WTI 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
W&t Offshore Inc. · NYSE · Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas · CIK 1288403 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Acquisitions and emerging technologies may increase our cybersecurity risk.”
New heading “Changes in U.S. trade policy and the impact of tariffs may have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.”
New heading “A prolonged government shutdown or lapse in federal appropriations could disrupt our offshore operations and delay required regulatory approvals.”
Largest changes
“On June 14, 2025, we entered into a Settlement and Release Agreement, dated effective as of June 13, 2025 (the “USSIC Settlement Agreement”), by and between us and USSIC and, on June 15, 2025, we entered into a Settlement Agreement, dated effective as of June 14, 2025 (the “PIIC Settlement Agreement,” and, together with the USSIC Settlement Agreement, the “Settlement Agreements”), by and between us and PIIC to dismiss all claims related to the Sureties Litigation without prejudice. …”see in full comparison
“The BOEM requires that lessees demonstrate financial strength and reliability according to its regulations and provide acceptable financial assurances to assure satisfaction of lease obligations, including decommissioning activities in the OCS. In April 2024, BOEM released a final rule that changes the way BOEM evaluates the financial health of companies and offshore assets in setting financial assurance requirements. …”see in full comparison
see in full comparisonPresidentTheBiden made addressing the threat of climate change from GHG emissions a priority under his administration, and regulatory agencies under the Biden administration issued rules in supportreturn of PresidentBiden’sTrumpregulatorytoandthepoliticalWhiteagenda,HousewhichinincludedJanuaryreducing2025dependencetriggeredon,aandsweepinguse of, fossil fuels and curtailmentrollback ofhydraulicUnitedfracturingStatesonclimatefederalpolicy,lands.reversingSincemanytakingofofficetheininitiatives introduced under former President Biden. In January 2025, President TrumphasannouncedtakenthatactionsthetoUnitedreverseStatesmanywasofwithdrawingthesefromBiden-eratherulesUnitedandNations-sponsoredpolicies.“ParisPresidentAgreement.”TrumpHein January 2025also issued additional executive orders aimed at boosting fossil fuels and undoing Biden-era initiatives to limit GHG emissions. He declared a national energy emergency and revoked many of Biden’s executive orders on climate change. New orders instruct agencies to roll back restrictions on offshore drilling and reconsider protections for Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. President Trump also issued a moratorium on new wind power projects on federal lands, pausing new leases and permits for both onshore and offshore wind farms. He revoked an executive order that compelled government regulators to assess the risks of climate change to the financial system and he instructed agencies to review any regulations that might “burden the development of domestic energy resources.”ThatThesecouldexecutiveincludeordersmajorandBidentheadministrationsubsequent changes to regulations have had a tangible impact on the regulatory environment as it relates to climatepolicies,change.includingAdditionally,EPAonrulesFebruarylimiting12, 2026, EPS Administrator Lee Zeldin signed a final rule repealing the EPS’s 2009 finding that emissionsfromofcoal-carbon dioxide, methane andnaturalothergas-firedGHGspowerpresentplantsan endangerment to public health andnewthefeesenvironment.onWemethaneanticipateemissions fromthat theoilfinalandrule,gasoneindustry.published in the Federal Register, will be the subject of widespread litigation.
“Changes in U.S. trade policy and the impact of tariffs may have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.”see in full comparison
We rely on our information technology (“IT”) infrastructure and management information systems to operate and record aspects of our business. Although we take security measures to protect against cybersecurity risks, including unauthorized access to our confidential and proprietary information, our security measures may not be able to detect or prevent every attempted breach. Similar to other companies, we have experienced cyber-attacks, although we have not suffered any material losses related to suchsee in full comparisonattacks.attacks as of the date of this Form 10-K. Security breaches include, among other things, illegal hacking, computer viruses, interference with treasury function, theft or acts of vandalism or terrorism. A breach could result in an interruption in our operations, malfunction of our platform control devices, disabling of our communication links, unauthorized publication of our confidential business or proprietary information, unauthorized release of customer or employee data, violation of privacy or other laws and exposure to litigation. Any of these security breaches could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.TheGeopoliticalinvasiontensions,of Ukraine by Russia,sanctions, andthe impact of world sanctions against Russia and the potential forretaliatoryacts from Russia,actions could result in increased cybersecurity attacks against U.S. companies.
“The BOEM requires that lessees demonstrate financial strength and reliability according to its regulations and provide acceptable financial assurances to assure satisfaction of lease obligations, including decommissioning activities in the OCS. In April 2024, BOEM released a final rule that changes the way BOEM evaluates the financial health of companies and offshore assets in setting financial assurance requirements. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (47)
Extended periods of lower prices for oil, NGLs and natural gas can have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. Among other things, our earnings, cash flows and capital expenditure programs could be negatively affected, as could our production and our estimates of proved reserves. A significant or sustained decline in liquidity could adversely affect our credit ratings, potentially increase financing costs and reduce access to capital markets. We may be unable to realize anticipated cost savings and expenditure reductions that are intended to compensate for such downturns. In addition, extended periods or low commodity prices can have a material adverse impact on the results of operations, financial condition and liquidity of our suppliers, vendors, partners and customers upon which our own results of operations and financial condition depends.depend.
In order to manage our exposure to price risk in the marketing of our production, we have entered into commodity derivative positions with respect to a portion of our expected future production from oil and natural gas, and may in the future enter into commodity derivative positions with respect to oil or natural gas. See Financial Statements and Supplementary Data– Note 1110 –Financial Instruments under Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K for additional information on our derivative contracts and transactions. While these commodity derivative positions are intended to reduce the effects of price volatility, they may also limit future income if prices were to rise substantially over the price established by such positions. In addition, such transactions may expose us to the risk of financial loss in certain circumstances, including instances in which there is a widening of price differentials between delivery points for our production and the delivery points assumed in the hedge arrangements or the counterparties to the derivative contracts fail to perform under the terms of the contracts.
We operate in a highly competitive environment for reviewing prospects, acquiring properties, marketing oil, NGLs and natural gas and securing trained personnel. Many of our competitors have financial resources that allow them to obtain substantially greater technical expertise and personnel than we have. We actively compete with other companies in our industry when acquiring new leases or oil and natural gas properties. For example, new leases acquired from the BOEM are acquired through a “sealed bid” process and are generally awarded to the highest bidder. Our competitors may be able to evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than our financial or personnel resources permit. Our competitors may also be able to pay more to acquire productive oil and natural gas properties and exploratory prospects than we are able or willing to pay or finance. Finally, companies with larger financial resources may have a significant advantage in terms of meeting any potential new bonding or financial assurance requirements. If we are unable to compete successfully in these areas in the future, our future revenues and growth may be diminished or restricted.
A portion of our oil and natural gas is processed for sale on platforms owned by third parties with no economic interest in our wells and no other processing facilities would be available to process such oil and natural gas without significant investment by us. In addition, third-party platforms could be damaged or destroyed by tropical storms, hurricanes or other weather events, which could reduce or eliminate our ability to market our production. As of December 31, 2024,2025, fourtwo fields, accounting for approximately 3.71.0 MMBoe (or 2.9%0.8%) of our total proved reserves, are tied back to separate, third-party owned platforms. Although we have entered into contracts for the process of our production with the owners of such platforms, there can be no assurance that the owners of such platforms will continue to process our oil and natural gas production.
In addition, we may be required to shut in wells because of a reduction in demand for our production or because of inadequacy or unavailability of pipelines, gathering system capacity or processing facilities. If that were to occur, then we would be unable to realize revenue from those wells until arrangements were made to process or deliver our production to market.
In addition, we may be required to shut in wells because of a reduction in demand for our production or because of inadequacy or unavailability of pipelines, gathering system capacity or processing facilities. If that were to occur, then we would be unable to realize revenue from those wells until arrangements were made to process or deliver our production to market. For example, the government recently issued an order requiring the abandonment of certain facilities in the Gulf of America, rendering the pipelines and other midstream assets that cross that facility incapable of operating. Our production from certain properties currently utilizes a pipeline that crosses over the facility in order for our production to reach its eventual market and, as a result of the government’s order to abandon the facilities, we are required to shut-in our production at the affected properties until we can find an alternative path to market for such production. While we are working to find an alternative path to market, we are unable to realize revenues from our production at the affected properties until such time as an alternative arrangement is made.
Exploring for, developing or acquiring reserves is capital intensive and uncertain. We may not be able to economically find, develop or acquire additional reserves or make the necessary capital investments if our cash flows from operations decline or external sources of capital become limited or unavailable. Our need to generate revenues to fund ongoing capital commitments or repay debt may limit our ability to slow or shut-in production from producing wells during periods of low prices for oil and natural gas. We cannot assure you that our future exploitation, exploration, development and acquisition activities will result in additional proved reserves or that we will be able to drill productive wells at acceptable costs. Further, current market conditions may adversely impact our ability to obtain financing to fund acquisitions, and further lower the level of activity and depresseddepress values in the oil and natural gas property sales market.
We annually re-evaluate the purchase of insurance, policy limits and terms annually.terms. Future insurance coverage for our industry could increase in cost and may include higher deductibles or retentions. In addition, some forms of insurance may become unavailable in the future or unavailable on terms that we believe are economically acceptable. No assurance can be given that we will be able to maintain insurance in the future at rates that we consider reasonable, and we may elect to maintain minimal or no insurance coverage. The occurrence of a significant event for which our losses are not fully insured or indemnified, or for which the insurance companies will not pay our claims, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, we may not be able to secure additional insurance or bonding that might be required by new governmental regulations. CurrentlyCurrently, the OPA requires owners and operators of offshore oil production facilities to have ready access to between $35.0 million and $150.0 million, which amount is based on a worst case oil spill discharge volume demonstration that can be used to cover costs that could be incurred in responding to an oil spill at our facilities on the OCS. We are currently required to demonstrate that we have ready access to $70.0 million. If OPA is amended to increase the minimum level of financial responsibility, we may experience difficulty in providing financial assurances sufficient to comply with this requirement.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we operate 86.1%86.7% of our wells. AsFor those wells that we carry out our drilling program, we maydo not serve as operator of all planned wells. In that case,operate, we have limited ability to exercise influence over the operations of some non-operated properties and their associated costs. Our dependence on the operator and other working interest owners and our limited ability to influence operations and associated costs of properties operated by others could prevent the realization of anticipated results in drilling or acquisition activities.
Oil and natural gas exploration and production activities involve certain risks that a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to overcome. Our future success will depend on the success of our exploration and production activities and on the future existence of the infrastructure and technology that will allow us to take advantage of our findings. Additionally, some of our properties are located in deepwater, which generally increases the capital and operating costs, technical challenges and risks associated with exploration and production activities. As a result, our exploration and production activities are subject to numerous risks, including the risk that drilling will not result in commercially viable production. Our decisions to purchase, explore, develop or otherwise exploit prospects or properties will depend in part on the evaluation of seismic data through geophysical and geological analyses, production data and engineering studies, the results of which are often inconclusive or subject to varying interpretations.
For 2024,2025, approximately 35%36% of our production and 15%20% of our total revenue was attributable to our interests in certain oil and natural gas leasehold interests and associated wells and units located off the coast of Alabama, in state coastal and federal Gulf of America waters approximately 70 miles south of Mobile, Alabama (the “Mobile Bay Properties”). This concentration means that any impact on our production from this field, whether because of mechanical problems, adverse weather, well containment activities, changes in the regulatory environment or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business. During 2024,2025, our Mobile Bay Properties were shut-in for various reasons, including Hurricane Helene, compressor problems and downstream operated plant issues. These shut-ins resulted in deferred production of approximately 850686 MBoe based on production rates prior to the shut-ins. Any additional shut-ins, depending on the duration of the shut-in, could have a material adverse impact on our business. In addition, if the actual reserves associated with the Mobile Bay Properties are less than our estimated reserves, such a reduction of reserves could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The oil and natural gas industry is subject to rapid and significant advancements in technology, including the introduction of new products and services using new technologies.technologies (such as the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning). As competitors use or develop new technologies, we may be placed at a competitive disadvantage, and competitive pressures may force us to implement new technologiestechnologies, provide enhancements and new integrations from our existing platforms, develop new products that achieve market acceptance or innovate quickly enough to keep pace with rapid technological developments at a substantial cost. In addition, competitors may have greater financial, technical and personnel resources that allow them to enjoy technological advantages, and that may in the future, allow them to implement new technologies before we can. We rely heavily on the use of advanced seismic technology to identify exploitation opportunities and to reduce our geological risk. Seismic technology or other technologies that we may implement in the future may become obsolete. We cannot be certain that we will be able to implement technologies on a timely basis or at a cost that is acceptable to us. If we are unable to maintain technological advancements consistent with industry standards, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
You should not assume that the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows or the present value of future net revenues from our proved oil and natural gas reserves is the current market value of our estimated oil and natural gas reserves. In accordance with SEC requirements, we base the estimated discounted future net cash flows from our proved reserves on the 12-month unweighted first-day-of-the-month average price for each product and costs in effect on the date of the estimate. Actual future prices and costs may differ materially from those used in the present value estimate.
We expect to grow by expanding the exploitation and development of our existing assets, in addition to making targeted acquisitions in the Gulf of America. We may not realize all of the anticipated benefits from future acquisitions, such as increased earnings, cost savings and revenue enhancements, for various reasons, including higher than expected acquisition and operating costs or other difficulties, unknown liabilities, inaccurate reserve estimates and fluctuations in market prices. This could lead to potential adverse short-term or long-term effects on our financial and operating results.
We rely on our information technology (“IT”) infrastructure and management information systems to operate and record aspects of our business. Although we take security measures to protect against cybersecurity risks, including unauthorized access to our confidential and proprietary information, our security measures may not be able to detect or prevent every attempted breach. Similar to other companies, we have experienced cyber-attacks, although we have not suffered any material losses related to such attacks.attacks as of the date of this Form 10-K. Security breaches include, among other things, illegal hacking, computer viruses, interference with treasury function, theft or acts of vandalism or terrorism. A breach could result in an interruption in our operations, malfunction of our platform control devices, disabling of our communication links, unauthorized publication of our confidential business or proprietary information, unauthorized release of customer or employee data, violation of privacy or other laws and exposure to litigation. Any of these security breaches could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. TheGeopolitical invasiontensions, of Ukraine by Russia,sanctions, and the impact of world sanctions against Russia and the potential for retaliatory acts from Russia,actions could result in increased cybersecurity attacks against U.S. companies.
Acquisitions and emerging technologies may increase our cybersecurity risk.
As we pursue our strategy to grow through acquisitions and implement new initiatives that improve our operations and cost structure, we are also expanding and improving our information technologies, resulting in a larger technological presence, utilization of “cloud” computing services, and corresponding exposure to cybersecurity risk. Certain new technologies that we may evaluate or deploy, such as use of autonomous vehicles, remote-controlled equipment, virtual reality, automation and artificial intelligence, present new and significant cybersecurity and safety risks that must be analyzed and addressed before implementation. If we fail to assess and identify cybersecurity risks associated with acquisitions and new initiatives, we may become increasingly vulnerable to such risks.
Such circumstances or conflicts might adversely affect us or other holders of our common stock. In addition, our significant concentration of share ownership and lender relationships may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock because investors may perceive disadvantages in owning shares in companies with significant stockholder concentrations or with such potential conflicts.
In January 2025, we issued $350.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 10.75% Senior Second Lien Notes due 2029 (the “10.75% Notes”) and entered into a new credit agreement with initial bank lending commitments of $50.0 million with a letter of credit sublimit of $10.0 million (the “New Credit Agreement”). The indenture (the “2025 Indenture”) governing our 10.75% Notes and our New Credit Agreement contain a number of significant restrictive covenants in addition to covenants restricting the incurrence of additional debt. These covenants limit our ability and the ability of certain subsidiaries, among other things, to:
Our New Credit Agreement requires us, among other things, to maintain certain financial ratios and satisfy certain financial condition tests. These restrictions may also limit our ability to obtain future financings, withstand a future downturn in our business or the economy in general, or otherwise conduct necessary corporate activities. We may also be prevented from taking advantage of business opportunities that arise because of the limitations imposed on us from the restrictive covenants under our 2025 Indenture and our New Credit Agreement.
Our New Credit Agreement and our 10.75% Notes are secured by various liens on our oil and natural gas properties. Any future borrowings under our New Credit Agreement would be secured on a first priority basis by the assets securing the 10.75% Notes. If the proceeds of the sale of the collateral securing the 10.75% Notes or any future indebtedness incurred under the New Credit Agreement are not sufficient to repay all amounts due in respect of such debt, then claims against our remaining assets to repay any amounts still outstanding under our secured obligations would be unsecured, and our ability to pay our other unsecured obligations and any distributions in respect of our capital stock would be significantly impaired.
If we experience certain kinds of changes of control, we must give holders of the 10.75% Notes the opportunity to sell us their notes at 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. However, in such an event, we might not be able to pay the holders the required repurchase price for the notes they present to us because we might not have sufficient funds available at that time, or the terms of our New Credit Agreement or other agreements we may enter into in the future may prevent us from applying funds to repurchase the 10.75% Notes. The source of funds for any repurchase required as a result of a change of control will be our available cash or cash generated from our oil and gas operations or other sources, including:
On August 14, 2024, we filed a complaint seeking declaratory relief (the “Original Complaint”) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, against Endurance Assurance Corporation and Lexon Insurance Company (the “Sompo Sureties”), providers of private and government-required surety bonds that secure decommissioning obligations we may have with respect to certain of our oil and natural gas assets (the “Sompo Sureties Litigation”). As described in the Original Complaint, we have paid all negotiated premiums associated with the bonds issued by the Sompo Sureties prior to the Original Complaint and have not suffered a material change to our financial status. Despite this, the Sompo Sureties issued us written demands requesting we provide collateral to the Sompo Sureties. On October 9, 2024, the Sompo Sureties filed an answer and counterclaim alleging breach of contract due to our failure to provide the collateral demanded by the Sompo Sureties. The Sompo Sureties originally issued approximately $55.0 million in surety bonds on our behalf. However, the BOEM cancelled a $13.1 million bond after we fulfilled our decommissioning obligations. Despite this, the Sompo Sureties have requested approximately $55.0 million in cash collateral.
On June 14, 2025, we entered into a Settlement and Release Agreement, dated effective as of June 13, 2025 (the “USSIC Settlement Agreement”), by and between us and USSIC and, on June 15, 2025, we entered into a Settlement Agreement, dated effective as of June 14, 2025 (the “PIIC Settlement Agreement,” and, together with the USSIC Settlement Agreement, the “Settlement Agreements”), by and between us and PIIC to dismiss all claims related to the Sureties Litigation without prejudice. Pursuant to the applicable Settlement Agreement, USSIC and PIIC agree that: (i) there will be no change to the 2024 premium rates paid by us or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries or joint venture entities, for any currently existing surety bond executed by USSIC or PIIC until after December 31, 2026, at the earliest, (ii) USSIC and PIIC withdraw all demands for collateral and agree not to request, demand, or otherwise insist on collateral, whether related to a surety bond or pursuant to the indemnity agreements, until after December 31, 2026, at the earliest; provided that such restriction shall not apply if (a) we do not pay premiums owed to USSIC or PIIC when due; (b) a claim is made by a third party against any bond issued by USSIC or PIIC to us or its affiliates or subsidiaries; (c) there is an initiation of an insolvency proceeding for us or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries or joint venture entities, whether voluntary or involuntary; (d) there is an uncured event of default under the indenture governing our second lien notes due 2029 that results in an acceleration, in whole or in part, of the indebtedness thereunder; or (e) we or our affiliates or subsidiaries initiate a lawsuit against USSIC or PIIC. Each of the Settlement Agreements also provides that, in the event that we enter into an agreement to provide collateral to another party in settlement of the Sureties Litigation on bonds existing as of the date of the Settlement Agreement, we shall, on a pro rata basis, provide substantially similar collateral to USSIC or PIIC as it does to such other party. The entry into the Settlement Agreements resulted in the withdrawal of approximately $94 million in collateral demands. On June 30, 2025, we announced that the presiding judge in the Sureties Litigation recommended denying the requests for preliminary injunction submitted by two surety providers. The preliminary injunction would have required us to immediately post $105 million of collateral. The recommendation would effectively nullify all current collateral requests related to the Sureties Litigation by the surety providers and we will not be required to post collateral (if at all) until a determination on the merits of the Sureties Litigation with the remaining surety providers.
All of the remaining parties to the Sureties Litigation previously agreed to mediate the case until the mediator declares an impasse. Mediation is no longer active as the mediator has declared an impasse with respect to the surety providers that did not enter into the Settlement Agreements. We continue to evaluate potential avenues for resolution of the remaining related premium and collateral-related matters.
As a result of the Sureties Litigation, we may potentially be required to provide some or all of the Demanded Collateral, or we may be required to or choose to replace the surety bonds provided by the applicable surety with alternate bonding or financial assurance. All of the parties to the Sureties Litigation, as well as PIIC (who is not a party to the Sureties Litigation) agreed to mediate the dispute on February 14, 2025, until the mediator declares an impasse. We are seeking to negotiate a reasonable resolution with respect to collateral provision amongst the Sureties and other surety entities with conflicting or different collateral requests (such as PIIC). As of March 4, 2025, the mediation continues to be ongoing.
To the extent that the Sureties succeed in forcing us to fulfill the Demanded Collateral, or in the event that other surety entities attempt to do the same, the fulfilment of such demands could be significant and our liquidity position will be negatively impacted, and we may be required to seek alternative financing. To the extent we are unable to secure adequate financing, we may be: forced to reduce our capital expenditures in the current year or future years; unable to execute our ARO plan; or unable to comply with our existing debt instruments.
The BOEM requires that lessees demonstrate financial strength and reliability according to its regulations and provide acceptable financial assurances to assure satisfaction of lease obligations, including decommissioning activities in the OCS. In April 2024, BOEM released a final rule that changes the way BOEM evaluates the financial health of companies and offshore assets in setting financial assurance requirements. Under the new rule, BOEM revised the criteria used for determining whether OCS oil and natural gas lessees and grant holders are required to provide supplemental financial assurance to backstop their decommissioning obligations. Following the announcement of the new rule, a series of lawsuits from both states and industry groups were filed against BOEM to block the implementation of the new rule. On April 8, 2025, the DOI, through a joint filing in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (Case no. 2:24-cv-00820), indicated that it will not seek supplemental financial assurance in the Gulf of America except in the case of (a) sole liability properties and (b) certain non-sole liability properties that do not have a financially strong co-owner or predecessor in title and meet other conditions.
In May 2025, the DOI announced its intent to revise this rule, and in March 2026, BOEM published a proposed rule setting forth amendments to the existing financial assurance regulatory framework. The proposed rule would, among other things, (i) permit BOEM to consider the financial strength of predecessors with joint and several liability when determining whether supplemental financial assurance is required, (ii) revise the level of BSEE probabilistic estimates of decommissioning cost used for determining the amount of supplemental financial assurance required from P70 to P50, (iii) provide BOEM with discretion, in circumstances where decommissioning is scheduled to occur within one year of a supplemental financial assurance demand, to accept third-party decommissioning contracts or decommissioning schedules in lieu of requiring new supplemental financial assurance, (iv) eliminate the requirement that a lessee challenging a supplemental financial assurance demand post an appeal bond equal to the amount of the demand in order to obtain a stay pending appeal, and (v) explicitly recognize dual-obligee bonds (which identify multiple obligees) as an acceptable form of financial assurance. The proposed rule is subject to a 60-day public comment period, which is expected to end on May 8, 2026.
The BOEM requires that lessees demonstrate financial strength and reliability according to its regulations and provide acceptable financial assurances to assure satisfaction of lease obligations, including decommissioning activities in the OCS. In April 2024, BOEM released a final rule that changes the way BOEM evaluates the financial health of companies and offshore assets in setting financial assurance requirements. Under the new rule, BOEM streamlined the criteria used to evaluate the financial health of an energy company down to two factors: (i) the company’s credit rating, and (ii) the ratio of the value of the company’s proved reserves to decommissioning liability associated with those reserves. The new rule also codifies the usage of BSEE decommissioning estimates to evaluate supplemental financial assurance requirements and allows third party guarantors (upon agreement with BOEM) to provide limited guarantees to specific amounts or specific leases instead of the blanket guarantees that have been used in the past. Finally, the new rule also requires a base financial assurance requirement of $500,000 for federal RUEs to match the requirement for state RUEs. To provide the industry with flexibility to meet the new financial assurance requirements, BOEM will allow current lessees and grant holders to request phased-in payments over a three-year period. BOEM estimates that the industry will be required to provide $6.9 billion in new financial assurances under the new rule, which took effect on June 29, 2024. Following the announcement of the new rule, a series of lawsuits from both states and industry groups have been filed against BOEM to block the implementation of the new rule. We are actively monitoring ongoing litigation with respect to the new rule.
IfA we failfailure to comply with theBOEM’s newfinancial ruleassurance andrequirements suchcould future orders, thecause BOEM couldto commence enforcement proceedings or take other remedial action against us, including assessing civil penalties, suspending operations or production, or initiating procedures to cancel leases, which, if upheld, would have a material adverse effect on our business, properties, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if we are required to provide collateral in the form of cash or letters of credit, our liquidity position could be negatively impacted, and we may be required to seek alternative financing. To the extent we are unable to secure adequate financing, we may be forced to reduce our capital expenditures.
The Biden administration took a number of actions that had potential to result in stricter environmental, health and safety standards applicable to our operations and those of the oil and natural gas industry more generally. Issuance of new or amended rulemakings restricting deepwater leasing, permitting or drilling could result in more stringent or costly restrictions, delays or cancellations to our operations as well as those of similarly situated offshore energy companies on the OCS. Compliance with any added or more stringent regulatory requirements or enforcement initiatives and existing environmental and spill regulations, together with uncertainties or inconsistencies in decisions by governmental agencies, delays in the processing and approval of drilling permits and exploration, development, oil spill response and decommissioning plans and possible additional regulatory initiatives, could adversely affect or delay new drilling and ongoing development efforts.
We are subject to numerous lawslaws, rules, regulations and regulationspolicies that can adversely affect the cost, manner or feasibility of doing business.
The IRA contains hundreds of billions of dollars in incentives for the development of renewable energy, clean hydrogen, clean fuels, electric vehicles and supporting infrastructure and carbon capture and sequestration, amongst other provisions. In addition, the IRA imposes the first ever federal fee on the emission of GHGs through a methane emissions charge. The IRA amends the federal CAA to impose a fee on the emission of methane from sources required to report their GHG emissions to the EPA, including those sources in the onshore petroleum and natural gas production categories. In January 2024, the EPA proposed a rule implementing the IRA’s methane emissions charge. Under this rule, finalized in November 2024, the methane emissions charge was established at $900 per ton emitted over annual methane emissions thresholds, and would increase to $1,200 in 2025, and $1,500 for 2026 and each year after. In February 2025, Congress filed a resolution under the Congressional Review Act to repeal the methane emissions charge.
CalculationThe IRA contains hundreds of thebillions feeof is based on certain thresholds establisheddollars in theincentives IRA. In addition,for the multipledevelopment of renewable energy, clean hydrogen, clean fuels, electric vehicles and supporting infrastructure and carbon capture and sequestration, amongst other provisions. These incentives offered for various clean energy industries referenced above could further accelerate the transition of the economy away from the use of fossil fuels towards lower- or zero-carbon emissions alternatives. This could decrease demand for oil and natural gas, increase our compliance and operating costs and consequently adversely affect our business.
Changes in U.S. trade policy and the impact of tariffs may have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business and results of operations may be adversely affected by uncertainty and changes in U.S. trade policies, including tariffs, trade agreements or other trade restrictions imposed by the U.S. or other governments. For example, on April 2, 2025, the U.S. government announced a 10% tariff on product imports from almost all countries and individualized higher tariffs on certain other countries. Several tariff announcements have been followed by announcements of limited exemptions and temporary pauses. Global trade policy continues to evolve and the ultimate impact of recent developments with respect to U.S. tariffs is unclear. On February 20, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). Following the Supreme Court’s decision, the U.S. presidential administration announced its intention to invoke other laws to collect tariffs and announced new tariffs on imports from all countries, in addition to any existing non-IEEPA tariffs.
There remains substantial uncertainty regarding the duration of existing and newly announced tariffs, potential changes or pauses to such tariffs, tariff levels, and whether further additional tariffs or other retaliatory actions may be imposed, modified, or suspended, and the impacts of such actions on our business. Furthermore, the process for potential refunds remains unclear. These and future changes in tariffs, trade policies, trade actions, or retaliatory trade measures in response, have resulted and may continue to result in decreased demand and price for the commodities that we produce, increase our operating costs and contribute to inflation in the markets in which we operate.
Changes in tariffs and trade restrictions can be announced with little or no advance notice. The adoption and expansion of tariffs or other trade restrictions, increasing trade tensions, or other changes in governmental policies related to taxes, tariffs, trade agreements or policies, are difficult to predict, which makes attendant risks difficult to anticipate and mitigate. Although we are continuing to monitor the economic effects of such announcements, as well as opportunities to mitigate their related impacts, costs and other effects associated with the tariffs remain uncertain. If we are unable to navigate further changes in U.S. or international trade policy, it could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
A prolonged government shutdown or lapse in federal appropriations could disrupt our offshore operations and delay required regulatory approvals.
From time to time, the U.S. federal government has experienced periods of prolonged shutdowns. A prolonged government shutdown, lapse in federal appropriations or other resulting restrictions on federal agency operations could result in significant delays or interruptions in future federal lease sales, permitting, inspections, approvals, decommissioning plans, and other agency actions (including actions by BOEM, BSEE, US. Coast Guard) upon which our offshore exploration, development and production activities in the U.S. Gulf of America depend. Such delays could increase project timelines, cause suspension or postponement of planned drilling plans, completion, tie-ins or platform work, and could decrease production, postpone capital projects, increase other costs or delay revenues, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, a government shutdown could affect supply-chain timing and create macroeconomic uncertainty that affects commodity markets and project financing which could materially adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
PresidentThe Biden made addressing the threat of climate change from GHG emissions a priority under his administration, and regulatory agencies under the Biden administration issued rules in supportreturn of President Biden’sTrump regulatoryto andthe politicalWhite agenda,House whichin includedJanuary reducing2025 dependencetriggered on,a andsweeping use of, fossil fuels and curtailmentrollback of hydraulicUnited fracturingStates onclimate federalpolicy, lands.reversing Sincemany takingof officethe ininitiatives introduced under former President Biden. In January 2025, President Trump hasannounced takenthat actionsthe toUnited reverseStates manywas ofwithdrawing thesefrom Biden-erathe rulesUnited andNations-sponsored policies.“Paris PresidentAgreement.” TrumpHe in January 2025also issued additional executive orders aimed at boosting fossil fuels and undoing Biden-era initiatives to limit GHG emissions. He declared a national energy emergency and revoked many of Biden’s executive orders on climate change. New orders instruct agencies to roll back restrictions on offshore drilling and reconsider protections for Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. President Trump also issued a moratorium on new wind power projects on federal lands, pausing new leases and permits for both onshore and offshore wind farms. He revoked an executive order that compelled government regulators to assess the risks of climate change to the financial system and he instructed agencies to review any regulations that might “burden the development of domestic energy resources.” ThatThese couldexecutive includeorders majorand Bidenthe administrationsubsequent changes to regulations have had a tangible impact on the regulatory environment as it relates to climate policies,change. includingAdditionally, EPAon rulesFebruary limiting12, 2026, EPS Administrator Lee Zeldin signed a final rule repealing the EPS’s 2009 finding that emissions fromof coal-carbon dioxide, methane and naturalother gas-firedGHGs powerpresent plantsan endangerment to public health and newthe feesenvironment. onWe methaneanticipate emissions fromthat the oilfinal andrule, gasone industry.published in the Federal Register, will be the subject of widespread litigation.
Additionally, increasing attention from consumers and other stakeholders on combating climate change, together with changes in consumer and industrial/commercial preferences and behavior and societal pressure on companies to address climate change may result in increased availability of, and increased demand from consumers and industry for, energy sources other than oil and natural gas (including wind, solar, geothermal, tidal and biofuels as well as electric vehicles) and development of, and increased demand from consumers and industry for, lower-emission products and services (including electric vehicles and renewable residential and commercial power supplies) as well as more efficient products and services. These developments may in the future adversely affect the demand for products manufactured with, or powered by, petroleum products, as well as the demand for, and in turn the prices of, oil and natural gas products.
Increasing attentionAttention to ESG matters may impact our business.
Increasing scrutiny related to ESG matters, societal expectations for companies to address climate change and sustainability concerns, and investor, societal, and other stakeholder expectations regarding ESG and sustainability practices and related disclosures may result in increased costs, reduced demand for the oil and natural gas we produce, reduced profits, increased risks of governmental investigations and private party litigation, and negative impacts on our stock price and access to capital markets. Increasing attentionAttention to climate change, for example, may result in demand shifts for the hydrocarbon products we produce as well as additional governmental investigations and private litigation against us. To the extent that societal pressures or political or other factors are involved, it is possible that such liability could be imposed without regard to our causation of or contribution to the assented damage, or to other mitigating factors.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Receipt of Insurance Proceeds”
New heading “Appeal with the Office of Natural Resources Revenue”
New heading “Bonding Disputes”
New heading “First Quarter 2026 Dividend”
New heading “Income tax expense (benefit)”
New heading “Operating activities”
New heading “Investing activities”
New heading “Financing activities”
Removed heading “Business and Operational Updates”
Removed heading “Derivative gain, net”
Largest changes
“On June 14, 2025, we entered into the USSIC Settlement Agreement and, on June 15, 2025, we entered into the PIIC Settlement Agreement to dismiss all claims with the applicable parties related to the Sureties Litigation without prejudice. …”see in full comparison
see in full comparisonThe BOEM requires that lessees demonstrate financial strength and reliability according to its regulations or provide acceptable financial assurances to satisfy lease obligations, including decommissioning activities on the OCS. In April 2024, BOEM released a final rule that changes the way BOEM evaluates the financial health of companies and offshore assets in setting financial assurance requirements. Under the new rule, BOEM streamlined the criteria used to evaluate the financial health of an energy company down to two factors: (i) the company’s credit rating, and (ii) the ratio of the value of the company’s proved reserves to decommissioning liability associated with those reserves. The new rule also codifies the usage of BSEE decommissioning estimates to evaluate supplemental financial assurance requirements and allows third party guarantors (upon agreement with BOEM) to provide limited guarantees to specific amounts or specific leases instead of the blanket guarantees that have been used in the past. Finally, the new rule also requires a base financial assurance requirement of $500,000 for federal RUEs to match the requirement for state RUEs. To provide the industry with flexibility to meet the new financial assurance requirements, BOEM will allow current lessees and grant holders to request phased-in payments over a three-year period. BOEM estimates that the industry will be required to provide $6.9 billion in new financial assurances under the new rule, which took effect on June 29, 2024. Following the announcement of the new rule, a series of lawsuits from both states and industry groups have been filed against BOEM to block the implementation of the new rule. We are actively monitoring ongoing litigation with respect to the new rule. However, President Trump may seek to suspend, revise or rescind this final rule pursuant to Interior Secretary Burgum’s Secretarial Order 3418 dated February 2, 2025.The substance and timing of such legal and regulatory actions cannot be predicted at this time. The future cost of compliance with respect to supplemental financial assurances, including the obligations imposed on us, whether as current or predecessor lessee or grant holder in respect of BOEM’s final rule or any new, more stringent, rules related to supplemental financial assurances could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, cash flows, liquidity and results of operations. Additionally, regardless of the final rule, BOEM has the right to issue liability orders in the future, including if it determines there is a substantial risk of nonperformance of the interest holder’s decommissioning liabilities. For more information on the BOEM and financial assurance obligations to that agency, see Business – Environmental, Health and Safety Matters and Government Regulations – Other Regulation of the Oil and Natural Gas Industry under Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K.
“In June 2024, we received notice from BSEE that we would be required to cease production at our Main Pass 108 and 98 fields as the result of a shut-in of midstream infrastructure not owned by us. On December 11, 2024, we entered into a purchase agreement and other arrangements with the trustee of the bankruptcy estate of Energy XXI GOM, LLC and Cox Operating L.L.C. (the “Cox Trustee”) to acquire the necessary midstream infrastructure, which is expected to allow us to return the Main Pass 108 and 98 fields to production in the second quarter of 2025. …”see in full comparison
“During 2025, other expense, net, was $8.4 million, compared to $18.1 million for 2024. …”see in full comparison
“The BOEM requires that lessees demonstrate financial strength and reliability according to its regulations and provide acceptable financial assurances to assure satisfaction of lease obligations, including decommissioning activities in the OCS. In April 2024, BOEM released a final rule that changed the way BOEM evaluates the financial health of companies and offshore assets in setting financial assurance requirements. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (72)
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on, and should be read in conjunction with Part I, Item 1. Business, Item 1A. Risk Factors, Item 2. Properties and Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk and with Part 1I,II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this 20242025 Form 10-K. The following discussion and analysis includes forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, particularly in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors.
RecentSignificant Developments
Receipt of Insurance Proceeds
Business and Operational Updates
On January 16, 2024, we closed on our acquisition of rights, titles and interest in and to certain leases, wells and personal property in the central shelf region of the Gulf of America, among other assets, for $77.3 million (including closing fees and other transaction costs). The acquisition was funded using cash on hand. We also assumed the related AROs associated with these assets. This transaction is described in more detail under Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 2 – Acquisitions, under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.
In December 2024, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell a non-core interest in the Garden Banks Blocks 385 and 386. The effective date of the sale was December 1, 2024, and the transaction closed on January 8, 2025 for approximately $11.9 million following customary purchase price adjustments.
Effective December 20, 2024, we entered into a resolution with the third-party pipeline operator at our West Delta 73 field. As a result of this resolution, we expect to restart production from the field in the second quarter of 2025. We originally acquired the West Delta 73 field in our January 2024 acquisition.
In June 2024, we received notice from BSEE that we would be required to cease production at our Main Pass 108 and 98 fields as the result of a shut-in of midstream infrastructure not owned by us. On December 11, 2024, we entered into a purchase agreement and other arrangements with the trustee of the bankruptcy estate of Energy XXI GOM, LLC and Cox Operating L.L.C. (the “Cox Trustee”) to acquire the necessary midstream infrastructure, which is expected to allow us to return the Main Pass 108 and 98 fields to production in the second quarter of 2025. Following developments in connection with the acquisition of the midstream infrastructure, on February 25, 2025, we mutually terminated the purchase agreement with the Cox Trustee and entered into a new purchase agreement with the Cox Trustee including the midstream infrastructure and additional properties. The closing of the acquisitions contemplated by the purchase agreement and subsequent return to production are subject to our obtaining approval from the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, necessary governmental approvals and permits in connection with the acquisitions, in addition to customary closing conditions.
Termination of Legacy Credit Agreement and Entry into New Credit Agreement
On January 28, 2025, in conjunction with the issuance of the 10.75% Notes, we terminated our Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Legacy Credit Agreement”) and entered into the New Credit Agreement which provides us a revolving credit and letter of credit facility with initial bank lending commitments of $50.0 million with a letter of credit sublimit of $10.0 million. The New Credit Agreement matures on July 28, 2028.
Appeal with the Office of Natural Resources Revenue
On August 26, 2025, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana issued a favorable order on the Company’s motion for summary judgment regarding the disallowance of allowable reduction of cash payments for royalties owed to the ONRR. On December 15, 2025 and December 16, 2025, the ONRR released the Company’s administrative appeal bonds. The Company remains in discussions with the ONRR regarding the related litigation bond and the amount, if any, to be refunded or credited to the Company. As a result of the order, the Company reversed its $5.3 million accrual related to this matter.
Bonding Disputes
On June 14, 2025, we entered into the USSIC Settlement Agreement and, on June 15, 2025, we entered into the PIIC Settlement Agreement to dismiss all claims with the applicable parties related to the Sureties Litigation without prejudice. Pursuant to the applicable Settlement Agreement, USSIC and PIIC agree that: (i) there will be no change to the 2024 premium rates paid by us or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries or joint venture entities, for any currently existing surety bond executed by USSIC or PIIC until after December 31, 2026, at the earliest, (ii) USSIC and PIIC withdraw all demands for collateral and agree not to request, demand, or otherwise insist on collateral, whether related to a surety bond or pursuant to the indemnity agreements, until after December 31, 2026, at the earliest; provided that such restriction shall not apply if (a) we do not pay premiums owed to USSIC or PIIC when due; (b) a claim is made by a third party against any bond issued by USSIC or PIIC to us or its affiliates or subsidiaries; (c) there is an initiation of an insolvency proceeding for us or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries or joint venture entities, whether voluntary or involuntary; (d) there is an uncured event of default under the indenture governing our second lien notes due 2029 that results in an acceleration, in whole or in part, of the indebtedness thereunder; or (e) we or our affiliates or subsidiaries initiate a lawsuit against USSIC or PIIC. Each of the Settlement Agreements also provides that, in the event that we enter into an agreement to provide collateral to another party in settlement of the Sureties Litigation on bonds existing as of the date of the Settlement Agreement, we shall, on a pro rata basis, provide substantially similar collateral to USSIC or PIIC as it does to such other party. The entry into the Settlement Agreements resulted in the withdrawal of approximately $94 million in collateral demands.
On June 30, 2025, we announced that the presiding judge in the Sureties Litigation recommended denying the requests for preliminary injunction submitted by two surety providers. The preliminary injunction would have required us to immediately post $105 million of collateral. The recommendation would effectively nullify all current collateral requests related to the surety litigation by the surety providers and we will not be required to post collateral (if at all) until a determination on the merits of the Sureties Litigation with the remaining surety providers.
All of the remaining parties to the Sureties Litigation previously agreed to mediate the case until the mediator declares an impasse. Mediation is no longer active as the mediator has declared an impasse with respect to the surety providers that did not enter into the Settlement Agreements. We continue to evaluate potential avenues for resolution of the remaining related premium and collateral-related matters.
First Quarter 2026 Dividend
On March 5, 2026, we declared a first quarter dividend of $0.01 per share. We expect to pay the dividend on March 26, 2026 to stockholders of record on March 19, 2026.
See Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 19 – Subsequent Events under Part II, Item 8 in this Form 10-K for additional information.
The EIA published its latest Short-Term Energy Outlook in January 2025.2026. The EIA expects downward oil priceprices pressuresto overdecline muchin of the next two years2026, as they expect that global oil production will grow more thanexceeds global oil demand.demand, causing inventories to rise. The EIA forecasts that the spot price for WTI oil will average $70.33$52.25 per barrel in 2025,2026, 8%20% less than 2024,the andaverage thenprice continueof to fall another 11% to $62.50$65.46 per barrel in 2026.2025 and then average $50.33 per barrel in 2027. The unwinding of OPEC+ production cuts and strong growth in oil production outside of OPEC+ results in global oil production growing in the EIA forecast. Although the EIA is forecasting OPEC+ will increase production, they expect the group will produce less oil than stated in its most recent production target in an effort to avoid significant inventory builds.
The EIA expects the spot prices for Henry Hub natural gas to average $3.14 per MMBtu in 2025 and $3.97$3.46 per MMBtu in 2026, updown 2% from athe historically low2025 average of $2.19$3.53 per MMBtu, and average $4.59 per MMBtu in 2024.2027. The EIA expects wholesale natural gas prices to increase becausedue to growth in demand, led by expanding liquified natural gas exports, will outpace production growth and keepmore inventoriesnatural gas consumption in the nextelectric twopower yearssector atfrom orgrowing belowdemand theirfor previouspower five-yearin averages.the commercial and industrial sectors.
We are also monitoring the impact of the tariffs announced by the United States federal government in 2025 and 2026. While there is significant uncertainty as to the duration of these and any further tariffs, and the impacts these tariffs and any corresponding retaliatory tariffs will have on the oil and gas industry and on commodity prices, we do not currently expect that the financial impact of the tariffs will be material to capital expenditures or operating expenses in 2026.
In addition to the impact of volatile commodity prices on our operations, continuing inflation could also impact our sales margins and profitability. The United States has experienced a rise in inflation since October 2021. Inflation peaked during mid-2022 at 9.1% but the rate of inflation has been gradually declining since the second half of 2022 according to the Consumer Price Index (the “CPI”). The annual inflation rate for December 2024 was 2.9%, a decrease from the 3.4% rate for December 2023. However, the annual inflation rate of January 2025 was 3.0%, an increase from the 2.9% rate for December 2024. Beginning in September 2024, the Federal Reserve made three cuts to the target federal funds rate, bringing the target federal funds range down to 4.25% to 4.50%, easing monetary policy for the first time in four years due to progress in inflation moving sustainably toward 2%. The Summary of Economic Projections published by the Federal Reserve in December 2024 points to another 50 basis points of cuts in 2025. However, if inflation were to continue to rise again, it is possible the Federal Reserve would continue to take action they deem necessary to bring inflation down and to ensure price stability, including targeted federal funds rate increases, which could have the effects of raising the cost of capital and depressing economic growth, either or both of which could negatively impact our business.
Since our operations are in the Gulf of America, we are particularly vulnerable to the effects of hurricanes on production and operations. Significant hurricane impacts include reductions and/or deferrals of future oil and natural gas production and revenues, increased lease operating expenses for evacuations and repairs and possible acceleration of plugging and abandonment costs.
Our production was impacted due to precautionary shut-ins of facilities and evacuations associated with Hurricanes Francine, Helene and Rafael. For 2024, we estimate deferred production related to Hurricane Francine was approximately 132.8 MBoe and affected 35 fields, deferred production related to Hurricane Helene was approximately 17.2 MBoe and affected five fields and deferred production related to Hurricane Rafael was approximately 3.4 MBoe and affected three fields.
Production downtime following these hurricanes was extended as a result of damage and power loss at third party downstream facilities, including oil terminals, natural gas processing plants and refineries, causing them to remain offline for several weeks. While our assets and infrastructure did not suffer significant damage during the storm, we incurred $1.1 million of unplanned costs for minor repairs and restoring production, as well as evacuating employees and contractors, as a result of the hurricane. These amounts are reflected in lease operating expense.
In addition, ourOur oil, NGLs and natural gas production can also be significantly affected by both planned and unplanned production downtime caused by events such as planned repairs and upgrades, third-party downtime associated with non-operated properties and the transportation, gathering or processing of production and weather events. For 2024,2025, we estimate deferred production was approximately 2.62.5 MMBoe, excluding the deferred production from the hurricanes.MMBoe.
The BOEM requires that lessees demonstrate financial strength and reliability according to its regulations and provide acceptable financial assurances to assure satisfaction of lease obligations, including decommissioning activities in the OCS. In April 2024, BOEM released a final rule that changed the way BOEM evaluates the financial health of companies and offshore assets in setting financial assurance requirements. Under the new rule, BOEM revised the criteria for determining whether OCS oil and natural gas lessees and grant holders are required to provide supplemental financial assurance to backstop their decommissioning obligations. On April 8, 2025, pursuant to directives from the Trump administration, the DOI, through a joint filing in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (Case no. 2:24-cv-00820), indicated that it will not seek supplemental financial assurance in the Gulf of America except in the case of (a) sole liability properties and (b) certain non-sole liability properties that do not have a financially strong co-owner or predecessor in title and meet other conditions. Further, in May 2025, the DOI announced its intent to revise the rule, and in March 2026, BOEM published a proposed rule setting forth amendments to the existing financial assurance regulatory framework. The proposed rule would, among other things, (i) permit BOEM to consider the financial strength of predecessors with joint and several liability when determining whether supplemental financial assurance is required, (ii) revise the level of BSEE probabilistic estimates of decommissioning cost used for determining the amount of supplemental financial assurance required from P70 to P50, (iii) provide BOEM with discretion, in circumstances where decommissioning is scheduled to occur within one year of a supplemental financial assurance demand, to accept third-party decommissioning contracts or decommissioning schedules in lieu of requiring new supplemental financial assurance, (iv) eliminate the requirement that a lessee challenging a supplemental financial assurance demand post an appeal bond equal to the amount of the demand in order to obtain a stay pending appeal, and (v) explicitly recognize dual-obligee bonds (which identify multiple obligees) as an acceptable form of financial assurance. The proposed rule is subject to a 60-day public comment period, which is expected to end on May 8, 2026.
The BOEM requires that lessees demonstrate financial strength and reliability according to its regulations or provide acceptable financial assurances to satisfy lease obligations, including decommissioning activities on the OCS. In April 2024, BOEM released a final rule that changes the way BOEM evaluates the financial health of companies and offshore assets in setting financial assurance requirements. Under the new rule, BOEM streamlined the criteria used to evaluate the financial health of an energy company down to two factors: (i) the company’s credit rating, and (ii) the ratio of the value of the company’s proved reserves to decommissioning liability associated with those reserves. The new rule also codifies the usage of BSEE decommissioning estimates to evaluate supplemental financial assurance requirements and allows third party guarantors (upon agreement with BOEM) to provide limited guarantees to specific amounts or specific leases instead of the blanket guarantees that have been used in the past. Finally, the new rule also requires a base financial assurance requirement of $500,000 for federal RUEs to match the requirement for state RUEs. To provide the industry with flexibility to meet the new financial assurance requirements, BOEM will allow current lessees and grant holders to request phased-in payments over a three-year period. BOEM estimates that the industry will be required to provide $6.9 billion in new financial assurances under the new rule, which took effect on June 29, 2024. Following the announcement of the new rule, a series of lawsuits from both states and industry groups have been filed against BOEM to block the implementation of the new rule. We are actively monitoring ongoing litigation with respect to the new rule. However, President Trump may seek to suspend, revise or rescind this final rule pursuant to Interior Secretary Burgum’s Secretarial Order 3418 dated February 2, 2025. The substance and timing of such legal and regulatory actions cannot be predicted at this time. The future cost of compliance with respect to supplemental financial assurances, including the obligations imposed on us, whether as current or predecessor lessee or grant holder in respect of BOEM’s final rule or any new, more stringent, rules related to supplemental financial assurances could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, cash flows, liquidity and results of operations. Additionally, regardless of the final rule, BOEM has the right to issue liability orders in the future, including if it determines there is a substantial risk of nonperformance of the interest holder’s decommissioning liabilities. For more information on the BOEM and financial assurance obligations to that agency, see Business – Environmental, Health and Safety Matters and Government Regulations – Other Regulation of the Oil and Natural Gas Industry under Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K.
In prior years, some of the sureties, which provided us surety bonds that we use for supplemental financial assurance purposes, requested and received collateral from us. Pursuant to the terms of our agreement with various sureties under outour existing bonding arrangements, we may be required to post collateral. These sureties may request additional collateral from us in the future, which could be significant and could materially impact our liquidity.
Our revenues are derived from the sale of our oil and natural gas production, as well as the sale of NGLs. Our oil, NGL and natural gas revenues do not include the effects of derivatives, which are reported in Derivative (gain) loss,gain, net in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Production volumes increased by 219 MBoe to 12,402 MBoe during 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, primarily due to restoring production at our West Delta 73, MO 916 and Main Pass 108 fields and increased production at our Mobile Bay fields due to well stimulation work and reduced downtime, partially offset by unplanned third party pipeline outages and the shut-in of a well due to solids production.
Production volumes decreased by 547 MBoe to 12,183 MBoe during 2024 compared to the same period in 2023, primarily due to deferred production of approximately 0.8 MMBoe at our Mobile Bay Properties, approximately 0.3 MMBoe from the shut-on of the MP 98 and 108 fields and approximately 0.2 MMBoe from the effects of Hurricanes Francine, Helene and Rafael. These decreases were partially offset by approximately 1.9 MMBoe of production from wells acquired in both the January 2024 and the September 2023 acquisitions.
Lease operating expenses include the expense of operating and maintaining our wells, platforms and other infrastructure primarily in the Gulf of America. These operating costs are comprised of several components including direct or base lease operating expenses, insurance premiums, workover costs and facility maintenance expenses. Our lease operating costs, which depend in part on the type of commodity produced, the level of workover activity and the geographical location of the properties, increased $23.8$17.3 million to $298.8 million in 2025 compared to $281.5 million in 2024 compared to $257.7 million in 2023.2024. On a per Boe basis, lease operating expenses increased to $24.09 per Boe during 2025 compared to $23.10 per Boe during 2024 compared to $20.24 per Boe during 2023.2024. On a component basis, base lease operating expenses increased $30.2$10.0 million, workover expenses increased $5.6 million and facility maintenance expenses increased $7.9$2.7 million and hurricane repairs increased $1.0 million,million. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $15.3$1.0 million in workoverhurricane expenses.repairs.
Expenses for direct labor, materials, supplies, repair, third-party costs and insurance comprise the most significant portion of our base lease operating expense. Base lease operating expenses increased primarily due to increases of $37.5 million of expenses at the fields acquiredbrought online during 2025 and increased repairs and maintenance in Januaryvarious 2024 and September 2023fields, partially offset by $6.1a millionfull year of a cost sharing agreement that began in mid-2024, cost reductions in several fields and reduced expenses from the abandonment work to shutdown certain of our fields.
Workover and facilities maintenance expenses consist of costs associated with major remedial operations on completed wells to restore, maintain or improve the well’s production. Since these remedial operations are not regularly scheduled, workover and maintenance expense are not necessarily comparable from period to period. The decreaseincreases in workover expenses and the increase in facilities maintenance expenses were due to the timing and mix of projects undertaken.
Hurricane expenses consist of costs for minor repairs and restoring production, as well as evacuating employees and contractors incurred as a result of Hurricanes Francine, Helene and Rafael.Rafael during 2024.
Gathering and transportation consist of costs incurred in the post-production shipping of oil, NGLs, and natural gas to the point of sale. Production taxes consist of severance taxes levied by the Alabama Department of Revenue ,Revenue, the Louisiana Department of Revenue and the Texas Department of Revenue on production of oil and natural gas from land or water bottoms within the boundaries of each state. Gathering, transportation and production taxes increaseddecreased to $25.7 million in 2025 compared to $28.2 million in 2024 compared to $26.3 million in 2023,2024, primarily due to increase of $1.5 million in gathering and transportation fees and $0.4 million in production taxes. Gathering and transportation fees increased during the first half of 2024 compared with the first half of 2023 primarily related to higher production volumes in the first quarter of 2024 and higher processing fees for our Mobile Bay production that had to be re-routed to a different processing plant due to the shut-in of our primary Mobile Bay processing plant.plant Theseduring fees decreased in the second half of 2024 as our production volumes decreased compared with the same period in 2023. The increase in production taxes is primarily related to the start of payments to the state of Louisiana from our acquisition of oil and natural gas properties in September 2023.2024.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense (“DD&A”) is the expensing of the capitalized costs incurred to acquire, explore and develop oil and natural gas reserves. We use the full cost method of accounting for oil and natural gas activities. DD&A increaseddecreased $28.3$26.6 million for 20242025 compared to 20232024 primarily due to increases of $33.3$28.6 million from ana increasedecrease in the depletion rate per Mcfe and $1.3 million for depreciation of other property and the corporate airplane acquired in May 2023, partially offset by $6.3$2.0 million from the decreaseincrease in production for 20242025 compared with 2023.2024. The DD&A rate increaseddecreased to $9.39 per Boe in 2025 from $11.74 per Boe in 2024 from $9.01 per Boe in 2023.2024. The DD&A rate per Boe increaseddecreased primarily as a result of a higher depreciable base due to our January 2024 acquisition, increasesdecreases in capital expenditures, future development costs and capitalized ARO anda lower depreciable base, partially offset by decreased proved reserves. The lower depreciable base is due to the $58.5 million in insurance proceeds and $11.9 million of proceeds from the sale of oil and natural gas properties that were included in our full cost pool.
Accretion expense is the expensing of the changes in value of our ARO as a result of the passage of time over the estimated productive life of the related assets as the discounted liabilities are accreted to their expected settlement values. Accretion expense increased to $33.4 million in 2025 compared to $32.4 million in 2024 compared to $29.0 million in 2023 primarily due to ourthe acquisitionincrease in Januaryour 2024ARO andliability as a result of revisions to the estimates used in calculating the liability.
General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses generally consist of costs incurred for overhead, including payroll and benefits for our corporate staff, costs of maintaining our headquarters, costs of managing our production operations, bad debt expense, share-based compensation costs, audit and other fees for professional services and legal compliance. For 2024,2025, G&A expenses were $82.4$80.0 million compared to $75.5$82.4 million in 2023.2024. The increasedecrease is primarily due to increasesa decrease of (i) $4.0 million in payroll costs consisting of $1.8 million related to merit and headcount increases and a $2.2 million employee retention credit recorded in 2023, (ii) $2.8$4.6 million in non-recurring legal fees and (iii)professional $1.9 million in medical claims cost,fees, partially offset by a $2.1$2.0 million decreaseincrease in short-term incentiveshare-based compensation costs.
Interest expense, net of interest income, decreased $4.2$4.0 million for 20242025 compared with 20232024 primarily due to decreasesa decrease of $7.9$42.3 million from the redemption in February 2023 of ourthe 9.75% Senior Second Lien11.75% Notes due 2023 and $1.9 million from the lower outstanding principal balancerepayment of the Term Loan,Loan in late January 2025, partially offset by $2.8$37.3 million incurred on the 11.75%10.75% Notes issued in late January 2023 and a $2.6 million decrease in interest income.2025.
During 2025, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt related to our January 2025 refinancing. The loss consisted of (i) $9.8 million of premiums paid on the redemption of the tendered 11.75% Notes; (ii) $4.6 million related to the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs; (iii) $0.5 million of fees related to the refinancing; and (iv) $0.2 million related to the legal defeasance of the untendered 11.75% Notes.
Derivative gain, net
Unrealized gains or losses on open derivative contracts relate to production for future periods; however, changes in the fair value of all of our open derivative contracts are recorded as a gain or loss on our Consolidated Statements of Operations at the end of each month. During 2025, the $13.6 million derivative gain consisted of $16.3 million of realized gains on settled contracts offset by a $2.7 million unrealized loss from the decrease in the fair value of the open contracts. During 2024, the $3.6 million derivative gain consisted of $2.9 million of realized gains on settled contracts and $0.7 million of unrealized gain, net, from the increase in the fair value of the open contracts. During 2023, the $54.8 million derivative gain consisted of $4.1 million of realized losses on settled contracts and $58.9 million of unrealized gain, net, from the increase in the fair value of the open contracts.
As a result of the derivative contracts we have on our anticipated natural gas production volumes through April 2028, we expect these activities to continue to impact net income based on fluctuations in market prices for natural gas.
During 2025, other expense, net, was $8.4 million, compared to $18.1 million for 2024. The decrease in other expense, net was primarily due to (i) the release of an accrual of $5.3 million related to our dispute with the ONRR, (ii) a $3.4 million decrease in the accrual of additional expenses for net abandonment obligations related to our assumption of decommissioning obligations when certain counterparties in past divestiture transactions or third parties in existing leases have filed for bankruptcy protection or have been unable to perform required abandonment obligations and (iii) an increase of $1.9 million in income from unconsolidated affiliates in 2025.
Income tax expense (benefit)
During 2024, other expense, net, was $18.1 million, compared to $5.6 million for 2023. During 2024 and 2023, other expense primarily consisted of $20.9 million and $6.2 million, respectively, of additional expenses for net abandonment obligations pertaining to a number of legacy Gulf of America properties, partially offset by fees paid by producers to tie into our subsea equipment at one of our wells.
Our effective tax ratesrate for 20242025 was not meaningful and 2023 were 10.3% and 54.0%, respectively. These rates differed from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the recording of 21%a $71.2 million valuation allowance in 2025 against our net deferred tax assets as it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets in excess of our deferred tax liabilities will currently not be utilized. Our effective tax rate for 2024 was 10.3% and differed from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the impact of state income taxes, non-deductible compensation and adjustments to the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets.
We expect to support our business requirements primarily with cash on hand and cash generated from operations. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had $109.0$140.6 million of available cash on hand and $50.0$43.9 million available under our Credit Agreement, based on a borrowing base of $50.0 million.million and $6.1 million of letters of credit outstanding. We also have up to approximately $83.0 million of availability through our “at-the-market” equity offering program, pursuant to which we may offer and sell shares of our common stock from time to time. Based on our current financial condition and current expectations of future market conditions, we believe our cash on hand, cash flows from operating activities and access to the equity markets from our “at-the-market” equity offering program will provide us with additional liquidity to continue our growth to take advantage of the current commodity environment and will allow us to meet our cash requirements for at least the next 12 months and beyond.
The following table summarizes cash flows provided by (used in) byeach type of activity for the following periods (in thousands):
Operating activities
Our largest source of operating cash is collecting cash from customers and joint interest partners from sales of our products. The primary use of operating cash is to pay our suppliers, employees and others for a wide range of goods and services.
Operating activities – Net cash provided by operating activities for 20242025 was $59.5$77.2 million, decreasingincreasing $55.8$17.7 million from 2023.2024. This was primarily due to decreasesan increase of $37.6 million in net (loss) income adjusted for certain non-cash items and $18.2$29.6 million from changes in operating assets and liabilities.liabilities Theoffset by a decrease of $11.9 million in net (loss) income adjusted for certain non-cash items was primarily related to a $7.4 million decrease in revenues and increases in cash operating expenses, partially offset by a $13.5 million increase in derivative cash receipts.items. The decreaseincrease in operating assets and liabilities is primarily related to lower accounts receivable balances due to decreased revenues partially offset by higher accounts payable and accrued liabilities balances in the current period. The decrease in net loss adjusted for certain non-cash items was primarily related to a $23.8 million decrease in revenues and increases in cash operating expenses, partially offset by a $10.1 million increase in derivative cash receipts.
Investing activities
Our principal recurring investing activity is the funding of acquisitions and investments in oil and natural gas properties to support and generate revenues from operations. Net cash provided by investing activities for 2025 increased $140.0 million compared to 2024. During 2025, we received $58.5 million in insurance proceeds and $11.9 million in proceeds from the sale of oil and natural gas properties. As we use the full cost method of accounting for our oil and natural gas properties, these proceeds were recorded in our full cost pool. This increase in cash flows and a $79.9 million decrease in acquisition of property interests was partially offset by an $11.3 million increase in investments in oil and natural gas properties.
Financing activities
Net cash used in financing activities during 2025 increased by $60.5 million compared to 2024. In connection with our debt refinancing in January 2025, we received $350.0 million in proceeds from the issuance of our 10.75% Notes and used these proceeds, along with cash on hand, to (i) purchase for cash, pursuant to the Tender Offer, $269.8 million of our 11.75% Notes; (ii) repay $114.2 million of amount outstanding under our Term Loan; (iii) purchase $5.3 million of government securities to be used in the legal defeasance of the remaining principal of our 11.75% Notes not validly tendered and accepted for purchase in the Tender Offer; and (iv) pay $21.8 million in premiums, fees and debt issuance costs.
Investing activities – Net cash used in investing activities for 2024 increased $36.6 million compared to 2023. This was primarily due to an increase of $53.3 million in acquisition of property interests, partially offset by a decrease of $4.5 million in investment in oil and natural gas properties and the purchase of the corporate aircraft during 2023.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
In addition to the information set forth in this Quarterly Report, investors should carefully consider the risk factors and other cautionary statements included under Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors, in our 2025 Annual Report, together with all of the other information included in this Quarterly Report, and in our other public filings, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or future results.
Notwithstanding the matters discussed herein, there have been no material changes in our risk factors as previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our 2025 Annual Report.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Operating Expenses”
New heading “Other Income and Expense Items”
Largest changes
“Other expense, net – Other expense, net decreased $13.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025 primarily related to an accrual of additional expenses in the three months ended June 30, 2025 for net abandonment obligations related to our assumption of decommissioning obligations when certain counterparties in past divestiture transactions or third parties in existing leases have filed for bankruptcy protection or may not be able to perform required abandonment obligations.”see in full comparison
“Other expense, net – Other expense, net decreased $12.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025 primarily related to an accrual of additional expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2025 for net abandonment obligations related to our assumption of decommissioning obligations when certain counterparties in past divestiture transactions or third parties in existing leases have filed for bankruptcy protection or may not be able to perform required abandonment obligations.”see in full comparison
“Just over a week after signing the MOU, Iran launched a drone strike against a ship in the Strait of Hormuz. The attack, interpreted by the United States as a violation of the ceasefire agreement, prompted a round of contained strikes against Iran. In addition, Yemen’s Houthis opened a new front in the war by targeting vessels carrying Saudi oil, further disrupting global oil shipping as the Red Sea is another strategic waterway that oil companies use to transport their oil from the Middle East. …”see in full comparison
“Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
“We are also monitoring the impact of the tariffs imposed by the United States federal government. While there is significant uncertainty as to the duration of these and any further tariffs, and the impacts these tariffs and any corresponding retaliatory tariffs will have on the oil and gas industry and on commodity prices, we do not currently expect that the financial impact of the tariffs will be material to our capital expenditures or operating expenses in 2026.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (48)
We are an independent oil and natural gas producer, active in the exploration, development and acquisition of oil and natural gas properties in the Gulf of America. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we hold working interests in 48 producing offshore fields in federal and state waters (which include 41 fields in federal waters and seven in state waters). We currently have under lease approximately 605,200591,000 gross acres (471,300457,100 net acres) spanning across the outer continental shelf off the coasts of Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi and Alabama, with approximately 5,600 gross acres in Alabama state waters, 457,700449,200 gross acres on the conventional shelf and approximately 141,900136,200 gross acres in the deepwater. A majority of our daily production is derived from wells we operate.
On MayAugust 7,5, 2026, we declared a regular quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share of common stock for the secondthird quarter of 2026. We expect to pay the dividend on MayAugust 28,26, 2026 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on MayAugust 21,19, 2026.
On June 18, 2026, the United States and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) related to the conflict between the two countries, including with respect to the re-opening of the Strait of Hormuz, which had been closed earlier in 2026 and had contributed to elevated oil prices. Expectations of increasing oil supply and moderating inventory draws have caused oil prices to fall. The average spot price for WTI oil averaged $84.81 per barrel in June 2026, down $17.32 per barrel from May 2026. In the Energy Information Administration’s (the “EIA”) Short-Term Energy Outlook published in July 2026, the EIA is forecasting that spot prices for WTI will average $68.50 per barrel for the remainder of 2026 and $60.83 per barrel in 2027. The EIA expects that ongoing oil inventory accumulation over the next year will continue to put downward pressure on oil prices.
Just over a week after signing the MOU, Iran launched a drone strike against a ship in the Strait of Hormuz. The attack, interpreted by the United States as a violation of the ceasefire agreement, prompted a round of contained strikes against Iran. In addition, Yemen’s Houthis opened a new front in the war by targeting vessels carrying Saudi oil, further disrupting global oil shipping as the Red Sea is another strategic waterway that oil companies use to transport their oil from the Middle East. Although oil prices rose as a result of these disruptions, prices are still significantly lower than the high prices experienced in the middle of May 2026. Workarounds via pipelines and the use of the southern shipping route through the Strait of Oman have kept the cost of oil from skyrocketing, and production worldwide has also stepped up in response to the off-and-on closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
The Energy Information Administration (the “EIA”) published its latest Short-Term Energy Outlook in April 2026. Global oil markets are in a period of heightened volatility and uncertainty due to significant disruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz since the conflict with Iran began at the end of February 2026. The WTI oil spot price averaged $91.38 per barrel in March 2026, $26.87 per barrel higher than the average for February 2026. The conflict with Iran has quickly shifted market dynamics, as producers in the region have been forced to shut-in significant volumes of oil production, leading to near-term tightness in the market. In its forecast, the EIA is forecasting that the average spot price for WTI oil will peak in the second quarter of 2026 at $101.67 per barrel before easing as production shut-ins slowly abate. The EIA is forecasting that the spot price for WTI oil will average $92.11 per barrel for the remainder of 2026 and $72.58 per barrel in 2027.
The Henry Hub spot price averaged $4.80$2.95 per MMBtu for the firstsecond quarter of 2026, and the EIA expects the spot prices for Henry Hub natural gas to average $3.29$3.47 per MMBtu for the remainder of 2026 and average $3.59$3.49 per MMBtu in 2027. The EIA expects wholesalethat record natural gas pricesproduction towill remainhelp closemeet torising recentdemand seasonalfrom normsthe aselectric power sector, putting moderate downward pressure on natural gas storage levels remain at average levels.prices.
We are also monitoring the impact of the tariffs imposed by the United States federal government. While there is significant uncertainty as to the duration of these and any further tariffs, and the impacts these tariffs and any corresponding retaliatory tariffs will have on the oil and gas industry and on commodity prices, we do not currently expect that the financial impact of the tariffs will be material to our capital expenditures or operating expenses in 2026.
We will continue to monitor developments related to trade policy and assess any potential impacts on our operations and cost structure.
Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 Compared to the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
Our revenues are derived from the sale of our oil and natural gas production, as well as the sale of NGLs. Our oil, NGL and natural gas revenues do not include the effects of derivatives, which are reported in Derivative gain,loss (gain), net in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Changes in average sales prices and production volumes caused the following changes to our oil, NGL and natural gas revenues between the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Production volumes increased by 515105 MBoe to 3,2593,157 MBoe during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025 primarily due to restoring production at our West Delta 73, MO 91673 and MainEugene PassIsland 10864 fields and increasedrecompletion of a well at our Garden Banks 783 field, partially offset by reduced production fromat our Mobile Bay fields due to reduceda downtime,temporary partiallyre-route offsetof byproduction shut-insdue atto ourthird-party SS 349 field for approximately five days.maintenance.
Lease operating expenses – Lease operating expenses (“LOE”) include the expense of operating and maintaining our wells, platforms and other infrastructure primarily in the Gulf of America. These operating costs are comprised of several components including direct or base lease operating expenses, insurance premiums, workover costs and facility maintenance expenses. LOE, which depend in part on the type of commodity produced, the level of workover activity and the geographical location of the properties, decreased $4.9$5.4 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. On a per Boe basis, LOE decreased to $20.29$22.67 per Boe during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to $25.88$25.20 per Boe during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. On a component basis, base LOE decreased $5.2$2.5 million, workover expenses decreased $0.7$1.1 million, facilities maintenance expense increaseddecreased $1.1$1.9 million and hurricane repairs decreasedincreased $0.1 million.
Expenses for direct labor, materials, supplies, repair, third-party costs and insurance comprise the most significant portion of our base LOE. These costs decreased primarily due to lower costs overall, reflecting the success of our cost reduction efforts that began in the fourth quarter of 2025 and continued into the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
Workover and facilities maintenance expenses consist of costs associated with major remedial operations on completed wells to restore, maintain or improve the well’s production. Since these remedial operations are not regularly scheduled, workover and maintenance expense are not necessarily comparable from period to period. The increasesdecreases in workover expenses and facilities maintenance expenses were due to the timing and mix of projects undertaken.
Gathering, transportation and production taxes – Gathering and transportation consist of costs incurred in the post-production shipping of oil, NGLs, and natural gas to the point of sale. Production taxes consist of severance taxes levied by the Alabama Department of Revenue, the Louisiana Department of Revenue and the Texas Department of Revenue on production of oil and natural gas from land or water bottoms within the boundaries of each state. Gathering, transportation and production taxes increased $3.0$1.1 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 primarily due to the impact of the new NGL processing contract at Mobile Bay and higher production volumes in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization – Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense (“DD&A”) is the expensing of the capitalized costs incurred to acquire, explore and develop oil and natural gas reserves. We use the full cost method of accounting for oil and natural gas activities. DD&A decreased $5.6$0.9 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 primarily due to a decrease of $11.6$1.6 million from the decrease in the depletion rate per thousand cubic feet equivalent (“Mcfe”) offset by an increase of $6.0$0.9 million from the increase in production. The DD&A rate decreased to $8.37$8.10 per Boe for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $11.99$8.67 per Boe for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The DD&A rate per Boe decreased primarily as a result of decreases in future development costs, partially offset by decreased proved reserves.
General and administrative expenses – General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses generally consist of costs incurred for overhead, including payroll and benefits for our corporate staff, costs of maintaining our headquarters, costs of managing our production operations, bad debt expense, share-based compensation costs, audit and other fees for professional services and legal compliance. G&A expenses increased $4.7$9.8 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 primarily due to an increaseincreases of $5.4$8.2 million in share-based compensation costs,costs partiallyand offset by a $1.0$1.1 million decrease in employeelegal payrolland costs.professional fees.
Derivative loss (gain), net – During the three months ended June 30, 2026, we recorded a $1.9 million derivative loss for our derivative contracts consisting of $13.7 million of realized losses offset by $11.8 million of unrealized gain from the increase in the fair value of our open contracts. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, we recorded a $12.0 million derivative gain for our natural gas derivative contracts consisting of $9.5 million of realized gains and $2.5 million of unrealized gain from the increase in the fair value of our open contracts.
Other expense, net – Other expense, net decreased $13.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025 primarily related to an accrual of additional expenses in the three months ended June 30, 2025 for net abandonment obligations related to our assumption of decommissioning obligations when certain counterparties in past divestiture transactions or third parties in existing leases have filed for bankruptcy protection or may not be able to perform required abandonment obligations.
Derivative loss, net – During the three months ended March 31, 2026, we recorded a $24.5 million derivative loss for our derivative contracts consisting of $2.7 million of realized losses and $21.8 million of unrealized loss from the decrease in the fair value of our open contracts. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, we recorded a $2.7 million derivative loss for our natural gas derivative contracts consisting of $3.6 million of realized losses offset by $0.9 million of unrealized gain from the increase in the fair value of our open contracts.
Income tax expense (benefit) – Our effective tax rates for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 were (13.312.2)% and 13.1%,10.2%, respectively, and differed from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the impact of losses with no tax benefit and adjustments to the valuation allowance.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
Revenues
The following table presents information regarding our revenues, production volumes and average realized sales prices (which exclude the effect of hedging unless otherwise stated) for the periods presented and corresponding changes (in thousands, except average realized sales prices data):
Changes in average sales prices and production volumes caused the following changes to our oil, NGL and natural gas revenues between the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Production volumes increased by 620 MBoe to 6,416 MBoe during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025 primarily due to restoring production at our West Delta 73, Eugene Island 64, Mobile Bay 916 and Main Pass 108 fields and increased production from our Mobile Bay fields due to reduced downtime, partially offset by shut-ins at our SS 349 field for approximately five days.
Operating Expenses
The following table presents information regarding costs and expenses and selected average costs and expenses per Boe sold for the periods presented and corresponding changes (in thousands, except average data):
Lease operating expenses – LOE decreased $10.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. On a per Boe basis, LOE decreased to $21.46 per Boe during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to $25.52 per Boe during the six months ended June 30, 2025. On a component basis, base LOE decreased $7.8 million, workover expenses decreased $1.7 million and facilities maintenance expense decreased $0.8 million.
Expenses for direct labor, materials, supplies, repair, third-party costs and insurance comprise the most significant portion of our base LOE. These costs decreased primarily due to lower costs overall, reflecting the success of our cost reduction efforts that began in the fourth quarter of 2025 and continued into the six months ended June 30, 2026.
Workover and facilities maintenance expenses consist of costs associated with major remedial operations on completed wells to restore, maintain or improve the well’s production. Since these remedial operations are not regularly scheduled, workover and maintenance expense are not necessarily comparable from period to period. The decreases in workover expenses and facilities maintenance expenses were due to the timing and mix of projects undertaken.
Gathering, transportation and production taxes – Gathering, transportation and production taxes increased $4.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025 primarily due to the impact of the new NGL processing contract at Mobile Bay and higher production volumes in the six months ended June 30, 2026.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization – DD&A decreased $6.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025 primarily due to a decrease of $12.5 million from the decrease in the depletion rate per Mcfe offset by an increase of $6.2 million from the increase in production. The DD&A rate decreased to $8.24 per Boe for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $10.24 per Boe for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The DD&A rate per Boe decreased primarily as a result of decreases in future development costs, partially offset by decreased proved reserves.
General and administrative expenses – G&A expenses increased $14.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025 primarily due to an increase of $13.5 million in share-based compensation costs.
Other Income and Expense Items
The following table presents the components of other income and expense items for the periods presented and corresponding changes (in thousands):
Derivative loss (gain), net – During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we recorded a $26.4 million derivative loss for our derivative contracts consisting of $16.4 million of realized losses and $10.0 million of unrealized loss from the decrease in the fair value of our open contracts. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, we recorded a $9.3 million derivative gain for our natural gas derivative contracts consisting of $5.9 million of realized gains and $3.4 million of unrealized gain from the increase in the fair value of our open contracts.
Other expense, net – Other expense, net decreased $12.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025 primarily related to an accrual of additional expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2025 for net abandonment obligations related to our assumption of decommissioning obligations when certain counterparties in past divestiture transactions or third parties in existing leases have filed for bankruptcy protection or may not be able to perform required abandonment obligations.
Income tax expense (benefit) – Our effective tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were (14.6)% and 12.0%, respectively, and differed from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the impact of losses with no tax benefit and adjustments to the valuation allowance.
We expect to support our business requirements primarily with cash on hand and cash generated from operations. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $130.9$150.7 million of unrestricted cash on hand and $43.9$43.4 million available under our Credit Agreement, based on a borrowing base of $50.0 million and $6.1$6.6 million of letters of credit outstanding. We also have up to approximately $83.0 million of availability through our “at-the-market” equity offering program, pursuant to which we may offer and sell shares of our common stock from time to time. Based on our current financial condition and current expectations of future market conditions, we believe our cash on hand, cash flows from operating activities and access to the equity markets from our “at-the-market” equity offering program will provide us with additional liquidity to continue our growth and will allow us to meet our cash requirements for at least the next 12 months and beyond.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $5.7$11.1 million in the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the corresponding period in 2025. This was primarily due to an increase of $25.5$53.2 million in net loss adjusted for certain noncash items and a decrease of $19.7$42.1 million in operating cash flows from changes in operating assets and liabilities. The increase in net loss adjusted for certain noncash items was primarily related to increases of $20.2$60.4 million in revenues andoffset $5.6by an increase of $16.4 million in derivative settlements. The decrease in operating assets and liabilities is primarily related to higher ARO settlements and unfavorable changes in accounts receivable, offset by favorable changes in accounts payable,payable and accrued liabilities and other.
Our principal recurring investing activity is the funding of acquisitions and investments in oil and natural gas properties to support and generate revenues from operations. Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities were $(10.319.0) million and $63.3$52.5 million during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Investments in oil and natural gas properties were $10.1$18.8 million and $6.7$17.1 million during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, we received $58.5 million in insurance proceeds and $11.9 million in proceeds from the sale of oil and natural gas properties. As we use the full cost method of accounting for our oil and natural gas properties, these proceeds were recorded in our full cost pool.
Cash flows used in financing activities were $1.9$6.8 million and $63.1$65.6 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. In connection with our debt refinancing in January 2025, we received $350.0 million in proceeds from the issuance of our 10.75% Notes and used these proceeds, along with cash on hand, to (i) purchase for cash, pursuant to a tender offer, $269.8 million of our 11.75% Senior Second Lien Notes due 2026 (the “11.75% Notes”); (ii) repay $114.2 million of amount outstanding under the credit agreement of certain of our indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries; (iii) purchase $5.9 million of government securities to be used in the legal defeasance of the remaining principal of our 11.75% Notes not validly tendered and accepted for purchase in the tender offer; and (iv) pay $21.3 million in premiums, fees and debt issuance costs.
As of March 31, 2026, we expect to incur an additional $12.0 million to $18.0 million of capital expenditures in the remainder of 2026, which excludes acquisitions. In our view of the outlook for the remainder of 2026, we believe thisour expected level of capital expenditure will leave us with sufficient liquidity to operate our business, while providing liquidity to make strategic acquisitions. At current pricing levels, we expect our cash flows to cover our liquidity requirements, and we expect additional financing sources to be available if needed. If our liquidity becomes stressed from significant or prolonged reductions in realized prices, we have flexibility in our capital expenditure budget to reduce investments. We strive to maintain flexibility in our capital expenditure projects and if commodity prices improve, we may increase our investments.
We have obligations to plug and abandon wells, remove platforms, pipelines, facilities and equipment and restore the land or seabed at the end of oil and natural gas production operations. Through the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we have paid $17.2$20.6 million related to these obligations. Our ARO estimates as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 were $566.0$573.2 million and $561.9 million, respectively. As our ARO estimates are for work to be performed in the future, and in the case of our non-current ARO, extend from one to many years in the future, actual expenditures could be substantially different than our estimates. See Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors, of our 2025 Annual Report for additional information.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we have $358.6$358.3 million in aggregate principal amount of long-term debt outstanding, with $8.6$8.3 million in aggregate principal coming due over the next twelve months.
During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we declared a cash dividenddividends of $0.01$3.2 permillion shareto holders of our common stock. The dividend was paid on March 26, 2026 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 19, 2026. The amount and frequency of future dividends is subject to the discretion of our board of directors and primarily depends on earnings, capital expenditures, debt covenants and various other factors.
WTI insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 8 filings (8 insiders, 3 trade dates, 306,000 shares, about $1.1M). Net open-market shares: -306,000 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$1.1M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-08 | Gamblin Huan |
Shares withheld for tax | 3,271 | $3.43 | $11.2K |
| 2026-08-08 | Gamblin Huan |
Option exercise | 8,312 | — | — |
| 2026-08-08 | Williford William J |
Shares withheld for tax | 22,066 | $3.43 | $75.7K |
| 2026-08-08 | Williford William J |
Option exercise | 56,075 | — | — |
| 2026-08-08 | Parasnis Sameer |
Option exercise | 56,075 | — | — |
| 2026-08-08 | Parasnis Sameer |
Shares withheld for tax | 22,066 | $3.43 | $75.7K |
| 2026-08-08 | Krohn Tracy W |
Option exercise | 132,918 | — | — |
| 2026-08-08 | Krohn Tracy W |
Shares withheld for tax | 52,304 | $3.43 | $179.4K |
| 2026-08-08 | Hartman Bart P. Iii |
Option exercise | 7,425 | — | — |
| 2026-08-08 | Hartman Bart P. Iii |
Shares withheld for tax | 2,922 | $3.43 | $10.0K |
| 2026-07-16 | Conwill Daniel O. Iv |
Open-market sale | 60,000 | $3.41 | $204.6K |
| 2026-07-15 | Chang Nancy T |
Open-market sale | 60,000 | $3.31 | $198.6K |
| 2026-07-14 | Williford William J |
Open-market sale | 30,000 | $3.56 | $106.8K |
| 2026-07-14 | Parasnis Sameer |
Open-market sale | 30,000 | $3.56 | $106.8K |
| 2026-07-14 | Hittner George |
Open-market sale | 30,000 | $3.53 | $105.9K |
| 2026-07-14 | Hartman Bart P. Iii |
Open-market sale | 6,000 | $3.54 | $21.2K |
| 2026-07-14 | Gamblin Huan |
Open-market sale | 30,000 | $3.55 | $106.5K |
| 2026-07-14 | Boulet Virginia |
Open-market sale | 60,000 | $3.54 | $212.4K |
| 2026-07-03 | Parasnis Sameer |
Option exercise | 22,685 | — | — |
| 2026-07-03 | Parasnis Sameer |
Shares withheld for tax | 8,927 | $3.09 | $27.6K |
| 2026-06-05 | Hartman Bart P. Iii |
Shares withheld for tax | 2,345 | $3.70 | $8.7K |
| 2026-06-05 | Hartman Bart P. Iii |
Option exercise | 5,959 | — | — |
| 2026-06-05 | Gamblin Huan |
Option exercise | 6,670 | — | — |
| 2026-06-05 | Gamblin Huan |
Shares withheld for tax | 2,625 | $3.70 | $9.7K |
| 2026-06-05 | Krohn Tracy W |
Shares withheld for tax | 41,974 | $3.70 | $155.3K |
| 2026-06-05 | Krohn Tracy W |
Option exercise | 106,667 | — | — |
| 2026-06-05 | Williford William J |
Option exercise | 45,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-05 | Williford William J |
Shares withheld for tax | 17,708 | $3.70 | $65.5K |
| 2026-06-03 | Conwill Daniel O. Iv |
Option exercise | 103,448 | — | — |
| 2026-06-03 | Chang Nancy T |
Option exercise | 103,448 | — | — |
| 2026-06-03 | Buchanan John D |
Option exercise | 103,448 | — | — |
| 2026-06-03 | Boulet Virginia |
Option exercise | 103,448 | — | — |
| 2026-06-03 | Stanley B Frank |
Option exercise | 103,448 | — | — |
| 2026-05-16 | Williford William J |
Shares withheld for tax | 43,131 | $4.75 | $204.9K |
| 2026-05-16 | Williford William J |
Option exercise | 152,542 | — | — |
| 2026-05-16 | Parasnis Sameer |
Option exercise | 152,542 | — | — |
| 2026-05-16 | Parasnis Sameer |
Shares withheld for tax | 44,410 | $4.75 | $210.9K |
| 2026-05-16 | Krohn Tracy W |
Option exercise | 361,582 | — | — |
| 2026-05-16 | Krohn Tracy W |
Shares withheld for tax | 141,494 | $4.75 | $672.1K |
| 2026-05-16 | Hittner George |
Option exercise | 152,542 | — | — |
| 2026-05-16 | Hittner George |
Shares withheld for tax | 40,526 | $4.75 | $192.5K |
| 2026-05-16 | Hartman Bart P. Iii |
Option exercise | 20,197 | — | — |
| 2026-05-16 | Hartman Bart P. Iii |
Shares withheld for tax | 4,918 | $4.75 | $23.4K |
| 2026-05-16 | Gamblin Huan |
Shares withheld for tax | 40,526 | $4.75 | $192.5K |
| 2026-05-16 | Gamblin Huan |
Option exercise | 152,542 | — | — |
Well-known investors holding WTI (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 6,230,774 | $19.6M | 0.01% | Added 113% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 2,961,478 | $9.3M | 0.01% | Reduced 42% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 2,720,068 | $8.6M | 0.0% | Added 268% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 1,350,970 | $4.3M | 0.0% | Added 44% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 920,800 | $2.9M | 0.0% | Added 56% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 498,789 | $1.6M | 0.0% | Added 44% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 63,273 | $199.3K | 0.0% | Reduced 87% |