VG 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Venture Global, Inc. · NYSE · Natural Gas Distribution · CIK 2007855 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Natural gas producers may curtail or shut in production due to market, pricing or other conditions, which could reduce the availability of feed gas for our LNG facilities.”
New heading “Certain metrics that we track and may present are illustrative and are subject to a number of assumptions, and any real or perceived inaccuracies in such metrics may adversely affect our business and reputation.”
New heading “Our natural gas liquefaction and export projects face, and our future projects or expansions may face, significant operational risks.”
New heading “We have not entered into all of the definitive agreements for our future projects and expansions, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so on a timely basis or on terms that are acceptable to us.”
New heading “Delays in deliveries of newbuild LNG tankers, and increases in price or building costs, could harm our operating results.”
New heading “Management and operation of our LNG tanker fleet and the charter of third-party vessels involve significant risks.”
Removed heading “Total contracted revenue is based on certain assumptions and is presented for illustrative purposes only and actual sales under our SPAs may differ materially from such illustrative operating results.”
Removed heading “When completed, our natural gas liquefaction and export projects, including the Calcasieu Project, the Plaquemines Project, the CP2 Project, the CP3 Project, the Delta Project, and any future projects or expansions thereof we develop, may face significant operational risks.”
Removed heading “We have not entered into all of the definitive agreements for the CP2 Project, the CP3 Project or the Delta Project, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so on a timely basis or on terms that are acceptable to us.”
Removed heading “Delays in deliveries of newbuild or acquired LNG tankers, and increases in price or building costs, could harm our operating results.”
Removed heading “Management and operation of our LNG tanker fleet and the subcharter of third-party vessels will involve significant risks.”
Removed heading “Our common equity interest in the Calcasieu Project will be diluted if we are unable to, or elect not to, pay certain distributions on the Holdings Preferred Units in cash.”
Removed heading “Plaquemines Credit Facilities, respectively, and/or certain investors exercising step-in rights to control, directly or indirectly, certain of our subsidiaries and the Calcasieu Project.”
Largest changes
“Our cost estimates for LNG facilities, related equipment and components, natural gas pipelines, LNG tankers, and other natural gas liquefaction and export facilities have been, and continue to be, subject to change due to many factors outside of our control. …”see in full comparison
“If our LNG tankers, or any vessels we charter, suffer damage as a result of such an incident, they may need to be repaired. Repairs and maintenance costs for LNG tankers are difficult to predict and may result in higher than anticipated operating expenses or require additional time or capital expenditures. The loss of earnings or costs to charter replacement tankers while these LNG tankers are being repaired could have a material adverse effect on our current or future business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, financing requirements, liquidity and prospects. …”see in full comparison
“If one of our LNG tankers, or any vessels we subcharter, were involved in an accident with the potential risk of environmental impacts or contamination, the resulting media coverage and potential liability, including regulatory penalties, sanctions, fines and litigation, could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, our current or future business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, financing requirements, liquidity and prospects. An accident involving one of our LNG tankers would also distract our management team. …”see in full comparison
“The delivery of newbuild LNG tankers to us could be delayed, not completed or cancelled, which could delay or eliminate our ability to optimize contracts with spot and term customers seeking delivered LNG and prevent us from realizing the anticipated benefits of operating our LNG tanker fleet. …”see in full comparison
“Our cost estimates for LNG facilities, related equipment and components, natural gas pipelines, LNG tankers, and other natural gas liquefaction and export facilities have been, and continue to be, subject to change due to many factors outside of our control. …”see in full comparison
“Our receipt of newbuild LNG tankers could be delayed, cancelled or otherwise not completed because of, among other things, quality or engineering problems or failure to deliver the LNG tanker in accordance with the specifications, changes in governmental regulations or maritime self-regulatory organization standards, delays to delivery of equipment by third-party suppliers, work stoppages or other labor disturbances at the shipyard, bankruptcy or other financial or liquidity problems of the shipbuilder, a backlog of orders at the shipyard, political or economic disturbances in the country or …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (271)
OurFor our projects that have yet to achieve COD, our ability to sell LNG commissioning cargos depends on our ability to successfully market, produce, load and, in some cases, deliver commissioning cargos during the commissioning of each of our projects prior to achieving COD. Although we have generated proceeds from the sales of commissioning cargos at the Calcasieu Project since thefrom first quarter of 2022 until COD was achieved in April 2025, and also at the Plaquemines Project since January 2025, prior to the relevant COD, such sales of commissioning cargos are limited in durationduration, and subject to a number of material uncertainties and risks. In addition, weWe are obligated to cease sales of commissioning cargos once the relevant COD occurs. The duration of the commissioning period at the Calcasieu Project, which has beenwas extended by a force majeure event, and the amount of proceeds we have generated from the sales of commissioning cargos from the Calcasieu Project toand datealso from the Plaquemines Project, may not be indicative of the duration of the commissioning period or the amount of proceeds from such sales for any futureof periodour for the Calcasieu Projectprojects or expansions thereof for any offuture our other projects, including bolt-on expansions thereof.period. See —Our ability to generate proceeds from sales of commissioning cargos is subject to significant uncertainty and volatility in such proceeds, given significant volatility in spot-market prices and —Historical proceeds from commissioning cargo sales at the Calcasieu Project, which has had an extended commissioning period due to unanticipated challenges with equipment reliability that we are in the process of remediating and which began producing LNG in a high-price environment, may not be indicative of the duration of the commissioning period or the amount of proceeds for any future period or for any of our other projects,projects including bolt-onor expansions thereof.
Our ability to generate sales of LNG following COD at each ofproject ouror projectsexpansion thereof following COD, depends on our ability to successfully commence and maintain deliveries under our post-COD SPAs.SPAs Suchfor revenuessuch canproject beor furtherexpansion, supplementedand ifalso weon areour ableability to produce and sell LNG in excess of the nameplate capacity of oursuch projects.project or expansion. We will not generate any revenues or operating cash flow under our post-COD SPAs, or from sales to third parties of excess LNG that is produced above the nameplate capacity of our LNG projects, until we have achieved COD for the relevant project. ThereIn isaddition, nosuch guaranteerevenues thatmay be subject to increased volatility when compared to our long term post-COD SPAs if we willchoose achieveto suchenter CODsinto withinany shorter term SPAs or if we choose to sell any LNG in excess of the anticipatednameplate timeframes for achieving COD at anycapacity of our projects or at all, including ason a resultspot ofor risksshort describedterm elsewhere in these "Risk Factors", including —Risks Relating to Regulation and Litigation—We may fail to receive the required approvals and permits from governmental and regulatory agencies for our projects.basis.
There is no guarantee that we will achieve COD for any of our projects or expansions thereof, within the anticipated timeframes or at all, including as a result of risks described elsewhere in these "Risk Factors", including —Risks Relating to Regulation and Litigation—We may fail to receive the required approvals and permits from governmental and regulatory agencies for our projects. As a result, there can be no assurance as to when we will commence deliveries under our post-COD SPAs, and therefore when, if at all, we will commence generating revenues and operating cash flows from our post-COD SPAs or from the sale of LNG produced in excess of nameplate capacity, if any, for our projects that have not yet achieved COD including any expansions thereof.
In addition to our post-COD SPAs, we have also entered into certain Firm-start SPAs. Our ability to satisfy our obligations under such Firm-start SPAs following the applicable firm start dates will depend in part on our ability to produce sufficient LNG cargos, either before or after COD, or in excess of nameplate capacity. While we expect to produce sufficient LNG volumes prior to the start date of each Firm-start SPA, there can be no assurance that our projects or bolt-on expansions will not be delayed, in which case we may not produce sufficient LNG to meet our obligations under the relevant Firm-start SPAs.
As a result, there can be no assurance as to when we will commence deliveries under our post-COD SPAs, and therefore when, if at all, we will commence generating revenues and operating cash flows from our post-COD SPAs or from the sale of LNG produced in excess of nameplate capacity, if any, for the Calcasieu Project or any of our other projects, including bolt-on expansions thereof. In addition,Further, there can be no assurance that we will be able to produce excess LNG above the nameplate capacity of the facilities at our projects, either at our target level of excess LNG production or at all, nor, even if such excess LNG is produced, that we will be able to resell all of it to third party customers.
Our ability to monetize our other assets, including our pipelines, LNG tankers and regasification facility capacity depends on a variety of factors, including but not limited to market conditions in the natural gas and LNG industries, required regulatory and governmental approvals, and our ability to successfully market, produce, load and deliver commissioning cargos during the commissioning of each of our projects prior to achieving COD and our ability to generate sales of LNG following COD at each of our projects. Specifically, our ability to construct and successfully monetize our interstate and intrastate pipelines will depend, among other factors, on worldwide demand for LNG, as well as on our obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals for our projects currently under development. Additionally, while we expect several of our LNG tankers to service our single DPU post-COD SPA, our ability to monetize the remainder of our LNG tanker fleet will depend on the demand from LNG customers or, potentially, other charterers, as well as that from any future SPAs we may enter into where LNG is sold on a delivered basis, for the services of such LNG tankers. Our ability to monetize the regasification facility capacity we have secured through our agreements with Grain LNG and the Alexandroupolis LNG receiving terminals will depend on demand for both LNG and regasified natural gas from downstream customers in the UK and European markets.
Our activities to date have included organizational efforts related to the development and construction of our projects and related assets, including but not limited to:
• raising capital;
• securing options to lease and leasing our project sites;
• negotiating and planning with various contractors for the development and production of such sites;
• negotiating SPAs with purchasers;
• negotiating and entering into construction contracts with construction contractors; and
• procuring gas transportation and supply.
In addition, as of December 31, 2024,2025, substantiallya allsignificant portion of the proceeds we have generated were proceeds generated from sales of commissioning cargos from the Calcasieu Project and the Plaquemines Project, and may not be indicative of the duration of the commissioning period or the amount of proceeds from such sales for any future period for the Calcasieu Project or for any of our other projects,projects including bolt-onor expansions thereof, or of our future results of operations more generally.
Our limited operating history may limit your ability to evaluate our prospects because of our limited historical financial data, our unproven ability to maintain or increase our profitability and our positive cash flows and our limited experience in addressing issues that may affect our ability to manage the construction, operation or maintenance of liquefaction facilities and related assets. We face all of the risks commonly encountered by other growing businesses, including competition and the need for additional capital and personnel. As a result, any assessment you make about our current business and any predictions you make about our future success or viability may not be accurate. There is no assurance that our business will be successful over the long term.
Historical proceeds from commissioning cargo sales at the Calcasieu Project, which has had an extended commissioning period due to unanticipated challenges with equipment reliability that we are in the process of remediating and which began producing LNG in a high-price environment, may not be indicative of the duration of the commissioning period or the amount of proceeds for any future period or for any of our other projects,projects including bolt-onor expansions thereof.
The duration of the commissioning period and our ability to generate proceeds from the sale of commissioning cargos during such period is subject to significant risks and uncertainties relating to the development, construction and commissioning of our projects as discussed in these “Risk Factors.” In particular, it is both our intention and our obligation, under our post-COD SPAs, to undertake the construction of and complete our projects or phases thereof in a reasonable and prudent manner, which, depending on the circumstances, could extend or shorten the commissioning period for such projects or phases thereof during which we are able to generate such proceeds. Further, certain delays in the development of or construction of our projects,projects and any issues with the construction of our projects could delay or otherwise adversely impact our ability to generate such proceeds during the commissioning of the relevant projects. At any of our projects or phases thereof, if the commissioning of certain equipment or integrated facilities is delayed or if COD occurs earlier than expected, the duration of time when we are able to generate proceeds from the sale of commissioning cargos may be shortened, which could adversely impact the volume of LNG produced during commissioning and our ability to generate proceeds from the sale of commissioning cargos.
Historical proceeds from the sale of commissioning cargos at the Calcasieu Project, which has had an extended commissioning period due to unanticipated challenges with equipment reliability thatbefore weCOD areoccurred in theApril process of remediating,2025, may not be indicative of the duration of the commissioning period or the amount of proceeds for any future period or for any of our other projects,projects includingor bolt-on expansions thereof.expansions. Although we have included targeted COD dates for certain of our projects and phases thereof, there can be no assurance that COD will not occur earlier or later than such targets. If COD occurs earlier than expected for a particular project or phase thereof, it would adversely impact our ability to generate proceeds from the sale of commissioning cargos, which, subject to market conditions, may otherwise be more valuable than the revenues earned under our post-COD SPAs.
A key element of our business strategy is to generate proceeds from the sale of LNG at each of our projects during the construction and commissioning phases of our projects, prior to the relevant project achieving COD.
In addition to the duration of the commissioning period, our ability to generate such proceeds depends on our ability to negotiate sales during the construction and commissioning phases of each project. There is no assurance that we will be able to continue to successfully negotiate sales of such commissioning cargos on terms that are acceptable to us, or that we will be able to successfully market, produce, load and deliver such commissioning cargos, eithercargos from theour Calcasieu Project or any other project,projects in the future. In addition, because commissioning cargos are not sold under post-COD SPAs and are instead sold on varying terms, including in some instances on a forward basis, proceeds from such commissioning cargos may vary significantly depending on, among other factors, prices and market conditions in the international LNG markets, global LNG freight rates, and on the timing of when a contract for sale is executed. As such, the amount of any proceeds that we may generate from the sale of commissioning cargos and our profitability relating to such sales is largely dependent on the strength of international LNG markets, as primarily reflected in the spot price for LNG at the time a contract for sale of commissioning cargos is executed. Historically, the spot price for LNG has varied significantly, which has impacted the amount of proceeds wegenerated havefrom generated.the sales of commissioning cargos. Further, the proceeds that we generate during any given period of time may not necessarily correlate with the prevailing market prices for the corresponding period of time, given a variety of factors, including that we have and may continue to contract sales on a forward basis, at a pre-determined price.
Additionally, we may at times contract commissioning cargos on a forward basis and, as a result, these sales of commissioning cargos may be uncorrelated with movements in spot LNG prices.
As a result, we have experienced,experienced during the commissioning phase for the Calcasieu Project and the Plaquemines Project, and expect to continue to experience during the remainder of therespective commissioning phase,phase for our other future projects and expansions, significant volatility in the proceeds we have generated from the sales of commissioning cargos from the Calcasieu Project and the Plaquemines Project.cargos. Accordingly, the proceeds we have generated from such sales of commissioning cargos of the Calcasieu Project to datedate, may not be indicative of the duration of the commissioning period or the amount of proceeds from such sales for any future period for the Calcasieu Project or for any of our other projects,projects includingor bolt-on expansions thereof.expansions. As a result, such proceeds, and also our operating results more generally, may vary significantly from one fiscal period to the next comparable fiscal period. Moreover, if we are not able to generate proceeds from the sale of commissioning cargos in the future that are comparable to such historical proceeds from the Calcasieu Project in the past,realized, that could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, financing requirements, liquidity, and prospects.
Our ability to optimize sales of post-CODour LNG cargos is subject to significant uncertainty and volatility in proceeds generated from such sales.
Our business strategy includes applying cash proceeds from one project to decrease the financing required for future projects. Our strategy is to optimize sales of LNG produced following COD by committing certain nameplate capacity to long-term post-COD SPAs, with the aim of creating a base of stable cash flows, while reserving the rest of a project’s nameplate capacitycapacity, as well as its potential excess capacity, to sell on a short-, medium-, or long-term basis with the goal of optimizing pricing for such capacity and balancing profit, duration and risk.
Our ability to optimize sales of LNG cargos that are not otherwise committed will dependdepends on our ability to negotiate sales that meet our objective of balancing profit, duration and risk. There is no assurance that we will be able to successfully negotiate sales of such cargos on terms that are acceptable to us. In addition, because such cargos may be sold on varying terms, including in some instances on a forward basis, proceeds from such cargos may vary significantly from period-to-period and from project-to-project depending on, among other factors, prices and market conditions in the international LNG markets, domestic natural gas markets, global LNG freight rates, and on the timing of when a contract for sale is executed. Further, the amount of any proceeds that we may generate from such sales, and our profitability relating to such sales, is largely dependent on the strength of international LNG markets, as primarily reflected in the spot price for LNG at the time a contract for sale of such cargos is executed.executed, as well as the availability and pricing of feed gas. Historically, the spot price for LNG has varied significantly, as have domestic natural gas prices, and we expect thethese spot priceprices will continue to vary significantly in the future which will impact the amount of proceeds we generate from such sales. Further, we may at times contract such cargos on a forward basis and, as a result, such sales may be uncorrelated with movements in spot LNG prices.
We have not entered into SPAs with customers for the total expected nameplate capacity at Phase 2 of the CP2 Project, theor CP3other Project,future the Delta Project,projects or any potential bolt-on expansions, and our failure to enter into final and binding contracts for an adequate portion of, or to otherwise sell, the expected nameplate capacity of any of our projects, including any phases or expansions thereof, could impact our ability to take FID for such projects.
We are actively marketing a portion of the remaining expected nameplate capacity of Phase 2 of the CP2 Project to leading international oil and gas companies, national and multinational utilities and LNG portfolio trading companies. As of December 31, 2024,2025, Phase 2 of the CP2 Project has contracted to sell 9.251.0 mtpa of LNG under eighta 20-year SPAs.SPA. The obligation to make LNG available under thesethe post-COD SPAs commences from the occurrence of COD for Phase 12 of the CP2 Project. Additionally, we contracted through VG Commodities to sell 2.5 mtpa of LNG under 20-year Firm-start SPAs, which are expected to be transition to CP2 upon COD of Phase 2 of the CP2 Project.
As of this date, we have not entered into any SPAs for theany expectedof nameplateour capacityother forfuture theprojects potentialor bolt-on expansion capacity for the Plaquemines Project, the CP3 Project, and the Delta Projectexpansions and have not yet begun actively marketing the expected nameplate capacity for such developments.other future projects or expansions. While taking FID for a given project, including any phase or expansion thereof, is subject to numerous factors, we may elect to proceed with FID for Phase 2 of the CP2 Project, the CP3 Project, the Delta Project, any potential bolt-on expansions, or any other future projects, including any phases or expansions thereof, only after we execute binding SPAs for such projects, phases, or expansions, that cover a targeted portion of the applicable nameplate capacity that we consider adequate to support the development and financing of such project, phase, or expansion. Our inability to take FID for any future development project or any phase or expansion thereof may result in a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, financing requirements, liquidity and, prospects.
We aim to develop and operate our LNG facilities to be capable of producing greater excess capacity,capacity at each of our projects, in mostsome cases atby leastas 30%much as 40% of their guaranteed nameplate capacity. Our ability to produce LNG in excess of the nameplate capacity at each of our projects is subject to significant risks and uncertainties relating to the development, construction and commissioning of our projects as discussed in these “Risk Factors.” Although we believe that our design and configuration will enable us to produce excess LNG without incurring material additional operating expenses or requiring additional capital investment, we may encounter additional, unforeseen costs, resulting in either operating expenses or capital investment, that make production of any excess LNG less economic or, potentially, uneconomic. Any increase in our incremental operating expenses or capital investments could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, financing requirements, liquidity and prospects. As a result, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in producing any such excess LNG at any of our projects on a consistent and reliable basis, or at all.
To the extent we are unable to sell any such remainingexcess LNG, our revenues will be adversely impacted, and any such impact could be significant. In addition, we will likely still be required to pay certain of our operating expenses related to the anticipated production of such remainingexcess LNG (such as pipeline transportation costs incurred to transport natural gas for the production of such excess LNG) without generating any corresponding revenue. As a result, any such shortfall would also reduce our operating margins. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, financing requirements, liquidity and prospects.
In addition, VG Commodities has contracted to resell at least 50% of the LNG generated post-COD by the Calcasieu Project in excess of itsthat project's nameplate capacity (subject to an annual cap at the option of the counterparty). Pursuant to such agreement, the counterparty is entitled to an assignment of VG Commodities’ rights under the applicable Intercompanyintercompany Excessexcess Capacitycapacity SPA in certain cases (including but not limited to when an event of default by VG Commodities has occurred and not been cured pursuant to such agreement with the counterparty). InVG addition,Commodities wehas also contracted to resell LNG generated by one or more of our other projects in excess of their respective nameplate capacities (excluding the 50% of the LNG generated by the Calcasieu Project) on a long-term basis. We may enter into similar arrangements related to the excess LNG at our other projects, including bolt-on expansions thereof, in the future.
For example, VGCP notified all customers under the Calcasieu Project post-COD SPAs of the anticipated delay to COD, indicating that such delay constitutes a force majeure event. As a result of such designation, the time period within which to achieve COD in such SPAs would be extended and such customers will not be entitled to terminate as a result of failure to designate COD until June 2025, at the earliest. All of such customers have questioned whether, and most have disputed in arbitration proceedings that, the delay constitutes a force majeure event, and they could assert that they are entitled to terminate their SPAs because COD did not occur by March 2024.
In addition, the CP2 Foundation SPAs include termination rights in favor of the customer and us if certain conditions precedent are not satisfied by us or waived by the customer by a certain date including that we receive all LNG export authorizations by that date. Because of the rehearing order issued by FERC on November 27, 2024 that required a supplemental environmental review and the delay in issuance of authorizations to proceed with construction on the CP2 Project until FERC issues a further merits order and the temporary pause on new authorizations of natural gas exports to Non-FTA Nations described under Item 1.—Business—Governmental Regulation—DOE Export Authorizations, some of our customers under the CP2 Foundation SPAs or we may elect to terminate such SPAs if the related conditions precedent are not satisfied by the applicable deadline. Such dates certain have passed in two of the CP2 Foundation SPAs and are upcoming in March 2025 in the remaining CP2 Foundation SPAs. Although most customers have agreed to extend their original deadlines until March 2025, we are negotiating extensions with all of the CP2 Foundation SPA customers. There can be no assurance that we will come to an agreement regarding an extension with such customers, and if we do not come to an agreement, either we or such customers may elect to terminate their respective SPA after the applicable grace period. Further, there can be no assurance that we will be able to secure any necessary extensions on similar terms with the CP2 Foundation SPA customers or at all if the future deadlines are not met in the event of further delays or otherwise.
Our ability to generate cash under our post-CODContracted SPAs and sales by VG Commodities is substantially dependent upon the performance by a limited number of our customers, and we could be materially and adversely affected if certain of these customers fail to perform their contractual obligations for any reason.
We currently have and expect to havecontinue having a limited number of customers to whom we sell LNG onunder aour post-CODContracted basis.SPAs and sales by VG Commodities. For example, as of December 31, 2024,2025, we have executed 39.2547.0 mtpa of post-COD SPAs and Firm-start SPAs with 2024 customers with respect to LNG from our projects, of which 37.4545.2 mtpa is contracted underon a 20-year fixed price SPAsbasis and 1.8 mtpa is contracted on a short- and medium-term basis. For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, approximately 72%50.0% of our revenue for the period from individual external customers was concentrated across three customers. Moreover, for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, we had one customer which represented approximately 32%23% of our revenue for that same period.
Our post-COD and other SPAs typically require, and we expect our future SPAs will require, our customers to pay a fee equal to a fixed facilityliquefaction chargefee per MMBtu, plus an amount equal to, depending on the applicable SPA, 115% or more of the Henry Hub price for feed gas that covers the cost of feed gas and is intended to cover gas transportation costs and certain of our other operating expenses. As a result, any decrease in the price of feed gas may reduce our operating margins under our SPAs.
Similarly, under certain SPAs for the sale of commissioning cargos and certain sales by VG Commodities, our customers pay a fixed fee or a fee based on an index other than Henry Hub (such as the TTF or JKM benchmarks), and in such cases our operating margins may be reduced in the event of an increase in the price at which we are required to purchase feed gas relative to the relevant fixed fee or alternate index, or in the event of a reduction in the price of the relevant index used to calculate the fee under the relevant SPA relative to the price at which we are required to purchase feed gas.
We also anticipate that certain post-CODContracted SPAs and certain sales by VG Commodities we enter into will include a fixed fee that will only be partially adjusted for inflation over the contract term. As a result, inflationary pressures over time will not be fully reflected in the prices we charge our customers under oursuch post-CODsale SPAs.agreements. At the same time, our operating expenses are likely to increase due to inflationary pressure. Any such increases may not be fully offset by any partial inflation adjustments under our post-CODContracted SPAs or certain sales by VG Commodities and, as a result, inflation may reduce our operating margins.
Natural gas producers may curtail or shut in production due to market, pricing or other conditions, which could reduce the availability of feed gas for our LNG facilities.
We depend on third-party natural gas suppliers to provide the natural gas necessary to operate our liquefaction facilities. Significant sustained declines in natural gas prices, oversupply in natural gas markets or crude, or materially adverse changes in the cost structure or profitability of upstream producers could cause producers to shut-in, curtail or reduce production from existing wells and defer or cancel planned drilling activity. Natural gas supply curtailments or shut-ins, whether due to low commodity prices, operational constraints, government actions, weather, or other market conditions, could limit the volume of natural gas available to us, and may significantly increase our feed gas costs, constrain our ability to operate our facilities at expected utilization levels, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future growth prospects.
In periods of low or volatile natural gas prices, producers may elect to reduce output from higher-cost wells or delay completion of drilled but uncompleted wells, which may lead to reduced supply in the natural gas markets where we obtain our feed gas. Such supply variability could, among other things, result in increased competition for available natural gas supplies and reduced reliability of delivery commitments from suppliers. Our inability to obtain sufficient natural gas on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, could adversely affect our relationships with our customers and counterparties, who rely on us to deliver contracted volumes of LNG.
Additionally, regulatory actions, pipeline infrastructure constraints, extreme weather events, or other force majeure occurrences affecting our supply regions could exacerbate upstream production curtailments and further limit the availability of natural gas. While we seek to mitigate these risks through long-term supply arrangements, portfolio diversification and pipeline connectivity, there can be no assurance that such measures will fully protect us from the effects of upstream production slowdowns or curtailments. Any prolonged or widespread reduction in upstream natural gas production could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future growth prospects.
We depend upon third-party pipelines to provide gas delivery options to our projects and any other natural gas liquefaction and export facilities that we may decide to develop in the future. We have entered into several precedent and service agreements with interstate pipeline companies to provide the natural gas transportation to the CalcasieuCalcasieu, ProjectPlaquemines, and the Plaquemines Project. We have begun to contract for natural gas transportation requirements for the CP2 Project and are currently in negotiations with other gas transportation companies to provide further natural gas transportation requirements for the CP2 Project and the natural gas transportation requirements for the CP3 Project and the Delta Project.Projects. We will need to enter into and secure additional pipeline transportation capacity for theour CP2other Project,future the CP3 Project, the Delta Project,projects and potentialand bolt-on expansionsexpansions, for us to generate the expected nameplate and excess capacity of LNG at such projects.projects or expansions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into the requisite agreements to secure natural gas transportation capacity for our future projects and expansions on terms acceptable to us, or at all, which would impair our ability to fulfill our obligations under any SPAs. Even if we have entered into the requisite agreements for our projects, there can be no assurance we will be able to secure the necessary natural gas transportation capacity for each of our projects.
In addition, we depend on third-party natural gas suppliers to provide the feed gas required to generate the expected nameplate and excess capacity of LNG at our projects. We anticipate that we will establish and maintain a portfolio of natural gas supply agreements or contracts to meet our requirements, which we have commencedrequirements for the CalcasieuCalcasieu, ProjectPlaquemines and theCP2 Plaqueminesprojects, Project,and for our other future projects or expansions, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so on a long-term basis.
We also cannot control the regulatory and permitting approvals or third parties’ construction times, either with respect to capacity that has been secured or capacity that will be secured. If and when we need to replace one or more of our agreements with these interconnecting pipelines or enter into additional agreements, we may not be able to do so on commercially reasonable terms or at all, which would, in turn, impair our ability to fulfill our obligations under certain of our SPAs. Our failure to purchase or receive physical delivery of sufficient quantities of natural gas could prevent us from producing LNG or meeting our obligations under our SPAs and our ability to generate revenue would be adversely affected, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, financing requirements, liquidity and prospects. In addition, if we are unable to deliver any contracted volume in full, our customers will generally be entitled to reimbursement of some or all costs and expenses for replacement LNG.
Certain metrics that we track and may present are illustrative and are subject to a number of assumptions, and any real or perceived inaccuracies in such metrics may adversely affect our business and reputation.
Total contracted revenue is based on certain assumptions and is presented for illustrative purposes only and actual sales under our SPAs may differ materially from such illustrative operating results.
We havetrack includedand inmay thispresent Formfrom 10-Ktime to time certain calculationsmetrics ofthat total contracted revenue as anare illustrative metricand reflectingnot revenueindependently thatverified couldby any third party. Such metrics may be generated under our post-COD SPAs as of a particular date for the remaining term of all such post-COD SPAs. These calculations are based on certaina assumptions as described in the definitionrange of “totalassumptions, contractedsuch revenue” included under Glossary of Key Terms of this Form 10-K. Those assumptions include, among others,as the development, completion and commissioning of each of the relevant projects (including obtaining any required regulatory approvals), estimated contracted volume for eachsuch project’s existing post-COD SPAs, assumed rate of inflation, and an assumed Henry Hub gas price per MMBtu.MMBtu, the occurrence of certain environmental conditions and the composition of feed gas. Such assumptions are based upon our management’s assessment of market comparables and other indicative pricing in the market and will be affected by various factors, including actual inflation rates and Henry Hub gas prices during the term of the relevant SPAs, performance by our customers under the applicable SPAs, as well as by the various risks and uncertainties relating to development, construction, commissioning and operation of each of our projects (including obtaining any required regulatory approvals) as described in this “Risk Factors” section. ForIf example,such actualmetrics inflationare ratesnot accurate representations of our business, if investors do not perceive such metrics to be accurate, or if we discover material inaccuracies with respect to these figures, investors may lose confidence in our metrics and actual Henry Hub gas prices during the term of the relevant SPAs will likely differ from the assumed rate of inflationbusiness and assumed Henry Hub gas price used in such calculation, and any such differenceswe could be material.subject Asto alegal result,claims, actualincluding revenuesecurities generatedclass underaction thoselawsuits, SPAsbusiness, willcontracts, likelyfinancial differcondition, fromoperating theresults, totalcash contractedflow, revenuefinancing includedrequirements, in this Form 10-K,liquidity and any such differencesprospects could be material.affected. InvestorsOur shouldmethodologies notfor placecalculating unduethese reliancemetrics onhave a number of limitations and may change over time, which could result in unexpected changes to our illustrativemetrics, calculations ofincluding the totalmetrics contractedwe revenue.publicly disclose.
We may not be successful in pursuing bolt-on expansion opportunities at our current or future projects, which would adversely impact our growth prospects.
A key element of our growth strategy is to increase the liquefaction capacity at certain of our current and future projects through bolt-on expansions that involve adding incremental liquefaction trains and certain related equipment to the relevant project. Our ability to pursue any such bolt-on expansion is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties and there can be no assurance that we will be able to complete all or some of our currently anticipated bolt-on expansion opportunities.
In particular, bolt-on expansion opportunities are subject to regulatory approval, and as of the date of this Form 10-K, we have only recently requestedsubmitted initiationapplications of the pre-filing process withto FERC and DOE for such bolt-on expansion opportunities with respect to the Plaquemines Expansion Project and we have not otherwise made any filings with the necessary regulators, including DOE or FERC, with respect to any suchother expansion opportunities at our current or future projects. Such regulatory approvals are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties as described under —Risks Relating to Regulation and Litigation, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining any such regulatory approvals. In addition, we are evaluating contracting and optimal financing options for any bolt-on expansions as there can be no assurance our projects will generate sufficient cash proceeds to fund all of the expansion opportunities we have identified at our current and future projects. Further, any bolt-on expansionexpansions will require sufficient additional natural gas supply at the relevant project, and there can be no assurance we will be able to enter agreements for supply or transportation of the requisite natural gas on terms acceptable to us or at all.
Additionally, the development and construction of any bolt-on expansions at our current or future projects could have an adverse effect on the ongoing or future construction, commissioning or operations, as applicable, of the relevant projects. The simultaneous construction and subsequent commissioning of any bolt-on expansion opportunities at any project while such project is otherwise in construction, commissioning, or operating at full capacity, could subject us and our third-party contractors to additional safety risks, as well as additional costs related to the management of those safety hazards and additional required regulatory approvals. Any such additional safety or other measures and approvals could result in additional costs, could delay our plans for any such expansions, or could result in a smaller size of any potential bolt-on expansion opportunity.
If we are not successful in pursuing bolt-on expansion opportunities that we have identified at our projects, or if any such expansion opportunities are executed only at a smaller scale or on a delayed timeline, our growth would be adversely impacted. Any of the foregoing could have an adverse effect on our growth, financial condition, operating results, and cash flow.
Our results of operations have fluctuated on a quarterly basis in the past, and may continue to fluctuate in the future, due to a wide variety of factors, including but not limited to the volatility in pricing and the seasonal nature of demand for natural gas and LNG, third-party supply disruptions, price spread between European and Asian LNG indices, the availability of, and associated freight rates of, LNG tankers and temperature and weather conditions across the markets we supply, which can have an impact on the demand for energy and, consequently, LNG. Accordingly, fluctuations in revenue during quarters of high and low demand, respectivelyrespectively, could have a disproportionate effect on our results of operations for the entire year. ThusThus, comparisons of our results of operations across different fiscal quarters may not be accurate indicators of our future performance. Annual or quarterly comparisons of our results of operations may not be usefuluseful, and our results in any particular period will not necessarily be indicative of the results to be expected for any future period. While we believe that our results of operations and earnings potential should be analyzed on a longer term view due to the nature of our business, such fluctuations can adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Substantially all of our anticipatedrevenue revenueis, and we expect will becontinue to be, dependent upon our LNG projects, all of which are currently located in southern Louisiana. Due to our limited asset and geographic diversification, an adverse development at the terminal or pipeline for our projects (including, for example, natural or man-made disasters affecting Louisiana, or significant long-term equipment failures), or in the natural gas or LNG industry,industries, would have a significantly greater impact on our financial condition and operating results than if we maintained more diverse assets and operating areas.
An element of our strategy is to support our LNG growth through targeted transactions in areas of the natural gas industry that relate to our natural gas liquefaction and export projects. We intend to continue to explore targeted investments and acquisitions in the natural gas industry that complement and strengthen our project portfolio and solidify access to, and transport for, natural gas molecules, and the ability to deliver LNG, at commercially attractive terms. For example, we have in the past acquired firm regasification facility capacity at the largest LNG regasification terminal in Europe, Grain LNG,terminals in the United Kingdom, which we expect will allow us to import 42 LNG cargos per year beginning, depending on the starting period, anytime between October 1, 2029 to April 1, 2030, toKingdom and until July 14, 2045 (except for the period from April 1, 2030 to September 30, 2030 when only 13 LNG cargos can be imported). Additionally, we have secured approximately 1 mtpa of LNG regasification capacity at the new Alexandroupolis LNG receiving terminal in Greece for five years, which is expected to begin on October 1, 2025. Our capacity will account for approximately 25% of the total terminal capacity at Alexandroupolis, or approximately 12 cargos annually.Greece. While we believe that these contracted regasification capacities will allow us to supply both LNG and regasified natural gas directly into the European market to current and future downstream customers and allow us to continue to grow our presence in the European markets, we cannot guarantee that demand for delivered LNG or regasified natural gas will be in line with our expectations.
Although we have obtained certain customary insurance coverage in respect of the CalcasieuCalcasieu, Project, the Plaquemines Project,Plaquemines, and the CP2 Projectprojects, and our LNG tankers, we do not currently maintain insurance with respect to most aspects of the development, construction or operation of our other projects. We expect to obtain insurance as required under our contracts and consistent with industry standards (subject to availability on commercially reasonable terms) to protect against certain construction, operating and other risks, but not all risks will be insured or are insurable (for example, losses as a result of force majeure, natural or man-made disasters, terrorist attacks or sabotage or environmental contamination may not be available at all or on commercially reasonable terms). However, there can be no assurance that such insurance coverage will be available in the future on commercially reasonable terms or at commercially reasonable rates, or on the same or substantially similar terms as our existing insurance coverage or that the insurance proceeds will be adequate to cover the repair or replacement of equipment and materials, to cover lost revenues from our projects, or to compensate for any injuries or loss of life. Further, we use a captive insurance subsidiary to insure certain risk related to named windstorms and such coverage involves retaining certain risks that might otherwise be covered by traditional insurance. If certain operating risks occur, or if there is a total or partial loss of a project in the future, there can be no assurance that the proceeds of the applicable insurance policies will be adequate to cover lost revenues, increased expenses or the cost of repair or replacement. Additionally, in the event we make a claim under our insurance policies, we will be subject to the credit risk of the insurers. Volatility and disruption in the financial and credit markets may adversely affect the credit quality of our insurers and impact their ability to pay claims. Any increases in the number or severity of claims or any such loss that is not covered by our insurance policies could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, financing requirements, liquidity and prospects.
Before construction of any project begins, we and our contractors, including our EPC contractors, need to hire new on-site employees to manage the construction of each project. We have engaged an EPC contractor to meet some of the construction labor needs of the Plaquemines Project and Phase 1 of the CP2 Project. In addition, before any of our projects commences operations, we need to hire an entire staff to operate the applicable facility. As a result, we expect the number of our personnel and our related costs to continue increasing significantly as we grow. If we and our contractors, including EPC contractors, are not able to attract and retain qualified personnel, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, financing requirements, liquidity and prospects.
We are in the process of commissioning the Calcasieu Project, constructing and commissioning the Plaquemines Project and developing the CP2 Project, the CP3 Project, the Delta Project and the potential bolt-on expansion for the Plaquemines Project. An amount expected to be necessary to complete the Calcasieu Project and achieve COD for the Calcasieu Project is held in cash reserve accounts pursuant to our project financing arrangements and reflected as restricted in our financial statements. While we believe we have sufficient cash and access to substantial commissioning cargo proceeds to fund the completion of the Plaquemines Project based on our current estimate of the total project costs, the CP2 Project, the CP3 Project, the Delta Project and any potential bolt-on expansions, as well as any future projects we develop, will require significant additional funding.
We currently estimate that the total project costs for the Plaquemines Project will be approximately $23.3 billion to $23.8 billion including EPC contractor profit and contingency, owners’ costs and financing costs, of which approximately $19.8 billion had been paid for as of December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2024, we have additional available borrowing capacity of $313 million under the Plaquemines Construction Term Loan. In addition, as of December 31, 2024, we estimate that the total project cost for the CP2 Project will range from approximately $27.0 billion to $28.0 billion, including EPC contractor profit and contingency, owners’ costs and financing costs, substantially all of which have not yet been funded. These estimates are based primarily upon our construction cost experiences with the Calcasieu Project and the Plaquemines Project and the pricing included in the CP2 Phase 1 EPC Contract, and reflect the current inflationary environment as well as the fact that the pipeline for the CP2 Project is expected to be longer and more expensive than the pipelines for the Calcasieu Project and the Plaquemines Project. However, we have not yet entered into a number of material contracts for the CP2 Project (including an EPC contract for Phase 2 of the CP2 Project), and our actual costs could vary significantly from our preliminary estimates depending on the terms we may agree to for those contracts. Further, these cost estimates do not include the cost of any potential bolt-on capacity at the Plaquemines Project or the CP2 Project, nor do they reflect the potential impact of any new tariffs that have been announced or implemented since December 31, 2024 or that may be implemented in the future. Our project budget estimates included in this Form 10-K reflect all tariffs in place, and Section 232 exemptions secured, as of December 31, 2024. Certain of our key components, including our Baker Hughes sourced liquefaction train system modules and power island components, are foreign sourced and specified under our regulatory approvals, offering no domestically sourced alternative and potentially exposing us to the effects of any future tariffs that may be imposed. There can be no assurance as to the extent of any future tariffs, or the impact thereof on any of our estimates of total project costs for our projects, which could have a material adverse effect on our construction budgets and limit our growth prospects.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Our Financial Results.”
New heading “Loss on Foreign Currency Transactions”
New heading “Sales and shipping”
New heading “Venture Global IPO”
New heading “VGLNG Debt and Equity Financing”
New heading “Change in cash used by investing activities (in billions)”
New heading “Change in cash from financing activities (in billions)”
New heading “For further discussion, see Item 1A.—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Regulation and Litigation—If we are unsuccessful in any current or potential future legal proceedings with customers, the amounts that we are required to pay may be substantial or certain of our post-COD SPAs may be terminated, which may lead to an acceleration of all our debt for the relevant project and adversely impact the trading price of our Class A common stock, Note 4 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K, and Part I Item 3.—Legal Proceedings of this Form 10-K.”
Removed heading “Insurance Recoveries, Net”
Removed heading “Results of Operations”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2023 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “Operating Expense”
Removed heading “Operating and Maintenance Expense”
Removed heading “General and Administrative Expense”
Removed heading “Development Expense”
Removed heading “Depreciation and Amortization”
Removed heading “Insurance Recoveries, Net”
Removed heading “Income from Operations”
Removed heading “Other Income or Expense”
Removed heading “Interest Income”
Removed heading “Interest Expense, Net”
Removed heading “Gain on Interest Rate Swaps”
Removed heading “Loss on Embedded Derivatives”
Removed heading “Loss on Financing Transactions”
Removed heading “Income before Income Tax Expense”
Removed heading “Income Tax Expense”
Removed heading “Net Income Attributable to Redeemable Stock of Subsidiary”
Removed heading “Net Income Attributable to Non-controlling Interests”
Removed heading “Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2023 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “Corporate, other and eliminations”
Removed heading “VGLNG Senior Secured Notes”
Removed heading “VGLNG Series A Preferred Shares”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2023 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “Operating Activities”
Removed heading “Investing Activities”
Removed heading “Financing Activities”
Removed heading “Macroeconomic Uncertainty”
Largest changes
“For further discussion, see Item 1A.—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Regulation and Litigation—If we are unsuccessful in any current or potential future legal proceedings with customers, the amounts that we are required to pay may be substantial or certain of our post-COD SPAs may be terminated, which may lead to an acceleration of all our debt for the relevant project and adversely impact the trading price of our Class A common stock, Note 4 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K, and Part I Item 3.—Legal Proceedings of …”see in full comparison
“Capital markets and interest rates — Capital markets have experienced recent volatility and liquidity constraints due to uncertainty around the global economic impact of tariffs, inflation and monetary policy. Although the annual rate of inflation has moderated, future changes in interest rate policy could reignite inflationary pressures or increase the overall cost of capital. Such volatility may adversely impact access to the market for corporate or project lending or lead to higher borrowing costs. …”see in full comparison
“Evolving global political and energy-policy conditions continue to shape LNG demand and pricing. In January 2026, the EU voted a plan into law to phase out Russian-sourced gas and LNG by 2027. The ban is expected to create a lasting increase in demand for non-Russian LNG imports, including U.S. supply. While supportive of long-term growth, the transition may create short-term uncertainty in market pricing. …”see in full comparison
“General macroeconomic trends and geopolitical uncertainty may result in conditions that could affect demand and market prices for our products and exacerbate some of the risks that affect our business. This includes heightened inflation, capital market volatility, interest rate and currency rate fluctuations, evolving tax regimes and tariff structures, and changes to environmental and energy policies. …”see in full comparison
“Global economic volatility may heighten risks related to tariffs, labor availability, capital market access, exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations, and market balance and margins.”see in full comparison
“The Calcasieu Project is involved in disputes and arbitration proceedings with certain of its post-COD SPA customers. Such customers are asserting, among other claims, that the Calcasieu Project is delayed in achieving COD under our post-COD SPAs. The remedies sought by these customers include damages ranging between $6.7 billion and $7.4 billion (which is potentially subject to increase with the passage of time until COD occurs), rather than the termination of the post-COD SPA. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (351)
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto, included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K. In addition to historical consolidated financial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates, and beliefs that involve significant risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to those differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in Item 1A.—Risk Factors and Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements of this Form 10-K. Except for per MMBtu amounts, or as otherwise specified, dollar amounts presented within tables are stated in millions.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company's sales and shipping business met the criteria to be a reportable segment. Prior to the year ended December 31, 2025, sales and shipping was not quantitatively material for reporting purposes and was combined with corporate activities as corporate, other and eliminations. Prior period presentations included within Item 7. ––Management's discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this form 10-K has been recast to conform to the current segment reporting structure.
For discussion of the Company's year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, refer to Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2024 Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 6, 2025.
In September 2023, we engaged in a series of reorganization transactions, or the Reorganization Transactions, that ultimately resulted in Venture Global becoming the principal parent company of our entire enterprise. See Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of this Form 10-K for further information.
On January 27, 2025, the Company effectuated an approximately 4,520.3317-for-one forward stock split of its Class A common stock in connection with its IPO which was completed on January 27, 2025. All Class A common stock share and per share amounts in these consolidated financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the impact of the Stock Split. See Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 25 – Subsequent Events for further discussion of the IPO.
Our Financial Results.
(1) Includes sales prices indexed to foreign gas markets, exclusive of an implied commodity fee, and fixed liquefaction fees.
Our income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased compared to the prior year primarily due to higher sales volumes at our Plaquemines Project from the commencement of LNG production in December 2024 and continued ramp up of LNG production during 2025. This was partially offset by lower weighted average LNG sales prices at our Calcasieu Project due to the commencement of LNG sales under its post-COD SPAs and the higher cost of feed gas.
Calcasieu Project. Our initial LNG export facility declared COD and commenced the sale of LNG to its customers under our post-COD SPAs on April 15, 2025. Prior to COD, the Calcasieu Project sold LNG under LNG Commissioning Sales Agreements.
Plaquemines Project. Production and sales of LNG from our second LNG export facility increased during the period while physical construction and the commissioning program of the project continued to advance. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we incurred $3.9 billion of project costs, the majority of which were capitalized, and we placed an additional $13.4 billion of assets in service in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.
CP2 Project. In June 2025, we commenced site work on our third LNG export facility, following receipt of final approval and notices to proceed with on-site construction from the FERC. In July 2025, Phase 1 of the CP2 Project achieved FID and obtained $15.1 billion in project financing to fund the development and construction of Phase 1 of the CP2 Project. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we incurred $6.5 billion of project costs primarily associated with construction activities and purchases of equipment procurement, of which $6.3 billion was capitalized and $203 million was expensed.
In February 2026, the CP2 Project executed a 20-year post-COD SPA for the delivery of 1.5 mtpa from Phase 2 of the CP2 Project, increasing the total expected capacity post-COD under contract from 26.0 mtpa to 27.5 mtpa.
Our Strategic Developments. In 2025, we formally initiated the development process for the Plaquemines Expansion Project with expected annual peak production capacity of 31.0 mtpa. See Item 1A.—Business for further discussion.
We took delivery of four LNG tankers during the year ended December 31, 2025, and one LNG tanker in the first quarter of 2026. This brought our total owned fleet of LNG tankers to seven with an additional two LNG tankers that are currently under construction and will be delivered in 2026. In 2025, we used our LNG tankers to transport 61 cargos from our LNG facilities.
Calcasieu Project. In 2024, production and sales of LNG from our initial LNG export facility remained ongoing, although not at full nameplate capacity levels, while we continued to address significant remaining work related to commissioning, carryover completions, rectification, reliability testing, and other incomplete aspects of the facility. Sales from our Calcasieu Project commenced in March 2022. LNG cargos exported in 2024 totaled 140 (504.5 TBtu of LNG) compared to 143 (506.0 TBtu of LNG) in 2023.
Plaquemines Project. In December 2024, we first produced LNG from our second LNG export facility, and as of December 31, 2024, we exported one cargo from the Plaquemines Project, which was in-transit to our customer. In December 2024, a portion of the facility’s assets, representing $11.4 billion of costs, were placed in service in accordance with GAAP. As of December 31, 2024, physical construction of the Plaquemines Project was ongoing and the project’s commissioning program remained underway. In 2024, we incurred $9.3 billion of project costs, the majority of which were capitalized.
CP2 Project. In 2024, we significantly advanced the development of our third LNG project, amidst a fluctuating political and regulatory environment. During the year, we incurred $2.7 billion of project costs primarily associated with engineering and design, equipment procurement, and off-site manufacturing work, a portion of which was capitalized and a portion of which were expensed. In 2024, we issued purchase orders and notices to proceed thereunder to Baker Hughes for both the liquefaction train and power island systems for Phase 2 of the project, among other development and procurement activities. We also continued to see change in regards to the CP2 Project’s regulatory landscape, as discussed below:
•FERC authorization. In June 2024, we received authorization from FERC to site, construct and operate the CP2 Project. In July 2024, a group of opponents, composed mostly of environmental groups, filed a request for rehearing of FERC’s authorization. In November 2024, FERC issued an order on rehearing that, among other things, (i) generally rejected the opposition’s arguments, (ii) stated that FERC would prepare a supplemental EIS to further address air impacts of certain emissions, and (iii) that FERC will address the emissions topic in a future order. In addition, FERC announced that, due to its initiation of supplemental environmental review, it will not issue authorizations to proceed with construction until the Commission issues a further merits order. In February 2025, FERC prepared its draft supplemental EIS which reaffirmed that CP2 Project emissions impacts are “not significant”.
•DOE non-FTA authorization. In January 2024, the Biden administration announced a temporary pause on approvals from the DOE to export natural gas to Non-FTA Nations. In January 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order that, among other things, directed the DOE to resume reviews of such export applications.
OurVGLNG Sources of Capital. In July 2024, VGLNG issued $1.5 billion of 7.000% senior secured notes maturing January 2030. In September 2024, VGLNG issued 3 million shares of 9.000% Series A Fixed-Rate Reset Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock for gross proceeds of $3.0 billion. In early 2025, we completed our IPO, issuing and selling 70 million shares of our Class A common stock at a public offering price of $25.00 per share.share for total net proceeds of $1.7 billion. In connection with the IPO, we effectuated a 4,520.3317-for-one forward stock split of our Class A common stock, which has been retrospectively incorporated into this Form 10-K, as applicable.stock.
In September 2025, Blackfin entered into the Blackfin Credit Facilities totaling $1.6 billion. Proceeds from the Blackfin Credit Facilities were used to reimburse $889 million to VGLNG for prior expenditures related to the development and construction of the Blackfin Pipeline.
In November 2025, VGLNG entered into the VGLNG Revolving Credit Facility totaling $2.0 billion. Proceeds from the VGLNG Revolving Credit Facility will be used for general corporate purposes of VGLNG and its subsidiaries.
Our Strategic Advancements. In July 2024, we took delivery of our first two of nine LNG tankers that we have contracted to construct and/or acquire. In addition, in 2024, we executed two medium-term and two short-term charters for additional LNG tankers, bringing our shipping portfolio to a total of thirteen vessels. In 2024, eight of our cargos from LNG produced by the Calcasieu Project and the Plaquemines Project were sold or in-transit on as delivered terms utilizing our owned or chartered LNG tankers. In 2024, we signed an agreement for 1 mtpa of regasification capacity, or approximately 12 cargos annually, at the Alexandroupolis LNG regasification terminal in Greece for five years, which is expected to begin in October 2025.
LNG Market Environment. In 2024, average LNG prices experienced a significant decline compared to 2023 as a result of various supply and demand factors, including high inventories in Europe and relatively stable natural gas supply conditions. In the U.S., the Henry Hub natural gas spot price averaged $2.25 per MMBtu in 2024 a decline of 11% from 2023. In Europe, the Title Transfer Facility, or TTF, price averaged $10.89 per MMBtu in 2024, a decline of 15% from 2023. The Japan-Korea-Marker, or JKM, price, a key benchmark for LNG in East Asia, averaged $11.91 per MMBtu in 2024, a decline of 14% from 2023. See Item 1A.—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—Our ability to generate proceeds from sales of commissioning cargos is subject to significant uncertainty and volatility in such proceeds, given significant volatility in spot-market prices of this Form 10-K.
Our Financial Results. Our net income for the year ended December 31, 2024 decreased $1.9 billion, from $3.6 billion in 2023 to $1.7 billion in 2024, primarily due to the decrease in income from operations of $3.1 billion, from $4.9 billion in 2023 to $1.8 billion in 2024. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in the weighted average price of LNG commissioning sales in 2024 compared to 2023. The impact on net income attributable to volumes sold was less significant between the periods.
___________ (1) Volumes that departed our LNG production facilities.
(2) Delivered to customer and recognized in results of operations.
(3) Contracted spot and/or forward prices, generally consisting of a liquefaction fee and commodity charge.
LNG Sales. We sell LNG throughout the full lifecycle of our LNG facilities—during testing and commissioning, operations under contracted sales agreements, and through the sale of excess production capacity. We employ a portfolio contracting approach designed to sell sufficient term liquefaction capacity to support financing while optimizing revenue and cash flow.
LNG pricing structure. The LNG sales price structure under our Contracted SPAs generally includes (i) a fixed liquefaction fee, a portion of which is subject to an annual adjustment for inflation; (ii) a variable commodity fee equal to at least 115% of Henry Hub per MMBtu of LNG; and (iii) a transportation charge, if sold on a DPU basis. The LNG sales price structure of both our commissioning sales and excess capacity sales generally aligns with our Contracted SPAs for FOB delivery, whereas our DES agreements are structured with a single sales price that includes a transportation charge and is indexed to foreign gas markets, such as TTF or JKM.
Sales of LNG during commissioning. We generally sell LNG produced during the commissioning phase of our projects.projects, Weprior aimto COD, on a forward spot or short-term contracted basis. Our ability to generate cash proceeds from the sale of LNG produced during the commissioning phase of each of our projects. Our ability to generate such cash proceeds,LNG, and the amount of any such cash proceeds, will dependdepends primarily on the duration of the commissioning phase for each of our projects, the volume of LNG that we are able to produce during the commissioning phase, our ability to negotiate sales of LNG produced during the commissioning phase, as well as the market price for LNG at the time of such sales.sales are executed. As a result, the amount of cash proceeds we are able to generate from suchthe salessale of commissioning cargosLNG will likely differ from period to period and from project to project, and such differences could be material.
Sales of LNGContracted post-COD of our projects.LNG. We aim to generate cash proceeds from the sale ofsell LNG producedunder afterpost CODCOD-SPAs forand eachFirm-start ofSPAs our projects underleveraging a combination of long-term 20-year post-CODContracted SPAs as well as short- and medium-term post-CODContracted SPAs to optimize the average fixed facilityliquefaction chargefee across our SPAs. Further, to the extent our projects generate excess capacity relative to the nameplate capacity, we expect to sell such excess capacity as described below. None of our projects have achieved COD as of the date of this Form 10-K. Our ability to generate cash proceeds from such sales,revenue, and the amount of any suchassociated cash proceeds that we are able to generate, will be contingent upon achieving COD at each of our projects, and will vary depending on the followingfixed keyliquefaction factors:fee under our Contracted SPAs, the variable commodity fee indexed to the Henry Hub price of gas, as well as the volume and sales prices of LNG produced in excess of committed sales under Contracted SPAs.
◦Contract price under our SPAs. Our existing post-COD SPAs will require our export customers to pay us a fixed facility charge per MMBtu, plus a variable commodity charge per MMBtu, in an amount equal to, depending on the applicable SPA, 115% or more of the Henry Hub gas price. The fixed facility charge varies across our post-COD SPAs and a portion of the fixed facility charge will be adjusted for inflation. For any additional post-COD SPAs that we may enter into in the future which include a fixed facility charge, that amount will be based on several factors, including market conditions at the time we enter into the relevant contract. Final terms for any additional post-COD SPAs we may enter into in the future will not be known until those contracts are executed and will impact our future revenue, as well as our operating margins.
◦Henry Hub gas price. As described above, the variable commodity charge under our post-COD SPAs requires our customers to pay 115% or more of the Henry Hub gas price per MMBtu, which is intended to cover the price of the feed gas and gas transportation costs, and is also intended to cover certain of our operating expenses and partially adjust for inflation. We anticipate that any additional post-COD SPAs we enter into in the future will similarly require our export customers to pay a similar variable commodity charge. As a result, changes in the Henry Hub gas price will impact our future revenue, as well as our operating margins. In addition, there may be differences, and such differences may be material, between the actual price we pay for feed gas and the Henry Hub gas price used to calculate the variable commodity charges payable by our customers under the relevant post-COD SPAs, which could affect our operating margins.
◦Sales of uncommitted and excess LNG. We intendsell toLNG marketproduced above our Contracted SPA commitments under short‑, medium‑, or long‑term arrangements, providing commercial and sell any uncommitted LNG and any excess capacity through our wholly owned subsidiary, VG Commodities, which manages our shipping business, providing the flexibility to optimize pricing for such sales.flexibility. Our ability to generate cash proceeds from such sales, and the amount of any such cash proceedsrevenue that we are able to generate, will depend primarily on the volume of LNG that has been contracted under post-COD SPAs and the amount of LNG that we are able to produce at any project in excess of the nameplate capacity, our ability to negotiate sales of such uncommittedcapacity and excess LNG, as well as the market price for LNG at the time of such sales or the terms of any SPA we are able to negotiate with respect to such sales.executed. As a result, the amount of revenue and cash proceeds we are able to generate from suchthe salessale of uncommitted and excess LNG, if any, will likely differ from period to period and from project to project, and such differences could be material.
Cost of feed gas. The direct costs of purchasing, transporting and converting natural gas to LNG for sale to our customers are the mainprimary component of our cost of sales. Under theour post-CODContracted SPAs and substantially all of theour commissioning cargoLNG sales that we have executed to date, our export customers pay a fixed facilityliquefaction chargefee (which includes a CPI-linked component) per MMBtu, plus a variable commodity chargefee per MMBtu, in an amount equal to, depending on the applicable SPA, 115% or more of the Henry Hub gas price, which is intended to cover the price of the feed gas and gas transportation costs, and is also intended to cover certain of our operating expenses and partially adjust for inflation. If we are successful in producing and selling excess LNG produced by our projects, we expect our cost of sales to increase as we will be required to purchase more feed gas to produce more LNG.
Project costs and development expenses. We currently have greenfield and expansion projects in various stages of construction and development. We expect our development, construction and commissioning costs for any particular project to increase significantly as we approach and commence the construction phase, and we expect these expenses will continue to be significant until the commissioning phase has been completed and the relevant project reaches its COD. Moreover, our project costs may be higher than we currently estimate due to many factors outside of our control, which could lead to higher development, construction and commissioning costs for our projects.
ProjectOperating costs and expenses.costs. We currently have five projects in various stages of development. We expect our development, construction and commissioning expenses for any particular project to increase significantly as we approach and commence the construction phase, and we expect these expenses will continue to be significant until the commissioning phase has been completed and the relevant project reaches its COD. Moreover, our project costs may be higher than we currently estimate due to many factors outside of our control, which could lead to higher development, construction and commissioning expenses for our projects. In addition, we expect to increase our project‑dedicated staff as we progress towards the commencement of construction of the CP2 Project, the CP3 Project and the Delta Project and when we subsequently commence operationoperations at our facilities. As a result, we anticipate that operating and maintenance expenses will increase significantly as we approachcontinue commissioning and operation of our projects (as was the case for the Calcasieu Project).projects. We outsource certain major equipment maintenance activities under long-terms service arrangements, but our various operating subsidiaries are responsible for performing day-to-day operations and maintenance work for our projects. See Item 1.—Business—Major Consultants and Contractors of this Form 10-K for more information. Once one of our projects has commencedcommence full commercial operations, we anticipate that the timing of the operating and maintenance costs under the long-term service arrangements for that project will be relatively predictable, subject to inflation, and will generally increase during periods in which regularly scheduled or other maintenance is performed.inflation. Increases in operating and maintenance expenses would impact our operating margins. Further, we anticipate that insurance premiums for LNG projects may increase due to losses and claims that have arisen or been experienced in respect of other unrelated projects in other regions, or losses and claims that are large enough to impact the broader insurance market even if an LNG project is not involved.
Effective tax rates and regulations. We utilize various tax incentive programs offered by the State of Louisiana offers,Louisiana, including the industrial tax exemption, to offset local and state taxes that would otherwise be payable. However, the industrial tax exemption will expire after two 5‑year periods, which would begin on the last day of the tax year in which the Calcasieu Project, the Plaquemines Project and the CP2 Project assets, as applicable, are placed in service from an accounting perspective, and afterwards ad valorem taxes may be levied against our properties. We anticipate similar tax exemptions will be available for theour CP3 Projectgreenfield and theexpansion Delta Project,projects, although any such exemptions may only be available at lower rates. The future rates at which any taxes (including ad valorem taxes, inventory taxes, franchise taxes and utility taxes) will be levied against us will impact our operating margins.
Inflation. Inflation remains a variable factor in the United States economy, and it may impact our operating margins and results of operations in the future. In particular, we anticipate that theour post-CODContracted SPAs and sales by VG Commodities that include a fixed facilityliquefaction charge and that we enter intofee will only be partially adjusted for inflation over the contract term, as is the case with certain of our existing post-CODContracted SPAs as described above.SPAs. In addition, we anticipate that our operating costs will experience inflationary pressure over time, and the commodity charge we charge our customers for recovery of these costs is based on the price of natural gas per MMBtu.time. We also expect to experience inflation with respect to the cost of equipment and personnel necessary to develop, construct and operate our projects. See Item 1A.—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Projects and Other Assets—Our estimated costs for our projects have been, and continue to be, subject to change due to various factors and Item 1A.—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—We and our contractors, including our EPC contractors, may experience increased labor costs, and the unavailability of skilled workers or our failure to attract and retain qualified personnel could adversely affect us of this Form 10-K.
Seasonality. Seasonal weather can affect demand for LNG and accordingly can impact our ability to sell LNG during the commissioning of our facilities or onceafter our facilities achieve their respective CODs. We have already begun experiencing, and we expect to experiencecontinue forto our other projects,experience, the effects of market volatility and fluctuation in seasonal demand for LNG in our existing markets. For example, temperature and weather in the markets we supply, as well as the amount of natural gas in storage in such markets, may affect both power demand and power generation mix, including the portion of electricity provided through other sources of energy, such as hydroelectric, solar or wind, thus affecting the need for LNG. Further, slower-than-expected inventory withdrawal due to mild weather can decrease the demand for LNG. Conversely, extreme or extended cold conditions in the U.S. may temporarily reduce LNG export volumes as domestic demand increases, reflecting how extreme weather events may influence near-term U.S. natural gas supply-demand balances and our export scheduling flexibility. Other factors, including but not limited to the price spread between European and Asian LNG indices and the availability of LNG tankers and the routes they choose to take due to seasonal and other factors can also affect the price of LNG. As a result, our ability to generate cash proceeds from LNG sales on a spot basis or short-term basis, and to enter into new SPAs for the sale of LNG, may be impacted by such factors, which may in turn result in fluctuations in revenue during quarters of high and low demand, respectively, and could have a disproportionate effect on our results of operations. As such, our results of operations across different fiscal quarters may not be comparable or accurate indicators of our future performance. For more information on these risks, see Item 1A.—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—Seasonal fluctuations will cause our business and results of operations to vary among quarters, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations of this Form 10-K.
Macroeconomic Trends. Macroeconomic conditions, such as high inflation and elevatedinflation, interest rates, tariffs and global trade policy continue to be sources of volatility and uncertainty for global economic activity, and may affect our project costs and operations, as discussed above. See Item 1A.—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—Our ability to maintain profitability and positive operating cash flows is subject to significant uncertainty of this Form 10-K. Ongoing geopolitical conflicts in Ukraine, the Middle East, Venezuela and tensions in United States-China relations may drive further economic instability and inflationary pressures, as well as increase risks for the global flow of goods, including energy. In the case of the LNG market, these geopolitical conflicts have and may continue to impact the availability of materials required for the development of LNG projects, in addition to disrupting the supply of LNG, resulting in price volatility on non-SPA volumes. For additional information on historical net spread volatility see Item 1A.—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—Our ability to generate proceeds from sales of commissioning cargos is subject to significant uncertainty and volatility in such proceeds, given significant volatility in spot-market prices of this Form 10-K. Historical proceeds from such sales at the Calcasieu Project, which has had an extended commissioning period due to unanticipated challenges with equipment reliability that we are in the process of remediating, may not be indicative of the duration of the commissioning period or the amount of proceeds for any future period or for any of our other projects including bolt-on expansions thereof.
NM Percentage not meaningful.
Revenue was $13.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025, an $8.8 billion, or 177%, increase from $5.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to $10.1 billion from higher LNG sales volumes primarily at the Plaquemines Project due to the commencement of LNG production in December 2024 and continued ramp up of LNG production throughout 2025. This increase was partially offset by lower LNG sales prices of $1.3 billion primarily at the Calcasieu Project after COD in April 2025, partially offset by higher LNG sales prices prior to COD in April 2025.
Gross proceeds, before deducting the cost of feed gas, attributable to Test LNG sales generated prior to the Plaquemines Project facilities being in service from an accounting perspective, and therefore recognized as an adjustment to construction in progress and not as revenue, were $132 million for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Revenue was $5.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024, a $2.9 billion, or 37%, decrease from $7.9 billion during the year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was primarily due to lower LNG sales prices for the sale of commissioning cargos of $2.8 billion and lower LNG sales volumes of $139 million.
Cost of sales was $5.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025, a $4.6 billion increase from $1.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was due to
•$3.8 billion from higher LNG sales volumes primarily at the Plaquemines Project due to the commencement of LNG production in December 2024 and continued ramp up of LNG production throughout 2025;
•$609 million due to higher costs of feed gas primarily at the Calcasieu Project; and
•$123 million unfavorable change in the fair value of our natural gas supply contracts.
Costs attributable to the production of Test LNG sales, primarily consisting of the cost of feed gas, incurred prior to the Plaquemines Project facilities being in service from an accounting perspective, and therefore recognized as an adjustment to construction in progress and not as cost of sales, was $63 million for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Cost of sales was $1.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024, a $333 million, or 20%, decrease from $1.7 billion during the year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was primarily due to the combined impact of a decrease in the net cost of natural gas and improved plant efficiency of $311 million and a decrease in LNG sales volumes of $22 million.
Operating and maintenance expense was $975 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, a $386 million, or 66%, increase from $589 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to $265 million in higher operating costs in support of the ramp up of LNG production at the Plaquemines Project due to an increase in non-capitalizable personnel costs, commissioning work, and operational insurance costs, as well as $175 million in higher operating costs for our LNG tankers. These increases were partially offset by a $77 million reduction in operating costs at the Calcasieu Project primarily due to lower commissioning and remediation work.
Operating and maintenance expense was $589 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a $198 million, or 51%, increase from $391 million during the year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to $67 million higher operating costs at the Calcasieu Project to support ongoing commissioning and remediation work and higher legal costs of $49 million, a $48 million increase in operating costs for our LNG tankers with no corresponding costs in 2023, and $14 million in higher operating costs for the Plaquemines Project mainly resulting from an increase in asset retirement obligation, or ARO, accretion.
General and administrative expense was $433 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, an $121 million, or 39%, increase from $312 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a $88 million, or 39%, increase from $224 million during the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. This increase was primarily due to higherincreased personnel costs of $43$82 million due to an increase inhigher employee headcount, increasesas inwell promotionalas activitiesincreased non-personnel costs of $10$38 million,million andprimarily due to increases in externallegal servicesand ofother $6professional million.service fees, IT and insurance costs.
Development expense was $344 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, a $291 million, or 46%, decrease from $635 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. This decrease was primarily due to lower development costs that were expensed of $282 million as a result of the CP2 Project being declared probable during 2025, and the majority of the costs to develop the facility subsequently being capitalized.
Development expense was $635 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a $145 million, or 30%, increase from $490 million during the year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to higher development costs of $91 million for engineering and environmental services related to the CP2 Project and $32 million related to pipeline projects and higher lease costs of $33 million, partially offset by a decrease of $36 million in legal costs related to construction contractor disputes at the Calcasieu Project.
Depreciation and amortization was $941 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, a $619 million, or 192%, increase from $322 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to placing a portion of the Plaquemines Project assets in service from an accounting perspective starting in December 2024 and throughout 2025 and placing additional LNG tankers in service throughout 2025. This increase was partially offset by a decrease of $46 million at the Calcasieu Project primarily due to an extension of the estimated useful lives of certain LNG facility assets in 2025 to align with the extended remaining terms of certain land leases to which the LNG facility assets are affixed.
Depreciation and amortization was $322 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a $45 million, or 16%, increase from $277 million during the year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily attributable to placing $11.4 billion of property, plant and equipment at the Plaquemines Project in service from an accounting perspective in December 2024 and the acquisition of two LNG tankers.
Insurance Recoveries, Net
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
There have been no material changes with respect to the risk factors disclosed in our 2025 Form 10-K.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Operating Expense”
New heading “Operating and Maintenance Expense”
New heading “General and Administrative Expense”
New heading “Development Expense”
New heading “Depreciation and Amortization”
New heading “Other Income or Expense”
New heading “Interest Income”
New heading “Interest Expense, Net”
New heading “Gain (Loss) on Interest Rate Swaps”
New heading “Loss on Financing Transactions”
New heading “Income Tax Expense”
New heading “Net Income Attributable to Redeemable Stock of Subsidiary”
New heading “Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-controlling Interests”
New heading “Dividends on VGLNG Series A Preferred Shares”
New heading “Six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to six months ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Plaquemines Project”
New heading “Six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to six months ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Calcasieu Project”
Removed heading “Sales and shipping”
Removed heading “Corporate, other and eliminations”
Removed heading “Project Debt Financing”
Largest changes
“Global geopolitical and energy-policy developments, including conflicts involving Iran and Ukraine and related sanctions and trade measures, continue to influence LNG demand, pricing and trade flows. Disruptions affecting global oil and natural gas supply chains, including transit through the Strait of Hormuz, have increased demand and raised prices for oil and natural gas sourced from regions outside the Middle East. These geopolitical developments may continue to affect global LNG demand patterns and prices. …”see in full comparison
“Broader geopolitical developments, including fluctuations in sanctions policy and potential shifts in regional oil and gas production, may influence global energy supply balances, energy pricing, and investment flows across the international oil and gas industry. This includes uncertainty from conflicts in major energy-producing regions like the Middle East, selective sourcing decisions in Asia, and international trade realignments that could affect contract timing, sales volumes and average realized prices. …”see in full comparison
“Evolving global political and energy-policy conditions continue to shape LNG demand and pricing. In February 2026, the war in Iran and closure of the Strait of Hormuz caused disruption in international oil and natural gas supply chains. This supply chain disruption resulted in increased demand and higher prices for oil and natural gas sourced from regions outside the Middle East, including LNG sold by the Company under our LNG Commissioning Agreements and our excess LNG sales. …”see in full comparison
“The potential cost impact is currently primarily expected to be concentrated in our CP2 Project, given the timing and scope of procurement activities for that project. The estimated impact of tariffs effective as of March 31, 2026, has been incorporated into our current budget for the CP2 Project. The cumulative impact of these tariffs is currently estimated to increase our total expected capital costs for the CP2 Project by approximately $600 million. Actual impacts may differ based on changes in tariff regimes, supplier negotiations, procurement strategies and timing of deliveries. …”see in full comparison
“Six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to six months ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (226)
The condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto, included in Item 1.—Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q, and discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 2, 2026 (the “2025 Form 10-K.10-K“). In addition to historical condensed consolidated financial information, this Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates, and beliefs that involve significant risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to those differences include those discussed below and in the Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements in this Form 10-Q and elsewhere in Item 1A.—Risk Factors of our 2025 Form 10-K. As used herein, unless the context otherwise requires, references to the "Company," "we," "us," and "our" refer to Venture Global, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. Except for per MMBtu amounts, or as otherwise specified, dollar amounts presented within tables are stated in millions.
Our Consolidated Financial Results.
(1) Includes fixed liquefaction fees and fees indexed to foreign gas markets, exclusive of an actual or implied commodity fee.
Our income from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2026 increased compared to the prior year primarily due to higher LNG sales volumes from the Plaquemines Project as commissioning activities progressed and LNG production ramped up, and higher weighted average LNG sales prices net of feed gas costs. These increases were partially offset by higher operating and maintenance expenses primarily associated with commissioning and the ramp up of LNG production at the Plaquemines Project.
Our income from operations for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 increased compared to the prior year primarily due to higher sales volumes atfrom ourthe Plaquemines Project as acommissioning resultactivities ofprogressed the continued ramp up ofand LNG production,production andramped up, as well as lower development costscosts, primarily at ourthe CP2 Project following its declarationdesignation as probable duringin 2025, after which the majority ofmost development costs were capitalized. These increases were partially offset by lower weighted average LNG sales prices,prices drivennet of feed gas costs, and higher net operating and maintenance expenses primarily associated with commissioning and the ramp up of LNG production at Plaquemines, partially offset by lower pricesrectification undercosts ourat Plaquemines Project LNG Commissioning Sales Agreements and lower prices under ourthe Calcasieu Project post-COD SPAs as compared to prices under its LNG Commissioning Sales Agreements, as well as higher costs of feed gas.Project.
Calcasieu Project. Our initial LNG export facility declared COD and commenced the sale of LNG to its customers under its post-COD SPAs on April 15, 2025. Prior to COD, the Calcasieu Projectproject sold LNG under LNG Commissioning Sales Agreements.
Plaquemines Project. Production and LNG sales of LNG from our second LNG export facility increasedcontinue duringto theramp periodup while physicalas construction and commissioning continued to advance.progress. In March 2026, the DOE approved our application to increase authorized exports to Non-FTA Nations from 24.0 mtpa to 27.2 mtpa. Additionally,Also in March 2026, we submitted aan newadditional DOE export application to further increase the authorized export volumes to 35.0 mtpa.
CP2 Project. Construction of our third LNG export project remains ongoing. In March 2026, Phase 2 of the CP2 Project achieved FID and we obtained $8.6 billion inof additional project financing to fund theits development and construction of Phase 2 of the CP2 Project.construction. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we incurred $2.9$6.1 billion of project costs, the majority of which were capitalized,costs primarily associatedrelated withto construction activities and purchasesequipment of equipment.purchases.
In February 2026, the CP2 Project executedentered ainto or increased contracted capacity under two 20-year post-COD SPASPAs for the delivery of 1.5a combined 2.0 mtpa from Phase 2 of the CP2 Project,2, increasing the total expected post-COD capacity under contractcontracted from 26.0 mtpa to 27.528.0 mtpa.
CP2 Expansion. In May 2026, the Company filed an application with FERC for an 11.7 mtpa expansion of the CP2 Project, or the CP2 Expansion Project. In July 2026, the Company submitted the corresponding export application to the DOE to authorize up to 11.7 mtpa of export volumes.
In 2026, VG Commodities has executed variousseveral new five-year LNG sales agreements totaling approximately 3.03.8 mtpa, further advancing our strategy of maintaining a diversified portfolio of short-short-, medium- and long-term LNG sales agreements to optimize pricing and manage risk across our portfolioasset of assets.portfolio.
During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we completed several financing and liability management transactions that strengthened our capital structure and liquidity profile, including:
In April 2026, we strengthened our financial position by redeeming, in full,•redeeming the CP Funding Redeemable Preferred Units, which carried a stated cash interestdistribution rate of 10%10.000% and various liquidity restrictions, using proceeds from the newly issued variable rate Calcasieu Funding TLB Facility. Additionally, we repaid, in full, the outstanding balance of the Calcasieu Pass Construction Term Loan, which was due in August 2026, with proceeds from the newly issued VGCP 2036 Notes.Facility;
•repaying the outstanding balance of the Calcasieu Pass Construction Term Loan, which was due in August 2026, with proceeds from the newly issued VGCP 2036 Notes;
•redeeming the VGLNG 2028 Notes, which carried a stated interest rate of 8.125%, with the proceeds from the newly issued VGLNG 2034 Notes and VGLNG 2036 Notes, which carry a stated interest rate of 6.375% and 6.625%, respectively; and
•prepaying $1.0 billion outstanding under the CP2 Holdings EBL Facilities, using net proceeds received from the sale of commissioning cargos generated by the Plaquemines Project.
Three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
The following table shows a summary of our results of operations for the periods indicated:
Revenue
Revenue was $4.6 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a $1.5 billion, or 48%, increase from $3.1 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to:
•$1.3 billion from higher LNG sales volumes primarily from the Plaquemines Project due to commissioning and the continued ramp up of LNG production; and
•$102 million from higher net LNG sales prices comprised of:
◦$403 million increase from higher implied liquefaction fees for LNG produced by our Plaquemines Project and sold by VG Commodities under commissioning sales agreements, partially offset by ◦$302 million decrease from lower variable commodity fees due to decreases in Henry Hub natural gas prices.
Operating Expense
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales was $1.7 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a $241 million, or 17%, increase from $1.4 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to:
•$534 million from higher LNG sales volumes primarily at the Plaquemines Project due to commissioning and the continued ramp up of LNG production, partially offset by
•$282 million from lower costs of feed gas primarily due to decreases in Henry Hub natural gas prices.
Operating and Maintenance Expense
Operating and maintenance expense was $335 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a $118 million, or 54%, increase from $217 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to:
•$48 million at the Plaquemines Project primarily for for higher maintenance and operational insurance costs in support of commissioning and the ramp up of LNG production;
•$33 million at the CP2 Project primarily due to an increase in personnel costs, primarily associated with higher headcount, and an increase in lease costs; and
•$17 million primarily due to increased costs associated with more LNG tankers in operation and increased fees associated with regasification capacity contracts.
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense was $112 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a $9 million, or 9%, increase from $103 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to higher marketing and other administrative costs.
Development Expense
Development expense was $23 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a $34 million, or 60%, decrease from $57 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This decrease was primarily due to the phases of the CP2 Project and certain of our pipeline projects being declared probable throughout 2025 and 2026, and the majority of the costs to develop the projects subsequently being capitalized.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization was $260 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a $7 million, or 3%, decrease from $267 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease of $90 million due to an extension of the estimated useful lives of certain LNG facility assets in the third quarter of 2025 to align with the extended remaining terms of certain land leases to which the LNG facility assets are affixed. This decrease was offset by an increase of $83 million primarily due to placing assets in service from an accounting perspective throughout 2025 and 2026, including a portion of the Plaquemines Project assets, additional LNG tankers, and the Blackfin Pipeline.
Other Income or Expense
Interest Income
Interest income was $26 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a $12 million, or 32%, decrease from $38 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This decrease was primarily due to net lower average cash balances and lower interest rates during the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net was $489 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a $179 million, or 58%, increase from $310 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was primarily from higher non-capitalizable interest costs due to placing a portion of the Plaquemines Project assets in service in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, higher commitment fees, and an increase in our average outstanding debt.
Gain (Loss) on Interest Rate Swaps
Gain on interest rate swaps was $124 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a $236 million, or 211%, increase from a loss on interest rate swaps of $112 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This favorable change was primarily due to an increase in the forward interest rate curves during the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to a decrease during the three months ended June 30, 2025.
Loss on Financing Transactions
Loss on financing transactions was $96 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a $33 million, or 52%, increase from $63 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was due to a $70 million loss associated with the early redemption of the VGLNG 2028 Notes and a $24 million loss associated with the partial prepayments of the CP2 Holdings EBL Facilities during the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to a $63 million loss associated with the partial prepayment of the Plaquemines Construction Term Loan during the three months ended June 30, 2025.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense was $336 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a $220 million or 190%, increase from $116 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to an increase in pre-tax income, partially offset by the impact of the FDDEI deduction and an increase in tax benefits associated with employee stock option exercises.
Our effective tax rate was 19.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to 19.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The 2026 effective tax rate was different from the statutory income tax rate primarily due to the recognition of tax benefits upon the exercise of employee stock options, the impact of the FDDEI deduction, and non-deductible expenses.
Net Income Attributable to Redeemable Stock of Subsidiary
Net income attributable to redeemable stock of subsidiary was $5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a $34 million, or 87%, decrease from $39 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This decrease was due to the full redemption of the CP Funding Redeemable Preferred Units in April 2026.
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-controlling Interests
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests was $2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a $3 million, or 300%, unfavorable change from a net income attributable to non-controlling interests of $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This decrease was primarily due to the allocation of losses to the Calcasieu Holdings Class B common unit holders based on ownership interests subsequent to COD of the Calcasieu Project on April 15, 2025, compared to a stated allocation of 10% per annum prior to COD.
Dividends on VGLNG Series A Preferred Shares
Dividends on VGLNG Series A Preferred Shares were $67 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.
Six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to six months ended June 30, 2025
Revenue was $9.2 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2026, a $3.2 billion, or 53%, increase from $6.0 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to:
•$4.5 billion from higher LNG sales volumes primarily from the Plaquemines Project due to commissioning and the continued ramp up of LNG production; partially offset by
VG insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 1 Form 4 filing (1 insider, 1 trade date, 1,226 shares, about $16.0K) and open-market sales in 23 filings (8 insiders, 32 trade dates, 15,759,577 shares, about $213.4M; 14 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -15,758,351 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$213.4M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-18 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Option exercise |
111,111 | $1.16 | $128.9K |
| 2026-09-18 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Open-market sale |
111,111 | $14.23 | $1.6M |
| 2026-09-17 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Open-market sale |
111,111 | $14.40 | $1.6M |
| 2026-09-17 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Option exercise |
111,111 | $1.16 | $128.9K |
| 2026-09-17 | Larson Keith D |
Open-market sale |
394,979 | $14.40 | $5.7M |
| 2026-09-17 | Larson Keith D |
Option exercise |
394,979 | $0.84 | $331.8K |
| 2026-09-16 | Larson Keith D |
Open-market sale |
394,979 | $14.82 | $5.9M |
| 2026-09-16 | Larson Keith D |
Option exercise |
239,287 | $0.79 | $189.0K |
| 2026-09-16 | Larson Keith D |
Option exercise |
155,692 | $0.84 | $130.8K |
| 2026-09-14 | Cothran Brian |
Open-market sale |
152,660 | $16.15 | $2.5M |
| 2026-09-14 | Cothran Brian |
Option exercise |
152,660 | $1.16 | $177.1K |
| 2026-09-09 | Larson Keith D |
Open-market sale |
1,885,804 | $15.21 | $28.7M |
| 2026-09-09 | Larson Keith D |
Option exercise |
1,885,804 | $0.79 | $1.5M |
| 2026-09-08 | Larson Keith D |
Option exercise |
464,196 | $0.79 | $366.7K |
| 2026-09-08 | Larson Keith D |
Open-market sale |
464,196 | $15.05 | $7.0M |
| 2026-08-20 | Musser Fory |
Open-market sale | 259,413 | $14.26 | $3.7M |
| 2026-08-20 | Musser Fory |
Option exercise | 259,413 | $0.79 | $204.9K |
| 2026-08-19 | Musser Fory |
Option exercise | 12,600 | $0.79 | $10.0K |
| 2026-08-19 | Musser Fory |
Open-market sale | 12,600 | $14.01 | $176.5K |
| 2026-08-19 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Option exercise |
111,111 | $1.16 | $128.9K |
| 2026-08-19 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Open-market sale |
111,111 | $13.86 | $1.5M |
| 2026-08-18 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Option exercise |
111,111 | $1.16 | $128.9K |
| 2026-08-18 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Open-market sale |
111,111 | $14.17 | $1.6M |
| 2026-08-17 | Musser Fory |
Option exercise | 22,013 | $0.79 | $17.4K |
| 2026-08-17 | Musser Fory |
Open-market sale | 22,013 | $14.02 | $308.6K |
| 2026-08-14 | Musser Fory |
Open-market sale | 447,534 | $14.02 | $6.3M |
| 2026-08-14 | Musser Fory |
Option exercise | 447,534 | $0.79 | $353.6K |
| 2026-08-14 | Blake Sarah |
Option exercise | 1,000,000 | $1.55 | $1.6M |
| 2026-08-14 | Blake Sarah |
Open-market sale | 1,000,000 | $14.02 | $14.0M |
| 2026-08-13 | Larson Keith D |
Option exercise |
555,555 | $0.79 | $438.9K |
| 2026-08-13 | Larson Keith D |
Open-market sale |
555,555 | $13.48 | $7.5M |
| 2026-08-13 | Granat Sari Beth |
Option exercise | 200,000 | $2.66 | $532.0K |
| 2026-08-13 | Granat Sari Beth |
Open-market sale | 200,000 | $13.49 | $2.7M |
| 2026-08-13 | Staton Jimmy D |
Option exercise | 1,100,000 | $0.79 | $869.0K |
| 2026-08-13 | Staton Jimmy D |
Open-market sale | 66,000 | $13.35 | $881.1K |
| 2026-07-21 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Open-market sale |
111,111 | $14.08 | $1.6M |
| 2026-07-21 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Option exercise |
111,111 | $1.16 | $128.9K |
| 2026-07-20 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Open-market sale |
111,111 | $14.21 | $1.6M |
| 2026-07-20 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Option exercise |
111,111 | $1.16 | $128.9K |
| 2026-07-16 | Larson Keith D |
Option exercise |
555,555 | $0.79 | $438.9K |
| 2026-07-16 | Larson Keith D |
Open-market sale |
555,555 | $12.91 | $7.2M |
| 2026-07-15 | Larson Keith D |
Option exercise |
555,556 | $0.79 | $438.9K |
| 2026-07-15 | Larson Keith D |
Open-market sale |
555,556 | $12.93 | $7.2M |
| 2026-06-18 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Open-market sale |
111,111 | $10.92 | $1.2M |
| 2026-06-18 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Option exercise |
111,111 | $1.16 | $128.9K |
| 2026-06-17 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Open-market sale |
111,111 | $11.05 | $1.2M |
| 2026-06-17 | Thayer Jonathan W |
Option exercise |
111,111 | $1.16 | $128.9K |
| 2026-06-16 | Larson Keith D |
Open-market sale |
555,555 | $11.27 | $6.3M |
| 2026-06-16 | Larson Keith D |
Option exercise |
555,555 | $0.79 | $438.9K |
| 2026-06-15 | Larson Keith D |
Option exercise |
555,556 | $0.79 | $438.9K |
| 2026-06-15 | Larson Keith D |
Open-market sale |
555,556 | $11.90 | $6.6M |
| 2026-06-12 | Sabel Michael |
Open-market purchase | 1,226 | $13.04 | $16.0K |
| 2026-05-27 | Musser Fory |
Open-market sale | 233,735 | $12.61 | $2.9M |
| 2026-05-27 | Musser Fory |
Option exercise | 233,735 | $0.79 | $184.7K |
| 2026-05-27 | Earl Thomas |
Open-market sale | 1,000,000 | $12.44 | $12.4M |
| 2026-05-27 | Earl Thomas |
Option exercise | 1,000,000 | $0.79 | $790.0K |
| 2026-05-26 | Musser Fory |
Option exercise | 266,265 | $0.79 | $210.3K |
| 2026-05-26 | Musser Fory |
Open-market sale | 266,265 | $13.09 | $3.5M |
| 2026-05-21 | Cothran Brian |
Option exercise | 31,910 | $1.16 | $37.0K |
| 2026-05-21 | Cothran Brian |
Open-market sale | 31,910 | $14.33 | $457.3K |
Well-known investors holding VG (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 15,644,297 | $174.1M | 0.11% | Added 17% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 3,466,930 | $38.6M | 0.06% | Added 29% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 3,357,950 | $37.4M | 0.03% | Added 50% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 3,304,753 | $36.8M | 0.02% | Added 43% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 2,964,040 | $33.0M | 0.05% | Added 45% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 2,033,759 | $22.6M | 0.01% | Reduced 61% |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2026-06-30 | 215,719 | $2.4M | 0.01% | New position |
| Gotham Asset Management (Joel Greenblatt) | 2026-06-30 | 19,491 | $307.2K | — | Sold out |