VOC 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

the armedongoing conflictswars between Russia andin Ukraine and betweenin Israelthe andPersian Iran and its proxiesGulf, and the potential destabilizing effects such conflicts may pose for the global oil and gas markets;

OPEC is an intergovernmental organization that seeks to manage the price and supply of oil on the global energy market. Actions taken by OPEC members, including those taken alongside other oil exporting nations, such as Russia, have a significant impact on global oil supply and pricing. For example, OPEC and certain other oil exporting nations have previously agreed to take measures, including production cuts, to support crude oil pricesprices. OPEC members and other oil exporting nations might not agree to future production cuts or other actions to support and stabilize oil prices, and they may not reduce oil prices or increase production in the future. Uncertainty regarding future actions that OPEC members or other oil exporting countries may take could lead to continued volatility in the price of oil, which could adversely affect the financial condition and economic performance of the operators of the Underlying Properties and may reduce the net proceeds to which the Trust is entitled, which could materially reduce or completely eliminate the amount of cash available for distribution to Trust unitholders.unitholders for an unknown period of time.

The Trust’s source of capital is the cash flows from the net profits interest. Pursuant to the Trust Agreement, the Trust may establish a cash reserve through the withholding of cash for contingent liabilities and to pay expenses, which will reduce the amount of cash otherwise available for distribution to Trust unitholders. From the first quarter of 2022 to the second quarter of 2023, the Trustee withheld a portion of the proceeds otherwise available for distribution each quarter toand buildbuilt an approximatelya $1.175 million cash reserve for the payment of future known, anticipated, or contingent expenses or liabilities of the Trust. This amount is in addition to the letter of credit in the amount of $1.7 million provided to the Trustee by VOC Brazos to protect the Trust against the risk that it does not have sufficient cash to pay future expenses. The Trustee may increase or decrease the targeted amount at any time and may increase or decrease the rate at which it withholds funds to build the cash reserve at any time, without advance notice to the Trust unitholders.

InThe responseTrump Administration’s efforts to itsroll 2009back findingfederal regulation of greenhouse gases (“GHGs”) represent a significant shift in federal climate policy, though the ultimate impact of those efforts on VOC Brazos is unclear. In 2009, the EPA found that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases (“GHGs”) may present an endangerment to public health and the environment,environment theand EPA hassubsequently issued regulations to restrict emissions of greenhouse gases under existing provisions of the CAA. These regulations include limits on tailpipe emissions from motor vehicles, preconstruction and operating permit requirements for certain large stationary sources, and methane emissions standards for certain new, modified and reconstructed oil and gas sources — as well as the EPA’s methane emissions guidelines for existing oil and gas sources that were adopted in 2024. The EPA also has adopted rules requiring the reporting of GHG emissions from specified large greenhouse gas emission sources in the United States, as well as certain onshore oil and natural gas production facilities, on an annual basis. Shortly after President Trump took office in January 2025, the federal government embarked on a series of changes relating to climate policy and regulation. On January 20, 2025, President Trump announced the withdrawal of the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement. PresidentIn TrumpJuly also2025, the EPA issued ana executiveproposed orderrule directingto rescind the 2009 GHG endangerment finding that provided a basis for GHG regulation under the CAA. In September 2025, the EPA proposed to rescind the GHG reporting program for sectors other than the oil and gas sector, while proposing to suspend GHG reporting requirements for the oil and gas sector until 2034. In February 2026, the EPA adopted a final rule repealing its prior endangerment finding, which opens the door for the EPA to review the legality and continuing applicability ofrepeal its 2009 GHG endangerment finding. The outcome of that review is not currently known; however, it has the potential to eliminate the basisrules for the EPA’soil regulationand ofgas GHGs under the CAA.sector.

The EPA has established GHGmethane standards for oil and gas sources under the CAA based on itsthe now-repealed GHG endangerment finding. In 2024, the EPA adopted a final rule that will directly regulate volatile organic compound and methane emissions from new oil and gas sources and will require further emissions reductions through its regulation of flaring, compressors, pumps, storage vessels, process controllers, well completions and liquids unloading, and equipment leaks. At the same time, the EPA adopted emissions guidelines that will apply to existing oil and gas sources and that require reductions in volatile organic compound and methane emissions that are largely equivalent to the requirements for new sources. The existing source emissions guidelines are to be implemented through state plans, with expected compliance dates for existing sources arriving in 2029. In 2025, however, the EPA extended certain compliance deadlines for both new and existing sources, and the 2026 endangerment finding repeal provides a basis for undoing the oil and gas methane standards, though the fact that the oil and gas standards address both methane and volatile organic compounds, which are regulated independently of EPA’s authority to regulate GHGs, may limit the impact of future changes to the methane standards that currently apply to oil and gas sources.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) included new CAA section 136(c) directing the EPA to collect the Waste Emissions Charge (“WEC”) from facilities in the oil and gas sector that report more than 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions in a calendar year. The charge will first apply to methane emissions from calendar year 2024. The charge is determined by comparing actual reported methane emissions to statutorily established “methane intensity figures” that are based on gas production or throughput, with a charge assessed for every ton of methane emissions that exceeds the facility’s allowable emissions based on the applicable methane intensity figure. The charge will be $900 per ton for 2024 emissions and will increase to $1,200 and then $1,500 per ton in subsequent years. The program includes key exemptions, most notably a regulatory compliance exemption that applies to and exempts the emissions from facilities that are subject to and in complete compliance with the EPA’s new or existing source methane requirements. The EPA adopted new rules to implement the WEC program in November 2024; however, the fate of the WEC and the EPA rules implementing the WEC is unclear. In FebruaryMarch 2025, thePresident UnitedTrump Statessigned Houselegislation of Representatives and Senate both passed resolutions to repealrepealing the EPA’s 2024 WEC rules under the Congressional Review ActAct. (“CRA”),The repeal of the EPA’s WEC rules did not eliminate the statutory requirement to pay the WEC, but it eliminated the rules established by the EPA to determine the WEC due, the payment mechanism, and onany Marchpayment 14,deadlines. 2025The PresidentU.S. Trump signed the resolution repealing those rules under the CRA. In addition, the United States House of Representatives and SenateCongress may be considering amendment or repeal of certain portions of the IRA, including the statutory provisions establishing the WEC.

Additionally,Meanwhile, more than one-third of the states have begun taking actions to control and/or reduce emissions of GHGs, primarily through the planned development of GHG emission inventories and/or regional GHG cap and trade programs. Although most of the state-level initiatives have to date focused on large sources of GHG emissions, such as coal-fired electric plants, it is possible that smaller sources of emissions could become subject to GHG emission limitations or allowance purchase requirements in the future. For example, the states of Colorado and New Mexico have adopted rules regulating GHGs from the oil and gas industry that are based on the federal standards. In addition, Congress may consider adopting legislation to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. Any one of these climate change regulatory and legislative initiatives could have a material adverse effect on VOC Brazos’ business, capital expenditures, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, new and emergingfuture regulatory initiatives in the U.S. related to climate change disclosure or reporting could adversely affect the Trust. In 2024, the SEC issued a final rule regarding the enhancement and standardization of mandatory climate-related disclosures for investors. The final rule mandates extensive disclosure of climate-related data, risks, and opportunities, including financial impacts, physical and transition risks, related governance and strategy and greenhouse gas emissions, for certain public companies. The SEC’s climate disclosure rule was challenged in court, and in March 2025 the SEC announced that it had voted to end its defense of the 2024 rule. The outcome of that litigation or separate rule changes made by the SEC may result in changes to climate-related disclosure requirements. Even in the absence of federal requirements, however, some states have adopted climate disclosure laws or rules that are not affected by the SEC’s review. Compliance with the finalfederal ruleor state disclosure rules may result in increased legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly, and place strain on the personnel, systems and resources of VOC Brazos or the Trust or both. The SEC’s climate disclosure requirements may change under the Trump Administration. In February 2025, the acting SEC Chair issued a statement that the SEC would not defend the 2024 disclosure rule in court and that the SEC would revisit the 2024 rule. The outcome of the SEC’s review may result in changes to SEC climate-related disclosure requirements, but the outcome of that review is uncertain. Even in the absence of federal requirements, however, some states have adopted climate disclosure laws or rules that are not affected by the SEC’s review.

VOC Brazos and its VOC Operators rely on information technology (“IT”) systems and networks in connection with various business activities, including exploration, development and production activities. VOC Brazos and its VOC Operators rely on digital technology, including information systems and related infrastructure, as well as cloud applications and services, to, among other things, estimate quantities of oil and natural gas reserves, analyze seismic and drilling information, process and record financial and operating data and communicate with employees and third parties. As dependence on digital technologies has increased, cyber incidents, including deliberate attacks and attempts to gain unauthorized access to computer systems and networks, have increased in frequency and sophistication. These threats pose a risk to the security of the systems and networks of VOC Brazos and its VOC Operators, the confidentiality, availability and integrity of their data and the physical security of employees and assets. VOCThis Brazosrisk andis itsexacerbated VOCwith Operatorsthe haveadvancement experienced,of andtechnologies expectlike toartificial continueintelligence, towhich experience, attempts from hackers and othermalicious third parties toare gain unauthorized accessusing to ITcreate systemsnew, sophisticated and networks.more Althoughfrequent priorattacks. cyber-attacksFurthermore, havegeopolitical nottensions hador aconflicts, materialsuch adverse effect onas the operationsongoing orwars financialin performanceUkraine and in the Persian Gulf, may further heighten the risk of VOCcybersecurity Brazos or of its VOC Operators, VOC Brazos and its VOC Operators may not be successful in preventing cyber-attacks or mitigating their effect. Any cyber-attack could have a material adverse effect on the reputation, competitive position, business, financial condition and results of operations of VOC Brazos and its VOC Operators, and could have a material adverse effect on the Trust. Cyber-attacks or security breaches also could result in litigation or regulatory action, as well as significant additional expense to VOC Brazos and its VOC Operators to implement further data protection measures.attacks.