct routine operations.
Market acceptance and sales for our marketed product, FC2, and drug candidates will depend on coverage and reimbursement policies and may be affected by health care reform measures. Government authorities and third-party payors, such as private health insurers and health maintenance organizations, decide which products they will pay for and establish reimbursement levels. We cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement will be available for our drug candidates, if approved. We also cannot be sure that the amount of reimbursement available, if any, will not reduce the demand for, or the price of, our products. If reimbursement is not available or is available only at limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our drug candidates.
Physicians may not prescribe our drug candidates, if approved by the appropriate regulatory authorities for marketing and sale, which would prevent any such drug candidate from generating revenue. Market acceptance of our marketed product, FC2, and drug candidates by physicians, patients and payors, will depend on a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:
We incurred a net loss of $22.7 million and $37.8 million during the yearyears ended September 30, 2024.2025 and 2024, respectively. Pharmaceutical product development is a speculative undertaking, involves a substantial degree of risk and is a capital-intensive business. We expect to incur significant expenses until we are able to obtain regulatory approval and subsequently sell one or more of our drug candidates under development in significant quantities, which may not happen. We expect to devote most of our financial resources to research and development, including our non-clinical development activities and clinical trials. Our drug candidates will require the completion of regulatory review, significant marketing efforts and substantial investment before they can provide us with any revenue. We are uncertain when or if we will be able to achieve or sustain profitability. If we achieve profitability in the future, we may not be able to sustain profitability in subsequent periods. Failure to become and remain profitable would impair our ability to sustain operations and adversely affect the price of our common stock and our ability to raise capital.
We will need to raise additional capital to fund our operations and development programs in the future. If we are unsuccessful in attracting new capital, we may not be able to continue operations or development or may be forced to sell assets to do so. Alternatively, capital may not be available to us on favorable terms, or if at all. If available, financing terms may lead to significant dilution of our stockholders’ equity.
We are not profitable and have had negative cash flow from operations. We will need large amounts of capital to support our development and commercialization efforts for our drug candidates, including the Phase 2b clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of enobosarm in preventing significant muscle wasting in obese patients receiving a GLP-1 therapeutic to treat obesity.candidates. Our existing cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash equivalents as of the date of this report may not be sufficient to fund our working capital needs and operating expenses. To obtain the capital necessary to fund our operations, we expect to finance our cash needs through public or private equity offerings, debt financing and/or other capital sources. Additional capital may not be available at such times or amounts as needed by us.
Even if capital is available, it might be available only on unfavorable terms. Any additional equity or convertible debt financing into which we enter could be dilutive to our existing stockholders. Any future debt financing into which we enter may impose covenants upon us that restrict our operations, including limitations on our ability to incur liens or additional debt, pay dividends, repurchase our stock, make certain investments and engage in certain merger, consolidation or asset sale transactions. Any debt financing or additional equity that we raise may contain terms that are not favorable to us or our stockholders. If we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements with third parties, we may need to relinquish rights to our technologies or our products or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. Our low stock price may make it more difficult to access equity capital markets and may increase the dilution to our shareholders if we raise capital through the sale of equity securities. If access to sufficient capital is not available as and when needed, our business will be materially impaired, and we may be required to cease operations, curtail one or more product development or commercialization programs, scale back or eliminate the development of business opportunities, or significantly reduce expenses, sell assets, seek a merger or joint venture partner, file for protection from creditors or liquidate all of our assets. Any of these factors could harm our operating results.
Unstable market and economic conditions may have serious adverse consequences on our ability to raise funds, which may cause us to delay, restructure or cease our operations.
From time to time, global and domestic credit and financial markets have experienced extreme disruptions, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, increases in unemployment rates or inflation, and uncertainty about economic stability. In recent years, the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas war have created volatility and uncertainty. Recently, tensions in trading relations between the U.S. and other countries due to U.S. tariffs and retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods could reduce trade volume, investment, technological exchange and other economic activities between major international economies, resulting in disruptions in global economic conditions and global financial markets. Our financing strategy may be adversely affected by an economic downturn, volatile business environment and continued unpredictable and unstable market conditions. If the equity and credit markets deteriorate, it may make a debt or equity financing more difficult to complete, costlier, and more dilutive. Failure to secure any necessary financing in a timely manner and on favorable terms will have a material adverse effect on our business strategy and financial performance, and could require us to cease or delay our operations.
As a result of our failure to timely file two reports with the SEC, we are currently ineligible to file new registration statements on Form S-3 or to use our current effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 until March 1, 2025, which may impair our ability to raise capital on terms favorable to us, in a timely manner or at all.
Form S-3 permits eligible issuers to conduct registered offerings using a short form registration statement that allows the issuer to incorporate by reference its past and future filings and reports made under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In addition, Form S-3 enables eligible issuers to conduct primary offerings under Rule 415 of the Securities Act. The shelf registration process, combined with the ability to forward incorporate information, allows issuers to avoid delays and interruptions in the offering process and to access the capital markets in a more expeditions and efficient manner than raising capital in a standard registered offering pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1. The ability to newly register securities for resale may also be limited as a result of the loss of Form S-3 eligibility with respect to such registrations.
As a result of our failure to timely file the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2023 and a Current Report on Form 8-K that was due on February 27, 2024, we are ineligible to file new registration statements on Form S-3 or to use our current effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-270606) (the “Current Shelf Registration Statement”) until no earlier than March 1, 2025. Our Form S-3 ineligibility may significantly impair our ability to raise necessary capital needed for our business. If we seek to access the capital markets through a registered offering pursuant to a new registration statement on Form S-1, we would be required to disclose the proposed offering and the material terms thereof before the offering commences. As a result of such disclosure and potential for SEC review of such registration statement on Form S-1, we may experience delays in the offering process and we may incur increased offering and transaction costs and other impediments to such an offering. If we are unable to raise capital through a registered offering, we would be required to raise capital on a private placement basis, which may be subject to pricing, size and other limitations imposed under NASDAQ rules, or seek other sources of capital. Until March 1, 2025, we will not be able to sell any securities pursuant to the Current Shelf Registration Statement, including under our current common stock purchase agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“Lincoln Park”).
We may not receive any additional payments from ONCO in connection with the sale of our ENTADFI assets and may not receive any value for the shares of ONCO common stock that we might hold from time to time.
In April 2023, we sold our ENTADFI assets to ONCO and on September 29, 2023, we entered into an amendment to the Asset Purchase Agreement which provided that the promissory note for the $4 million installment of the purchase price due September 30, 2023 was deemed paid and fully satisfied upon (1) the payment to us of the sum of $1.0 million in immediately available funds on September 29, 2023, and (2) the issuance to us by October 3, 2023 of 3,000 shares of ONCO Preferred Stock. The shares of ONCO Preferred Stock held by the Company were converted into 142,749 shares of ONCO common stock on September 24, 2024. Although ONCO’s common stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market, there is limited trading volume and we may find it difficult to sell the shares of ONCO common stock that we might hold from time to time at an acceptable price or at all, and as a result we may not receive any value for the shares of ONCO common stock that we might hold from time to time. Under the Asset Purchase Agreement, ONCO was obligated to pay an additional $10 million in installments in our fiscal year 2024 pursuant to the ONCO Promissory Notes, plus up to an additional $80 million in milestone payments based on ONCO’s net sales from ENTADFI business after closing.
There is uncertainty as to whether and when we will receive any future installment payments of purchase price under the ONCO Promissory Notes or sales milestone payments under the Asset Purchase Agreement, and there is a risk of a future default by ONCO in performing its payment obligations, and we do not have a security interest in any of ONCO's assets and accordingly would be an unsecured creditor in the event that ONCO defaulted. We received payment of $1.0 million on September 29, 2023 and total payments of $0.3 million during the year ended September 30, 2024 from ONCO pursuant to the ONCO Promissory Notes. We have entered into the Forbearance Agreement with ONCO, relating to certain defaults under the ONCO Promissory Notes, which includes a forbearance period as to the April 2024 Promissory Note that ends on the earlier of (a) March 31, 2025 and (b) the occurrence of an Event of Default (as defined in the Forbearance Agreement) and an extension of the due date of the September 2024 Promissory Note to June 30, 2025. ONCO is required to make certain Required Payments towards the outstanding balance of the ONCO Promissory Notes during such periods. There can be no assurance as to (1) whether and when we will receive any payments pursuant to the terms of the Forbearance Agreement or otherwise under the ONCO Promissory Notes or any sales milestone payments under the Asset Purchase Agreement, (2) the extent of the risk of a future default by ONCO in performing its payment or other obligations under the Forbearance Agreement and the ONCO Promissory Notes, and (3) whether and when we will be able to receive any cash proceeds from the shares of ONCO common stock that we might hold from time to time. If ONCO fails to pay the outstanding ONCO Promissory Notes when due or an event of default under the ONCO Promissory Notes or the Forbearance Agreement otherwise occurs, we may, among other things, declare the full amount outstanding to be due and sue to collect the ONCO Promissory Notes, which actions may force ONCO into bankruptcy. There can be no assurance as to whether we would be able to collect any amounts due under the ONCO Promissory Notes if ONCO files for bankruptcy and, in such event, the shares of ONCO common stock we hold would likely have no value.
Our FC2 business may be affected by contracting risks with government and other international health agencies.
Large international agencies and government health agencies which purchase and distribute FC2 for use in family planning and HIV/AIDS prevention programs have historically purchased significant quantities of FC2. Sales to such agencies may be subject to government contracting risks, including the appropriations process and funding priorities, potential bureaucratic delays in awarding contracts under governmental tenders, process errors, politics or other pressures, and the risk that contracts may be subject to cancellation, delay, or restructuring. A governmental tender award indicates acceptance of the bidder’s price rather than an order or guarantee of the purchase of any minimum number of units. Many governmental tenders are stated to be “up to” the maximum number of units, which gives the applicable government agency discretion to purchase less than the full maximum tender amount. As a result, government agencies may order and purchase fewer units than the full maximum tender amount and there are no guarantees as to the timing or amount of actual orders or shipments under government tenders. Orders received may vary from the amount of the tender award based on a number of factors, including vendor supply capacity, quality inspections, and changes in demand. These contracting risks may cause significant quarter-to-quarter variations in our operating results and could adversely affect our net revenues and profitability. Budget issues, spending cuts, and global health spending priorities affecting government health agencies may also adversely affect demand for FC2 and our net revenues.
The FDA issued a final order reclassifying female condoms as Class II medical devices, which may result in increased competition for FC2 in the U.S. market.
On September 21, 2018, the FDA issued a final order reclassifying female condoms from Class III to Class II medical devices, renaming them “single-use internal condoms” and requiring new devices in this category to submit a 510(k) premarket notification and comply with various “special controls.” Special controls are a battery of product clinical testing which includes, but is not limited to, determining product effectiveness against pregnancy and against infection transmission, and product tolerability. While FC2 is the only currently available female condom approved for marketing by the FDA in the U.S., this reclassification by the FDA may reduce the barriers for other types of female condoms to enter the U.S. market. If other female condoms enter the U.S. market, we may face increased competition in the U.S., which may put downward pressure on pricing for FC2 and adversely affect sales of FC2 in the U.S.
We may experience competition, especially for enobosarm as a treatment for metabolic diseases, if approved, and FC2.approved.
Other parties have developed and marketed female condoms, although only two such products presently have WHO pre-qualification and none of these female condoms have been approved for market by the FDA. FDA market approval is required to sell female condoms in the U.S., and WHO pre-qualification is required to sell female condoms to U.N. agencies. The FDA’s reclassification of female condoms from Class III to Class II medical devices may reduce the barriers for other types of female condoms to enter the U.S. market. FC2 has also been competing with other female condoms in markets that do not require either FDA market approval or WHO prequalification. There are other polyurethane brands from China that have CE-certification. We have experienced increasing competition in the global public health sector, and competitors received part of the last three South African tenders and the latest Brazilian tender. Increasing competition in FC2’s markets has put pressure on pricing for FC2 and adversely affected sales of FC2, and some customers, particularly in the global public health sector, may prioritize price over other features where FC2 may have an advantage. It is also possible that other companies will develop a female condom, and such companies could have greater financial resources and customer contacts than us. In addition, other contraceptive and HIV-prevention and treatment methods compete with FC2 for funding and attention in the global public health sector.
Our net revenues from sales of FC2 may not return to past levels.
Net revenues from sales of FC2 have declined significantly in recent periods, particularly in the U.S. prescription channel. Although we are working to restore ordering and utilization patterns in future periods, net revenues from sales of FC2 may not return to past levels. Ordering patterns may not rebound or may continue to decline if our distribution partners in the telehealth sector encounter issues, we or our distribution partners are not able or willing to spend sufficient amounts to market and promote FC2, or underlying demand for FC2 decreases. In particular, sales to our largest telehealth customer, The Pill Club, have been eliminated due to The Pill Club’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing on April 18, 2023 and the termination of our contract with The Pill Club. In addition, we may lack resources to increase FC2 marketing efforts by an amount sufficient to grow revenues and drive awareness of our independent, FC2-dedicated direct to patient telemedicine and pharmacy services portal. Any failure to attain or sustain sales growth for FC2 in the U.S. market may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We may not be able to successfully implement our strategy to grow sales of FC2 in the U.S. market through our own telehealth portal.
We have developed and continue to refine our own telehealth portal to grow revenues from the U.S. prescription channel. We have never developed a telemedicine platform before. The cost and regulatory complexity required to operate and continue to refine this platform, including costs for collaborators who are helping us refine the platform and who will help us in our efforts to market the telehealth platform and FC2, may outweigh any increased sales resulting from this effort. Patients may also incur costs in paying for the telehealth physician consultations. Any of these risks could harm patient acceptance of the platform and our ability to continue to grow FC2 sales. Market acceptance of our platform may be slow to develop, and to date we have not experienced significant sales through our platform.
The Pill Club was one of ourthe largest customers,customers of the FC2 Business, accounting for 44% of our net revenues in fiscal 2022 and 43% of our net revenues in fiscal 2021. On February 7, 2023, the California Attorney General announced a settlement with The Pill Club over a number of alleged improper actions by The Pill Club, including alleged overbilling for FC2. Although we were not involved in the business practices that were the subject of the California Attorney General’s allegations, it is possible that the California Attorney General or another governmental authority may investigate or assert claims against us in connection with The Pill Club’s practices with respect to sales of FC2. Any such claims or investigations could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition. Any such claims or investigations, regardless of the outcome, would be costly and time-consuming.
WeAlthough havewe asold concentrationthe ofFC2 Business, we retained our claims relating to accounts receivable atdue from The Pill Club, withwhich had a balance of $3.9 million of accounts receivable as of September 30, 2024.2025. On April 18, 2023, The Pill Club filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and its assets were sold in June 2023 to satisfy a secured creditor. Our claims against The Pill Club for these receivables have been filed with The Pill Club bankruptcy estate and weWe will continue to pursue payment for as much of the receivables as possible but based on the amount of the claims of other unsecured creditors and the limited assets remaining in The Pill Club bankruptcy estate it is unlikely that we will recover any of these receivables. We recorded in fiscal 2023 and maintain as of September 30, 20242025 an allowance for credit losses of $3.9 million due to The Pill Club’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in April 2023.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Phase 2b Extension Maintenance Portion of the Phase 2b QUALITY Study”
New heading “Novel Modified Release Oral Enobosarm Formulation is on Track to be Available for Phase 3 Clinical Studies and Commercialization”
New heading “Development Plan: Planned Clinical Trials.”
New heading “Planned Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical study”
New heading “Novel Modified Release Oral Enobosarm Formulation is on Track to be Available for Phase 3 Clinical Studies and Commercialization”
New heading “Atherosclerosis Inflammation Program”
New heading “Development Plan: Planned Clinical Trials.”
New heading “FC2 Business Sale and Discontinued Operations”
Removed heading “Oncology Program”
Removed heading “Infectious Disease Program”
Removed heading “Sexual Health Program”
Removed heading “Aspire Capital Purchase Agreement”
Removed heading “Private Investment in Public Equity”
Removed heading “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”
Largest changes
“On April 24, 2024, the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement with ONCO, which was amended and restated as of September 19, 2024 (as amended and restated, the "Forbearance Agreement"), relating to certain defaults under the ONCO Promissory Notes. …”see in full comparison
“On December 30, 2024, the Company and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (collectively, the “Sellers”) entered into a Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Clear Future, Inc. (the “Purchaser”). Pursuant to, and subject to the terms and conditions of, the Purchase Agreement, the Purchaser purchased substantially all of the assets (the “FC2 Business Sale”) related to the Company's FC2 female condom business ® (internal condom), including the stock of the Company’s U.K. and Malaysian operating subsidiaries. …”see in full comparison
“The Company has $6.9 million recorded as goodwill at September 30, 2025 and 2024. The Company evaluates the carrying value of its goodwill on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist. An impairment of goodwill could occur if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeded the fair value of that reporting unit. The estimated fair value of a reporting unit is highly sensitive to changes in projections and assumptions; therefore, in some instances changes in these assumptions could potentially lead to impairment. …”see in full comparison
“The Company has $6.9 million recorded as goodwill at September 30, 2024 and 2023. The Company evaluates the carrying value of its goodwill on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist. An impairment of goodwill could occur if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeded the fair value of that reporting unit. The estimated fair value of a reporting unit is highly sensitive to changes in projections and assumptions; therefore, in some instances changes in these assumptions could potentially lead to impairment. …”see in full comparison
“Intangible assets are highly vulnerable to impairment charges, particularly IPR&D. These assets are initially measured at fair value and therefore any reduction in expectations used in the valuations could potentially lead to impairment. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (139)
We are a late clinical stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing novel medicines for the treatment of metabolic diseases, oncology,cardiometabolic and viral-inducedinflammatory ARDS.diseases. Our drug development program includesconsists of two late-stage new chemical entities, enobosarm and sabizabulin. Enobosarm, aan oral selective androgen receptor modulator (“SARM”), is being developed inas twoa differentnext programs:generation (i)drug obesity-that enobosarmmakes inweight combinationreduction withby GLP-1 RA todrugs augmentmore tissue selective for loss of fat loss,and preservation of lean mass. This activity leads to preventimproved musclebody loss,composition and maintain physical function forwith higherexpected qualityclinically meaningful incremental weight lossreduction andversus (ii)GLP-1 breastRA cancer- enobosarm plus abemaciclib for the 2nd line treatment of androgen receptor positive (AR+), estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer, subject to the availability of sufficient funding.monotherapy. Sabizabulin, a microtubule disruptor, is being developed for the treatment of hospitalizedinflammation patientsin withatherosclerotic viral-inducedcardiovascular ARDS.disease. WeOn doDecember not30, intend to undertake further development of sabizabulin for2024, the treatmentCompany ofsold viral-induced ARDS unless we obtain funding from government grants, pharmaceutical company partnerships, or other similar third-party external sources. We also have anits FDA-approved commercial product, the FC2 Female Condom® (Internal Condom), for the dual protection against unplanned pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections.infections (the “FC2 Business”).
Obesity Program - Enobosarm
In reported third-party clinical trials evaluating currentlyCurrently approved GLP-1 RA in obesepatients patients,with trial participantsobesity exhibited significant weight loss composed of reductions in both fat and lean (muscle and bone) mass. Of the total weight loss reported in certain ofthird these third-partyparty clinical trials, 20-50% of the total weight loss reported by patients was attributable to lean mass (muscle) loss. AccordingPatients to the CDC, 41.5% of older adults are obese and could benefit from weight loss medication. Up to 34.4% of people over the age of 60 with obesity in the United Stateswho have sarcopenic obesity. Sarcopenic obese patients are patients whoobesity have both obesity and low muscle mass at the same time and are potentially at the greatest risk for developing critically low muscle mass when taking a currently approved GLP-1 RA. We therefore believe there is an urgent unmet need for a drug that can ameliorateprevents the muscle wasting effectsloss of currently approved GLP-1 RA therapiesmuscle and alsoincreases allow for preferentialthe loss of fat massfor greater weight loss in at-risk sarcopenic obese and overweight elderly patients. While older adultspatients arereceiving atGLP-1 higher riskRA for sarcopeniaweight and sarcopenic obesity, in discussions with the FDA, Veru intends to ultimately seek an approval in the broadest population that could benefit in all ages rather than limiting the indication to patients over the age of 60 years as younger patients (including females of child-bearing potential) with obesity on GLP-1 receptor agonists could benefit from the potential muscle-preserving effects of enobosarm.reduction.
Enobosarm is an oral, novel SARM that has demonstrated tissue-selective, dose-dependent improvement in body composition with increases in lean mass and decreases in fat mass, improvement in muscle strength and physical function, has no clinically-relevant masculinizing effects in women and has neutral prostate effects in men in previous clinical trials.
Advanced cancer can cause a loss of appetite where there is significant loss of both lean mass and fat mass. Enobosarm has been evaluated in five separate third-party clinical trials in which lean mass measurement was a primary or co-primary endpoint. These third-party clinical trials include two Phase 2 clinical trials in healthy older or sarcopenic subjects (168 subjects) and one Phase 2b clinical trial and two Phase 3 clinical trials in subjects with muscle wasting because of cancer (800 subjects), generating lean mass and safety data from a total of 968 patients. In certain of these trials, enobosarm demonstrated a dose-dependent improvement in body composition with increases in lean mass and reductions in fat mass. For example, in the Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating enobosarm in 120 men over 60 years old and postmenopausal women treated for 12 weeks, patients receiving 3mg dose of enobosarm (n=24) demonstrated a statistically significant (i) increase in total lean body mass (average increase of 1.25 kg (p = < 0.001)) and (ii) decrease in total fat mass (average decrease of 0.32 kg (p=0.049)). When measuring physical function by stair climb test, patients receiving 3mg dose of enobosarm in this trial also demonstrated statistically significant improvements compared to placebo (p=0.049) using a secondary methodology of statistical analysis provided for in the trial protocol.
Based on a large safety database which includes 1,581 men and women with treatment duration for up to 3 years, enobosarm has been generally well tolerated in clinical trials completed to date. However, no preclinical studies or clinical trials evaluating the combination of enobosarm and a GLP-1 RA have been completed to date. All the nonclinical and clinical efficacy and safety data on enobosarm including those generated by these five third-party clinical trials are owned by Veru pursuant to an assignment from the University of Tennessee Research Foundation.
We believe the clinical data we own that was generated from third-party clinical trials of enobosarm in both elderly patients and in patients with initial and ongoing muscle wasting caused by loss of appetite, provide strong clinical rationale for the co-administration of enobosarm and a GLP-1 RA in at-risk sarcopenic obese or overweight elderly patients as the combination has the potential to ameliorate the muscle wasting effects of currently approved GLP-1 RA therapies and also allow for preferential loss of fat mass.
WeEnobosarm submittedis anbeing Investigationaldeveloped Newas Druga Applicationtreatment (IND)to preserve muscle/physical function and reduce fat to cause incremental weight loss in patients with obesity receiving a GLP-1 RA for enobosarmweight forreduction. a Phase 2b clinical study in January 2024. In February 2024, the Company received FDA clearance to initiate theA Phase 2b, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, dose-finding QUALITY clinical trial designedwas conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of enobosarm 3mg, enobosarm 6mg, or placebo as a treatment to augment fat loss and to prevent muscle loss in sarcopenic168 obesepatients orwith overweight olderobesity (>≥60 years of age) patients receiving semaglutide (Wegovy®). for weight reduction. The primary endpoint iswas the percent change from baseline in total lean body mass, and the key secondary endpoints arewere the percent change from baseline in total body fat mass, total body weight, and physical function as measured by stair climb test at 16 weeks. InAfter April 2024completing the Companyefficacy announceddose-assessment that it had enrolled its first patients in the Phase 2b QUALITY clinical study and in August 2024 the Company completed enrollment of 168 subjects in 14 clinical sites in the U.S. with the topline clinical results from the trial expected in January 2025. The purposeportion of the Phase 2b QUALITY clinical trial is to selecttrial, the optimalparticipants dosecontinued ofinto enobosarma inPhase combination2b extension maintenance trial where all patients stopped treatment with semaglutide (Wegovy®), thatbut bestcontinue preservestaking placebo, enobosarm 3mg, or enobosarm 6mg in a blinded fashion for 12 additional weeks. The Phase 2b extension clinical trial evaluated whether enobosarm can maintain muscle and reducesprevent the fat regain that generally occurs after 16 weeks of treatment to advance intodiscontinuing a PhaseGLP-1 3 obesity clinical trial.RA.
In January 2025, the Company announced topline results for the Phase 2b QUALITY clinical trial. The trial met its prespecified primary endpoint with a statistically significant and a clinically meaningful benefit in the preservation of total lean body mass in all patients receiving enobosarm 3mg + semaglutide versus placebo + semaglutide at 16 weeks (100% relative reduction in lean mass loss, p<0.001).
As for secondary clinical endpoints, enobosarm + semaglutide treatment resulted in dose dependent greater loss of fat mass compared to placebo + semaglutide with the enobosarm 6mg dose having a 42% greater relative loss of fat mass compared to placebo + semaglutide group at 16 weeks (p=0.017) and the enobosarm 3mg having a 12% greater fat loss. Although enobosarm + semaglutide significantly preserved lean mass, the additional loss of fat mass caused by enobosarm treatment was able to replace the lean mass preserved to allow a similar net mean weight loss measured by a DEXA scan with semaglutide at 16 weeks. Accordingly, the tissue composition of the total weight loss shifted to greater and selective loss of fat with enobosarm treatment. The mean percentage of total body mass loss in the placebo + semaglutide group that was due to lean mass was 34% and estimated fat loss was 66%. In contrast, in the enobosarm 3mg + semaglutide group, the total weight loss due to lean mass was 0% and estimated fat loss was 100%. Physical function was measured by the Stair Climb Test. Climbing stairs is an activity of daily living, and the Stair Climb Test measured functional muscle strength, balance and agility. Declines in performance measured by Stair Climb Test predicts in older patients a higher risk for mobility disabilities, gait difficulties, falls and bone fractures, hospitalizations, and mortality. As a point of reference, stair climb power declines by -1.38% annually with aging according to Van Roie E. PLOS ONE 14:e0210653, 2019.
Enobosarm is a novel drug candidate that improves GLP-1 RA therapy resulting in tissue selective quality weight reduction, that is, enobosarm + semaglutide improved changes in body composition which resulted in more selective and greater loss of adiposity (fat mass) than in subjects receiving placebo + semaglutide alone.
On May 28, 2025, we announced positive topline safety results for the Phase 2b QUALITY clinical study that showed the enobosarm + semaglutide combination had a positive safety profile compared to semaglutide alone. There were no increases in gastrointestinal side effects, no evidence of drug induced liver injury (as defined by Hy’s law), and no increases in obstructive sleep apnea at any dose of enobosarm compared to placebo (semaglutide alone). There were no adverse events of increases in prostate specific antigen in men. There were no adverse events related to masculinization in women. There were no reports of suicidal ideation observed (Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale). Enobosarm 3mg + semaglutide combination had the added benefit of fewer gastrointestinal side effects (diarrhea, nausea, and gastroesophageal reflux disease) compared to semaglutide alone. There were five non-treatment related serious adverse events equally distributed between the treatment groups.
Phase 2b Extension Maintenance Portion of the Phase 2b QUALITY Study
After completing the efficacy dose-finding and active weight reduction portion of the Phase 2b QUALITY clinical trial, the participants are expected to continuecontinued into a Phase 2b maintenance extension trialstudy where all patients will stop treatment withdiscontinued semaglutide (Wegovy®),treatment, but willcontinued continue takingreceiving placebo, 3mgenobosarm of enobosarm,3mg, or enobosarm 6mg ofas enobosarmmonotherapy in a blindeddouble-blind fashion for 12 weeks. TheOn June 24, 2025, we announced positive results from the Maintenance Extension portion of the Phase 2b extensionQUALITY clinical trial will evaluate whether enobosarm can maintain muscle and prevent the fat and weight regain that generally occurs after discontinuing a GLP-1 RA. The topline results of the separate blinded Phase 2b extension clinical study are expected in the second quarter of calendar 2025.study.
At the end of the Phase 2b QUALITY study active weight loss period of 16 weeks, body weight loss was similar across treatment groups with the semaglutide + placebo group losing an average of 11.88 lbs. After the 12-week Maintenance and Extension study period (Day 112 to Day 196) where all treatment groups discontinued the use of semaglutide, the placebo monotherapy group regained 43% of body weight that was previously lost during the Phase 2b QUALITY for a mean percent change of 2.57% (5.06 lbs) in body weight, compared to 1.41% (2.73 lbs) for the 3mg enobosarm group (p=0.038) and 2.87% (5.29lbs) for the 6mg enobosarm group. The 3mg enobosarm monotherapy significantly reduced the body weight regained by 46%. On average, the placebo monotherapy group regained 2.27% in fat mass, while the enobosarm monotherapy cohorts had a loss of fat mass of -0.27% for the 3mg and -0.50% for the 6mg doses. The mean tissue composition of body weight regained was 28% fat and 72% lean mass in the placebo group, versus 0% fat and 100% lean mass in both the 3mg and the 6mg enobosarm groups. By the end of the study at 28 weeks (Day 1 to Day 196), the placebo + semaglutide followed by placebo monotherapy group experienced a loss of lean mass, while both enobosarm + semaglutide followed by enobosarm monotherapy groups (3 mg and 6 mg doses) significantly preserved more than 100% of lean mass (enobosarm 3mg p<0.001 and enobosarm 6mg p=0.004). The enobosarm + semaglutide followed by enobosarm monotherapy patients had a 58% greater loss of fat with enobosarm 3mg (p=0.085) and a 93% greater loss of fat with enobosarm 6mg (p=0.008) compared to placebo + semaglutide followed by placebo monotherapy.
In the double-blind Phase 2b QUALITY Maintenance Extension clinical trial (Day 112-196), enobosarm monotherapy had a positive safety profile. After discontinuation of semaglutide, there were essentially no gastrointestinal side effects, no evidence of drug induced liver injury (by Hy’s law), and no increases in obstructive sleep apnea observed at any dose of enobosarm compared to placebo monotherapy. There were no adverse events of increases in prostate specific antigen in men. There were no adverse events related to masculinization in women. There were no reports of suicidal ideation observed (Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale). The proposed Phase 3 clinical program dose of enobosarm 3mg continued to have a positive safety profile in the Phase 2b maintenance extension clinical trial.
The Phase 2b QUALITY and Maintenance Extension clinical trial confirmed that preserving lean mass with enobosarm plus semaglutide led to greater fat loss during the active weight loss period, and after the use of semaglutide was discontinued, enobosarm monotherapy significantly prevented the regain of both weight and fat mass during the maintenance period such that by end of study there was greater loss of fat mass while lean mass was preserved for a higher quality weight reduction compared to the placebo group.
Novel Modified Release Oral Enobosarm Formulation is on Track to be Available for Phase 3 Clinical Studies and Commercialization
Veru is currently developing a novel, patentable, modified release oral formulation for enobosarm. In a pilot pharmacokinetic study, the new modified release formulation resulted in a 25-33% reduction in maximum plasma contraction (Cmax), a delayed time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax), a distinct secondary peak, and similar extent of absorption (AUC) compared to historical values for enobosarm immediate release capsules. The actual formulation, pharmacokinetic release profile(s), and method of manufacturing are the subjects of pending patent applications. If issued, the expiry for the new modified release oral enobosarm formulation patent is expected to be 2046. The expectation is that this novel modified release oral enobosarm formulation will be available for the Phase 3 clinical studies and for commercialization.
Development Plan: Planned Clinical Trials.
The regulatory landscape continues to evolve for muscle preservation drugs in the treatment of obesity. Based on FDA feedback on Veru’s clinical development program for enobosarm, the FDA now guides that incremental weight loss with enobosarm added to GLP-1 RA treatment over the GLP-1 RA treatment alone is an acceptable primary endpoint to support approval. The FDA also confirmed that enobosarm 3mg is an acceptable dosage for future Veru clinical development. Further, the FDA has encouraged Veru to expand the enobosarm development program to include a younger population with obesity as younger patients could also benefit from a muscle preservation drug like enobosarm.
The weight loss plateau occurs when the patient with obesity stops losing weight while on a GLP-1 RA. In the SURMOUNT-1 clinical study conducted by Eli Lilly and Company, about 88% of patients with obesity receiving tirzepatide reached the weight loss plateau by 72 weeks. Unfortunately, 62.6% of these patients are still clinically overweight or have obesity at 72 weeks. We believe treatment with tirzepatide when combined with enobosarm, will lead to additional fat loss by preserving muscle and physical function, especially in older patients. Enobosarm’s ability to directly and indirectly cause additional fat loss is expected to reset the weight loss plateau leading to incremental weight reduction, thereby increasing the number of patients who achieve and maintain a normal weight.
The evolving FDA thinking for the development of muscle preservation drugs for obesity and the critical changes in the current FDA guidance related to the acceptable primary endpoint of incremental weight loss, have necessitated the change in Veru’s clinical development plan. The clinical development program of enobosarm will take advantage of both the FDA regulatory clarity on the acceptable primary endpoint and on enobosarm’s key attributes, preservation of muscle and physical function, and greater selective fat loss (100% fat loss and 0% lean mass weight loss), that were demonstrated in Veru’s Phase 2 QUALITY study at 16 weeks.
Planned Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical study
Veru’s planned Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical study will evaluate the effect of enobosarm 3mg on total body weight, physical function, and safety in approximately 200 patients who have obesity (BMI ≥ 35) and are initiating GLP-1 RA treatment for weight reduction. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study is the percent change from baseline in total body weight at 72 weeks. An interim analysis will be conducted at 36 weeks to assess the percent change from baseline in lean body mass and fat mass, as measured by DEXA scans. The key secondary endpoints are total fat mass, total lean mass, physical function (stair climb test), bone mineral density, and patient reported outcome questionnaires for physical function (SF-36 PF-10, and IWQOL-lite CT physical function).
The Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical study is designed to assess the ability of enobosarm treatment to break through the weight loss plateau observed in patients with obesity receiving GLP-1 RA treatment to achieve clinically meaningful incremental weight reduction and preserve muscle mass and physical function by 72 weeks. The clinical study is expected to begin in the first quarter of calendar 2026.
The proposed Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical trial design is a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in approximately 200 patients with BMI ≥ 35 and age ≥ 65 who are eligible for treatment with GLP-1 RA. The GLP-1 RA may be either WEGOVY (semaglutide) and/or Zepbound® (tirzepatide). Patients will be randomized to oral daily enobosarm or matching placebo. All subjects will start and receive GLP-1 RA during the study. The proposed primary objective will be the effect of enobosarm on total body weight. Proposed key secondary objectives will be to assess the effect of enobosarm on total lean mass, total fat mass, bone mineral density, physical function (stair climb assessment), HOMA-IR, and select patient reported outcome measures.
Novel Modified Release Oral Enobosarm Formulation is on Track to be Available for Phase 3 Clinical Studies and Commercialization
Veru is also currently developing a novel, patentable, modified release oral formulation for enobosarmenobosarm. with multiple releases during a 24-hour dosing period. We anticipate theThe actual formulation, pharmacokinetic release profile(s), and method of manufacturing will be the subjectsubjects of future patents.patent Theapplications. purposeIf ofissued, the modification is to create a consistent release profile with a significantly reduced maximum exposure plus an extended-release profile to minimize any dose-related adverse events while facilitating full exposure of the patient to the drug product between dosesexpiry for the entirenew periodmodified ofrelease 24oral hours. Thisenobosarm formulation is currently in animal trials andpatent is anticipatedexpected to be available2045. forThe new enobosarm formulation has completed the initial Phase 1 bioavailability clinical trial duringin the first half ofJuly 2025. WeThe expectexpectation is that thethis oral enobosarmnovel modified release drugoral enobosarm formulation will be utilizedavailable for anythe Phase 3 obesity clinical studies.studies and for commercialization.
In a pilot pharmacokinetic study, the new modified release formulation resulted in a significant reduction in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), a delayed time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax), a distinct secondary peak, and similar extent of absorption (AUC) compared to historical values for enobosarm immediate release capsules.
Atherosclerosis Inflammation Program
Atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Inflammation and high cholesterol jointly contribute to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. It appears that the pathogenesis and progression of coronary artery disease, however, is largely driven by inflammation in response to atheromatous plaques containing cholesterol in the arterial wall. In fact, inflammation mediates all stages of atherosclerotic coronary vascular disease: plaque initiation, plaque progression, and plaque rupture and the resulting thrombotic complications. Even with cholesterol reduction therapies, there remains a major and largely untreated residual inflammatory risk. Using high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) blood levels to assess the contribution of inflammation, a recent analysis of 31,245 patients receiving statin lipid lowering therapy showed that inflammation was a stronger predictor for risk of future major cardiovascular events and death than cholesterol by LDL-C. The realization that the combined use of aggressive lipid-lowering and inflammation-inhibiting therapies might be needed to further reduce atherosclerotic risk has sparked the search for anti-inflammatory medications that could lower the risk of atherosclerotic events in patients with CAD.
An old drug, colchicine, inhibits tubulin polymerization to disrupt microtubules resulting in broad anti-inflammatory activity. Recent randomized controlled trials assessing the role of low-dose colchicine to treat inflammation to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including COLCOT (Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose colchicine after Myocardial Infarction), LoDoCo (Low-dose colchicine for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease) and LoDoCo-2 (Colchicine in Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease) trials, had promising results demonstrating significant cardiovascular risk reduction. Colchicine lowered major adverse cardiovascular events by 31% among those with stable CAD and by 23% in patients following a recent myocardial infarction. This magnitude of benefit is greater than what has been observed in contemporary trials of lipid lowering medications including those with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK-9) inhibitors.
To gain mechanistic insight, Vaidya et al. (2018) conducted a prospective open label single center clinical study to evaluate the effects of colchicine on modifying the atheromatous coronary artery plaques by coronary CT angiography (CCTA) imaging. Eighty patients who had recent acute coronary syndrome received either low dose colchicine plus optimal medical therapy or optimal medical therapy alone for 12 months. The primary endpoint was low attenuation plaque volume (LAPV), a marker of plaque instability on CCTA and a strong predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events. High sensitivity CRP blood levels, a biomarker of inflammation, was also measured. The study results showed that colchicine + optimal medical therapy versus optimal medical therapy alone significantly reduced the primary endpoint of LAPV by -40.9% and high sensitivity CRP by -37.3%. (Vaidya 2018). This was an important milestone for the treatment of CAD as colchicine therapy was able to directly modify coronary arterial plaque independent of high dose statins that lower LDL. Further, because of the reduction of high sensitivity CRP, the improvements in plaque morphology were most likely driven by colchicine’s anti-inflammatory effects.
Data from these trials led the FDA in June 2023 to approve colchicine for reducing cardiovascular events in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), making colchicine the first anti-inflammatory drug with such an indication. Furthermore, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, European Society of Cardiology as well as national guidelines in Canada and South America have endorsed the use of low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg/d orally) in patients with coronary artery disease, especially among those with uncontrolled risk factors or recurrent events despite optimal medical therapy.
Unfortunately, colchicine has well known serious safety concerns. Colchicine has high potential for drug-drug interactions as it is a substrate for CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein. Consequently, commonly used cardiovascular drugs including almost all statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) may interact with colchicine resulting in erratic or higher blood levels of colchicine. Colchicine has a narrow therapeutic index and extreme care must be taken to avoid accidental overdoses, which may be fatal. Accordingly, patients receiving regular colchicine therapy require close clinical supervision. Common side effects are gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea, vomiting, and abdominal cramping) and myalgia. Blood dyscrasias which may be fatal, neurotoxicity, and rhabdomyolysis may also rarely occur (LODOCO FDA PI 2023). Colchicine may be first-in-class and the first FDA approved treatment for this significant indication to treat atherosclerotic inflammation, but unfortunately colchicine has significant safety concerns that may limit its expected widespread use and therefore may not adequately address the current unmet medical need of atherosclerotic inflammation.
We believe there is compelling scientific evidence and rationale to evaluate sabizabulin as a treatment for the inflammation associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Sabizabulin is a new molecular entity, small molecule that targets the colchicine binding site on β-tubulin. Like colchicine, sabizabulin inhibits microtubule polymerization and has demonstrated the ability to reduce the most important inflammatory mediators that play a role in the initiation and progression of atherosclerotic CAD. Overall preclinical data from in vitro and in vivo inflammation studies show that sabizabulin treatment suppressed all cytokines and chemokines tested which includes IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, Interferon-γ, and IP-10 (CXCL-10). In Phase 2 and 3 pulmonary inflammation COVID-19 clinical studies, sabizabulin has demonstrated broad anti-inflammatory activity. The safety database consists of 266 dosed patients from the sabizabulin clinical development program comprised of the Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies in hospitalized COVID-19 patients for acute use (149 patients at 9 mg daily for ≤ 21 days), as well as data from the Phase 1b/2 and Phase 3 studies in prostate cancer for chronic use (117 patients treated at up to 32 mg daily for up to 3 years). Further, because sabizabulin has a different chemical structure than colchicine, it is not a substrate for CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein thereby potentially eliminating drug-drug interactions concerns associated with colchicine. In contrast to colchicine, sabizabulin has stable pharmacokinetics and low potential for drug-drug interactions; thus, sabizabulin may be administered potentially more safely as a secondary therapy in combination with statin therapy for the reduction of inflammation to slow the progression or promote regression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
With the FDA’s 2023 approval of colchicine for reducing cardiovascular events in subjects with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, we believe a novel clinical pathway is now open to develop anti-inflammatory drugs with a potentially better efficacy and safety profile like sabizabulin as a secondary treatment in combination with lipid lowering statin drugs to prevent and treat atherosclerotic CAD. As a consequence, Veru has evolved its drug development strategy for sabizabulin and is exploring the possibility of the clinical development of sabizabulin, a novel oral broad anti-inflammatory agent, for the treatment of inflammation in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The Company’s decision to explore this major cardiometabolic indication was based on the significant unmet medical need to treat inflammation in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, the large global market opportunity, current clinical and safety sabizabulin database of 266 patients, high probability of success of the drug’s mechanism of action which is similar to colchicine, and strong intellectual property position.
Development Plan: Planned Clinical Trials.
Veru had a pre-IND meeting with the FDA Division of Cardiology and Nephrology Center for Drug Evaluation and Research on December 26, 2024. The indication for discussion was the use of sabizabulin to slow progression or promote regression of atherosclerotic disease in patients with a history of coronary artery disease. The FDA agreed that there remains an unmet medical need based on disease pathophysiology. Initially, we plan to evaluate sabizabulin in a small Phase 2 dose finding proof of concept study to assess whether sabizabulin reduces blood levels of high sensitivity C-reactive protein, a important measurement of inflammation, in patients with stable CAD. Veru currently has sufficient drug substance to supply the proposed Phase 2 clinical study in patients with stable CAD to measure levels of high sensitivity C-reactive protein.
FC2 Business Sale and Discontinued Operations
On December 30, 2024, the Company and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (collectively, the “Sellers”) entered into a Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Clear Future, Inc. (the “Purchaser”). Pursuant to, and subject to the terms and conditions of, the Purchase Agreement, the Purchaser purchased substantially all of the assets (the “FC2 Business Sale”) related to the Company's FC2 female condom business ® (internal condom), including the stock of the Company’s U.K. and Malaysian operating subsidiaries. The Purchaser assumed certain liabilities relating to the FC2 Business that are specified in the Purchase Agreement. The transaction closed on December 30, 2024. The Sellers and the Purchaser made customary representations and warranties, and agreed to certain customary covenants, in the Purchase Agreement. Subject to certain exceptions and limitations, each party agreed to indemnify the other for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants and for certain other matters. The Purchase Agreement also specifies that, subject to a $54,000 retention amount, a representations and warranties insurance policy (the “R&W Policy”) issued to the Purchaser would be the sole and exclusive remedy for breach of representations and warranties (other than certain specified representations and warranties) by the Sellers except in the case of fraud.
The purchase price for the FC2 Business Sale was $18.0 million in cash, including adjustments to the purchase price in the Purchase Agreement, which included a customary working capital adjustment subsequent to closing based on the amount by which certain working capital items at closing are greater or less than a target set forth in the Purchase Agreement. In September 2025, an accounting firm delivered its final determination with respect to a dispute between the Sellers and the Purchaser as to the amount of the purchase price adjustments, resolving all disputed matters in favor of the Sellers. As a result of the final determination, the Purchaser paid additional purchase price of approximately $150,000 to the Company and approximately $300,000 was released from an escrow account to the Company. Net proceeds from the FC2 Business Sale were $16.5 million, which is the $18.0 million purchase price per the Purchase Agreement after purchase price adjustments, net of costs incurred of $1.4 million, and amounts allocated to the related transition services agreement of $150,000 but excluding the change of control payment pursuant to the Residual Royalty Agreement of $4.2 million (see Note 8 for additional information). The loss on sale of the FC2 Business is $4.1 million, which is the difference between estimated net proceeds of $16.5 million and the total carrying value of the FC2 Business of $20.6 million. The carrying value of the FC2 Business at December 30, 2024 primarily included deferred income tax assets of $12.3 million, accounts receivable of $4.6 million, and inventory of $3.4 million, partially offset by accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $1.5 million. In addition, due to the FC2 Business Sale, liabilities associated with the Residual Royalty Agreement, which totaled $9.9 million at September 30, 2024, were extinguished.
The FC2 Business Sale represented a strategic shift, which had a major effect on our operations and financial results. We have classified all direct revenues, costs and expenses related to the FC2 Business within loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. We have not allocated any amounts for shared general and administrative operating support expense to discontinued operations. Additionally, the related assets and liabilities have been reported as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2024. The assets and liabilities sold as part of the FC2 Business Sale were written off upon the closing of the FC2 Business Sale, and therefore there are no assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2025.
Oncology Program
Our oncology drug pipeline is focused on the clinical development of enobosarm, an oral selective androgen receptor modulator, for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. As we have prioritized our clinical programs to focus on enobosarm for obesity, the continued clinical development of enobosarm for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer is subject to the availability of sufficient funding. We completed the Stage 1a portion of our Phase 3 clinical trial in October 2023. We will not, however, begin the Stage 1b portion or otherwise advance our trial Phase 3 clinical trial until sufficient funding is available.
Enobosarm is a new class of endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer. Enobosarm is an oral, new chemical entity, selective androgen receptor modulator designed to activate the AR in AR+ ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer and thereby suppress tumor growth without the unwanted masculinizing side effects. Enobosarm has extensive nonclinical and clinical experience having been evaluated in 27 separate clinical studies in 1,581 subjects dosed, including three Phase 2 clinical trials in advanced breast cancer involving more than 191 patients. In one of the Phase 2 clinical trials conducted in women with AR+ ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer, enobosarm demonstrated significant antitumor efficacy in heavily pretreated cohorts that failed estrogen blocking agents, chemotherapy and/or CDK 4/6 inhibitors and was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile.
The current standard of care for first line treatment of ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer is treatment with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor in combination with an estrogen blocking agent. Once a patient progresses while receiving this combination therapy, the FDA-approved treatment choices are limited to another estrogen blocking agent or chemotherapy. As up to 95% of ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancers have an androgen receptor, we are developing enobosarm as another, but different, hormone therapy for the second line treatment of ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer. In preclinical studies, metastatic breast cancer tissue samples taken from patients who have ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer that had become resistant to CDK 4/6 inhibitors and estrogen blocking agents were grown in mice. In these mice, treatment with enobosarm in combination with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor suppressed the growth of human metastatic breast cancer greater than the CDK 4/6 inhibitor alone. Further, enobosarm treatment alone was also effective in suppressing the growth of CDK 4/6 inhibitor and estrogen blocking agent resistant human metastatic breast cancer tumors in mice.
On March 30, 2023 and November 3, 2023, we met with the FDA to discuss the design of our Phase 3 clinical trial in patients with AR+ ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer who have tumor progression while receiving palbociclib (a CDK 4/6 inhibitor) plus an estrogen blocking agent (nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor or selective estrogen receptor degrader). The design of the Phase 3 clinical trial was amended following our November 3, 2023 meeting with the FDA to implement the recommendations that were provided by the FDA. The primary endpoint for the Stage 1 portion of the Phase 3 clinical trial is objective tumor response rates (“ORR”).
We began patient enrollment in April 2022. As of August 2023, we had completed the target enrollment of three patients in the Stage 1a portion of the Phase 3 ENABLAR-2 clinical trial to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of the combination of abemaciclib and enobosarm. There were no reported drug-to-drug interactions between abemaciclib and enobosarm or new safety findings in the three patients as of the data cutoff date. Further, the early preliminary clinical results showed two partial responses and one stable disease in the first three patients based on local assessments.
Subject to the availability of sufficient funding, we expect to reinitiate Stage 1b of our Phase 3 ENABLAR-2 clinical trial by early 2026. If enobosarm + abemaciclib combination therapy compared to estrogen blocking agent (active control) demonstrates significant improvement in ORR, which is considered a surrogate endpoint for clinical benefit, then we may meet with the FDA to consider an accelerated approval regulatory pathway based on the clinical data from the Stage 1b portion of the Phase 3 clinical trial. Granting accelerated approval for investigational products is within the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if we believe that one of our product candidates meets the criteria for this approval pathway, the FDA may disagree and instead determine not to make such designation. Further, even if we receive a designation, such designation for a product candidate may not result in a faster development or regulatory review or approval process compared to products considered for approval under conventional FDA procedures and does not assure ultimate approval by the FDA. In addition, even if one or more of our product candidates qualifies for these designations, the FDA may, among other things, later decide that the product candidates no longer meet the conditions for qualification or decide that the time period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened. There can be no assurances that the FDA will accept our proposed trial design, that we will be able to cost-effectively continue development of enobosarm, or that enobosarm will receive FDA approval or be commercialized, for this application.
Infectious Disease Program
We are developing sabizabulin 9mg, which has both host targeted antiviral and broad anti-inflammatory properties, as a two-pronged approach to the treatment of hospitalized patients with viral lung infection at high risk for ARDS and death. We have completed positive Phase 2 and positive Phase 3 COVID-19 clinical trials, which have demonstrated that sabizabulin treatment resulted in a mortality benefit in hospitalized moderate to severe patients with COVID-19 viral lung infection at high risk for ARDS and death. The FDA granted Fast Track designation to our COVID-19 program in January 2022. On May 10, 2022, we had a pre-EUA meeting with the FDA to discuss next steps including the submission of an EUA application regarding sabizabulin for COVID-19. In June 2022, we submitted a request for FDA Emergency Use Authorization. In February 2023, the FDA declined to grant our request for Emergency Use Authorization for sabizabulin. In September 2023, we received agreement from the FDA on the design of a Phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate sabizabulin in broadly any viral-induced ARDS.
However, we currently plan to prioritize the use of our internal cash and the net proceeds of any future financings for the development of enobosarm, with a primary near-term focus on funding the Phase 2b clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of enobosarm as a treatment for obesity, and to seek external funding through government grants, pharmaceutical company partnerships, or similar sources to advance the development of sabizabulin as a treatment for viral-induced ARDS. Without such external funding, we do not plan to advance the Phase 3 development of sabizabulin as a treatment for viral-induced ARDS.
There can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain external funding through government grants, pharmaceutical company partnerships, or similar sources, that we will be able to cost-effectively continue development of sabizabulin, or that sabizabulin will receive FDA approval or be commercialized, for this application.
Sexual Health Program
Our sexual health program consists of FC2, the only FDA-approved, female controlled, hormone-free and latex-free female condom indicated for the dual protection against unplanned pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, including HIV/AIDS.
We sell FC2 in the U.S. in both the prescription channel and in the public health sector and globally we sell FC2 in the public sector.
In the U.S. prescription channel, FC2 is available through multiple telehealth and telepharmacy channels as well as retail pharmacies. While there has been recent consolidation in the telehealth industry, we continue to believe that telehealth will be an important commercial strategy in the U.S. for access to birth control products, including FC2, given both healthcare industry dynamics and our product’s profile. In order to maximize its reach and to have more direct control of the promotion, distribution, and sales of FC2, we launched our own telehealth portal in April 2022.
We expect revenue from the U.S. prescription channel to demonstrate growth from our dedicated FC2 telehealth portal as we continue to refine the infrastructure of the portal. We intend to continue leveraging relationships with entities in the U.S. public health sector such as state departments of health and 501(c)(3) organizations.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Largest changes
Under current SEC regulations, because our public float is less than $75 million, and for so long as our public float remains less than $75 million, the amount we can raise through primary public offerings of securities in any 12-month period using shelf registration statements is limited to an aggregate of one-third of our public float (referred to as the “baby shelf” rule). As ofsee in full comparisonAprilJuly7,2, 2026, the aggregate market value of our outstanding common shares held by non-affiliates, or public float, was approximately$38.5$65.5 million, which is calculated based on14,480,29215,480,292 shares of our outstanding common stock held by non-affiliates and a price of$2.66$4.23 per share, the closing price of our common stock onFebruaryJune26,4, 2026, which is the highest closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market within the prior 60 days ofAprilJuly7,2, 2026.IfOn July 2, 2026, we filed a prospectus supplement with the SEC relating to the offering and sale of up to $21.8 million of shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Sales Agreement, which represented one-third of our public float of $65.5 million calculated as of July 2, 2026. Depending on the amount of common stock we sell pursuant to the Sales Agreement, our use of our shelf registration statement for other primary public offerings may be limited. In addition, if our public float decreases, the amount of securities we may sell under our shelf registration statement may also decrease.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (1)
Under current SEC regulations, because our public float is less than $75 million, and for so long as our public float remains less than $75 million, the amount we can raise through primary public offerings of securities in any 12-month period using shelf registration statements is limited to an aggregate of one-third of our public float (referred to as the “baby shelf” rule). As of AprilJuly 7,2, 2026, the aggregate market value of our outstanding common shares held by non-affiliates, or public float, was approximately $38.5$65.5 million, which is calculated based on 14,480,29215,480,292 shares of our outstanding common stock held by non-affiliates and a price of $2.66$4.23 per share, the closing price of our common stock on FebruaryJune 26,4, 2026, which is the highest closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market within the prior 60 days of AprilJuly 7,2, 2026. IfOn July 2, 2026, we filed a prospectus supplement with the SEC relating to the offering and sale of up to $21.8 million of shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Sales Agreement, which represented one-third of our public float of $65.5 million calculated as of July 2, 2026. Depending on the amount of common stock we sell pursuant to the Sales Agreement, our use of our shelf registration statement for other primary public offerings may be limited. In addition, if our public float decreases, the amount of securities we may sell under our shelf registration statement may also decrease.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Recent Developments Regarding Enobosarm Intellectual Property”
New heading “Sale Agreement with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. and Canaccord Genuity LLC”
Largest changes
“The Company is not obligated to sell any shares of common stock under the Sales Agreement. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Sales Agreement, each Sales Agent will use commercially reasonable efforts consistent with its normal trading and sales practices, to sell shares of common stock from time to time based upon the Company’s instructions, including any price, time or size limits specified by the Company. …”see in full comparison
“Sale Agreement with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. and Canaccord Genuity LLC”see in full comparison
“On July 2, 2026, the Company entered into a Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”), with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. and Canaccord Genuity LLC (each, an “Sales Agent” and, collectively the “Sales Agents”), as sales agents, pursuant to which the Company may issue and sell, from time to time, to or through the applicable Sales Agent (the “Designated Sales Agent”), shares of the Company’s common stock. …”see in full comparison
“On June 2, 2026, the Company entered into a clinical supply agreement (the “Supply Agreement”) with Novo Nordisk A/S (“Novo Nordisk”) in conjunction with the Company’s Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical study*. The objective of the Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical study is to evaluate the combination of enobosarm, the Company’s oral, first-in-class, novel small molecule, selective androgen receptor modulator, with Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy®** (semaglutide for injection), a GLP-1 RA, in older adults with obesity who are receiving Wegovy® therapy for weight reduction. …”see in full comparison
“The allowed claims are directed to the: (i) preservation, restoration, or gaining of lean body mass; (ii) preservation, restoration, or gaining of muscle mass; (iii) enhancement of fat mass loss, including reducing abdominal, subcutaneous, or intramuscular fat accumulation, improving body composition, lowering body fat content, and lowering fat mass; …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (45)
Enobosarm is being developed for weight loss and as a treatment to preserve physical function as well as to augment fat loss resulting in incremental weight loss in older patients with obesity receiving a GLP-1 RA for weight reduction. A Phase 2b, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, dose-finding Phase 2b QUALITY clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of enobosarm 3mg, enobosarm 6mg, or placebo in 168 older patients with obesity (≥60 years of age) with obesity receiving semaglutide (Wegovy®) for weight reduction. The primary endpoint for the Phase 2b QUALITY clinical trial was the percent change from baseline in total lean body mass, and the key secondary endpoints were the percent change from baseline in total body fat mass, total body weight, and physical function as measured by stair climb test at 16 weeks. After completing the efficacy dose-assessment portion of the Phase 2b QUALITY clinical trial, the participants continued into a Phase 2b maintenance extension trial where all patients stopped treatment with semaglutide, but continuecontinued taking placebo, enobosarm 3mg, or enobosarm 6mg monotherapy in a blinded fashion for 12 additional weeks. The Phase 2b extension clinical trial evaluated whether enobosarm can maintain muscle and prevent the fat and weight regain that generally occurs after discontinuing a GLP-1 RA.
Currently Enrolling Phase 2b PLATEAU Clinical Study
On MarchJuly 9,27, 2026, the Company announced it had enrolledcompleted itsthe firstenrollment patientof patients in the Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical trial. Veru’s PLATEAU clinical trial design is a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of enobosarm 3mg on total body weight, fat mass, lean mass and physical function, bone mineral density and safety in approximately 200 older patients (age ≥ 65 yo) who have obesity (BMI ≥ 35) and are initiating semaglutide (Wegovy) GLP-1 RA treatment for weight reduction. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study is the percent change from baseline in total body weight at 68 weeks. An interim analysis will be conducted at 3632 weeks to assess the percent change from baseline in lean body mass, total fat mass, percentage body fat mass, percentage body lean mass, and total body mass, as measured by DXA scan. The key secondary endpoints for the overall study are total fat mass, total lean mass, physical function (stair climb test), mobility-disability assessment, bone mineral density,density (BMD), and patient reported outcome questionnaires for physical function (SF-36 PF-10, and IWQOL-lite CT physical function), HbA1c, and insulin resistance.
The Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical study is designed to assess the ability of enobosarm treatment to break through the weight loss plateau observed in patients with obesity receiving GLP-1 RA treatment to achieve clinically meaningful incremental weight reduction and preserve muscle mass and physical function by 68 weeks. AnThe interim analysis for the clinical studystudy, to assess the percent change from baseline in lean body mass, total fat mass, percentage body fat mass, percentage body lean mass, and total body mass, as measured by DXA scan, will be conducted after all patients are treated for 3632 weeks and is planned for the first quarter of calendar 2027.
Based on FDA regulatory feedback and qualification of BMD as an acceptable surrogate endpoint, results from the Phase 2b PLATEAU study may have three possible regulatory pathways to support efficacy for approval of enobosarm in combination with the GLP- 1 RA. If incremental weight loss is ≥ 5%, the Phase 3 study could be a study in patients with obesity with a primary endpoint of total body weight, and key secondary endpoints for prespecified subgroups of physical function in sarcopenic patients (age ≥ 65 yo) with mobility disability and another for BMD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. If the incremental weight loss is < 5%, the Phase 3 study could be a study in patients with obesity and mobility disability with a primary endpoint of physical function in sarcopenic obesity patients (age ≥ 65 yo) with mobility disability, and a key secondary endpoint could beof BMD in a prespecified group of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Alternatively, the Phase 3 study could be a study in patients with obesity and osteoporosis with a primary endpoint of BMD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and a key secondary endpoint of physical function in sarcopenic patients (age ≥ 65 yo) with mobility disability.
On June 2, 2026, the Company entered into a clinical supply agreement (the “Supply Agreement”) with Novo Nordisk A/S (“Novo Nordisk”) in conjunction with the Company’s Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical study*. The objective of the Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical study is to evaluate the combination of enobosarm, the Company’s oral, first-in-class, novel small molecule, selective androgen receptor modulator, with Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy®** (semaglutide for injection), a GLP-1 RA, in older adults with obesity who are receiving Wegovy® therapy for weight reduction. Under the terms of the Supply Agreement, the Company is solely responsible for conducting and sponsoring the Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical study while Novo Nordisk will supply Wegovy® to the Company at no charge and as required for the conduct of the Phase 2b PLATEAU study. Novo Nordisk provides Wegovy® solely for use within the study under a clinical supply agreement. In return, the Company will provide Novo Nordisk with insights into obesity and weight management trial design, methodology, and clinical conduct, including regular clinical study updates, protocol changes, and safety updates. While the Company maintains full global development and commercialization rights to enobosarm, the Company has granted Novo Nordisk a right of first negotiation in the Supply Agreement if the Company in the future intends to develop, commercialize, or license enobosarm intellectual property in combination with any Novo Nordisk GLP-1 product, including Wegovy®, for any indication.
*Novo Nordisk’s participation in the PLATEAU study does not constitute endorsement of enobosarm or the combination approach tested in the study and Novo Nordisk’s supply of Wegovy® (semaglutide) for the study does not constitute any representation regarding semaglutide’s requirement for adjunctive therapy.
**Wegovy® is a registered trademark of Novo Nordisk A/S.
Recent Developments Regarding Enobosarm Intellectual Property
Recently the Company announced that it had received from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) a Notice of Allowance for U.S. Patent Application titled “Compositions Comprising Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator Compounds in Combination with Weight Loss Drugs and Uses Thereof for Quality Weight Loss.” The Notice of Allowance indicates that the USPTO has determined that the patent application meets the requirements for patentability and is expected to issue as a U.S. patent.
The Notice of Allowance encompasses treatment regimens where: (i) enobosarm is concurrently given with semaglutide; (ii) enobosarm is added to initial semaglutide monotherapy with said co-therapy continuing; and (iii) enobosarm continues or is initiated as monotherapy after semaglutide therapy is discontinued.
The allowed claims are directed to the: (i) preservation, restoration, or gaining of lean body mass; (ii) preservation, restoration, or gaining of muscle mass; (iii) enhancement of fat mass loss, including reducing abdominal, subcutaneous, or intramuscular fat accumulation, improving body composition, lowering body fat content, and lowering fat mass; (iv) preservation, restoration, or improvement of physical function and the corresponding prevention or treatment of a number of conditions that can result from decreased physical function such as reducing or treating muscle weakness, poor balance, decreased gait speed, mobility disability, loss of independence, increased risk of falls, loss of physical function, physical disability, poor quality of life, high hospitalization rates, and/or increased mortality; (v) preservation, restoration, or gaining of bone, and the corresponding prevention or treatment of bone fractures; (vi) overcoming or improving of insulin resistance; (vii) improving of HbA1c; (viii) reduction of or treatment to prevent total body weight gain rebound after discontinuing semaglutide; (ix) reduction of or treatment to prevent fat mass gain rebound after discontinuing semaglutide; and (x) treatment to prevent or restore lean mass loss during rebound after discontinuing semaglutide.
When issued, this U.S. patent will have a patent expiry of at least October 3, 2044, prior to the potential application of any patent term adjustment or patent term extension.
These allowed claims add to the Company’s growing intellectual property portfolio for enobosarm for quality weight loss, including already issued enobosarm specific polymorph composition of matter patents, as well as a number of other pending uses of selective androgen receptor modulator compounds alone or in combination with weight loss drugs for quality weight loss and chronic weight management patent applications. In addition, the patent portfolio of Veru includes patent applications directed to a novel, oral, modified-release enobosarm formulation, which if such patent were to issue, would provide patent protection until at least May 2046.
The Company owns a worldwide portfolio of patent applications directed to the methods of use of enobosarm in combination with weight loss drugs for higher quality weight loss and incremental weight loss. These claims encompass weight loss drugs including incretin containing drugs such as GLP-1 RA drugs. The Company continues to prosecute a number of pending patent applications worldwide covering a number of different weight loss drugs beyond semaglutide.
Veru had a pre-IND meeting with the FDA Division of Cardiology and Nephrology Center for Drug Evaluation and Research on December 26, 2024. The indication for discussion was the use of sabizabulin to slow progression or promote regression of atherosclerotic disease in patients with a history of coronary artery disease. The FDA agreed that there remains an unmet medical need based on disease pathophysiology. Initially, we plan to evaluate sabizabulin in a small Phase 2 dose finding proof of concept study to assess whether sabizabulin reduces blood levels of high sensitivity C-reactive protein, aan important measurement of inflammation, in 45 patients with stable CAD following 3 months of treatment. Veru currently has sufficient drug substance to supply the proposed Phase 2 clinical study in patients with stable CAD to measure levels of high sensitivity C-reactive protein.
During the threenine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company recognized an additional gain on sale of the FC2 business of $351,000, which is for net proceeds received from the Purchaser in the settlement of a dispute related to a pre-closing tax receivable and liability.
The FC2 Business Sale represented a strategic shift, which had a major effect on our operations and financial results. We have classified all direct revenues, costs and expenses related to the FC2 business within loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. We did not allocate any amounts for shared general and administrative operating support expense to discontinued operations. The assets and liabilities sold as part of the FC2 Business Sale were written off upon the closing of the FC2 Business Sale, and therefore there are no assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 or September 30, 2025.
As of September 22, 2025, an aggregate of $8.8 million was payable to the Company under the ONCO Promissory Notes and related amendments. On September 22, 2025, the Company and ONCO entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release (the “Settlement Agreement”), whereby the Company agreed to accept a cash payment of $6.3 million, 3,125 shares of ONCO’s Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (the “ONCO Series D Preferred Stock”) and a warrant (the “ONCO Warrant”) to purchase 169,3953,216,344 shares of ONCO’s common stock (the “ONCO WarrantCommon Stock”) (such cash payment, shares of ONCO Series D Preferred Stock, and the ONCO Warrant, collectively, the “Settlement Amount”) in full satisfaction of all amounts due under the ONCO Promissory Notes, as amended by all preceding amendments, forbearance agreements, and waivers, in complete discharge of all obligations thereunder. The ONCO Promissory Notes and the Forbearance Agreement terminated upon payment of the Settlement Amounts.Amount. The Company received proceeds of $3.2$5.0 million from the sale of shares of ONCO’sONCO commonCommon stockStock acquired from the conversion of ONCO Series D Preferred Stock during the threenine months ended MarchJune 31, 2026 and $1.8 million from the sale of shares of ONCO’s common stock acquired from the conversion of ONCO Series D Preferred Stock subsequent to March 31,30, 2026, and after such sales the Company no longer holds any shares of ONCO Series D Preferred Stock. There can be no assurances as to whether and when the Company will be able to receive any cash proceeds from the shares of ONCO Warrant or any shares of ONCO’sONCO commonCommon stockStock that the Company might acquire upon exercise of the ONCO Warrant.
Operating Expenses. Conducting research and development is central to our drug development programs. The Company has several products under development and management routinely evaluates each product in its portfolio of products. Advancement is limited to available working capital and management’s understanding of the prospects for each product. If future prospects do not meet management’s strategic goals, advancement may be discontinued. We have invested and expect to continue to invest significant time and capital in our research and development operations. Our research and development expenses were $3.1$4.4 million and $3.9$3.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $4.5$8.8 million and $9.6$12.7 million for the six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. We expect to continue investing significant resources in research and development in the future due to advancement of our drug candidates.
THREE MONTHS ENDED MarchJune 31,30, 2026 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED MarchJune 31,30, 2025 Research and development expenses decreasedincreased to $3.1$4.4 million in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $3.9$3.0 million in the same period in fiscal 2025. The decreaseincrease in research and development expenses is primarily due to reducedincreased personnelexpenses costs,related drivento bythe lowerongoing share-basedPhase compensation2b expense.PLATEAU clinical study.
General and administrative expenses were
$4.1$3.4 million in the three months ended
MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which is a
decrease from
$5.2$5.0 million in the three months ended
MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease is due primarily to a reduction in corporate personnel costs, primarily due to reduced share-based compensation expense.expense, and a decrease in third-party consulting expenses.
The Company recorded a gain on sale of ENTADFI assets of $1.0$0.5 million in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The Company recognized a gain on sale of ENTADFI assets as nonrefundable consideration was received from the ONCO Promissory Notes. The ONCO Promissory Notes were settled in fiscal 2025 so no additional gain from additional consideration is expected in future periods. Refer to Note 15 to the financial statements included in this report for additional information.
The Company also recorded a gain from the increase in fair value of equity securities of $3.9$0.5 million in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. The increase in fair value was driven by realized gain from the conversion of the ONCO Series D Preferred Stock and sale of the underlying ONCO commonCommon stockStock and a change in the fair value of the remaining outstanding ONCO Series D Preferred Stock and the ONCO Warrants, driven by favorable provisions triggered by ONCO’s reverse stock split onin March 25,May 2026.
Net income from discontinued operations, net of taxes, related to the FC2 business of $351,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, which is an additional gain on the sale of the FC2 business for net proceeds received from the Purchaser in the settlement of a dispute related to a pre-closing tax receivable and liability. The net loss from discontinued operations of $49,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2025 is due to changes in estimates made at the time the FC2 business was sold.
SixNine MONTHS ENDED MarchJune 31,30, 2026 COMPARED TO SixNine MONTHS ENDED MarchJune 31,30, 2025 Research and development expenses decreased to $4.5$8.8 million in the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $9.6$12.7 million in the same period in fiscal 2025. The decrease in research and development expenses is due primarily to the wind down of the Company’s Phase 2b QUALITY clinical study for enobosarm as a treatment to augment fat loss and to prevent muscle loss, which was completed during fiscal 2025. The Company initiated the Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical study during the three months endedin March 31, 2026. Personnel costs also decreased due primarily to reduced share-based compensation expense.
General and administrative expenses were $8.2$11.5 million in the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which is a decrease from $10.4$15.4 million in the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease is due primarily to a reduction in corporate personnel costs, due to reduced share-based compensation expense.expense, and a decrease in third-party consulting expenses.
The Company recorded a gain on sale of ENTADFI assets of $1.7$2.2 million in the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The Company recognized a gain on sale of ENTADFI assets as nonrefundable consideration was received from the ONCO Promissory Notes. The ONCO Promissory Notes were settled in fiscal 2025 so no additional gain from additional consideration is expected in future periods. Refer to Note 15 to the financial statements included in this report for additional information.
Gain on extinguishment of debt of $8.6 million was recognized during the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, related to the termination of the Residual Royalty Agreement, in connection with the FC2 Business Sale. The gain was the difference between the change of control payment of $4.2 million and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt of $12.8 million, which included an embedded derivative for the change of control provision at fair value of $4.7 million.
During the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company also recorded a gain from the increase in fair value of equity securities of $3.8$4.4 million compared to a loss from a decrease in fair value of equity securities of $0.3 million during the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase in fair value in the fiscal 2026 period was driven by realized gain from the conversion of the ONCO Series D Preferred Stock and sale of the underlying ONCO commonCommon stockStock and a change in the fair value of the remaining outstanding ONCO Series D Preferred Stock and the ONCO Warrants, driven by favorable provisions triggered by ONCO’s reverse stock splitsplits onin March 25,2026 and May 2026.
Net income from discontinued operations, net of taxes, related to the FC2 business of $351,000$0.4 million for the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which is an additional gain on the sale of the FC2 business for net proceeds received from the Purchaser in the settlement of a dispute related to a pre-closing tax receivable and liability. The Company recorded a net loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes, related to the FC2 business of $7.2 million for the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The net loss from discontinued operations during the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 is attributable to the operations of the FC2 business during that period and the recognition of the loss on sale of FC2, initially estimated as $4.2$4.3 million for the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 and adjusted to $4.1 million in a subsequent quarter during fiscal 2025.
Our cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash on hand at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $27.6$23.9 million, compared to $15.8 million at September 30, 2025. Restricted cash included in this balance is $0.1 million$54,000 at each of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and September 30, 2025. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company had working capital of $28.0$21.1 million and stockholders’ equity of $34.8$28.4 million compared to working capital of $11.1 million and stockholders’ equity of $18.3 million as of September 30, 2025. The increase in working capital is primarily due to an increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash of $11.8$8.1 million, an increase in prepaid expenses of $2.0 million, a decrease in accrued compensation of $1.3 million,million and a decrease in accounts payable of $1.0$1.4 million.
Operating activities used cash of $15.1$20.6 million in the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. Cash used in operating activities included net loss of $8.1$15.1 million, adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities totaling a decrease of $2.7$2.5 million and changes in operating assets and liabilities resulting in a decrease of $4.3$3.0 million. Adjustments to net loss primarily consisted of $3.8$4.4 million for the gain from the change in fair value of equity securitiessecurities, andpartially $1.2offset by $1.7 million for share-based compensation. The decrease in cash from changes in operating assets and liabilities primarily included a decrease in accounts payable of $1.6$2.3 million, a decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities of $1.4$0.3 million, and ana increasedecrease in prepaidoperating expenseslease and other assetsliabilities of $1.1$0.4 million.
Operating activities used cash of $19.1$24.6 million in the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Cash used in operating activities included net loss of $16.8$24.2 million, adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities totaling an increase of $2.5$3.9 million and changes in operating assets and liabilities resulting in a decrease of $4.7$4.3 million. Adjustments to net loss primarily consisted of $4.9$6.6 million for share-based compensation, $4.2$4.3 million for the loss on sale of the FC2 business, $3.1 million for the change in fair value of derivative liabilities, partially offset by the gain on extinguishment of debt of $8.6 million and the gain on sale of ENTADFI assets of $1.7$2.2 million. The decrease in cash from changes in operating assets and liabilities primarily included a decrease in accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $2.6$1.9 million and a decrease in accounts payable of $1.7$1.9 million. The cash flows related to discontinued operations have not been segregated and are included in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Total operating cash flows of discontinued operations for the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 are outflows of $0.3 million.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $3.5$5.3 million during the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and consisted of net proceeds from the sale of equity securities of $3.2$5.0 million and net proceeds of $0.4 million from the sale of the FC2 business for the settlement of a dispute related to a pre-closing tax receivable and liability.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $18.4$18.9 million during the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, and consisted of net proceeds of $16.3 million from the sale of the FC2 business, proceeds of $1.7$2.2 million from the sale of ENTADFI assets, and proceeds of $0.4 million from the sale of equity securities.
The cash flows related to discontinued operations have not been segregated and are included in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Total investing cash flows of discontinued operations for the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 are inflows of $0.3$0.4 million and $16.2$16.3 million, respectively, which consist of net proceeds from the sale of the FC2 business.
Net cash provided by financing activities in the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $23.4$23.3 million, which consisted primarily of proceeds from the sale of common stock and warrants in an underwritten public offering, net of commissions and costs, of $23.4 million.
Net cash used in financing activities in the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 was $4.2 million, which represented a change of control payment of $4.2 million to SWK pursuant to the Residual Royalty Agreement, which terminated the Residual Royalty Agreement and extinguished the related debt.
Excluding the change of control payment, the Company made total payments under the Residual Royalty Agreement of $0.3 million during the three and sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The Company is not required to make any additional payments under the Residual Royalty Agreement.
Sale Agreement with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. and Canaccord Genuity LLC
On July 2, 2026, the Company entered into a Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”), with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. and Canaccord Genuity LLC (each, an “Sales Agent” and, collectively the “Sales Agents”), as sales agents, pursuant to which the Company may issue and sell, from time to time, to or through the applicable Sales Agent (the “Designated Sales Agent”), shares of the Company’s common stock. The offering and sale of up to $21.8 million of shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Sales Agreement are registered pursuant to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-294911), which became effective on April 15, 2026, which includes a base prospectus and a related prospectus supplement that was filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on July 2, 2026.
The Company is not obligated to sell any shares of common stock under the Sales Agreement. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Sales Agreement, each Sales Agent will use commercially reasonable efforts consistent with its normal trading and sales practices, to sell shares of common stock from time to time based upon the Company’s instructions, including any price, time or size limits specified by the Company. Upon delivery of a placement notice, and subject to the Company’s instructions in that notice, and the terms and conditions of the Sales Agreement generally, the Designated Sales Agent may sell the common stock by any method permitted by law deemed to be an "at the market offering" as defined by Rule 415(a)(4) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). The Sales Agents’ obligations to sell shares under the Sales Agreement are subject to satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the Sales Agreement. The Company will pay the Designated Sales Agent a commission of 3.0% of the aggregate gross proceeds from each sale of the common stock and has agreed to provide the Sales Agents with customary indemnification and contribution rights, including liabilities under the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company has also agreed to reimburse the Sales Agents for certain specified expenses.
During the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, we did not sell any shares under the Lincoln Park Purchase Agreement. Since inception of the Lincoln Park Purchase Agreement through MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we sold 302,500 shares of common stock to Lincoln Park resulting in proceeds to the Company of $3.1 million.
The Company has investments in equity securities consisting of the ONCO Warrant as of June 30, 2026 and the ONCO Series D Preferred Stock and the ONCO Warrant as of March 31, 2026 and September 30, 2025. The ONCO Series D Preferred Stock and the ONCO Warrant were received on September 22, 2025 as a settlement of the ONCO Promissory Notes. See Note 15 to the financial statements included in this report for additional information. The Company has elected to measure the ONCO Series D Preferred Stock and the ONCO Warrant at fair value in accordance with ASC 825. The investments in the ONCO Series D Preferred Stock and the ONCO Warrant are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because there is no market for these types of securities and the fair value is determined using significant unobservable inputs. The fair value of the ONCO Series D Preferred Stock and the ONCO Warrant have beenwere determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. This valuation model incorporates the contractual terms of the instruments and assumptions including the stock price of ONCO Common Stock, expected volatility, and a selected discount rate. Additionally, the ONCO Series D Preferred Stock and the ONCO Warrant were issued by ONCO as part of a Securities Purchase Agreement, which included the sale of 16,099 shares of Series D convertible preferred stock and warrants to purchase 4,362,82787,256 shares of ONCO Common Stock to eleven institutional investors, for an aggregate purchase price of $12.9 million. The valuation of the ONCO Series D Preferred Stock and ONCO Warrant at issuance included a calibration discount to the proceeds of the original transaction, which was done at arms’ length. The calibration discount was reduced to zero as of March 31, 2026 aswhen the Company began to convert the ONCO Series D Preferred Stock during the threenine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which had the effect of increasing the fair value of the ONCO Series D Preferred Stock and the ONCO Warrant. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the financial instruments represent the Company’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, the use of different estimates or assumptions would result in a higher or lower fair value and different amounts being recorded in the Company’s financial statements. Material changes in any of these inputs could result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement at future reporting dates, which could have a material effect on our results of operations. See Note 4 to the financial statements included in this report for additional information.
VERU insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 1 Form 4 filing (1 insider, 1 trade date, 1,800 shares, about $4.8K) and open-market sales in 0 filings. Net open-market shares: 1,800 (purchases minus sales); net value about $4.8K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-13 | Barnette K Gary |
Open-market purchase | 1,800 | $2.69 | $4.8K |
Well-known investors holding VERU (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 164,450 | $514.7K | 0.0% | Added 137% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 150,401 | $332.4K | — | Sold out |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 61,977 | $194.0K | 0.0% | Added 39% |