VTOL 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Bristow Group Inc. · NYSE · Air Transportation, Nonscheduled · CIK 1525221 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “We may be unable to meet our capital allocation framework, which could decrease expected returns on investment in our common stock.”
Largest changes
“For example, after taking office in 2021, the Biden Administration (i) rejoined the Paris Agreement, an international treaty on climate change, (ii) joined the Global Methane Pledge, a pact that aims to reduce global methane emissions at least 30% below 2020 levels by 2030, signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which created the Methane Emissions Reduction Program, (iii) implemented a pause on new oil and natural gas leases on public lands and offshore waters (which has been lifted subject to certain limitations), (iv) finalized new methane rules to reduce emissions from both new and …”see in full comparison
“We may be unable to meet our capital allocation framework, which could decrease expected returns on investment in our common stock.”see in full comparison
“Meeting our capital allocation framework strategy requires us to have available capital in the years ahead in an amount sufficient to enable us to maintain a strong balance sheet and liquidity position and pursue growth opportunities, as well as to return capital to shareholders through share repurchases and quarterly dividends. The amount of our cash flow in any quarter may vary and be more or less than our capital allocation framework.”see in full comparison
“Additionally, we have acquired interests in unconsolidated interests, or in some cases have lease and service agreements with entities that operate aircraft in Canada and Egypt. We provide engineering and administrative support to certain of these entities, and derive lease revenues, service revenues, equity earnings and dividend income from these entities. The interests of persons who control these entities or partners may differ from ours and may cause such entities to take actions that are not in our best interest. …”see in full comparison
see in full comparisonSomeAlthough new offshore energy contracts have begun to include more stringent cancellation provisions and better terms and conditions around certain operational risks (such as penalty payments that are typically intended to recover costs incurred in connection with providing services that would have otherwise been recovered through future performance), some of our fixed-term contracts contain provisions permitting early termination by the customer at their convenience, generally without penalty, and with limited notice requirements. In addition,manysome of our contracts permit our customers to decrease the number of aircraft under contract with a corresponding decrease in the fixed monthly payments without penalty. As a result, you should not place undue reliance on the strength of our customer contracts or the terms of those contracts.
We conduct many of our international operations through entities in which we have a noncontrolling interest or through strategic alliances with foreign partners and we are subject tosee in full comparisongovernmentalgovernment regulation that limits foreign ownership of aircraft companies in favor of domestic ownership. Based on regulations in various markets in which we operate, the use of our local AOCs may be halted and we may lose our ability to operate within these countries if certain levels of local ownership are not maintained. The inability to utilize our local AOCs for any reason, including foreign ownership in excess of permitted levels, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct operations within these markets and our overall financial condition. We cannot assure you that there will be no changes in aviation laws, regulations or administrative requirements or the interpretations or applications thereof that could restrict or prohibit our ability to operate in certain regions or that would cause the cost of operating in the region to be uneconomical. Any such restriction or prohibition on our ability to operate in non-U.S. jurisdictions or any significant increase in operating costs in such jurisdictions as a result of changes in law and regulation or otherwise may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.See Part I, Item 1, “ Business – Government Regulation” for additional information.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (56)
Certain models of aircraft that we operate, or have operated in the past, have experienced accidents while operated by third parties. If other operators experience accidents with aircraft models that we operate or lease, obligating us to take such aircraft out of service until the cause of the accident is rectified, we could lose revenues and customers. In addition, safety issues experienced by a particular model of aircraft could result in customers refusing to use that particular aircraft modeluse, or a regulatory body groundinggrounding, that particular aircraft model. The value of the aircraft model might also be reduced in the market if the model were to be considered less desirable for future service and the inventory for such aircraft may be impaired, leading to impairment and similar changes.
We contract with a small number of manufacturers and lessors for most of our aircraft expansion, replacement, leasing and maintenance needs. If any of the manufacturers face production delays due to, for example, natural disasters, pandemics, labor strikes or availability of skilled labor, we may experience a significant delay in the delivery of previously orderedpreviously-ordered aircraft. During these periods, we may not be able to obtain orders for additional aircraft with acceptable pricing, delivery dates or other terms. Also, we have operating leases for a portion of our helicopters. The number of companies that provide leasing for helicopters is limited. If any of these leasing companies face financial setbacks, we may experience delays or restrictions in our ability to lease aircraft. Delivery delays or our inability to obtain acceptable aircraft orders or lease aircraft have from time to time adversely affected, and could adversely affect in the future, our revenues and profitability and could jeopardize our ability to meet the demands of our customers and grow our business.
In addition, there are a limited number of suppliers, vendors and OEMs that we are able to rely on (such as Sikorsky Commercial Inc., Leonardo Spa, Nova Systems International Ltd., and General Electric Aviation Inc.) for the supply and overhaul of components fitted to our aircraft in connection with required maintenance and repairs. This maintenance and/or repairs is often required in order for our aircraft to stay fully operational and available for use in our operations. Our inability to perform maintenance and repairs timely or economically, may result in our aircraft being underutilized, which could have an adverse impact on our operating results and financial condition. In particular, we have experienced significant delays in the delivery of parts for our S92 fleet, which comprises approximately 30%29% of our total fleet, resulting in the need to (i) to purchase or otherwise acquire parts from other sources and (ii) to ground multiple S92 aircraft and forgo certain related business opportunities.
•changes in regulation or competition from other air transport companies and other modes of transportation.
Our failure to attract and retain qualified personnelpersonnel, and retirements or other shortages of pilots and engineers could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain skilled personnel, specifically our pilots and mechanics.engineers. The competition for pilots and mechanicsengineers is fiercely competitive, and we compete with major Part 121 air carriers and the emergency air medical industry to attract and retain such talent. Additionally, many of our customers require pilots with very high levels of flight experience. The market for these experienced and highly trained personnel is competitive and may become more competitive, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully attract and retain such personnel. Some of our pilots, mechanicsengineers and other personnel, as well as those of our competitors, are members of military reserves who have been, or could be, called to active duty. If significant numbers of such personnel retire or are called to active duty, it could reduce the supply of such workers and likely increase our labor costs.
Further, Title 49—Transportation of the United StatesU.S. Code of Federal Regulations and other statutes require our President, two-thirds of the Board and other managing officers be U.S. citizens. Our failure to attract and retain qualified executive personnel or for such executive personnel to work well together or as effective leaders in their respective areas of responsibility could have a material adverse effect on our current business and future growth.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, approximately 64%60% of our employees were covered by union or other collective bargaining agreements, some of which have expired or will expire in one year or less. In 2025, we successfully negotiated a new 2-year agreement with the National Union of Aeronauts (SNA), and with the Norwegian engineers’ union. We cannot assure you that we will be able to negotiate the terms of any expired or expiring agreement on terms that are acceptable to us or at all, which may result in strikes, work stoppages or other slowdowns. Furthermore, our employees who are not covered under a collective bargaining agreement may become subject to labor organizing efforts. If our unionized workers engage in an extended strike, work stoppage or other slowdown, if other employees elect to become unionized, existing labor agreements are renegotiated or if future labor agreements contain terms that are unfavorable to us, we could experience a significant disruption of our operations or higher ongoing labor costs, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Through our operations outside the U.S., we are exposed to foreign currency fluctuations and exchange rate risks. A portion of the services we provide outside the U.S. generate revenues in foreign currencies with the associated expenses incurred in U.S. dollars. In such cases, a strengthening U.S. dollar adversely affects the profitability of providing such services, and therefore could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. A strong U.S. dollar may also reduce the demand for our services that are provided under U.S. dollar-denominated contracts in foreign countries. Because we maintain our financial statements in U.S. dollars, our financial results are vulnerable to fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies. In preparing our financial statements, we must convert all non-U.S. dollar results to U.S. dollars. The effect of foreign currency translation impacts our results of operations as a result of the translation of non-U.S. dollar results and is reflected as a component of stockholders’ investment, while the revaluation of certain monetary foreign currency transactions is credited or charged to income and reflected in other income (expense), net.
We also operate in countries with foreign exchange controls, including Brazil and Nigeria. These controls may limit our ability to repatriate funds from our international operations and unconsolidated affiliates or otherwise convert local currencies into U.S. dollars. These limitations could adversely affect our ability to access cash from these operations. As of December 31, 2024,2025, approximately 74%65% of our total cash balance was held outside the U.S.
Our business is capital intensive, and to the extent we do not generate sufficient cash from operations, we will need to raise additional funds to, among other things, purchase new equipment and maintain currently owned equipment. Adequate sources of capital funding may not be available when needed,needed or may not be available on favorable terms. If we raise additional debt, we will incur additional interest expense, the rates and terms of such debt may be at less favorable than the rates and terms of existing debt and we could be required to pledge additional assets as security or subjected to financial and/or operating covenants that affect our ability to conduct our business. The issuance of additional equity or equity-linked capital could have the effect of diluting current stockholders. If funding is insufficient or unavailable in the future, we may be unable to acquire additional aircraft, take advantage of business opportunities, fund operating losses or respond to competitive pressures, any of which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. See discussion of our material cash requirements and capital commitments in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Contractual Obligations and Capital Commitments.”
Our future growth will depend on our ability to grow in our core markets and expand into new business lines, such as advanced air mobility, and additional international markets. Our business has traditionally been significantly dependent upon the level of offshore energy exploration, development and production activity. Through continuous evaluation of strategic opportunities to acquire or dispose of operating business or assets (such as through merger, acquisitions and organic growth initiatives), we continue to diversify our operations into other aviation services, including SAR services, and we believe that additional Government Services contracts and advanced air mobility present attractive growth and diversification opportunities. The consideration for acquisitive transactions may include, among other things, cash, common stock or equity interests in us or our subsidiaries, or a contribution of equipment to obtain equity interests, and in conjunction with such a transaction we might incur additional indebtedness. Further, as we look to diversify into new markets, acquisitions of assets operating in such sectors could present risks related to operating new lines of business or in new geographies. In addition, such transactions could distract management from current operations. We cannot guarantee that any such transaction will ultimately result in the realization of its anticipated benefits or that it will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The North Sea and the U.S. Gulf of America are mature exploration and production regions that have undergone substantial seismic survey, exploration and production activity for many years. The continued success of our business operations in these regions is subject to our customers’ ability to produce at a level at which continued production and further exploration activity are economically viable. If production falls below these levels, our customers may cease operations at certain or all of their properties, at which point our services with respect to such properties would no longer be needed. Additionally, because a large number of offshore energy properties in these regions have already been drilled, offshore energy companies may not be able to identify additional drilling sites of sufficient size and quality to replace those that become depleted, and the U.S. government’s potential restrictions on the availability of offshore energy leases together with the UK government’s exercise of authority could adversely impact exploration and production activity in the U.S. Gulf of America and the North Sea, respectively. Actions of current or future presidential administrations also could negatively impact offshore energy operations in the U.S. in favor of lower energy prices or renewable energy projects. Any material decline in offshore energy exploration, development and production activity in either the U.S. Gulf of America or the North Sea could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot predict the levels of activity in these areas.
During the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 2024,2025, we generated revenues in 1815 countries across the world. Our non-U.S. operations accounted for approximately 83% and 82%83% of our consolidated revenues in the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. Instability and unforeseen changes in any of the markets in which we operate could result in business disruptions that may have an adverse effect on the demand for our products and services or our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Such instability or unforeseen changes could result from a number of factors, including, but not limited to: (i) uncertain or volatile political and economic conditions; (ii) social unrest, acts of terrorism, war or other armed conflict; (iii) trade and economic sanctions or other restrictions imposed by the UK, the U.S. or other regions or countries that could restrict or curtail our ability to profitably operate in certain markets, including tariffs; (iv) unexpected changes in legal and regulatory requirements, including the enactment of new laws and changes in interpretation or enforcement of existing laws; (v) restrictions on the repatriation of income or capital; (vi) confiscatory taxation, repatriation restrictions or other adverse tax policies; (vii) certain local or global economic conditions, such as inflation and currency exchange controls, rate fluctuations and devaluations; and (viii) public health crises and other catastrophic events, such as pandemics. For example, there has recently been political and social unrest in Nigeria, where we derived 12%13% and 9%12% of our revenues during the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. Our operations in Nigeria and in other regions are also subject to local laws requiring that our customers select service providers having greater “local content” in the respective region, and local authorities monitor compliance with and may penalize our customers for failure to satisfy such local content requirements. Future unrest or legislation adverse to our business or operations in Nigeria or our other operating regions could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations in those regions.
In addition, there is significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the U.S. and other countries, particularly Canada and Mexico, with respect to the trade policies, treaties, taxes, government regulations and tariffs that would be applicable.applicable (including as a result of legal challenges to such tariffs). Changes in U.S. political, regulatory and economic conditions or laws and policies governing foreign trade, travel to and from the U.S., immigration, manufacturing, development and investment in the territories and countries in which we operate, and any negative sentiments or retaliatory actions towards the U.S. as a result of such changes, could adversely affect the industry as a whole, which could adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations, cash flows and growth prospects.
We are exposed to credit risk, which arises either from the potential for counterparties to default on their contractual obligations or, with respect to our trade receivables, from the potential a customer will not be able to meet its obligations to us. We generated approximately 68%66% of our consolidated revenues from Offshore Energy Services during the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 2024,2025, and the majority of our customers are engaged in offshore energy production, exploration and development. We also derive a significant amount of our revenues from our UK and Irish SAR Contract,contract, as well as from a small number of offshore energy companies. Our loss of one of these significant customers, if not offset by sales to new or other existing customers, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our highly concentrated customer base increases our overall exposure to credit risk because changes in economic, regulatory and industry conditions that adversely affect the offshore energy industry could affect the credit worthiness of many of our customers. We monitor the concentration of our credit risk exposure with counterparties (both individually, with respect to specific counterparties, and collectively, with respect to all counterparties) on an ongoing basis. We manage credit risk by entering into arrangements with established counterparties and through the establishment ofestablishing credit policies, which include the review, approval and monitoring of new customers, annual credit evaluations and credit limits, to apply in the selection of counterparties. However, we generally lack the leverage to obtain and do not require letters of credit or other collateral to support our trade receivables, and there can be no assurance that our risk mitigation strategies will be effective or that credit risk, including any increases in our exposure thereto on account of a downturn in the economic condition of the offshore energy industry, will not adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Certain of our operations are subject to harsh weather conditions and seasonal factors. Poor visibility, high wind, heavy precipitation, sandstorms and hurricanes can affect the operation of helicopters and fixed wing aircraft and result in a reduced number of flight hours. In addition, harsh weather conditions have the potential to disrupt our clients’ businesses and operations, which in turn may affect the operation of helicopters and fixed wing aircraft and result in a reduced number of flight hours. A significant portion of our revenues and profits related to offshore energy exploration, development and production activity is dependent on actual flight hours, and a substantial portion of our operating expenses is fixed. Lower flight hours typically result in reduced revenues, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
OurSome of our contracts often can be terminated or downsized by our customers without penalty.customers.
SomeAlthough new offshore energy contracts have begun to include more stringent cancellation provisions and better terms and conditions around certain operational risks (such as penalty payments that are typically intended to recover costs incurred in connection with providing services that would have otherwise been recovered through future performance), some of our fixed-term contracts contain provisions permitting early termination by the customer at their convenience, generally without penalty, and with limited notice requirements. In addition, manysome of our contracts permit our customers to decrease the number of aircraft under contract with a corresponding decrease in the fixed monthly payments without penalty. As a result, you should not place undue reliance on the strength of our customer contracts or the terms of those contracts.
Our UK SAR contract, which accounted for approximately 19% of our revenues for twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 2024,2025, allows the DfT to cancel the UK SAR contract for any reason upon notice and payment of a specified cancellation fee based on the number of bases reduced as a result of the exercise and the timing of the exercise. Prior to any cancellation or termination of the contract, the DfT may also invite tenders to award a contract for the SAR services we provide to a replacement contractor. We currently lease a significant number of aircraft to service the UK SAR and contract. Although we are entitled to some compensation for termination or early expiration if we are not at fault for a breach of the agreement, termination or early expiration of the UK SAR contract would result in a significant loss of expected revenues. Additionally, we do not have the right to cause the transfer of the ground facilities supporting the UK SAR contract to the replacement service provider. If alternative long-term uses were not identified for these facilities, we could incur recurring fixed expenses for these non-revenues producing assets if we were unable to sell them to a replacement contractor or other party in the event the UK SAR contract is terminated.
We give to and receive from our customers indemnities relating to damages caused or sustained by us in connection with our operations. Our customers often seek to capitalize on their market leverage by shifting responsibility for risk. In difficult markets, we may be obliged to accept greater risk to win new business, retain renewing business or could result in us losing business if we are not prepared to take such risks. To the extent that we accept such additional risk, and seek to insure against it, if possible, our insurance premiums could rise. If we cannot insure against such risks or otherwise choose not to do so, we could be exposed to losses in the event such risks are realized.
If we cannot insure against such risks or otherwise choose not to do so, we could be exposed to catastrophic losses in the event such risks are realized.
Our Government Services contracts accounted for approximately 23%26% of our revenues for the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 2024.2025. Governmental agencies receive funding through budget appropriations, which are determined through the political process, and as a result, funding for the agencies with which we do business may fluctuate. In recent years, there has been increased Congressional scrutiny of discretionary program spending by the U.S. government in light of concerns over the size of the national debt and lawmakers have discussed the need to cut or impose caps on discretionary spending, which could result in budget cuts to federalgovernment agencies to which we provide services. Any reductions in an agency’s budget or other changes in governmental spending or service priorities may cause such agency to implement cost-saving measures, impose modifications to our contract terms, delay delivery of receivables owed to us by such agency or substantially reduce or cease using our services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, there are inherent risks in contracting with governmental agencies. Applicable laws and regulations in the countries in which we operate may enable our governmental agency customers to (i) terminate contracts for convenience, (ii) reduce, modify or cancel contracts or subcontracts if requirements or budgetary constraints change or (iii) require contractors to assume more risk under the terms of the contracts. Any of these events could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The increasing penetration of renewable energy into the energy supply mix, the increased production of electric-powered vehicles and improvements in energy storage, as well as increased consumer demand for alternative fuels, energy sources and electric-powered vehicles, may affect the demand for oil and natural gas and drilling services and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows. As a result of changes in consumer preferences and uncertainty regarding the pace of the energy transition and expected impacts on oil and natural gas demand, there have been changes in the budgets of offshore energy companies in connection with the move away from oil and natural gas exploration and production, which could result in reduced capital spending by our customers and in turn reduced demand for our services.
We provide helicopter and fixed wing services to companies engaged in offshore energy exploration, development and production activities. As a result, demand for our services, as well as our revenues and our profitability, are substantially dependent on the worldwide levels of activity in offshore energy exploration, development and production. These activity levels are principally affected by trends in, and expectations regarding, oil and natural gas prices, as well as the capital expenditure budgets of offshore energy companies and shifts in technology for energy exploration, development and production. Consolidation in the oil and gas industry is common and has the potential to shrink our customer base. Historically, oil and gas prices have been volatile and are subject to factors beyond our control, such as: (i) the supply of and demand for offshore energy, including any fluctuation thereof resulting from increased onshore production and development activity or actions of OPEC+, and related market expectations; (ii) the price and availability of alternative fuels; (iii) technology developments, including those impacting energy consumption and advances in exploration, development and production technology; (iv) general economic conditions and the changing environmental and social landscape; (v) governmental regulation and other actions, or proposed changes in respect thereof, including tariffs; and (vi) the worldwide political environment, including the armed conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East and associated economic sanctions, change in political regimes in South America or other areas, or acts of terrorism in the UK, the U.S. or elsewhere. We cannot predict future exploration, development and production activity or offshore energy price movements. Even though offshore energy prices recovered beginning in 2022 onwards, developments or changes relating to these factors could adversely affect the long-term outlook for offshore energy exploration, development and production activities, which may result in reduced demand for our services and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
IncreasingChanging attentionsentiments with respect to sustainability matters may impact our business, financial results or stock price.
InThere recent years, increasing attention hashave been givenchanging sentiments with respect to corporate activities related to sustainability matters in public discourse and the investment community. Advocacy groups, both domestically and internationally, have campaigned for governmental and private action to promote change at public companies related to sustainability matters, including through the investment and voting practices of investment advisers, proxy advisory firms, public pension funds, universities and other members of the investing community. These activities include increasing demands for action related to climate change, promoting the use of substitutes to fossil fuel products and encouraging the divestment of companies in the offshore energy industry. These activities could reduce demand for our services, reduce our profits, increase the potential for investigations and litigation and thereby increase our costs, impair our brand and have negative impacts on the price of our common stock and access to capital markets. The adoption and expansion of sustainability-related regulation may also result in increased capital expenditures and compliance, operational and other costs to us.
In recent years, certain stakeholders and regulators have also proposed or enacted “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or initiatives. This divergence in stakeholder expectations could expose us to reputational risks and potentially disrupt relationships with certain stakeholders.
The continued threat of terrorismterrorism, civil unrest, acts of terrorism, war, and other armed conflict, such as the ongoing actions in Ukraine, Israel, South America and the broader Middle East, and the potential destabilizing effect such conflicts may pose, including with respect to the global oil and natural gas markets, could materially adversely affect us.
We also use third-party service providers to process certain data or information on our behalf. Under applicable laws, we may be held responsible for cybersecurity incidents involving information we share with these providers. Although we require service providers to implement and maintain reasonable security measures, we cannot control their systems or guarantee that breachedbreaches will not occur. Despite efforts to refine our procedures, educate our employees, and implement security measures, no system is immune to unauthorized access or cyberattacks. Future upgrades may not be completely effective or may cause operational disruptions or fail to deliver the anticipated improvements.
A cyberattack or security breach could remain undetected for an extended period of time, with the investigation and remediation taking significant time and potentially repeating errors before containment. A breach or failure of our systems or networks, critical third-party systems, or those of our customers or vendors, could lead to operational disruptions, diversion of personnel attention, unplanned expenditures, unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data, theft or misappropriation of funds, violation of privacy laws, or exposure to litigation or indemnity claims. Moreover, any failure to disclose incidents to regulators, law enforcement or affected individuals in a timely manner could result in a reputational harm and regulatory scrutiny, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.
We operate in manycertain international areas through entities that we do not control and are subject to government regulation that limits foreign ownership of aircraft companies in favor of domestic ownership.
We conduct many of our international operations through entities in which we have a noncontrolling interest or through strategic alliances with foreign partners. For example, we have acquired interests in, or in some cases have lease and service agreements with, entities that operate aircraft in Canada and Egypt. We provide engineering and administrative support to certain of these entities. We derive lease revenues, service revenues, equity earnings and dividend income from these entities. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, we received approximately $30.9 million of revenues from the provision of aircraft and other services to unconsolidated affiliates. As a result of not owning a majority interest or maintaining voting control of our unconsolidated affiliates, we do not have the ability to control their policies, management or affairs. The interests of persons who control these entities or partners may differ from ours and may cause such entities to take actions that are not in our best interest. Certain of our co-owners of these entities have the right to require us to purchase their interest, in which case we would need to find a qualifying person to hold the interest. If we are unable to maintain our relationships with our partners in these entities, we could lose our ability to operate in these areas, potentially resulting in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, an operational incident involving one of the entities over which we do not have operational control may nevertheless cause us reputational harm.
We conduct many of our international operations through entities in which we have a noncontrolling interest or through strategic alliances with foreign partners and we are subject to governmentalgovernment regulation that limits foreign ownership of aircraft companies in favor of domestic ownership. Based on regulations in various markets in which we operate, the use of our local AOCs may be halted and we may lose our ability to operate within these countries if certain levels of local ownership are not maintained. The inability to utilize our local AOCs for any reason, including foreign ownership in excess of permitted levels, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct operations within these markets and our overall financial condition. We cannot assure you that there will be no changes in aviation laws, regulations or administrative requirements or the interpretations or applications thereof that could restrict or prohibit our ability to operate in certain regions or that would cause the cost of operating in the region to be uneconomical. Any such restriction or prohibition on our ability to operate in non-U.S. jurisdictions or any significant increase in operating costs in such jurisdictions as a result of changes in law and regulation or otherwise may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See Part I, Item 1, “ Business – Government Regulation” for additional information.
Additionally, we have acquired interests in unconsolidated interests, or in some cases have lease and service agreements with entities that operate aircraft in Canada and Egypt. We provide engineering and administrative support to certain of these entities, and derive lease revenues, service revenues, equity earnings and dividend income from these entities. The interests of persons who control these entities or partners may differ from ours and may cause such entities to take actions that are not in our best interest. If we are unable to maintain our relationships with our partners in these entities, we could lose our ability to operate in these areas, potentially resulting in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, an operational incident involving one of the entities over which we do not have operational control may nevertheless cause us reputational harm. See Part I, Item 1, “ Business – Government Regulation” for additional information.
Changes in environmental laws or regulations could require us to devote capital or other resources to comply with those laws and regulations and subject us to additional costs and restrictions, as well as increase costs of compliance and doing business for our customers and thereby decrease the demand for our services. Because our business depends on the level of activity in the offshore energy industry, existing or future laws, regulations, treaties or international agreements related to greenhouse gases and climate change, including incentives to conserve energy or use alternative energy sources, could have a negative impact on our business if such laws, regulations, treaties or international agreements reduce the worldwide demand for offshore energy or limit drilling opportunities.
For example, after taking office in 2021, the Biden Administration (i) rejoined the Paris Agreement, an international treaty on climate change, (ii) joined the Global Methane Pledge, a pact that aims to reduce global methane emissions at least 30% below 2020 levels by 2030, signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which created the Methane Emissions Reduction Program, (iii) implemented a pause on new oil and natural gas leases on public lands and offshore waters (which has been lifted subject to certain limitations), (iv) finalized new methane rules to reduce emissions from both new and existing oil and natural gas industry sources, (v) finalized the Waste Emissions Charge on large emitters of waste methane from the oil and gas sector, and (vi) issued a Memorandum under section 12(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act withdrawing certain areas from oil or natural gas leasing. On January 20, 2025, the Trump Administration issued executive orders initiating the process to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement and to undo the climate change and energy initiatives of the Biden Administration, the future of which is uncertain.
As a global business, we are subject to complex laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which we operate. These laws and regulations relate to a number of aspects of our business, including import and export controls, the payment of taxes, employment and labor relations, fair competition, data privacy protections, securities regulation, anti-money laundering, anti-corruption, economic sanctions and other regulatory requirements affecting trade and investment. Compliance with these laws and regulations may involve significant costs or require changes in our business practices that result in reduced revenues and profitability. A failure to comply could also result in significant fines, damages and other criminal sanctions against us, our officers, employees, joint venture partners or strategic partners, prohibitions or additional requirements on the conduct of our business and damage to our reputation. Further, we could be charged with wrongdoing for any violation of such laws and regulations by our agents, local partners or joint ventures, even though such parties may not be subject to the applicable statutes or may not operate under our control. Failure by us or one of our agents, joint ventures or strategic partners to comply with applicable export and trade practice laws could result in civil or criminal penalties and suspension or termination of export privileges. Certain violations of law could also result in suspension of or debarment from government contracts. We incur additional legal compliance costs associated with our global regulations and the changes in laws or regulations and related interpretations and other guidance could result in higher expenses and payments. Uncertainty relating to such laws or regulations, including how they affect a business or how we are required to comply with the laws,comply, may also affect how we conduct our operations and structure our investments and could limit our ability to enforce our rights.
In many foreign countries, particularly those with developing economies, it may be customary for others to engage in business practices that are prohibited by laws such as the FCPA, the UK Bribery Act, the Brazilian Clean Companies Act in Brazil, an anti-bribery law that is similar to the FCPA and the UK Bribery Act,Act or other similar laws. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, contractors, agents and business partners will not take action in violation of our internal policies or applicable law and any such violation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in a regulatory environment that is increasingly complex and constantly evolving with respect to data privacy and protection. Laws such as the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”), Brazil’s Lei Geral de Protecão de Dados Pessoais (the “LGPD”), and similar legislation in jurisdictions where we operate, including the United StatesU.S. and the United Kingdom,UK, pose significant compliance challenges and may elevate our operational costs. These laws are often subject to inconsistent interpretation and enforcement, and any failure, or perceived failure, to comply with applicable data protection laws could result in significant fines, penalties, judgments, negative publicity, and potentially require us to change our business practices. Regulatory scrutiny may also increase as global authorities, including those in regions where we operate, consider regulations addressing artificial intelligence and its intersection with data privacy. Compliance with these evolving requirements may further increase costs andcosts, adversely impact our business.business and increase the costs and complexity of compliance, which could adverselynegatively affect our business.
Our industry is regulated by various laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate. The scope of such regulation includes infrastructure and operational issues relating to helicopters, maintenance, spare parts and route flyingroute-flying rights as well as safety and security requirements. We cannot fully anticipate all changes that might be made to the laws and regulations to which we are subject or the possible impact of such changes. These changes could subject us to additional costs and restrictions.
Other Countries and Regulations. Our operations in other jurisdictions, including the UK, Nigeria and Brazil, are regulated to various degrees by the governments of such jurisdictions and must be conducted in compliance with those regulations and, where applicable, in accordance with our air service licenses and AOCs. Such regulations may require us to obtain a license to operate in that country, favor local companies or require operating permits that can only be obtained by locally registeredlocally-registered companies and often impose other nationality requirements. In such cases, we partner with local persons, but there is no assurance regarding which foreign governmental regulations may be applicable to our helicopter operations in the future and whether we would be able to comply with them.
The indenture governing the 6.875%6.750% Senior Notes due 2033 (the “6.750% Senior Notes”) and the UK Export Finance Facilities Agreement (“IRCG Debt”) limit, among other things, our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to borrow money or issue guarantees; pay dividends, redeem capital stock or make certain other restricted payments; incur liens to secure indebtedness; make certain investments; use assets for non-permitted purposes; sell certain assets; enter into transactions with our affiliates; or merge with another entity or sell substantially all of our assets. Our ability to observe certain of these covenants can be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to observe these covenants in the future.
If we fail to comply with these and other covenants, we would be in default under the equipment financings with the National Westminster Bank PLC (“UKSAR Debt”), our asset-backed revolving credit facility (“ABL Facility”),facility, the IRCG Debt and the indenture governing the 6.875%6.750% Senior Notes (together, our “Credit Facilities”), and the principal and accrued interest on our outstanding indebtedness under the Credit Facilities may become due and payable. In addition, our other debt agreements and our future debt agreements may contain similar and additional affirmative and negative covenants. Our Credit Facilities are secured by many of our assets (including, in the aggregate, most of our owned helicopters), and such assets may not be available to secure additional financings. As a result, our ability to respond to changes in business and economic conditions and to obtain additional secured financing, if needed, may be significantly restricted.
We are currently, and may in the future be, subject to subject to legal and regulatory claims, investigations and proceedings that arise out of the ordinary conduct of our business. We cannot predict the results of such proceedings with any degree of certainty. Litigation may be both lengthy and disruptive to our operations and could cause significant expenditure and diversion of management attention. We may face significant monetary damages or injunctive relief against us, which could materially adversely affect a portion of our business operations.
Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in tax laws, both domestically and internationally, or the interpretation or application thereof. From time to time, the U.S. federal, state, and foreign, governments enact legislation that could increase our effective tax rate or the effective tax rates of our consolidated affiliates. In August 2022, the United StatesU.S. enacted the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which, among other things, imposed a new 15% alternative minimum tax on the book income of certain corporations and a 1% excise tax on certain repurchases of shares. WeAdditionally, continueon July 4, 2025, the U.S. enacted the legislation commonly referred to evaluateas the impactOne ofBig thisBeautiful legislation.Bill Act, which, among other changes, extended the 21% U.S. corporate tax rate, business interest expense deduction limits, 100% bonus depreciation, domestic research cost expensing, and various international provisions, with certain modifications. The Company expects the primary impacts will be to Section 163j elections under the U.S. Tax Code. We cannot determine whether, or in what form, other future tax legislation will ultimately be enacted or what impact any such legislation could have on our profitability, and we will continue to monitor any such legislation.
In 2021, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (the "OECD") announced the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting which proposed a two-pillar solution with a global minimum tax of 15% of reported profits (“Pillar 2”) to address tax challenges arising from digitalization of the economy. Currently, Pillar 2 has been agreed upon, in principle, by over 140 countries and while it is uncertain whether or when the U.S. will enact legislation to adopt the minimum tax directive,and, certain countries in which we operate have adopted some form of legislation, and other countries are in the process of introducing legislation to implement the minimum tax directive. Additionally, the U.S. has entered into a “side-by-side” arrangement with the OECD exempting U.S.-parented groups from the under taxed profits rule (UTPR) and the income inclusion rule (IIR) in respect of both their domestic and foreign profits. We are evaluating and monitoring the impacts from Pillar 2 although we currently do not expect it to have a material impact on our effective tax rate or our consolidated results of operation, financial position and cash flows.
We may be unable to meet our capital allocation framework, which could decrease expected returns on investment in our common stock.
Our capital allocation framework includes goals of paying down our debt and returning capital to our stockholders through share repurchases and dividends. There can be no assurance that we will seek or be able to do any of the foregoing on terms acceptable to us or at all.
Share repurchases and dividends are authorized and determined by the Board in its sole discretion and depend upon a number of factors, including the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, growth opportunities, restrictions in our financing arrangements and other factors that the Board may deem relevant. Any elimination of, or downward revision in, our share repurchase program, dividend payment plans or capital allocation framework could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
Meeting our capital allocation framework strategy requires us to have available capital in the years ahead in an amount sufficient to enable us to maintain a strong balance sheet and liquidity position and pursue growth opportunities, as well as to return capital to shareholders through share repurchases and quarterly dividends. The amount of our cash flow in any quarter may vary and be more or less than our capital allocation framework.
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restatedour bylaws and Delaware law may discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our business or changes in our management.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation (“certificate of incorporation”) and amended and restated bylaws (“bylaws”) include certain provisions that could have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change of control of our business or changes in our management. Such provisions include, among other things: restrictions on the ability of our stockholders to fill a vacancy on the Board; restrictions related to the ability of non-U.S. citizens owning our common stock; our ability to issue preferred stock with terms that the Board may determine, without stockholder approval, which could be used to significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquirer; the absence of cumulative voting in the election of directors, which may limit the ability of minority stockholders to elect directors; and advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations, which may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from soliciting proxies to elect a particular slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us. These provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our business that is in the best interest of our stockholders. Even in the absence of a takeover attempt, the existence of these provisions may materially adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock if they are viewed as discouraging future takeover attempts.
These provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our business that is in the best interest of our stockholders. Even in the absence of a takeover attempt, the existence of these provisions may materially adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock if they are viewed as discouraging future takeover attempts.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “The following is a discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.”
New heading “A discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023 can be found in Part II, Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2025.”
New heading “Initiation of Quarterly Dividend Program”
New heading “Irish Coast Guard Contract Transition”
New heading “Closing of $500 Million Senior Secured Notes and Extension of ABL Facility”
New heading “Completes Its First Electric Aviation Test Project in Norway”
New heading “Signs Launch Agreement with Electra to Secure First Delivery Slot for EL9 Aircraft”
New heading “Advances Role in Electric Air‑Taxi Network with Vertical Aerospace and Skyports”
New heading “Government Services”
New heading “Government Services”
New heading “Income tax expense”
New heading “Capital Allocation Framework”
New heading “Shareholder Capital Returns:”
Removed heading “The following is a discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Also included is a discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. Due to our fiscal year transition from March 31 to December 31 that was applied on a prospective basis in December 2022, the discussion of the financial condition and results of operations for the comparative twelve months ended December 31, 2022, is reflected on an unaudited pro forma basis.”
Removed heading “Capital Allocation”
Removed heading “Total Revenues by Segment”
Removed heading “Gains (losses) on disposal of assets.”
Removed heading “Interest expense, net.”
Removed heading “Income tax expense.”
Removed heading “Annual Consolidated Statement of Operations by Segment”
Removed heading “Total Revenues by Segment”
Removed heading “Flight Hours by Segment”
Removed heading “Gains (losses) on disposal of assets.”
Removed heading “Interest income.”
Largest changes
“Severe supply chain challenges have also delayed parts and repairs for relevant offshore helicopter models, thereby, at times, limiting the number of aircraft that are serviceable and further tightening the overall supply. The limited available capacity in our markets at this time has resulted in significant net increases in leading-edge rates, and the current utilization levels combined with longer lead times for new builds comes at a time when we have reset only a portion of our Offshore Energy Services contracts at leading-edge rates, with approximately half set to renew in 2026. …”see in full comparison
“In January 2026, Bristow entered into an amendment and restatement of its asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL Facility”), which, among other things, extended the maturity date to January 26, 2031 (subject to certain provisions), reduced the total commitments under the ABL Facility from $85 million to $70 million, permitted an increase of the total commitments up to a maximum aggregate amount of $105 million (subject to satisfaction of certain terms and conditions) and revised the interest rate pricing by reducing the applicable margin under each tranche by 25 basis points and …”see in full comparison
“In January 2026, Bristow entered into an amendment and restatement of its ABL Facility, which, among other things, extended the maturity date to January 26, 2031 (subject to certain provisions), reduced the total commitments under the ABL Facility from $85 million to $70 million, permitted an increase of the total commitments up to a maximum aggregate amount of $105 million (subject to satisfaction of certain terms and conditions) and revised the interest rate pricing by reducing the applicable margin under each tranche by 25 basis points and eliminating the 0.10% credit spread adjustment in …”see in full comparison
“The following is a discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Also included is a discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. Due to our fiscal year transition from March 31 to December 31 that was applied on a prospective basis in December 2022, the discussion of the financial condition and results of operations for the comparative twelve months ended December 31, 2022, is reflected on an unaudited pro forma basis.”see in full comparison
“A discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023 can be found in Part II, Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2025.”see in full comparison
“The following is a discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (152)
The following is a discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
The following is a discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Also included is a discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. Due to our fiscal year transition from March 31 to December 31 that was applied on a prospective basis in December 2022, the discussion of the financial condition and results of operations for the comparative twelve months ended December 31, 2022, is reflected on an unaudited pro forma basis.
This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and the other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additional information on the fiscal year end change can be found in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023, filed with the SEC on March 6, 2024. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve significant risks and uncertainties. As a result of many factors, such as those set forth under Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
A discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023 can be found in Part II, Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2025.
We are the leading global provider of innovative and sustainable vertical flight solutions, primarily providing aviation services to a broad base of offshore energy companies and government entities. Our business comprises three reportable segments: Offshore Energy Services, Government Services and Other Services, using a fleet of 210214 aircraft located across sixfive continents and 18in 15 different countries. Today, we serve customers in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, the Dutch Caribbean, the Falkland Islands, India, Ireland, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Spain, Suriname, Trinidad,Trinidad theand Tobago, UK and the U.S. Our offshore energy customers primarily use our services to transport personnel to, from and between offshore energy installations. Our government customers primarily outsource SAR activities whereby we operate specialized helicopters and provide highly trained personnel. Our other customers primarily include fixed wing passengers utilizing our regional airline in Australia and companies that dry-lease helicopters from us in support of other industries and markets wherein which we do not directly compete or operate in.
During the twelve monthsyears ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, approximately 68%66% and 66%,68%, respectively, of our total revenues were derived from Offshore Energy Services while approximately 23%26% and 26%,23%, respectively, were derived from Government Services and approximately 9%8% and 8%,9%, respectively, were derived from Other Services.
Initiation of Quarterly Dividend Program
On February 25, 2026, Bristow launched its quarterly cash dividend program and declared a dividend of $0.125 per share of its common stock. The cash dividend will be paid on March 26, 2026 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 13, 2026. See Part II, Item 5 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details on the Company’s dividend policy.
Irish Coast Guard Contract Transition
On February 1, 2026, Bristow’s last Irish SAR base went live at Waterford Airport, in south-east Ireland. Bristow will provide critical, life saving, day and night-time operations in Ireland, delivering nationwide all-weather 24-hour coverage, 365 days a year. The 10-year, ~€670 million IRCG contract includes the use of six specialized SAR-configured AW189 helicopters equipped with the latest evolution of mission systems along with two specialized fixed-wing aircraft providing operational support for search and rescue and environmental monitoring.
Closing of $500 Million Senior Secured Notes and Extension of ABL Facility
In January 2026, Bristow closed a private offering of $500 million aggregate principal amount of 6.750% Senior Secured Notes due 2033 (the “6.750% Senior Notes”), which were issued at par and bear interest payable semiannually. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds to irrevocably deposit funds with the trustee under the indenture governing its existing 6.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2028 (the “6.875% Senior Notes”) in an amount sufficient to redeem the 6.875% Senior Notes in full on March 1, 2026, resulting in the satisfaction and discharge of the indenture governing the 6.875% Senior Notes upon deposit, with the remaining net proceeds to be used for general corporate purposes.
In January 2026, Bristow entered into an amendment and restatement of its asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL Facility”), which, among other things, extended the maturity date to January 26, 2031 (subject to certain provisions), reduced the total commitments under the ABL Facility from $85 million to $70 million, permitted an increase of the total commitments up to a maximum aggregate amount of $105 million (subject to satisfaction of certain terms and conditions) and revised the interest rate pricing by reducing the applicable margin under each tranche by 25 basis points and eliminating the 0.10% credit spread adjustment in respect of the first-out tranche introduced in connection with the 2022 transition from the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”).
See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details.
Completes Its First Electric Aviation Test Project in Norway
In February 2026, Bristow completed its first electric aviation test project, conducted as an international test arena alongside partners BETA Technologies, Inc. (“Beta”), Avinor and Norway CAA, using BETA's ALIA CX300 aircraft. Over a six-month period, the aircraft performed regular test flights on a cargo route between Stavanger and Bergen, bringing the project to a close and delivering valuable real-world experience in electric aircraft operations, infrastructure, and regulatory frameworks. As a result, airports, air traffic control, and regulators gained hands-on experience with charging infrastructure, winter operations, new procedures, and future training needs.
Signs Launch Agreement with Electra to Secure First Delivery Slot for EL9 Aircraft
In January 2026, Bristow announced it had signed a deposit agreement with Electra.aero, Inc. (“Electra”) to secure the first delivery slots for five Electra EL9 Ultra Short hybrid-electric aircraft, subject to aircraft certification. The EL9 aircraft is capable of carrying nine passengers with baggage or 3,000 pounds of cargo for 330 nautical miles, and has a maximum ferry range of 1,100 nautical miles. Upon certification and delivery of aircraft, Bristow plans to deploy the EL9 across turnkey mobility solutions for corporate customers, premier destinations and resorts, major and regional airlines, and government agencies operating essential public service routes.
Advances Role in Electric Air‑Taxi Network with Vertical Aerospace and Skyports
In December 2025, Bristow announced its expanded role in advancing the UK’s first electric air‑taxi network through a new collaboration with Vertical Aerospace (“Vertical”) and Skyports Infrastructure (“Skyports”), with initial service targeted for early 2029. Under the arrangement, Bristow will leverage its operational expertise and Air Operator Certificates to lead early route operations connecting Canary Wharf with major transportation hubs, including Heathrow, Gatwick, Cambridge, and Oxford, supported by Vertical’s newly introduced Valo eVTOL aircraft (“Valo”) and Skyports’ infrastructure. Valo is designed to fly up to 100 miles at speeds of up to 150 mph with zero operating emissions, and engineered to meet airliner-level safety standards. The aircraft is targeting certification in 2028, enabling entry into service in the U.S. and globally with airline and operator customers. Furthermore, this partnership is also working on a range of future mobility solutions for Valo in the U.S., including routes in and out of Manhattan, New York. The plans are expected to cut multi-hour road journeys to minutes, such as flying from John F. Kennedy (JFK) and other airports to Manhattan, as well as other use cases such as event travel, leisure and aerial sightseeing tours, cross-town urban transfers and emergency services.
Capital Allocation
In February 2025, we announced a new capital allocation framework with key priorities that include: (i) protect and maintain a strong balance sheet and liquidity position; (ii) pursue high impact, high return growth opportunities; and (iii) return capital to shareholders via opportunistic share repurchases and initiate quarterly dividend payments in 2026. Understanding that the Offshore Energy Services segment is inherently volatile, the Company recognizes the importance of maintaining a strong balance sheet that can withstand challenging market down cycles. As such, Bristow intends to pay down debt to a balance of approximately $500 million gross debt by the end of 2026. Bristow’s Board of Directors has approved a new $125 million share repurchase program that will be deployed on an opportunistic basis. In addition, the Company intends to initiate a quarterly dividend program beginning in the first quarter of 2026, with an initial dividend payment of $0.125 per share ($0.50 per share annualized).
Many energy industry observers believe that the combination of increasing long-term energy demand tied to global economic growth, geopolitical conflicts leading to energy security concerns, and a growing desire for more efficient and consistent energy sources are contributing to the shift towards deepwater and ultra-deepwater drilling. While initial costs are higher, deepwater and ultra-deepwater regions often hold vast, untapped reservoirs of oil and natural gas that can produce energy over decades while proving better returns on invested capital over their useful lives compared to onshore wells. In recent years, innovations in deepwater technology, such as advanced seismic imaging and high-pressure drilling equipment, have reduced exploratory risks and improved operational efficiency and safety, making previously inaccessible reserves viable for development. As energy exploration, development and production moves further offshore and into deeper waters, more heavy and medium helicopters and newer technology helicopters are expected to be required by our customers. In addition, markets such as Nigeria and Brazil continue to show growth and increased demand for vertical lift. We believe we are well positioned to benefit from higher pricing and improved cash flows as legacy contracts expire and are renegotiated at higher rates and on better terms for the service provider. While drilling and exploration activity is likely amidst a mid-cycle activity plateau that may persist for much of 2026, many energy analysts expect exploration activity to increase in late 2026 and beyond.
Recent concerns, amongst industry observers, around the offshore rig count and white space pose important questions about the outlook for global offshore energy markets. While there are headwinds that impact our business, including supply chain challenges and a strong U.S. dollar, the dynamics that continue to support the positive outlook for our sector differ from those of other oilfield services companies in key ways.
Fortunately, the dynamics that continue to support the positive outlook for our sector differ from those of other oilfield services companies in key ways. For instance, although the offshore energy market is highly cyclical with demand linked to the price of oil and gas, the impacts of short-term fluctuations in commodity prices are less severe on our primarily production-focused business. While long periods of depressed prices would have more significant impacts, we believe current prices can continue to provide the fundamentals needed for sustained growth.
During the offshore energy downturn that began in late 2014,2014 and continued through 2021, deliveries of new helicopters were limited, as the price of crude oil had been range-bound for a number of years. This negatively impacted the cash flows of our customers and led to reduced capital and operational expenditures, including reductions related to offshore exploration,operations developmentwere and production activities.limited. Throughout this downturn, numerous helicopters were sold or otherwise exited the offshore market. However, the recent increase in offshore energy activity that began in 2022 is driving a constructive supply and demand balance for offshore helicopters, and the once excess available capacity has shrunk, with effective utilization levels for offshore-configured medium, super medium and heavy helicopters at or near 100%. Furthermore,A significant portion of recent offshore helicopter deliveries have been to closed-market operators and jurisdictions (e.g., China and the Middle East) that do not address the demand across our target markets and do not directly impact the markets or helicopter fleet with which we compete. In addition, militaries and governments placing orders for aircrafthelicopter models that share OEM production lines with civilian aircraft have ledcontributed to longer lead times for new builds, in some instances taking upwards of 18 to 24 months for new order deliveries. TheIn longaddition to longer delivery lead times, coupledthere withare atfewer orhelicopter nearmanufacturers fullbuilding utilization ofcertified, relevant aircraftmodels models,for comeour atoperating segments compared to just a timedecade when we have only reset a portion of our Offshore Energy Services contracts at leading-edge rates, with the majority set to renew in late 2025 and 2026.ago.
Severe supply chain challenges have also delayed parts and repairs for relevant offshore helicopter models, thereby, at times, limiting the number of aircraft that are serviceable and further tightening the overall supply. The limited available capacity in our markets at this time has resulted in significant net increases in leading-edge rates, and the current utilization levels combined with longer lead times for new builds comes at a time when we have reset only a portion of our Offshore Energy Services contracts at leading-edge rates, with approximately half set to renew in 2026. Additionally, given our sector’s late cycle exposure and the lag effect involving new projects, helicopter operators are typically contracted later amongst the late-cycle businesses servicing offshore energy exploration and production platforms, often long after rig announcements and often on longer duration contracts than other offshore equipment operators. As such, any mid-cycle lulls or downturns take longer to impact the offshore helicopter industry. As a result of the lack of spare capacity and current helicopter market tightness, customer contract lead times are also beginning to increase. Due to the current favorable environment for service providers, new offshore energy contracts have begun to include more beneficial cancellation provisions and better terms and conditions around certain operational risks. However, any further exacerbation of the supply chain issues could offset a portion of the benefits we expect to derive, primarily through the application of customer-levied penalties or lost opportunities, while relief or return to pre-pandemic supply chain conditions can positively influence our results.
Government Services
Severe supply chain challenges have also delayed parts and repairs for the S92 heavy helicopters, thereby limiting the number of S92s that are serviceable today and further tightening the overall supply; while this has helped raise rates to some extent, there is now unmet lift demand that serviceable S92s could absorb. Any further exacerbation of this supply chain issue could bias our guidance to the lower end of the range, while relief or return to pre-pandemic levels can positively influence our results.
Additionally, given our sector’s late cycle exposure and the lag effect involving new projects, helicopter operators are typically contracted later amongst the late-cycle businesses servicing offshore energy exploration and production platforms, often long after rig announcements. As a result of the lack of spare capacity and current helicopter market tightness, contract lead times are beginning to increase. Some of our contracts that recently commenced were awarded last year, and conversations with customers are just beginning for services set to commence in 2025 and 2026. Furthermore, markets such as Nigeria and Brazil continue to show growth and increased demand for vertical lift. We believe we are well positioned to meet this demand given our decades-long experience operating in these markets, our reputation for safety and reliability, and our performance history. The combination of all these factors continue to support our outlook that we are in the midst of a multi-year growth cycle that will benefit the offshore helicopter market.
Government Services, especially the public SAR market, are continuing to evolve, and while there are no current active tenders, we believe further outsourcing of public SAR services and other government contract work will become available to the private sector in the future, although the timing of these opportunities is uncertain. Over the past few years, we have experienced growth from notable awards of governmentGovernment servicesServices contracts, and the investments we are making to grow and diversify our leading governmentGovernment servicesServices business are expected to result in attractive long-term cash flow yields for the Company well into the middle of the next decade.decade, as the duration of our Government Services contracts generally last for ten or more years with options for extensions. Operations for the previously announced IRCG contract commenced in late 20242024, and arethe expectedfinal tobase finishtransitioned transitioningas inof 2025.early 2026. The transition to the previously announced UKSAR2G contract also commenced in the fourth quarter of 2024, and the last base will finish transitioning in late 2026. We expect the full year impacteffects of these contract commencementstransition completions to have positive impacts on our financial results in 2026 and beyond,beyond. though theAny strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to local currencies, particularly the British pound sterling and the Euro, and the impacts of penalties due to aircraft availability, primarily related to supply chain challenges that are expected to persist, could offset a portion of the benefits we expect to derive from increased activity. Additionally, 2025 will largely remain a transition period for our Government Services segment as we incur costs related to these new contracts while revenues and operations fully ramp, and though the majority of capital expenditures will conclude in 2025, associated operating expenses and delays in contract transitions may not present the full earnings power and quality margins from this business until 2026 and beyond. For further commentary on these risks, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk - Foreign Currency Risk” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Privatization of aviation services historically operated by the public sector depend heavily on governmental agencies receiving funding through budget appropriation and the desire to outsource such services. Government Services, especially the public SAR market, are continuing to evolve, and we believe further outsourcing of public SAR services and other government contract work will become available to the private sector in the future. For example, recent announcements by NATO members regarding defense spend targets and a commitment to spending 5% of their GDP on core defense and resilience initiatives by 2035, provide promising opportunities, as we believe it would be difficult to achieve these targets without some combination of private and public partnerships. We believe that we are well positioned to continue to serve the government services market as more opportunities arise.
Other Services
The duration of Government Services contracts generally lasts for ten or more years with options for extensions. Privatization of aviation services historically operated by the public sector depend heavily on governmental agencies receiving funding through budget appropriation and the desire to outsource such services. We believe that we are well positioned to continue to serve the market as more opportunities arise.
Other Services has experienced growth in recent years from charter revenues in Australia, and weincreased observedpassenger higher yieldsactivity in scheduled passenger transport throughout the year.Australia. Performance for this market is largely tied to passenger demand in Northern and Western Australia. We believe the financial performance of this business will remain consistentconsistent, with at or near current levels of activity. Dry leasing, albeit a smaller portion of our Other Services, is expected to continue providing cash flows without significant operating or capital requirements.
We derive our revenues primarily from providing aviation services, and our profits depend on our cost of capital, the acquisition costs of aircraft, our operating costscosts, market conditions, customer demand and our reputation.ability to win and negotiate profitable contracts. A majority of our revenues are generated through two types of contracts: helicopter services and fixed wing services. We operate in three segments: Offshore Energy Services, Government Services and Other Services.
The primary drivers of our revenues are utilization, rates and added capacity. Utilization can refer to either aircraft utilization, which is the number of hours an aircraft has flown during the period, or contract utilization, which is the commencement or end of contracts and the number of aircraft on contract in a given period. Rates mainly refer to the Monthly Standing Charge (“MSC”), which is the fixed monthly fee charged to a customer for the right to use an aircraft, or the Fixed Hourly Rate (“FHR”), which is an incremental per flight hour charge for hours flown. Capacity can refer to new aircraft that have been added to the fleet, older aircraft that have been removed from the fleet, or when an existing aircraft has been moved to a different market, increasing or decreasing the capacity in that market.
Revenues under our Offshore Energy Services segment are primarily generated from offshore energy exploration, development and production activities by our customers, with fixed-term contracts generally ranging between one to five years,years subjector toin provisionssome permittingcases, early termination by certain customers.longer. Revenues are typically earned through a combination of aan MSC plus an incremental FHR. Ad hoc revenues are typically earned through either a combination of a daily fixed fee plus a charge based on hours flown or an hourly rate with a minimum number of hours to be charged daily.
For helicopters that we lease to third parties under arrangements whereby the customer assumes operational responsibility (dry leases), we often provide technical parts support,support but generally wedo not incur no other material operating costs. In some instances, we may provide training and other services to support our leasing customers.customers for an additional charge.
In many cases, aircraft components, such as engines and transmissions, are maintained by third-party vendors under contractual agreements also referred to as power-by-the-hour (“PBH”) maintenance agreements. Under these agreements, the Company is charged an agreed amount per hour of flying time related to maintenance, repair and overhaul of the parts and components covered. The costs under these arrangements are expensed in the period that the flight hours were incurred. When the Company places a helicopter in a PBH program after a maintenance period has begun, it may be necessary to pay an initial buy-in charge based on hours flown since the previous maintenance event. The timing of entering or exiting third-party PBH programs and the timing of credits issued by the OEMs (also referred to as vendor credits) may create variation in our operating expenses between comparative periods.
For aircraft that are not oncovered by PBH programs, maintenance and repair costs, including major aircraft component overhaul costs, are recognized in the period they are incurred.
In our industry, vendor credits are common practice and generally provided for reasons such as (i) credits tied to asset purchases, particularly when a customer has placed orders for several aircraft; (ii) OEM performance and delays; and (iii) incentives when entering or extending long-term PBH and other maintenance contracts or as refunds when exiting such contracts or as aircraft covered by PBH contracts are retired. We have historically applied vendor credits towards aircraft and inventory parts purchases or towards ongoing maintenance.
Our policy of expensing helicopter repair costs as incurred, particularly for those aircraft not on PBH agreements, and recognizing vendor credits may result in operating expenses varying substantially when compared with a prior year or prior quarter if a disproportionate number of repairs, refurbishmentsrefurbishments, overhauls or overhaulscredits are undertaken.
•repairs and maintenance (includes hourly charges for PBH maintenance contracts, amortization of PBH buy-in agreements,charges, vendor credits, inventory write-downsusage and adjustments and additional maintenance and repair costs, including major aircraft component overhaul costs, to earnings as the costs are incurred);
•other (primarily base and facility expenses, amortization of deferred contract costs, subcontractor costs, property, sales and use taxes, training, transportation, freightfreight, expenses,flight systems costs and other).
The following table presents our operating results and other statement of operations information for the twelveyear monthsended December 31, 2025 (the “Current Year”) and the year ended December 31, 2024 and(the 2023“Prior Year”):
Annual Consolidated Statement of Operations by Segment (in thousands, except percentages)
__________________ nm = Not Meaningful
Total Revenues by Segment
___________________ (1) Includes revenues of approximately $10.8 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023, related to fixed wing revenues in Africa that were previously classified in Other Services.
Revenues from Offshore Energy Services were $24.4 million higher in the Current Year. Revenues in Africa were $21.7 million higher primarily due to higher utilization and additional aircraft capacity. Revenues in the Americas were $19.2 million higher primarily due to higher utilization in the U.S. and Brazil, which was partially offset by the absence of a one-time benefit in the Prior Year related to the transition from cash basis recognition to an accrual basis of accounting in Canada and lower utilization in Trinidad. Revenues in Europe were $16.5 million lower primarily due to lower utilization, partially offset by higher reimbursable revenues, higher rates and favorable foreign exchange rate impacts. Operating income was $33.4 million higher in the Current Year primarily due to the higher revenues coupled with lower general and administrative expenses of $5.9 million and lower operating expenses of $3.6 million, partially offset by lower earnings from unconsolidated affiliates of $0.9 million. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to lower professional services fees, insurance and lease costs. Repairs and maintenance costs were $34.0 million lower primarily due to higher vendor credits. Fuel costs were $6.5 million lower due to lower global fuel prices and decreased flight hours in Europe. Insurance costs were $1.4 million lower primarily due to lower commercial property insurance premiums. Personnel costs were $21.8 million higher primarily due to increased headcount in Africa and Brazil due to increased activity, unfavorable foreign exchange rate impacts and labor agreement escalations. Other operating expenses were $15.7 million higher primarily due to higher reimbursable expenses, freight, demobilization and training costs. Leased-in equipment costs were $1.0 million higher primarily due to an increase in aircraft and non-aircraft leases.
Government Services
Revenues from Government Services were $49.8 million higher in the Current Year due to the commencement of the IRCG contract and higher UKSAR revenues primarily due to favorable foreign exchange rate impacts and the commencement of fixed wing services. Operating income was $16.0 million lower primarily due to higher expenses attributable to the commencement of new contracts in Ireland and the UK, partially offset by the higher revenues. Operating expenses were $57.9 million higher primarily due to higher subcontractor costs of $28.2 million, which are expected to subside as transitions to the new contracts conclude in 2026, higher amortization of deferred costs of $7.7 million, increased personnel costs of $15.1 million and other operating expenses of $9.4 million, partially offset by lower repairs and maintenance costs of $2.5 million primarily due to increased vendor credits. Additionally, general and administrative costs and depreciation and amortization expenses were $4.4 million and $3.5 million higher, respectively, primarily due to the ongoing transitions of the new Government Services contracts.
Offshore Energy Services. Revenues from Offshore Energy Services were $113.1 million higher in the Current Year compared to the Prior Year. Revenues in Africa were $47.4 million higher primarily due to higher utilization and increased rates. Revenues in the Americas were $36.1 million higher primarily due to higher utilization and the commencement of new contracts in Brazil. Revenues in Europe were $29.7 million higher primarily due to the commencement of a new contract in Norway. Operating income was $86.6 million higher in the Current Year primarily due to these higher revenues. Operating income was negatively impacted by higher repairs and maintenance costs of $20.1 million and operating personnel costs of $8.7 million, both primarily due to increased activity, partially offset by lower fuel costs of $5.5 million due to lower fuel prices.
Government Services. Revenues from Government Services were $7.6 million lower in the Current Year primarily due to a change in rates after transitioning to the long-term contract with the Dutch Caribbean Coast Guard (“DCCG”). Operating income was $8.5 million lower in the Current Year. In addition to lower revenues, operating income was also impacted by higher personnel costs of $6.8 million primarily due to the finalization of a labor agreement in the UK and higher other operating costs of $1.6 million due to the commencement of the IRCG and UKSAR2G contracts. These increases in operating expenses were partially offset by lower general and administrative expenses of $3.1 million in the Current Year, primarily due to lower professional services fees, and lower depreciation and amortization expense of $1.4 million. Fuel costs were $1.4 million lower due to lower global fuel prices, and repairs and maintenance costs were $1.0 million lower primarily due to decreased activity.
Other Services. Revenues from Other Services were $12.6 million higher in the Current Year primarily due to higher utilization and increased rates. Operating income from Other Services was $1.7 million lower in the Current Year primarily due to higher operating costs in fixed wing services of $12.7 million due to increased subcontractor costs, training and fuel expenses. Depreciation and amortization was $1.6 million higher than the Prior Year.
Corporate. Total expenses for Corporate were $2.3 million higher in the Current Year primarily due to the full-year impact of increased headcount.
Gains (losses) on disposal of assets.
During the Current Year, the Company sold or otherwise disposed of 13 helicopters and various other assets, resulting in net losses of $1.0 million, compared to $1.1 million of net gains in the Prior Year primarily due to the sale of eight helicopters and disposal of various other assets.
Interest expense, net.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (1)
Additionally, the market price of fuel has historically fluctuated substantially and continues to be volatile due to a multitude of unpredictable factors, including global crude oil prices, fuel supply and demand, geopolitical conflicts and instability, natural disasters, and fuel production and transportation infrastructure, as well as other, indirect factors. Changes in any of these factors could drive rapid, significant changes in fuel prices in short periods of time. For example, we are currently experiencing increased fuel prices due to the ongoing conflict inwith Iran. Although we are able to recoup fuel costs from our customers through the majority of our contracts, we may experience delays from the time the costs are incurred and the period in which we are able to assess such costs to our customers. Additionally, we may be unable to increase our rates enough to fully offset the impact of increases in fuel prices on certain contracts and in markets such as our regular passenger transport business in Australia, especially if such price increases were to sustain for a prolonged period. Therefore, any increase in our rates to offset increased fuel prices may take several months to implement, may not be sustainable, may reduce general demand for our services and may also eventually impact our operations, strategic growth and investment plans for the future.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Acquisition of Berry Aviation”
New heading “Exit of Norway Offshore Energy Services Business”
New heading “2025 Sustainability Report”
New heading “Offshore Energy Services”
New heading “Government Services”
Largest changes
“Revenues from Government Services were $4.4 million higher in the Current Quarter. UKSAR revenues were $1.6 million higher primarily due to the commencement of operations at two second-generation UK search and rescue (“UKSAR2G”) seasonal bases and increased rates from annual rate escalations. Irish Coast Guard ("IRCG") revenues were $1.5 million higher primarily due to the full-quarter impact of the Waterford base that commenced operations in the Preceding Quarter. Revenues in the U.S. were $1.0 million higher primarily due to higher utilization. …”see in full comparison
“Revenues from Offshore Energy Services were $23.4 million higher in the Current Year. Revenues in the Americas were $25.2 million higher primarily due to higher utilization in Brazil and Trinidad and higher rates in the U.S and Canada. Revenues in Africa were $3.8 million higher primarily due to lower penalties related to aircraft availability, higher rates, higher utilization and higher fuel revenues due to higher fuel prices, partially offset by the conclusion of fixed-wing operations. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (87)
In the discussions that follow, the terms “Current Quarter”, “Preceding Quarter” and “Prior YearPreceding Quarter” refer to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, December 31, 20252026 and March 31, 2026, respectively, and “Current Year” and “Prior Year” refer to the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements are statements about our future business, strategy, operations, capabilities and results; financial projections; plans and objectives of our management, including our expectations regarding our quarterly dividend program and our intention to pay down debt; expected actions by us and by third parties, including our customers, competitors, vendors and regulators; and other matters. Some of the forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “believes," “belief," “forecasts," “expects," “plans," “anticipates," “intends," “projects," “estimates," “may," “might," “will," “would," “could," “should” or other similar words; however, all statements in this AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K,10-Q, other than statements of historical fact or historical financial results, are forward-looking statements.
•the possibility that we may be unable to maintain compliance with covenants in our financing or other agreements;
•the possibility of changes in tax, environmental, trade, immigration and other laws and regulations and policies, including, without limitation, tariffs and actions of the governments that impact the aviation industry, oil and gas operations, favor renewable energy projects or address climate change;
•the possibility that reductions in spending on aviation services by governmental agencies where we are seeking contracts could adversely affect or lead to modifications of the procurement process or that such reductions in spending could adversely affect searchGovernment and rescue (“SAR”)Services contract terms or otherwise delay service or the receipt of payments under such contracts; and
The above description of risks and uncertainties is by no means all-inclusive, but is designed to highlight what we believe are important factors to consider. All forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are qualified by these cautionary statements and are only made as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect our businesses, particularly those discussed in greater detail in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of the Annual Report on Form 10-K and Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and ResultResults of Operations” and Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of the Company’s subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
Bristow Group Inc. is a leading global provider of mission-critical aviation services for government entities, offshore energy companies and other customers around the world. Our business is comprised of three operating segments: Offshore Energy Services (OES), Government Services and Other Services. Through the use of helicopters, fixed-wing aircraft, unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and highly skilled personnel, we provide aviation services such as personnel transportation, offshore energy logistics, search and rescue (SAR), special missions, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) operations, maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) services, medevac, unmanned systems, on-demand cargo logistics (ODC) and other specialized aviation solutions. We are also involved in various advanced air mobility (AAM) initiatives and emerging next-generation aviation technologies.
Bristow Group Inc. is the leading global provider of innovative and sustainable vertical flight solutions. Bristow primarily provides aviation services to a broad base of offshore energy companies and government entities. Our aviation services include personnel transportation, search and rescue (“SAR”), medevac, fixed wing transportation, unmanned systems and ad-hoc helicopter services. Our business is comprised of three reportable segments: Offshore Energy Services, Government Services and Other Services. Our offshore energy customers primarily use our services to transport personnel to, from and between offshore energy installations. Our government customers primarily outsource SAR activities whereby we operate specialized helicopters and provide highly trained personnel. Our other customers primarily include fixed wing passengers utilizing our regional airline in Australia and companies that dry-lease helicopters from us in support of other industries and markets in which we do not directly compete or operate in.
BristowOur diversified customer and revenue mix, coupled with our broad geographic footprint, supports a durable and balanced business profile. We currently hashave customersa presence in Australia, Benin, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Djibouti, the Dutch Caribbean, the Falkland Islands, Ireland, Kenya, the Marshall Islands, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, the Philippines, Spain, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago,Trinidad, the United Kingdom (“UK”) and the U.S.United States (“U.S .”).
Recent Developments
Acquisition of Berry Aviation
In July 2026, the Company completed its acquisition of Berry Aviation, Inc. (“Berry Aviation”) for $105.0 million, in an all-cash transaction, subject to customary purchase price adjustments. Berry Aviation is expected to add differentiated capabilities that further strengthen the Company’s Government Services offering, including special missions, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) operations, maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) services, training and mission support, unmanned aerial systems (UAS) design and development capabilities, and on-demand cargo logistics (ODC). The acquisition is also expected to support a more diversified and balanced business profile.
Exit of Norway Offshore Energy Services Business
In June 2026, the Company announced plans to pursue the sale of its Norway Offshore Energy Services business as part of its portfolio optimization strategy. The planned divestiture aligns with the Company's disciplined approach to capital allocation and strategic portfolio management. The timing and structure of any potential transaction remain subject to market conditions and other considerations.
2025 Sustainability Report
In May 2026, the Company announced the release of its 2025 Sustainability Report, highlighting significant achievements in advanced air mobility (“AAM”), safety performance, environmental stewardship, governance and community engagement. The report highlights safety as the Company’s number one Core Value and foundation of its business. In 2025, the Company had a 13% reduction in lost workdays compared to the prior year, reflecting the discipline, training, and culture behind its Target Zero commitment. The Company’s Search and Rescue (“SAR”) operations completed 4,416 missions, logging 15,861 operating hours and assisting or rescuing 784 people worldwide. The Company also continued to advance its AAM initiatives, conducting 103 electric aircraft flights totaling more than 7,000 nautical miles. Information on our website, including the Company’s 2025 Sustainability Report, is not incorporated by reference into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
The management of our fleet involves a careful evaluation of the expected demand for helicopteraviation services across global markets, segments,segments and the types of helicoptersaircraft needed to meet this demand. Heavy and medium helicopters can fly longer distances and candistances, carry heavier payloads than light helicopters and are usually equipped with sophisticated avionics permitting them to operate in more demanding weather conditions and difficult climates. Heavy and medium helicopters are most commonly used for crew changes on large offshore production facilities and drilling rigs servicing the offshore energy industry and for SAR operations.
The table below presents the number of aircraft in our fleet as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, their distribution among the segments through which we operate, as a percentage of total revenues for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and the number of aircraft not yet reflected in our fleet as they were on order or under construction as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
______________________ (1)Under construction reflects new aircraft that the Company has either taken possession of and are undergoing additional configuration before being placed into service or are currently under construction by the Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) and pending delivery. Includes fivefour AW189 heavy helicopters.helicopters (of which one was delivered and is undergoing additional configuration).
(2)Options include 10nine AW189 heavy helicopters and sevensix H135 light-twin helicopters.
(3)Excludes leased aircraft in the Company’s possession but not yet placed in service and any orders or options for electric/hybrid vertical takeoff and landing and short takeoff and landing aircraft, collectively known as Advanced Air Mobility (“AAM”) aircraft, that may have deposits but are pending regulatory certification.
The following table identifies the types of aircraft that comprise our fleet and the number of those aircraft in our fleet as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
Revenues from Offshore Energy Services were $7.3 million higher in the Current Quarter. Revenues in Europe were $5.9 million higher primarily due to higher rates and higher fuel revenues, partially offset by lower utilization. Revenues in the Americas were $1.2 million higher primarily due to higher fuel revenues driven by higher fuel prices, partially offset by lower utilization. Revenues in Africa were consistent with the Preceding Quarter.
Operating income from Offshore Energy Services was $10.3 million higher in the Current Quarter primarily due to the higher revenues, lower operating expenses of $4.3 million, higher earnings from unconsolidated affiliates of $2.2 million and lower general and administrative expenses of $0.5 million, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense of $4.0 million.
Repairs and maintenance costs were $7.8 million lower in the Current Quarter primarily due to higher vendor credits. Personnel costs were $6.3 million lower primarily due to seasonal personnel cost variations in Norway. Fuel costs were $6.5 million higher due to higher global fuel prices, partially offset by lower flight hours. Other operating costs were $3.4 million higher primarily due to higher freight costs, reimbursable expenses, lease costs and training costs. Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates were $2.2 million higher in the Current Quarter primarily due to the timing of dividends received. Depreciation and amortization expense was higher primarily due to accelerated depreciation of assets related to a leased facility in the U.S. and capital spare parts associated with S76D medium helicopters. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to seasonal personnel cost variations in Norway.
Revenues from Offshore Energy Services were $6.9 million higher in the Current Quarter. Revenues in the Americas were $5.6 million higher primarily due to increased rates and higher utilization in the U.S. and Trinidad. Revenues in Africa were $4.0 million higher primarily due to higher utilization and other revenues driven by activity. Revenues in Europe were $2.8 million lower primarily due to lower utilization and lower reimbursable revenues in the UK, partially offset by favorable foreign exchange impacts.
Operating income from Offshore Energy Services was $6.5 million lower in the Current Quarter primarily due to higher depreciation and amortization expense of $6.0 million, higher operating expenses of $5.6 million and lower earnings from unconsolidated affiliates of $1.8 million, partially offset by the higher revenues.
The higher depreciation and amortization expense was due to the acceleration of depreciation on S76D medium helicopters resulting from a revision to their estimated useful lives. Repairs and maintenance costs were $10.6 million higher primarily due to lower vendor credits. Leased‑in equipment costs were $0.8 million higher primarily due to additional aircraft leases. Personnel costs were $3.1 million lower primarily due to lower severance costs in Africa and lower benefits costs and decreased headcount in the U.S. Other operating costs were $2.9 million lower primarily due to lower reimbursable expenses and subcontractor costs, partially offset by higher training costs. Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates were $1.8 million lower in the Current Quarter primarily due to dividends received in the Preceding Quarter.
Revenues from Government Services were $4.4 million higher in the Current Quarter. UKSAR revenues were $1.6 million higher primarily due to the commencement of operations at two second-generation UK search and rescue (“UKSAR2G”) seasonal bases and increased rates from annual rate escalations. Irish Coast Guard ("IRCG") revenues were $1.5 million higher primarily due to the full-quarter impact of the Waterford base that commenced operations in the Preceding Quarter. Revenues in the U.S. were $1.0 million higher primarily due to higher utilization. Penalties related to aircraft availability, which has been adversely impacted by continued supply chain challenges, have remained elevated in the Current Quarter but were consistent with the Preceding Quarter. Fuel revenues were consistent with the Preceding Quarter, despite increases in global fuel prices, due to contractual lags in rebilling fuel costs under UKSAR2G.
Operating loss was $2.1 million in the Current Quarter compared to operating income of $0.9 million in the Preceding Quarter primarily due to higher operating expenses of $6.1 million, higher depreciation and amortization expense of $0.7 million and higher general and administrative expenses of $0.6 million, partially offset by the higher revenues.
Personnel costs were $3.3 million higher due to the commencement of operations at certain UKSAR2G and IRCG bases, including full quarter impacts of costs that were previously deferred of $1.8 million, increased overtime costs to support the ongoing transitions of $1.0 million and one-time salary adjustments related to a labor agreement in the UK of $0.5 million. Other operating costs related to the ongoing contract transitions in the UK and Ireland were $1.3 million higher, primarily due to increased training, travel between bases, and higher base and facilities costs. Fuel costs were $1.5 million higher due to higher global fuel prices, and while fuel is typically a pass-through, there are delays between when the Company incurs the cost of fuel at prevailing market prices and is then able to recoup the fuel expense under UKSAR2G. Depreciation and amortization expense was higher primarily due to the full quarter impact of a helicopter and other assets placed into service in the Current Quarter for UKSAR2G. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to higher professional services fees and higher personnel costs.
In summary, the operating income margin in the Current Quarter was adversely impacted by total penalties related to aircraft availability of $3.6 million, fuel expenses in excess of fuel revenues of $1.5 million, and certain transition costs that have persisted beyond the commencement of operations at select bases.
Revenues from Government Services were $7.8 million higher in the Current Quarter primarily due to the transition of the Irish Coast Guard ("IRCG") contract, including the full quarter impact of the Sligo base that commenced operations in the Preceding Quarter and the commencement of operations at the final base in Waterford in the Current Quarter. Operating income was $0.9 million in the Current Quarter compared to an operating loss of $1.6 million in the Preceding Quarter primarily due to the higher revenues, partially offset by higher operating expenses of $4.8 million and higher general and administrative expenses of $0.5 million. The increase in operating expenses was due to higher repairs and maintenance costs of $2.3 million primarily related to the timing of repairs, higher personnel costs of $1.6 million due to increased operating personnel headcount in Ireland and higher leased-in equipment costs of $0.5 million related to ongoing transition activities on the second-generation UK search and rescue (“UKSAR2G”) contract. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to higher professional services fees.
Revenues from Other Services were $3.2$11.4 million lowerhigher in the Current Quarter primarily due to lowerhigher seasonal utilization inand Australia,higher partiallyfuel offset by favorable foreign exchange rate impacts.revenues. Operating lossincome was $1.3$2.9 million in the Current Quarter compared to an operating incomeloss of $1.5$1.3 million in the Preceding Quarter, primarily due to the lowerhigher seasonal revenues,revenues and lower general and administrative expenses of $0.5 million, partially offset by lowerhigher operating expenses of $0.4$7.7 million related to lowerincreased activity.activity and higher fuel prices.
Operating loss was $0.6$6.6 million higher in the Current Quarter compared to an operating loss of $10.0 million in the Preceding Quarter, primarily due to lower net gains on asset dispositions of $7.6$7.5 million, partially offset by lower general and administrative expenses of $0.8 million in the Current Quarter compareddue to netlower lossescompensation ofcosts $2.1related millionto inlower the Preceding Quarter.headcount. During the Current Quarter, the Company sold one AW139 medium helicopter, one AS365 medium helicopter, one fixed wing aircraft and various other assets, resulting in net gains of $0.1 million. During the Preceding Quarter, the Company sold two heavy helicopters and various other assets.assets Duringresulting thein Precedingnet Quarter, the Company sold or otherwise disposedgains of a$7.6 heavy helicopter and various other assets.million.
Interest income was $1.0 million higher in the Current Quarterlower primarily due to income earned from U.S. Treasury bill investments on certain escrowed investment balances usedfunds in the satisfactionPreceding and discharge of the 6.875% Senior Notes.Quarter.
Interest expense was $3.4$1.6 million higherlower primarily due to higher debt balances andthe concurrent interest expense incurred during the refinancing of the Company’s 6.875% Senior Secured Notes in the Preceding Quarter, partially offset by a full quarter of interest expense incurred on the 6.750% Senior Secured Notes.
Loss on extinguishment of debt was $2.8 million in the Preceding Quarter due to the write offwrite-off of unamortized deferred financing fees associated with the redemption of the 6.875% Senior Notes.
Other expense, net of $5.4$8.9 million in the Current Quarter was primarily due to non-cash foreign exchange losses.losses of $7.7 million and pension-related costs of $1.9 million, partially offset by gains related to insurance claims of $0.7 million. Other expense, net of $2.9$5.4 million in the Preceding Quarter was primarily resulteddue fromto pension-related costs of $4.9 million andnon-cash foreign exchange losses of $3.1 million, partially offset by gains on insurance recoveries of $5.0 million.losses.
Income tax expense was $3.4 million lower in the Current Quarter primarily due to higher tax credit utilization in Nigeria.
Results of Operations for Current Year compared to Prior Year (in thousands, except percentages) The following table presents our operating results and other statement of operations information for the Current Year and Prior Year:
Flight Hours by Segment
Offshore Energy Services
Revenues from Offshore Energy Services were $23.4 million higher in the Current Year. Revenues in the Americas were $25.2 million higher primarily due to higher utilization in Brazil and Trinidad and higher rates in the U.S and Canada. Revenues in Africa were $3.8 million higher primarily due to lower penalties related to aircraft availability, higher rates, higher utilization and higher fuel revenues due to higher fuel prices, partially offset by the conclusion of fixed-wing operations. Revenues in Europe were $5.6 million lower primarily due to lower utilization and lower reimbursable revenues, partially offset by favorable foreign exchange rate impacts, higher rates and lower penalties related to aircraft availability.
Operating income was $0.8 million higher in the Current Year primarily due to the higher revenues and higher earnings from unconsolidated affiliates of $2.3 million coupled with lower general and administrative expenses of $0.6 million, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense of $16.4 million and higher operating expenses of $9.0 million.
Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates were higher in the Current Year primarily due to the timing of dividends received. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to lower IT and travel costs, partially offset by higher professional services fees. Depreciation and amortization expense was higher primarily due to the acceleration of depreciation on S76D medium helicopters and depreciation related to a base closure. Personnel costs were $8.6 million higher primarily due to increased headcount in Brazil and Africa related to increased activity, unfavorable foreign exchange rate impacts and higher overtime and benefits costs in Norway, partially offset by decreased headcount in the UK and the U.S. Fuel costs were $6.9 million higher primarily due to higher global fuel prices. Leased-in equipment costs were $3.0 million higher primarily due to increased aircraft and facilities leases. Other operating costs were $7.9 million lower primarily due to lower subcontractor costs, reimbursable expenses and training costs, partially offset by higher property and other taxes, freight costs and passenger and landing fees. Repairs and maintenance costs were $1.7 million lower primarily due to higher vendor credits.
Government Services
Revenues from Government Services were $41.7 million higher in the Current Year primarily due to the commencement of the IRCG and UKSAR2G operations of $34.3 million, favorable foreign exchange rate impacts of $8.0 million and higher fuel revenues of $1.0 million, partially offset by higher penalties of $1.9 million due to aircraft availability primarily attributable to OEM delays in the UK and Ireland, which have remained elevated in the Current Year.
Operating income was $5.3 million lower primarily due to higher operating expenses of $41.6 million, higher depreciation and amortization expense of $2.9 million and higher general and administrative expenses of $2.5 million, offsetting the increased revenues.
Other operating costs were $17.4 million higher primarily due to higher pass-through subcontractor costs related to the fixed wing element of the IRCG and UKSAR2G contracts, increased amortization of deferred costs for the bases that have commenced operations and higher training costs. Personnel costs were $16.8 million higher primarily due to increased headcount in Ireland and the recognition of costs that were previously deferred until the commencement of operations at the IRCG and UKSAR2G bases. Leased-in equipment costs were $1.3 million higher due to additional leased operating bases in the UK and Ireland. Repairs and maintenance costs were $3.9 million higher due to the timing of repairs. Fuel costs were $2.4 million higher due to higher global fuel prices and increased activity. Depreciation and amortization expense was $2.9 million higher due to the additional assets placed into service for IRCG and UKSAR2G. General and administrative expenses were $2.5 million higher primarily due to higher personnel costs related to the commencement of operations at IRCG.
In summary, the operating income margin in the Current Year was adversely impacted by total penalties related to aircraft availability of $6.6 million in the UK and Ireland, fuel expenses in excess of fuel revenues of $1.4 million and certain transition costs that have persisted beyond the commencement of operations at select bases.
Other Services
Revenues from Other Services were $8.5 million higher in the Current Year primarily due to increased activity in Australia, partially offset by lower revenues resulting from the conclusion of certain dry-lease contracts. Operating income from Other Services was $1.2 million lower primarily due to higher operating expenses of $10.2 million, offsetting the higher revenues of $8.5 million, and lower depreciation and amortization expenses of $0.5 million. Fuel costs were $4.9 million higher due to higher fuel prices. Personnel costs were $3.2 million higher due to increased headcount. Repairs and maintenance and other operating costs were $1.7 million higher primarily due to higher activity.
Corporate
Operating losses were $3.8 million lower than the Prior Year primarily due to increased gains on disposal of assets of $2.1 million and lower general and administrative expenses of $2.0 million. During the Current Year, the Company sold or otherwise disposed of one AW189 heavy helicopter as part of a sale lease-back transaction, one S92 heavy helicopter, one AS365 medium helicopter, one AW139 medium helicopter and various other assets resulting in net gains of $7.8 million. During the Prior Year, the Company sold or otherwise disposed of two AW139 medium helicopters and various other assets, resulting in net gains of $5.7 million.
Interest income was $2.6 million higher in the Current Year primarily due to higher investment balances and income from U.S. Treasury bill investments related to escrowed funds used in the satisfaction and discharge of the 6.875% Senior Secured Notes.
Interest expense, net was $6.5 million higher in the Current Year primarily due to lower capitalized interest related to aircraft that were placed into service of $4.5 million, higher interest expense of $2.8 million on higher debt balances and concurrent interest expense incurred during the refinancing of the Senior Secured Notes, partially offset by lower amortization of deferred financing costs of $0.7 million due to prepayments of principal on the Company’s UKSAR Debt in the Prior Year.
Other expense, net was $14.3 million in the Current Year primarily due to foreign exchange losses of $12.2 million and pension-related costs of $2.8 million, partially offset by other income of $0.7 million related to gains on insurance proceeds. Other income, net was $29.0 million in the Prior Year primarily due to foreign exchange gains.
Income tax expense was $27.0 million lower in the Current Year primarily due to lower pretax book income.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $342.1$312.3 million of unrestricted cash and $51.5$59.3 million of remaining availability under our ABL Facility for total liquidity of $393.6$371.6 million. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, approximately 55%43% of our total cash balance was held outside the U.S. Most of our cash held outside the U.S. could be repatriated to the U.S., and any such repatriation could be subject to additional taxes. If cash held by non-U.S. operations is required for funding operations in the U.S., we may make a provision for additional taxes in connection with repatriating this cash, which is not expected to have a significant impact on our results of operations.
VTOL insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 13 filings (6 insiders, 13 trade dates, 57,358 shares, about $2.6M). Net open-market shares: -57,358 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$2.6M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | Solus Alternative Asset Management Lp |
Open-market sale | 897 | $43.00 | $38.6K |
| 2026-09-22 | Solus Alternative Asset Management Lp |
Open-market sale | 377 | $43.00 | $16.2K |
| 2026-09-22 | Brass Lorin L. |
Open-market sale | 3,000 | $42.42 | $127.3K |
| 2026-09-21 | Brass Lorin L. |
Open-market sale | 1,000 | $41.54 | $41.5K |
| 2026-09-14 | Pucillo Christopher |
Open-market sale | 3,000 | $43.03 | $129.1K |
| 2026-09-11 | Pucillo Christopher |
Open-market sale | 5,000 | $43.00 | $215.0K |
| 2026-09-03 | Pucillo Christopher |
Open-market sale | 41 | $45.75 | $1.9K |
| 2026-09-02 | Pucillo Christopher |
Open-market sale | 12,045 | $45.68 | $550.2K |
| 2026-09-01 | Pucillo Christopher |
Open-market sale | 15,000 | $45.85 | $687.8K |
| 2026-09-01 | Brass Lorin L. |
Open-market sale | 350 | $46.03 | $16.1K |
| 2026-09-01 | Truelove Brian D. |
Open-market sale | 3,500 | $45.87 | $160.5K |
| 2026-08-25 | Brass Lorin L. |
Open-market sale | 200 | $46.55 | $9.3K |
| 2026-08-20 | Stavley Stuart |
Open-market sale | 10,218 | $46.20 | $472.1K |
| 2026-08-20 | Brass Lorin L. |
Open-market sale | 100 | $47.05 | $4.7K |
| 2026-08-19 | Brass Lorin L. |
Open-market sale | 1,890 | $46.56 | $88.0K |
| 2026-08-19 | Miller Maryanne |
Open-market sale | 430 | $46.05 | $19.8K |
| 2026-08-18 | Brass Lorin L. |
Open-market sale | 100 | $46.55 | $4.7K |
| 2026-08-17 | Brass Lorin L. |
Open-market sale | 210 | $46.78 | $9.8K |
| 2026-06-03 | Brass Lorin L. |
Grant/award | 3,618 | — | — |
| 2026-06-03 | Kern Wesley E. |
Grant/award | 3,618 | — | — |
| 2026-06-03 | Mickelson George Mark |
Grant/award | 3,618 | — | — |
| 2026-06-03 | Shah Shefali A |
Grant/award | 3,618 | — | — |
| 2026-06-03 | Manzo Robert |
Grant/award | 3,618 | — | — |
| 2026-06-03 | Miller Maryanne |
Grant/award | 3,618 | — | — |
| 2026-06-03 | Truelove Brian D. |
Grant/award | 3,618 | — | — |
Well-known investors holding VTOL (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 365,942 | $15.1M | 0.01% | Added 111% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 156,616 | $6.5M | 0.0% | Added 17% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 142,698 | $5.9M | 0.0% | Added 4% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 142,241 | $5.9M | 0.0% | Added 19% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 88,198 | $3.6M | 0.0% | Reduced 40% |
| Polen Capital Management | 2026-06-30 | 7,483 | $350.9K | — | Sold out |