Companies › VTS

VTS 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Vitesse Energy, Inc. · NYSE · Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas · CIK 1944558 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Vitesse Energy, Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

6 / 21risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
1new risk-factor headings
2Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-03-02 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-03-12 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

6new paragraphs
21removed paragraphs
26reworded paragraphs
22,161 → 19,859words in section

New heading “Certain economic and geopolitical conditions, and the negative global and economic impact resulting from such conditions or any other geopolitical tensions, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.”

Removed heading “The ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East have caused unstable market and economic conditions and may have additional global consequences. Our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially adversely affected by the negative global and economic impact resulting from such conflicts or any other geopolitical tensions.”

Removed heading “If the Distribution does not qualify as a transaction that is tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Jefferies and holders of Jefferies common stock who received shares of our common stock in connection with the Spin-Off could be subject to significant tax liability.”

Removed heading “We agreed to numerous restrictions to preserve the non-recognition treatment of the Distribution, which may reduce our strategic and operating flexibility.”

Removed heading “Some stockholders might be deemed to have received a taxable distribution as a result of our repurchase of our own stock.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: ukraine, middle east
“The ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East have caused unstable market and economic conditions and may have additional global consequences. Our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially adversely affected by the negative global and economic impact resulting from such conflicts or any other geopolitical tensions.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: cyberattack, ransomware, artificial intelligence
“We are not able to anticipate, detect or prevent all cyberattacks, particularly because the methodologies used by attackers change frequently or may not be recognized until an attack is already underway or significantly thereafter, and because attackers are increasingly using technologies designed to circumvent cybersecurity measures and avoid detection. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: breach, covenant
“In connection with the Spin-Off, we entered into a Tax Matters Agreement with Jefferies. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: breach, covenant
“We entered into a Tax Matters Agreement with Jefferies, which sets out each party’s rights and obligations with respect to U.S. federal, state, local or non-U.S. taxes for periods before and after the Distribution and related matters such as filing of tax returns and conduct with the Internal Revenue Services or otherwise with respect to any tax audit or proceeding. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: lawsuit, regulation
“Oil and gas sector activity on federal lands have become subject to increasing regulatory scrutiny. We and our operators are affected by the adoption of new or more stringent laws, regulations and policy directives that, for economic, environmental protection or other policy reasons, could increase the operating costs of, or otherwise curtail exploration and development drilling for oil and natural gas. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: litigation, regulation, climate

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Increasing attention to climate change, increasing societal expectations on companies to address climate change, increasing investor and societal expectations regarding voluntary ESG disclosures, increasing mandatory ESG disclosures, and increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil and natural gas may result in increased costs, reduced demand for our products, reduced profits, increased administrative, legislative, and judicial scrutiny, reputational damage, and negative impacts on our access to capital markets. To the extent that societal pressures or political or other factors are involved, it is possible that the Company could be subject to additional governmental investigations, private litigation or activist campaigns as stockholders may attempt to effect changes to the Company’s business or governance practices. Moreover, any new regulations or initiatives related to the disclosure of climate- or ESG-related risks could lead to reputational or other harm with customers, regulators, lenders, investors or other stakeholders and could also increase litigation risks.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (53)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 2 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Added

■We could have an indemnification obligation to Jefferies in certain circumstances if the Distribution were determined not to qualify for tax-free treatment for U.S. federal tax purposes.

Removed

■If the Distribution does not qualify as a transaction that is tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Jefferies and holders of Jefferies common stock who received shares of our common stock in connection with the Spin-Off could be subject to significant tax liability.

Added

■The IRS Forms 1099-DIV that our stockholders receive from their brokers may over-report dividend income, which may result in a stockholder’s overpayment of tax by U.S. holders of our common stock and over withholding on non-U.S. holders of our common stock.

Removed

■The IRS Forms 1099-DIV that our stockholders receive from their brokers may over-report dividend income with respect to our common stock for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which may result in a stockholder’s overpayment of tax. In addition, failure to report dividend income in a manner consistent with the IRS Forms 1099-DIV may cause the IRS to assert audit adjustments to a stockholder’s U.S. federal income tax return. For non-U.S. holders of our common stock, brokers or other withholding agents may overwithhold taxes from dividends paid, in which case a stockholder generally would have to timely file a U.S. tax return or an appropriate claim for refund to claim a refund of the overwithheld taxes.

Removed

■Some stockholders might be deemed to have received a taxable distribution as a result of our repurchase of our own stock.

Removed

■whether the Lucero Acquisition is accretive and may be dilutive to our earnings per share;

Removed

■the ultimate timing, outcome and results of integrating and executing on Lucero’s operations;

Reworded

■political and economic conditions, including embargoes, in oil-producing countries such as Venezuela or affecting other oil-producing activity;

Reworded

These factors and the volatility of the energy markets make it extremely difficult to predict oil and natural gas prices. A substantial or extended decline in oil or natural gas prices,prices suchhas asin the significant and rapid decline that occurred in 2020, haspast resulted in and could result in future impairments of our proved oil and natural gas properties and may materially and adversely affect our future business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or ability to finance planned capital expenditures. To the extent oil and natural gas prices received from production are insufficient to fund planned capital expenditures, we may be required to reduce spending or borrow or issue additional equity to cover any such shortfall. Lower oil and natural gas prices may limit our ability to comply with the covenants under our Revolving Credit Facility or limit our ability to access borrowing availability thereunder, which is dependent on many factors including the value of our proved reserves.

Reworded

In addition, fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices have impacted unit-basedequity-based compensation expense for our Predecessor for prior periods and may impact our stock-based compensation expense. For example, in prior periods we have experienced increases to our unit-basedequity-based compensation expense primarily due to increased oil and natural gas prices causing the estimated fair value of the liabilities associated with such unit-basedequity-based compensation to increase, which contributed to net losses recorded during such periods. As a result of the foregoing and other factors, we may continue to incur net losses in the future.

Reworded

Because the rate of production from oil and natural gas properties generally declines as reserves are depleted, our future success depends upon our ability to economically find or acquire and produce additional oil and natural gas reserves. Except to the extent that we acquire additional properties containing proved reserves, conduct successful development activities or, through engineering studies, identify additional behind-pipe zones or secondary recovery reserves, our proved reserves will decline as our reserves are produced. We have added significant net wells and production from wellbore-only acquisitions, where we don’t hold the underlying leasehold interest that would entitle us to participate in future wells. Future oil and natural gas production, therefore, is highly dependent upon our level of success in acquiring or finding additional reserves that are economically recoverable. We cannot assure you that we will be able to find or acquire and develop additional reserves at an acceptable cost.

Reworded

The DAPL, a major pipeline transporting oil from the Williston Basin, is subject to ongoing litigation that could threaten its continued operation. In July 2020, a federal district court vacated the DAPL’s easement to cross the Missouri River at Lake Oahe and ordered the pipeline be shut down pending the completion of an EIS to determine whether the DAPL poses a threat to the Missouri River and drinking water supply of the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation. The shut-down order was later reversed on appeal and the DAPL currently remains in operation while the Corps completes the EIS, a draft of which was completed and published for public comment in 2023, The Corps has delayed the release of the final EIS, which is now expected in 2025. Following completion of the EIS, the Corps will issue a final decision whether to grant the DAPL an easement to cross the Missouri River at Lake Oahe or to require the abandonment, removal, or reroute of that section, effectively shutting down the pipeline. Moreover,The shut-down order was later reversed on appeal, and in December 2025, the Corps issued a final EIS concluding that the Corps’ preferred alternative is that the Corps reissue its easement to DAPL subject to additional easement conditions. The Corps is expected to issue a Record of Decision in early 2026 and the DAPL currently remains in operation. However, the EIS or the Corps’ decision with respect to an easement may subsequently be challenged in court. In the interim, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe has filed suit challengingchallenged the continued operation of the DAPL without the easement.easement in federal court. The district court dismissed Standing Rock’s lawsuit, but Standing Rock has appealed that dismissal to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. As a result, a shut-down remains possible, and there is no guarantee that the DAPL will be permitted to continue operations following the completion of the EIS.operations. Any significant curtailment in gathering system or pipeline capacity, or the unavailability of sufficient third-party trucking or rail capacity, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Reworded

Seasonal weather conditions can limit drilling and completion activities, selling oil and natural gas, and other operations in some of our operating areas. In the Williston Basin, and in other areas in which our interests are located, drilling and other oil and natural gas activities on our properties can be adversely affected during the winter months by severe winter weather and drilling on our properties is generally performed during the summer and fall months. These seasonal constraints can pose challenges for meeting well drilling objectives and increase competition for equipment, supplies and personnel during the summer and fall months, which could lead to shortages and increase costs or delay operations. Additionally, many municipalities impose weight restrictions on the paved roads that lead to jobsites due to the muddy conditions caused by spring thaws. This could limit access to jobsites and our and our operators’ ability to service wells in these areas.

Reworded

Prior to the Lucero Acquisition, we have only participated in wells operated by third parties and following the Lucero Acquisition, ourOur business continues to be a predominantly non-operated business model. The success of our business operations depends on the timing of drilling activities and success of our third-party operators. If our operators are not successful in the development, exploitation, production and exploration activities relating to our leasehold interests, or are unable or unwilling to perform, our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

Reworded

An increase in oil and natural gas prices or other factors could result in increased development activity and investment in our areas of operations, which may increase competition for and cost of equipment, labor and supplies. Global, industry-wide supply chain disruptions have resulted in shortages in labor, materials and services from time to time. Such shortages have resulted in inflationary cost increases for labor, materials and services and could cause future costs to increase as well as scarcity of certain products and raw materials. To the extent inflation is elevated, our operators may experience further cost increases for their operations, including oilfield services, labor costs, and equipment if drilling activity in our operators’ areas of operations increases. In addition, there is currently significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States and various other countries, with respect to trade policies, treaties, tariffs, taxes, and other limitations on cross-border operations. Tariffs, if enacted, and any further legislation or actions taken by the U.S. federal government that restrict trade, such as trade barriers, and other protectionist or retaliatory measures taken and measures taken by other countries in response could increase the cost of operations. Shortages of, or increasing costs for, experienced drilling crews and equipment, labor or supplies could restrict our operators’ ability to conduct desired or expected operations. In addition, capital and operating costs in the oil and natural gas industry have generally risen during periods of increasing oil and natural gas prices as producers seek to increase production in order to capitalize on higher oil and natural gas prices. In situations where cost inflation exceeds oil and natural gas price inflation, our profitability and cash flow, our and our operators’ ability to complete development activities as scheduled and on budget, may be negatively impacted. Any delay in drilling or significant increase in drilling costs could reduce our revenues and profitability.

Reworded

We intend to continue to expand our operations in part through acquisitionsacquisitions, such as the Lucero Acquisition. Our decision to acquire a property will depend in part on the evaluation of data obtained from production reports and engineering studies, geophysical and geological analyses and seismic and other information, the results of which are often inconclusive and subject to various interpretations. Also, our reviews of acquired properties are inherently incomplete because it generally is not economically feasible to perform an in-depth review of the individual properties involved in each acquisition. Even a detailed review of records and properties may not necessarily reveal existing or potential problems, nor will it permit us to become sufficiently familiar with the properties to assess fully their deficiencies and potential recoverable reserves. On-site inspections are often not performed on properties being acquired, and environmental matters, such as subsurface contamination, are not necessarily observable even when an on-site inspection is undertaken. Any acquisition involves other potential risks, including, among other things:

Reworded

We may not be able to integrate the acquired assets into our existing business in an efficient and effective manner or achieve the anticipated benefits of acquisitions such as the Lucero Acquisition.acquisitions. We may not be able to accomplish this integration process successfully. The successful acquisition of properties requires an assessment of several factors, including:

Reworded

Our oil and natural gas properties are focused on the Williston Basin, which means our current producing properties and new drilling opportunities are geographically concentrated in that area. Because our oil and natural gas properties are not aswidely diversified geographically as some of our competitors,geographically, our profitability may be disproportionately exposed to the effect of any regional events, including fluctuations in prices of oil and natural gas produced from the wells in the region, natural disasters, restrictive governmental regulations, transportation capacity constraints, weather, curtailment of production or interruption of transportation and processing, and any resulting delays or interruptions of production from existing or planned new wells.

Added

Certain economic and geopolitical conditions, and the negative global and economic impact resulting from such conditions or any other geopolitical tensions, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Removed

The ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East have caused unstable market and economic conditions and may have additional global consequences. Our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially adversely affected by the negative global and economic impact resulting from such conflicts or any other geopolitical tensions.

Reworded

U.S. and global markets aremay experiencingexperience volatility and disruption followingas thea escalationresult of certain economic and geopolitical tensions,conditions, including the ongoing military conflict between Russia and Ukraine andUkraine, hostilities in the Middle East.East and the evolving situation in Venezuela. Although the length and impact of thesesuch ongoing conflictsconditions are highly unpredictable, thethese conflictsgeopolitical intensions Ukrainehave, and insuch theconditions Middlemay Eastcontinue haveto, ledlead to market disruptions, including significant volatility in oil and natural gas prices, credit and capital markets, as well as supply chain disruptions. These disruptions have caused, and could continue to cause, significant volatilityVolatility in energy prices,prices whichresulting from such disruptions could have a material effect on our business.

Reworded

Prolonged unfavorable economic conditions or uncertainty as a result of these conflictsconditions may adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Any of the foregoing may also magnify the impact of other risks described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Reworded

We have entered into agreements with third parties for hardware, software, telecommunications and other information technology services in connection with our business. In addition, we have developed or may develop proprietary software systems, management techniques and other information technologies incorporating software licensed from third parties. It is possible that we,We, or these third parties, could incur interruptions from cybersecurity attacks, computer viruses or malware, or that third-party service providers could cause a breach of our data. We believe that we have positive relations with our related vendors and maintain adequate anti-virus and malware software and controls; however, any interruptions to our arrangements with third parties for our computing and communications infrastructure or any other interruptions to, or breaches of, our information systems could lead to data corruption, communication interruption, loss of sensitive or confidential information or otherwise significantly disrupt our business operations. Although we utilize various procedures and controls to monitor these threats and mitigate our exposure to such threats, there can be no assurance that these procedures and controls will be sufficient in preventing security threats from materializing. Furthermore, various third-party resources that we rely on, directly or indirectly, in the operation of our business (such as pipelines and other infrastructure) could suffer interruptions or breaches from cyber-attacks or similar events that are entirely outside our control, and any such events could significantly disrupt our business operations or have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. ToAs of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, to our knowledge we have not experienced any material losses relating to cyber-attacks; however, there can be no assurance that we will not suffer material losses in the future.

Added

We are not able to anticipate, detect or prevent all cyberattacks, particularly because the methodologies used by attackers change frequently or may not be recognized until an attack is already underway or significantly thereafter, and because attackers are increasingly using technologies designed to circumvent cybersecurity measures and avoid detection. Cybersecurity attacks are also becoming more sophisticated and include, but are not limited to, ransomware, credential stuffing, spear phishing, social engineering, use of deepfakes (i.e., highly realistic synthetic media generated by artificial intelligence) and other attempts to gain unauthorized access to data for purposes of extortion or other malfeasance. Additionally, as cyberattacks become more sophisticated, we may incur significant cost to upgrade or enhance our security measures and procedures to protect against such cyberattacks.

Reworded

Our business could also be impacted by governmental initiatives to encourage the conservation of energy or the use of alternative energy sources. InFor addition,example, the IRA includesincluded a variety of clean-energy tax credits and establishesprovided asignificant programfinancial designedsupport tofor reduce methane emissions from oil and gas operations. These initiativesalternative or similarlower stateGHG-emitting energy production. While the OBBBA eliminated the funding for the majority of the IRA’s incentive programs, any new federal or federalstate initiatives to reduce energy consumption or encourage a shift away from fossil fuels could reduce demand for hydrocarbons and have a material adverse effect on our earnings, cash flows and financial condition. Whether,Though theit extentpresently to which, or howappears the Trump Administration or Congress will continuenot orimplement reverseany coursesuch on governmental initiatives like these cannot be predicted at this time, though the Trump Administration has indicated it will seek to remove support for such. Regardless of federal support,initiatives, states and municipalities may continue to encourage and implement decarbonization measures.measures and future federal administrations or legislatures could reintroduce such.

Reworded

Additionally, certain segments of the investor community have recently expressed negative sentiment towards investing in the oil and natural gas industry. Some organizations that provide information to investors on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings for investment and voting decisions. While such ratings do not impact all investors’ investment or voting decisions, unfavorable ESG ratings and recent activismActivism directed at shifting funding away from companies with energy-related assets could also lead to increased negative investor sentiment toward us and our industry and to the diversion of investment to other industries. Furthermore, certain other stakeholders have pressured commercial and investment banks to stop funding oil and natural gas projects. With the continued volatility in oil and natural gas prices, and the possibility that interest rates may continue to rise in the near term, increasing the cost of borrowing, certain investors have emphasized capital efficiency and free cash flow from earnings as key drivers for energy companies, especially shale producers. This may also result in aAny reduction of available capital funding for potential development projects, furtherincluding impactingoil and gas infrastructure projects upon which the operations on our properties rely, could adversely impact our future financial results.

Reworded

Increasing attention to climate change, increasing societal expectations on companies to address climate change, increasing investor and societal expectations regarding voluntary ESG disclosures, increasing mandatory ESG disclosures, and increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil and natural gas may result in increased costs, reduced demand for our products, reduced profits, increased administrative, legislative, and judicial scrutiny, reputational damage, and negative impacts on our access to capital markets. To the extent that societal pressures or political or other factors are involved, it is possible that the Company could be subject to additional governmental investigations, private litigation or activist campaigns as stockholders may attempt to effect changes to the Company’s business or governance practices. Moreover, any new regulations or initiatives related to the disclosure of climate- or ESG-related risks could lead to reputational or other harm with customers, regulators, lenders, investors or other stakeholders and could also increase litigation risks.

Reworded

While we may elect to pursue certain ESG strategies in the future, any such goals or commitments are aspirational and may not have the intended impact on our business. We may also receive pressure from investors, lenders or other groups to adopt more aggressive climate or other ESG-related goals,goals or commitments, but we cannot guarantee that we will be able to pursue or implement such goals or commitments because of potential costscosts, inaccurate assumptions or technical or operational obstacles. Moreover, failure or a perception (whether or not valid) of failure to pursue or implement ESG strategies or achieve ESG goals or commitments, including any GHG emission reduction or carbon intensity goals or commitments, could result in private litigation and damage our reputation, cause investors or consumers to lose confidence in us, and negatively impact our operations. Additionally, to the extent ESG-related matters negatively impact our reputation, we may not be able to compete as effectively to recruit or retain employees, which may adversely affect our operations. ESG-related matters may also impact our suppliers and customers, which may ultimately have adverse impacts on our operations.

Reworded

Also, institutionalcertain lendersfinancial institutions may, of their own accord, decide not to provide funding or insurance for fossil fuel energy companies or related infrastructure projects based on climate or other ESG-related concerns, which could affect our access to capital for potential growth projects.projects, In March 2024, the SEC finalized rules mandating extensive disclosure of climate risks for certain registrants. In March 2024, the SEC finalized rules mandating extensive disclosure of climate risks for certain registrants. However, the future of the rule is uncertain atthough this time given that its implementationtrend has beenwaned stayedin pendingrecent theyears. outcomeAny ofmaterial legal challenges. Moreover, on February 11, 2025, SEC Acting Chairman Mark T. Uyeda requested that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit not schedule argumentreduction in the casecapital whileavailable to the SECfossil reconsidersfuel theindustry finalizedcould rules.make Whileit themore SEC, under the new presidential administration, may seekdifficult to repealsecure orfunding otherwisefor modifyexploration, thedevelopment, rules,production, wetransportation, cannotand predictprocessing whetheractivities, such action will occur or its timings. Enhanced climate disclosure requirementswhich could resultimpact inour additional legalbusiness and accounting costs and accelerate the trendresults of certain stakeholders and lenders restricting or seeking more stringent conditions with respect to their investments in certain carbon-intensive sectors. States may pass laws imposing more expansive disclosure requirements for climate-related risks.operations. New laws, regulations, or enforcement initiatives related to the disclosure of climate-related risks could lead to reputational or other harm with customers, regulators, lenders, investors or other stakeholders and could also increase litigation risks. Any material reduction in the capital available to the fossil fuel industry could make it more difficult to secure funding for exploration, development, production, transportation, and processing activities, which could impact our business and results of operations.

Reworded

Separately,Certain existing public and governmental authorities, as well as other parties, have also heightened scrutiny around climate-change related disclosures in public filings. For example, the SEC has recently taken enforcement action against companies for ESG-related misconduct, including greenwashing (i.e., misleading informationemployment or false claims overstating potential benefits). Certain regulators, such as the SEC and various state agencies, as well as non-governmental organizations and other private actors have also filed lawsuits under various securities and consumer protection laws alleging that certain ESG-statements, goals or standards were misleading, false or otherwise deceptive. Certain employmentbusiness practices and social initiatives are the subject of scrutiny by both those calling for the continued advancement of such policies, as well as those who believe they should be curbed, including government actors, and the complex regulatory and legal frameworks applicable to such initiatives continue to evolve. We cannot be certain of the impact of such regulatory, legal and other developments on our business. More recent political developments could mean that the Company faces increasing criticism or litigation risks from certain “anti-ESG” parties, including various governmental agencies. Such sentiment may focus on the Company’s environmental or social commitments (such as reducing GHG emissions) or its pursuit of certain employment or business practices or social initiatives that are alleged to be political or polarizing in nature or are alleged to violate laws based, in part, on changing priorities of, or interpretations by, federal agencies or state governments. Consideration of ESG-related factors in the Company’s decision-making could be subject to increasing scrutiny and objection from such anti-ESG parties.

Reworded

Holders of our common stock are only entitled to receive such cash dividends as our Board, in its sole discretion, may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. We paid cash dividends of $63.6$92.1 million, $58.0$63.6 million and $36.0$58.0 million to our equity holders during the years ended December 31, 2024,2025, 20232024 and 2022,2023, respectively. We cannot assure you that we will pay dividends in the future. Any future determination relating to the payment of dividends will be dependent on a variety of factors, including any limitations imposed by covenants in the Revolving Credit Facility and any debt agreements that we may enter into in the future. Under ourthe Revolving Credit Facility, we are permitted to make cash distributions without limit to our equity holders if (i) no event of default or borrowing base deficiency (i.e., outstanding debt (including loans and letters of credit) exceeds the borrowing base) then exists or would result from such distribution and (ii) after giving effect to such distribution, (a) our total outstanding credit usage does not exceed 80% of the least of (the following collectively referred to as “Commitments”): (1) $500$500.0 million,million (2) our then-effective borrowing base, and (3) the then-effective aggregate amount of our lenders’elected commitments and (b) as of the date of such distribution, the EBITDAX Ratio does not exceed 1.50 to 1.00. If ourthe EBITDAX Ratio exceeds 1.50 to 1.00, but does not exceed 2.25 to 1.00, and if our total outstanding credit usage does not exceed 80% of the Commitments, we may also make distributions if our distributable free cash flow (as defined under the Revolving Credit Facility) is greater than $0 and we have delivered a certificate to our lenders attesting to the foregoing. The summaries above do not purport to be completecomplete. and you are encouraged to read theThe Revolving Credit Facility, whichFacility is filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for greater detail with respect to these provisions.10-K. As a consequence of these various limitations and restrictions, we may not be able to make, or may have to reduce or eliminate at any time, the payment of dividends on our common stock. If as a result, we are unable to pay dividends, investors may be forced to rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize a return on their investment. Any change in the level of our dividends or the suspension of the payment thereof could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. For additional information, please see —Risks Relating to Our Common Stock—. Although we expect to continue to pay dividends, we cannot provide assurance that we will pay dividends on our common stock, and our indebtedness may limit our ability to pay dividends on our common stock.

Added

Oil and gas sector activity on federal lands have become subject to increasing regulatory scrutiny. We and our operators are affected by the adoption of new or more stringent laws, regulations and policy directives that, for economic, environmental protection or other policy reasons, could increase the operating costs of, or otherwise curtail exploration and development drilling for oil and natural gas. For example, the BLM issued a rule in 2024 limiting venting and flaring from well sites on federal lands and requiring operators to commit to certain methane waste minimization obligations. Implementation of this rule is currently paused in several states, including North Dakota, pending ongoing legal challenges to the rule, and the BLM has separately announced it will reconsider and delay enforcement of the rule. Congress has also, from time to time, legislated changes to the fiscal terms of federal oil and gas leases. The ultimate impacts of these regulatory developments concerning BLM leases cannot be predicted at this time, but any changes to existing or new regulations on federal oil and gas leases or oil and gas infrastructure on federal lands could adversely impact our operators’ and our results of operations.

Removed

Oil and gas sector activity on federal lands have become subject to increasing regulatory scrutiny. We and our operators are affected by the adoption of new or more stringent laws, regulations and policy directives that, for economic, environmental protection or other policy reasons, could increase the operating costs of, or otherwise curtail exploration and development drilling for oil and natural gas. For example, the IRA legislated changes to the fiscal terms of federal oil and gas leases, increasing fees, rents, royalties, and bonding requirements, all of which have been implemented pursuant to a finalized BLM rule. The BLM has also finalized a rule that would require operators to limit venting and flaring from well sites on federal lands and require operators to submit a methane waste minimization plan or self-certification statement committing the operator to capture 100% of the gas produced from a well and pay royalties on lost gas as part of the permit application process. This rule is currently subject to legal challenge and its implementation is paused in several states, including North Dakota. Though the Trump Administration has announced an intent to reverse regulations that hinder oil and gas production, it is uncertain what actions the administration may take with respect to this rule or otherwise affecting oil and gas leasing on federal lands. Uncertainty over continued implementation of the Biden Administration’s SC-GHGs metric may also impact future regulatory decision- and policy-making regarding oil and gas operations on federal lands. This metric, intended to inform federal agency cost/benefits analyses, has been contested in multiple lawsuits and the Trump Administration is not expected to continue its development or use. The ultimate impacts of these regulatory initiatives concerning BLM leases and the use of the SC-GHGs metric cannot be predicted at this time, but such could affect the character of new regulations on certain federal oil and gas leases or oil and gas infrastructure on federal lands, which in turn could adversely impact our operators’ and our results of operations.

Reworded

Additionally, oil and natural gas operations and related infrastructure projects on federal lands mayare bealso impacted by recent and ongoing revisionssubject to the NEPA implementing regulations.NEPA. NEPA requires federal agencies, including the BLM and the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”), to evaluate major agency actions, such as the issuance of permits that have the potential to significantly impact the environment. In the course of such evaluations, an agency will prepare an environmental assessment that assesses the potential direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of a proposed project and, if necessary, will prepare a more detailed environmental impact statement that may be made available for public review and comment. NEPA’sFor implementingmany regulations,years, asthe promulgatedNEPA process has followed regulations issued by the CEQ,CEQ. have been subject to multiple revisionsHowever, in recentJanuary years2026, betweenCEQ theissued Trumpa andfinal Bidenrule Administrations.rescinding CEQ’s latest revisions under the Biden Administration expanded requirements to analyze the cumulative effects of the project on climate change and consider any disproportionate impact of the project on communities with environmental justice concerns as well enhance certain project obligations for implementing environmental mitigation measures. However, theseits regulations were vacated in February 2025 byfollowing a federal district court and the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recentlydecision heldlimiting similarly that CEQ does not haveCEQ’s authority to issuepromulgate bindingsuch. Further, the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent Seven County decision directed lower courts to give substantial deference to the reviewing agency’s scoping decisions in NEPA regulations.reviews. The ultimate consequences of thisthese judicial decisiondevelopments are not yet clear and the actions the Trump Administration may take, if any, in the aftermath of these decisions cannot be predicted at this time.clear.

Removed

Additionally, states in which we operate or own assets may impose new or increased taxes or fees on natural gas and oil extraction. The passage of any legislation as a result of these proposals and other similar changes in U.S. federal income tax laws or the imposition of new or increased taxes or fees on natural gas and oil extraction could increase our future tax liabilities and adversely affect our operations and cash flows.

Removed

In addition, the IRA includes, among other things, a 1% non-deductible excise tax on the fair market value of any stock repurchased by a publicly traded domestic corporation during any taxable year, with the fair market value of such repurchased stock reduced by the fair market value of certain stock issued by such corporation during such taxable year (such excise tax, the “Stock Buyback Tax”). In the past, there have been proposals to increase the amount of the Stock Buyback Tax from 1% to 4%; however, it is unclear whether such a change in the amount of the excise tax will be enacted and, if enacted, how soon any such change could take effect. Although we were not subject to the Stock Buyback Tax in 2024, share repurchases in the future under our stock repurchase program may result in us becoming subject to Stock Buyback Tax.

Removed

The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service have released proposed and final regulations and other interpretive guidance relating to the Stock Buyback Tax. Any significant variance from our current interpretation of such regulations and interpretive guidance could result in a change in our analysis of the application of the Stock Buyback Tax to us and its impact on our operations and cash flows.

Reworded

The Dodd-Frank Act contains measures aimed at increasing the transparency and stability of the OTC derivatives market and preventing excessive speculation. On January 14, 2021, the CFTC published a final rule imposing position limits for certain futures and options contracts in various commodities (including oil and gas) and for swaps that are their economic equivalents, though certain types of derivative transactions are exempt from these limits, provided that such derivative transactions satisfy the CFTC’s requirements for certain enumerated “bona fide” derivative transactions. The CFTC also has adopted final rules regarding aggregation of positions, under which a party that controls the trading of, or owns ten percent or more of the equity interests in, another party will have to aggregate the positions of the controlled or owned party with its own positions for purposes of determining compliance with position limits unless an exemption applies. The CFTC’s aggregation rules are now in effect, although CFTC staff has granted relief until August 12, 2025 from various conditions and requirements in the final aggregation rules.rules until the effective date of any codifying rulemaking. These rules may affect both the size of the positions that we may hold and the ability or willingness of counterparties to trade with us, potentially increasing the costs of transactions. Moreover, such changes could materially reduce our access to derivative opportunities, which could adversely affect revenues or cash flow during periods of low oil and natural gas prices.

Reworded

In recent years Congress has considered legislation to reduce emissions of GHGs, including methane, a primary component of natural gas, and carbon dioxide, a byproduct of the burning of natural gas. While it presently appears unlikely that comprehensive climate change legislation will be passed by Congress in the near future, certain federal laws, like the IRA, have been enacted to advance numerous climate-related objectives. TheWhile IRA contains hundredsmany of billionsthe IRA’s provisions were repealed or defunded following the change in presidential administrations and the enactment of dollarsthe OBBBA in incentives2025, forany similar or future climate-related legislation could increase costs within the developmentoil and gas industry or accelerate a transition away from fossil fuels, either of renewablewhich energy,could cleanadversely hydrogen,affect cleanour fuels, electric vehicles, supporting infrastructurebusiness and carbonresults captureof and sequestration, among other provisions.operations. Moreover, various federal agencies have adopted climate change considerations into their rulemaking and decision-making processes and have promulgated regulations that seek to restrict, monitor or otherwise limit GHG emissions. For example, in December 2023, the EPA finalized rules establishing more stringent methane and volatile organic compound emissions performance standards for oil and gas facilities. The IRA also included a first-ever fee on waste methane emissions, for which the EPA has finalizedpromulgated regulationsregulations, applicable to implement. These regulatory initiatives could increase operating costs within the oil and gas industryoperations and the IRA’s funding provisions could accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels,upon which could in turn adversely affect our business relies, that impose stringent performance standards for methane emissions, including so-called green well-completion standards, limits on venting and resultsflaring and requirements to implement enhanced leak detection and repair programs. However, there continues to be uncertainty regarding the federal regulation of operations.GHG emissions. Federal policy towards GHG emissions, and regulation thereunder, has varied significantly between the past several presidential administrations. The current Trump Administration announcedhas itsexpressed intenta topolicy seekpreference reversalof andlimiting eliminateor supportrescinding regulations concerning GHG emissions and, in February 2026 promulgated a final rule repealing the EPA’s 2009 “Endangerment Finding” that forms the basis under the CAA for such regulations and initiatives, though the extent to which and the timeline for doing so remains uncertain. Whether Congress elects to pursue legislation to repeal, revise, or otherwise limit the enforcement of these regulations and certainmost of the IRA’sEPA’s provisionsGHG-related rules. However, whether or how the EPA’s rescission of its “Endangerment Finding” and other such policies will be implemented and if they will survive any potential legal challenges, or whether future administrations or Congress may pursue new GHG emissions regulations, cannot be predicted at this time. SeveralIn the absence of federal climate legislation, several states have also implemented, of their own accord or in coordination with their neighbor states, regional initiatives and programs limiting, monitoring, or otherwise regulating GHG emissions. State, regional, and local governments may also elect to continue to participate in international climate change initiatives, despite the current Trump Administration withdrawing the United States from the Paris Agreement and related initiatives and pledges in 2025. The participation in, or support for, climate-related policies and initiatives by politicians, regulators, financial institutions, consumers and other stakeholders could increase opposition to, reduce funding for, or lead to new restrictions on, fossil fuel development and production activities, any of which could adversely affect our financial performance. See Part I. Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties—Regulation and Environmental Matters, for additional discussion of regulatory matters affecting and resulting from risks related to climate change and GHGs.

Removed

At the international level, the Paris Agreement requires member states to submit non-binding, individually determined reduction goals known as Nationally Determined Contributions every five years after 2020. The international community continues to meet annually at Conferences of the Parties to deliberate on global emissions reduction and climate-related initiatives. Recent Conferences of the Parties have resulted in reaffirmations of the goals of the Paris Agreement, calls for parties to eliminate fossil fuel subsidies, agreements to transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems and increase renewable energy capacity, financial commitments to fund energy transition efforts in developing countries, and similar initiatives, though none legally binding. While non-binding, agreements arising from any Conference of the Parties could result in increased pressure on politicians, regulators, financial institutions, consumers, and other stakeholders to reduce the use of, impose more stringent limitations on, increase opposition against, or reduce funding for, fossil fuels. The United States’ most recent goal under the Paris Agreement was to reduce its net economy-wide GHG emissions by 61-66 percent from 2005 levels by 2035. However, in January 2025, President Trump issued an executive order calling for the withdrawal of the United States from the Paris Agreement and revocation of any financial commitments thereunder as apart of a broader series of executive orders announcing a deregulatory approach with respect to climate change-related matters. Nevertheless, state or local governments may elect to continue participation in international climate change initiatives and pursue state- or regional-level climate-related regulations. Although it appears unlikely in the near-term that new federal climate-related measures will be imposed, and such new or more stringent regulations limiting or taxing the emission of GHGs, legislation restricting the production of oil and gas, or other climate-related policies having the effect of reducing the availability or attractiveness of fossil-fuel energy could reduce demand for the oil and gas we and our operators produce and sell and adversely impact our results of operations.

Reworded

Wells in the Williston Basin of North Dakota, where we own significant oil and natural gas properties, produce natural gas as well as oil. Constraints in third party natural gas gathering and processing systems in certain areas have resulted in some of that natural gas being flared instead of gathered, processed and sold. In 2014, theThe NDIC, North Dakota’s chief energy regulator, adopted a policy to reduce the volume of natural gas flared from oil wells in the Williston Basin. The NDIC requires operators to develop gas capture plans that describe how much natural gas is expected to be produced, how it will be delivered to a processor and where it will be processed. As of November 1, 2020, the enforceable gas capture percentage goal is 91%. Production caps or penalties may be imposed on certain wells that cannot meet the capture goals. It is possible that other states in which we operate, including Montana, will require gas capture plans or otherwise institute new regulatory requirements in the future to reduce flaring.

Removed

If the Distribution does not qualify as a transaction that is tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Jefferies and holders of Jefferies common stock who received shares of our common stock in connection with the Spin-Off could be subject to significant tax liability.

Removed

In connection with the Spin-Off, Jefferies’ received (1) a ruling from the IRS and (2) a tax opinion from legal counsel, each substantially to the effect that, subject to the limitations specified therein and the accuracy of and compliance with certain representations, warranties and covenants, the Distribution, together with certain related transactions, qualified as a tax-free “reorganization” for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code and the Distribution qualified as a tax-free distribution within the meaning of Section 355 of the Code.

Removed

Although the IRS ruling is generally binding on the IRS, the continuing validity of the IRS ruling is subject to the accuracy of the factual representations made in the ruling request. In addition, in rendering its tax opinion, legal counsel relied on (1) customary representations and covenants made by Jefferies and Vitesse and (2) specified assumptions, including an assumption regarding the completion of the Distribution and certain related transactions in the manner contemplated by the transaction agreements. If any of those representations, covenants or assumptions are inaccurate, the tax opinion may not be valid and the tax consequences of the Distribution and certain related transactions could differ from those described above. Notwithstanding the receipt of the IRS ruling and tax opinion, there can be no assurance that the IRS or a court will not take a contrary position and the consequences of the Distribution and certain related transactions to Jefferies and the holders of Jefferies common stock could be materially different from, and worse than, the U.S. federal income tax consequences described above.

Removed

If it were determined that the Distribution, together with certain related transactions, did not qualify as a tax-free “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code and the Distribution did not qualify as a distribution to which Section 355 of the Code applies, Jefferies would generally be subject to tax as if it sold the Vitesse common stock in a transaction taxable to Jefferies, which could result in a material tax liability. In addition, Jefferies shareholders who are U.S. holders would generally, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, be treated as receiving a distribution in an amount equal to the fair market value of our common stock received, which could result in a material tax liability.

Removed

We agreed to numerous restrictions to preserve the non-recognition treatment of the Distribution, which may reduce our strategic and operating flexibility.

Removed

We agreed in the Tax Matters Agreement to covenants and indemnification obligations that address compliance with Section 355(e) of the Code. These covenants and indemnification obligations may limit our ability to pursue strategic transactions or engage in new businesses or other transactions that may otherwise maximize the value of our business, and might discourage or delay a strategic transaction that our stockholders may consider favorable, including share repurchases, stock issuances, certain asset dispositions and other strategic transactions. To preserve the tax-free treatment of the Distribution, and in addition to our indemnity obligations described above, the Tax Matters Agreement restricts us, for the two-year period following the Distribution, except in specific circumstances, from: (1) entering into any transaction pursuant to which all or a specified portion of our stock would be acquired, whether by merger or otherwise, (2) issuing equity securities in a manner that could reasonably be expected to have adverse consequences under Section 355(e) of the Code, (3) repurchasing shares of our stock other than in certain open-market transactions, (4) ceasing to actively conduct certain of our businesses or (5) taking or failing to take any other action that prevents the Distribution and certain related transactions from qualifying as a transaction that is generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code.

Reworded

We could have an indemnification obligation to Jefferies in certain circumstances if the Distribution were determined not to qualify for tax-free treatment for U.S. federal tax purposes, or in certain other circumstances, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.purposes.

Added

We entered into a Tax Matters Agreement with Jefferies, which sets out each party’s rights and obligations with respect to U.S. federal, state, local or non-U.S. taxes for periods before and after the Distribution and related matters such as filing of tax returns and conduct with the Internal Revenue Services or otherwise with respect to any tax audit or proceeding. Pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement, we are required to indemnify Jefferies (and certain related parties) for applicable taxes and losses, resulting from, among other things, our breach of certain covenants and certain taxable gain recognized by such parties in connection with the Distribution. If we are required to indemnify Jefferies and / or certain related parties under the circumstances set forth in the Tax Matters Agreement, we may be subject to substantial liabilities, which could materially adversely affect our financial position.

Removed

In connection with the Spin-Off, we entered into a Tax Matters Agreement with Jefferies. The terms of the Tax Matters Agreement require us to indemnify Jefferies and certain related parties for certain taxes and losses that (i) result primarily from, individually or in the aggregate, the breach of certain representations and warranties made by us (including in connection with the IRS ruling or the tax opinion regarding the tax treatment of the Distribution) or covenants made by us (applicable to actions or failures to act by us and our subsidiaries following the completion of the Distribution), (ii) are attributable to actions we take following the Distribution and result from the failure of the transfer of the Vitesse Energy equity interests to Vitesse, together with the Distribution, to qualify as (a) a reorganization described in Section 355(a) and Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code, (b) a transaction in which the stock distributed thereby is “qualified property” for purposes of Sections 355(c) and 361(c) of the Code, or (c) a transaction in which Jefferies, Vitesse and the holders of Jefferies common stock recognize no income or gain for U.S. federal income tax purposes pursuant to Sections 355, 361 and 1032 of the Code, including, as a result of the application of Section 355(e) of the Code to the Distribution as a result of a 50% or greater change in ownership as described below, or (iii) are attributable to taxes with respect to Vitesse Energy or Vitesse Oil for tax periods or portions thereof ending before the Distribution, including as may arise on audit.

Removed

Even if the Distribution were otherwise to qualify as a tax-free transaction under Section 368(a)(1)(D) and Section 355 of the Code, the Distribution would be taxable to Jefferies (but not to Jefferies’ shareholders) pursuant to Section 355(e) of the Code if there were a 50% or greater change in beneficial ownership of either Jefferies or Vitesse as part of a plan or series of related transactions that included the Distribution. For this purpose, any acquisitions of Jefferies or our common stock during the four-year period beginning on the date that begins two years before the date of the Distribution are presumed to be part of such a plan, although we or Jefferies may rebut that presumption. The U.S. federal income tax rules for determining whether there has been a 50% or greater change in beneficial ownership of Jefferies and Vitesse, and the period during which that change is measured, are complex and include the aggregation and attribution rules of Section 355(e)(4)(C) of the Code. The Distribution itself does not give rise to a change in beneficial ownership, and public trading of the stock of Jefferies or Vitesse by small stockholders does not give rise to a change in beneficial ownership, but many other transactions could do so. Such transactions may include (but are not limited to) acquisitions by Vitesse or Jefferies using its own stock, the merger or consolidation of Vitesse or Jefferies with or into another company, redemptions, recapitalizations, stock dividends, and sales or issuances of stock.

Removed

Some stockholders might be deemed to have received a taxable distribution as a result of our repurchase of our own stock.

Removed

Under certain circumstances, where a corporation repurchases its own stock, certain stockholders whose stocks have not been redeemed might be deemed to have received a taxable distribution. We do not currently know if any repurchase of our stock under the Stock Repurchase Program or any other contemplated repurchase of our stocks would satisfy the circumstances under which such potential tax liability may arise. While we believe that the repurchase of our stock under the Stock Repurchase Program and any other possible contemplated repurchase of our stocks, even if it were to satisfy such circumstances, would be an “isolated redemption” which would not result in taxable income to the non-redeemed stockholders, we have not requested, nor do we intend to request, a ruling to that effect. The IRS may disagree with this position, and a successful challenge by the IRS may thus result in taxable income to such non-redeemed stockholders.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

13new paragraphs
14removed paragraphs
36reworded paragraphs
8,460 → 8,077words in section

New heading “Unless otherwise indicated, the financial, reserve and operational information presented does not reflect the Lucero Acquisition for periods prior to March 7, 2025.”

New heading “Business Combinations”

Removed heading “Predecessor Equity-Based Compensation”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: impairment, goodwill
“Any excess of the acquisition price over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill and is subject to ongoing impairment evaluation as described. Any excess of the estimated fair value of net assets acquired over the acquisition price is recorded in current earnings as a gain on bargain purchase. Deferred taxes are recorded for any differences between the assigned values and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“Unless otherwise indicated, the financial, reserve and operational information presented does not reflect the Lucero Acquisition for periods prior to March 7, 2025.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: fine
“The price at which our oil production is sold typically reflects a discount to the WTI benchmark price. The price at which our natural gas production is sold may reflect either a discount or premium to the Henry Hub benchmark price. Thus, our operating results are also affected by changes in the oil price differentials between the applicable benchmark and the sales prices we receive for our oil production. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation
“General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense increased to $24.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $23.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2025, $7.1 million of litigation costs were reimbursed as a result of the settlement discussed in Note 11 (“Commitments and Contingencies”) to the Consolidated Financial Statements. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Predecessor Equity-Based Compensation”
see in full comparison
New text
“Business Combinations”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (63)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 15 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

This section generally discusses certain 20242025 and 20232024 items and certain year-to-year comparisons between 20242025 and 2023.2024. Discussions of 20222023 items and year-to-year comparisons between 20232024 and 20222023 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, filed on FebruaryMarch 24,12, 20242025 which is incorporated herein by reference.

Added

Unless otherwise indicated, the financial, reserve and operational information presented does not reflect the Lucero Acquisition for periods prior to March 7, 2025.

Reworded

Our business strategy is focused on creating long-term stockholder value through the profitable acquisition, development and production of oil and natural gas assets that provide an attractive return on invested capital, while maintaining a strong balance sheet and distributing a meaningful dividend to our stockholders. We have historically investedinvest in non-operated minority working and mineral interests in oil and natural gas properties with our core area of focus currently in the Bakken and Three Forks formations of the Williston Basin of North Dakota and Montana, although we have assumed limited operations in the Williston Basin through the Lucero Acquisition.Montana. We also have interests in wells in the Denver-Julesburg Basin located in Colorado and Wyoming and the Powder River Basin located in Wyoming. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had a working interest in 6,0716,402 gross (168.2226.1 net) productive wells and 248283 gross (9.76.1 net) wells that were being drilled or completed, and an additional 362336 gross (8.015.9 net) wells that had been permitted for development by us or our operators. In addition, we had a royalty only interest in 1,1801,301 gross (2.83.2 net) productive wells.

Added

On March 7, 2025, we closed the Lucero Acquisition pursuant to which we acquired Lucero in an all-stock transaction. Lucero shareholders received 8,169,368 shares of Vitesse common stock. Lucero is an oil and natural gas operator with assets in the Bakken and Three Forks formations in the Williston Basin area of North Dakota.

Removed

On December 15, 2024, Vitesse and Lucero entered into the Lucero Arrangement Agreement, pursuant to which, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, Vitesse would acquire all of the issued and outstanding Lucero common shares, in an all stock transaction, pursuant to a Plan of Arrangement, with Lucero becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Vitesse. The Arrangement was subject to the approval by the Alberta Court, Vitesse and Lucero equity holders and certain other customary conditions precedent. On March 7, 2025, the Lucero Acquisition was consummated pursuant to which we acquired Lucero in an all-stock transaction. Lucero shareholders received 0.01239 of a share of Vitesse common stock for each common share of Lucero with 8,169,368 shares of Vitesse common stock issued. Lucero is an oil and natural gas operator with assets in the Bakken and Three Forks formations in the Williston Basin area of North Dakota. Upon completion of the Lucero Acquisition, prior Vitesse stockholders owned approximately 80% and prior Lucero shareholders owned approximately 20% of the common stock of the Company on a fully diluted basis.

Removed

The Lucero Acquisition is expected to strengthen our balance sheet and cash flows and serve to enhance our competitive strengths by increasing the optionality of our capital deployment through adding a limited operating function while maintaining our focus on assets in the Williston Basin. This acquisition is expected to increase future revenue, expenses, cash flows and capital expenditures.

Reworded

Commodity prices are a significant factor impacting our earnings, operating cash flows and our acquisition and divestiture strategy, as well as the decisions of us and our operators in conducting operations. During the last several years, prices for oil and natural gas have experienced periodic downturns and sustained volatility, impacted by thegeneral COVID-19 pandemiceconomic and recovery,political conditions, the ongoing military conflict between Russia and Ukraine, conflicthostilities in the Middle East, the evolving situation in Venezuela, supply chain constraints, elevated interest rates and costs of capital, and reductionschanges in production by OPEC and its key member, Saudi Arabia, and certain other non-OPEC oil-producing countries.

Reworded

As a result of such commodity price volatility, which we expect to continue throughout 2025,2026, our earnings and operating cash flows can vary substantially. While we do hedge a substantial portion of our production, we are still significantly subject to movements in commodity prices. Such volatility can make it difficult to predict future effects on our financial results and the decisions of our operators. Factors that we expect will continue to impact commodity prices include product demand connected with global economic conditions, inflationary factors, industry production and inventory levels, the United States Department of Energy’s planned repurchases (or possible releases) of oil from the strategic petroleum reserve, technology advancements, production quotas or other actions imposed by OPEC and other oil-producing countries, the imposition of and changes in tariffs and other controls on imports and exports and resulting consequences,consequences of such, actions of regulators, and regional supply interruptions or fears thereof that may be caused by military conflicts, civil unrest or political uncertainty.uncertainty, including a prolonged U.S. government shutdown. Any of the foregoing can have a substantial impact on the prices of oil and natural gas, which in turn impacts our decisions and the decision of our operators to drill and extract resources.

Reworded

We derive our revenues from the sale of oil and natural gas produced from our properties. Revenues are a function of the volume produced, the prevailing market price at the time of sale, oil quality, Btu content and transportation costs to market. We use derivative instruments to hedge future sales prices on a substantial, but varying, portion of our oil production. We also entered into a number of costless collars forand natural gas in the first quarter of 2025.production. We expect our derivative activities will help us achieve more predictable cash flows and reduce our exposure to downward price fluctuations. The use of derivative instruments has in the past, and may in the future, prevent us from realizing the full benefit of upward price movements but also mitigates the effects of declining price movements.

Reworded

Commodity derivatives gain (loss), net. We utilize commodity derivative financial instruments to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in the prices of oil and natural gas. Gain (loss) on commodity derivatives, net is comprised of (i1) cash gains and losses we recognize on settled commodity derivatives during the period, and (ii2) non-cash mark-to-market gains and losses we incur on commodity derivative instruments outstanding at period-end.

Reworded

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses include overhead, including payroll and benefits for our corporate staff, costs of maintaining our headquarters, costs of managing our acquisition and development operations, franchise taxes, audit and other professional fees and legal compliance. For fiscal 2024 and 2023,2025, general and administrative expenses included non-recurring costs related to the Lucero Acquisition and an offset for reimbursement of past legal expenses as a result of the Spin-Off,settlement respectively.discussed in Note 11 (“Commitments and Contingencies”) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Reworded

Interest expense. We finance a portion of our working capital requirements, capital expenditures and acquisitions with borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. As a result, we incur interest expense that is affected by both fluctuations in interest rates and our financing decisions. We do not capitalize any portion of the interest paid on applicable borrowings. We include the amortization of deferred financing costs, commitment fees and annual agency fees as interest expense.

Reworded

■changes in the fairrealized valuegains ofand thelosses on our derivative instruments;

Reworded

■our ability to continue to identify and acquire producing properties, high-quality acreage and drilling opportunities; and ■the level of our operating expenses.

Reworded

The price that we receive for the oil and natural gas we produce is largely a function of market supply and demand. Because our oil and gas revenues are heavily weighted toward oil, we are more significantly impacted by changes in oil prices than by changes in the price of natural gas. Worldwide supply in terms of output, especially production from properties within the United States, the production quotas set by OPEC and certain other oil-producing countries, the conflictsconflict in UkraineUkraine, andhostilities in the Middle EastEast, the evolving situation in Venezuela and the strength of the U.S. dollar can adversely impact oil prices.

Removed

The price at which our oil production is sold typically reflects a discount to the WTI benchmark price. The price at which our natural gas production is sold may reflect either a discount or premium to the Henry Hub benchmark price. Thus, our operating results are also affected by changes in the oil price differentials between the applicable benchmark and the sales prices we receive for our oil production. Our oil price differential to the weighted average WTI benchmark price during the year ended December 31, 2024 was negative $5.90 per Bbl, as compared to a negative $4.19 per Bbl during the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to less favorable local market pricing, including gathering and transportation costs, as compared to the benchmark price. Our net realized natural gas price during the year ended December 31, 2024 was $1.34 per Mcf, representing a 62% realization relative to average Henry Hub pricing, compared to a net realized natural gas price of $1.88 per Mcf during the year ended December 31, 2023, representing a 74% realization relative to average Henry Hub pricing. Fluctuations in our natural gas price differentials and realizations are due to several factors such as NGL value net of processing costs, gathering, and transportation costs, takeaway capacity relative to production levels, regional storage capacity, seasonal demand for heating fuel and seasonal refinery maintenance temporarily depressing demand. The exact impact of each of these items is difficult to quantify as each of our operators pass through these costs in a different manner.

Reworded

The average calendar 20242025 WTI oil price was $75.69$64.60 per Bbl or 2%15% lower than the average WTI price per Bbl in calendar 2023.2024. Our settled derivatives increased our realized oil price per Bbl by $1.54$3.81 in calendar 20242025 and increased our realized oil price per Bbl by $0.40$1.54 in calendar 2023.2024. Our average 20242025 realized oil price per Bbl after reflecting settled derivatives was $71.48$62.95 compared to $73.99$71.48 in 2023.2024. The average calendar 20242025 NYMEX natural gas price was $2.19$3.52 per MMBtu, or 13%61% lowerhigher than the average NYMEX price per MMBtu in calendar 2023.2024. Our settled derivatives increased our realized gas price per Mcf by $0.10 in calendar 2025. We had no gas price derivatives in place in calendar 2024 and 2023.2024. Our 20242025 realized natural gas price per Mcf after reflecting settled derivatives was $1.34$2.31 compared to $1.88$1.34 in 2023, which was primarily driven by lower NYMEX pricing for natural gas and gas realization.2024.

Reworded

We employ a hedging program that partially mitigates the risk associated with fluctuations in commodity prices. For detailed information on our commodity hedging program, see Part II. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk and NotesNote 6 (“Derivative Instruments”) to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 6—Derivative Instruments.Statements.

Added

*Not meaningful

Reworded

Oil and Natural Gas Revenue and Volumes. Oil and natural gas revenue increased to $274.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $242.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $233.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increase in oil and natural gas revenue was due to a 10%34% increase in production volumes, and was partially offset by a 6%15% decrease in the average realized prices per Boe before hedging for the year ended December 31, 2024.2025. The increase in production volumes increased oil and natural gas revenue by approximately $21.3$69.2 million, while the decrease in average realized prices per Boe before hedging decreased oil and natural gas revenue by approximately $13.2$37.2 million. The increase in production volumes was in part due to the Lucero Acquisition.

Reworded

The decreases in realized oil and natural gas prices were primarily due to lower benchmark commodity prices inDuring the year ended December 31, 20242025, $3.3 million and $13.6 million of recoupments of oil and gas revenue, respectively, were recognized as comparedpart of the settlement discussed in Note 11 (“Commitments and Contingencies”) to the yearConsolidated endedFinancial December 31, 2023, as well as increased differentials.Statements. Our oil price differential to the weighted average benchmark price during the year ended December 31, 20242025 was negative $5.90$5.40 per Bbl, as compared to a negative $4.19$5.90 per Bbl during the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, primarily due to the legal settlement increasing the realized price per Bbl in the period, partially offset by less favorable local market pricing as compared to the benchmark price. Our net realized natural gas price during the year ended December 31, 20242025 was $1.34$2.21 per Mcf, representing a 62%64% realization relative to the weighted average NYMEX natural gas price, compared to a net realized natural gas price of $1.88$1.34 per Mcf during the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, representing a 74%62% realization relative to the weighted average NYMEX natural gas price. The higher realized price was primarily due to the legal settlement increasing the realized price per Mcf in the period. Fluctuations in our natural gas price differentials and realizations are due to several factors such as NGL value net of processing costs, gathering and transportation fees, takeaway capacity relative to production levels, regional storage capacity, seasonal demand for heating fuel and seasonal refinery maintenance temporarily depressing demand. The exact impact of each of these items is difficult to quantify as each of our operators passes through these costs in a different manner.

Reworded

Lease Operating Expense. Lease operating expense increased to $10.92 per Boe for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $10.00 per Boe for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $9.11 per Boe for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increase per Boe for the year ended December 31, 20242025 compared with the year ended December 31, 20232024 was relateddue in part to increaseda workover$1.10 operationsper andBoe higherincrease service costs. The increasedin workover costs werebetween responsibleperiods, fordriven approximately $0.10/Boe ofby the increaseproperties andfrom shouldthe resultLucero in increased production when these wells return to production.Acquisition.

Reworded

Production Tax Expense. Total production taxes decreasedincreased to $23.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $21.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $21.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. Production taxes are primarily based on oil revenue and natural gas production, excluding gains and losses associated with hedging activities. Production taxes as a percentage of oil and natural gas sales before hedging adjustments were 8.9%8.5% and 9.2%8.9% for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. The lower production tax rate was driven by the production mix and the relative tax rates on oil and natural gas revenue.

Added

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense increased to $24.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $23.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2025, $7.1 million of litigation costs were reimbursed as a result of the settlement discussed in Note 11 (“Commitments and Contingencies”) to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Excluding net litigation costs and Lucero Acquisition transaction costs of $0.9 million and $2.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, general and administrative expense on a per Boe basis decreased to $3.68 for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $4.47 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in per Boe cost is associated with economies of scale on a 34% increase in production between periods and impacts from the Lucero Acquisition.

Removed

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense decreased to $23.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $23.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. General and administrative expense on a per Boe basis decreased to $4.94 for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $5.52 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Costs related to the Spin-Off are included in 2023 and costs related to the Lucero Acquisition are included in 2024. Excluding these costs, the per Boe rate for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 would have been $4.47 and $3.94, respectively. The increase in general and administrative expense per Boe, excluding the Spin-Off and Lucero Acquisition costs, was due to higher legal costs and costs associated with being a public company.

Reworded

DD&A. DD&A increased to $129.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared with $100.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared with $81.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increase of $18.6$29.1 million or 23%29% was the result of a 10%34% increase in production and a 12%4% increasedecrease in the DD&A rate for the year ended December 31, 20242025 compared with the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increase in production accounted for a $8.8$32.7 million increase in DD&A expense while the increasedecrease in the DD&A rate accounted for a $9.7$3.6 million increasedecrease in DD&A expense.

Reworded

For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, the relationship of capital expenditures, proved reserves and production from certain producing fields yielded a depletion rate (excluding depreciation, amortization and accretion) of $20.92$20.16 per Boe compared with $18.68$20.92 per Boe for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increaselower in the depletionDD&A rate was driven by the properties acquired in the Lucero Acquisition in 2025 and was partially offset by decreased oil and natural gas reserves related to the lower oil and natural gas prices combined with higher operating expenses and the impact of acquisitions and related capital expenditures in the year ended December 31, 2024.expenses.

Reworded

Equity-based Compensation. During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, equity-based compensation expense decreasedincreased to $8.1$10.2 million from $32.2$8.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. Equity-based compensation expense was higher in 20232025 due to retirementadditional vestingLTIP provisionsRSUs inand somePSUs ofawarded theto awardsemployees resultingand indirectors 1,863,000at restricteda stockhigher unitsgrant beingdate expensed upon award. The retirement vesting provisions were responsible for $26.8 million of expenses during the year ended December 31, 2023.price.

Reworded

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased to $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $10.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increase for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was due to a higher SOFR interest rate in the year ended December 31, 2024 and a higher average outstandingdebt balance on our Revolving Credit Facility during the year ended December 31, 20242025 compared to 2023.2024 Thepartially higheroffset by a lower interest rate was due to increases to the federal funds rate by the Federal Reserve during the first nine months of the year ended December 31, 2024.rate.

Reworded

Commodity Derivative Gain (Loss) Gain.. The net commodity derivative gain was $27.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared with a loss wasof $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared with a gain of $12.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. Gain (lossLoss) on commodityCommodity derivatives, netDerivatives is comprised of (i1) cash gains and losses we recognize on settled commodity derivativesderivative instruments during the period, and (ii2) non-cash mark-to-marketunsettled gains and losses we incur on commodity derivative instruments outstanding at period-end.

Added

In 2025, approximately 61% of our oil volumes were covered by financial hedges, which resulted in a realized gain on oil derivatives of $15.8 million. In 2025, approximately half of our natural gas volume was covered by residue gas and NGL financial hedges, which resulted in a realized gain on gas and NGL derivatives of $1.4 million. In 2024, approximately 59% of our oil volumes and none of our natural gas volumes were covered by financial hedges, which resulted in a realized gain on oil derivatives of $5.1 million.

Removed

In 2024, approximately 59% of our oil volumes and none of our natural gas volumes were covered by financial hedges, which resulted in a realized gain on oil derivatives of $5.1 million. In 2023, approximately 49% of our oil volumes and none of our natural gas volumes were covered by financial hedges, which resulted in a realized gain on oil derivatives of $1.2 million.

Reworded

At December 31, 2024,2025, all of our derivative contracts were recorded at their fair value, which was a net asset of $3.7$14.4 million, aan decreaseincrease of $7.4$10.7 million from the $11.1$3.7 million net asset recorded as of December 31, 2023,2024. whileThe a net liability of $0.2 millionincrease was recorded as of December 31, 2022. The decrease in 2024 and asset increase in 2023 wasprimarily due to changesdecreases toin forward commodity prices since December 31, 2024 relative to prices on our open commodity derivative contracts and new contracts entered into in the respective years.contracts.

Reworded

Income Tax Expense. We recorded income tax expense of $9.8 million and $7.7 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 20242025 and 2024, respectively, related to federal and state income taxes. The effective tax raterates of 27.9% and 26.7% for the yearyears ended December 31, 20242025 and 2024, respectively, differs from the amount that would be provided by applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 21% to pre-tax income primarily due to §162(m) limitations on certain covered employee compensation andcompensation, state income taxes.taxes and non-amortizable transaction costs.

Removed

During the year ended December 31, 2023, we recorded income tax expense of $61.9 million related to federal and state income taxes. In January 2023, in connection with the Spin-Off, the Predecessor was contributed into Vitesse resulting in a change in tax status and the recording of a $44.1 million deferred tax liability related to the temporary difference between the tax and GAAP basis of the assets of the Predecessor and an offsetting charge to income tax expense.

Reworded

Overview. At December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, we had $3.0$1.3 million and $0.6$3.0 million of unrestricted cash on hand and $128.0$125.5 million and $164.0$118.0 million available under the elected commitments in our Revolving Credit Facility, respectively. We expect that our liquidity going forward will be primarily derived from cash flows from our operations, cash on hand andhand, availability under the Revolving Credit Facility and proceeds from equity or debt offerings and that these sources of liquidity will be sufficient to provide us the ability to fund our material cash requirements for the next twelve months, as described below, including our planned capital expenditures program, as well as dividends and our share repurchase program. We may need to fund acquisitions or other business opportunities that support our strategy through additional borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility or the issuance of equity or debt. Our primary uses of capital have been for the acquisition and development of our oil and natural gas properties and dividend payments. We continually monitor potential capital sources for opportunities to enhance liquidity or otherwise improve our financial position.

Removed

The Lucero Acquisition is expected to increase the optionality of our capital deployment by adding a limited operating function. This acquisition is expected to increase future revenue, expenses, cash flows and capital expenditures. Upon the closing of the Lucero Acquisition, $49.8 million of cash was acquired along with the other assets and liabilities, which did not include any incremental long term debt.

Reworded

Working Capital. Our working capital balance fluctuates as a result of changes in commodity pricing and production volumes, the collection of revenueaccrued receivables,revenue, expenditures related to our acquisition and development, and production operations and the impact of our outstanding commodity derivative instruments.

Reworded

At December 31, 2024,2025, we had a working capital deficitsurplus of $49.4$0.9 million, compared to a deficit of $2.1$49.4 million at December 31, 2023.2024. Current assets decreasedincreased by $7.4$1.3 million while current liabilities increaseddecreased by $39.9$49.1 million at December 31, 2024,2025, compared to December 31, 2023.2024. The decreaseincrease in current assets in 20242025 as compared to 20232024 was primarily due to aan decreaseincrease of $6.2$10.4 million in our commodity derivative instruments due to forward oil price decreases as compared to hedged oil prices, andpartially offset by a decrease of $5.1$9.2 million in revenue receivable primarily due to lower oil and natural gasaccrued revenue in the fourth quarter, partially offsetdriven by animproved increase in our cash balance of $2.4 million and an increase in other receivables of $1.5 million primarily related to prepayments and a higher receivable from commodity derivative instruments.collections. The increasedecrease in current liabilities in 20242025 as compared to 20232024 was primarily due to an increasedecrease of $39.8$49.1 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities as a result of increaseddecreased development activity.

Reworded

Cash Flows. Our cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2024, 20232025 and 20222024 are presented below:

Reworded

During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, we generated $155.0$170.3 million of cash from operations, an increase of 9%10% from the year ended December 31, 20232024 driven by a 3%13% increase in total revenue. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we generated $141.9 million of cash from operating activities, a 3% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2022. Cash flows from operationsoperating activities are primarily affected by production volumesvolumes, which increased with the Lucero Acquisition, and commodity prices, net of the effects of settlements of our derivative contracts, and by changes in working capital. Any interim cash needs are funded by cash on hand, cash flows from operations or borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. We typically enter into commodity derivative transactions covering a substantial, but varying, portion of our anticipated future oil and gas production for the next 12 to 24 months. A minimum level of derivative coverage is required by certain debt covenants. See Part II. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Added

One of the primary sources of variability in our cash provided by operating activities is commodity price volatility, which we partially mitigate through the use of commodity derivative contracts. As of December 31, 2025, for calendar 2026 we had oil swaps covering 1,608,134 Bbls at a weighted average price of $64.52 per Bbl, oil collars covering 66,000 Bbls with a weighted average floor and ceiling of $50.00 per Bbl and $68.80 per Bbl, respectively, natural gas collars covering 4,638,900 MMBtu with a weighted average floor and ceiling of $3.73 per MMBtu and $4.99 per MMBtu, respectively, natural gas basis swaps (Chicago City Gate to Henry Hub) covering the same MMBtu at a weighted average price of ($0.121) per MMBtu, and various natural gas liquid swaps covering 6,410,000 gallons at a weighted average price of $0.67 per gallon. For calendar 2027, we had natural gas collars covering 795,000 MMBtu with a weighted average floor and ceiling of $4.00 per MMBtu and $5.68 per MMBtu, respectively, and basis swaps (Chicago City Gate to Henry Hub) covering the same MMBtu at a weighted average price of $0.300 per MMBtu. For more information on our outstanding derivatives, see Note 6 (“Derivative Instruments”) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Removed

One of the primary sources of variability in our cash provided by operating activities is commodity price volatility, which we partially mitigate through the use of commodity derivative contracts. As of December 31, 2024, we had oil swaps covering 2,304,003 Bbls at a weighted average price of $71.16 per Bbl for calendar 2025 and oil swaps covering the sale of 917,994 Bbls at a weighted average price of $66.95 per Bbl for calendar 2026. As of December 31, 2024, we had no natural gas derivative contracts. For more information on our outstanding derivatives, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 6—Derivative Instruments.

Reworded

Cash used in investing activities during the years ended December 31, 2024, 20232025 and 20222024 was $115.3$127.7 million, $120.7 million,million and $84.6$115.3 million, respectively. Cash used in investing activities primarily relates to capital expenditures for acquisition and development costs. Development costs for the year ended December 31, 2025 included $11.0 million for completion costs on two wells from the Lucero Acquisition. Our cash used in investing activities reflects actual cash spending, which can lag several months from when the related costs were accrued. As a result, our actual cash spending is not always reflective of current levels of development activity. Acquisition and development activities are discretionary. We monitor our capital expenditures on a regular basis, adjusting the amount up or down, and between projects, depending on projected commodity prices, cash flows and financial returns. We supplement development activity on our asset base with opportunistic acquisitions of near-term drilling opportunities when development activity by our operators on our existing properties does not meet our development objectives. Our cash spending for acquisition activities was $21.1 million, $35.7$6.6 million and $28.5$21.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2024, 20232025 and 2022,2024, respectively.

Added

Cash used in financing activities was $44.3 million and $37.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The cash used in financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2025 was primarily related to $92.1 million in dividends paid and $9.2 million value of retained shares paid to fund employee tax withholding in connection with the vesting of restricted stock units, which was partially offset by $49.8 million in cash acquired associated with the Lucero Acquisition and $7.5 million of net borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. The cash used in financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily related to $63.6 million in dividends paid and $7.5 million value of retained shares paid to fund employee tax withholding in connection with the vesting of restricted stock units, which was partially offset by $36.0 million of net borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility.

Removed

Cash used in financing activities was $37.3 million, $30.7 million, and $57.8 million during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The cash used in financing activities was related to distributions to our equity holders of $63.6 million, $58.0 million and $36.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively and net repayments of $20.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2022 under our Prior Revolving Credit Facility. During the years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023, net borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility of $36.0 million and $28.0 million, respectively, partially offset these other uses of funds.

Added

The borrowing base under the Revolving Credit Facility is subject to regular, semi-annual redeterminations on or about April 1 and October 1 of each year based on, among other things, the value of the Company’s proved oil and natural gas reserves, as determined by the lenders in their discretion. As of December 31, 2025, the Company’s borrowing base was $295.0 million with an aggregate elected commitment of $250.0 million of which $124.5 million was outstanding. See Note 5 (“Credit Facility”) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details regarding the Revolving Credit Facility.

Removed

As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s borrowing base was $245.0 million with an aggregate elected commitment of $235.0 million of which $117.0 million was outstanding. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 5—Credit Facility for further details regarding the Revolving Credit Facility. In conjunction with the closing of the Lucero Acquisition on March 7, 2025, the Revolving Credit Facility was amended to increase the borrowing base to $315 million. This increase will serve as the borrowing base redetermination scheduled to occur in April 2025. The next borrowing base redetermination is scheduled for the fall of 2025. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility and as part of the amendment, the Company elected to increase the aggregate elected commitment amount to $250.0 million.

Removed

Prior Revolving Credit Facility. See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements —Note 5—Credit Facility for further details regarding the Prior Revolving Credit Facility.

Reworded

Material Cash Requirements. Our material short-term cash requirements include payments under our short-term lease agreements, recurring payroll and benefits obligations for our employees, capital and operating expenditures and other working capital needs. AsIf commodity prices improve, our working capital requirements may increase as we spend additional capital, increase production and pay larger settlements on our outstanding commodity derivative contracts. Conversely, working capital requirements would be expected to decrease if commodity prices decline.

Reworded

Our long-term material cash requirements from currently known obligations include settlements on our outstanding commodity derivative contracts, future obligations to plug, abandon and remediate our oil and gas properties at the end of their productive lives, and operating lease obligations. We cannot provide specific timing for repayments of outstanding borrowings on our Revolving Credit Facility, or the associated interest payments, as the timing and amount of borrowings and repayments cannot be forecasted with certainty and are based on working capital requirements, commodity prices and acquisition and divestiture activity (including the Lucero Acquisition),activity, among other factors. We cannot provide specific timing for other current and long-term liability obligations where we cannot forecast with certainty the amount and timing of such payments, including asset retirement obligations, as the plugging and abandonment of wells is primarily at the discretion of the operators and any amounts we may be obligated to pay under our derivative contracts, as such payments are dependent on commodity prices in effect at the time of settlement. See NotesNote 4 (“Fair Value Measurements”) to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 4— Fair Value Measurements for further information on these contracts and their fair values as of December 31, 2024,2025, which fair values represent the estimated cash settlement amount required to terminate such instruments based on forward price curves for commodities as of that date.

Reworded

Dividends. We paid cash dividends to our equity holders of $63.6$92.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2024.2025. While we believe that our future cash flows from operations will be able to sustain an increasing level offuture dividends, future dividends may change based on a variety of factors, including contractual restrictions, legal limitations (the most common of which are limitations set forth in a company’s organizational documents and insolvency), business developments and the judgment of our Board. Future cash dividends to equity holders are subject to the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility, as previously described. There can be no guarantee that we will be able to pay dividends at current levels or at all or otherwise return capital to our investors in the future.

Reworded

The amount, timing and allocation of capital expenditures are largely discretionary and subject to change based on a variety of factors. If oil and natural gas prices decline below our acceptable levels, or costs increase, we may choose to defer a portion of our budgeted capital expenditures until later periods to achieve the desired balance between sources and uses of liquidity and prioritize capital projects that we believe have the highest expected financial returns and potential to generate near-term cash flow. We may also increase our capital expenditures significantly to take advantage of opportunities we consider to be attractive. We will carefully monitor and may adjust our projected capital expenditures in response to success or lack of success in drilling activities, changes in prices, availability of financing and joint venture opportunities, drilling and acquisition costs, industry conditions, the timing of regulatory approvals, the availability of rigs, change in service costs, contractual obligations, internally generated cash flow and other factors both within and outside our control, including the Lucero Acquisition.control. For additional information on the impact of changing prices and market conditions on our financial position, see Part II. Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Reworded

For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023,2025 and 20222024 we did not record any impairment expense.

Added

Business Combinations

Added

We account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. Under this method, we recognize the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated acquisition-date fair values. Transaction and integration costs related to business combinations are expensed as incurred.

Added

In valuing the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, we make various assumptions to estimate fair values. Fair value is a market-based measurement that reflects the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. For the Lucero Acquisition, the most significant assumptions related to the estimated fair value of the proved oil and gas properties. The fair value of these properties was determined using the income approach, which is based on discounted future net cash flows derived from the properties' reserve reports. The valuation relied primarily on unobservable inputs, which are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820. Key inputs included estimates of future production volumes from the proved reserves, future commodity prices based on forward strip price curves (adjusted for basis differentials), estimates of lease operating, development and abandonment costs, and the application of a discount rate.

Added

Any excess of the acquisition price over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill and is subject to ongoing impairment evaluation as described. Any excess of the estimated fair value of net assets acquired over the acquisition price is recorded in current earnings as a gain on bargain purchase. Deferred taxes are recorded for any differences between the assigned values and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Estimated deferred taxes are based on available information concerning the tax basis of assets acquired and liabilities assumed and loss carryforwards at the acquisition date, although such estimates may change in the future as additional information becomes known.

Added

A description of our significant accounting policies and fair value measurements is included in Note 2 (“Significant Accounting Policies”) and Note 4 (“Fair Value Measurements”), respectively, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Removed

Predecessor Equity-Based Compensation

Showing the first 60 of 63 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-03 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-04 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
37 → 37words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2025.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

25new paragraphs
4removed paragraphs
39reworded paragraphs
6,605 → 8,291words in section

New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”

Removed heading “Income Tax Expense.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text
“Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine
“Our oil price differential to the weighted average benchmark price during the six months ended June 30, 2026 was negative $3.11 per barrel, as compared to a negative $5.32 per barrel during the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to more favorable local market pricing as compared to the benchmark price. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation
“General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense increased to $14.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $12.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, $2.4 million in separation benefits related to our leadership transition were incurred. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, $7.1 million of litigation costs were reimbursed as a result of a legal settlement and Lucero Acquisition transaction costs of $4.9 million were incurred. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation
“General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense increased to $6.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 from $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, $7.1 million of litigation costs were reimbursed as a result of a legal settlement. Excluding net litigation costs and Lucero Acquisition transaction costs of $0.3 million, general and administrative expense on a per Boe basis was $3.47 for the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $3.89 for the three months ended June 30, 2026.”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Income Tax Expense.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: interest rate

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreasedincreased to $2.6$3.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $2.9$2.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decreaseincrease was due to a lower average debt balance and lower interest rate duringfor the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 comparedwas primarily due to a higher average debt balance during the three months ended March 31, 2025.period.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (68)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 4 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Our business strategy is focused on creating long-term stockholder value through the profitable acquisition, development and production of oil and natural gas assets that provide an attractive return on invested capital, while maintaining a strong balance sheet and distributing a meaningful dividend to our stockholders. We invest in working and mineral interests in oil and natural gas properties with our core area of focus currently in the Bakken and Three Forks formations of the Williston Basin of North Dakota and Montana. We also have interests in wells in the Denver-Julesburg Basin located in Colorado and Wyoming and the Powder River Basin located in Wyoming. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had a working interest in 6,4276,579 gross (226.0237.4 net) productive wells and 303278 gross (6.26.4 net) wells that were being drilled or completed, and an additional 282320 gross (13.713.0 net) wells that had been permitted for development by our operators. In addition, we had a royalty only interest in 1,2991,289 gross (3.1 net) productive wells.

Reworded

OnAs Marchpreviously 26,announced, 2026on weMay announced1, a2026, leadership transition withMr. Jamie Benard set to joinjoined our team as President and Chief Executive OfficerOfficer. effective May 1, 2026,On the resignationsame ofdate, Robert Gerrity as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman and the transition on May 1, 2026 ofMr. Brian Cree ourtransitioned existingfrom President and Interim Chief Executive Officer transitioning to Senior AdvisorAdvisor, anda role he will hold until his retirement on December 31, 2026. This leadership transition does not change our overall business strategy.

Reworded

Our financial and operating performance for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 included the following:

Removed

■Net loss of $42.3 million, including an unrealized loss on commodity derivatives of $48.2 million.

Reworded

■CashNet flows from operationsincome of $24.0$33.1 million.

Added

■Cash flows from operations of $25.4 million.

Reworded

■Total debt of $144.5$158.5 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026.

Reworded

Commodity prices are a significant factor impacting our earnings, operating cash flows and our acquisition and divestiture strategy, as well as the decisions of us and our operators in conducting operations. During the last several years, prices for oil and natural gas have experienced sustained volatility, impacted by general economic and political conditions, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, conflict in the Middle East, including Iran, the situation in Venezuela, U.S. international trade and tariff policies and responses thereto, supply chain constraints, elevated interest rates and costs of capital, and changes in production by OPEC and its key member, Saudi Arabia, and certain other non-OPEC oil-producing countries. Most recently, the conflict in Iran and disruption of maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has caused significant volatility in commodity prices.

Reworded

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses include overhead, including payroll and benefits for our staff, costs of maintaining our headquarters, costs of managing our acquisition and development operations, franchise taxes, audit and other professional fees and legal compliance. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, general and administrative expenses included non-recurring costs related to the Lucero Acquisition.Acquisition and an offset for reimbursement of past legal expenses as a result of a settlement discussed in Note 9 (“Commitments and Contingencies”) to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Reworded

Impairment expense. Under the successful efforts method of accounting, we review our oil and natural gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that a decline in the recoverability of their carrying value may have occurred. Whenever we conclude the carrying value may not be recoverable, we estimate the expected undiscounted future net cash flows of our oil and natural gas properties using proved and risked probable and possible reserves based on our development plans and best estimate of future production, commodity pricing, reserve risking, gathering, processing and transportation deductions, production tax rates, lease operating expenses and future development costs. We compare such undiscounted future net cash flows to the carrying amount of the oil and natural gas properties in each depletion pool to determine if the carrying amount is recoverable. If the undiscounted future net cash flows exceed the carrying amount of the aggregated oil and natural gas properties, no impairment is recorded. If the carrying amount of the oil and natural gas properties exceeds the undiscounted future net cash flows, we will record an impairment expense to reduce the carrying value to fair value as of the balance sheet date. The factors used to determine fair value may include, but are not limited to, recent sales prices of comparable properties, indications from marketing activities, the present value of future revenues, net of estimated operating and development costs using estimates of reserves, future commodity pricing, future production estimates, anticipated capital expenditures and various discount rates commensurate with the risk and current market conditions associated with realizing the projected cash flows. There were no proved oil and gas property impairments during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025.

Reworded

The average firstsecond quarter 2026 NYMEX oil price was $72.43$92.38 per barrelbarrel, or 2%45% higher than the average NYMEX oil price per barrel in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. Our settled derivatives decreased andour increasedsecond ourquarter 2026 realized oil price per barrel by $4.91$20.84 and $0.75increased inour the firstsecond quarter of2025 2026realized andoil 2025,price respectively.per barrel by $4.71. Our average firstsecond quarter 2026 realized oil price per barrel after reflecting settled derivatives was $61.85$71.14 compared to $64.93$64.21 during the same period in 2025.

Reworded

The average firstsecond quarter 2026 NYMEX natural gas price was $4.71$2.95 per MMBtu, or 14%8% higherlower than the average NYMEX price per MMBtu in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. In the firstsecond quarter of 2026, our settled derivatives decreasedincreased our realized natural gas price by $0.38 per Mcf by $0.75,Mcf, bringing our realized natural gas price after reflecting settled derivatives to $1.54$1.55 per Mcf. In the firstsecond quarter of 2025, we had no realizedmaterial natural gas derivativeprice settlementsderivatives in place and our realized natural gas price was $2.81$4.17 per Mcf.

Added

The average year-to-date 2026 NYMEX oil price was $82.40 per barrel, or 22% higher than the 2025 average year-to-date oil price per barrel. Our settled derivatives decreased our average year-to-date 2026 realized oil price per barrel by $13.06 and increased our average year-to-date 2025 realized oil price per barrel by $2.92. Our average year-to-date 2026 realized oil price per barrel after reflecting settled derivatives was $66.60 compared to $64.53 during the same period in 2025.

Added

The average year-to-date 2026 NYMEX natural gas price was $3.81 per MMBtu, or 5% higher than the 2025 average year-to-date price per MMBtu. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, our settled derivatives decreased our realized natural gas price by $0.13 per Mcf, bringing our realized natural gas price after reflecting settled derivatives to $1.55 per Mcf. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, we had no material natural gas price derivatives in place and our realized natural gas price was $3.61 per Mcf.

Reworded

We employ a hedging program that partially mitigates the risk associated with fluctuations in commodity prices. For detailed information on our commodity hedging program, see Part I, Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk and Note 6 (“Commodity Derivative Instruments”) to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Reworded

Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 Compared with Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025

Removed

*Not meaningful

Reworded

Oil and Natural Gas Revenue and Volumes. Oil and natural gas revenue increased to $67.4$91.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $66.2$81.8 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase in oil and natural gas revenue was due to a 7%22% increase in production volumes, driven by acquisition and development activity (including the Lucero Acquisition for a full period in the most recently completed quarter), which was partially offset by a 4% decrease in the average realized prices per Boe before hedginghedging, partially offset by an 8% decrease in production volumes for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. The increase in production volumes increased oil and natural gas revenue by $4.2 million, while the decrease in average realized prices per Boe before hedging increased oil and natural gas revenue by $17.6 million, while the decrease in production volumes decreased oil and natural gas revenue by $2.9$8.4 million.

Added

During the three months ended June 30, 2025, $3.3 million and $13.6 million of recoupments of oil and natural gas revenue, respectively, were recognized as part of the settlement discussed in Note 9 (“Commitments and Contingencies”) to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Reworded

Our oil price differential to the weighted average benchmark price during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was negative $5.44$0.88 per barrel, as compared to a negative $6.72$4.17 per barrel during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to more favorable local market pricing as compared to the benchmark price. Our net realized natural gas price during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $2.29$1.17 per Mcf, representing a 47%40% realization relative to the weighted average NYMEX natural gas price, compared to a net realized natural gas price of $2.81$4.17 per Mcf during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, representing a 68%130% realization relative to the weighted average NYMEX natural gas price. The lower realized price was primarily due to the legal settlement increasing the realized price per Mcf in the prior period. Fluctuations in our natural gas price differentials and realizations are due to several factors such as NGL value net of processing costs, gathering and transportation fees, takeaway capacity relative to production levels, regional storage capacity, seasonal demand for heating fuel and seasonal refinery maintenance temporarily depressing demand. The exact impact of each of these items is difficult to quantify as each of our operators passes through these costs in a different manner.

Reworded

Lease Operating Expense. Lease operating expense increaseddecreased to $15.3$18.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $13.9$19.6 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20252025. The decrease is primarily asattributable ato resultan of8% a 7% increasedecrease in production volumes between periods.

Reworded

Production Tax Expense. Total production taxes wereincreased $5.7to million and $5.8$8.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 andfrom 2025,$6.2 respectively.million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Production taxes are primarily based on oil revenue and natural gas production, excluding gains and losses associated with hedging activities. Production taxes as a percentage of oil and natural gas sales before hedging adjustments were 8.4%9.3% and 8.7%7.6% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The production tax rate was lower for the three months ended June 30, 2025 due to a legal settlement increasing revenue in the period.

Added

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense increased to $6.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 from $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, $7.1 million of litigation costs were reimbursed as a result of a legal settlement. Excluding net litigation costs and Lucero Acquisition transaction costs of $0.3 million, general and administrative expense on a per Boe basis was $3.47 for the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $3.89 for the three months ended June 30, 2026.

Removed

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense decreased to $8.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 from $12.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. General and administrative expense on a per Boe basis decreased to $5.98 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 from $9.00 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease in general and administrative expense was primarily due to Lucero Acquisition transaction costs of $4.6 million incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2025, partially offset by $2.4 million in separation benefits incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2026 related to our leadership transition. Excluding these costs the per Boe rate for the three months ended March 31, 2025 would have been $5.57 and the Boe rate for the three months ended March 31, 2026 would have been $4.31.

Reworded

DD&A. DD&A increased to $31.2$34.8 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared with $26.6$34.6 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase of $4.6 million, or 17%, was the result of a 7% increase in production and a $1.99 per Boe increase in the DD&A rate for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, partially offset by an 8% decrease in production compared with the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase in production accounted for a $1.9 million increase in DD&A expense while the increase in the DD&A rate accounted for a $2.7$3.4 million increase in DD&A expense while the decrease in production accounted for a $3.2 million decrease in DD&A expense.

Reworded

For the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the relationship of capital expenditures, proved reserves and production from certain producing fields yielded a depletion rate (excluding depreciation, amortization and accretion) of $21.51$21.85 per Boe compared with $19.56$19.88 per Boe for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The rate was primarily higher for the three months ended March 31, 2026 due to lower SEC oil prices used to estimate reserves between periods.

Reworded

Equity-Based Compensation. During the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, equity-based compensation expense decreasedincreased to $0.7$2.7 million from $2.5$2.4 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Equity-based compensation expense was primarily lowerhigher in 2026 due to aadditional $1.4LTIP millionRSUs reversaland ofPSUs expenseawarded forto forfeitedemployees awardsand during the period.directors.

Reworded

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreasedincreased to $2.6$3.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $2.9$2.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decreaseincrease was due to a lower average debt balance and lower interest rate duringfor the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 comparedwas primarily due to a higher average debt balance during the three months ended March 31, 2025.period.

Reworded

Commodity Derivative (Loss),Gain, Net. The net commodity derivative lossgain was $55.0$22.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared with a lossgain of $0.2$18.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Gain (Loss) on Commodity Derivatives is comprised of (1) cash gains and losses we recognize on settled commodity derivative instruments during the period, and (2) unsettled gains and losses we incur on commodity derivative instruments outstanding at period-end.

Reworded

(1)Realized and unrealized gains and losses on commodity derivatives are presented herein as separate line items but are combined for a total Commoditycommodity derivative gain (loss), net in the statements of operations included in this Form 10-Q. Management believes the separate presentation of the realized and unrealized commodity derivative gains and losses is useful because the realized cash settlement portion provides a better understanding of our hedge position.

Reworded

In the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, approximately 61%84% of our oil volumes were covered by financial hedges, which resulted in a realized loss on oil derivatives of $4.4$19.6 million. In the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, approximately half of our natural gas volumevolumes waswere covered by residue gas and NGL financial hedges, which resulted in a realized lossgain on gas and NGL derivatives of $2.4$1.4 million. In the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, approximately 65%58% of our oil volumes and noneno of ourmaterial natural gas volumes were covered by financial hedges, which resulted in a realized gain on oil derivatives of $0.7$5.3 million.

Reworded

At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, all of our derivative contracts were recorded at their fair value, which was a net liabilityasset of $33.8$6.4 million, aan decreaseincrease in value of $48.2$40.2 million from the $14.4$33.8 million net assetliability recorded as of DecemberMarch 31, 2025.2026. Derivative contract fair value is recorded in part based on published forward commodity prices. This declineincrease in fair value was largely driven by the NYMEX WTI price increasingdecreasing from $57.42/Bbl at December 31, 2025 to $101.38/Bbl at March 31, 2026 to $69.50/Bbl at June 30, 2026 and the corresponding change in forward commodity prices.

Removed

Income Tax Expense.

Reworded

Income Tax Expense. During the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025,2026, we recorded an income tax benefitexpense of $9.5$6.8 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to federal and state income taxes.taxes compared to an income tax expense of $9.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025.

Reworded

The provision for income taxes for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 differs from the amount that would be provided by applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 21% to pre-tax income primarily due to §162(m) limitations on certain covered employee compensation, other discrete permanent differences related to vesting of RSUs for non-covered employees and state income taxes.

Added

Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2025

Added

The following table sets forth selected financial and operating data for the periods indicated.

Added

Oil and Natural Gas Revenue and Volumes. Oil and natural gas revenue increased to $158.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $147.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in oil and natural gas revenue was due to a 9% increase in the average realized prices per Boe before hedging, which was partially offset by a 2% decrease in production volumes for the six months ended June 30, 2026. The increase in average realized prices per Boe before hedging increased oil and natural gas revenue by $13.4 million, while the decrease in production volumes decreased oil and natural gas revenue by $2.9 million.

Added

During the six months ended June 30, 2025, $3.3 million and $13.6 million of recoupments of oil and natural gas revenue, respectively, were recognized as part of the settlement discussed in Note 9 (“Commitments and Contingencies”) to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Added

Our oil price differential to the weighted average benchmark price during the six months ended June 30, 2026 was negative $3.11 per barrel, as compared to a negative $5.32 per barrel during the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to more favorable local market pricing as compared to the benchmark price. Our net realized natural gas price during the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $1.68 per Mcf, representing a 44% realization relative to the weighted average NYMEX natural gas price, compared to a net realized natural gas price of $3.61 per Mcf during the six months ended June 30, 2025, representing a 101% realization relative to the weighted average NYMEX natural gas price. The lower realized price was primarily due to a legal settlement increasing the realized price per Mcf in the prior period. Fluctuations in our natural gas price differentials and realizations are due to several factors such as NGL value net of processing costs, gathering and transportation fees, takeaway capacity relative to production levels, regional storage capacity, seasonal demand for heating fuel and seasonal refinery maintenance temporarily depressing demand. The exact impact of each of these items is difficult to quantify as each of our operators passes through these costs in a different manner.

Added

Lease Operating Expense. Lease operating expense decreased to $33.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $33.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease is primarily attributable to a 2% decrease in production between periods.

Added

Production Tax Expense. Total production taxes increased to $14.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $12.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Production taxes are primarily based on oil revenue and natural gas production, excluding gains and losses associated with hedging activities. Production taxes as a percentage of oil and natural gas sales before hedging adjustments were 8.9% and 8.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The production tax rate was lower for the six months ended June 30, 2025 due to the legal settlement increasing revenue in the period.

Added

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense increased to $14.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $12.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, $2.4 million in separation benefits related to our leadership transition were incurred. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, $7.1 million of litigation costs were reimbursed as a result of a legal settlement and Lucero Acquisition transaction costs of $4.9 million were incurred. Excluding these one-time costs, general and administrative expense on a per Boe basis increased to $4.09 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $3.87 for the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Added

DD&A. DD&A increased to $66.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $61.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was the result of a $1.98 per Boe increase in the DD&A rate, partially offset by a 2% decrease in production for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in the DD&A rate accounted for a $6.1 million increase in DD&A expense while the decrease in production accounted for a $1.2 million decrease in DD&A expense.

Added

For the six months ended June 30, 2026, the relationship of capital expenditures, proved reserves and production from certain producing fields yielded a depletion rate (excluding depreciation, amortization and accretion) of $21.69 per Boe compared with $19.74 per Boe for the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Added

Equity-Based Compensation. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, equity-based compensation expense decreased to $3.5 million from $4.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2025. Equity-based compensation expense was primarily lower in 2026 due to a $1.4 million reversal of expense for forfeited awards during the period.

Added

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased to $5.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $5.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was due to a higher average debt balance during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Added

Commodity Derivative (Loss) Gain, Net. The commodity derivative loss was $33.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared with a gain of $18.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Gain (Loss) on Commodity Derivatives is comprised of (1) cash gains and losses we recognize on settled commodity derivative instruments during the period, and (2) unsettled gains and losses we incur on commodity derivative instruments outstanding at period-end.

Added

The mark-to-market fair value of the unsettled commodity derivative instruments will generally be inversely related to the price movement of the underlying commodity. If commodity price trends reverse from period to period, prior unrealized gains may become unrealized losses and vice versa. These unrealized gains and losses will impact our net income in the period reported. The mark-to-market fair value can create non-cash volatility in our reported earnings during periods of commodity price volatility. We have experienced such volatility in the past and are likely to experience it in the future. Gains on our derivatives generally indicate lower oil revenues in the future while losses indicate higher future oil revenues.

Added

The table below summarizes our commodity derivative gains and losses that were recorded in the periods presented.

Added

(1)Realized and unrealized gains and losses on commodity derivatives are presented herein as separate line items but are combined for a total commodity derivative gain (loss) in the statements of operations included in this Form 10-Q. Management believes the separate presentation of the realized and unrealized commodity derivative gains and losses is useful because the realized cash settlement portion provides a better understanding of our hedge position.

Added

In the six months ended June 30, 2026, 72% of our oil volumes were subject to financial hedges, which resulted in a realized loss on oil derivatives of $24.0 million. In the six months ended June 30, 2026, approximately half of our natural gas volumes were covered by residue gas and NGL financial hedges, which resulted in a realized loss on gas and NGL derivatives of $1.0 million. In the six months ended June 30, 2025, 52% of our oil volumes and no material natural gas volumes were subject to financial hedges, which resulted in a realized gain on oil derivatives of $6.0 million.

Added

At June 30, 2026, all of our derivative contracts were recorded at their fair value, which was a net asset of $6.4 million, a decrease in value of $8.0 million from the $14.4 million net asset recorded as of December 31, 2025. Derivative contract fair value is recorded in part based on published forward commodity prices. This decline in fair value was largely driven by the NYMEX WTI price increasing from $57.42/Bbl at December 31, 2025 to $69.50/Bbl at June 30, 2026 and the corresponding change in forward commodity prices.

Added

Income Tax Expense. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we recorded an income tax benefit of $2.7 million related to federal and state income taxes compared to an income tax expense of $9.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Added

The provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 differs from the amount that would be provided by applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 21% to pre-tax income (loss) primarily due to §162(m) limitations on certain covered employee compensation, other discrete permanent differences related to vesting of RSUs for non-covered employees and state income taxes.

Reworded

Overview. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $3.2$0.9 million of unrestricted cash on hand and $105.5$116.5 million available under the elected commitments in our Revolving Credit Facility. At December 31, 2025, we had $1.3 million of unrestricted cash on hand and $125.5 million available under the elected commitments in our Revolving Credit Facility. We expect that our liquidity going forward will be primarily derived from cash flows from our operations, cash on hand, availability under the Revolving Credit Facility and proceeds from equity or debt offerings and that these sources of liquidity will be sufficient to provide us the ability to fund our material cash requirements for the next twelve months, as described below, including our planned capital expenditures program, as well as dividends and our share repurchase program. We may need to fund acquisitions or other business opportunities that support our strategy through additional borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility or the issuance of equity or debt. Our primary uses of capital have been for the acquisition and development of our oil and natural gas properties and dividend payments. We continually monitor potential capital sources for opportunities to enhance liquidity or otherwise improve our financial position.

Reworded

At MarchJune 30, 2026 and December 31, 2026,2025, we had a working capital deficit of $38.3 million compared to a surplus of $0.9$3.1 million atand December$0.9 31,million, 2025.respectively. Current assets decreasedincreased by $3.4$6.2 million whileand current liabilities increased by $35.7$4.0 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to December 31, 2025. The decreaseincrease in current assets during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was primarily due to an increase of $21.8 million in accrued revenue, partially offset by a decrease of $14.3$12.5 million in current derivative instrument assets due to forward oil price increases as compared to hedged oil prices, partially offset by a $10.7 million increase in accrued revenue due to an increase in the oil index price in March.prices. The changeincrease in current liabilities during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was primarily due to an increase of $32.0$4.3 million in current derivative instrument liabilities due to forward oil price increases as compared to hedged oil prices and a $3.8 million increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities as a result increased development activity.prices.

Reworded

Cash Flows. Our cash flows for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 are presented below:

Reworded

During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we generated $24.0$49.5 million of cash from operating activities,operations, a 37%$34.0 increasemillion decrease from the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Cash flows from operating activities are primarily affected by production volumes, commodity prices, net of the effects of settlements of our derivative contracts, and by changes in working capital. During 2025, we received a one-time $24.0 million legal settlement that impacted cash flows from operating activities. Any interim cash needs are funded by cash on hand, cash flows from operations or borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. A minimum level of derivative coverage is required by certain debt covenants. See Part I, Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Reworded

One of the primary sources of variability in our cash provided by operating activities is commodity price volatility, which we partially mitigate through the use of commodity derivative contracts. For more information on our outstanding derivatives, see Note 6 (“Commodity Derivative Instruments”) to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Showing the first 60 of 68 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

VTS insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 2 Form 4 filings (1 insider, 2 trade dates, 100,000 shares, about $1.7M) and open-market sales in 0 filings. Net open-market shares: 100,000 (purchases minus sales); net value about $1.7M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-08-07Friedman Brian P
Director
Gift 59,619— —467,384 SEC
2026-06-15Steinberg Joseph S
Director
Open-market purchase 40,882$16.16 $660.7K108,500 SEC
2026-06-05O Leary Dan
Director
Grant/award 7,066— —40,855 SEC
2026-06-05Stein Randy I
Director
Grant/award 7,066— —26,855 SEC
2026-06-05Osborn Cathleen M
Director
Grant/award 7,066— —26,855 SEC
2026-06-05Adamany Linda
Director
Grant/award 7,066— —34,388 SEC
2026-06-05Steinberg Joseph S
Director
Grant/award 7,066— —67,618 SEC
2026-06-05Friedman Brian P
Director
Grant/award 7,066— —527,003 SEC
2026-05-28Steinberg Joseph S
Director
Open-market purchase 59,118$17.00 $1.0M60,552 SEC
2026-05-01Henderson James P
Chief Financial Officer
Grant/award 26,273— —202,477 SEC
2026-05-01Benard Jamie Brett
Director, CEO & PRESIDENT
Grant/award 87,576— —87,576 SEC

Well-known investors holding VTS (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COMMON STOCK2026-06-30152,723$2.4M0.0%Added 920%
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COMMON STOCK2026-06-3075,063$1.2M0.0%Added 24%
Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) COMMON STOCK2026-06-3059,531$1.1M—Sold out
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COMMON STOCK2026-06-3068,431$1.1M0.0%Reduced 50%
Two Sigma Investments COMMON STOCK2026-06-3033,732$612.6K—Sold out

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when VTS files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.