Companies › WD

WD 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. · NYSE · Finance Services · CIK 1497770 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

5 / 0risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
2new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-02-26 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-02-25 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

5new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
11reworded paragraphs
9,427 → 9,922words in section

New heading “Interest rate movements, market volatility, and borrower financing preferences could reduce origination volumes, compress margins, and adversely affect our fee income and servicing assets.”

New heading “(iii)Investments in LIHTC equity funds”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Reworded topics: cyberattack, breach, artificial intelligence

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We regularly update our existing information technology systems and install new technologies when deemed necessary and regularly provide employee awareness training around phishing, malware, and other cyber risks and physical security to address the risk of cyber-attackscyberattacks and other security breaches. However, such preventative measures may not be sufficient to prevent all future cyberattacks or a breachbreaches of customer information. Additionally, most of our employees work remotely or in a hybrid arrangement and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Remote and hybrid working arrangements at our Company (and at many third-party providers) increase cybersecurity risks due to the challenges associated with managing remote computing assets and security vulnerabilities that are present in many non-corporate and home networks. While we have designed our controls and processes to operate in a remote working environment, there is a heightened risk such controls and processes may not detect or prevent unauthorized access to our information systems. There can be no assurance that our cybersecurity risk management program and processes, including our policies, controls, or procedures, will be fully implemented, complied with or effective in protecting our information technology systems and confidential information. Because we make extensive use of service providers that support our operations, significant cyberattacks that disrupt or compromise third-party IT Systems could materially impact our business. The continued development and integration of artificial intelligence in our or third-party providers’ operations is expected to pose new and unknown cybersecurity risks.
see in full comparison
New text topics: interest rate
“Interest rate movements, market volatility, and borrower financing preferences could reduce origination volumes, compress margins, and adversely affect our fee income and servicing assets.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: breach

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We have been, and in the future may bebe, required to repurchase loans or indemnify loan purchasers ifdue thereto isbreaches of representations or warranties we have made, either as a breachresult of aour representationactions or warrantybased madeon information provided to us by usborrowers or third parties in connection with the sale of loans to third parties, including through the programsAgencies’ of the Agencies,programs, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: default

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

All of these items discussed above could have a negative impact on our cash flows. Because of the foregoing, a rise in delinquencies could have a material adverse effect on us. Under the Fannie Mae DUS program, we originate and service multifamily loans for Fannie Mae without having to obtain Fannie Mae's prior approval for certain loans, as long as the loans meet the underwriting guidelines set forth by Fannie Mae. In return for the delegated authority to make loans and the commitment to purchase loans by Fannie Mae, we must maintain minimum collateral and generally are required to share risk of loss on loans sold throughto Fannie Mae. Under the full risk-sharing formula, we are required to absorb the first 5% of any losses on the UPB of a loan at the time of loss settlement, and above 5% we are required to share the loss with Fannie Mae, with our maximum loss generally capped at 20% of the original unpaid principal balance of a loan. In addition, Fannie Mae can double or triple our risk-sharing obligations if the loan does not meet specific underwriting criteria or if the loan defaults within 12 months of its sale to Fannie Mae. Fannie Mae also requires us to maintain collateral, which may include pledged securities, for our risk-sharing obligations. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had pledged securities of $206.9$225.0 million as collateral against future losses related to $63.4$68.6 billion of loans outstanding that are subject to risk-sharing obligations, as more fully described under “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Quality andQuality, Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligation, and Loan Repurchases” which we refer to as our “at-risk balance.” Fannie Mae collateral requirements may change in the future. As of December 31, 2024,2025, our allowance for risk-sharing as a percentage of the at-risk balance was 0.04%,0.05%, or $28.2$37.5 million, and reflects our current estimate of our future expected payouts under our risk-sharing obligations. Over the past 10 years, we have settled $10.0$9.2 million of risk-sharing losses, or 0.30.2 basis points of the average at-risk balance. We cannot ensure that our estimate of the allowance for risk-sharing obligations will be sufficient to cover future actual write offs.write-offs. Other factors may also affect a borrower's decision to default on a loan, such as property, cash flow, occupancy, maintenance needs, and other financing obligations. As of December 31, 2024,2025, three11 at-risk Fannie Mae loans were in default with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $30.7$147.8 million and an aggregate collateral-based reserve of $2.8$11.4 million that had defaulted and arewere awaiting ultimate disposition. If loan defaults increase, actual risk-sharing obligation payments under the Fannie Mae DUS program may increase, and such defaults and payments could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and liquidity. In addition, any failure to pay our share of losses under the Fannie Mae DUS program could result in the revocation of our license from Fannie Mae and the exercise of various remedies available to Fannie Mae under the Fannie Mae DUS program. In limited circumstances we have agreed, and may in the future agree, with Fannie Mae to increase our loss sharing up to 100% of a loan’s UPB in lieu of the risk-sharing agreement described above.
see in full comparison
New text topics: investigation
“In total, we have been required, or expect to be required, to repurchase or provide indemnification for $221.6 million of loans over the last two years, and we incurred $40.9 million of indemnified and repurchased loan expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025 in connection with these indemnified and repurchased loans. For example, in 2025, we received loan repurchase requests from Freddie Mac for two portfolios of loans with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $100.0 million. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: liquidity

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

In the event of a breach of any representation or warranty concerning a loan, investors could, among other things, require us to repurchase the full amount of the loan and/or seek indemnification for losses from us, or, for Fannie Mae DUS loans, increase the level of risk-sharing on the loan up to 100% of the unpaid principal balance of the loan. Our obligation to repurchase the loan is independent of our risk-sharing obligations. The Agencies could require us to repurchase the loan if representations and warranties are breached, even if the loan is not in default. Because the accuracy of many such representations and warranties generally is based on our actions or on third-party reports, such as title reports and environmental reports, we may not receive similar representations and warranties from other parties that would serve as a claim against them. Even if we receive representations and warranties from third parties and have a claim against them, in the event of a breach, our ability to recover on any such claim may be limited. Our ability to recover against a borrower that breaches its representations and warranties to us may be similarly limited. In 2024, we received loan repurchase requests from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for five loans with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $87.3 million, which we repurchased or indemnified. The provision for credit losses associated with these loans was $14.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. Additionally, we incurred $10.6 million of other operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 in connection with the five repurchase requests and resulting activities. Our ability to recover on a claim against any party would also be dependent, in part, upon the financial condition and liquidity of such party. There can be no assurance that we, our employees or third parties will not make mistakes that would subject us to repurchase or indemnification obligations. A significant amount of repurchase or indemnification obligations imposed on us could have a material adverse effect on us and increase our liquidity needs.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (16)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 2 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

All of these items discussed above could have a negative impact on our cash flows. Because of the foregoing, a rise in delinquencies could have a material adverse effect on us. Under the Fannie Mae DUS program, we originate and service multifamily loans for Fannie Mae without having to obtain Fannie Mae's prior approval for certain loans, as long as the loans meet the underwriting guidelines set forth by Fannie Mae. In return for the delegated authority to make loans and the commitment to purchase loans by Fannie Mae, we must maintain minimum collateral and generally are required to share risk of loss on loans sold throughto Fannie Mae. Under the full risk-sharing formula, we are required to absorb the first 5% of any losses on the UPB of a loan at the time of loss settlement, and above 5% we are required to share the loss with Fannie Mae, with our maximum loss generally capped at 20% of the original unpaid principal balance of a loan. In addition, Fannie Mae can double or triple our risk-sharing obligations if the loan does not meet specific underwriting criteria or if the loan defaults within 12 months of its sale to Fannie Mae. Fannie Mae also requires us to maintain collateral, which may include pledged securities, for our risk-sharing obligations. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had pledged securities of $206.9$225.0 million as collateral against future losses related to $63.4$68.6 billion of loans outstanding that are subject to risk-sharing obligations, as more fully described under “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Quality andQuality, Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligation, and Loan Repurchases” which we refer to as our “at-risk balance.” Fannie Mae collateral requirements may change in the future. As of December 31, 2024,2025, our allowance for risk-sharing as a percentage of the at-risk balance was 0.04%,0.05%, or $28.2$37.5 million, and reflects our current estimate of our future expected payouts under our risk-sharing obligations. Over the past 10 years, we have settled $10.0$9.2 million of risk-sharing losses, or 0.30.2 basis points of the average at-risk balance. We cannot ensure that our estimate of the allowance for risk-sharing obligations will be sufficient to cover future actual write offs.write-offs. Other factors may also affect a borrower's decision to default on a loan, such as property, cash flow, occupancy, maintenance needs, and other financing obligations. As of December 31, 2024,2025, three11 at-risk Fannie Mae loans were in default with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $30.7$147.8 million and an aggregate collateral-based reserve of $2.8$11.4 million that had defaulted and arewere awaiting ultimate disposition. If loan defaults increase, actual risk-sharing obligation payments under the Fannie Mae DUS program may increase, and such defaults and payments could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and liquidity. In addition, any failure to pay our share of losses under the Fannie Mae DUS program could result in the revocation of our license from Fannie Mae and the exercise of various remedies available to Fannie Mae under the Fannie Mae DUS program. In limited circumstances we have agreed, and may in the future agree, with Fannie Mae to increase our loss sharing up to 100% of a loan’s UPB in lieu of the risk-sharing agreement described above.

Added

Interest rate movements, market volatility, and borrower financing preferences could reduce origination volumes, compress margins, and adversely affect our fee income and servicing assets.

Added

Our revenue is significantly driven by transaction volumes, pricing, and servicing-related income in the multifamily and commercial real estate debt capital markets. Rapid changes in interest rates, sustained elevated rates, yield curve inversions, or increased market volatility may reduce refinancing and transaction activity, delay borrower decision-making, increase borrower payment burdens, and limit the availability of accretive financing alternatives. In addition, these conditions may cause clients to favor floating-rate or shorter-term financing structures, which generally generate lower fees than longer-term or fixed-rate transactions. As a result, origination volumes, margins, gain-on-sale income, fee revenue, and the fair value of mortgage servicing rights may decline or become more volatile, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Reworded

We require a significant amount of short-term funding capacity to finance Agency loans we originate. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had $3.8 billion of committed and uncommitted loan funding available through five commercial banks and $1.5 billion of uncommitted funding available through Fannie Mae’s As Soon As Pooled program. Additionally, consistent with industry practice, our existing loan warehouse facilities have terms of one year,year and therefore require annual renewal. If a significant number of our committed facilities are reduced, terminated, or are not renewed or our uncommitted facilities are not honored, we may be unable to find replacement financing on favorable terms, or at all, and we might not be able to originate loans, which would have a material adverse effect on us. Additionally, as our business continues to expand, we may need additional warehouse funding capacity for loans we originate. There can be no assurance that, in the future, we will be able to obtain additional warehouse funding capacity on favorable terms, on a timely basis, or at all.

Reworded

We have been, and in the future may bebe, required to repurchase loans or indemnify loan purchasers ifdue thereto isbreaches of representations or warranties we have made, either as a breachresult of aour representationactions or warrantybased madeon information provided to us by usborrowers or third parties in connection with the sale of loans to third parties, including through the programsAgencies’ of the Agencies,programs, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Reworded

We must make certain representations and warranties concerning each loan originated by us for the Agencies’ programs. The representations and warranties relate to our practices in the origination and servicing of the loans and the accuracy of the information being provided by us. For example, we are generally required to provide, among others, the following representations and warranties: we are authorized to do business and to sell or assign the loan; the loan conforms to the requirements of the Agencies (including with respect to property conditions and the financial performance of the property) and certain laws and regulations; the underlying mortgage represents a valid lien on the property and there are no other liens on the property; the loan documents are valid and enforceable; taxes, assessments, insurance premiums, rents and similar other payments have been paid or escrowed; the property is insured, conforms to zoning laws and remains intact; there is not any act or omission of which we, in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have been aware; and we do not know of any issues regarding the loan that are reasonably expected to cause the loan to be delinquent or unacceptable for investment or adversely affect its value. Many of the representations and warranties we are required to make are based on information provided to us by borrowers or third parties and there is a risk that these representations and warranties may be breached, either inadvertently or due to unforeseen circumstances, including inaccurate, incomplete or fraudulent information provided by borrowers or third parties, errors in documentation, changes in program guidelines, or changes in the regulatory environment. We have in the past been and may in the future be required to repurchase loans or indemnify loan purchasers in connection with inaccurate, incomplete, or fraudulent information provided by borrowers or third parties or other breaches of representations and warranties. We are permitted to satisfy certain of these representations and warranties by furnishing a title insurance policy. Given the inherent risks associated with loan origination and servicing activities, particularly in highly-regulated programs such as Fannie Mae DUS and Freddie Mac Optigo, we maintain underwriting and due diligence processes, compliance procedures, and risk mitigation measures to minimize the likelihood of breaches, though such measures may not always be complied with by our personnel or fully effective in mitigating all risks, especially in the case of breaches tied to the actions of borrowers or third parties, from whom recovery may be limited.

Reworded

In the event of a breach of any representation or warranty concerning a loan, investors could, among other things, require us to repurchase the full amount of the loan and/or seek indemnification for losses from us, or, for Fannie Mae DUS loans, increase the level of risk-sharing on the loan up to 100% of the unpaid principal balance of the loan. Our obligation to repurchase the loan is independent of our risk-sharing obligations. The Agencies could require us to repurchase the loan if representations and warranties are breached, even if the loan is not in default. Because the accuracy of many such representations and warranties generally is based on our actions or on third-party reports, such as title reports and environmental reports, we may not receive similar representations and warranties from other parties that would serve as a claim against them. Even if we receive representations and warranties from third parties and have a claim against them, in the event of a breach, our ability to recover on any such claim may be limited. Our ability to recover against a borrower that breaches its representations and warranties to us may be similarly limited. In 2024, we received loan repurchase requests from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for five loans with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $87.3 million, which we repurchased or indemnified. The provision for credit losses associated with these loans was $14.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. Additionally, we incurred $10.6 million of other operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 in connection with the five repurchase requests and resulting activities. Our ability to recover on a claim against any party would also be dependent, in part, upon the financial condition and liquidity of such party. There can be no assurance that we, our employees or third parties will not make mistakes that would subject us to repurchase or indemnification obligations. A significant amount of repurchase or indemnification obligations imposed on us could have a material adverse effect on us and increase our liquidity needs.

Added

In total, we have been required, or expect to be required, to repurchase or provide indemnification for $221.6 million of loans over the last two years, and we incurred $40.9 million of indemnified and repurchased loan expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025 in connection with these indemnified and repurchased loans. For example, in 2025, we received loan repurchase requests from Freddie Mac for two portfolios of loans with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $100.0 million. An internal investigation into the origination of the two portfolios of loans revealed fraudulent borrower activity, including undisclosed flip transactions involving concealed lower sale prices and inflated purchase and sale agreements used to establish a higher price for the loans. While investigating the loans, we determined that certain of our employees had not adhered to our loan origination policies and procedures. These employees are no longer at the Company. As of December 31, 2025, we have agreed to indemnify Freddie Mac for one of the portfolios. In the first quarter of 2026, we completed this internal investigation, reported our findings to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and are negotiating the terms for the other portfolio. We are continuing to engage with the GSEs regarding loans originated by the former employees. In total, these former employees originated $194.6 million of the loans repurchased over the last two years. The scope, timing, and outcome of these engagements remain uncertain, and additional developments could result in additional repurchases, indemnities, expenses or other negative impacts.

Added

Our ability to recover on a claim against any party would also be dependent, in part, upon the financial condition and liquidity of such party. There can be no assurance that we, our employees or third parties will not make mistakes that would subject us to repurchase or indemnification obligations. A significant amount of repurchase or indemnification obligations imposed on us could have a material adverse effect on us and increase our liquidity needs.

Added

(iii)Investments in LIHTC equity funds

Reworded

As discussed in “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources,” we have made commitments to fund (i) equity-method investments,investments and (ii) investments in affordable housing partnerships to be syndicated into LIHTC investment funds, and (iii) earnout payments from acquisitions, and we also must satisfy collateral requirements for our Fannie Mae DUS risk-sharing obligations and the operational liquidity requirements of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, Ginnie Mae, and our warehouse facility lenders. To fund these cash flow obligations along with any obligations we may have related to loan repurchases, we typically use cash generated from our operations and, when necessary, from funds raised in the capital markets. A significant decline in our operational performance, an inability to access capital markets for funding, or a sharp rise in our cost of capital could adversely affect our ability to meet these future obligations.

Reworded

Moreover, other factors may adversely affect the multifamily sector, including general business, economic and market conditions, including higher interest rates or a period of elevated interest rates, inflation, political and geographical instability, trade tensions, including the recent tariffs proposedimposed by the United States and retaliatory tariffs by other countries, fluctuations in the real estate and debt capital markets, changes in government fiscal and monetary policies, regulations and other laws, rules and regulations governing real estate, zoning or taxes, changes in interest rate levels, the potential liability under environmental and other laws, and other unforeseen events. Any or all of these factors could negatively impact the multifamily sector and, as a result, reduce the demand for our products and services. Any such reduction could materially and adversely affect us.

Reworded

Regulatory authorities also require us to submit financial reports and to maintain a quality control plan for the underwriting, origination and servicing of loans. Numerous laws and regulations also impose qualification and licensing obligations on us and impose requirements and restrictions affecting, among other things: our loan originations; maximum interest rates, finance charges and other fees that we may charge; disclosures to consumers; the terms of secured transactions; debt collection; personnel qualifications; and other trade practices. We also are subject to inspection by the Agencies and regulatory authorities and the regulations and guidelines promulgated by the Agencies are subject to change in the Agencies’ discretion. For example, during 2024 and into 2025, the GSEs have implemented many significant changes to their multifamily program requirements applicable to us. Our failure to comply with these requirements could lead to, among other things, the loss of a license as an approved Agency lender, the inability to gain additional approvals or licenses, the termination of contractual rights without compensation, demands for indemnification or loan repurchases, class action lawsuits and administrative enforcement actions.

Reworded

If we fail to comply with laws, regulations and market standards regarding the privacy, use, and security of customer information, or if we are the target of a successful cyber-attack,cyberattack, we may be subject to legal and regulatory actions and our reputation would be harmed.

Reworded

We rely on hardware, software, technology infrastructure and online sites and networks for both internal and external operations that are critical to our business (collectively, “IT Systems”). We own and manage certain IT Systems but also rely on third parties for a range of IT Systems and related products and services, such as cloud computing. We also receive, maintain, and store non-public personal information of our customers.customers as well as proprietary business data. The technology and other controls and processes designed to secure our customerIT Systems and information and to prevent, detect, and remedy any unauthorized access to that information were designed to obtain reasonable, not absolute, assurance that such information is secure and that any unauthorized access is identified and addressed appropriately. We, and our service providers, are regularly subject to and expect to continue to experience cyberattacks that are increasingly sophisticated (including using artificial intelligence), that are often designed to evade detection, and/or that seek to damage or disrupt our network, as well as those of our service providers, and other information systems. Certain of these cyberattacks, including phishing attacks, have resulted in unauthorized access by third parties to information that we receive, maintain and store in the course of our business. Although theseno cyberattacks haveto notdate resulted in material financial impacts or disruptions to our business, given the accelerating scope, sophistication, and frequency of cyberattacks, there can be no assurance that the cybersecurity incidents we have experienced or any future incident will not materially impact our security, operations and financial results. Future cyberattacks,cyberattacks that impact our IT Systems or the perception thereof,information, could result in a loss of data, operational disruptions, and even lost business and goodwill. Additionally, we could incur significant costs associated with the recovery from a cyber-attack,cyberattack, and these costs may exceed, or the events to which they relate, may be excluded from, coverage under, our cyber insurance.

Reworded

We regularly update our existing information technology systems and install new technologies when deemed necessary and regularly provide employee awareness training around phishing, malware, and other cyber risks and physical security to address the risk of cyber-attackscyberattacks and other security breaches. However, such preventative measures may not be sufficient to prevent all future cyberattacks or a breachbreaches of customer information. Additionally, most of our employees work remotely or in a hybrid arrangement and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Remote and hybrid working arrangements at our Company (and at many third-party providers) increase cybersecurity risks due to the challenges associated with managing remote computing assets and security vulnerabilities that are present in many non-corporate and home networks. While we have designed our controls and processes to operate in a remote working environment, there is a heightened risk such controls and processes may not detect or prevent unauthorized access to our information systems. There can be no assurance that our cybersecurity risk management program and processes, including our policies, controls, or procedures, will be fully implemented, complied with or effective in protecting our information technology systems and confidential information. Because we make extensive use of service providers that support our operations, significant cyberattacks that disrupt or compromise third-party IT Systems could materially impact our business. The continued development and integration of artificial intelligence in our or third-party providers’ operations is expected to pose new and unknown cybersecurity risks.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

26new paragraphs
29removed paragraphs
62reworded paragraphs
14,865 → 14,620words in section

New heading “Commercial Loan Servicing”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Reworded topics: impairment, goodwill, interest rate

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The increase in expenses was due to increases in personnel costs, amortizationindemnified and depreciation,repurchased provisionloan (benefit)expenses, forand creditasset losses,impairments and other operating expenses, and lower fair value adjustments to contingent consideration liabilities, partially offset by lower goodwill impairment.impairment, and a decrease in interest expense on corporate debt. Personnel costs increased, largely due to increases in variable compensation costs for our salespeople as a result of our higher transaction volumes and subjectivesalaries bonusand compensationbenefits due to ourhigher improvedaverage financialheadcount. performance. AmortizationIndemnified and depreciationrepurchased loan expenses increased due to increases in loan repurchase losses and repurchased loan operating costs. Asset impairments and other expenses increased largely due to theour write-offstrategic decision to sell asset management contracts and interests in assets held within one of intangible assets related to the pending sale of a portfolio of assets by our LIHTCaffordable subsidiaryoperating combinedsubsidiaries. withThe aexpected smallersales prices were below current carrying values in many instances resulting in an impairment loss. There was also an increase in amortization of MSRs. Provision (benefit) for credit losses changed from a benefit to a provision, primarily due to provision for losses related to repurchased loans. Other operating expenses increased largely as a result of increased travel and entertainment mostly related to our all-company meeting, with no comparable activity in 2023, software costs associated with automation efforts, and expenses associated with repurchased loans. Additionally, the results for 2023 include the write off of unamortized premium from corporate debt repayment,repayment. whichInterest reducedexpense otheron operatingcorporate expenses,debt decreased due to lower average interest rates during 2025 compared to 2024, partially offset by an increase in the balance outstanding from the refinancing of our debt. Goodwill impairment decreased due to an impairment in 2024 with no comparable activity in 2024.2025. Fair value adjustments to contingent consideration decreased primarily due to thea larger adjustmentsadjustment in 20232024 due to the challenging market conditions related to one of our reporting units that impacted the estimated fair value of future earnout payments morewithout acutelya thansimilar adjustment to the earnout for that reporting unit in 2024. Goodwill impairment decreased due a decrease in the size of the impairment and number of reporting units impacted.2025.
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: impairment, goodwill
“A 10% change in the cash flows used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2024 would have increased or decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by 24%. A 20% change in the cash flows used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2024 would have increased or decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by 48%. A 100 basis-point change in the discount rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2024 would have increased or decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by 15%. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: liquidity, interest rate
“Capital Availability & Lending Markets: During the period of rapid interest rate increases by the FOMC from March 2022 through the end of 2023, liquidity was constrained as lenders found it difficult to effectively price their long-term cost of capital. As interest rates have stabilized, capital has grown more abundant. Banks, life insurance companies, conduits (CMBS), and debt funds remain active but are selective, with a preference for high-quality assets and well-capitalized sponsors. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: impairment, goodwill
“Goodwill impairment. Goodwill impairment decreased due to the lower projected cash flows at one of our reporting units in the CM reportable segment compared to two reporting units in 2023. Additionally, the size of the impairment per reporting unit decreased in 2024 from 2023 as the challenging market conditions and related future expectations began to improve.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: investigation, impairment
“Asset impairments and other expenses. Asset impairments and other expenses consist of asset impairments of investments, write-offs of unamortized deferred issuance costs associated with repayments of our corporate debt, costs associated with corporate investigations and other professional fees driven by specific individual events.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: impairment, interest rate

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Servicing fees increased due to growth in the average balance of the servicing portfolio period over period as a result of loan originations, partially offset by a decrease in the average servicing fee rate. Investment management fees decreased primarily due to lower AMF revenues from LIHTC dispositions.originations. Placement fees and other interest income increaseddecreased primarily due to decrease in the placement fee rate due to the interest rate environment, partially offset by an increase in theinterest averageincome balancefrom ofshort-term escrowloans deposits.to our affordable joint ventures. Other revenues increaseddecreased primarily due to the gain on equity method investments from the aforementioned sale of a portfolioproperty ofin assets.a fund in 2024 with no comparable activity in 2025. Personnel increased primarily due to an increase in salaries and benefit costs and subjective bonus compensation.compensation Netdue write-offsprimarily decreasedto an increase in average segment headcount. Indemnified and repurchased loan expenses increased due to thean write-offincrease ofin arepurchase loancosts heldand foroperating costs. Asset impairments and other expenses increased primarily due to investment duringimpairments 2023 with a larger UPB, while the write offtaken in 2024 related to a loan with a smaller UPB.2025.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (117)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 30 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Added

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is a holding company, and we conduct the majority of our operations through Walker & Dunlop, LLC, our primary operating company. During the fourth quarter of 2025, we granted profit interest awards to certain non-executive employees of Walker & Dunlop, LLC to better align their incentive compensation with our goals. The profit interest awards allocate 15% of the income before taxes of a wholly owned subsidiary to these employees. The wholly owned subsidiary is focused on debt financing transactions closed by these employees and is part of our Capital Markets segment.

Removed

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is a holding company, and we conduct the majority of our operations through Walker & Dunlop, LLC, our primary operating company.

Reworded

We originate and sell multifamily loans through the programs of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae, and HUD, with which we have licenses and long-established relationships. We retain servicing rights and asset management responsibilities on nearly all loans that we originate for the Agencies’ programs. We are approved as a Fannie Mae DUS lender nationally, a Freddie Mac Optigo lender nationally for Conventional, Seniors Housing, Targeted Affordable Housing and Small Balance Loans, a HUD MAP lender nationally, a HUD LEAN lender nationally, and a Ginnie Mae issuer. We broker and service loans for many life insurance companies, commercial banks, and other institutional investors, in which cases we do not fund the loan but rather act as a loan broker. Fannie Mae recently announced that we ranked as its largest DUS lender in 2024,2025, by loan deliveries, and Freddie Mac recently announced that we ranked as its 4th3rd largest Freddie Mac lender in 2024,2025, by loan deliveries. Our market share with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was 10.7%11.2% on a combined basis, by loan deliveries in 2024,2025, compared to 11.3%10.7% in 2023.2024. Additionally, we were the 2nd5th largest overall lender for HUD infor 2024.its fiscal year ended September 30, 2025.

Reworded

We recognize revenue when we make simultaneous commitments to originate a loan to a borrower and sell that loan to an investor. The revenues earned reflect the fair value attributable to loan origination fees, premiums on the sale of loans, net of any co-broker fees, and the fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with servicing the loans, net of any guaranty obligations retained. We also recognize revenue when we receive the origination fee from a brokered loan transaction. Other transaction-related sources of revenue include (i) net warehouse interest income we earn or expense we incur while the loan is held for sale, (ii) net warehouse interest income from loans held for investment while they are outstanding, (iii) sales commissions for brokering the sale of multifamily and hospitality properties, and (iviii) syndication and transaction-based asset management fees from our investment management activities.

Reworded

We are currently not exposed to unhedged interest rate risk during the loan commitment, closing, and delivery process. The sale or placement of each loan to an investor is negotiated concurrently with establishing the coupon rate for the loan. We also seek to mitigate the risk of a loan not closing. We have agreements in place with the Agencies that specify the cost of a failed loan delivery in the event we fail to deliver the loan to the investor. To protect us against such fees, we require a deposit from the borrower at rate lock that is typically more than the potential fee. The deposit is returned to the borrower only once the loan is closed. Any potential loss from a catastrophic change in the property condition while the loan is held for sale using warehouse facility financing is mitigated through property insurance equal to replacement cost. We are also protected contractually from an investor’s failure to purchase the loan. We have experienced a de minimis number of failed deliveries in our history and have incurred immaterialinsignificant losses on such failed deliveries.

Reworded

We have risk-sharing obligations on substantially all loans we originate under the Fannie Mae DUS program. When a Fannie Mae DUS loan is subject to full risk-sharing, we absorb losses on the first 5% of the unpaid principal balance of a loan at the time of loss settlement, and above 5% we share a percentage of the loss with Fannie Mae, with our maximum loss capped at 20% of the original loan amount (subject to doubling or tripling if the loan does not meet specific underwriting criteria or if the loan defaults within 12 months of its sale to Fannie Mae). Our full risk-sharing is currently limited to loans up to $300$400 million, which equates to a maximum loss per loan of $60$80 million (such exposure would occur in the event that the underlying collateral is determined to be completely without value at the time of loss)., updated from $300 million in the fourth quarter of 2025. For loans in excess of $300$400 million, we receive modified risk-sharing. We also may request modified risk-sharing at the time of origination on loans below $300$400 million, which reduces our potential risk-sharing losses from the levels described above if we do not believe that we are being fully compensated for the risks of the transactions. The full risk-sharing limit in prior years was less than $300$400 million. Accordingly, loans originated in those prior years were subject to risk-sharing at lower levels. In limited circumstances we have agreed, and may in the future agree, with Fannie Mae to increase our loss sharing up to 100% of a loan’s UPB in lieu of the risk-sharing agreement described above. Our servicing fees for risk-sharing loans include compensation for the risk-sharing obligations and are substantially larger than the servicing fees we receive from Fannie Mae for loans with no risk-sharing obligations.

Removed

We retain servicing rights on substantially all the loans we originate and sell and generate revenues from the fees we receive for servicing the loans, from the placement fees on escrow deposits held on behalf of borrowers, and from other ancillary fees. Servicing fees set at the time an investor agrees to purchase the loan are generally paid monthly for the duration of the loan and are based on the unpaid principal balance of the loan. Our Fannie Mae servicing arrangements generally provide for prepayment protection in the event of a voluntary prepayment. For loans serviced outside of Fannie Mae, we typically do not have similar prepayment protections. For loans serviced for Freddie Mac, the economic deterrent that reduces the risk of loan prepayment comes in the form of a defeasance requirement wherein the borrower is required to replace the prepaid loan with securities that offer an equivalent return.

Removed

As of December 31, 2024, our servicing portfolio was $135.3 billion, up 4% from December 31, 2023, which was the 7th largest commercial/multifamily primary and master servicing portfolio in the nation according to the Mortgage Bankers’ Association’s (“MBA”) 2024 year-end survey (the “Survey”). Our servicing portfolio includes $68.2 billion of loans serviced for Fannie Mae and $39.2 billion for Freddie Mac, making us the 1st and 6th largest servicer of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac multifamily loans in the nation, respectively, according to the Survey. Also included in our servicing portfolio is $10.8 billion of multifamily HUD loans, the 4th largest HUD primary and servicing portfolio in the nation according to the Survey.

Reworded

Through WDIS, we offer property sales brokerage services to owners and developers of multifamily and hospitality properties that are seeking to sell these properties. Through these property sales brokerage services, we seek to maximize proceeds and certainty of closure for our clients using our knowledge of the commercial real estate and capital markets and relying on our experienced transaction professionals. Our property sales services are offered in various regions throughout the United States and cover many major markets. We have added several property sales brokerage teams over the past few years and continue to seek to add other property sales brokers, with the goal of continuing to expand the depth and number of regions covered by our brokerage services.

Added

Commercial Loan Servicing

Added

We retain servicing rights on substantially all the loans we originate and sell to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and HUD, and generate revenues from the fees we receive for servicing the loans, from the placement fees on escrow deposits held on behalf of borrowers, and from other ancillary fees. Servicing fees are set at the time an investor agrees to purchase the loan and are generally paid monthly for the duration of the loan based on the unpaid principal balance of the loan. Our Fannie Mae servicing arrangements generally provide for prepayment protection in the event of a voluntary prepayment. For loans serviced for Freddie Mac, the economic deterrent that reduces the risk of loan prepayment comes in the form of a defeasance requirement wherein the borrower is required to replace the prepaid loan with securities that offer an equivalent return. We also service loans for many of the life insurance companies, conduits and private credit vehicles to which we broker loans. Our responsibilities for servicing brokered loans are limited to cashiering only, and typically earn lower servicing fees than our Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and HUD loan servicing arrangements. For loans serviced outside of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and HUD, we typically do not have similar prepayment protections that reduce the risk of loan prepayment.

Added

As of December 31, 2025, our servicing portfolio was $144.0 billion, up 6% from December 31, 2024, which was the 6th largest commercial/multifamily primary and master servicing portfolio in the nation according to the Mortgage Bankers’ Association’s (“MBA”) 2025 year-end survey (the “Survey”). Our servicing portfolio includes $72.7 billion of loans serviced for Fannie Mae and $42.6 billion for Freddie Mac, making us the 1st and 7th largest servicer of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac multifamily loans in the nation, respectively, according to the Survey. Also included in our servicing portfolio is $11.6 billion of multifamily HUD loans, the 4th largest HUD primary and servicing portfolio in the nation according to the Survey.

Reworded

WDIP, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is part of our strategy to grow and diversify the Company by growing our investment management platform. WDIP is a registered investment adviser and general partner of private commercial real estate investment funds focused on the management of debt, preferred equity, and mezzanine equity investments through private middle-market commercial real estate funds and separately managed accounts. WDIP’s current AUM of $2.3$2.7 billion primarily consist of eight sources: Fund III, Fund IV, Fund V, Fund VI, Fund VII, Debt Fund I, and Debt Fund II (collectively, the “Funds”), and separate accounts managed for life insurance companies.companies and a preferred equity JV with a large Canadian pension fund. AUM for the Funds and for the separate accounts consists of both unfunded commitments and funded investments. Unfunded commitments are highest during the fund raising and investment phases. AUM disclosed in this 10-K may differ from regulatory assets under management disclosed on WDIP’s Form ADV.

Reworded

WDIP typically receives management fees based on limited partner capital commitments, unfunded investment commitments, and funded investments. Additionally, with respect to Fund III, Fund IV, Fund V, Fund VI, and Fund VII, WDIP receives a percentage of the profits above the fund expenses and preferred return specified in the fund offering agreements.agreements, referred to as “carry” or “promote”. Unrealized carry is recognized based on the estimated fair value of the underlying investments, and realized carry is recognized when an investment is repaid and capital is returned to investors in the respective fund.

Reworded

Through WDAE, a wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of the Company, we are the 8th9th largest tax credit syndicator in the U.S., as measured by the number of Affordable units under management, and an affordable housing developer through various joint venture partnerships. Affordable assets under management from our LIHTC operations is part of our strategy to grow our investment management platform and to strengthen our position in the affordable housing debt, equity, and property sales sector. We manage $15.9 billion of affordable AUM and have an established tax syndication and affordable housing development platform from which we earn investment management, syndication, and other LIHTC related fees.

Added

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, and all intercompany transactions have been eliminated. During the fourth quarter of 2025, we granted profit interest awards to certain non-executive employees of Walker & Dunlop, LLC to better align their incentive compensation with our goals. The profit interest awards allocate 15% of the income before taxes of a wholly owned subsidiary to these employees. The wholly owned subsidiary is focused on debt financing transactions closed by these employees and is part of our Capital Markets segment.

Removed

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, and all intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

Reworded

The weighted-average annual loss rate is calculated using a ten-year look-back period, utilizing the average portfolio balance and settled losses for each year. A ten-year lookback period is used as we believe this period of time includes sufficiently different economic conditions to generate a reasonable estimate of expected results in the future, given the relatively long-term nature of the current portfolio. As the weighted-average annual loss rate utilizes a rolling ten-year look-back period, the loss rate used in the estimate will change as loss data from earlier periods in the look-back period continue to roll off as new loss data are added. For example, in the first quarter of 2024, loss data from earlier periods in the look-back period with significantly higher losses rolled off and were replaced with more recent loss data with fewer losses, resulting in the weighted-average historical annual loss rate changing from 0.6 basis points to 0.3 basis points. Our historical loss rate over the past ten years is 0.2 basis points.

Added

Property Valuations. As noted above, property valuations are a key component of our collateral-based reserves for our risk-sharing portfolio. Additionally, property valuations impact our impairment analyses for real estate held for use (“real estate HFU”) and other real estate owned (“OREO”), the assessment of allowances for loan losses, and the assessment of any expected principal losses on loan repurchase. Those property values are determined using (i) standard appraisals obtained from certified appraisers at national firms subjected to management review or (ii) internal management valuations using inputs and assumptions such as capitalization rates (“cap rates”), net operating income of the property, vacancy rates, bad debt expense, and rental rates. The appraisals often include assumptions about comparable sales and cap rates, among other things. Management reviews those assumptions against its own experience and market data to assess the reasonableness of the assumptions and the resulting property valuations. When management determines the property valuation using an internal model, management maximizes the use of its historical experience with the property and market data from well-recognized data providers. We also may benchmark our historical experience with external data sources to assess the reasonableness of our inputs and assumptions.

Added

We believe our property valuations are reasonable and in line with those a market participant would develop. However, actual sales prices for these properties may differ from those used by management. Additionally, significant changes in the assumptions or judgments would have a significant impact on our reserves and impairment analyses and thus our reported financial results. As noted above, with respect to the property valuations and associated reserves for our risk-sharing portfolio, we have not experienced significant changes from the time of initial reserve and final settlement. However, with respect to properties used for reserves on repurchased loans and impairment analyses for real estate HFU and OREO, we have never disposed of a property.

Removed

Contingent Consideration Liabilities. The Company often includes an earnout as part of the consideration paid for acquisitions to align the long-term interests of the acquiree with those of the Company. These earnouts contain milestones for achievement, which typically are revenue, revenue-like, or productivity measurements. If the milestone is achieved, the acquiree is paid the additional consideration. Upon acquisition, the Company is required to estimate the fair value of the earnout and include that fair value measurement as a component of the total consideration paid in the calculation of goodwill. The fair value of the earnout is recorded as a contingent consideration liability and included within Other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and adjusted to the estimated fair value periodically.

Removed

The determination of the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities requires significant management judgment and unobservable inputs to (i) determine forecasts and scenarios of future revenues, net cash flows and certain other performance metrics, (ii) assign a probability of achievement for the forecasts and scenarios, and (iii) select a discount rate. A Monte Carlo simulation analysis is used to determine many iterations of potential fair values. The average of these iterations is then used to determine the estimated fair value. We typically obtain the assistance of third-party valuation specialists to assist with the fair value estimation. The probability of the earnout achievement is based on management’s estimate of the expected future performance and other financial metrics of each of the acquired entities, which are subject to significant uncertainty. Changes to the aforementioned inputs impact the estimate; for example, in 2024, we recorded a reduction of $50.3 million to the fair value of our contingent consideration liabilities based on revised management forecasts, scenarios, and other valuation inputs (NOTE 7 in the consolidated financial statements details changes in the estimate over the past two years).

Removed

In 2024, we updated the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration liability for the GeoPhy acquisition. The update resulted in a $34.5 million reduction of the expected liability, effectively reducing the expected liability to zero. Neither a change of 10% nor a change of 20% in the cash flows used for the GeoPhy contingent consideration liability assessment as of December 31, 2024 would have had any impact on the fair value, as the fair value of the GeoPhy contingent consideration was zero as of December 31, 2024. Additionally, in 2024, we also updated the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration liability for the Alliant acquisition. The update resulted in a $10.8 million reduction of the expected liability. A decrease of 10% in the cash flows assumed for this contingent consideration liability assessment as of December 31, 2024 would have decreased the expected payout by an additional 9%, while a decrease of 20% would have decreased the payout by 19%. Changes in the cash flows for the contingent consideration liabilities associated with other acquisitions would have resulted in immaterial changes in the fair values of those contingent consideration liabilities. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as they do not include interplay among assumptions.

Removed

The aggregate fair value of our contingent consideration liabilities as of December 31, 2024 was $30.5 million. This fair value represents management’s best estimate of the discounted cash payments that will be made in the future for all of our remaining contingent consideration arrangements. The maximum remaining undiscounted earnout payments as of December 31, 2024 was $258.5 million, with the vast majority of the undiscounted payments related to the GeoPhy acquisition. In 2022 and 2021, we made two large acquisitions that included significant amounts of contingent consideration to maximize alignment of the key principals and management teams. The earnouts completed prior to 2021 involved businesses that operated in our core debt financing business and involved substantially smaller amounts of contingent consideration as compared to the two aforementioned acquisitions.

Reworded

Goodwill. As of both December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, goodwill was $868.7 million and $901.7 million, respectively.million. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit to which the acquisition relates. Goodwill is recognized as an asset and is reviewed for impairment annually as of October 1. Between annual impairment analyses, we perform an evaluation of recoverability, when events and circumstances indicate that it is more-likely-thanmore-likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is below its carrying value. Impairment testing requires an assessment of qualitative factors to determine if there are indicators of potential impairment, followed by, if necessary, an assessment of quantitative factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, whether there has been a significant or adverse change in the business climate that could affect the value of an asset and/or significant or adverse changes in cash flow projections or earnings forecasts. These assessments require management to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates about projected cash flows, discount rates and other factors.

Reworded

In 2022, we acquired GeoPhy, a software development company focused on data analytics and product development with a specific concentration in U.S. commercial real estate. As part of the acquisition, a significant portion of the transaction proceeds were contingent upon the achievement of performance-based hurdles tied to commercial real estate transaction volumes and associated revenues from the date of the acquisition through December 31, 2025. Due to the sustained challenging macroeconomic conditions relatedin tothe aU.S. reportingcommercial unit,real estate sector from the date of the acquisition through December 31, 2025, outlined more fully in Overview of Current Business Environment, our projected cash flows for this reporting unit declined, resulting in goodwill impairment during 2024 of $33.0 million or 3.7% of the aggregate goodwill balance outstanding at the time. We attributed this goodwill impairment to one of the reporting units to which the GeoPhy operations and goodwill are assigned, which is a component of the Capital Markets segment. The remaining goodwill assigned to this reporting unit as of December 31, 2024 was $80.8 million.

Removed

A 10% change in the cash flows used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2024 would have increased or decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by 24%. A 20% change in the cash flows used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2024 would have increased or decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by 48%. A 100 basis-point change in the discount rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2024 would have increased or decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by 15%. A 200 basis-point change in the discount rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit as of December 31, 2024 would have increased or decreased the goodwill impairment recognized by 30%. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as they do not include interplay among assumptions.

Reworded

As of December 31, 2024,2025, our assessment of the remaining goodwill at each of our other reporting units, totaling $787.9 million,units indicates they are not impaired (NOTE 79 of the consolidated financial statements details the changes in the goodwill balance).

Reworded

TheFrom 2022 through the first quarter of 2025, the commercial real estate (CRE) market, and in particular the multifamily sector is experiencingexperienced a challenging environment shaped by elevated interest rates that are directly impactingimpacted the cost and availability of capital, slower rent growth that ishas impactingimpacted growth expectations and asset valuations, and macroeconomic uncertainties that areimpacted impactinginvestors’ long-term outlook and overall demand for transactions. Although these factors have all shown signs of improvement throughout 2024, indicating a recovery may be underway, these factors generally negatively impacted the commercial real estate transactions market throughout 2024.

Added

Many of these factors showed signs of improvement throughout 2025 and the outlook for the commercial real estate sector has improved, and transaction activity has steadily grown over the course of the year. The impact of these factors can be summarized as follows:

Removed

Interest Rates & Cost of Capital: The Federal Open Market Committee’s (“FOMC”) aggressive rate hikes over the past two years materially increased the cost of capital for commercial real estate operators. Higher borrowing costs have reduced leverage, pressured debt service coverage ratios, and led to valuation declines as cap rates adjust. While some investors remain active, deal flow has slowed as buyers and sellers struggle to align on pricing in an environment of heightened uncertainty. The FOMC decreased its target Federal Funds Rate at three of its last four meetings, lowering the target rate to 4.25% to 4.50% at its December 2024 meeting. The FOMC has indicated rates will remain elevated for longer, and the market is expecting few rate cuts in 2025 as a result. This should have the effect of stabilizing interest rates, albeit higher than many investors in commercial real estate hoped. The FOMC’s future rate policy will be a key driver of transaction volume and capital markets activity. A pronounced pause in rate hikes or additional rate cuts could unlock demand and improve financing conditions for commercial real estate assets.

Removed

Capital Availability & Lending Markets: During the period of rapid interest rate increases by the FOMC from March 2022 through the end of 2023, liquidity was constrained as lenders found it difficult to effectively price their long-term cost of capital. As interest rates have stabilized, capital has grown more abundant. Banks, life insurance companies, conduits (CMBS), and debt funds remain active but are selective, with a preference for high-quality assets and well-capitalized sponsors. Meanwhile, the availability of equity capital has also tightened, making it more challenging for sponsors to secure financing for acquisitions or refinancings. The GSEs, the predominant suppliers of capital to the multifamily market, deployed $120 billion of capital to the industry in 2024, up from $101 billion in 2023. Entering 2025, the GSE’s lending caps were set at combined $146 billion, providing them a 22% increase in capacity over 2024 volumes. As Fannie Mae’s largest partner for six consecutive years, and Freddie Mac’s fourth largest partner in 2024, their participation in the market is a significant driver of our financial performance and a material increase in their lending activity would enhance our business and results from operations.

Removed

Multifamily Rent Growth & Asset Values: Rent growth has slowed considerably over the past 12-18 months, particularly in high-supply Sun Belt markets. This has made it difficult for net operating income (NOI) growth to offset valuation declines caused by elevated interest rates. Markets with strong job growth and in-migration continue to see rent increases, with Zelman, our housing research arm, reporting national rent growth of approximately 2% in 2024, a pace that is far below the aggressive rent growth seen in 2021 and 2022. According to MSCI, in December 2024, multifamily property prices remained stable month-over-month but were down 4.2% compared to the previous year. Notably, multifamily prices have declined by 19.6% from their peak, but remain 11.9% above pre-COVID January 2020 levels.

Removed

Other Macroeconomic Considerations: The national unemployment rate remained low at 4.1% in December 2024. According to RealPage, vacancies in the multifamily sector stabilized around 5.2% as of December 2024, down from 5.8% in December 2023. An all-time high number of multifamily units were delivered to the sector in 2024, particularly in high demand Sun Belt markets. Most of those units were absorbed in 2024, and we expect that absorption will continue into the first half of 2025. Looking forward, multifamily completions are anticipated to decrease significantly due to stalled new construction starts in 2023 and 2024, largely driven by tighter liquidity. Long term, we believe the fundamentals for multifamily properties will trend positively due to constrained supply resulting from reduced construction starts, recent negative trends in household formation and a lack of entry-level single-family homes driving strong demand for rental housing in many areas.

Reworded

Despite the current headwinds, multifamilyMultifamily remains one of the most resilient asset classes in CRE. Market participants are adjusting to current conditions and we expect the market to continue recovering and transaction activity to continue to increase. Improving conditions in the second half of 20242025 led to increased transaction volumes across nearly all aspects of our business during 2024,2025, which surged to $39.9$54.8 billion with notable increases in Brokered (37%), GSE (11%38%) and property sales (11%37%) transaction volumes compared to last year. Consequently, our Capital Markets segment produced net income of $66.7$89.8 million in 2024,2025, up 62%35% compared to 2023.2024.

Reworded

Our Servicing & Asset Management segment is not directly correlated to the transaction markets like our Capital Markets segment. This segment’s total managed portfolio of $153.7$162.6 billion as of December 31, 20242025 was up 4%6% from December 31, 2023,2024, and included our $135.3$144.0 billion loan servicing portfolio and our $18.4$18.6 billion of assets under management.AUM. Total revenues for the segment grewdecreased 5%,4%, to $591.6$566.6 million, while net income decreased 5%,46%, to $157.8$85.1 million, in 20242025 compared to 2023,2024, althoughwith net income showed signs of improvementdecreasing in the fourth quarter of 20242025 compared to 2023. The revenues from the servicing portfolio have benefitted from higher short-term interest rates.2024. We hold escrow deposits on behalf of our servicing portfolio and place those deposits with large, multinational banks that earn close to Fedthe Funds.Federal Wefunds expectrate. theseRevenues revenuesfrom those escrow deposits have benefitted over the last several years from higher short-term interest rates, but we have begun to declinesee movingdeclines forwardin those revenues as the FOMC eventuallyhas reduceseased monetary policy and adjusted short-term rates downward. We expect that trend to continue, but moderate, in 2026 as the FOMC may slow the pace, and rate, of interest rates.rate Overreductions. the past two years, weWe have shiftedincreased our focus toon scaling our assets under management, and in the fourth quarter of 2024 we successfully closed a first round of $200 million of equity capital for Debt Fund II from life insurance companies, pension funds, high net worth investors and a co-investment from Walker & Dunlop. DebtThe Fundinitial IIclosing will provideprovided our investment management team with over $500 million of levered capitalcapital, toof deploywhich approximately $490 million was deployed into transitional multifamily assets.assets in 2025. We continue to actively raise capital for Debt Fund II, and we expect the revenues of our investment management business to grow as that capital is raised and deployed. This segment also includes the activities of WDAE, an alternative investment manager focused on affordable housing, including LIHTC syndication and joint venture development. We ranked as the eighthninth largest LIHTC syndicator in 20242025 and continue to pursue combined LIHTC syndication and affordable housing services to generate significant long-term financing, property sales, and syndication opportunities. We expect the revenues for WDAE to remain fairly stable moving forward, as the realization revenues from our historical LIHTC investments are tied to the underlying value of the affordable assets, and we do not expect a material increase in the value of affordable assets in the near term due to the aforementioned macroeconomic challenges facing the commercial real estate sector.

Reworded

Premiums received on the sale of a loan result when a loan is sold to an investor for more than its face value. There are various reasons investors may pay a premium when purchasing a loan. For example, the fixed rate on the loan may be higher than the rate of return required by an investor or the characteristics of a particular loan may be desirable to an investor. We do not receive premiums on brokered loans, since we doare not originate the loan.lender.

Reworded

Fair Value of Expected Net Cash Flows from Servicing, net.net of Guaranty Obligation. Revenue related to expected net cash flows from servicing is recognized at the loan commitment date, similar to the loan origination fees, as described above. The derivative asset is recognized at fair value, which reflects the estimated fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with the servicing of the loan, reduced by the estimated fair value of any guaranty obligations to be assumed. MSRs and guaranty obligations are recognized as assets and liabilities, respectively, upon the sale of the loans.

Reworded

Servicing Fees. We service nearly all loans we originate for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, and some loans we broker. We earn servicing fees for performing certain loan servicing functions such as processing loan, tax, and insurance payments and managing escrow balances. Servicing generally also includes asset management functions, such as monitoring the physical condition of the property, analyzing the financial condition and liquidity of the borrower, and performing loss mitigation activities as directed by the Agencies.

Reworded

Investment Management Fees. We manage invested capital from third-party investors through an investment fund structure. The capital placed into the investment fund is utilized to make investments in commercial real estate investment opportunities, primarily as equity in commercial real estate operating partnerships or LIHTC-generating multifamily properties. Additionally, we may utilize the capital to fund debt financing opportunities through certain investment funds, primarily to multifamily owner-operators. We earn an investment management or asset management fee based on a contractual percentage of the invested capital. For market-rate investments, we earn and collect the investment management fees through the returns of the investment funds. For LIHTC investments, we collect the asset management fees (“AMF”) through the combination of current payments and asset dispositions. NOTE 2 of the consolidated financial statements provides additional details of the accounting for AMF revenues. We also are entitled to a set percentage of the sales proceeds for properties in LIHTC funds. We, as general partner, may sell properties in the funds after the tax credits have been fully distributed to the investors in the funds. The proceeds are used to pay the fund’s obligations and provide any excess as a return to the investor(s) in the fund, with a small percentage retained by us for executing the sale. These sales fees are also included as a component of this line item.

Reworded

Net Warehouse Interest Income (Expense)—. We earn warehouse interest income net of warehouse interest expense. Warehouse interest income is the interest earned from loans held for sale and loans held for investment. Generally, a substantial portion of our loans is financed with matched borrowings under one of our warehouse facilities. The remaining portion of loans not funded with matched borrowings is financed with our own cash. Occasionally, we also fully fund a small number of loans held for sale or loans held for investment with our own cash. Warehouse interest expense is incurred on borrowings used to fund loans solely while they are held for sale or for investment. Warehouse interest income and expense are earned or incurred on loans held for sale after a loan is closed and before a loan is sold. Warehouse interest income and expense are earned or incurred on loans held for investment after a loan is closed and before a loan is repaid. NOTE 67 of the consolidated financial statements provides additional details regarding our warehouse facilities.

Reworded

Provision (benefit) for credit losses. The provision (benefit) for credit losses consists primarily of the provision associated with our risk-sharing loans, including pre-securitized Freddie Mac SBL loans. The provision (benefit) for credit losses associated with risk-sharing loans is estimated on a collective basis when a loan is sold to Fannie Mae and is based on our current expected credit losses on the current portfolio from loan sale to maturity. When a loan is probable of default (in foreclosure) and thus collateral dependent, the loan is taken out of the collective evaluation and individually evaluated for credit losses. Our estimates of property fair value are based on appraisals, broker opinions of value, or net operating income and market capitalization rates, whichever we believe is the best estimate of the net disposition value. Also included is a provision (benefit) for loan and other credit losses related to indemnified Agency loans. Given the nature and performance of these loans, we individually evaluate these loans for credit losses as described above.

Reworded

The “Critical Accounting Estimates” section above and NOTE 2 of the consolidated financial statements provide additional details of the accounting for the provision (benefit) for credit losses.losses associated with our at-risk servicing portfolio.

Reworded

The “Critical Accounting Estimates” section above and NOTE 89 of the consolidated financial statements provide additional details of the accounting for this expense.

Added

Indemnified and repurchased loan expenses. Indemnified and repurchased loan expenses include the expected principal losses on loan repurchases (“loan repurchase losses”), the initial loan repurchase costs, and indemnified and repurchased loans operating costs related to repurchased loans. The loan repurchase losses represent the estimated losses of principal from indemnifying the loan. The initial loan repurchase costs are composed of any indemnifiable legal costs, reimbursed interest, and prepayment costs associated with repurchasing a loan. The indemnified and repurchased loans operating costs are expenses we incur in operating and/or maintaining the loan and/or property collateralizing the loan.

Added

NOTE 2 and NOTE 5 of the consolidated financial statements provide additional details of the accounting for this expense.

Added

Asset impairments and other expenses. Asset impairments and other expenses consist of asset impairments of investments, write-offs of unamortized deferred issuance costs associated with repayments of our corporate debt, costs associated with corporate investigations and other professional fees driven by specific individual events.

Reworded

Other operating expenses. Other operating expenses include facilities costs, travel and entertainment costs, marketing costs, professional fees, losses on debt extinguishment, accretion of contingent consideration liabilities, corporate insurance premiums, software costs, and other general and administrative expenses.

Reworded

Income tax expense. The Company is a C-corporation subject to federal, state, and international corporate tax. Our estimated combined statutory federal, state, and international tax rate was 25.1%, 26.1%,25.1%, and 26.1% for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, 2023, and 2022,2023, respectively. Except for the effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Reform”), our combined statutory tax rate has historically not varied significantly as the only material difference in the calculation of the combined statutory tax rate from year to year is the apportionment of our taxable income amongstamong the various states where we are subject to taxation since our foreign operations are (i) immaterialinsignificant and (ii) taxed at a rate similar to our blended federal and state tax rate. Absent additional significant legislative changes to statutory tax rates (particularly the federal tax rate), we expect low deviation from the 20242025 combined statutory tax rate for future years. However, we do expect some variability in the effective tax rate going forward due to excess tax benefits and shortfalls recognized and limitations on the deductibility of certain book expenses as a result of Tax Reform, primarily related to executive compensation.

Added

Total transaction volume growth of 37% was the principal driver of revenue growth in 2025. Transaction related revenues—loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net (“origination fees”) plus the fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net of guaranty obligations (“MSR income”) plus property sales broker fees—increased 23% year over year. Revenues grew at a slower pace than transaction volumes principally due to lower non-cash MSR income on our new Fannie Mae loan originations. This was driven by two factors: (i) a portion of our volume in 2025 was driven by larger portfolio transactions which earn lower servicing fees as a percentage of loan volume and (ii) the weighted average servicing fees and loan terms—two key inputs that drive the estimated fair value of MSR income—for new loans were lower year over year. Borrowers have consistently been opting for shorter duration loans since interest rates began rising sharply in 2022, and that trend continued in 2025. Growth in transaction volume supported 6% growth in our loan servicing portfolio, to $144.0 billion at December 31, 2025. Growth in the loan servicing portfolio drove the 4% growth in servicing fees year on year, which was offset, however, by the decline in placement fees and other interest income. Placement fees are closely correlated to short-term interest rates, and the decline in short-term interest rates throughout 2025 drives the 9% decline in placement fees and other interest income. Other revenues decreased primarily due to a discreet transaction. In 2024, we sold an asset held within our affordable operating subsidiary that generated a gain in 2024 that was included in Other revenues with no comparable activity in 2025. The decline in Other revenues was partially offset by an increase in investment banking revenues and prepayment fees, and various other revenue categories.

Removed

The increase in revenues was driven by increases in loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net (“origination fees”), fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net (“MSR income”), servicing fees, property sales broker fees, and placement fees and other interest income, partially offset by a decrease in investment management fees. Origination fees and MSR income increased largely as a result of a 23% increase in overall debt financing volume. The increase in servicing fees was primarily driven by an increase in the average servicing portfolio. Property sales broker fees increased primarily due to an 11% increase in property sales volume. Placement fees and other interest income increased primarily as a result of higher fee arrangements with our financial partners and higher average escrow balances. Investment management fees decreased largely as a result of a decline in asset management fees from our LIHTC operations.

Reworded

The increase in expenses was due to increases in personnel costs, amortizationindemnified and depreciation,repurchased provisionloan (benefit)expenses, forand creditasset losses,impairments and other operating expenses, and lower fair value adjustments to contingent consideration liabilities, partially offset by lower goodwill impairment.impairment, and a decrease in interest expense on corporate debt. Personnel costs increased, largely due to increases in variable compensation costs for our salespeople as a result of our higher transaction volumes and subjectivesalaries bonusand compensationbenefits due to ourhigher improvedaverage financialheadcount. performance. AmortizationIndemnified and depreciationrepurchased loan expenses increased due to increases in loan repurchase losses and repurchased loan operating costs. Asset impairments and other expenses increased largely due to theour write-offstrategic decision to sell asset management contracts and interests in assets held within one of intangible assets related to the pending sale of a portfolio of assets by our LIHTCaffordable subsidiaryoperating combinedsubsidiaries. withThe aexpected smallersales prices were below current carrying values in many instances resulting in an impairment loss. There was also an increase in amortization of MSRs. Provision (benefit) for credit losses changed from a benefit to a provision, primarily due to provision for losses related to repurchased loans. Other operating expenses increased largely as a result of increased travel and entertainment mostly related to our all-company meeting, with no comparable activity in 2023, software costs associated with automation efforts, and expenses associated with repurchased loans. Additionally, the results for 2023 include the write off of unamortized premium from corporate debt repayment,repayment. whichInterest reducedexpense otheron operatingcorporate expenses,debt decreased due to lower average interest rates during 2025 compared to 2024, partially offset by an increase in the balance outstanding from the refinancing of our debt. Goodwill impairment decreased due to an impairment in 2024 with no comparable activity in 2024.2025. Fair value adjustments to contingent consideration decreased primarily due to thea larger adjustmentsadjustment in 20232024 due to the challenging market conditions related to one of our reporting units that impacted the estimated fair value of future earnout payments morewithout acutelya thansimilar adjustment to the earnout for that reporting unit in 2024. Goodwill impairment decreased due a decrease in the size of the impairment and number of reporting units impacted.2025.

Reworded

Income Tax Expense. The decrease in income tax expense primarily relates to a 5%40% decrease in income frombefore operationstaxes, combinedpartially withoffset by a decrease in the blended statutoryexcess tax ratebenefits. fromWe 26.1%recognized excess tax shortfalls of $1.4 million in 2025 compared to 25.1% and several one-timeexcess tax benefits duringof the$1.7 yearmillion ended December 31,in 2024.

Added

Net Income (Loss) from Noncontrolling Interests. The decrease in losses attributed to noncontrolling interests is largely the result of a change in the ownership of an entity producing losses in 2024. As part of a larger transaction with the noncontrolling interest holder, we regained full control of the entity at the end of 2024. The remaining noncontrolling interests in 2025 are insignificant.

Reworded

To supplement our financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP, we use adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure. The presentation of adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. When analyzing our operating performance, readers should use adjusted EBITDA in addition to, and not as an alternative for, net income. Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before income taxes, interest expense on our corporate debt, and amortization and depreciation, adjusted for provision (benefit) for credit losses, net write-offs based on the final resolution of the defaulted loans or collateral, loan repurchase losses, stock-based incentive compensation charges,compensation, the fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net,net of guaranty obligation, the write off of unamortized balance of premiumdeferred issuance costs associated with the repayment of a portion of our corporate debt, the gain from revaluation of a previously held equity-method investment, goodwill impairment, and contingent consideration liability fair value adjustments when the fair value adjustment is a triggering event for a goodwill impairment assessment. In cases where the fair value adjustment of contingent consideration liabilities is a trigger for goodwill impairment, the goodwill impairment is netted against the fair value adjustment of contingent consideration liabilities and included as a net number. Because not all companies use identical calculations, our presentation of adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Furthermore, adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for our management’s discretionary use, as it does not reflect certain cash requirements such as tax and debt service payments. The amounts shown for adjusted EBITDA may also differ from the amounts calculated under similarly titled definitions in our debt instruments, which are further adjusted to reflect certain other cash and non-cash charges that are used to determine compliance with financial covenants.

Reworded

We believe that adjusted EBITDA has limitations in that it does not reflect all of the amounts associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP and that adjusted EBITDA should only be used to evaluate our results of operations in conjunction with net income.income on both a consolidated and segment basis. Adjusted EBITDA is reconciled to net income as follows:

Removed

Adjusted EBITDA is reconciled to net income as follows:

Reworded

The increase in origination fees was primarily related to an increase in the overall debt financing volumes year over year. Servicing fees increased mainly due to an increase in the average balance of the servicing portfolio. Property sales broker fees increased largely as a result of an increase in property sales volume year over year. Investment management fees decreased primarily due to a decline in asset management fees from our LIHTC operations due to the sustained challenging market conditions. Placement fees and other interest income increaseddecreased primarily as a result of higherlower average escrowfee balances.arrangements Thewith our financial partners. Other revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease in the gain on sale of an asset in our affordable operations in 2024 with no comparable activity in 2025, partially offset by an increase in personnelinvestment banking revenues, prepayment fees, and various other revenue categories. Personnel costs wasincreased largely due to increases in variable compensation costs for our salespeople as a result of our higher transaction volumes and subjectivesalaries bonusand compensationbenefits due to ourhigher financialaverage performance.headcount. NetIndemnified write-offsand decreased primarily due to a $6.0 million write off of arepurchased loan held for investment in 2023 with only a small write-off in 2024. Other operating expenses increased largelydue as a result of increased travel and entertainment, software costs, and expenses associated with repurchased loans, partially offset byto an increase in beneficialrepurchase faircosts valueand adjustmentsrepurchased loan operating costs. Asset impairment and other expenses increased due to contingentincreases considerationin liabilities.asset impairments and investment charges. The decrease in losses attributed to noncontrolling interests is largely the result of a change in the ownership of an entity producing losses in 2024. As part of a larger transaction with the noncontrolling interest holder, we regained full control of the entity at the end of 2024. The remaining noncontrolling interests in 2025 are insignificant.

Reworded

Our cash flows from operating activities are generated from loan sales, servicing fees, placement fees, net warehouse interest income,income (expense), property sales broker fees, investment management fees, research subscription fees, investment banking advisory fees, and other income, net of loan origination and operating costs. Our cash flows from operating activities are impacted by the fees generated by our loan originations and property sales, the timing of loan closings, and the period of time loans are held for sale in the warehouse loan facility prior to delivery to the investor.

Reworded

We usually lease facilities and equipment for our operations. Our cash flows from investing activities also include the funding and repayment of loans held for investment, including repurchased loans, contributions to and distributions from joint ventures, purchases of equity-method investments, cash paid for acquisitions, and the purchase of available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities pledged to Fannie Mae.

Showing the first 60 of 117 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-06 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-07 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
68 → 68words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

We have included in Part I, Item 1A of our 2025 Form 10-K descriptions of certain risks and uncertainties that could affect our business, future performance, or financial condition (the “Risk Factors”). There have been no material changes from the disclosures provided in our 2025 Form 10-K. Investors should consider the Risk Factors prior to making an investment decision with respect to the Company’s stock.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

41new paragraphs
29removed paragraphs
37reworded paragraphs
11,309 → 12,301words in section

New heading “ADJUSTED EBITDA – CONSOLIDATED”

New heading “ADJUSTED EBITDA”

New heading “ADJUSTED EBITDA”

New heading “ADJUSTED EBITDA”

New heading “Loan Repurchases”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: inflation, interest rate, labor
“Inflation reaccelerated during the quarter, driven largely by higher energy prices, with the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) rising 4.2% year over year in May 2026, a 12 month high, and core CPI rising 2.9%. The labor market remained relatively stable though as unemployment fell to a twelve-month low of 4.2% for June 2026, while payroll growth moderated as evidenced by non-farm payroll growth of 57,000 in June 2026. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: default
“Total expenses increased $37.2 million, or 19%, due to an increase in Amortization and depreciation resulting from higher write-offs of MSRs following the payoff of the underlying loan. The increase was also driven by higher Provision (benefit) for credit losses and Indemnified and repurchased loan expenses. The charges year to date are concentrated in loans associated with a small number of fraudulent sponsors previously identified and were largely driven by three events. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: default
“Total expenses increased to $304.6 million, up 12%, primarily due to Provision (benefit) for credit losses and Indemnified and repurchased loan expenses. The charges this quarter were concentrated in loans associated with a small number of fraudulent sponsors previously identified and were largely driven by two events. First, a portfolio of previously repurchased loans defaulted during the quarter. We indemnified one of the GSEs on these loans in the fourth quarter of 2025, and the loans were performing until early in the second quarter of 2026. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: default
“Total expenses were up $26.5 million, or 27%, due to increases in Provision (benefit) for credit losses and Indemnified and repurchased loan expenses. The charges this quarter were concentrated in loans associated with a small number of fraudulent sponsors previously identified and were largely driven by two events. First, a portfolio of previously repurchased loans defaulted during the quarter. We indemnified one of the GSEs on these loans in the fourth quarter of 2025, and the loans were performing until early in the second quarter of 2026. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: inflation, labor
“During the first quarter of 2026, the U.S. macroeconomic environment remained constructive but uneven. Inflation continued to moderate, with the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) rising 2.4% year over year in February 2026 and core CPI rising 2.5%, both slightly above the Federal Reserve’s targets, while the labor market remained relatively stable, with March 2026 non-farm payroll growth of 178,000 and unemployment of 4.3%. At its March 2026 meeting, the Federal Reserve maintained the federal funds target range at 3.50% to 3.75%, reflecting a still-cautious policy stance.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: impairment
“As of June 30, 2026, we have either repurchased, or agreed to indemnify and repurchase (collectively, “Repurchased Loans”), $193.3 million of loans from the GSEs and recognized $54.3 million of collateral-based reserves associated with these loans. We have fully repurchased $57.1 million of these loans from the GSEs and agreed to indemnify and repurchase the remaining $136.2 million of loans—and funded an escrow reserve with the GSEs totaling $50.6 million in connection with those agreements. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (107)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Walker & Dunlop isoperates one of the largest commercial real estate capital markets platforms.and finance platforms in the United States, with a growing international capital markets business. We are focused on originating, selling, and servicing loans, with a market-leading position in the U.S. multifamily sector. Our longstanding multifamily focus has established us as one of the largest multifamily property sales brokerage platforms in the U.S., and perennially as one of the largest lenders for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (collectively, the “GSEs”), and the Federal Housing Administration, a division of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (together with Ginnie Mae, “HUD”) (collectively, the “Agencies”). We also provide investment management and other ancillary services to commercial real estate owners and investors.

Reworded

A core element of our strategy is to convert transaction activity into contractual, long-duration, recurring revenue streams. When we originate loans—particularly through Agency programs—we typically retain the right to service those loans, which increases the size of our commercial real estate loan servicing portfolio, and generates ongoing cash flows over the life of the loan. Our strategy has established Walker & Dunlop as the sixth largest commercial real estate loan servicer in the U.S. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we serviced $146.4$145.8 billion of commercial real estate loans (primarily multifamily) that provide durable, largely prepayment protected cash flows. This servicing platform is a foundational component of our business that supports our ability to invest in growth initiatives.

Reworded

Over the past several years, we have been investing in expanding and diversifying our service offerings to commercial real estate owners and investors, including appraisal, valuation, research, investment banking, and additional investment management services. We have also been expanding our lending, brokerage and property sales capabilities across other commercial real estate asset classes, including hospitality, industrial, and digital infrastructure and expanding our presence and service offerings in Europe to better serve many of our institutional clients that operate global investment strategies. These initiatives represent long-term growth opportunities. Many of these businesses are currently operating at or near break-even as we continue to invest in their development. As a result, our near-term financial performance continues to be driven predominantly by our core multifamily lending, brokerage, property sales services, loan servicing, and investment management platform.platforms.

Reworded

We are also investing in proprietary technology and software solutions to improve the efficiency of our business model, enhance our competitive position and support the long-term evolution of our business. These investments are designed to increase our touchpoints with current and prospective clients, improve the delivery and scalability of our existing and future services, and drive operating efficiencies across our business. As advancements in artificial intelligence and related technologies continue to reshape financial and real estate services, we believe it is critical to invest proactively to ensure we remain an essential intermediarypartner to our clients and well-positioned within the evolving transaction ecosystem. Our technology initiatives are intended to strengthen client engagement, improve data-driven decision-making, and enhance our ability to originate transactions and growcontinue growing our servicing and asset management platforms over time.

Reworded

We offer multifamily appraisal and valuation services. We leverage technology and data science to dramatically improve the consistency, transparency, and speed of multifamily property appraisals in the U.S. through our proprietary technology and providesprovide appraisal services to a client list that includes many national commercial real estate lenders. We also provide quarterly and annual valuation services to some of the largest institutional commercial real estate investors in the country. The growth strategy has resulted in an increase in our market share of the appraisal market over the past several years. Additionally, these valuation specialists provide support for and insight to our Agency lending and property sales professionals. We offer our appraisal and valuation services through our subsidiary, Apprise.

Reworded

SAM focuses on servicing and asset-managing the portfolio of loans we originate and sell to the Agencies, broker to certain life insurance companies,companies and other third-party capital providers, originate loans through our principal lending and investing activities, and manage through our tax credit equity funds focused on the affordable housing sector and other commercial real estate. We earn servicing fees for overseeing the loans in our servicing portfolio and asset management fees for the capital invested in our funds. Additionally, we earn revenue through net interest income on the loans held for investment and the associated warehouse interest expense. The primary services within SAM are described below. For additional information on our SAM services, refer to Item 1. Business in our 2025 Form 10-K.

Reworded

We have risk-sharing obligations on substantially all loans we originate under the Fannie Mae DUS program. When a Fannie Mae DUS loan is subject to full risk-sharing, we absorb losses on the first 5% of the unpaid principal balance (“UPB”) of a loan at the time of loss settlement, and above 5% we share a percentage of the loss with Fannie Mae, with our maximum loss capped at 20% of the original unpaid principal balance of the loan (subject to doublingincreasing orup triplingto 100% of the loss if the loan does not meet specific underwriting criteria or if the loan defaults within 12 months of its sale to Fannie Mae). Our full risk-sharing is currently limited to loans up to $400 million, which equates to a maximum loss per loan of $80 million (such exposure would occur in the event that the underlying collateral is determined to be completely without value at the time of loss). For loans in excess of $400 million, we receive modified risk-sharing. We also may request modified risk-sharing at the time of origination on loans below $400 million, which reduces our potential risk-sharing losses from the levels described above if we do not believe that we are being fully compensated for the risks of the transactions. The full risk-sharing limit has varied over time. Accordingly, loans originated in prior years may have been subject to modified risk-sharing losses at lower levels. In limited circumstances we have agreed, and may in the future agree, with Fannie Mae to increase our loss sharing up to 100% of a loan’s UPB in lieu of the risk-sharing agreement described above.

Reworded

We are the operator of a private commercial real estate investment adviser focused on the management of senior debt, mezzanine debt, preferred equity, and joint venture (“JV”) equity investments in commercial real estate funds. Our current regulatory assets under management (“AUM”) is $2.6 billionbillion, primarily consisting of four equity investment vehicles: Fund IV, Fund V, Fund VI, and Fund VII (the “Equity Funds”) and two credit funds, Debt Fund I and Debt Fund II (the “Debt Funds” and, together with the Equity Funds, the “Funds”), as well as separate accounts managed primarily for life insurance companies and a preferred equity JV with a large Canadian pension fund. AUM for the Funds and for the separate accounts consists of both unfunded commitments and funded investments. Unfunded commitments are highest during the fundraising and investment phases. We receive management fees based on both unfunded commitments and funded investments. Additionally, with respect to the Funds, we receive a percentage of the return above the fund return hurdle rate specified in the fund agreements. We are a co-investor in the Funds and certain separate accounts. We offer these investment management services through our subsidiary, WDIP.

Reworded

The weighted-average annual loss rate is calculated using a ten-year look-back period, utilizing the average portfolio balance and settled losses for each year. A ten-year lookback period is used as we believe this period of time includes sufficiently different economic conditions to generate a reasonable estimate of expected results in the future, given the relatively long-term nature of the current portfolio. As the weighted-average annual loss rate utilizes a rolling ten-year look-back period, the loss rate used in the estimate often changes as loss data from earlier periods in the look-back period continue to roll off as new loss data are added. For example, in the first quarter of 2024, loss data from earlier periods in the look-back period with significantly higher losses rolled off and were replaced with more recent loss data with fewer losses, resulting in the weighted-average historical annual loss rate changing from 0.6 basis points to 0.3 basis points. However, over the past two years, there has been no volatility in the historical annual loss rate.

Reworded

We believe our property valuations are reasonable and in line with those a market participant would develop. However, actual sales prices for these properties may differ from the estimates used by management. Additionally, significant changes in the assumptions or judgments would have a significant impact on our reserves and impairment analyses and thus our reported financial results. As noted above, with respect to the property valuations and associated reserves for our risk-sharing portfolio, we have not experienced significant changes from the time of initial reserve and final settlement. However, with respect to properties used to calculate reserves on repurchased loans andloans, impairment analyses for real estate HFUHFU, and carrying value of real estate HFS, we have never disposed of a property.

Reworded

Goodwill. As of both MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, we reported goodwill of $868.7 million. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit to which the acquisition relates. Goodwill is recognized as an asset and is reviewed for impairment annually as of October 1. Between annual impairment analyses, we perform an evaluation of recoverability, when events and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is below its carrying value. Impairment testing requires an assessment of qualitative factors to determine if there are indicators of potential impairment, followed by, if necessary, an assessment of quantitative factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, whether there has been a significant or adverse change in the business climate that could affect the value of an asset and/or significant or adverse changes in cash flow projections or earnings forecasts. These assessments require management to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates about projected cash flows, discount ratesrates, and other factors.

Added

During the second quarter of 2026, the U.S. macroeconomic environment remained constructive but became increasingly uneven and uncertain due to geopolitical risks and their impact on inflation and long-term interest rates, shown more fully in the graphs below.

Added

Inflation reaccelerated during the quarter, driven largely by higher energy prices, with the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) rising 4.2% year over year in May 2026, a 12 month high, and core CPI rising 2.9%. The labor market remained relatively stable though as unemployment fell to a twelve-month low of 4.2% for June 2026, while payroll growth moderated as evidenced by non-farm payroll growth of 57,000 in June 2026. Overall, the increased uncertainty caused by geopolitical tensions has driven the path of long-term interest rates significantly higher throughout the second quarter of 2026, where rates have remained into the third quarter. Meanwhile, Fed Funds has remained steady since December 2025, as the Federal Reserve maintained the federal funds target range at 3.50% to 3.75% at its June 2026 meeting, reflecting a continued data-dependent monetary policy stance amid geopolitical uncertainty and resulting elevated inflation.

Added

Elevated interest rates and uncertainty surrounding the inflation outlook is impacting borrowing costs, leverage, asset valuations, and transaction timing across commercial real estate markets.

Added

Within commercial real estate, the capital markets remained bifurcated. The availability of multifamily debt capital broadened through Agency, securitization, and private-debt channels, while equity investment opportunities and property-sales activity remained comparatively subdued. Execution continued to be selective and sensitive to asset quality, market, sponsorship, basis, and the alignment of buyer and seller pricing expectations. Refinancing requirements also remained significant, with approximately 17%, or $875 billion, of outstanding commercial mortgage balances scheduled to mature during 2026. We believe these maturities should continue to create financing and transaction opportunities, although interest-rate volatility may periodically delay execution.

Added

In the multifamily sector, demand strengthened meaningfully during the second quarter. More than 187,000 units were absorbed nationally during the quarter, compared with approximately 77,700 units delivered, helping occupancy increase to 95.5%. Annual deliveries declined to approximately 340,200 units for the 12 months ended June 30, 2026, marking the sixth consecutive quarter of declining annual supply following the peak in late 2024. Effective asking rents increased 1.4% during the quarter but remained 0.2% below year-earlier levels, and concessions remained widespread. Performance also continued to vary materially by geography, with supply-constrained coastal and Midwest markets generally outperforming markets in the South and portions of the Sun Belt where elevated supply maintained pressure on rents and occupancy.

Added

U.S. Census data indicates that, in June 2026, starts for buildings with five units or more were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 513,000, while permits for buildings with five units or more were 445,000 and completions were 413,000. Although the monthly construction series can be volatile, the continued moderation in multifamily permitting relative to recent peak levels, together with declining annual deliveries, supports our view that multifamily supply growth should continue to moderate as the existing development pipeline is completed. However, the substantial inventory of recently delivered units in lease-up is expected to continue creating competitive pressure in certain supply-heavy markets over the near term.

Removed

During the first quarter of 2026, the U.S. macroeconomic environment remained constructive but uneven. Inflation continued to moderate, with the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) rising 2.4% year over year in February 2026 and core CPI rising 2.5%, both slightly above the Federal Reserve’s targets, while the labor market remained relatively stable, with March 2026 non-farm payroll growth of 178,000 and unemployment of 4.3%. At its March 2026 meeting, the Federal Reserve maintained the federal funds target range at 3.50% to 3.75%, reflecting a still-cautious policy stance.

Removed

Longer-term interest rates declined during the early part of the quarter, which supported transaction activity across commercial real estate asset classes and benefited our lending, brokerage, and property sales services. Toward the end of the quarter, interest rate volatility increased, and the 10-year Treasury yield rose to the mid 4% range, where it has remained. While this increase in rates has introduced some near-term uncertainty, it has not materially impacted transaction activity to date.

Removed

Commercial real estate owners and investors have demonstrated increased willingness to transact following a prolonged period of constrained capital markets. Since the beginning of the current interest rate cycle in 2022, many market participants delayed transactions through loan extensions and extended hold periods. Over the past several quarters, this dynamic has begun to shift, with transaction activity becoming less sensitive to short-term interest rate movements. As a result, changes in interest rates are more frequently causing temporary pauses in execution rather than cancellations of transactions.

Removed

Within commercial real estate, capital markets conditions continued improving compared with the more restrictive environment of 2023 and early 2024, but execution remained highly selective and sensitive to asset quality, market, sponsorship, and basis.

Removed

In the multifamily sector, demand fundamentals remained resilient, supported by continued renter demand and homeownership affordability constraints, but rent growth remained below historical norms as the market continued to absorb the elevated level of new supply delivered over the past several years. New multifamily supply remained elevated entering 2026, but the forward pipeline of deliveries continued to contract. U.S. Census data indicates that March 2026 starts for buildings with five units or more were at a 446,000 seasonally adjusted annual rate, while permits for five-plus-unit buildings were 427,000, suggesting that future deliveries are likely to moderate through 2026 and into 2027. We believe this reduction in new supply, together with continued absorption, should gradually reduce lease-up pressure and support improved rent growth over time, although the pace and timing of recovery are expected to vary by market.

Reworded

As of the end of the firstsecond quarter of 2026, we believe the multifamily market isremained in a transition period characterized by improving,improving butdebt still-fragile,liquidity, capitalstronger markets,seasonal elevateddemand, butslowing moderatingnew supplysupply, pressures,moderate annual rent growth, and asignificant morevariation normalizedin operatingperformance environment.across markets. In this environment, asset performance isand transaction execution are increasingly driven by local marketsupply-and-demand fundamentals, affordability, sponsorship quality, basis, and execution.access to capital. We believe these conditions continue to create opportunities for well-capitalized and experienced market participants, particularly in Agency lending, debt brokerage, loan servicing, and selective property-sales activity.

Removed

We believe these conditions continue to create opportunities for well-capitalized and experienced market participants, particularly in Agency lending, debt brokerage, property sales, and loan servicing.

Reworded

The following is a discussion of our consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025. The financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results. Our quarterly results have fluctuated in the past and are expected to fluctuate in the future, reflecting the interest-rate environment, the volume of transactions, business acquisitions, regulatory actions, industry trends, and general economic conditions. The table below provides supplemental data regarding our financial performance.

Added

CONSOLIDATED

Reworded

The following table presents a period-to-period comparison of our financial results for the threethree- monthsand six-month periods ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025.

Added

CONSOLIDATED

Added

Total revenues decreased to $306.7 million, down 4%. Although total transaction volumes were up 3% this quarter, the mix of business shifted from Agency transactions to a relatively higher proportion of brokered transactions. The shift in mix drove Loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net (‘Origination fees”) and Fair value of expected net cash flow from servicing, net of guaranty obligation (“MSR Income”) lower. Revenues also benefitted from the 6% growth in the servicing portfolio year over year, to $145.8 billion, which increased servicing fee revenue 4%. This benefit from Servicing fees was offset by both lower (i) Placement fees and other interest income, which is directly tied to short-term interest rates which declined 83 basis points from the same period last year and (ii) Other revenues due to a decline income from our affordable development joint ventures this year compared to the same period last year.

Added

Total expenses increased to $304.6 million, up 12%, primarily due to Provision (benefit) for credit losses and Indemnified and repurchased loan expenses. The charges this quarter were concentrated in loans associated with a small number of fraudulent sponsors previously identified and were largely driven by two events. First, a portfolio of previously repurchased loans defaulted during the quarter. We indemnified one of the GSEs on these loans in the fourth quarter of 2025, and the loans were performing until early in the second quarter of 2026. Upon default, we updated our property level inspections, and increased our loss estimates by $11.8 million to reflect the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral. Second, Fannie Mae notified us of underwriting concerns associated with two loans totaling $15.9 million. These loans previously defaulted in 2025, and we recognized a provision for credit losses at that time based on the estimated values of the underlying collateral and our risk sharing agreement in place. Rather than repurchase the loans from Fannie Mae, we agreed to increase our loss sharing on the loans, updated our estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, and recognized an additional provision for credit losses of $5.8 million during the second quarter of 2026. Additionally, we had increased costs of $4.5 million associated with operating these loans. Lastly, Other operating expenses increased primarily due to a reclass to professional fees to reflect an amendment to a contractual relationship that were previously reported in Personnel expense.

Added

Income tax expense (benefit) decreased from expense in 2025 to benefit in 2026 due to lower income before taxes and a lower estimated annual effective tax rate largely driven by higher low-income housing tax credits becoming available in the second quarter of 2026.

Added

Total revenues increased to $608.0 million, up 9%, driven by a 34% increase in total transaction volume year over year. The increase in transaction volume was driven by a significant increase in brokered transactions, and a moderate increase in our Agency lending volume. The growth in transaction volume drove increases in Origination fees and MSR income. Revenues also benefitted from the 6% growth in the servicing portfolio, which drove a $6.2 million increase in Servicing fees. This benefit from Servicing Fees was offset by both lower (i) Placement fees and other interest income, which is directly tied to short-term interest rates, which declined 79 basis points year over year and (ii) Other revenues due to a decline in income from our affordable development joint ventures this year compared to the same period last year.

Added

Total expenses increased to $580.0 million, up 15%, due to a $32.5 million increase in Personnel expense that was driven primarily by increased variable compensation costs associated with higher transaction revenue, and, to a lesser extent, increases in average headcount that drove higher fixed compensation costs. Year-to-date results were also impacted by the same credit-related expenses on legacy repurchased assets described in the Quarterly Results above. On a year-to-date basis, we recognized a $26.9 million increase in credit-related expenses, and a $6.8 million increase in costs to operate the assets following foreclosure.

Added

Income tax expense (benefit) decreased due to the same factors that impacted the income tax expense (benefit) in the second quarter discussed above.

Removed

Revenue increases this quarter were driven primarily by significantly higher transaction volumes executed by our Capital Markets business. Higher transaction volumes drove increases in loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net (“origination fees”) and the fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net of guaranty obligation (“MSR income”). Origination fees and MSR income did not increase in tandem with transaction activity due to declines in average margins, which was driven by a combination of product mix and a large $1.7 billion transaction. Margins on large transactions are typically lower than standard transactions. Higher transaction volumes also expanded the balance of our loan servicing portfolio, which in turn increased servicing fees.

Removed

The increase in expenses was primarily due to increases in personnel expense, amortization and depreciation, and indemnified and repurchased loan expenses, partially offset by a decrease in other operating expenses. Personnel expense increased primarily due to an increase in commission costs mainly due to the aforementioned increase in origination fees combined with an increase in salaries and benefits due to an increase in average headcount and growth in our bonus accrual due to improved company performance. The increase in amortization and depreciation was primarily driven by an increase in write-offs due to prepayments, along with an increase in recurring amortization of MSRs. Indemnified and repurchased loan expenses increased primarily due to increased loan repurchase losses with no comparable activity in the prior year, combined with increased repurchased loan operating costs due to the increase in the number of loans indemnified year over year. Other operating expenses decreased primarily driven by a downward adjustment in a loss estimate.

Removed

Income tax expense increased $5.5 million, or 218%, year over year, primarily driven by a 395% increase in income before taxes during the first quarter of 2026 compared to the first quarter of 2025. Additionally, we recognized a higher balance of realizable tax shortfall. We recognized a $2.0 million shortfall during the first quarter of 2026 compared to a $1.3 million shortfall during the first quarter of 2025, resulting from changes between the grant date fair value and vesting date fair value of share-based compensation awards that vested during the first quarter of 2026. Absent the impact from tax shortfalls, income tax expense increased 394%, which is consistent with the growth in income before taxes.

Added

CONSOLIDATED

Reworded

The following table presents a period-to-period comparison of the components of adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025.

Added

ADJUSTED EBITDA – CONSOLIDATED

Added

Adjusted EBITDA decreased $14.7 million driven by lower earnings from our affordable development joint ventures quarter over quarter, a decrease in Placement fees and other interest income which is directly correlated to lower short-term interest rates, and the aforementioned increase in the cost to operate assets collateralizing repurchased loans.

Added

Adjusted EBITDA decreased $5.9 million driven by higher transaction revenues, net of variable commission costs tied directly to those revenues, which were offset by an increase in the cost of operating assets collateralizing repurchased loans and a decrease in Other revenue from the aforementioned affordable joint venture investments.

Removed

Origination fees increased largely due to the increase in debt financing volume, partially offset by a decrease in the margin. Servicing fees increased largely due to growth in the average servicing portfolio. Personnel expense increased primarily due to an increase in commission costs mainly due to the aforementioned increase in origination fees combined with an increase in salaries and benefits due to an increase in average headcount and growth in our bonus accrual due to improved company performance. Indemnified and repurchased loan expenses increased due to increased repurchased loan operating costs. Net income from noncontrolling interest and temporary equity holders increased due to (i) a lack of temporary equity holders in the first quarter of 2025 and (ii) an increase in net income from noncontrolling interest holders year over year.

Reworded

We use our warehouse loan facilities and, when necessary, our corporate cash to fund loan closings, both for loans held for sale and loans held for investment. We believe that our current warehouse loan facilities are adequate to meet our loan origination needs. Historically, we used a combination of long-term debt and cash flows from operating activities to fund large acquisitions. Additionally, we repurchase shares, pay cash dividends, make long-term debt principal payments, and repay short-term borrowings on a regular basis. We issue stock primarily in connection with the exercisevesting of employee stock optionsawards and occasionally for acquisitions (non-cash transactions).

Reworded

ThreeSix Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 Compared to ThreeSix Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025

Reworded

The following table presents a period-to-period comparison of the significant components of cash flows for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025.

Reworded

Net cash related to operating activities changed from net cash used in operating activities to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities changed primarily due to:

Reworded

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities changeddecreased primarily due to:

Removed

Partially offsetting the aforementioned changes that decreased cash were the following activities that increased cash:

Reworded

Net cash related to financing activities changed from net cash provided by (financing activities to net cash used in) financing activities changed primarily due to:

Added

The change to net cash used was offset by lower Debt issuance costs paid due to the issuance of our Senior Notes and amendment of the Term Loan in 2025, with no comparable activity in 2026.

Removed

Partially offsetting the aforementioned changes that increased cash were the following activities that decreased cash:

Added

Total revenues decreased $4.0 million, down 2%, compared to the same quarter last year. Transaction volumes increased 2%, led by growth in brokered and HUD transactions, offset by declines in GSE lending and property sales transactions. The shift in mix of debt financing volume drove Origination fees and MSR income lower for the segment. The 15% decrease in property sales revenues was generally in line with 18% decrease in property sales transactions this quarter. Higher application and appraisal fees and investment banking revenue drove the increase in Other revenues.

Added

Total expenses were up only 3% this quarter, or $4.4 million. The increase was driven by an increase in other professional fees tied to a brokerage relationship. Costs associated with this relationship were previously reported in Personnel expense and were reclassified to Other operating expenses this quarter to reflect an amendment to the contractual relationship.

Added

Total revenues increased $55.9 million, or 20%, driven by a 45% increase in debt financing volume year to date. Debt financing volume growth was led by brokered, Freddie Mac and HUD transactions. The overall growth in debt financing volume drove Origination fees and MSR income higher.

Added

Total expenses increased $26.8 million, or 12%, largely associated with an increase in variable commission costs tied to origination fee growth. The aforementioned reclassification of the brokerage agreement also drove an increase in Other operating expenses on a year-to-date basis.

Removed

Origination fees and MSR income. The following tables provide additional information that helps explain changes in origination fees and MSR income period over period:

Removed

The increase in origination fees was largely the result of the 132% increase in total debt financing volume, partially offset by a decline in our origination fee rate. The decrease in the origination fee rate related to a $1.7 billion Freddie Mac portfolio that was originated in the first quarter of 2026 with no comparable activity in the first quarter of 2025 and a shift in our volume mix towards brokered transactions. Portfolio transactions have lower origination fee rates than non-portfolio transactions. Brokered transactions, which carry lower fee margins, represented 56% of our debt financing volume in the first quarter of 2026 compared to 51% in the first quarter of 2025.

Removed

The increase in our MSR income was largely driven by the increase in total debt financing volume, partially offset by a 19% decrease in the Agency MSR rate. The decrease in the Agency MSR rate reflects a shift in mix of Agency volume, with Freddie Mac representing 61% of Agency volume in the first quarter of 2026 compared to 33% in the first quarter of 2025. The aforementioned Freddie Mac portfolio caused a decline in the weighted-average servicing fee (“WASF”) on Freddie Mac debt financing volume. Portfolio transactions typically have lower servicing fees than non-portfolio transactions. Partially offsetting the decline in the Agency MSR rate due to the mix of volume and the portfolio transaction was an increase in the WASF for Fannie Mae debt financing volume.

Removed

Other revenues. The decrease was principally due to a $4.7 million decrease in investment banking revenues, partially offset by a $2.5 million increase in application and appraisal fees. Investment banking revenues decreased primarily due to several M&A transactions that closed during the first quarter of 2025 compared to fewer transactions in the first quarter of 2026. Application and appraisal fees increased due to the aforementioned increase in transaction volume.

Showing the first 60 of 107 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

WD insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-05-19Schmaltz Dana L
Director
Grant/award 3,096— —87,421 SEC
2026-05-19Rice E. John Jr
Director
Grant/award 3,096— —36,397 SEC
2026-05-19Hayward Jeffery R
Director
Grant/award 3,096— —6,712 SEC
2026-05-19Freedman Ernest Michael
Director
Grant/award 3,096— —9,193 SEC

Well-known investors holding WD (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COM2026-06-30671,312$36.7M0.01%Added 180%
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-3040,874$2.2M0.0%Reduced 2%
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM2026-06-3026,804$1.5M0.0%Reduced 32%
Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) COM2026-06-3030,623$1.4M—Sold out
D. E. Shaw & Co. COM2026-06-3018,831$1.0M0.0%No change
Two Sigma Investments COM2026-06-3013,541$740.7K0.0%Reduced 96%
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM2026-06-307,683$420.3K0.0%Reduced 95%

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when WD files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.