Companies › XNCR

XNCR 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Xencor Inc · Nasdaq · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1326732 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Xencor Inc's public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

57 / 12risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
6new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
6Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-02-25 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-02-27 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

57new paragraphs
12removed paragraphs
34reworded paragraphs
22,960 → 28,120words in section

New heading “We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.”

New heading “We have conducted, are currently conducting, and may in the future conduct clinical trials for our product candidates outside the United States, and the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities may not accept data from such trials.”

New heading “We may seek Fast Track or other accelerated review designations for some or all of our product candidates. We may not receive such designation, and even for those product candidates for which we do, it may not lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process, and will not increase the likelihood that product candidates will receive marketing approval.”

New heading “A variety of risks associated with conducting research and clinical trials abroad and marketing our product candidates internationally could materially adversely affect our business.”

New heading “Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of our product candidates in one jurisdiction does not mean that we will be successful in obtaining regulatory approval of our product candidates in other jurisdictions.”

New heading “Disruptions at the FDA, SEC and other government agencies caused by changing priorities or funding shortages could hinder their ability to hire, retain or deploy key leadership and other personnel, prevent new or modified products from being developed, reviewed, approved or commercialized in a timely manner or at all, which could negatively impact our business.”

Removed heading “If our internal control over financial reporting is not effective, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or file our periodic reports in a timely manner, which may cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and may lead to a decline in our stock price.”

Removed heading “Requirements associated with being a public reporting company will continue to increase our costs significantly, as well as divert significant company resources and management attention.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: sanction, liquidity, russia, ukraine
“Our business is susceptible to general conditions in the global economy and in the global financial markets. A global financial crisis or a global or regional political disruption could cause extreme volatility in the capital and credit markets. A severe or prolonged economic downturn, including a recession or depression resulting from the political disruption, could result in a variety of risks to our business, including weakened demand for our current or future product candidates, if approved, and our ability to raise additional capital when needed on acceptable terms, if at all. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: penalt, inflation, regulation
“Moreover, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their marketed products, which has resulted in several U.S. presidential executive orders, congressional inquiries, and proposed and enacted legislation designed, among other things, to bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for pharmaceutical products. The IRA, among other things, (i) directs the U.S. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: tariff, ai, regulation
“The current presidential administration is pursuing policies to reduce regulations and expenditures across government including at HHS, the FDA, CMS and related agencies. These actions, presently directed by executive orders or memoranda from the Office of Management and Budget, may propose policy changes that create additional uncertainty for our business. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: material weakness

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

WeIf havewe identifiedidentify material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and our management has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2023 and 2024. If we fail to remediate these material weaknesses, or if we identify additional material weaknessesreporting in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting in the future,reporting, we may not be able to accurately or timely report our financial condition or results of operations, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the trading price of our common stock may decline.
see in full comparison
New text topics: lawsuit, china
“Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on our product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive. The requirements for patentability may differ in certain countries, particularly developing countries. For example, China has a heightened requirement for patentability, and specifically requires a detailed description of medical uses of a claimed drug. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as laws in the United States. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: tariff, china
“Significant political, trade, or regulatory developments in the jurisdictions in which we may sell our products, if approved, such as those stemming from the change in U.S. federal administration, are difficult to predict and may have a material adverse effect on us. Similarly, changes in U.S. federal policy that affect the geopolitical landscape could give rise to circumstances outside our control that could have negative impacts on our business operations. The U.S. has imposed tariffs on a significant number of imports to the U.S. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (103)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 5 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

•WeIf havewe identifiedidentify material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and our management has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2023 and 2024. If we fail to remediate these material weaknesses, or if we identify additional material weaknessesreporting in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting in the future,reporting, we may not be able to accurately or timely report our financial condition or results of operations, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the trading price of our common stock may decline.

Reworded

•If we are unable to obtain, maintain and enforce intellectual property protection covering our products,products and any future products we may develop, others may be able to make, use or sell products substantially the same as ours, which could adversely affect our ability to compete in the market.

Reworded

•OurOthers may allege that our products couldinfringe infringetheir patents and other property rights of others,rights, which may result in costly litigation and, if we are not successful, could cause us to pay substantial damages or limit our ability to commercialize our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Reworded

•Clinical trials are expensive and take years to conduct andconduct, the outcome of such clinical trials is uncertain.uncertain and results of earlier studies and trials may not be predictive of future trial results. Clinical trials may fail to prove our product candidates are safe and effective.

Reworded

•Our business involves the controlled use of hazardous materials,materials and as such we are subject to environmental and occupational safety laws. Continued compliance with these laws may incur substantial costs and failure to maintain compliance could result in liability for damages that may exceed our resources.

Removed

Our business is susceptible to general conditions in the global economy and in the global financial markets. A global financial crisis or a global or regional political disruption could cause extreme volatility in the capital and credit markets. A severe or prolonged economic downturn, including a recession or depression resulting from the political disruption, could result in a variety of risks to our business, including weakened demand for our current or future product candidates, if approved, and our ability to raise additional capital when needed on acceptable terms, if at all. A weak or declining economy or political disruption could also strain our manufacturers or suppliers, possibly resulting in supply disruption, or cause our customers to delay making payments for our potential drugs, if approved. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and sanctions against Russia are causing disruptions to global economic conditions. The escalation in October 2023 of the conflict between Israel and Hamas also could cause disruptions to global economic conditions and affect the stability of the Middle East region. Further, the global equity markets in general have recently experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, including as a result of economic uncertainty and increased interest rates, inflation, the government closure of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, and liquidity concerns at other financial institutions that may be unrelated to our operating performance. Any of the foregoing could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, and we cannot anticipate all of the ways in which the political or economic climate and financial market conditions could adversely impact our business.

Reworded

We believe our existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, together with interest thereon and expected milestones and royalty payments will be sufficient to fund our operations intothrough 2028. However, changing circumstances or inaccurate estimates by us may cause us to use capital significantly faster than we currently anticipate, and we may need to spend more money than currently expected because of circumstances beyond our control. We do not have sufficient cash to complete the clinical development of any of our product candidates and will require additional funding to complete the development activities required for regulatory approval of our current product candidates or any other future product candidates that we develop independently. Because successful development of our product candidates is uncertain, we are unable to estimate the actual funds we will require to complete research and development and commercialize our product candidates. Adequate additional financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations;considerations, even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or any future commercialization efforts.

Reworded

Pursuant to our 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (2023 Plan), subject to the Board of Directors approval, our management is authorized to grant stock options and other equity-based awards to our employees, directors and consultants. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had optionsoutstanding to purchase 12,370,08112,956,592 shares outstandingof stock options and 1,981,345 shares of restricted stock units under our equity compensation plans. In addition, we are also authorized to grant equity awards, including stock options,awards to our employees, directors, and consultants, covering up to 18,367,00019,878,573 shares of our common stock, pursuant to our equity compensation plans. We plan to register the number of shares available for issuance or subject to outstanding awards under our equity compensation plans.

Reworded

On February 27, 2023, we filed an automatic universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-270030) as a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which became effective upon filing (the Shelf Registration Statement). The Shelf Registration Statement allows us to offer an indeterminate amount of securities, including equity securities, debt securities, warrants, rights, units and depositary shares, from time to time as described in the Shelf Registration Statement. The specific terms of any offering under the Shelf Registration Statement will be established at the time of such offering. The Shelf Registration Statement will expire on February 27, 2026. We plan to file a new shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC simultaneously with, or promptly after, the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which would replace the Shelf Registration Statement.

Removed

If our internal control over financial reporting is not effective, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or file our periodic reports in a timely manner, which may cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and may lead to a decline in our stock price.

Removed

Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports in a timely manner. If we fail to adequately staff our accounting and finance function to address the additional demands that will be placed upon us as a public company, including the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or fail to maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting, it could prevent our management from concluding our internal control over financial reporting is effective and impair our ability to prevent material misstatements in our financial statements, which could cause our business to suffer.

Removed

As a large accelerated filer, we are subject to additional internal control requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Reworded

Our net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards generated in tax years ending on or prior to December 31, 2017, are only permitted to be carried forward for 20 years under applicable U.S. tax law. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”), our federal NOLs generated in tax years ending after December 31, 2017, may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such federal NOLs generated in tax years beginning after December 31, 2021, is limited. Under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and corresponding provisions of state law, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” which is generally defined as a greater than 50% change, by value, in its equity ownership over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change NOL carryforwards and other pre-change U.S. tax attributes (such as research tax credits) to offset its post-change income or taxes may be limited. It is also possible that we have in the past undergone, and in the future may undergo, ownership changes that could result in additional limitations on our net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.

Removed

Requirements associated with being a public reporting company will continue to increase our costs significantly, as well as divert significant company resources and management attention.

Removed

We have been subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and the other rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) since December 2013. Effective for the year-ended December 31, 2016, we became a large accelerated filer and are subject to additional internal control and SEC reporting obligations. Compliance with the various reporting and other requirements applicable to public reporting companies requires considerable time, attention of management, and financial resources.

Removed

Further, the listing requirements of The Nasdaq Global Market require that we satisfy certain corporate governance requirements relating to director independence, distributing annual and interim reports, stockholder meetings, approvals, and voting, soliciting proxies, conflicts of interest and a code of conduct. Our management and other personnel need to devote a substantial amount of time to ensure that we comply with all of these requirements. Moreover, the reporting requirements, rules and regulations increase our legal and financial compliance costs and also make some activities more time-consuming and costly. These reporting requirements, rules, and regulations, coupled with the increase in potential litigation exposure associated with being a public company, could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors or Board committees or to serve as executive officers, or to obtain certain types of insurance, including directors’ and officers’ insurance, on acceptable terms.

Removed

In addition, being a public company could make it more difficult or more costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of these events could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors, our Board committees, or as executive officers.

Removed

Any changes we make to comply with these obligations may not be sufficient to allow us to satisfy our obligations as a public company on a timely basis, or at all.

Reworded

Our ability to effectively monitor and respond to the rapid and evolving developments and expectations relating to sustainability, including the environmental, social and governance matters, may impose unexpected costs or resultsresult in reputational or other harm that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Reworded

There ishas an increasingbeen focus from certain investors, employees, regulators and other stakeholders concerning corporate responsibility and sustainability matters, including with regard to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) factors. Some investors and investor groups may use these factors, either positively or negatively, to guide investment strategies and decisions and, in some cases, investors may choose not to invest in us if they believe our policies or practices relating to corporate responsibility and sustainability do not align with their expectations.

Reworded

Currently, aA variety of third-party providers of corporate responsibility and sustainability ratings measure the performance of companies on sustainability or ESG topics, and the results of these assessments are widely publicized. Investors, particularly institutional investors, use these ratings to benchmark companies against their peers, and major institutional investors have publicly emphasized the importance of sustainability or ESG measures to their investment decisions. Topics taken into account in such assessments include, among others, companies’ efforts and impacts on climate change, human rights, business ethics and compliance, diversity,pay equity and inclusion (DEI)inclusion, and the role of companies’ board of directors in overseeing various sustainability-related issues. In light of investors’ increased focus on sustainability matters, ifIf we are, for example,are perceived as lagging in taking steps with respect to sustainability or ESG initiatives, certain investors may seek to engage with us on improving our ESGsustainability-related disclosures or performance. They may also make voting decisions or take other actions to hold us and our Board of Directors accountable.

Added

However, a growing number of States in the U.S. have proposed or enacted policies, legislation or initiatives or issued related legal opinions prohibiting reliance on ‘ESG’ frameworks, scoring methodologies and related factors in business and investment decision-making which may be deemed non-pecuniary in nature. Simultaneously, there has been increasing scrutiny on the legality of corporate diversity, equity and inclusion (“DEI”) practices. While we comply with the law, given the breadth and divergence of views, policies, legislation, initiatives and regulation regarding ESG matters, we could be sued, challenged, investigated, penalized or ‘boycotted’ for our sustainability, including our human capital management, policies and/or programs, be it for the scope of such initiatives or goals or the perception of not acting in a sufficiently responsible manner in connection with these matters. If we were sued under any of these claims, or were subject to state or federal enforcement action, our financial condition, reputation or business could be adversely impacted. While we remain focused on evaluating financially material considerations in our business, if market participants or investors subject to such legislation viewed our business practices as being in breach of ESG-related federal, state or local policies, legislation or legal opinions, it could increase our compliance costs, impact our reputation and/or negatively affect our operations, financial condition and/or value of our Common Stock.

Reworded

InThere addition,have therealso are rapidlybeen evolving developments and changing expectations relating to sustainability matters. As a result, the criteria by which our corporate responsibility and sustainability practices are assessed may change, which could cause us to undertake costly initiatives or actions to satisfy new demands. If we elect not to or are unable to adequately recognize and respond to such developments and changing governmental, societal, investor and/or consumer expectations relating to sustainability matters, we may miss corporate opportunities, become subject to additional scrutiny or incur unexpected costs. We may face risk of litigation or reputational damage in the event that our sustainability policies or practices do not meet the standards set by various constituencies.

Added

Further, to the extent we consider such factors, any sustainability-related initiatives, considerations or business practices that we may undertake are intended to solely support value preservation and value generation for the company and to improve our long-term financial performance. However, such initiatives may not result in the financial effects we anticipate, and could, in some circumstances, adversely affect our short-term financial results, have financial effects that conflict with the market’s or our stockholders’ expectations and/or otherwise adversely impact our reputation. Such impacts or effects may not be discernible for a number of years.

Removed

Further, our emphasis on sustainability issues may not maximize short-term financial results and may yield financial results that conflict with the market’s expectations. We may in the future make business decisions consistent with our sustainability goals that we believe, based on considered analysis, will create value and improve our financial performance over the long-term. These decisions, however, may not be consistent with the short-term expectations of our stockholders and may not produce the long-term benefits that we expect, in which case our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed.

Reworded

WeIf havewe identifiedidentify material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and our management has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2023 and 2024. If we fail to remediate these material weaknesses, or if we identify additional material weaknessesreporting in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting in the future,reporting, we may not be able to accurately or timely report our financial condition or results of operations, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the trading price of our common stock may decline.

Reworded

We previously concluded that certain periods ofPreviously, our historical financial statements should no longer be relied upon and should be restated to reflect the correct accounting for the sale of future royalties pursuant to the Ultomiris Royalty Sale Agreement and to account for additional tax liabilities. In addition, on February 7, 2025, RSM informed us that disclosure should be made or action should be taken to prevent future reliance on RSM’s audit report filed with the Original Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 and completed interim review related to previously issued financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2024, June 30, 2024 and September 30, 2024. In connection with this restatement, our management re-evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2023, and our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2023 due to material weaknesses (a material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis) related to the design of controls related to the review of the accounting treatment of the non-routine transactions and the evaluation of certain tax legislation. These material weaknesses led to the restatement of our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023 and the unaudited financial statements for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2024, June 30, 2024 and September 30, 2024. On February 24, 2025, we filed an Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2023 and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q/As for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2024, June 30, 2024 and September 30, 2024.

Reworded

We are in the process of implementing remediation plans to addressremediated these material weaknesses.weaknesses Whileduring the year ended December 31, 2025 and we believe thesewe effortshave will improveimproved our internal controls and addressaddressed the root causes of the material weaknesses, theprior material weaknessesweaknesses. cannotHowever, be considered completely remediated until applicable controls have been designed, implemented, have operated for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. Wewe cannot be certain that the steps we are takingtook will be sufficient to remediate the control deficiencies that led to the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting or prevent future material weaknesses or control deficiencies from occurring. In addition, we cannot be certain that we have identified all material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, or that in the future we will not have additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. For more information related to the material weaknesses and their remediation, see Part II, Item 9A Controls and Procedures of this Form 10-K.

Reworded

Our commercial success depends, in part, on our ability to obtain, maintain and enforce patents, trade secrets, trademarks and other intellectual property rights and to operate without having third parties infringe, misappropriate or circumvent the rights that we own or license. The value of many of our partnered licensing arrangements is based on the underlying intellectual property and related patents. If we are unable to obtain, maintain and enforce intellectual property protection covering our products or underlying technologies, others may be able to make, use or sell products that are substantially the same as ours without incurring the sizeablesizable development and licensing costs that we have incurred, which would adversely affect our ability to compete in the market. We file patent applications in the United States, Canada, Japan, Europe and other major markets either directly or via the Patent Cooperation Treaty. Our ability to stop third parties from making, using, selling, offering to sell or importing our product candidates is dependent upon the extent to which we have rights under valid and enforceable patents or trade secrets that cover these activities. However, the patent positions of biopharmaceutical companies, including ours, can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions for which important legal principles remain unresolved. No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in patents in these fields has emerged to date in the United States. The U.S. patent laws have recently changed, there have been changes regarding how patent laws are interpreted, and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO) has also implemented changes to the patent system. Some of these changes are currently being litigated, and we cannot accurately determine the outcome of any such proceedings or predict future changes in the interpretation of patent laws or changes to patent laws which might be enacted into law. Those changes may materially affect our patents, our ability to obtain patents or the patents and applications of our collaborators and licensors. The patent situation in the biopharmaceutical industry outside the United States is even more uncertain. Therefore, there is no assurance that our pending patent applications will result in the issuance of patents or that we will develop additional proprietary products which are patentable. Moreover, patents issued or to be issued to us may not provide us with any competitive advantage. Our patent position is subject to numerous additional risks, including the following:

Reworded

6.we could inadvertently abandon a patent or patent application, resulting in the loss of protection of certain intellectual property rights in a certain country. We, our collaboratorscollaborators, or,or our patent counsel may take action resulting in a patent or patent application becoming abandoned which may not be able to be reinstated or if reinstated, may suffer patent term adjustments;

Reworded

Furthermore, changes in U.S. patent law under the America Invents Act allows for post-issuance challenges to U.S. patents, including ex parte reexaminations, inter partepartes reviewsreview and post-grant review. There is significant uncertainty as to how the new laws will be applied and if our U.S. patents are challenged using such procedures, we may not prevail, possibly resulting in altered or diminished claim scope or loss of patent rights altogether. Similarly, some countries, notably members of the European Union, also have post grantpost-grant opposition proceedings that can result in changes in scope and/or cancellation of patent claims.

Reworded

OurOthers may allege that our products couldinfringe infringetheir patents and other property rights of others,rights, which may result in costly litigation and, if we are not successful, could cause us to pay substantial damages or limit our ability to commercialize our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Reworded

Our commercial success depends upon our ability, and the ability of our collaborators, to develop, manufacture, market and sell our product candidates and use our proprietary technologies without infringing the patents and other proprietary rights of third parties. There is considerable intellectual property litigation in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. For example, we are aware of issued patents owned by Merus B.V. (Merus) that may relate to and claim components of our bispecific antibody product candidates and partnered bispecific product candidates, including plamotamab, vudalimab and XmAb819 will putatively expire in 2033. In August 2024, Merus filed suit against us in the United States District Court of the District of Delaware alleging that we have infringed threecertain claims of its patents. WeOn maintainOctober 10, 2024, we filed a motion to dismiss the Merus complaint with prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6), in which we argued that our developmentall of these candidates currently falls into the “safeactivities harbor”accused of non-infringementinfringement underare covered by the 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1). Thissafe protection,harbor. however,Merus wouldfiled notits beresponse availableto uponour commercializationmotion noron canOctober 31, 2024, and we givereplied assurancesto Merus’ response on howNovember 14, 2024. On September 30, 2025, the Court wouldgranted rulethe motion to dismiss Merus’ complaint, but permitted Merus to file an amended complaint. On November 11, 2025, Merus filed a first amended complaint, and asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,944,695, 9,358,286, 11,926,859, and 12,123,043. On December 16, 2025, we filed a motion to dismiss the first amended complaint on thisthe issue.same Wegrounds alsopreviously believeasserted. Briefing on the motion to dismiss is ongoing, and the Court held a hearing on the motion to dismiss on February 17, 2026. On February 11, 2025, we havefiled strongfor defensesinter topartes Merus’s claims, including defensesreview of invalidityMerus’ U.S. Patent Nos. 9,358,286 and/or non-infringement11,926,859 before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Appeal Board seeking a finding that certain claims of those patents are unpatentable. On September 26, 2025, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Appeal Board granted institution of the inter partes review. A schedule for the Merusinter patents,partes butreview therehas been set, and oral argument is noscheduled guaranteefor thatJune we24, will prevail.2026. If we are found to infringe the Merus patents, we may be ordered by a court to cease commercializing the applicable product candidates, which could materially harm our business. In addition, we could be found liable for monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees if we are found to have willfully infringed the Merus patents.

Added

Third parties may infringe one or more of our issued patents or trademarks. We cannot predict if, when or where a third party may infringe one or more of our issued patents or trademarks. To counter infringement, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time consuming. There is no assurance that we would be successful in a court of law in proving that a third party is infringing one or more of our issued patents or trademarks. Any claims we assert against perceived infringers could also provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against us, alleging that we infringe their intellectual property. In addition, in a patent infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours is invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, construe the patent’s claims narrowly and/or refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question, any of which may adversely affect our business. Even if we are successful in proving in a court of law that a third party is infringing one or more of our issued patents or trademarks there can be no assurance that we would be successful in halting their infringing activities, for example, through a permanent injunction, or that we would be fully or even partially financially compensated for any harm to our business. We may be forced to enter into a license or other agreement with the infringing third party at terms less profitable or otherwise commercially acceptable to us than if the license or agreement were negotiated under conditions between those of a willing licensee and a willing licensor. We may not become aware of a third-party infringer within legal timeframes for compensation or at all, thereby possibly losing the ability to be compensated for any harm to our business. Such a third party may be operating in a foreign country where the infringer is difficult to locate and/or the intellectual property laws may be more difficult to enforce. Some third-party infringers may be able to sustain the costs of complex infringement litigation more effectively than we can because they have substantially greater resources. Any inability to stop third-party infringement could result in loss in market share of some of our products or even lead to a delay, reduction and/or inhibition of the development, manufacture, or sale of certain products by us. There is no assurance that a product produced and sold by a third-party infringer would meet our or other regulatory standards or would be safe for use. Such third-party infringer products could irreparably harm the reputation of our products thereby resulting in substantial loss in market share and profits.

Added

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Added

Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on our product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive. The requirements for patentability may differ in certain countries, particularly developing countries. For example, China has a heightened requirement for patentability, and specifically requires a detailed description of medical uses of a claimed drug. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as laws in the United States. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the United States. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection, but enforcement on infringing activities is inadequate. These products may compete with our product candidates, and our patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing. Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to biopharmaceuticals, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing products in violation of our proprietary rights generally. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. In addition, certain countries in Europe and certain developing countries, including India and China, have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties. In those countries, we may have limited remedies if our patents are infringed or if we are compelled to grant a license to our patents to a third party, which could materially diminish the value of those patents. This could limit our potential revenue opportunities. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we own or license. Finally, our ability to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights may be adversely affected by unforeseen changes in foreign intellectual property laws.

Reworded

We rely on third-party manufacturers to manufacture our product candidates and provide supplies for our studies. If any of our third-party manufacturers,manufacturers encounter problems or loss of drug material during production or otherwise fail to comply with their contractual obligations, the development of our product candidates could be delayed or stopped.

Added

Any replacement of our manufacturers could require significant effort and expertise because there may be a limited number of qualified replacements. The process of changing manufacturers is extensive and time-consuming and could cause delays or interruptions in our product or product candidate supply. Further, if we are required to change manufacturers for any reason, we will be required to verify that the new manufacturer maintains facilities and procedures that comply with all applicable regulations and guidelines, including cGMPs, and that the post-change material is comparable to pre-change. The delays associated with the verification of a new manufacturer could negatively affect our ability to develop product candidates in a timely manner or within budget. We may also be required to provide additional data to regulatory authorities in order to use any alternative components, equipment, materials or disposables, any of which could set back, delay, or increase the costs required to complete our clinical development and commercialization of our product candidates. Additionally, any such change or modification may adversely affect the safety, efficacy, stability, or potency of our product candidates, and could adversely affect our clinical development of our product candidates and harm our business.

Added

Certain of our third-party manufacturers are located outside the United States, and our ability to continue to receive drug material for our development candidates would be at-risk in the event of instability or geopolitical problems between the United States and the countries where these manufacturers are located. Under recent legislation, certain third-party manufacturers and other third parties (frequently China-based companies) may be considered a ‘biotechnology company of concern.’ If a third-party manufacturer receives such a designation, it may restrict the ability of U.S. companies like us to purchase services or products from, collaborate with, or otherwise work with such manufacturers. For example, it may delay the procurement or supply of such material or have an adverse effect on our ability to secure significant commitments from governments to purchase our potential therapies. Such disruption could have adverse effects on the development of our product candidates.

Added

If our current vendors become unable for any reason, or unwilling to perform their required activities, we could experience protracted delays or interruptions in the supply of clinical trial material or any future approved product for commercial sale, which could materially and adversely affect our development programs, commercial activities, operating results, and financial condition. Any new manufacturer would be required to qualify under applicable regulatory requirements. In some cases, the technical skills or technology required to manufacture our clinical trial material may be unique or proprietary to the original manufacturer and we may have difficulty transferring such skills or technology to another third party and a feasible alternative may not exist. These factors would increase our reliance on such manufacturers or require us to obtain a license from them in order to have another third party manufacture our product candidates or any future approved product. If we are required to change manufacturers for any reason, we will be required to verify that the new manufacturer maintains facilities and procedures that comply with quality standards and with all applicable regulations and guidelines. In some cases, the FDA or applicable foreign regulatory authority may require us to conduct additional clinical or nonclinical studies, collect additional stability data, and provide additional information concerning any new manufacturer before we could distribute products from that manufacturer. The process of identifying, verifying and transitioning to a new manufacturer could significantly delay development or regulatory approval of our product candidates or delay or disrupt commercialization of any approved product and substantially increase costs or result in significant loss of product sales and associated revenue.

Reworded

Certain of our third-party manufacturers are located outside the United States, and our ability to continue to receive drug material for our development candidates would be at-risk in the event of instability or geopolitical problems between the United States and the country's where these manufacturers are located. During the last few years, there have also been significant changes to U.S. and other countries’ trade policies, export control laws, sanctions, legislation, treaties and tariffs. There is currently significant uncertainty about the future of trade relationships around the world, including potential changes to trade laws and regulations, trade policies, and tariffs. We cannot predict what additional actions may ultimately be taken by the United States or other governments with respect to tariffs or trade relations, what products may be subject to such actions (including subject to U.S. export control restrictions), or what actions may be taken by the other countries in retaliation. As a result of these dynamics, we cannot predict the impact to our relationships with third-party manufacturers or our business of any future changes to the United States’ or other countries’ trading relationships or the impact of new laws or regulations adopted by the United States or other countries.

Reworded

In some cases, there may be only one or few providers of such services, including clinical data management or manufacturing services. In addition, the cost of such services could be significantly increased over time. We rely on third parties and collaborators as mentioned above to enroll qualified patients and conduct, supervise and monitor our clinical trials. Our reliance on these third parties and collaborators for clinical development activities reduces our control over these activities. Our reliance on these parties, however, does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities, including ensuring that our clinical trials are conducted in accordance with GCP regulations and the investigational plan and protocols contained in the regulatory agency applications. In addition, these third parties may not complete activities on schedule or may not manufacture under GMP conditions. Preclinical or clinical studies may not be performed or completed in accordance with Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) or other regulatory requirements or our trial design. If these third parties or collaborators do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines,deadlines or regulatory requirements, obtaining regulatory approval for manufacturing and commercialization of our product candidates may be delayed or prevented. We rely substantially on third-party data managers for our clinical trial data. There is no assurance that these third parties will not make errors in the design, management or retention of our data or data systems. There is no assurance these third parties will pass FDA or regulatory audits, which could delay or prohibit regulatory approval. Moreover, our business may be significantly impacted if our CROs, clinical investigators or other third parties violate federal or state healthcare fraud and abuse or false claims laws and regulations or healthcare privacy and security laws.

Added

If any of our relationships with these third parties terminate, we may not be able to enter into alternative arrangements or do so on commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding additional contractors involves additional cost and time and requires management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new third party commences work. As a result, delays could occur, which could compromise our ability to meet our desired development timelines. In addition, if an agreement with any of our collaborators terminates, our access to technology and intellectual property licensed to us by that collaborator may be restricted or terminate entirely, which may delay our continued development of our product candidates utilizing the collaborator’s technology or intellectual property or require us to stop development of those product candidates completely.

Reworded

Each product candidate must receive regulatory approval and therefore must undergo rigorous and extensive preclinical studies and clinical trials to demonstrate safety and efficacy in patients. Clinical trials at any stage in development may fail to demonstrate the safety, efficacy or pharmacologic properties needed to be a viable product candidate in patients. Early clinical trials are expensive and can take many years to complete and may fail to demonstrate the safety and pharmacokinetic characteristics needed to invest in larger later stage clinical studies. Alternatively, success in preclinical testing and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will generate the same results or otherwise provide adequate data to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of a product candidate .candidate. Later clinical studies that are larger may not demonstrate the desired safety and efficacy profile needed to be of benefit to patients. Additionally,Results regulatoryfrom authoritiespreclinical maystudies determineand thatclinical trials can be interpreted in different ways. Even if we believe the preclinical or clinical data provided is not sufficient to grant marketing approval for our product candidates andare promising, such data may not be sufficient to support approval by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Additionally, regulatory authorities may request additional data including additional clinical trials or reject product approval.

Added

In addition, the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities may change their policies, issue additional regulations or revise existing regulations, or take other actions, which may prevent or delay approval of our future products under development on a timely basis. There remains substantial uncertainty as to how the current U.S. administration will seek or continue to modify or revise the requirements and policies of the FDA and other regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over our product candidates. This uncertainty could present new challenges or potential opportunities as we navigate the clinical development and approval process for our product candidates. Such policy or regulatory changes through, for example, executive orders or legislation could impose additional requirements upon us that could delay our ability to obtain approvals or increase the costs of compliance.

Reworded

Conducting early clinical trials is complex and the outcomes are uncertain. Preclinical studies are performed to help inform human clinical trials, but human and animal studies are not comparable. Expected or unexpected undesirable side effects caused by our product candidates or other reasons could cause us, our collaborators or regulatory authorities to delay, suspend or terminate clinical trials and could result in themore delay,restrictive suspensionlabeling or terminationthe delay or denial of clinicalregulatory trialsapproval by us, our collaborators, the FDA or othercomparable foreign regulatory authorities for a number of reasons.authority. If we elect or are required to delay, suspend or terminate any clinical trial of any product candidates that we develop, the commercial prospects of such product candidates will be harmed and our ability to generate product revenues from any of these product candidates will be delayed or eliminated. If our product candidates are associated with adverse events in clinical trials or have side effects or other characteristics that are serious or unexpected, we may need to abandon their development or limit development to more narrow uses in which the adverse events, side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective. We may also be required to modify our trial plans based on findings in our ongoing clinical trials. The FDA may also require that we conduct additional studies regarding the safety and efficacy of our product candidates which we have not planned or anticipated. Such findings could further result in regulatory authorities failing to provide marketing authorization for our product candidates or limiting the scope of the approved indication,indication or imposing post-market safety restrictions, if approved. Many product candidates that initially showed promise in early stage testing have later been found to cause side effects that prevented further development of such product candidates.

Added

We have conducted, are currently conducting, and may in the future conduct clinical trials for our product candidates outside the United States, and the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities may not accept data from such trials.

Added

We have conducted, are currently conducting, and may in the future conduct one or more clinical trials of our current or future product candidates outside the United States. The acceptance of study data from clinical trials conducted outside the United States or another jurisdiction by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority may be subject to certain conditions or may not be accepted at all. In cases where data from foreign clinical trials are intended to serve as the basis for marketing approval in the United States, the FDA will generally not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless (i) the data are applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice; (ii) the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence; and (iii) the data may be considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection by the FDA or, if the FDA considers such an inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. Additionally, the FDA’s clinical trial requirements, including sufficient size of patient populations and statistical power, must be met. Many foreign regulatory authorities have similar approval requirements. In addition, such foreign trials would be subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the trials are conducted. There can be no assurance that the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority will accept data from trials conducted outside of the United States or the applicable jurisdiction. If the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data, we would need to conduct additional trials, which could be costly and time-consuming.

Reworded

•obtaining institutional review Board of Directorsboard approval to conduct one or more clinical trials at a prospective site;

Added

We may seek Fast Track or other accelerated review designations for some or all of our product candidates. We may not receive such designation, and even for those product candidates for which we do, it may not lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process, and will not increase the likelihood that product candidates will receive marketing approval.

Added

We may seek Fast Track or other accelerated review designations for some or all of our other product candidates. If a drug or biologic is intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition or disease, and nonclinical or clinical data demonstrate the potential to address an unmet medical need, the product may qualify for FDA Fast Track designation, for which sponsors must apply. If granted, a Fast Track or other accelerated review designation makes a product candidate eligible for more frequent interactions with the FDA to discuss the development plan and clinical trial design, as well as rolling review of the application, which means that we can submit completed sections of our marketing application for review prior to completion of the entire submission. Marketing applications of product candidates with a Fast Track or other accelerated review designation may qualify for priority review under the policies and procedures offered by the FDA, but a Fast Track or other accelerated review designation does not assure any such qualification or ultimate marketing approval by the FDA. The FDA has broad discretion with respect to whether or not to grant this designation. Thus, even if we believe a particular product candidate is eligible for this designation, the FDA may decide not to grant it. Moreover, even if we do receive a Fast Track or another accelerated review designation, we or our collaborators may not experience a faster development process, review or approval compared to conventional FDA procedures. Access to an expedited program does not change the standards for approval. In addition, the FDA may withdraw a Fast Track or other accelerated review designation if it believes that the designation is no longer supported by data from our clinical development program.

Added

A variety of risks associated with conducting research and clinical trials abroad and marketing our product candidates internationally could materially adversely affect our business.

Added

We plan to globally develop our product candidates. In addition, our enrollment timelines for our product candidates depend on initiating clinical trial sites outside of the United States. Accordingly, we expect that we will be subject to additional risks related to operating in foreign countries, including:

Added

•differing regulatory requirements in foreign countries;

Added

•unexpected changes in tariffs, trade barriers, price and exchange controls and other regulatory requirements;

Added

•differing standards and privacy requirements for the conduct of clinical trials;

Added

•increased difficulties in managing the logistics and transportation of storing and shipping product candidates produced in the United States and shipping the product candidate to the patient abroad;

Added

•import and export requirements and restrictions;

Added

•economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in particular foreign economies and markets;

Added

•compliance with tax, employment, immigration and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad;

Showing the first 60 of 103 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

75new paragraphs
49removed paragraphs
2reworded paragraphs
3,880 → 4,243words in section

New heading “The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. This Item generally discusses 2025 and 2024 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2025 and 2024. Discussions of 2023 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2024 and 2023 are not included, and can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.”

New heading “RESULTS OF OPERATIONS”

New heading “(1) Other income (expense), net, included interest income, interest expense, gain/loss on marketable equity securities and asset impairment charges.”

New heading “Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024”

New heading “Research and Development (R&D) Expenses”

New heading “(1) We have retrospectively adjusted segment operating expenses for the years ended on December 31, 2024 and 2023 to reflect the significant segment expenses as currently reviewed by our CODM.”

New heading “General and Administrative Expenses”

New heading “Other Income (Expense)”

New heading “LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES”

New heading “Funding Requirements”

New heading “Contractual Obligations and Commitments”

New heading “CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES”

New heading “Revenue Recognition”

New heading “Accrued Research and Development Expenses”

New heading “Liability Related to the Sale of Future Royalties”

New heading “Stock-Based Compensation”

New heading “Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements”

Removed heading “You should read the following discussion and analysis together with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” in Item 1A, and other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results.”

Removed heading “Strategic Portfolio Prioritization”

Removed heading “Advancements in Our Clinical Portfolio of XmAb Drug Candidates”

Removed heading “Oncology Programs”

Removed heading “Autoimmune Disease Programs”

Removed heading “Additional Clinical-Stage XmAb Drug Candidate”

Removed heading “Advancements Expanding XmAb Bispecific Platforms”

Removed heading “Progress Across Partnerships”

Removed heading “Product Licenses”

Removed heading “Novel Bispecific Antibody Collaborations”

Removed heading “Technology License Agreements”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: securities and exchange commission
“You should read the following discussion and analysis together with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” in Item 1A, and other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: impairment
“(1) Other income (expense), net, included interest income, interest expense, gain/loss on marketable equity securities and asset impairment charges.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: liquidity
“LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES”
see in full comparison
New text
“The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. This Item generally discusses 2025 and 2024 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2025 and 2024. Discussions of 2023 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2024 and 2023 are not included, and can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: labor
“Novel Bispecific Antibody Collaborations”
see in full comparison
New text
“(1) We have retrospectively adjusted segment operating expenses for the years ended on December 31, 2024 and 2023 to reflect the significant segment expenses as currently reviewed by our CODM.”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (126)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Added

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. This Item generally discusses 2025 and 2024 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2025 and 2024. Discussions of 2023 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2024 and 2023 are not included, and can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.

Removed

You should read the following discussion and analysis together with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” in Item 1A, and other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results.

Reworded

WeAs discussed in Part I, Item 1, Business, we are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering and developing engineered antibody therapeutics to treat patients with cancer and autoimmuneother serious diseases, who have unmet medical needs. We useLeveraging our proprietary protein engineering capabilitiescapabilities, toincluding our XmAb® Fc domain technologies, we design new technologies and XmAb®advance novel antibody-based drug candidates with improved properties. We advance these candidates into clinical-stage development, where we are conducting Phase 1functionality and Phasetherapeutic 2 studies for a broad portfolio of programs, to determine which programs we advance into later stages of development and potentially commercialization, which programs we partner to access complementary resources to optimize development, and which programs we discontinue.potential.

Added

We advance selected candidates through clinical development, while also partnering with programs to access complementary development and commercialization capabilities. Our portfolio spans early- and mid-stage clinical programs, and our strategic approach emphasizes disciplined portfolio management, including advancing, partnering, or discontinuing programs based on clinical data and development priorities. Three marketed medicines have been developed using our XmAb technologies.

Added

Refer to Part I, Item 1, Business, for a more detailed discussion of our business, technology platforms, pipeline, and key developments.

Added

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Added

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the following periods indicated:

Added

(1) Other income (expense), net, included interest income, interest expense, gain/loss on marketable equity securities and asset impairment charges.

Added

Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024

Added

Revenues

Added

Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $15.1 million from the same period of 2024. The change was primarily driven by the revenue recognition associated with Alexion and Incyte license agreements as discussed below. See Note 2, Collaboration and Licensing Agreements of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Part II, “Item 8. Financial Statements and Schedule” for more information on revenue recognized under the collaboration and license agreements.

Added

Alexion: In January 2013, we entered into an Option and License Agreement (the “Alexion Agreement”) with Alexion. Under the terms of the Alexion Agreement, we granted to Alexion an exclusive research license, with limited sublicensing rights, to make and use our Xtend technology to evaluate and advance compounds. Alexion exercised its rights to one target program, ALXN1210, which is now marketed as Ultomiris®.

Added

Under the Alexion Agreement, we recognized $70.1 million and $58.2 million of non-cash royalty revenue for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Added

Incyte: In June 2010, we entered into a Collaboration and License Agreement with MorphoSys AG, which was subsequently amended in 2012, 2020 and 2024 (as amended, the “MorphoSys Agreement”). The MorphoSys Agreement provides MorphoSys AG with an exclusive worldwide license to our patents and know-how to research, develop, and commercialize our XmAb5574 product candidate (subsequently renamed MOR208 and tafasitamab) with the right to sublicense under certain conditions. If certain developmental, regulatory and sales milestones are achieved, we are eligible to receive future milestone payments and royalties. In February 2024, Incyte assumed all of MorphoSys AG’s right, title and interest under the MorphoSys Agreement.

Added

In February 2025, the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) accepted Incyte’s submission of a supplemental biologics license application, triggering a $12.5 million milestone payment to the Company, and approved the application in June 2025, triggering an additional $25.0 million milestone payment to the Company. Both milestone payments were received by the Company in 2025. In addition, Incyte dosed two patients in a Phase 2 study on December 29, 2025, one patient with immune thrombocytopenia and one patient with autoimmune hemolytic anemia, triggering a $4.0 million milestone payment to the Company which was paid in January 2026.

Added

In addition, under the MorphoSys Agreement, we recognized $10.2 million and $8.7 million of non-cash royalty revenue for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.

Added

Amgen: In September 2015, we entered into a Research and License Agreement (the “Amgen Agreement”) with Amgen to develop and commercialize bispecific antibody product candidates using our proprietary XmAb® bispecific Fc technology. In December 2024, Amgen initiated a Phase 3 clinical study of xaluritamig, which triggered a $30.0 million milestone payment received in January 2025.

Added

Novartis: In June 2016, we entered into a Collaboration and License Agreement (the “Novartis Agreement”) with Novartis to develop and commercialize bispecific and other Fc-engineered antibody product candidates using our proprietary XmAb® technologies. In 2024, Novartis initiated a Phase 2 clinical study for the Fc product candidate, resulting in $4.0 million of revenue recognized under the Novartis Agreement.

Added

Mabgeek: On December 22, 2023, we entered into a Technology License Agreement with Mabgeek. On June 21, 2024, the parties entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Technology License Agreement (as amended, the “Mabgeek Agreement”). Under the Mabgeek Agreement, we received an upfront payment of $1.5 million, which was recognized as revenue, and is eligible to receive royalties in the low single digits on net sales of approved products. We evaluated the Mabgeek Agreement and determined that it contains a single performance obligation—access to a non-exclusive license to certain of our patents, which was transferred to Mabgeek in June 2024. Mabgeek’s Phase 3 study achieved the milestone of database lock in Mainland China on November 20, 2025, triggering a $1.8 million milestone payment, which will be received in the first quarter of 2026.

Added

Vir Bio: In 2019, we entered into a Patent License Agreement (the “Vir Bio Agreement”) with Vir Bio, granting a non-exclusive license to our Xtend technology for up to two targets. In March 2025, Vir Bio initiated a Phase 3 study for tobevibart, triggering a $2.0 million milestone payment to us, which was paid in the second quarter of 2025.

Added

Research and Development (R&D) Expenses

Added

R&D expenses consist of external and internal costs incurred in the discovery and development of product candidates and new technologies. External R&D expenses primarily include costs for preclinical studies, clinical trials, and fees paid to third-party service providers, including CROs and CMOs, for activities such as clinical trial management, manufacturing and process development, IND-enabling toxicology studies, and formulation of clinical drug supplies. Internal R&D expenses primarily include salaries, benefits, and other personnel-related costs, supplies, and allocated overhead, including facility costs.

Added

Clinical trial expenses may fluctuate from period to period due to changes in trial stage, patient enrollment, service provider costs, and the initiation or completion of clinical programs. We expect this variability to continue as our development programs progress. We expect future R&D expenses to increase compared to recent periods if we successfully advance our clinical-stage or preclinical programs into later stages of development.

Added

Our R&D activities are primarily designed, managed, and evaluated internally, while certain activities—such as GLP toxicology studies, clinical trials and cGMP manufacturing—are conducted by CROs and CMOs. External R&D costs are tracked on a program-by-program basis, except during early research and discovery stages, when efforts are focused on identifying preclinical candidates and enhancing discovery platforms and technologies that are not attributable to a specific program. Costs related to these activities are assigned to distinct preclinical pipeline or technology development projects. Internal research and development costs are managed and reviewed on an aggregate basis and are therefore not presented at a program-specific level.

Added

The following tables summarize our research and development expenses for the following periods indicated:

Added

(1) We have retrospectively adjusted segment operating expenses for the years ended on December 31, 2024 and 2023 to reflect the significant segment expenses as currently reviewed by our CODM.

Added

Total R&D expenses increased by $11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. The increase was primarily driven by higher external and internal costs incurred associated with the programs listed above, which are aligned with our strategic research and development priorities, partially offset by lower stock-based compensation expense in the current period. R&D expenses may fluctuate from period to period depending on the timing, progress, and level of activity of each program.

Added

General and Administrative Expenses

Added

General and administrative expenses consist of salaries, stock compensation, professional services related to legal, audit, consulting, patent filings, business insurance and technology expenses, facilities, and depreciation and amortization. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025 remained relatively consistent with the same period in 2024.

Added

Other Income (Expense)

Added

Other income (expense) primarily consists of interest income and expense, gains and losses on marketable equity securities, and asset impairment charges. Other income increased by $144.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024.

Added

The change for the year ended December 31, 2025, was primarily driven by a combination of realized and unrealized gains from the marketable equity securities. In addition, impairment charges of $20.4 million were recognized in the first quarter of 2024 related to an equity interest in a private biotechnology company.

Added

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Added

We have historically financed our operations through payments received from product development partnerships and licensing arrangements, private placements of equity securities, and public offerings of common stock. Research and development activities have required significant capital investment since the Company’s inception and are expected to continue to require significant cash expenditure as the Company’s pipeline continues to expand.

Removed

Our approach to protein design includes engineering Fc domains, the parts of antibodies that interact with multiple segments of the immune system and control antibody structure. The Fc domain is constant and interchangeable among antibodies, and our engineered XmAb Fc domains can be readily substituted for natural Fc domains.

Removed

We and our partners develop XmAb antibodies and other types of biotherapeutic drug candidates with improved properties and functionality, which can provide innovative approaches to potentially treating disease and clinical benefits over other treatment options. Applications of our protein engineering technologies include multi-specific antibodies that bind two or more different targets simultaneously, creating entirely new biological mechanism of anti-disease activity, or enhancement of antibody performance by increasing immune inhibitory activity, improving cytotoxicity, extending circulating half-life and stabilizing novel protein structures. Three marketed XmAb medicines have been developed with our protein engineering technologies.

Removed

Refer to Part I, Item 1, "XmAb Bispecific Fc Domain and Multi-Specific Antibody Formats" and "Other XmAb Fc Domains" in the description of our business included in this Annual Report for a discussion of our core Fc technology platforms.

Removed

Strategic Portfolio Prioritization

Removed

We are focused on developing T cell-engaging bispecific antibodies, which we believe hold great potential for the treatment of patients with solid tumors and autoimmune diseases, and beginning in the third quarter of 2023, we began aligning our portfolio to prioritize these programs, which now include XmAb819 (ENPP3 x CD3), XmAb541 (CLDN6 x CD3), plamotamab (CD20 x CD3) and XmAb657 (CD19 x CD3). We have also prioritized a potential best-in-class anti-TL1A antibody, XmAb942 (Xtend TL1A), and a research-stage TL1A x IL-23p19 bispecific antibody program.

Removed

We have implemented measures to align resources with our strategic plan for a focused pipeline and to strengthen our financial position.

Removed

In 2024, we narrowed the clinical development plan for our dual checkpoint inhibitor, vudalimab, in treating patients with advanced prostate and non-small cell lung cancers. We also concluded Phase 1 studies evaluating our XmAb564 and XmAb662 cytokine drug candidates and paused further development of both programs. In addition, our cost-sharing obligations with Genentech, related to the development of the cytokine drug candidate efbalropendekin alfa, ended as of June 1, 2024, and Genentech became responsible for all development thereafter. In June 2024, we also announced that we would regain worldwide rights to plamotamab from J&J.

Removed

In September 2024, we announced new clinical development plans for plamotamab and announced new XmAb drug candidates to be evaluated for the treatment of patients with autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. We subsequently completed an underwritten public offering of common stock and pre-funded warrants, and we received gross proceeds of $201.3 million before deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and offering expenses.

Removed

During 2024, we initiated first-in-human studies to evaluate XmAb541, a first-in-class bispecific antibody being developed for patients with CLDN6-positive tumors including advanced ovarian cancer, and XmAb942, our high potency anti-TL1A antibody with extended half-life in development for people living with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Removed

In early 2025, we paused further development of vudalimab and decided not to initiate expansion cohorts of XmAb808 in combination with pembrolizumab. Potential combination of XmAb808 with CD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibodies is being evaluated.

Reworded

As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had $706.7$610.8 million inof cash, cash equivalentsequivalents, and marketable debt securities,securities andcompared basedto on$706.7 ourmillion currentas plansof andDecember projections,31, we estimate this will provide necessary funding into 2028.2024.

Added

On February 27, 2023, we entered into an open market sale agreement (the “Sales Agreement”), pursuant to which we may, from time to time, offer and sell up to $200.0 million in shares of our common stock through SVB Securities LLC, acting as the sales agent. As of December 31, 2025, no shares have been issued under the Sales Agreement.

Added

We expect to continue receiving payments from our collaborators for potential additional milestones, opt-ins, contingent payments, royalties, and research and development services rendered, if any. The receipt of future milestone and contingent payments is dependent on the achievement of certain research and development milestones by us or our partners and, as such, remains uncertain at this time.

Added

We believe our current financial resources are sufficient to fund our operations through at least the next twelve months from the date of the issuance of these consolidated financial statements.

Added

Funding Requirements

Added

We have not generated any revenue from the sale of products developed by us to date and do not expect to do so until we obtain regulatory approval of and commercialize one or more of our internal product development candidates. As we are currently in the clinical stage of development, it will be some time before we expect to achieve this, and it is uncertain that we will ever commercialize one or more of our internal product development candidates. We expect that we will continue to increase our operating expenses in connection with ongoing and additional clinical and preclinical development of product candidates in our pipeline and candidates that we are co-developing with our partners.

Added

Although it is difficult to predict our funding requirements, based upon our current operating plan, we expect that our existing cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and certain potential milestone payments will fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements through 2028. We have based these estimates on assumptions that may prove to be wrong which would cause us to use our capital resources sooner than we currently expect.

Added

Cash Flows

Added

The following table sets forth the primary sources and uses of cash for each of the periods presented below:

Added

During the year ended December 31, 2025, cash flow used in operating activities was $135.1 million, which was primarily due to the ongoing expenses related to our research and development programs and general and administrative expenses. While overall operating expenditures remained consistent with the prior year, the change was primarily driven by higher milestone receipts in 2025, including $30.0 million received from Amgen during the year ended December 31, 2025, which had been recognized as revenue in December 2024. Cash provided by investing activities amounted to $140.0 million, primarily reflecting proceeds of $442.0 million from sales and maturities of marketable securities, offset by purchases of marketable securities totaling $298.9 million. Cash provided by financing activities of $8.2 million was primarily related to cash received from stock option exercises and the issuance of common stock under the ESPP, offset by payments to acquire non-controlling interest.

Added

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Added

We are party to other contracts associated with ongoing business activities that will result in cash payments to counterparties in future periods. Based on our current operating plan, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents and marketable debt securities as of December 31, 2025 will be sufficient to satisfy our near-term capital and operating needs. Recent and expected working capital and other capital requirements include the items described below.

Added

•For information related to our future commitments for collaboration and licensing agreements, see Note 2 of Notes to our consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Schedules.”

Added

•We have entered into various in-license and technology agreements that require future payments upon the achievement of specified development, regulatory, and sales milestones, as well as royalties on commercial sales. These obligations are contingent on the successful development and commercialization of the related programs, and the timing and amount of any such payments are not currently probable or reasonably estimable.

Added

•Amounts related to future lease payments for operating lease obligations on an undiscounted basis at December 31, 2025 totaled $94.6 million, with $7.8 million expected to be paid within the next 12 months.

Added

•We have not entered into, nor do we currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements (as defined under SEC rules).

Showing the first 60 of 126 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-05 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-06 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
95 → 95words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, which could materially affect our business, financial position, or future results of operations. See also “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. There have been no material changes from the risk factors identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

12new paragraphs
3removed paragraphs
26reworded paragraphs
3,936 → 4,855words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: impairment
“Emerging clinical data from XmAb541 monotherapy support evaluation of XmAb541 in combination with XmAb808. At the putative RP3D, clinical activity has been observed in heavily pretreated patients, with an approximate overall response rate of 14% in patients with ovarian cancer and an approximate overall response rate of 28% in patients with germ cell tumors. Potential additional anti-tumor activity was observed at doses above 60 mg; however, reversible hearing impairment limited XmAb541 exposure due to the frequency of dose interruptions and dose reductions at those higher dose levels. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“The safety profile of XmAb541 monotherapy at the putative RP3D supports further clinical evaluation, including future outpatient administration. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) has been low grade and no cases of Grade ≥3 CRS were reported at any dose level. At the putative RP3D, Grade 1 CRS was reported in approximately 14% of patients, and Grade 2 CRS was reported in approximately 17%. No other clinically significant safety signals have been observed. Based on monotherapy data, in July 2026 the U.S. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“On July 29, 2026, we entered into Settlement Agreement with Alexion with respect to a commercial dispute related to U.S. royalties on Ultomiris. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, we will receive an aggregate of $105.0 million from Alexion, payable in two equal installments of $52.5 million: the first payment is anticipated to be received in August 2026, and the second payment is due following the one-year anniversary of the date of the Settlement Agreement. Following the settlement, Alexion has no further obligation to pay royalties on U.S. sales of Ultomiris. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

XmAb819 (ENPP3 x CD3): XmAb819 is a novel, potential first-in-class, tumor-targeted, T-cell engaging XmAb 2+1 bispecific antibody in development for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). and additional ENPP3+ tumors. XmAb819 is designed to engage the immune system and activate T cells for highly potent and targeted lysis of tumor cells expressing ENPP3, an antigen highly expressed on kidney cancers.ENPP3. ENPP3 is a differentially expressed target, with high level expression in RCCseveral tumor types and low level expression on normal tissues. With two tumor-antigen binding domains and one T-cell binding domain, our XmAb 2+1 format is designed to enable antibodies to bind more avidly and selectively kill tumor cells with higher antigen density, potentially sparing normal cells. We are conducting a Phase 1 study to evaluate XmAb819 in patients with advancedENPP3+ ccRCC,tumors. andCurrently, expansion cohorts are evaluating intravenous doses to support selection of a dose for the planned Phase 3 pivotal study includes additional cohorts that are enrollingfor patients with otheradvanced ENPP3-expressingccRCC; tumordose types,escalation includingof subcutaneous administration in advanced ccRCC is ongoing; a sub-study for patients with ENPP3+ advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC). began enrollment in the second quarter of 2026, and a sub-study for patients with intermediate- or poor-risk advanced ccRCC who have progressed after front-line immuno-oncology (IO) doublet therapy is planned to open for enrollment in the third quarter of 2026.
see in full comparison
New text
“At the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting in April 2026, we presented data demonstrating co-expression of CLDN6 and B7-H3 on high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma cells. Preclinical testing demonstrated that XmAb808 promoted durable T-cell-directed killing of cancer cells with XmAb541, enhanced XmAb541-induced killing by exhausted T cells and enhanced the anti-tumor activity of XmAb541. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Incyte: The FDA approved Monjuvi® (tafasitamab-cxix) under accelerated approval in July 2020. Monjuvi is a CD19-directed cytolytic antibody containing an XmAb Fc domain for improved cytotoxic potency and indicated in combination with lenalidomide for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including DLBCL arising from low grade lymphoma, and who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in a confirmatory trial(s). In December 2024, Incyte announced positive full results from the pivotal study of tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide and rituximab in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) and submitted a supplemental Biologics License Application (“sBLA”), which was accepted in February 2025. In June 2025, the FDA approved Monjuvi in combination with rituximab and lenalidomide for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory FL. InIncyte Januaryhas 2026, Incytealso announced positive topline results from a pivotal study of Monjuvi as a first-line treatment for DLBCLDLBCL, and thatIncyte’s theyglobal expectregulatory tosubmissions filefor Monjuvi/Minjuvi as a sBLAtreatment for the first-line treatment of adultspatients with newly diagnosed DLBCL were accepted for review in the firstsecond halfquarter of 2026. Tafasitamab was created and initially developed by us. Tafasitamab is marketed by Incyte under the brand name Monjuvi in the U.S. and under the brand name Minjuvi® in Europe and Canada. Incyte has exclusive commercialization rights to tafasitamab outside the U.S. In February 2024, Incyte acquired exclusive global development and commercialization rights to tafasitamab from MorphoSys AG. Monjuvi® and Minjuvi® are registered trademarks of Incyte.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (41)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering and developing engineered antibody therapeutics to treat patients with cancer and autoimmune diseases,diseases who have unmet medical needs. Leveraging our XmAb® protein engineering platforms, we rapidly design, engineer and advance purpose-built drug candidates with novel mechanisms of action and improved therapeutic potential.

Reworded

We are currently enrolling fiveseven clinical studies to evaluate our XmAb drug candidates for patients with many different types of serious diseases.

Reworded

XmAb819 (ENPP3 x CD3): XmAb819 is a novel, potential first-in-class, tumor-targeted, T-cell engaging XmAb 2+1 bispecific antibody in development for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). and additional ENPP3+ tumors. XmAb819 is designed to engage the immune system and activate T cells for highly potent and targeted lysis of tumor cells expressing ENPP3, an antigen highly expressed on kidney cancers.ENPP3. ENPP3 is a differentially expressed target, with high level expression in RCCseveral tumor types and low level expression on normal tissues. With two tumor-antigen binding domains and one T-cell binding domain, our XmAb 2+1 format is designed to enable antibodies to bind more avidly and selectively kill tumor cells with higher antigen density, potentially sparing normal cells. We are conducting a Phase 1 study to evaluate XmAb819 in patients with advancedENPP3+ ccRCC,tumors. andCurrently, expansion cohorts are evaluating intravenous doses to support selection of a dose for the planned Phase 3 pivotal study includes additional cohorts that are enrollingfor patients with otheradvanced ENPP3-expressingccRCC; tumordose types,escalation includingof subcutaneous administration in advanced ccRCC is ongoing; a sub-study for patients with ENPP3+ advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC). began enrollment in the second quarter of 2026, and a sub-study for patients with intermediate- or poor-risk advanced ccRCC who have progressed after front-line immuno-oncology (IO) doublet therapy is planned to open for enrollment in the third quarter of 2026.

Added

XmAb541 (CLDN6 x CD3) + XmAb808 (B7-H3 x CD28): XmAb541 and XmAb808 are being evaluated in Phase 1 clinical development for T-cell engagement of CLDN6-expressing tumors, including high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Together, XmAb541 and XmAb808 are intended to provide tumor-targeted T-cell activation and co-stimulation.

Reworded

XmAb541 (CLDN6 x CD3): XmAb541 is a novel, potential first-in-class, tumor-targeted, T-cell engaging XmAb 2+1 bispecific antibodyantibody. The XmAb 2+1 multivalent format used in developmentXmAb541 is intended to enable greater selectivity for patients with CLDN6 expressingover tumorsimilar typesclaudin includingfamily ovarianmembers, cancer.such as CLDN9, CLDN3 and CLDN4, and XmAb541 is designed to engage the immune system and activate T cells for highly potent and targeted lysis of tumor cells expressing CLDN6, a tumor-associated antigen in ovarian cancer, germ cell tumors and other solid tumors. The XmAb 2+1 multivalent format used in XmAb541 enables greater selectivity for CLDN6 over similar Claudin family members, such as CLDN9, CLDN3 and CLDN4. We are conducting a Phase 1 dose-escalation study to evaluate XmAb541 in patients with advanced gynecologic and germ cell tumors.CLDN6.

Reworded

XmAb808 (B7-H3 x CD28): XmAb808 is a tumor-selective, co-stimulatory CD28 bispecific antibody that binds to the broadly expressed tumor antigen B7-H3 and is also constructed with the XmAb 2+1 multivalent format. Co-stimulation is required for T cells to achieve full activation, and targeted CD28 bispecific antibodies may provide conditional co-stimulation of T cells when the antibodies are bound to tumor cells. Data from completed cohorts in a Phase 1 dose-escalation study of XmAb808 in combination with pembrolizumab, an anti-PD1 antibody, are expected to inform future development decisions for the program. Potential combination with CD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibodies is being evaluated. We presented a poster characterizing preclinical combinations of XmAb808 with multiple CD3 T cell engaging bispecific antibodies, including XmAb541, at the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting in April 2026.

Added

At the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting in April 2026, we presented data demonstrating co-expression of CLDN6 and B7-H3 on high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma cells. Preclinical testing demonstrated that XmAb808 promoted durable T-cell-directed killing of cancer cells with XmAb541, enhanced XmAb541-induced killing by exhausted T cells and enhanced the anti-tumor activity of XmAb541. CLDN6 and B7-H3 have low expression overlap on normal tissues, potentially localizing T-cell co-stimulation to tumor cells, which supports the continued clinical evaluation of the XmAb541 and XmAb808 combination in patients with CLDN6-expressing tumors.

Added

XmAb541 (CLDN6 x CD3): We have prioritized the development of XmAb541 in combination with XmAb808. XmAb541 monotherapy expansion cohorts at the putative recommended Phase 3 dose (RP3D) of 60 mg dosed every 3 weeks in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (TPS≥50) and germ cell tumors are expected to complete enrollment by year end, with the data intended to support further combination development with XmAb808.

Added

Emerging clinical data from XmAb541 monotherapy support evaluation of XmAb541 in combination with XmAb808. At the putative RP3D, clinical activity has been observed in heavily pretreated patients, with an approximate overall response rate of 14% in patients with ovarian cancer and an approximate overall response rate of 28% in patients with germ cell tumors. Potential additional anti-tumor activity was observed at doses above 60 mg; however, reversible hearing impairment limited XmAb541 exposure due to the frequency of dose interruptions and dose reductions at those higher dose levels. Hearing impairment is potentially on-target for CLDN6, which is expressed on cochlear hair cells.

Added

The safety profile of XmAb541 monotherapy at the putative RP3D supports further clinical evaluation, including future outpatient administration. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) has been low grade and no cases of Grade ≥3 CRS were reported at any dose level. At the putative RP3D, Grade 1 CRS was reported in approximately 14% of patients, and Grade 2 CRS was reported in approximately 17%. No other clinically significant safety signals have been observed. Based on monotherapy data, in July 2026 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted Fast Track designation to XmAb541 for the treatment of patients with germ cell tumors who have relapsed following two or more lines of platinum therapy or were refractory to prior platinum therapy.

Reworded

XmAb942 (Xtend TL1A): XmAb942 is a high-potency, extended half-life, investigational anti-TL1A antibody in clinical development for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), such as ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). The first generation of anti-TL1A antibodies, designed to block the interaction between the DR3 receptor and its ligand TL1A, have reduced disease activity in patients with UC and CD in multiple clinical studies. We announced final results from a Phase 1 dose-escalation study in healthy participants at Digestive Disease Week (DDW) in May 2026. The results indicate that XmAb942 was well tolerated. Pharmacokinetic analysis of the single dose cohorts estimated a human half-life of 74.1 days, which supports a 12-week dosing interval during maintenance treatment. We initiated a Phase 2b study of XmAb942 in UC, the XENITH-UC Study, in the third quarter of 2025. XENITH-UC is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with moderate-to-severe UC, whose disease has progressed after at least one conventional or advanced therapy.

Added

XmAb412 (TL1A x IL-23p19): XmAb412 is a novel bispecific antibody using the XenLock™ platform for dual targeting of inflammatory pathways in autoimmune and inflammatory disease. We presented preclinical characterization of XmAb412 at DDW in May 2026. XmAb412 robustly suppresses both TL1A and IL-23 inflammatory pathways and is predicted from preclinical pharmacokinetic data to have a human half-life between 60 and 70 days. XmAb412 supports high-concentration, low viscosity and citrate-free formulation suitable for subcutaneous dosing. We initiated a first-in-human study of XmAb412 in the third quarter of 2026.

Reworded

XmAb657 (CD19 x CD3): XmAb657 is a potent, potentially long-acting CD19 x CD3 bispecific antibody, utilizing the XmAb 2+1 bispecific antibody format and Xtend Fc technology. In non-human primate studies, a single dose of XmAb657 deeply reduced B cells by over 99.98% in the peripheral compartment, bone marrow and lymph nodes, which was sustained for at least 42 days. Half-life in non-human primates was estimated to be 15 days, which indicates a potential for durable B-cell depletion in human clinical studies. XmAb657 was well tolerated preclinically, with no clinical signs of cytokine release syndrome. XmAb657 is in development for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM)., Wesystemic initiatedsclerosis a(SSc) first-in-human,and PhaseSjögren's 1 study in the fourth quarter of 2025.disease. We are conducting a first-in-human, Phase 1 study to evaluate XmAb657 in healthy volunteers and patients with IIM.IIM, SSc and Sjögren's disease.

Reworded

Incyte: The FDA approved Monjuvi® (tafasitamab-cxix) under accelerated approval in July 2020. Monjuvi is a CD19-directed cytolytic antibody containing an XmAb Fc domain for improved cytotoxic potency and indicated in combination with lenalidomide for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including DLBCL arising from low grade lymphoma, and who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in a confirmatory trial(s). In December 2024, Incyte announced positive full results from the pivotal study of tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide and rituximab in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) and submitted a supplemental Biologics License Application (“sBLA”), which was accepted in February 2025. In June 2025, the FDA approved Monjuvi in combination with rituximab and lenalidomide for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory FL. InIncyte Januaryhas 2026, Incytealso announced positive topline results from a pivotal study of Monjuvi as a first-line treatment for DLBCLDLBCL, and thatIncyte’s theyglobal expectregulatory tosubmissions filefor Monjuvi/Minjuvi as a sBLAtreatment for the first-line treatment of adultspatients with newly diagnosed DLBCL were accepted for review in the firstsecond halfquarter of 2026. Tafasitamab was created and initially developed by us. Tafasitamab is marketed by Incyte under the brand name Monjuvi in the U.S. and under the brand name Minjuvi® in Europe and Canada. Incyte has exclusive commercialization rights to tafasitamab outside the U.S. In February 2024, Incyte acquired exclusive global development and commercialization rights to tafasitamab from MorphoSys AG. Monjuvi® and Minjuvi® are registered trademarks of Incyte.

Removed

Tafasitamab was created and initially developed by us. Tafasitamab is marketed by Incyte under the brand name Monjuvi in the U.S. and under the brand name Minjuvi® in Europe and Canada. Incyte has exclusive commercialization rights to tafasitamab outside the U.S. In February 2024, Incyte acquired exclusive global development and commercialization rights to tafasitamab from MorphoSys AG. Monjuvi® and Minjuvi® are registered trademarks of Incyte.

Reworded

Zenas: Zenas BioPharma, Inc. (“Zenas”) is advancing obexelimab, an antibody that targets CD19 with its variable domain, for the treatment of patients with autoimmune diseases. Obexelimab uses an XmAb Fc domain that was designed to inhibit the function of B cells, an important component of the immune system. Obexelimab was created and initially developed by us and was licensed to Zenas in November 2021. Zenas’ partner, Bristol Myers Squibb, holds exclusive development and commercialization rights for obexelimab in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Australia.

Reworded

In January 2026, Zenas announced positive results from the Phase 3 INDIGO trial of obexelimab in patients with immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD), in which the primary endpoint was met. Zenas announced that it anticipates submittingsubmitted a BLA to the FDA for the treatment of IgG4-RD in the second quarter ofMay 2026 and anticipates submitting a Marketing Authorization Application to the European Medicines Agency in the second half of 2026. Zenas is also conducting a Phase 2 study of obexelimab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and has reported positive results from the Phase 2 MoonStone trial of obexelimab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis, in which the primary endpoint was met. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we own 3,098,380 shares of common stock in Zenas.

Reworded

Refer to Part I, Item 1, Note 2, Collaboration and Licensing Agreements and Note 13, Subsequent Events of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a description of the key terms of our arrangements.

Reworded

Total revenue increased by $7.6 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and decreased by $28.2$20.6 million fromfor the samesix periodmonths ended June 30, 2026, compared to the corresponding periods in 2025. The change was primarily driven by the revenue recognition associated with Alexion and Incyte license agreements as discussed below. See Note 2, Collaboration and Licensing Agreements of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Part I, “Item 1. Financial Statements” for more information on revenue recognized under the collaboration and license agreements.

Reworded

On December 9, 2025, a new patent term extension related to the Xtend™ Fc domain for antibodies targeting C5 was announced, extending the expected royalty term for Ultomiris® net sales into December 2028 in the United States. On March 4, 2026, Alexion informed us that it had taken the position that it doesdid not owe additional royalties for U.S. sales of Ultomiris and doesdid not intend to make future payments for sales in the U.S. under the parties’ agreement. We disputedisputed this position andand, aresubsequent evaluatingto ourJune options.30, 2026, entered into a settlement agreement with Alexion. See Note 13 for additional information.

Reworded

In the first quarter of 2026, we evaluated the effect of Alexion’s notice, including the variable consideration constraint and the sales‑ and usage‑based royalty guidance applicable to licenses of intellectual property. We concluded that royalties on disputed U.S. sales should be constrained to zero until the uncertainty iswas resolved. Accordingly, we recorded a reduction of $6.6 million to royalty revenue recorded in 2025 and a corresponding reduction to the related receivable in the first quarter ended March 31,of 2026. There was no cash impact from this entry in the period. Recognition of undisputed ex‑U.S. royalties was unaffected and continues in accordance with ASC Topic 606’s sales‑ and usage‑based royalty guidance.

Added

On July 29, 2026, we entered into a settlement agreement with Alexion, which resolved the uncertainty over the variable consideration earned related to U.S. Ultomiris royalties. As a result, we recognized $27.6 million of royalty revenue during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, related to our royalty rights for U.S. Ultomiris sales from the period of dispute through June 30, 2026.

Removed

We will recognize royalty revenue related to disputed U.S. sales upon resolution of the uncertainty, when it is probable that a significant reversal will not occur, or upon receipt of payments that are not subject to refund. The ultimate outcome and timing of resolution are uncertain, and we cannot reasonably estimate the amount or timing of any recovery, if any, as of March 31, 2026.

Reworded

Under the Alexion Agreement, we recognized $1.5$37.3 million (net of $6.6 million reduction) and $15.5$16.8 million of non-cash royalty revenue during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $38.8 million and $32.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

Added

During the second quarter of 2026, cumulative royalties payable to OMERS reached the $29.3 million maximum under the Monjuvi Royalty Sale Agreement. Under the MorphoSys Agreement, we recognized royalty revenue of $3.9 million and $6.8 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, consisting of $3.1 million of non-cash royalty revenue and $0.8 million of royalties payable directly to us, compared to non-cash royalty revenue of $1.8 million and $4.5 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively.

Added

Zenas: In November 2020, we entered into a License Agreement (the “Zenas Agreement”) with Zenas, pursuant to which we granted Zenas exclusive worldwide rights to develop and commercialize three preclinical-stage Fc-engineered drug candidates. In November 2021, we entered into a second license agreement (the “Second Zenas Agreement”), pursuant to which we granted Zenas exclusive worldwide rights to develop and commercialize obexelimab (XmAb5871). We satisfied our performance obligations under the Zenas agreements in 2021.

Added

In May 2026, Zenas submitted a BLA to the FDA for obexelimab in IgG4-RD, which triggered a $10.0 million milestone payment to us under the Zenas Agreement that we received during the second quarter of 2026.

Added

Vir Bio: In 2019, we entered into a Patent License Agreement (the “Vir Bio Agreement”) with Vir Bio, granting a non-exclusive license to its Xtend technology for up to two targets, including tobevibart. In March 2025, Vir Bio initiated a Phase 3 study for tobevibart, triggering a $2.0 million milestone payment to us, which was paid in the second quarter of 2025.

Reworded

In addition, under the MorphoSys Agreement, weWe recognized $2.9nominal million and $2.8 millionamounts of non-cash royalty revenue duringfor the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.2025.

Reworded

R&D expenses increased by $6.1$10.2 million and $16.3 million for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, overrespectively, compared to the same period in 2025. The increase was primarily driven by higher external and internal costs incurred associated with the programs listed above, which are aligned with our strategic research and development priorities, partially offset by lower stock-based compensation expense in the current period. R&D expenses may fluctuate from period to period depending on the timing, progress, and level of activity of each program.

Reworded

General and administrative expenses consist of salaries, stock compensation, professional services related to legal, audit, consulting, patent filings, business insurance and technology expenses, facilities, and depreciation and amortization. General and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 remained relatively consistent with the same period in 2025.

Removed

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 remained relatively consistent with the same period in 2025.

Reworded

Other Income (Expense), Net

Reworded

Other income (expense), net primarily consists of interest income and expense, gains and losses on marketable equity securities, and asset impairment charges. Other income increased by $13.1 million and other expense increased by $45.7$32.6 million for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, respectively, compared to the same period in 2025.

Reworded

The changechanges for the three months ended March 31, 2026 waswere primarily driven by unrealized lossgains fromand thelosses marketablerecognized equityon securityour relatedinvestment toin Zenas.

Added

On July 29, 2026, we entered into Settlement Agreement with Alexion with respect to a commercial dispute related to U.S. royalties on Ultomiris. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, we will receive an aggregate of $105.0 million from Alexion, payable in two equal installments of $52.5 million: the first payment is anticipated to be received in August 2026, and the second payment is due following the one-year anniversary of the date of the Settlement Agreement. Following the settlement, Alexion has no further obligation to pay royalties on U.S. sales of Ultomiris. The Settlement Agreement does not affect the Company’s right to receive royalties on ex-U.S. sales of Ultomiris under the existing terms of the Alexion Agreement, as amended.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $541.8$486.4 million of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable debt securities compared to $610.8 million as of December 31, 2025.

Reworded

Although it is difficult to predict our funding requirements, based upon our current operating plan, we expect that our existing cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and certain potential milestone payments will fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements intothrough 2028. We have based these estimates on assumptions that may prove to be wrong which would cause us to use our capital resources sooner than we currently expect.

Reworded

During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, cash flow used in operating activities was $67.6$123.3 million, which was primarily due to the ongoing expenses related to our research and development programs and general and administrative expenses. The change was primarily driven by lower milestone receipts in 2026, as the prior year period included higher milestone collections, as well as higher operating expenditures in 2026 related to ongoing business activities. Cash provided by investing activities amounted to $26.7$111.8 million, primarily reflecting proceeds of $100.0$185.6 million from sales and maturities of marketable securities, offset by purchases of marketable securities totaling $72.7 million. Cash provided by financing activities of $1.0$2.0 million was primarily related to cash received from stock option exercises.exercises and ESPP purchases.

Reworded

During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, cash flow used in operating activities was $16.2$52.6 million, which was primarily due to the ongoing expenses related to our research and development programs and general and administrative expenses. Cash provided by investing activities amounted to $13.7$54.1 million, primarily reflecting proceeds of $119.0$232.8 million from sales and maturities of marketable securities, offset by purchases of marketable securities totaling $103.9$176.8 million. Cash provided by financing activities of $1.2$1.9 million was primarily related to cash received from stock option exercises, offset by payment to acquire non-controllingnoncontrolling interest.

Reworded

There were no material changes outside of the ordinary course of business to our specific contractual obligations during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.

XNCR insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 6 filings (6 insiders, 3 trade dates, 33,881 shares, about $422.1K; 5 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -33,881 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$422.1K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-06-18Feigal Ellen
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
6,843$13.06 $89.4K12,340 SEC
2026-06-16Feigal Ellen
Director
Grant/award 10,302— —22,642 SEC
2026-06-16Gorman Kevin Charles
Director
Grant/award 10,302— —21,680 SEC
2026-06-16Gustafson Kurt A
Director
Grant/award 10,302— —25,011 SEC
2026-06-16Klencke Barbara
Director
Grant/award 10,302— —29,974 SEC
2026-06-16Montgomery Alan Bruce
Director
Grant/award 10,302— —25,849 SEC
2026-06-16Ranieri Richard J
Director
Grant/award 10,302— —24,011 SEC
2026-06-16Simpson Todd E
Director
Grant/award 10,302— —23,988 SEC
2026-06-16Deshaies Raymond Joseph
Director
Grant/award 10,302— —10,302 SEC
2026-06-15Gorman Kevin Charles
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
7,527$12.31 $92.7K11,378 SEC
2026-06-15Gustafson Kurt A
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
5,474$12.31 $67.4K14,709 SEC
2026-06-15Ranieri Richard J
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
5,474$12.31 $67.4K13,709 SEC
2026-06-15Montgomery Alan Bruce
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
5,064$12.31 $62.3K15,547 SEC
2026-04-10Cornelissen Bart Jan
SR. VICE PRESIDENT & CFO
Open-market sale 3,499$12.29 $43.0K75,898 SEC

Well-known investors holding XNCR (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
PRIMECAP Management COM2026-06-3010,181,322$163.9M0.1%Reduced 2%
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM2026-06-30853,677$13.7M0.01%Added 40%
Two Sigma Investments COM2026-06-30819,515$13.2M0.01%Added 2%
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COM2026-06-30483,834$7.8M0.0%Added 198%
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM2026-06-30190,826$3.1M0.0%Reduced 49%
Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) COM2026-06-3071,572$1.2M0.0%New position
D. E. Shaw & Co. COM2026-06-3050,475$812.6K0.0%New position
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-3018,723$225.8K—Sold out

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when XNCR files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.