WTM 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. · NYSE · Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance · CIK 776867 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Distinguished’s commission revenues are dependent on many factors, some of which are beyond its control, including the pricing and profitability of certain segments of the property and casualty insurance industry, which is highly competitive and cyclical. Distinguished may not be able to compete effectively in the future, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.”
New heading “A substantial portion of Distinguished’s business is placed with one insurance carrier, and most of Distinguished’s business is placed with a small number of carriers. Any deterioration in the arrangements with its carriers could adversely affect Distinguished’s business, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.”
Removed heading “Bamboo’s business is dependent on its capacity providers (both fronting and reinsurance), and a change in availability, terms or ratings could materially impact Bamboo’s results of operations and financial condition or adversely affect its ability to write business.”
Removed heading “Bamboo and its fronting partners are subject to extensive regulation which may prevent Bamboo from adequately pricing or selecting risk.”
Largest changes
“Bamboo and its fronting partners are subject to extensive regulation which may prevent Bamboo from adequately pricing or selecting risk.”see in full comparison
“Distinguished’s commission revenues are dependent on many factors, some of which are beyond its control, including the pricing and profitability of certain segments of the property and casualty insurance industry, which is highly competitive and cyclical. Distinguished may not be able to compete effectively in the future, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.”see in full comparison
“A substantial portion of Distinguished’s business is placed with one insurance carrier, and most of Distinguished’s business is placed with a small number of carriers. Any deterioration in the arrangements with its carriers could adversely affect Distinguished’s business, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.”see in full comparison
“Bamboo’s business is dependent on its capacity providers (both fronting and reinsurance), and a change in availability, terms or ratings could materially impact Bamboo’s results of operations and financial condition or adversely affect its ability to write business.”see in full comparison
“For the year ended December 31, 2024, Bamboo placed substantially all of its business with one fronting partner. Should this fronting partner reduce the volume of business accepted from Bamboo or adversely change the terms and conditions of placement, we cannot guarantee that Bamboo would be able to find other fronting partners to write its full programs, which could materially adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition. In addition, Bamboo relies on its fronting partners’ financial strength ratings in establishing the competitive position of its products. …”see in full comparison
“The property and casualty insurance industry is highly competitive and has historically been cyclical, experiencing periods of severe price competition and less selective underwriting standards (soft markets) followed by periods of relatively high prices and more selective underwriting standards (hard markets). The cyclicality of the property and casualty markets is beyond Distinguished’s control and could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition by reducing the commissions it receives for property and casualty insurance placed during soft markets. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (62)
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had total goodwill and other intangible assets of $720$1,020 million on our consolidated balance sheet, $355 million of which $578 million relates to our acquisition of BambooDistinguished and $293 million of which relates to our acquisition of Ark.
Ark and WM Outrigger Re writeunderwrites insurance and reinsurance policies that cover unpredictable catastrophic events all over the world. Ark and WM Outrigger Re havehas exposure to losses caused by eventsnatural including naturaldisasters and other disastersevents such as hurricanes, windstorms, earthquakes, floods, wildfires, tornadoes, tsunamis and severe weather. Catastrophes can also include large losses driven by public health crises, terrorist attacks, war and war-like actions, explosions, infrastructure failures and cyber attacks.
The extent of a catastrophe loss is a function of both the severity of the event and the total amount of insured exposure to the event, as well as the coverage provided to customers. Increases in the value and concentration of insured property or insured employees, the effects of inflation, changes in weather patterns and increased terrorism and war and war-like actions could increase the future frequency and/or severity of claims from catastrophic events. Climate change, which is characterized by higher temperatures, sea level rise and more extreme weather events including droughts, heavy storms, wildfires and stronger hurricaneshurricanes, increases the frequency and severity of certain major natural catastrophes. There is also a growing threat of cyber risks due to the increasing interconnectivity of global systems. Claims from catastrophic events could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Ark’sIn abilityaddition, following a large loss event, Ark could have diminished capacity to write new insurance and reinsurance policies coulddue also be impacted as a result of correspondingto reductions in its capital levels. WM Outrigger Re’s obligations under its quota share reinsurance agreement with GAIL is subject to an aggregate limit equal to the assets in the collateral trust account at any point in time.
Ark seeks to manage its exposure to catastrophic losses by limiting and monitoring the aggregate insured value of policies in geographic areas with exposure to catastrophic events and by buying reinsurance. To manage, monitor and analyze insured values and potential losses, Ark utilizes proprietary and third-party catastrophe management software to estimate potential losses for many different catastrophe scenarios. Ark incorporates the physical risk of climate change in its underwriting process through sensitivity and stress testing of its catastrophe models, including increased frequency of U.S. windstorms and the implications of storm surge. Ark’s estimates of potential losses are dependent on many variables, including assumptions about storm intensity, storm surge, loss amplification, loss adjustment expenses and insurance-to-value in the aftermath of weather-related catastrophes. In addition, Ark has to account for quality of data provided by insureds. Accordingly, if the assumptions are incorrect, the actual losses Ark and WM Outrigger Re might incur from an actuala catastrophe could be materially different than the expectation of losses generated from modeled catastrophe scenarios, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
The maintenance of an “A-” or better financial strength rating is particularly important to Ark’s ability to write property and casualty insurance and reinsurance business in most markets. Ark writes insurance and reinsurance through Lloyd’s Syndicates 4020 and 3902, each of which benefits from the financial strength rating of “A+/stable” by A.M. Best and “AA-/stable” by Standard & Poor’s assigned to the Lloyd’s marketplace. Beginning in January 2021, Ark began writing certain classes of its business through GAIL, Ark’s wholly-owned Bermuda-based insurance and reinsurance company, which has an “A/stable” financial strength rating by A.M. Best. See “RATINGS” on page 28.
Ark may not successfullyadequately alleviate risk through reinsurance and retrocessional arrangements, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Ark attempts to limit its risk of loss through reinsurance and retrocessional arrangements, including through its quota share reinsurance agreement with Outrigger Re Ltd.arrangements. Retrocessional arrangements refer to reinsurance purchased by a reinsurer to cover its own risks assumed from ceding companies. The availability and cost of reinsurance and retrocessional protection is subject to market conditions, which are outside of Ark’s control. In addition, the coverage provided by Ark’s reinsurance and retrocessional arrangements may be inadequate tonot cover certain of its future liabilities. As a result, Ark may not be able to successfullyadequately alleviate risk through these arrangements, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, due to factorsvarious suchfactors, asincluding the price or availability of reinsurance or retrocessional coverage, Ark sometimesmay decidesdecide to increase the amount of risk retained by purchasing less reinsurance. Such determinationsa havedetermination has the effect of increasing Ark’s financial exposure to losses associated with risks that it underwrites and, in the event of significant losses associated with a given risk, could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Purchasing reinsurance does not relieve Ark of its underlying obligations to policyholders or ceding companies,companies. soAs a result, any inability to collect amounts due from reinsurers could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. InabilityThe inability to collect amounts due from reinsurers, including Outrigger Re Ltd., can result from a number of scenarios, including: (i) reinsurers choosing to withholdwithholding payment due to a disputedispute, including coverage terms, adverse judicial rulings or failed arbitration, or other factors beyond Ark’s control; (ii) reinsurers becoming unable to pay amounts owed to Ark as a result of a deterioration in their financial condition; and (iii) in the case of Outrigger Re Ltd., losses exceeding amounts within the collateral trust accounts for Outrigger Re Ltd.accounts. While we currently believe the condition of Ark’s reinsurers is strong, it is possible that one or more of Ark’s reinsurers will be adversely affected by future significant losses or economic events,events causing them to be unable or unwilling to pay amounts owed.
The property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industries are highly competitive and have historically been cyclical, experiencing periods of severe price competition and less selective underwriting standards (soft markets) followed by periods of relatively high prices and more selective underwriting standards (hard markets). Ark competes with other Lloyd’s syndicates, London market participants and major U.S., Bermuda, European and other international insurance and reinsurance companies. Many of these competitors have greater resourcesfinancial than Ark does,resources, have more established long-term and continuing business relationships throughout the insurance and reinsurance industries and may have higher financial strength ratings, which can represent significant competitive advantages for them.
Soft primary insurance market conditions could lead to a significant reduction in reinsurance premium rates, less favorable contract terms and fewer submissions for Ark’s reinsurance underwriting capacity. The supply of reinsurance is also related to the level of reinsured losses and the level of industry capital which, in turn, may fluctuate in response to changes in rates of return earned in the reinsurance industry. As a result, the reinsurance businessindustry historically has been a cyclical industrycyclical, characterized by periods of intense price competition due to excess underwriting capacity, as well as periods when shortages of capacity permitted improvements in reinsurance rate levels and terms and conditions. In addition, the ease of entry into the reinsurance sector facilitates competition from third-party capital in the property catastrophe excess reinsurance line. This alternative capital provides collateralized property catastrophe protection in the form of catastrophe bonds, industry loss warranties, sidecars and other vehicles that facilitate the ability for non-reinsurance entities, such as hedge funds and pension funds, to compete for property catastrophe excess reinsurance business outside of the traditional treaty market.
Ark/WM Outrigger’sArk’s loss and LAE reserves may be inadequate to cover the ultimate liability for losses, andwhich ascould amaterially result,adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.condition.
Ark/WM Outrigger must maintainmaintains reserves adequate to cover its estimated ultimate liabilities for loss and LAE. Loss and LAE reserves are typically comprised of (i) case reserves for reported claims and (ii) incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) reserves for losses that have occurred but for which claims have not yet been reported and for expected future development on case reserves. Loss and LAE reserves are estimates of what Ark/WM Outrigger believes the settlement and administration of claims will cost based on facts and circumstances then known. These estimates involve actuarial and claims assessments and require Ark/WM Outrigger to make a number of assumptions about future events that are subject to unexpected changes and are beyond Ark/WM Outrigger’sArk’s control, such as future trends in claim severity, emerging coverage issues, frequency, inflation, legislative and judicial changes, regulatory changes, adverse court rulings and other factors. Because of uncertainties associated with estimating ultimate loss and LAE reserves, we cannot be certain that Ark/WM Outrigger’sArk’s reserves are adequate. In the event that Ark/WM Outrigger’sArk’s reserves are insufficient to cover the actual loss and LAE, Ark/WM Outrigger may need to add to the reserves, which could havematerially aadversely material adverse effect onaffect our results of operations and financial condition. For further discussion of our loss and LAE reserves, see “CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES — Loss and LAE Reserves” on page 85.90.
On MayJuly 29,11, 2024,2025, Standard & Poor’s concluded its most recent review and affirmed BAM’s “AA/stable” financial strength rating. A downgrade, withdrawal or negative watch/outlook of BAM’s financial strength rating could severely limit or prevent BAM’s ability to write municipal bond insurance policies, which could materially adversely affect HG Re’s business, and, consequently, could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, White Mountains owned BAM Surplus Notes with a principal balance of $301$277 million and accrued interest receivable of $195$214 million, both at nominal value. The BAM Surplus Notes were carried at theira fair value of $382$339 million as of December 31, 2024.2025. No payment of principal or interest on the BAM Surplus Notes may be made without the approval of the NYDFS. Under its agreements with HG Global, BAM is required to seek regulatory approval to pay principal and interest on the BAM Surplus Notes only to the extent that its capital resources continue to support its outstanding obligations, business plan and rating. It is unlikely that BAM would pay principal and interest on the BAM Surplus Notes if such payments could lead to a rating downgrade. In 2024,2025, the NYDFS approved cash payments of principal and interest on the BAM Surplus Notes totaling $30$35 million. We cannot guarantee that the NYDFS will approve payments on the BAM Surplus Notes in the future.
If BAM does not repay some or all of the principal and interest on the BAM Surplus Notes, it could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. BAM’s ability to repay principal and interest on the BAM Surplus Notes is dependent on a number of factors, many of which are beyond BAM’s control, including primary municipal bond issuance levels, insured penetration rates, interest rate levels, credit spreads, trading value, capture rate and market share. BAM also could incur significant losses from the municipal bonds it insures. If BAM does not repay some or all of the principal and interest on the BAM Surplus Notes, it could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We may be subject to greater volatility from the BAM Surplus Notes, as the valuation of the BAM Surplus Notes under the discounted cash flow analysis subsequent to deconsolidation could be more volatile,Notes, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Under GAAP, for periods prior to July 1, 2024, the BAM Surplus Notes, including accrued interest receivable, were classified as intercompany notes carried at nominal value with no consideration for time value of money and eliminated in consolidation. Upon the deconsolidation of BAM on July 1, 2024, White Mountains elected the fair value option, and the BAM Surplus Notes, including accrued interest receivable, were fair valued at $387 million using a discounted cash flow analysis, which resulted in an unrealized loss on deconsolidation of $115 million. This fair value includes the impact of a discount for the time value of money, which was previously included in adjusted book value per share as a non-GAAP adjustment to book value per share. As of December 31, 2024, the fair value of the BAM Surplus Notes was $382 million.
As of December 31, 2025, the fair value of the BAM Surplus Notes was $339 million using a discounted cash flow analysis. White Mountains’s reported book value per share and adjusted book value per share may be subject to greater volatility in the future, as the valuation of the BAM Surplus Notes under the discounted cash flow analysis could be morevolatile. volatile.For example, in 2025 White Mountains recognized a decrease of $38 million in the fair value of the BAM Surplus Notes. We use judgment in selecting the key inputs to the discounted cash flow analysis. With a discounted cash flow analysis, small changes to key inputs may result in significant changes to fair value. See “BAM Surplus Notes” under “CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES — Fair Value Measurements” on page 8288 for a description of the methodology and key inputs we use to determine the valuation of the BAM Surplus Notes. Given the inherent subjectivity and uncertainty in the methodology and inputs used to determine the fair value of the BAM Surplus Notes, the value established using this methodology may not be fully realized. Should there be a significant decrease in the valuation of the BAM Surplus Notes, it could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
The municipal bond industry is highly regulated at the federal and state level, and certain municipal bonds enjoy preferential tax treatment. Significant changes to these regulations or to the tax treatment of municipal bonds could affect the attractiveness of and market for BAM’s financial guarantee solutions. This could in turn materially adversely affect BAM’s and HG Re’s business and, consequently, could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
The municipal bond market is subject to regulations at both the federal and state level, and certain municipal bonds enjoy preferential tax treatment. Changes to such regulations or to the tax treatment of municipal bonds could affect the issuance of certain municipal bonds or could reduce the attractiveness of and market for BAM’s financial guarantee solutions. This could decrease the amount of bond insurance issued by BAM and thereby reduce payments on the BAM Surplus Notes and risk premiums ceded to HG Re, both of which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Kudu’s financial performance is dependent upon its clients’ asset and performance-based fees, which are subject to a variety of economic, market and other risks. Additionally, Kudu’s managers participate in a highly competitive, highly regulated industry. Kudu’s managers may not be able to compete effectively in the future, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Kudu provides capital solutions for asset and wealth management firms through Participation Contracts, which are noncontrolling equity interests in the form of revenue and earnings participation contracts.Contracts. Kudu’s investeesmanagers generate their revenues and earnings by charging asset-based fees, which are typically a percentage of the value of the assets they manage for their clients, and/or performance-based fees, which are typically a portion of actual returns achieved for their clients above a target return. TheMuch of the revenue that Kudu generates from its clients is subject to the same general economic and market risks that may affect our investment portfolio. See Risk Factors, “Our investment portfolio may suffer reduced returns or losses, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Adverse changes in equity markets, interest rates, debt markets or foreign currency exchange rates could result in significant losses to the value of our investment portfolio.” on page 35.
Additionally, Kudu’s investeesmanagers participate in a highly competitive, highly regulated industry that subjects their operations to a number of other risks that are out of our control and could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition,control, including (i) changes in investor preference from the actively-managed investments offered by Kudu’s investeesmanagers to passively-managed investments; (ii) the ability of Kudu’s investeesmanagers to successfully attract new clients and retain existing ones; (iii) the ability of Kudu’s investeesmanagers to avoid fee compression; (iv) the reliance of Kudu’s investeesmanagers on a small number of key personnel; and (v) future changes to regulations that make Kudu’s investees’managers’ businesses more cumbersome and expensive to operate. If Kudu’s managers are unable to compete effectively in the future, Kudu’s business may be materially adversely affected, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to Bamboo’sDistinguished’s Business and Industry
Distinguished’s commission revenues are dependent on many factors, some of which are beyond its control, including the pricing and profitability of certain segments of the property and casualty insurance industry, which is highly competitive and cyclical. Distinguished may not be able to compete effectively in the future, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Bamboo’s business is dependent on its capacity providers (both fronting and reinsurance), and a change in availability, terms or ratings could materially impact Bamboo’s results of operations and financial condition or adversely affect its ability to write business.
Bamboo is an MGA and program administrator with delegated binding authorities, and as such, is generally dependent on its Capacity Providers to bear the insurance risk on the programs designed and underwritten by Bamboo. Bamboo currently relies on a small group of Capacity Providers for a large proportion of its business, and loss of capacity from any one of these could materially adversely affect Bamboo’s results of operations and financial condition.
Distinguished generates most of its revenues from commissions that are a portion of premiums charged by insurance companies to their insureds. Distinguished is an MGA and program administrator with delegated binding authorities, and as such, its carrier partners bear the insurance risk on the programs designed and underwritten by Distinguished. Should BambooDistinguished fail to meet the profitability expectations of itsthe Capacity Providerscarriers that writeunderwrite the business it places, itsthose Capacity Providerscarriers could choose to stop writingunderwriting the business or reduce the commission rate they will pay for placement services, which could materially adversely affect Distinguished’s commission revenues and, consequently, could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Distinguished’s future commission revenues could also be materially adversely affected by other factors beyond its control, including (i) the increasing availability of capital markets-based products designed to replace traditional insurance and reinsurance products; (ii) growth in the direct-to-consumer sales channel at the expense of insurance intermediaries including agents and brokers; (iii) the percentage of premium insurance carriers will pay for placement services; (iv) the availability and cost of reinsurance; and (v) future trends in claim severity, emerging coverage issues, frequency, inflation, legislative and judicial changes, regulatory changes, adverse court rulings and other factors.
The property and casualty insurance industry is highly competitive and has historically been cyclical, experiencing periods of severe price competition and less selective underwriting standards (soft markets) followed by periods of relatively high prices and more selective underwriting standards (hard markets). The cyclicality of the property and casualty markets is beyond Distinguished’s control and could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition by reducing the commissions it receives for property and casualty insurance placed during soft markets. We expect to continue to experience the effects of cyclicality. If Distinguished is unable to successfully manage the risks associated with soft markets, Distinguished’s business may be materially adversely affected, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
A substantial portion of Distinguished’s business is placed with one insurance carrier, and most of Distinguished’s business is placed with a small number of carriers. Any deterioration in the arrangements with its carriers could adversely affect Distinguished’s business, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, Bamboo placed substantially all of its business with one fronting partner. Should this fronting partner reduce the volume of business accepted from Bamboo or adversely change the terms and conditions of placement, we cannot guarantee that Bamboo would be able to find other fronting partners to write its full programs, which could materially adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition. In addition, Bamboo relies on its fronting partners’ financial strength ratings in establishing the competitive position of its products. A ratings downgrade of Bamboo’s primary fronting partner could result in a substantial loss of business should policyholders choose to move to other companies with higher financial strength ratings.
Bamboo, in conjunction with its fronting partners, purchases various forms of reinsurance. The availability and cost of reinsurance are subject to prevailing market conditions, including terms, price and capacity, which can affect Bamboo’s business volume and profitability. In addition, reinsurance programs are generally subject to renewal on an annual basis. Bamboo and its fronting partners may not be able to obtain reinsurance on acceptable terms. Even if available, that reinsurance may not be available from entities with satisfactory creditworthiness. If Bamboo is unable to obtain satisfactory reinsurance, it would have to reduce the level of its underwriting commitments, which could materially adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition.
ForDistinguished placed approximately 22% of its business with its single largest carrier during the year ended December 31, 2024,2025. Distinguished placed approximately 61% of its business with its three largest carriers during the insuranceyear riskended forDecember Bamboo’s31, programs2025. wasShould concentrated, with two third-party Capacity Providers representing approximately 28%any of Bamboo’sthese managed premiums. Should its Capacity Providerscarriers reduce the volume of business accepted from BambooDistinguished or adversely change the terms and conditions,conditions of placement, we cannot guarantee that BambooDistinguished would be able to find other Capacity Providerscarriers to writeassume the business, which could materially adversely affect itsour results of operations and financial condition.
BambooDistinguished primarily relies on third-party agents and brokers to distribute its products, and any deterioration in the relationships with these parties could adversely affect Bamboo’sDistinguished’s business.business, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Substantially all of Bamboo’sDistinguished’s products are distributed through third-party agents and brokers who have the principal relationships with policyholders. Agents and brokers generallyhave ownsignificant theinfluence “renewalover rights,”renewals, and thus Bamboo’sDistinguished’s business model is dependent on its relationships with, and the success of, the agents and brokers with whom BambooDistinguished does business.
Because BambooDistinguished primarily relies on third-party agents and brokers as its sales channel, any deterioration in the relationships with these parties or failure to provide competitive compensation could lead them to place less premium with Bamboo.Distinguished. BambooDistinguished places a substantial portion of its premium through a limited number of agents and broker relationships. For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, the top three relationships accounted for 41%10% of Distinguished’s managed premiums. Certain of these agents and brokers are affiliated with insurance entities that compete with Bamboo. These agents and brokers may favor their own insurance entities over Bamboo. Loss of all or a substantial portion of the business provided by one or more of these agents and brokers could havematerially aadversely materialaffect adverseDistinguished’s effectbusiness, onwhich Bamboo’scould business.materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Bamboo and its fronting partners are subject to extensive regulation which may prevent Bamboo from adequately pricing or selecting risk.
Bamboo and its fronting partners are subject to extensive state regulation, primarily in the state of California. This regulation requires, among other things, state approval of policy forms and premium rates for fronting carriers and admitted producers. If policy forms and premium rates are not approved in a timely manner, Bamboo’s ability to price risk adequately will be adversely impacted. Additionally, state regulators could restrict market access or place undue burdens on Bamboo’s ability to manage risk selection. Inadequate pricing or selection of risk could materially adversely affect Bamboo’s results of operations and financial condition.
Our investment portfolio primarily consists of fixed maturity investments, short-term investments, common equity securities, our investment in MediaAlpha and other long-term investments. Other long-term investments consist primarily of Kudu’s Participation Contracts, the Bamboo SPV, PassportCard/DavidShield, the BroadStreet SPV, private equity funds and hedge funds, a bank loan fund and Lloyd’s trust deposits. We invest to maximize long-term after-tax total returns while taking prudent levels of risk and maintaining a diversified portfolio subject to our investment guidelines and various regulatory restrictions. However, investing entails substantial risks. We may not achieve our investment objectives, and our investment performance may vary substantially over time. Losses or volatility in the equity or fixed income markets could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
The fair market value of our investment portfolio is affected by general economic and market conditions that are outside of our control, including (i) fluctuations in equity market levels, interest rates, debt market levels and foreign currency exchange rates; (ii) public health crises, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, war and war-like actions and other outside events; and (iii) credit losses sustained by issuers. A significant decline in the equity markets such as that experienced from September 2008 to March 2009 could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In addition to causing declines in the fair value of securities that we own in our investment portfolio, public health crises, natural disasters, terrorist attacks and other outside events can adversely affect general commercial activity and the economies of many countries, which could materially adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of the entities in which we have invested. For example, reductions of leisure travel, due to (i) travel restrictions imposed by governments due to the COVID-19 pandemic and (ii) fewer international flights in and out of Israel as a result of the regional conflict in the Middle East negatively impacted revenues at PassportCard/DavidShield. We are also exposed to changes in debt markets. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary policies, economic and political conditions and other factors beyond our control. In particular, a significant increase in interest rates, as experienced in 2022, could result in significant losses in the fair value of our investment portfolio. A significant increase in interest rates that causes severe losses could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We also hold investments, such as unconsolidated entities, including Kudu’s Participation Contracts, private equity funds and hedge funds, a bank loan fund, Lloyd’s trust deposits, ILS funds and private debt instruments, that are not regularly traded in active investment markets and may be illiquid. These investments can experience volatility in their returns or valuation, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, certain of our other long-term investments are not regularly traded in active investment markets and may be illiquid. These investments can experience volatility in their returns or valuations, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha is valued based on the publicly-traded share price of MediaAlpha’s common stock, which at the December 31, 20242025 closing price of $11.29$12.95 per share was $202$231 million. As a result, White Mountains’s reported book value per share and adjusted book value per share may be subject to future volatility, as the valuation of its investment in MediaAlpha is based on the publicly-traded share price of MediaAlpha’s common stock. Should there be a significant decrease in the publicly-traded share price of MediaAlpha’s common stock, it could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, White Mountains owned $1,263$1,814 million in securities, including our investments in Kudu’s Participation ContractsContracts, the Bamboo SPV and PassportCard/DavidShield, that are not actively traded in public markets, do not have readily observable market prices and are classified as Level 3 investments in the GAAP fair value hierarchy. On a quarterly basis, we make a good faith determination of the fair value of our Level 3 investments in our GAAP financial statements using valuation techniques that are inherently subjective and uncertain.
On December 27, 2023, Bermuda enacted a 15% corporate income tax that became effective on January 1, 2025. The Bermuda legislation defers the effective date untilfor Januaryfive 1, 2030,years for Bermuda companies in consolidated groups that meet certain requirements. To qualify for the deferral, generally the group must (i) have consolidated affiliates and permanent establishments in six or fewer countries, (ii) have no more than €50 million of net tangible assets outside of the country where the group has the largest amount of net tangible assets and (iii) not have a consolidated Bermuda affiliate or Bermuda permanent establishment directly or indirectly owned by a parent entity that is subject to the Income Inclusion Rule of Pillar Two in any jurisdiction. White Mountains expects to meet the requirements to be exempt from the Bermuda corporate income tax until January 1, 2030.
On December 15, 2022, European Union Member States voted to adopt the European Union Minimum Tax Directive (the “EU Minimum Tax Directive”) in conformity with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”) Pillar Two initiative. The Pillar Two initiative includes a set of model rules that are generally designed to impose a top-up tax on a large multinational enterprise group to the extent that the group is not subject to an effective tax rate of at least 15% in each jurisdiction in which the group has a consolidated affiliate or permanent establishment. The EU Minimum Tax Directive required European Union Member States to enact conforming law by December 31, 2023. The main rule of the EU Minimum Tax Directive, the Income Inclusion Rule (“IIR”), was to become effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 31, 2023, while the Undertaxed Profits Rule (“UTPR”) was to become effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 31, 2024. The EU Minimum Tax Directive also permits European Union Member States to elect to apply a Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax (“QDMTT”) for fiscal years beginning on or after December 31, 2023.
On DecemberJuly 20,11, 2023, Luxemburgthe United Kingdom enacted conforming Pillar Two legislation.legislation Theincluding Luxembourgthe IIR and QDMTT. On March 20, 2025, the United Kingdom enacted legislation defersadopting the Pillar Two UTPR. Under the legislation, the effective date of the UTPR untilis deferred for five years to fiscal years beginning on or after December 31, 2029 for LuxembourgU.K. companies in consolidated groups with a non-EU parent company that meet certain requirements. To qualify for the deferral, generally the group must (i) have consolidated affiliates and permanent establishments in six or fewer countries,countries and (ii) have no more than €50 million of net tangible assets outside of the country where the group has the largest amount of net tangible assets. White Mountains expects to meet the requirements to be exempt from the LuxembourgU.K. UTPR until January 1, 2030.
On December 20, 2023, Luxemburg enacted conforming Pillar Two legislation including the IIR, UTPR and QDMTT. The Luxembourg legislation defers the effective date of the UTPR for five years to fiscal years beginning on or after December 31, 2029 for Luxembourg companies in consolidated groups that meet certain requirements. To qualify for the deferral, generally the group must (i) have consolidated affiliates and permanent establishments in six or fewer countries and (ii) have no more than €50 million of net tangible assets outside of the country where the group has the largest amount of net tangible assets. White Mountains expects to meet the requirements to be exempt from the Luxembourg UTPR until January 1, 2030.
On July 11, 2023, the U.K. enacted conforming legislation adopting the Pillar Two IIR and QDMTT, which became effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 31, 2023.
IfThe failure by White Mountains fails to meet the requirements of the five-year deferral under the Bermuda corporate income tax or the OECD Pillar Two UTPR,UTPR itscould materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.condition.
The income of our U.S. subsidiaries is subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax and other taxes. The income of our non-U.S. subsidiaries is generally subject to a lower tax rate than that imposed by the United States. Certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries are eligible for the benefits of tax treaties between the United States and other countries. We believe our non-U.S. subsidiaries will continue to be eligible for treaty benefits. However, it is possible that factual changes or changes to U.S. tax laws or changes to tax treaties that presently apply to our non-U.S. subsidiaries could increase income subject to tax, or the tax rate on income, in the United States. Similarly, changes to the applicable tax laws, treaties or regulations of other countries could subject the income of members of our group to higher rates of tax outside the United States. Additionally, the base erosion and profit shifting (“BEPS”) project currently being undertaken by the OECD and the European Commission’s investigation into illegal state aid may result in changes to long standing tax principles, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.principles. The recently enacted Bermuda corporate income tax and the Pillar Two worldwide minimum tax currently being enacted around the world are examples of the effects of the BEPS project. Such changes in tax laws or tax treaties could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
On January 15, 2025, the OECD released administrative guidance on its Pillar Two model rules (the “January 2025 OECD Administrative Guidance”). The January 2025 OECD Administrative Guidance provides that, subject to limited exceptions, deferred tax expense attributable to deferred tax assets resulting from the introduction of a new corporate income tax after November 30, 2021 is to be excluded when assessing whether a multinational enterprise group has an effective tax rate of at least 15% in the jurisdiction that adopted the corporate income tax. The exclusion of such deferred tax expense would increase the likelihood that a top-up tax could be imposed by a country that adopted the Pillar Two rules.
Deferred tax assets associated with the economic transition adjustment recognized under the Bermuda corporate income tax are expected to be within the scope of the January 2025 OECD Administrative Guidance. As of December 31, 2024, no country had enacted the January 2025 OECD Administrative Guidance, and no changes had been enacted with respect to the Bermuda corporate income tax to repeal or otherwise limit the economic transition adjustment. Accordingly, under GAAP, we are required to maintain the net deferred tax asset attributable to the economic transition adjustment as of December 31, 2024. It is unclear whether the Bermuda government will enact legislative changes to the economic transition adjustment in response to the January 2025 OECD Administrative Guidance. It is also unclear the extent to which the January 2025 OECD Administrative Guidance will be enacted into the domestic Pillar Two law of Luxembourg or the U.K. If the Bermuda government repeals or otherwise limits the economic transition adjustment, or if Luxembourg or the U.K. enacts the January 2025 OECD Administrative Guidance into its domestic Pillar Two law, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”) modified certain U.S. tax rules that apply to controlled foreign corporations (“CFCs”). As a result of these changes, each of our non-U.S. subsidiaries is treated as a CFC. If any of our shareholders is a “U.S. 10% shareholder” (as described below) that directly or indirectly owns stock in White Mountains, that shareholder must include in its taxable income each year its pro rata share of our CFC subsidiaries’ “subpart F income” and global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) for that year, even if no distributions are received by the U.S. 10% shareholder.
Due to changes made by the TCJA, a shareholder is treated as a U.S. 10% shareholder if the shareholder is a U.S. person who owns directly, indirectly or through constructive ownership rules 10% or more of either the voting power or the total value of our shares. As a result, a U.S. person that owns (directly, indirectly or through constructive ownership rules) 10% or more of our shares will generally be treated as a U.S. 10% shareholder of our CFC subsidiaries, notwithstanding the voting power restrictions of our shares. However, a person that is a U.S. 10% shareholder solely as a result of constructive ownership rules (i.e., such person does not directly or indirectly own stock of White Mountains) should not have a subpart F income inclusion or globalGILTI intangible low-taxed incomeinclusion with respect to our CFC subsidiaries.
On July 4, 2025, the U.S. enacted the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”). The OBBBA reinstated the pre-TCJA rules for determining status as a U.S. 10% shareholder and made certain changes to the subpart F and GILTI rules (including renaming GILTI “net CFC tested income”), effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2025.
The OBBBA enacted a separate inclusion regime for a “foreign controlled U.S.” (“FCUS”) shareholder of a “foreign controlled foreign corporation” (“FCFC”). A FCUS shareholder of a FCFC must include in its taxable income each year its pro rata share of a FCFC’s subpart F income and CFC tested income for that year, even if no distributions are received by the FCUS shareholder. A FCUS shareholder is a U.S. person who owns more than 50% of a foreign corporation directly, indirectly or through certain constructive ownership rules. A FCFC is a foreign corporation (other than a CFC) where FCUS shareholders own more than 50% of the stock of the foreign corporation directly, indirectly or through certain constructive ownership rules. The enacted provisions apply to tax years of foreign corporations beginning after December 31, 2025.
If you are a U.S. person who might be a U.S. 10% shareholder or a FCUS shareholder, we encourage you to consult your own tax advisor concerning the CFCthese rules.
We are subject to supervision and regulation by regulatory authorities in the various jurisdictions in which we conduct business, including state and national insurance regulators. Regulatory authorities have broad regulatory, supervisory and administrative powers relating to, among other things, data protection and data privacy, solvency standards, licensing, coverage requirements, policy rates and forms and the form and content of financial reports. Regulatory authorities continue to implement new or enhanced regulatory requirements. Regulatory authorities also may seek to exercise their supervisory or enforcement authority in new or more extensive ways. These actions, if they occur, could affect the competitive market and the way in which we conduct our business and manage our capital and could result in lower revenues and higher costs. As a result, such actions could havematerially aadversely material adverse effect onaffect our results of operations and financial condition.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Overview—Year Ended December 31, 2025 versus Year Ended December 31, 2024”
New heading “Ark/WM Outrigger Results—Year Ended December 31, 2025 versus Year Ended December 31, 2024”
New heading “HG Global Results—Year Ended December 31, 2025 versus Year Ended December 31, 2024”
New heading “Kudu Results—Year Ended December 31, 2024 versus Year Ended December 31, 2023”
New heading “Distinguished Results – Period from September 2, 2025 through December 31, 2025”
New heading “Managed Premiums and Commission and Fee Revenues”
New heading “Other Operations Results—Year Ended December 31, 2025 versus Year Ended December 31, 2024”
New heading “Investment Returns—Year Ended December 31, 2025 versus Year Ended December 31, 2024”
New heading “(3) See “Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests” in Note 13 — “Common Shareholders’ Equity and Noncontrolling Interests” on page F-68.”
New heading “Cash flows from investing and financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2025”
New heading “Ark’s tangible book value and tangible capital”
New heading “Distinguished’s ScaleCo net income (loss), ScaleCo EBITDA and ScaleCo adjusted EBITDA”
Removed heading “Overview—Year Ended December 31, 2023 versus Year Ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “Bermuda Corporate Income Tax”
Removed heading “California Wildfires in January 2025”
Removed heading “Ark/WM Outrigger Results—Year Ended December 31, 2023 versus Year Ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “HG Global Results—Year Ended December 31, 2023 versus Year Ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “Kudu Results—Year Ended December 31, 2023 versus Year Ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “California Wildfires in January 2025”
Removed heading “California Wildfires in January 2025”
Removed heading “Other Operations Results—Year Ended December 31, 2023 versus Year Ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “Investment Returns—Year Ended December 31, 2023 versus Year Ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “IV. Discontinued Operations”
Removed heading “Cash flows from investing and financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “Adjusted book value per share”
Removed heading “Value of BAM Surplus Notes for adjusted book value purposes”
Removed heading “Total adjusted capital and total debt to total adjusted capital”
Removed heading “Impact of Third-Party Capital”
Largest changes
•Sustained elevated levels of inflation: Elevated levels of economic inflation have been observed sincesee in full comparison2021 driven by the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic supply chain disruption and the conflict in Ukraine.2021. While most global economies are seeing these elevated levelslowering,begin to decline, inflationlevelscontinuesremaintohigherbethanahistorickeynormsfocusandpointrecentforeconomiccentralforecastsbanksuggestpolicy.thisThetrendextent to which inflation willcontinue at least inimpact theshortultimateterm.costThisofhasinsurancebeenclaims remains uncertain, particularlyobservedin the casualty lines of business with key social inflation drivers being court awards, changes in technology and the legal environment. For example, a hypothetical increase in inflation rates by 4% per annum would increase the recorded loss and LAE reserves, net of reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses, for the casualty reserving lines of business by approximately$16$20 million, or approximately 7% of the recorded casualty loss and LAE reserves of$245$288 million.
“(3) See “Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests” in Note 13 — “Common Shareholders’ Equity and Noncontrolling Interests” on page F-68.”see in full comparison
“Ark’s combined ratio was 83% in both 2025 and 2024. Ark’s combined ratio included eight points of catastrophe losses in 2025, driven primarily by Hurricane Melissa as well as losses related to the January 2025 California wildfires of $78 million on a net basis after reinsurance and reinstatement premiums, compared to 13 points of catastrophe losses in 2024, driven primarily by Hurricanes Milton, Helene, Debby and Beryl. Ark’s combined ratio included seven points of net favorable prior year development in 2025, driven primarily by property and specialty lines of business. …”see in full comparison
“•Conflict in Ukraine and Russia: The conflict in Ukraine and Russia has and will continue to have a significant impact on the insurance industry. Recent U.K. High Court rulings on leasing claims provided more certainty on coverages related to aviation hull war risk claims, but there are additional court cases to be decided and there is uncertainty as to how claims will be presented to reinsurers. For the year ended December 31, 2025, Ark recognized $91 million of unfavorable loss reserve development related to aviation losses from the conflict in Ukraine and Russia, driven by the U.K. …”see in full comparison
During the year ended December 31,see in full comparison2024,2025, Ark experienced$53$106 million of net favorable prior year loss reservedevelopment. The net favorable prior year loss reserve development wasdevelopment, driven primarily bythe specialty ($34 million) andthe property and accident & health ($24$85 million) and specialty ($27 million) reserving lines of business, partially offset by net unfavorable development in thecasualty-activemarine & energy ($5 million) and casualty-active ($4 million) reservinglinelines of business.TheFor property and accident & health, the net favorable prior year loss reserve development was driven primarily by positive claims experiencein specialtyfor the20232024 and20192023 accidentyearsyears.andForinspecialty,propertytheandnetaccidentfavorable&priorhealthyear loss reserve development was driven primarily by positive claims experience for the 2023 accidentyear.year, partially offset by negative claims experience for the 2022 and 2024 accident years. In addition, the net favorable prior year loss reserve development for specialty includes $91 million of unfavorable development related to aviation losses from the conflict in Ukraine and Russia resulting from the 2025 U.K. High Court rulings on leasing claims.
“Ark’s combined ratio was 83% in both 2025 and 2024. Ark’s combined ratio in 2025 included eight points of catastrophe losses, driven primarily by Hurricane Melissa and losses related to the January 2025 California wildfires, compared to 13 points of catastrophe losses in 2024, driven primarily by Hurricanes Milton, Helene, Debby and Beryl. Ark’s combined ratio included seven points of net favorable prior year development in 2025, driven primarily by property and specialty lines of business. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (333)
The following discussion also includes 1112 non-GAAP financial measures: (i) adjustedArk’s tangible book value per share,value, (ii) valueArk’s oftangible BAM Surplus Notes for adjusted book value purposes,capital, (iii) Kudu’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), (iv) Kudu’s adjusted EBITDA, (v) Bamboo’s MGA pre-tax income (loss), (vi) Bamboo’s MGA net income (loss), (vii) Bamboo’s MGA EBITDA, (viii) Bamboo’s MGA adjusted EBITDA, (ix) Distinguished’s ScaleCo net income (loss), (x) Distinguished’s ScaleCo EBITDA, (xi) Distinguished’s ScaleCo adjusted EBITDA and (xii) total consolidated portfolio return excluding MediaAlpha, (x) total adjusted capital and (xi) total debt to total adjusted capital,MediaAlpha that have been reconciled from their most comparable GAAP financial measures on page 79.85. White Mountains believes these measures to be useful in evaluating White Mountains’s financial performance and condition.
Overview—Year Ended December 31, 2025 versus Year Ended December 31, 2024
White Mountains ended 2025 with book value per share of $2,188, an increase of 25% for the year, including dividends.
The increase in book value per share was driven primarily by the net gain on sale of the Bamboo Group of approximately $320 per share (based on 2.54 million shares outstanding at December 5, 2025). In addition, the growth in White Mountains’s book value per share reflected solid results at its operating companies and good investment returns.
Comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders was $1,109 million in 2025, largely driven by the net gain on sale of the Bamboo Group, compared to $230 million in 2024. White Mountains also recognized a net deferred tax expense of $73 million in 2025 from the reversal of the deferred tax asset related to the Bermuda economic transition adjustment, of which $51 million was recorded at Ark and $22 million was recorded at HG Global. Due to the enactment of Pillar II legislation by Luxembourg in December 2025, White Mountains no longer expects to utilize the benefit of the Bermuda economic transition adjustment.
On December 5, 2025, White Mountains completed the sale of a controlling financial interest in the Bamboo Group to affiliates of funds advised by CVC. White Mountains sold approximately 77.3% of its equity interest in the Bamboo Group for net cash proceeds at closing of $848 million and retained an indirect equity interest valued at $250 million. White Mountains’s Other Operations recognized a net gain of $816 million, which was comprised of an $849 million net gain on sale of the Bamboo Group, partially offset by $33 million of parent company compensation costs recorded within general and administrative expenses.
On September 2, 2025, White Mountains closed its transaction to acquire a controlling financial interest in Distinguished, a full-service MGA and program administrator for specialty property & casualty insurance. White Mountains paid $225 million of cash consideration, including a post-closing purchase price adjustment of $1 million. In addition, Distinguished borrowed $50 million of incremental debt and utilized $7 million of cash on hand as part of the transaction.
On July 18, 2025, White Mountains closed its transaction to deploy $150 million into BroadStreet through the BroadStreet SPV, alongside co-lead investors Ethos Capital LP and British Columbia Investment Management Corporation. BroadStreet is an insurance brokerage company with a presence in all 50 U.S. states and ten Canadian provinces.
On April 1, 2025, White Mountains acquired a majority interest in Enterprise Solutions, a provider of specialty electrical contracting services. This was the first acquisition by WTM Partners. White Mountains paid $58 million of cash consideration, and Enterprise Solutions borrowed $15 million in new debt as part of the transaction.
In 2025, White Mountains repurchased and retired 100,581 of its common shares for $203 million at an average share price of $2,013.67, or 92% of White Mountains’s December 31, 2025 book value per share. This included 64,064 shares repurchased through the self-tender offer in December.
Including a distribution of $128 million from WM Outrigger Re received in January, undeployed capital stands at roughly $1.0 billion.
The Ark/WM Outrigger segment’s combined ratio was 81% in 2025 compared to 82% in 2024. The Ark/WM Outrigger segment reported gross written premiums of $2,557 million, net written premiums of $1,812 million and net earned premiums of $1,697 million in 2025 compared to gross written premiums of $2,207 million, net written premiums of $1,679 million and net earned premiums of $1,588 million in 2024. The Ark/WM Outrigger segment reported pre-tax income of $310 million in 2025 compared to $299 million in 2024.
Ark’s combined ratio was 83% in both 2025 and 2024. Ark’s combined ratio in 2025 included eight points of catastrophe losses, driven primarily by Hurricane Melissa and losses related to the January 2025 California wildfires, compared to 13 points of catastrophe losses in 2024, driven primarily by Hurricanes Milton, Helene, Debby and Beryl. Ark’s combined ratio included seven points of net favorable prior year development in 2025, driven primarily by property and specialty lines of business. This included six points of unfavorable development related to aviation losses from the conflict in Ukraine and Russia. This compares to four points of net favorable prior year development in 2024, driven primarily by property and specialty lines of business.
Ark reported gross written premiums of $2,557 million, net written premiums of $1,727 million and net earned premiums of $1,613 million in 2025 compared to gross written premiums of $2,207 million, net written premiums of $1,593 million and net earned premiums of $1,500 million in 2024. Ark reported pre-tax income of $265 million in 2025 compared to $253 million in 2024. Ark’s results included net realized and unrealized investment gains of $125 million in 2025 compared to $50 million in 2024. Ark’s results in 2025 also included a $173 million of expense related to the increase in fair value of contingent consideration compared to $61 million in 2024. The increase in the contingent consideration liability was driven primarily by strong growth in Ark’s tangible book value in the year. Ark’s results in 2025 also included the reversal of the $51 million deferred tax asset associated with the Bermuda economic transition adjustment. In November 2025, A.M. Best affirmed Ark’s “A/stable” financial strength rating and upgraded its issuer credit rating to “a+/stable”.
WM Outrigger Re’s combined ratio was 57% in 2025, compared to 60% in 2024. Catastrophe losses in the year ended December 31, 2025 included $19 million of losses related to the California wildfires (net of reinstatement premiums), primarily attributable to the 2024 underwriting year. WM Outrigger Re reported gross written premiums of $84 million and net earned premiums of $85 million in 2025 compared to gross written premiums of $87 million and net earned premiums of $88 million in 2024.
WM Outrigger Re reported pre-tax income (loss) of $45 million in 2025, of which $55 million was attributable to the 2025 underwriting year and $(10) million was attributable to the 2024 underwriting year. WM Outrigger Re reported pre-tax income of $46 million in 2024, of which $38 million was attributable to the 2024 underwriting year and $8 million was attributable to the 2023 underwriting year. Through December 31, 2025, WM Outrigger Re has generated pre-tax income of $55 million from the 2025 underwriting year, $29 million from the 2024 underwriting year and $76 million from the 2023 underwriting year.
White Mountains’s capital commitment to WM Outrigger Re was $150 million for the 2025 underwriting year, $130 million for the 2024 underwriting year and $205 million for the 2023 underwriting year. During the fourth quarter of 2025, Ark renewed Outrigger Re Ltd. for the 2026 underwriting year with $70 million of capital. The capital was provided entirely by third-party investors excluding White Mountains.
HG Global reported gross written premiums and earned premiums of $61 million and $31 million in 2025 compared to $52 million and $29 million in 2024. HG Global’s total par value of policies assumed was $3,170 million in 2025 compared to $2,952 million in 2024. HG Global’s total gross pricing was 194 basis points in 2025 compared to 177 basis points in 2024. HG Global reported pre-tax income (loss) of $45 million in 2025 compared to $(66) million in 2024. HG Global’s results included net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) of $23 million in 2025 compared to $(6) million in 2024, driven by movements in interest rates. HG Global’s results in 2025 also included the reversal of the $22 million deferred tax asset associated with the Bermuda economic transition adjustment. HG Global’s results in 2025 included a $38 million decline in the fair value of the BAM surplus notes, which was driven by changes in certain key inputs used in the discounted cash flow analysis. HG Global’s results in 2024 included an increase of $1 million in the fair value of the BAM surplus notes. In addition, HG Global’s results in 2024 included the $115 million unrealized loss on deconsolidation of BAM.
The fair value of the BAM Surplus Notes was $339 million as of December 31, 2025 compared to $382 million as of December 31, 2024. The decline was driven by the $38 million decrease in fair value and $35 million in cash payments of principal and interest, partially offset by approximately $30 million of accrued interest.
Kudu reported total revenues of $183 million, pre-tax income of $140 million and adjusted EBITDA of $65 million in 2025 compared to total revenues of $119 million, pre-tax income of $81 million and adjusted EBITDA of $55 million in 2024. Total revenues, pre-tax income and adjusted EBITDA included $79 million of net investment income in 2025 compared to $67 million in 2024. Total revenues and pre-tax income also included $104 million of net realized and unrealized investment gains in 2025 compared to $51 million in 2024.
Kudu deployed $197 million, including transaction costs, into three new asset management firms in 2025. As of December 31, 2025, Kudu has deployed $1.2 billion, including transaction costs, into 30 asset and wealth management firms globally, including three that have been exited. As of December 31, 2025, the asset and wealth management firms have combined assets under management of approximately $153 billion, spanning a range of asset classes.
Bamboo reported commission and fee revenues of $211 million and pre-tax income of $40 million in the period from January 1, 2025 through December 5, 2025, the date of sale, while Bamboo reported commission and fee revenues of $135 million and pre-tax income of $33 million in 2024. Bamboo reported MGA pre-tax income of $41 million and MGA adjusted EBITDA of $91 million in the period from January 1, 2025 through December 5, 2025, while Bamboo reported MGA pre-tax income of $32 million and MGA adjusted EBITDA of $53 million in 2024. Managed premiums, which represent the total premium placed by Bamboo, were $705 million in the period from January 1, 2025 through December 5, 2025 and $484 million in 2024. The increase in managed premiums was driven by growth in the renewal book as well as new business volume.
For the period from September 2, 2025, the date of acquisition, through December 31, 2025, Distinguished reported managed premiums of $188 million, commission and fee revenues of $57 million, pre-tax loss of $17 million and ScaleCo adjusted EBITDA of $9 million.
As of December 31, 2025, White Mountains owned 17.9 million shares of MediaAlpha, representing a 27.4% basic ownership interest based on the total class A and class B common shares outstanding in MediaAlpha’s Report on Form 10-Q dated October 29, 2025. As of December 31, 2025, MediaAlpha’s share price was $12.95 per share, which increased from $11.29 per share as of December 31, 2024. The carrying value of White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha was $231 million as of December 31, 2025, which increased from $202 million as of December 31, 2024. At White Mountains’s current level of ownership, each $1.00 per share increase or decrease in the stock price of MediaAlpha will result in an approximate $7.00 per share increase or decrease in White Mountains’s book value per share.
White Mountains’s total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was 9.1% in 2025, which included $30 million of unrealized investment gains from White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha. Excluding MediaAlpha, the total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was 8.9% in 2025. Excluding MediaAlpha, investment returns in 2025 were driven primarily by net investment income and net unrealized investment gains from other long-term investments, net investment income from the fixed income portfolio and net realized gains from common equity securities.
White Mountains’s total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was 6.9% in 2024, which included $38 million of net realized and unrealized investment gains from White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha. Excluding MediaAlpha, the total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was 6.5% in 2024. Excluding MediaAlpha, investment returns in 2024 were driven primarily by net investment income and net realized and unrealized investment gains from other long-term investments, net investment income from the fixed income portfolio and net unrealized gains from common equity securities.
White Mountains ended 2024 with book value per share of $1,746$1,746, andan adjusted book value per shareincrease of $1,834. During 2024, book value per share and adjusted book value per share increased 6% andfor 8%,the year, including dividends. Comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders was $230 million in 2024 compared to $511 million in 2023.
As of July 1, 2024, White Mountains no longer consolidates BAM. Upon deconsolidation, the BAM Surplus Notes, including accrued interest receivable, were fair valued in accordance with GAAP at $387 million, which resulted in an unrealized loss on deconsolidation of $115 million. As of December 31, 2024, the BAM Surplus Notes were fair valued at $382 million. The decrease in fair value of $5 million was driven by a $22 million cash payment of principal and interest, partially offset by $16 million of accrued interest and a $1 million increase in fair value as a result of lower market interest rates. As of June 30, 2024, for adjusted book value purposes, the BAM Surplus Notes were valued at $415 million, including an $87 million time value discount.
As of December 31, 2024, White Mountains owned 17.9 million shares of MediaAlpha, representing a 27%26.6% basic ownership interest (25% on a fully-diluted/fully-converted basis).interest. As of December 31, 2024, MediaAlpha’s share price was $11.29, which increased from $11.15 per share as of December 31, 2023. The carrying value of White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha was $202 million as of December 31, 2024, which decreased from $255 million as of December 31, 2023 as a result of the secondary offering. Based on White Mountains’s ownership as of December 31, 2024, each $1.00 per share increase or decrease in the stock price of MediaAlpha will result in an approximate $7.00 per share increase or decrease in White Mountains’s book value per share and adjusted book value per share.
White Mountains’s total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets, both including and excluding White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha, was 11.4% in 2023. The total consolidated portfolio return included $27 million of net unrealized investment gains from White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha. Excluding MediaAlpha, investment returns in 2023 were driven primarily by net investment income and net realized and unrealized investment gains from the other long-term investments and fixed income portfolios.
Overview—Year Ended December 31, 2023 versus Year Ended December 31, 2022
White Mountains ended 2023 with book value per share of $1,656 and adjusted book value per share of $1,704. During 2023, book value per share and adjusted book value per share both increased 14%, including dividends. Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common shareholders was $511 million in 2023 compared to $788 million in 2022.
Results in 2023 were driven primarily by good results from White Mountains’s operating businesses and strong returns in the investment portfolio. Results in 2022 were driven primarily by the net gain of $876 million from the NSM Transaction. Results in 2023 also included $27 million of unrealized investment gains (losses) from White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha compared to $(93) million in 2022.
As of December 31, 2023, White Mountains’s undeployed capital was approximately $0.5 billion reflecting the Bamboo Transaction and redeployment to WM Outrigger Re.
Ark’s combined ratio was 82% in both 2023 and 2022. The combined ratio in 2023 included two points of net unfavorable prior year loss reserve development compared to six points of net favorable prior year loss reserve development in 2022. The combined ratio for 2023 included two points of catastrophe losses, which included losses from Hurricanes Otis and Idalia as well as the Maui wildfires, compared to 13 points in 2022, driven primarily by losses from Hurricane Ian and the conflict in Ukraine. Ark reported gross written premiums of $1,898 million, net written premiums of $1,411 million and net earned premiums of $1,305 million in 2023 compared to gross written premiums of $1,452 million, net written premiums of $1,195 million and net earned premiums of $1,043 million in 2022. Ark reported pre-tax income of $249 million in 2023 compared to $95 million in 2022. In December 2023, AM Best affirmed Ark’s financial strength rating at “A/stable.”
WM Outrigger Re’s combined ratio was 44% in 2023. WM Outrigger Re reported gross and net written premiums of $110 million, net earned premiums of $104 million and pre-tax income of $69 million in 2023. During the fourth quarter of 2023, White Mountains agreed to redeploy $130 million into Outrigger Re Ltd. for business written in the 2024 underwriting year.
HG Global reported gross written premiums and earned premiums of $50 million and $26 million in 2023 compared to $56 million and $28 million in 2022. HG Global reported gross written premiums net of ceding commission paid of $35 million in 2023 compared to $38 million in 2022. HG Global’s total par value of policies assumed, which represents its first-loss exposure on policies assumed from BAM, was $2,356 million in 2023 compared to $2,421 million in 2022. HG Global’s total gross pricing was 213 basis points in 2023 compared to 231 basis points in 2022.
Kudu reported total revenues of $177 million, pre-tax income of $137 million and adjusted EBITDA of $57 million in 2023 compared to total revenues of $119 million, pre-tax income of $89 million and adjusted EBITDA of $42 million in 2022. Total revenues and pre-tax income in 2023 included $71 million of net investment income and $106 million of net realized and unrealized investment gains compared to $54 million and $64 million in 2022.
Kudu deployed $165 million, including transaction costs, into five new asset management firms in 2023. As of December 31, 2023, Kudu had deployed $884 million, including transaction costs, into 25 asset and wealth management firms globally, including three that have been exited. As of December 31, 2023, the asset and wealth management firms have combined assets under management of approximately $104 billion, spanning a range of asset classes.
During the second quarter of 2023, White Mountains completed a tender offer to purchase 5.9 million additional shares of MediaAlpha at a purchase price of $10.00 per share. As of December 31, 2023, White Mountains owned 22.9 million shares of MediaAlpha, representing a 34.9% basic ownership interest (33.1% on a fully-diluted/fully-converted basis). As of December 31, 2023, MediaAlpha’s share price was $11.15, which increased from $9.95 per share as of December 31, 2022. The carrying value of White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha was $255 million as of December 31, 2023, which increased from $169 million as of December 31, 2022. Based on White Mountains’s ownership as of December 31, 2023, each $1.00 per share increase or decrease in the stock price of MediaAlpha will result in an approximate $9.00 per share increase or decrease in White Mountains’s book value per share and adjusted book value per share.
White Mountains’s total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets, both including and excluding White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha, was 11.4% in 2023. The total consolidated portfolio return included $27 million of net unrealized investment gains from White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha. Excluding MediaAlpha, investment returns in 2023 were driven primarily by net investment income and net realized and unrealized investment gains from the other long-term investments and fixed income portfolios.
White Mountains’s total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was -1.6% in 2022, which included $93 million of net unrealized investment losses from White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha. Excluding MediaAlpha, the total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was 0.3% in 2022. Excluding MediaAlpha, investment returns in 2022 were driven primarily by net investment income and net realized and unrealized gains from other long-term investments, which more than offset net unrealized investment losses in the fixed income portfolio due to rising interest rates.
During 2023, White Mountains repurchased and retired 24,165 of its common shares for $33 million at an average share price of $1,354.88, or 82% of White Mountains’s book value per share and 80% of White Mountains’s adjusted book value per share as of December 31, 2023.
Bermuda Corporate Income Tax
On December 27, 2023, Bermuda enacted a 15% corporate income tax that became effective on January 1, 2025. White Mountains expects to meet the requirements to be exempt from the Bermuda corporate income tax and the Pillar Two worldwide minimum tax until January 1, 2030. The Bermuda legislation also provides for an economic transition adjustment that will reduce future years’ taxable income. Under GAAP, this economic transition adjustment was required to be recognized as a net deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2023. Accordingly, White Mountains’s net income for 2023 included a net deferred tax benefit of $68 million, of which $51 million was recorded at Ark and $17 million was recorded at HG Global. This tax benefit increased both book value per share and adjusted book value per share in 2023 by approximately $14, net of noncontrolling interest and the impact on the fair value of Ark’s contingent consideration. As of July 1, 2024, White Mountains no longer consolidates BAM. As a result of the deconsolidation, the BAM Surplus Notes are recorded at fair value, which resulted in the reversal of a $5 million deferred tax liability related to the Bermuda economic transition adjustment, generating a $5 million tax benefit in the third quarter of 2024.
Adjusted Book Value Per Share
The following table presents White Mountains’s adjusted book value per share, a non-GAAP financial measure,share as of December 31, 2024,2025, 20232024 and 2022 and reconciles this non-GAAP measure from book value per share, the most comparable GAAP measure. See “NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES” on page 79.2023:
(1) Amounts reflect White Mountains’s preferred share ownership in HG Global of 96.9%.
(2) For periods subsequent to July 1, 2024, White Mountains carries the BAM Surplus Notes under GAAP at fair value, which incorporates time value into its estimate.
The following table presents goodwill and other intangible assets that are included in White Mountains’s adjusted book value as of December 31, 2024,2025, 20232024 and 20222023:
(1) The relative fair values of goodwill and other intangible assets recognized in connection with the Distinguished Transaction and the Enterprise Solutions Transaction have not yet been finalized. See Note 2 — “Significant Transactions” on page F-19.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, White Mountains conducted its operations through four reportable segments: (1) Ark/WM Outrigger, (2) HG Global, (3) Kudu and (4) Bamboo,Distinguished, with our remaining operating businesses, holding companies and other assets included in Other Operations. White Mountains has made its segment determination based on consideration of the following criteria: (i) the nature of the business activities of each of the Company’s subsidiaries and affiliates; (ii) the manner in which the Company’s subsidiaries and affiliates are organized; (iii) the existence of primary managers responsible for specific subsidiaries and affiliates; and (iv) the organization of information provided to the Company’s chief operating decision makers and its Board of Directors. Significant intercompany transactions among White Mountains’s segments have been eliminated herein. White Mountains’s segment information is presented in Note 15 — “Segment Information” on page F-65.F-70.
During the fourth quarter of 2022, Ark sponsored the formation of Outrigger Re Ltd. to provide collateralized reinsurance protection on Ark’s Bermuda global property catastrophe excess of loss portfolio written in the 2023 underwriting year. Ark renewed its quota share reinsurance agreement with Outrigger Re Ltd. for the 20242024, 2025 and 20252026 underwriting years. White Mountains consolidates its segregated account of Outrigger Re Ltd., WM Outrigger Re, in its financial statements. WM Outrigger Re’s quota share reinsurance agreement with GAIL eliminates in White Mountains’s consolidated financial statements. WM Outrigger Re exclusively provides reinsurance protection to Ark. As a result, WM Outrigger Re was aggregated with Ark within the Ark/WM Outrigger segment starting in 2023. See Note 2 — “Significant Transactions” on page F-19.
Effective July 1, 2024, White Mountains no longer consolidates BAM. Through June 30, 2024, BAM’s assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests, as well as its results of operations, are presented within the HG Global segment. See Note 2 — “Significant Transactions” on page F-19.
On December 5, 2025, White Mountains completed the Bamboo Sale Transaction. As a result, White Mountains deconsolidated the Bamboo Group on December 5, 2025, and Bamboo is no longer a reportable segment. Through December 5, 2025, Bamboo’s results of operations, are presented within the Bamboo segment. White Mountains’s noncontrolling equity interest in the Bamboo SPV is accounted for at fair value in other long-term investments within Other Operations. See Note 2 — “Significant Transactions” on page F-19.
On September 2, 2025, White Mountains completed the Distinguished Transaction. As a result of the Bamboo Transaction,result, White Mountains began consolidating BambooDistinguished in its financial statements ason of JanuarySeptember 2, 2024.2025. See Note 2 — “Significant Transactions” on page F-19.
As a result of the NSM Transaction, the results of operations for NSM, previously reported as a segment, have been classified as discontinued operations in the statements of operations and comprehensive income through the closing of the transaction in 2022. See Note 20 — “Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations” on page F-73.
During the fourth quarter of 2022, Ark sponsored the formation of Outrigger Re Ltd., a Bermuda company registered as a special purpose insurer and segregated accounts company, to provide collateralized reinsurance protection on Ark’s Bermuda global property catastrophe excess of loss portfolio written in the 2023 underwriting year. Ark renewed its quota share reinsurance agreement with Outrigger Re Ltd. for the 2024 and 2025 underwriting years.portfolio. White Mountains consolidates its segregated account of Outrigger Re Ltd., WM Outrigger Re, in its financial statements.
(1) Included within general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.
The following table presents WM Outrigger Re’s insurance premiums, combined ratio and pre-tax income by underwriting year for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023:
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to any of the risk factors previously disclosed in the Registrant’s 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Ark/WM Outrigger Results—Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Gross Written Premiums”
New heading “Ark’s Book Value and Tangible Book Value”
New heading “Kudu Results—Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “HG Global Results—Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Distinguished Results – Six Months Ended June 30, 2026”
New heading “WTM Partners Results—Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Other Operations Results—Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 versus Three Months Ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Share Repurchases”
New heading “Other Operations Results—Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Share Repurchases”
New heading “Acquisitions and Dispositions”
New heading “Acquisitions and Dispositions”
New heading “WTM Partners’s EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA”
Largest changes
“Other Operations Results—Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 versus Three Months Ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
“Ark/WM Outrigger Results—Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
“Other Operations Results—Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
“WTM Partners Results—Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
“HG Global Results—Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
“Kudu Results—Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (230)
The following discussion also includes eighteleven non-GAAP financial measures: (i) Ark’s tangible book value, (ii) Ark’s growth in tangible book value, (iii) Ark’s tangible capital, (iiiiv) Kudu’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), (ivv) Kudu’s adjusted EBITDA, (vvi) Distinguished’s ScaleCo net income (loss), (vivii) Distinguished’s ScaleCo EBITDAEBITDA, (viiviii) Distinguished’s ScaleCo adjusted EBITDA, (ix) WTM Partners’s EBITDA, (x) WTM Partners’s adjusted EBITDA and (viiixi) total consolidated portfolio return excluding MediaAlpha. These non-GAAP financial measures have been reconciled from their most comparable GAAP financial measures on page 70.87. White Mountains believes these measures to be useful in evaluating White Mountains’s financial performance and condition.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCHJUNE 31,30, 2026 and 2025
White Mountains reported book value per share of $2,170 as of March 31, 2026, a decrease of 1% for the first quarter of 2026, including dividends. Results in the first quarter of 2026 were driven primarily by solid results from White Mountains’s operating businesses that were more than offset by a decline in the MediaAlpha share price.
White Mountains reported book value per share of $1,752$2,258 as of MarchJune 31,30, 2025,2026, an increase of 0.4%4% in the second quarter of 2026 and 3% in the first quartersix months of 2025,2026, including dividends. Results in the firstsecond quarter and first six months of 20252026 were driven primarily by solidstrong operating company results from White Mountains’s operating businesses and goodsolid investment returns, mostly offset by a decline in the MediaAlpha share price.returns.
White Mountains reported book value per share of $1,804 as of June 30, 2025, an increase of 3% in both the second quarter and first six months of 2025, including dividends. Results in the second quarter and first six months of 2025 were driven primarily by solid operating company results and good investment returns.
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common shareholders was $(27)$199 million and $173 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026 compared to $35$124 million and $159 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2025. Results in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026 included $11$151 million and $161 million of net realized and unrealized investment gains compared to $87 million and $173 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2025. Results in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026 also included $65$58 million and $(7) million of unrealized investment gains (losses) from White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha compared to $37$31 million and $(6) million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2025.
On February 26, 2026, White Mountains deployed $125 million into Bishop Street, a diversified platform of MGAs and niche underwriting teams focused on the property and casualty insurance sector.
In the second quarter of 2026, WTM Partners closed two new acquisitions. The acquisition of BaseSix Systems LLC,Basesix, a low voltage electricalcontracting systems integrator,platform, closed on April 1, 20262026. andWTM representedPartners an equity investment of approximatelydeployed $97 million.million Theinto Basesix. Enterprise Solutions’s bolt-on acquisition of Hawkeye Electric, LLC, a provider of specialty electrical contracting services, closed on May 1, 20262026. WTM Partners deployed $35 million into Enterprise Solutions to fund the acquisition of Hawkeye Electric. Beginning in the second quarter of 2026, in conjunction with the acquisitions of Basesix and representedHawkeye anElectric, equityWTM investmentPartners ofhas approximatelybeen $35presented million.as a separate reportable segment. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
In the second quarter of 2026, White Mountains repurchased and retired 91,194 of its common shares for $191 million at an average share price of $2,092.72, or 93% of White Mountains’s June 30, 2026 book value per share. In the first six months of 2026, White Mountains repurchased and retired 103,816 of its common shares for $217 million at an average share price of $2,088.40, or 93% of White Mountains’s June 30, 2026 book value per share. Including these share repurchases as well as recent deployments and operating company distributions, undeployed capital is roughly $0.8 billion.
Including these deployments, undeployed capital stands at roughly $0.8 billion.
The Ark/WM Outrigger segment’s combined ratio was 91%84% and 88% in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026 compared to 97%84% and 90% in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2025. The Ark/WM Outrigger segment reported gross written premiums of $1,091$778 million and $1,868 million, net written premiums of $590$537 million and $1,128 million and net earned premiums of $374$376 million and $750 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026 compared to gross written premiums of $1,108$815 million and $1,923 million, net written premiums of $728$579 million and $1,306 million and net earned premiums of $358$364 million and $722 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2025. The Ark/WM Outrigger segment reported pre-tax income of $9$80 million and $89 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026 compared to $46$98 million and $144 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2025.
Ark’s combined ratio was 91%84% and 88% in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026 compared to 94%85% and 90% in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2025. Ark’s combined ratio in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026 included seventhree points and five points of catastrophe losses, driven primarily by losses related to the war in Iran. This compares to 25minimal catastrophe losses in the second quarter of 2025 and thirteen points of catastrophe losses in the first quartersix months of 2025, driven by losses related to the California wildfires. Ark’s combined ratio included fiveeight points and six points of net favorable prior year development in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026, driven primarily by the specialtyproperty and propertyspecialty lines of business. This compares to 14five points and nine points of net favorable prior year development in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2025, driven primarily by the property, marine & energy and propertyspecialty lines of business.business, partially offset by six points of unfavorable development in the second quarter related to aviation losses from the conflict in Ukraine. Ark has ongoing exposure to the war in Iran, primarily through the specialty and marine & energy lines of business. In the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026, Ark recorded estimated losses of $25$17 million and $42 million (net of reinsurance and reinstatement premiums). However,related losses could increase asto the war is ongoing.war.
Ark reported gross written premiums of $778 million and $1,868 million, net written premiums of $538 million and $1,128 million and net earned premiums of $375 million and $747 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2026 compared to gross written premiums of $815 million and $1,923 million, net written premiums of $536 million and $1,226 million and net earned premiums of $357 million and $703 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2025. The decline in gross written premiums in the second quarter of 2026 was driven primarily by softening market conditions in property lines, which was partially offset by growth in specialty lines. The decline in gross written premiums in the first six months of 2026 was driven primarily by a change in the timing of recognition of certain delegated authority business, which had no impact on the timing of recognition of Ark’s earned premiums.
Ark reported gross written premiums of $1,091 million, net written premiums of $590 million and net earned premiums of $371 million in the first quarter of 2026 compared to gross written premiums of $1,108 million, net written premiums of $690 million and net earned premiums of $346 million in the first quarter of 2025. The decline in Ark’s written premiums was driven primarily by a change in the timing of recognition of certain delegated authority business. This change had no impact on the timing of recognition of Ark’s earned premiums, which increased 7% in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the first quarter of 2025, driven primarily by continued growth in the specialty and property lines of business. Net written premiums were also impacted by Ark’s greater use of quota share reinsurance in the current period. As a result, ceded written premiums increased to $501 million in the first quarter of 2026 from $417 million in the first quarter of 2025. Ark reported pre-tax income of $7 million in the first quarter of 2026 compared to $52 million in the first quarter of 2025. Ark’s results included net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) of $(33) million in the first quarter of 2026 compared to $30 million in the first quarter of 2025.
WM Outrigger Re’s combined ratio was 44% in the first quarter of 2026 compared to 166% in the first quarter of 2025. Catastrophe losses in the first quarter of 2025 included $19 million of losses related to the California wildfires (net of reinstatement premiums). Ark renewed Outrigger Re Ltd. for the 2026 underwriting year with $70 million of unaffiliated third-party capital. Through March 31, 2026, WM Outrigger Re has generated pre-tax income of $57 million from the 2025 underwriting year, $29 million from the 2024 underwriting year and $76 million from the 2023 underwriting year.
KuduArk reported total revenues of $63 million, pre-tax income of $52$78 million and adjusted EBITDA of $17$85 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026 compared to total revenues of $64 million, pre-tax income of $53$91 million and adjusted EBITDA of $16$144 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2025. TotalArk’s revenues, pre-tax income and adjusted EBITDAresults included $21 million of net investment income in the first quarter of 2026 compared to $19 million in the first quarter of 2025. Total revenues and pre-tax income also included $42 million of net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) of $31 million and $(2) million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026 compared to $44$51 million and $81 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2025.
Ark reported book value of $1,615 million as of June 30, 2026, an increase of 4% in the second quarter of 2026 and 5% in the first six months of 2026, including dividends. Ark reported tangible book value of $1,736 million as of June 30, 2026, an increase of 6% in the second quarter of 2026 and 7% in the first six months of 2026, including dividends. Ark’s book value includes goodwill and other intangible assets, net of tax, and White Mountains’s contingent consideration liability, which are excluded from Ark’s tangible book value.
WM Outrigger Re’s combined ratio was 25% and 40% in the second quarter and first six months of 2026 compared to 44% and 120% in the second quarter and first six months of 2025. Catastrophe losses in the first six months of 2025 included $19 million of losses related to the California wildfires (net of reinstatement premiums). Ark renewed Outrigger Re Ltd. for the 2026 underwriting year with $70 million of unaffiliated third-party capital. Through June 30, 2026, WM Outrigger Re has generated pre-tax income of $59 million from the 2025 underwriting year, $29 million from the 2024 underwriting year and $76 million from the 2023 underwriting year. In the first six months of 2026, White Mountains received $145 million of distributions from WM Outrigger Re, primarily a return of capital related to its non-renewal for the 2026 underwriting year. On July 23, 2026, White Mountains received an additional distribution of $77 million.
Kudu reported total revenues of $69 million and $132 million, pre-tax income of $57 million and $109 million and adjusted EBITDA of $16 million and $33 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2026 compared to total revenues of $20 million and $84 million, pre-tax income of $11 million and $64 million and adjusted EBITDA of $16 million and $32 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2025. Total revenues, pre-tax income and adjusted EBITDA included $19 million and $40 million of net investment income in the second quarter and first six months of 2026 compared to $19 million and $39 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2025. Total revenues and pre-tax income also included $50 million and $92 million of net realized and unrealized investment gains in the second quarter and first six months of 2026 compared to $1 million and $45 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2025. The increases in net realized and unrealized investment gains in the second quarter and first six months of 2026 were driven by increases in the fair value of Kudu’s participation contracts, primarily due to lower discount rates across the portfolio and step-ups in valuation related to certain sale transactions. The increase for the first six months of 2026 was also due to growth in assets under management at several managers.
Kudu deployed a total of $21$36 million, including transaction costs, into onetwo new asset management firmfirms in the first quarter of 2026. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, Kudu hashad deployed a total of $1.2 billion, including transaction costs, into 3132 asset and wealth management firms globally, including three that have been exited. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the asset and wealth management firms have combined assets under management (“AUM”) of approximately $155$164 billion, spanning a range of asset classes.
HG Global reported gross written premiums of $8$11 million and $19 million and earned premiums of $8 million and $15 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026 compared to gross written premiums of $7$19 million and $26 million and earned premiums of $8$7 million and $15 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2025. HG Global’s total par value of policies assumed was $518$818 million and $1,335 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026 compared to $427$931 million and $1,358 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2025. HG Global’s total gross pricing was 160135 and 145 basis points in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026 compared to 157206 and 191 basis points in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2025. HG Global reported pre-tax income of $11$10 million and $21 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026 compared to $25$17 million and $42 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2025. HG Global’s results included net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) of $(52) million and $(7) million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026 compared to $10$3 million and $13 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2025, driven by movements in interest rates.
The fair value of the BAM Surplus Notes was $353 million as of June 30, 2026 compared to $346 million as of March 31, 2026 compared to $339 million as of December 31, 2025.2026. The increase was driven by $7 million of accrued interest. On July 28, 2026, HG Global received a cash payment of principal and interest on the BAM Surplus Notes of $8 million.
On May 14, 2026, HG Global refinanced its senior debt facility, upsizing the facility to $200 million and lowering the interest rate to a fixed rate of 7.4%. In turn, on May 26, 2026, HG Global paid a $93 million cash dividend to shareholders, of which $90 million was paid to White Mountains. In connection with the extinguishment of its prior senior debt facility, HG Global recognized a $4 million loss within general and administrative expenses.
For the second quarter and first six months of 2026, HG Global grew its book value attributable to White Mountains by 1% and 3%, including the $90 million dividend paid to White Mountains.
Distinguished reported managed premiums of $132$189 million and $321 million, commission and fee revenues of $40$57 million and $96 million, pre-tax loss of $18$11 million and $28 million and ScaleCo adjusted EBITDA of $4$12 million and $17 million for the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2026. Distinguished’s managed premiums increased by 7%13% in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025 and 10% in the first six months of 2026 compared to the first six months of 2025. ThisThese includesfigures include periods prior to White Mountains’s ownership of Distinguished, which White Mountains believebelieves is useful in understanding Distinguished’s performance.
WTM Partners reported total revenues of $93 million and $137 million, pre-tax income of $4 million and $2 million and adjusted EBITDA of $9 million and $11 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2026 compared to total revenues of $43 million and $43 million, pre-tax income (loss) of $1 million and $(2) million and adjusted EBITDA of $3 million and $2 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2025.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, White Mountains owned 17.9 million shares of MediaAlpha, representing a 28%29% basic ownership interest based on the total class A and class B common shares outstanding. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, MediaAlpha’s share price was $9.30$12.57 per share, which decreasedincreased from $12.95$9.30 per share as of DecemberMarch 31, 2025.2026. The carrying value of White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha was $225 million as of June 30, 2026 compared to $166 million as of March 31, 2026 compared to $231 million as of December 31, 2025.2026. At White Mountains’s currentJune 30, 2026 level of ownership, each $1.00 per share increase or decrease in the share price of MediaAlpha will result in an approximate $7.00$7.50 per share increase or decrease in White Mountains’s book value per share.
On July 1, 2026, White Mountains received a distribution of $26 million from the Bamboo SPV.
White Mountains’s total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was 0.2% in the first quarter of 2026, which included $65 million of unrealized investment losses from White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha. Excluding MediaAlpha, the total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was 1.0% in the first quarter of 2026. Excluding MediaAlpha, investment results in the first quarter of 2026 were driven primarily by net investment income, net unrealized investment gains from other long-term investments and net unrealized investment losses from the fixed income and common equity portfolios.
White Mountains’s total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was 1.7%3.5% in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, which included $58 million of unrealized investment gains from White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha. Excluding MediaAlpha, the total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was 2.8% in the second quarter of 2026. Excluding MediaAlpha, investment results were driven primarily by net realized and unrealized investment gains from other long-term investments, net unrealized gains from common equity securities and net investment income from the other long-term investments and fixed income portfolios. White Mountains’s total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was 2.7% in the second quarter of 2025, which included $37$31 million of unrealized investment lossesgains from White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha. Excluding MediaAlpha, the total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was 2.3% in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. Excluding MediaAlpha, investment results in the first quarter of 2025 were driven primarily by net investment income and net unrealized investment gains from the other long-term investments and fixed income portfolios.
White Mountains’s total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was 3.7% in the first six months of 2026, which included $7 million of unrealized investment losses from White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha. Excluding MediaAlpha, the total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was 3.8% in the first six months of 2026. Excluding MediaAlpha, investment results were driven primarily by net unrealized investment gains from other long-term investments and net investment income from the other long-term investments and fixed income portfolios. White Mountains’s total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was 4.5% in the first six months of 2025, which included $6 million of unrealized investment losses from White Mountains’s investment in MediaAlpha. Excluding MediaAlpha, the total consolidated portfolio return on invested assets was 4.7% in the first six months of 2025. Excluding MediaAlpha, investment results were driven primarily by net investment income and net unrealized investment gains from the other long-term investments and fixed income portfolios.
The following table presents White Mountains’s book value per share as of June 30, 2026, March 31, 2026, December 31, 2025 and MarchJune 31,30, 2025:
The following table presents goodwill and other intangible assets that are included in White Mountains’s book value as of June 30, 2026, March 31, 2026, December 31, 2025 and MarchJune 31,30, 2025:
(1) The relative fair values of goodwill and other intangible assets recognized in connection with the Distinguishedacquisitions Transactionof haveBasesix and Hawkeye Electric had not yet been finalized. See Note 2 — “Significant Transactions.”
(2) See Note 4 — “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” on page 24 for details of other intangible assets.
The following table presents White Mountains’s consolidated financial results by industry for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, White Mountains conducted its operations through fourfive reportable segments: (1) Ark/WM Outrigger, (2) Kudu, (3) HG Global andGlobal, (4) Distinguished,Distinguished and (5) WTM Partners, with ourits remaining operating businesses, holding companies and other assets included in Other Operations. White Mountains has made its segment determination based on consideration of the following criteria: (i) the nature of the business activities of each of the Company’s subsidiaries and affiliates; (ii) the manner in which the Company’s subsidiaries and affiliates are organized; (iii) the existence of primary managers responsible for specific subsidiaries and affiliates; and (iv) the organization of information provided to the Company’s chief operating decision makerCODM and itsthe Board of Directors. Significant intercompany transactions among White Mountains’s segments have been eliminated herein. White Mountains’s segment information is presented in Note 14 — “Segment Information” on page 41.43.
The following tables present the components of pre-tax income (loss) included in the Ark/WM Outrigger segment for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
Combined Ratio
The following tables present the Ark/WM Outrigger segment’s insurance premiums, insurance expenses and insurance ratios for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:
(1) Included within general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.
(1) Included within general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.
The following table presents WM Outrigger Re’s insurance premiums, combined ratio and pre-tax income by underwriting year for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:
White Mountains’s capital commitment to WM Outrigger Re was $150 million for the 2025 underwriting year, $130 million for the 2024 underwriting year and $205 million for the 2023 underwriting year. Ark renewed Outrigger Re Ltd. for the 2026 underwriting year with $70 million of unaffiliated third-party capital. Ark increased its use of traditional quota share reinsurance for 2026, reducing the need for capacity from Outrigger Re Ltd.
Ark/WM Outrigger Results—Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 versus Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
The Ark/WM Outrigger segment’s combined ratio was 91%84% in both the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to 97% in the first quarter ofand 2025. The Ark/WM Outrigger segment reported gross written premiums of $1,091$778 million, net written premiums of $590$537 million and net earned premiums of $374$376 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to gross written premiums of $1,108$815 million, net written premiums of $728$579 million and net earned premiums of $358$364 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The Ark/WM Outrigger segment reported pre-tax income of $9$80 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to $46$98 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2025.
Ark’s combined ratio was 91%84% and 85% in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to 94% in the first quarter ofand 2025. Ark’s combined ratio in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 included seventhree points of catastrophe losses, driven primarily by losses related to the war in Iran, compared to 25 points ofminimal catastrophe losses in the firstsecond quarter of 2025, driven by losses related to the California wildfires.2025. Ark’s combined ratio in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 included eight points of net favorable prior year development, driven by the property and specialty lines of business. This compares to five points of net favorable prior year lossdevelopment reservein development,the second quarter of 2025, driven primarily by the specialtyproperty and propertyspecialty lines of business.business, Thispartially comparesoffset toby fourteensix points of net favorable prior year loss reserveunfavorable development inrelated to aviation losses from the firstconflict quarterin of 2025, driven by the marine & energy and property lines of business.Ukraine.
Ark has ongoing exposure to the war in Iran, primarily through the specialty and marine & energy lines of business. In the firstsecond quarter of 2026, Ark recorded estimated losses of $25$17 million (net of reinsurance and reinstatement premiums). However,related losses could increase asto the war is ongoing.war.
Ark reported gross written premiums of $1,091 million, net written premiums of $590 million and net earned premiums of $371 million in the first quarter of 2026 compared to gross written premiums of $1,108 million, net written premiums of $690 million and net earned premiums of $346 million in the first quarter of 2025. The decline in Ark’s written premiums was driven primarily by a change in the timing of recognition of certain delegated authority business. This change had no impact on the timing of recognition of Ark’s earned premiums, which increased 7% in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the first quarter of 2025, driven primarily by continued growth in the specialty and property lines of business. Net written premiums were also impacted by Ark’s greater use of quota share reinsurance in the current period. As a result, ceded written premiums increased to $501 million in the first quarter of 2026 from $417 million in the first quarter of 2025.
Ark reported pre-tax income of $7 million in the first quarter of 2026 compared to $52 million in the first quarter of 2025. Ark’s results included net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) of $(33) million in the first quarter of 2026, driven primarily by net unrealized investment losses from common equity securities and fixed maturity securities due to an increase in interest rates, compared to $30 million in the first quarter of 2025, driven primarily by net unrealized investment gains from common equity securities and fixed maturity securities due to foreign currency gains and a decrease in interest rates. Ark’s results also included a $10 million expense related to the increase in fair value of White Mountains’s contingent consideration liability in both the first quarter of 2026 and 2025.
WM Outrigger Re’s combined ratio was 44% in the first quarter of 2026 compared to 166% in the first quarter of 2025. Catastrophe losses in 2025 included $19 million of losses related to the California wildfires (net of reinstatement premiums). In the first quarter of 2026, WM Outrigger Re’s combined ratio was 44% for the 2025 underwriting year compared to 72% for the 2025 underwriting year and 256% for the 2024 underwriting year in the first quarter of 2025.
WM Outrigger ReArk reported gross written premiums of $0$778 million, net written premiums of $538 million and net earned premiums of $3$375 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to gross written premiums of $38$815 million, net written premiums of $536 million and net earned premiums of $12$357 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. WMThe Outriggerdecline Rein reportedgross pre-taxwritten income of $3 millionpremiums in the firstsecond quarter of 2026,2026 allwas relateddriven toprimarily theby 2025softening underwritingmarket year. WM Outrigger Re reported pre-tax income (loss) of $(6) millionconditions in theproperty first quarter of 2025, oflines, which $4was millionpartially relatedoffset toby thegrowth 2024in underwritingspecialty year and $(10) million related to the 2024 underwriting year.lines.
Ark reported pre-tax income of $78 million in the second quarter of 2026 compared to $91 million in the second quarter of 2025. Ark’s results included net realized and unrealized investment gains of $31 million in the second quarter of 2026, driven primarily by net unrealized investment gains from common equity securities and other long-term investments, compared to net realized and unrealized investment gains of $51 million in the second quarter of 2025, driven primarily by net unrealized investment gains from foreign currency, other long-term investments and common equity securities. Ark’s results also included a $32 million expense related to the increase in fair value of White Mountains’s contingent consideration liability in the second quarter of 2026 compared to $28 million in the second quarter of 2025.
WM Outrigger Re’s combined ratio was 25% in the second quarter of 2026 compared to 44% in the second quarter of 2025. Catastrophe losses were minimal in the second quarter of 2026 and 2025. WM Outrigger Re reported gross written premiums of $0 million and net earned premiums of $1 million in the second quarter of 2026 compared to gross written premiums of $43 million and net earned premiums of $7 million in the second quarter of 2025. WM Outrigger Re reported pre-tax income of $2 million in the second quarter of 2026 compared to $6 million in the second quarter of 2025.
The following tables present the Ark/WM Outrigger segment’s insurance premiums, insurance expenses and insurance ratios for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:
The following table presents WM Outrigger Re’s insurance premiums, combined ratio and pre-tax income by underwriting year for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:
Ark’s grossGross written premiums decreased 2%5% to $1,091$778 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to $1,108$815 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2025, with risk adjusted rate change of -6%.-10%. The decline in Ark’s gross written premiums in the second quarter of 2026 was driven primarily by asoftening changemarket conditions in theproperty timing of recognition of certain delegated authority business. This change had no impact on the timing of recognition of Ark’s earned premiums,lines, which increasedwas 7%partially in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the first quarter of 2025, driven primarilyoffset by continued growth in the specialty and property lines of business.lines.
The following table presents the Ark/WM Outrigger segment’s gross written premiums by line of business for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
Ark/WM Outrigger Results—Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
The Ark/WM Outrigger segment’s combined ratio was 88% in the first six months of 2026 compared to 90% in the first six months of 2025. The Ark/WM Outrigger segment reported gross written premiums of $1,868 million, net written premiums of $1,128 million and net earned premiums of $750 million in the first six months of 2026 compared to gross written premiums of $1,923 million, net written premiums of $1,306 million and net earned premiums of $722 million in the first six months of 2025. The Ark/WM Outrigger segment reported pre-tax income of $89 million in the first six months of 2026 compared to $144 million in the first six months of 2025.
WTM insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-31 | Tanner David Allen |
Gift | 2 | — | — |
| 2026-08-26 | Klar Stephen |
Grant/award | 113 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Tanner David Allen |
Grant/award | 135 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Shank Suzanne F. |
Grant/award | 135 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Hicks Weston M |
Grant/award | 190 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Gelston Philip A |
Grant/award | 135 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Dillon Margaret |
Grant/award | 135 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Chu John |
Grant/award | 135 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Choksi Mary C |
Grant/award | 135 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Carlson Peter M |
Grant/award | 135 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Campbell Reid Tarlton |
Grant/award | 135 | — | — |
Well-known investors holding WTM (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.